Archived Content Contenu Archivé

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Archived Content Contenu Archivé Archived Content Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us. Contenu archivé L'information archivée sur le Web est disponible à des fins de consultation, de recherche ou de tenue de dossiers seulement. Elle n’a été ni modifiée ni mise à jour depuis sa date d’archivage. Les pages archivées sur le Web ne sont pas assujetties aux normes Web du gouvernement du Canada. Conformément à la Politique de communication du gouvernement du Canada, vous pouvez obtenir cette information dans un format de rechange en communiquant avec nous. Archived Content Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us. Contenu archivé L'information archivée sur le Web est disponible à des fins de consultation, de recherche ou de tenue de dossiers seulement. Elle n’a été ni modifiée ni mise à jour depuis sa date d’archivage. Les pages archivées sur le Web ne sont pas assujetties aux normes Web du gouvernement du Canada. Conformément à la Politique de communication du gouvernement du Canada, vous pouvez obtenir cette information dans un format de rechange en communiquant avec nous. Russian foreign policy and global security: how Russia defines its international security policy Prepared by Michael Berk Canadian International Council (CIC) RUSSIAN FOREIGN POLICY AND GLOBAL SECURITY: HOW RUSSIA DEFINES ITS INTERNATIONAL SECURITY POLICY Prepared by Michael Berk Canadian International Council (CIC) Prepared for the International Security Research and Outreach Programme International Security Bureau April 2008 1 About the workshop and report The following report is a summary of expert presentations and discussions that took place at a policy workshop developed and conducted by the Canadian International Council (CIC) at the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT) on February 18th, 2008. Sponsored by the International Security Research and Outreach Program at DFAIT, the workshop brought together Canadian and Russian scholars and policy experts to address specific questions developed by the organizers in consultation with DFAIT (see Annex B, page 34). The workshop took place one day after Kosovo declared its independence from Serbia, a day prior to the Armenian presidential elections and two weeks prior to the Russian presidential elections. References to these events throughout the report should be taken in the proper context. This report was prepared by Michael Berk, CIC workshop’s coordinator who specializes in Russian affairs, with the assistance of Margaret Watts and Allison Keating from Carleton University. The views expressed in this report are those of the experts and are not intended to reflect the views of DFAIT or the Government of Canada. About the Canadian International Council (CIC) The CIC is a non-partisan, nationwide organization established to strengthen Canada's role in international affairs. Building upon the proud history of the Canadian Institute of International Affairs (CIIA), the Council aims to advance research and dialogue on international affairs issues by supporting a Canadian foreign policy network that crosses academic disciplines, policy areas, and economic sectors. CIC’s 13 branches promote national foreign policy dialogue by presenting speakers, seminars, roundtable discussions and study groups to interested Canadians. Dialogue and research are combined in highly-regarded publications such as the International Journal and Behind the Headlines. 2 PREFACE The International Security Research and Outreach Programme (ISROP) is located within the Continental Defence Relations Division of the International Security Bureau. ISROP’s mandate is to provide the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT) with timely, high quality policy relevant research that will inform and support the development of Canada’s international security policy in the areas of North American, regional and multilateral security and defence cooperation, non-proliferation (nuclear and non-nuclear), arms control and disarmament. The current ISROP research themes can be found at: www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca/ arms/isrop/menu-en.asp. ISROP regularly commissions research to support Canadian officials by drawing on its think-tank and academic networks in Canada and abroad. The following report, Russian foreign policy and global security: how Russia defines its international security policy, is an example of such contract research. DFAIT wishes to acknowledge the work performed under contract by Michael Berk, on behalf of the Canadian International Council (CIC). Disclaimer: The views and positions expressed in this report are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade or the Government of Canada. The report is in its original language. 3 PRÉAMBULE Le Programme de recherche et d'information dans le domaine de la sécurité internationale (PRISI) fait partie de la Direction de la défense continentale, qui relève elle-même de la Direction générale de la sécurité internationale. Il a pour mandat de fournir au ministère des Affaires étrangères et du Commerce international (MAECI), en temps utile, des études stratégiques de haute qualité et pertinentes qui permettent d’orienter et de soutenir l’élaboration de la politique canadienne de sécurité internationale concernant l’Amérique du Nord, la coopération régionale et multilatérale en matière de sécurité et de défense, ainsi que la non-prolifération (nucléaire et non nucléaire), le contrôle des armements et le désarmement. Les thèmes de recherches actuels du Programme de recherche et d’information dans le domaine de la sécurité internationale (PRISI) figurent à l’adresse suivante: www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca/arms/isrop/menu-fr.asp Le PRISI commande régulièrement des études pour faciliter le travail des fonctionnaires canadiens, en faisant appel à ses réseaux de spécialistes et d’universitaires au Canada et à l’étranger. Le rapport suivant est un exemple de ce type d’étude. Le MAECI souhaite reconnaître le travail exécuté à contrat par Michael Berk, Le Conseil international du Canada. Déni de responsabilité : Les vues et opinions exprimées dans le présent rapport appartiennent exclusivement à l’auteur, et ne reflètent pas nécessairement celles du ministère des Affaires étrangères et du Commerce international, ou celles du gouvernement du Canada. Le rapport est présenté dans la langue de rédaction. 4 Executive Summary As a security player with both regional and global reach, understanding the Russian Federation and how it perceives its foreign policy and security interests is essential to Canada’s own security interests in and foreign and economic policies towards the region. In order to develop an adequate approach to Russia, grounded in strategic analysis of emerging global trends and a realization of the existing window of opportunity presented by Canada’s involvement in Afghanistan, the following realities must be accepted: • Russia is positioning itself as an indispensable actor in Eurasia (East- West relations) and uses its economic, political and military assets to develop and secure the necessary pre-conditions for continuing sustainable growth; • Devoid of the ideological constraints of the past, Russia is viewing its ‘near abroad’ both as a crucial buffer against external threats and an area of economic influence using consensus–building mechanisms (CSTO, SCO, EurAsEC) to ensure its predominance in the region; • Aware of the limitations of the current international system, but also of the opportunities such a situation presents, the Russian security doctrine prefers flexible issue-based alliances with partners in both the East and West to fixed ‘block-based’ structures; • The ability of all FSU countries to pursue direct multi-vector engagements with different partners (NATO, EU, China, US, Iran, Turkey) forces Russia to accommodate and offers ‘out of region’ players significant leverage opportunities, which in turn requires the development of a systemic approach to the region; • Potential NATO expansion eastward (Ukraine, Georgia) will undoubtedly create a serious rift between Russia and the West on many international arms control and other security issues, including raising opportunity costs for Western engagement in Afghanistan; • Despite emerging global economic, financial and security threats Canada does not possess clearly articulated priorities regarding engaging Russia on issues such as Afghanistan, arms control, conflict resolution, the Arctic and commerce; • Given geographic proximity, a similar climate, Canada’s position in the international community, national interests and a wealth of knowledge on many topics of interest to Russia, Canada is well positioned to promote mutually beneficial partnerships between Russia and the West. 5 Any approach to Russia must be based on a realistic assessment of Canadian national interests in the post-Soviet space,
Recommended publications
  • The Relationship Between Democratisation and the Invigoration of Civil Society in Hungary, Poland and Romania
    The Relationship between Democratisation and the Invigoration of Civil Society in Hungary, Poland and Romania Mehmet Umut Korkut Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment for the degree of DPhil Central European University, Department of Political Science May 2003 Supervisor: PhD Committee: András Bozóki, CEU Aurel Braun, University of Toronto Reinald Döbel, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster Zsolt Enyedi, CEU Anneci÷ime ve BabacÕ÷Õma, Beni ben yapan de÷erleri, Beni özel kÕlan sevgiyi, Beni baúarÕOÕ eden deste÷i verdikleri için . 1 Abstract: This is an explanation on how and why the invigoration of civil society is slow in Hungary, Poland and Romania during their democratic consolidation period. To that end, I will examine civil society invigoration by assessing the effect of interest organisations on policy-making at the governmental level, and the internal democracy of civil society organisations. The key claim is that despite previously diverging communist structures in Hungary, Poland and Romania, there is a convergence among these three countries in the aftermath of their transition to democracy as related to the invigoration of civil society. This claim rests on two empirical observations and one theoretical argument: (1) elitism is widely embedded in political and civil spheres; (2) patron-client forms of relationship between the state and the civil society organisations weaken the institutionalisation of policy-making. As a result, there is a gap between the general and specific aspects of institutionalisation of democracy at the levels of both the political system and civil society. The theoretical argument is that the country-specific historical legacies from the communist period have only a secondary impact on the invigoration of civil society in the period of democratic consolidation.
    [Show full text]
  • Studia Politica 42015
    www.ssoar.info The politics of international relations: building bridges and the quest for relevance Braun, Aurel Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Braun, A. (2015). The politics of international relations: building bridges and the quest for relevance. Studia Politica: Romanian Political Science Review, 15(4), 557-566. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-51674-8 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY-NC-ND Lizenz This document is made available under a CC BY-NC-ND Licence (Namensnennung-Nicht-kommerziell-Keine Bearbeitung) zur (Attribution-Non Comercial-NoDerivatives). For more Information Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.de The Politics of International Relations Building Bridges and the Quest for Relevance 1 AUREL BRAUN The 21 st Century sadly is proving to be a volatile and violent one where the hopes of the immediate years of the post-Cold War era have proven to be ephemeral. International Relations, (IR) at first blush, appears to be ideally positioned as a discipline to help us understand or even cope with the extreme dissonance of the international system. A discreet academic field for a century now, but in fact one of the oldest approaches, IR seems to brim with promise to offer explanation, identify causality and enable cogent prediction. After all, in an era where we emphasize interdisciplinary studies and across-the-board approaches IR appears to be a compelling intellectual ecosystem.
    [Show full text]
  • February 17, 2017 Oral History Interview with Christopher Westdal
    Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified February 17, 2017 Oral History Interview with Christopher Westdal Citation: “Oral History Interview with Christopher Westdal,” February 17, 2017, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, Contributed to NPIHP by Michal Onderco. https://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/177553 Summary: Canada's Ambassador and Permanent Representative to the United Nations in Geneva (1999-2003) Credits: This document was made possible with support from Carnegie Corporation of New York (CCNY). Original Language: English Contents: English Transcription Christopher Westdal Canada Oral history interview conducted by Michal Onderco by Skype on 17 February 2017 Michal Onderco: Okay, well, thank you very much for finding the time to talk to me and to, to discuss with me your participation in the 1995 NPT Review Conference. Chris Westdal: Okay, well, listen, I’d gladly speak with you, but I should explain the context. I was Canada’s Ambassador for Disarmament twice, once for a year, 1995 and in that year, I did the NPT Review Conference, and then later, 1999 to 2003, I was Canada’s Ambassador for Disarmament in Geneva to the Conference on Disarmament, to the First Committee, and to the NPT. So, I was present at both the 1995, and particularly, the 2000 NPT Conference. Among other things I find now that I haven’t thought about these things for decades intensely, that I mix up my memories of the two events. I just might want to ramble a bit about some memories, some of them, both because I think your ambit is quite broad, and you’re looking at how multilateralism works and so on.
    [Show full text]
  • Jack L. Snyder Robert and Renée Belfer
    Jack L. Snyder Robert and Renée Belfer Professor of International Relations Saltzman Institute of War and Peace Studies, Department of Political Science Columbia University December 4, 2019 1327 International Affairs Building 420 W. 118 St. New York, NY 10027 work tel: 212-854-8290 e-mail: [email protected] fax: 212-864-1686 Education Ph.D., Columbia University, political science (international relations), 1981. Certificate of the Russian Institute, Columbia University, 1978. B.A., Harvard University, government, 1973. Teaching Columbia University, Political Science Department, full professor, 1991; tenured associate professor, 1988; assistant professor, 1982. Graduate and undergraduate courses on international politics, nationalism, and human rights. Publications: Books Power and Progress: International Politics in Transition (Routledge, 2012), a selection of my articles on anarchy, democratization, and empire published between 1990 and 2010, with a new introduction, conclusion, and chapter on “Democratization and Civil War.” Co-authored with Edward Mansfield, Electing to Fight: Why Emerging Democracies Go to War (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2005). Lepgold Prize for the best book on international relations published in 2005. Foreword Book of the Year Gold Award in Political Science for 2005. Choice Magazine Outstanding Academic Title, 2006. From Voting to Violence: Democratization and Nationalist Conflict. W. W. Norton, 2000. Indonesian edition, 2003. Chinese edition, Shanghai Press, 2017. Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition. Cornell University Press, 1991. Korean edition, 1996. Chinese edition, 2007. The Ideology of the Offensive: Military Decision Making and the Disasters of 1914 Cornell University Press, 1984. “Active citation” web version of ch. 7, 2014, at https://qdr.syr.edu/. 2 Edited books Co-editor with Stephen Hopgood and Leslie Vinjamuri, Human Rights Futures (Cambridge University Press, 2017); author of chapter, “Empowering Rights,” and co- author of introduction and conclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011-2012 CJFE's Review of Free Expression in Canada
    2011-2012 CJFE’s Review of Free Expression in Canada LETTER FROM THE EDITORS OH, HOW THE MIGHTY FALL. ONCE A LEADER IN ACCESS TO INFORMATION, PEACEKEEPING, HUMAN RIGHTS AND MORE, CANADA’S GLOBAL STOCK HAS PLUMMETED IN RECENT YEARS. This Review begins, as always, with a Report Card that grades key issues, institutions and governmental departments in terms of how their actions have affected freedom of expres- sion and access to information between May 2011 and May 2012. This year we’ve assessed Canadian scientists’ freedom of expression, federal protection of digital rights and Internet JOIN CJFE access, federal access to information, the Supreme Court, media ownership and ourselves—the Canadian public. Being involved with CJFE is When we began talking about this Review, we knew we wanted to highlight a major issue with a series of articles. There were plenty of options to choose from, but we ultimately settled not restricted to journalists; on the one topic that is both urgent and has an impact on your daily life: the Internet. Think about it: When was the last time you went a whole day without accessing the membership is open to all Internet? No email, no Skype, no gaming, no online shopping, no Facebook, Twitter or Instagram, no news websites or blogs, no checking the weather with that app. Can you even who believe in the right to recall the last time you went totally Net-free? Our series on free expression and the Internet (beginning on p. 18) examines the complex free expression. relationship between the Internet, its users and free expression, access to information, legislation and court decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • St. George Campus 2018-2019 POL459/2216Y: the Military
    St. George Campus 2018-2019 POL459/2216Y: The Military Instrument of Foreign Policy Professor A. Braun [email protected] Office hours: Trinity College, Room #309N Munk School, 1 Devonshire Pl. Mondays, 12-1pm (other times by arrangement) Telephone: 416-946-8952 Synopsis: This combined undergraduate-graduate course analyzes the relationship of military force to politics. Nuclear war and deterrence, conventional war, revolutionary war, terrorism, counter-insurgency, cyberwar, and drone warfare are examined from the perspectives of the U.S., Russia, China, and other contemporary military powers. Foreign policy provides the context within which one should examine the existence of and the utility of the military instrument of foreign policy. And, as Henry Brandon has said, foreign policy begins at home. Therefore, the introductory part of the course deals with the theory and politics of civil-military relations and examines the military establishments of the major powers with special emphasis on those of the USA, Russia/CIS, and China. This section will also explore the problems of measuring equivalence. The second part investigates the various theories of conflict, the problems of nuclear war and deterrence, the diverse forms of conventional war, and the efficacy of war termination strategies. The final section contains case studies of some of these problems. The aim of this course is to help acquaint students of international relations with the vital importance of the military instrument in the formulation and implementation of foreign policy and in the functioning of the international system. It is also hoped that thus they will be able to employ additional tools of analysis in the study of international relations.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnic Minorities and Politics in Post- Socialist Southeastern Europe
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-15912-9 — Ethnic Minorities and Politics in Post-Socialist Southeastern Europe Edited by Sabrina P. Ramet , Marko Valenta Frontmatter More Information i Ethnic Minorities and Politics in Post-Socialist Southeastern Europe Southeast European politics cannot be understood without taking into account ethnic minorities. This book provides a comprehensive introduction to the politics of ethnic minorities, examining both their political parties and issues of social distance, migration, and ethnic boundaries, as well as issues related to citizenship and integration. Coverage includes detailed analyses of Hungarian minority parties in Romania, Albanian minority parties in Macedonia, Serb minority par- ties in Croatia, Bosniak minority parties in Serbia, and various minor- ity parties in Montenegro, as well as the Movement for Rights and Freedoms, a largely Turkish party, in Bulgaria. Sabrina P. Ramet is a professor of Political Science at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, in Trondheim, Norway. Born in London, England, she was educated at Stanford University, the University of Arkansas, and UCLA, receiving her Ph.D. in Political Science from UCLA in 1981. She is the author of twelve scholarly books (three of which have been published in Croatian translations) and edi- tor or co- editor of thirty- two published books. Her books can also be found in French, German, Italian, Macedonian, Polish, and Serbian translations. Her latest book is Gender (In)equality and Gender Politics in Southeastern Europe: A question of justice , co- edited with Christine M. Hassenstab (2015). Marko Valenta is a sociologist and a Professor at the Department of Social Work and Health Science at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, in Trondheim, Norway.
    [Show full text]
  • G8 and G20 Experts at the Munk School of Global Affairs
    G8 and G20 Experts at the Munk School of Global Affairs Alan Alexandroff • Cell: 416‐617‐9627 • [email protected] • Globalization and banking, finance • International politics, economics, and trade in the global economy • The BRICs, especially China, and the architecture of global governance Dr. Alexandroff received his PhD in Government from Cornell University in 1979 and his LLB from McGill Law School in 1984. He taught political economy and international relations at Queen’s University, McGill University, and the University of California at Los Angeles. He practiced civil litigation and government/business relations at Torys in Toronto. After leaving full‐time law practice in 1992, he established a number of programs at the Centre for International Studies at the University of Toronto. Currently, Dr. Alexandroff is the Research Director of the Program on Conflict Management and Negotiation ( PCMN) at the Munk School of Global Affairs. In this role, he established a joint program between PCMN and the University of Toronto’s School of Continuing Studies—the Certificate Program in Dispute Resolution. Within this program he has taught courses dealing with the alternate dispute resolution, strategic negotiation, cross‐cultural negotiation, international relations, and the management of public disputes conflict. As Research Director, Dr. Alexandroff has focused a great deal of attention on the accession of China to the World Trade Organization. In 2000, Dr. Alexandroff was appointed Fellow‐in‐Residence in International Policy at the
    [Show full text]
  • Diplomat SEPT 05 FINAL
    OLYMPIC-BOUND HORSES: FIRST, SHOW ME YOUR PASSPORT January–February 2008 Russia Rising AMBASSADOR GEORGIY MAMEDOV SAYS RUSSIA WILL BE RICH AND RESPONSIBLE, DEMOCRATIC AND FREE. JUST BE PATIENT FOR A FEW YEARS. PLUS: A FEW SECRETS FROM THE SOVIET ERA. CHRIS WESTDAL, CANADA'S FORMER MAN IN MOSCOW, SAYS IT'S TIME TO CUT RUSSIA SOME SLACK. ONE RESERVATION: "THE CONCENTRATION OF POWER IN ONE MAN." Wildlife safari adventures in Kenya's Masai Mara Tour the Ottawa home of Turkey's top diplomat Wine tips: How to buy the best at the LCBO ESTABLISHED 1989 CDN $5.95 PM 40957514 OLYMPIC-BOUND HORSES: FIRST, SHOW ME YOUR PASSPORT January–February 2008 Russia Rising AMBASSADOR GEORGIY MAMEDOV SAYS RUSSIA WILL BE RICH AND RESPONSIBLE, DEMOCRATIC AND FREE. JUST BE PATIENT FOR A FEW YEARS. PLUS: A FEW SECRETS FROM THE SOVIET ERA. CHRIS WESTDAL, CANADA'S FORMER MAN IN MOSCOW, SAYS IT'S TIME TO CUT RUSSIA SOME SLACK. ONE RESERVATION: "THE CONCENTRATION OF POWER IN ONE MAN." Wildlife safari adventures in Kenya's Masai Mara Tour the Ottawa home of Turkey's top diplomat Wine tips: How to buy the best at the LCBO ESTABLISHED 1989 CDN $5.95 The World in Canada PM 40957514 Volume 18, Number 6 PUBLISHER Neil Reynolds ASSOCIATE PUBLISHER Table of Donna Jacobs EDITOR Jennifer Campbell CONTENTS ART DIRECTOR Paul Cavanaugh COPY EDITOR Roger Bird CONTRIBUTING EDITORS Daniel Drolet George Abraham CULTURE EDITOR Margo Roston DIPLOMATICA| CONTRIBUTING WRITERS Stephen Beckta Verbatim: Hugo Chavez’s utterings . 3 Laura Neilson Bonikowsky Good Deeds: The EU reaches out to Canada .
    [Show full text]
  • "Cool Neighbors": Sweden's EU Presidency and Russia
    "Cool Neighbors": Sweden's EU Presidency and Russia Eva Hagström Frisell Ingmar Oldberg July 2009 Russia/NIS Center Ifri is a research center and a forum for debate on major international political and economic issues. Headed by Thierry de Montbrial since its founding in 1979, Ifri is a non-governmental and a non-profit organization. As an independent think tank, Ifri sets its own research agenda, publishing its findings regularly for a global audience. With offices in Paris and Brussels, Ifri stands out as one of the rare French think tanks to have positioned itself at the very heart of European debate. Using an interdisciplinary approach, Ifri brings together political and economic decision-makers, researchers and internationally renowned experts to animate its debates and research activities. The opinions expressed in this article are the authors’ alone and do not reflect the official views of their institutions. Russia/NIS Center © All rights reserved – Ifri – Paris, 2009 ISBN: 978-2-86592-564-3 IFRI IFRI-Bruxelles 27 RUE DE LA PROCESSION RUE MARIE-THERESE, 21 75740 PARIS CEDEX 15 – FRANCE 1000 BRUXELLES TEL. : 33 (0)1 40 61 60 00 TEL. : 32(2) 238 51 10 FAX : 33 (0)1 40 61 60 60 FAX : 32 (2) 238 51 15 E-MAIL : [email protected] E-MAIL : [email protected] WEBSITE : www.ifri.org E. Hagström Frisell and I. Oldberg / Sweden's EU Presidency and Russia Russie.Nei.Visions Russie.Nei.Visions is an electronic collection dedicated to Russia and the other new independent states (Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova, Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan).
    [Show full text]
  • THE CBW CONVENTIONS BULLETIN News, Background and Comment on Chemical and Biological Weapons Issues
    THE CBW CONVENTIONS BULLETIN News, Background and Comment on Chemical and Biological Weapons Issues ISSUE NO. 54 DECEMBER 2001 Quarterly Journal of the Harvard Sussex Program on CBW Armament and Arms Limitation INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW AND SANCTIONS TO REINFORCE THE BWC Prospects for strengthening the Biological Weapons architecture of international measures to strengthen the Convention any time soon appear to have faded still further BWC. Controls on access to dangerous pathogens and since their setback in July, when the United States withdrew certain dual-use equipment can impede their acquisition by its support for the efforts of the Ad Hoc Group of States non-state actors and non-self-sufficient states seeking Parties to design a legally binding instrument to strengthen biological weapons. But the widespread natural occurrence the Convention. It was then widely expected that the Bush of most pathogens that have been or can be developed as Administration would present new proposals at the weapons, and the accelerating worldwide diffusion of bio- Convention’s Fifth Review Conference, which took place in technology, make only temporary the effect of such controls Geneva from 19 November to 7 December. However, as on any nation or group determined to have the weapons. described in “Report from Geneva” in this issue of the Intent, more than denial, is the crucial element to be Bulletin, what the US proposed was a set of mostly old ideas addressed in seeking to strengthen the Convention. To some for voluntary measures by individual states, without any extent, this can be done by propagating among scientists and binding treaty commitment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Youngest Conservative MP with the Most To
    EXCLUSIVE POLITICAL COVERAGE: NEWS, FEATURES, AND ANALYSIS INSIDE DISSECTING THE NEW OWN THE POWERS DUFFY TRIAL STAFFERS CLEAN-TECH ON POT Whittington P.P. 11 GALORE POLICY Hébert P. 10 PP. 20-21 PODIUM P. 15 P. 11 TWENTY-SEVENTH YEAR, NO. 1334 CANADA’S POLITICS AND GOVERNMENT NEWSWEEKLY WEDNESDAY, APRIL 27, 2016 $5.00 NEWS STAFFERS NEWS HILL LIFE & PEOPLE NEWS DUFFY TRIAL The people The youngest Conservative AG denies behind foreign Harper lawyer policy: A look MP with the most to say suggestion he inside the foreign will audit Duffy minister’s offi ce expenses with BY CHELSEA NASH trial over Political staffers, no matter their ambi- BY T IM NAUMETZ tion, don’t always get a chance to shape events outside the walls of Parliament. Auditor General Michael Ferguson does In the case of those hand-picked to work not intend to conduct an audit on Senator for Global Affairs Minister Stéphane Dion Mike Duffy’s travel, housing and contract ex- (Saint-Laurent, Que.) that’s exactly what penses following his acquittal on 31 charges they’ve been hired to do. A new government of fraud, breach of trust and bribery last invariably wants to project a new image of week—unless the Senate requests one, Mr. Canada to the world. Not just anyone can— Ferguson’s offi ce said Tuesday. or should—be trusted to paint that picture. A spokesperson for Mr. Ferguson was Colin Robertson, a former Canadian responding to an unexpected public state- diplomat, personally knows a few of the ment, from a lawyer representing former people working in Mr.
    [Show full text]