DOCSLIB.ORG

Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bibliography Bibliography Abell, F., Happé, F. and Frith, U. (2000) Do Triangles Play Tricks? Attribution of Mental States to Animated Shapes in Normal and Abnormal Development. Cognitive Development 15: 1–16. Adams, F. and Aizawa, K. (2008) The Bounds of Cognition (Malden, MA: Blackwell). Ah-King, M. (2009) Queer Nature: Towards a Non-Normative Perspective on Biological Diversity. In J. Bromseth, L. Folkmarson Käll and K. Mattsson (eds), Body Claims (Uppsala: Centre for Gender Research, Uppsala University). Ahmed, S. (2004) The Cultural Politics of Emotion (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press). Alcoff, L. (1988) Cultural Feminism versus Post-Structuralism: The Identity Crisis in Feminist Theory. Signs 13(3): 405–436. Alexander, G. M. and Evardone, M. (2008) Blocks and Bodies: Sex Differences in a Novel Version of the Mental Rotations Test. Hormones and Behavior 53: 177–184. Alexander, G. M. and Hines, M. (2002) Sex Differences in Response to Children’s Toys in Nonhuman Primates (Cercopithecus aethiops sabaeus). Evolution and Human Behavior 23: 467–479. Allen, J., Damasio, H., Grabowski, T., Bruss, J. and Zhang, W. (2003) Sexual Dimorphism and Asymmetries in the Gray–White Composition of the Human Cerebrum. NeuroImage 18: 880–894. Allen, L. S., Hines, M. et al. (1989) 2 Sexually Dimorphic Cell Groups in the Human Brain. Journal of Neuroscience 9(2): 497–506. Allman, J. M., Watson, K. K., Tetreault, N. A. and Hakeem, A. Y. (2005) Intuition and Autism: A Possible Role for Von Economo Neurons. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9(8): 367–373. Alvarez-Buylla, A. and Nottebohm, F. (1988) Migration of Young Neurons in Adult Avian Brain. Nature 335: 353–354. American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Section on Urology (1996) Timing of Elective Surgery on the Genitalia of Male Children with Particular Reference to the Risks, Benefits, and Psychological Effects of Surgery and Anesthesia. Pediatrics 97(4): 590–594. Ames, D. R. and Kammrath, L. K. (2004) Mind-Reading and Metacognition: Narcissism, Not Actual Competence, Predicts Self-Estimated Ability. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 28: 187–209. Anderson, E. (2011) Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism- epistemology/), accessed 5 December 2011. Auyeung, B., Baron-Cohen, S., Chapman, E., Knickmeyer, R., Taylor, K. and Hackett, G. (2006) Foetal Testosterone and the Child Systemizing Quotient. European Journal of Endocrinology 155: S123–S130. Auyeung, B., Baron-Cohen, S., Ashwin, E., Knickmeyer, R., Taylor, K. and Hackett, G. (2009a) Fetal Testosterone and Autistic Traits. British Journal of Psychology 100: 1–22. 246 Bibliography 247 Auyeung, B., Baron-Cohen, S., Ashwin, E., Knickmeyer, R., Taylor, K., Hackett, G. et al. (2009b) Fetal Testosterone Predicts Sexually Differentiated Childhood Behaviour in Girls and in Boys. Psychological Science 20: 144–148. Axelrod, R. (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation (New York: Basic Books). Ayden, M., Herzog, M. H. et al. (2008) Perceived Speed Differences Explain Apparent Compression in Slit Viewing. Vision Research 48(15): 1603. Azim, E., Mobbs, D., Jo, B., Menon, V. and Reiss, A. L. (2005) Sex Differences in Brain Activation Elicited by Humor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 102(45): 16496–16501. Baenninger, M. and Newcombe, N. (1989) The Role of Experience in Spatial Test Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Sex Roles 20: 327–344. Bagemihl, B. (1999) Biological Exuberance: Animal Homosexuality and Natural Diversity (New York: St. Martin’s Press). Baier, A. (1991) A Progress of Sentiments: Reflections on Hume’s ‘Treatise’ (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press). Baier, A. (1994) Moral Prejudices: Essays on Ethics (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press). Baier, A. (1997) The Commons of the Mind (Chicago: Open Court). Balaban, E. (2006) Cognitive Developmental Biology: History, Process and Fortune’s Wheel. Cognition 101(2): 298–332. Banville, J. (2006) Temple of Mysteries. Tate Etc. Issue 7 (http://www.tate.org.uk/ tateetc/issue7/rothko.htm). Bao, A. M. and Swaab, D. F. (2010) Sex Differences in the Brain, Behavior, and Neuropsychiatric Disorders. Neuroscientist 16(5): 550–565. Barad, K. (1999) Agential Realism: Feminist Interventions in Understanding. In M. Biagioli (ed.), The Science Studies Reader (New York: Routledge), 1–11. Barad, K. (2003) Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter’. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28(3): 801–831. Barad, K. (2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning (Durham: Duke University Press). Barnett, R. and Rivers C. (2005) Same Difference: How Gender Myths are Hurting Our Relationships, Our Children, and Our Jobs (New York: Basic Books). Baron-Cohen, S. (2002) The Extreme Male Brain Theory of Autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6: 248–254. Baron-Cohen, S. (2003) The Essential Difference: Men, Women and the Extreme Male Brain (London: Allen Lane). Baron-Cohen, S. (2007) Sex Differences in Mind: Keeping Science Distinct from Social Policy. In S. J. Ceci and W. M. Williams (eds), Why Aren’t More Women in Science? Top Researchers Debate the Evidence (Washington, DC: APA), 159–172. Baron-Cohen, S. and Wheelwright, S. (2004) The Empathy Quotient: An Investigation of Adults with Asperger Syndrome or High Functioning Autism, and Normal Sex Differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 34: 163–175. Baron-Cohen, S., Knickmeyer, R. C. and Belmonte, M. K. (2005) Sex Differences in the Brain: Implications for Explaining Autism. Science 310: 819–823. Baron-Cohen, S., O’Riordan, M., Stone, V., Jones, R. and Plaisted, K. (1999) Recognition of Faux Pas by Normally Developing Children and Children 248 Bibliography with Asperger Syndrome or High Functioning Autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 29: 407–418. Baron-Cohen, S., Richler, J., Bisarya, D., Gurunathan, N. and Wheelwright, S. (2003) The Systemizing Quotient: An Investigation of Adults with Asperger Syndrome or High-Functioning Autism, and Normal Sex Differences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 358(1430): 361–374. Barsalou, L. W. (1999) Perceptual Symbol Systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22(4): 577. Batson, D. (1991) The Altruism Question: Towards a Social-Psychological Answer (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates). Batson, D. (2009) Empathic Concern and Altruism in Humans. The National Humanities Center’s Web Project: ‘On the Human’ (http://onthehuman. org/2009/10/empathic-concern-and-altruism-in-humans/), accessed Novem- ber 2009. Batson, C. D. (2011) Altruism in Humans (New York: Oxford University Press). Batson, D., Early, S., and Salvarini, G. (1997). Perspective Taking: Imagining How Another Feels versus Imagining How You Would Feel. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 23: 751–8. Baxter, L. C., Saykin, A. J., Flashman, L. A., Johnson, S. C., Guerin, S. J., Babcock, D. R. et al. (2003) Sex Differences in Semantic Language Processing: A Functional MRI Study. Brain and Language 84: 264–272. Beaulieu, A. (2003) Brains, Maps and the New Territory of Psychology. Theory and Psychology 13(4): 561–8. Bechtel, W. and Mundale, J. (1999) Multiple Realizability Revisited: Linking Cognitive and Neural States. Philosophy of Science 66: 175–207. Beck, M. (1997/1998). Her maph rod ites w it h At t it ude Ta ke to t he St reets. Chrysalis: Journal of Transgressive Gender Identities 2(5): 45–50. Becker, J. B., Arnold, A. P., Berkley, K. J., Blaustein, J. D., Eckel, L. A., Hampson, E., et al. (2005) Strategies and Methods for Research on Sex Differences in Brain and Behavior. Endocrinology 146: 1650–1673. Beh, H. G. and Diamond, M. (2000) An Emerging Ethical and Medical Dilemma: Should Physicians Perform Sex Assignment Surgery on Infants with Ambiguous Genitalia? [web version]. University of Hawaii (http://www.hawaii.edu/PCSS/ online_artcls/intersex/intersex00_00.html), accessed 16 January 2009. Bell, E., Willson, M., Wilman, A., Dave, S. and Silverstone, P. (2006) Males and Females Differ in Brain Activation During Cognitive Tasks. NeuroImage 30: 529–538. Bennett, C. M., Baird, A. A., Miller, M. B. and Wolford, G. L. (2009) Neural Correlates of Interspecies Perspective Taking in The Post-Mortem Atlantic Salmon: An Argument for Multiple Comparisons Correction. Organization for Human Brain Mapping Abstracts. Berenbaum, S. A. (1999) Effects of Early Androgens on Sex-Typed Activities and Interests in Adolescents with Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia. Hormones and Behavior 35: 102–110. Berenbaum, S. A. (2001) Cognitive Function in Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia. Endocrinology Metabolism Clinics of North America 30: 173–192. Berglund, H., Lindström, P. et al. (2006) Brain Response to Putative Pheromones in Lesbian Women. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 103: 8269–74 Bibliography 249 Bester-Meredith, J. K. and Marler, C. A. (2001) Vasopressin and Aggression in Cross-Fostered California Mice (Peromyscus californicus) and White-Footed Mice (Peromyscus leucopus). Hormones and Behavior 40(1): 51–64. Biology and Gender Study Group (1988) The Importance of Feminist Critique for Contemporary Cell Biology. Hypatia 3(1): 61–76. Birke, L. (1986) Women, Feminism and Biology: The Feminist Challenge (London: Wheatsheaf). Birke, L. (1999) Feminism and the Biological Body (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press). Birmingham, K. (2000) NIH Funds Gender Biology Research. Nature America News (http://medicine.nature.com), accessed 20
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Critically Evaluate the Understanding of Gender As Discourse
    Vol. 1, No. 2 International Education Studies Critically Evaluate the Understanding of Gender as Discourse Changxue Xue College of Foreign languages, Yanshan University Qinhuangdao 066004, China Tel: 86-335-805-8710 Email: [email protected] Abstract In this paper, the author explores the different views on gender and the nature of gender as discourse. Furthermore, the author argues that discursive psychology’s views on gender are convincing and explain more than other perspectives of gender. Keywords: Gender, Essentialism, Constructionism Since the 1950s, an increasing use of the term gender has been seen in the academic literature and the public discourse for distinguishing gender identity from biological sex. Money and Hampson (1955) defined the term gender as what a person says or does to reveal that he or she has the status of being boy or girl, man or woman (masculinity or femininity of a person). Gender is a complex issue, constituents of which encompass styles of dressing, patterns of moving as well as ways of talking rather than just being limited to biological sex. Over the years, the perception of the issue ‘gender’ has been changing and developing from essentialism to social constructionism. Essentialism suggests that gender is a biological sex, by contrast, social constructionism suggests that gender is constructed within a social and cultural discourse. Due to its complex nature, gender intrigues numerous debates over the extent to which gender is a biological construct or a social construct. Social constructionists employ discourse analysis as a method for research on gender identity. Discursive psychology is one of most important approaches within discourse analysis in the field of social psychology.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuroscience and Sex/Gender
    Neuroethics (2012) 5:211–215 DOI 10.1007/s12152-012-9165-5 EDITORIAL NOTE Neuroscience and Sex/Gender Isabelle Dussauge & Anelis Kaiser Received: 4 September 2012 /Accepted: 13 September 2012 /Published online: 2 October 2012 # Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012 This special issue publishes interdisciplinary scholar- hosts very different epistemological approaches, a ship which aims to map and re-imagine the relations common knowledge of neuroscience and gender between neuroscience and gender studies. studies was a prerequisite for the group’stheoret- ical and methodological exchange. The participants lively debated crucial issues, from current research neuroGenderings: The Network on sex/gender difference in neuropsychology, through the implications of notions of sex/gender, The authors of the present special issue were all par- gender identity and sexuality used in neuroscien- ticipants in the workshop neuroGenderings: Critical tific experimentation, to the social workings of a Studies of the Sexed Brain (Uppsala, 2010). Then co- sexed/gendered brain. organizers, now guest editors, we work in gender More precisely, the neuroGenderings workshop studies, neuroscience, and science and technology achieved an impressive first mapping of the research studies. In 2010, we did not know for a fact that the on sex/gender in neurosciences and the methodological neuroGenderings initiative would grow and develop frames used in those sciences. We discussed, for in- into an international network and conference series. stance, the role assigned to “sexed” regions of the brain, Now we know. by analyzing the relevance of the notion of sexual di- In neuroGenderings, a transdisciplinary and inter- morphism, itself a system of significance that is always national group of researchers from the neurosciences, and solely framed by neuro-logical sexual dichotomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender/Sex Diversity Beliefs: Heterogeneity, Links to Prejudice, and Diversity-Affirming Interventions by Zachary C
    Gender/Sex Diversity Beliefs: Heterogeneity, Links to Prejudice, and Diversity-Affirming Interventions by Zachary C. Schudson A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Psychology and Women’s Studies) in the University of Michigan 2020 Doctoral Committee: Professor Sari van Anders, Co-Chair Professor Susan Gelman, Co-Chair Professor Anna Kirkland Associate Professor Sara McClelland Zach C. Schudson [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1300-5674 © Zach C. Schudson ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank the many people who made this dissertation possible. First and foremost, thank you to Dr. Sari van Anders, my dissertation advisor and co-chair and my mentor. I have never met someone more committed to social justice through psychological research or to their students. Your expansive, nuanced thinking about gender and sexuality, your incredible, detailed feedback on everything I wrote, your lightning-quick, thoughtful responses whenever I needed anything, and your persistence in improving communication even when it was difficult all make me feel astoundingly lucky. Despite the many time and energy-intensive challenges you have faced over the last several years, you have done everything you can to facilitate my success as a scholar, all the while showing deep care for my well-being as a person. Thank you also to Dr. Susan Gelman, my dissertation co-chair, for your incredible support these last feW years. Your intellectual generosity is truly a gift; I feel smarter and more capable every time we speak. Thank you to Drs. Sara McClelland and Anna Kirkland, members of my dissertation committee and my teaching mentors.
    [Show full text]
  • Race and Essentialism in Gloria Steinem
    Scholarly Commons @ UNLV Boyd Law Scholarly Works Faculty Scholarship 2009 Race and Essentialism in Gloria Steinem Frank Rudy Cooper University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/facpub Part of the Law and Gender Commons, Law and Philosophy Commons, and the Law and Race Commons Recommended Citation Cooper, Frank Rudy, "Race and Essentialism in Gloria Steinem" (2009). Scholarly Works. 1123. https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/facpub/1123 This Article is brought to you by the Scholarly Commons @ UNLV Boyd Law, an institutional repository administered by the Wiener-Rogers Law Library at the William S. Boyd School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Race and Essentialism in Gloria Steinem Frank Rudy Cooper* I. INTRODUCTION A. The Story of My Discovery ofAngela Harris The book that I have referred to the most since law school is Katherine Bartlett and Roseanne Kennedys' anthology FEMINIST LEGAL THEORY. 1 The reason it holds that unique place on my bookshelf is that it contains the first copy I read of Angela Harris's essay Race and Essentialism in Feminist Legal Theory.2 My edition now has at least three layers of annotations. As I reread it today, I recall my first reading. I encountered the essay in my law school feminist theory class. Up to the point where we read Harris's article, I was probably a dominance feminist, having found Catherine MacKinnon's theory that women are a group bound together by patriarchal domination to be simpatico with my undergraduate training.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating the Existence, Cognitive Attributes and Potential Pathological Consequences of the Extreme Female Brain
    INVESTIGATING THE EXISTENCE, COGNITIVE ATTRIBUTES AND POTENTIAL PATHOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE EXTREME FEMALE BRAIN Sarah Louise JONES Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Division of Psychology Faculty of Social Sciences University of Bradford 2 0 1 6 Abstract INVESTIGATING THE EXISTENCE, COGNITIVE ATTRIBUTES AND POTENTIAL PATHOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE EXTREME FEMALE BRAIN Sarah Louise Jones Key words: extreme female brain, empathising, systemising, sex differences, autism, schizophrenia, memory, cognition, gene imprinting, paranoid ideation The ‘extreme female brain’ (EFB) is derived from the empathising - systemising theory (E-S) which hypothesises that sex differences in cognition exist on a continuum, based on abilities in ‘empathising’ and ‘systemising’ (Baron-Cohen, 2003). The EFB profile; extreme empathising alongside deficient systemising, has received little attention in social cognitive neuroscience research, compared to the extreme male brain, which has advanced the knowledge of sex differences in the expression of autism. Currently, there is no solid evidence of a clinical pathology relating to the EFB nor a marker of cognition associated with a person’s ‘place’ on the E-S continuum. Here, an episodic memory paradigm with social and non-social conditions was given to participants along with measures of empathising and systemising. Scores on the social condition predicted where a person lies on the E-S continuum. The thesis then investigated the hypothesis that schizophrenia is expressed in the feminised profile (Badcock & Crepsi, 2006) i and the presumption that empathising and systemising demonstrate a trade­ off. Elements of paranoia were associated with an empathising bias. However, a bias in systemising ability was associated with schizotypy along with a significant overlap in the expression of autistic traits and schizotypy.
    [Show full text]
  • Delayed Critique: on Being Feminist, Time and Time Again
    Delayed Critique: On Being Feminist, Time and Time Again In “On Being in Time with Feminism,” Robyn Emma McKenna is a Ph.D. candidate in English and Wiegman (2004) supports my contention that history, Cultural Studies at McMaster University. She is the au- theory, and pedagogy are central to thinking through thor of “‘Freedom to Choose”: Neoliberalism, Femi- the problems internal to feminism when she asks: “… nism, and Childcare in Canada.” what learning will ever be final?” (165) Positioning fem- inism as neither “an antidote to [n]or an ethical stance Abstract toward otherness,” Wiegman argues that “feminism it- In this article, I argue for a systematic critique of trans- self is our most challenging other” (164). I want to take phobia in feminism, advocating for a reconciling of seriously this claim in order to consider how feminism trans and feminist politics in community, pedagogy, is a kind of political intimacy that binds a subject to the and criticism. I claim that this critique is both delayed desire for an “Other-wise” (Thobani 2007). The content and productive. Using the Michigan Womyn’s Music of this “otherwise” is as varied as the projects that femi- Festival as a cultural archive of gender essentialism, I nism is called on to justify. In this paper, I consider the consider how rereading and revising politics might be marginalization of trans-feminism across mainstream, what is “essential” to feminism. lesbian feminist, and academic feminisms. Part of my interest in this analysis is the influence of the temporal Résumé on the way in which certain kinds of feminism are given Dans cet article, je défends l’idée d’une critique systéma- primacy in the representation of feminism.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethical Trans-Feminism: Berlin's Transgender Individuals' Narratives As Contributions to Ethics of Vegetarian Eco- Feminism
    ETHICAL TRANS-FEMINISM: BERLIN’S TRANSGENDER INDIVIDUALS’ NARRATIVES AS CONTRIBUTIONS TO ETHICS OF VEGETARIAN ECO- FEMINISMS By Anja Koletnik Submitted to Central European University Department of Gender Studies In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Gender Studies Supervisor: Assistant Professor Eszter Timár CEU eTD Collection Second Reader: Professor Allaine Cerwonka Budapest, Hungary 2014 Abstract This thesis will explore multi-directional ethical and political implications of meat non- consumption and cisgender non-conformity. My argument will present how applying transgender as an analytical category to vegetarian eco-feminisms, can be contributive in expanding ethical and political solidarity within feminist projects, which apply gender identity politics to their conceptualizations and argumentations. I will outline the potential to transcend usages of gender identity politics upon a cisnormative canon of vegetarian eco-feminisms lead by Carol J. Adams’ The Sexual Politics of Meat (1990). Adams’s canon of vegetarian eco-feminisms appropriates diet as a central resource of their political projects, which contest speciesism and cis-sexism. Like Adams’ canon, my analysis will consider diet as always having political connotations and implications, both for individuals and their embodiments, within broader socio-political realms. Alongside diet, transgender as an analytical category will be employed within analysis, due to its potential of exposing how genders as social categories and constructs are re-formed. My analysis will be based on narrative interviews, which will explore the multi-directional ethical and political implications of meat non-consumption and cisgender non-conformity among members of Berlin’s transgender / cisgender non-conforming and meat non-consuming subcultures.
    [Show full text]
  • Delusions of Gender: How Our Minds, Society, and Neurosexism Create Difference
    P a g e | 145 Delusions of Gender: How Our Minds, Society, and Neurosexism Create Difference Author: Cordelia Fine, 2010, Published by W. W. Norton & Company Book review by Sorana-Alexandra CONSTANTINESCU Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania [email protected] This book is an alternative to the vast literature that aims to show us why women are from Venus and men are from Mars. As pretentions it might sound, I consider this book to be a must read for everybody, not only for academics or researchers. Gender myth perpetuation can be in some proportion stopped by educating people about the various biases that can interfere with the outcome of studies on sex and gender, and the factors that can favor or inhibit their popularization outside academia, which could, in the long run, lead to a discrediting or at least a critical reception of the wealth of pseudo- scientific claims of biologically inherent differences in the psychological and social construction of men and women. Emphasis in writings that explain that there are hard-wired differences between men and women is placed upon the fine-tuned emotional skills of women, as opposed to their emotionally helpless male counterpart, to sugarcoat the inherently misogynistic message at the core of these studies: it is due to the very nature of our species that women are underrepresented in the hard sciences and mathematics, in leadership etc., not due to historical systemic oppression. While the history of sexism is not explicitly denied, it is provided with an implicit excuse in an appeal to nature, and the active role of excluding women from the political, economic and academic spheres is thus minimized, and passed off as being in a large part due to women being, on average, naturally deficient in the necessary skills required to be involved in these activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Delusions of Gender: How Our Minds, Society, and Neurosexism Create Difference. by CORDELIA FINE. New York: W. W. Norton Comp
    INVITED REVIEW ESSAY Delusions of Gender: How Our Minds, Society, and Neurosexism Create Difference. By CORDELIA FINE. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2010. Brain Storm: The Flaws in the Science of Sex Differences.ByREBECCAM. JORDAN-YOUNG. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2010. Letitia Meynell “…we’re only trying to find the biological roots to gender inequality, so why be fussy, right?” (Fine, 108). That the search for dimorphic cognitive, affective, and behavioral sex differences con- tinues is no doubt a source of anxiety for those who have long embraced a feminist or progressive ideal of equality for all postnatal humans, regardless of their sex/gender (or other) identities. Indeed, the prevalence of media reports and best-selling accounts of scientific findings of fundamental neurological, psychological, and behavioral sex dif- ferences, in addition to the studies themselves, may give the most ardent feminists among us occasion to suspect that there might just be something to it: Putting aside the many queer, trans, and intersexed exceptions—for which some biological explana- tion must also, presumably, exist—a rational consideration of the mountain of evi- dence surely suggests that our natural history really has produced two fundamentally different types of people: men and women. Or so one might suppose. Feminists strug- gling with this haunting doubt would do well to take a look at Cordelia Fine’s Delu- sions of Gender: How Our Minds, Society, and Neurosexism Create Difference and Rebecca Jordan-Young’s Brain Storm: The Flaws in the Science of Sex Differences as effective remedies. These recent books join a now extensive literature by feminist aca- demics, both within and outside the biological and mind sciences, that meticulously and critically dissect empirical claims about human sex differences as they pertain to cognition, emotions, and behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Engagement with Neuroscience
    The Brain in Society: Public Engagement with Neuroscience Cliodhna O’Connor Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University College London September 2013 DECLARATION I, Cliodhna O’Connor, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. ____________________________________________ Cliodhna O’Connor 1 DEDICATION To Mom and Dad, with love and thanks 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My first thanks go to my supervisor, Hélène Joffe, who has guided and encouraged me tirelessly over the last three years. I will always be grateful for the time and energy that she has devoted to my work. The research would not have been possible without the financial support that I received from several sources: the EPSRC; the Faraday Institute for Science & Religion at St Edmund’s College, Cambridge; the Easter Week 1916 commemoration scholarship scheme; the UCL Graduate School Research Projects Fund; and the UCL Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology. I very much appreciate all of these contributions. The work presented in this thesis owes much to countless conversations I have had with colleagues, both within and outside UCL. The comments of the editors and anonymous reviewers of the journals to which I submitted articles over the course of my PhD were extremely helpful in refining my ideas, as were the audiences at the various conferences and workshops at which I presented my research. I would also like to thank Caroline Bradley for her help in the analysis stages. Finally, I wish to express my sincere gratitude to my family, friends and boyfriend for their constant support throughout the last three years.
    [Show full text]
  • SBC Publication List July 13Th 2019
    PUBLICATIONS BY SIMON BARON-COHEN (updated 13 July 2019) * Top 20 most important SECTION 1: PEER REVIEWED JOURNAL ARTICLES (in chronological order) 1985 1. *Baron-Cohen, S, Leslie, A.M., & Frith, U, (1985) Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind?” Cognition, 21, 37-46. 1986 2. Baron-Cohen, S, Leslie, A.M., & Frith, U, (1986) Mechanical, behavioural and Intentional understanding of picture stories in autistic children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 4, 113-125. 1987 3. Baron-Cohen, S, (1987) Autism and symbolic play. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5, 139-148. 4. Baron-Cohen, S, Wyke, M, & Binnie, C, (1987) Hearing words and seeing colours: an experimental investigation of a case of synaesthesia. Perception, 16, 761-767. 1988 5. Baron-Cohen, S, (1988) Social and pragmatic deficits in autism: cognitive or affective? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 18, 379-402. 6. Baron-Cohen, S, (1988) An assessment of violence in a young man with Asperger's Syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 29, 351-360. 7. Baron-Cohen, S, (1988) “Without a theory of mind one cannot participate in a conversation”. Cognition, 29, 83-84. 1989 8. Baron-Cohen, S, (1989) The autistic child's theory of mind: a case of specific developmental delay. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 30, 285-297. 9. Baron-Cohen, S, (1989) Perceptual role taking and protodeclarative pointing in autism. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 7, 113-127. 10. Baron-Cohen, S, (1989) Do autistic children have obsessions and compulsions? British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 193-200. 11.
    [Show full text]
  • What's Wrong with Essentialism?
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by LSE Research Online Anne Phillips What’s wrong with essentialism? Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Phillips, Anne (2010) What’s wrong with essentialism? Distinktion: Scandinavian journal of social theory, 11 (1). pp. 47-60. ISSN 1600-910X DOI: 10.1080/1600910X.2010.9672755 © 2010 University of Aarhus This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/30900/ Available in LSE Research Online: April 2012 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s final manuscript accepted version of the journal article, incorporating any revisions agreed during the peer review process. Some differences between this version and the published version may remain. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. 1 What’s wrong with essentialism? Anne Phillips This paper identifies and discusses four distinct meanings of essentialism. The first is the attribution of certain characteristics to everyone subsumed within a particular category: the ‘(all) women are caring and empathetic’, ‘(all) Africans have rhythm’, ’(all) Asians are community oriented’ syndrome.
    [Show full text]