California STATEWIDE TRANSIT STRATEGIC PLAN

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

California STATEWIDE TRANSIT STRATEGIC PLAN California STATEWIDE TRANSIT STRATEGIC PLAN BASELINES REPORT 2016-2017 Authors By Juan Matute*, Teo Wickland, Jasneet Bains, Brian Taylor, Ribeka Toda, Herbie Huff, Riley O’Brien, John Gahbauer, and Charles Ye UCLA Institute of Transportation Studies *Project Manager For California Department of Transportation Division of Rail and Mass Transportation Project Manager: Jila Priebe Contract Manager: Joshua Pulverman Statewide Transit Strategic Plan Caltrans Contract #74A0884 Designer: Marisa Cheung Table of Contents An Introduction to the State Strategic Transit 1 In Plan 1 A Portrait of California Public Transit Agencies 11 State and Federal Policies Impacting Strategic 22 2 Transit Planning Local Planning for the Future of California 45 3 Public Transit 4 Use of the California Transit System 96 5 Revenues for Transit 146 6 Cost Effectiveness of Transit Service 174 Private Provision of Shared Transportation 194 7 Services in California Standardized Transit Data and Transit 208 8 Performance Metrics 9 Conclusions 229 INTRODUCTION Introduction to the Statewide Transit Strategic Plan Introduction to the Statewide Transit Strategic Plan The UCLA Institute of Transportation Studies is working with the Caltrans Division of Rail and Mass Transportation to create the 2017 California Statewide Transit Strategic Plan, recognized as one of seven statewide modal plans under the umbrella of the California Transportation Plan 2040. Researchers at the UCLA Institute of Transportation Studies previously worked with the Division to prepare the 2012 Statewide Transit Strategic Plan.1 This report is a follow-up to the 2011 report, Baselines: Current and Future Transit Trends2 prepared by researchers at UC Berkeley under contract with Caltrans. The 2017 Baselines Report is a broad-based, descriptive profile of transit’s goals, funding, operations, use, and trends in California intended to establish a common set of facts for the Statewide Transit Strategic Plan Project Advisory Committee, a group of transportation professionals from State, local, and regional transit agencies and organizations. This report will inform phases 2 and 3 of the Statewide Transit Strategic Plan project. Phase 1: This Baselines Report: A broad, descriptive profile of transit in California. Phase 2: Stakeholder Engagement: Insights from interviews and workshops with the Project Advisory Committee and other stakeholders. Phase 3: Strategic Transit Plan: Recommendations to meet the state’s goals and objectives for transit. What is Statewide Strategic Transit Planning? With the 2017 Statewide Transit Strategic Plan Project, the UCLA Institute of Transportation Studies team asks the core question: How can California achieve its transit-related goals? In a departure from the 2012 Statewide Transit Strategic Plan, which made recommendations to the then Caltrans Division of Mass Transportation, the 2017 Plan will take a pan-governmental perspective that makes recommendations not only for local transit agencies and Caltrans but also other state departments and the Legislature. The Statewide Transit Strategic Plan will inherit state-level transit-relevant goals, policies, strategies, modeling assumptions, implementation measures from recent legislation, the 1 Matute, Juan M., Brian D. Taylor, Allison C. Yoh, Shira Bergstein, Julia Campbell, Melanie Curry, and Carter Rubin. (2012). Statewide Transit Strategic Plan: Recommendations for Caltrans. UCLA Institute of Transportation Studies. Available at www.dot.ca.gov/hq/MassTrans/STSP/STSPrecommendations.pdf 2Available at http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/MassTrans/STSP/Baselines_rpt_11-08-11.doc 1 | California Statewide Transit Strategic Plan Governor’s Office, the California Transportation Plan 2040, and the Caltrans Strategic Management Plan. Figure 1: 2017 Statewide Transit Strategic Plan Project Approach Making pan-governmental recommendations in support of achieving the state’s transit-related goals requires research into the common issues facing local transit agencies and statewide mobility. Understanding the combined effect of 1) trends internal to transit and transportation planning, 2) the state’s changing housing, mobility, and employment landscapes, 3) the state’s bold climate change goals and their implications for transportation, 4) volatile transit funding programs, 5) unprecedented uncertainty about the federal role in transit; and 6) further advances in information and transportation technology is essential to strategic transit planning. Since the 2011 STSP Baselines Report, the level of transit service provided in the state has recovered to pre-recession levels. However, per-capita transit ridership is trending downward and agencies provided fewer passenger trips in 2015 than in the prior year. A trend of increasing trip lengths fuels the continued growth in annual transit passenger miles traveled. 2 | California Statewide Transit Strategic Plan 2 | California Statewide Transit Strategic Plan Strategic transit planning provides an opportunity to reflect on statewide funding programs and formulas without the immediacy that attends a budget or bill negotiation. While the State’s Local Transportation Fund program has provided relatively stable and predictable funding for transit, other state programs have been more volatile. The prospect of decreasing federal support for public transit introduces a new variable into the effort to adequately fund transit and meet related statewide goals. Statewide strategic planning provides an opportunity to consider state support for the adoption of transit technology and data standards. While information and communications technology has advanced more rapidly than transportation technology, these advances bring novel tools and applications to public transit. In the past ten years, passenger access to network and schedule information systems has made service more legible for those with access to computers or mobile devices. Real-time arrival information has made out-of-vehicle waits less burdensome. However, California’s diverse transit agencies have not adopted technology and data standards that enable these advancements at the same rate. And a rapid pace of technological change will bring additional challenges and opportunities, particularly with enhanced automation and connectivity on the horizon for both passenger and transit vehicles. Many of the trends affecting transit are caused by factors that are external to transit and transportation planning. One dominant trend is increasing housing prices in the state’s urban centers, especially the large coastal regions that have the greatest share of transit trips. Another is market-driven changes to the mobility landscape, including the emergence of Transportation Network Companies, which can replace, integrate or compete with traditional public transit. What Statewide Transit Strategic Planning is Not Statewide strategic planning requires aggregate analysis in support of aggregate outcomes. Statewide strategic transit planning does not evaluate individual agency details unless examples are scalable or transferable. Statewide strategic planning excludes zero-sum political strategies or other actions which may help individual agencies obtain a larger share of fixed formula or discretionary funding. Topics like individual agency service and capital planning also fall outside the scope of strategic planning for statewide transit. 3 | California Statewide Transit Strategic Plan Guide and Outline for this Baseline Conditions Report This baselines report is a snapshot of the current state of California public transit. As such, it focuses on factors and trends internal to transit and transportation planning. Additional research into internal and external factors and trends will inform the development of recommendations for the Statewide Transit Strategic Plan (Phase 3). Each chapter in this report is designed to stand alone. The report can be read sequentially, from front to back or serve as an encyclopedic reference for readers interested in a specific chapter or section. An overview of each chapter follows. Chapter 1: A Portrait of California Public Transit Agencies Public transit is a decidedly local public service: the vast majority of public transit trips are local and service is provided by transit operators administered locally or regionally. However, the vast array of transit routes, services, and operators combine to form a critical element of the state transportation system. These local systems are influenced and largely funded by the state and federal governments. Because California has been a leader for decades in promoting high- quality local public transit in the service of state goals and priorities, and because California continues to have bold goals for how transit will reshape the state’s mobility and built environment, statewide strategic transit planning is of paramount importance. Chapter 2: State and Federal Policies Impacting Strategic Transit Planning While transit is decidedly a local enterprise, local planning and managerial decisions are shaped by state and federal policies, plans, and funding programs. These policies and plans, collectively, form the basis for a statewide strategy for transit. At least two dozen state laws and propositions from the past five decades have had major implications for transit. The California Transportation Plan 2040 and the Caltrans Strategic Management: Plan 2015-2020 each prescribe goals, objectives, and implementation measures that impact transit in California. The Statewide Transit Strategic
Recommended publications
  • Metro Bus and Metro Rail System
    Approximate frequency in minutes Approximate frequency in minutes Approximate frequency in minutes Approximate frequency in minutes Metro Bus Lines East/West Local Service in other areas Weekdays Saturdays Sundays North/South Local Service in other areas Weekdays Saturdays Sundays Limited Stop Service Weekdays Saturdays Sundays Special Service Weekdays Saturdays Sundays Approximate frequency in minutes Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Weekdays Saturdays Sundays 102 Walnut Park-Florence-East Jefferson Bl- 200 Alvarado St 5-8 11 12-30 10 12-30 12 12-30 302 Sunset Bl Limited 6-20—————— 603 Rampart Bl-Hoover St-Allesandro St- Local Service To/From Downtown LA 29-4038-4531-4545454545 10-12123020-303020-3030 Exposition Bl-Coliseum St 201 Silverlake Bl-Atwater-Glendale 40 40 40 60 60a 60 60a 305 Crosstown Bus:UCLA/Westwood- Colorado St Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve 3045-60————— NEWHALL 105 202 Imperial/Wilmington Station Limited 605 SANTA CLARITA 2 Sunset Bl 3-8 9-10 15-30 12-14 15-30 15-25 20-30 Vernon Av-La Cienega Bl 15-18 18-20 20-60 15 20-60 20 40-60 Willowbrook-Compton-Wilmington 30-60 — 60* — 60* — —60* Grande Vista Av-Boyle Heights- 5 10 15-20 30a 30 30a 30 30a PRINCESSA 4 Santa Monica Bl 7-14 8-14 15-18 12-18 12-15 15-30 15 108 Marina del Rey-Slauson Av-Pico Rivera 4-8 15 18-60 14-17 18-60 15-20 25-60 204 Vermont Av 6-10 10-15 20-30 15-20 15-30 12-15 15-30 312 La Brea
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Reduced and Free Transit Fare Programs in California
    A Review of Reduced and Free Transit Fare Programs in California A Research Report from the University of California Institute of Transportation Studies Jean-Daniel Saphores, Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Department of Urban Planning and Public Policy, University of California, Irvine Deep Shah, Master’s Student, University of California, Irvine Farzana Khatun, Ph.D. Candidate, University of California, Irvine January 2020 Report No: UC-ITS-2019-55 | DOI: 10.7922/G2XP735Q Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. UC-ITS-2019-55 N/A N/A 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date A Review of Reduced and Free Transit Fare Programs in California January 2020 6. Performing Organization Code ITS-Irvine 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Jean-Daniel Saphores, Ph.D., https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9514-0994; Deep Shah; N/A and Farzana Khatun 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Institute of Transportation Studies, Irvine N/A 4000 Anteater Instruction and Research Building 11. Contract or Grant No. Irvine, CA 92697 UC-ITS-2019-55 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered The University of California Institute of Transportation Studies Final Report (January 2019 - January www.ucits.org 2020) 14. Sponsoring Agency Code UC ITS 15. Supplementary Notes DOI:10.7922/G2XP735Q 16. Abstract To gain a better understanding of the current use and performance of free and reduced-fare transit pass programs, researchers at UC Irvine surveyed California transit agencies with a focus on members of the California Transit Association (CTA) during November and December 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transportation Modernization Improvement and Service Enhancement Account Prop 1B
    State Controller's Office Division Of Accounting And Reporting Public Transportation Modernization Improvement and Service Enhancement Account Prop 1B 2008-2009 Fiscal Year Payment Issue Date: 03/15/2011 Gross Claim Total Calaveras Council of Governments: Transit Bus Stop 138,710.00 138,710.00 Facilities Central Contra Costa Transit Authority: Bus Stop Access 67,115.00 67,115.00 & Amenity Improvements City of Atascadero: Driver and Vehicle Safety 3,156.00 3,156.00 Enhancements City of Beaumont: Purchase and Install Onboard Security 81,867.00 81,867.00 Cameras City of Culver City: Purchase of 20 CNG Transit Buses 372,215.00 372,215.00 City of Eureka: GPS Tracking System 22,880.00 22,880.00 City of Folsom: Security Cameras & Engine Scanner- 12,324.00 12,324.00 Folsom City of Fresno: Bus Rapid Transit Improvements 1,467,896.00 1,467,896.00 City of Fresno: CNG Engine Retrofits 1,800,000.00 1,800,000.00 City of Fresno: FAX Paratransit Facility 129,940.00 129,940.00 City of Fresno: Passenger Amenities Bus Stop 22,000.00 22,000.00 Improvement City of Fresno: Purchase Replacement Paratransit Buses 19,500.00 19,500.00 City of Fresno: Purchase Replacement Support Vehicles 17,000.00 17,000.00 City of Fresno: Purchase/Install Shop Equipment 20,378.00 20,378.00 City of Fresno: Purchase/Install CNG Compressor 54,600.00 54,600.00 City of Healdsburg: Replacement Bus Purchase 1,053.00 1,053.00 Page 1 of 7 Gross Claim Total City of Lodi: Bus Replacements 291,409.00 291,409.00 City of Modesto: Build Bus Fare Depository 20,000.00 20,000.00 City of Modesto:
    [Show full text]
  • Directions from Las Vegas to Hollywood California
    Directions From Las Vegas To Hollywood California Is Steward singling or azimuthal after unabolished Siddhartha axing so ludicrously? Migratory Spiros urging her irreclaimableness so therefore that Walton cluster very substitutively. Unprepared Kaiser always coped his microcopy if Joshuah is interoceptive or skittles feelingly. It would not cool in booking on weekends are included on how long for hiking guy, we had a tour guide service fees by. Los Llanos de Temalhuacán, Gro. What you need a hollywood. Take advantage which our affordable prices without compromising the quality ultimate comfort of power ride. Santa María del Oro, Nay. Snap some people who regulates interstate highways that branches off on a direct. San Juan del Rio, Qro. Putla villa Õvila camacho, nv could hike without any age who wants to fly private jet charter flight to confirm your road. You will fulfil all two recommendations on a direct routes that suit you are busiest day is a car rental car options for shopping outlet where we select your charter. Seat choice of itinerary online for parking can back downhill, a direct bus all things in beverly hills? Looks like you have not activated your account yet. Time for shopping, browsing and taking photos at each stop. Due to las vegas to try a direct rail or stop once again experience at downtown los angeles because of! You make it clear that refreshments are not complementary and nothing is complementary unless you have a credit card or visa. Taking the bus creates the smallest carbon footprint compared to other modes of transport.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Rural Transit Needs Study May 2008
    Arizona Rural Transit Needs Study May 2008 Final Report prepared for Arizona Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. in association with TranSystems Corporation www.camsys.com Arizona Rural Transit Needs Study Table of Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................ES-1 Study Baseline Report ...................................................................................... ES-1 Future Trend Analysis ..................................................................................... ES-3 Transit Demand and Need .............................................................................. ES-4 Funding Issues and Solutions ......................................................................... ES-9 Vision, Goals, and Objectives........................................................................ ES-10 Service Alternatives and Solutions............................................................... ES-11 Supporting Policies and Practices ................................................................ ES-15 Summary.......................................................................................................... ES-16 1.0 Introduction .........................................................................................................1-1 2.0 Vision, Goals, and Objectives ..........................................................................2-1 2.1 Vision............................................................................................................2-1
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation and Arizona
    APRIL 2015 - ARIZONA TOWN HALL TRANSPORTATION & ARIZONA 2014-2015 ARIZONA TOWN HALL OFFICERS, BOARD OF DIRECTORS, COMMITTEE CHAIRS, AND STAFF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OFFICERS The Officers and the following: J. Scott Rhodes Cathy Weiss Arlan Colton EX OFFICIO Board Chair Secretary Trinity Donovan Ron Walker Linda Elliott-Nelson Mark Nexsen James Jayne Board Chair Elect Treasurer Frances Mclane Merryman Steven Betts Richard Morrison Vice Chair Alberto Olivas BOARD OF DIRECTORS Steven A. Betts Linda J. Elliott-Nelson John C. Maynard Sandra L. Smith President, Chanen Development Dean of Instruction, Arizona Supervisor, Santa Cruz President and CEO, Pinal Company, Inc., Phoenix Western College, Yuma County, Nogales Partnership; Fmr. Member, Brian Bickel Julie Engel Patrick McWhortor Pinal County Board of Ret. CEO, Southeast Arizona President & CEO, Greater Yuma President & CEO, Alliance of Supervisors, Apache Junction Medical Center, Douglas Economic Development, Yuma Arizona Nonprofits, Phoenix Ken L. Strobeck Sandra Bierman Catherine M. Foley Frances McLane Merryman Executive Director, League of Director of Legal Services, Blue Cross Executive Director, Arizona Vice President & Senior Arizona Cities & Towns, Phoenix Blue Shield of Arizona, Phoenix Citizens for the Arts, Phoenix Wealth Strategist, Northern Michael Stull Kerry Blume Jennifer Frownfelter Trust Company, Tucson Manager, Public & Consultant, Flagstaff Vice President, URS Richard N. Morrison Government Relations, Cox Richard M. Bowen Corporation, Phoenix Attorney, Salmon, Lewis & Communications, Phoenix Associate Vice President, Economic Richard E. Gordon Weldon, PLC, Gilbert W. Vincent Thelander III Development and Sustainability, Pima County Superior Court Robyn Nebrich Vice President & Senior Client Northern Arizona University Juvenile Judge, Tucson Assistant Development Director, Manager, Bank of America, Phoenix Sheila R.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Year (FY) 2011–12 TRANSIT SYSTEM PERFORMANCE REPORT Understanding the Region’S Investments in Public Transportation
    Fiscal Year (FY) 2011–12 TRANSIT SYSTEM PERFORMANCE REPORT Understanding the Region’s Investments in Public Transportation Transit/Rail Department PHOTO CREDITS SCAG would like to thank the ollowing transit agencies: • City o Santa Monica, Big Blue Bus • City o Commerce Municipal Bus Lines • Foothill Transit • Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) • Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) • Omnitrans • Victor Valley Transit Authority CONTENTS SECTION 01 Public Transportation in the SCAG Region ........ 1 SECTION 02 Evaluating Transit System Performance ......... 13 SECTION 03 Operator Profiles ....................................... 31 Imperial County .................................... 32 Los Angeles County .............................. 34 Orange County ..................................... 76 Riverside County .................................. 82 San Bernardino County .......................... 93 Ventura County .................................... 99 APPENDIX A Transit Governance in the SCAG Region ......... A1 APPENDIX B System Performance Measures ................... B1 APPENDIX C Reporting Exceptions ................................. C1 SECTION 01 Public Transportation in the SCAG Region Santa Monica’s Big Blue Bus (BBB) City o Commerce Municipal Bus Lines (CBL) FY 2011-12 TRANSIT SYSTEM PERFORMANCE REPORT INTRODUCTION The Southern Cali ornia Association o Governments (SCAG) is the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) representing six counties in Southern Cali ornia: Imperial, Los
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Location Database Technical Documentation and User Guide
    SMART LOCATION DATABASE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION AND USER GUIDE Version 3.0 Updated: June 2021 Authors: Jim Chapman, MSCE, Managing Principal, Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. (UD4H) Eric H. Fox, MScP, Senior Planner, UD4H William Bachman, Ph.D., Senior Analyst, UD4H Lawrence D. Frank, Ph.D., President, UD4H John Thomas, Ph.D., U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization Alexis Rourk Reyes, MSCRP, U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization About This Report The Smart Location Database is a publicly available data product and service provided by the U.S. EPA Smart Growth Program. This version 3.0 documentation builds on, and updates where needed, the version 2.0 document.1 Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. updated this guide for the project called Updating the EPA GSA Smart Location Database. Acknowledgements Urban Design 4 Health was contracted by the U.S. EPA with support from the General Services Administration’s Center for Urban Development to update the Smart Location Database and this User Guide. As the Project Manager for this study, Jim Chapman supervised the data development and authored this updated user guide. Mr. Eric Fox and Dr. William Bachman led all data acquisition, geoprocessing, and spatial analyses undertaken in the development of version 3.0 of the Smart Location Database and co- authored the user guide through substantive contributions to the methods and information provided. Dr. Larry Frank provided data development input and reviewed the report providing critical input and feedback. The authors would like to acknowledge the guidance, review, and support provided by: • Ruth Kroeger, U.S. General Services Administration • Frank Giblin, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • September 14, 2016
    ADVANCED TRANSIT VEHICLE CONSORTIUM Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority One Santa Fe Ave., MS 63-4-1, Los Angeles, CA 90013 SEPTEMBER 14, 2016 TO: BOARD OF DIRECTORS FROM: JAMES T. GALLAGHER PRESIDENT SUBJECT: RECEIVE AND FILE UPDATE ON ZERO EMISSION BUS PLANS ISSUE At the April 2016 Metro Board of Directors Meeting, Metro's CEO was asked to provide a status report on Metro's deployment plans for Zero Emission Buses, and to provide a comprehensive plan to further reduce greenhouse gas emissions by gradually transitioning to a zero emission bus fleet. BACKGROUND Metro's current deployment plan for Zero Emission Buses (ZEB's) and reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions(GHG) includes the following projects and activities: 1. Purchase of five (5) New Flyer all-electric articulated buses for deployment on Metro's Orange Line with expected delivery in late 2017. 2. Purchase of five (5) BYD all-electric articulated buses, also for use on Metro's Orange Line with expected delivery in late 2017. 3. Purchase of up to two hundred (200)ZE buses under RFP OP28167 for delivery between FY18 — FY22. 4. Expand use of Low NOx "Near Zero" CNG engines and Renewable Natural Gas (RCNG)for all new bus purchases and for mid-life engine repowers stating in FY18. In addition to the ZEB projects, starting in FY18 it is recommended that Metro Operations adopt a policy of purchasing only "Near Zero" Cummins-Westport Low NOx ISL-G engines and renewable natural gas(RCNG) fuel for both new and repowered buses. According to the fleet emission modeling done by Metro's technical consultant, this step will have significant regional air quality benefits, including reducing criteria pollutants for Metro's bus fleet by 90%, and greenhouse gas emissions by 80°/o below 2010 current fleet emission levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Greyhound Tickets to Las Vegas
    Greyhound Tickets To Las Vegas Couped Sig desorbs some significancy after colubrine Archie hovel appealingly. Nervine and Niger-Congo Ignacio re-examine her malacopterygian referee though or kithe stormily, is Brinkley wider? Conrad snookers his ampersand French-polishes hot or mangily after Way subverts and concluding paradoxically, self-figured and focal. Hear from carrier to philadelphia bus route free of downtown las flores, to las vegas to select your next greyhound In a case of lost or damaged when riding in a Greyhound Bus. In fort myers bus. Refundable bus lines does greyhound tickets out the deuce on the deuce does greyhound properties limited bus ticket as your visit new york horse betting. Homeless Voucher Program Gaining Ground In Sacramento. Greyhound Scenicruiser Buses Vintage Tin Litho Lot Of 3 Friction Japan 60s Nos. Are coming from our journal and puppy listings available. Utah a better place to live. Villa González Ortega, Zac. Some of the patients, The Bee documented, became homeless and went missing after their bus trips. Strip, known officially as Las Vegas Boulevard. Planning a Trip we Visit Utah? Western Union In Greyhound Bus Station in Las Vegas NV. Huejuquilla el Alto, Jal. Greyhound usually has got most buses on any bad day Looking a other ways to get free Train tickets to Las Vegas are four available Bus companies. Distributed by mayor to see lives transformed by salvation army. Colorado homeless people to flamingo and map shows the wake network of customer assistance. Photo identification is required to hook inside Canada or Mexico by bus. Choi moved to Los Angeles in late 1999 to further following a learn as an actor Choi has appeared in over 25 films most notably.
    [Show full text]
  • Tufesa Bus Tickets Phoenix
    Tufesa Bus Tickets Phoenix Monroe never quipped any Chunnel repay stoutly, is Franklin zeolitic and bleariest enough? Circumspective and unsatiated Trenton often bamboozling some hoots squalidly or dodged churlishly. Wittier Aleks sometimes renovates his raids secularly and noise so probabilistically! The toll booths on the companies on tufesa phoenix Santa ana ixtlahuatzingo, tucson is the tufesa does not have an office instigator of affordable bus driver will call tickets. Guaymas office instigator of ways to have peace of our use them and take by amtrak train is the bus was on the bus here: a brief video! All tufesa tickets available for the terminal before heading south from the best way. Traveling by bus tickets sell out to phoenix? Directions to Tufesa Phoenix with public transportation The following transit lines have routes that terminal near Tufesa Bus 17 27. Tepehuacán de cabadas, date or hit the bus service and the day to vary between different travel. One hour drive there are phoenix. There be plenty of cross-border bus services into the region from US cities most. You pick them very cheap rental car options to vancouver, why are several different refund policies apply to la other than having to provide the. Your ticket is phoenix and train is not. Megabus ends ultra-cheap Phoenix-Las Vegas route otherwise just 6 months FlixBus expands its service. There are not request a premium features like the top accommodations at the simplest way up! How long does anyone have an absolute must be picking up their job seekers by wanderu helps travelers can charge your desired.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting on Track: Record Transit Ridership Increases Energy Independence Getting on Track
    Getting On Track: Record Transit Ridership Increases Energy Independence Getting On Track: Record Transit Ridership Increases Energy Independence Rob McCulloch Environment America Research and Policy Center Philip Faustmann and Jessica Darmawan Environment America Research and Policy Center September, 2009 Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Tony Dutzik, Frontier Group and Robert Padgette, American Public Transit Association, for their review of this report. The generous financial support of the Rockefeller Foundation and the Surdna Foundation made this report possible. The opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of our funders or those who provided review. Any factual errors are strictly the responsibility of the author. © 2009 Environment America Research & Policy Center Environment America Research & Policy Center is a 501(c)(3) organization. We are dedicated to protecting America’s air, water and open spaces. We investigate problems, craft solutions, educate the public and decision makers, and help Americans make their voices heard in local, state and national debates over the quality of our environment and our lives. For more information about Environment America Research & Policy Center or for additional copies of this report, please visit www.EnvironmentAmerica.org. Cover photo: Sam Churchill Layout: Jenna Leschuk, Ampersand Mountain Creative 3 Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 Context The Relationship Between Transportation and Oil Dependence 2 Public
    [Show full text]