DOCSLIB.ORG

Their Distribution and Abundance the Chat

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Their Distribution and Abundance the Chat Checklist for the NC Bird Records Committee List 490 species recorded This is a list of all species accepted by the North for North Carolina Carolina Bird Records Committee as of its annual report for 2019. Taxonomy follows the AOS This checklist provides a compendium of all Check-list of North American Birds through the of the bird species accepted by the NC Bird 62th Supplement. Records Committee to either the Definitive List or the Provisional List in North Carolina. All species in regular type are on the Definitive Species not on the Definitive List or the List. All species with the common name in italics Provisional List are not included; thus, are on the Provisional List. species considered of Unaccepted Origin (such as several waterfowl and parrot species) are not a part of this checklist. As of the end Province Status: M P C of June 2021, there are 476 species on the Relative abundance within a province is indicated Definitive List, and 14 species on the for Mountains, Piedmont, and Coastal Plain. Provisional List, for a total of 490 species on 1 = reported for less than 25% of that the Accepted List (Definitive List + province's counties Provisional List) for North Carolina. 2 = reported for at least 25% but less than 75% of that province's counties 3 = reported for at least 75% of that Additionally: province's counties Not Established List - Monk Parakeet, Whooping Crane Resources Compilers: Harry LeGrand, John Haire, and <http://www.carolinabirdclub.org/brc/ Tom Howard checklist_of_North_Carolina_birds.html> Official list of the birds of North Carolina <http://ncbirds.carolinabirdclub.org/accounts.php> Birds of North Carolina: their Distribution and Abundance The Chat. The quarterly bulletin of the Carolina Bird Club, Inc.<http://www.carolinabirdclub.org/chat/> M P C M P C M P C 490 BIRD species ANATIDAE: Ducks, Geese, & Swans [cont.] PHASIANIDAE: Grouse and Allies [3] __ White-cheeked Pintail ................................... - - 1 __ Wild Turkey ................................................... 3 3 3 ANATIDAE: Ducks, Geese, & Swans [46] Anas bahamensis Meleagris gallopavo __ Black-bellied Whistling-Duck ......................... 2 2 2 __ Northern Pintail ............................................. 2 2 2 __ Ruffed Grouse ............................................... 3 1 - Dendrocygna autumnalis Anas acuta Bonasa umbellus __ Fulvous Whistling-Duck ................................. - 1 1 __ Green-winged Teal ........................................ 2 2 3 __ Ring-necked Pheasant .................................. 1 1 1 Dendrocygna bicolor Anas crecca Phasianus colchicus __ Snow Goose .................................................. 2 3 3 __ Canvasback .................................................. 2 2 2 PODICIPEDIDAE: Grebes [6] Anser caerulescens Aythya valisineria __ Pied-billed Grebe .......................................... 3 3 3 __ Ross's Goose ................................................ 2 2 2 __ Redhead ........................................................ 2 2 2 Podilymbus podiceps Anser rossii Aythya americana __ Horned Grebe ............................................... 2 3 2 __ Greater White-fronted Goose ........................ 2 2 2 __ Ring-necked Duck ......................................... 3 3 3 Podiceps auritus Anser albifrons Aythya collaris __ Red-necked Grebe ........................................ 2 2 2 __ Brant .............................................................. - 1 1 __ Tufted Duck ................................................... - 1 - Podiceps grisegena Branta bernicla Aythya fuligula __ Eared Grebe .................................................. 1 2 2 __ Barnacle Goose ............................................ - - 1 __ Greater Scaup ............................................... 2 2 2 Podiceps nigricollis Branta leucopsis Aythya marila __ Western Grebe .............................................. 1 1 1 __ Cackling Goose ............................................. 1 2 1 __ Lesser Scaup ................................................ 3 3 3 Aechmophorus occidentalis Branta hutchinsii Aythya affinis __ Clark's Grebe ................................................ - - 1 __ Canada Goose .............................................. 3 3 3 __ King Eider ...................................................... - - 1 Aechmophorus clarkii Branta canadensis Somateria spectabilis COLUMBIDAE: Doves [7] __ Mute Swan .................................................... - 1 1 __ Common Eider .............................................. - - 1 __ Rock Pigeon .................................................. 3 3 3 Cygnus olor Somateria mollissima Columba livia __ Trumpeter Swan ............................................ 1 1 1 __ Harlequin Duck .............................................. - 1 1 __ Band-tailed Pigeon ........................................ 1 1 1 Cygnus buccinator Histrionicus histrionicus Patagioenas fasciata __ Tundra Swan ................................................. 2 2 3 __ Surf Scoter .................................................... 2 2 2 __ Eurasian Collared-Dove ................................ 2 2 2 Cygnus columbianus Melanitta perspicillata Streptopelia decaocto __ Wood Duck .................................................... 3 3 3 __ White-winged Scoter ..................................... 1 2 2 __ Passenger Pigeon ......................................... 1 1 - Aix sponsa Melanitta deglandi Ectopistes migratorius __ Garganey ...................................................... - - 1 __ Black Scoter .................................................. 1 2 2 __ Common Ground Dove ................................. 1 1 2 Spatula querquedula Melanitta americana Columbina passerina __ Blue-winged Teal .......................................... 3 3 2 __ Long-tailed Duck ........................................... 1 2 2 __ White-winged Dove ....................................... - 1 2 Spatula discors Clangula hyemalis Zenaida asiatica __ Cinnamon Teal .............................................. - - 1 __ Bufflehead ..................................................... 3 3 3 __ Mourning Dove .............................................. 3 3 3 Spatula cyanoptera Bucephala albeola Zenaida macroura __ Northern Shoveler ......................................... 2 2 2 __ Common Goldeneye ..................................... 2 2 2 CUCULIDAE: Cuckoos & Anis [4] Spatula clypeata Bucephala clangula __ Smooth-billed Ani .......................................... - - 1 __ Gadwall ......................................................... 2 3 2 __ Hooded Merganser ....................................... 3 3 3 Crotophaga ani Mareca strepera Lophodytes cucullatus __ Groove-billed Ani ........................................... - - 1 __ Eurasian Wigeon ........................................... 1 1 2 __ Common Merganser ..................................... 2 2 2 Crotophaga sulcirostris Mareca penelope Mergus merganser __ Yellow-billed Cuckoo ..................................... 3 3 3 __ American Wigeon .......................................... 3 3 3 __ Red-breasted Merganser .............................. 2 3 2 Coccyzus americanus Mareca americana Mergus serrator __ Black-billed Cuckoo ....................................... 3 2 2 __ Mallard .......................................................... 3 3 3 __ Masked Duck ................................................ - - 1 Coccyzus erythropthalmus Anas platyrhynchos Nomonyx dominicus CAPRIMULGIDAE: Goatsuckers [5] __ American Black Duck .................................... 2 3 2 __ Ruddy Duck ................................................... 2 3 3 __ Lesser Nighthawk .......................................... - - 1 Anas rubripes Oxyura jamaicensis Chordeiles acutipennis __ Mottled Duck ................................................. - 1 1 ODONTOPHORIDAE: New World Quails [1] __ Common Nighthawk ...................................... 2 2 2 Anas fulvigula __ Northern Bobwhite ........................................ 3 3 3 Chordeiles minor Colinus virginianus Page 1 M P C M P C M P C CAPRIMULGIDAE: Goatsuckers [cont.] RALLIDAE: Rails, Gallinules, & Coots [cont.] SCOLOPACIDAE: Sandpipers [cont.] __ Antillean Nighthawk ....................................... - - 1 __ American Coot .............................................. 2 3 3 __ Whimbrel ....................................................... 1 1 2 Chordeiles gundlachii Fulica americana Numenius phaeopus __ Chuck-will's-widow ........................................ 2 2 2 __ Purple Gallinule ............................................. 1 1 2 __ Long-billed Curlew ........................................ 1 - 1 Antrostomus carolinensis Porphyrio martinicus Numenius americanus __ Eastern Whip-poor-will .................................. 2 2 2 __ Yellow Rail .................................................... 1 1 2 __ Bar-tailed Godwit ........................................... - - 1 Antrostomus vociferus Coturnicops noveboracensis Limosa lapponica APODIDAE: Swifts [3] __ Black Rail ...................................................... 1 1 2 __ Black-tailed Godwit ....................................... - - 1 __ Cypseloides Swift sp. .................................... 1 - - Laterallus jamaicensis Limosa limosa Cypseloides sp. ARAMIDAE: Limpkin [1] __ Hudsonian Godwit ......................................... 1 1 2 __ Chimney Swift ............................................... 3 3 3 __ Limpkin .........................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 111 Historical Notes on Whooping Cranes at White
    HISTORICAL NOTES ON WHOOPING CRANES AT WHITE LAKE, LOUISIANA: THE JOHN J. LYNCH INTERVIEWS, 1947-1948 GAY M. GOMEZ, Department of Social Sciences, McNeese State University, Box 92335, Lake Charles, LA 70609, USA RODERICK C. DREWIEN, Hornocker Wildlife Institute, University of Idaho, 3346 E 200 N, Rigby, ID 83442, USA MARY LYNCH COURVILLE, John J. Lynch American Natural Heritage Park, 1393 Henderson Highway, Breaux Bridge, LA 70517, USA Abstract: In May 1939 biologist John J. Lynch of the U.S. Bureau of Biological Survey conducted an aerial survey that documented the existence of a non-migratory population of whooping cranes (Grus americana) near White Lake in southwest Louisiana. Lynch found 13 cranes, including 2 pre-fledged young, confirming breeding. Lynch’s survey occurred, in part, because fur trappers and alligator hunters working in the White Lake marshes had informed the biologist of the cranes’ presence and habits. Lynch con- tinued his contacts with these knowledgeable marsh users, and in 1947 and 1948 interviewed at least 7 individuals. In 2001, M. L. Courville, along with her sister Nora Z. Lynch, discovered the interview notes among their father’s papers. The notes contain information on the Louisiana non-migratory population’s range, abundance, habitat use, feeding behavior, nesting, and young, including survival of twins; they also include a small amount of information on sandhill cranes (Grus canadensis) and migratory whooping cranes. Both Lynch and Robert P. Allen relied heavily on this “traditional ecological knowledge” in their accounts of non-migratory whooping cranes in southwest Louisiana. Because of their biological and historical significance, the interview notes are reproduced in this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Masked Bobwhite (Colinus Virginianus Ridgwayi) 5-Year Review
    Masked Bobwhite (Colinus virginianus ridgwayi) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation Photograph by Paul Zimmerman U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Buenos Aires National Wildlife Refuge Sasabe, AZ March 2014 5-YEAR REVIEW Masked Bobwhite (Colinus virginianus ridgwayi) 1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1 Reviewers Lead Regional Office Southwest Region, Region 2, Albuquerque, NM Susan Jacobsen, Chief, Division of Classification and Restoration, 505-248-6641 Wendy Brown, Chief, Branch of Recovery and Restoration, 505-248-6664 Jennifer Smith-Castro, Recovery Biologist, 505-248-6663 Lead Field Office: Buenos Aires National Wildlife Refuge (BANWR) Sally Gall, Refuge Manager, 520-823-4251 x 102 Juliette Fernandez, Assistant Refuge Manager, 520-823-4251 x 103 Dan Cohan, Wildlife Biologist, 520-823-4351 x 105 Mary Hunnicutt, Wildlife Biologist, 520-823-4251 Cooperating Field Office(s): Arizona Ecological Services Tucson Field Office Jean Calhoun, Assistant Field Supervisor, 520-670-6150 x 223 Mima Falk, Senior Listing Biologist, 520-670-6150 x 225 Scott Richardson, Supervisory Fish and Wildlife Biologist, 520-670-6150 x 242 Mark Crites, Fish and Wildlife Biologist, 520-670-6150 x 229 Arizona Ecological Services Field Office Steve Spangle, Field Supervisor, 602-242-0210 x 244 1.2 Purpose of 5-Year Reviews: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service or USFWS) is required by section 4(c)(2) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) to conduct a status review of each listed species once every 5 years. The purpose of a 5-year review is to evaluate whether or not the species’ status has changed since it was listed (or since the most recent 5-year review).
    [Show full text]
  • Iceland Gull Larus Glaucoides
    Iceland Gull Larus glaucoides Folk Name: (none) Status: Migrant Abundance: Accidental Habitat: Open water of lakes or rivers The Iceland Gull breeds in the Arctic and most spend the winter along the northeastern coast of the United States and Canada. They are rare, but somewhat regular, along the coast of the Carolinas between October and April. They are casual inland. An immature Iceland Gull was seen and well photographed on Lake Norman on March 9, 2014, by several observers in two boats, one captained by David and Marcia Wright and the other captained by Chris Talkington. This sighting represents the first record of this species for both Mecklenburg County and Iredell County, and is also the first and only report of an Iceland Gull in the Central Carolina region. This bird wasn’t an easy find. The birders located the gull after carefully “sifting” through hundreds of other gulls roosting on the lake. Kevin Metcalf noted these field marks: Seemed to be second winter plumage. …Larger than Ring-billed Gulls and smaller than Herring Gull. Washed out whitish gull. Pale gray on back. Primaries whitish with slight brown-gray tint, tail in flight slightly more brown-gray than rump. Bill bi-colored dark at tip, pale base. Eye appeared dark Iceland Gull on Lake Norman. (Jim Guyton) at the distance viewed. From Birds of the Central Carolinas by Donald W. Seriff, illustrations by Leigh Anne Carter © 2018 Mecklenburg County www.parkandrec.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Landbird Habitat Conservation Strategy – 2020 Revision
    Upper Mississippi / Great Lakes Joint Venture Landbird Habitat Conservation Strategy – 2020 Revision Upper Mississippi / Great Lakes Joint Venture Landbird Habitat Conservation Strategy – 2020 Revision Joint Venture Landbird Committee Members: Kelly VanBeek, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Migratory Birds), Co-chair Chris Tonra, The Ohio State University, Co-chair Mohammed Al-Saffar, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Joint Venture) Dave Ewert, American Bird Conservancy Erin Gnass Giese, University of Wisconsin – Green Bay Allisyn-Marie Gillet, Indiana Dept. of Natural Resources Shawn Graff, American Bird Conservancy Jim Herkert, Illinois Audubon Sarah Kendrick, Missouri Dept. of Conservation Mark Nelson, U.S.D.A. Forest Service Katie O’Brien, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Migratory Birds) Greg Soulliere, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Joint Venture) Wayne Thogmartin, U.S. Geological Survey Mike Ward, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Tom Will, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Migratory Birds) Recommended citation: Soulliere, G. J., M. A. Al-Saffar, K. R. VanBeek, C. M. Tonra, M. D. Nelson, D. N. Ewert, T. Will, W. E. Thogmartin, K. E. O’Brien, S. W. Kendrick, A. M. Gillet, J. R. Herkert, E. E. Gnass Giese, M. P. Ward, and S. Graff. 2020. Upper Mississippi / Great Lakes Joint Venture Landbird Habitat Conservation Strategy – 2020 Revision. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Bloomington, Minnesota, USA. Cover photo: Whip-poor-will, by Ian Sousa-Cole. TABLE OF CONTENTS STRATEGY SUMMARY ..................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • (369) the Glaucous Gull in Winter
    (369) THE GLAUCOUS GULL IN WINTER BY G. T. KAY. (Plates 40-53). SINCE the winter of 1941-42 the Glaucous Gull (Larus hyperboreus) has become a comparatively numerous winter-visitor to the Shet­ land Islands. At a refuse dump on the outskirts of Lerwick where it had been rare to see more than half a dozen of these birds together, it is now a common occurrence to see thirty or forty and occasion­ ally as many as a hundred. During the winter of 1945-46, the writer, with others interested in the project, arranged for an attempt to be made to photograph particularly Glaucous Gulls and possibly Iceland Gulls (Larus glaucoides) in the vicinity of the dump. The proposal was to use still and cine cameras from hides. It was hoped that a series of photographs might be secured which would do something towards clearing up the difficulties of dis­ tinguishing between these two species in the field, which have proved to be in some respects greater than used to be supposed. We were fortunate as regards the Glaucous Gull. A series of photographs and 300ft. of cine film were taken of this arctic visitor at most stages of plumage from the bird in its first winter plumage to that of the fully adult. Further photographs were added during the winter of 1946-47. Unfortunately the only Iceland Gull seen during these two winters was a dead specimen ; an immature bird in its first winter which had been captured on a fishing boat off the east side of Shetland on January 16th, 1947.
    [Show full text]
  • Wisconsin Bird Nesting Dates for Species Tracked by the Natural
    Introduction to the “Wisconsin Bird Nesting Dates (Avoidance Period) for Species Tracked by the Natural Heritage Inventory” The table “Wisconsin Bird Nesting Dates (Avoidance Period) for Species Tracked by the Natural Heritage Inventory” below, provides guidance to DNR staff and external certified reviewers who use the NHI Portal for Endangered Resources reviews. This guidance was developed by a team of Natural Heritage Conservation program staff from DNR using the best available information for species on the Natural Heritage Working List. The Nesting Dates (Avoidance Period) table was developed to help customers comply with State and Federal laws and thus avoid “intentional taking, killing, or possession” of bird nests, eggs, and body parts. For each species, the avoidance dates are the period each year when birds are most vulnerable because there are eggs or flightless chicks in nests. Species tracked by the Natural Heritage Inventory include endangered, threatened and special concern species. Avoidance of these nesting dates is required for endangered and threatened species and recommended (voluntary) for special concern species. For more information on rare bird species, see the Rare Bird webpage. Revised 10/18/2019 https://dnr.wi.gov/topic/endangeredresources/documents/wisbirdnestingcalendar.pdf Wisconsin Bird Avoidance Dates for Species Tracked by the Natural Heritage Inventory Common Name Scientific Name Status Avoidance Dates Acadian Flycatcher Empidonax virescens THR 25 May - 20 Aug American Bittern Botaurus lentiginosus SC/M
    [Show full text]
  • Hairy Woodpecker Dryobates Villosus Kingdom: Animalia FEATURES Phylum: Chordata the Hairy Woodpecker Averages Nine and One-Half Class: Aves Inches in Length
    hairy woodpecker Dryobates villosus Kingdom: Animalia FEATURES Phylum: Chordata The hairy woodpecker averages nine and one-half Class: Aves inches in length. The feathers on its back, outer tail Order: Piciformes feathers, belly, stripes on its head and spots on its wings are white. The head, wing and tail feathers Family: Picidae are black. The male has a small, red patch on the ILLINOIS STATUS back of the head. Unlike the similar downy woodpecker, the hairy woodpecker has a large bill. common, native BEHAVIORS The hairy woodpecker is a common, permanent resident statewide. Nesting takes place from March through June. The nest cavity is dug five to 30 feet above the ground in a dead or live tree. Both sexes excavate the hole over a one- to three-week period. The female deposits three to six white eggs on a nest of wood chips. The male and female take turns incubating the eggs during the day, with only the male incubating at night for the duration of the 11- to 12-day incubation period. One brood is raised per year. The hairy woodpecker lives in woodlands, wooded areas in towns, swamps, orchards and city parks. Its call is a loud “peek.” This woodpecker eats insects, seeds and berries. adult at suet food ILLINOIS RANGE © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. 2021. Biodiversity of Illinois. Unless otherwise noted, photos and images © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. 2021. Biodiversity of Illinois. Unless otherwise noted, photos and images © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Establishments and Extinctions of Northern Gannet Morus Bassanus Colonies in North Norway, 1995-2008
    Recent establishments and extinctions of Northern Gannet Morus bassanus colonies in North Norway, 1995-2008 Robert T. Barrett Barrett, R.T. 2008. Recent establishments and extinctions of Northern Gannet Morus bassanus colonies in North Norway, 1995-2008. – Ornis Norvegica 31: 172-182. Since the last published review of the development of the Northern Gannet Morus bassanus population in Norway (Barrett & Folkestad 1996), there has been a general increase in numbers breeding in North Norway from ca. 2200 occupied nests in 1995 to ca. 2700 in 2008. In Lofoten and Vesterålen, however, numbers have decreased from 1500 occupied nests in 1989 to 500 in 2008, and what were the two largest colonies on Skarvklakken and Hovsflesa have been abandoned. Small colonies have, in the meantime, been established in the region, but these are all characteristically unstable. A new colony established in Troms in 2001 increased to 400 occupied sites in 2007, but the population dropped to 326 in 2008. Harassment by White-tailed eagles Haliaeetus albicilla is mooted as the main cause of the decline in Lofoten and Vesterålen. Robert T. Barrett, Dept. of Natural Science, Tromsø University Museum, N-9037 Tromsø, Norway. INTRODUCTION the well-established colonies, Skarvklakken and Hovsflesa in the north of the country, there were Apart from perhaps the Great Skua Catharacta even signs of declines between 1991 and 1995. skua, there is no species whose establishment as a This paper documents the subsequent fate of the breeding bird in Norway and subsequent popula- North Norwegian colonies, including the extinc- tion development has been so well documented tion of some and the establishment of others.
    [Show full text]
  • The Generic Distinction of Pied Woodpeckers
    THE GENERIC DISTINCTION OF PIED WOODPECKERS M. RALPH BROWNING, 170 JacksonCreek Drive, Jacksonville,Oregon 97530 ABSTRACT: The ten speciesof New World four-toedwoodpeckers (scalaris, nuttallii, pubescens, villosus, stricklandi, arizonae, borealis, albolarvatus, lignarius,and m ixtusand the two borealthree-toed species (arcticus and tridactylus), currentlycombined in the genusPicoides, differ, in additionto the numberof toes,in modificationsof the skull,ribs, the belly of the pubo-ischio-femoralismuscle, head plumage,and behavior. I recommendthat the genericname Dryobates be reinstituted for the New World four-toedwoodpeckers. There are three generalmorphological groups of pied woodpeckers,a groupof nine four-toedspecies of the New World, a groupof 22 four-toed speciesof the Old World, and a groupof two three-toedspecies straddling bothregions. ! referto thesegroups of piedwoodpeckers beyond as the New World,Old World,and three-toedgroups. The three-toedspecies have long beenin the genusPicoides Lac•p•de, 1799, but the four-toedgroups have been combinedat the genericlevel in differentways. All four-toedpied woodpeckerswere long includedin the genusDryobates Boie, 1826, later changed to Dendrocopos Koch, 1816 an earlier name (Voous 1947, A.O.U. 1947, Peters 1948). Despite the differencein number of toes, Dendrocoposwas combined with Picoidesbecause of generalsimilarities in anatomy (Delacour 1951, Short 1971a), plumage and behavior (Short 1974a), and vocalizations(Winkler and Short 1978). The A.O.U (1976) followedthis mergerof the genera.On the basisof skeletalcharacters Rea (1983) was skepticalof the merger,but he did not providedetails. On the otherhand, Ouellet(1977), concludingthat the two generadiffer in external morphologyand some behaviors and vocalizations, separated the Old World four-toedwoodpeckers in Dendrocoposand three-toedand New World four-toedwoodpeckers in Picoides.The A.O.U.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeography of Finches and Sparrows
    In: Animal Genetics ISBN: 978-1-60741-844-3 Editor: Leopold J. Rechi © 2009 Nova Science Publishers, Inc. Chapter 1 PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF FINCHES AND SPARROWS Antonio Arnaiz-Villena*, Pablo Gomez-Prieto and Valentin Ruiz-del-Valle Department of Immunology, University Complutense, The Madrid Regional Blood Center, Madrid, Spain. ABSTRACT Fringillidae finches form a subfamily of songbirds (Passeriformes), which are presently distributed around the world. This subfamily includes canaries, goldfinches, greenfinches, rosefinches, and grosbeaks, among others. Molecular phylogenies obtained with mitochondrial DNA sequences show that these groups of finches are put together, but with some polytomies that have apparently evolved or radiated in parallel. The time of appearance on Earth of all studied groups is suggested to start after Middle Miocene Epoch, around 10 million years ago. Greenfinches (genus Carduelis) may have originated at Eurasian desert margins coming from Rhodopechys obsoleta (dessert finch) or an extinct pale plumage ancestor; it later acquired green plumage suitable for the greenfinch ecological niche, i.e.: woods. Multicolored Eurasian goldfinch (Carduelis carduelis) has a genetic extant ancestor, the green-feathered Carduelis citrinella (citril finch); this was thought to be a canary on phonotypical bases, but it is now included within goldfinches by our molecular genetics phylograms. Speciation events between citril finch and Eurasian goldfinch are related with the Mediterranean Messinian salinity crisis (5 million years ago). Linurgus olivaceus (oriole finch) is presently thriving in Equatorial Africa and was included in a separate genus (Linurgus) by itself on phenotypical bases. Our phylograms demonstrate that it is and old canary. Proposed genus Acanthis does not exist. Twite and linnet form a separate radiation from redpolls.
    [Show full text]
  • How Seabirds Plunge-Dive Without Injuries
    How seabirds plunge-dive without injuries Brian Changa,1, Matthew Crosona,1, Lorian Strakerb,c,1, Sean Garta, Carla Doveb, John Gerwind, and Sunghwan Junga,2 aDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061; bNational Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560; cSetor de Ornitologia, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, São Cristóvão, Rio de Janeiro RJ 20940-040, Brazil; and dNorth Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, Raleigh, NC 27601 Edited by David A. Weitz, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, and approved August 30, 2016 (received for review May 27, 2016) In nature, several seabirds (e.g., gannets and boobies) dive into wa- From a mechanics standpoint, an axial force acting on a slender ter at up to 24 m/s as a hunting mechanism; furthermore, gannets body may lead to mechanical failure on the body, otherwise known and boobies have a slender neck, which is potentially the weakest as buckling. Therefore, under compressive loads, the neck is po- part of the body under compression during high-speed impact. In tentially the weakest part of the northern gannet due to its long this work, we investigate the stability of the bird’s neck during and slender geometry. Still, northern gannets impact the water at plunge-diving by understanding the interaction between the fluid up to 24 m/s without injuries (18) (see SI Appendix, Table S1 for forces acting on the head and the flexibility of the neck. First, we estimated speeds). The only reported injuries from plunge-diving use a salvaged bird to identify plunge-diving phases.
    [Show full text]
  • 1- Checklist of New Mexico
    CHECKLIST OF NEW MEXICO BIRD SPECIES Sartor O. Williams III Secretary, New Mexico Bird Records Committee [email protected] 1 January 2021 This checklist contains all the species of birds that have been verified by specimen, photograph, or audio recording in New Mexico and have been accepted as valid by the New Mexico Bird Records Committee. Nomenclature, taxonomy, sequence, and spelling follow the seventh edition of the American Ornithological Society’s [formerly American Ornithologists’ Union, or AOU] Check-list of North American Birds (1998) as amended through the 61st Supplement (Auk 2020, Vol. 137; 24 pp.). Included are all families and species of birds known to occur (or have occurred) in New Mexico in the historical period (1540 to present). Through 1 January 2021, 549 species representing 68 families have been verified in New Mexico, including five established non-native species (identified as “Introduced”) and three species now extirpated (identified as “Extirpated”). Family ANATIDAE: Ducks, Geese, Swans Black-bellied Whistling-Duck, Dendrocygna autumnalis Fulvous Whistling-Duck, Dendrocygna bicolor Snow Goose, Anser caerulescens Ross’s Goose, Anser rossii Greater White-fronted Goose, Anser albifrons Brant, Branta bernicla Cackling Goose, Branta hutchinsii Canada Goose, Branta canadensis Trumpeter Swan, Cygnus buccinator Tundra Swan, Cygnus columbianus Wood Duck, Aix sponsa Garganey, Spatula querquedula Blue-winged Teal, Spatula discors Cinnamon Teal, Spatula cyanoptera Northern Shoveler, Spatula clypeata Gadwall, Mareca
    [Show full text]