DOCSLIB.ORG

Finnish Railway Network Statement 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

3 • 2015 TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE DATA OF THE FINNISH TRANSPORT AGENCY Finnish Railway Network Statement 2017 Finnish Railway Network Statement 2017 Transport infrastructure data of the Finnish Transport Agency 3/2015 Finnish Transport Agency Helsinki 2015 Photograph on the cover: Tehanu Tapola Online publication pdf (www.liikennevirasto.fi) ISSN-L 1798-8276 ISSN 1798-8284 ISBN 978-952-317-165-7 Finnish Transport Agency P.O. Box 33 FI-00521 Helsinki, Finland Tel. +358 (0)29 534 3000 Transport infrastructure data of the Finnish Transport Agency 3/2015 3 Finnish Railway Network Statement 2017 Foreword The Finnish Transport Agency (FTA) publishes the Finnish Railway Network Statement (hereinafter the Network Statement) for the timetable period 2017. This is the fourteenth Network Statement prepared in Finland, in accordance with the Finnish Railway Act. The Network Statement describes the access conditions, the state- owned railway network, the rail capacity allocation process, the services supplied to Railway Undertakings and the principles of determining the infrastructure charge. The Network Statement is published for applicants for capacity for each timetable period separately. The present Network Statement is intended for the timetable period 11.12.2016-9.12.2017. The Network Statement 2017 has been prepared based on the previous Network Statement taking into account the feedback received from users and the Network Statements of other European Infrastructure Managers. The structure of the Network Statement follows the common European structure and comprises the following chapters: 1 General 2 Access conditions 3 Railway network 4 Capacity allocation 5 Services supplied to Railway Undertakings 6 Infrastructure charge The amendment to the Railway Act entered into force on 8 December 2015, and the decrees to be issued under the Act are being prepared at the time of publication. The amendments resulting from the revised statutes will be made in the Network Statement at the beginning of 2016. Within the Finnish Transport Agency, the Network Statement is the responsibility of the Traffic Services Department. Several specialists inside and outside the Finnish Transport Agency have been involved in the preparation of the Network Statement. Helsinki, 11 December 2015 Finnish Transport Agency Traffic and Information, Traffic Services Department 4 Transport infrastructure data of the Finnish Transport Agency 3/2015 Finnish Railway Network Statement 2017 Table of Contents 1 GENERAL INFORMATION .............................................................................................. 7 1.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 7 1.2 Objective ............................................................................................................................ 7 1.3 Legal Framework .............................................................................................................. 7 1.4 Legal Status ...................................................................................................................... 8 1.4.1 General Remarks .................................................................................................. 8 1.4.2 Liability .................................................................................................................. 8 1.4.3 Appeals Procedure ............................................................................................... 8 1.5 Structure of the Network Statement ............................................................................ 9 1.6 Validity and Updating ..................................................................................................... 9 1.6.1 Validity Period ...................................................................................................... 9 1.6.2 Updating Process ................................................................................................. 9 1.7 Publishing ....................................................................................................................... 10 1.8 Contacts .......................................................................................................................... 10 1.9 Cooperation Between Infrastructure Managers ....................................................... 12 1.10 Glossary ........................................................................................................................... 13 2 ACCESS CONDITIONS ................................................................................................ 16 2.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 16 2.2 General Access Requirements .................................................................................... 16 2.2.1 General Requirements for Operating Railway Traffic ................................. 16 2.2.2 General Requirements for Access to the Railway Network ........................ 18 2.2.3 Operating Licence .............................................................................................. 18 2.2.4 Safety Certificate ............................................................................................... 18 2.2.5 Cover of Liabilities ............................................................................................. 20 2.3 General Business Conditions ...................................................................................... 20 2.3.1 Framework Agreement ...................................................................................... 20 2.3.2 Access Agreement ............................................................................................. 20 2.3.3 Other Railway Network Access Agreements .................................................. 21 2.4 Operational Rules and Legislative Information ....................................................... 23 2.5 Exceptional Transport .................................................................................................. 23 2.6 Dangerous Goods .......................................................................................................... 23 2.7 Rolling Stock Acceptance Process Guidelines ......................................................... 23 2.8 Staff Acceptance Process ............................................................................................ 25 3 INFRASTRUCTURE ....................................................................................................... 27 3.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 27 3.2 Extent of Network .......................................................................................................... 27 3.2.1 Multi-Track Line Sections ................................................................................ 27 3.2.2 Limits .................................................................................................................... 27 3.2.3 Connected Railway Networks .......................................................................... 28 3.3 Network Description ..................................................................................................... 28 3.3.1 Geographic Identification ................................................................................ 28 3.3.2 Capabilities ......................................................................................................... 32 3.3.3 Traffic Control and Communications Systems ............................................ 34 3.4 Traffic Restrictions ........................................................................................................ 38 3.4.1 Specialised Infrastructure Capacity ............................................................... 38 3.4.2 Environmental Restrictions .............................................................................. 38 3.4.3 Dangerous Goods .............................................................................................. 39 Transport infrastructure data of the Finnish Transport Agency 3/2015 5 Finnish Railway Network Statement 2017 3.4.4 Tunnel Restrictions ............................................................................................ 41 3.4.5 Bridge Restrictions ............................................................................................. 41 3.4.6 Overweight Load Transport .............................................................................. 41 3.5 Availability of the Infrastructure ................................................................................. 41 3.6 Passenger Stations ........................................................................................................ 41 3.7 Freight Terminals ........................................................................................................... 41 3.8 Service Facilities ............................................................................................................ 42 3.8.1 Train Formation Yards ....................................................................................... 42 3.8.2 Storage Sidings ................................................................................................... 42 3.8.3 Maintenance and Service Facilities ................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Records Relating to Railroads in the Cartographic Section of the National Archives

    Records Relating to Railroads in the Cartographic Section of the National Archives

    REFERENCE INFORMATION PAPER 116 Records Relating to Railroads in the Cartographic Section of the national archives 1 Records Relating to Railroads in the Cartographic Section of the National Archives REFERENCE INFORMATION PAPER 116 National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC Compiled by Peter F. Brauer 2010 United States. National Archives and Records Administration. Records relating to railroads in the cartographic section of the National Archives / compiled by Peter F. Brauer.— Washington, DC : National Archives and Records Administration, 2010. p. ; cm.— (Reference information paper ; no 116) includes index. 1. United States. National Archives and Records Administration. Cartographic and Architectural Branch — Catalogs. 2. Railroads — United States — Armed Forces — History —Sources. 3. United States — Maps — Bibliography — Catalogs. I. Brauer, Peter F. II. Title. Cover: A section of a topographic quadrangle map produced by the U.S. Geological Survey showing the Union Pacific Railroad’s Bailey Yard in North Platte, Nebraska, 1983. The Bailey Yard is the largest railroad classification yard in the world. Maps like this one are useful in identifying the locations and names of railroads throughout the United States from the late 19th into the 21st century. (Topographic Quadrangle Maps—1:24,000, NE-North Platte West, 1983, Record Group 57) table of contents Preface vii PART I INTRODUCTION ix Origins of Railroad Records ix Selection Criteria xii Using This Guide xiii Researching the Records xiii Guides to Records xiv Related
  • Lions Club Ekenäs 50 År

    Lions Club Ekenäs 50 År

    Lions Club Ekenäs 50 år Lions Club Ekenäs Tryckplats: Ekenäs Tryckeri 2008 Presidentens förord Lions Club Ekenäs firar 50-årsjubileum i oktober 2008. Björn Björkvall, lektor i religion och filosofi vid Ekenäs samlyceum, tog initiativet till att grunda LC Ekenäs. Den 1 april 1958 bildades klubben och charterfesten hölls den 25 oktober samma år. Då LC Ekenäs grundades för 50 år sedan stod LC Lohja som fadderklubb. Vid olika jubiléer som hållits i vår klubb har det getts ut historiker. Nu vid 50-årsjubiléet ges den i en ny utformning som benämns jubileumsskrift. Först beskrivs klubbens tillkomst och lionsrörelsens uppkomst i Finland, varefter följer en allmän översikt över Lions Club Ekenäs verksamhet. Därefter berättar den enda kvarvarande chartermed- lemmen Johan Rappe om sina hågkomster. I specialtexter skrivna av lionsbröder som har varit länge med i klubben och i specialintervjuer kan man läsa om olika aktiviteter. Ladylions har sedan början aktivt medverkat i klubbens verksamhet och de har fått en egen text i jubileumsskriften. Jubileumsskriften har sammanställts av Mårten Kevin och för layouten står Kaj Koivumäki. Tack vare befolkningens välvilliga inställning har vi kunnat ha vår mångsidiga verksamhet, vari också har ingått större projekt, såsom den av barnen högt uppskattade Lions Park. Den senaste och fjärde större donationen gäller ljugarbänken som överläts till Ekenäs stad på sommaren inför klubbens 50-årsjubileum. Klas Dahlqvist President i LC Ekenäs Bengt Björkholm 18.1.1927-17.8.2008 LC Ekenäs fick två månader före sitt 50-årsjubileum sorgebu- det att den äldsta, aktiva klubbmedlemmen Bengt Björkholm hade avlidit. Broder Bengt var aktiv inom klubben in i det sista.
  • The Strategies of Modern Science Development X International

    The Strategies of Modern Science Development X International

    The Strategies of Modern Science Development X International scientific–practical conference 12-13 April 2016 Proceedings CreateSpace North Charleston, SC, USA 2016 Scientific Publishing Center "Discovery" otkritieinfo.ru The Strategies of Modern Science Development: Proceedings of the X International scientific–practical conference. North Charleston, USA, 12-13 April 2016. - North Charleston: CreateSpace, 2016. - 151 p. The materials of the conference have presented the results of the latest research in various fields of science. The collection is of interest to researchers, graduate students, doctoral candidates, teachers, students - for anyone interested in the latest trends of the world of science. ISBN-13: 978-1533065865 ISBN-10: 1533065861 Your book has been assigned a CreateSpace ISBN. @ Authors, 2016 @Scientific Publishing Center "Discovery", 2016 2 CONTENT SECTION I. Physical sciences Bednarzhevskiy S.S., Smirnov G.I., Strekalov M.L., Josan D.A., Filatov K.V. NONLINEAR-WAVE EFFECTS OF THE ENERGY EXTRACTION OF THE QUANTUM VACUUM ................................................................... 7 SECTION II. Information Technology Siddikjon Abduganiev, Manfred Pils, Friedrich Roithmayr Elicitation of Criteria Weights for the Web Quality Evaluation Method Universal Star: by using different ranking methods .................................... 11 Klevanskiy N.N., Antipov M.A. Simultaneous Freight Train Routing and Timetabling ............................... 24 SECTION III. Biological sciences Larkina N. I. AMPHIDIPLOIDS - INTERSPECIFIS
  • The Finnish Archipelago Coast from AD 500 to 1550 – a Zone of Interaction

    The Finnish Archipelago Coast from AD 500 to 1550 – a Zone of Interaction

    The Finnish Archipelago Coast from AD 500 to 1550 – a Zone of Interaction Tapani Tuovinen [email protected], [email protected] Abstract New archaeological, historical, paleoecological and onomastic evidence indicates Iron Age settle- ment on the archipelago coast of Uusimaa, a region which traditionally has been perceived as deso- lated during the Iron Age. This view, which has pertained to large parts of the archipelago coast, can be traced back to the early period of field archaeology, when an initial conception of the archipelago as an unsettled and insignificant territory took form. Over time, the idea has been rendered possible by the unbalance between the archaeological evidence and the written sources, the predominant trend of archaeology towards the mainland (the terrestrical paradigm), and the history culture of wilderness. Wilderness was an important platform for the nationalistic constructions of early Finnishness. The thesis about the Iron Age archipelago as an untouched no-man’s land was a history politically convenient tacit agreement between the Finnish- and the Swedish-minded scholars. It can be seen as a part of the post-war demand for a common view of history. A geographical model of the present-day archaeological, historical and palaeoecological evi- dence of the archipelago coast is suggested. Keywords: Finland, Iron Age, Middle Ages, archipelago, settlement studies, nationalism, history, culture, wilderness, borderlands. 1. The coastal Uusimaa revisited er the country had inhabitants at all during the Bronze Age (Aspelin 1875: 58). This drastic The early Finnish settlement archaeologists of- interpretation developed into a long-term re- ten treated the question of whether the country search tradition that contains the idea of easily was settled at all during the prehistory: were perishable human communities and abandoned people in some sense active there, or was the regions.
  • Ekenäs KARIS Sommaröstrand Marina Tel

    Ekenäs KARIS Sommaröstrand Marina Tel

    VISITOR’S GUIDE TO ENGLISH 2018–2019 Raseborgvisitraseborg.com EKENÄS • KARIS • POJO • BILLNÄS • BROMARV • EKENÄS ARCHIPELAGO NATIONAL PARK • FISKARS VILLAGE JUSSARÖ ISLAND • RASEBORGS CASTLE • SKÅLDÖ ISLAND • SNAPPERTUNA • SVARTÅ MANOR • TENALA A different world Just an hour from Helsinki and Turku Svartå Manor – svartamanor.fi Raseborg Raseborg castle ruins – nationalparks.fi/raseborg The coastal route Ekenäs Port coastalroute.fi Västerby nature park Påminne ski center & Downhill Åbo go-karting – paminne.com Salo Turku ➜ 33 km Calliola – calliola.com 93 km ➜ Kisakeskus – kisakeskus.fi Malmbacka – malmbacka.fi Åminne Gård – nordcenter.fi Hanko Front Museum – rintamamuseo.fi/eng Fiskars Village – fiskarsvillage.fi Guest harbour Distances to different towns in Raseborg (by car) To KARIS: From Helsinki ..................................................76 km From Turku ....................................................118 km From Helsinki-Vantaa airport ...................89 km From Tampere ..............................................222 km From Jyväskylä ............................................329 km From Hanko .....................................................51 km To EKENÄS: From Helsinki ..................................................93 km From Turku ....................................................111 km From Helsinki-Vantaa airport ................105 km From Tampere ..............................................237 km From Jyväskylä ............................................345 km From Hanko .....................................................35
  • MPLS VPN Service

    MPLS VPN Service

    MPLS VPN Service PCCW Global’s MPLS VPN Service provides reliable and secure access to your network from anywhere in the world. This technology-independent solution enables you to handle a multitude of tasks ranging from mission-critical Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP), Customer Relationship Management (CRM), quality videoconferencing and Voice-over-IP (VoIP) to convenient email and web-based applications while addressing traditional network problems relating to speed, scalability, Quality of Service (QoS) management and traffic engineering. MPLS VPN enables routers to tag and forward incoming packets based on their class of service specification and allows you to run voice communications, video, and IT applications separately via a single connection and create faster and smoother pathways by simplifying traffic flow. Independent of other VPNs, your network enjoys a level of security equivalent to that provided by frame relay and ATM. Network diagram Database Customer Portal 24/7 online customer portal CE Router Voice Voice Regional LAN Headquarters Headquarters Data LAN Data LAN Country A LAN Country B PE CE Customer Router Service Portal PE Router Router • Router report IPSec • Traffic report Backup • QoS report PCCW Global • Application report MPLS Core Network Internet IPSec MPLS Gateway Partner Network PE Router CE Remote Router Site Access PE Router Voice CE Voice LAN Router Branch Office CE Data Branch Router Office LAN Country D Data LAN Country C Key benefits to your business n A fully-scalable solution requiring minimal investment
  • Fiskars/Fiskari Svartå/Mustio Ekenäs Centrum/Tammisaaren Keskusta Tenala/Tenhola Finnäs Bromarv

    Fiskars/Fiskari Svartå/Mustio Ekenäs Centrum/Tammisaaren Keskusta Tenala/Tenhola Finnäs Bromarv

    682 Järnvik 665 Borgby 703 Slicko 668 Pojo Böle 638 Mjölnarby BROMARV710 RAASEPORI / RASEBORG ANTSKOG FISKARS/FISKARI SVARTÅ/MUSTIO Kårböle 550 POJO CENTRUM664 Bollstad Revbacka 572 710 RAASEPORI RASEBORG 614 Karis Bredvik 679 Gästerby 550 Kårböle 666 Brunkom 668 Pojo Böle 665 Borgby 710POHJAN RAASEPORI KESKUSTA 541 Kivitok 638 Mjölnarby Kårböle 550 711 Torby 664 Bollstad 712 Trädbollstad 679 Gästerby 668 Pojo Böle 665 Borgby 664 Bollstad 711 Torby 660 Antskog 666 Brunkom 679 Gästerby 664 Bollstad 670 Degernäs 632 Knapsby 632 Knapsby Revbacka 572 664 Bollstad 668 Pojo Böle 712 Trädbollstad 711 Torby 712 Trädbollstad 702 Skuru 702 Skuru 614 Karis Bredvik 572 Revbacka 665 Borgby 682 Järnvik 666 Brunkom 695 Ramskulla 682 Järnvik 616 Bålaby 711 Torby 665 Borgby 509 Bromarv 695 Ramskulla 682 Järnvik 638 Mjölnarby 702 Skuru 667 Brödtorp 679 Gästerby 551 Kägra Med Pålarv 638 Mjölnarby 682 Järnvik 682 Järnvik Bromarv 509 632 Knapsby 664 Bollstad 690 Näsby 430 Lillfors 509 Bromarv 627 Karis Ingvalsby 702 Skuru 687 Lillfors 684 Klinkbacka 682 Järnvik 638 Mjölnarby 638 Mjölnarby 665 Borgby 610 Bengsmora 686 Kyrkbacka 407 Borgby 664 Bollstad 684 Klinkbacka 573 Rilax 713 Övervesterby 664 Bollstad 617 Båtsmora 687 Lillfors 684 Klinkbacka 664 Bollstad 678 Gumnäs 664 Bollstad 662 Björsby 406 Bollstad 679 Gästerby 669 Dalkarby 686 Kyrkbacka 665 Borgby 704 Sonabacka 638 Mjölnarby 509 Bromarv 678 Gumnäs 664 Bollstad 668 Pojo Böle 678 Gumnäs 686 Kyrkbacka 660 Antskog 662 Björsby 690 Näsby 702 Skuru 665 Borgby 638 Mjölnarby 662 Björsby 665 Borgby 627 Karis
  • Railroads and Harbors

    Railroads and Harbors

    ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") Cornucopia Superior Red Lake Detail MINNESOTA "x Cliff "x Port Wing Superior Bayfield "x Wisconsin "x !5 White Pine Mine !5 Superior "x !5 "x La Pointe !5 !5!5 Washburn !5 !5 !5 "x !5 Saxon Harbor "x!5 Ashland !5 Bergland "x Railroads !5 Hawthorne !5 North Ironwood Marengo !5 Junction !5 Sauntry BAYFIELD DOUGLAS !5 Mellen & Harbors !5 Gordon IRON MICHIGAN Channing !5 !5 Glidden ASHLAND 2021 VILAS Hayward !5 Butternut Springbrook !5 ") !5 !5 Park Falls !5 Tipler Trego !5 BURNETT SAWYER !5 Fifield FOREST !5 FLORENCE Quinnesec Escanaba ") Spooner !5 !5 Hermansville !5 PRICE Kingsford !5 Laona Jct. Niagara !5 WASHBURN Weirgor !5 !5 Phillips Dunbar !5 !5 ONEIDA Argonne Cavour Powers !5 !5 !5 !5 Exeland !5 !5 !5 Pembine Rhinelander Goodman Tripoli !5 !5 BARRON RUSK Catawba !5 Crandon !5 Laona Beecher Hawkins !5 !5 Lake Rice Lake !5 !5 !5 Tony !5 Bradley Heafford Jct !5 Amberg Bruce !5 Prentice POLK Almena !5 !5 !5 Tomahawk MARINETTE Barron !5 Detroit !5 !5 !5 Ladysmith !5 Wisconsin Harbor !5 Dresser !5 !5 Osceola Poskin Cameron Conrath Dam Wausaukee "x !5 !5 MICHIGAN Sheldon !5 "x Chetek Sister Bay Northport LINCOLN LANGLADE Crivitz !5 "x Withrow !5 New Auburn TAYLOR Somerset New Richmond !5 !5 !5 CHIPPEWA !5 Gilman Merrill !5 !5 Medford !5 Menominee !5 Bloomer !5 Pound !5 "x Boyceville !5 OCONTO !5 ST CROIX !5 !5 Wheeler Stetsonville Coleman !5 Marinette Colfax !5 Brokaw Peshtigo ") !5 !5 !5 Chippewa !5 Falls Norma Cadott MARATHON MENOMINEE Hudson !5 !5 !5 Owen !5 Lena !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 Abbotsford Sturgeon Minneapolis HammondBaldwin !5 !5 Wausau !5 Kelly Gillett Oconto Bay WoodvilleWilson Knapp Stanley Withee !5 !5 !5 "x St.
  • SCM Projects

    SCM Projects

    Annex 3 ‐ List of projects Scandinavian‐Mediterranean Corridor ‐ sorted by Country and Mode ‐ Final Report CEF pre‐ Transport Studies or Costs Critical ID Location Description of project Project promoter Timing Financing sources identified mode works (MEUR) issue section Ring Rail Line : A two‐track urban line for passenger traffic to Helsinki Airport. It will have an 8‐kilometre FI 1 Rail Helsinki Works Finnish Transport Agency 2009‐2015 736 Public funds and other sources. X X tunnel with two tubes, 5 surface stations in the first phase out of wich 2‐3 underground stations Finnish Transport Agency, FI 2a Rail Helsinki Study & works Central Pasila and metro: Center‐Pasila new railway line 2014‐2017 40 Public funds and possible EU Co‐funding (CEF) X cities of Helsinki and Espoo Finnish Transport Agency, FI 2b Rail Helsinki Study & works Helsinki marshalling yard: Improvement of Helsinki marshaling yard (60 M€) 2015‐2020 60 Public funds and possible EU Co‐funding (CEF) X cities of Helsinki and Espoo Finnish Transport Agency, FI 2c Rail Helsinki Study & works Helsinki interlocking system: Updating of the Helsinki interlocking system 2020‐2025 90 Public funds and possible EU Co‐funding (CEF) X cities of Helsinki and Espoo City Rail Loop : New railway to connect Helsinki Airport with rail (1st phase Ring Rail to be completed in 2015). Finnish Transport Agency, city FI 3 Rail Helsinki Study & works 2014‐2020 1.000 Public funds and possible EU Co‐funding (CEF) X X City Rail Loop also improves the connection between the two CNCs that cross in the Helsinki node.
  • 1 Partial Translation from the Book: Air Force Participation in the Finnish

    1 Partial Translation from the Book: Air Force Participation in the Finnish

    Partial translation from the book: Air Force Participation in the Finnish War of Independence in Year 1918 by Aarne Bremer, 1934 Translated by Seppo Koivisto, 2.2.1999; updated 18.5.1999, 15.5.2004 Chapter II. German Air Activity in Finland 1918 (pages 170-202) Initial Phase of Getting Aid (page 170) The greatest aid, that Finland received already in the preparatory stages and then during the war, came from Germany. Already in autumn 1917 arms shipments came from there to arm the home defence. During the Independence War large amounts of arms and ammunition were further bought from Germany. In February 1918 Germany agreed to send the Königlicher Preussischer Jägerbataillon Nr. 27 (of Finnish volunteers) to Finland. When the red danger was continuously worsening in Southern Finland, made Councillor of State Hjelt, a Finn that had greatest influence in Germany, his best to get aid to Finland. (Edvard Hjelt, 1855-1921, was an active and sometimes arbitrary representative of the Finnish Senate in Germany. He for instance issued a Finnish passport in false name to General Ludendorf after his resignation.) On February 11th the peace negotiations between Germany and Russia at Brest-Litovski were interrupted. By threatening St. Petersburg from Finland, Germany would force Russia swiftly for final conclusion of peace. For this Germany would not need large forces, just so much that the white Finland would win. German high command asked councillor of state Hjelt to send an urgent request for armed assistance. Councillor of State Hjelt saw, that he could fulfil this request, as he had received a telegram from Councillor of State A.
  • Talviaik Ata Ulut

    Talviaik Ata Ulut

    INKOO – KIRKKONUMMI TH – HELSINKI 192T HELSINKI – KARJAA – TAMMISAARI – HANKO 192T HELSINKI – KARJAA – FISKARI INGÅ – KYRKSLÄTT VGS – HELSINGFORS 192T HELSINGFORS – KARIS – EKENÄS – HANGÖ 192T HELSINGFORS – KARIS – FISKARS Merkkien selitykset – Teckenförklaring: – VINTERTIDTABELLER TALVIAIKATAULUT M–P M–P M–P 192T 192T Laituri H:ki 16 26 16 16 Laituri H:ki 16 16 Plattform H:fors M–P M–P M–P M–P Ingå/Inkoo 7.15 8.35 14.50 Plattform H:fors M–P M–P + Kouluvuoden aikana – Under skolåret Helsinki/Helsingfors 9.30 14.15 16.10 17.00 Munkin kuja - 9.00 - Helsinki/Helsingfors 9.30 16.10 Vain koulujen kesäloman aikana K:nummi/Kyrkslätt th 10.00 - 16.45 17.35 ++ Kyrkslätt VGS/Kirkkonummi TH 7.45 x 15.15 Lauttasaari/Drumsö x x Under skolans sommarlov Inkoo/Ingå 10.30 - 17.15 18.05 Jorvas TH x x x Jorvas th x x +++ 1.5–30.9 Lohja/Lojo - 15.35 - Iso Omena x x x K:nummi/Kyrkslätt th 10.00 16.45 Maanantaista perjantaihin Karjaa/Karis 10.50 16.20 17.35 18.40 M–P Lauttasaari/Drumsö x x x Inkoo kk/Ingå kby 10.30 17.15 Från måndag till fredag Puh./Tfn Pohja/Pojo 11.10 16.35 18.10 19.10 E-mail Helsingfors/Helsinki Kamppi 8.20 9.35 15.50 Karjaa/Karis 10.50 17.35 Jatkaa tarvittaessa Fax T 13.8.2020 Alkaen / Fr.o.m. Fiskari/Fiskars 11.20 16.45 T T Fortsätter vid behov Tammisaari/Ekenäs 11.15 18.00 Ansku/Antskog - T Vuoro ei käy tai pysähdy paikkakunnalla HELSINKI 192T – KIRKKONUMMI TH – INKOO Hanko/Hangö 11.45 18.30 I [email protected] (019) 245 4314 (019) 245 4311 (019) 245 4310 HELSINGFORS 192T – KYRKSLÄTT VGS – INGÅ Turen kör eller stannar ej vid orten Pysähtyy
  • RAILWAY NETWORK STATEMENT 2022 Updated 30 June 2021 Updated 30 June 2021

    RAILWAY NETWORK STATEMENT 2022 Updated 30 June 2021 Updated 30 June 2021

    Updated 30 June 2021 FTIA's publications 52eng/2020 RAILWAY NETWORK STATEMENT 2022 Updated 30 June 2021 Updated 30 June 2021 Railway Network Statement 2022 FTIA's publications 52eng/2020 Finnish Transport Infrastructure Agency Helsinki 2020 Updated 30 June 2021 Photo on the cover: FTIA's photo archive Online publication pdf (www.vayla.fi) ISSN 2490-0745 ISBN 978-952-317-813-7 Väylävirasto PL 33 00521 HELSINKI Puhelin 0295 34 3000 Updated 30 June 2021 FTIA’s publications 52/2020 3 Railway Network Statement 2022 Version history Date Version Change 14 May 2021 Version for comments - 30 June 2021 Updated version Foreword and text, appendices 2E, 2F, 2G, 2L, 2M, 5F, 5G, 5J Updated 30 June 2021 FTIA’s publications 52/2020 4 Railway Network Statement 2022 Foreword In compliance with the Rail Transport Act (1302/2018 (in Finnish)) and in its capacity as the manager of the state-owned railway network, the Finnish Transport Infrastructure Agency is publishing the Network Statement of Finland’s state-owned railway network (hereafter the ‘Network Statement’) for the timetable period 2022. The Network Statement describes the state-owned railway network, access conditions, the infrastructure capacity allocation process, the services supplied to railway undertakings and their pricing as well as the principles for determining the infrastructure charge. The Network Statement is published for each timetable period for applicants requesting infrastructure capacity. This Network Statement covers the timetable period 12 December 2021 – 10 December 2022. The Network Statement 2022 has been prepared on the basis of the previous Network Statement taking into account the feedback received from users and the Network Statements of other European Infrastructure Managers.