DOCSLIB.ORG

Fiscal Year (FY) 2011–12 TRANSIT SYSTEM PERFORMANCE REPORT Understanding the Region’S Investments in Public Transportation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fiscal Year (FY) 2011–12 TRANSIT SYSTEM PERFORMANCE REPORT Understanding the Region’S Investments in Public Transportation Fiscal Year (FY) 2011–12 TRANSIT SYSTEM PERFORMANCE REPORT Understanding the Region’s Investments in Public Transportation Transit/Rail Department PHOTO CREDITS SCAG would like to thank the ollowing transit agencies: • City o Santa Monica, Big Blue Bus • City o Commerce Municipal Bus Lines • Foothill Transit • Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) • Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) • Omnitrans • Victor Valley Transit Authority CONTENTS SECTION 01 Public Transportation in the SCAG Region ........ 1 SECTION 02 Evaluating Transit System Performance ......... 13 SECTION 03 Operator Profiles ....................................... 31 Imperial County .................................... 32 Los Angeles County .............................. 34 Orange County ..................................... 76 Riverside County .................................. 82 San Bernardino County .......................... 93 Ventura County .................................... 99 APPENDIX A Transit Governance in the SCAG Region ......... A1 APPENDIX B System Performance Measures ................... B1 APPENDIX C Reporting Exceptions ................................. C1 SECTION 01 Public Transportation in the SCAG Region Santa Monica’s Big Blue Bus (BBB) City o Commerce Municipal Bus Lines (CBL) FY 2011-12 TRANSIT SYSTEM PERFORMANCE REPORT INTRODUCTION The Southern Cali ornia Association o Governments (SCAG) is the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) representing six counties in Southern Cali ornia: Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura. SCAG is responsible under state and ederal law or preparing long-range transportation plans and transportation improvement programs through a per ormance- driven, outcome-based approach, and in cooperation with the public and stakeholders, including the State o Cali ornia and public transportation operators. These plans and programs must provide or the development and integrated management and operation o transportation systems and acilities that will unction as an intermodal transportation system or the ederally designated metropolitan planning area and as an integral part o an intermodal transportation system or the state and the nation. Public transportation, or transit, is a mobility strategy that allows travelers modal choice to reach their destinations, and provides mobility or residents without access to vehicles. Transit also represents a signi icant investment within the region’s overall transportation system, composing roughly hal (in com- bination with passenger rail) o all investments in the 2012-2035 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustain- able Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS). SCAG REGION NEVADA CALIFORNIA 191 cities SAN BERNARDINO VENTURA 6 counties LOS ANGELES 38,000 square miles RIVERSIDE ORANGE ARIZONA 19 million people PACIFIC OCEAN IMPERIAL MEXICO 1 SECTION 01 Public Transportation in the SCAG Region operations within the context o the production THE FEDERAL TRANSIT ACT OF 2012 DEFINES o the 2016 RTP/SCS PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AS: X Providing a benchmarking resource which Transportation by a conveyance that provides providers o public transportation can use to regular and continuing general or special trans- compare their system’s perormance to that o portation to the public, but does not include comparable agencies school bus, charter, or intercity bus transpor- X Addressing new Metropolitan Planning provisions tation or intercity passenger rail transportation contained in Moving Ahead or Progress in the provided by the entity described in chapter 243 21st Century (MAP-21), relating to the production (or a successor to such entity).i o public transportation System Perormance Reports in Regional Transportation Plans The purpose o this report is to provide an incremen- This report is organized into three sections: tal step towards producing a transit System Peror- SECTION 01 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION IN mance Report or the 2016 RTP/SCS, and to continue THE SCAG REGION discusses the types o tran- incorporating an annual review o system peror- sit provided in the region, how service provision is mance geared towards planning or operations and governed, transit’s role in providing mobility, and the maintenance into SCAG’s transit modal planning prac- external beneits transit provides. tices. There are our key actors this report addresses SECTION 02 REGIONAL PERFORMANCE as an incremental step towards the 2016 RTP/SCS: analyzes transit perormance at a regional level, X Providing a ramework or understanding the addressing the system’s productivity, the inancial region’s large and complex public transporta- resources dedicated to the region’s transit system, tion system, and analyzing its perormance at the geographic distribution o service provision and that same level. This includes contextualizing consumption or Fiscal Year 2011-2012 (FY 2011-12)11. public transportation’s role in providing mobility SECTION 03 OPERATOR PROFILES depicts the within the region, addressing governance issues, individual perormance o each o the transit proper- and addressing the geographic distribution o ties in the region that report data within the National service provision and consumption, in addition Transit Database’s urban operator’s ormat. to addressing the growing role o rail transit and demand response services in the region Finally, the Appendices provide urther detail regard- ing transit governance in the SCAG region and the X Providing a resource that helps policy makers development o the system perormance measures understand the nature and extent o the region’s used in this report. investments in public transportation, the kinds o returns those investments are delivering, and adding to the discussion regarding planning or 1 For purposes of this report, a fiscal year begins on July 1 and ends June 30 of the following calendar year. 2 Southern California Association of Governments FY 2011-12 TRANSIT SYSTEM PERFORMANCE REPORT annual reports (see Table 4). These measures were reviewed by the High Speed Rail and Transit Subcom- mittee o SCAG’s Transportation Committee, and by the Regional Transit Technical Advisory Committee. Deining Public Transportation The Federal Transit Act o 2012 deines public trans- portation as: “Transportation by a conveyance that provides regular and continuing general or special transpor- tation to the public, but does not include school bus, charter, or intercity bus transportation or intercity passenger rail transportation provided by The 2012-2035 RTP/SCS the entity described in chapter 243 (or a successor On April 4, 2012 SCAG’s Regional Council adopted the to such entity)i.” 2012-2035 RTP/SCS, the culmination o a multi-year planning eort involving stakeholders rom across As amended by MAP-21, 49 US Code Section 5302, the region. This plan laid orth the region’s vision urther deines public transportation as: or mobility investments over a twenty- three year “(14) PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION.—The term ‘public time span, and was the irst to integrate a “Sustain- transportation’— able Communities Strategy” identiying “high quality (A) means regular, continuing shared-ride surace transit corridors” or inill development, and advanc- transportation services that are open to the gen- ing strategies or reducing regional greenhouse gas eral public or open to a segment o the general emissions. public deined by age, disability, or low income; and As part o the analytical work comprising the produc- (B) does not include— tion o the transit appendix to the 2012-2035 RTP/ SCS, base year perormance data were analyzed or (i) intercity passenger rail transportation provided 25 agencies providing inter-jurisdictional transit ser- by the entity described in chapter 243 (or a succes- vice in the SCAG Region. sor to such entity); The 2010-11 System Perormance Report (ii) intercity bus service; The 2010-11 Transit System Perormance Report was (iii) charter bus service; (iv) school bus service; (v) SCAG’s irst eort at producing an annual ormat or sightseeing service; measuring system perormance. This eort included a (vi) courtesy shuttle service or patrons o one or review o the literature on transit perormance mea- more speciic establishments; or sures (see Appendix B) which led to the selection o a discrete set o measures proposed to be used or the (vii) intra-terminal or intra-acility shuttle services.” 3 SECTION 01 Public Transportation in the SCAG Region It is important to note that per the ederal deinition o transit, and or the sake o this report, services such FIGURE 1 Public Transit Modes in the SCAG Region as intercity passenger transportation, high speed rail, FIXED ROUTE BUS SERVICE university or workplace shuttles, school buses, or tour- ism based services do not qualiy as public transporta- De ined as “a transit mode comprised o rubber tired vehicles operating on tion and will not be considered here. Further, since the ixed routes and schedules over road- perormance o the Southern Caliornia Regional Rail ways” (re erred to as Motor Bus in the National Transit Database). Authority’s Metrolink service was analyzed in SCAG’s 2013 Rail System Per ormance Report, its individual perormance will not be analyzed here in any depth. DEMAND RESPONSE The transit system in the six-county SCAG Region is De ined as “a transit mode comprised comprised o an extensive network o services pro- o passenger cars, vans, or small buses operating in response to calls vided by dozens o operators. The network includes rom passengers or their agents ixed-route
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Metro Bus and Metro Rail System
    Approximate frequency in minutes Approximate frequency in minutes Approximate frequency in minutes Approximate frequency in minutes Metro Bus Lines East/West Local Service in other areas Weekdays Saturdays Sundays North/South Local Service in other areas Weekdays Saturdays Sundays Limited Stop Service Weekdays Saturdays Sundays Special Service Weekdays Saturdays Sundays Approximate frequency in minutes Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Weekdays Saturdays Sundays 102 Walnut Park-Florence-East Jefferson Bl- 200 Alvarado St 5-8 11 12-30 10 12-30 12 12-30 302 Sunset Bl Limited 6-20—————— 603 Rampart Bl-Hoover St-Allesandro St- Local Service To/From Downtown LA 29-4038-4531-4545454545 10-12123020-303020-3030 Exposition Bl-Coliseum St 201 Silverlake Bl-Atwater-Glendale 40 40 40 60 60a 60 60a 305 Crosstown Bus:UCLA/Westwood- Colorado St Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve 3045-60————— NEWHALL 105 202 Imperial/Wilmington Station Limited 605 SANTA CLARITA 2 Sunset Bl 3-8 9-10 15-30 12-14 15-30 15-25 20-30 Vernon Av-La Cienega Bl 15-18 18-20 20-60 15 20-60 20 40-60 Willowbrook-Compton-Wilmington 30-60 — 60* — 60* — —60* Grande Vista Av-Boyle Heights- 5 10 15-20 30a 30 30a 30 30a PRINCESSA 4 Santa Monica Bl 7-14 8-14 15-18 12-18 12-15 15-30 15 108 Marina del Rey-Slauson Av-Pico Rivera 4-8 15 18-60 14-17 18-60 15-20 25-60 204 Vermont Av 6-10 10-15 20-30 15-20 15-30 12-15 15-30 312 La Brea
    [Show full text]
  • Staff Report
    Staff Report TO: Mayor, and City Council Members FROM: Elizabeth Gibbs, Director of Community Services DATE February 4, 2020 SUBJECT: Opposition Letter – SunLine Transit Agency Proposed Commuter Link Route 10 Background and Analysis: On November 7, 2019, SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine) announced to the Transportation Now (T-Now) committee that they had completed a new draft schedule for their Commuter Link 220, which provides service from Palm Desert to the Riverside Metrolink Station, with stops at Casino Morongo and Beaumont Walmart (Attachment A). On November 12, 2019, SunLine held a community meeting at the Beaumont Civic Center and presented a proposed new commuter link route with service from the Coachella Valley to California State University San Bernardino’s (CSUSB) main campus in San Bernardino, with a stop at Beaumont Walmart (Attachment B). SunLine presented their proposal as follows: Current Service - Three (3) eastbound and three (3) westbound trips from Coachella Valley to Riverside, - FY 19 ridership was 13,561 passenger trips, Proposed Service - Four (4) eastbound and four (4) westbound trips from Coachella Valley to San Bernardino, and - Target passengers are CSUSB students. Following the community meeting, City staff contacted SunLine staff and requested a meeting to discuss the proposed route to gain more information about future service; however, no response was received. On January 9, 2020, SunLine staff emailed a draft support letter for their grant application for a solar microgrid to hydrogen transit project. In the letter, they introduced a new Commuter Link Route 10 bus service from Indio to San Bernardino, with stops at Beaumont Walmart and the San Bernardino Transit Center (SBTC) (Attachment C).
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Reduced and Free Transit Fare Programs in California
    A Review of Reduced and Free Transit Fare Programs in California A Research Report from the University of California Institute of Transportation Studies Jean-Daniel Saphores, Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Department of Urban Planning and Public Policy, University of California, Irvine Deep Shah, Master’s Student, University of California, Irvine Farzana Khatun, Ph.D. Candidate, University of California, Irvine January 2020 Report No: UC-ITS-2019-55 | DOI: 10.7922/G2XP735Q Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. UC-ITS-2019-55 N/A N/A 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date A Review of Reduced and Free Transit Fare Programs in California January 2020 6. Performing Organization Code ITS-Irvine 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Jean-Daniel Saphores, Ph.D., https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9514-0994; Deep Shah; N/A and Farzana Khatun 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Institute of Transportation Studies, Irvine N/A 4000 Anteater Instruction and Research Building 11. Contract or Grant No. Irvine, CA 92697 UC-ITS-2019-55 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered The University of California Institute of Transportation Studies Final Report (January 2019 - January www.ucits.org 2020) 14. Sponsoring Agency Code UC ITS 15. Supplementary Notes DOI:10.7922/G2XP735Q 16. Abstract To gain a better understanding of the current use and performance of free and reduced-fare transit pass programs, researchers at UC Irvine surveyed California transit agencies with a focus on members of the California Transit Association (CTA) during November and December 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transportation Modernization Improvement and Service Enhancement Account Prop 1B
    State Controller's Office Division Of Accounting And Reporting Public Transportation Modernization Improvement and Service Enhancement Account Prop 1B 2008-2009 Fiscal Year Payment Issue Date: 03/15/2011 Gross Claim Total Calaveras Council of Governments: Transit Bus Stop 138,710.00 138,710.00 Facilities Central Contra Costa Transit Authority: Bus Stop Access 67,115.00 67,115.00 & Amenity Improvements City of Atascadero: Driver and Vehicle Safety 3,156.00 3,156.00 Enhancements City of Beaumont: Purchase and Install Onboard Security 81,867.00 81,867.00 Cameras City of Culver City: Purchase of 20 CNG Transit Buses 372,215.00 372,215.00 City of Eureka: GPS Tracking System 22,880.00 22,880.00 City of Folsom: Security Cameras & Engine Scanner- 12,324.00 12,324.00 Folsom City of Fresno: Bus Rapid Transit Improvements 1,467,896.00 1,467,896.00 City of Fresno: CNG Engine Retrofits 1,800,000.00 1,800,000.00 City of Fresno: FAX Paratransit Facility 129,940.00 129,940.00 City of Fresno: Passenger Amenities Bus Stop 22,000.00 22,000.00 Improvement City of Fresno: Purchase Replacement Paratransit Buses 19,500.00 19,500.00 City of Fresno: Purchase Replacement Support Vehicles 17,000.00 17,000.00 City of Fresno: Purchase/Install Shop Equipment 20,378.00 20,378.00 City of Fresno: Purchase/Install CNG Compressor 54,600.00 54,600.00 City of Healdsburg: Replacement Bus Purchase 1,053.00 1,053.00 Page 1 of 7 Gross Claim Total City of Lodi: Bus Replacements 291,409.00 291,409.00 City of Modesto: Build Bus Fare Depository 20,000.00 20,000.00 City of Modesto:
    [Show full text]
  • Sunline Transit Agency Board of Directors Agenda for 20 June 2018
    SunLine Transit Agency June 20, 2018 12:00 p.m. AGENDA Regular Board of Directors Meeting Board Room 32-505 Harry Oliver Trail Thousand Palms, CA 92276 In compliance with the Brown Act and Government Code Section 54957.5, agenda materials distributed 72 hours prior to the meeting, which are public records relating to open session agenda items, will be available for inspection by members of the public prior to the meeting at SunLine Transit Agency’s Administration Building, 32505 Harry Oliver Trail, Thousand Palms, CA 92276 and on the Agency’s website, sunline.org. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, Government Code Section 54954.2, and the Federal Transit Administration Title VI, please contact the Clerk of the Board at (760) 343-3456 if special assistance is needed to participate in a Board meeting, including accessibility and translation services. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to the meeting time will assist staff in assuring reasonable arrangements can be made to provide assistance at the meeting. ITEM RECOMMENDATION 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. PRESENTATIONS a) Capital Projects Update (Staff: Rudy Le Flore, Chief Project Consultant) b) SunLine University: Talent Development (Staff: Jenny Bellinger, Performance Project Assistant) 4. FINALIZATION OF AGENDA 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – APPROVE MAY 23, 2018 BOARD MEETING (PAGE 4-6) SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING PAGE 2 JUNE 20, 2018 ITEM RECOMMENDATION 6. PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVE COMMENTS NON AGENDA ITEMS Members of the public may address the Board regarding any item within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board; however, no action may be taken on off-agenda items unless authorized.
    [Show full text]
  • Regular Meeting No. 2020-3A March 26, 2020 2:00 P.M. AGENDA Regular Board of Directors Meeting Telephonic Meeting Please Dial-In
    Regular Meeting No. 2020-3A March 26, 2020 2:00 p.m. AGENDA Regular Board of Directors Meeting Telephonic Meeting Please dial-in: Telephone number: +1 (872) 240-3212 Code: 358317125 When asked for an Audio PIN, just press # SPECIAL NOTICE REGARDING COVID-19 On March 4, 2020, Governor Newsom proclaimed a State of Emergency in California as a result of the threat of COVID-19. Public gatherings are to be limited. Further, on March 18, 2020, Governor Newsom temporarily suspended the Brown Act requirements pertaining to telephonic conferencing of local government meetings and the requirement to have at least one physical location available to the public for purposes of attending the meeting. As such, RTA has opted to conduct the March 26, 2020 meeting via teleconference. Participants can participate via teleconference in each participant’s own office / home area which will not be made physically accessible to the public. Members of the public wishing to participate via teleconference, can do so by dialing in to the following number at 2:00 p.m. on March 26, 2020: (872) 240-3212; Access Code: 358317125. If you do not wish to speak, please silence / mute your device during the meeting. Those wishing to speak during the meeting, may submit comments and/or questions in writing for Board consideration by sending them to the Clerk of the Board at [email protected]. If possible, please submit your written comments by Wednesday, March 25, 2020, at 5:00 p.m. Once you dial in, you must ensure that you are in a quiet environment with no background noise (traffic, children, pets, etc.) You must mute your phone until called upon by the Chair or the Clerk to speak.
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Location Database Technical Documentation and User Guide
    SMART LOCATION DATABASE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION AND USER GUIDE Version 3.0 Updated: June 2021 Authors: Jim Chapman, MSCE, Managing Principal, Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. (UD4H) Eric H. Fox, MScP, Senior Planner, UD4H William Bachman, Ph.D., Senior Analyst, UD4H Lawrence D. Frank, Ph.D., President, UD4H John Thomas, Ph.D., U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization Alexis Rourk Reyes, MSCRP, U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization About This Report The Smart Location Database is a publicly available data product and service provided by the U.S. EPA Smart Growth Program. This version 3.0 documentation builds on, and updates where needed, the version 2.0 document.1 Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. updated this guide for the project called Updating the EPA GSA Smart Location Database. Acknowledgements Urban Design 4 Health was contracted by the U.S. EPA with support from the General Services Administration’s Center for Urban Development to update the Smart Location Database and this User Guide. As the Project Manager for this study, Jim Chapman supervised the data development and authored this updated user guide. Mr. Eric Fox and Dr. William Bachman led all data acquisition, geoprocessing, and spatial analyses undertaken in the development of version 3.0 of the Smart Location Database and co- authored the user guide through substantive contributions to the methods and information provided. Dr. Larry Frank provided data development input and reviewed the report providing critical input and feedback. The authors would like to acknowledge the guidance, review, and support provided by: • Ruth Kroeger, U.S. General Services Administration • Frank Giblin, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Transit Technical Advisory Committee April 30, 2018 Full
    MEETING OF THE REGIONAL TRANSIT TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS Monday, April 30, 2018 900 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 1700 Los Angeles, CA 90017 10:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. T: (213) 236- 1800 www.scag.ca.gov SCAG LOS ANGELES MAIN OFFICE 900 WILSHIRE BLVD., STE. 1700 REGIONAL COUNCIL OFFICERS POLICY COMMITTEE ROOM A President LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017 Margaret E. Finlay, Duarte (213) 236-1800 First Vice President Alan D. Wapner, Ontario Second Vice President TELECONFERENCE Bill Jahn, Big Bear Lake TO JOIN THE MEETING: https://zoom.us/j/318478770 Immediate Past President CONFERENCE NUMBER: 1 (646) 558 8656 Michele Martinez, Santa Ana MEETING ID: 318 478 770 COMMITTEE CHAIRS VIDEOCONFERENCE Executive/Administration Orange SCAG Office Riverside SCAG Office Margaret E. Finlay, Duarte 600 S. MAIN ST, STE. 906 3403 10TH STREET, SUITE 805 Commu nity, Economic & ORANGE, CA 92863 RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 Human Development Rex Richardson, Long Beach San Bernardino Ventura SCAG Office Energy & Environment 950 COUNTY SQUARE DR, STE 101 Carmen Ramirez, Oxnard SCAG Office 1170 W. 3RD ST, STE. 140 VENTURA, CA 93003 Transportation SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92410 Curt Hagman, San Bernardino County PLEASE NOTE NEW LOCATION If members of the public wish to review the attachments or have any questions on any of the agenda items, please contact Matt Gleason at (213) 236-1832 or email [email protected] SCAG, in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), will accommodate persons who require a modification of accommodation in order to participate in this meeting. SCAG is also committed to helping people with limited proficiency in the English language access the agency’s essential public information and services.
    [Show full text]
  • Today's Transit for Tomorrow's World
    SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY FY 2016/17 – FY 2018/19 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN “Today’s Transit for Tomorrow’s World” Contents PAGE CHAPTER 1 – SYSTEM OVERVIEW........................................................................................ 1 1.1 Description of Service Area .......................................................................................... 2 1.2 Population Profile and Demographic Projection ........................................................... 5 1.3 Fixed Route Transit and Paratransit Services .............................................................. 5 1.4 Current Fare Structure ................................................................................................ 22 1.5 Revenue Fleet ............................................................................................................ 23 1.6 Existing/Planned Facilities .......................................................................................... 24 1.7 Existing Coordination between Transit Agencies ....................................................... 24 1.8 Taxi Administration ..................................................................................................... 25 CHAPTER 2 – EXISTING SERVICE AND ROUTE PERFORMANCE ........................................ 26 2.1 Fixed Route Service – Route by Route Evaluation and Analysis ............................... 27 2.2 Paratransit Service – System Performance ................................................................ 28 2.3 Key Performance Indicators ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • March 27, 2019 6:00 Pm
    1503 N. IMPERIAL AVENUE, SUITE 104 EL CENTRO, CA 92243-2875 PHONE: (760) 592-4494 FAX: (760) 592-4410 TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AGENDA REVISED WEDNESDAY, MARCH 27, 2019 6:00 PM County of Imperial Administration Center Board of Supervisors Chambers 940 W. Main Street, Second Floor El Centro, CA 92243 CHAIR: ROBERT AMPARANO VICE CHAIR: GEORGE NAVA Individuals wishing accessibility accommodations at this meeting, under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), may request such accommodations to aid hearing, visual, or mobility impairment by contacting ICTC offices at (760) 592-4494. Please note that 48 hours advance notice will be necessary to honor your request. I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL II. EMERGENCY ITEMS A. Discussion/Action of emergency items, if necessary. III. PUBLIC COMMENTS Any member of the public may address the Commission for a period not to exceed three minutes on any item of interest not on the agenda within the jurisdiction of the Commission. The Commission will listen to all communication, but in compliance with the Brown Act, will not take any action on items that are not on the agenda. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR (Executive Director recommends approval of consent calendar items) A. Approval of the ICTC Commission Draft Minutes: February 27, 2019 B. Receive and File: 1. ICTC Management Committee Draft Minutes: March 13, 2019 2. ICTC SSTAC Minutes: February 6, 2019 C. Passenger Statistical Summary Project for FY 2019-20 for Imperial Valley Transit (IVT) It is requested that the ICTC Management Committee forward this item to the ICTC Commission for their review and approval after public comment, if any.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Advisory Committee of the Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee
    TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE OF THE MOBILE SOURCE AIR POLLUTION REDUCTION REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA Thursday, September 2, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. Pursuant to Governor Newsom’s Executive Orders N-25-20 (March 12, 2020) and N-29-20 (March 17, 2020), the MSRC-TAC meeting will only be conducted via video conferencing and by telephone. Please follow the instructions below to join the meeting remotely. INSTRUCTIONS FOR ELECTRONIC PARTICIPATION AT BOTTOM OF AGENDA Join Zoom Webinar Meeting - from PC or Laptop https://scaqmd.zoom.us/j/91592357379 Zoom Webinar ID: 915 9235 7379 (applies to all) Teleconference Dial In +1 669 900 6833 One Tap Mobile +16699006833, 915 9235 7379# Audience will be allowed to provide public comment through telephone or Zoom connection during public comment periods PUBLIC COMMENT WILL STILL BE TAKEN Members of the public may address this body concerning any agenda item before or during consideration of that item (Gov’t Code Section 54954.3(a)). If you wish to comment on an agenda item or during the public comment period, please “raise your hand” on Zoom or dial *9 on your phone. All agendas for regular meetings are posted at District Headquarters, 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California, at least 72 hours in advance of the regular meeting. Speakers may be limited to three (3) minutes each. 9/2/21 MSRC-TAC Agenda Committee Members MSRC-TAC Chair Jenny Chan Alternate: Lorelle Moe-Luna Representing Riverside County Transportation Commission MSRC-TAC Vice-Chair Steven Lee Alternate: David Lor Representing Los Angeles County MTA MSRC-TAC Members Steve Hillman Representing City of Los Angeles Adriann Cardoso Alternate: Cliff Thorne Representing Orange County Transportation Authority Rongsheng Luo Alternate: Scott Strelecki Representing Southern California Association of Governments Jason Farin Representing Riverside County Board of Supervisors Derek Winters, Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • September 14, 2016
    ADVANCED TRANSIT VEHICLE CONSORTIUM Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority One Santa Fe Ave., MS 63-4-1, Los Angeles, CA 90013 SEPTEMBER 14, 2016 TO: BOARD OF DIRECTORS FROM: JAMES T. GALLAGHER PRESIDENT SUBJECT: RECEIVE AND FILE UPDATE ON ZERO EMISSION BUS PLANS ISSUE At the April 2016 Metro Board of Directors Meeting, Metro's CEO was asked to provide a status report on Metro's deployment plans for Zero Emission Buses, and to provide a comprehensive plan to further reduce greenhouse gas emissions by gradually transitioning to a zero emission bus fleet. BACKGROUND Metro's current deployment plan for Zero Emission Buses (ZEB's) and reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions(GHG) includes the following projects and activities: 1. Purchase of five (5) New Flyer all-electric articulated buses for deployment on Metro's Orange Line with expected delivery in late 2017. 2. Purchase of five (5) BYD all-electric articulated buses, also for use on Metro's Orange Line with expected delivery in late 2017. 3. Purchase of up to two hundred (200)ZE buses under RFP OP28167 for delivery between FY18 — FY22. 4. Expand use of Low NOx "Near Zero" CNG engines and Renewable Natural Gas (RCNG)for all new bus purchases and for mid-life engine repowers stating in FY18. In addition to the ZEB projects, starting in FY18 it is recommended that Metro Operations adopt a policy of purchasing only "Near Zero" Cummins-Westport Low NOx ISL-G engines and renewable natural gas(RCNG) fuel for both new and repowered buses. According to the fleet emission modeling done by Metro's technical consultant, this step will have significant regional air quality benefits, including reducing criteria pollutants for Metro's bus fleet by 90%, and greenhouse gas emissions by 80°/o below 2010 current fleet emission levels.
    [Show full text]