DOCSLIB.ORG

Operating Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

REDACTED - TO BE PLACED ON PUBLIC FILE BEFORE THE SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD ___________________________ DOCKET NO. FD 36472 ___________________________ CSX CORPORATION AND CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., ET AL. —CONTROL AND MERGER— PAN AM SYSTEMS, INC., PAN AM RAILWAYS, INC., BOSTON AND MAINE CORPORATION, MAINE CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, NORTHERN RAILROAD, PAN AM SOUTHERN LLC, PORTLAND TERMINAL COMPANY, SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY, STONY BROOK RAILROAD COMPANY, AND VERMONT & MASSACHUSETTS RAILROAD COMPANY ___________________________ EXHIBIT 13 ___________________________ Operating Plan Verified by Mr. Jamie Boychuk APP-298 REDACTED - TO BE PLACED ON PUBLIC FILE OPERATING PLAN VERIFIED BY JAMIE BOYCHUK Table of Contents I. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 3 II. Data Sources and Methodologies ....................................................................... 5 A. Traffic Data Sources ...................................................................................... 5 B. Operating Data Sources ................................................................................ 5 C. Methodology ................................................................................................... 5 III. Summary ............................................................................................................. 6 IV. Pre-Transaction Operations ............................................................................. 10 A. Train Operations ......................................................................................... 10 i. Summary of PAR System Train Operations ......................................... 11 ii. Summary of PAS Network Train Operations ....................................... 13 iii. Summary of CSXT Train Operations .................................................... 16 iv. Description of the PAR System Lines ................................................... 22 v. Description of the PAS Lines ................................................................. 24 B. Interchanges ................................................................................................ 26 C. Yards ............................................................................................................ 28 D. Dispatching .................................................................................................. 30 E. Intermodal Operations ................................................................................ 31 F. Labor ............................................................................................................ 32 G. Commuter and Other Passenger Rail Service ............................................ 32 H. Abandonments and Discontinuances .......................................................... 32 I. Mechanical Facilities ................................................................................... 33 V. Post-Transaction Operations ............................................................................ 34 A. Changes to Train Operations ...................................................................... 34 i. The PAR System ..................................................................................... 34 ii. The PAS Network ................................................................................... 37 iii. Changes in traffic flows resulting from the NSR Settlement Agreement. ................................................................................................... 40 B. Changes to Interchanges ............................................................................. 42 - 1 - APP-299 REDACTED - TO BE PLACED ON PUBLIC FILE C. Changes to Yards ......................................................................................... 44 D. Changes to Dispatching ............................................................................... 47 E. Changes to Intermodal Operations ............................................................. 47 F. Labor Impacts .............................................................................................. 48 G. Maintenance and Capital Investment ........................................................ 48 H. Impacts on Commuter and Other Passenger Rail Service ........................ 54 I. Anticipated Abandonments and Discontinuances ..................................... 54 J. Equipment Requirements ........................................................................... 54 i. Post-transaction impacts on PAR System and PAS Network equipment. ................................................................................................... 54 ii. Post-transaction locomotive efficiency benefits. ................................... 55 K. Impacts on Safety Performance .................................................................. 57 VI. Safety Integration Plan .................................................................................... 59 - 2 - APP-300 REDACTED - TO BE PLACED ON PUBLIC FILE I. Introduction I am Jamie Boychuk. My role as Executive Vice President of Operations for CSX Transportation, Inc. (“CSXT”) includes overseeing CSXT’s mechanical, engineering, transportation and network operations, as well as the company’s safety and facilities functions. I previously served as the Senior Vice President of Network, Engineering, Mechanical and Intermodal Operations, with responsibility for optimizing assets across CSXT’s network to support efficient system-wide operations. I joined CSXT in 2017 as Assistant Vice President of Transportation Support. In 2018, I was promoted to Vice President of Scheduled Railroading Implementation and also led intermodal operations before being promoted to Senior Vice President of Network Operations in August 2018. Throughout my time at CSXT, I have identified efficiency opportunities, implemented significant operational changes, driven the implementation of trip plans, and delivered improvements in network fluidity. I have been involved in the analysis of CSX’s proposed acquisition of Pan Am Systems, Inc. (“Systems”) (the “Proposed Transaction”) since the beginning of the bid process. Specifically, I participated in CSX’s due diligence, analysis of the business opportunity, and review of the PAR System’s existing operations and infrastructure. As discussed in further depth by the Verified Statement of Sean Pelkey attached to this Amended and Supplemented Application, the Proposed Transaction will allow CSXT to expand further into New England, linking the region via single- line service to the rest of CSXT’s rail network. CSXT will make significant and much-needed capital investments in the PAR System, and CSXT will implement its industry-leading customer-centric operating model on a PAR System that currently does not have the resources or scale to operate as reliably and effectively as CSXT. The Proposed Transaction will provide CSXT’s existing customers with more direct and efficient access to New England markets, and will give the PAR System’s existing customers more reliable single-line access to CSXT’s rail network. - 3 - APP-301 REDACTED - TO BE PLACED ON PUBLIC FILE In connection with preparation of the Application submitted in this proceeding on February 25, 2021, and the Amended Application submitted in this proceeding on April 26, 2021, I oversaw the CSXT team that worked with the Systems team to prepare the Operating Plan attached as Exhibit 13 to those filings. In response to the Board’s Decision No. 3 in this proceeding, I have prepared an amended and supplemented Operating Plan based on my review of the revised Market Analysis and related impact analyses submitted with this Amended and Supplemented Application, including the marketing plan presented in the Verified Statement of Mark K. Wallace, CSXT’s Executive Vice President. The proposed operating and traffic pattern changes described in this Operating Plan are based on the conclusions and growth forecasts set forth in those market and impact analyses. Importantly, based on the market and impact analyses, I expect that the CSXT, PAR System, and PAS Network will accommodate the minimal forecasted traffic growth in existing train service. Additionally, this amended and supplemented Operating Plan: (1) identifies the amount of traffic that would benefit from single-line CSXT service and describes and quantifies the benefits that will result from such single-line service; (2) includes information regarding service to Granite Shore Power’s Merrimack Generation Station and other as-needed service; (3) provides more detail on the benefits of B&E taking over Springfield Terminal’s role as contract operator of PAS; (4) addresses potential changes at PAS’s East Deerfield yard; (5) provides further explanation and data concerning the impact of the NSR Settlement Agreement on Ayer Yard traffic; (6) further quantifies the benefits of CSXT’s capital investment in the PAR System; and (7) further describes and quantifies the benefits of transitioning the Springfield Terminal locomotive fleet to the CSXT locomotive fleet. - 4 - APP-302 REDACTED - TO BE PLACED ON PUBLIC FILE Because the Proposed Transaction will result in significant public benefits, including operating efficiencies, improved infrastructure, and better and more competitive service for rail customers in New England and the existing CSXT rail network, I urge the Board to authorize and approve the Proposed Transaction. II. Data Sources
Recommended publications
  • SRPP Report Shell Ver 3A

    SRPP Report Shell Ver 3A

    2008 New York State Rail Plan State of New York Working Draft June 2008 New York State Department of Transportation DAVID A. PATERSON, Governor ASTRID C. GLYNN, Commissioner THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY 2008 New York State Rail Plan Working Draft June 2008 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-1 CHAPTER 1 – STATE RAIL VISION, GOALS, OBJECTIVES 1 AND STRATEGIES 1.1 Role of Railroads in New York State 1 1.2 Vision of Rail Transportation in New York State 4 1.3 Goals, Objectives and Strategies for Rail Service in New York State 7 CHAPTER 2 – PLAN PURPOSE AND AUTHORITY 15 2.1 Purposes of the State Rail Plan 15 2.2 State and Federal Legislative and Planning Requirements 16 CHAPTER 3 – THE RAIL SYSTEM IN NEW YORK STATE 23 3.1 Overview of New York State’s Rail Network 23 3.2 Summary History of Railroads in New York State 26 3.3 National Rail Industry Developments 26 3.4 Recent Rail System Changes Impacting New York 29 3.5 Rail Freight System Needs 31 CHAPTER 4 – FREIGHT RAIL 35 4.1 The Freight Rail Network in New York State 35 4.2 Freight Activity, Traffic Density, and Service Description 39 4.3 Freight Terminals, Intermodal Facilities, and Major Yards 53 4.4 Rail System Asset Condition: Freight Rail Service 56 4.5 Rail Line Abandonments: Recent, Proposed, and/or At-Risk Lines 59 4.6 Corridor and Freight Planning Efforts 61 4.7 Rail Freight System Issues and Needs 66 CHAPTER 5 – INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL 79 5.1 The Intercity Passenger Rail Network in New York State 79 5.2 Existing Passenger Rail Services, Stations, and Routes 80 5.3 Passenger
  • Nnepra Ea Finall.Pdf

    Nnepra Ea Finall.Pdf

    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE DOWNEASTER PORTLAND NORTH EXPANSION PROJECT Contents 1.0 Purpose and Need 3 1.1 Introduction 3 1.2 Project History 3 1.3 Project Area 4 1.4 Project Purpose and Need 4 1.5 Decision to be Made 5 1.6 Connected Actions 5 1.7 Applicable Regulations and Permits 6 2.0 Alternatives 8 2.1 Introduction 8 2.2 No Build Alternative 8 2.3 Preferred Alternative 8 2.4 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Detailed Analysis 11 3.0 Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences 12 3.1 Physical Environment 12 3.1.1 Air Quality 12 3.1.2 Water Quality 12 3.1.3 Water Bodies and Waterways 13 3.1.4 Floodplains 14 3.1.5 Wetlands 15 3.1.6 Coastal Zones 16 3.1.7 Noise 16 3.2 Biological Environment 20 3.2.1 Ecological Systems 20 3.2.2 Threatened and Endangered Species 21 3.3 Human Environment 21 3.3.1 Transportation 21 3.3.2 Land Use, Zoning and Property Acquisition 24 3.3.3 Environmental Justice 24 3.3.4 Public Health and Safety 25 3.3.5 Contaminated Sites and Hazardous Waste 26 3.3.6 Cultural Resources 26 3.3.7 Section 4(f) Resources 27 3.4 Construction Impacts 27 3.5 Secondary and Cumulative Impacts 28 4.0 Coordination and Consultation 31 5.0 List of Preparers 33 6.0 Distribution List 34 7.0 References 37 8.0 Appendix A 39 Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE DOWNEASTER PORTLAND NORTH EXPANSION PROJECT 1.0 Purpose and Need 1.1 Introduction The Northern New England Passenger Rail Authority (NNEPRA), in conjunction with the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), is studying alternatives for the Downeaster Portland North Expansion project.
  • Federal Railroad Administration Office of Safety Headquarters Assigned Accident Investigation Report HQ-2009-08

    Federal Railroad Administration Office of Safety Headquarters Assigned Accident Investigation Report HQ-2009-08

    Federal Railroad Administration Office of Safety Headquarters Assigned Accident Investigation Report HQ-2009-08 Amtrak (ATK) Russell, MA March 8, 2009 Note that 49 U.S.C. §20903 provides that no part of an accident or incident report made by the Secretary of Transportation/Federal Railroad Administration under 49 U.S.C. §20902 may be used in a civil action for damages resulting from a matter mentioned in the report. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FRA FACTUAL RAILROAD ACCIDENT REPORT FRA File # HQ-2009-08 FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION 1.Name of Railroad Operating Train #1 1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No. Amtrak [ATK ] ATK 111316 2.Name of Railroad Operating Train #2 2a. Alphabetic Code 2b. Railroad Accident/Incident No. N/A N/A N/A 3.Name of Railroad Operating Train #3 3a. Alphabetic Code 3b. Railroad Accident/Incident No. N/A N/A N/A 4.Name of Railroad Responsible for Track Maintenance: 4a. Alphabetic Code 4b. Railroad Accident/Incident No. CSX Transportation [CSX ] CSX R00057726 5. U.S. DOT_AAR Grade Crossing Identification Number 6. Date of Accident/Incident 7. Time of Accident/Incident Month 03 Day 08 Year 2009 02:48:00 AM PM 8. Type of Accident/Indicent 1. Derailment 4. Side collision 7. Hwy-rail crossing 10. Explosion-detonation 13. Other Code (single entry in code box) 2. Head on collision 5. Raking collision 8. RR grade crossing 11. Fire/violent rupture (describe in narrative) 3. Rear end collision 6. Broken Train collision 9. Obstruction 12. Other impacts 01 9. Cars Carrying 10. HAZMAT Cars 11.
  • CENTRAL CONNECTICUT METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION 241 Main St, Hartford, CT 06106

    CENTRAL CONNECTICUT METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION 241 Main St, Hartford, CT 06106

    ADOPTED APRIL 21, 2015 CENTRAL CONNECTICUT METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION 241 Main St, Hartford, CT 06106 Disclaimer This report has been prepared by the Central ConnecticutMetropolitan Planning Organizationin cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation, including its participating agencies, and the Connecticut Department of Transportation. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the Central Connecticut Metropolitan Planning Organization and do not neces- sarily reflect the official views or policies of the State of Connecticut. 2015 Minor Update 2 of 212 Contents CONTENTS ................................................................................... 3 SYSTEMS .................................................................................. 101 FOREWORD ................................................................................. 4 Pedestrians and cyclists.................................................................. 102 2015 Minor Update ............................................................................ 5 Public transit .................................................................................. 118 VISION ......................................................................................... 7 Private vehicles .............................................................................. 149 National performance oalsg ............................................................... 9 Freight ...........................................................................................
  • [Docket No. FD 36472] CSX Corporation And

    [Docket No. FD 36472] CSX Corporation And

    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 07/30/2021 and available online at FR-4915-01-P federalregister.gov/d/2021-16328, and on govinfo.gov SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD [Docket No. FD 36472] CSX Corporation and CSX Transportation, Inc., et al.—Control and Merger— Pan Am Systems, Inc., Pan Am Railways, Inc., Boston and Maine Corporation, Maine Central Railroad Company, Northern Railroad, Pan Am Southern LLC, Portland Terminal Company, Springfield Terminal Railway Company, Stony Brook Railroad Company, and Vermont & Massachusetts Railroad Company AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board. ACTION: Decision No. 4 in STB Finance Docket No. 36472; Notice of Acceptance of Application and Related Filings; Issuance of Procedural Schedule. SUMMARY: The Surface Transportation Board (Board) is accepting for consideration the revised application filed on July 1, 2021, by CSX Corporation (CSXC), CSX Transportation Inc. (CSXT), 747 Merger Sub 2, Inc. (747 Merger Sub 2), Pan Am Systems, Inc. (Systems), Pan Am Railways, Inc. (PAR), Boston and Maine Corporation (Boston & Maine), Maine Central Railroad Company (Maine Central), Northern Railroad (Northern), Portland Terminal Company (Portland Terminal), Springfield Terminal Railway Company (Springfield Terminal), Stony Brook Railroad Company (Stony Brook), and Vermont & Massachusetts Railroad Company (V&M) (collectively, Applicants). The application will be referred to as the Revised Application. The Revised Application seeks Board approval under 49 U.S.C. 11321-26 for: CSXC, CSXT, and 747 Merger Sub 2 to control the seven railroads controlled by Systems and PAR, and CSXT to merge six of the seven railroads into CSXT. This proposal is referred to as the Merger Transaction.
  • Feasibility Study

    Feasibility Study

    BERKSHIRE FLYER: PITTSFIELD TO NEW YORK CITY CITYFEASIBILITY STUDY DEVELOPED IN SUPPORT OF THE BERKSHIRE FLYER WORKING GROUP March 26, 2018 Berkshire Flyer: Pittsfield-New York City Feasibility Study Berkshire Flyer: Pittsfield to New York City Feasibility Study Developed by: MasssDOT Transit & Rail Division In support of: The Berkshire Flyer Working Group Study Support Provided by: STV Inc. HMMH Inc. TPRG 3/26/2018 Berkshire Flyer: Pittsfield-New York City Feasibility Study TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction and Background ................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Study Goals ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Study Development Process ............................................................................................. 2 1.2.1 Berkshire Flyer Working Group ............................................................................... 2 1.2.2 Working Group meetings .......................................................................................... 3 1.3 Potential Passenger Rail Service ...................................................................................... 3 1.3.1 Cape Flyer Rail Service ............................................................................................ 4 1.3.2 Framework for Berkshire Flyer Service ................................................................... 6 1.4 Existing Services .............................................................................................................
  • January/February 2016

    January/February 2016

    CENTRAL CROSSINGS Monthly Newsletter of the Central Railway Model & Historical Association, Inc. Volume 26, Issue 11 February 2016 108 Werner St Central Railway Museum Central, SC 29627 Surviving the Great Blizzard 2016 Bob Folsom Photo Website: www.crmha.org Superintendent Dan Marett, Jr. Vice Presidents Joe Fitzpatrick Rob Seel, AIA Stationmaster Sage Viehe Paymaster Jim Alexander Curator Jack Green Newsletter Ralph Watson Webmaster David Mead Next Meeting March 3 2016 Your Editor is struggling to learn Microsoft Word on a borrowed Windows computer. 7:10 PM Please bear with us as we adapt to the environment (or become extinct). Articles photos web links columns jokes and favorite recipes are needed to fill these pages. at the Central rxalph Railway Museum Approach Signals Central Railway Model & Historical Association as well as regional shows and events worth mentioning PROGRAM SCHEDULE Program ideas and presenters URGENTLY needed. Contact Sandy Eustis to volunteer to share your railroading experiences and modeling techniques. MUSEUM OPEN TO THE PUBLIC Every Saturday of the Month 9am to 2 pm OPERATING SESSIONS D Second Thursdays & D Fourth Tuesdays 7PM D Going to try to placing a link here to a Google calendar February 23 for CRMHA. Stay tuned. March 10 March 22 Central Railroad Festival April 23 al The CRM&HA has begun regular operating sessions on the second Thursday and fourth NMRA Tuesday of each month. Members interested in 2016 Annual Convention learning how to operate the layout and gain their Indianapolis July 3-10 certification in order to be able to run trains on the museum layout are encouraged to attend these 2017 Annual Convention sessions.
  • 2011 Downeaster Expansion Overview

    2011 Downeaster Expansion Overview

    DOWNEASTER EXPANSION PROJECT OVERVIEW BACKGROUND The Amtrak Downeaster makes five daily round trips between Boston and Portland, serving 10 communities in three states along its 116-mile corridor. The Boston to Portland service has been in operation since December 2001. Included in the original plan for the Downeaster service, but not possible until now, was the extension of service 30 miles beyond Portland to Freeport and Brunswick. Expansion of service to Brunswick is important because it will provide more mobility to Maine residents, increase tourism, support the redevelopment of the Brunswick Naval Air Station (BNAS) and provide a connection to the state owned Rockland Branch, which extends 58 miles from Brunswick to Rockland, the heart of mid-coast Maine. Although a capital plan to upgrade the freight line between Portland and Brunswick to passenger standards had been in place for years, the lack of capital funding to complete the project remained a barrier until spring 2009 when the High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail (HSIPR) Grant Program was announced. Administered by the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), the HSIPR grant program made $8 billion available as a “down payment” on investment in our nation’s passenger rail system through a national competitive application process. The Northern New England Passenger Rail Authority (NNEPRA) submi�ed an application for the Downeaster Expansion Project, and was awarded $35 million. Under the leadership of Governor John Baldacci, the State of Maine agreed to provide the remaining funds (approximately $3 million) to complete the project. The Downeaster Expansion Construction Project includes the rehabilitation of approximately 27 miles of track between Portland and Brunswick owned by Pan Am Railways, and approximately 1.2 miles of track in Brunswick owned by the MaineDOT.
  • NYMTC Regional Freight Plan Update 2015-2040 Interim Plan

    NYMTC Regional Freight Plan Update 2015-2040 Interim Plan

    TECHNICAL MEMO NYMTC Regional Freight Plan Update 2015-2040 Interim Plan Task 1.1 Resource Scan Summary PREPARED BY Cambridge Systematics, Inc. APRIL 2013 technical memorandum Task 1.1 Technical Memorandum Resource Scan Summary prepared for New York Metropolitan Transportation Council prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 38 East 32nd Street, 7th Floor New York, NY 10016 with AECOM, Inc. Arch Street Communications, Inc. date April 30, 2013 Task 1.1 Technical Memorandum Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1-1 List of Studies ....................................................................................................... 1-2 2.0 Resource Scans .................................................................................................... 2-1 Mid-Atlantic Rail Operations Study Summary Report .................................. 2-1 Investing in Mobility: Freight Transport in the Hudson Region ................. 2-3 CPIP Consortium Port of New York and New Jersey Comprehensive Port Improvement Plan .............................................................................. 2-6 Bi-State Domestic Freight Ferries Study ........................................................... 2-8 National Rail Freight Infrastructure Capacity and Investment Study ......... 2-9 Northeast Rail Operations Study (NEROps) Phase I Final Report ............. 2-11 Northeast Rail Operations Study, Phase II Summary of Potential Rail Improvement Projects
  • Bay State Model Railroad Museum

    Bay State Model Railroad Museum

    This Convention Is Dedicated to the Memory of Robert A. Buck (1929-2011) Bob Buck in the cab of GMRR 302 in Palmer in 1999. (Brian Solomon Photo) A descendant of the first English settler of Warren, Massachusetts, Bob Buck was born and raised there, within sight and sound of the Boston & Albany Railroad. From the time he was first able to lift his eyes above a window sill in his family home, he grew up watching a steady parade of NE-2 articulateds, A-1 Berkshires, J-2 Hudsons, and a changing potpourri of Consolidations, Mikados, Pacifics, tank engines and, later, the early New York Central diesels that replaced them. As he grew into teenage years, Bob made friends with local railroaders and spent many hours riding in the cabooses and cabs of local freights serving the Warren area. An early interest in photography, coupled with a skilled photographer's eye, allowed Bob to capture the rapidly disappearing world of steam railroading, not only on the B&A, but all across the United States and Canada. Although Bob had a great passion for railroading and railroad history, the flame burned brightest on the subject of his favorite: the Boston & Albany Railroad. Throughout his life, Bob collected and selflessly shared any photographs and documentation he could find on the B&A. Whether you were an aspiring author, a renowned expert, or simply a novice with an interest in the "Albany Line" (as it was known to old timers), Bob would generously offer access to his collection and his tremendous insight, spiced, of course, with a large dose of colorful jokes and anecdotes, in true "Yankee Fashion.” Bob was a founder and for many years the director of the huge Amherst Train Show held annually in West Springfield, Massachusetts.
  • 302918-CP-Comments

    302918-CP-Comments

    REDACTED PUBLIC RECORD VERSION CP-2 BEFORE THE SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD Finance Docket No. 36472 CSX CORPORATION AND CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., ET AL. – CONTROL AND MERGER – PAN AM SYSTEMS, INC., PAN AM RAILWAYS, INC., BOSTON AND MAINE CORPORATION, MAINE CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, NORTHERN RAILROAD, PAN AM SOUTHERN LLC, PORTLAND TERMINAL COMPANY, SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY, STONY BROOK RAILROAD COMPANY, AND VERMONT & MASSACHUSETTS RAILROAD COMPANY 302918 CANADIAN PACIFIC’S COMMENTS ENTERED Office of Proceedings August 27, 2021 Part of Public Record David L. Meyer LAW OFFICE OF DAVID L. MEYER 1105 S Street NW Washington, D.C. 20009 Email: [email protected] Telephone: (202) 294-1399 Jeffrey J. Ellis CANADIAN PACIFIC 7550 Ogden Dale Road S.E. Calgary, AB T2C 4X9 Canada Email: [email protected] Telephone: (888) 333-6370 Attorneys for Canadian Pacific August 27, 2021 i REDACTED PUBLIC RECORD VERSION TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 2 I. TRANSACTION RAISES MATERIAL CONCERNS ABOUT THE LONG-RUN PRESERVATION OF COMPETITIVE RAIL ACCESS TO NEW ENGLAND FROM THE WEST ................................................................................................................................... 6 A. The PAS Hoosac Tunnel Route Is the Only Viable Competitive Alternative to CSX for Most New England Rail Traffic ........................................ 7 B. The Transaction Will Have Significant Long-Term Implications
  • Appendix B Long Range Service and Investment Program for Passenger Rail

    Appendix B Long Range Service and Investment Program for Passenger Rail

    Appendix B Long Range Service and Investment Program for Passenger Rail APPENDIX B LONG RANGE SERVICE AND INVESTMENT PROGRAM FOR PASSENGER RAIL (2009 – 2013) Introduction This Appendix describes the Long Range Service and Investment Program (LRSIP) required by the Federal Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008. These are the projects that the state expects to undertake or support, in whole or in part, to improve intercity passenger rail service in the future. The ultimate decisions on costs and funding of these projects are subject to future discussions with the involved rail partners. This investment program was developed from the comprehensive inventory of rail system needs described earlier in this report, specifically those projects that improve intercity rail passenger service. This Appendix presents the list of projects contained in the LRSIP. These include projects that solely benefit passenger rail service, as well as projects that benefit passenger rail service and improve infrastructure of the owning railroads, which can be either commuter railroads or freight railroads. Improvements are presented on each New York’s passenger rail corridors, including the Empire Corridor from Albany south to New York City, (Hudson line), Empire Corridor west from Albany to Niagara Falls (Empire Corridor West) and on the Adirondack line from Albany north to the Canadian border. The combination of projects on each segment of the corridor provide significant benefits to the passenger rail traveling public. These projects will improve rail infrastructure including track, control signals and passenger stations across the state and will result in significant improvements to intercity passenger rail service. These investments address critical capacity and bottleneck constraints as well as operational improvements that will improve the fluidity of the multi-purpose rail network.