Component 1. Elaboration of Bucharest's Iuds, Capital Investment Planning and Management

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Component 1. Elaboration of Bucharest's Iuds, Capital Investment Planning and Management ROMANIA Reimbursable Advisory Services Agreement on the Bucharest Urban Development Program (P169577) COMPONENT 1. ELABORATION OF BUCHAREST’S IUDS, CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT Output 3. Urban context and identification of key local issues and needs, and visions and objectives of IUDS, and identification of a longlist of projects. Chapter 2. Economic Development March 2021 DISCLAIMER This report is a product of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/the World Bank. The findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. This report does not necessarily represent the position of the European Union or the Romanian Government. COPYRIGHT STATEMENT The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable laws. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with the complete information to either: (i) the Municipality of Bucharest (Bd. Regina Elisabeta 47, Bucharest, Romania); or (ii) the World Bank Group Romania (Str. Vasile Lascăr 31, et. 6, Sector 2, Bucharest, Romania). This report was delivered in March 2021 under the Reimbursable Advisory Services Agreement on the Bucharest Urban Development Program, concluded between the Municipality of Bucharest and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development on March 4, 2019. It is part of Output 3 under the above-mentioned agreement – Urban context and identification of key local issues and needs, and visions and objectives of IUDS and Identification of a long list of projects – under Component 1, which refers to the elaboration of the Bucharest’s Integrated Urban Development Strategy, Capital Investment Planning, and Management. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report has been delivered under the provisions of the Reimbursable Advisory Services Agreement on the Bucharest Urban Development Program and has been prepared under the guidance and supervision of Christoph Pusch (Practice Manager, Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience for Europe and Central Asia) and Tatiana Proskuryakova (Country Manager, Romania and Hungary). The report has been prepared by a team under the coordination of Dean Cira (Lead Urban Specialist) and composed of Ioana Ivanov (Senior Urban Development Specialist), Marius Cristea (Senior Urban Development Specialist), Reinhold Stadler (Senior Urban Transport Specialist), Oana Stănculescu (Urban Development Specialist) Amelia Pîrvu (Analyst), Sorina Racoviceanu (Lead Urban Development Specialist), Marcel Ionescu-Heroiu (Senior Urban Development Specialist), Carli Venter (Senior Urban Development Specialist), Oana Franț (Operations Specialist), Bianca Butacu (Analyst), Adina Vințan (Operations Specialist), Ioana Irimia (Communications Specialist) și George Moldoveanu (Information Assistant). The team would like to express its gratitude for the excellent cooperation, guidance, and timely feedback provided by the representatives of the Municipality of Bucharest, especially Mr. Nicușor Dan, Mr. Sorin Chiriță, Mr. Cătălin Zoican, Ms. Adriana Duțu, Ms. Luminița Glodea, and by the many other local and regional partners that have contributed to the elaboration of this report. ABRECIETIONS AND ACRONIMS ALU Active Local Units AROPE A composite indicator adopted at European Union level BPO Business Processes Outsourcing CBD Central Business District CFR Romanian Railways CLLD Community-led local development COR Romanian Classification of Occupations DGASMB Bucharest General Directorate for Social Assistance DGASPC and the Bucharest General Directorate for Social Assistance DGASPC General Directorates for Social Assistance and Child Protection EU European Union EUROSTAT Statistical office of the European Union. FDI Foreign Direct Investment FUA Functional Urban Area GDP Gross Domestic product GVA gross value added HORECA Hotel/Restaurant/Catering ICT Information Communication and Technology IT Information Technology IT&C Information Technology and Communication IUDS Integrated Sustainable Urban Development Strategy LAG Local Action Group MRDPA Ministry of Regional Development and Public Administration NACE Nomenclature Statistique des Activités Économiques dans la Communauté Européenne NBR National Bank of Romania NGO Non-Governmental Organization NIS National Institute of Statistics NTRO National Trade Register Office NUTS The common classification of territorial units for statistics PHC Primary Health Care RDI Research, Development, Innovation ROP Regional Operational Programme SME small medium enterprises UMA Urban Marginalized Areas UN United Nations UNCTAD United Nations Conference on Trade and Development UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. General context (global, national, regional) ....................................................................................... 1 Regional competitiveness in a European context ............................................................................... 1 1.1.1. Macroeconomic indicators and economic performance ............................................................ 7 1.1.2. Capital city attractiveness and labor resources……………………………………………………………………..14 2. Economic profile of Bucharest, main economic sectors and their relevance for national economy .... 20 3. Foreign investment and foreign trade ............................................................................................. 48 3.1. Foreign investment ............................................................................................................................ 48 3.2. Foreign trade ..................................................................................................................................... 57 4. Workforce ...................................................................................................................................... 64 4.1. Training .............................................................................................................................................. 92 5. Research, development, innovation and business support services and infrastructure ..................... 95 6. Economic development drivers and specialization potential .......................................................... 105 7. Conclusions, issues and trends, strategy recommendations ........................................................... 114 Appendix 1 – Regional competitiveness index for the Bucharest-Ilfov Region ........................................ 123 Appendix 2 – Component indicators of the regional competitiveness index ........................................... 124 Appendix 3 – Foreign investors in Bucharest City .................................................................................. 128 Appendix 4 – Support infrastructure for R&D and business ................................................................... 134 Appendix 5 – Location quotient ............................................................................................................ 142 Appendix 6 – Shift-Share Analysis ......................................................................................................... 145 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 – GVA structure in the Capital City and the city's competitive position in a national context ............ 12 Table 2 – Romanian cities where Romanians would most like to live .............................................................. 14 Table 3 – Top 10 subunits of Bucharest City companies, by number of employees, 2018 ............................... 33 Table 4 – Top 10 subunits in Bucharest City by turnover, 2018 ........................................................................ 37 Table 5 – Top 10 companies by foreign ownership to the subscribed capital .................................................. 54 Table 6 – Top 10 foreign investors in Bucharest City, by turnover and number of employees, 2018, by administrative sectors ....................................................................................................................................... 55 Table 7 – Monthly gross average wages in Bucharest City by national economy activities (NACE divisions), 2018 ........................................................................................................................................................................... 87 Table 8 – National ranking by enterprises active in RDI .................................................................................... 95 Table 9 – Competitiveness of Bucharest City economy in a national context (NACE sections) ...................... 106 Table 10 – Competitiveness of economic activities in Bucharest City in a national context (NACE divisions) – selection .......................................................................................................................................................... 109 Table 11 – Competitiveness of computer programming, consultancy and related activities ......................... 112 Table 12 – Foreign investors in Bucharest City, by turnover and number of employees, 2018, by administrative sectors ............................................................................................................................................................. 128 Table 13 –
Recommended publications
  • Documents.Worldbank.Org
    46730 THE WORLD BANK GROUP WASHINGTON, D.C. TP-23 TRANSPORT PAPERS NOVEMBER 2008 Public Disclosure Authorized Road User Charges: Current Practice and Perspectives in Central and Eastern Europe Cesar Queiroz, Barbara Rdzanowska, Robert Garbarczyk and Michel Audige Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized TRANSPORT SECTOR BOARD ROAD USER CHARGES: CURRENT PRACTICE AND PERSPECTIVES IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE Cesar Queiroz, Barbara Rdzanowska, Robert Garbarczyk and Michel Audige THE WORLD BANK WASHINGTON, D.C. © 2008 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington, DC 20433 Telephone 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org This volume is a product of the staff of The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA; telephone: 978-750-8400; fax: 978-750-4470; Internet: www.copyright.com.
    [Show full text]
  • DLA Piper. Details of the Member Entities of DLA Piper Are Available on the Website
    EUROPEAN PPP REPORT 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Report has been published with particular thanks to: The EPEC Executive and in particular, Livia Dumitrescu, Goetz von Thadden, Mathieu Nemoz and Laura Potten. Those EPEC Members and EIB staff who commented on the country reports. Each of the contributors of a ‘View from a Country’. Line Markert and Mikkel Fritsch from Horten for assistance with the report on Denmark. Andrei Aganimov from Borenius & Kemppinen for assistance with the report on Finland. Maura Capoulas Santos and Alberto Galhardo Simões from Miranda Correia Amendoeira & Associados for assistance with the report on Portugal. Gustaf Reuterskiöld and Malin Cope from DLA Nordic for assistance with the report on Sweden. Infra-News for assistance generally and in particular with the project lists. All those members of DLA Piper who assisted with the preparation of the country reports and finally, Rosemary Bointon, Editor of the Report. Production of Report and Copyright This European PPP Report 2009 ( “Report”) has been produced and edited by DLA Piper*. DLA Piper acknowledges the contribution of the European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC)** in the preparation of the Report. DLA Piper retains editorial responsibility for the Report. In contributing to the Report neither the European Investment Bank, EPEC, EPEC’s Members, nor any Contributor*** indicates or implies agreement with, or endorsement of, any part of the Report. This document is the copyright of DLA Piper and the Contributors. This document is confidential and personal to you. It is provided to you on the understanding that it is not to be re-used in any way, duplicated or distributed without the written consent of DLA Piper or the relevant Contributor.
    [Show full text]
  • Halele Carol, Bucharest Observatory Case
    8. Halele Carol (Bucharest, Romania) This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 776766 Space for Logos H2020 PROJECT Grant Agreement No 776766 Organizing, Promoting and Enabling Heritage Re- Project Full Title use through Inclusion, Technology, Access, Governance and Empowerment Project Acronym OpenHeritage Grant Agreement No. 776766 Coordinator Metropolitan Research Institute (MRI) Project duration June 2018 – May 2021 (48 months) Project website www.openheritage.eu Work Package No. 2 Deliverable D2.2 Individual report on the Observatory Cases Delivery Date 30.11.2019 Author(s) Alina, Tomescu (Eurodite) Joep, de Roo; Meta, van Drunen; Cristiana, Stoian; Contributor(s) (Eurodite); Constantin, Goagea (Zeppelin); Reviewer(s) (if applicable) Public (PU) X Dissemination level: Confidential, only for members of the consortium (CO) This document has been prepared in the framework of the European project OpenHeritage – Organizing, Promoting and Enabling Heritage Re-use through Inclusion, Technology, Access, Governance and Empowerment. This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 776766. The sole responsibility for the content of this document lies with the authors. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the European Union. Neither the EASME nor the European Commission is responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. Deliverable
    [Show full text]
  • Housing Activism Initiatives and Land-Use Conflicts
    sustainability Article Housing Activism Initiatives and Land-Use Conflicts: Pathways for Participatory Planning and Urban Sustainable Development in Bucharest City, Romania Mariana Nae, Liliana Dumitrache *, Bogdan Suditu and Elena Matei Faculty of Geography, University of Bucharest, 1.Blv. Nicolae Bălcescu, Bucharest 010041, Romania; [email protected] (M.N.); [email protected] (B.S.); [email protected] (E.M.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +40-21-305-3844 Received: 1 October 2019; Accepted: 4 November 2019; Published: 6 November 2019 Abstract: This paper presents a geographical perspective of the phenomena of housing activism and land-use conflicts per se. It focuses not only on their spatial manifestations, but also on the complexity of the perceived meanings, values, and the power relationships among the involved parties, rooting into activist geographies. The research methodology was based on two complementary methods: frame analysis to observe the emergence, sources of land-use conflicts, and nature of the relationships between the actors involved; and discourse analysis to explore the social interactions and power relations between structures and practices related to housing activism. For a more inclusive perspective on the sources of land-use conflicts and housing activism initiatives in Bucharest, we used a combination and triangulation of various sources and modes of data collection. Compared with other European cities with active civic engagement, this phenomenon is still emerging in Bucharest. Although conflicts are numerous, the civic initiatives are still fragmented and fail to generate a vision and implementable public policy. However, multiple assaults on urban spaces (green areas, historically protected areas) have resulted in more actions and actors (individual or organised) becoming civically engaged.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 UNIVERSITY of ARTS in BELGRADE Interdisciplinary
    UNIVERSITY OF ARTS IN BELGRADE Interdisciplinary postgraduate studies Cultural management and cultural policy Master thesis Reinventing the City: Outlook on Bucharest's Cultural Policy By: Bianca Floarea Supervisor: Milena Dragićević-Šešić, PhD Belgrade, October 2007 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………… ..………. 3 Abstract……………. …………………………..………………….…………………………..……... 4 Introduction.…………………………………….………………………………………………...…... 5 Methodological Approach. Research Design and Data Analysis….………………………..…….. 7 I. The Evolution of Urban Cultural Policies in Europe..……………………….…............................. 9 I.1. Cultural Policies and the City…………………………………………….…… 9 I.2. Historical Trajectory of Urban Cultural Policies……………………………… 11 II. The Cultural Policy of Bucharest. Analysis and Diagnosis of the City Government’s Approach to Culture……………………………………………………………………………………………... 26 II.1. The City: History, Demographics, Economical Indicators, Architecture and the Arts... 26 II.1.1. History……………………………………………………………………… 27 II.1.2. Demographics………………………………………………………….…… 29 II.1.3. Economical Indicators……………………………………………………… 30 II.1.4. Architecture………………………………………………………………… 30 II.1.5. The Arts Scene…………………………………..…………………………. 32 II. 2. The Local Government: History, Functioning and Structure. Overview of the Cultural Administration………………………………………………………………. 34 II.2.1. The Local Government: History, Functioning And Structure…….……..… 34 II.2.2. Overview of the Cultural Administration…………………..……………… 37 II.3 The Official Approach to Culture
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation Egis Romania
    Regional development and projects TEM / HEEP Area V EGIS Romania 2011 Annual Meeting June 2011 1 Summary EGIS Romania organization Activity fields Involvement in infrastructure projects Objectives EGIS Romania organization Organization chart Project Transportation Management department and Urban Development Civil, industry General manager Water and and Energy and Deputy General Environmental departments manager department Commercial and Marketing Finance and administration Human resources and support 3 EGIS Romania organization Organization chart Design Supervision Support Management HR Tender preparation Financial 4 Transport infrastructure Egis Romania’s activity mainly covers the roads, highways and motorways transport sector, on which market we are already known as quality services provider. In Transport Infrastructure field, Egis Romania, based on the international experience, provides services for: Roads, highways and motorways ‐ Design –even 3D road modeling ‐ On site technical assistance during construction ‐ Supervision of construction works ‐ Short term expertises ‐ Design verification ‐ Feasibility studies and other studies ‐ Operation and maintenance Railway/ subway Egis Rail is authorized by the Romanian Rail Authority to provide "services for design, consultancy and technical assistance for rail and subway works". Airports Egis Avia is in progress to obtain the authorization from the Romanian Civil Aviation Authority. 5 Water & Environment Water/ Waste Water Based on the international experience, Egis Romania provides high
    [Show full text]
  • A Delegation from the Congress Observed the Local and Regional Elections in Romania on the 6 June 2004
    THE CONGRESS OF LOCAL AND REGIONAL AUTHORITIES Council of Europe F – 67075 Strasbourg Cedex Tel : +33 (0)3 88 41 20 00 Fax : +33 (0)3 88 41 27 51/ 37 47 http://www.coe.int/cplre THE BUREAU OF THE CONGRESS CG/BUR (11) 25 Strasbourg, 16 July 2004 REPORT ON THE OBSERVATION OF LOCAL AND REGIONAL ELECTIONS IN ROMANIA (6 June 2004) President of the Delegation : Günther Krug (Germany, R, SOC) __________ Document adopted by the Bureau of the Congress on 12 July 2004 2 Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 3 1. View of the Delegation ............................................................................................................... 4 2. Background................................................................................................................................. 4 3. Invitation ..................................................................................................................................... 4 4. Delegation ................................................................................................................................... 5 5. Background Information for the Delegation ........................................................................... 5 a. A Report on Local Democracy in Romania ................................................................................. 5 b. An Information Report on Local and Regional Democracy in Romania in 2002 ......................
    [Show full text]
  • Diana Culescu
    Curriculum vitae Europass Informații personale Nume / Prenume CULESCU Diana-Lavinia Adresă Str. Maica Alexandra nr. 30, sector 1, 011243 - București Mobil (0040) 724 08 35 09 E-mail [email protected] Website www.dianaculescu.ro Facebook https://www.facebook.com/dianaculescu.ro/ Naționalitate română Data nașterii 26 iulie 1976 Sex feminin Experiența profesională Perioada 2019-prezent Funcția sau postul ocupat Reglementator - Expert analiză și sistematizare legislație (Titlul IV - peisaj cultural) Activități și responsabilități principale Realizarea unei analize transversale a legislației cu incidență în domeniul peisajului cultural, consultarea autorităților și instituțiilor cu incidență în domeniu, organizarea de dezbateri profesionale, redactarea de rapoarte de analiză, implicare în procesul de sistematizare a legislației, de profil, participarea la elaborarea Codului Patrimoniului Cultural Numele și adresa angajatorului Ministerul Culturii și Identității Naționale Unitatea de Management a Proiectului, Bulevardul Unirii nr. 22, sector 3, București Perioada 2019-prezent Funcția sau postul ocupat Cadru didactic asociat Activități și responsabilități principale coordonarea atelierelor de proiectare și planificare peisageră pentru III Numele și adresa angajatorului Universitatea de Științe Agronomice și Medicină Veterinară București Specializarea PEISAGISTICĂ a Facultății de Horticultură B-dul Mărăști nr. 59, sector 1, 011464 - București Tipul activității sau sectorul de activitate Arhitectură Peisageră Perioada 2010-prezent Funcția
    [Show full text]
  • An Empirical Analysis of the Relation Between Infrastructure and Road Accidents
    MATEC Web of Conferences 121, 06005 (2017) DOI: 10.1051/ matecconf/201712106005 MSE 2017 An empirical analysis of the relation between infrastructure and road accidents Lucian Lobonț 1,*, and Lucian Ioan Tarnu1 1Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Engineering Faculty, Industrial Engineering and Management Department, 550025, 4 Emil Cioran, Sibiu, România Abstract. The concern for road safety in Europe is growing bigger. European Union by its means promote the aim of reducing the number of victims of traffic accidents by half in the period 2011-2020. In order to achieve this objective a lot of actions should be developed. One of our concern is the development of the infrastructure, mainly building motorways. Our research aims to study the relation between infrastructure – motorway versus highway and road accidents. Our findings show that is a great relationship between uses of motorways and reducing the number of accidents. 1 Introduction The road transportation of freight and passengers counts for the most of the deaths by mean of transportation. Road traffic accidents are one of the leading causes of violent death in the European Union and at a global level. The actions promoted by the European Commission aims to reduce the number of victims of traffic accidents in the EU by half over the period 2011-2020.[1] From the many initiatives started to support the objective of reducing number of victims one of them is focusing on the safety of the infrastructure. Fig. 1. Road safety evolution in EU – november 2016 * Corresponding author: [email protected] © The Authors, published by EDP Sciences. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
    [Show full text]
  • Astaldi06 INGL
    annual report2006 “To consolidate as leading Italian General Contractor and mission enhance value, progress and well-being for the communities” main ratios ratios (million of euro) 2006 2005 2004 (percentage) R.O.S. R.O.I. R.O.E. economic items total revenues 1,072 1,021 1,054 40.0% 30.5 30.5 EBIT 78 78 71 30.0% 27.8 profit before interests 61 55 43 20.0% 15.8 15.4 net income 30 32 28 13.8 10.0% 7.3 7.6 6.7 financial items 0.0% gross self-financing margin 60 69 52 capital expenditure 109 47 50 % on total revenues 2006 2005 2004 EBIT 7.3% 7.6% 6.7% R.O.S. = EBIT / total revenues R.O.I. = EBIT / net invested capital profit before interests 5.7% 5.3% 4.1% R.O.E. = EBIT / net equity net income 2.8% 3.2% 2.7% balance sheet items (values) GEARING RATIO CURRENT RATIO QUICK RATIO total fixed assets 331 213 178 net invested capital 567 493 461 2.5 net debt (*) 281 231 115 2.0 net equity 281 256 233 1.5 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 0,5 0.5 (*) Net of own shares. 0.0 order backlog by lines of business 2006 2005 2004 (million of euro) GEARING RATIO = net financial indebtedness / net equity CURRENT RATIO = short-term assets / short-term liabilities 2006 2005 QUICK RATIO = total account receivables and cash / short-term liabilities 24% 47% 27% 39% ■ ■ (million of euro) EBITDA EBIT EBT 200 ■ ■ 150 126 7% 116 113 100 78 78 71 9% 61 5% 50 55 43 5% 0 1% 15% 1% 21% 2006 2005 railways and subways 3,279 2,167 2006 2005 2004 EBITDA = income before interests, taxes, depreciation and amortization roads and motorways 1,036 1,156 EBIT = income before interests
    [Show full text]
  • Touch & Go and Touch 2 with Go
    Touch & Go and Touch 2 with Go Autumn 2018 map update release notes 4 more pages required in Autumn edition to fit information Keeping up to date with The Toyota Map Update Release Notes Map update information these and many more features: Touch & Go (CY11) helps you stay on track with the map Full map navigation Release date: Autumn 2018 Driver-friendly full map pan-European navigation updates of the Touch & Go and Touch 2 Version: 2018 with clear visual displays for signposts, junctions and lane with Go navigation systems. Database: 2018.Q1 guidance. Media: USB stick or download by user Speed limit and safety Toyota map updates are released at least once a year System vendor: Harman camera alerts Drive safely with the help of a and at a maximum twice. Coverage: Albania, Andorra, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia Herzegovina, speed limit display and warning, including an optional Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Gibraltar, France, speed warning setting. Alerts Keep up with the product information, map changes, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, Latvia, notify you of fixed safety Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Macedonia (F.Y.R.O.M), Malta, Moldova, camera locations (in countries premium content and sales arguments. where it is legal). Monaco, Montenegro, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, San Marino, Serbia, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom, Vatican. Intuitive detour suggestions Real-time traffic information Contents updates* alert you to Touch 2 with Go (CY13/16) congestion ahead on your planned route. The system Map update information 3 Release date: Autumn, 2018 calculates potential delay times and suggests a detour Navigation features 4 Version: 2018 to avoid the problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Results Presentation and Company Profile on 30 June 2021 TABLE of CONTENTS
    Photo: Dambovita MallPhoto: Results Presentation and Company Profile on 30 June 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 RESULTS SUMMARY 15 INCOME PROPERTY SCHEDULE Jun 21 4 CEE GLA STATUS, FOOTFALL, TENANTS’ SALES, INVOICING & COLLECTION Jan — Jun 21 16 DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY SCHEDULE Jun 21 5 EARNINGS Jan — Jun 21 17 INCOME PROPERTY HELD FOR SALE SCHEDULE Jun 21 6 NET ASSET VALUE Jun 21 18 PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW 7 EARNINGS Jan — Jun 21 vs. Jul — Dec 20 19 INCOME PROPERTY 8 NET ASSET VALUE Jun 21 vs. Dec 20 31 DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY 9 CEE PASSING NET RENTAL INCOME & FAIR VALUE MOVEMENTS Jan — Jun 21 41 GROUP MANAGEMENT 10 CEE DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY MOVEMENTS Jan — Jun 21 43 NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS 11 DEBT CAPACITY AND REPAYMENT PROFILE Jun 21 45 DEVELOPMENT JOINT VENTURE STRUCTURE 12 CREDIT RATINGS 46 BENEFICIAL SHAREHOLDERS HOLDING OVER 5% Jun 21 13 COMPANY PROFILE 47 GLOSSARY 14 ENVIRONMENTAL Note: All figures in this document are based on segmental financial information (Note 3 in the consolidated annual financial statements for the year ended 30 June 2021 — the 'IFRS financial statements'), where the development joint venture ('DJV') is consolidated under the proportionate method, instead of the equity method. This information is intended to be a complement to, not a replacement of, MAS' (hereafter referred to as the Group or the Company) IFRS financial statements. Historical segmental analysis information in editable format may be downloaded here. 2 RESULTS SUMMARY FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS RESULTS 2.81 eurocents 124 eurocents Adjusted distributable Tangible net asset CEE tenants' sales above 2019 levels earnings/share value/share 87% Pro-Forma CEE collection rate Jan – Jun 2021 Jun 2021 Sepsi Value Centre opening (Mar 2021) CEE OPERATIONAL RESULTS 23.3% 2.8% Strong liquidity profile Sales/m2 (LFL)* Passing NRI (LFL) Jan – Jun 2021 vs.
    [Show full text]