DOCSLIB.ORG

Lesotho Country Report FY16

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lesotho Country Report FY16 USAID ASSIST Project Lesotho Country Report FY16 Cooperative Agreement Number: AID-OAA-A-12-00101 Performance Period: October 1, 2015 – September 30, 2016 DECEMBER 2016 This annual country report was prepared by University Research Co., LLC for review by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The USAID Applying Science to Strengthen and Improve Systems (ASSIST) Project is made possible by the generous support of the American people through USAID. USAID ASSIST Project Applying Science to Strengthen and Improve Systems Lesotho Country Report FY16 Cooperative Agreement Number AID-OAA-A-12-00101 Performance Period: October 1, 2015 - September 30, 2016 DECEMBER 2016 DISCLAIMER This country report was authored by University Research Co., LLC (URC). The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Acknowledgements This country report was prepared by University Research Co., LLC (URC) for review by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under the USAID Applying Science to Strengthen and Improve Systems (ASSIST) Project, which is funded by the American people through USAID’s Bureau for Global Health, Office of Health Systems. The project is managed by URC under the terms of Cooperative Agreement Number AID-OAA-A-12-00101. URC's global partners for USAID ASSIST include: EnCompass LLC; FHI 360; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health; HEALTHQUAL International; Initiatives Inc.; Institute for Healthcare Improvement; Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs; and WI-HER, LLC. For more information on the work of the USAID ASSIST Project, please visit www.usaidassist.org or write [email protected]. Recommended citation USAID Applying Science to Strengthen and Improve Systems (ASSIST) Project. 2016. Lesotho Country Report FY16. Published by the USAID ASSIST Project. Bethesda, MD: University Research Co., LLC (URC). Table of Contents List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................. i Abbreviations .............................................................................................................................................. i 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 1 2 PROGRAM OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................ 2 3 KEY ACTIVITIES, ACCOMPLISHMENTS, AND RESULTS .................................................................... 4 Activity 1. Strengthen linkages and retention to improve clinical services ................................................ 4 Activity 2. Strengthen the capacity of DHMTs in five “sustained response districts” to oversee and monitor the quality of services for PLHIV currently enrolled in PMTCT and care and treatment ...... 9 Activity 3. Build capacity for national level QI program coordination and management ......................... 12 Activity 4. Quality improvement in OVC programming ............................................................................ 12 4 IMPROVEMENT IN KEY INDICATORS .................................................................................................. 15 5 SUSTAINABILITY AND INSTITUTIONALIZATION ............................................................................... 17 6 KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PRODUCTS AND ACTIVITIES ........................................................... 17 7 GENDER INTEGRATION ........................................................................................................................ 19 8 DIRECTIONS FOR FY17 ........................................................................................................................ 19 List of Figures Figure 1. Improving retention, quality of care and data quality, Lithipeng Health Center, Mohale’s Hoek (April 2014-Sept 2016) .................................................................................................................................. 6 Figure 2. Improving retention, quality of care and data quality, Morifi Health Center, Mohale’s Hoek (April 2014-Sept 2016) ........................................................................................................................................... 7 Figure 3. Improving retention, quality of care and data quality, Mofumahali-Oa-Rosari Health Center, Mohale’s Hoek (April 2014-Sept 2016) ......................................................................................................... 8 Figure 4: Slice of the health system .............................................................................................................. 8 Figure 5: Slice of the health system in multiple districts ............................................................................... 9 Figure 6. Percentage of mother-baby pairs retained, 12 PHFS sites (Nov 2013-Sept 2016) .................... 11 Figure 7. Percentage of mother-baby pairs receiving standard package of care, 4 faith-based facilities, 2 government hospital, and 6 other government facilities (Nov 2013 – Sept 2016) ...................................... 11 Figure 8. Progress among sub-grantees in registering and developing care plans for vulnerable families, 8 sub-grantees (Sept 2016) ........................................................................................................................... 14 Abbreviations AIDS Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome ANC Antenatal care ART Antiretroviral therapy ASSIST USAID Applying Science to Strengthen and Improve Systems Project CBO Community-based organization CC Community Council CDC U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CHAL Christian Health Association of Lesotho COP Country Operation Plan USAID ASSIST Lesotho Country Report FY16 i DCPT District Child Protection Teams DHMT District Health Management Teams FY Fiscal year GOL Government of Lesotho HBC Home-based care HIV Human immunodeficiency virus HTC HIV testing and counselling IP Implementing partner LENASO Lesotho Network of AIDS Services Organisations LVHIT Lesotho Vulnerable Household Identification Tool M&E Monitoring and evaluation M2M Mothers 2 Mothers MNCH Maternal, newborn, and child health MOH Ministry of Health MOSD Ministry of Social Development MSH Management Sciences for Health NGO Non-governmental organization OVC Orphans and vulnerable children PEPFAR U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief PHFS Partnership for HIV-Free Survival PLHIV People living with HIV PMTCT Prevention of mother-to-child transmission QA Quality assurance QI Quality improvement REPSSI Regional Psychosocial Support Initiative RFA Request for Applications SIMS Site Improvement through Monitoring System SRD Sustained response district SUD Scale-up district TA Technical assistance TWG Technical working group USAID United States Agency for International Development WHO World Health Organization ii USAID ASSIST Lesotho Country Report FY16 1 Introduction The Government of Lesotho (GOL) launched its National Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) Program in November 2004. Since the national program was launched, the GOL’s efforts to provide ART have been hampered by chronic shortages of staff due to high staff attrition rates and historically high costs of drugs. In recent years, the country has made significant progress in scaling up treatment for HIV and AIDS. The number of people on treatment has risen steadily since the onset of the national program, in spite of service delivery gaps. A key problem still being encountered is that only a few of the children requiring therapy receive it. Since November 2013, the GOL has worked with the USAID Applying Science to Strengthen and Improve Systems (ASSIST) Project on the following areas: Development of a national strategy for improving the quality of clinical services. This strategy is to be consistent with the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) Quality Framework; Strengthening linkages between HIV testing and counselling (HTC), antenatal care (ANC), maternal, newborn, and child health (MNCH), HIV care and treatment, prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV (PMTCT), and home-based care (HBC) services; Improving the quality, uptake, and retention of services along the continuum of PMTCT care; and Scaling up of quality improvement (QI) within integrated clinical services. In fiscal year 2016 (FY16), ASSIST’s work in Lesotho was revised to align it to the PEPFAR Country Operational Plan (COP 15). COP 15 defines the intention of USAID to increase the number of eligible people receiving ART with the key aim of achieving 80% coverage in five priority scale-up districts (SUDs) defined as being most burdened by HIV: Berea, Leribe, Mafeteng, Maseru, and Mohale’s Hoek. The other five districts have been designated as sustained response districts (SRDs). In the SRDs, ASSIST has been asked to direct support to the District Health Management Teams (DHMTs) and health unit in- charges. In June 2016, Lesotho became the first country in the world to launch the new World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended “Test and Treat Initiative” for managing the HIV pandemic. This initiative is expected to exponentially increase the number of patients of all ages on ART in Lesotho. ASSIST has been requested by USAID to support an enhanced
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Literature Review on Decentralization in Lesotho
    Public Disclosure Authorized Kingdom of Lesotho Local Governance, Decentralization and Demand-Driven Service Delivery VOLUME II: ANNEXES Public Disclosure Authorized DRAFT REPORT - CONFIDENTIAL WORLD BANK Public Disclosure Authorized IN COLLABORATION WITH GOVERNMENT OF LESOTHO, GTZ, AND FAO JUNE 27, 2007 Public Disclosure Authorized Table of Contents ANNEX 1: LITERATURE REVIEW ON DECENTRALIZATION IN LESOTHO 3 ANNEX 2: DETAILED ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ACT 10 ANNEX 3A: STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROVISIONS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT AS AMENDED .10 ANNEX 3.B STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ACT IN THE SECTORS ..........................................................18 ANNEX 3: CONCEPT PAPER ON CHANGE MANAGEMENT 27 ANNEX 4: PERCEPTIONS OF DECENTRALIZATION AT COMMUNITY AND DISTRICT LEVEL 31 ANNEX 4. 1 ADDITIONAL DETAILS ON METHODOLOGY, CCS AND VILLAGES ..................................................31 ANNEX 4.2 THE STORY OF MR POTSO CHALLENGING THE RIGHT TO FINE WITHOUT ISSUING RECEIPT ............32 ANNEX 5: PRIORITIES, ACCESS AND QUALITY OF SERVICES 33 ANNEX TABLE 5.1: PRIORITY AND ACCESS TO SERVICES ACROSS VILLAGES WITH DIFFERENT ROAD ACCESS ..33 ANNEX FIGURE 5.1: SERVICE PRIORITY IN THABA-TSEKA ...............................................................................34 ANNEX FIGURE 5.2: SERVICE ACCESS IN THABA-TSEKA..................................................................................35 ANNEX TABLE 5.2: STATUS OF SERVICES FOUND IN VILLAGES VISITED BY THE TEAM..................................36 ANNEX
    [Show full text]
  • Lesotho Vulnerability Assessment Committee
    2016 Lesotho Government Lesotho VAC Table of Contents List of Tables ................................LESOTHO................................................................ VULNERABILITY.............................................................................. 0 List of Maps ................................................................................................................................................................................ 0 Acknowledgments ................................ASSESSMENT................................................................ COMMITTEE................................................................ ... 3 Key Findings .............................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................................ 5 INTERVENTION MODALITY SELECTION Section 1: Objectives, methodology and limitations ................................................................................................. 7 1.1 Objectives ................................In light ................................of the findings................................ from the LVAC................................ Market Assessment................................ that assessed....... 9 the functionality and performance of Lesotho’s food markets, LVAC proceeded to 1.2 Methodology
    [Show full text]
  • LESOTHO SITUATION REPORT - June 2016
    UNICEF LESOTHO SITUATION REPORT - June 2016 Lesotho Humanitarian Situation Report June 2016 ©UNICEF/Lesotho/2015 Situation in Numbers Highlights UNICEF provided support for the completed Lesotho Vulnerability 310,015 Assessment Committee (LVAC), which revised the number of people Children affected requiring humanitarian assistance from 725,000+ down to 679,437. UNICEF is reaching 69,000 of the most vulnerable children (51% girls), through its Cash Grant Top Up response, which provides relief 64,141 for families in response to the food price shock during the winter Children under 5 affected months. The rapid assessment of schools indicates that 30% of schools are in need of immediate water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) 69,000 support. This means there is insufficient water for over 100,000 Vulnerable children in need of social children in all districts. Poor WASH services in schools have shown safety nets to result in low attendance and high drop-out rates. UNICEF’s WASH interventions are progressing in Mohale’s Hoek (the most drought stricken district) with 7 community tanks installed in the 534,508 most vulnerable communities. These communities will receive water People currently at risk of food tankering services, reaching an estimated 5,000 people (55% female; insecurity 41% children). During the first week of July, construction/re-habilitation will begin on community water supply schemes in Berea, Botha Buthe and 679,437 Mohale’s Hoek. This will benefit 15 most vulnerable communities, reaching 23,809 people (56% female; 45% are children). People in need of humanitarian Water purification and WASH messaging are being undertaken in assistance (LVAC) Mokhotlong and Thaba Tseka reaching 80,000 people (52% female; *All numbers above are from the Rapid Drought 49% children), starting the first week of July.
    [Show full text]
  • Terms of Reference
    Terms of Reference Position Title: Consultancy on Community Development Projects Identification and Feasibility Study Type of Contract: Consultancy service Duration of Assignment: April 2021 to May 2021 (25 working days) 1. BACKGROUND: International Organization for Migration (IOM) has been advocating for the adoption of sustainability-oriented reintegration policies that respond to the economic, social and psychosocial needs of returning migrants while also benefiting communities of origin and addressing structural challenges to reintegration. With the aim to support sustainable reintegration of returnees who continue to come back to Lesotho affected by COVID-19, as well as host communities in migration affected areas, the Government of Japan has provided financial support to International Organization for Migration (IOM) under the project called ‘’Socio-Economic Reintegration of Returnees and other vulnerable members in migration affected areas severely impacted by COVID-19 pandemic.’’ The project will be implemented from March 2021 for 12 months. In this project, IOM intends to apply part of the reintegration assistance modality which proved to be effective and productive based on the global IOM Reintegration project which will be modified and tailored to the Lesotho context and the urgent needs of returnees pressured by continuous challenges of COVID-19. The project has three outcomes. Outcome 1: GoL has improved its ability to successfully implement reintegration programmes; Outcome 2: Vulnerable Basotho returnees impacted by COVID-19 have enhanced their livelihoods through restoring their dignity, income generating opportunities and enhanced their living conditions in the district of origin; and Outcome 3: GoL (Local Government) has improved its ability to enhance social unity / cohesion through community development initiative.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Acute Food Insecurity Phase Classification
    INTEGRATED ACUTE FOOD INSECURITY PHASE CLASSIFICATION MAY 16/MAR 17 THE KINGDOM OF LESOTHO IPC analysis conducted from 24 to 30 May 2016 for all 10 districts of Lesotho based on primary data collected by LVAC and partners in May 2016 and secondary data collected from Jan. 2016 onwards. Projected analysis requires an update in October 2016. AGGREGATE NUMBERS FOR WORST PERIOD KEY FOOD INSECURITY OUTCOMES AS OF MAY 2016 – JULY TO OCTOBER 2016 – Despite current analysis corresponding to harvest/post-harvest Proportions of households and number of people in need of urgent period, 19% of households had poor food consumption, and 45% had support to protect their livelihoods and reduce food gaps and classified borderline food consumption. using IPC1: In Berea, Mafeteng, Mohale’s Hoek, Quthing and Thaba-Tseka, over Thaba-Tseka 40% (48,903 people) 20% of the rural households spent more than 75% of their cash in Maseru 25% (55,623 people) food purchase. In other districts the same expenditure pattern is Mafeteng 45% (67,204 people) experienced by 10-16% of rural households. Qacha’s Nek 45% (23,950 people) Generally, 13% of households engaged in crisis and emergency Leribe 35% (86,918 people) livelihood coping strategies, indicating that households reduced food Mohale’s Hoek 33% (50,245 people) consumption rather than depleting livelihood assets Quthing 43% (48,448 people) Global Acute Malnutrition was below 5% in all districts except in Mokhotlong 25% (23,625 people) Mohale’s Hoek, which had a GAM prevalence of 6.6%. Butha Buthe 20% (16,616 people) Berea 51% (88,725 people) Total Approx.
    [Show full text]
  • "TV D>( 14 Zdthd
    ( l ? 1 ) 0 MAFETENG TOWN : ITS ECONOMIC STRUCTURE AND REGIONAL FUNCTIONS INSTITUTE OPj£ 1 1 APR 1934 ■ MVtlOmiOT STUDIES U G iU ftY t J f m "TV d>( 14 ZdTHD ^ Durban and regional planning programme t> DEPARTMENT OF GEOGRAPHY N.U.L. ROMA LESOTHO AFRICA (RESEARCH REPORTj I Henk Huismpn 1S83 X t > u i Preface For the research programme undertaken in the context of the Urban and Regional Planning Programme, established at the National University of Lesotho in 1978, emphasis has been put on the spatial organization of develooment efforts and activities in the rural areas of Lesotho. This focus on the rural parts of the country also includes an assess­ ment of the role of urban centres in providing both agricultural and non-agricultursl services to the rural populati on. The present report focusses on the only urban centre in the Mafeteng District, viz. Mafeteng town. Services provided from the centre to the district's population are analysed in relation to the town 1s internal production structure. The information for this report was collected in 1981 by means of a sample survey of households and a number of special studies in which attention was paid to specific aspects of the urban economy and the town's population which were considered crucial for the analysis of structure and function of the town. The report should be seen as the urban counterpart to the URPP research report on households, production and resources in Mafeteng District, which was published in 1987. These reports will be followed by a planning survey of Mafeteng District, which contains an analysis of the district economy.
    ( 14 Zdthd" class="panel-rg color-a">[Show full text]
  • 3· PB Sanders, Moshoeshoe: Chief Rif the Sotho (London, 1975)
    Notes INTRODUCTION 1. J. A. Benyon, 'Basutoland and the High Commission with particular reference to the years 1868-1884: The Changing Nature of the Imperial Government's "Special Responsibility" for the Territory' (Oxford Univ. D.Phil., 1968). 2. A. Atmore and S. Marks, 'The lmpe~ial Factor in South Africa in the Nineteenth Century: Towards a Reassessment', Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, iii, 1 ( 1974). 3· P. B. Sanders, Moshoeshoe: Chief rif the Sotho (London, 1975) appendix. CHAPTER I CREATING A NATION 1. E. H. Brookes and C. de B. Webb, A History of Natal (Pietermaritzburg, 1965) PP· 14-15. 2. For the etymology of the word, see Sanders, Moshoeshoe, p. 27, n. 1. 3· The exact date of his birth is unknown: see Sanders, ibid., p. 5· 4· For other names, see D. F. Ellenberger, History rifthe Basuto, Ancient and Modern (rewritten in English by J. C. MacGregor, London, 1912) pp. 106-7. Amongst the English and settlers he became known as Moshesh. 5· Probably so-named because of the illusion created by the setting sun, and subsequent legend which arose, that the mountain grows larger at night. See Sanders, Moshoeshoe, p. 35, n. 21. Often called 'Thaba Bosigo' by nineteenth­ century writers. 6. Though his son, Thlali, and Dr John Philip, the L.M.S. missionary, described him as short. 7· G. Tylden, The Rise rifthe Basuto (Cape Town, 1950) pp. 14-16. 8. Sanders, Moshoeshoe, p. 138, quoting Arbousset to P.E.M.S. Committee, 2 Mar. 1852, J.M.E. (1852) p. 208. Sanders does also point out that Moshoeshoe's temper was much feared, and that when enraged he had been known to attack and even to attempt to kill offenders: see Sanders, ibid., p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Livelihood Impacts of Cash Transfers in Sub-Saharan Africa: Beneficiary Perspectives from Six Countries
    The livelihood impacts of cash transfers in sub-Saharan Africa: beneficiary perspectives from six countries Article Accepted Version Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 Fisher, E., Attah, R., Barca, V., O'Brien, C., Brook, S., Holland, J., Kardan, A., Pavanello, S. and Pozarny, P. (2017) The livelihood impacts of cash transfers in sub-Saharan Africa: beneficiary perspectives from six countries. World Development, 99. pp. 299-319. ISSN 0305-750X doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.05.020 Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/68625/ It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. See Guidance on citing . To link to this article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.05.020 Publisher: Elsevier All outputs in CentAUR are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including copyright law. Copyright and IPR is retained by the creators or other copyright holders. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the End User Agreement . www.reading.ac.uk/centaur CentAUR Central Archive at the University of Reading Reading’s research outputs online The Livelihood Impacts of Cash Transfers in Sub-Saharan Africa: Beneficiary Perspectives from Six Countries 1. INTRODUCTION1 “I am now using my energy on my field because I can now afford fertiliser.” Male beneficiary, Zimbabwe Harmonised Social Cash Transfer programme, Ward 21, Goromonzi District. “Some of the beneficiaries have started small businesses. They have put up temporary tables where they sell sweets, biscuits, matches. Others also fry koshe and kulikuli and they sell them in the market on the road.” Female beneficiary, Ghana Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty programme, Tali community, Tolon Gumbugu District.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Poverty and Food Insecurity in Maseru, Lesotho
    Wilfrid Laurier University Scholars Commons @ Laurier Hungry Cities Partnership Reports and Papers 2015 The State of Poverty and Food Insecurity in Maseru, Lesotho Resetselemang Leduka Jonathan Crush Balsillie School of International Affairs/WLU, [email protected] Bruce Frayne Southern African Migration Programme Cameron McCordic Balsillie School of International Affairs/WLU Thope Matobo See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/hcp Part of the Food Studies Commons, Human Geography Commons, Politics and Social Change Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Recommended Citation Leduka, R., Crush, J., Frayne, B., McCordic, C., Matobo, T., Makoa, T., Mphale, M., Phaila, M., Letsie, M. (2015). The State of Poverty and Food Insecurity in Maseru, Lesotho (rep., pp. i-80). Kingston, ON and Cape Town: African Food Security Urban Network. Urban Food Security Series No. 21. This Other Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Reports and Papers at Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hungry Cities Partnership by an authorized administrator of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Resetselemang Leduka, Jonathan Crush, Bruce Frayne, Cameron McCordic, Thope Matobo, Ts’episo Makoa, Matseliso Mphale, Mmantai Phaila, and Moipone Letsie This other report is available at Scholars Commons @ Laurier: https://scholars.wlu.ca/hcp/29 AFRICAN FOOD SECURITY URBAN NETWORK (AFSUN) THE STATE OF POVERTY AND FOOD INSECURITY IN MASERU, LESOTHO URBAN FOOD SECURITY SERIES NO. 21 AFRICAN FOOD SECURITY URBAN NETWORK (AFSUN) THE STATE OF POVERTY AND FOOD INSECURITY IN MASERU, LESOTHO RESETSELEMANG LEDUKA, JONATHAN CRUSH, BRUCE FRAYNE, CAMERON MCCORDIC, THOPE MATOBO, TS’EPISO E.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Owns the Land in Lesotho'! Land Disputes and the Politics of Land I Ownership in Lesotho T
    Who Owns The Land in Lesotho'! Land Disputes and The Politics of Land I Ownership in Lesotho t, I, by i M. I'llaha"" Res.earch Report NQ. 29 \ ,) Institute (!f Somhcm African Studies Nathmal (fniver,\'Uy 0/Lesnlho P.O. Roma UW, Lesofho 1998 ...w ... __ " .... TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Intnxiuction t Methodology and Scope 2 I Towards an Assessment ofthe Value of Land among Basotho J The Traditional Land Tenure Arrangement 6 Land Legislation in Lesotho 9 Chiefly Land Disputes, Late 19th ~ Early 20th Centuries 11 Land Disputes: Commoners vs Chiefs, Chiefs vs Chiefs, 1940 - 1994 16 Consequences 20 Summary 24 Endnotes 26, References 36 f -._ .. "0\, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I. INTRODUCTION The author wishes to thank the Institute of Southern African I Studies (ISAS) for .ffording him the oppnrtunity and funding to + Basotho have often been described as an agricultural sodety.J undertake this study. Although this assertion was certainly true until the cnd of the 1920s • at the latest, more than 80%,1 of the population in Lesotho is rural Thls work was carried out with the aid of a grant from and oontinues to regard the land as its source of livelihood. Life such International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada. as this dearly revolves around land to a more profound extent than say, in a society that is described as •industrial'. Although both AboUJ the Author need land for activities geared towards producing the necessities of bfe, the dependence on land is much greater in a socIety that is Dr. M, Thabane is a Senior lecturer, Department of HlstOry, described as agriculturaJ.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    The World Bank Report No: ISR6157 Implementation Status & Results Lesotho Lesotho HIV and AIDS Technical Assistance Project (P107375) Operation Name: Lesotho HIV and AIDS Technical Assistance Project Project Stage: Implementation Seq.No: 6 Status: ARCHIVED Archive Date: 03-Jan-2012 (P107375) Public Disclosure Authorized Country: Lesotho Approval FY: 2010 Product Line:IBRD/IDA Region: AFRICA Lending Instrument: Technical Assistance Loan Implementing Agency(ies): Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, Ministry of Local Government and Chieftainship Key Dates Public Disclosure Copy Board Approval Date 27-Aug-2009 Original Closing Date 31-Jan-2015 Planned Mid Term Review Date 28-Jan-2012 Last Archived ISR Date 03-Jan-2012 Effectiveness Date 14-Jan-2010 Revised Closing Date 31-Jan-2015 Actual Mid Term Review Date 01-Oct-2012 Project Development Objectives Project Development Objective (from Project Appraisal Document) The project aims at building capacity of government agencies and civil society organizations at both the national and local level to address the identified key gaps in implementing the National HIV and AIDS Strategic Plan in an effort to contain and reverse the epidemic. Has the Project Development Objective been changed since Board Approval of the Project? Public Disclosure Authorized Yes No Component(s) Component Name Component Cost Component 1: Improved institutional capacity of NGOs/CSOs to implement HIV programs 1.70 Component 2: Scaling up the Health Sector Response 1.78 Component 3: Supporting a Decentralized local response 1.22 Overall Ratings Previous Rating Current Rating Progress towards achievement of PDO Moderately Satisfactory Moderately Satisfactory Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Moderately Unsatisfactory Moderately Satisfactory Public Disclosure Authorized Overall Risk Rating Implementation Status Overview Project implementation continues to improve since the final approval of the restructuring process in December 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Strengthening Coherence Between Social Protection and Productive Interventions the Case of Lesotho
    Lesotho Strengthening coherence between social protection and productive interventions The case of Lesotho Strengthening coherence between social protection and productive interventions The case of Lesotho Noemi Pace, Silvio Daidone, Pamela Pozarny and Garima Bhalla FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2021 Required citation: Pace, N., Daidone, S., Pozarny P.and Bhalla, G. 2021. Strengthening coherence between social protection and productive interventions – The case of Lesotho. Rome, FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb3864en The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. ISBN 978-92-5-134286-2 © FAO, 2021 Some rights reserved. This work is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo/legalcode). Under the terms of this licence, this work may be copied, redistributed and adapted for non-commercial purposes, provided that the work is appropriately cited.
    [Show full text]