DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix a List of International Authors, Contributors, and Reviewers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

APPENDIX A
LIST OF INTERNATIONAL AUTHORS, CONTRIBUTORS, AND REVIEWERS

COCHAIRS

Ayité-Lô Nohende Ajavon Daniel L. Albritton Gérard Mégie

  • Université de Lomé
  • Togo

US
France
US
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

  • World Bank
  • Robert T. Watson

AUTHORS AND CONTRIBUTORS

CHAPTER 1
CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES AND OTHER SOURCE GASES

Chapter Lead Authors

Stephen A. Montzka Paul J. Fraser
NOAA Climate Monitoring and Diagnostics Laboratory CSIRO Division of Atmospheric Research
US
Australia

Coauthors

James H. Butler Peter S. Connell Derek M. Cunnold John S. Daniel
NOAA Climate Monitoring and Diagnostics Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Georgia Institute of Technology
US US US

  • US
  • NOAAAeronomy Laboratory

Richard G. Derwent Shyam Lal
UK Meteorological Office Physical Research Laboratory Marbury Technical Consulting University of East Anglia
UK India UK UK UK
Archie McCulloch David E. Oram Claire E. Reeves Eugenio Sanhueza L. Paul Steele
University of East Anglia Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Cientificas CSIRO Division of Atmospheric Research National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) University of California at San Diego/Scripps Institution of Oceanography
Venezuela Australia
The Netherlands
US
Guus J.M. Velders Ray F. Weiss

  • Rodolphe J. Zander
  • Université de Liège
  • Belgium

Contributors

Stephen O. Andersen James Anderson Donald R. Blake
Environmental Protection Agency Harvard University University of California at Irvine
US US US

A.1

AUTHORS, CONTRIBUTORS, AND REVIEWERS

Martyn P. Chipperfield Ed Dlugokencky James W. Elkins Andreas Engel David B. Harper Emmanuel Mahieu Klaus Pfeilsticker Jean-Pierre Pommereau James M. Russell III Gary Taylor

  • University of Leeds
  • UK

US US
NOAA Climate Monitoring and Diagnostics Laboratory NOAA Climate Monitoring and Diagnostics Laboratory Universität Frankfurt The Queen's University of Belfast Université de Liège Universität Heidelberg Service d'Aéronomie du CNRS Hampton University
Germany
UK
Belgium Germany
France
US
Canada Belgium
US
Taylor/Wagner, Inc. Institut d'Aeronomie Spatiale de Belgique Johns Hopkins University
Michel Van Roozendael Darryn W. Waugh

CHAPTER 2
VERY SHORT-LIVED HALOGEN AND SULFUR SUBSTANCES

Chapter Lead Authors

Malcolm K.W. Ko Gilles Poulet
Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Inc. CNRS-Université d'Orléans
US
France

Coauthors

Donald R. Blake Olivier Boucher James H. Burkholder Mian Chin R. Anthony Cox Christian George
University of California at Irvine CNRS-Université des Sciences et Technologies de Lille NOAAAeronomy Laboratory Georgia Institute of Technology/NASA Goddard Space Flight Center University of Cambridge
US
France
US US UK

  • France
  • Laboratoire d'Application de la Chimie à l'Environnement/

University of Lyon
Hans-F. Graf James R. Holton Daniel J. Jacob
Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie University of Washington Harvard University
Germany
US US
Katherine S. Law Mark G. Lawrence Pauline M. Midgley Paul W. Seakins Dudley E. Shallcross Susan E. Strahan Donald J. Wuebbles Yoko Yokouchi
University of Cambridge Max-Planck-Institut für Chemie M&D Consulting University of Leeds University of Bristol University of Maryland University of Illinois National Institute for Environmental Studies
UK
Germany Germany
UK UK US US
Japan

Contributors

  • Nicola J. Blake
  • University of California at Irvine

NOAA Climate Monitoring and Diagnostics Laboratory NASA Goddard Space Flight Center PacifiCorp Dalhousie University University of Cambridge
US US US
James H. Butler Anne R. Douglass Victor L. Dvortsov Ian Folkins Peter H. Haynes Abdelwahid Mellouki Michael J. Prather
US
Canada
UK
France
US
CNRS-Laboratoire de Combustion et Systèmes Réactifs University of California at Irvine

A.2

AUTHORS, CONTRIBUTORS, AND REVIEWERS

José M. Rodríguez Sue M. Schauffler Theodore G. Shepherd Christiane Textor Claudia Timmreck Debra K. Weisenstein
University of Miami National Center for Atmospheric Research University of Toronto Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Inc.
US US
Canada Germany Germany
US

CHAPTER 3
POLAR STRATOSPHERIC OZONE: PAST AND FUTURE

Chapter Lead Authors

Paul A. Newman John A. Pyle
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Centre for Atmospheric Science, University of Cambridge
US UK

Coauthors

  • John Austin
  • UK Meteorological Office
  • UK

Norway Argentina
UK
Geir O. Braathen Pablo O. Canziani Ken S. Carslaw Piers M. de F. Forster Sophie Godin-Beekmann Bjørn M. Knudsen Karin Kreher Hideaki Nakane Steven Pawson V. Ramaswamy Markus Rex
Norwegian Institute for Air Research (NILU) CONICET/Universidad de Buenos Aires University of Leeds University of Reading Service d'Aeronomie du CNRS
UK
France
Denmark
New Zealand
Japan
Danmarks Meteorologiske Institut National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA) National Institute for Environmental Studies Goddard Earth Sciences and Technology Center/University of Maryland NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research California Institute of Technology/NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies NASAAmes Research Center
US US
Germany

  • US
  • Ross J. Salawitch

Drew T. Shindell Azadeh Tabazadeh Darin W. Toohey
US US

  • US
  • University of Colorado

Contributors

Douglas R. Allen Linnea M. Avallone Stephen R. Beagley Greg E. Bodeker Christoph Brühl John Christy
Naval Research Laboratory University of Colorado York University
US US
Canada
New Zealand
Germany
US
New Zealand
Germany
US
National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA) Max-Planck-Institut für Chemie University of Alabama at Huntsville National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA) DLR Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Naval Research Laboratory NOAA NWS Climate Prediction Center Service d'Aeronomie du CNRS San Jose State University
Brian Connor Martin Dameris Anne R. Douglass Stephen Eckermann Melvyn Gelman Florence Goutail Patrick Hamill
US US
France
US
Yuri Koshelkov Karin Labitzke Ulrike Langematz
Central Aerological Observatory Freie Universität Berlin Freie Universität Berlin
Russia
Germany Germany

A.3

AUTHORS, CONTRIBUTORS, AND REVIEWERS

  • Roger Lin
  • NOAA National Centers for Environmental Prediction/
  • US

RS Information Systems
Elisa Manzini Tatsuya Nagashima Eric R. Nash
Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie National Institute for Environmental Studies Science Systems and Applications, Inc. UK Meteorological Office
Germany
Japan
US

  • John Nash
  • UK

Samuel J. Oltmans David Parker
NOAA Climate Monitoring and Diagnostics Laboratory Hadley Centre Met Office
US UK
Klaus Pfeilsticker Giovanni Pitari William J. Randel Eugene Rozanov
Universität Heidelberg Università L'Aquila National Center for Atmospheric Research World Radiation Center and Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science ETH
Germany
Italy US
Switzerland

Michelle L. Santee Christina Schnadt
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory DLR Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory University of Toronto Japan Meteorological Agency Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research Johns Hopkins University
US
Germany
US
Canada Japan
M. Daniel Schwarzkopf Theodore G. Shepherd Masanori Shitamichi Peter von der Gathen Darryn W. Waugh
Germany
US

  • Paul O. Wennberg
  • California Institute of Technology
  • US

CHAPTER 4
GLOBAL OZONE: PAST AND FUTURE

Chapter Lead Authors

Martyn P. Chipperfield William J. Randel
University of Leeds National Center for Atmospheric Research
UK US

Coauthors

Greg E. Bodeker Martin Dameris Vitali E. Fioletov Randall R. Friedl Neil R.P. Harris Jennifer A. Logan Richard D. McPeters Nzioka John Muthama Thomas Peter Theodore G. Shepherd Keith P. Shine
National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA) DLR Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre Meteorological Service of Canada NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory European Ozone Research Coordinating Unit Harvard University NASA Goddard Space Flight Center University of Nairobi Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science ETH-Zurich University of Toronto
New Zealand
Germany Canada
US UK US US
Kenya
Switzerland
Canada

  • UK
  • University of Reading

  • Susan Solomon
  • NOAAAeronomy Laboratory
  • US

Larry W. Thomason Joseph M. Zawodny
NASA Langley Research Center NASA Langley Research Center
US US

Contributors

John Austin Michel Bourqui Peter Braesicke
UK Meteorological Office University of Reading University of Cambridge
UK UK UK

A.4

AUTHORS, CONTRIBUTORS, AND REVIEWERS

Christoph Brühl Neal Butchart
Max-Planck-Institut für Chemie UK Meteorological Office
Germany
UK
David B. Considine Derek M. Cunnold David W. Fahey Eric L. Fleming Marvin A. Geller Sophie Godin-Beekmann Volker Grewe Joanna D. Haigh Charles H. Jackman Paul Johnston Ulrike Langematz Katherine S. Law J. Ben Liley Inna A. Megretskaia Alvin J. Miller
NASA Langley Research Center Georgia Institute of Technology NOAAAeronomy Laboratory NASA Goddard Space Flight Center State University of New York, Stony Brook Service d'Aeronomie du CNRS DLR Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre Imperial College of Science, Technology, and Medicine NASA Goddard Space Flight Center National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA) Freie Universität Berlin University of Cambridge National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA) Harvard University NOAA NWS Climate Prediction Center National Institute for Environmental Studies Università L'Aquila
US US US US US
France
Germany
UK US
New Zealand
Germany
UK
New Zealand
US US
Japan Italy
Tatsuya Nagashima Giovanni Pitari Robert W. Portmann V. Ramaswamy Bjørg Rognerud Joan E. Rosenfield Martin N. Ross
NOAAAeronomy Laboratory NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Universitetet I Oslo NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Aerospace Corporation
US US
Norway
US US
Christina Schnadt M. Daniel Schwarzkopf Drew T. Shindell Claire A. Smith
DLR Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies Imperial College of Science, Technology, and Medicine Russian State Hydrometeorological University/ State University of New York
Germany
US US UK

  • Russia
  • Sergei Smyshlyaev

Richard S. Stolarski Guus J.M. Velders Ray Wang Debra K. Weisenstein Fei Wu
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) Georgia Institute of Technology Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Inc. National Center for Atmospheric Research Université de Liège
US
The Netherlands
US US US

  • Rodolphe J. Zander
  • Belgium

CHAPTER 5
SURFACE ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION: PAST AND FUTURE

Chapter Lead Authors

James B. Kerr Gunther Seckmeyer
Meteorological Service of Canada Universität Hannover
Canada Germany

Coauthors

Alkiviadis F. Bais Germar Bernhard Mario Blumthaler Susana B. Diaz
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Biospherical Instruments, Inc. Universität Innsbruck Centro Austral de Investigaciones Cientificas (CADIC) University of Maryland
Greece
US
Austria
Argentina

  • US
  • Nickolay A. Krotkov

A.5

AUTHORS, CONTRIBUTORS, AND REVIEWERS

  • Daniel Lubin
  • Scripps Institution of Oceanography

National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA) University of Bou-Ali Sina
US
New Zealand
Iran
Richard L. McKenzie Ali A. Sabzipavar

  • Jean Verdebout
  • European Commission Joint Research Centre
  • Italy

Contributors

  • Antti Arola
  • Finnish Meteorological Institute
  • Finland

Vitali E. Fioletov Jay R. Herman Peter W. Kiedron J. Ben Liley

  • Meteorological Service of Canada
  • Canada

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center State University of New York at Albany National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA) NOAA NWS Climate Prediction Center National Center for Atmospheric Research Universität Graz DLR-Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre Smithsonian Environmental Research Center National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) Colorado State University
US US
New Zealand

  • US
  • Craig S. Long

Sasha Madronich Timothy J. Martin Ralf Meerkötter Patrick J. Neale Harry Slaper
US
Austria Germany
US
The Netherlands

  • US
  • James R. Slusser

  • Petteri Taalas
  • Finnish Meteorological Institute
  • Finland

Michiel van Weele Elizabeth C. Weatherhead Christos S. Zerefos
Koninklijk Nederlands Meteorologisch Instituut (KNMI) NOAAAir Resources Laboratory Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
The Netherlands
US
Greece

TWENTY QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE OZONE LAYER
Lead Author

  • David W. Fahey
  • NOAA Aeronomy Laboratory
  • US

CHAPTER EDITORIAL CONTRIBUTORS

CHAPTER 1: CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES AND OTHER SOURCE GASES

  • Nada Derek
  • CSIRO Division of Atmospheric Research
  • Australia

CHAPTER 3: POLAR STRATOSPHERIC OZONE: PAST AND FUTURE

Rose Kendall Kathy A. Thompson
Computer Sciences Corporation Computer Sciences Corporation
US US

REVIEWERS

Alberto Adriani Ayité-Lô Nohende Ajavon Daniel L. Albritton
Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche Istituto di Fisica dell'Atmosfera Université de Lomé NOAAAeronomy Laboratory
Italy Togo US
Georgios T. Amanatidis Stephen O. Andersen
European Commission Environmental Protection Agency
Belgium
US

A.6

AUTHORS, CONTRIBUTORS, AND REVIEWERS

Gustavo A. Argüello Roger Atkinson Pieter J. Aucamp John Austin
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba University of California at Riverside Ptersa Environmental Consultant UK Meteorological Office
Argentina
US
South Africa
UK
Mark P. Baldwin Pranvera Bekteshi Germar Bernhard Donald R. Blake Greg E. Bodeker Rumen D. Bojkov
NorthWest Research Associates, Inc. Hydrometeorological Institute Biospherical Instruments, Inc. University of California at Irvine National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA) Centre for International Postgraduate Studies of Environmental Management
US
Albania
US US
New Zealand
Germany

Guy P. Brasseur Bram Bregman Christoph Brühl William Brune
Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute Max-Planck-Institut für Chemie
Germany
The Netherlands
Germany

  • US
  • Pennsylvania State University

James H. Butler James Calm
NOAA Climate Monitoring and Diagnostics Laboratory Engineering Consultant
US US
Ken S. Carslaw Marie-Lise Chanin Martyn P. Chipperfield R. Anthony Cox Derek M. Cunnold Martin Dameris John S. Daniel
University of Leeds Service d’Aeronomie du CNRS University of Leeds University of Cambridge Georgia Institute of Technology DLR Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre NOAAAeronomy Laboratory
UK
France
UK UK US
Germany
US
Susana B. Diaz Katja Drdla
Centro Austral de Investigaciones Cientificas (CADIC) NASAAmes Research Center
Argentina
US
Ellsworth S. Dutton Thomas Duafala Ezequiel Echer Kalju Eerme James W. Elkins Andreas Engel Christine A. Ennis David W. Fahey Joe Farman Vitali E. Fioletov Piers M. de F. Forster Paul J. Fraser
NOAA Climate Monitoring and Diagnostics Laboratory Tri-Cal Research Division Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE) Tartu Observatory NOAA Climate Monitoring and Diagnostics Laboratory Universität Frankfurt NOAAAeronomy Laboratory/CIRES NOAAAeronomy Laboratory European Ozone Research Coordinating Unit Meteorological Service of Canada University of Reading CSIRO Division of Atmospheric Research NOAAAeronomy Laboratory
US US
Brazil Estonia
US
Germany
US US UK
Canada
UK
Australia

  • US
  • Ru-Shan Gao

Rolando R. Garcia Marvin A. Geller Sophie Godin-Beekmann Marco González Michael Graber Hans-F. Graf Joanna D. Haigh Neil R.P. Harris Didier Hauglustaine Peter H. Haynes
National Center for Atmospheric Research State University of New York, Stony Brook Service d'Aeronomie du CNRS United Nations Environment Programme United Nations Environment Programme Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie Imperial College of Science, Technology, and Medicine European Ozone Research Coordinating Unit CNRS-Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement University of Cambridge
US US
France Kenya Kenya
Germany
UK UK
France
UK

A.7

AUTHORS, CONTRIBUTORS, AND REVIEWERS

  • Jay R. Herman
  • NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

NOAA Climate Monitoring and Diagnostics Laboratory University of Washington
US US US US US
David J. Hofmann James R. Holton Robert D. Hudson Drusilla Hufford Abdelmoneim A. Ibrahim Mohammad Ilyas Takashi Imamura Ivar S.A. Isaksen Charles H. Jackman Daniel J. Jacob
University of Maryland Environmental Protection Agency Egyptian Meteorological Authority University of Science Malaysia National Institute for Environmental Studies University of Oslo
Egypt
Malaysia
Japan Norway

  • US
  • NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

  • Harvard University
  • US

Mauricio Jaramillo-Ayerbe David Karoly Nozomi Kawamoto Jack A. Kaye
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana-Cali Monash University National Space Development Agency NASA Office of Earth Science
Colombia Australia
Japan
US
James B. Kerr M.A.K. Khalil
Meteorological Service of Canada Portland State University
Canada
US
Dieter Kley Malcolm K.W. Ko Yutaka Kondo Janusz W. Krzys´cin Lambert Kuijpers Michael J. Kurylo Murari Lal
Institut für Chemie und Dynamik der Geoshäre Forschungszentrum Jülich Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Inc. University of Tokyo
Germany
US
Japan

  • Poland
  • Polish Academy of Sciences

Technical University Pav NASA Headquarters
The Netherlands
US

  • Indian Institute of Technology
  • India

  • Shyam Lal
  • Physical Research Laboratory
  • India

Kathleen O. Lantz Neils Larsen Katherine S. Law Mark G. Lawrence J. Ben Liley
NOAAAir Resources Laboratory Danish Meteorological Institute University of Cambridge Max-Planck-Institut für Chemie National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA) Academia Sinica Harvard University
US
Denmark
UK
Germany
New Zealand Taiwan R.O.C.
US UK US
France
New Zealand
Germany
UK
Shaw Liu Jennifer A. Logan A. Robert MacKenzie Gloria L. Manney Céline Mari W. Andrew Matthews Konrad Mauersberger Archie McCulloch Gordon McFadyen Mack McFarland Daniel S. McKenna Richard L. McKenzie Ralf Meerkötter Gérard Mégie
Lancaster University NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory/New Mexico Highlands University Laboratoire d'Aérologie, Observatoire Midi Pyrénées National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA) Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik Marbury Technical Consulting Scottish Environment Protection Agency E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Company National Center for Atmospheric Research National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA) DLR-Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Department of Hydrometeorology M&D Consulting
UK US US
New Zealand
Germany
France Armenia Germany
US
Davit Melkonyan Pauline M. Midgley Stephen A. Montzka Rolf Müller
NOAA Climate Monitoring and Diagnostics Laboratory Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH University of Nairobi
Germany

  • Kenya
  • Nzioka John Muthama

Recommended publications
  • Abstract Measurement and Analysis of Bromate Ion

    Abstract Measurement and Analysis of Bromate Ion

    ABSTRACT MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS OF BROMATE ION REDUCTION IN SYNTHETIC GASTRIC JUICE by Jason Dimitrius Keith Bromate ion is a possible carcinogen that is regulated by the US EPA at a Maximum Contamination Level (MCL) of 10 µg/L in drinking water. In order to propose an improved scientifically appropriate bromate ion MCL, a more rigorous scientific methodology is needed for determining low level dose health risks. The objectives of this research project were to measure bromate ion with oxidizing and/or reducing agents typically ingested in foods and drinking water. The loss of bromate ion in HCl is too slow for significant reduction in the stomach. -5 Addition of 10 M H2S, a gastric juice component, decreases the half-life from 153 to 14 minutes. The ingested reducing agents iodide ion, nitrite ion, and iron(II) decrease the lifetime of bromate ion in the stomach. Chlorine, monochloramine, and iron(III) have little actual effect on the lifetime of bromate ion. The measured rates and chemical details of the reactions are discussed. MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS OF BROMATE ION REDUCTION IN SYNTHETIC GASTRIC JUICE A Thesis Submitted to the faculty of Miami University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Department of Chemistry by Jason Dimitrius Keith Miami University Oxford, Ohio 2005 Co-Advisor________________ (Dr. Gilbert Gordon) Co-Advisor________________ (Dr. Gilbert E. Pacey) Reader_________________ (Dr. Michael W. Crowder) Reader_________________ (Dr. Hongcai Zhou) TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ii LIST OF TABLES iii LIST OF FIGURES iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS v INTRODUCTION 1 Bromate Ion Chemistry and Human Toxicology 1 Prior Analytical Methodology 6 Objectives 7 METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND ESTABLISHMENT OF PROTOCOLS 7 Solution Preparation 7 Preparation and Measurement of Stock HOCl/ Cl2 and ClNH2 Solutions 11 Measurement of Iron(II) and Iron(III) in Solution 12 Instrumentation.
  • Standard Thermodynamic Properties of Chemical

    Standard Thermodynamic Properties of Chemical

    STANDARD THERMODYNAMIC PROPERTIES OF CHEMICAL SUBSTANCES ∆ ° –1 ∆ ° –1 ° –1 –1 –1 –1 Molecular fH /kJ mol fG /kJ mol S /J mol K Cp/J mol K formula Name Crys. Liq. Gas Crys. Liq. Gas Crys. Liq. Gas Crys. Liq. Gas Ac Actinium 0.0 406.0 366.0 56.5 188.1 27.2 20.8 Ag Silver 0.0 284.9 246.0 42.6 173.0 25.4 20.8 AgBr Silver(I) bromide -100.4 -96.9 107.1 52.4 AgBrO3 Silver(I) bromate -10.5 71.3 151.9 AgCl Silver(I) chloride -127.0 -109.8 96.3 50.8 AgClO3 Silver(I) chlorate -30.3 64.5 142.0 AgClO4 Silver(I) perchlorate -31.1 AgF Silver(I) fluoride -204.6 AgF2 Silver(II) fluoride -360.0 AgI Silver(I) iodide -61.8 -66.2 115.5 56.8 AgIO3 Silver(I) iodate -171.1 -93.7 149.4 102.9 AgNO3 Silver(I) nitrate -124.4 -33.4 140.9 93.1 Ag2 Disilver 410.0 358.8 257.1 37.0 Ag2CrO4 Silver(I) chromate -731.7 -641.8 217.6 142.3 Ag2O Silver(I) oxide -31.1 -11.2 121.3 65.9 Ag2O2 Silver(II) oxide -24.3 27.6 117.0 88.0 Ag2O3 Silver(III) oxide 33.9 121.4 100.0 Ag2O4S Silver(I) sulfate -715.9 -618.4 200.4 131.4 Ag2S Silver(I) sulfide (argentite) -32.6 -40.7 144.0 76.5 Al Aluminum 0.0 330.0 289.4 28.3 164.6 24.4 21.4 AlB3H12 Aluminum borohydride -16.3 13.0 145.0 147.0 289.1 379.2 194.6 AlBr Aluminum monobromide -4.0 -42.0 239.5 35.6 AlBr3 Aluminum tribromide -527.2 -425.1 180.2 100.6 AlCl Aluminum monochloride -47.7 -74.1 228.1 35.0 AlCl2 Aluminum dichloride -331.0 AlCl3 Aluminum trichloride -704.2 -583.2 -628.8 109.3 91.1 AlF Aluminum monofluoride -258.2 -283.7 215.0 31.9 AlF3 Aluminum trifluoride -1510.4 -1204.6 -1431.1 -1188.2 66.5 277.1 75.1 62.6 AlF4Na Sodium tetrafluoroaluminate
  • Electronic Structures and Spin Density Distributions of Bro2 and (HO)2Bro Radicals

    Electronic Structures and Spin Density Distributions of Bro2 and (HO)2Bro Radicals

    Article pubs.acs.org/IC Electronic Structures and Spin Density Distributions of BrO2 and (HO)2BrO Radicals. Mechanisms for Avoidance of Hypervalency and for Spin Delocalization and Spin Polarization Rainer Glaser* and Cory Camasta Department of Chemistry, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211, United States *S Supporting Information ABSTRACT: The results are reported of an ab initio study of bromine dioxide BrO2, 1, and of the T-shaped trans- and cis- dihydroxides 2 and 3 of dihydrogen bromate (HO)2BrO. The thermochemistry has been explored of potential synthetic routes to (HO)2BrO involving water addition to BrO2, hydroxyl addition to bromous acid HOBrO, 4, protonation/ − reduction of bromic acid HOBrO2, 5, via tautomers 6 8 of protonated bromic acid, and by reduction/protonation of − bromic acid via radical anion [HOBrO2] , 9. The potential energy surface analyses were performed at the MP2(full)/6- 311G* level (or better) and with the consideration of aqueous solvation at the SMD(MP2(full)/6-311G*) level (or better), and higher-level energies were computed at levels up to QCISD(full,T)/6-311++G(2df,2pd)//MP2. The addition of RO radical to bromous acid or bromite esters and the reduction of protonated bromic acid or protonated bromate esters are promising leads for possible synthetic exploration. Spin density distributions and molecular electrostatic potentials were computed at the QCISD(full)/6-311G*//MP2(full)/6-311G* level to characterize the electronic structures of 1−3. Both radicals employ maximally occupied (pseudo) π-systems to transfer electron density from bromine to the periphery. While the formation of the (3c-5e) π-system suffices to avoid hypervalency in 1, the π formation of the (4c-7e) -system in 2 or 3 still leaves the bromine formally hypervalent and (HO)2BrO requires delocalization of bromine density into σ*-SMOs over the trans O−Br−O moiety.
  • Mechanistic and Computational Studies of Ferroin, Simple Organic Acids, and Bromine Oxides

    Mechanistic and Computational Studies of Ferroin, Simple Organic Acids, and Bromine Oxides

    Mechanistic and Computational Studies of Ferroin, Simple Organic Acids, and Bromine Oxides Elucidating the Complex Electrochemical Dance in an Oscillating Reaction A thesis presented to Faculty of the Graduate School of Chemistry At the University of Missouri-Columbia In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science By: Cory Camasta Dr. Rainer Glaser, Ph.D., Thesis Supervisor December 2016 The undersigned, appointed by the Dean of the Graduate School, have examined the thesis entitled: MECHANISTIC AND COMPUTATIONAL STUDIES OF FERROIN, SIMPLE ORGANIC ACIDS, AND BROMINE OXIDES presented by Cory Camasta, a candidate for the Master of Science degree, and hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. _______________________________ Dr. Rainer E. Glaser _______________________________ Dr. Thomas D. Sewell _______________________________ Dr. Aigen Li Acknowledgement The scientist’s journey is a long and challenging one. Though I do not know where mine will end, I have high hopes for it. In this short preface to the work that has directly consumed a large amount of my last nine months at the University of Missouri (and indirectly quite a bit longer), I would like to take a moment to give due thanks: Thank you to all of the dedicated researchers that allowed me to write this thesis without ever putting on a pair of protective eyewear – including the one that gave me a job. Thank you to those who loved every second of the research you did. Your sincere efforts to extend our collective knowledgebase certainly show in the fruits of your labor. Thank you to those who hated every second of the research you did.
  • Chemical Names and CAS Numbers Final

    Chemical Names and CAS Numbers Final

    Chemical Abstract Chemical Formula Chemical Name Service (CAS) Number C3H8O 1‐propanol C4H7BrO2 2‐bromobutyric acid 80‐58‐0 GeH3COOH 2‐germaacetic acid C4H10 2‐methylpropane 75‐28‐5 C3H8O 2‐propanol 67‐63‐0 C6H10O3 4‐acetylbutyric acid 448671 C4H7BrO2 4‐bromobutyric acid 2623‐87‐2 CH3CHO acetaldehyde CH3CONH2 acetamide C8H9NO2 acetaminophen 103‐90‐2 − C2H3O2 acetate ion − CH3COO acetate ion C2H4O2 acetic acid 64‐19‐7 CH3COOH acetic acid (CH3)2CO acetone CH3COCl acetyl chloride C2H2 acetylene 74‐86‐2 HCCH acetylene C9H8O4 acetylsalicylic acid 50‐78‐2 H2C(CH)CN acrylonitrile C3H7NO2 Ala C3H7NO2 alanine 56‐41‐7 NaAlSi3O3 albite AlSb aluminium antimonide 25152‐52‐7 AlAs aluminium arsenide 22831‐42‐1 AlBO2 aluminium borate 61279‐70‐7 AlBO aluminium boron oxide 12041‐48‐4 AlBr3 aluminium bromide 7727‐15‐3 AlBr3•6H2O aluminium bromide hexahydrate 2149397 AlCl4Cs aluminium caesium tetrachloride 17992‐03‐9 AlCl3 aluminium chloride (anhydrous) 7446‐70‐0 AlCl3•6H2O aluminium chloride hexahydrate 7784‐13‐6 AlClO aluminium chloride oxide 13596‐11‐7 AlB2 aluminium diboride 12041‐50‐8 AlF2 aluminium difluoride 13569‐23‐8 AlF2O aluminium difluoride oxide 38344‐66‐0 AlB12 aluminium dodecaboride 12041‐54‐2 Al2F6 aluminium fluoride 17949‐86‐9 AlF3 aluminium fluoride 7784‐18‐1 Al(CHO2)3 aluminium formate 7360‐53‐4 1 of 75 Chemical Abstract Chemical Formula Chemical Name Service (CAS) Number Al(OH)3 aluminium hydroxide 21645‐51‐2 Al2I6 aluminium iodide 18898‐35‐6 AlI3 aluminium iodide 7784‐23‐8 AlBr aluminium monobromide 22359‐97‐3 AlCl aluminium monochloride
  • Safety Data Sheets for Each Part Listed Above Follow This Cover Sheet. Transportation Instruction

    Safety Data Sheets for Each Part Listed Above Follow This Cover Sheet. Transportation Instruction

    Kit Revision Date: 09 March 2020 8329TCF THERMALLY CONDUCTIVE EPOXY ADHESIVE KIT MG Chemicals Multipart Product Kit This product is a kit made up of multiple parts. Each part is an independently packaged chemical component and has independent hazard assessments. Kit Content Part Product Name Product Use A 8329TCF-A Thermally conductive epoxy resin B 8329TCF-B Thermally conductive epoxy hardener Safety Data Sheets for each part listed above follow this cover sheet. Transportation Instruction Before offering this product kit for transport, read Section 14 for all parts listed above. 8329TCF-A Thermally Conductive Epoxy Adhesive MG Chemicals UK Limited Version No: A-1.01 Issue Date:23/05/2018 Safety Data Sheet (Conforms to Regulation (EU) No 2015/830) Revision Date: 17/03/2020 L.REACH.GBR.EN SECTION 1 IDENTIFICATION OF THE SUBSTANCE / MIXTURE AND OF THE COMPANY / UNDERTAKING 1.1. Product Identifier Product name 8329TCF-A Synonyms SDS Code: 8329TCF-Part A; 8329TCF-6ML, 8329TCF-50ML, 8329TCF-T50ML, 8329TCF-200ML Other means of identification Thermally Conductive Epoxy Adhesive 1.2. Relevant identified uses of the substance or mixture and uses advised against Relevant identified uses Thermally conductive adhesive for bonding and thermal management Uses advised against Not Applicable 1.3. Details of the supplier of the safety data sheet Registered company name MG Chemicals UK Limited MG Chemicals (Head office) Heame House, 23 Bilston Street, Sedgely Dudley DY3 1JA United Address 9347 - 193 Street Surrey V4N 4E7 British Columbia Canada Kingdom Telephone +(44) 1663 362888 +(1) 800-201-8822 Fax Not Available +(1) 800-708-9888 Website Not Available www.mgchemicals.com Email [email protected] [email protected] 1.4.
  • This Table Gives the Standard State Chemical Thermodynamic Properties of About 2500 Individual Substances in the Crystalline, Liquid, and Gaseous States

    This Table Gives the Standard State Chemical Thermodynamic Properties of About 2500 Individual Substances in the Crystalline, Liquid, and Gaseous States

    STANDARD THERMODYNAMIC PROPERTIES OF CHEMICAL SUBSTANCES This table gives the standard state chemical thermodynamic properties of about 2500 individual substances in the crystalline, liquid, and gaseous states. Substances are listed by molecular formula in a modified Hill order; all substances not containing carbon appear first, followed by those that contain carbon. The properties tabulated are: DfH° Standard molar enthalpy (heat) of formation at 298.15 K in kJ/mol DfG° Standard molar Gibbs energy of formation at 298.15 K in kJ/mol S° Standard molar entropy at 298.15 K in J/mol K Cp Molar heat capacity at constant pressure at 298.15 K in J/mol K The standard state pressure is 100 kPa (1 bar). The standard states are defined for different phases by: • The standard state of a pure gaseous substance is that of the substance as a (hypothetical) ideal gas at the standard state pressure. • The standard state of a pure liquid substance is that of the liquid under the standard state pressure. • The standard state of a pure crystalline substance is that of the crystalline substance under the standard state pressure. An entry of 0.0 for DfH° for an element indicates the reference state of that element. See References 1 and 2 for further information on reference states. A blank means no value is available. The data are derived from the sources listed in the references, from other papers appearing in the Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, and from the primary research literature. We are indebted to M. V. Korobov for providing data on fullerene compounds.
  • Carboline Pyroclad X1 Part A

    Carboline Pyroclad X1 Part A

    Carboline Pyroclad X1 Part A ALTEX COATINGS LTD Chemwatch Hazard Alert Code: 3 Version No: 1.2 Issue Date: 12/04/2020 Safety Data Sheet according to HSNO Regulations Print Date: 12/04/2020 S.GHS.NZL.EN SECTION 1 IDENTIFICATION OF THE SUBSTANCE / MIXTURE AND OF THE COMPANY / UNDERTAKING Product Identifier Product name Carboline Pyroclad X1 Part A Synonyms Not Available Proper shipping name ENVIRONMENTALLY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE, LIQUID, N.O.S. (contains bisphenol A/ diglycidyl ether resin, liquid) Other means of identification Not Available Relevant identified uses of the substance or mixture and uses advised against Relevant identified uses Part A of a multi-component industrial coating Details of the supplier of the safety data sheet Registered company name ALTEX COATINGS LTD Address 91-111 Oropi Road, Tauranga, New Zealand Other New Zealand Telephone +64 7 5411221 Fax +64 7 5411310 Website Not Available Email [email protected] Emergency telephone number Association / Organisation NZ POISONS CENTRE CHEMWATCH EMERGENCY RESPONSE Emergency telephone 0800 764 766 +64 800 700 112 numbers Other emergency telephone Not Available +61 2 9186 1132 numbers Once connected and if the message is not in your prefered language then please dial 01 SECTION 2 HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION Classification of the substance or mixture Considered a Hazardous Substance according to the criteria of the New Zealand Hazardous Substances New Organisms legislation. Classified as Dangerous Goods for transport purposes. Chronic Aquatic Hazard Category 2, Specific target organ toxicity - single exposure Category 2, Specific target organ toxicity - repeated exposure Classification [1] Category 2, Eye Irritation Category 2, Reproductive Toxicity Category 2, Skin Sensitizer Category 1, Skin Corrosion/Irritation Category 3, Acute Aquatic Hazard Category 2 Legend: 1.
  • Principles of Chemical Nomenclature a GUIDE to IUPAC RECOMMENDATIONS Principles of Chemical Nomenclature a GUIDE to IUPAC RECOMMENDATIONS

    Principles of Chemical Nomenclature a GUIDE to IUPAC RECOMMENDATIONS Principles of Chemical Nomenclature a GUIDE to IUPAC RECOMMENDATIONS

    Principles of Chemical Nomenclature A GUIDE TO IUPAC RECOMMENDATIONS Principles of Chemical Nomenclature A GUIDE TO IUPAC RECOMMENDATIONS G.J. LEIGH OBE TheSchool of Chemistry, Physics and Environmental Science, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK H.A. FAVRE Université de Montréal Montréal, Canada W.V. METANOMSKI Chemical Abstracts Service Columbus, Ohio, USA Edited by G.J. Leigh b Blackwell Science © 1998 by DISTRIBUTORS BlackweilScience Ltd Marston Book Services Ltd Editorial Offices: P0 Box 269 Osney Mead, Oxford 0X2 0EL Abingdon 25 John Street, London WC1N 2BL Oxon 0X14 4YN 23 Ainslie Place, Edinburgh EH3 6AJ (Orders:Tel:01235 465500 350 Main Street, Maiden Fax: MA 02 148-5018, USA 01235 465555) 54 University Street, Carlton USA Victoria 3053, Australia BlackwellScience, Inc. 10, Rue Casmir Delavigne Commerce Place 75006 Paris, France 350 Main Street Malden, MA 02 148-5018 Other Editorial Offices: (Orders:Tel:800 759 6102 Blackwell Wissenschafts-Verlag GmbH 781 388 8250 KurfUrstendamm 57 Fax:781 388 8255) 10707 Berlin, Germany Canada Blackwell Science KK Copp Clark Professional MG Kodenmacho Building 200Adelaide St West, 3rd Floor 7—10 Kodenmacho Nihombashi Toronto, Ontario M5H 1W7 Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104, Japan (Orders:Tel:416 597-1616 800 815-9417 All rights reserved. No part of Fax:416 597-1617) this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or Australia BlackwellScience Pty Ltd transmitted, in any form or by any 54 University Street means, electronic, mechanical, Carlton, Victoria 3053 photocopying, recording or otherwise, (Orders:Tel:39347 0300 except as permitted by the UK Fax:3 9347 5001) Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the copyright owner.
  • Bromate Production in Ozone Contactors

    Bromate Production in Ozone Contactors

    BROMATE PRODUCTION IN OZONE CONTACTORS Richard S. Yates, Graduate Research Assistant Michael K. Stenstrom, Professor and Chairman Department of Civil Engineering University of California, Los Angeles, 90024 Abstract A pilot-scale study of the ozonation of surface waters containing moderate levels of bromide .(Br-) was conducted in order to collect kinetic parameters suitable for modeling the production of bromate. Operating in a pre- ozonation mode, the two surface waters were dosed under conditions designed to theoretically provide greater than 0.51ogto inactivation levels for Giardia. Key results from the experimental study and kinetic analysis of bromate formation in these two waters are: 1) Bromate production results from rapid free radical processes. The slower, recursive reactions involving the direct oxidation of bromide and hypobromite by ozone are insignificant. 2) Ozone residual is the controlling factor in the rate and extent of bromate formation. 3) Hypobromite and hypobromous acid are formed primarily as minor byproducts of oxybromine radical decay, and do not play a significant role as precursors at pHs less than 9.0. 4) Naturally occurring organic matter plays a complex role in production and consumption of both oxygen radicals and possibly oxybromine radicals. 5) Gas-liquid contactor hydrodynamics play a critical role in bromate formation, influencing mass transfer rates, peak ozone residuals, spatial-temporal concentration gradients, and liquid backmixing phenomena. INTRODUCTION Boomate Toxicity Oral feeding studies involving rodents have shown that the ingestion of bromate (Br03) via drinking water can promote the formation of renal tumors (Kurokawa et al., 1987). Given this data, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) has classified Br03 as a possible human carcinogen, and is likely to propose a maximum contantinant level in the range of 5 - 10 ,ug/L .
  • Chlorine, Bromine, Iodine

    Chlorine, Bromine, Iodine

    SECTION 5 Chlorine, Bromine, Iodine M. SCHMEISSER Chlorin e CI2 Commercially available liquid chlorine, which is obtained by electrolysis of alkali, is not sufficiently pure and must therefore be purified by method I. On the other hand, a gas that is already largely free of such impurities as Os and chlorine oxides is produced by the reaction of hydrated manganese dioxide with pure hydrochloric acid. For this preparation, see method II below. I. Chlorine from a steel cylinder is passed consecutively through two wash bottles or columns containing concentrated H2S04, a tube or column containing CaO (to remove any HC1 that might be present), a tube containing P2Os, and finally into a container placed in a Dry Ice-acetone bath, where it is condensed and liquefied. The liquefied Cl2 is repeatedly vaporized and condensed while noncondensable gases (02) are continuously removed with a pump. Finally, the liquid Cl2 is fractionated in high vacuum and passed into receivers cooled with liquid nitrogen. (For the appa• ratus see, for example, Part I, p. 66 ff.) Only the middle frac• tion is used for further work. II. Mn02xH20* + 4 HC1 = MnCl2 + (x + 2)H20 + Cl2 ~ 100 145.88 70.91 *x ~ 0.8 for a product of about 86% purity. Concentrated, air-free hydrochloric acid (d 1.16) is added dropwise to precipitated hydrated manganese dioxide (e.g., the 86% pure commercially obtainable material) in a flask equipped with a dropping funnel and a gas outlet tube. The gas formation may be regulated by moderate heating. The chlorine thus formed is passed through water (to remove entrained HC1) and H2S04 (carried out as in method I, that is, 272 5.
  • On the Problem of Bromide Control in a Tl3 +-Perturbed Belousov-Zhabotinsky Oscillator Szilvia Murányi

    On the Problem of Bromide Control in a Tl3 +-Perturbed Belousov-Zhabotinsky Oscillator Szilvia Murányi

    On the Problem of Bromide Control in a Tl3 +-perturbed Belousov-Zhabotinsky Oscillator Szilvia Murányi Institute of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, L. Eötvös University, H-1518 Budapest, Hungary Zoltän Noszticzius Institute of Physics, Technical University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary, and Center for Nonlinear Dynamics and the Department of Physics, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712 Z. Naturforsch. 47 a, 605-613 (1992); received January 9, 1992 It is shown that Tl3+ as a bromide removing perturbant of the BZ oscillators is superior to Ag + in several aspects. A most important advantage is that the upper limit of the actual Br" concentra- tion can be calculated from the potential of a bromide selective electrode in the presence of the corrosive Tl3+ ions. Experimental Potentiometrie traces of a bromide selective electrode in a Tl3 + perturbed BZ system show that the Br- concentration stays much below its critical concentration during the oscillations. These observations suggest that free Br" is not the critical intermediate formed during reduction of Ce4+ and responsible for the negative feedback associated with the oscillations. Introduction is below is critical value and it is "switched off" above that level. The main features of the mechanism of the classical While there is a general agreement in the literature Belousov-Zhabotinsky (BZ) reaction [1] - the oscilla- regarding the positive feedback loop, opinions are tory oxidation of malonic acid by acidic bromate cata- more divided concerning the negative one. The first lyzed by the Ce4+/Ce3+ redox couple - were clarified problems of the negative feedback loop came into by Field, Koros, and Noyes (FKN) nearly two decades light when Noszticzius [4] observed oscillations in the ago [2, 3].