July-August 2012
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Nnepra Ea Finall.Pdf
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE DOWNEASTER PORTLAND NORTH EXPANSION PROJECT Contents 1.0 Purpose and Need 3 1.1 Introduction 3 1.2 Project History 3 1.3 Project Area 4 1.4 Project Purpose and Need 4 1.5 Decision to be Made 5 1.6 Connected Actions 5 1.7 Applicable Regulations and Permits 6 2.0 Alternatives 8 2.1 Introduction 8 2.2 No Build Alternative 8 2.3 Preferred Alternative 8 2.4 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Detailed Analysis 11 3.0 Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences 12 3.1 Physical Environment 12 3.1.1 Air Quality 12 3.1.2 Water Quality 12 3.1.3 Water Bodies and Waterways 13 3.1.4 Floodplains 14 3.1.5 Wetlands 15 3.1.6 Coastal Zones 16 3.1.7 Noise 16 3.2 Biological Environment 20 3.2.1 Ecological Systems 20 3.2.2 Threatened and Endangered Species 21 3.3 Human Environment 21 3.3.1 Transportation 21 3.3.2 Land Use, Zoning and Property Acquisition 24 3.3.3 Environmental Justice 24 3.3.4 Public Health and Safety 25 3.3.5 Contaminated Sites and Hazardous Waste 26 3.3.6 Cultural Resources 26 3.3.7 Section 4(f) Resources 27 3.4 Construction Impacts 27 3.5 Secondary and Cumulative Impacts 28 4.0 Coordination and Consultation 31 5.0 List of Preparers 33 6.0 Distribution List 34 7.0 References 37 8.0 Appendix A 39 Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE DOWNEASTER PORTLAND NORTH EXPANSION PROJECT 1.0 Purpose and Need 1.1 Introduction The Northern New England Passenger Rail Authority (NNEPRA), in conjunction with the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), is studying alternatives for the Downeaster Portland North Expansion project. -
Operating Plan
REDACTED - TO BE PLACED ON PUBLIC FILE BEFORE THE SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD ___________________________ DOCKET NO. FD 36472 ___________________________ CSX CORPORATION AND CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., ET AL. —CONTROL AND MERGER— PAN AM SYSTEMS, INC., PAN AM RAILWAYS, INC., BOSTON AND MAINE CORPORATION, MAINE CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, NORTHERN RAILROAD, PAN AM SOUTHERN LLC, PORTLAND TERMINAL COMPANY, SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY, STONY BROOK RAILROAD COMPANY, AND VERMONT & MASSACHUSETTS RAILROAD COMPANY ___________________________ EXHIBIT 13 ___________________________ Operating Plan Verified by Mr. Jamie Boychuk APP-298 REDACTED - TO BE PLACED ON PUBLIC FILE OPERATING PLAN VERIFIED BY JAMIE BOYCHUK Table of Contents I. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 3 II. Data Sources and Methodologies ....................................................................... 5 A. Traffic Data Sources ...................................................................................... 5 B. Operating Data Sources ................................................................................ 5 C. Methodology ................................................................................................... 5 III. Summary ............................................................................................................. 6 IV. Pre-Transaction Operations ............................................................................. 10 A. Train Operations -
2011 Downeaster Expansion Overview
DOWNEASTER EXPANSION PROJECT OVERVIEW BACKGROUND The Amtrak Downeaster makes five daily round trips between Boston and Portland, serving 10 communities in three states along its 116-mile corridor. The Boston to Portland service has been in operation since December 2001. Included in the original plan for the Downeaster service, but not possible until now, was the extension of service 30 miles beyond Portland to Freeport and Brunswick. Expansion of service to Brunswick is important because it will provide more mobility to Maine residents, increase tourism, support the redevelopment of the Brunswick Naval Air Station (BNAS) and provide a connection to the state owned Rockland Branch, which extends 58 miles from Brunswick to Rockland, the heart of mid-coast Maine. Although a capital plan to upgrade the freight line between Portland and Brunswick to passenger standards had been in place for years, the lack of capital funding to complete the project remained a barrier until spring 2009 when the High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail (HSIPR) Grant Program was announced. Administered by the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), the HSIPR grant program made $8 billion available as a “down payment” on investment in our nation’s passenger rail system through a national competitive application process. The Northern New England Passenger Rail Authority (NNEPRA) submi�ed an application for the Downeaster Expansion Project, and was awarded $35 million. Under the leadership of Governor John Baldacci, the State of Maine agreed to provide the remaining funds (approximately $3 million) to complete the project. The Downeaster Expansion Construction Project includes the rehabilitation of approximately 27 miles of track between Portland and Brunswick owned by Pan Am Railways, and approximately 1.2 miles of track in Brunswick owned by the MaineDOT. -
Brunswick EA.Pdf
Brunswick Layover Environmental Assessment September 2013 Table of Contents 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 NNEPRA and Amtrak Downeaster Background and History ......................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose and Need ......................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Required Approvals and Permits .................................................................................................. 3 2 Description of the Proposed Action and Alternatives .......................................................................... 4 2.1 No Build Alternative ...................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Alternatives Eliminated from Further Consideraion ..................................................................... 4 2.3 Build Alternative- Brunswick West ............................................................................................... 8 2.3.1 Site History .......................................................................................................................... 11 2.4 Amtrak Service Assumptions ...................................................................................................... 11 2.4.1 Current Service Levels ........................................................................................................ -
Density Charts
REDACTED - TO BE PLACED ON PUBLIC FILE BEFORE THE SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD ___________________________ DOCKET NO. FD 36472 ___________________________ CSX CORPORATION AND CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., ET AL. —CONTROL AND MERGER— PAN AM SYSTEMS, INC., PAN AM RAILWAYS, INC., BOSTON AND MAINE CORPORATION, MAINE CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, NORTHERN RAILROAD, PAN AM SOUTHERN LLC, PORTLAND TERMINAL COMPANY, SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY, STONY BROOK RAILROAD COMPANY, AND VERMONT & MASSACHUSETTS RAILROAD COMPANY ___________________________ EXHIBIT 14 ___________________________ Density Charts APP-389 CSX FREIGHT DENSITY 2019 Montreal JY)E / • I ' 'I '\ I I I VY I I Jiff I I 'I \ '/ YYJ I Oswego I / ~.w I Fonda~~- 1~ <12:!'} )Y/A Boston y ~~:r;;-,,, I pf/ r, ~ -•..>_r;, ~<)i:·J '-... '.tJJ. I Grand Rapids .,.- I I Hartford , JO I Holland I ' I Plymouth New Haven I I j , I Sandusky New York Joliet ., -, {~oj~~ Garrett • I c-- North Utic .,,,.-} Streator '------- - - - - - - -- l ~f ~ ( I, lt 1 il i J ',.j" I~ / 1CO I -_.i '-~ I Lima ', -~, Philadelphia Woodland '- Lafayette AA Frankfort Sidney /4~/J' Danville ~" Ji Golumbus •· ,&rt;~ I ,,~ Decatur Dayton New Martinsville Baltimore ~ Chrisman /,'~~ DE ~-· w Chillicothe Strasburg YVI/ Hughesville Fredericksburg (12.36] I Salem ., iiDs) Staunton _ - i\J' I .f -- (G__l~· - ' I ., ' .,. • Craigsville , ,,, - ... ... ,"',,,.,,,- :c: -- ......... Louis ., ., ,__ y .Al ' ·- - .... - ... I 'I I ' ' ', Richmond Henderson , Hopewell Lynchburg Owensboro Newport News pf, Chesapeake Corbin Norlina Winston-Salem Durham Rocky Mount Plymouth High Point Springfield Raleigh Wilson McKenzie ffj , , Sherril ls Ford - ''Aurora g , I \~ Kinston I Mount Holly .,_!. Columbia Jackson Chattanooga Wallace Greenville Williamston Wilmington I Decatur Georgetown Talladega (3840.,,, Augusta --' i'.~{5!}~~ Brookwood Milledgeville G_A Montgomery I I I Savannah I I ' I ' \ \ ' Albany ,(,,:.,} •> I ,s,:;;.) Brunswick I I r Folkston I Thomasville Quitman REDACTED - TO BE PLACED ON PUBLIC FILECrestview ,,,.,,,,.,-.,-...----., .,------ .. -
Appendix B: Downeaster Layover Facility Project Siting Report
Brunswick Layover Environmental Assessment (EA) Appendix B: Downeaster Layover Facility Project Siting Report September 2013 Downeaster Layover Facility Project Siting Report Prepared for: Prepared by: August 18, 2011 Downeaster Layover Facility Siting Report 1. Introduction The Northern New England Passenger Rail Authority (NNEPRA) is in the process of extending the northern terminus of the Amtrak-operated Downeaster rail passenger service from Portland to Brunswick, Maine. The extension of service is anticipated to begin in late 2012. The purpose of this Report is to evaluate the suitability of several potential sites, located along the rail corridor in Brunswick Maine, for development as a Downeaster passenger train layover facility. The layover facility is intended to encompass a set of railroad storage tracks and switches (termed “yard tracks”) , a building incorporating these tracks to be used for the overnight storage (termed “layover”) of rail passenger equipment, and ancillary components to accommodate daily service and maintenance functions associated with rail passenger equipment. As such, this facility will provide both storage (layover) and maintenance functions, although it is described herein as a layover facility. The intent of this analysis is to address the need for relocating the layover facility from Portland to the new terminus at Brunswick, based on facility limitations at Portland and operating issues, and to compare the physical and functional merits of several potential layover facility sites identified at Brunswick. Two public meetings have been held in Brunswick to discuss the requirements for the layover facility and associated operational issues, and to obtain input from the public and elected officials concerning the location of the facility. -
Federal Project
Updated 1/19/10 FEDERAL PROJECT Effective January 20, 2010 Supersedes December 1, 2008 BIDDING INSTRUCTIONS FOR ALL PROJECTS: 1. Use pen and ink to complete all paper Bids. 2. As a minimum, the following must be received prior to the time of Bid opening: For a Paper Bid: a) a copy of the Notice to Contractors, b) the completed Acknowledgement of Bid Amendments form, c) the completed Schedule of Items, d) two copies of the completed and signed Contract Offer, Agreement & Award form, e) a Bid Guaranty, and f) any other certifications or Bid requirements listed in the Bid Documents as due by Bid opening. For an Electronic Bid: a) a completed Bid using Expedite® software and submitted via the Bid Express™ webbased service, b) a Bid Guaranty (as described below) or a faxed copy of a Bid Bond (with original to be delivered within 72 hours), and c) any other certifications or Bid requirements listed in the Bid Documents as due by Bid opening. 3. Include prices for all items in the Schedule of Items. 4. Include a Bid Guaranty. Acceptable forms are: a) a properly completed and signed Bid Bond on the Department’s prescribed form (or on a form that does not contain any significant variations from the Department’s form as determined by the Department) for 5% of the Bid Amount or b) an Official Bank Check, Cashier’s Check, Certified Check, U.S. Postal Money Order or Negotiable Certificate of Deposit in the amount stated in the Notice to Contractors. 5. If a paper Bid is to be sent, Federal Express overnight delivery is suggested as the package is delivered directly to the DOT Headquarters Building located at 16 Child Street in Augusta. -
Environmental Assessment for The
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE PORTLAND NORTH PASSENGER RAIL SERVICE EXTENSION PROJECT PORTLAND TO BRUNSWICK CUMBERLAND COUNTY, MAINE PIN 09503.20 ME-90-X134 Prepared Pursuant to 23 CFR 771 and 23 USC 138 by the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration and Maine Department of Transportation Jonathan McDade Date Judith Lindsey Division Administrator Bureau of Planning Federal Highway Administration Maine Department of Transportation Room 614 16 State House Station Augusta, Maine 04330 Augusta, Maine 04333-0016 (207) 622-8350 (207) 624-3300 Richard H. Doyle Date Regional Administrator Federal Transit Administration 55 Broadway, Suite 920 Cambridge, MA 02142-1093 (617) 494-2055 Comments on this Environmental Assessment are due by _____________________ and may be sent to the addresses above. Portland North Passenger Rail Service Extension Project Maine Department of Transportation PIN 09503.20 Environmental Assessment November 2004 Draft November 2004 Contents Tables................................................................................................................ iv Figures ............................................................................................................... v 1. Purpose and Need.................................1-Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.1 Project History .................................... 1-Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.2 Project Area ........................................ 1-Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.3 Project Purpose and -
TIMETABLE No
TIMETABLE No. 3 Superseding Timetable No. 2 Effective 0001 Hours JUNE 15, 2014 Springfield Terminal Railway Company Pan Am Southern, LLC Boston & Maine Corporation Maine Central Railroad Company JOB BRIEFING GUIDELINES Well planned and properly conducted job briefings result in safe and efficient operations. In addition to the requirements of NORAC Rule 4, employees must consider the following when planning and conducting job briefings: B. Communicate existing or potential 1. Plan your Job Briefing hazards: A. Develop your own work plan: 1. What existing or potential hazards may interfere with safe operations, and what 1. Review work or task to be accomplished. can be done to protect against them? 2. Check the job location and work area. 2. Consider and discuss things like close 3. Determine tool, equipment, and material clearances, walking hazards, movements requirements. on adjacent tracks, other crews working in 4. Determine what safety or operating rules the area, etc. are applicable. 3. Do not needlessly create your own 5. Break the work or task down into step-by- hazards. step procedures. 4. Ensure that any hazards that are B. Consider existing and potential discovered are communicated to all crew hazards and ways to protect against members. them: C. When conditions change, conduct 1. Current and expected weather conditions. another job briefing: 2. The nature of the work to be done. 1. Ensure everyone stays on the same page 3. The work location. when conditions or tasks change. 4. The tools, equipment, and materials 2. Conduct a new job briefing when an used. individual joins or leaves the crew.