Extending the Npt? a Critical Oral History of the 1995 Review and Extension Conference

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Extending the Npt? a Critical Oral History of the 1995 Review and Extension Conference EXTENDING THE NPT? A CRITICAL ORAL HISTORY OF THE 1995 REVIEW AND EXTENSION CONFERENCE Edited by Michal Onderco and Leopoldo Nuti History and Public Policy Program Critical Oral History Conference Series EXTENDING THE NPT? A CRITICAL ORAL HISTORY OF THE 1995 REVIEW AND EXTENSION CONFERENCE Edited by Michal Onderco and Leopoldo Nuti Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars One Woodrow Wilson Plaza 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20004-3027 www.wilsoncenter.org Cover image: Review and Extension Conference of the Treaty on Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons Opens at Headquarters. Seated on the podium from left to right are: Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali; Ambassador Jayantha Dhanapala (Sri Lanka), President of the Conference; Prvoslav Davinic, Secretary-General of the Conference. 17 April 1995. United Nations, New York Photo # 68537 Photo Credit: “UN Photo by Evan Schneider” © 2020 Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars ISBN - 978-1-938027-88-8 Contents Acknowledgements V About This Book VI Introduction X Extended Summary of Discussions XIV Participants XXII Session I: General Mood and Expectations 1 Session II: Hurdles for the Agreement 51 Session III: Overcoming the Opposition 85 Session IV: Middle East WMD-Free Zone 123 Session V: Principles & Objectives 157 Session VI: Strengthened Review Process 187 References 217 IV The Wilson Center, chartered by Congress as the official memorial to President Woodrow Wilson, is the nation’s key non-partisan policy forum for tackling global issues through independent research and open dialogue to inform actionable ideas for Congress, the Administration and the broader international policy community. Jane Harman, Director, President, and CEO CHAIR Scott Walker, Former Governor of Wisconsin VICE CHAIR Drew Maloney, President and CEO, American Investment Council Public Members: Alex Azar, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Elisabeth DeVos, Secretary, U.S. Department of Education David Ferriero, Archivist of the United States Carla D. Hayden, Librarian of Congress Jon Parrish Peede, Chairman, National Endowment for the Humanities Michael Pompeo, Secretary, U.S. Department of State Lonnie G. Bunch III, Secretary, Smithsonian Institution Private Citizen Members: Peter J. Beshar, Executive Vice President & General Counsel, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. Thelma Duggin, President, AnBryce Foundation Barry S. Jackson, Managing Director, The Lindsey Group and Strategic Advisor, Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck David Jacobson, Former U.S. Ambassador to Canada and Vice Chair, BMO Financial Group Nathalie Rayes, Vice President of Public Affairs, Grupo Salinas Earl W. Stafford, Chief Executive Officer, The Wentworth Group, LLC Louis Susman, Former U.S. Ambassador to the United Kingdom and Senior Advisor, Perella Weinberg Partners ABOUT THIS BOOK Michal Onderco What follows in Extending the NPT is a record of a conference conducted at the Erasmus University Rotterdam on 22-23 March, 2018 as a part of the Nuclear Proliferation International History Project. The conference in Rotterdam was not a traditional academic conference, but followed a critical oral history (COH) methodology with discussion between academic experts on one side and policy veterans on the other.1 This conference aimed at shedding new light on the indefinite extension of the Treaty on Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) in 1995. Given the upcoming 25th anniversary of the indefinite extension, and the growing role that the legacy of the extension plays for the NPT politics today, revisiting what happened and how in 1995 was an attractive prospect. For this reason, the conference brought together the main participants in the 1995 NPT Review and Extension Conference (1995 NPTREC), including diplomats repre- senting the most important countries present at the conference, as well as a small number of academics. The deliberations were supported by a collection of primary documents related to the 1995 NPTREC, collected in various archives in Belgium, the United Kingdom, Germany, and South Africa. COH methodology expects that the presence of many policy veterans, academic experts, and available primary documents will provide a fruitful ground for a rich discussion of what happened and why in a particular moment in history. Soon after the 1995 NPTREC, there were a number of attempts to provide a sum- mary of what was discussed.2 Thus a major ‘post-mortem’ conference was organized at the Monterey Institute for International Studies less than three months after the 1995 NPTREC with all major participants involved. Some participants in the conference would reference the 1995 NPTREC in their memoirs.3 Yet, the Rotterdam conference is different in several and important ways. Firstly, the time lag of 23 years allowed access to primary documents which were unavailable until recently. Secondly, retirement of major 1 For other similar recent examples, see Onslow and van Wyk 2013, Mallea, et al. 2015 2 Johnson 1995, Rauf and Johnson 1995, Welsh 1995 3 Graham 2002, Markram 2004, Dhanapala and Rydell 2005, Dhanapala 2015, von Wielligh and von Wielligh-Steyn 2015, Dhanapala and Rauf 2017 VI VI PARTICIPANTS participants from the active government service meant that they were freer to discuss events which happened over 20 years ago, compared to the situation immediately after the conference. Thirdly, the Rotterdam Conference focused on aspects which were simply not considered by researchers and scholars back in 1995. Two examples illustrate these differences: the discussion about the origins of the Decision on Principles and Objectives; and the discussion of its relevance by the community of experts in the Programme for Promoting Nuclear Non-Proliferation (PPNN). Back at the ‘post-mortem’ conference in Monterey, the Decision on Principles and Objectives had been discussed as a given. Other accounts had also shed little light on the deliberations leading to the Decision and the seeds that were sown well before the conference. By contrast, the Rotterdam conference extensively discussed the origins of the Decision on Principles and Objectives in the bilateral exchanges prior to the 1995 NPTREC, as well as the negotiation of the document at the NPTREC itself. Similarly, back in 1995, very little attention was given to PPNN’s role in informing, socializing, and networking diplomats prior to the conference. These two examples only illustrate how the present project has opened new avenues for scholarly in- quiry into the key development in non-proliferation regime; and one of the most important moments in post-Cold War arms control history. The Rotterdam conference was the pinnacle of a two-year effort which consisted of three (often overlapping) building blocks. Firstly, we conducted oral history interviews with twenty-eight policy veterans, usually with heads of delegations or chief negotiators from individual countries. These inter- views took place between September 2016 and May 2017. The list of questions for these interviews was composed based on the review of available secondary literature related to the NPT regime, particularly the NPT’s extension in 1995. A vast majority of these were conducted by Michal Onderco, except two which were conducted by Hassan Elbahtimy and Katrin Heilman respectively. With some of the interviewees, follow-up questions were arranged via phone or e-mail. Secondly, we started collecting primary documents in a number of archives. Declassification requests were filed with the National Archives in Washington, Archives of the Department of International Relations and Cooperation in Pretoria, Political Archive of the Federal Foreign Office in Berlin, Archives of the Secretariat of the European Council in Brussels, and Archive of the Canada Global (Canada’s Foreign Affairs Department) in Ottawa. Unfortunately, in the two years preceding the Rotterdam conference, only some of these requests were processed and declassified. Additional documents were therefore sought in the Archive of the University of Southampton, Rockefeller Archive Center in Pocantico, NY, and in private archives of some of our attendees. A selection of these VII VII EXTENDING THE NPT? A CRITICAL ORAL HISTORY OF THE 1995 REVIEW AND EXTENSION CONFERENCE documents were included in the document reader distributed to participants ahead of the conference, and are now available at the Wilson Center’s website. Thirdly, on the basis of interviews and available archival documents, we determined what was still unknown or not well understood about the 1995 NPTREC. We then formulated a brief list of ques- tions which policy veterans were encouraged to consider before the Rotterdam conference began. At the same time, we had to select the policy veterans to invite to our conference. As stated before, we opted to invite heads of delegations. However, when these heads were unavailable, their senior policy or academic advisors were invited instead. Only a small number of invited participants turned down our invitation to come to the Rotterdam conference, usually due to scheduling conflicts or due to poor health which would not allow them to travel to The Netherlands. Although these practitioners knew each other from their previous experiences, in most cases they had not been in touch for a decade or more. It is important to note that we did not send policy veterans each other’s interviews. As Mallea et al4 advised, we wanted to avoid giving the policy veterans “too many axes to grind” and invited them to participate
Recommended publications
  • February 17, 2017 Oral History Interview with Christopher Westdal
    Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified February 17, 2017 Oral History Interview with Christopher Westdal Citation: “Oral History Interview with Christopher Westdal,” February 17, 2017, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, Contributed to NPIHP by Michal Onderco. https://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/177553 Summary: Canada's Ambassador and Permanent Representative to the United Nations in Geneva (1999-2003) Credits: This document was made possible with support from Carnegie Corporation of New York (CCNY). Original Language: English Contents: English Transcription Christopher Westdal Canada Oral history interview conducted by Michal Onderco by Skype on 17 February 2017 Michal Onderco: Okay, well, thank you very much for finding the time to talk to me and to, to discuss with me your participation in the 1995 NPT Review Conference. Chris Westdal: Okay, well, listen, I’d gladly speak with you, but I should explain the context. I was Canada’s Ambassador for Disarmament twice, once for a year, 1995 and in that year, I did the NPT Review Conference, and then later, 1999 to 2003, I was Canada’s Ambassador for Disarmament in Geneva to the Conference on Disarmament, to the First Committee, and to the NPT. So, I was present at both the 1995, and particularly, the 2000 NPT Conference. Among other things I find now that I haven’t thought about these things for decades intensely, that I mix up my memories of the two events. I just might want to ramble a bit about some memories, some of them, both because I think your ambit is quite broad, and you’re looking at how multilateralism works and so on.
    [Show full text]
  • Diplomat SEPT 05 FINAL
    OLYMPIC-BOUND HORSES: FIRST, SHOW ME YOUR PASSPORT January–February 2008 Russia Rising AMBASSADOR GEORGIY MAMEDOV SAYS RUSSIA WILL BE RICH AND RESPONSIBLE, DEMOCRATIC AND FREE. JUST BE PATIENT FOR A FEW YEARS. PLUS: A FEW SECRETS FROM THE SOVIET ERA. CHRIS WESTDAL, CANADA'S FORMER MAN IN MOSCOW, SAYS IT'S TIME TO CUT RUSSIA SOME SLACK. ONE RESERVATION: "THE CONCENTRATION OF POWER IN ONE MAN." Wildlife safari adventures in Kenya's Masai Mara Tour the Ottawa home of Turkey's top diplomat Wine tips: How to buy the best at the LCBO ESTABLISHED 1989 CDN $5.95 PM 40957514 OLYMPIC-BOUND HORSES: FIRST, SHOW ME YOUR PASSPORT January–February 2008 Russia Rising AMBASSADOR GEORGIY MAMEDOV SAYS RUSSIA WILL BE RICH AND RESPONSIBLE, DEMOCRATIC AND FREE. JUST BE PATIENT FOR A FEW YEARS. PLUS: A FEW SECRETS FROM THE SOVIET ERA. CHRIS WESTDAL, CANADA'S FORMER MAN IN MOSCOW, SAYS IT'S TIME TO CUT RUSSIA SOME SLACK. ONE RESERVATION: "THE CONCENTRATION OF POWER IN ONE MAN." Wildlife safari adventures in Kenya's Masai Mara Tour the Ottawa home of Turkey's top diplomat Wine tips: How to buy the best at the LCBO ESTABLISHED 1989 CDN $5.95 The World in Canada PM 40957514 Volume 18, Number 6 PUBLISHER Neil Reynolds ASSOCIATE PUBLISHER Table of Donna Jacobs EDITOR Jennifer Campbell CONTENTS ART DIRECTOR Paul Cavanaugh COPY EDITOR Roger Bird CONTRIBUTING EDITORS Daniel Drolet George Abraham CULTURE EDITOR Margo Roston DIPLOMATICA| CONTRIBUTING WRITERS Stephen Beckta Verbatim: Hugo Chavez’s utterings . 3 Laura Neilson Bonikowsky Good Deeds: The EU reaches out to Canada .
    [Show full text]
  • THE CBW CONVENTIONS BULLETIN News, Background and Comment on Chemical and Biological Weapons Issues
    THE CBW CONVENTIONS BULLETIN News, Background and Comment on Chemical and Biological Weapons Issues ISSUE NO. 54 DECEMBER 2001 Quarterly Journal of the Harvard Sussex Program on CBW Armament and Arms Limitation INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW AND SANCTIONS TO REINFORCE THE BWC Prospects for strengthening the Biological Weapons architecture of international measures to strengthen the Convention any time soon appear to have faded still further BWC. Controls on access to dangerous pathogens and since their setback in July, when the United States withdrew certain dual-use equipment can impede their acquisition by its support for the efforts of the Ad Hoc Group of States non-state actors and non-self-sufficient states seeking Parties to design a legally binding instrument to strengthen biological weapons. But the widespread natural occurrence the Convention. It was then widely expected that the Bush of most pathogens that have been or can be developed as Administration would present new proposals at the weapons, and the accelerating worldwide diffusion of bio- Convention’s Fifth Review Conference, which took place in technology, make only temporary the effect of such controls Geneva from 19 November to 7 December. However, as on any nation or group determined to have the weapons. described in “Report from Geneva” in this issue of the Intent, more than denial, is the crucial element to be Bulletin, what the US proposed was a set of mostly old ideas addressed in seeking to strengthen the Convention. To some for voluntary measures by individual states, without any extent, this can be done by propagating among scientists and binding treaty commitment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Youngest Conservative MP with the Most To
    EXCLUSIVE POLITICAL COVERAGE: NEWS, FEATURES, AND ANALYSIS INSIDE DISSECTING THE NEW OWN THE POWERS DUFFY TRIAL STAFFERS CLEAN-TECH ON POT Whittington P.P. 11 GALORE POLICY Hébert P. 10 PP. 20-21 PODIUM P. 15 P. 11 TWENTY-SEVENTH YEAR, NO. 1334 CANADA’S POLITICS AND GOVERNMENT NEWSWEEKLY WEDNESDAY, APRIL 27, 2016 $5.00 NEWS STAFFERS NEWS HILL LIFE & PEOPLE NEWS DUFFY TRIAL The people The youngest Conservative AG denies behind foreign Harper lawyer policy: A look MP with the most to say suggestion he inside the foreign will audit Duffy minister’s offi ce expenses with BY CHELSEA NASH trial over Political staffers, no matter their ambi- BY T IM NAUMETZ tion, don’t always get a chance to shape events outside the walls of Parliament. Auditor General Michael Ferguson does In the case of those hand-picked to work not intend to conduct an audit on Senator for Global Affairs Minister Stéphane Dion Mike Duffy’s travel, housing and contract ex- (Saint-Laurent, Que.) that’s exactly what penses following his acquittal on 31 charges they’ve been hired to do. A new government of fraud, breach of trust and bribery last invariably wants to project a new image of week—unless the Senate requests one, Mr. Canada to the world. Not just anyone can— Ferguson’s offi ce said Tuesday. or should—be trusted to paint that picture. A spokesperson for Mr. Ferguson was Colin Robertson, a former Canadian responding to an unexpected public state- diplomat, personally knows a few of the ment, from a lawyer representing former people working in Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Westdal Oct 2014
    Group of 78 Luncheon Speaker Series Chris Westdal Ukraine Can’t Move DATE: Tuesday October 28, 2014 TIME: 12:00 noon (sharp) PLACE: Palais Imperial Restaurant, 311- 313 Dalhousie St., Ottawa COST: $30 for luncheon and presentation $5 for presentation only (For presentation only, please plan to arrive by 12:45 p.m. Coffee and tea will be available.) RESERVATIONS: [email protected] or 613-230-0860 by Friday October 24, 2014 We regret that late registrations cannot be accepted. The group is required to pay for those who reserve but do not come. Therefore, individuals who do not cancel their reservations at least 24 hours before the luncheon will be billed $30. ***************************************************** Chris Westdal states: “The zones of security interest and influence around major powers like Russia are real. We Canadians know that; we live in one. In the real world, Ukrainians are about as free to adopt security policy hostile to Moscow as we are to do the same to Washington. Canadian relations with Ukraine will long be animated by the active interest and concerns of our million-strong Ukrainian diaspora. As our leaders put it, we are Kyiv's ‘most certain friend ... proud to be loudest.’ Our soaring Lone Hawk rhetoric, though, dare not be taken too seriously. We are friends always willing to do what we might - through close diplomatic and official links, a sustained aid program of technical cooperation, and large teams of election observers. The record of decades of our effort, though, makes plain that it is beyond us to comprehend sufficiently, to help guide or to contribute much to the rescue, the reform and the future progress of Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • Donors, Development and Dependence Some Lessons
    DONORS, DEVELOPMENT AND DEPENDENCE SOME LESSONS FROM BANGLADESH 1971 TO 1986 BY PETER G.R. THOMSON A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS) LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS AND POLITICAL SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF LONDON AUGUST 1990 UMI Number: U048683 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U048683 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 -T H £ ■ S 1 r b%£~J i - rt \ ~ 4 POLITICAL tw? Aid is not so much about helping others as it is about helping yourself. Member, Planning Commission 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT 7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 8 INTRODUCTION 9 Chapter I. THE ISSUE 16 Introduction to the Country The Importance of Bangladesh in the Context of Aid The Foreign Aid Programme Evidence of Increasing Dependence An Aid Dependence Paradigm Some Limitations to the Model A Hypothesis The Evidence Required to Substantiate the Model II. DEVELOPMENT THEORY 63 The International Relations Context Development Theory The Types of Foreign Aid Recipient Aid Motivation Recipient Strategies Development Theory: Bangladesh’s Strategy Evidence Required to Substantiate the Theory III.
    [Show full text]
  • Multilateral Diplomacy and the NPT
    i UNIDIR/2005/3 Multilateral Diplomacy and the NPT: An Insider’s Account Jayantha Dhanapala with Randy Rydell UNIDIR United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research Geneva, Switzerland NOTE The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. * * * The views expressed in this publication are the sole responsibility of the individual authors. They do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the United Nations, UNIDIR, its staff members or sponsors. UNIDIR/2005/3 Copyright © United Nations, 2005 All rights reserved UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No. GV.E.05.0.5 ISBN 92-9045-170-X The United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR)—an intergovernmental organization within the United Nations—conducts research on disarmament and security. UNIDIR is based in Geneva, Switzerland, the centre for bilateral and multilateral disarmament and non- proliferation negotiations, and home of the Conference on Disarmament. The Institute explores current issues pertaining to the variety of existing and future armaments, as well as global diplomacy and local entrenched tensions and conflicts. Working with researchers, diplomats, Government officials, NGOs and other institutions since 1980, UNIDIR acts as a bridge between the research community and Governments. UNIDIR’s activities are funded by contributions from Governments and donors foundations. The Institute’s web site can be found at URL: http://www.unidir.org iv CONTENTS Page Preface by Jayantha Dhanapala .
    [Show full text]
  • Common Security in Outer Space and International Law
    i UNIDIR/2005/29 Common Security in Outer Space and International Law Detlev Wolter UNIDIR United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research Geneva, Switzerland NOTE The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. * * * The views expressed in this publication are the sole responsibility of the individual author. They do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the United Nations, UNIDIR, its staff members or sponsors, nor those of the German Foreign Ministry. UNIDIR/2005/29 Copyright © United Nations, 2006 All rights reserved UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No. GV.E.06.0.3 ISBN 92-9045-177-7 The United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR)—an intergovernmental organization within the United Nations—conducts research on disarmament and security. UNIDIR is based in Geneva, Switzerland, the centre for bilateral and multilateral disarmament and non- proliferation negotiations, and home of the Conference on Disarmament. The Institute explores current issues pertaining to the variety of existing and future armaments, as well as global diplomacy and local entrenched tensions and conflicts. Working with researchers, diplomats, Government officials, NGOs and other institutions since 1980, UNIDIR acts as a bridge between the research community and Governments. UNIDIR’s activities are funded by contributions from Governments and donors foundations. The Institute’s web site can be found at URL: http://www.unidir.org iv v ”Common Security” arose from the understanding that the nuclear powers could no longer win a war given their second-strike capabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections on the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation Of
    REFLECTIONS ON THE TREATY ON THE NON-PROLIFERATION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS Review conferences and the future of the NPT edited by jayantha dhanapala and tariq rauf REFLECTIONS ON THE TREATY ON THE NON-PROLIFERATION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS Review conferences and the future of the NPT EDITED BY JAYANTHA DHANAPALA AND TARIQ RAUF STOCKHOLM INTERNATIONAL PEACE RESEARCH INSTITUTE SIPRI is an independent international institute dedicated to research into conflict, armaments, arms control and disarmament. Established in 1966, SIPRI provides data, analysis and recommendations, based on open sources, to policymakers, researchers, media and the interested public. The Governing Board is not responsible for the views expressed in the publications of the Institute. GOVERNING BOARD Sven-Olof Petersson, Chairman (Sweden) Dr Dewi Fortuna Anwar (Indonesia) Dr Vladimir Baranovsky (Russia) Ambassador Lakhdar Brahimi (Algeria) Ambassador Wolfgang Ischinger (Germany) Professor Mary Kaldor (United Kingdom) Dr Radha Kumar (India) The Director DIRECTOR Dan Smith (United Kingdom) Signalistgatan 9 SE-169 72 Solna, Sweden Telephone: +46 8 655 97 00 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.sipri.org Contents Acknowledgements v About the authors vi Introduction 1 JAYANTHA DHANAPALA AND TARIQ RAUF Part 1 Multilateral diplomacy and the NPT: An insider’s account 5 JAYANTHA DHANAPALA WITH RANDY RYDELL Part 2 Planning for the 2010 NPT Review Conference: 133 A practitioner’s overview JAYANTHA DHANAPALA Part 3 Evaluating the 2010 NPT Review Conference 181 JAYANTHA DHANAPALA Part 4 Assessing the 2015 NPT Review Conference 199 TARIQ RAUF Part 5 The 2020 NPT Review Conference: A guide to procedural matters 211 TARIQ RAUF Conclusions: The Future of the NPT 235 TARIQ RAUF AND JAYANTHA DHANAPALA Annexes Annex A.
    [Show full text]
  • June 20, 2017 Oral History Interview with Tariq Rauf
    Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified June 20, 2017 Oral History Interview with Tariq Rauf Citation: “Oral History Interview with Tariq Rauf,” June 20, 2017, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, Contributed to NPIHP by Michal Onderco. https://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/177546 Summary: Expert Advisor to Canada’s delegation to the 1995 review conference. Credits: This document was made possible with support from Carnegie Corporation of New York (CCNY). Original Language: English Contents: English Transcription Tariq Rauf Canada Oral history interview conducted by Michal Onderco by Skype on 20 June 2017 Michal Onderco: I want to start again by thanking you for finding the time to talk to me. I like to at the beginning always place the people within the National Delegation. So how did you become the advisor to the national delegation and what was your position within the Delegation? Tariq Rauf: Yeah, so in Canada, I worked at the Canadian Center for Arms Control and Disarmament in Ottawa. This was an independent research center on arms control funded mainly by the Foreign Ministry. But it was completely independent. They didn’t exercise any control over us and many times we were critical of the Canadian government’s policy. And for the Foreign Ministry, this was part of Canadian democracy: supporting a think tank, which may or may not agree with government policy. So our think tank was like the Arms Control Association in Washington in the general sense, partly advocacy, partly research. And we were also asked to testify before the Parliamentary committees on national defense and also arms control.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Security in Outer Space and International Law
    i UNIDIR/2005/29 Common Security in Outer Space and International Law Detlev Wolter UNIDIR United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research Geneva, Switzerland NOTE The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. * * * The views expressed in this publication are the sole responsibility of the individual author. They do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the United Nations, UNIDIR, its staff members or sponsors, nor those of the German Foreign Ministry. UNIDIR/2005/29 Copyright © United Nations, 2006 All rights reserved UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No. GV.E.06.0.3 ISBN 92-9045-177-7 The United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR)—an intergovernmental organization within the United Nations—conducts research on disarmament and security. UNIDIR is based in Geneva, Switzerland, the centre for bilateral and multilateral disarmament and non- proliferation negotiations, and home of the Conference on Disarmament. The Institute explores current issues pertaining to the variety of existing and future armaments, as well as global diplomacy and local entrenched tensions and conflicts. Working with researchers, diplomats, Government officials, NGOs and other institutions since 1980, UNIDIR acts as a bridge between the research community and Governments. UNIDIR’s activities are funded by contributions from Governments and donors foundations. The Institute’s web site can be found at URL: http://www.unidir.org iv v ”Common Security” arose from the understanding that the nuclear powers could no longer win a war given their second-strike capabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • CERBA EURASIA MINING CONFERENCE Partnerships
    CERBA EURASIA MINING CONFERENCE Partnerships. Opportunities. Innovation. www.cerbamining.com March 6, 2018 Part of the official programming of 2018 CONTENTS СОДЕРЖАНИЕ WELCOMING REMARKS ПРИВЕТСТВЕННОЕ СЛОВО MR. ALEXANDER N. DARCHIEV, Ambassador Extraordinary And Plenipotentiary Of The Russian Federation ЧРЕЗВЫЧАЙНОГО И ПОЛНОМОЧНОГО ПОСЛА РОССИЙСКОЙ ФЕДЕРАЦИИ В КАНАДЕ А.Н. ДАРЧИЕВА 4 To Canada 4 WELCOMING REMARKS ПРИВЕТСТВЕННОЕ СЛОВО KONSTANTIN ZHIGALOV, Ambassador Of Kazakhstan To Canada 6 ЧРЕЗВЫЧАЙНОГО И ПОЛНОМОЧНОГО ПОСЛА РЕСПУБЛИКИ КАЗАХСТАН В КАНАДЕ К.ЖИГАЛОВА 6 WELCOMING REMARKS JAVLON VAKHABOV, Uzbekistan’s Ambassador To The United States And Canada 8 ПРИВЕТСТВЕННОЕ СЛОВО ЧРЕЗВЫЧАЙНОГО И ПОЛНОМОЧНОГО ПОСЛА УЗБЕКИСТАНА В США И КАНАДЕ ЖАВЛОНА ВАХАБОВА 8 ABOUT CERBA 10 PROGRAM 12 О CERBA 10 OUR SUPPORTERS 14 ПРОГРАММА 12 НАШИ СПОНСОРЫ 14 SESSION 1. Mining in Eurasia: Changes and Trends СЕССИЯ 1. Горная индустрия в Евразии: изменения и тренды Lou Naumovski, CERBA National Chair 2013-2017, Non-Executive Director, Amur Minerals Corporation 16 Evgeniy Kiselev, Deputy Minister of the Natural Resources and Environment of Russia, Head of RosNedra 17 Лу Наумовский, Председатель Совета директоров, CERBA 2013-2017; Член Совета Директоров, Amur Timur Toktabayev, Vice-Minister of Investment and Development of Kazakhstan 18 Minerals Corporation 16 Vardan Gevorgyan, Deputy Minister, Ministry of Energy Infrastructures and Natural Resources of the Republic Евгений Киселев, Заместитель Министра природных ресурсов и экологии РФ, Глава РосНедра 17 of Armenia 19 Тимур Токтабаев, Министр по Инвестициям и Развитию Республики Казахстан 18 Munkhbileg Namsrai, Senior Officer of Mineral Resources Information and Technology Center of the Mineral Вардан Геворгян, Заместитель Министра Энергетики и природных ресурсов Республики Армения 19 Resources and Petroleum Authority of Mongolia 20 Мунхбилег Намсрай, Старший Офицер Минеральных Ресурсов и Нефтяного Управления Монголии 20 Boris Yatsenko, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]