Selected Biographies

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Selected Biographies Selected Biographies Abramovitch, A.E. (pseud. Albrecht) (1888–?) – Bolshevik, from 1911 in Switzerland, contact with Lenin, 1917 return to Russia, 1919 Comintern tasks in Berlin and Munich, 1920–21 in France (pseud. Salewski), 1921 headed Comintern news service, 1925–30 Comintern secretariat in Moscow. Alpári, Gyula (Julius) (1882–1944) – 1891 Hungarian Socialist Party, 1902 editor of its central organ Nepszava, 1910 expelled, 1919 Hungarian Communist Party, head of press commission and deputy people’s commissar for foreign affairs in the Hungarian Soviet Republic, from September 1919 often illegally in Germany, Switzerland and France, del- egate to the Third, Fourth, Fifth and Seventh Congresses of the Comintern, 1921–39 editor-in-chief of Inprekorr and its successor Rundschau, 1940 arrested by Gestapo in Paris, solitary confinement in Sachsenhausen, murdered. Balabanova, Angelica (1877–1965) – left Russia 1897, Italian Socialist Party, 1912–14 editor of Avanti, 1917 return to Russia (in Lenin’s ‘sealed train’), 1919 delegate to Comin- tern founding congress, first secretary of ECCI, left Soviet Russia 1922, 1923 Vienna, 1925 Paris, 1936–46 USA, 1947 return to Italy. Barth, Emil (1879–1941) – plumber, from 1914 SPD and union official, 1915 soldier, from 1916 head of plumbers’ section in Berlin’s engineering union, 1917 USPD, 1918 chair of Berlin revolutionary shop stewards, November 1918 on executive of workers’ and sol- diers’ councils, November/December 1918 member of people’s executive council, the provisional government led by Ebert, 1921 SPD, 1921–24 secretary then president of the Berlin central factory council, 1933 imprisoned. Bebel, August (1840–1913) – master carpenter in Leipzig, 1869 co-founder SDAP (prede- cessor of SPD), 1872 two years’ imprisonment, until 1913 president of SPD. Bernstein, Eduard (1850–1932) – bank employee, 1871 SDP, since 1881 editor of Der Sozi- aldemokrat, 1887–1901 in London, 1902–06, 1912–18 and 1920–28 Reichstag deputy, 1917 USPD, 1919 return to SPD. Borchardt, Julian (1868–1932) – 1900–06 editor of Social-Democratic papers, 1907–13 itinerant speaker, 1911–13 member of Prussian Landtag, 1913–16 and 1918–21 editor of left radical Lichtstrahlen, 1915 attended Zimmerwald conference, 1916 brief period in ‘protective custody’, 1917 banning of Lichtstrahlen, member of IKD, expelled in Decem- ber 1918. From then on mainly literary activity, close to KPD. Paul Frölich - 9789004410152 Downloaded from Brill.com09/30/2021 07:45:07AM via free access 252 selected biographies Brandler, Heinrich (1881–1967) – building worker, 1901 SPD, from 1904 secretary of Bre- men builders’ federation, editor of Bremer Bürger-Zeitung, 1915 expelled from SPD, trade-union secretary in Chemnitz, 1916 co-founder of Spartacus Group, 1919 co- founder of KPD and member of central committee, 1921 party president, April 1921 (after the ‘March action’) imprisoned, escaped to Moscow, 1921–22 KPD representat- ive on ECCI, 1923 KPD central committee, 1924–28 in Moscow, member of CPSU and collaborator of the Supreme Soviet of the National Economy, 1928 return to Germany, co-founder of KPD(O), 1933 emigration to France, 1941–46 Havana, 1947–48 London, 1948–56 leading member of Arbeiterpolitik group. Bronski, Mieczysław (pseud. Braun, Posner, Spartakus) (1882–1941) – 1902 Social-Demo- cratic Party of the Kingdom of Poland, 1917 joined the Bolsheviks in Petrograd, 1918–19 deputy people’s commissar for trade and industry, October 1919 to 1924 Comintern responsibility for Germany and member of Comintern’s West European bureau, later in Soviet people’s commissariat for finance, victim of the purges. Däumig, Ernst (1866–1922) – 1898 SPD, writer for many newspapers in Gera, Halle, Erfurt and Berlin, 1912–18 president of SPD educational commission for Greater Ber- lin, 1916–18 editor of Mitteilungs-Blatt (from April 1917 a USPD organ), 1917 founding member of the USPD, November 1918–19 member of executive of Berlin workers’ and soldiers’ councils, 1920–21 editor of Der Arbeiter-Rat, 1920 at Halle congress president of USPD (Left) together with Adolph Hoffmann, then KPD president with Paul Levi, 1921 resigned party functions, co-founder Communist Working Group, 1922 return to USPD, 1920–22 Reichstag deputy. David, Eduard (1863–1930) – 1893 SPD, from 1896 writer for Sozialistische Monatshefte, 1903–18 and 1927–30 Reichstag deputy, 1919 president of national assembly in Weimar, several times minister. Dittmann, Wilhelm (1874–1954) – carpenter, 1894 woodworkers’ union and SPD, editor of Social-Democratic papers, 1904–09 party secretary in Frankfurt, 1912–18 Reichstag deputy, 1917 USPD, 1918 imprisoned, then member of the Council of the People’s Depu- ties, from 1920 Reichstag deputy, delegate to Second Congress of Comintern, 1922 return to SPD, 1922–33 secretary of party executive and president of SPD Reichstag group, 1933 emigration to Switzerland. Duncker, Hermann (1874–1960) – 1893 SPD, 1896–1900 studied philosophy, econom- ics and history at Leipzig, from 1906 itinerant speaker for the party, 1912–14 teacher at central party school, co-founder of Internationale Group, which became the Spartacus League, member of its leadership, 1915 conscripted, 1919 delegate to founding congress Paul Frölich - 9789004410152 Downloaded from Brill.com09/30/2021 07:45:07AM via free access selected biographies 253 of the KPD and elected to its central committee, 1923 teacher at national party school, from 1926 teacher at Marxist Workers’ School, 1933 imprisoned, 1936 emigrated, 1941–47 USA, 1947 returned to Germany, member of SED. Duncker, Käte, née Döll (1871–1953) – teacher, 1890 SPD, collaborator of Clara Zetkin, 1917 USPD, in leadership of Spartacus Group during the war, 1919 delegate to founding congress of the KPD and elected to its central committee, imprisoned by the Nazis, 1939 emigrated to USA, 1947 return to Germany. Eberlein, Hugo (1887–1944) – draughtsman, 1906 SPD, co-founder of Spartacus Group, 1918 leadership of Spartacus League, 1919 delegate to KPD founding congress, elected to central committee, imprisoned for a time, KPD representative at founding congress of Comintern, 1921–29 member of KPD central committee, 1921–33 member of Prussian Landtag, 1928 member of Comintern control commission, 1933 emigrated to Switzer- land, then Soviet Union, 1935 sector head with ECCI, 1937 imprisoned, 1941 sentenced to death. Fischer, Ruth (Elfriede Friedländer, née Eisler) (1895–1961) – 1918 co-founder of Aus- trian Communist Party, 1921 head of Berlin KPD, 1923 member of central committee, from 1924 Reichstag deputy and candidate member of ECCI, 1926 expulsion from KPD, 1928 co-founder of Lenin League, 1933 emigrated to Paris, 1940 via Lisbon to USA, after the war again in Paris. Friesland, Ernst (Friesland-Reuter) (1889–1953) – historian and economist, 1912 SPD, 1915–16 soldier, POW in Russia, 1918 head of people’s commissariat for Volga Germans, end 1918 return to Berlin (with Karl Radek and Werner Rakow), delegate to founding congress of KPD, then imprisoned, 1920 member of organisational bureau, then can- didate member of central committee, from December 1920 member of executive, 1922 general secretary then expelled, member of Communist Working Group, then USPD, 1922 return to SPD, editor of Vorwärts, 1926 city councillor for transport in Berlin (con- struction of subway system), 1931 mayor of Magdeburg, 1932–33 Reichstag member, 1933–34 concentration camp, 1935 emigrated to England, then Turkey, from 1947 mayor of West Berlin. Haase, Hugo (1863–1919) – 1888 SPD, 1912–18 Reichstag deputy, until 1915 president of SPD group, 1911–16 one of two party presidents, 1917–19 USPD president, 1918 together with Friedrich Ebert president of Council of the People’s Deputies, member of national assembly, murdered. Paul Frölich - 9789004410152 Downloaded from Brill.com09/30/2021 07:45:07AM via free access 254 selected biographies Haenisch, Konrad (1876–1925) – 1893 expelled from high school for socialist propa- ganda, 1894 assistant on Leipziger Volkszeitung, 1895–1911 editor of Social-Democratic papers, 1911 head of the leaflet propaganda for the SPD, 1913–25 member of Prussian parliament, 1915–19 editor of Die Glocke, 1919–21 Prussian minister for education, 1923– 25 head of district government in the Prussian part of Hesse. Henke, Alfred (1868–1946) – cigar maker, 1888–91 military service, official in Ger- man Tobacco Workers’ Association, SPD member, 1900–17 political editor and 1906 to January 1917 editor-in-chief Bremer Bürger-Zeitung, 1906–22 member of Bremen city council, 1912–18 Reichstag deputy, 1916 Social-Democratic Working Group, 1917 USPD, June 1917 USPD secretary for north coastal district, 1918 president of Bremen workers’ and soldiers’ council, 1919 with Johann Knief president of council of people’s commissioners in Bremen, member of National Assembly, 1920–32 Reichstag deputy, until 1922 USPD advisory council, then return to SPD, 1922–33 councillor in Berlin- Reinickendorf. Hölz, Max (1889–1933) – 1918 USPD, 1919 KPD, 1920 KAPD and commander of the ‘Red Army’ in the Vogtland, 1921 leader of uprising in central Germany, sentenced to life imprisonment, 1928 amnestied, 1929 emigrated to Russia. Jogiches, Leo (Tyszka) (1867–1919) – from 1885 active in Russian revolutionary move- ment, several times imprisoned, 1890 flight to Switzerland, connection with Plekhanov, 1893 co-founder Social-Democratic Party of the Kingdom of Poland, 1905–06 inWarsaw, condemned to eight years’ forced labour, 1907 escape to Germany, from 1915–16 de facto head of
Recommended publications
  • Douglas Peifer on Munich 1919: Diary of a Revolution
    Victor Klemperer. Munich 1919: Diary of a Revolution. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2017. 220 pp. $25.00, cloth, ISBN 978-1-5095-1058-0. Reviewed by Douglas Peifer Published on H-War (December, 2017) Commissioned by Margaret Sankey (Air University) Victor Klemperer’s diary created quite a stir came an increasingly desperate struggle. Translat‐ when frst published in Germany in 1995. Klem‐ ed into English in 1998/99, his frst-person reflec‐ perer’s diary entries for the period 1933-45 have tions of life in the Third Reich have been used ex‐ been used extensively by scholars of the Third Re‐ tensively by scholars such as Richad J. Evans, Saul ich and the Holocaust to illustrate how Nazi ideol‐ Friedländer, and Omer Bartov.[1] ogy and racial policies affected even thoroughly Klemperer’s Munich 1919: Diary of a Revolu‐ assimilated, converted Jews. Klemperer, the son tion provides a remarkable eyewitness account of of a rabbi, was born in Wilhelmine Germany. His an earlier crisis in German history, one connected education, professional development, and life to the Third Reich by the myths and memories choices were thoroughly bourgeois, with Klem‐ that ideologues on the far right exploited through‐ perer’s conversion to Protestantism signaling his out the Weimar era. Two days before the abdica‐ self-identification with German culture and his tion of Kaiser Wilhelm II and the declaration of a desire to assimilate. Klemperer attended Gymna‐ German Republic in Berlin on November 9, 1918, sium in Berlin and Landsberg on the Warthe, worker and soldier councils in Munich toppled studied German and Romance philology in Mu‐ the 738-year Wittelsbach dynasty in Bavaria.
    [Show full text]
  • ? FIRST and SECOND NATIONAL CONGRESSES of the CHINESE SOVIET REPUBLIC, 1931 and 1934 by Derek John Waller, B*Sc.(Econ.), M.A.(In
    ? FIRST AND SECOND NATIONAL CONGRESSES OF THE CHINESE SOVIET REPUBLIC, 1931 AND 1934 By Derek John Waller, B*Sc.(Econ.), M.A.(Indiana) Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy to the University of London, September 1968* ProQuest Number: 10731658 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10731658 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 2 ABSTRACT The early 1930fs, or "Kiangsi soviet" period in the history of the Chinese Communist Party (COP), is one of the most obscure in the entire development of the communist movement* The major significance of the two National Congresses of 1931 and 1934 is that using them as a focal-point for analysis provides new information on the inter-related themes of political processes and power-relations during this period* In 1930, the COP leader Li Li-san attempted to convene the First Congress. The attempt proved abortive when Li fell from power in November 1930* The "Returned Student groupn, as the new Party leadership, continued to press for a Congress in order to assert their authority over that of Mao Tse-tung in the soviet areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Generate PDF of This Page
    Institute of National Remembrance https://ipn.gov.pl/en/news/4377,The-Polish-Soviet-War-of-1920.html 2021-10-04, 09:59 03.08.2020 The Polish-Soviet War of 1920 Reasons The main reason for the outbreak of the Polish-Soviet war the threat to Poland’s independence by Soviet Russia, as well as the attempt to implement the idea of a permanent revolution, and the export of the communist revolution Europe-wide. The Bolsheviks began carrying out this plan immediately after seizing power in Russia in October of 1917. They undertook the first attempts in Finland already in 1918, where civil war had broken out, as well as in the Baltic nations. In 1919 an attempt was made at provoking an uprising in Berlin, in March of the same year a government coalition was formed in Hungary with the participation communists, and in June of 1919 an attempt was made at a coup in Vienna. With the aim of transferring the revolution to other European countries, in March 1919, the Bolsheviks founded Comintern – the Third International, which was formally an independent organisation, but in practise functioned according to the guidelines of the Political Office of the communist party. One of its “branches” was the Communist Polish Workers Party (later: the Communist Party of Poland), which originated even earlier – in December 1918. From the perspective of Poland’s independence, a highly significant issue in relations with the eastern neighbour, was determining the course of the eastern border. During this time Central Europe was occupied along the belt from the Baltic Sea to the Sea of Azov, by the German army, which only began retreating after entering into a ceasefire in Compiegne on 11 November 1918.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy
    Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy How do democracies form and what makes them die? Daniel Ziblatt revisits this timely and classic question in a wide-ranging historical narrative that traces the evolution of modern political democracy in Europe from its modest beginnings in 1830s Britain to Adolf Hitler’s 1933 seizure of power in Weimar Germany. Based on rich historical and quantitative evidence, the book offers a major reinterpretation of European history and the question of how stable political democracy is achieved. The barriers to inclusive political rule, Ziblatt finds, were not inevitably overcome by unstoppable tides of socioeconomic change, a simple triumph of a growing middle class, or even by working class collective action. Instead, political democracy’s fate surprisingly hinged on how conservative political parties – the historical defenders of power, wealth, and privilege – recast themselves and coped with the rise of their own radical right. With striking modern parallels, the book has vital implications for today’s new and old democracies under siege. Daniel Ziblatt is Professor of Government at Harvard University where he is also a resident fellow of the Minda de Gunzburg Center for European Studies. He is also currently Fernand Braudel Senior Fellow at the European University Institute. His first book, Structuring the State: The Formation of Italy and Germany and the Puzzle of Federalism (2006) received several prizes from the American Political Science Association. He has written extensively on the emergence of democracy in European political history, publishing in journals such as American Political Science Review, Journal of Economic History, and World Politics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ashgate Research Companion to Imperial Germany ASHGATE RESEARCH COMPANION
    ASHGATE RESEARCH COMPANION THE ASHGatE RESEarCH COMPANION TO IMPERIAL GERMANY ASHGATE RESEARCH COMPANION The Ashgate Research Companions are designed to offer scholars and graduate students a comprehensive and authoritative state-of-the-art review of current research in a particular area. The companions’ editors bring together a team of respected and experienced experts to write chapters on the key issues in their speciality, providing a comprehensive reference to the field. The Ashgate Research Companion to Imperial Germany Edited by MattHEW JEFFERIES University of Manchester, UK © Matthew Jefferies 2015 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. Matthew Jefferies has asserted his right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identified as the editor of this work. Published by Ashgate Publishing Limited Ashgate Publishing Company Wey Court East 110 Cherry Street Union Road Suite 3-1 Farnham Burlington, VT 05401-3818 Surrey, GU9 7PT USA England www.ashgate.com British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The Ashgate research companion to Imperial Germany / edited by Matthew Jefferies. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-4094-3551-8 (hardcover) – ISBN 978-1-4094-3552-5
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Thirty-Eight 'Militia and Disarmament' (August 1912) Paul
    Chapter Thirty-Eight ‘Militia and Disarmament’ (August 1912) Paul Lensch In 1912 the author of this article, Paul Lensch (1873– 1926), was one of the main anti-revisionist spokes- men of the Left, whose positions he had defended at party conferences in Essen (1907), Jena (1911) and Chemnitz (1912). From 1908 to 1913, Lensch served as chief editor of the Leipziger Volkszeitung, and in 1912 he was elected to the German Reichstag for the SPD. He opposed war-credits in October 1914 but later changed his view. In 1915, the Lensch- Cunow-Haenisch group was formed with the pur- pose of endorsing German imperialism on Marxist grounds, especially through their organ Die Glocke (‘The Bell’), edited by Parvus. As an Anglophobe, Lensch regarded Germany as the ‘revolutionary’ side in the conflict, with England as the ‘counter- revolutionary’. When the SPD split in October 1917, Lensch became one of the journalistic spokesmen of the SPD-majority grouped around Friedrich Ebert. In November 1918, he played an important role as a contact-man between the Council of People’s Repre- sentatives and the military leadership. Lensch then withdrew from party politics and, in 1919, received a professorship of economics at the University of Berlin through his friend, the Prussian Minister of 562 • Paul Lensch Culture Konrad Haenisch. He also worked as a foreign-policy correspondent for the Deutsche Allgemeine Zeitung, a journal belonging to the concern of Hugo Stinnes. In 1922, Lensch left the SPD and became increasingly associated with conservative opponents of Social Democracy until his death in 1926.1 The article translated here dates from Lensch’s radical early years, when he challenged Karl Kautsky for proposing disarmament agreements as the appropriate tactical response to imperialism.
    [Show full text]
  • Representations of Unity in Soviet State Symbols
    Soiuz and Symbolic Union: Representations of Unity in Soviet State Symbols Anne M. Platoff ff fvast Defining the Soviet Union representatives of four republics signed the During its nearly 70-year existence from 1922- ‘Treaty of the Creation of the Union of Soviet 1991, the Soviet Union was the world’s largest Socialist Republics’ and the ‘Declaration of the country. From the end of World War II through the Creation of the USSR’, officially reuniting the breakup of the USSR, this vast state spanned an Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic area of 22,402,200 square kilometres (8,649,500 (Russian SFSR), the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist sq. mi.) across 11 time zones in north-eastern Republic (Ukrainian SSR), the Byelorussian Soviet Europe and northern Asia. The borders of the Socialist Republic (Byelorussian SSR), and the country measured more than 60,000 km (37,282 Transcaucasian Socialist Federative Soviet miles) and were adjacent to 12 countries, 12 seas, Republic (Transcaucasian SFSR; comprised of as well as the Arctic, Atlantic, and Pacific Oceans. Armenia, Georgia, and Azerbaijan) into one In terms of population (285,743,000 in 1989), the multinational state. Throughout the history of the USSR ranked third in the world behind China and country some republics were subdivided, others India. The full name of the country in Russian was were added, and one became an autonomous Soiuz Sovetskikh Sotsialisticheskikh Respublik, republic of the RSFSR, with the total number which translated into English as ‘Union of Soviet ranging from four to sixteen. From 1956 through Socialist Republics.’ The word ‘Soviet’ (which in 1991, there were fifteen Soviet republics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reform of Higher Education Systems and the Concept of Lifelong Learning
    The Reform of Higher Education Systems and the Concept of Lifelong Learning A comparative study of German and Armenian universities in the Bologna Process Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor philosophiae (Dr. phil.) vorgelegt dem Rat der Fakult¨at f¨ur Sozial- und Verhaltenswissenschaften der Friedrich-Schiller-Universit¨at Jena von Hasmik Hunanyan geboren am 21.04.1977 in Jerewan, Armenien Gutachter 1. Prof. Dr. Martha Friedenthal-Haase 2. Prof. Dr. Elisabeth Meilhammer Tag des Kolloquiums: 12.11.2010 Contents TitlePage.................................... i TableofContents................................ iii ListofFigures.................................. vii Acknowledgments................................ viii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 ResearchTopic .............................. 1 1.2 ResearchApproach ............................ 11 1.3 RelevancetoResearchandPractice . 13 1.4 StructureoftheThesis .......................... 16 2 Methodology 18 2.1 ResearchDesign.............................. 18 2.2 Cross-CountryComparison. 19 2.3 Selection of Cases for the Cross-Country Comparison . .. 25 2.4 Interview as a Method of Qualitative Research . 28 2.4.1 Purposesofinterviews . .. .. 28 2.4.2 The type of the interviews conducted . 30 2.4.3 Selection of interviewees . 34 2.4.4 Reflexions on the limitations of interviews as research method 35 2.5 The Case-Oriented Comparative Research Scheme . 36 3 The Bologna Process 40 3.1 Introduction................................ 40 iii Contents iv 3.2 MagnaChartaUniversitatum . 41 3.3 SorbonneDeclaration(1998). 43 3.4 BolognaDeclaration(1999) . 49 3.5 Lisbon, Salamanca, G¨oteborg, or other cities that matter . .... 53 3.6 PragueCommuniqu´e(2001) . 60 3.7 BerlinCommuniqu´e(2003). 62 3.8 BergenCommuniqu´e(2005) . 68 3.9 LondonCommuniqu´e(2007) . 73 3.10 Leuven/Louvain–la–Neuve Communiqu´e(2009) . 76 3.11Conclusions ................................ 80 4 The German System of Higher Education 85 4.1 HistoricalContext ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Euromosaic III Touches Upon Vital Interests of Individuals and Their Living Conditions
    Research Centre on Multilingualism at the KU Brussel E U R O M O S A I C III Presence of Regional and Minority Language Groups in the New Member States * * * * * C O N T E N T S Preface INTRODUCTION 1. Methodology 1.1 Data sources 5 1.2 Structure 5 1.3 Inclusion of languages 6 1.4 Working languages and translation 7 2. Regional or Minority Languages in the New Member States 2.1 Linguistic overview 8 2.2 Statistic and language use 9 2.3 Historical and geographical aspects 11 2.4 Statehood and beyond 12 INDIVIDUAL REPORTS Cyprus Country profile and languages 16 Bibliography 28 The Czech Republic Country profile 30 German 37 Polish 44 Romani 51 Slovak 59 Other languages 65 Bibliography 73 Estonia Country profile 79 Russian 88 Other languages 99 Bibliography 108 Hungary Country profile 111 Croatian 127 German 132 Romani 138 Romanian 143 Serbian 148 Slovak 152 Slovenian 156 Other languages 160 Bibliography 164 i Latvia Country profile 167 Belorussian 176 Polish 180 Russian 184 Ukrainian 189 Other languages 193 Bibliography 198 Lithuania Country profile 200 Polish 207 Russian 212 Other languages 217 Bibliography 225 Malta Country profile and linguistic situation 227 Poland Country profile 237 Belorussian 244 German 248 Kashubian 255 Lithuanian 261 Ruthenian/Lemkish 264 Ukrainian 268 Other languages 273 Bibliography 277 Slovakia Country profile 278 German 285 Hungarian 290 Romani 298 Other languages 305 Bibliography 313 Slovenia Country profile 316 Hungarian 323 Italian 328 Romani 334 Other languages 337 Bibliography 339 ii PREFACE i The European Union has been called the “modern Babel”, a statement that bears witness to the multitude of languages and cultures whose number has remarkably increased after the enlargement of the Union in May of 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents Ix
    ~ MONOGRAPHS No CCXL TABLE OF CONTENTS Vlll Bela Kirruy Acknowledgements Bela K. Kiraly Preface to the Se ries IX Pet er Pastor Introduction 3 I REVOL1JI10NARY HUNGARY AND THE M1UTARY Marton Farkas, The Military Collapse of the Austro­ Hungarian Monarchy, Octobe r 24 to November 3, 1918 II Ervin Liptai, War and Home Defense, October 31 , 19 18 toMarch21,1919 2S Laszlo F ogarassy, The Eastern Campaign of the Hungarian Red Arm y, Ap ril 1919 31 Tibor Hetes, The No nhern Campaign of the Hungarian Red Army, 191 9 55 Gyorgy Borsanyi, Bela Kun and His Views on Strategy and Defense 61 Peter Gosztony, The Collapse of the Hungarian Red Army 69 Jean Nouzille The July Campaign of the Hungarian Red Army Against Romania as Seen by France 81 Ferenc Tibor Zsuppan, The Hungarian Red Army as Seen through British Eyes 89 U HUNGARIAN SOCIETY DURING THE REVOL1JI10NS 'y Atlantic Research and Publication includes the right to reproduce litis book Gabor Vermes, Hungarian Politics and Society on the m whatsoever, without the written permission Eve of Revolution 107 of the publisher Gyorgy Lilvan, The Home Front During the Karolyi Regime 123 ess Catalog Card Number 87-6241 S Susan Glanz, The Hu ngarian Stock Market During >BN 0-88033-137-2 the Liberal Democratic Revolution , lie United States of America 191 8-1919 131 The French Army and Intervention in Kim Munholland, Gy6rgy Peteri, Engjneer Utopia: On the Position of the Ukraine 335 The Foreign Policy of the Hungarian Technostructure in Hungary's War Maria Ormos, Communism,I919 139 Soviet Republic 357 Plans of Strategic Cooperation between Igruic Romsics, The Social Basis of the Communist Tibor Hajdu, Revolution and of the Counterrevolutions the Russian and Hungarian Red in Hungary 157 Armies 367 Sandor SzakaJy, The Officer Corps of the Hungarian Leslie C.
    [Show full text]
  • Soviet”: from Bolshevik Utopia to Soviet Modernity
    Introduction Countercultures Ideologies and Practices Alternative Visions A HISTORY OF THE “SOVIET”: FROM BOLSHEVIK UTOPIA TO SOVIET MODERNITY Anna Krylova Introduction: Crossing out “Proletarian,” Writing “Soviet”1 In early 1936,Aleksandr Kosarev, the thirty-three-year-old leader of the All-Union Young Communist League (Komsomol), and his Central Committee worked away on a draft of the organiza- tion’s new membership rules. The draft was forwarded directly to Joseph Stalin, who must have spent hours hand-editing the lengthy document. The resulting document was cleansed of what most scholars today would associate with the signature Bolshevik lingua franca of the socialist project undertaken in the Soviet Union. Stalin consistently crossed out the familiar Bolshevik terms, categories, and metaphors that Kosarev had copied from the old rules. Stalin wrote “nonaffi liated” in place of “proletarian” and “laboring” in place of “class conscious.”2 Two months later, at the Komsomol Congress that gathered to adopt the new mem- bership rules, Stalin began to use the term “Soviet” to refer to these “party-less” and “laboring” young people. The toast with which he ended the Congress, “Long live the Soviet youth,” sounded like a definitive corrective to Kosarev and other weath- ered Komsomol leaders, who still preferred to refer to their 1 I am grateful to Social organization as the “young generation of the proletarian revolu- History for allowing me to draw on materials 3 tionaries.” published in Anna Krylova, “Imagining Socialism in the Soviet Century,” Social The odd but explicit opposition between the Bolshevik political History 42, no. 3 (2017): lingua franca and Stalin’s discursive intervention carried out under 315–41, in this essay, DOI: 10.1080/03071022 the rubric of the “Soviet” cannot help but give a scholar of modern .2017.1327640, reprinted Russia pause.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing Ancient History Textbooks of Imperial
    COMPARING ANCIENT HISTORY TEXTBOOKS OF IMPERIAL GERMANY AND THE WEIMAR REPUBLIC A thesis submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts by Hans-Henning Bunge December 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES……………………………………………………………………….iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS………………………………………………………………iv Chapter Introduction………………………………………………………………………..1 I. Humanistic education in Imperial Germany and the Weimar Republic……....10 II. Comparisons of ancient Greek and Roman history books……………………24 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………….54 BIBLOGRAPHY………………………………………………………………………...64 ii LIST OF TABLES Table I – Curricula of German Secondary Schools in 1901……………………………17 Table II – Imperial Period………………………………………………………………25 Table III – Weimar Republic……………………………………………………………38 i ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my advisors Dr. Steigmann-Gall, Associate Professor of History, Dr. Baranowski, Professor of History and Dr. Harp, Professor of History for their help, guidance and patience. Their continuous support enabled me to bring this thesis to a successful conclusion. I would like to specially thank my fellow student Ms. Monika Flaschka for proofreading my scripts with admirable patience. My wife, Ms. Gisela Bunge, has been very supportive and tolerated my seclusion while I was working on my thesis for wish I would very much like to thank i v Comparing Ancient History Textbooks of Imperial Germany and the Weimar Republic INTRODUCTION Hannibal’s tactics at Cannae were exemplary for overcoming a much larger force. The same plan allowed Germany to repeat his victory at Sedan and Tannenberg against a similarly superior foe. The glorious victories of Hannibal and of Germany in 1914 failed to lead to a positive outcome of each war because time favored his enemies as it did ours.1 By associating contemporary events with Antiquity this quote in a textbook of ancient Greek and Roman history illustrates how strongly the Bildungsbürgertum identified with these ancient cultures and the continuing influence of the humanistic education.
    [Show full text]