DOCSLIB.ORG

The Origins of Wave Elections: Narrative Control Polarization and Turnout in New Hampshire Electoral Politics 2006-2012 Zachary Jonas Union College - Schenectady, NY

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Origins of Wave Elections: Narrative Control Polarization and Turnout in New Hampshire Electoral Politics 2006-2012 Zachary Jonas Union College - Schenectady, NY Union College Union | Digital Works Honors Theses Student Work 6-2014 The Origins of Wave Elections: Narrative Control Polarization and Turnout in New Hampshire Electoral Politics 2006-2012 Zachary Jonas Union College - Schenectady, NY Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses Part of the American Politics Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Jonas, Zachary, "The Origins of Wave Elections: Narrative Control Polarization and Turnout in New Hampshire Electoral Politics 2006-2012" (2014). Honors Theses. 537. https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses/537 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Work at Union | Digital Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Union | Digital Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Origins of Wave Elections: Narrative Control, Polarization and Turnout in New Hampshire Electoral Politics, 2006-2012 By Zachary Jonas ************* Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for Honors in the Department of Political Science Union College June, 2014 i ABSTRACT: JONAS, ZACHARY The Origins of Wave Elections: Narrative Control, Polarization and Turnout in New Hampshire Electoral Politics, 2006-2012. Department of Political Science, June 2014. ADVISOR: Clifford Brown This thesis investigates the origin of wave elections in New Hampshire in 2006, 2010 and 2012. It finds that recent demographic shifts in the state laid the groundwork for these dramatic electoral results. This paper also examines the nationalization and polarization that have redefined New Hampshire’s political landscape and contributed to massive partisan shifts in state government. The combination of demographic changes and a polarized political culture have created an electoral environment for both Republicans and Democrats that favors turnout, increasing the importance of agenda setting and narrative control in order to produce high turnout among core constituencies. Chapter 1 discusses the important demographic trends of the past several decades that have pushed New Hampshire leftward politically. Chapters 2 through 5 discuss the 2006, 2008, 2010 and 2012 elections respectively, with special attention paid to the importance of narrative control and turnout in determining the results of each contest. Finally, the conclusion will tie the recent wave elections in New Hampshire to the national political environment and the general direction of American politics. ii Contents Abstract………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………i Contents ............................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................. iv Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 Nationalization of State Politics ......................................................................................................3 Agenda Setting and Turnout ...........................................................................................................4 Basic Overview of New Hampshire .................................................................................................6 Chapter 1: Politics in a Migrant State ................................................................................... 10 Recent Demographic Trends in the State of New Hampshire ......................................................... 10 Politics in a Migrant State............................................................................................................. 15 Chapter 2: All Politics is National in 2006 ............................................................................. 20 All Politics are National ................................................................................................................ 21 State Level Rout ........................................................................................................................... 28 Chapter 3: “Hello Blue Hampshire”: The 2008 Election ......................................................... 33 The Presidential Contest .............................................................................................................. 36 Lynch’s Landslide ......................................................................................................................... 42 Keeping the State House .............................................................................................................. 44 Chapter 4: Red Tsunami in the 2010 Election ....................................................................... 48 Republican Voter Turnout and the Tea Party ................................................................................ 49 What Drives Turnout? .................................................................................................................. 52 The Tea Party and Electoral Discourse .......................................................................................... 57 Chapter 5: The 2012 Election: Women Lead the Way ........................................................... 62 Women and the 2012 Election ...................................................................................................... 64 O’Brien’s Legislature .................................................................................................................... 67 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................... 72 Explanation of Findings ................................................................................................................ 72 What Does This Mean for New Hampshire? .................................................................................. 72 National Trends ........................................................................................................................... 74 Where to go from Here?............................................................................................................... 77 Appendix 1: Nhteapartycoalition.org ................................................................................... 79 Framework and Methods ............................................................................................................. 79 iii Findings: Politics Come First ......................................................................................................... 84 John Birch is Back ......................................................................................................................... 89 Social Issues ................................................................................................................................. 92 Economy, Healthcare and Taxes ................................................................................................... 94 Explanation of Findings ................................................................................................................ 95 Bibliography ........................................................................................................................ 96 iv Acknowledgements This work is the result of my love affair with New Hampshire, which began on a Union College mini-term to the state in December of 2011. My internship during that mini-term turned into a job in Concord that changed the course of my political, academic and personal life. New Hampshire is a beautiful state filled with beautiful people and fascinating politics. Thanks to the generosity of New Hampshire and her people, I know that I will always feel at home in the Granite State. I’d like to thank Deborah “Arnie” Arnesen, the Hattans, and the other people who hosted me in their homes for their generosity and kindness throughout my time living in Concord. I’d also like to thank Zandra Rice-Hawkins, Caitlin Rollo and the rest of the Granite State Progress crew for teaching me the ropes and exposing me to the fascinating world of New Hampshire’s State House. Without Cliff Brown, this paper would have been simply impossible. His insight and advice were invaluable throughout the process. I’d also like to thank Zoe Oxley, who ran the New Hampshire mini-term, and Tom Lobe, who contributed mightily to my development as a political and academic thinker at Union. Additionally, I must thank the New Hampshire-based social scientists that made this paper possible. This project rests on the solid foundation of data collected and presented by Andrew Smith and Dante Scala at the UNH Survey Center, and the work of Kenneth Johnson at the UNH Carsey Institute. Their data, and the reporting of Kevin Landrigan and his colleagues at the Nashua Telegraph, Concord Monitor and New Hampshire Union Leader, laid the foundations of this paper. I am forever in their debt. Finally, I’d like to thank my family, especially my mom and dad, for all their love and support throughout this difficult project. 1 Introduction This paper seeks to identify the root causes of several wave elections in the state of New Hampshire over the past decade. New Hampshire is a small but fascinating state with incredible importance to national politics for a number of reasons. It has become a swing state and presidential bell
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fall Elections Are Less Than 3 Months Away One of the Many Impacts Of
    Fall Elections are Less Than 3 Months Away One of the many impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic is that some events that are non-pandemic-related get lost in the all-COVID, all-the-time news coverage. In the midst of the recent NH House and Senate meetings in-person at different locations than their usual State House chambers, the filing period for all State elective offices quietly opened and closed. Other than one US Senator whose term does not end this year - Sen. Maggie Hassan (D) - every NH state, county and local elective office is up for grabs and there are some surprises in the NH House, Senate and Executive Council line-ups for the September primary and the November general elections. In the House, 38 Democrats and 37 Republicans did not file for re-election, which will leave some big holes, especially in committee leadership positions. The chair of the Commerce & Consumer Affairs Committee, Ed Butler, is stepping down and the Science and Technology Committee is losing both its chair and vice-chair, Bob Backus and Howard Moffett. The Health, Human Services and Elderly Affairs Committee will lose its vice-chair, Polly Campion. And the Children and Family Law and Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committees will both lose their vice-chairs, Skip Berrien and Beth Rodd. In addition, two Division chairs of the House Finance Committee will not be back next session because they are seeking higher office: Patricia Lovejoy (D) is running for the Executive Council seat left open by the retirement of Russell Prescott; and Susan Ford (D) is running for State Senate District One, the seat now held by David Starr (R).
    [Show full text]
  • Politicians and Their Professors the Discrepancy Between Climate Science and Climate Policy
    Better Future Project 30 Bow Street Cambridge, MA. 02138 Politicians and Their Professors The Discrepancy between Climate Science and Climate Policy By Craig S. Altemose and Hayley Browdy Massachusetts Edition Better Future Project 1 Politicians and Their Professors: The Discrepancy between Climate Science and Climate Policy By Craig Altemose and Hayley Browdy With research and editing assistance provided by Elana Sulakshana, Alli Welton, and Kristen Wraith © 2012, Better Future Project 30 Bow Street, Cambridge, MA 02138 About This Report This report seeks to highlight the discrepancy between the overwhelming consensus on climate change that exists among the nation’s scientific community and the lack of action by federal leaders. Past studies have shown that 97-98% of climate scientists who publish in peer-reviewed journals agree with the consensus that climate change is real, happening now, and man-made. Since many politicians seem to disregard the views of such scientific “elites” as a whole, we decided to compare politicians’ views on climate change to those of the climate experts at their alma maters. These politicians clearly valued the expertise of the academics at their schools enough that they chose to (usually) spend tens of thousands of dollars and up to four years of their lives absorbing knowledge from these institutions’ experts. We thought that even if these politicians choose to disregard the consensus of national experts, they might be persuaded by the consensus of the higher education institutions in which they trusted enough to invest great amounts of their time and money. This report and the research supporting it are available online at www.betterfutureproject.org/resources.
    [Show full text]
  • CMS-2258-P Paper Comments 101-110 (PDF)
    Association ofcounties March 15,2007 Leslie Norwalk, Acting Administrator Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 200 Independence Avenue, S.W., Room 445-G Washington, DC 20201 Re: CMS-2258-P: Medicaid Program; Cost Limit for Providers Operated by Units of Government and Provisions to Ensure the Integrity of federal-State Financial Partnership, (Vol. 72, NO. ll), January 18,2007 Dear Ms. Norwalk: The New Hampshire Association of Counties would like to be on file as opposing this proposed rule for the following reasons: 1. The rule will impose new restrictions on how states fund their Medicaid program and restricts how states reimburse their governmentally nursing homes. 2. This rule will result in an inefficient cost-based reimbursement system that contains no incentives for efficient performance. Congress moved away from a Medicaid cost- based system 27 years ago. 3. The estimated cut in federal spending over five years amounts to a budget cut for safety-net nursing homes. 4. The rule restricts intergovernmental transfers and certified public expenditures thus restricting New Hampshire's ability to fund the non-federal share of Medicaid payments. 5. There is no authority in the statute for CMS to restrict IGTs to funds generated from tax revenue and inconsistent with historic CMS policy. We believe that CMS has inappropriately interpreted the federal statute. 6. The new restrictions would result in fewer dollars to pay for the needed care for the nation's most vulnerable people, the sick and frail elderly. 7. CMS has not provided sufficient and relative data to support a claim that state financing practices across the nation do not comport with the Medicaid statute.
    [Show full text]
  • To Download This Handout As an Adobe Acrobat
    AEI Election Watch 2006 October 11, 2006 Bush’s Ratings Congress’s Ratings Approve Disapprove Approve Disapprove CNN/ORC Oct. 6-8 39 56 CNN/ORC Oct. 6-8 28 63 Gallup/USAT Oct. 6-8 37 59 Gallup/USAT Oct. 6-8 24 68 ABC/WP Oct. 5-8 39 60 ABC/WP Oct. 5-8 32 66 CBS/NYT Oct. 5-8 34 60 CBS/NYT Oct. 5-8 27 64 Newsweek Oct. 5-6 33 59 Time/SRBI Oct. 3-4 31 57 Time/SRBI Oct. 3-4 36 57 AP/Ipsos Oct. 2-4 27 69 AP/Ipsos Oct. 2-4 38 59 Diag.-Hotline Sep. 24-26 28 65 PSRA/Pew Sep. 21-Oct. 4 37 53 LAT/Bloom Sep. 16-19 30 57 NBC/WSJ Sep. 30-Oct. 2 39 56 Fox/OD Sep. 12-13 29 53 Fox/OD Sep. 26-27 42 54 NBC/WSJ (RV) Sep. 8-11 20 65 Diag-Hotline Sep. 24-26 42 56 LAT/Bloom Sep. 16-19 45 52 Final October approval rating for the president and Final October approval rating for Congress and number of House seats won/lost by the president’s number of House seats won/lost by the president’s party party Gallup/CNN/USA Today Gallup/CNN/USA Today Number Number Approve of seats Approve of seats Oct. 2002 67 +8 Oct. 2002 50 +8 Oct. 1998 65 +5 Oct. 1998 44 +5 Oct. 1994 48 -52 Oct. 1994 23 -52 Oct. 1990 48 -9 Oct. 1990 24 -9 Oct. 1986 62 -5 Apr.
    [Show full text]
  • June 28, 2018 Dear Senator, We, the Undersigned, Are Members of Issue
    June 28, 2018 Dear Senator, We, the undersigned, are members of Issue One’s ReFormers Caucus — a coalition of former members of Congress, Cabinet officials and governors representing all fifty states — writing to strongly urge you to co-sponsor the bipartisan, bicameral Honest Ads Act. The bill is a carefully crafted first step to address foreign meddling in U.S. ​ politics. The Honest Ads Act is also the first bill created in response to outside interference in the 2016 elections. There is encouraging widespread agreement: The Intelligence Community Assessment and both the House and Senate Intelligence Committees concur that foreign actors interfered in the 2016 U.S. elections through the use of paid, online advertisements on some of the largest internet platforms — all to divide Americans and weaken the country. These ads — some of which were paid for in rubles — targeted certain American voters in an attempt to sow discord and manipulate our political system. It is imperative that Congress act now in response to this national security crisis created by Russia and other non-state actors in order to protect our free and fair elections from foreign intrusions in the future. For decades, disclosure rules governing political advertising in print, radio and television have improved transparency and accountability by providing American consumers with vital information. While rules involving these types of media have proven successful, hardly any disclosure rules exist for the digital frontier and online advertisements. The Honest Ads Act simply seeks to update our 20th century laws and requires similar disclosure requirements as television and radio advertisements.
    [Show full text]
  • Election 2006
    APPENDIX: CANDIDATE PROFILES BY STATE We analyzed the fair trade positions of candidates in each race that the Cook Political Report categorized as in play. In the profiles below, race winners are denoted by a check mark. Winners who are fair traders are highlighted in blue text. Alabama – no competitive races___________________________________________ Alaska_________________________________________________________________ Governor OPEN SEAT – incumbent Frank Murkowski (R) lost in primary and was anti-fair trade. As senator, Murkowski had a 100% anti-fair trade voting record. 9 GOP Sarah Palin’s trade position is unknown. • Democratic challenger Tony Knowles is a fair trader. In 2004, Knowles ran against Lisa Murkowski for Senate and attacked her for voting for NAFTA-style trade deals while in the Senate, and for accepting campaign contributions from companies that off-shore jobs.1 Arizona________________________________________________________________ Senate: Incumbent GOP Sen. Jon Kyl. 9 Kyl is anti-fair trade. Has a 100% anti-fair trade record. • Jim Pederson (D) is a fair trader. Pederson came out attacking Kyl’s bad trade record in closing week of campaign, deciding to make off-shoring the closing issue. On Nov. 3 campaign statement: “Kyl has repeatedly voted for tax breaks for companies that ship jobs overseas, and he has voted against a measure that prohibited outsourcing of work done under federally funded contracts,” said Pederson spokesman Kevin Griffis, who added that Pederson “wants more protections [in trade pacts] related to child labor rules and environmental safeguards to help protect U.S. jobs.”2 House Arizona 1: GOP Rep. Rick Renzi incumbent 9 Renzi is anti-fair trade. 100% bad trade vote record.
    [Show full text]
  • Verizon Political Contributions January – December 2012
    VERIZON POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS JANUARY – DECEMBER 2012 1 Verizon Political Contributions January – December 2012 A Message from Craig Silliman Verizon is affected by a wide variety of government policies ‐‐ from telecommunications regulation to taxation to health care and more ‐‐ that have an enormous impact on the business climate in which we operate. We owe it to our shareowners, employees and customers to advocate public policies that will enable us to compete fairly and freely in the marketplace. Political contributions are one way we support the democratic electoral process and participate in the policy dialogue. Our employees have established political action committees at the federal level and in 20 states. These political action committees (PACs) allow employees to pool their resources to support candidates for office who generally support the public policies our employees advocate. This report lists all PAC contributions, corporate political contributions, support for ballot initiatives and independent expenditures made by Verizon in 2012. The contribution process is overseen by the Corporate Governance and Policy Committee of our Board of Directors, which receives a comprehensive report and briefing on these activities at least annually. We intend to update this voluntary disclosure twice a year and publish it on our corporate website. We believe this transparency with respect to our political spending is in keeping with our commitment to good corporate governance and a further sign of our responsiveness to the interests of our shareowners. Craig L. Silliman Senior Vice President, Public Policy 2 Verizon Political Contributions January – December 2012 Political Contributions Policy: Our Voice in the Political Process What are the Verizon Good Government Clubs? and the government agencies administering the federal and individual state election laws.
    [Show full text]
  • October 9, 1992
    This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas http://dolearchives.ku.edu October 9, 1992 MEMORANDUM TO THE LEADER FROM: JOHN DIAMANTAKIOU SUBJECT: POLITICAL BRIEFINGS Below is an outline of your briefing materials for your appearances in New England and New York. Enclosed for your perusal are: 1. Campaign briefing: • overview of race • biographical materials • Bills introduced in 102nd Congress 2. National Republican Senatorial Briefing 3. City Stop/District race overview 4. Governor's race brief (NH, VT) 5. Redistricting map/Congressional representation 6. NAFTA Brief 7. Republican National Committee Briefing 8. State Statistical Summary 9. State Committee/DFP supporter contact list 10. Clips (courtesy of the campaigns) 11. Political Media Recommendations (Clarkson also has a copy) Thank you. Page 1 of 46 This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas P. 2/ 9 OCT 02 '92 10 : 07 http://dolearchives.ku.edu OVERVIEW OF NEW HAMPSHIRE U. S. SENATE RACE Defense Cuts Governor Gregg maintains that defense cuts are necessary but at a careful and cautious rate. The cuts he supports are at a level slightly higher than those proposed by the President, but lower than Bill Clinton1s defense cut proposal. The Governor's Democratic opponent, John Rauht wants a 50% defense cut over five years. None of the savings would be applied to the budget deficit but would instead go wholly to retraining programs. Governor Gregg believes that this drastic cut is irresponsible, would wreak economic havoc on New Hampshire's defense dependent industry1 would force the closing of the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, and would cripple the nation's ability to respond to military threats.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Post-Shellacking Issue
    2010_11_29upc_cover61404-postal.qxd 11/9/2010 9:57 PM Page 1 November 29, 2010 49145 $3.95 SPECIAL POST-SHELLACKING ISSUE Duncan Currie w Victor Davis Hanson w Keith Hennessey w John Hood John J. Miller w Henry Olsen w Ramesh Ponnuru w Brian Riedl Patrick Ruffini w Reihan Salam w Sean Trende $3.95 William Voegeli w The Editors 48 0 74851 08155 6 www.nationalreview.com base_milliken-mar 22.qxd 11/8/2010 2:34 PM Page 1 HOW A STRATEGY TO HELP A IS PUTTING THOUSANDS OF REGIONAL STORE GO NATIONAL JOBS BACK ON THE MAP PROGRESS IS EVERYONE’S BUSINESS When a chain of retail stores needed capital to expand, we helped them find it. Soon, new stores were opening in other towns and other parts of the country. Providing value for families and job opportunities for thousands of inventory specialists, warehouse supervisors and managers in training. goldmansachs.com/progress ©Goldman Sachs, 2010. All rights reserved. Cyan, Magenta, Yellow, Black toc_QXP-1127940144.qxp 11/10/2010 1:25 PM Page 1 Contents NOVEMBER 29, 2010 | VOLUME LXII, NO. 22 | www.nationalreview.com ON THE COVER Page 12 From Defeat to Rout The weak economy and previous Democratic gains meant that Republicans Patrick Ruffini on the Tea Party would likely do well in this election, p. 22 especially in the House. But it was Democratic obstinacy that converted a BOOKS, ARTS defeat into a rout. The Editors & MANNERS COVER: ROMAN GENN 52 FOR GOD AND MAN ELECTION 2010 Conrad Black reviews The End and the Beginning: Pope John Paul 18 YES, THEY DID by John J.
    [Show full text]
  • Honoring Community Volunteers by LIZ PREMO and Making It a Better Place for Their Service
    INSIDE: POLITICAL VIEWS 26,000 COPIES Please Deliver Before FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 2006 Vol. 32 | No. 43 | 2 Sections |40 Pages Water worries Cyan North Hampton considers acquiring Aquarion Magenta BY SCOTT E. KINNEY Yellow ATLANTIC NEWS STAFF WRITER NORTH HAMPTON | The date is set. On Tuesday, Nov. 14, at North Hampton School, residents will come together to deliberate Black on the possible takeover of the assets of Aquarion Water Co., while Senior Vice President of Aquarion, Larry Bingaman, says the company is not for sale. As part of a special town meeting, the voting portion will follow on Dec. 19. The vote is only to determine if voters want to explore the feasibility of assuming the assets of Aquarion within North Hampton’s borders. If the article receives the necessary two-thirds approval, a warrant article with a dollar amount would then go before voters at the town’s annual town meeting in March. The meeting is a result of a petition by Henry Fuller, resident and Water Commission chair- man. The petition was signed by more than 450 North Hampton residents. Aquarion Water Co. currently provides water for more than 8,000 customers living in Hampton, North Hampton and Rye. Roughly 70 percent of the households in North Hampton are served by the water company. Bingaman said it’s not as simple as just taking control of the system in a single town. WATER Continued on 18A• Honoring community volunteers BY LIZ PREMO and making it a better place for their service. the organization was hailed ATLANTIC NEWS STAFF WRITER in which to live.
    [Show full text]
  • Administration of Barack H. Obama, 2010 Remarks at a Town Hall Meeting and a Question-And-Answer Session in Nashua, New Hampshir
    Administration of Barack H. Obama, 2010 Remarks at a Town Hall Meeting and a Question-and-Answer Session in Nashua, New Hampshire February 2, 2010 The President. Thank you. Hello, Nashua! Thank you very much. Thank you, guys. Thank you so much. Everybody, please have a seat. Thank you. Well, it is—— Audience member. We love you! The President. I love you back. It's great to be here, great to be back in New Hampshire. Now, some of you may remember, I've spent a little time in this State. [Laughter] I've had beers at Peddler's Daughter. I manned the scoop at ice cream socials from Dover to Hudson. I've walked Main Street in Concord and visited with folks in all 10 counties. I even once flew in the airport in Milan, which has got to be one of the only airports with a functioning wood stove. [Laughter] We spent a bunch of times in this gym, caused traffic jams several times— [laughter]—and just have a lot of good friends here in this State, here in this city, and here in this high school. So I'm just grateful to all of you for taking the time to be here. I've got a couple of special thank yous to say. Now, first of all, please thank Tim Dining for the wonderful introduction and for the great work that he's doing day in, day out. I want to thank David Ryan, doing a great job as principal here at Nashua North. Mayor Donnalee Lozeau is here; give her a big round of applause.
    [Show full text]
  • Couple Is Mainstay of Republican Politics in NH
    Couple is mainstay of Republican politics in N.H. By Shira Schoenberg Globe Correspondent/ September 1, 2011 AMHERST, N.H. - When Susan Duprey travels with Ann Romney, the wife of presidential candidate Mitt Romney, Duprey carries the Sharpie pens, hand sanitizer, sewing kit, and camera phone. When Duprey’s husband, Steve Duprey, traveled with 2008 presidential nominee John McCain, he had the pirate bandannas and eye patches, tropical hats in Florida, and cheesehead hats in Wisconsin. To Ann Romney, Susan Duprey has become a “close confidante’’ with a reputation as a problem solver, according to one top campaign aide. Traveling with McCain, Steve Duprey earned the title “morale officer’’ for the way he would joke around and hand out McCain-Palin hockey pucks or shot glasses - in addition to being a trusted adviser. The Dupreys carry to an extreme the type of citizen involvement that New Hampshire presidential campaigns rely on. They emphatically deny any aspirations for higher office, though he ran unsuccessfully for Congress in 1992. Between them, the two have worked on more than 30 national and state Republican campaigns since the 1970s. “For any campaign at a state or federal level, you would have both of them on a short list of activists you want helping,’’ said Charlie Arlinghaus, who was executive director of the state Republican Party when Steve Duprey was chairman. “They’re low maintenance and they do a lot of work.’’ Susan Duprey is the former president of the Devine Millimet law firm; her husband developed some of the biggest real estate projects in Concord, their hometown.
    [Show full text]