Transcript a Pinewood Dialogue with Michael Moore

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Transcript a Pinewood Dialogue with Michael Moore TRANSCRIPT A PINEWOOD DIALOGUE WITH MICHAEL MOORE Michael Moore is the most famous, controversial, and commercially successful documentary filmmaker working today. The notoriety surrounding his films has obscured the fact that he is a gifted director who uses a wide range of cinematic techniques to engage, entertain, and provoke his audience. Sicko , his widely acclaimed, no-holds barred attack on the American healthcare system, uses the issue of healthcare to explore larger questions about what kind of country America is. In this discussion presented by the Museum of the Moving Image in collaboration with Variety , Moore spoke passionately about the many questions raised by his film. A Pinewood Dialogue following a screening of this country and say to those on the other side of Sicko , moderated by Chief Curator David the political fence, “Look, aren’t there some issues Schwartz (June 28, 2007): where we can find some common ground and work together on this? And it shouldn’t be about DAVID SCHWARTZ: Congratulations on the film. The Democrat or Republican. If the polar ice caps are film was rushed into the theaters last week and I melting, that affects all of us. If 47 million people understand that you went to some of the don’t have health insurance, that affects all of us. screenings at the Lincoln Square [theater]. The film Can’t we agree to fix this?” So I do hope that that has gotten really an amazing response. will happen. Having said that, that may make my most subversive film, because I am attempting to MICHAEL MOORE: Well… (Applause) reach deep into mainstream America with this movie. SCHWARTZ: A woman outside, when you came in, came up and said, “I’m glad you were born.” You SCHWARTZ: There’s so much discussion and press said you’d never heard that one before. around any opening of a Michael Moore film. It’s just been amazing trying to keep up with all the MOORE: No. (Laughs) No, in fact I’ve spent most of stories coming out. And I think sometimes you’re the last three years listening to people say, “I wish not appreciated enough, or people don’t talk you were dead.” (Laughter) enough about just the filmmaking craft and process that you go through. SCHWARTZ: But there’s a different reception to this film than the sort of polarizing effect that previous MOORE: Thanks. I appreciate that, because I rarely films have had. I mean, this film seems to really be get a chance to talk about that because people bringing people together. usually want to engage in—which is okay—in the political discussion, but… MOORE: Yeah, I—no, that’s true. I mean, they’ve actually tested it with Republican audiences SCHWARTZ: Well, we’ll get into that! (Laughter) But I (Laughter) and it’s tested very well. And the Fox know that you—for one thing, that this film probably News channel reviewer called it “Brilliant and had the highest shooting ratio: about 250:1, from uplifting.” So… (Laughter) I thought, “What are they what I understand. And really, what I want to ask is trying to do, ruin me?” (Laughter) But I made this in how you put this together? I heard that you were a spirit of—while I still believe, obviously very making a film about healthcare, and I couldn’t strongly, in the things I believe in—that this picture how that would work as a film, or what you shouldn’t be a partisan issue. I’m hoping to hold would do. my hand out across the great divide that we have in MOORE: Neither could I, I would say. (Laughter) But painful at times to watch.” But it is a Michael Moore I like to pick subjects that I think either sound film; you always make your films entertaining. boring, or difficult to understand or—I always imagine someone saying to their spouse or MOORE: Well, and I also say in the first two minutes boyfriend or girlfriend, “Hey honey, let’s go to that that I’m not going to do what you may think I’m health care documentary tonight!” (Laughter) going to do, which is give you a two-hour film about because I wouldn’t want to go to that. So I start with the poor (as any good Liberal would want to make that: that I wouldn’t want to see a film like this. And a film about that). I’m at a point in my life where if I so, while shooting it, I’m always in a theater seat, in have to spend two hours trying to convince people an imaginary theater seat, thinking about, “What that 47 million [Americans] who don’t have would I like to see on a Friday night?” And as a insurance should at least have insurance—or at filmmaker, first and foremost, I set out to try and least the 9 million of them who are children should make a film where, at the end of the two hours, be covered—if I have to take, really, two hours and people will leave with a feeling of exhilaration. And I a year-and-a-half of my life to make that film, then think all filmmakers hope to do that, ultimately. we’re much more messed up than a two-hour film is ever going to correct. So I start with the People work hard all week, and Friday night comes; assumption that most people think that that’s they want to go to the movies. And so I want to give wrong and somehow should be fixed. I thought it them that two hours of something where they’ll was much more interesting to focus on people who laugh and—you know the cliché, “They’ll laugh are covered, who have insurance, and who think they’ll cry… and, in this case, leave the theater everything is hunky-dory until they meet with a wanting to slap an insurance company serious illness. executive…” (Laughter) No, don’t! No violence. SCHWARTZ: So how did the shape of it come into I mean, I love this art form, and I worry that it’s been focus? Because you did a call for stories, you so debased by the bottom line, by Hollywood, collected all these stories, but you have a very which is owned by other companies that are clear… it’s an essay film, in a way. It’s entertaining, concerned about profit and not about the art. That’s but you’re making a very clearly thought-out why we have so many movies that—I mean, I like argument. going to the movies, so I go to a lot of movies, and I just leave constantly with a sense of… (Sighs) Am MOORE: Well, it was because of those letters. I I right? I mean, that’s not an unfamiliar feeling. We mean, I thought we would hear mostly from people don’t want that feeling! We want to skip up the who don’t have insurance—and we did. But the aisle. And so I’m thinking a lot about that. stories that we heard from people who were covered, and who found out that even if they had SCHWARTZ: Let’s talk, then, about just how you start money, [they] could end up destitute—people in the film, the first two shots. We start off with George the upper middle class who lost everything Bush. It’s an easy laugh-line, of course. It’s a great because of hospital bills that were half-a-million, a laugh-line. million, two-million dollars, and [who] found that their insurance company no way wanted to pay MOORE: Well, it’s a tease to you, too. (Laughs) two-million dollars, and [that they were] going to Because, you know, I just imagine people going, find any way they could to get out of paying that “Oh, here we go again. (Laughter) Two hours of bill. And I thought, “Geez, you know, I wonder how Bush bashing. O-h-h-h.” And then you don’t see many people really realize that?” Because I think him for another hour, so it’s really—I’m just having most of us—if you’re healthy, and you haven’t really some fun with the audience. had a serious illness—you don’t really think about it a whole lot. In fact, we actually like to brag about, SCHWARTZ: Then you go to this incredible shot of “Hey, yeah, I got benefits . Oh, yeah, I got. I’m fully this guy stitching up his wound—right with those covered! Fully insured!” After this film, I want first two shots, just saying, “This is going to be people to maybe pick up their health insurance something different. Something that might be policy and read the fine print, because there’s a lot TRANSCRIPT: A PINEWOOD DIALOGUE WITH MICHAEL MOORE PAGE 2 of things in there that I think would shock a lot of figure out how we can make that work in our unique people. situation. SCHWARTZ: Now, the idea to look at other SCHWARTZ: I want to ask you about a few of the countries—and you’ve done this before a bit with choices you made, where you probably knew you voyages to Canada in Bowling for Columbine —but were opening yourself up to questions or criticism. the idea of using that, and winding up in Cuba as And I’ll start with the easier one: The person who you did, can you talk about how that came into the had the anti-Michael Moore website, and you story? Because that’s not from the stories you decided to help him out.
Recommended publications
  • RTS TV Jobs Guide 2018
    TV JOBS GUIDE HOWHOW TOTO TELETELE VVGETGET INTO INTO II SS II ON ON HOW TO SURVIVE AS A FREELANCER LOUIS THEROUX’S INTERVIEW TIPS WRITE THE NEXT LINE OF DUTY HOW TO GET THE PERFECT SHOT 5 Smart moves 6 A running start A foot in the door is the It’s the ultimate entry- first step, says Holly Close. level job and a hard Now you need to graft, but it can open keep it up all kinds of futures there 8 Cast your net wide Without you, the show would have no exclusives, no guests and no archive footage 12 Headline snapper Covering the news is all about hitting deadlines in the Story first face of unforseen 10 events Good storytelling is central to editing – and editing is central to all TV shows 14 Hear this! It’s all about knowing what’s possible, says Strictly’s Tony Revell It’s all in the light 13 The pros shed light on shooting Centre of big-budget 16 attention dramas Keep it raw, rather than falsely polished – you can be yourself and still stand out, says Chris Stark 2 20 Write now Line of Duty creator Jed Mercurio Making headlines took time out of filming 18 series 5 to share his advice for writers Follow your curiosity, says who want to see their work on screen Louis Theroux – but don’t forget your audience 22 Freelance survival guide Job hunting How to make a success 24 What employers of self-employment – are looking for in and who to turn to for your CV, letter advice and support and interview 26 Get in training 28 Love TV? So do we Find out about a wide variety The RTS is committed to of training schemes from helping young people make broadcasters, producers and their way in television professional organisations Television is not an industry for the faint hearted, but the results can be hugely rewarding.
    [Show full text]
  • Documentary Films Audiences in Europe Findings from the Moving Docs Survey
    1 Credit: Moving Docs DOCUMENTARY FILMS AUDIENCES IN EUROPE FINDINGS FROM THE MOVING DOCS SURVEY HUW D JONES July 2020 2 CONTENTS Project team .............................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Foreword ................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Key findings ............................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................................. 8 Study method ............................................................................................................................................................................ 9 1. Who watches documentaries? ........................................................................................................................................ 11 2. Where are documentaries viewed? ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Cable Network in an Era of Digital Media: Bravo and the Constraints of Consumer Citizenship
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations Dissertations and Theses Fall August 2014 The Cable Network in an Era of Digital Media: Bravo and the Constraints of Consumer Citizenship Alison D. Brzenchek University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2 Part of the Communication Technology and New Media Commons, Critical and Cultural Studies Commons, Cultural History Commons, Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, Film and Media Studies Commons, History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons, and the Political Economy Commons Recommended Citation Brzenchek, Alison D., "The Cable Network in an Era of Digital Media: Bravo and the Constraints of Consumer Citizenship" (2014). Doctoral Dissertations. 55. https://doi.org/10.7275/bjgn-vg94 https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2/55 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE CABLE NETWORK IN AN ERA OF DIGITAL MEDIA: BRAVO AND THE CONSTRAINTS OF CONSUMER CITIZENSHIP A Dissertation Presented by ALISON D. BRZENCHEK Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2014 Department
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Matthew H
    Michael Moore: Filmmaker, Newsmaker, Cultural Icon Matthew H. Bernstein, Editor http://press.umich.edu/titleDetailDesc.do?id=192221 The University of Michigan Press, 2010 Introduction matthew h. bernstein With the premiere of his popular debut ‹lm Roger & Me in late 1989, Michael Moore proved himself an astonishingly successful non‹ction ‹lmmaker. Thir- teen years later, Bowling for Columbine’s extraordinary box of‹ce performance and its Academy Award for Best Documentary con‹rmed Moore’s standing as a cultural commentator to be reckoned with. In the intervening years, Moore diversi‹ed his output: he became a best-selling book author, TV show pro- ducer, and media personality. When Fahrenheit 9/11 premiered in June 2004, following its winning the Palme D’Or at Cannes, Moore certi‹ed his status as a ‹lmmaker, newsmaker, icon, and political celebrity larger than any one of the ‹lms, books or TV shows he produced or the website established and main- tained in his name. For 20 years and counting, Moore has served as a comic, unof‹cial, har- ried, and harrying spokesperson for the disenfranchised working class and liberal and leftist Americans—a single-handed critic of corporate America and an answer to the rise of Fox News. He had also become a lightning rod for conservative criticism and personal attacks long before he attempted to in›uence the outcome of the 2004 American presidential election with Fahrenheit 9/11. And while 2007’s Sicko was not nearly so ambitious as the 2004 opus—and it’s worth recalling that no other theatrical non‹ction ‹lm has ever tried to dethrone a sitting American president—Moore’s 2007 movie inaugurated a more intensive phase in America’s ongoing efforts at healthcare reform that the Obama administration and Congress have begun to address through legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • Downsize This! Downsize This!
    Moore, Michael − Downsize This! Downsize This! Michael Moore Grateful acknowledgment is made to the following for permission to reprint the following photographs: John Abbot Photography: photos of David Hoag, President of LTV, and Ralph Larsen, CEO of Johnson /> Archive Photos: photos of Oklahoma building (Chris Smith), Helmut Werner (Hillery), and Keun Hee Lee (Hankyorch). Michael R. Honeywell: photo of William Stavropoulos, Dow Chemical, CEO (M. H. Photo). Black Star: photos of Dwayne Andreas (John Harrington), Edward Brennan (Rob Nelson), and Hillary Clinton (Dennis Brack). Luther S. Miller: photo of David Levan. SABA: photos of Oklahoma City bombing (Jim Argo/SABA photo); Daniel Tellep (Chris Brown/SABA photo); Jan Timmer (Leimdorfer/ R.E.A./SABA photo); Phil Knight (Mark Peterson/SABA photo); and Bill Rutledge (LaraJ. Regan/SABA photo). UPI/Corbis−Bettman: photo of Art Modell. Impact Visuals: photo of Uzi (Russ Marshall). ISBN 0−517−70739−X To my wife, Kathleen, and my daughter, Natalie two very funny people I love immensely. Contents • The Etiquette of Downsizing • Let's All Hop in a Ryder Truck • Would Pat Buchanan Take a Check from Satan? • "Don't Vote—It Only Encourages Them" • Democrat? Republican? Can You Tell the Difference? • Not on the Mayflower? Then Leave! • Big Welfare Mamas • Let's Dump on Orange County • How to Conduct the Rodney King Commemorative Riot • Pagan Babies • Germany Still Hasn't Paid for Its Sins—and I Intend to Collect • So You Want to Kill the President! • Show Trials I'd Like to See • If Clinton Had Balls . • Steve Forbes Was an Alien • Corporate Crooks Trading Cards • Why Are Union Leaders So F#!@ing Stupid? • Balance the Budget? Balance My Checkbook! • Mike's Penal Systems, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (580Kb)
    Rennie, Allan (2012) Representing Performance: Documentary film, performance theory, and the Real. MPhil(R) thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/3572/ Copyright and moral rights for this thesis are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Glasgow Theses Service http://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] 1 ‘Representing Performance: Documentary Film, Performance Theory and the Real’ Allan Rennie 0601966 Supervisors: Dr Karen Lury Dr Katie Gough MPhil Thesis School of Creative Arts Theatre, Film and Television Department Abstract: This thesis explores the points of intersection between documentary theory and performance theory. Documentary discourse – both practice and theory – concerns itself with the search for an origin; an object in the real world with which the filmmaking apparatus interacts. The object is the nucleus of the documentary text. The fact that the object is taken from the historical world provides the text and its argument with immediacy and relevance. Writing on documentary focuses on the relationship forged between this object and the documentary text. The cynosure of documentary theory is an examination of the practices and processes deployed by the filmmaker in the representation of reality.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter September 2018
    FOREST FRIENDS IRELAND NEWSLETTER – SEPTEMBER 2018 Issue 28 Forest Friends Ireland WE PLANT TREES … IN THIS ISSUE Summer’s gone …. Well, we’ve left Lughnasa behind and we Some elements of the Cross Border are moving through the Autumnal Equinox Project are already in place. The Centre for towards the great festival of Samháin, Forest Biodiversity is a project at the initial marking the end of the harvest and the stages. This issue summarises our progress beginning of Winter. The leaves are this season. changing colour and the days are beginning Saving Mother Earth to look just a little bit shorter but we still Carbon Offsets For Urban In this article John Haughton examines the have a lot of work to do so let’s jump right Bolivian model for the conservation of Mother Trees – Page 10 Earth as a desirable starting point based on a in to this season’s newsletter. We have a lot Urban trees improve air and water quality, of ground to cover. deep ecological perspective at the bedrock of reduce energy costs and improve human environmental conservation. health, and offer the benefit of storing Saving Mother Earth - Page 2 carbon. But in cities across the world, they Bolivia is further advanced than most with are disappearing. regard to adopting a model for saving Mother Earth and has now established laws You probably noticed the felling of trees in pertaining to the 'Law of Mother Earth'. your own locality and U.S. Forest Service scientists report that metropolitan areas in The Wake and Death of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Humorous Treatment of Actuality
    HUMOROUS TREATMENT OF ACTUALITY ! Karianne Holt Vårdal Master of Arts Documentary Production University of Stavanger Spring 2015 !!Page "1 of "59 Abstract ! This essay is a close reading of the humor and irony used in Michael Moore's feature documen- taries; Roger and Me, Bowling for Columbine and Sicko. Based on existing theories on humor and the documentary, my analysis is a reading of carefully chosen scenes to illustrate the different methods used to create humor and irony, as well as a attempt to describe why we laugh at these par- ticular scenes. A review of critical discourse surrounding Moore's films and their use of humor, identifies issues with the comedy/documentary hybridization, yet also that Moore's signature style of documentary is one of the latest manifestations in the evolution of the feature documentary film. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!Page "2 of "59 Table of Contents! Chapter 1 Introduction .........................................................................................................................4 1.2 Background and Motivation .......................................................................................................4 1.3 Selection of Films ......................................................................................................................5 1.4 Research Problem ......................................................................................................................5 1.5 Essay Structure ...........................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Broadcasting the BUSINESSWEEKLY of TELEVISIR,E
    Dec. 30, 1968:Our 38th Year:504 Broadcasting THE BUSINESSWEEKLY OF TELEVISIR,E. AND RADIO Special report: Detailed lock at 1968. p17 Shots of lunar surface highlight Apollo coverage. p42 Pastore says broadcasters are doing responsible job. p46 Nielsen reveals new computerized spot -TV service. p49 LIBRARY CHI g. YLVISAKEB CCNCORDIA COLLEGE -LEAD IVIINNES- MOOD. $ ea Tgrili:E111.1.1REPRESENTING KARD -TV- KANSAS STATE NETWORK KCOP -LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA KPTV- PORTLAND, OREGON KTNT -TV- SEATTLE- TACOMA, WASHINGTON WTCN- MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA OPENS ACROSS THE COUNTRY JANUARY 1, 1969 WITH THE MOST EFFECTIVE TELEVISION STATION REPRESENTATIVE SALES TEAM. AL MARINI ROB SCHNEIDER PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT AND SALES PLANNING ANO GENERAL MANAGER DEVELOPMENT DAN KELLY DIRECTOR OF NEW YORK DETROIT CHICAGO SAN FRANCISCO LOS ANGE-LS-1 LEN TRONICK MARRY GOOSIL LLOYD WERNER DON WICKES GERRY VELON SALES MANAGER SALES MANAGER SALES MANAGER SALES MANAGER SALES MANAGER MS MADISON AVENUE DAVID STOTT MUDDING PRUDENTIAL PLAZA 350 NSOME STREET ZII PLAU SAN? III. -3.",, .15..1;.'"' 213456 1711 Tube Camera TK-42 -401111111106, Tube Camera TK-44A r 4 -Tube Color or 3 -Tube Color? ...at RCA You Choose The TK -42 "Best of the 4 -Tube Cameras" The TK -42 is the 4 -tube design, and the only one -- -----~--z employing a 41/2-inch image orthicon for resolution unequalled by any 4 -tube camera ... and sharpest color _ pictures. With a high degree of technical sophistication, the TK -42 has earned the reputation for producing the very finest of color pictures. 41/2-inch I.O. in luminance channel; three vidicons in chrominance channels The TK -44A "Best of the 3 -Tube Cameras" The TK -44A is the latest in 3 -tube design employing lead oxide tubes.
    [Show full text]
  • Television 2.0: Reconceptualizing TV As an Engagement Medium
    Television 2.0: Reconceptualizing TV as an Engagement Medium by Ivan D. Askwith B.A. Individualized Study (Technology, Media & Culture) Gallatin School of Individualized Study New York University, 2003 SUBMITTED TO THE PROGRAM IN COMPARATIVE MEDIA STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN COMPARATIVE MEDIA STUDIES AT THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SEPTEMBER 2007 © 2007 Ivan D. Askwith. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Signature of Author: Program in Comparative Media Studies 10 August 2007 Certified by: //I Henry Jenkins III Peter d;l orez Professor of Humanities Professor of Comparative Media Studies and Literature Co-Director, Comparative Media Studies Accepted by: -:?Z7 MASSACHUSETTS INS - Cee~<Fo < Henryjenkins III OF TECHNOLOGY Petee Florez Professor of Humanities Professor of Comparative Media Studies and Literature IAUG 7 4 2007 Co-Director, Comparative Media Studies VM0E =ES LIIRARIES Television 2.0: Reconceptualizing TV as an Engagement Medium by Ivan D. Askwith Submitted to the Program in Comparative Media Studies on August 10, 2007, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Comparative Media Studies ABSTRACT Television is in a period of dramatic change. As the mass audience continues to fragment into ever-smaller niche audiences and communities of interest, and new technologies shift control over the television viewing experience from network programmers into the hands of media consumers, television's traditional business models prove themselves increasingly untenable.
    [Show full text]
  • Fahrenheit 9/11: O Medo Como Arma De Guerra
    FAHRENHEIT 9/11: O MEDO COMO ARMA DE GUERRA Lilian VICTORINO1 “A democracia periga quando está sendo negligenciado o seu princípio essencial: o predomínio do bem comum sobre os interesses de indivíduos ou de grupos particulares.” Anatol Rosenfeld Resumo: Este artigo apresenta alguns aspectos do discurso fílmico construído no documentário Fahrenheit 9/11 do diretor Michael Moore. A partir dos principais grupos estabelecidos pelo filme e seus personagens principais são observadas as proposições de sentido entre o filme e a sua relação com a sociedade. O filme aponta para históricas relações entre empresários, americanos e sauditas, do setor petrolífero e de armamentos, que, aliados à influência política da família Bush e membros do partido republicano, encontraram nos ataques cometidos em 11 de setembro de 2001, o ponto de ebulição para uma lucrativa guerra contra o Iraque sob o pretexto de levar democracia e liberdade ao povo. Para a legitimação da guerra, o filme sugere a cultura do medo, ostensivamente cultivada entre os estadunidenses, como importante arma para mobilizar a opinião pública e os membros do Senado, a fim de aprovarem os orçamentos necessários para o ataque contra uma nação que, segundo o filme, nunca representou ameaça aos EUA. Palavras-chave: Cinema Documental. Estados Unidos. 11 de Setembro. Guerra. Medo 41 Estreando nos cinemas em 2004, Fahrenheit 9/11 é um documentário estadunidense cuja ácida crítica, aliada à “comedic license” que caracteriza a direção de Michael Moore, incide sobre o governo do republicano George
    [Show full text]
  • The Documentary Handbook
    The Documentary Handbook The Documentary Handbook takes a thematic approach to documentary, including chapters on the many myriad forms we watch today – from the cinematic releases of Michael Moore to low-budget internet efforts like Video Nation, from ‘shock docs’ to reality television. The Documentary Handbook is a critical introduction to the documentary film, its theory and changing practices. The book charts the evolution of the documentary from screen art to core television genre, its metamorphosis into many different types of factual TV programmes and its current emergence in forms of new media. It analyses those pathways and the transformation of means of production through economic, technical and editorial changes. The Documentary Handbook explains the documentary process, skills and job specifica- tions for everyone from industry entrants to senior personnel, and shows how the industrial evolution of television has relocated the powers and principles of decision-making. Through the use of professional ‘expert briefings’ it gives practical pointers about programme- making, from researching, developing and pitching programme ideas to their production and delivery through a fast-evolving multi-platform universe. Peter Lee-Wright is a documentary filmmaker with 30 years’ experience working for the BBC and Channel 4. He is currently Senior Lecturer in Media and Communications at Goldsmiths, University of London. His most recent writing includes critical overviews of sports documentary and trade union documentary in Encyclopedia of the Documentary Film (2005) and analysis of the changes taking place in multimedia news, notably in New Media, Old News (edited by Natalie Fenton, 2009). Media Practice Edited by James Curran, Goldsmiths, University of London The Media Practice handbooks are comprehensive resource books for students of media and journalism, and for anyone planning a career as a media professional.
    [Show full text]