DOCSLIB.ORG

Cephalopods of the Broad Caribbean: Distribution, Abundance, and Ecological Importance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cephalopods of the Broad Caribbean: Distribution, Abundance, and Ecological Importance University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 6-10-2009 Cephalopods of the Broad Caribbean: Distribution, Abundance, and Ecological Importance Heather L. Judkins University of South Florida Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons Scholar Commons Citation Judkins, Heather L., "Cephalopods of the Broad Caribbean: Distribution, Abundance, and Ecological Importance" (2009). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/2034 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cephalopods of the Broad Caribbean: Distribution, Abundance, and Ecological Importance by Heather L. Judkins A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy College of Marine Science University of South Florida Co-Major Professor: Joseph Torres, Ph.D. Co-Major Professor: Michael Vecchione, Ph.D. Susan Bell, Ph.D. David Mann, Ph.D. Mark Luther, Ph.D. Date of Approval: June 10, 2009 Keywords: mollusca, Caribbean diversity, biogeography, latitudinal gradients, coastal Atlantic Ocean ©Copyright 2009, Heather L. Judkins ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to acknowledge the team of people who have helped me through this process. Dr. Joseph Torres, Dr. Michael Vecchione, and my entire committee, Dr. Susan Bell, Dr. David Mann, and Dr. Mark Luther, have been instrumental in terms of advice, pathways to follow, and excellent sounding boards for my many questions. I would like to acknowledge Dr. Clyde Roper for his foresight in seeing that I had potential to add a small part of research to the cephalopod scientific community and his words of wisdom and encouragement throughout this entire venture. I would like to thank Dr. Nancy Voss for her advice and guidance in understanding of cephalopod species of the Broad Caribbean. Her assistance in my work is beyond compare. Dr. Ronald B. Toll and Dr. Steven C. Hess were instrumental in documenting cephalopod specimen information from the Hourglass Cruises that were conducted from 1965 through 1967, by the Marine Research Laboratory of the Florida Board of Conservation on the continental shelf of the Gulf of Mexico which was included in my dissertation. I also thank Teresa Greely and Angela Lodge for their assistance throughout the two years of my GK12 Oceans Fellowship and the opportunity to coordinate the regional competition for the National Ocean Sciences Bowl that I have been so excited to be a part of for the College of Marine Science at USF. Lastly, I wouldn’t be where I am without the unfailing support and constant source of smiles from my family and friends who have been there through the ups and downs of my journey. Thank you. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS i LIST OF TABLES iii LIST OF FIGURES iv ABSTRACT v CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Broad Caribbean 1 1.2 Cephalopod Biology 3 1.3 Distribution of Cephalopods 4 1.4 Abundance of Cephalopods 4 1.5 Cephalopods in Food Webs 5 1.6 Overall Significance 7 1.7 Study Goals 8 1.8. Study Area 9 1.9 Materials and Methods 9 1.10 References 13 CHAPTER 2. BIOGEOGRAPHY OF CEPHALOPODS OF THE BROAD CARIBBEAN 16 2.1 Introduction 16 Broad Caribbean 16 The Cephalopods 18 Biogeography of Cephalopods 18 Abundance of Cephalopods 21 Ecological Focus 21 Study Area 24 2.2 Materials and Methods 24 Statistical analysis 26 2.3 Results 27 Rapoport’s Rule and Species Richness 27 Cephalopod Biogeography 28 Distribution and Abundance 29 Range Extensions 29 New Species to Area 38 2.4 Discussion 38 Rapoport’s Rule and Species Richness 38 Cephalopod Biogeography 41 i Distribution and Abundance 43 Range Extensions 45 New Species 45 2.5 References 47 CHAPTER 3. CEPHALOPODA (MOLLUSCA: CEPHALOPODA) OF THE GULF OF MEXICO 52 3.1 Introduction 52 3.2 Major Systematic Revisions 56 3.3 Comparative Assessment of the Group in the Gulf of Mexico 56 3.4 Explanation of Checklist 57 3.5 Acknowledgements 60 3.6 References 61 3.7 Gulf of Mexico Checklist 66 3.8 Taxonomic Summary for Cephalopods of the Gulf of Mexico 73 CHAPTER 4. FIRST RECORDS OF Asperoteuthis acanthoderma (Lu, 1977) (CEPHALOPODA: OEGOPSIDA: CHIROTEUTHIDAE) FROM THE NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN; STRAITS OF FLORIDA 74 4.1 Abstract 74 4.2 Introduction 75 4.3 Systematics 76 4.4 Description 76 4.5 Discussion 81 4.6 Acknowledgements 86 4.7 References 87 4.8 Figure Legends 88 CHAPTER 5. CONCLUSIONS 94 5.1 Summary 94 5.2 References 100 APPENDICES 102 Appendix A: Regional distribution point coordinates 103 Appendix B: Species richness comparison quadrats 104 Appendix C: Cephalopod distribution maps 105 ABOUT THE AUTHOR End page ii LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1 Regional cephalopod locations 20 Table 2.2 Region, species number and sample number for hotspots 33 Table 2.3 Cephalopod range extensions to Broad Caribbean 35 Table 3.1 Checklist of the Cephalopods of the Gulf of Mexico 66 Table 3.2 Taxonomic summary for cephalopods of the Gulf of Mexico 73 Table 4.1 Measurements of Asperoteuthis acanthoderma specimens 89 Table 5.1 Gulf of Mexico checklist species not included in Ch. II 95 iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1 Current flow through the Caribbean Sea and Gulf of Mexico 2 Figure 1.2 A summary of the role of cephalopods in the world’s oceans 6 Figure 1.3 Study Area 9 Figure 2.1 Current flow through the Caribbean Sea and Gulf of Mexico 17 Figure 2.2 Study area 24 Figure 2.3 Species richness per 5˚ latitudinal band 30 Figure 2.4 Comparison of species richness and number of individuals 30 Figure 2.5 Rapoport’s Rule- Rarefaction curve 31 Figure 2.6 Rapoport’s Rule- Chao 1 estimator graph 31 Figure 2.7 Eight study sites for richness and diversity comparisons 32 Figure 2.8 Species richness regional comparison 32 Figure 2.9 Hotspot species observed- Rarefaction curve 33 Figure 2.10 Hotspot Chao 1 estimator of regional species richness 34 Figure 2.11 Broad Caribbean sample effort map 34 Figure 4.1 Key West Asperoteuthis acanthoderma specimen 91 Figure 4.2 Marathon Asperoteuthis acanthoderma specimen 92 Figure 4.3 Internal organs of the Key West specimen 93 iv CEPHALOPODS OF THE BROAD CARIBBEAN SEA: DISTRIBUTION, ABUNDANCE, AND ECOLOGICAL IMPORTANCE Heather L. Judkins ABSTRACT The Broad Caribbean region is defined as the Gulf of Mexico, and the coastal and marine areas of the Caribbean Sea, including the chain of islands forming the Greater and Lesser Antilles, Turks and Caicos, the Bahamas, and the gulf coasts of the United States, Central and South America (Stanley, 1995). The cephalopods of the Broad Caribbean were examined in terms of distribution, abundance, and ecological importance. A suite of 5190 preserved cephalopod specimens were identified and catalogued to produce regional maps of cephalopod distribution within the Broad Caribbean. Eighteen range extensions were noted for known species. Regional species richness was examined with respect to Rapoport’s Rule with an eye toward possible cephalopod hotspots in the region. Cephalopods of the Broad Caribbean within the latitudinal bands of 8˚N and 30˚N do not support Rapoport’s Rule as they exhibit increasing species richness with increasing latitude. Eight subareas were chosen to compare species richness. Regionally, species richness is patchy, with the largest concentration of cephalopods off the eastern Florida coast. Areas of the southern Caribbean Sea are in need of more samples for accurate assemblage counts and more meaningful comparisons with other Caribbean regions. Rarefaction curves were used to normalize the variously sized samples throughout the Broad Caribbean. A checklist of the Gulf of Mexico based on literature developed a picture for the northern regions of the Broad Caribbean. This checklist v provided an updated account of cephalopod species that were reported from smaller literature works. Lastly, the first observation in the North Atlantic Ocean of the deep-sea squid Asperoteuthis acanthoderma (family Chiroteuthidae) was described. The description is based on two nearly intact, but damaged, specimens that were found floating at the surface in the waters off Key West and Marathon, Florida in 2007. All previously known records are recorded from a few specimens scattered in the western Pacific Ocean. There is a need for increased sampling throughout the Broad Caribbean to explore the systematics, life histories, distribution patterns, and potential fisheries for this group of organisms. vi CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Cephalopods of the Broad Caribbean have not been reviewed in recent years. The unique features, currents, and coastlines of the Gulf of Mexico, Caribbean and the Straits of Florida combine as a potentially unique ecotone for cephalopod distribution, abundance, and diversity. Work conducted by G. Voss (1956), C.F. Roper (1984), N. Voss (1998), M. Vecchione (2002), and others provide background for further exploration of cephalopods in this area. The present study focuses on over 5000 specimens collected from the area to extend cephalopod research. 1.1 The Broad Caribbean The Broad Caribbean region is defined as the Gulf of Mexico, and the coastal and marine areas of the Caribbean Sea, including the chain of islands forming the Greater and Lesser Antilles, Turks and Caicos, the Bahamas, and the Gulf coasts of North, Central and South America (Stanley, 1995). The region is influenced by waters that flow through the lower Caribbean islands, originating from the Guiana Current that moves north along Brazil’s coast. The Guiana Current is joined by the North Equatorial Current, which flows through the lower Caribbean, veering north around western Cuba and into the Gulf of Mexico.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Review of Southern Ocean Squids Using Nets and Beaks
    Marine Biodiversity (2020) 50:98 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12526-020-01113-4 REVIEW A review of Southern Ocean squids using nets and beaks Yves Cherel1 Received: 31 May 2020 /Revised: 31 August 2020 /Accepted: 3 September 2020 # Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung 2020 Abstract This review presents an innovative approach to investigate the teuthofauna from the Southern Ocean by combining two com- plementary data sets, the literature on cephalopod taxonomy and biogeography, together with predator dietary investigations. Sixty squids were recorded south of the Subtropical Front, including one circumpolar Antarctic (Psychroteuthis glacialis Thiele, 1920), 13 circumpolar Southern Ocean, 20 circumpolar subantarctic, eight regional subantarctic, and 12 occasional subantarctic species. A critical evaluation removed five species from the list, and one species has an unknown taxonomic status. The 42 Southern Ocean squids belong to three large taxonomic units, bathyteuthoids (n = 1 species), myopsids (n =1),andoegopsids (n = 40). A high level of endemism (21 species, 50%, all oegopsids) characterizes the Southern Ocean teuthofauna. Seventeen families of oegopsids are represented, with three dominating families, onychoteuthids (seven species, five endemics), ommastrephids (six species, three endemics), and cranchiids (five species, three endemics). Recent improvements in beak identification and taxonomy allowed making new correspondence between beak and species names, such as Galiteuthis suhmi (Hoyle 1886), Liguriella podophtalma Issel, 1908, and the recently described Taonius notalia Evans, in prep. Gonatus phoebetriae beaks were synonymized with those of Gonatopsis octopedatus Sasaki, 1920, thus increasing significantly the number of records and detailing the circumpolar distribution of this rarely caught Southern Ocean squid. The review extends considerably the number of species, including endemics, recorded from the Southern Ocean, but it also highlights that the corresponding species to two well-described beaks (Moroteuthopsis sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Name: Chiton Class: Polyplacophora
    Common Name: Chiton Class: Polyplacophora Scrapes algae off rock with radula 8 Overlapping Plates Phylum? Mollusca Class? Gastropoda Common name? Brown sea hare Class? Scaphopoda Common name? Tooth shell or tusk shell Mud Tentacle Foot Class? Gastropoda Common name? Limpet Phylum? Mollusca Class? Bivalvia Class? Gastropoda Common name? Brown sea hare Phylum? Mollusca Class? Gastropoda Common name? Nudibranch Class? Cephalopoda Cuttlefish Octopus Squid Nautilus Phylum? Mollusca Class? Gastropoda Most Bivalves are Filter Feeders A B E D C • A: Mantle • B: Gill • C: Mantle • D: Foot • E: Posterior adductor muscle I.D. Green: Foot I.D. Red Gills Three Body Regions 1. Head – Foot 2. Visceral Mass 3. Mantle A B C D • A: Radula • B: Mantle • C: Mouth • D: Foot What are these? Snail Radulas Dorsal HingeA Growth line UmboB (Anterior) Ventral ByssalC threads Mussel – View of Outer Shell • A: Hinge • B: Umbo • C: Byssal threads Internal Anatomy of the Bay Mussel A B C D • A: Labial palps • B: Mantle • C: Foot • D: Byssal threads NacreousB layer Posterior adductorC PeriostracumA muscle SiphonD Mantle Byssal threads E Internal Anatomy of the Bay Mussel • A: Periostracum • B: Nacreous layer • C: Posterior adductor muscle • D: Siphon • E: Mantle Byssal gland Mantle Gill Foot Labial palp Mantle Byssal threads Gill Byssal gland Mantle Foot Incurrent siphon Byssal Labial palp threads C D B A E • A: Foot • B: Gills • C: Posterior adductor muscle • D: Excurrent siphon • E: Incurrent siphon Heart G F H E D A B C • A: Foot • B: Gills • C: Mantle • D: Excurrent siphon • E: Incurrent siphon • F: Posterior adductor muscle • G: Labial palps • H: Anterior adductor muscle Siphon or 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity and the Future of the Gulf of Maine Area Lewis Incze and Peter Lawton Genes
    Biodiversity and the Future of the Gulf of Maine Area Lewis Incze and Peter Lawton Genes Biodiversity is the diversity of life at all levels of organization, from genes to species, communities and ecosystems. Species Nearshore Offshore Bank Basin Slope GoMA: Ecosystem Field Project Habitats and Seamount Communities Abyssal Plain From microbes to whales, and from fundamental biodiversity to EBM GoMA Areas of Work: Species in the Gulf of Maine Area Ecology: past and present Technology Synthesizing Knowledge Linkages to EBM Outreach Today’s Agenda: 08:45-09:45 Presentation: The Global Census and GoMA: What did we do? What did we learn? 09:45-10:00 Q&A 10:00-10:20 BREAK 10:20-11:00 Presentation: Pathways to EBM 11:00-11:45 Discussion Programs of the Census of Marine Life ArCoD Arctic CMarZ Zooplankton CAML Antarctic Creefs Coral Reefs CenSeam Seamounts GoMA Gulf of Maine Area CheSS Chemosynthetic Systems ICOMM Microbes COMARGE Continental margins MAR-ECO Mid-Ocean Ridges CeDAMAR Abyssal Plains NaGISA Intertidal/Shallow Subtidal CenSeam Seamounts TOPP Top Predators HMAP History of Marine Animal Populations FMAP Future of “ “ “ OBIS Ocean Biogeographic Information System Collaborators/Affiliated programs Great Barrier Reef Gulf of Mexico BarCode of Life Encyclopedia of Life Oceans film 10 years (2000-2010) 80 countries, 2700 scientists 17 projects, 14 field projects + OBIS, HMAP Xxx cruises, xxxx days at sea, and FMAP ~ $77m leveraged ~ $767 m --need to 5 affiliated projects (field and technology) check 9 national and regional committees >2,500 scientific papers (many covers) books special journal volumes ~1,200 new species identified >1,500 species in waiting Collection in PLoS-ONE, 2010, incl.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Identification of Octopodidae Species in Southern California Seafood Markets: Species Diversity and Resource Implications
    Genetic Identification of Octopodidae Species in Southern California Seafood Markets: Species Diversity and Resource Implications Chase Martin Center for Marine Biodiversity and Conservation Scripps Institution of Oceanography University of California San Diego Abstract Various species of Octopodidae are commonly found in seafood markets throughout Southern California. Most of the octopus available for purchase is imported, with the majority of imports coming from various Asian nations. Despite the diversity of global octopus species, products are most commonly labeled as simply “octopus,” with some distinctions being made in size, e.g., “baby” or “little octopus.” In efforts to characterize species diversity, this study genetically tested 59 octopus samples from a variety of seafood markets in Los Angeles, Orange, and San Diego Counties. Universal 16S rRNA primers (ref) and CO1 primers developed by Folmer et al. (1994) were used for PCR amplification and sequencing of mtDNA. In all, 105 sequences were acquired. Seven species were identified with some confidence. Amphioctopus aegina was the most prevalent species, while two additional species were undetermined. Little available data exists pertaining to octopus fisheries of the countries of production of the samples. Most available information on octopus fisheries pertains to those of Mediterranean and North African nations, and identifies the Octopus vulgaris as the fished species. Characterizing octopus diversity in Southern California seafood markets and assessing labeling and countries of production provides the necessary first step for assessing the possible management implications of these fisheries and seafood supply chain logistics for this group of cephalopods. Introduction Octopuses are exclusively marine cephalopod mollusks that form the order Octopoda.
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Index of Scientific and Vernacular Names
    Cephalopods of the World 249 7. INDEX OF SCIENTIFIC AND VERNACULAR NAMES Explanation of the System Italics : Valid scientific names (double entry by genera and species) Italics : Synonyms, misidentifications and subspecies (double entry by genera and species) ROMAN : Family names ROMAN : Scientific names of divisions, classes, subclasses, orders, suborders and subfamilies Roman : FAO names Roman : Local names 250 FAO Species Catalogue for Fishery Purposes No. 4, Vol. 1 A B Acanthosepion pageorum .....................118 Babbunedda ................................184 Acanthosepion whitleyana ....................128 bandensis, Sepia ..........................72, 138 aculeata, Sepia ............................63–64 bartletti, Blandosepia ........................138 acuminata, Sepia..........................97,137 bartletti, Sepia ............................72,138 adami, Sepia ................................137 bartramii, Ommastrephes .......................18 adhaesa, Solitosepia plangon ..................109 bathyalis, Sepia ..............................138 affinis, Sepia ...............................130 Bathypolypus sponsalis........................191 affinis, Sepiola.......................158–159, 177 Bathyteuthis .................................. 3 African cuttlefish..............................73 baxteri, Blandosepia .........................138 Ajia-kouika .................................. 115 baxteri, Sepia.............................72,138 albatrossae, Euprymna ........................181 belauensis, Nautilus .....................51,53–54
    [Show full text]
  • Os Nomes Galegos Dos Moluscos
    A Chave Os nomes galegos dos moluscos 2017 Citación recomendada / Recommended citation: A Chave (2017): Nomes galegos dos moluscos recomendados pola Chave. http://www.achave.gal/wp-content/uploads/achave_osnomesgalegosdos_moluscos.pdf 1 Notas introdutorias O que contén este documento Neste documento fornécense denominacións para as especies de moluscos galegos (e) ou europeos, e tamén para algunhas das especies exóticas máis coñecidas (xeralmente no ámbito divulgativo, por causa do seu interese científico ou económico, ou por seren moi comúns noutras áreas xeográficas). En total, achéganse nomes galegos para 534 especies de moluscos. A estrutura En primeiro lugar preséntase unha clasificación taxonómica que considera as clases, ordes, superfamilias e familias de moluscos. Aquí apúntase, de maneira xeral, os nomes dos moluscos que hai en cada familia. A seguir vén o corpo do documento, onde se indica, especie por especie, alén do nome científico, os nomes galegos e ingleses de cada molusco (nalgún caso, tamén, o nome xenérico para un grupo deles). Ao final inclúese unha listaxe de referencias bibliográficas que foron utilizadas para a elaboración do presente documento. Nalgunhas desas referencias recolléronse ou propuxéronse nomes galegos para os moluscos, quer xenéricos quer específicos. Outras referencias achegan nomes para os moluscos noutras linguas, que tamén foron tidos en conta. Alén diso, inclúense algunhas fontes básicas a respecto da metodoloxía e dos criterios terminolóxicos empregados. 2 Tratamento terminolóxico De modo moi resumido, traballouse nas seguintes liñas e cos seguintes criterios: En primeiro lugar, aprofundouse no acervo lingüístico galego. A respecto dos nomes dos moluscos, a lingua galega é riquísima e dispomos dunha chea de nomes, tanto específicos (que designan un único animal) como xenéricos (que designan varios animais parecidos).
    [Show full text]
  • Study on the Economic Benefits of Marine Protected Areas Literature Review Analysis
    Study on the economic benefits of Marine Protected Areas Literature review analysis Written by ICF Consulting Services Limited, in association with IEEP and PML Sept 2017 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (EASME) Unit A.3 — EMFF E-mail: [email protected] European Commission B-1049 Brussels EUROPEAN COMMISSION Study on the economic benefits of Marine Protected Areas Literature review analysis Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (EASME) Contract No EASME/EMFF/2015/1.3.1.8/SI2.737373 2018 EN Study on the economic benefits of Marine Protected Areas Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). LEGAL NOTICE This document has been prepared for the European Commission however it reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://www.europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2018 ISBN 978-92-9202-379-9 DOI 10.2826/40733 © European Union, 2018 Study on the economic benefits of Marine Protected Areas Report authors Pantzar, Mia (IEEP) Russi, Daniela (IEEP) Hooper, Tara (PML) Haines, Rupert (ICF) Quality review Rayment, Matt (ICF) Kettunen, Marianne (IEEP) Study on the economic benefits of Marine Protected Areas Table of Contents Executive summary ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Husbandry Manual for BLUE-RINGED OCTOPUS Hapalochlaena Lunulata (Mollusca: Octopodidae)
    Husbandry Manual for BLUE-RINGED OCTOPUS Hapalochlaena lunulata (Mollusca: Octopodidae) Date By From Version 2005 Leanne Hayter Ultimo TAFE v 1 T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S 1 PREFACE ................................................................................................................................ 5 2 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 CLASSIFICATION .............................................................................................................................. 8 2.2 GENERAL FEATURES ....................................................................................................................... 8 2.3 HISTORY IN CAPTIVITY ..................................................................................................................... 9 2.4 EDUCATION ..................................................................................................................................... 9 2.5 CONSERVATION & RESEARCH ........................................................................................................ 10 3 TAXONOMY ............................................................................................................................12 3.1 NOMENCLATURE ........................................................................................................................... 12 3.2 OTHER SPECIES ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Short Note on the Cephalopods Sampled in the Angola Basin During the DIVA-1 Expedition Uwe Piatkowskiã, Rabea Diekmann
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Organisms, Diversity & Evolution 5 (2005) 227–230 www.elsevier.de/ode RESULTS OF THE DIVA-1 EXPEDITION OF RV ‘‘METEOR’’ (CRUISE M48/1) A short note on the cephalopods sampled in the Angola Basin during the DIVA-1 expedition Uwe PiatkowskiÃ, Rabea Diekmann IFM-GEOMAR, Leibniz-Institut fu¨r Meereswissenschaften an der Universita¨t Kiel, Du¨sternbrooker Weg 20, D-24105 Kiel, Germany Abstract Five cephalopods, all belonging to different species, were identified from deep-sea trawl samples conducted during the DIVA 1-expedition of RV ‘‘Meteor’’ in the Angola Basin in July 2000. These were the teuthoid squids Bathyteuthis abyssicola, Brachioteuthis riisei, Mastigoteuthis atlantica, Galiteuthis armata, and the finned deep-sea octopus Grimpoteuthis wuelkeri. The present study contributes information on size, morphometry, biology and distribution of the species form this unique cephalopod collection. r 2004 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved. Keywords: Cephalopoda; Deep-sea; Angola Basin; Cirrate octopods Introduction captured. These circumstances demonstrate the great scientific value of any cephalopod sampled from deep- Cephalopods in the bathyal and abyssal ecosystems sea habitats. The abyssal plains still belong to the most have been the subject of only a limited number of studies unknown regions in the oceans. One of these plains, the due to the obvious difficulties involved in collecting Angola Basin was sampled during the RV ‘‘Meteor’’ them adequately at such great depths (Voss 1967; expedition in 2000. In the present study, we provide Villanueva 1992). A further drawback relates to their information on a small collection of cephalopods which delicate bodies, which are frequently damaged almost have been caught during the expedition and which beyond recognition in trawl samples.
    [Show full text]
  • Argonauta Argo Linnaeus, 1758
    Argonauta argo Linnaeus, 1758 AphiaID: 138803 PAPER NAUTILUS Animalia (Reino) > Mollusca (Filo) > Cephalopoda (Classe) > Coleoidea (Subclasse) > Octopodiformes (Superordem) > Octopoda (Ordem) > Incirrata (Subordem) > Argonautoidea (Superfamilia) > Argonautidae (Familia) Natural History Museum Rotterdam Natural History Museum Rotterdam Sinónimos Argonauta argo f. agglutinans Martens, 1867 Argonauta argo f. aurita Martens, 1867 Argonauta argo f. mediterranea Monterosato, 1914 Argonauta argo f. obtusangula Martens, 1867 Argonauta argo var. americana Dall, 1889 Argonauta bulleri Kirk, 1886 Argonauta compressus Blainville, 1826 Argonauta corrugata Humphrey, 1797 Argonauta corrugatus Humphrey, 1797 Argonauta cygnus Monterosato, 1889 Argonauta dispar Conrad, 1854 Argonauta ferussaci Monterosato, 1914 Argonauta grandiformis Perry, 1811 Argonauta haustrum Dillwyn, 1817 Argonauta haustrum Wood, 1811 Argonauta minor Risso, 1854 Argonauta monterosatoi Monterosato, 1914 Argonauta monterosatoi Coen, 1915 Argonauta naviformis Conrad, 1854 1 Argonauta pacificus Dall, 1871 Argonauta papyraceus Röding, 1798 Argonauta papyria Conrad, 1854 Argonauta papyrius Conrad, 1854 Argonauta sebae Monterosato, 1914 Argonauta sulcatus Lamarck, 1801 Ocythoe antiquorum Leach, 1817 Ocythoe argonautae (Cuvier, 1829) Referências original description Linnaeus, C. (1758). Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Editio decima, reformata. Laurentius Salvius: Holmiae. ii, 824 pp., available
    [Show full text]
  • 555 Nautilus Bercangkang Rapuh Dari Teluk Tomini
    Open Access, August 2020 J. Ilmu dan Teknologi Kelautan Tropis, 12(2): 555-563 p-ISSN : 2087-9423 http://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jurnalikt e-ISSN : 2620-309X DOI: http://doi.org/10.29244/jitkt.v12i2.25795 NAUTILUS BERCANGKANG RAPUH DARI TELUK TOMINI KABUPATEN PARIGI MOUTONG SULAWESI TENGAH, INDONESIA PAPER NAUTILUSES FROM TOMINI BAY PARIGI MOUTONG REGENCY CENTRAL SULAWESI, INDONESIA Fina Saffuteri Sarif1*, Delianis Pringgenies2, Agus Hartoko2, & Mada T Sibero2 1Program Studi Manajemen Sumberdaya Pantai, Fakultas Perikanan dan Ilmu Kelautan, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, 50275, Indonesia 2Departemen Ilmu Kelautan, FPIK, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, 50275, Indonesia *E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Paper nautiluses are classified as Cephalopoda class, Argonautidae family. The aims of this research to identification of shell morphological characters of paper Nautiluses were collected at 1,000 m depth. The results showed that out of all the samples successfully collected during the course of the study (March till December 2016), only 6 specimens were found at 70-80 depth, with 4 of those species are egg-laying, and the other 2 are not. From the 6 species found, 2 were Argonauta argo with average shell length of 34.05 mm, shell width of 22.20 mm, and average aperture width of 11.15 mm. A. argo is known to possess 8 tentacles, 4 long and 2 short appendages. The shell color is brighter than that of A. hians, with flatter shell and two strips of keels located near each other along the dorsal and soft side, along ventral side thickens and sharpens. A. hians possess average shell length of 47.02 mm, shell width of 33.07 mm and aperture width of 21.30 mm.
    [Show full text]
  • Octopus Insularis</Italic> As a New Marine Model for Evolutionary
    © 2019. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Biology Open (2019) 8, bio046086. doi:10.1242/bio.046086 RESEARCH ARTICLE Octopus insularis as a new marine model for evolutionary developmental biology Ernesto Maldonado1,*, Emma Rangel-Huerta1,2, Roberto González-Gómez3,4, Gabriel Fajardo-Alvarado3,4 and Piedad S. Morillo-Velarde4,5,* ABSTRACT of aquatic animal eggs and embryos guarantees the observation of Octopuses are intriguing organisms that, together with squids and every developmental stage using microscopy and allows detailed cuttlefishes, form the extant coleoid cephalopods. This group includes experimental analysis from the first cell division through to the many species that can potentially be used as models in the fields of formation of embryonic germ layers and organogenesis (Boletzky biomedicine, developmental biology, evolution, neuroscience and et al., 2006). Finally, small embryos allow reasonable sample sizes even for robotics research. The purpose of this work is to first to be tested together using multi-well plates to provide multiple present a simple method for maintaining Octopus insularis embryos experimental replicates at the same time, making them cost- under a laboratory setup. Second, we show that these embryos are effective animal models (Hill et al., 2005). suitable for detailed analyses of specific traits that appear during Coleoid cephalopods (octopus, squid and cuttlefish) exhibit the developmental stages, including the eyes, hearts, arms, suckers, largest nervous systems found among invertebrates (Young, 1971) chromatophores and Kölliker’s organs. Similar complex traits between and a sophisticated visual system controlling body color changes for cephalopods and vertebrates such as the visual, cardiovascular, communication, camouflage and mimicry (Hanlon et al., 2011; neural and pigmentation systems are generally considered to be a Robin et al., 2014).
    [Show full text]