Election Security Threat Assessment Towards 2015 Elections
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Combating Corruption in Nigeria: a Critical Appraisal of the Laws, Institutions, and the Political Will Osita Nnamani Ogbu
Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law Volume 14 | Issue 1 Article 6 2008 Combating Corruption in Nigeria: A Critical Appraisal of the Laws, Institutions, and the Political Will Osita Nnamani Ogbu Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/annlsurvey Part of the Other Law Commons Recommended Citation Ogbu, Osita Nnamani (2008) "Combating Corruption in Nigeria: A Critical Appraisal of the Laws, Institutions, and the Political Will," Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law: Vol. 14: Iss. 1, Article 6. Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/annlsurvey/vol14/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Academic Journals at GGU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law by an authorized administrator of GGU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ogbu: Combating Corruption in Nigeria COMBATING CORRUPTION IN NIGERIA: A CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF THE LAWS, INSTITUTIONS, AND THE POLITICAL WILL OSITA NNAMANI OGBU· I. INTRODUCTION Corruption is pervasive and widespread in Nigerian society. It has permeated all facets of life, and every segment of society is involved. In recent times, Nigeria has held the unenviable record of being considered one of the most corrupt countries among those surveyed I. The Political Bureau, set up under the Ibrahim Babangida regime, summed up the magnitude of corruption in Nigeria as follows: It [corruption] pervades all strata of the society. From the highest level of the political and business elites to the ordinary person in the village. Its multifarious manifestations include the inflation of government contracts in return for kickbacks; fraud and falsification of accounts in the public service; examination * Senior Lecturer, and Ag. -
Chieftaincy and Security in Nigeria: the Role of Traditional Institutions
Chieftaincy and Security in Nigeria Past, Present, and Future Edited by Abdalla Uba Adamu ii Chieftaincy and Security in Nigeria Past, Present, and Future Proceedings of the National Conference on Chieftaincy and Security in Nigeria. Organized by the Kano State Emirate Council to commemorate the 40th anniversary of His Royal Highness, the Emir of Kano, Alhaji Ado Bayero, CFR, LLD, as the Emir of Kano (October 1963-October 2003) H.R.H. Alhaji (Dr.) Ado Bayero, CFR, LLD 40th Anniversary (1383-1424 A.H., 1963-2003) Allah Ya Kara Jan Zamanin Sarki, Amin. iii Copyright Pages © ISBN © All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the editors. iv Contents A Brief Biography of the Emir of Kano..............................................................vi Editorial Note........................................................................................................i Preface...................................................................................................................i Opening Lead Papers Chieftaincy and Security in Nigeria: The Role of Traditional Institutions...........1 Lt. General Aliyu Mohammed (rtd), GCON Chieftaincy and Security in Nigeria: A Case Study of Sarkin Kano Alhaji Ado Bayero and the Kano Emirate Council...............................................................14 Dr. Ibrahim Tahir, M.A. (Cantab) PhD (Cantab) -
Senate Committee Report
THE 7TH SENATE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA COMMITTEE ON THE REVIEW OF THE 1999 CONSTITUTION REPORT OF THE SENATE COMMITTEE ON THE REVIEW OF THE 1999 CONSTITUTION ON A BILL FOR AN ACT TO FURTHER ALTER THE PROVISIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA 1999 AND FOR OTHER MATTERS CONNECTED THEREWITH, 2013 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Senate of the Federal Republic of Nigeria referred the following Constitution alterations bills to the Committee for further legislative action after the debate on their general principles and second reading passage: 1. Constitution (Alteration Bill) 2012 (SB.107), Second Reading – Wednesday 14th March, 2012 2. Constitution (Alteration Bill) 2012 (SB.136), Second Reading – Thursday, 14th October, 2012 3. Constitution (Alteration Bill) 2012 (SB.139), Second Reading – Thursday, 4th October, 2012 4. Constitution (Alteration Bill) 2012 (SB.158), Second Reading – Thursday, 4th October, 2012 5. Constitution (Alteration Bill) 2012 (SB.162), Second Reading – Thursday, 4th October, 2012 6. Constitution (Alteration Bill) 2012 (SB.168), Second Reading – Thursday 1 | P a g e 4th October, 2012 7. Constitution (Alteration Bill) 2012 (SB.226), Second Reading – 20th February, 2013 8. Ministerial (Nominees Bill), 2013 (SB.108), Second Reading – Wednesday, 13th March, 2013 1.1 MEMBERSHIP OF THE COMMITTEE 1. Sen. Ike Ekweremadu - Chairman 2. Sen. Victor Ndoma-Egba - Member 3. Sen. Bello Hayatu Gwarzo - “ 4. Sen. Uche Chukwumerije - “ 5. Sen. Abdul Ahmed Ningi - “ 6. Sen. Solomon Ganiyu - “ 7. Sen. George Akume - “ 8. Sen. Abu Ibrahim - “ 9. Sen. Ahmed Rufa’i Sani - “ 10. Sen. Ayoola H. Agboola - “ 11. Sen. Umaru Dahiru - “ 12. Sen. James E. -
Towards a New Type of Regime in Sub-Saharan Africa?
Towards a New Type of Regime in Sub-Saharan Africa? DEMOCRATIC TRANSITIONS BUT NO DEMOCRACY Marc-Antoine Pérouse de Montclos cahiers & conférences travaux & recherches les études The Institut français des relations internationales (Ifri) is a research center and a forum for debate on major international political and economic issues. Headed by Thierry de Montbrial since its founding in 1979, Ifri is a non-governmental and a non- profit organization. As an independent think tank, Ifri sets its own research agenda, publishing its findings regularly for a global audience. Using an interdisciplinary approach, Ifri brings together political and economic decision-makers, researchers and internationally renowned experts to animate its debate and research activities. With offices in Paris and Brussels, Ifri stands out as one of the rare French think tanks to have positioned itself at the very heart of European debate. The opinions expressed in this text are the responsibility of the author alone. The Sub-Saharian Africa Program is supported by: Translated by: Henry Kenrick, in collaboration with the author © Droits exclusivement réservés – Ifri – Paris, 2010 ISBN: 978-2-86592-709-8 Ifri Ifri-Bruxelles 27 rue de la Procession Rue Marie-Thérèse, 21 75740 Paris Cedex 15 – France 1000 Bruxelles – Belgique Tél. : +33 (0)1 40 61 60 00 Tél. : +32 (0)2 238 51 10 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Internet Website : Ifri.org Summary Sub-Saharan African hopes of democratization raised by the end of the Cold War and the decline in the number of single party states are giving way to disillusionment. -
Event Report | June 18, 2013 Prepared by Continental Project Affairs Associates (Cpaa)
EVENT REPORT | JUNE 18, 2013 PREPARED BY CONTINENTAL PROJECT AFFAIRS ASSOCIATES (CPAA) Theme: ‘‘Internet Governance for Empowerment, National Integration, and Security through Multi-stakeholders’ Engagement’’ Goal: Harmonization of National Multi-Stakeholders Positions based on the Global IGF framework covering: Digital Inclusion and Integration; Building Trust, Confidence, & Assurance on the Internet; Policy and Regulatory Model for the Internet; Encouraging Local Research on Internet Development in Nigeria; Addressing Infrastructural Challenges in the Cashless Society; and Emerging IssuesOrganizers and Way: Forward ~ 1 ~ NIGF 2013 REPORT CERTIFICATION We hereby certify that the 2013 edition of Nigeria Internet Governance Forum organized by Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC), National Information, Technology Development Agency (NITDA), Nigerian Internet Registration Association (NiRA) in collaboration with the Federal Ministry of Communication Technology did take place at the Shehu Musa Yar’adua Centre Abuja on the June 18, 2013. The report of the NIGF 2013 as captured in this document to the best of our knowledge, presents the actual proceedings, observations, delegate areas of concerns, and suggestions which are harmonized in the final work on the communiqué. To the best of our knowledge, the NIGF 2013 was a successful event with a record number of over Six Hundred delegates, 100 percent above the official 300 delegates participation forecast, 100 percent above the NIGF 2012 delegates population, with broader spectrum of internet -
Nigeria's Nascent Democracy
An International Multi-Disciplinary Journal, Ethiopia Vol. 5 (2), Serial No. 19, April, 2011 ISSN 1994-9057 (Print) ISSN 2070-0083 (Online) Nigeria’s Nascent Democracy and ‘WAR’ Against Corruption: A Rear View Mirror (56-71) Ojo, Emmanuel O. - University of Ilorin, P.M.B. 1515, Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria E-mail: [email protected] Cell: +2348033822383; 07057807714 Home: 022-008330 Abstract One of the problems facing the nascent democracy in Nigeria which is more pressing than economic development is the high rate of brazen corruption in virtually all facets of the polity’s national life. Thus, the thrust of this paper is a review of the recent ‘WAR’ against corruption in Nigeria. The paper surveys a number of manifestations of corruption in the body politik and the country’s woes. The paper however infers that unless the institutional mechanisms put in place are rejuvenated coupled with political will on the part of the political actors, the so-called war may be a mirage after all. Key words: Corruption, Kleptocracy, Constitutionalism, Integrity, Poverty. Introduction Most of us came into the National Assembly with very high expectations...when we go around campaigning and asking for votes, we don’t get these votes free. You spend some money. Most of us even sold houses. You come in through legitimate means but you can’t recoup what you spent (The News , April 4, 2005:50). Copyright © IAARR 2011: www.afrrevjo.com 56 Indexed African Journals Online: www.ajol.info Vol. 5 (2), Serial No. 19, April, 2011. Pp. 56-71 The above quotation by a one time Senate President – Adolphus Wabara – betrayed what psychologists would call a Freudian slip. -
SENATE of the FEDERAL REPUBLIC of NIGERIA VOTES and PROCEEDINGS Tuesday, 30Th November, 2010
6TH NATIONAL ASSEMBLY FOURTH SESSION No. 45 621 SENATE OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA VOTES AND PROCEEDINGS Tuesday, 30th November, 2010 1. The Senate met at 10:56 a.m. The Senate President read prayers. 2. Votesand Proceedings: The Senate President announced that he had examined the Votes and Proceedings of Thursday, 25th November, 2010 and approved same. By unanimous consent, the Votes and Proceedings were approved. 3. Messagefrom Mr. President: The Senate President announced that he had received a letter from the President, Commander-in- Chief of the Armed Forces of the Federation, which he read as follows: Appointment of a new Chairman for the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC): PRESIDENT, FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA 25th November, 2010 Senator David Mark, GCON President of the Senate, Senate Chambers, National Assembly, Three Arms Zone, Abuja. Your Excellency, APPOINTMENT OF A NEW CHAIRMAN FOR THE INDEPENDENT CORRUPT PRACTICES AND OTHER RELATED OFFENCES COMMISSION PRINTED BY NATIONAL ASSEMBLY PRESS, ABUJA 622 Tuesday, 30th November, 2010 No. 45 In line with the provision of Section 3 of the Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Act, Cap C.3l, LFN 2004, I forward the name of Bon. Justice Pius Olayiwola Aderemi, JSC, CON along with his curriculum vitae for kind consideration and confirmation by the Senate for appointment as Chairman of the Independent Corrupt Practices and other Related Offences Commission. Distinguished President of the Senate, it is my hope that, in the usual tradition of the Senate of the Federal Republic, this will receive expeditious consideration. Please accept, as usual, the assurances of my highest consideration. -
First Election Security Threat Assessment
SECURITY THREAT ASSESSMENT: TOWARDS 2015 ELECTIONS January – June 2013 edition With Support from the MacArthur Foundation Table of Contents I. Executive Summary II. Security Threat Assessment for North Central III. Security Threat Assessment for North East IV. Security Threat Assessment for North West V. Security Threat Assessment for South East VI. Security Threat Assessment for South South VII. Security Threat Assessment for South West Executive Summary Political Context The merger between the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN), Congress for Progressive Change (CPC), All Nigerian Peoples Party (ANPP) and other smaller parties, has provided an opportunity for opposition parties to align and challenge the dominance of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). This however will also provide the backdrop for a keenly contested election in 2015. The zoning arrangement for the presidency is also a key issue that will define the face of the 2015 elections and possible security consequences. Across the six geopolitical zones, other factors will define the elections. These include the persisting state of insecurity from the insurgency and activities of militants and vigilante groups, the high stakes of election as a result of the availability of derivation revenues, the ethnic heterogeneity that makes elite consensus more difficult to attain, as well as the difficult environmental terrain that makes policing of elections a herculean task. Preparations for the Elections The political temperature across the country is heating up in preparation for the 2015 elections. While some state governors are up for re-election, most others are serving out their second terms. The implication is that most of the states are open for grab by either of the major parties and will therefore make the electoral contest fiercer in 2015 both within the political parties and in the general election. -
PROVISIONAL LIST.Pdf
S/N NAME YEAR OF CALL BRANCH PHONE NO EMAIL 1 JONATHAN FELIX ABA 2 SYLVESTER C. IFEAKOR ABA 3 NSIKAK UTANG IJIOMA ABA 4 ORAKWE OBIANUJU IFEYINWA ABA 5 OGUNJI CHIDOZIE KINGSLEY ABA 6 UCHENNA V. OBODOCHUKWU ABA 7 KEVIN CHUKWUDI NWUFO, SAN ABA 8 NWOGU IFIONU TAGBO ABA 9 ANIAWONWA NJIDEKA LINDA ABA 10 UKOH NDUDIM ISAAC ABA 11 EKENE RICHIE IREMEKA ABA 12 HIPPOLITUS U. UDENSI ABA 13 ABIGAIL C. AGBAI ABA 14 UKPAI OKORIE UKAIRO ABA 15 ONYINYECHI GIFT OGBODO ABA 16 EZINMA UKPAI UKAIRO ABA 17 GRACE UZOME UKEJE ABA 18 AJUGA JOHN ONWUKWE ABA 19 ONUCHUKWU CHARLES NSOBUNDU ABA 20 IREM ENYINNAYA OKERE ABA 21 ONYEKACHI OKWUOSA MUKOSOLU ABA 22 CHINYERE C. UMEOJIAKA ABA 23 OBIORA AKINWUMI OBIANWU, SAN ABA 24 NWAUGO VICTOR CHIMA ABA 25 NWABUIKWU K. MGBEMENA ABA 26 KANU FRANCIS ONYEBUCHI ABA 27 MARK ISRAEL CHIJIOKE ABA 28 EMEKA E. AGWULONU ABA 29 TREASURE E. N. UDO ABA 30 JULIET N. UDECHUKWU ABA 31 AWA CHUKWU IKECHUKWU ABA 32 CHIMUANYA V. OKWANDU ABA 33 CHIBUEZE OWUALAH ABA 34 AMANZE LINUS ALOMA ABA 35 CHINONSO ONONUJU ABA 36 MABEL OGONNAYA EZE ABA 37 BOB CHIEDOZIE OGU ABA 38 DANDY CHIMAOBI NWOKONNA ABA 39 JOHN IFEANYICHUKWU KALU ABA 40 UGOCHUKWU UKIWE ABA 41 FELIX EGBULE AGBARIRI, SAN ABA 42 OMENIHU CHINWEUBA ABA 43 IGNATIUS O. NWOKO ABA 44 ICHIE MATTHEW EKEOMA ABA 45 ICHIE CORDELIA CHINWENDU ABA 46 NNAMDI G. NWABEKE ABA 47 NNAOCHIE ADAOBI ANANSO ABA 48 OGOJIAKU RUFUS UMUNNA ABA 49 EPHRAIM CHINEDU DURU ABA 50 UGONWANYI S. AHAIWE ABA 51 EMMANUEL E. -
Nigeria Malaria Indicator Survey (MIS) 2015 [MIS20]
NIGERIA 2015 NIGERIA Malaria Indicator Survey (MIS) Malaria Indicator Survey (MIS) 2015 The Federal Republic of Nigeria Nigeria Malaria Indicator Survey 2015 Final Report National Malaria Elimination Programme Federal Ministry of Health Federal Republic of Nigeria Abuja, Nigeria National Population Commission Federal Republic of Nigeria Abuja, Nigeria National Bureau of Statistics Federal Republic of Nigeria Abuja, Nigeria ICF International Rockville, Maryland, USA August 2016 The 2015 Nigeria Malaria Indicator Survey (2015 NMIS) was implemented by the National Malaria Elimination Programme (NMEP), the National Population Commission (NPopC), and the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) from October 2015 through November 2015. Funding for the 2015 NMIS was provided by the United States President’s Malaria Initiative (PMI); the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria; and the United Kingdom Department for International Development (DFID) through the Support to National Malaria Program (SuNMaP). Other partners who provided technical support include the World Health Organization (WHO), United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), and Society for Family Health (SFH). ICF International provided technical assistance as well as funding to the project through The DHS Program, a project funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), provides support and technical assistance in the implementation of population and health surveys in countries worldwide. Additional information about the 2015 NMIS may be obtained from the National Malaria Elimination Programme, 1st Floor, Abia House, Central Business District, Abuja; Telephone: +234 803000296 or the headquarters of the National Population Commission, Plot 2031, Olusegun Obasanjo Way, Zone 7 Wuse District, PMB 0281, Abuja, Nigeria; Telephone: +234 9 523 9173; Fax: +234 9 5231024. -
2016 Approved Capital Budget (EHOA)
EDO STATEYEAR OF2016NIGERIA APPROVED BUDGET ESTIMATES TABLE OF CONTENT ♣ Budget Summary ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….3 ♣ Summary and Details of Revenue ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….4-60 ♣ Recurrent Expenditure (Personnel and Overhead Costs) ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….61-68 ♣ Consolidated Revenue Funds Charges ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….69 ♣ Capital Budget 70 • Summary ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….71-73 • Agriculture ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….74-75 • Fisheries ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….76 • Livestock ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….76 • Arts, Culture & Tourism ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….77 • Commerce & Industry ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….78 • Ministry of Education ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….79-80 • Ministry of Basic Education ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….81 • Energy (Rural Electrification) ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….82-83 • Water Resources ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….84-85 • Drainage & Sewage/Environmental Protection ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….86 • Forestry ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….87 • Health ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….88-90 • Information & Orientation ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….91 • Lands &Surveys ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….92 • Housing and Urban Planning ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….93-94 • Edo State Development -
Map of Edo State
THIS DOCUMENT IS IMPORTANT AND YOU ARE ADVISED TO CAREFULLY READ AND UNDERSTAND ITS CONTENTS. IF YOU ARE IN DOUBT ABOUT ITS CONTENTS OR THE ACTION TO TAKE, PLEASE CONSULT YOUR STOCKBROKER, SOLICITOR, BANKER OR AN INDEPENDENT INVESTMENT ADVISER. THIS PROSPECTUS HAS BEEN SEEN AND APPROVED BY THE MEMBERS OF THE EDO STATE EXECUTIVE COUNCIL AND THEY JOINTLY AND INDIVIDUALLY ACCEPT FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OF ALL INFORMATION GIVENTHIS DOCUMENTAND CONFIRM IS IMPORTANT THAT, AFTERAND YOU HAVING ARE ADVISED MADE TO INQUIRIES CAREFULLY WHICHREAD AND ARE UNDERSTAND REASONABLE ITS IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES ANDCONTENTS. TO THE IFBEST YOU OF ARE THEIR IN DOUBT KNOWLEDGE ABOUT ITS AND CONTENTS BELIEF, OR THERE THE ACTIONARE NO TO OTHER TAKE, FACTS, PLEASE THE CONSULT OMISSION YOUR OF WHICH WOULD MAKE ANY STOCKBROKER,STATEMENT HEREIN SOLICITOR, MISLEADING. BANKER OR AN INDEPENDENT INVESTMENT ADVISER. THIS PROSPECTUS HAS BEEN For information concerningSEEN certainAND APPROVED risk factors BY which THE shouldMEMBERS be considered OF THE EDO by STATEprospective EXECUTIVE investors, COUNCIL see risk AND factors THEY on pageJOINTLY 77. AND INDIVIDUALLY ACCEPT FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OF ALL INFORMATION GIVEN AND CONFIRM THAT, AFTER HAVING MADE INQUIRIES WHICH ARE REASONABLE IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES AND TO THE BEST OF THEIR KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, THERE ARE NO OTHER FACTS, THE OMISSION OF WHICH WOULD MAKE ANY STATEMENT HEREIN MISLEADING. For information concerning certain risk factors which should be considered by prospective investors, see risk