DOCSLIB.ORG

2020 Martina

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2020 Martina Bangor University DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Credit rating divergence and the role of opacity in emerging market banks Martin Merizalde, Andrea Award date: 2020 Awarding institution: Bangor University Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 11. Oct. 2021 Credit rating divergence and the role of opacity in emerging market banks By Andrea Martin Merizalde PhD thesis Bangor Business School April 2020 Declaration and consent I hereby declare that this thesis is the results of my own investigations, except where otherwise stated. All other sources are acknowledged by bibliographic references. This work has not previously been accepted in substance for any degree and is not being concurrently submitted in candidature for any degree unless, as agreed by the University, for approved dual awards. Yr wyf drwy hyn yn datgan mai canlyniad fy ymchwil fy hun yw’r thesis hwn, ac eithrio lle nodir yn wahanol. Caiff ffynonellau eraill eu cydnabod gan droednodiadau yn rhoi cyfeiriadau eglur. Nid yw sylwedd y gwaith hwn wedi cael ei dderbyn o’r blaen ar gyfer unrhyw radd, ac nid yw’n cael ei gyflwyno ar yr un pryd mewn ymgeisiaeth am unrhyw radd oni bai ei fod, fel y cytunwyd gan y Brifysgol, am gymwysterau deuol cymeradwy. i | P a g e Abstract Prior credit rating literature focused on emerging economies is very limited and often country- specific, despite the significant expansion of the credit rating industry in these countries in recent years. Bank rating studies are particularly scarce, notwithstanding the pivotal role of banks as major funding providers in emerging economies. This thesis addresses these voids in the literature and investigates bank rating divergences between S&P, Moody’s and Fitch, the global rating agencies (GRAs), using a cross-country setting (11 emerging economies). Three perspectives are central to the thesis: (i) examining the drivers of national scale ratings (NSR) and global scale ratings (GSR) assignments by S&P; (ii) evaluating the effect of bank opacity on split bank ratings; and (iii) analysing to what extent split bank ratings are driven by systematic components including opacity at the sovereign government level and the sovereign rating ceiling. The first empirical chapter finds that bank size and competition between GRAs have the strongest effect on the probability of S&P rating assignments. GSR (NSR) assignments by S&P are more likely for larger (smaller) banks, although there exists a dependency on whether the bank has prior NSR (GSR) ratings. Fitch ratings potentially substitute S&P ratings, while Moody’s ratings complement S&P. The second empirical chapter uses bank size, capital, liquidity and profitability as proxies of bank opacity. The analysis demonstrates that bank opacity increases the probability of split bank ratings. Also, split-rated banks are more likely to experience future rating migrations than non-split rated banks, and wider rating differences have the strongest impact. The third empirical chapter presents evidence of a significant effect of split sovereign ratings and the ceiling effect on split bank ratings. The probability that S&P assigns bank ratings in a more conservative manner than Moody’s (Fitch), increases when S&P assigns lower sovereign ratings than Moody’s (Fitch). The same result is achieved when Moody’s assigns lower sovereign ratings than Fitch. Moreover, bank rating disagreements are more sensitive to split sovereign ratings when the ceiling effect of the GRA that assigns higher bank and sovereign ratings prevails. The thesis provides highly original contributions to the literature. New evidence on the rating dynamics between NSR and GSR assignments in emerging economies offers a novel perspective on the study of bank rating determinants. The thesis also provides clear insights on the strong effect of asset opacity and information quality on split bank ratings in emerging economies. These issues are of interest for policymakers, banks and other market participants due to their potential impact on debt issuance costs and foreign investment flows. ii | P a g e Acknowledgements First of all, I would like to thank my supervisors, Professor Owain ap Gwilym and Dr Rasha Alsakka, for all their guidance, support and advice during my PhD. I feel extremely fortunate to have supervisors who have also been my mentors, sharing their valuable expertise and providing insightful discussions about my research. Their encouragement, patience and confidence in my work have been invaluable throughout the PhD. I am also grateful with Bangor Business School for the PhD scholarship received to pursue my Doctoral studies and to Professor Aziz Jaafar for his constructive comments and suggestions. I would also like to thank all my PhD colleagues for the stimulating discussions during the PRSS and for making my PhD a pleasant journey. Also, a big thanks to the staff at Bangor Business School, especially Rachel Parry for her invaluable help coordinating my tutorials. My sincere gratitude also to my friends for their support and advice during my studies, specially to Marybeth, Calvin, Laurence, Lana and Quang for the interesting discussions and being unconditional friends, which has been essential during these academic years. I also want to express my gratitude to my family in Colombia for believing in me and have accompanied me during my academic endeavours. And finally, special thanks to Sebastian, my partner, who inspired me to pursue my doctoral degree and who has been by my side throughout this PhD journey, discussing my findings and giving me his patience, encouragement and unconditional support. iii | P a g e Contents Declaration and consent ................................................................................................................... i Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................ iii Contents .......................................................................................................................................... iv List of tables ................................................................................................................................. viii List of supporting tables ................................................................................................................. xi List of figures ................................................................................................................................ xii Abbreviations and acronyms ........................................................................................................ xiii Country codes ................................................................................................................................ xv Chapter 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 2 Chapter 2 Background of the credit rating industry ........................................................................ 8 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Composition of the credit rating industry ............................................................................ 10 2.3 Credit rating scales .............................................................................................................. 15 2.4 CRAs’ business model......................................................................................................... 18 2.5 Conclusions ......................................................................................................................... 21 Chapter 2 Tables ........................................................................................................................ 22 Chapter 3 Literature review ........................................................................................................... 31 3.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 32 3.2 The value and impact of GRAs’ credit ratings .................................................................... 33 3.2.1 Certification effect and reputation ................................................................................ 33 3.2.2 The role of competition on rating quality ....................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ID Periodo De Inicio (Mes/Año)
    Periodo de Periodo de ID inicio conclusión Denominación de la Institución o empresa Cargo o puesto desempeñado Campo de experiencia (mes/año) (mes/año) 43028 06/01/92 12/1994 ESCUELA BANCARIA COMERCIAL COORDINADOR DE CARRERA 67725 27/02/90 3/1991 PROSPECTIVA ECONÓMICA Y SOCIAL. S.C. (DESPACHO CONSULTOR EN SISTEMAS) ANALISTA PROGRAMADOR 68233 2016 A LA FECHA BANOBRAS DIRECTOR DE CRÉDITO 68233 2014 2016 BANOBRAS GERENTE DE EVALUACIÓN DE CRÉDITO AL SECTOR PRIVADO 68233 2011 2014 BANOBRAS GERENTE DE MESA DE CONTROL Y NORMATIVIDAD CREDITICIA 68233 2004 2011 BANOBRAS SUBGERENTE DE EVALUACION FINANCIERA DE LA FUENTE DE PAGO 68233 2000 2004 BANOBRAS SUBGERENTE DE SECTOR PUBLICO 68233 1991 2000 BANOBRAS ESPECIALISTA TÉCNICO, EXPERTO TÉCNICO, SUBGERENTE DE MODERNIZACIÓN DEL TRANSPORTE 68276 01/02/88 5/1992 PROCURADURIA GENERAL DE LA REPUBLICA DIRECTOR DE AREA 70777 2014 A LA FECHA BANOBRAS, S.N.C. GERENTE DE EVALUACIÓN DE PROYECTOS 70823 16/09/89 3/1993 CONSORCIO CONSTRUMERK S.A. DE C.V. GERENTE DE SISTEMAS 70823 02/09/85 1/1998 TELEFONOS DE MEXICO ANALISTA DE SISTEMAS 70823 01/02/88 8/1989 AUTOMANUFACTURAS S.A DE C.V. COORDINADOR DE PLANEACION Y ANALISIS DE SISTEMAS 71412 1991 1992 PROYECTOS Y CONSTRUCCIONES COVFER, S.A. DE C.V. AUXILIAR ADMINISTRATIVO Y CONTABLE 71412 1989 1991 BEJAR, GALINDO, LOZANO Y CÍA, S.C. AUXILIAR CONTABLE 72834 2014 A LA FECHA BANOBRAS SUBGERENTE DE PROYECTOS CARRETEROS ESTATALES 1 72834 1996 2014 BANOBRAS EXPERTO TÉCNICO A 72834 1994 1996 BANOBRAS ESPECIALISTA TÉCNICO 72834 1993 1994 G.A. INGENIEROS S.A. DE C.V.
    [Show full text]
  • MEXICO Executive Summary
    Underwritten by CASH AND TREASURY MANAGEMENT COUNTRY REPORT MEXICO Executive Summary Banking Mexico’s central bank, Banco de México (Banxico), is an independent body under the country’s constitution. It is responsible for monetary policy and is lender of last resort and provider of treasury services to the federal government. Banco de México shares responsibility for exchange rate policy and regulatory supervision of the finance sector with the Ministry of Finance and Public Credit (Secretaría de Hacienda y Crédito Público). Mexico does not apply central bank reporting requirements or export controls. Resident entities are permitted to retain both MXN (Mexican peso) and foreign currency bank accounts domestically and abroad. Non-resident entities may hold domestic and foreign currency bank accounts within Mexico. Local currency accounts are not convertible into foreign currency. Mexico’s stable and well capitalized banking system is dominated by large foreign-owned institutions following a period of privatization and consolidation in the early 2000s sparked by legislation permitting foreign investment in the sector. Banks currently operating in Mexico include 23 financial groups, 50 multiple banks, six development banks, 84 credit unions and 39 representative offices of foreign banks. Payments Mexico’s high- and low-value clearing systems (SPEI and SICAM) are owned and operated by the central bank. CECOBAN, a consortium of banks, owns and operates CCEN, a clearing system for retail payments. Electronic credit transfers are widely used by large companies, while debit and credit cards are very popular for retail payments. Cash and checks are still commonly used by smaller firms and households. Internet-based electronic banking services are offered to both corporate and retail customers.
    [Show full text]
  • Solid Profitable Growth
    SOLID PROFITABLE GROWTH 2015 Annual report For more than 20 years, we have been supporting our clients with top quality financial services. We are a company with a reputation for building solid, lasting alliances with our clients. We want to become the leading company in our market by helping companies to grow thus making Mexico stronger. 2 SOLID PROFITABLE GROWTH With a multi-product offering focused on three core business lines —leasing, factoring and auto loans— UNIFIN’s financial solidity comes from its origination process and its skillful, well-timed portfolio management. Total portfolio Ps. 18.9 billion 3 SOLID • The compiled information is submitted to a The loan origination process is handled by a special- credit committee: i) Minor Risk Committee for ized team in each business line, using cutting-edge transactions below Ps. 7.5 million, with a dig- technology and various selection criteria: ital response within 72 hours; ii) Major Risk Loan origination process Committee, which meets in person to decide • Strict and formal analysis of national and ION on larger transactions, providing a response VAT CL ENO IEN global economies and trends in various R T P ND R within two weeks. A OS LE P industries. A EC S TI ET N S G S • We also have highly rigorous systems involv- A 6 • 16 dynamic credit scorings, analysis for ma- 1 ing month to month tracking and monitoring, jor and minor risk and analytic parameters that in compliance with anti-money laundering are part of our in-house model. and data privacy laws. 5 E E T A T P I P M L I M C O A C 2 T I T O I N D E R Collection process C 4 -5 0 2-7 8-30 31-60 61-90 +90 C R E D I S T E B C U N E 3 R R E E A F U E R A N D Administrative L E E-mail G A In-person L Payment Call center Workout Court collection reminder collection date 2nd reminder collection TEAM 1 TEAM 2 TEAM 3 TEAM 4 Collection is simpler because UNIFIN maintains ownership of the assets.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Capital Markets and Institutional Investors in Russia Recent Achievements and Policy Challenges Ahead
    37266 WORLD BANK WORKING PAPER NO. 87 Development of Capital Markets Public Disclosure Authorized and Institutional Investors in Russia Recent Achievements and Policy Challenges Ahead Michel Noel Zeynep Kantur Evgeny Krasnov Sue Rutledge Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized THE WORLD BANK WORLD BANK WORKING PAPER NO. 87 Development of Capital Markets and Institutional Investors in Russia Recent Achievements and Policy Challenges Ahead Michel Noel Zeynep Kantur Evgeny Krasnov Sue Rutledge THE WORLD BANK Washington, D.C. Copyright © 2006 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank 1818 H Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20433, U.S.A. All rights reserved Manufactured in the United States of America First Printing: August 2006 printed on recycled paper 1 2 3 4 5 09 08 07 06 World Bank Working Papers are published to communicate the results of the Bank’s work to the development community with the least possible delay. The manuscript of this paper therefore has not been prepared in accordance with the procedures appropriate to formally-edited texts. Some sources cited in this paper may be informal documents that are not readily available. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank and its affiliated organizations, or those of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank of the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Rating Action: Moody's Downgrades Eight Mexican Banks and the IPAB; Outlook Negative
    Rating Action: Moody's downgrades eight Mexican banks and the IPAB; outlook negative 22 Apr 2020 Mexico, April 22, 2020 -- Moody's de México ("Moody's") has today downgraded to Baa1, from A3, the long- term global local and foreign currency deposit, issuer and debt ratings, where applicable of BBVA Bancomer, S.A. (BBVA), Banco Mercantil del Norte, S.A. (Banorte), Banco Santander México, S.A. (Santander México), Banco Nacional de México, S.A. (Citibanamex), HSBC México, S.A. (HSBC México), Banco Nacional de Obras y Servicios Públicos, S.N.C. (Banobras), Nacional Financiera, S.N.C. (Nafin), Banco Nacional de Comercio Exterior, S.N.C. (Bancomext), and the deposit insurer, Instituto para la Protección al Ahorro Bancario (IPAB). Moody's also affirmed MUFG Bank México, S.A.'s (MUFG) Baa1 deposit ratings. In the same rating action, Moody's affirmed the Aaa.mx/MX-1 long- and short-term Mexican National Scale ratings of BBVA, Banorte, Santander México, Citibanamex, HSBC México, Banobras, Nafin, Bancomext, and the IPAB. Moody's also affirmed long- and short-term Mexican National Scale ratings of Banco del Bajío, S.A. (BanBajío) at Aa2.mx/MX-1 and of MUFG at Aa1.mx/MX-1. The rating outlook on BBVA, Banorte, Santander México, Banobras, Nafin, Bancomext, and the IPAB remains negative. The rating outlook for Citibanamex and HSBC México was changed to stable, from negative. The rating outlook on BanBajío was changed to negative, from stable of its global local and foreign currency ratings. The rating outlook on MUFG remained stable. Moody's also affirmed the baseline credit assessments (BCAs) and adjusted BCAs of BBVA, Banorte, Santander México, Citibanamex, HSBC México, BanBajío, MUFG, Banobras, Nafin and Bancomext.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on the Potential of Green Bond Finance for Resource-Efficient Investments
    Study on the potential of green bond finance for resource-efficient investments Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). LEGAL NOTICE This document has been prepared for the European Commission however, it reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://www.europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2016 ISBN 978-92 -79-63802-2 doi:10.2779/234777 © European Union, November 2016 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for ENVIRONMENT Directorate ENV.A — Policy Unit ENV.A.2— Green Finance & Economic Analysis European Commission B-1049 Brussels Study on the potential of green bond finance for resource-efficient investments Authors: Annica Cochu, Carsten Glenting, Dominic Hogg, Ivo Georgiev, Julija Skolina, Frederik Eisinger, Malene Jespersen, Rainer Agster, Steven Fawkes, Tanzir Chowdhury 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................... 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................... 8 ABBREVIATIONS .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Catálogo De Bancos. Catálogo De Bancos Clave Nombre Corto Nombre O Razón Social 002 BANAMEX Banco Nacional De México, S.A
    Catálogo de bancos. Catálogo de bancos Clave Nombre corto Nombre o razón social Banco Nacional de México, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo 002 BANAMEX Financiero Banamex Banco Nacional de Comercio Exterior, Sociedad Nacional de Crédito, 006 BANCOMEXT Institución de Banca de Desarrollo Banco Nacional de Obras y Servicios Públicos, Sociedad Nacional de 009 BANOBRAS Crédito, Institución de Banca de Desarrollo BBVA Bancomer, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero BBVA 012 BBVA BANCOMER Bancomer Banco Santander (México), S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo 014 SANTANDER Financiero Santander Banco Nacional del Ejército, Fuerza Aérea y Armada, Sociedad Nacional de 019 BANJERCITO Crédito, Institución de Banca de Desarrollo 021 HSBC HSBC México, S.A., institución De Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero HSBC 030 BAJIO Banco del Bajío, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple 032 IXE IXE Banco, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, IXE Grupo Financiero 036 INBURSA Banco Inbursa, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero Inbursa 037 INTERACCIONES Banco Interacciones, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple 042 MIFEL Banca Mifel, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero Mifel 044 SCOTIABANK Scotiabank Inverlat, S.A. Banco Regional de Monterrey, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Banregio 058 BANREGIO Grupo Financiero 059 INVEX Banco Invex, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Invex Grupo Financiero 060 BANSI Bansi, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple 062 AFIRME Banca Afirme, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple Banco Mercantil del Norte, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo 072 BANORTE Financiero Banorte 102 THE ROYAL BANK The Royal Bank of Scotland México, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple 103 AMERICAN EXPRESS American Express Bank (México), S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple Bank of America México, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo 106 BAMSA Financiero Bank of America 108 TOKYO Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ (México), S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolución De La Deuda Pública Del 1º De Enero Al 30 De Junio De 2020
    EVOLUCIÓN DE LA DEUDA PÚBLICA DEL 1º DE ENERO AL 30 DE JUNIO DE 2020. evolución1 SECTOR CENTRAL % TOTAL % SALDO AL 31 -DIC-19 41,880,485,703.68 100.0 41,880,485,703.68 100.0 CONTRATACIONES 2,122,815,153.27 0.0 2,122,815,153.27 0.0 menos: AMORTIZACIONES 1,671,035,414.78 100.0 1,671,035,414.78 100.0 menos: SALDO AL 30 - JUN - 20 42,332,265,442.17 100.0 42,332,265,442.17 100.0 FINANCIAMIENTOS CONTRATADOS DEL 1º DE ENERO AL 30 DE JUNIO DE 2020. PERIODO BANCA COMERCIAL BANCA DESARROLLO CONTRATISTAS TOTAL PRIMER TRIMESTRE 1,433,466,770.32 338,481,108.00 0.00 1,771,947,878.32 SEGUNDO TRIMESTRE 350,867,274.95 0.00 0.00 350,867,274.95 TOTAL 1,784,334,045.27 338,481,108.00 0.00 2,122,815,153.27 RESUMEN DE FINANCIAMIENTOS CONTRATADOS CON INSTITUCIONES BANCARIAS DEL 1º DE ENERO AL 30 DE JUNIO DE 2020 MONTO SALDO AL BANCO PERIODO CONTRATADO 31-JUN-2020 BANOBRAS, S.N.C. 13,603,842,128.66 BANORTE, S.A. 13,429,120,148.79 BBVA BANCOMER 10,619,275,073.22 SANTANDER 4,676,653,320.28 SUBTOTAL 42,328,890,670.95 TOTAL 42,328,890,670.95 ANÁLISIS DE LOS FINANCIAMIENTOS CONTRATADOS CON INSTITUCIONES BANCARIAS SEGUNDO TRIMESTRE 2020 FECHA DE FECHA DE FECHA DE TASA MONTO MONTO BANCO ANEXO CONTRATACIÓN DISPOSICIÓN VENCIMIENTO CONTRATADA DISPUESTO CONTRATADO BANCO SANTANDER 1 22-ene-20 18-may-20 02-ene-40 TIIE + 0.25 PP 350,867,274.95 1,500,000,000.00 BANCO AZTECA 2 20-may-20 NO DISPUESTO 18-may-21 TIIE + 1.20 PP NO DISPUESTO 500,000,000.00 BBVA BANCOMER 3 20-may-20 NO DISPUESTO 18-may-21 TIIE + 1.80 PP NO DISPUESTO 500,000,000.00 HSBC 4 20-may-20 NO DISPUESTO 18-may-21
    [Show full text]
  • BANCOMEXT Sustainability Bond Framework
    BANCOMEXT Sustainability Bond Framework July 2021 1 Table of Contents 2 1. Introduction - Sustainable Bond Framework As one of the world’s largest economies and most biodiverse countries, Mexico has a unique role in environmental protection and in the global fight against climate change. To fulfill this role in a way that is truly sustainable, Mexico is also committed to ensuring that its citizens are not left behind, and can fully benefit from the country’s transition towards a sustainable development model. Mexico has started to implement a comprehensive model of sustainable development by designing a structured action plan around the principles of the 2030 Agenda. In order to achieve this, Mexico has been consistently incorporating the intersecting principles and objectives of the 2030 Agenda into its development plans, public policies and federal budgets. Through its National Development Plan (“NDP”) and its National Program to Finance Development (“PRONAFIDE”), Mexico has strongly emphasized that sustainable development is an indispensable factor of national well-being. The NDP promotes a deep reengineering of public spending to redirect resources towards integral programs that generate well-being, and target the most disadvantaged populations1. The current NDP was developed through an inclusive consultation process between the Federal Government, the private sector, academic and scientific institutions and local authorities. Because of this participatory process, the NDP includes a transversal perspective of sustainable development throughout the entire Federal Government with defined actions to achieve the planned goals. The NDP also includes relevant perspectives of non-governmental actors, as well as inputs and considerations made during prior fiscal years.
    [Show full text]
  • Banco Nacional De México, Sa, Integrante Del Grupo Financiero
    BANCO NACIONAL DE MÉXICO, S.A., INTEGRANTE DEL GRUPO FINANCIERO BANAMEX Isabel la Católica 44, Colonia Centro Delegación Cuauhtémoc C.P. 06000, México, D.F. Reporte Anual que se presenta de acuerdo con las Disposiciones de Carácter General aplicables a las Emisoras de Valores y a otros Participantes del Mercado de Valores respecto al ejercicio terminado el 31 de diciembre de 2016 Clave de Cotización: BANAMEX El Programa de Instrumentos que se describe en este Reporte fue autorizado por la Comisión Nacional Bancaria y de Valores y los Instrumentos objeto del mismo se encuentran inscritos con los números 0181-4.18-2009-001, 0181-4.21-2009-001, 0181-4.31-2009-001 y 0181-4.41-2009-001 en el Registro Nacional de Valores y serán objeto de Oferta Pública y/o Privada (sin que al efecto medie Oferta Pública) de acuerdo con lo que se establezca en el Suplemento o Folleto Informativo correspondiente y podrán ser aptos para ser listados en el listado correspondiente de la Bolsa Mexicana de Valores, S.A.B. de C.V. La inscripción en el Registro Nacional de Valores no implica certificación sobre la bondad de los valores, la solvencia de la emisora o sobre la exactitud o veracidad de la información contenida en el presente Reporte Anual, ni convalida los actos que, en su caso, hubieren sido realizados en contravención de las leyes. Especificaciones de las características de los títulos en circulación: PROGRAMA REVOLVENTE DE CERTIFICADOS BURSÁTILES BANCARIOS, CERTIFICADOS DE DEPÓSITO BANCARIO DE DINERO A PLAZO, PAGARÉS CON RENDIMIENTO LIQUIDABLE AL VENCIMIENTO
    [Show full text]
  • Clearstream Banking Luxemburg
    Clearstream Banking Luxemburg Participant Name BIC Code* Participant Code (CHINA) SOUTHERN SECS-SH/SN n.a. CN030 (ING) BARING SECURITIES HK-SH/SN n.a. CN205 1ST BK GREENWICH/U102 n.a. F7249 1ST CAP BK MONTERY/L101 n.a. F7133 1ST CENTENNIAL/T108 n.a. F9445 1ST CENTURY BANK/L101 n.a. F6878 1ST ENTPRSE BK LA/1030 n.a. F7223 1ST PAC BK CA SD/1020 n.a. F7234 2S BANCA n.a. C3307 6980271103 n.a. H0487 6980321592 n.a. H1074 6980413561 n.a. H0953 6980764740 n.a. H0962 6980767923 n.a. H0730 6981200105 n.a. H0486 6981903737 n.a. H0961 6981916176 n.a. H0768 6982000078 n.a. H0811 6984400093 n.a. H1078 6984400503 n.a. H0770 6984400668 n.a. H0564 698MFS n.a. H1462 A S NOMINEES n.a. H0800 1 A, ER SEC BANK/T108 n.a. F8783 A.B.ASESORES BURSATILES DEUDA n.a. E4012 A.C. NOMINEES LTD n.a. H0016 A.T. EQUITIES SPAIN n.a. E3670 AAHGSBL n.a. H0567 AAIC (FORMERLY DESCAP) n.a. F9548 AANVLDNBRNCHEURHUB/ABN AMRO EQUI.UK n.a. H1794 ABACO CASA DE BOLSA S.A. DE C.V. n.a. M5017 ABAX BANK n.a. C0061 ABBACUS n.a. C6288 ABBEY NATIONAL n.a. C2535 ABBEY NATIONAL n.a. C0072 ABBEY NATIONAL TREASURY SERV. PLC n.a. S0341 ABDELMALEK RAUL EMILIO n.a. A0626 ABERDEEN UTM LTD n.a. H0775 ABN AMRO n.a. F0792 ABN AMRO ASIA LTD.SEOUL BRANCH n.a. KR196 ABN AMRO ASIA LTD-SH/SN n.a. CN240 ABN AMRO ASIA SEC (S) PTE LTD n.a.
    [Show full text]
  • Fitch Takes Actions on Mexican Fis After Sovereign Outlook Revision to Negative
    FITCH TAKES ACTIONS ON MEXICAN FIS AFTER SOVEREIGN OUTLOOK REVISION TO NEGATIVE Fitch Ratings-Monterrey-06 November 2018: Fitch Ratings has conducted a portfolio review of selected Mexican Financial Institutions (FIs) following the revision of Mexico's sovereign rating Outlook to Negative from Stable on Oct. 31, 2018. (See "Fitch Affirms Mexico at 'BBB+'; Revises Outlook to Negative" at 'www.fitchratings.com'.) The portfolio review includes Mexican FIs with Issuer Default Ratings (IDRs), Viability Ratings (VRs) or Insurer's Financial Strength Ratings (IFS ratings) that are at the same, above or one notch below the sovereign level. Fitch believes these ratings are more sensitive to a potential sovereign downgrade or any deterioration of the operating environment over the near term. Most of these entities' IDRs have been affirmed and the Rating Outlooks revised to Negative from Stable, except for a few particular cases further described below. A full list of rating actions follows at the end of this commentary. KEY RATING DRIVERS Government-Support Driven Ratings This group considers state-owned banks or government financial institutions with IDRs, Support Ratings (SRs) and Support Rating Floors (SRFs) driven by explicit support (Bancomext, Banobras and Nafin) or implicit support (Infonavit and IPAB) from the sovereign, where the federal government is the shareholder and the source of any potential support, if required. The Negative Outlook on this group highlights downside potential from a sovereign downgrade. The creditworthiness of these entities is linked to the country's federal government, given their policy role and/or high strategic importance to the government. Therefore, their ratings have been traditionally aligned to the sovereign's, which explains the Outlook revision to Negative from Stable.
    [Show full text]