Ramsar Sites in Order of Their Addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
![Docket No. FWS–HQ–NWRS–2019–0040; FXRS12610900000-190-FF09R20000]](https://docslib.b-cdn.net/cover/6439/docket-no-fws-hq-nwrs-2019-0040-fxrs12610900000-190-ff09r20000-6439.webp)
Docket No. FWS–HQ–NWRS–2019–0040; FXRS12610900000-190-FF09R20000]
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 09/10/2019 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2019-18054, and on govinfo.gov Billing Code 4333-15 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Parts 26, 32, 36, and 71 [Docket No. FWS–HQ–NWRS–2019–0040; FXRS12610900000-190-FF09R20000] RIN 1018-BD79 2019–2020 Station-Specific Hunting and Sport Fishing Regulations AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), open seven National Wildlife Refuges (NWRs) that are currently closed to hunting and sport fishing. In addition, we expand hunting and sport fishing at 70 other NWRs, and add pertinent station-specific regulations for other NWRs that pertain to migratory game bird hunting, upland game hunting, big game hunting, and sport fishing for the 2019–2020 season. We also formally open 15 units of the National Fish Hatchery System to hunting and sport fishing. We also add pertinent station- specific regulations that pertain to migratory game bird hunting, upland game hunting, big game hunting, and sport fishing at these 15 National Fish Hatcheries (NFHs) for the 2019–2020 season. This rule includes global administrative updates to every NWR entry in our refuge- specific regulations and the reorganization of general public use regulations. We remove approximately 2,100 regulations that will have no impact on the administration of hunting and sport fishing within the National Wildlife Refuge System. We also simplify over 2,900 refuge- specific regulations to comply with a Presidential mandate to adhere to plain language standards 1 and to reduce the regulatory burden on the public. -
Evaluating the Risk to Ramsar Sites from Climate Change Induced Sea
STRP Scientific and Technical Briefing Note Review Panel Number 5, December 2012 Ramsar Convention on Wetlands Purpose of this BN Evaluating the risk to Ramsar Sites from To provide a preliminary as- climate change induced sea level rise sessment of coastal Ramsar Sites that are at risk to inunda- his Briefing Note and the accompanying web map service and data tion as a consequence of sea Tsets, developed by the Center for International Earth Science Infor- level rise, in order to provide mation Network (CIESIN) of Columbia University, provide a preliminary site managers with information that may assist them in assess- assessment of the risk to coastal wetlands designated as Wetlands of ing adaptation strategies. International Importance (Ramsar Sites) under the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands from rising sea levels due to climate change. Two scenarios are evaluated, 0-1 meter sea level rise (SLR), which is close to what the Background information Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) predicts for this cen- tury, and 0-2 meter SLR, which is an upper bound for SLR in this century CIESIN, through its NASA- if land-based ice sheets respond faster than expected to temperature supported Socioeconomic changes (AMAP 2011, Pfeffer et al. 2008). It has to be recognized that Data and Applications Center (SEDAC), conducted a glo- sea level rise will not be consistent globally, but is affected by coastal bal analysis of Ramsar Sites bathymetry and local topography and tides, while the extent of areas and developed this report in periodically submerged will also be affected by storm surges (Strauss et response to a request by the al. -
Ramsar Sites in Order of Addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance
Ramsar sites in order of addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance RS# Country Site Name Desig’n Date 1 Australia Cobourg Peninsula 8-May-74 2 Finland Aspskär 28-May-74 3 Finland Söderskär and Långören 28-May-74 4 Finland Björkör and Lågskär 28-May-74 5 Finland Signilskär 28-May-74 6 Finland Valassaaret and Björkögrunden 28-May-74 7 Finland Krunnit 28-May-74 8 Finland Ruskis 28-May-74 9 Finland Viikki 28-May-74 10 Finland Suomujärvi - Patvinsuo 28-May-74 11 Finland Martimoaapa - Lumiaapa 28-May-74 12 Finland Koitilaiskaira 28-May-74 13 Norway Åkersvika 9-Jul-74 14 Sweden Falsterbo - Foteviken 5-Dec-74 15 Sweden Klingavälsån - Krankesjön 5-Dec-74 16 Sweden Helgeån 5-Dec-74 17 Sweden Ottenby 5-Dec-74 18 Sweden Öland, eastern coastal areas 5-Dec-74 19 Sweden Getterön 5-Dec-74 20 Sweden Store Mosse and Kävsjön 5-Dec-74 21 Sweden Gotland, east coast 5-Dec-74 22 Sweden Hornborgasjön 5-Dec-74 23 Sweden Tåkern 5-Dec-74 24 Sweden Kvismaren 5-Dec-74 25 Sweden Hjälstaviken 5-Dec-74 26 Sweden Ånnsjön 5-Dec-74 27 Sweden Gammelstadsviken 5-Dec-74 28 Sweden Persöfjärden 5-Dec-74 29 Sweden Tärnasjön 5-Dec-74 30 Sweden Tjålmejaure - Laisdalen 5-Dec-74 31 Sweden Laidaure 5-Dec-74 32 Sweden Sjaunja 5-Dec-74 33 Sweden Tavvavuoma 5-Dec-74 34 South Africa De Hoop Vlei 12-Mar-75 35 South Africa Barberspan 12-Mar-75 36 Iran, I. R. -
Evaluation of Special Management Measures for Midcontinent Lesser Snow Geese and Ross’S Geese Report of the Arctic Goose Habitat Working Group
Evaluation of special management measures for midcontinent lesser snow geese and ross’s geese Report of the Arctic Goose Habitat Working Group A Special Publication of the Arctic Goose Joint Venture of the North American Waterfowl Management Plan Evaluation of special management measures for midcontinent lesser snow geese and ross’s geese Report of the Arctic Goose Habitat Working Group A Special Publication of the Arctic Goose Joint Venture of the North American Waterfowl Management Plan Edited by: James O. Leafloor, Timothy J. Moser, and Bruce D.J. Batt Working Group Members James O. Leafloor Co-Chair Canadian Wildlife Service Timothy J. Moser Co-Chair U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Bruce D. J. Batt Past Chair Ducks Unlimited, Inc. Kenneth F. Abraham Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Ray T. Alisauskas Wildlife Research Division, Environment Canada F. Dale Caswell Canadian Wildlife Service Kevin W. Dufour Canadian Wildlife Service Michel H. Gendron Canadian Wildlife Service David A. Graber Missouri Department of Conservation Robert L. Jefferies University of Toronto Michael A. Johnson North Dakota Game and Fish Department Dana K. Kellett Wildlife Research Division, Environment Canada David N. Koons Utah State University Paul I. Padding U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Eric T. Reed Canadian Wildlife Service Robert F. Rockwell American Museum of Natural History Evaluation of Special Management Measures for Midcontinent Snow Geese and Ross's Geese: Report of the Arctic Goose Habitat Working Group SUGGESTED citations: Abraham, K. F., R. L. Jefferies, R. T. Alisauskas, and R. F. Rockwell. 2012. Northern wetland ecosystems and their response to high densities of lesser snow geese and Ross’s geese. -
Master Plan for North Livonia Wetland Protection and Rural Development in the Transboundary Area of Latvia and Estonia
Master Plan for North Livonia Wetland Protection and Rural Development in the Transboundary Area of Latvia and Estonia February 2006 Table of Contents Preface . 3 3.4. Identifying impacts and proposing management activities . 36 List of partners . 4 3.5. Recommendations for coordinated nature Abbreviations . 5 management . 36 Executive summary . 6 4. Sookuninga, Nigula and Ziemelu Purvi as Transboundary Ramsar Site . 38 1. Background Information . 8 4.1. Relation between Ramsar Convention and 1.1. Introduction to the Master Plan . 8 EU Directives on Nature and Water . 38 1.2. North Livonia . 8 Water Bodies and their linkage to wetlands . 39 1.3. Physical Information. 10 4.2. Ramsar and EU management planning . 40 1.4. Biological Information . 10 Pilot River Basin Projects and Ramsar 1.5. Protection status of the biodiversity in Sites – an opportunity . 40 the project area . 13 4.3 Potential transboundary designation 1.6. Main factors influencing the biodiversity shared by Latvia and Estonia . 41 values in North Livonia . 14 4.4. Suggested procedure for achieving a transboundary designation of a 2. Management and Development of “North Livonia” Ramsar Site . 41 North Livonia . 16 4.5 Recommendations . 41 2.1. Protected areas management . 16 2.2. Hydrological management . 18 5. Recommendations for the future transboundary co-operation . 42 2.3. Forestry . 20 5.1. Importance of transboundary 2.4. Eco-tourism . 23 co-operation . 42 2.5. Cultural heritage . 26 5.2. Recommendations for the future transboundary co-operation . 43 2.6. Game management . 27 2.7. Agriculture. 29 References . 44 2.8. Estonian Native Cows. -
1St International Eurasian Ornithology Congress
1st International Eurasian Ornithology Congress Erdoğan, A., Turan, L., Albayrak, T. (Ed.) 1ST INTERNATIONAL EURASIAN ORNITHOLOGY CONGRESS Antalya, Turkey 8-11 April 2004 Jointly organized by Akdeniz University - Antalya and Hacettepe University - Ankara i 1st International Eurasian Ornithology Congress Ali Erdoğan, Levent Turan, Tamer Albayrak (Editorial Board) 1ST INTERNATIONAL EURASIAN ORNITHOLOGY CONGRESS Antalya Turkey 8-11 April 2004 ISBN: 975-98424-0-8 Print: Sadri Grafik 2004 Antalya ii 1st International Eurasian Ornithology Congress HONORARY PRESIDENTS (ALPHABETICALLY ORDERED) Prof. Dr. Tunçalp ÖZGEN Rector of Hacettepe University, Ankara Prof.Dr.Yaşar UÇAR Rector of Akdeniz University, Antalya CONGRESS CHAIRMAN Prof.Dr. İlhami KİZİROĞLU Hacettepe University EXECUTİVE COMMİTTEE Prof. Dr. Ali ERDOĞAN (Chairman) Prof. Dr. İlhami KİZİROĞLU Assoc. Prof. Dr. Levent TURAN (Vice Chairman) Cengiz GÖKOĞLU (Mayor of Bogazkent ) SCIENTIFIC CONGRESS SECRETARY Tamer ALBAYRAK (Akdeniz University, Antalya) iii 1st International Eurasian Ornithology Congress SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Özdemir ADIZEL, (Yüzüncüyıl U. Van, Turkey ) Zafer AYAŞ, (Hacettepe U. Ankara, Turkey) Yusuf AYVAZ, (S. Demirel U. Isparta,Turkey) Walter BÄUMLER, (TU, Münich, Germany ) Franz BAIRLEIN, (Journal f.Ornithologie, Germany) Stuart BEARHOP, (University of Glasgow, UK) Einhard BEZZEL, (Falke, Germany) Mahmut BILGINER, (Ondokuz Mayıs U. Samsun, Turkey) Dan CHAMBERLAIN, (University of Stirling, UK) Ali ERDOĞAN, (Akdeniz U. Antalya, Turkey) Michael EXO, (Institut fuer Vogelforschung, -
Research on the Non-Point Pollution Loads in the Lake Uluabat Basin
Journal of Environmental Protection, 2013, 4, 29-37 29 http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jep.2013.47A004 Published Online July 2013 (http://www.scirp.org/journal/jep) Research on the Non-Point Pollution Loads in the Lake Uluabat Basin Aslıhan Katip, Feza Karaer Faculty of Engineering-Architecture, Department of Environmental Engineering, Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey. Email: [email protected] Received May 3rd, 2013; revised June 5th, 2013; accepted July 8th, 2013 Copyright © 2013 Aslıhan Katip, Feza Karaer. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. ABSTRACT Lake Uluabat, having an international significance and subject to the Ramsar Convention, is fed by the basin of Musta- fakemalpaşa Stream which runs through fertile lands utilized for livestock breeding and agriculture. In this study, total amount of nitrogen (TN) and phosphorus (TP) loads of non-point pollutants (agriculture, livestock breeding, vegetation, surface runoff and small settlements) was calculated. It was found out that most intensive pollution load stemmed from livestock breeding which causes dispersion of 13653.57 tons·year−1 of TN and 3224.45 tons·year−1 of TP into the Lake Uluabat. Additionally, seasonal changes in concentration of TN and TP were observed during the period of 2008-2009 in Lake Uluabat. It was concluded that the rise of agricultural activities in summer months was the reason underlying the increase in pollution during the months in question. Keywords: Lake Uluabat Basin; Nitrogen; Non-Point Pollution Loads; Phosphorus; Transport Coefficients 1. -
Transformation of an Industrial Brownfield Into an Ecological Buffer for Michigan’S Only Ramsar Wetland of International Importance
OPEN ACCESS www. wsforum.org Article Transformation of an Industrial Brownfield into an Ecological Buffer for Michigan’s only Ramsar Wetland of International Importance John Hartig 1,* and Allison Krueger 2 E-Mails: [email protected]; [email protected] *Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-734-692-7608; Fax: +1-734-692-7603 Received: / Accepted: / Published: Abstract: The Detroit River International Wildlife Refuge spans 77 km along the Detroit River and western Lake Erie, and is the only international wildlife refuge in North America. A key unit of the refuge is the 166-ha Humbug Marsh that represents the last kilometer of natural shoreline on the U.S. mainland of the river and Michigan’s only “Wetland of International Importance” designated under the 1971 International Ramsar Convention. Adjacent to Humbug Marsh is an 18-ha former industrial manufacturing site (now called the Refuge Gateway) that is being remediated and restored as an ecological buffer for Humbug Marsh and the future home of the refuge’s visitor center. Restoration and redevelopment activities have included: cleanup and capping of contaminated lands; daylighting a creek and constructing a retention pond and emergent wetland to treat storm water prior to discharge to the Detroit River; restoring coastal wetland, riparian buffer, and upland habitats; and constructing two roads, hiking/biking trails, and a kayak/canoe landing to offer wildlife-compatible public uses that allow visitors to experience this internationally- recognized natural resource. This project has been described as transformational for the region by restoring an industrial brownfield into high quality wildlife habitat that expands the ecological buffer of a Ramsar site. -
Agenda Item XI Ramsar COP11 DOC. 8 Report of the Secretary General
11th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Wetlands (Ramsar, Iran, 1971) “Wetlands: home and destination” Bucharest, Romania, 6-13 July 2012 Agenda item XI Ramsar COP11 DOC. 8 Report of the Secretary General pursuant to Article 8.2 concerning the List of Wetlands of International Importance Explanatory note: This paper provides information received at the Secretariat up to 2 June 2012 which is required to be presented to COP11 under the terms of Article 8.2 of the Convention. The information provided below should be updated by Contracting Parties, if necessary, just before or during COP11 through written texts submitted to the Secretariat, and as appropriate these will then be incorporated into a revised COP11 DR 4 on “The status of sites in the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance” to be considered during COP11. Parties are requested not to repeat orally during the plenary session their written updates that have been provided to the Secretariat, “in order to save time spent on corrections and comments during plenary sessions” (Decision SC42-7). See also COP11 DOC. 3 Add.1 for further information about interventions during COP11 plenaries. 1. Article 8.2 of the text of the Convention on Wetlands states that the continuing duties of the Secretariat shall be, inter alia, “b) to maintain the List of Wetlands of International Importance and to be informed by the Contracting Parties of any additions, extensions, deletions or restrictions concerning wetlands included in the List provided in accordance -
Class G Tables of Geographic Cutter Numbers: Maps -- by Region Or
G3862 SOUTHERN STATES. REGIONS, NATURAL G3862 FEATURES, ETC. .C55 Clayton Aquifer .C6 Coasts .E8 Eutaw Aquifer .G8 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway .L6 Louisville and Nashville Railroad 525 G3867 SOUTHEASTERN STATES. REGIONS, NATURAL G3867 FEATURES, ETC. .C5 Chattahoochee River .C8 Cumberland Gap National Historical Park .C85 Cumberland Mountains .F55 Floridan Aquifer .G8 Gulf Islands National Seashore .H5 Hiwassee River .J4 Jefferson National Forest .L5 Little Tennessee River .O8 Overmountain Victory National Historic Trail 526 G3872 SOUTHEAST ATLANTIC STATES. REGIONS, G3872 NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. .B6 Blue Ridge Mountains .C5 Chattooga River .C52 Chattooga River [wild & scenic river] .C6 Coasts .E4 Ellicott Rock Wilderness Area .N4 New River .S3 Sandhills 527 G3882 VIRGINIA. REGIONS, NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. G3882 .A3 Accotink, Lake .A43 Alexanders Island .A44 Alexandria Canal .A46 Amelia Wildlife Management Area .A5 Anna, Lake .A62 Appomattox River .A64 Arlington Boulevard .A66 Arlington Estate .A68 Arlington House, the Robert E. Lee Memorial .A7 Arlington National Cemetery .A8 Ash-Lawn Highland .A85 Assawoman Island .A89 Asylum Creek .B3 Back Bay [VA & NC] .B33 Back Bay National Wildlife Refuge .B35 Baker Island .B37 Barbours Creek Wilderness .B38 Barboursville Basin [geologic basin] .B39 Barcroft, Lake .B395 Battery Cove .B4 Beach Creek .B43 Bear Creek Lake State Park .B44 Beech Forest .B454 Belle Isle [Lancaster County] .B455 Belle Isle [Richmond] .B458 Berkeley Island .B46 Berkeley Plantation .B53 Big Bethel Reservoir .B542 Big Island [Amherst County] .B543 Big Island [Bedford County] .B544 Big Island [Fluvanna County] .B545 Big Island [Gloucester County] .B547 Big Island [New Kent County] .B548 Big Island [Virginia Beach] .B55 Blackwater River .B56 Bluestone River [VA & WV] .B57 Bolling Island .B6 Booker T. -
Ramsar Convention on Wetlands of International Importance
The Convention on Wetlands of International Importance Ramsar Convention What Ramsar Is: Who can nominate a site stakeholders associated with the proposed site greatly contribute to • In 1971, an international convention • Any local government, group, the nomination process; and was held in Ramsar, Iran and community, private organization, participants signed a treaty entitled, or landowner can nominate a A completed Ramsar Information “The Convention on Wetlands of site for inclusion on the Ramsar Sheet, is available online at http://bit. International Importance, Especially List of Wetlands of International ly/1HIU7PR as Waterfowl Habitat.” Importance. The Federal government can also nominate sites, such as Nine Criteria for “Wetlands • The Ramsar Convention provides a National Parks, National Forests, or of International Importance” framework for voluntary international National Wildlife Refuges. Designation: cooperation for wetland conservation. A wetland should be considered • A written agreement is required internationally important if it meets • The U.S. acceded to the Ramsar from all landowners and a Member Convention April 18, 1987. any one of the following criteria. The of Congress representing the site: geographic area. What Ramsar Does: 1. contains a representative, rare, • Recognizes wetlands’ importance to Nomination package or unique example of a natural communities, cultures, governments, The petitioner must submit a complete or near-natural wetland type and businesses and encourages nomination package to the Director, found within the appropriate wetland conservation and wise use of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), biogeographic region; or wetlands. 1849 C Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20006, with a copy to the Global 2. supports vulnerable, endangered, • Establishes criteria for designating Program, Division of International or critically endangered species rivers, marshes, coral reefs and other Conservation, FWS. -
Transboundary Wetlands: Exploring Formal Mechanisms for Cooperation
AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Zoe Rosenblum for the degree of Master of Science in Water Resources Policy and Management presented on December 15, 2020. Title: Transboundary Wetlands: Exploring Formal Mechanisms for Cooperation Abstract approved: ____________________________________________________ Susanne Schmeier Despite increased understanding of the benefits of wetlands, global wetland area continues to decrease. Wetlands are being lost at an alarming rate, and with them, biodiversity, floodwater storage, water purification, and countless other functions. There is little information available about mechanisms to manage transboundary wetlands. While the Ramsar Convention is one international mechanism for wetland governance, there are very few cases in which all riparian parties have jointly designated a Transboundary Ramsar Site. Most research on transboundary wetlands explores specific conflicts or management issues or argues for or against the Ramsar Convention as a legal tool to manage wetlands. However, little research explores institutions for managing transboundary wetlands. Furthermore, while there is much evidence that freshwater resources are a source of cooperation, there is emphasis on rivers and wetlands are largely absent from the discourse. This research employs document analysis, coding, and spatial analysis to explore how transboundary wetlands are managed. The products of this research are: a database of the world’s transboundary wetlands; an in-depth analysis of the management of the Wadden Sea, Okavango Delta, and