DOCSLIB.ORG

Study on the Potential of Green Bond Finance for Resource-Efficient Investments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Study on the potential of green bond finance for resource-efficient investments Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). LEGAL NOTICE This document has been prepared for the European Commission however, it reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://www.europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2016 ISBN 978-92 -79-63802-2 doi:10.2779/234777 © European Union, November 2016 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for ENVIRONMENT Directorate ENV.A — Policy Unit ENV.A.2— Green Finance & Economic Analysis European Commission B-1049 Brussels Study on the potential of green bond finance for resource-efficient investments Authors: Annica Cochu, Carsten Glenting, Dominic Hogg, Ivo Georgiev, Julija Skolina, Frederik Eisinger, Malene Jespersen, Rainer Agster, Steven Fawkes, Tanzir Chowdhury 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................... 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................... 8 ABBREVIATIONS .......................................................................................................... 16 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 19 Background ......................................................................................................... 19 Contents ............................................................................................................. 21 1. ANALYSIS OF THE GREEN BOND MARKET .................................................................... 22 1.1 Green bond market ......................................................................................... 22 1.2 Market development and functioning in the EU ................................................... 30 1.3 Market development and functioning outside the EU ............................................ 33 2. ANALYSIS OF THE PUBLIC SECTOR ROLE .................................................................... 38 2.1 Key bottlenecks .............................................................................................. 38 2.2 Public sector measures .................................................................................... 46 2.3 Good practices ................................................................................................ 54 3. ANALYSIS OF THE OPPORTUNITY IN DEVELOPING COMMON EU STANDARDS .................. 57 3.1 Existing standards and their key components ..................................................... 57 3.2 Key bottlenecks due to the lack of common standards ......................................... 64 3.3 Possible EU policy measures ............................................................................. 66 3.4 Analysis of EU policy measures ......................................................................... 69 4. CONCLUSIONS ......................................................................................................... 75 4.1 Green bond market development ...................................................................... 75 4.2 Public sector role ............................................................................................ 75 4.3 Opportunities in developing common EU standards ............................................. 77 ANNEX A: GLOSSARY ................................................................................................... 80 ANNEX B: STAKEHOLDERS FEEDBACK ............................................................................ 85 ANNEX C: POLICY TOOLBOX .......................................................................................... 88 ANNEX D: COUNTRY STUDIES ..................................................................................... 109 ANNEX E: BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................................................................... 170 5 Disclaimer The information and views set out in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this study. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for the use, which may be made of the information contained therein. 6 ABSTRACT Green bonds could play a key role in helping to finance the investment needed to achieve the EU’s 2030 Climate and Energy objectives and the UN Sustainable Devel- opment Goals. This report presents an analysis of the development and functioning of the green bond market, including the main actors and sectors, with specific focus on financing invest- ments into improved resource efficiency. It summarizes the key bottlenecks limiting the development of the market in specific countries and sectors. It identifies a set of possible public sector measures to overcome these bottlenecks, supported by exam- ples of good practices. The report also assesses the regulatory feasibility and expected impacts of specific standardization options on the liquidity and size of the market. Fi- nally, the report presents a set of recommendations addressed at the EU and its Mem- ber States. A Policy Toolbox provides additional detail on possible public sector measures on the demand and supply side. Nine country case studies support the analysis, focusing on Bulgaria, France, Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom, as well as China, Mexico, Nor- way, and the United States. 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A green bond is differentiated from a regular bond by its label, which signifies a com- mitment to exclusively use the funds raised to finance or re-finance "green" projects, assets or business activities. Green projects are projects that promote progress on environmentally sustainable activities. Green bonds provide an opportunity to mobilize capital for green investments. They offer an opportunity to investors to make in- formed, explicit decisions to invest in green projects. Green bonds are a means of at- tracting new investors and hence mobilizing liquidity for green investments. The main actors in the market1 can be categorized as issuers (entities with green pro- jects needing funding or refunding), underwriters (financial institutions arranging the issuance of the green bonds), external reviewers (verifying the "greenness" of the underlying projects) including rating agencies, intermediaries (such as stock exchang- es), and investors (particularly those with a mandate to invest in green assets). Issu- ers of green bonds may benefit from reputational gains2 and upgraded environmental risk management processes due to commitments to green disclosure. On the other hand, bond investors, especially long-term and responsible investors, are provided with an emerging class of green assets and more opportunities to actively engage with issuers on ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) factors related to the financed projects. The green bond market can provide an additional source of green financing to bank lending and equity financing, and enable long-term financing for green projects in ge- ographies where the supply of long-term bank loans can be limited. Today, green bonds mainly finance projects within renewable energy (45.8% of the issuance global- ly in 2015), energy efficiency (19.6%), low carbon transport (13.4%), sustainable water (9.3%), and waste & pollution (5.6%). The demand for green bonds has been growing exponentially with pension funds and insurance companies diversifying their investment portfolios. The total issuance of green bonds was USD 41.8 bn. in 2015 and reached USD 65.4 bn. by November 2016. In the light of the global commitment to shift to a low carbon economy, the green bond market is likely to continue to grow, while attracting more diverse issuers and investors. Key developments in the evolution of the green bond market have included: The green bond market emerged in 2007-08 with the first few issuances by Multilateral Development Banks. Private sector issuers, including corporates and banks joined the market in 2013-2014, supported by the launch of the Green Bond Principles. From 2013, there was a surge in the issuance of labelled green bonds. More countries joined the green bond market in 2015, contributing to a total annual issuance of USD 41.8 bn. Corporate green bonds accounted for 36% of the issuance – the highest share ever, followed by municipalities with 15% and by banks with 12%. Today, the annual green bond issuance continues to grow rapidly and current estimates for 2016 range from USD 70 to USD 100 bn., with much of this growth being the impact of Chinese issuers in the market. 1 The referred main actors are active in both the primary and secondary bond markets. See more details in the Glossary (Annex A) 2 For example, corporate issuers of green bonds whose business model is not oriented towards developing sustainable solutions can flag a responsible and long-term oriented product to investors. 8 The EU green bond market has developed well compared to other green bond
Recommended publications
  • Resit Akcakaya

    Resit Akcakaya

    H. Reşit Akçakaya Department of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794 USA • 1-631-632-8605 • http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/ee/akcakayalab/ EDUCATION 1989 Ph.D. in Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook Thesis: "Population cycles of mammals: theory and evidence" 1983 B.Sc. (high honors) in Biology, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey CAREER 2007 to present Professor, Department of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, New York 2012 to 2015 Director, Graduate Program in Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, New York 1988 to 2007 Senior Scientist, Applied Biomathematics, Setauket, New York 1993 Post-doctoral fellow, Inst. of Animal Ecology, Univ. of Lausanne, Switzerland PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES AND MEMBERSHIPS 2016 to present IUCN SSC Task Force on Assessing Conservation Success, which is developing guidelines for a new IUCN Green List of Species to quantify species recovery and conservation impact. 2014 to present Regional Editor (North America), Conservation Biology 2014 to present Coordinating Lead Author, Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), deliverable on "Policy support tools and methodologies for scenario analysis and modelling of biodiversity and ecosystem services." 2001 to present Chair, Red List Standards and Petitions Subcommittee, IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC). 2001 to present IUCN SSC Red List Committee 2012 to present IUCN SSC Climate Change Specialist Group Steering Committee 2014 to
  • Green Parties and Elections to the European Parliament, 1979–2019 Green Par Elections

    Green Parties and Elections to the European Parliament, 1979–2019 Green Par Elections

    Chapter 1 Green Parties and Elections, 1979–2019 Green parties and elections to the European Parliament, 1979–2019 Wolfgang Rüdig Introduction The history of green parties in Europe is closely intertwined with the history of elections to the European Parliament. When the first direct elections to the European Parliament took place in June 1979, the development of green parties in Europe was still in its infancy. Only in Belgium and the UK had green parties been formed that took part in these elections; but ecological lists, which were the pre- decessors of green parties, competed in other countries. Despite not winning representation, the German Greens were particularly influ- enced by the 1979 European elections. Five years later, most partic- ipating countries had seen the formation of national green parties, and the first Green MEPs from Belgium and Germany were elected. Green parties have been represented continuously in the European Parliament since 1984. Subsequent years saw Greens from many other countries joining their Belgian and German colleagues in the Euro- pean Parliament. European elections continued to be important for party formation in new EU member countries. In the 1980s it was the South European countries (Greece, Portugal and Spain), following 4 GREENS FOR A BETTER EUROPE their successful transition to democracies, that became members. Green parties did not have a strong role in their national party systems, and European elections became an important focus for party develop- ment. In the 1990s it was the turn of Austria, Finland and Sweden to join; green parties were already well established in all three nations and provided ongoing support for Greens in the European Parliament.
  • Green Illusions Is Not a Litany of Despair

    Green Illusions Is Not a Litany of Despair

    “In this terrific book, Ozzie Zehner explains why most current approaches to the world’s gathering climate and energy crises are not only misguided but actually counterproductive. We fool ourselves in innumerable ways, and Zehner is especially good at untangling sloppy thinking. Yet Green Illusions is not a litany of despair. It’s full of hope—which is different from false hope, and which requires readers with open, skeptical minds.”— David Owen, author of Green Metropolis “Think the answer to global warming lies in solar panels, wind turbines, and biofuels? Think again. In this thought-provoking and deeply researched critique of popular ‘green’ solutions, Zehner makes a convincing case that such alternatives won’t solve our energy problems; in fact, they could make matters even worse.”—Susan Freinkel, author of Plastic: A Toxic Love Story “There is no obvious competing or comparable book. Green Illusions has the same potential to sound a wake-up call in the energy arena as was observed with Silent Spring in the environment, and Fast Food Nation in the food system.”—Charles Francis, former director of the Center for Sustainable Agriculture Systems at the University of Nebraska “This is one of those books that you read with a yellow marker and end up highlighting most of it.”—David Ochsner, University of Texas at Austin Green Illusions Our Sustainable Future Series Editors Charles A. Francis University of Nebraska–Lincoln Cornelia Flora Iowa State University Paul A. Olson University of Nebraska–Lincoln The Dirty Secrets of Clean Energy and the Future of Environmentalism Ozzie Zehner University of Nebraska Press Lincoln and London Both text and cover are printed on acid-free paper that is 100% ancient forest free (100% post-consumer recycled).
  • Development of Capital Markets and Institutional Investors in Russia Recent Achievements and Policy Challenges Ahead

    Development of Capital Markets and Institutional Investors in Russia Recent Achievements and Policy Challenges Ahead

    37266 WORLD BANK WORKING PAPER NO. 87 Development of Capital Markets Public Disclosure Authorized and Institutional Investors in Russia Recent Achievements and Policy Challenges Ahead Michel Noel Zeynep Kantur Evgeny Krasnov Sue Rutledge Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized THE WORLD BANK WORLD BANK WORKING PAPER NO. 87 Development of Capital Markets and Institutional Investors in Russia Recent Achievements and Policy Challenges Ahead Michel Noel Zeynep Kantur Evgeny Krasnov Sue Rutledge THE WORLD BANK Washington, D.C. Copyright © 2006 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank 1818 H Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20433, U.S.A. All rights reserved Manufactured in the United States of America First Printing: August 2006 printed on recycled paper 1 2 3 4 5 09 08 07 06 World Bank Working Papers are published to communicate the results of the Bank’s work to the development community with the least possible delay. The manuscript of this paper therefore has not been prepared in accordance with the procedures appropriate to formally-edited texts. Some sources cited in this paper may be informal documents that are not readily available. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank and its affiliated organizations, or those of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank of the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries.
  • International Union for Conservation of Nature

    International Union for Conservation of Nature

    INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE EASTERN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA REGIONAL OFFICE ANNUAL REPORT 2019 Mutnovsky Volcano, Kamchatka, Russia © IUCN/Boris Erg CONTENTS 2 Message from the Director 3 IUCN at a glance 5 Strategic orientation 6 IUCN ECARO Members 8 IUCN Commissions in Eastern Europe and Central Asia 9 Regional Councillors 9 Regional Conservation Forum 2019 10 Programme work and main achievements 10 Valuing and conserving nature 15 Governance of nature’s use 18 Deploying Nature-based Solutions 20 Our team 21 Publications and other outputs 24 Promotional materials 25 Events and awareness campaigns 27 Strategic partnerships 27 Regional financial summary 2019 MESSAGE FROM THE DIRECTOR This year marked the 15th anniversary since the establishment of the IUCN office in Belgrade in 2004. We have come a long way ever since. From a small team operating a modest portfolio of activities in South-East Europe to a dedicated international team managing a diverse regional programme across Eastern Europe and Central Asia. The path has been challenging and winding, and we have managed to travel this far by working closely with our Members and Commissions, who have greatly helped us raise the profile of IUCN in the region, build successful partnerships and open new thematic chapters Boris Erg, Director of the IUCN Regional Office in our work. By working together, we have successfully for Eastern Europe and Central Asia contributed to policy development and institutional strengthening, priority setting and resource mobilisation for conservation action in the region, and we have also invested in knowledge generation, capacity building, and community engagement.
  • Electronic Waste and the Circular Economy

    Electronic Waste and the Circular Economy

    House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee Electronic waste and the Circular Economy First Report of Session 2019–21 HC 220 Environmental Audit Committee The Environmental Audit Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to consider to what extent the policies and programmes of government departments and non-departmental public bodies contribute to environmental protection and sustainable development; to audit their performance against such targets as may be set for them by Her Majesty’s Ministers; and to report thereon to the House. Current membership Rt Hon Philip Dunne MP (Conservative, Ludlow) (Chair) Duncan Baker MP (Conservative, North Norfolk) Sir Christopher Chope MP (Conservative, Christchurch) Feryal Clark MP (Labour, Enfield North) Barry Gardiner MP (Labour, Brent North) Rt Hon Robert Goodwill MP (Conservative, Scarborough and Whitby) Ian Levy MP (Conservative, Blyth Valley) Marco Longhi MP (Conservative, Dudley North) Caroline Lucas MP (Green Party, Brighton, Pavilion) Cherilyn Mackrory MP (Conservative, Truro and Falmouth) Jerome Mayhew MP (Conservative, Broadland) John McNally MP (Scottish National Party, Falkirk) Dr Matthew Offord MP (Conservative, Hendon) Alex Sobel MP (Labour (Co-op), Leeds North West) Claudia Webbe MP (Independent, Leicester East) Nadia Whittome MP (Labour, Nottingham East) The following Member is a former member of the Committee: Mr Shailesh Vara MP (Conservative, North West Cambridgeshire) Powers The constitution and powers are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152A. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2020. This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament Licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/copyright.
  • Climate Action Policy Survey

    Climate Action Policy Survey

    Executive Summary The People’s GND Working Group Climate Action Policy Survey The U.S. House of Representatives-Select Committee on the Climate Crisis. Response to the House Committee Request for Information from The People’s Green New Deal Working Group: A database of over 100 Climate Policy Proposals. Methodology The People’s Green New Deal Working Group represents an informal coalition of activists based in New York, including members of Climate Action Mondays and 350NYC, as well as academics at Columbia University and City University of New York (CUNY). Our work has been to collect, in a non-biased process, outstanding climate policy recommendations that can be used by the House Committee and other lawmakers to write an ambitious and just national climate policy. The result is a “Climate Action Policy Survey” of over 100 proposals, reviewed and digested for specific policy ideas by sector. The proposals in our database were either submitted by experts and organizations or collected via an extensive internet search by a team of volunteers. In the coming months, we intend to post the database online to collect additional recommendations and ask the wider community to vote on their priority proposals to include in a National Climate Policy. This submission is unique in that it represents a compendium of climate solutions and policies from a broad set of sources and organizations, listed therein, including: Federal, State, & Local Government Legislation Inter-government Coalitions Think Tanks Non-profit Groups and Coalitions Academic Studies and Reports The sectors (in sheet tabs) covered include: List of 100+ Proposals (with summaries) Proposal Comparison (showing which proposals touch on which sectors).
  • ***CUBA CASE NEG **A2: SUGAR ETHANOL ADV A2: CUBA PRODUCING ETHANOL A2: CUBAL ETHANOL WILL SOLVE OIL DDEPENDENCE Cuban Ethanol Won’T Solve Oil Dependence Siegel 08

    ***CUBA CASE NEG **A2: SUGAR ETHANOL ADV A2: CUBA PRODUCING ETHANOL A2: CUBAL ETHANOL WILL SOLVE OIL DDEPENDENCE Cuban Ethanol Won’T Solve Oil Dependence Siegel 08

    ***CUBA CASE NEG **A2: SUGAR ETHANOL ADV A2: CUBA PRODUCING ETHANOL A2: CUBAL ETHANOL WILL SOLVE OIL DDEPENDENCE Cuban ethanol won’t solve oil dependence Siegel 08. Jeff Siegel, he managing editor of Energy and Capital and contributing analyst for the Energy Investor, an independent investment research service that focuses primarily on stocks in the oil & gas, modern energy and infrastructure markets. "Cuban Sugar Cane Ethanol". Energy and Capital. February 22nd, 2008. Accessed online at: www.energyandcapital.com/articles/cuba- sugar+cane-ethanol/625 Still, it's anybody's guess how this will turn out. And even if Cuba becomes the next big ethanol player, it doesn't change the fact that ethanol is not going to provide much more than about a 10% displacement once the Renewable Fuel Standard in the U.S. is met. A2: CUBA SOLVES FOR SUGAR ETHANOL Cuba can’t and won’t produce sugar ethanol Frank 08. Marc Frank, contributer to google news, reuters, and MSNBC . "Cuban ethanol boom doubtful after Castro exit". Reuters. February 22nd, 2008. Accesed online at: www.reuters.com/article/2008/02/22/cuba-castro-ethanol- idUSN2261316320080222 "It is inconceivable while Fidel is still alive that his brother Raul, or anyone else, would convert a significant proportion of our sugar crop or vacant land to ethanol," the economist said, asking not to be identified. "Even after Fidel dies, I can't imagine that happening for quite some time," he said. Currently, ethanol is obtained from sugar cane juice and cannot be made from bagasse, but new research is focusing on cellulose technology that could make this possible.
  • Description of the Euromanifestos Dataset 1979/1999 and 2004

    Description of the Euromanifestos Dataset 1979/1999 and 2004

    EUROMANIFESTO DOCUMENTATION Daniela Braun, Maike Salzwedel, Christian Stumpf and Andreas M. Wüst This file compiles all relevant information on the Euromanifesto collection, on missing Euromanifestos, on the coding, on additional variables provided by the coders, and the information on all variables included in the Euromanifesto dataset. The latter information also contains macro data for each country, party, and election, like vote shares, seats and parliamentary group membership. For the analytical variables that have been computed and used for analyses, the SPSS syntax is documented as well. The documentation includes information divided into the following five parts: 1. Coded Euromanifestos 1979–2004 2. Euromanifestos Coding Scheme (EMCS) 3. Euromanifesto Coding Instructions 4. Additional Information Provided by Coders 5. Description of the Euromanifestos Dataset Version 31/05/2012 GESIS study no. ZA4457 doi:10.4232/1.4457 1 Coded Euromanifestos 1979–2004 EUROPE (Euro-Parties) Initials Party Name EM-ID Elections Manifestos first-last not available EPP-ED European People’s Party-European Democrats 10600 1979-2004 - PES Party of European Socialists 10300 1979-2004 - ELDR European Liberal Democrat and Reform Party 10400 1979-2004 - EFGP European Federation of Green Parties 10100 1989-2004 - AUSTRIA Initials Party Name EM-ID Elections Manifestos first-last not available SPÖ Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs 42320 1996-2004 - Social Democratic Party of Austria ÖVP Österreichische Volkspartei 42520 1996-2004 - Austrian People’s Party
  • Dataset of Electoral Volatility in the European Parliament Elections Since 1979 Codebook (July 31, 2019)

    Dataset of Electoral Volatility in the European Parliament Elections Since 1979 Codebook (July 31, 2019)

    Dataset of Electoral Volatility in the European Parliament elections since 1979 Vincenzo Emanuele (Luiss), Davide Angelucci (Luiss), Bruno Marino (Unitelma Sapienza), Leonardo Puleo (Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna), Federico Vegetti (University of Milan) Codebook (July 31, 2019) Description This dataset provides data on electoral volatility and its internal components in the elections for the European Parliament (EP) in all European Union (EU) countries since 1979 or the date of their accession to the Union. It also provides data about electoral volatility for both the class bloc and the demarcation bloc. This dataset will be regularly updated so as to include the next rounds of the European Parliament elections. Content Country: country where the EP election is held (in alphabetical order) Election_year: year in which the election is held Election_date: exact date of the election RegV: electoral volatility caused by vote switching between parties that enter or exit from the party system. A party is considered as entering the party system where it receives at least 1% of the national share in election at time t+1 (while it received less than 1% in election at time t). Conversely, a party is considered as exiting the part system where it receives less than 1% in election at time t+1 (while it received at least 1% in election at time t). AltV: electoral volatility caused by vote switching between existing parties, namely parties receiving at least 1% of the national share in both elections under scrutiny. OthV: electoral volatility caused by vote switching between parties falling below 1% of the national share in both the elections at time t and t+1.
  • CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S1303 Bill S

    CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S1303 Bill S

    March 3, 2020 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S1303 bill S. 2657, supra; which was ordered to lie ‘‘(II) does not use as its primary feedstock of amounts that have been paid are required, on the table. carbon oxide which is deliberately released the Commission shall order the natural-gas SA 1478. Mr. LANKFORD submitted an from naturally occurring subsurface springs, company to make those refunds for the pe- amendment intended to be proposed to and riod beginning on the refund effective date amendment SA 1407 submitted by Ms. MUR- ‘‘(III) is determined by the Secretary, after established under paragraph (3) and ending KOWSKI and intended to be proposed to the consultation with the Secretary of Energy on the date on which the new rate estab- bill S. 2657, supra; which was ordered to lie and the Administrator of the Environmental lished by the Commission under subsection on the table. Protection Agency, to achieve a reduction of (a) takes effect in amounts in excess of those SA 1479. Mr. ROMNEY submitted an not less than a 60 percent in lifecycle green- amounts that would have been paid under amendment intended to be proposed to house gas emissions (as defined in section the just and reasonable rate, charge, classi- amendment SA 1407 submitted by Ms. MUR- 211(o)(1)(H) of the Clean Air Act, as in effect fication, rule, regulation, practice, or con- KOWSKI and intended to be proposed to the on the date of the enactment of this clause) tract that the Commission orders to be ob- bill S. 2657, supra; which was ordered to lie compared to baseline lifecycle greenhouse served and in force.
  • Strategy Shaping a Sustainable Future For

    Strategy Shaping a Sustainable Future For

    Shaping a Sustainable Future for South-Eastern Europe A Strategic Plan for IUCN in SEE This publication has been made possible in part through the support of the MAVA Foundation Shaping a Sustainable Future for South-Eastern Europe A Strategic Plan for IUCN in SEE Table of Contents Acronyms and abbreviations ...........................................................................................................................5 Summary ........................................................................................................................................................6 1. Introduction ..............................................................................................................................................7 2. Regional context ......................................................................................................................................8 2.1 Background .......................................................................................................................................8 2.2 Sectors ..............................................................................................................................................9 2.2.1 Nature conservation ................................................................................................................9 2.2.2 Agriculture .............................................................................................................................11 2.2.3 Forestry .................................................................................................................................11