Anthropological Perspectives of Solidarity and Reciprocity

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Anthropological Perspectives of Solidarity and Reciprocity ANTHROPOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES OF SOLIDARITY AND RECIPROCITY Anthropological perspectives of solidarity and reciprocity_FINAL.indd 1 14.1.2019 12:55:26 Anthropological perspectives of Založila/Published by solidarity and reciprocity Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakul- tete Univerze v Ljubljani (Ljubljana Uredil/Edited by University Press, Faculty of Arts) Peter Simonič Izdal/Issued by Recenzenta/Reviewers Oddelek za etnologijo in kulturno Olivier Givre antropologijo (Department of Ljupčo Risteski Ethnology and Cultural Anthropology) Zbirka/Book series Zupaničeva knjižnica, št. 47/ Za založbo/For the publisher Zupanič's collection no. 47 Roman Kuhar, dekan Filozofske ISSN 1855-671X fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani/The e-ISSN 2630-3922 dean of the Faculty of Arts, University of Ljubljana Lektorica/Proofreading Heather Pirjevec Ljubljana, 2019 Odgovorni urednik zbirke/ Naklada/Number of copies printed Editor in chief 300 izvodov Boštjan Kravanja Oblikovna zasnova zbirke in prelom/ Uredniški odbor zbirke/ Design and layout Editorial board Vasja Cenčič Bojan Baskar, Mateja Habinc, Vito Hazler, Jože Hudales, Božidar Jezernik, Tisk/Printed by Miha Kozorog, Boštjan Kravanja, Birografika Bori, d. o. o. Uršula Lipovec Čebron, Ana Sarah Lunaček Brumen, Mirjam Mencej, Cena Rajko Muršič, Jaka Repič, 20,00 Peter Simonič Knjiga je izšla s podporo Javne agencije za raziskovalno dejavnost RS./ The book was Fotografija na naslovnici/Cover photo published with support from the Slovenian Urška Repar Research Agency. Raziskovalni program (P6-0187) je sofinancirala Javna agencija za raziskovalno dejavnost Republike Slovenije iz državnega proračuna./The To delo je ponujeno pod licenco Creative authors acknowledge the financial support from Commons Priznanje avtorstva-Deljenje pod the Slovenian Research Agency (research core enakimi pogoji 4.0 Mednarodna licenca. / funding No. P6-0187). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Prva e-izdaja. Publikacija je v digitalni obliki International License. prosto dostopna na https://e-knjige.ff.uni-lj.si/ DOI: 10.4312/9789610601463 Anthropological perspectives of solidarity and reciprocity_FINAL.indd 2 14.1.2019 12:55:27 Anthropological perspectives of solidarity and reciprocity Edited by Peter Simonič Ljubljana 2019 Anthropological perspectives of solidarity and reciprocity_FINAL.indd 3 14.1.2019 12:55:27 Anthropological perspectives of solidarity and reciprocity_FINAL.indd 4 14.1.2019 12:55:27 Table of Content Anthropological perspectives of solidarity and reciprocity_FINAL.indd 5 14.1.2019 12:55:27 Peter Simonič Alter Political Economy 9 Jadran Kale Komunjsko, Skupno, and 19 Seljansko - Legacy of Eastern Adriatic Commons Peter Simonič Communitarian Institutions 31 in Trenta Valley Silvia Contessi, Co-Producing Participatory 45 Cristina Grasseni Guarantee Systems – Limits and Potentials HOSARALMO Cooperative Practices: Survival 57 Collective Strategies, “Aternative” Movements or Capitalism Re-Embedding? Valentina New Transition: Community 69 Gulin Zrnić, Gardens and Civic Engagement Tihana Rubić in the City of Zagreb Irene Sabaté Reciprocity and Solidarity 83 in the Face of the Spanish Home Repossessions Crisis Cirila Toplak For a New Social Order. 95 A Genealogy of Self-Management in SFRY Anthropological perspectives of solidarity and reciprocity_FINAL.indd 6 14.1.2019 12:55:27 Nina Vodopivec Solidarity and the Feelings of 113 Belonging: Textile Industrial Workers in the Socialist and Post socialist Slovenia Gorazd Kovačič Trade Unions Fragmentation 131 in Slovenia. Causes and Lessons Tanja Ahlin 'Repaying the Suffering' 145 in Transnational Families from Kerala, South India Eugene Richard Looking for a City with 159 Sensenig Foundations: Intentional Urban Communities as a Christian Response to Justice and Power Boštjan Kravanja The Spirit of Social Cohesion 173 and Sharing in Relation to Dance Consumption Practices in Contemporary Swing Dance Communities Dan Podjed, Orgunity as a New Form of 189 Daša Ličen Cooperation: Case Studies of Two Environmental NGOs Name Index 209 Summaries 215 About the Authors 221 Anthropological perspectives of solidarity and reciprocity_FINAL.indd 7 14.1.2019 12:55:27 Anthropological perspectives of solidarity and reciprocity_FINAL.indd 8 14.1.2019 12:55:27 Alter Political Economy Peter Simonič Sociologists such as Simmel, Tönnies, Durkheim, or Weber defined various kinds of solidarity: national, religious, guild, and kinship. In the 19th and 20th century, their ideas and identifications competed in the political arenas across Europe and USA (Stjernø 2004). In their theories, the economy as social process was identified with the econom- ics as (socially conditioned) theory (Hopkins 1957), and their habitus was nation-state (Graeber 2004; comp. Smith 2010 [1876]). Taking into account the diversity of human natural and cultural environ- ments, and historical shifts in the political and economic conditions, we realize that the phenomenon of stress and group forming, belong- ing and sharing must be much older and more diverse than the idea of solidarity, the promise of the French Revolution. The concept of solidarity is ambiguous: it includes mecha- nisms of taxes and redistribution, charity, altruistic contributions 9 Anthropological perspectives of solidarity and reciprocity_FINAL.indd 9 14.1.2019 12:55:27 and political support, social policy, concessions, grants, funds, food, clothes, social entrepreneurship, sponsorship, NGOS, etc. Communi- tarianism, equality and progress are their ideological pillars. Solidar- ity in mass culture is a form of ideational and tangible redistribution. Sociology based on the Marxist tradition has been rejecting perpetu- ation and masking of fundamental economic, social and political ine- qualities, but their classless society remained attached to nation-states. Following the game theory in the late 20th century, sociological and economic solidarity became a matter of rational choice among alterna- tives of group belonging (intentional communities) that could bring the greatest “profit” to an individual (Komter 2005). Anthropology initially used the expertise of European sociol- ogy, political science, law and economics. Anthropologists have re- ported about internal balance, "social security" and cooperation in a number of non-European and preindustrial communities, which have been by default referred in the west as archaic. In the 20th century, anthropology and ethnology remained on the imperial and heritage margins of culture and science. When Garrett Hardin declared the tragedy of commons (1968), the divide between mainstream sociology, economics and anthropology in the American west seemed to be sealed. His writing was an application of the game theory, with separated, misinformed and mistrusted members of society (methodological individualism). In his view, neither socialist state nor commons were suitable as prop- erty owners for environmental challenges of the global future. In time of cold war, such an announcement looked quite logical to western readers and became a common sense among many students and future scholars in ecology and economics. Persistence of economic and environmental anthropologist at small-scale, face-to-face communities and ethnographic research has reversibly influenced political and economic thought. Elinor Ostrom (2003, 2009), accepted Robert Netting’s stance from his book Bal- ancing on an Alp (1981), that it is possible and sustainable to practice common (pool) management, especially in areas with small communi- ties. In short, I see at least four aspects of Ostrom’s communitarian intervention, important for our understanding of mainstream west- ern political economy. First, Ostrom also used the game theory, but this time to prove quite the opposite as Hardin. Second, she explicitly used Netting’s description of management in an (Alpine) community to reintroduce an alternative to mainstream economics, but she barely mentioned anthropology in her book (2003). Third, she became and remained the only woman to win the Nobel Prize in economics (2009). Peter Simonič 10 Anthropological perspectives of solidarity and reciprocity_FINAL.indd 10 14.1.2019 12:55:27 Fourth, western economic theories (mercantilism, classical and politi- cal economy) have been standing on influx of various (“unlimited”) riches coming from the newly established colonies, emerging world trade system and church-like organisations. Alternative models (her- esies) in economics gather momentum and recognition only in times of perceived environmental and social crises. To overcome subsistential problems after the global financial crisis in 2008, many people recalled and established different com- munitarian models of production, exchange, distribution, and con- sumption. The mainstream theory and media called them “alternative economic practices”: cooperatives, agrarian commons, immediate sup- ply networks, social enterprises, housing communities, etc. (Simonič 2014a). The recent reinvention and reinforcement of community and resilience in the USA and (southern) Europe pulled anthropological methodology close to this kind of public discussions (Graeber 2011). Anthropology never definitively adopted the concept of soli- darity, at least not in the same manner as sociology and economics. For Mauss (1966 [1925]), solidarity was an ideological side of established social order. Solidarity can arise from either contractual arrangements of individualised types of society and market exchange or through gift-giving of mainly
Recommended publications
  • GO GIRLS! When Slovenian Women Left Home When Slovenian Women G O G Left Home Irls !
    Published titles “Slovenian girls, stay at home! But if you do leave, do not bring shame to your home- Go Girls! When Slovenian Women land and your nation.” Left Home is not about researching Zvone Žigon: IZ SPOMINA V From a booklet entitled Če greš na tuje (If you go abroad), published in 1934. PRIHODNOST and writing only about female emi- Mihael Kuzmič: SLOVENSKI IZSELJENCI “Man is a head, woman is a heart; he bears reason, she bears emotion.” gration, some kind of “women’s mi- IZ PREKMURJA V BETHLEHEMU V Janez Bleiweis, an important figure in Slovenian political, social, and cultural life in the gration”, but is among other things ZDA 1893–1924 second half of the 19th century, in his lecture in Graz in 1866. focused on understanding the com- Zvone Žigon: IZZIVI DRUGAČNOSTI SEZONSTVO IN IZSELJENSTVO V “Housewife, wife, and mother. Three roles that the Creator ensconced in women’s plexity, multi-facetedness and of PANONSKEM PROSTORU (edited by hearts. A housewife, who props up three corners of the house, who like a bee tirelessly course the multi-gendered aspect of Marina Lukšič - Hacin) takes care of a hundred tiny, often invisible things... A mother! Above all a mother! To migrations. This can only be done by Marie Pislar Fernandez: SLOVENCI V be a mother is the most natural thing... A mother, who in a blessed union gives birth focusing on a missing but constitu- ŽELEZNI LORENI (1919–1939) skozi to a new generation for the nation and for God, and through sacrifice and suffering družinske pripovedi / SLOVÈNES EN raises them to be valuable members of human society..
    [Show full text]
  • 'Relocalization and Prefigurative Movements
    1 ‘RELOCALIZATION AND PREFIGURATIVE MOVEMENTS’ AS SOCIAL NETWORKS AGAINST GLOBALIZATION: THE CONSTRUCTION OF LOCAL ALTERNATIVES TO GLOBAL CAPITALISM Michail Psimitis email: [email protected] Associate professor full address: Ioustinianou 3 Department of Sociology 81100 Mytilene University of the Aegean tel: (+30)22510-36514 & 23597 ABSTRACT Drawing upon an older periodization concerning worldwide social movements, we can say that the current decade is the first one of a period characterized by the strong presence of ‘relocalization and prefigurative social movements’. While earlier forms of organized collective actions either remained almost exclusively confined to the limits of the nation state (labor movements and new social movements) or explicitly rejected the nation state as the objective of their presence and chose a global action (global movements), modern relocalization movements reject both types of action and prefer an action focused directly against globalization. They act outside and away from the state and focus on territorial regeneration of the local autonomy as the cornerstone of self-governed and direct-democratic communities, with strong egalitarian social ties and a propensity for coequal participation. 2 These contemporary movements appear as forms of local resistance to globalization, but they are not showing trends of spatial or social isolation or marginalization, as happened, for instance, to most old communes and intentional communities of the past century. Instead, these are cosmopolitan communities that
    [Show full text]
  • The Global Network Le Reseau Global
    THE GLOBAL NETWORK LE RESEAU GLOBAL NO. 4-5 Le Reseau The Network Communication and Society in Eastern Europe • Communication et Societé en Europe de l’Est No 4-5 MARCH / JUNE 1996 Peter Gross & Ray Hiebert Departures on an Old Fashioned Track. Broadcast Laws in Romania, Poland and The Czech Republic Vesella Tabakova Women and Media in Bulgaria: Access to Expression and Decision Making File / Dossier Detailed presentation of some Central & Eastern European Schools of Journalism Contents / Sommaire ESSAY ESSAI Tapio Varis Global Communication in the Age of Cyberspace SPECIAL EMPHASIS LE POINT SUR Peter Gross & Ray Hiebert Departures on an Old Fashioned Track. Broadcasting Laws in Romania, Poland and the Czech Republic Marius Lukosiunas & Skirmantas Valiulis Lithuanian Mass Media and Its Legal Regulation Between 1991 - 1995 AR T I C L E S AR T I C L E S Vesella Tabakova Women and Media in Bulgaria: Access to Expression and Decision Making Daniela Frumusani New Role Models for Journalists in Eastern European Countries Teresa Sasinska-Klas Transformation of the Polish Media System FI L E DO S S I E R Detailed Presentation of some Central & Eastern European Schools of Journalism Facultatea de Jurnalism si Stiintele Comunicarii Universitatea Bucuresti FJSC PUB L I S H I N G DIR E C T O R / DIR E C T E U R DE L AP U B L I C A T I O N Mihai Coman „A strong publisher creates a cor- porate culture that can leave its EDITOR / REDACTEUR EN CHEF Oscar Stanciulescu mark on an organisation long after he or she is gone.“ ADVISORY BOARD / COMITÉE DE LECTURE Jean-Pierre Bacot France Philip Meyer Claude Jean Bertrand France Peter Gross US „An editor should tell the writer Andrei Marga Romania his writing is better than it is.
    [Show full text]
  • Solidarity Economy: Key Concepts and Issues
    Published in Kawano, Emily and Tom Masterson and Jonathan Teller-Ellsberg (eds). Solidarity Economy I: Building Alternatives for People and Planet. Amherst, MA: Center for Popular Economics. 2010. Solidarity Economy: Key Concepts and Issues Ethan Miller People across the United States and throughout the world are experiencing the devastating effects of an economy that places the profit of a few above the well being of everyone else. The political and business leaders who benefit from this arrangement consistently proclaim that there are no real alternatives, yet citizens and grassroots organizations around the world are boldly demonstrating otherwise. A compelling array of grassroots economic initiatives already exist, often hidden or marginalized, in the “nooks and crannies” of the dominant economy: worker, consumer and producer cooperatives; fair trade initiatives; intentional communities; alternative currencies; community-run social centers and resource libraries; community development credit unions; community gardens; open source free software initiatives; community supported agriculture (CSA) programs; community land trusts and more. While incredibly diverse, these initiatives share a broad set of values that stand in bold contrast to those of the dominant economy. Instead of enforcing a culture of cutthroat competition, they build cultures and communities of cooperation. Rather than isolating us from one another, they foster relationships of mutual support and solidarity. In place of centralized structures of control, they move us towards shared responsibility and directly democratic decision-making. Instead of imposing a single global monoculture, they strengthen the diversity of local cultures and environments. Instead of prioritizing profit over all else, they encourage commitment to broader work for social, economic, and environmental justice.
    [Show full text]
  • IS2010 Volume B.Pdf
    Zbornik 13. mednarodne multikonference INFORMACIJSKA DRUŽBA – IS 2010 Zvezek B Proceedings of the 13th International Multiconference INFORMATION SOCIETY – IS 2010 Volume B Soočanje z demografskimi izzivi Facing Demographic Challenges Uredila / Edited by Janez Malačič, Matjaž Gams http://is.ijs.si 11.−12. oktober 2010 / October 11th−12th, 2010 Ljubljana, Slovenia Uredniki: Janez Malačič Ekonomska fakulteta Univerza v Ljubljani Matjaž Gams Odsek za inteligentne sisteme Institut »Jožef Stefan«, Ljubljana Založnik: Institut »Jožef Stefan«, Ljubljana Tisk: Birografika BORI d.o.o. Priprava zbornika: Mitja Lasič, Jana Krivec Oblikovanje naslovnice: Miran Krivec, Vesna Lasič Tiskano iz predloga avtorjev Naklada: 30 Ljubljana, oktober 2010 Konferenco IS 2010 sofinancirata Ministrstvo za visoko šolstvo, znanost in tehnologijo Javna agencija za raziskovalno dejavnost RS (ARRS) Institut »Jožef Stefan« Informacijska družba ISSN 1581-9973 CIP - Kataložni zapis o publikaciji Narodna in univerzitetna knjižnica, Ljubljana 314(4)(082) MEDNARODNA multikonferenca Informacijska družba (13 ; 2010 ; Ljubljana) Soočanje z demografskimi izzivi v Evropi : zbornik 13. mednarodne multikonference Informacijska družba - IS 2010, 11.-12. oktober 2010 : zvezek B = Facing demographic challenges : proceedings of The 13th International Multiconference Information Society - IS 2010, October 11th-12th, 2010, Ljubljana, Slovenia : volume B / uredila, edited by Janez Malačič, Matjaž Gams. - Ljubljana : Institut Jožef Stefan, 2010. - (Informacijska družba, ISSN 1581-9973) ISBN 978-961-264-024-8 1. Gl. stv. nasl. 2. Vzp. stv. nasl. 3. Informacijska družba 4. Information society 5. Malačič, Janez 252779008 PREDGOVOR MULTIKONFERENCI INFORMACIJSKA DRUŽBA 2010 V svojem trinajstem letu je multikonferenca Informacijska družba (http://is.ijs.si) znova dokazala, da je ena vodilnih srednjeevropskih konferenc, ki združuje znanstvenike z različnih raziskovalnih področij, povezanih z informacijsko družbo.
    [Show full text]
  • The Social and Solidarity Economy: Towards an ‘Alternative’ Globalisation*
    The Social and Solidarity Economy: Towards an ‘Alternative’ Globalisation* Background paper prepared by: NANCY NEAMTAN Présidente du Chantier de l’économie sociale In preparation for the symposium Citizenship and Globalization: Exploring Participation and Democracy in a Global Context Sponsored by: The Carold Institute for the Advancement of Citizenship in Social Change Langara College, Vancouver, June 14-16, 2002 *Translation: Anika Mendell The Carold Institute appreciates the financial assistance for translation provided by the Canadian Commission for UNESCO. The Social and Solidarity Economy: Towards an “Alternative” Globalisation Introduction The social and solidarity economy are concepts that have become increasingly recognised and used in Quebec since 1995. Following the examples of certain European, as well as Latin American countries, these terms emerged in Quebec as part of a growing will and desire on the part of social movements to propose an alternative model of development, in response to the dominant neo-liberal model. The emergence of this movement has not been without debate, nor obstacles. In fact, the contours and composition of the social economy are still being determined; its definition continues to evolve. However, after the second World Social Forum, which took place in Porto Alegre in February 2002, where the social and solidarity economy were important themes, it is now clear that this movement is firmly inscribed in an international movement for an alternative globalisation. Defining the social and solidarity economy Since the terms “social economy” or “economy of solidarity” are not yet widely used in Canada, outside of Quebec, it is important to establish certain defining elements. The social economy combines two terms that are often contradictory: • “economy” refers to the concrete production of goods or of services by business or enterprise that contributes to a net increase in collective wealth.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Science - Slovenia Fink-Hafner, Danica
    www.ssoar.info Political science - Slovenia Fink-Hafner, Danica Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Sammelwerksbeitrag / collection article Zur Verfügung gestellt in Kooperation mit / provided in cooperation with: GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Fink-Hafner, D. (2002). Political science - Slovenia. In M. Kaase, V. Sparschuh, & A. Wenninger (Eds.), Three social science disciplines in Central and Eastern Europe: handbook on economics, political science and sociology (1989-2001) (pp. 358-374). Berlin: Informationszentrum Sozialwissenschaften. https://nbn-resolving.org/ urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-281035 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY Lizenz (Namensnennung) zur This document is made available under a CC BY Licence Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden (Attribution). For more Information see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de 358 Danica Fink-Hafner Political Science – Slovenia Discussant: Zlatko Šabič Introductory remarks This text aims to present a brief historical overview of political science in Slovenia, the characteristics of its contents and its methodological and institutional developments. In brief, we note the following three processes: 1. development from knowledge relevant to political science toward a modern and internationally more comparable political science; 2. from knowledge and science within supranational states to political
    [Show full text]
  • Marxism and the Solidarity Economy: Toward a New Theory of Revolution
    Class, Race and Corporate Power Volume 9 Issue 1 Article 2 2021 Marxism and the Solidarity Economy: Toward a New Theory of Revolution Chris Wright [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/classracecorporatepower Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Wright, Chris (2021) "Marxism and the Solidarity Economy: Toward a New Theory of Revolution," Class, Race and Corporate Power: Vol. 9 : Iss. 1 , Article 2. DOI: 10.25148/CRCP.9.1.009647 Available at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/classracecorporatepower/vol9/iss1/2 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts, Sciences & Education at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Class, Race and Corporate Power by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Marxism and the Solidarity Economy: Toward a New Theory of Revolution Abstract In the twenty-first century, it is time that Marxists updated the conception of socialist revolution they have inherited from Marx, Engels, and Lenin. Slogans about the “dictatorship of the proletariat” “smashing the capitalist state” and carrying out a social revolution from the commanding heights of a reconstituted state are completely obsolete. In this article I propose a reconceptualization that accomplishes several purposes: first, it explains the logical and empirical problems with Marx’s classical theory of revolution; second, it revises the classical theory to make it, for the first time, logically consistent with the premises of historical materialism; third, it provides a (Marxist) theoretical grounding for activism in the solidarity economy, and thus partially reconciles Marxism with anarchism; fourth, it accounts for the long-term failure of all attempts at socialist revolution so far.
    [Show full text]
  • The British, Kugy, and Western Slovenia
    182 The British, Kugy, and Western Slovenia Ksenija Rozman Plates 69-72 The Julian Alps, the Sava valley, the surroundings of the lakes at Bled and Bohin;, Lake Cerknica, the city of Ljubljana and the Postojna caves are areas which the British have been visiting for centuries-fust as scientists, later also as travellers and mountaineers, and today mainly as tourists. All these areas are readily accessible by organized motor co'ach tours which start from Bled, Bohinj and Kran;ska gora. This territory, once part of the multi-national Austrian empire, now is the western part of the republic of Slovenia, one of the six constituent republics of Yugoslavia. The highest mountain in Yugoslavia, Triglav (2863m), lies in Slovenia. Dr Julius Kugy once asked France Avein, the Slovenian moun­ taineer, climber and professor of electrical engineering, what part of the Julian Alps he liked the best. Avein decided on the western Julian Alps, but Kugy demurred; 'That's all right, my dear Avein, it's beautiful! But the eastern part has the Triglav. The Triglav is not a mountain, the Triglav is a realm.'l Forests, mountains, mountain flora, meadows, rivers and lakes are all naturally constituent parts of the globe-but so many prominent Britons have wri~ten so much in praise of Slovenia and its people that even the best educated European could hardly fail to take heed and to be flattered. Sir Humphry Davy, and after him Josiah Gilbert and GC Churchill thought that the valley of the Sava river was the most beautiful valley in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Solidarity Economy: Key Concepts and Issues
    Published in Kawano, Emily and Tom Masterson and Jonathan Teller-Ellsberg (eds). Solidarity Economy I: Building Alternatives for People and Planet. Amherst, MA: Center for Popular Economics. 2010. Solidarity Economy: Key Concepts and Issues Ethan Miller People across the United States and throughout the world are experiencing the devastating effects of an economy that places the profit of a few above the well being of everyone else. The political and business leaders who benefit from this arrangement consistently proclaim that there are no real alternatives, yet citizens and grassroots organizations around the world are boldly demonstrating otherwise. A compelling array of grassroots economic initiatives already exist, often hidden or marginalized, in the “nooks and crannies” of the dominant economy: worker, consumer and producer cooperatives; fair trade initiatives; intentional communities; alternative currencies; community-run social centers and resource libraries; community development credit unions; community gardens; open source free software initiatives; community supported agriculture (CSA) programs; community land trusts and more. While incredibly diverse, these initiatives share a broad set of values that stand in bold contrast to those of the dominant economy. Instead of enforcing a culture of cutthroat competition, they build cultures and communities of cooperation. Rather than isolating us from one another, they foster relationships of mutual support and solidarity. In place of centralized structures of control, they move us towards shared responsibility and directly democratic decision-making. Instead of imposing a single global monoculture, they strengthen the diversity of local cultures and environments. Instead of prioritizing profit over all else, they encourage commitment to broader work for social, economic, and environmental justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Between the House of Habsburg and Tito a Look at the Slovenian Past 1861–1980
    BETWEEN THE HOUSE OF HABSBURG AND TITO A LOOK AT THE SLOVENIAN PAST 1861–1980 BETWEEN THE HOUSE OF HABSBURG AND TITO A LOOK AT THE SLOVENIAN PAST 1861–1980 EDITORS JURIJ PEROVŠEK AND BOJAN GODEŠA Ljubljana 2016 Between the House of Habsburg and Tito ZALOŽBA INZ Managing editor Aleš Gabrič ZBIRKA VPOGLEDI 14 ISSN 2350-5656 Jurij Perovšek in Bojan Godeša (eds.) BETWEEN THE HOUSE OF HABSBURG AND TITO A LOOK AT THE SLOVENIAN PAST 1861–1980 Technical editor Mojca Šorn Reviewers Božo Repe Žarko Lazarevič English translation: Translat d.o.o. and Studio S.U.R. Design Barbara Bogataj Kokalj Published by Inštitut za novejšo zgodovino/Instute of Contemporaray History Printed by Medium d.o.o. Print run 300 copies The publication of this book was supported by Slovenian Research Agency CIP - Kataložni zapis o publikaciji Narodna in univerzitetna knjižnica, Ljubljana 94(497.4)"1861/1980"(082) BETWEEN the House of Habsburg and Tito : a look at the Slovenian past 1861-1980 / editors Jurij Perovšek and Bojan Godeša ; [English translation Translat and Studio S. U. R.]. - Ljubljana : Inštitut za novejšo zgodovino = Institute of Contemporary History, 2016. - (Zbirka Vpogledi, ISSN 2350-5656 ; 14) ISBN 978-961-6386-72-2 1. Perovšek, Jurij 287630080 ©2016, Inštitut za novejšo zgodovino All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, hired out, transmitted, published, adapted or used in any other way, including photocopying, printing, recording or storing and publishing in the electronic form without the prior written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other non-commercial uses permitted by copyright law.
    [Show full text]
  • May '68 in Yugoslavia
    SLAVICA TER 24 SLAVICA TERGESTINA European Slavic Studies Journal VOLUME 24 (2020/I) May ’68 in Yugoslavia SLAVICA TER 24 SLAVICA TERGESTINA European Slavic Studies Journal VOLUME 24 (2020/I) May ’68 in Yugoslavia SLAVICA TERGESTINA European Slavic Studies Journal ISSN 1592-0291 (print) & 2283-5482 (online) WEB www.slavica-ter.org EMAIL [email protected] PUBLISHED BY Università degli Studi di Trieste Dipartimento di Scienze Giuridiche, del Linguaggio, dell’Interpretazione e della Traduzione Universität Konstanz Fachbereich Literaturwissenschaft Univerza v Ljubljani Filozofska fakulteta, Oddelek za slavistiko EDITORIAL BOARD Roman Bobryk (Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities) Margherita De Michiel (University of Trieste) Tomáš Glanc (University of Zurich) Vladimir Feshchenko (Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Sciences) Kornelija Ičin (University of Belgrade) Miha Javornik (University of Ljubljana) Jurij Murašov (University of Konstanz) Blaž Podlesnik (University of Ljubljana, technical editor) Ivan Verč (University of Trieste, editor in chief) ISSUE CO-EDITED BY Jernej Habjan and Andraž Jež EDITORIAL Antonella D’Amelia (University of Salerno) ADVISORY BOARD Patrizia Deotto (University of Trieste) Nikolaj Jež (University of Ljubljana) Alenka Koron (Institute of Slovenian Literature and Literary Studies) Đurđa Strsoglavec (University of Ljubljana) Tomo Virk (University of Ljubljana) DESIGN & LAYOUT Aljaž Vesel & Anja Delbello / AA Copyright by Authors Contents 8 Yugoslavia between May ’68 and November ’89:
    [Show full text]