Federal Register/Vol. 72, No. 162/Wednesday, August 22, 2007

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 22, 2007 / Notices 46957

74. Zhanjiang Regal Integrated Marine prior to publication in the Federal Preliminary Results of New Shipper Resources Co., Ltd. Register, this amendment is being Reviews and Notice of Partial 75. Zhanjiang Runhai Foods Co., Ltd. published in place of the original Rescission, 72 FR 6201 (February 9, 76. Zhanjiang Universal Seafood Corp 2007) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’). The 77. Zhejiang Cereals, Oils & Foodstuff Import version released on August 8, 2007. & Export Co., Ltd. In the administrative review, we have Department conducted verification of 78. Zhejiang Daishan Baofa Aquatic Products determined that all five mandatory two of the mandatory respondents’ and Co., Ltd. respondents (i.e., Fine Furniture certain Separate-Rate Applicants’ data 79. Zhejiang Evernew Seafood Co., Ltd. (Shanghai) Limited and its affiliates in the People’s Republic of China 80. Zhejiang Xingyang Import & Export (‘‘Fine Furniture’’); Foshan Guanqiu (‘‘PRC’’). See Verification section, 81. Zhejiang Xintianjiu Sea Products Co., Ltd. Furniture Co., Ltd. (‘‘Foshan Guanqiu’’); below, for additional information. 82. Zhejiang Zhenlong Foodstuffs Co., Ltd. Fujian Lianfu Forestry Co./Fujian On June 12, 2007, the Department 83. Zhenjiang Evergreen Aquatic Products extended the deadline for the final Science & Technology Co., Ltd. Wonder Pacific Inc./Fuzhou Huan Mei 84. Zhoushan Cereals, Oils, and Foodstuffs Furniture Co., Ltd./Jiangsu Dare results of review to August 8, 2007. See Import and Export Co., Ltd. Furniture Co., Ltd. (‘‘Dare Group’’); Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the 85. Zhoushan Diciyuan Aquatic Products Shanghai Aosen Furniture Co., Ltd. People’s Republic of China: Extension of 86. Zhoushan Guotai Aquatic Products Co., (‘‘Shanghai Aosen’’) and Shanghai Time Limits for the Final Results of the Ltd. Starcorp Furniture Co., Ltd, Starcorp Antidumping Duty Administrative 87. Zhoushan Haichang Food Co Furniture (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Orin Review and New Shipper Reviews, 72 88. Zhoushan Huading Seafood Co., Ltd. Furniture (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Shanghai FR 32281 (June 12, 2007). 89. Zhoushan Industrial Co., Ltd. We invited parties to comment on the 90. Zhoushan Jingzhou Aquatic Product Co., Star Furniture Co., Ltd., and Shanghai Ltd. Xing Ding Furniture Industrial Co., Ltd. Preliminary Results. We received 91. Zhoushan Lizhou Fishery Co., Ltd. (collectively, ‘‘Starcorp’’)) made sales in comments from the Petitioners, certain 92. Zhoushan Putuo Huafa Sea Products Co., the United States at prices below normal mandatory respondents, certain Ltd. value. With respect to the remaining Separate-Rate Applicants, and other 93. Zhoushan Xifeng Aquatic Co., Ltd. respondents in the administrative interested parties to this review. On 94. Zhoushan Zhenyang Developing Co., Ltd. review (collectively, ‘‘Separate Rate June 18, 2007, parties submitted case 95. ZJ CNF Sea Products Engineering Ltd. Applicants’’), we have determined that briefs. On June 26, 2007, parties [FR Doc. E7–16576 Filed 8–21–07; 8:45 am] 42 entities have provided sufficient submitted rebuttal briefs. On July 12, BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P evidence that they are separate from the 2007, the Department held public and state-controlled entity, and we have closed hearings. established a weighted-average margin Analysis of Comments Received DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE based on the rates we have calculated for the five mandatory respondents, All issues raised in the case and International Trade Administration excluding any rates that are zero, de rebuttal briefs by parties in this review [A–570–890] minimis, or based entirely on adverse are addressed in the memorandum from facts available, to be applied to these Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant Amended Final Results of separate-rate entities. We invited Secretary for Import Administration, to Antidumping Duty Administrative interested parties to comment on our David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary Review and New Shipper Reviews: preliminary results of review. For the for Import Administration, ‘‘Issues and Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the new shipper reviews, the Department Decision Memorandum for the Final People’s Republic of China also reviewed two exporters/producers, Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and New AGENCY: Import Administration, i.e., Dongguan Huanghouse Furniture Co., Ltd. (‘‘Huanghouse’’) and Tianjin Shipper Reviews on Wooden Bedroom International Trade Administration, Furniture from the People’s Republic of Department of Commerce. First Wood Co., Ltd. (‘‘First Wood’’). Based on our analysis of the comments China,’’ Issues and Decision SUMMARY: On February 9, 2007, the Memorandum, dated August 8, 2007, Department of Commerce (‘‘the we received, we have made certain changes to our calculations for all which is hereby adopted by this notice Department’’) published its preliminary (‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum’’). results in the antidumping duty mandatory respondents. The final dumping margins for this review are A list of the issues which parties raised administrative review and new shipper and to which we respond in the Issues reviews and notice of partial rescission listed in the ‘‘Final Results Margins’’ section below. and Decision Memorandum is attached for wooden bedroom furniture from the to this notice as an Appendix. The DATES: Effective Date: August 22, 2007. People’s Republic of China. The period Issues and Decision Memorandum is a of review (‘‘POR’’) for the administrative FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: public document and is on file in the review and the new shipper reviews is Gene Degnan or Robert Bolling, Import Central Records Unit (‘‘CRU’’), Main June 24, 2004 through December 31, Administration, International Trade Commerce Building, Room B–099, and 2005. For the final results of Administration, U.S. Department of is accessible on the Web at http:// administrative review, see this notice. Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy and As a result of an inadvertent error, the Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; electronic version of the memorandum version of this notice released on telephone: (202) 482–0414 and (202) are identical in content. Wednesday, August 8, 2007, contained 482–3434, respectively. the appendix from the investigation of Period of Review Background this proceeding, rather than the The POR is June 24, 2004 through appendix intended for this The Department published its December 31, 2005. administrative review. These amended preliminary results on February 9, 2007. final results correct this error. No See Wooden Bedroom Furniture from Scope of Order changes to the analysis, methodologies the People’s Republic of China: The product covered by the order is employed, or the rates calculated were Preliminary Results of Antidumping wooden bedroom furniture. Wooden made. Because this error was discovered Duty Administrative Review, bedroom furniture is generally, but not

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:26 Aug 21, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22AUN1.SGM 22AUN1 jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES 46958 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 22, 2007 / Notices

exclusively, designed, manufactured, (6) desks, computer stands, filing mirrors 12; (11) certain metal parts 13;(12) and offered for sale in coordinated cabinets, book cases, or writing tables mirrors that do not attach to, groups, or bedrooms, in which all of the that are attached to or incorporated in incorporate in, sit on, or hang over a individual pieces are of approximately the subject merchandise; and (7) other dresser if they are not designed and the same style and approximately the bedroom furniture consistent with the marketed to be sold in conjunction with same material and/or finish. The subject above list. a dresser as part of a dresser-mirror set; merchandise is made substantially of and (13) upholstered beds. 14 The scope of the order excludes the wood products, including both solid Imports of subject merchandise are wood and also engineered wood following items: (1) Seats, chairs, classified under subheading products made from wood particles, benches, couches, sofas, sofa beds, 9403.50.9040 of the HTSUS as ‘‘wooden fibers, or other wooden materials such stools, and other seating furniture; (2) * * * beds’’ and under subheading as plywood, oriented strand board, mattresses, mattress supports (including 9403.50.9080 of the HTSUS as ‘‘other particle board, and fiberboard, with or box springs), infant cribs, water beds, * * * wooden furniture of a kind used without wood veneers, wood overlays, and futon frames; (3) office furniture, in the bedroom.’’ In addition, wooden or laminates, with or without non-wood such as desks, stand-up desks, computer headboards for beds, wooden footboards components or trim such as metal, cabinets, filing cabinets, credenzas, and for beds, wooden side rails for beds, and marble, leather, glass, plastic, or other bookcases; (4) dining room or kitchen wooden canopies for beds may also be resins, and whether or not assembled, furniture such as dining tables, chairs, entered under subheading 9403.50.9040 completed, or finished. servers, sideboards, buffets, corner of the HTSUS as ‘‘parts of wood’’ and framed glass mirrors may also be The subject merchandise includes the cabinets, china cabinets, and china hutches; (5) other non-bedroom entered under subheading 7009.92.5000 following items: (1) Wooden beds such of the HTSUS as ‘‘glass mirrors * * * as loft beds, bunk beds, and other beds; furniture, such as television cabinets, cocktail tables, end tables, occasional framed.’’ This order covers all wooden (2) wooden headboards for beds bedroom furniture meeting the above tables, wall systems, book cases, and (whether stand-alone or attached to side description, regardless of tariff entertainment systems; (6) bedroom rails), wooden footboards for beds, classification. Although the HTSUS wooden side rails for beds, and wooden furniture made primarily of wicker, subheadings are provided for canopies for beds; (3) night tables, night cane, osier, bamboo or rattan; (7) side convenience and customs purposes, our stands, dressers, commodes, bureaus, rails for beds made of metal if sold written description of the scope of this mule chests, gentlemen’s chests, separately from the headboard and proceeding is dispositive. bachelor’s chests, lingerie chests, footboard; (8) bedroom furniture in wardrobes, vanities, chessers, which bentwood parts predominate 10; 12 Cheval mirrors are, i.e., any framed, tiltable chifforobes, and wardrobe-type cabinets; (9) jewelry armories 11; (10) cheval mirror with a height in excess of 50’’ that is (4) dressers with framed glass mirrors mounted on a floor-standing, hinged base. that are attached to, incorporated in, sit Additionally, the scope of the order excludes combination cheval mirror/jewelry cabinets. The on, or hang over the dresser; (5) chests- excluded merchandise is an integrated piece on-chests, 1 highboys, 2 lowboys, 3 chests consisting of a cheval mirror, i.e., a framed tiltable of drawers, 4 chests, 5 door chests, 6 mirror with a height in excess of 50 inches, 7 8 9 mounted on a floor-standing, hinged base, the chiffoniers, hutches, and armoires; cheval mirror serving as a door to a cabinet back that is integral to the structure of the mirror and 1 A chest-on-chest is typically a tall chest-of- which constitutes a jewelry cabinet lined with drawers in two or more sections (or appearing to be fabric, having necklace and bracelet hooks, in two or more sections), with one or two sections mountings for rings and shelves, with or without a mounted (or appearing to be mounted) on a slightly working lock and key to secure the contents of the larger chest; also known as a tallboy. jewelry cabinet back to the cheval mirror, and no 2 A highboy is typically a tall chest of drawers drawers anywhere on the integrated piece. The fully usually composed of a base and a top section with assembled piece must be at least 50 inches in drawers, and supported on four legs or a small chest height, 14.5 inches in width, and 3 inches in depth. (often 15 inches or more in height). to hold television receivers and/or other audio- See Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People’s 3 Republic of China: Final Results of Changed A lowboy is typically a short chest of drawers, visual entertainment systems. Circumstances Review and Determination To not more than four feet high, normally set on short 10 As used herein, bentwood means solid wood legs. Revoke Order in Part, 72 FR 948 (January 9, 2007). made pliable. Bentwood is wood that is brought to 13 4 A chest of drawers is typically a case containing Metal furniture parts and unfinished furniture a curved shape by bending it while made pliable drawers for storing clothing. parts made of wood products (as defined above) with moist heat or other agency and then set by that are not otherwise specifically named in this 5 A chest is typically a case piece taller than it scope (i.e., wooden headboards for beds, wooden is wide featuring a series of drawers and with or cooling or drying. See Customs’ Headquarters’ footboards for beds, wooden side rails for beds, and without one or more doors for storing clothing. The Ruling Letter 043859, dated May 17, 1976. wooden canopies for beds) and that do not possess piece can either include drawers or be designed as 11 Any armoire, cabinet or other accent item for the essential character of wooden bedroom a large box incorporating a lid. the purpose of storing jewelry, not to exceed 24’’ furniture in an unassembled, incomplete, or 6 A door chest is typically a chest with hinged in width, 18’’ in depth, and 49’’ in height, including unfinished form. Such parts are usually classified doors to store clothing, whether or not containing a minimum of 5 lined drawers lined with felt or under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the drawers. The piece may also include shelves for felt-like material, at least one side door (whether or United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) subheading 9403.90.7000. televisions and other entertainment electronics. not the door is lined with felt or felt-like material), 14 Upholstered beds that are completely 7 A chiffonier is typically a tall and narrow chest with necklace hangers, and a flip-top lid with inset upholstered, i.e., containing filling material and of drawers normally used for storing undergarments mirror. See Issues and Decision Memorandum from completely covered in sewn genuine leather, and lingerie, often with mirror(s) attached. Laurel LaCivita to Laurie Parkhill, Office Director, synthetic leather, or natural or synthetic decorative 8 A hutch is typically an open case of furniture Concerning Jewelry Armoires and Cheval Mirrors in fabric. To be excluded, the entire bed (headboards, with shelves that typically sits on another piece of the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Wooden footboards, and side rails) must be upholstered furniture and provides storage for clothes. except for bed feet, which may be of wood, metal, Bedroom Furniture from the People’s Republic of 9 An armoire is typically a tall cabinet or or any other material and which are no more than wardrobe (typically 50 inches or taller), with doors, China, dated August 31, 2004. See also Wooden nine inches in height from the floor. See Wooden and with one or more drawers (either exterior below Bedroom Furniture from the People’s Republic of Bedroom Furniture from the People’s Republic of or above the doors or interior behind the doors), China: Notice of Final Results of Changed China: Final Results of Changed Circumstances shelves, and/or garment rods or other apparatus for Circumstances Review and Revocation in Part, 71 Review and Determination to Revoke Order in Part, storing clothes. Bedroom armoires may also be used FR 38621 (July 7, 2006). 72 FR 7013 (February 14, 2007).

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:26 Aug 21, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22AUN1.SGM 22AUN1 jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 22, 2007 / Notices 46959

Verification Decision Memorandum at Comment 21, Company-Specific Issues and WBF Final Factor Valuation As provided in section 782(i) of the Dare Group Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘Act’’), Memorandum. • For the final results, the Department we verified the information submitted • For the final results, the Department has revised the Harmonized Tariff by certain mandatory respondents and has excluded ‘‘Octroi’’ expenses from Schedule (‘‘HTS’’) category used to certain Separate-Rate Applicants for use the calculation of Huzaifa Furniture calculate the surrogate value for in our final results. See the Industries Pvt. Ltd.’s surrogate financial cardboard. See Issues and Decision Department’s verification reports on the ratios. See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 34 and WBF record of this review in the CRU with Memorandum at Comment 25. Final Factor Valuation Memorandum. respect to Shanghai Aosen; Starcorp; • For the final results, the Department • For the final results, the Department Baigou Crafts Factory of Fengkai has included the line-item ‘‘Contract has revised certain assessment rate (‘‘Baigou Crafts’’); Dongguan Dihao Manufacturing’’ in manufacturing calculations. See Issues and Decision Furniture Co., Ltd. (‘‘Dihao’’); and overhead of Ahuja Furnishers Private Memorandum at Comment 36 and Transworld (Zhangzhou) Furniture Co., Limited’s surrogate financial ratios. See ‘‘Analysis Memorandum for the Final Ltd. (‘‘Transworld’’). For all verified Issues and Decision Memorandum at Results of Administrative Review of companies, we used standard Comment 18, and WBF Final Factor Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the verification procedures, including Valuation Memorandum. People’s Republic of China for Fujian examination of relevant accounting and • Lianfu Forestry Co., Ltd., Fuzhou Huan production records, as well as original For the final results, the Department has re-classified ‘‘Bonuses’’ and Mei Furniture Co. Ltd., and Jiangsu Dare source documents provided by Furniture Co, Ltd.’’ dated (August 8, respondents. For the further details on ‘‘Gratuities’’ from manufacturing overhead or selling, general and 2007) (‘‘WBF Dare Group Final Results the verifications, see the aforementioned Analysis Memo 08/08/07’’). verification reports. administrative expenses to the direct • labor portion of Materials, Labor and For the final results, the Department Changes Since the Preliminary Results Energy (‘‘ML&E’’) in the calculation of has excluded certain non-scope merchandise from the margin Based on an analysis of comments surrogate financial ratios for Ahuja calculation. See Issues and Decision received, the Department has made Furnishers Private Limited, Huzaifa Memorandum at Comment 37 and WBF certain changes in the margin Furniture Industries Pvt. Ltd., and Dare Group Final Results Analysis calculations. For the final results, the Indian Furniture Products Limited. See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Memo 08/08/07. Department has made the following • For the final results, the Department changes with respect to Shanghai Comment 20 and WBF Final Factor Valuation Memorandum. is using a material-specific conversion Aosen, Dare Group, Foshan Guanqui, rate to calculate surrogate values for • Starcorp, and Fine Furniture. For the final results, the Department ‘‘FIBERBOARDMD’’, General Issues has included ‘‘Closing Stock’’ and ‘‘PAPEREDFIBERBOARDMD’’, and ‘‘Opening Stock’’ in the material portion ‘‘FIBERBOARDPACKING.’’ See Issues Calculation of Surrogate Financial of ML&E in the calculation of Fusion and Decision Memorandum at Comment Ratios Design Private Ltd.’s surrogate financial 40 and WBF Dare Group Final Results • For the final results, the Department ratios. See Issues and Decision Analysis Memo 08/08/07. is no longer using the Nizamuddin Memorandum at Comment 23, and WBF • For the final results, the Department Furnitures Private Limited 2004–2005 Final Factor Valuation Memorandum. has corrected a conversion error in the financial statement in the calculation of Recalculation of Surrogate Values calculation of the surrogate values for the surrogate financial ratios. See Issues ‘‘WOODPLUG’’ and and Decision Memorandum. • For the final results, the Department ‘‘OKOUEMEVEMEER.’’ See Issues and • For the final results, the Department has recalculated surrogate values for the Decision Memorandum at Comments 41 is using the following additional polymers of styrene, cardboard, paint, and 42 and WBF Dare Group Final financial statements (not used in the and resin. See Issues and Decision Results Analysis Memo 08/08/07. preliminary results) to calculate Memorandum at Comments 10, 13, 14, • For the final results, the Department surrogate financial ratios: (1) 47, and 48 and WBF Final Factor is using data from a different HTS Nizamuddin Furnitures Private Limited Valuation Memorandum. category to calculate the surrogate value (2005–2006); (2) James Andrew Newton of ‘‘PIGMENT_O’’. See Issues and • For the final results, the Department Art Export Pvt. Ltd. (2004–2005); (3) Decision Memorandum at Comment 31 has calculated a surrogate value for Nikhil Decore Industries Pvt. Ltd. and WBF Dare Group Final Results mirrors using Glass Yug instead of the (2004–2005); and (4) Indian Furniture Analysis Memo 08/08/07. Products Limited (2005–2006). See Monthly Statistics of the Foreign Trade • For the final results, the Department Issues and Decision Memorandum at of India, Volume II: Imports. See is using updated quantity data Comment 17, and ‘‘First Administrative http://www.gtis.com/wta.htm, which we submitted by Dare Group and is no Review of Wooden Bedroom Furniture used for the preliminary results. See longer applying facts available to certain from the People’s Republic of China: Issues and Decision Memorandum at sales where Dare Group reported zero Factor Valuation Memorandum for the Comment 12 and WBF Final Factor quantity in gross unit kilograms. See Final Results’’ dated August 8, 2007 Valuation Memorandum. Issues and Decision Memorandum at (‘‘WBF Final Factor Valuation • For the final results, the Department Comment 39 and WBF Dare Group Final Memorandum’’). has recalculated the surrogate value for Results Analysis Memo 08/08/07. • For the final results, in the labor using the surrogate value of $0.83 • In the preliminary results, the calculation of Akriti Perfections India per hour instead of $0.97 per hour used Department used partial adverse facts Pvt. Ltd.’s surrogate financial ratios, the for the preliminary results. See Issues available (‘‘AFA’’) to value the indirect Department has reclassified and Decision Memorandum at Comment and packing labor which was not ‘‘Consumables’’ from raw material to 17 and WBF Final Factor Valuation reported for certain control numbers manufacturing overhead. See Issues and Memorandum. (‘‘CONNUMs’’). For the final results, the

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:26 Aug 21, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22AUN1.SGM 22AUN1 jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES 46960 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 22, 2007 / Notices

Department is continuing to apply as use in this review for the following Department reconsider its preliminary partial AFA the highest labor values reasons: (1) India is at a level of decision to deny them separate-rate reported by Dare Group for any economic development comparable to status. See Final Separate-Rates Memo. CONNUM. See ‘‘Application of Partial that of the PRC; (2) India is a significant Based on the information submitted Facts Available’’ section, below, the producer of comparable merchandise; in response to our post-preliminary Issues and Decision Memorandum at and (3) India provides the best supplemental questionnaires, we find Comment 38, and WBF Dare Group opportunity to use quality, publicly that Guangdong New Four Seas Final Results Analysis Memo 08/08/07. available data to value the factors of Furniture Manufacturing Ltd.; King Kei production (‘‘FOP’’). See Preliminary Furniture Factory/King Kei Trading Co., Fine Furniture Results, 72 FR at 6208. For the final Ltd./Jin Ching Trading Co. Ltd.; and Top • For the final results, the Department results, the Department has made no Art Furniture Factory/Sanxig Top Art has determined not to apply partial facts changes to its findings with respect to Funiture/Ngai Kun Trading have available with respect to certain of Fine the selection of a surrogate country. See provided sufficient information to Furniture’s sample sales. With respect Issues and Decision Memorandum at establish an absence of government to Fine Furniture’s sample sales, we are Comment 1. control and eligibility for separate-rate using Fine Furniture’s reported data in Separate Rates status. Therefore, the evidence placed our margin calculation. See ‘‘Analysis on the record of this administrative Memorandum for the Final Results of In proceedings involving NME review by these separate-rate the First Administrative Review of countries, the Department begins with a respondents demonstrates an absence of Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the rebuttable presumption that all government control, both in law and in People’s Republic of China: Fine companies within the country are fact, with respect to each of the Furniture (Shanghai) Limited’’ dated subject to government control and, thus, exporter’s exports of the subject August 8, 2007. should be assigned a single merchandise, in accordance with the antidumping duty deposit rate (‘‘PRC- Foshan Guanqiu criteria identified in Final wide rate’’). It is the Department’s Determination of Sales at Less Than • For the final results, the Department policy to assign all exporters of Fair Value: Sparklers from the People’s has recalculated surrogate values for merchandise subject to review in an Republic of China, 56 FR 20588 (May 6, resin and paint used by Foshan NME country this single rate unless an 1991), and Final Determination of Sales Guanqiu. See Issues and Decision exporter can demonstrate that it is free at Less Than Fair Value: Silicon Carbide Memorandum at Comments 47 and 48, of de jure (in law) and de facto (in fact) from the People’s Republic of China, 59 and ‘‘Analysis Memorandum for the control over its export decisions, so as FR 22585 (May 2,1994). As a result, for Final Results of the First Administrative to be entitled to a separate rate. the purposes of these final results, we In the Preliminary Results, the Review of Wooden Bedroom Furniture have granted separate rate status to the Department found that the mandatory from the People’s Republic of China: above-named separate-rate applicants respondents and numerous companies Foshan Guanqiu’’ dated August 8. 2007. that shipped wooden bedroom furniture which provided responses to the to the United States during the POR. Starcorp separate-rate application or separate-rate Additionally, we have granted a • For the preliminary results, we certification were eligible for a rate separate rate to other separate-rate calculated a dumping margin of 74.69 separate from the PRC-wide rate. See applicants.15 See Final Separate-Rates percent for Starcorp, using partial Preliminary Results, 72 FR at 6208, Memo. adverse facts available. However, for the 6210. For the final results, we have determined that additional companies final results, we are applying total AFA. 15 Ace Furniture & Crafts Ltd. (a.k.a. Deqing Ace See Adverse Facts Available section, qualify for separate-rate status. For a Furniture & Crafts Limited); Baigou Crafts Factory below. See also Issues and Decision complete listing of all the companies of Fengkai; Best King International Ltd.; Dalian Memorandum at Comment 63, and the that received a separate rate, see the Pretty Home Furniture; Decca Furniture Limited; Final Results Margins section, below. Der Cheng Wooden Works of Factory; Dongguan companion Memorandum regarding Dihao Furniture Co., Ltd.; Dongguan Hua Ban ‘‘Application of Adverse Facts Available See also, Memorandum regarding Furniture Co., Ltd.; Dongguan Mingsheng Furniture for Shanghai Starcorp Funiture Co., Ltd, ‘‘Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the Co., Ltd.; Dongguan New Technology Import & Starcorp Furniture (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., People’s Republic of China: Separate Export Co., Ltd.; Dongguan Sunpower Enterprise Rates for Producers/Exporters that Co., Ltd.; Dongguan Yihaiwei Furniture Limited; Orin Furniture (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Kalanter (Hong Kong) Furniture Company Limited; Shanghai Star Furniture Co., Ltd., and Submitted Separate Rate Certifications Foshan Guanqiu Furniture Co., Ltd.; Fujian Lianfu Shanghai Xing Ding Furniture Industrial and Applications’’ (‘‘Final Separate- Forestry Co., Ltd./Fujian Wonder Pacific Inc.; Co., Ltd. in the Final Results of Rates Memo’’), dated August 8, 2007. Furnmart Ltd.; Fuzhou Huan Mei Furniture Co. In the Preliminary Results, we did not Ltd.; Guangdong New Four Seas Furniture Antidumping Duty Administrative Manufacturing Ltd.; Guangzhou Lucky Furniture Review of Wooden Bedroom Furniture grant separate-rate status for 14 Co. Ltd.; Hong Yu Furniture (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd.; from the People’s Republic of China,’’ companies. See Preliminary Results 72 Hung Fai Wood Products Factory, Ltd.; Hwang Ho dated August 8, 2007 (‘‘Starcorp AFA FR at 6209, 6210. Of those, we stated International Holdings Limited; Jiangsu Dare Memorandum’’). that we would request additional Furniture Co, Ltd.; King Kei Furniture Factory; information from six applicants after the Kingwood Furniture Co. Ltd.; Meikangchi Nantong Surrogate Country Furniture Company Ltd.; Nantong Yangzi Furniture Preliminary Results, whereupon we Co., Ltd.; Po Ying Industrial Co.; Profit Force Ltd.; In the preliminary results, the would reevaluate their eligibility for a Qingdao Beiyuan-Shengli Furniture Co., Ltd.; Department stated that it treats the PRC separate rate for the final results. See Qingdao Shenchang Wooden Co., Ltd.; Red Apple Trading Co. Ltd.; Shanghai Aosen Furniture Co., as a non-market economy (‘‘NME’’) Preliminary Results 72 FR at 6210. Also, Ltd.; Starcorp Furniture Co., Ltd., Starcorp country, and therefore, the Department three additional companies (i.e., Furniture (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Orin Furniture calculated normal value in accordance Zhejiang Niannian Hong Industrial Co. (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Shanghai Star Furniture Co., with section 773(c) of the Act, which Ltd. (‘‘Nanaholy’’); Triple J Enterprises Ltd., and Shanghai Xing Ding Furniture Industrial Co., Ltd. (collectively ‘‘Starcorp’’); Shenyang Kunyu applies to NME countries. Also, the Co. Ltd. (‘‘Triple J’’), Zhongshan Winny Wood Industry Co., Ltd.; Shenzhen Dafuhao Department stated that it selected India Furniture Ltd. (‘‘Winny’’)) filed post- Industrial Development Co., Ltd.; Shenzhen Shen as the appropriate surrogate country to preliminary submissions asking that the Long Hang Industry Co., Ltd.; Sino Concord

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:26 Aug 21, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22AUN1.SGM 22AUN1 jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 22, 2007 / Notices 46961

Furthermore, we continue to find that withholds information that has been its FOP consumption in units of the following separate-rate applicants requested, (B) fails to provide measure in a manner that does not allow have not demonstrated an absence of information within the deadlines the Department to identify the actual government control over their export established, or in the form and manner consumption rates or calculate the value activities, both in law and in fact: requested by the Department, subject to for the FOP consumed in the production Conghua J. L. George Timber & Co. Ltd. subsections (c)(1) and (e) of section 782, of subject merchandise, thereby (‘‘Conghua’’); Zhongshan Youcheng (C) significantly impedes a proceeding, significantly impeding the proceeding, Wooden Arts & Crafts Co., Ltd. (‘‘ZY or (D) provides information that cannot resulting in the sales and FOP data Wooden’’) and Macau Youcheng be verified as provided by section 782(i) being unverifiable. See Preliminary Trading Co. (‘‘MY Trading’’) of the Act. Results, 72 FR at 6212–13. We also (collectively, ‘‘ZY Wooden/MY Where the Department determines determined that First Wood did not act Trading’’); Kunwa Enterprise Company that a response to a request for ‘‘to the best of its ability,’’ as required (‘‘Kunwa’’), Nanaholy; Triple J, Winny, information does not comply with the by the statute. See Preliminary Results, Kong Fong Art Factory and Kong Fong request, section 782(d) of the Act 72 FR at 6212–13. Thus, based on First Mao Iek Hong (‘‘Kong Fong’’), Putian Ou provides that the Department will so Wood’s actions, we preliminarily Dian Furniture Co., Ltd. (‘‘Putian’’), and inform the party submitting the determined that it failed to cooperate to Speedy International, Ltd. (‘‘Speedy’’). response and will, to the extent the best of its ability in responding to Therefore, we determine that Conghua, practicable, provide that party the the Department’s requests for Kunwa, Nanaholy, Triple J, Winny, ZY opportunity to remedy or explain the information. Therefore, we Wooden/MY Trading, Kong Fong, deficiency. If the party fails to remedy preliminarily determined that, when Putian, and Speedy are part of the PRC- the deficiency within the applicable selecting from among the facts wide entity and, therefore, do not time limits and subject to section 782(e) otherwise available, an adverse qualify for a separate rate and will be of the Act, the Department may inference is warranted for First Wood subject to PRC-wide rate. See Final disregard all or part of the original and pursuant to section 776(b) of the Act. Separate-Rates Memo. subsequent responses, as appropriate. See Preliminary Results, 72 FR at 6212, The margin we calculated in the Section 782(e) of the Act provides that 6213. For the final results, we have Preliminary Results for these separate- the Department ‘‘shall not decline to made no changes to our findings with rate companies was 62.94 percent. consider information that is submitted respect to First Wood’s total AFA Because the rates of the selected by an interested party and is necessary determination. See Issues and Decision mandatory respondents have changed to the determination but does not meet Memorandum at Comments 43 and 44. since the Preliminary Results, we have all applicable requirements established Huanghouse recalculated the rate for Separate-Rate by the administering authority’’ if the Applicants. The final rate is 35.38 information is timely, can be verified, is In the Preliminary Results, we percent. See Memorandum to the File not so incomplete that it cannot be used, determined that because Huanghouse from Eugene Degnan, ‘‘Calculation of and if the interested party acted to the ceased participating in the new shipper Separate Rate,’’ dated August 8, 2007. best of its ability in providing the review, and none of its submitted information. Where all of these information could be verified, Affiliation conditions are met, the statute requires Huanghouse did not demonstrate its In the Preliminary Results, we stated the Department to use the information if entitlement to a separate rate and was, Fujian Lianfu Forestry Co. Ltd./Fujian it can do so without undue difficulties. therefore, subject to the PRC-wide rate. Wonder Pacific Inc./Fuzhou Huan Mei Section 776(b) of the Act further See Preliminary Results, 72 FR at 6212– Furniture Co., Ltd./Jiangsu Dare provides that the Department may use 13. For the final results, we made no Furniture Co., Ltd., collectively, (‘‘Dare an adverse inference in applying the changes to our findings with respect to Group’’) were affiliated pursuant to facts otherwise available when a party Huanghouse’s determination. sections 771(33)(A), (E) and (F) of the has failed to cooperate by not acting to Kong Fong Art Factory and Kong Fong Act and that these companies should be the best of its ability to comply with a Mao Iek Hong treated as a single entity for the request for information. Section 776(b) In the Preliminary Results, we purposes of the antidumping of the Act also authorizes the determined that because Kong Fong administrative review of wooden Department to use as AFA information ceased participating in the bedroom furniture from the PRC. See derived from the petition, the final administrative review and would not Preliminary Results, 72 FR at 6208. For determination, a previous provide a response to the Department’s the final results, we have made no administrative review, or other supplemental questionnaire, Kong Fong changes to our findings with respect to information placed on the record. Dare Group’s affiliation. did not demonstrate its entitlement to a Application of Facts Available separate rate and was, therefore, subject Adverse Facts Available to the PRC-wide rate. See Preliminary First Wood Sections 776(a)(1) and (2) of the Act Results, 72 FR at 6210–12. For the final In the Preliminary Results, we provide that the Department shall apply results, we made no changes to our determined pursuant to sections ‘‘facts otherwise available’’ if necessary findings with respect to Huanghouse’s 776(a)(1), 776(a)(2), and 776(b) of the information is not on the record or an determination. Act to apply AFA to First Wood in the interested party or any other person (A) new shipper review because First Wood: Putian Ou Dian Furniture Co., Ltd. International Corporation; T.J. Maxx International withheld the sales and cost In the Preliminary Results, we Co. Ltd.; Top Art Furniture Factory/Sanxig Top Art reconciliations as well as extensive determined that because Putian Funiture/Ngai Kun Trading; Top Goal Development factors of production (‘‘FOP’’) data submitted a withdrawal of its request for Co.; Transworld (Zhangzhou) Furniture Co. Ltd.; requested by the Department; failed to the administrative review after the 90- Wan Bao Chen Group Hong Kong Co. Ltd.; Winmost Enterprises Limited; Xilinmen Group Co. Ltd.; provide the units of measure for its FOP day regulatory deadline (i.e., November Yongxin Industrial (Holdings) Limited; Zhongshan consumption in a form or manner 30, 2006), and stated that it would not Gainwell Furniture Co. Ltd. requested by the Department; reported provide a response to the Department’s

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:26 Aug 21, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22AUN1.SGM 22AUN1 jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES 46962 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 22, 2007 / Notices

supplemental questionnaire. Thus Issues and Decision Memorandum. Finally, there remain significant Putian stopped participating in this These failures significantly impeded the discrepancies between Starcorp’s review, did not demonstrate its Department’s ability to comprehend and numerous data files and the narrative entitlement to a separate rate and was, analyze Starcorp’s data adequately descriptions Starcorp provided therefore, subject to the PRC-wide rate. within the Department’s statutory purporting to explain those data files. See Preliminary Results, 72 FR at 6211– timeframe. As a result of Starcorp’s For example, there are inconsistencies 12. For the final results, we made no repeated misreporting and failure to related to: which unique products were changes to our findings with respect to provide information that was responsive not sold during the POR and which Putian’s determination. to the Department’s requests, the FOPs were therefore based on proxy Department’s ability to calculate FOP data; Starcorp’s reported Speedy International, Ltd. accurate margins for a significant production quantities for sets, In the Preliminary Results, we portion of Starcorp’s sales was notwithstanding Starcorp’s repeated determined that because Speedy compromised. statements that it does not produce sets; International, Ltd. (‘‘Speedy’’) failed to Starcorp further impeded the and Starcorp’s inclusion of the same support its claim that its owner was a Department’s ability to calculate product in the FOP buildups for more citizen of Taiwan, and did not complete accurate margins as a direct result of its than one CONNUM. the sections of the separate rate failure to provide, in the form and Based on the analysis above, for the application for NME owned entities, manner requested by the Department final results, we applied facts available thus, Speedy did not demonstrate its and within the Department’s established pursuant to sections 776(a)(2)(A), (B), entitlement to a separate rate and was, deadlines, the information that would and (C) of the Act with respect to therefore, subject to the PRC-wide rate. have served as the basis of the Starcorp’s sales. Furthermore, it is See Preliminary Results, 72 FR at 6211– Department’s analysis, pursuant to apparent from the facts on the record, 12. For the final results, we have made sections 776(a)(2)(B) and (C) of the Act. i.e., Starcorp’s repeated no changes to our findings with respect Specifically, and as discussed in great unresponsiveness to information to Speedy’s determination. detail in the Starcorp AFA requests, its repeated failure to provide Starcorp Memorandum, Starcorp did not provide requested data in a timely manner, its plant-specific plant data until very late withholding of its methodology to The Department finds that the in the proceeding, and did not disclose determine the product-specific source of information necessary to calculate an that these data do not contain FOPs for proxy FOP data, and the significant accurate and reliable margin is not all of the CONNUMs correlating to its level of inconsistencies and available on the record with respect to U.S. sales (i.e., the plant-specific contradictions in its data and narrative Starcorp. See Issues and Decision Memo databases did not contain the requisite submissions (including information at Comment 63; and Starcorp AFA data for calculating normal values for all obtained at verification), that Starcorp Memorandum. Specifically, Starcorp of Starcorp’s U.S. sales and thus do not did not act as a reasonable respondent has significantly impeded the contain the data necessary to calculate because its failure to be responsive was Department’s ability to calculate a dumping margin for those sales). unnecessary. See Starcorp AFA accurate margins for a significant Despite having numerous opportunities Memorandum. Thus, we find that percentage of its U.S. sales as a direct to provide the plant-specific and Starcorp failed to cooperate by not result of its misreporting and weighted-average data in a timely acting to the best of its ability. For this withholding of information that would manner, as evidenced by the reason, we find it appropriate that an have served as the basis for the Department’s numerous supplemental adverse inference be applied when Department’s analysis. Therefore, we questionnaires addressing deficiencies selecting from among the facts available find use of facts available appropriate in Starcorp’s responses, Starcorp did not in accordance with section 776(b) of the pursuant to sections 776(a)(2)(A), (B) do so. Thus, as explained in detail in Act. and (C) of the Act, and as discussed in the Starcorp AFA Memorandum, the As AFA we are applying a rate of extensive detail in the Starcorp AFA facts on the record lead the Department 216.01 percent, the rate calculated for a Memorandum. Despite having to the conclusion that Starcorp failed to respondent in the most recently numerous opportunities to provide the provide forthcoming responses in a completed new shipper reviews of Department with requested information timely manner to the Department’s wooden bedroom furniture from the with respect to merchandise sold but numerous direct requests, and this PRC, covering the first 12 months of this not produced during the POR, the facts failure significantly impeded the administrative review. See Final Results on the record lead the Department to the Department’s ability to comprehend and of the 2004–2005 Semi-Annual New conclusion that Starcorp did not act as analyze Starcorp’s data adequately Shipper Reviews: Wooden Bedroom a reasonable respondent by withholding within the Department’s statutory time Furniture from the People’s Republic of certain information necessary to frame. As a result, the Department’s China, 71 FR 70739 (December 6, 2006) calculate an accurate margin (i.e., it ability to calculate accurate margins for (‘‘04–05 New Shipper Reviews’’). This failed to disclose the methodology it any of Starcorp’s sales was represents the highest rate from the used to derive its proxy FOPs for compromised. history of this proceeding. merchandise sold but not produced Further, the Department also found during the POR (i.e., proxy FOPs) and Starcorp’s financial statements to be Application of Partial Facts Available failed to provide forthcoming responses unreliable. See Comment 56 of the Sections 776(a)(2)(A) and (B) of the in a timely manner to the Department’s Issues and Decision Memorandum and Act provide for the use of facts available numerous direct questions regarding its the Starcorp AFA Memo. Because the when an interested party withholds reporting methodology (i.e., use of Department finds that Starcorp’s information that has been requested by proxy FOPs and use of sales quantities submitted information cannot be tied to the Department or when an interested instead of production quantities to reliable financial statements or a reliable party fails to provide the information weight certain FOPs within numerous financial recording system, the requested in a timely manner and in the CONNUMs)). See Starcorp AFA Department must conclude that any form required. Additionally, section Memorandum and Comment 63 of the submitted data are also not reliable. 776(b) of the Act provides for the use of

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:26 Aug 21, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22AUN1.SGM 22AUN1 jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 22, 2007 / Notices 46963

AFA when an interested party has failed sources used to corroborate such section 776(c) that secondary to cooperate by not acting to the best of evidence may include, for example, information have probative value. As a its ability. We have concluded that the published price lists, official import result, the Department determines that Dare Group did not cooperate to the best statistics and customs data, and the margin is corroborated for the of its ability. information obtained from interested purposes of this administrative review parties during the particular Dare Group and may reasonably be applied to First investigation or review. See 19 CFR Wood, Huanghouse, Kong Fong, Putian, Because the Dare Group did not 351.308(d). Speedy, and Starcorp, and the PRC-wide provide complete information with The AFA rate that the Department is entity as AFA. respect to indirect and packing labor for now using was determined in the certain CONNUMs, as requested in the recently published new shipper review. The PRC-Wide Rate Department’s questionnaires, we See 04–05 New Shipper Reviews 71 FR preliminarily determined that the use of at 70741. In that new shipper review, Because we begin with the an adverse inference was warranted to the Department calculated a company- presumption that all companies within value these FOPs. See Preliminary specific rate of 216.01 percent, which an NME country are subject to Results, 72 FR at 6214. For the final was above the PRC-wide rate government control and because only results, we have determined to continue established in the less-than-fair-value the companies listed under these ‘‘Final to apply sections 776(a)(2)(A), (a)(2)(B), investigation. Because this new rate is a Results Margins’’ section, below, have and (b) of the Act because the Dare company-specific calculated rate overcome that presumption, we are Group did not provide us with the concerning subject merchandise, we applying a single antidumping rate (i.e., information we requested. Therefore, in have determined this rate to be reliable. the PRC-wide rate) to all other exporters accordance with sections 776(a)(2) and With respect to the relevance aspect of subject merchandise from the PRC. (b) of the Act, we have applied partial of corroboration, the Department will Such companies did not demonstrate AFA in calculating the Dare Group’s consider information reasonably at its entitlement to a separate rate. See e.g., margin. For each CONNUM for which disposal to determine whether a margin Notice of Final Determination of Sales zero labor hours were reported, we have continues to have relevance. Where at Less Than Fair Value: Synthetic applied the highest labor hour value for circumstances indicate that the selected Indigo from the People’s Republic of any CONNUM reported in the Dare margin is not appropriate as AFA, the China, 65 FR 25706, 25707 (May 3, Group’s FOP database. See Issues and Department will disregard the margin 2000). The PRC-wide rate applies to all Decision Memorandum at Comment 38. and determine an appropriate margin. entries of subject merchandise except For example, in Fresh Cut Flowers From Corroboration for entries from the respondents that are Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping Section 776(c) of the Act provides Duty Administrative Review, 61 FR 6812 listed in the ‘‘Final Results Margins’’ that, when the Department relies on (February 22, 1996), the Department section, below (except as noted). secondary information rather than on disregarded the highest margin in that The Department based the margin for information obtained in the course of an case as adverse best information the PRC-wide entity on adverse facts investigation or review, it shall, to the available (the predecessor to facts available. See Preliminary Results, 72 extent practicable, corroborate that available), because the margin was FR at 6212, 6214. Pursuant to section information from independent sources based on another company’s 776(a) of the Act, the Department found that are reasonably at its disposal. uncharacteristic business expense that because the PRC-wide entity failed Secondary information is information resulting in an unusually high margin. to respond to the Department’s derived from the petition that gave rise Similarly, the Department does not questionnaires, withheld or failed to to the investigation or review, the final apply a margin that has been provide information in a timely manner determination concerning the subject discredited. See D&L Supply Co. v. or in the form or manner requested by merchandise, or any previous review United States, 113 F.3d 1220, 1221 (Fed. the Department, submitted information under section 751 concerning the Cir. 1997) where the Court ruled that the subject merchandise. See e.g., Statement that could not be verified, or otherwise Department will not use a margin that impeded the process, it was appropriate of Administration Action accompanying has been judicially invalidated. Nothing the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, to apply a dumping margin for the PRC- on the record of this review calls into wide entity using facts otherwise H.R. Rep. No. 103–316, (1994) (SAA) at question the relevance of the margin available on the record. The Department 870. Corroborate means that the selected as AFA. Further, the selected further determined that an adverse Department will satisfy itself that the margin is a company-specific calculated inference was appropriate because the secondary information to be used has rate for another respondent for a period probative value. To corroborate covering 12 months (i.e., June 24, 2004, PRC-wide entity failed to respond to secondary information, the Department through June 30, 2005) of this 18-month requests for information and therefore will, to the extent practicable, examine administrative review. Moreover, this failed to cooperate by not acting to the the reliability and relevance of the rate has not been invalidated judicially, best of its ability. As AFA we are information to be used. See e.g., and falls within the range of margins applying the highest calculated rate Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts calculated for another respondent in from the history of this proceeding, a Thereof, Finished and Unfinished from this review. Therefore, it is appropriate rate calculated for a respondent in the Japan, and Tapered Roller Bearings, to use the selected rate as AFA and we most recently completed new shipper Four Inches or Less in Outside have determined the 216.01 percent rate reviews of wooden bedroom furniture Diameter, and Components Thereof, to be relevant for use in this from the PRC, covering the first 12 from Japan; Preliminary Results of administrative review. months of this administrative review. Antidumping Duty Administrative As the adverse margin is both reliable See Wooden Bedroom Furniture from Reviews and Partial Termination of and relevant, we determine that it has the People ’s Republic of China: Final Administrative Reviews, 61 FR 57391, probative value. Accordingly, we Results of the 2004–2005 Semi-Annual 57392 (November 6, 1996) (unchanged determine that this rate meets the New Shipper Reviews, 71 FR 70739 in the final determination). Independent corroboration criteria established in (December 6, 2006).

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:26 Aug 21, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22AUN1.SGM 22AUN1 jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES 46964 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 22, 2007 / Notices

Final Results Margins We determine that the following percentage weighted-average margins exist for the POR:

WOODEN BEDROOM FURNITURE FROM THE PRC

Weighted-average Producer/exporter margin (percent)

Fujian Lianfu Forestry Co. Ltd /Fujian Wonder Pacific Inc. (Dare Group) ...... 48.97 Fuzhou Huan Mei Furniture Co., Ltd (Dare Group) ...... 48.97 Jiangsu Dare Furniture Co., Ltd (Dare Group) ...... 48.97 Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Limited ...... 1.97 Foshan Guanqiu Furniture Co., Ltd ...... 11.72 Shanghai Aosen Furniture Co., Ltd ...... 0.53 Starcorp Funiture Co., Ltd, Starcorp Furniture (Shanghai) Co., Ltd, Orin Furniture (Shanghai) Co., Ltd, Shanghai Star Furniture Co., Ltd, and Shanghai Xing Ding Furniture Industrial Co., Ltd * ...... 216.01 Tianjin First Wood Co., Ltd ...... 216.01 Ace Furniture & Crafts Ltd (a.k.a. Deqing Ace Furniture and Crafts Limited) ...... 35.38 Baigou Crafts Factory of Fengkai ...... 35.38 Best King International Ltd ...... 35.38 Dalian Pretty Home Furniture ...... 35.38 Decca Furniture Limited ...... 35.38 Der Cheng Wooden Works of Factory ...... 35.38 Dongguan Dihao Furniture Co., Ltd ...... 35.38 Dongguan Hua Ban Furniture Co., Ltd ...... 35.38 Dongguan Mingsheng Furniture Co., Ltd ...... 35.38 Dongguan New Technology Import & Export Co., Ltd ...... 35.38 Dongguan Sunpower Enterprise Co., Ltd ...... 35.38 Dongguan Yihaiwei Furniture Limited ...... 35.38 Kalanter (Hong Kong) Furniture Company Limited ...... 35.38 Furnmart Ltd ...... 35.38 Guangdong New Four Seas Furniture Manufacturing Ltd ...... 35.38 Guangzhou Lucky Furniture Co. Ltd ...... 35.38 Hong Yu Furniture (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd ...... 35.38 Hung Fai Wood Products Factory, Ltd ...... 35.38 Hwang Ho International Holdings Limited ...... 35.38 King Kei Furniture Factory ...... 35.38 King Wood Furniture Co., Ltd ...... 35.38 Meikangchi Nantong Furniture Company Ltd ...... 35.38 Nantong Yangzi Furniture Co., Ltd ...... 35.38 Po Ying Industrial Co...... 35.38 Profit Force Ltd ...... 35.38 Qingdao Beiyuan-Shengli Furniture Co., Ltd ...... 35.38 Qingdao Shenchang Wooden Co., Ltd ...... 35.38 Red Apple Trading Co. Ltd ...... 35.38 Shenyang Kunyu Wood Industry Co., Ltd ...... 35.38 Shenzhen Dafuhao Industrial Development Co., Ltd ...... 35.38 Shenzhen Shen Long Hang Industry Co., Ltd ...... 35.38 Sino Concord International Corporation ...... 35.38 T.J. Maxx International Co., Ltd ...... 35.38 Top Art Furniture Factory/Sanxiang Top Art Funiture/Ngai Kun Trading ...... 35.38 Top Goal Development Co...... 35.38 Transworld (Zhangzhou) Furniture Co. Ltd ...... 35.38 Wan Bao Chen Group Hong Kong Co. Ltd ...... 35.38 Winmost Enterprises Limited ...... 35.38 Xilinmen Group Co. Ltd ...... 35.38 Yongxin Industrial (Holdings) Limited ...... 35.38 Zhongshan Gainwell Furniture Co. Ltd ...... 35.38 PRC-Wide Rate ...... 216.01 Starcorp is not subject to the PRC-wide rate.

Assessment Rates based on the ratio of the total amount of based on customer/importer-specific ad The Department has determined, and antidumping duties calculated for the valorem rates in accordance with 19 U.S. Customs and Border Protection examined sales of subject merchandise CFR 351.212(b)(1). For the companies (‘‘CBP’’) shall assess, antidumping to the total quantity of subject receiving a separate rate that were not duties on all appropriate entries. For merchandise sold in those transactions. selected for individual review (i.e., customers/importers of respondents that For customers/importers of respondents separate rate companies) we will did not report entered value, we that reported entered value, we calculate an assessment rate based on calculated customer/importer-specific calculated customer-specific the weighted average of the cash deposit antidumping duty assessment amounts antidumping duty assessment amounts rates calculated for the companies

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:26 Aug 21, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22AUN1.SGM 22AUN1 jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 22, 2007 / Notices 46965

selected for individual review excluding of the proceeding. Timely written C. Huzaifa (2005–2006) any that are zero, de minimis, or based notification of the return/destruction of D. IFP (2004–2005 and 2005–2006) entirely on AFA pursuant to section APO materials or conversion to judicial E. Imperial (2006) 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act. The Department protective order is hereby requested. F. Jayabharatham (2006) G. Newton (2005) intends to issue assessment instructions Failure to comply with the regulations H. Nikhil (2005) to CBP within 15 days after the date of and terms of an APO is a violation I. Nizamuddin (2005–2006) publication of these final results of which is subject to sanction. J. Raghbir (2004–2005 & 2005–2006) administrative and new shippers Disclosure K. Usha Shriram (2005 & 2006) review. Comment 18: Treatment of Polish, Contract We will disclose the calculations Manufacturing, and Manufacturing Glass Cash Deposit Requirements performed within five days of the date in Ahuja’s Financial Statement The following cash deposit of publication of this notice to parties in Comment 19: Treatment of Job Work requirements will be effective upon this proceeding in accordance with 19 Expense in Huzaifa and IFP’s Financial publication of these final results of this CFR 351.224(b). Statement administrative review and new shippers Comment 20: Treatment of Labor-Related We are issuing and publishing this Expenses in Multiple Surrogate for all shipments of the subject determination and notice in accordance Financial Statement merchandise entered, or withdrawn with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of Comment 21: Treatment of Consumables in from warehouse, for consumption on or the Act. Akriti’s Financial Statement after the publication date, as provided Dated: August 15, 2007. Comment 22: Treatment of ‘‘Designing for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) Charges,’’ Consumables, and Profit on David M. Spooner, For the exporters listed above, the cash Sale of Assets in Imperial’s 2004–2005 deposit rate will be the rates shown for Assistant Secretary for Import Financial Statements Administration. those companies (except if the rate is de Comment 23: Treatment of Nizamuddin’s minimis, i.e., less than 0.5 percent, no Appendix 2004–2005 Financial Statement and Treatment of Manufacturing Charges cash deposit will be required for that Issues in the Issues and Decision Labour in Nizamuddin’s 2005–2006 company); (2) for previously Memorandum Financial Statement investigated or reviewed PRC and non- I. General Issues Comment 24: Use of 2004–2005 Data from PRC exporters not listed above that have Comment 1: Surrogate Country Selection Jayabharathan’s 2005–2006 Financial separate rates, the cash deposit rate will A. Economic Comparability Statements continue to be the exporter-specific rate B. Significant Producer Comment 25: Treatment of Octroi Expenses published for the most recent period; (3) C. Data Considerations in Huzaifa’s Financial Statement for all PRC exporters of subject D. Burden and Predictability Comment 26: Allocation of Aggregated merchandise which have not been Comment 2: Labor Rate Methodology Personnel Expenses in the Calculation of found to be entitled to a separate rate, Comment 3: Application of the 33 Percent Surrogate Financial Ratios Based on ASI Threshold for Market Economy Data the cash deposit rate will be the PRC- Comment 27: Allocation of Aggregated wide rate of 216.01 percent; and (4) for Purchases Comment 4: Zeroing Personnel Expenses in the Calculation of all non-PRC exporters of subject Comment 5: Department Should Apply Surrogate Financial Ratios Based on merchandise which have not received Combination Rates to Separate Rate Record Financial Statements their own rate, the cash deposit rate will Companies III. Aosen-Specific Issues be the rate applicable to the PRC Comment 6: Use of Values Versus Comment 28: Application of Partial AFA exporters that supplied that non-PRC Quantities To Determine the Weighted- for Nails exporter. These deposit requirements Average Separate Rate Margin Comment 29: HTS Classification for shall remain in effect until further Comment 7: Incorporation of Zero, De ‘‘PLYWOOD,’’ ‘‘MDBD,’’ ‘‘PINE,’’ ‘‘ASHVEN,’’ ‘‘EXPLYSHT,’’ and notice. Minimis, and Total Adverse Facts Available Margins in Non-selected ‘‘POLYFOAM’’ Notification of Interested Parties Respondents’ Rate IV. Baigou Crafts Comment 8: Standard for Accepting Comment 30: Application of Total AFA to This notice also serves as a final Respondents Factor Descriptions and Baigou Crafts reminder to importers of their Appropriate Harmonized Tariff Schedule V. Dare Group-Specific Issues responsibility under 19 CFR of India Categories Comment 31: HTS Classification for 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate Comment 9: Time Period Used To ‘‘PIGMENT_O’’ regarding the reimbursement of Calculate Surrogate Values Comment 32: HTS Classification for antidumping duties prior to liquidation Comment 10: Ministerial Error in the ‘‘CURVINGWOODY’’ and of the relevant entries during this Valuation of Polymers of Styrene ‘‘VENEERPLY’’ review period. Failure to comply with Comment 11: Exclusion of Myanmar and Comment 33: HTS Classification for Bhutan Data in the Surrogate Value ‘‘WOODSALICACEAE’’ this requirement could result in the Calculation for Plywood Comment 34: HTS Classification for Box/ Secretary’s presumption that Comment 12: Surrogate Value Source for Carton reimbursement of the antidumping Mirrors Comment 35: Unit of Measure for duties occurred and the subsequent Comment 13: HTS Classification for ‘‘TURNINGDY’’ assessment of double antidumping Corrugated Paper Comment 36: Assessment Rate duties. Comment 14: HTS Classification for Calculations This notice also serves as a reminder Cardboard Comment 37: Certain Non-Scope to parties subject to administrative Comment 15: Surrogate Value Source for Merchandise Should be Excluded from protective orders (‘‘APOs’’) of their Electricity the Margin Calculation responsibility concerning the return or Comment 16: Electricity and Coal Inflator Comment 38: Post Preliminary Results II. Surrogate Financial Ratio Issues Updated FOP database to Reflect destruction of proprietary information Comment 17: Use of Certain Financial Correction for Previously Unreported disclosed under the APO in accordance Statements for the Calculation of Labor Hours Data with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which Surrogate Financial Ratios Comment 39: Updated Sales Database continues to govern business A. Ahuja Which Includes Previously Unreported proprietary information in this segment B. Evergreen Weight Information

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:26 Aug 21, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22AUN1.SGM 22AUN1 jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES 46966 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 22, 2007 / Notices

Comment 40: Use of Material-Specific SUMMARY: The Department of IV. Request for Comments Conversion Rate for FIBERBOARDMD, Commerce, as part of its continuing PAPEREDFIBERBOARDMD, and Comments are invited on: (a) Whether effort to reduce paperwork and the proposed collection of information FIBERBOARDPACKING respondent burden, invites the general Comment 41: WOODPLUG—Clerical Error is necessary for the proper performance Allegation public and other Federal agencies to of the functions of the agency, including Comment 42: OKOUEMEVEMEER— take this opportunity to comment on whether the information shall have Clerical Error Allegation proposed and/or continuing information practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the VI. First Wood-Specific Issues collections, as required by the agency’s estimate of the burden Comment 43: Rescission of First Wood’s Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. (including hours and cost) of the New Shipper Review is Consistent With DATES: Written comments must be proposed collection of information; (c) Department Precedent submitted on or before October 22, ways to enhance the quality, utility, and VII. Guanqiu-Specific Issues 2007. Comment 44: HTS Classification for clarity of the information to be Plywood ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments collected; and (d) ways to minimize the Comment 45: HTS Classification for MDF to Diana Hynek, Departmental burden of the collection of information Comment 46: HTS Classification for Resin Paperwork Clearance Officer, on respondents. Comment 47: HTS Classification for Paint Department of Commerce, Room 6625, Comments submitted in response to Comment 48: Surrogate Value Selection for 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., this notice will be summarized and/or Ocean Freight included in the request for OMB VIII. Starcorp-Specific Issues Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at [email protected]). approval of this information collection; Comment 49: Total Labor Hour they also will become a matter of public Consumption FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Comment 50: Market Economy Purchases, Requests for additional information or record. Wood Materials and Wood Screws copies of the information collection Dated: August 16, 2007. Comment 51: Department’s Conduct at instrument and instructions should be Gwellnar Banks, Verification directed to David Enabnit, 301– Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Comment 52: Timing of Verification 71302770 x132, Information Officer. Outline Comment 53: Appropriateness of Plant- [email protected]. [FR Doc. E7–16543 Filed 8–21–07; 8:45 am] Specific versus Combined FOP Data and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: BILLING CODE 3510–JE–P Valuation of the Appropriate Data Comment 54: Application of Partial I. Abstract Adverse Facts Available for CONNUMs The National Oceanic and DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Consisting of Sets and ‘‘Sold But Not Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Produced’’ was mandated to develop and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Comment 55: Starcorp’s Financial Administration Statements implement a quality assurance program Comment 56: Raw Material Consumption under which the Administrator may RIN 0648–XB42 Methodology certify privately-made hydrographic Comment 57: Non-Wood Materials products. The Administrator fulfilled Endangered and Threatened Species; Comment 58: Valuation of Thinner this mandate by establishing procedures Recovery Plans Comment 59: Electricity by which hydrographic products are AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Comment 60: Packing Materials proposed for certification; by which Comment 61: Minor Corrections Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and standards and compliance tests are Atmospheric Administration, Comment 62: Application of Total Adverse developed, adopted, and applied for Facts Available Commerce. those products; and by which IX. Separate Rate Company-Specific Issues ACTION: Notice of availability; recovery certification is awarded or denied. Comment 63: Separate-Rate Status for New plan and 5-year review for the Hawaiian These procedures are now 15 CFR part Four Seas monk seal. Comment 64: Separate-Rate Status for 996. The application and recordkeeping Winny and Triple J requirements at 15 CFR part 996 are SUMMARY: The National Marine Comment 65: Separate-Rate Status for ZY basis for this collection of information. Fisheries Service (NMFS) announces the Wooden/MY Trading II. Method of Collection adoption of an Endangered Species Act [FR Doc. E7–16584 Filed 8–21–07; 8:45 am] (ESA) Recovery Plan (Recovery Plan) Paper applications and electronic BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P and 5-year review for the Hawaiian reports are required from participants. monk seal (Monachus schauinslandi). Methods of submittal include mail, The Recovery Plan contains revisions DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Internet, and facsimile transmission of and additions in consideration of public paper forms. comments on the proposed draft National Oceanic and Atmospheric III. Data Recovery Plan for the Hawaiian Monk Administration Seal. This is the first 5-year review OMB Number: 0648–0507. Proposed Information Collection; Form Number: None. completed for the Hawaiian monk seal. Comment Request; Certification Type of Review: Regular submission. ADDRESSES: Additional information Requirements for NOAA’s Affected Public: Business or other for- about the Recovery Plan and 5-year Hydrographic Product Quality profit. review may be obtained by writing to Assurance Program Estimated Number of Respondents: 2. Dr. Michelle Yuen, National Marine Estimated Time per Response: 4 Fisheries Service, Pacific Islands AGENCY: National Oceanic and hours. Regional Office, Protected Resources Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Estimated Total Annual Burden Division, 1601 Kapiolani Boulevard Commerce. Hours: 24. Suite 1110, Honolulu, HI, 96814 or send Estimated Total Annual Cost to an electronic message to ACTION: Notice. Public: $0. [email protected].

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:26 Aug 21, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22AUN1.SGM 22AUN1 jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES