DOCSLIB.ORG

Rain Sim Drop Sizes, Distributions and Energies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rain Sim Drop Sizes, Distributions and Energies 1 DRAFT 3/4/2011 2 Rainfall Simulation Studies – A Review of Designs, Performance and 3 Erosion Measurement Variability 4 5 Mark E. Grismer 6 Depts. of Hydrologic Sciences and Biological & Agricultural Engineering 7 UC Davis 8 9 Table of Contents pages 10 INTRODUCTION 1-2 11 12 EROSION PROCESSES – Model Development 2-16 13 Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) 4-8 14 Water Erosion & Prediction Project (WEPP) 8-12 15 Characterizing Erosion - Continued Developments 12-16 16 17 NATURAL & SIMULATED RAINFALL ENERGIES AND INTENSITIES 16-25 18 19 RAINFALL SIMULATOR (RS) DESIGNS 26-57 20 Basic RS Designs – Overview 26-29 21 Table AA. Summary of RS performance characteristics 29-34 22 Basic RS Designs –Drop sizes, Distribution & Intensity Uniformity 23 Drop-former type RSs 35-37 24 Spray-nozzle type RSs 37-46 25 Basic RS Designs –Drop-size Distribution & Intensity Effects on KEs 46-57 26 27 FIELD RS METHODOLOGIES – Effects of measurement methods & plot conditions 28 57-72 29 APPLICABILITY OF FIELD RS-DERIVED EROSION RATES – Up-scalability? 30 72-76 31 32 Recent Rainfall Simulation Studies in the Tahoe Basin 76-83 33 34 SUMMARY & CONCLUSIONS 83-87 35 36 REFERENCES 88-101 37 38 0 39 INTRODUCTION 40 The unpredictability, infrequent and random nature of natural rainfall makes 41 difficult the study of its effects on soils while rainfall is occurring. The use of rainfall 42 simulators (RSs) and perhaps runoff simulators for rill erosion can overcome some of 43 these difficulties, enabling a precise, defined storm centrally located over runoff 44 measurement “frames”. RSs are often used to study the effects of various soil factors on 45 rates of infiltration and erosion in the field. Following development of sprinkler and 46 drop-former designs in the 1950s, a variety of RSs have been developed for use in the 47 laboratory and field. Generally, these are associated with smaller plot sizes on the order 48 of 1 m2 and are directed at assessment of soil cover, tillage or practice treatment effects, 49 determination of soil inter-rill and rill erodibilities for model parameterization, evaluation 50 of pollutant transport or dispersal rates and other applications of particular interest to the 51 research group. That no standardized methodology has been proposed or can be 52 identified in the literature, making comparisons between study results difficult has long 53 been recognized. Such efforts in Europe were represented in part by conferences and 54 meetings resulting in a special journal issue (Parsons and Lascelles, 2006) that detailed 55 some of the efforts of a working group having the goals of cataloging the RSs in use, 56 their specifications and performance characteristics, as well as developing a standard RS 57 evaluation and test methodology for broad use such that data collected by various studies 58 can be compared. Agassi and Bradford (1999) completed a review of inter-rill erosion 59 measurement studies using rainfall simulation methods and categorized the 60 “methodology problems” into inadequate characterization of (a) the type of RS its rainfall 61 intensities, mean drop size and drop-size distribution, and water quality deployed, (b) the 62 soil plot physical and chemical properties, and (c) the type of results obtained and how 63 they are presented. Kinnell (2005, 2006) completed thorough reviews of the processes 64 associated with raindrop impacted erosion and noted that both conceptual models and 65 measurements fail in various respects to adequately characterize observed erosion 66 processes from bare soils. Concerns such as these have also arisen in the Tahoe Basin, 67 because a variety of methods for measurement of infiltration and erosion rates have been 68 deployed, but comparisons between results of different studies are uncertain. 1 69 The objective of this paper is to review the more recent literature of the past two 70 decades concerning application of RS techniques in the field and how they might apply to 71 forested, rangeland, and ski-run conditions similar to that found in the Sierra Nevada. As 72 many of the RS-derived erosion measurement efforts are, at least in part, motivated by 73 the historical conceptual view of erosion processes, first, the prevailing descriptions of 74 the erosion processes as they developed from the classic USLE-based interpretation to 75 sediment transport and WEPP-based analyses are considered. Next, as a primary concern 76 of the past has been the ability of RSs to replicate “natural” rainfall characteristics, 77 available studies of these characteristics are reviewed and compared with laboratory 78 analyses of rain drop-sizes, their distributions and kinetic energies (KEs). These reviews 79 set the stage for consideration of RS designs and field methodologies as they may have 80 been affected by attempted definitions of erodibility and “natural” rain characteristics. 81 Following review of RS designs and issues associated with field plot conditions, some of 82 the key issues associated with RS-based erosion measurements; the processes involved in 83 forested landscapes, their interpretation, sources of error or uncertainty and up-scaling 84 plot results to hillslope and catchments are considered. Here, the focus is largely on 85 “portable” RS usable in field studies of these various processes on a range of slopes. 86 87 88 EROSION PROCESSES – USLE and WEPP Development 89 The rainfall runoff and erosion process is usually considered to be initiated with 90 rain drop impact on bare or nearly bare soils, detaching and splashing soil particles and 91 subsequent downslope transport as part of overland flow (Mutchler et al, 1988). Raindrop 92 momentum or kinetic energy (KE) is a product of raindrop size (mass) and velocity or 93 velocity -squared at impact. Though Wischmeier and others originally found from 94 statistical analyses that rainfall KE alone was insufficient to describe erosivity, Lal 95 (1988) opined that it is a major factor in the soil detachment process, and likewise that 96 the total energy load of a storm is proportional to its erosivity. Net erosion rates 97 (sediment mass/unit area) are a function of both rainsplash and overland flow transport. 98 For shallow slopes, rainsplash is considered the dominant factor in causing erosion; as the 99 slope angle increases, runoff becomes the dominant factor (Kamalu, 1994). Splash 2 100 erosion alone does not redistribute large amounts of soil, rather it serves to detach soil 101 material for transport by runoff (Evans, 1980). Runoff, as interrill overland flow, carries 102 with it the smaller detached particles, and acts to remove the most erodible silt and very 103 fine sand particles from the soil surface as it flows downhill (Press and Siever, 1986). 104 When the rainfall intensity exceeds the infiltration rate, surface water excess 105 accumulates on the soil; when the surface depressions are filled, runoff in the form of 106 sheet overland flow can occur. Surface roughness reduces the velocity of overland flow 107 (Evans, 1980); differences in surface roughness can be due to soil textural variations, 108 tillage, residues on the surface, or the presence of living plant stems. Overland flow is a 109 very elusive and difficult process to measure, and as such, relatively little is known about 110 the actual mechanics of soil loss by this process (Emmett, 1980), though classic sediment 111 transport concepts are generally used. 112 Surface cover, in the form of living vegetation or residues, both reduces the 113 impact energy of the raindrops and prevents them from striking the soil surface. Raindrop 114 impacts both compact the surface and possibly detach surface soil particles from bare 115 soils; together these processes can seal the soil surface, reducing the infiltration rate. At 116 low cover levels, runoff and erosion rates are related to the area of bare ground, 117 increasing as the bare ground area increases. Vegetated soils also have greater structure 118 and aggregation, leading to higher infiltration rates (Evans, 1980). The effect of plant 119 canopy cover on reducing runoff and erosion in natural rangeland environments has been 120 demonstrated to be due primarily to the increased litter cover, soil macro-porosity, and 121 soil structure that occur due to the presence of canopy cover, rather than to the direct 122 interception of rainfall (Simanton et al., 1991). Similarly, rock cover tends to reduce 123 erosion rates proportional to the cover fraction. 124 Generally with all else equal, erosion rates increase as the slope angle increases 125 (Evans, 1980). As slope increases, overland flow velocities increase (Kloosterboer and 126 Eppink, 1989) such that the greater surface flow velocity increases both the erosive 127 power and the flow competence (i.e. “transport capacity”) to carry suspended sediments 128 (Press and Siever, 1986). The slope angle is also important in the splash erosion process; 129 as the angle steepness increases, more soil is splashed downhill (Evans, 1980). However, 3 130 the runoff component is the most sensitive to slope change; beyond some threshold 131 inclination, it becomes the dominant erosive process (Kamalu, 1994). 132 Though only briefly outlined above, it is clear that erosion from soil surfaces 133 involves several inter-related processes that in the field combine in complex spatial and 134 temporal variations such that results from different erosion studies are difficult to 135 compare. These processes can include particle (aggregate) breakdown, particle 136 detachment, related splash effects then particle suspension and transport as part of 137 overland flow or wind, particle filtration by covers or mulch layers, particle movement 138 into the soil profile and so on. Clearly, all these processes are controlled by basic 139 hydrologic phenomena such as precipitation form and rates, soil infiltration rates and 140 capacity and the surface conditions (e.g.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Daniel D. Richter CV 2021
    2020 Daniel D. Richter, Jr. Nicholas School of the Environment Box 90328, A205, LSRC Duke University Durham, North Carolina 27708-0328 USA Office Tel 919-613-8031; Cell 919-475-7939, Fax 919-684-8741 [email protected], @suelos2010 http://criticalzone.org/calhoun/ h-index 66, i10-index 155, citations 15,369 Education Ph.D. Soil Science & Ecology, Minor Statistics, Duke University, Durham, 1980 Graduate coursework: Soil Science, Statistics, Ecology, and Forestry at Mississippi State and North Carolina State Universities, 1976-77 B.A., Philosophy, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, 1973 Employment Full and Associate Professor of Soils and Ecology, Nicholas School of the Environment, 1987-present Visiting Associate Professor of Soils, Instituto Tecnologico de Costa Rica, Cartago, 1993-4 Assistant Professor of Soils and Watershed Management, School of Natural Resources, University of Michigan, 1984-87 Research Associate, Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 1980-84 Leadership Lead-PI with 15 Co-Is, NSF and USFS Calhoun Critical Zone Observatory, 2013- present Chair, National CZO PI Committee of the nine USA CZOs, 2015 PI and Director, Long-Term Calhoun Experimental Forest Soil-Ecosystem Experiment, 1988-present PI and Director, International Network of Long-Term Soil-Ecosystem Experiments, 2005-present, (250 studies worldwide) Member, International Commission of Stratigraphy’s Working Group on the Anthropocene, 2012-present Co-Founder and Chair Working Groups on Soil Change, International Union of Soil Sciences and
    [Show full text]
  • The Walnut Gulch Rainfall Simulator: a Computer-Controlled Variable Intensity Rainfall Simulator
    THE WALNUT GULCH RAINFALL SIMULATOR: A COMPUTER-CONTROLLED VARIABLE INTENSITY RAINFALL SIMULATOR G. B. Paige, J. J. Stone, J. R. Smith, J. R. Kennedy ABSTRACT. The Walnut Gulch Rainfall Simulator (WGRS) is a portable, computer-controlled, variable intensity rainfall simulator for rainfall-runoff-erosion research on rangelands. The WGRS was developed with the objective to quantify the relationship between rainfall intensity and steady state infiltration rate and to determine how that relationship affects sediment transport by overland flow. The simulator has a single central oscillating boom and applies water over a 2- y 6.1-m area. Two important improvements have been made to the oscillating boom simulator design. First, a computer-controlled stepper motor is used to control the oscillations and minimize the variability of the water application across the plot. Second, the spray time and sequence of nozzle operation are controlled by three-way solenoids to minimize the delay time between oscillations at low application rates. The simulator applies rainfall rates between 13 and 178 mm/h, in 13-mm/h increments, with a coefficient of variability of 11% across the plot. Water use is minimized by recycling the water that is not sprayed directly on the plot. The simulator has been tested in both laboratory and field applications. Keywords. Rainfall simulator, Variable intensity, Infiltration, Runoff, Erosion. ainfall simulators have been used in hydrologic one of the largest runoff and erosion databases for rangelands and erosion process studies since the 1930s. They including studies to parameterize the Universal Soil Loss are designed to apply a controlled amount and rate Equation (Simanton et al., 1986) and the Water Erosion of water on a known area or plot.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil and Land Use Catenas. a Case Study of Amani Sub-Catchment, East Usambara Mountains, Tanzania
    INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AEROSPACE SURVEY AND EARTH SCIENCES SOIL AND LAND USE CATENAS. A CASE STUDY OF AMANI SUB-CATCHMENT, EAST USAMBARA MOUNTAINS, TANZANIA By: Pitio Ndyeshumba SOIL AND LAND USE CATENAS. A CASE STUDY OF AMANI SUB-CATCHMENT, EAST USAMBARA MOUNTAINS, TANZANIA By: Pitio Ndyeshumba SUPERVISOR Dr W. Siderius CO-SUPERVISOR D. Shrestha MSc Submitted as a partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Soil survey at the International Institute for Aerospace survey and Earth Sciences (ITC), Enschede, The Netherlands Degree Assessment Board Prof. Dr. J.A. Zinck Dr. M.A. Mulders (external examiner) Drs. L.A. Van Sleen Dr. W. Siderius INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AEROSPACE SURVEY AND EARTH SCIENCES ITC ENSCHEDE THE NETHERLANDS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This study could not have been successfully completed without appreciable contribution of many people who in one way or another rendered their painstaking efforts. I am extremely grateful for the support extended to me. Just to mention a few are:- Dr. W. Siderius, my supervisor and director of studies for SOL2 for his appreciable help, constructive criticism, constant incouragement and guidence and his petience in dealing with me. Mr Drhuba Shrestha, my co-supervisor for his support and constructive comments and ideas. Professor A. J. Zinck, the head of soil survey division for his advice and encouragements. Ir E.Bergsma, for his support during and after fieldwork. Ir Van Sleen also for his support during and after field work. Also I would like to thank all soil survey division staff for their academic and moral support I received from them during the whole period.
    [Show full text]
  • Youth Education on Rainwater Harvesting and Agricultural Irrigation Training for Small Acreage Landowners
    Youth Education on Rainwater Harvesting and Agricultural Irrigation Training for Small Acreage Landowners Final Project Report For the Completion of TWDB Contract No. 1003581100 by Dr. Dana Porter, P.E. Associate Professor & Extension Irrigation Engineer Texas AgriLife Research Lubbock, TX Brent Clayton Extension Program Specialist Texas AgriLife Extension Corpus Christi, TX submitted to the Texas Water Development Board P.O. Box 13231, Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711-3231 April 2012 i This page is intentionally blank. ii Texas Water Development Board Final Project Report Youth Education on Rainwater Harvesting and Agricultural Irrigation Training for Small Acreage Landowners by Dana Porter, Ph.D. Brent Clayton Texas AgriLife Extension Service April 2012 iii This page is intentionally blank. iv Acknowledgements This resource is made available through support from the Texas Water Development Board (Contract #1003581100, “Youth Education on Rainwater Harvesting and Agricultural Irrigation Training for Small Acreage Landowners”) and the USDA-ARS Ogallala Aquifer Program. Special thanks are extended to Cameron Turner, Texas Water Development Board, and Whitney Milberger-Laird, formerly with the Texas Water Development Board, for their guidance and participation in this project, as well as to Billy Kniffen, Extension Program Specialist, Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, for his tireless efforts in conducting Rainwater Harvesting training events; to Justin Mechell, former Extension Program Specialist, Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, for his assistance in project management and contributions to the irrigation curriculum materials and to Diana Thomas for her assistance with various aspects of the project. v This page is intentionally blank. vi Youth Education on Rainwater Harvesting and Agricultural Irrigation Training for Small Acreage Landowners Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Treatise in Geomorphology: Overview of Weathering and Soils
    Provided for non-commercial research and educational use only. Not for reproduction, distribution or commercial use. This chapter was originally published in the Treatise on Geomorphology, the copy attached is provided by Elsevier for the author’s benefit and for the benefit of the author’s institution, for non-commercial research and educational use. This includes without limitation use in instruction at your institution, distribution to specific colleagues, and providing a copy to your institution’s administrator. All other uses, reproduction and distribution, including without limitation commercial reprints, selling or licensing copies or access, or posting on open internet sites, your personal or institution’s website or repository, are prohibited. For exceptions, permission may be sought for such use through Elsevier’s permissions site at: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/permissionusematerial Pope G.A. (2013) Overview of Weathering and Soils Geomorphology. In: John F. Shroder (ed.) Treatise on Geomorphology, Volume 4, pp. 1-11. San Diego: Academic Press. © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Author's personal copy 4.1 Overview of Weathering and Soils Geomorphology GA Pope, Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ, USA r 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 4.1.1 Previous Major Works in Weathering and Soils Geomorphology 1 4.1.1.1 Relevant Topics not Covered in this Text 3 4.1.2 What Constitutes Weathering Geomorphology? 5 4.1.2.1 Weathering Voids 5 4.1.2.2 Weathering-Resistant Landforms 6 4.1.2.3 Weathering Residua: Soils and Sediments 6 4.1.2.4 Weathered Landscapes 6 4.1.3 Major Themes, Current Trends, and Overview of the Text 6 4.1.3.1 Synergistic Systems 7 4.1.3.2 Environmental Regions 7 4.1.3.3 Processes at Different Scales 8 4.1.3.4 Soils Geomorphology, Regolith, and Weathering Byproducts 8 4.1.4 Conclusion 9 References 9 Abstract Weathering and soil geomorphology constitutes a specific subfield of earth surface processes, equally important in the process system in creating the surface landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rainfall Simulator Study of Soil Erodibility in the Gallatin National
    A rainfall simulator study of soil erodibility in the Gallatin National Forest, southwest Montana by Ginger Lee Schmid A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Soils Montana State University © Copyright by Ginger Lee Schmid (1988) Abstract: Adequate equations are a necessity for quantitatively predicting soil losses from precipitation events on nonagricultural soils in the Rocky Mountain west. A modified Meeuwig rainfall simulator was used to study sediment yield environments on wildland soils in the Gallatin National Forest of southwest Montana. Sediment was collected from simulator plots under three different treatments: (1) natural ground cover intact, (2) vegetation and litter removed, and (3) soil surface removed to a depth of 15 cm. Sediment yields from these three treatments on fine textured soils formed on Cretaceous shales were compared to those from coarse textured soils formed on Pre-Cambrian metamorphics. Slope angle; percent of ground area covered by vegetation, litter and rock; and the soil properties of texture, bulk density, organic matter content and water content were measured as possible variables affecting erodibility. These soil and site characteristics were also used to determine if sediment yield prediction equations developed from Meeuwig's (1970,1971) simulator research on high elevation rangeland in the Intermountain west were applicable on forested lands in southwestern Montana. Soil texture, soil water content, and percent of the soil surface protected by vegetation, litter, and rock were significantly different between soil textures and treatments. No significant differences were found between the fine and coarse textured sediment yields for any one treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Rainfall Simulations to Evaluate Pathogen and Nutrients Runoff Loss Under Controlled Conditions
    Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Publications Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering 5-2018 Rainfall simulations to evaluate pathogen and nutrients runoff loss under controlled conditions María Isabel Delgado National University of La Plata Rameshwar S. Kanwar Iowa State University and Lovely Professional University, [email protected] Carl H. Pederson Iowa State University, [email protected] Chi Hoang Iowa State University Huy Nguyen Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/abe_eng_pubs Part of the Agriculture Commons, Bioresource and Agricultural Engineering Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons The complete bibliographic information for this item can be found at https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ abe_eng_pubs/1218. For information on how to cite this item, please visit http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/howtocite.html. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Publications by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Rainfall simulations to evaluate pathogen and nutrients runoff loss under controlled conditions Abstract Soil fertilizing the old-fashioned way, with raw manure, is a well-known procedure to increase land productivity. However, the fertilization value of organic amendment to the soil depends among others, on the composition of manure and manure application rates, timing and placement. When a rainfall event occurs soon after organic fertilizer application, it might help increase nutrient and pathogen concentrations in superficial runoff, carrying out negative consequences on water quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Rainfall Simulation on Rangeland Erosion Plots J.R
    &<=>0% 11 RAINFALL SIMULATOR WORKSHOP Rainfall Simulation on Rangeland Erosion Plots J.R. Simanton, C.W. Johnson, J.W. Nyhan, and E.M. Romney Key Words: soil loss, rangeland, rainfall simulator, USLE Abstract Rainfall simulator studieson erosion plots have been madeon relatively large plots, astandard surface treatment, 9 percent plot rangelands in Arizona, Idaho, New Mexico,' and Nevada. An slope and standard sequences of rainfall input (Wischmeier and extensive data base hasbeen developed for various ecosystems in Mannering 1969). Similar standards were used in oursimulator thesewesternstates.Becausethe same simulatorand similarexper studies so direct comparison could be made to other USLE imental design were used for allthestudies, results can beeasity research. transferred across ecosystems. The experimental design included Method and Materials the use of large plots (10.7 mX 3 m); 60mm/hr rainfall rate; and natural, bare, clipped, grazed and tilled treatments. Results from Erosion plot studies were conducted using a Swanson rotating thesestudieshavebeenrelated to USLE parametersand to effects boom simulator (Swanson 1965) on 3.05 m X 10.7 m plots in of various surface and canopy characteristics. The importance of rangelands of Arizona, Idaho, New Mexico, and Nevada. The erosion pavement on the erosion process of western arid and rotating boom rainfall simulator istrailer mounted and has 10-7.6 semiarid rangelands has been demonstrated, and, in some cases, mbooms radiating from acentral stem. Thearms support 30 V-Jet appears to be moredominantthan vegetationcanopy. 80100 nozzles positioned at various distances from thestem. The nozzles spray downward from anaverage height of 2.4 m, apply Introduction rainfall intensities of about60or 130 mm/hr(depending on nozzle Rainfallsimulation is a valuable research tool used in the study configuration), and produce drop-size distributions similar tonat ofthe hydrologtc and erosional responses of thenatural environ uralrainfall.
    [Show full text]
  • Illinois Nutrient Research & Education Council 2013 Projects Annual Report
    Illinois Nutrient Research & Education Council 2013 Projects Annual Report In its first year of operation (January – December projects that described plans for summarizing the 2013) the Illinois Nutrient Research and Education results into a package that would allow producers to Council (NREC) allocated funding totaling $1,477,572 determine how the results could be incorporated into for seven research and education projects. All projects management plans for their operation, or to address selected for funding were designed to address specific specific educational needs. problems or opportunities related to the purpose of NREC “to pursue nutrient research and provide The following information has been extracted educational programs to ensure the adoption and from project reports submitted by the researchers. implementation of practices that optimize nutrient The reports are available in their entirety at use efficiency, ensure soil fertility, and address www.illinoisnrec.org. The NREC website also environmental concerns with regard to fertilizer use.” contains information regarding members of the By statute, NREC is required to allocate a minimum Council, the enacting legislation creating NREC, and of 20% of the funds toward programs that include minutes of official NREC Council meetings. Since on-farm demonstrations that study and address water 2013 was the first year for virtually all NREC projects, quality issues. caution must be exerted in drawing conclusions from the results of the research projects. It is also NREC solicited Requests for Proposals in September important to recognize that reactions to treatments 2012 for funding in 2013, and received 30 proposals. may be different from one climatic area or one soil To insure that funds expended for NREC would have type to another.
    [Show full text]
  • A Small Rainfall Simulator for the Determination of Soil Erodibility
    Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Sciences 35 (1987) 407-415 A small rainfall simulator for the determination of soil erodibility A. Kamphorst Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Wageningen Agricultural Univer­ sity, P.O. Box 8005, NL 6700 EC Wageningen, Netherlands Received 15 April 1987; accepted 10 May 1987 Key words: rainfall simulator, soil erodibility, soil conservation, soil loss, runoff, in­ filtration Abstract A small rainfall simulator is described, which can be used in the field as well as in the laboratory for the determination of the water infiltration and erosion characteris­ tics of soils. It is particularly suitable for soil conservation surveys, as it is light to carry and easy to handle in the field. A description is given of a standard procedure for the determination of topsoil erodibilities in the field. Some results obtained with the standard procedure are pre­ sented. The method appears to be highly sensitive for soil properties influencing soil erodibility, such as clay content, organic matter content and soil pH. Introduction The soil erodibility factor or K-factor in the universal soil loss equation is a soil pa­ rameter representing the integrated effect of the infiltration characteristics and of soil particle detachability and transportability (Römkens, 1985). Together with the rainfall erosion factor and factors for slope steepness, slope length, vegetation cov­ er and soil management, it determines the erosion hazard or predicted annual soil loss in a particular field location (Wischmeier & Smith, 1960). The soil erodibility factor cannot be estimated simply on the basis of measurable or observable environmental variables. It has to be determined experimentally for every individual soil series by making elaborate soil loss measurements in unit field plots (Wischmeier & Smith, 1978).
    [Show full text]
  • Provided for Non-Commercial Research and Educational Use Only. Not for Reproduction, Distribution Or Commercial Use
    Provided for non-commercial research and educational use only. Not for reproduction, distribution or commercial use. This chapter was originally published in the Treatise on Geomorphology, the copy attached is provided by Elsevier for the author’s benefit and for the benefit of the author’s institution, for non-commercial research and educational use. This includes without limitation use in instruction at your institution, distribution to specific colleagues, and providing a copy to your institution’s administrator. All other uses, reproduction and distribution, including without limitation commercial reprints, selling or licensing copies or access, or posting on open internet sites, your personal or institution’s website or repository, are prohibited. For exceptions, permission may be sought for such use through Elsevier’s permissions site at: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/permissionusematerial Schaetzl R.J. Catenas and Soils. In: John F. Shroder (Editor-in-chief), Pope, G.A. (Volume Editor). Treatise on Geomorphology, Vol 4, Weathering and Soils Geomorphology, San Diego: Academic Press; 2013. p. 145-158. © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Author's personal copy 4.9 Catenas and Soils RJ Schaetzl, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA r 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 4.9.1 Introduction 146 4.9.2 The Catena Concept 146 4.9.3 Elements and Characteristics of Catenas 148 4.9.3.1 Summits 148 4.9.3.2 Shoulders and Free Faces 149 4.9.3.3 Backslopes 149 4.9.3.4 Footslopes 149 4.9.3.5 Toeslopes 149 4.9.3.6 Catenary Variation as Affected by Sediments and Climate 150 4.9.4 Soil Variation on Catenas – Why? 150 4.9.5 Soil Drainage Classes along Catenas 154 4.9.6 The Edge Effect 155 4.9.7 Summary 156 References 156 Glossary Hydrosequence A sequence of related soils, usually along Catena A sequence of soils along a slope, having di- a slope, that differ, one from the other primarily with regard fferent characteristics due to variation in relief, ele- to wetness.
    [Show full text]
  • THE USE of a RAINFALL SIMULATOR for BRUSH CONTROL RESEARCH on the EDWARDS PLATEAU REGION of TEXAS a Thesis by SHANE COURTNEY
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Texas A&amp;M Repository THE USE OF A RAINFALL SIMULATOR FOR BRUSH CONTROL RESEARCH ON THE EDWARDS PLATEAU REGION OF TEXAS A Thesis by SHANE COURTNEY PORTER Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE December 2005 Major Subject: Biological and Agricultural Engineering THE USE OF A RAINFALL SIMULATOR FOR BRUSH CONTROL RESEARCH ON THE EDWARDS PLATEAU REGION OF TEXAS A Thesis by SHANE COURTNEY PORTER Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Approved by: Co-Chairs of Committee, Clyde L. Munster Bradford P. Wilcox Committee Member, Binayak P. Mohanty Head of Department, Gerald Riskowski December 2005 Major Subject: Biological and Agricultural Engineering iii ABSTRACT The Use of a Rainfall Simulator for Brush Control Research on the Edwards Plateau Region of Texas. (December 2005) Shane Courtney Porter, B.S., Texas A&M University Co-Chairs of Advisory Committee: Dr. Clyde L. Munster Dr. Bradford P. Wilcox The thicketization of the semi-arid region of the United States has resulted in a dramatic change allowing invasive woody species to dominate the landscape with an unknown impact to the water budget. This landscape transformation has created a need to study the hydrology of the region and in particular the effects of increased brush on the water cycle. To study the effects of invasive brush on the water budget, a portable above- canopy rainfall simulator was developed for plot scale hydrologic research.
    [Show full text]