DOCSLIB.ORG

Integrated Acute Food Insecurity Phase Classification

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Integrated Acute Food Insecurity Phase Classification INTEGRATED ACUTE FOOD INSECURITY PHASE CLASSIFICATION MAY 16/MAR 17 THE KINGDOM OF LESOTHO IPC analysis conducted from 24 to 30 May 2016 for all 10 districts of Lesotho based on primary data collected by LVAC and partners in May 2016 and secondary data collected from Jan. 2016 onwards. Projected analysis requires an update in October 2016. AGGREGATE NUMBERS FOR WORST PERIOD KEY FOOD INSECURITY OUTCOMES AS OF MAY 2016 – JULY TO OCTOBER 2016 – Despite current analysis corresponding to harvest/post-harvest Proportions of households and number of people in need of urgent period, 19% of households had poor food consumption, and 45% had support to protect their livelihoods and reduce food gaps and classified borderline food consumption. using IPC1: In Berea, Mafeteng, Mohale’s Hoek, Quthing and Thaba-Tseka, over Thaba-Tseka 40% (48,903 people) 20% of the rural households spent more than 75% of their cash in Maseru 25% (55,623 people) food purchase. In other districts the same expenditure pattern is Mafeteng 45% (67,204 people) experienced by 10-16% of rural households. Qacha’s Nek 45% (23,950 people) Generally, 13% of households engaged in crisis and emergency Leribe 35% (86,918 people) livelihood coping strategies, indicating that households reduced food Mohale’s Hoek 33% (50,245 people) consumption rather than depleting livelihood assets Quthing 43% (48,448 people) Global Acute Malnutrition was below 5% in all districts except in Mokhotlong 25% (23,625 people) Mohale’s Hoek, which had a GAM prevalence of 6.6%. Butha Buthe 20% (16,616 people) Berea 51% (88,725 people) Total Approx. 510,258 people (36%) 1The percentage of households is based on estimations and includes populationCurrent classified (May in – IPC Jun Phase 3 (“Crisis”) and IPC Phase 4 (“Emergency”). Projected (Jul – Sep 2016) 2016) 50,254 Projected (Oct 2016 – Feb 2017) Map Notes: 1 District classification based whether area has at least 20% of households in need of urgent assistance to protect livelihoods and decrease food consumption gaps Produced by the IPC Technical Working Group in Lesotho Although not a partner, the technical assistance of FEWS NET is acknowledged OVERVIEW OF SEVERITY OF CURRENT AND PROJECTED ACUTE FOOD INSECURITY The current situation (Apr-Jun 2016) reveals that eight districts out of ten, i.e. Mafeteng, Leribe, Berea, Qacha’s Nek, Quthing, Mokhotlong, Thaba-Tseka, and Butha Buthe are classified as Phase 2 ‘Stressed’. Two districts (Maseru and Mohale’s Hoek) are in Phase 3 ‘Crisis’. There is no district that is classified in Phase 4, although all districts have population ranging from 4 to 15) that are thought to be facing an emergency food insecurity situation (Phase 4). All in all 44% of the total rural population are expected to be in Phase 1 (‘No/Minimal Acute Food Insecurity’), 34% in Phase 2 (‘Stressed’), 13% in Phase 3 (‘Crisis’), and 8% in Phase 4 (‘Emergency’). With regard to the projected situations, the seasonal calendar indicates that the first projection period (July to October) is a post-harvest period (with harvest usually ending in May-June), whereas the period from November to February typically correspond to the lean season, although harvesting of green maize starts already in January in many districts. This year, due to negligible production of staple food items, the lean season is expected to start earlier, and to be more severe than usually. However, different social safety net programmes and Government food price subsidies are likely to alleviate the severity of the lean season. Nevertheless, prices are expected to remain high, likely affecting poor population with no sufficient income to cover their basic needs, particularly in the absence of assistance. The two projection periods are discussed below in more detail: First projection from July to October 2016: this is typically a post-harvest period when households have some food stock from their own production, and food prices are relatively stable with slight increases towards the end of the period. This year, however, very few if any households have stocks due to very poor harvest. This means that households become market dependent sooner than usually during the projection period. Food prices are expected to be higher than average and increasing due to lack of domestic production, higher demand, and the dependence on imports from South Africa. Prices, even with Government subsidies, are expected to increase by 15-25% compared to average over the projection period in all districts. In Mokhotlong, however, prices are expected to dramatically increase by up to 70%. In total, it is estimated that between 20 and 31% of the rural population will experience No or Minimal acute food insecurity (IPC Phase 1), 33% will be in Phase 2 (‘Stressed’), 26% in Phase 3 (‘Crisis’), and 11% in Phase 4 (‘Emergency’). The worst affected households, classified Phases 3 and 4, are typically the poor and very poor, who lack sufficient income to purchase food at higher food prices, as well as those who have already depleted or will deplete their main livelihood assets, such as livestock, in order to cover their food and non-food needs. All the districts are expected to be in Phase 3 ‘Crisis’ in the projection period, with typically up to a maximum of 15% of the population in Phase 4 ‘ Emergency’ by district. Second projection from November 2016 to March 2017: Rainfall in the post-harvest period is typically very low, condition confirmed by rainfall forecast for 2016. Since water levels are already low due to poor rainfall, it is likely that the wheat harvest taking place early in the second projection period will be lower than usual. The peak of the lean season, normally taking place from December to February, is expected to manifest earlier (December) and more severely than usual due to depleted stocks, low winter wheat harvest and high food prices. Despite these conditions, it is still expected that food security situation is somewhat better compared to the first projection period. This is due to the fact that many households are expected to be able to increase their income by engaging in casual labour, given that the expected ‘La Nina’ phenomenon could bring ample rains to the county starting in October, thus increasing demand for agricultural labour. In the peak of the lean season, this source of income is likely to facilitate households’ access to food. In addition, social safety net programmes and food subsidies, are expected to lessen the impact of the lean season. In general, 46% of the rural population is expected to remain in IPC Phase 1, 29% will be in Phase 2 ‘Stressed’, 16% in Phase 3 ‘Crisis’, and the remaining 8% will be in Phase 4 ‘Emergency’. All the districts, except Leribe and Mokhotlong, will remain in Phase 3 ‘Crisis’ over the second projection period, with between 5 and 13% of rural population in Phase 4. ACUTE FOOD INSECURITY CONDITIONS • Regarding rainfall, it has been estimated by USGS FEWS NET that the rainy season from September 2015 to May 2016 was one of the lowest recorded: rainfall was only around one half to two thirds (by month) of average between 2001 and 2010.. • In terms of food availability, Lesotho typically produces only around 30% of its annual cereal requirements. As a result, availability is typically a function of limited domestic production and cereal (and other food item) imports from South Africa. Production in Lesotho suffered to a large extent from poor rainfall and dry spells, and production is almost negligent compared to normal conditions. It is estimated that maize production decreased by 89%, wheat by 96%, and sorghum by 93% in 2016 compared to the reference year of 2009. This large decrease in production means an even higher dependence on cereal imports from South Africa to maintain food availability in Lesotho. However, since production in South Africa has also been impacted by the El Nino conditions, cereal availability in the country is not at its typical level and this is reflected in food prices. However, it is expected that food will continue to be available in Lesotho markets, albeit at higher prices. Animal herd size has decreased over the years: there has been a decrease of 25% in cattle and 9% in sheep and goats mainly due to recurrent droughts, animal thefts, and disease epidemics between 2010 and 2015. (And this year?) • Food access is mainly a function of the economic capacity of households to purchase food on market, given own production usually being insufficient to cover households needs. Markets are well integrated and road network is relatively good, facilitating physical food access and flow of goods from South Africa to markets in different parts of the country. There are also typically no problems with social access of households. The main problem is financial access, which is constrained in many ways: (1) high food prices, (2) limited income, and (3) lack of household stocks. Latest available price information form March 2016 shows that maize prices were typically 20-35% higher than previous year, and with very low domestic production it is expected that prices will continue to rise. Income from typical sources such as domestic work (washing, smearing of walls), gifts and remittances, and self-employment has decreased substantially (especially in Butha- Buthe, Berea, Qacha’s Nek, Quthing and Tsaba-Tseka), whereas income from cash for work programmes has increased between 25 and 80% in practically all the districts, indicating increased dependence on social safety net programmes. In January, in around half of the districts, 17-50% of households still had some food stocks, but it is expected that they have depleted them by this period, leaving households dependent on market for food provisioning.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lesotho's Technology Needs Assessment
    Lesotho Meteorological Services Ministry of Natural Resources ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE TECHNOLOGY NEEDS IN LESOTHO Energy and Land Use Change and Forestry TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE i LIST OF ACRONYMS ii LIST OF PEOPLE INTERVIEWED iii I. BACKGROUND 1 Socio-economic conditions 1 National development objectives 1 Poverty alleviation 1 Employment creation 1 Social integration 2 Conservation of the land base 2 The future path of development 4 The role of science and technology in development 4 Agro-climatic conditions 5 Climate change scenarios 5 The draft technology development policy 6 International and regional perspectives 7 II. NATIONAL EXPERIENCES 10 Introduction 10 Agricultural research 10 Appropriate technology research 11 Labour-intensive construction 12 Rural water supplies 13 The rural sanitation programme 13 Low-cost housing development 14 Other initiatives 14 Technology registration 15 Technology transfer mechanisms 15 Shows, fairs and exhibitions 15 Extension services 15 Radio and other services 16 III. TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND TRAINING 17 Introduction 17 Current education and training policies 17 Curriculum development 18 School programmes 20 Technical and vocational training 21 University and other tertiary training 22 Other related initiatives 23 Industrial training and support 23 Small contractor training 24 Skills training 24 Trades testing 24 IV. TECHNOLOGY NEEDS IN THE ENERGY SECTOR 26 Introduction 26 Challenging issues 28 Sector Institutions 29 Overall policies and strategies 30 Options for Technology Transfer in the Sector 32 Renewable energy technologies 32 Hydro-power development 33 Solar photovoltaic technologies 34 Solar thermal technologies 34 Wind energy 35 Biogas technology 35 Energy Conservation 36 Energy efficiency/conservation in the residential sector 36 Energy efficiency/conservation in commerce and industry 36 Energy efficiency/conservation in the transport sector 37 Energy efficiency/conservation in government buildings 37 Passive solar design in buildings 37 Energy efficient cooking devices/stoves 37 Energy auditing 38 V.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Review on Decentralization in Lesotho
    Public Disclosure Authorized Kingdom of Lesotho Local Governance, Decentralization and Demand-Driven Service Delivery VOLUME II: ANNEXES Public Disclosure Authorized DRAFT REPORT - CONFIDENTIAL WORLD BANK Public Disclosure Authorized IN COLLABORATION WITH GOVERNMENT OF LESOTHO, GTZ, AND FAO JUNE 27, 2007 Public Disclosure Authorized Table of Contents ANNEX 1: LITERATURE REVIEW ON DECENTRALIZATION IN LESOTHO 3 ANNEX 2: DETAILED ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ACT 10 ANNEX 3A: STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROVISIONS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT AS AMENDED .10 ANNEX 3.B STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ACT IN THE SECTORS ..........................................................18 ANNEX 3: CONCEPT PAPER ON CHANGE MANAGEMENT 27 ANNEX 4: PERCEPTIONS OF DECENTRALIZATION AT COMMUNITY AND DISTRICT LEVEL 31 ANNEX 4. 1 ADDITIONAL DETAILS ON METHODOLOGY, CCS AND VILLAGES ..................................................31 ANNEX 4.2 THE STORY OF MR POTSO CHALLENGING THE RIGHT TO FINE WITHOUT ISSUING RECEIPT ............32 ANNEX 5: PRIORITIES, ACCESS AND QUALITY OF SERVICES 33 ANNEX TABLE 5.1: PRIORITY AND ACCESS TO SERVICES ACROSS VILLAGES WITH DIFFERENT ROAD ACCESS ..33 ANNEX FIGURE 5.1: SERVICE PRIORITY IN THABA-TSEKA ...............................................................................34 ANNEX FIGURE 5.2: SERVICE ACCESS IN THABA-TSEKA..................................................................................35 ANNEX TABLE 5.2: STATUS OF SERVICES FOUND IN VILLAGES VISITED BY THE TEAM..................................36 ANNEX
    [Show full text]
  • Lesotho Vulnerability Assessment Committee
    2016 Lesotho Government Lesotho VAC Table of Contents List of Tables ................................LESOTHO................................................................ VULNERABILITY.............................................................................. 0 List of Maps ................................................................................................................................................................................ 0 Acknowledgments ................................ASSESSMENT................................................................ COMMITTEE................................................................ ... 3 Key Findings .............................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................................ 5 INTERVENTION MODALITY SELECTION Section 1: Objectives, methodology and limitations ................................................................................................. 7 1.1 Objectives ................................In light ................................of the findings................................ from the LVAC................................ Market Assessment................................ that assessed....... 9 the functionality and performance of Lesotho’s food markets, LVAC proceeded to 1.2 Methodology
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 09 30 USG Southern Africa Fact Sheet #3
    Fact Sheet #3 Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 Southern Africa – Regional Disasters SEPTEMBER 30, 2020 SITUATION AT A GLANCE 10.5 765,000 5.4 1.7 320,000 MILLION MILLION MILLION Estimated Food- Estimated Confirmed Estimated Food-Insecure Estimated Severely Estimated Number Insecure Population in COVID-19 Cases in Population in Rural Food-Insecure of IDPs in Southern Africa Southern Africa Zimbabwe Population in Malawi Cabo Delgado IPC – Sept. 2020 WHO – Sept. 30, 2020 ZimVAC – Sept. 2020 IPC – Sept. 2020 WFP – Sept. 2020 Increasing prevalence of droughts, flooding, and other climatic shocks has decreased food production in Southern Africa, extending the agricultural lean season and exacerbating existing humanitarian needs. The COVID-19 pandemic and related containment measures have worsened food insecurity and disrupted livelihoods for urban and rural households. USG partners delivered life-saving food, health, nutrition, protection, shelter, and WASH assistance to vulnerable populations in eight Southern African countries during FY 2020. TOTAL U.S. GOVERNMENT HUMANITARIAN FUNDING USAID/BHA1,2 $202,836,889 For the Southern Africa Response in FY 2020 State/PRM3 $19,681,453 For complete funding breakdown with partners, see detailed chart on page 6 Total $222,518,3424 1USAID’s Bureau for Humanitarian Assistance (USAID/BHA) 2 Total USAID/BHA funding includes non-food humanitarian assistance from the former Office of U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance (USAID/OFDA) and emergency food assistance from the former Office of Food for Peace (USAID/FFP). 3 U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration (State/PRM) 4 This total includes approximately $30,914,447 in supplemental funding through USAID/BHA and State/PRM for COVID-19 preparedness and response activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Household Population and Housing Characteristics 2
    HOUSEHOLD POPULATION AND HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS 2 John Nkonyana This chapter presents information on the social, economic, and demographic characteristics of the household population, focusing mainly on such background characteristics as age, sex, educational attendance and attainment, place of residence, and socioeconomic conditions of households. The information provided is intended to facilitate interpretation of the key demographic, socioeconomic, and health indices. It is further intended to assist in the assessment of the representativeness of the survey. One of the background characteristics used throughout this report is an index of socioeconomic status. The economic index used here was recently developed and tested in a large number of countries in relation to inequities in household income, use of health services, and health outcomes (Rutstein et al., 2000). It is an indicator of the level of wealth that is consistent with expenditure and income measures (Rutstein, 1999). The economic index was constructed using household asset data with principal components analysis. The asset information was collected through the Household Questionnaire of the 2004 LDHS and covers information on household ownership of a number of consumer items ranging from a television to a bicycle or car, as well as dwelling characteristics, such as source of drinking water, sanitation facilities, and type of material used for flooring. Each asset was assigned a weight (factor score) generated through principal components analysis, and the resulting asset scores were standardized in relation to a normal distribution with a mean of zero and standard deviation of one (Gwatkin et al., 2000). Each household was then assigned a score for each asset, and the scores were summed for each household; individuals were ranked according to the total score of the household in which they resided.
    [Show full text]
  • LESOTHO SITUATION REPORT - June 2016
    UNICEF LESOTHO SITUATION REPORT - June 2016 Lesotho Humanitarian Situation Report June 2016 ©UNICEF/Lesotho/2015 Situation in Numbers Highlights UNICEF provided support for the completed Lesotho Vulnerability 310,015 Assessment Committee (LVAC), which revised the number of people Children affected requiring humanitarian assistance from 725,000+ down to 679,437. UNICEF is reaching 69,000 of the most vulnerable children (51% girls), through its Cash Grant Top Up response, which provides relief 64,141 for families in response to the food price shock during the winter Children under 5 affected months. The rapid assessment of schools indicates that 30% of schools are in need of immediate water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) 69,000 support. This means there is insufficient water for over 100,000 Vulnerable children in need of social children in all districts. Poor WASH services in schools have shown safety nets to result in low attendance and high drop-out rates. UNICEF’s WASH interventions are progressing in Mohale’s Hoek (the most drought stricken district) with 7 community tanks installed in the 534,508 most vulnerable communities. These communities will receive water People currently at risk of food tankering services, reaching an estimated 5,000 people (55% female; insecurity 41% children). During the first week of July, construction/re-habilitation will begin on community water supply schemes in Berea, Botha Buthe and 679,437 Mohale’s Hoek. This will benefit 15 most vulnerable communities, reaching 23,809 people (56% female; 45% are children). People in need of humanitarian Water purification and WASH messaging are being undertaken in assistance (LVAC) Mokhotlong and Thaba Tseka reaching 80,000 people (52% female; *All numbers above are from the Rapid Drought 49% children), starting the first week of July.
    [Show full text]
  • Terms of Reference
    Terms of Reference Position Title: Consultancy on Community Development Projects Identification and Feasibility Study Type of Contract: Consultancy service Duration of Assignment: April 2021 to May 2021 (25 working days) 1. BACKGROUND: International Organization for Migration (IOM) has been advocating for the adoption of sustainability-oriented reintegration policies that respond to the economic, social and psychosocial needs of returning migrants while also benefiting communities of origin and addressing structural challenges to reintegration. With the aim to support sustainable reintegration of returnees who continue to come back to Lesotho affected by COVID-19, as well as host communities in migration affected areas, the Government of Japan has provided financial support to International Organization for Migration (IOM) under the project called ‘’Socio-Economic Reintegration of Returnees and other vulnerable members in migration affected areas severely impacted by COVID-19 pandemic.’’ The project will be implemented from March 2021 for 12 months. In this project, IOM intends to apply part of the reintegration assistance modality which proved to be effective and productive based on the global IOM Reintegration project which will be modified and tailored to the Lesotho context and the urgent needs of returnees pressured by continuous challenges of COVID-19. The project has three outcomes. Outcome 1: GoL has improved its ability to successfully implement reintegration programmes; Outcome 2: Vulnerable Basotho returnees impacted by COVID-19 have enhanced their livelihoods through restoring their dignity, income generating opportunities and enhanced their living conditions in the district of origin; and Outcome 3: GoL (Local Government) has improved its ability to enhance social unity / cohesion through community development initiative.
    [Show full text]
  • Nature Conservation in Lesotho
    Nature Conservation in Lesotho Report on Current Progress and Forward Planning by Dr. Donald N. McVean IUCN Consultant Report of International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources to the Government of Lesotho prepared with the financial support of the United Nations Environment Programme Morges, Switzerland June 1977 NATURE CONSERVATION IN LESOTHO Report on Current Progress and Forward Planning by Dr. Donald N. McVean IUCN Consultant Report of International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources to the Government of Lesotho with the financial support of the United Nations Environment Programme. Morges, Switzerland June 1977 FOREWORD Following a UNEP Mission to the Kingdom of Lesotho by Mr. A.L .D. Mongi, UNEP Advisor on Conservation and Wildlife from 29 January to 3 February 1975 in which he identified urgent need for a short-term advisory consult- ancy to the Kingdom to work out details on matters related to nature conservation, the Government of Lesotho approached UNEP for the provis- ion of such a consultant. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN), which works in close cooperation with UNEP in the promotion of conservation, was requested to carry out this task under UNEP/IUCN Project FP-1103-75-04. This arrangement made it possible to send an IUCN Consultant for three months the result of which is the subject of this report. IUCN acknowledges with gratitude the cooperation given to the Consultant by the Kingdom of Lesotho through the various Ministries, private bodies and individuals, and to the UNDP Resident Representative; and lastly to UNEP for making the funds available.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Operational Plan COP 2019 Strategic Direction Summary April 5, 2019
    Country Operational Plan COP 2019 Strategic Direction Summary April 5, 2019 Table of Contents 1.0 Goal Statement ................................................................................................................................. 4 2.0 Epidemic, Response, and Program Context ................................................................................... 6 2.1 Summary statistics, disease burden and country profile ............................................................ 6 2.2 Investment Profile ...................................................................................................................... 12 2.3 National Sustainability Profile Update ...................................................................................... 15 2.4 Alignment of PEPFAR investments geographically to disease burden .................................... 16 2.5 Stakeholder Engagement ............................................................................................................ 19 3.0 Geographic and Population Prioritization ................................................................................... 20 4.0 Program Activities for Epidemic Control in Scale-Up Locations and Populations .................... 22 4.1 Finding the missing, getting them on treatment, and retaining them ensuring viral suppression ...................................................................................................................................... 22 4.1.1. Adult Women 15+ years .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Private Solutions for Infrastructure in Lesotho
    A COUNTRY FRAMEWORK REPORT Private Solutions for Infrastructure in Lesotho PUBLIC-PRIVATE INFRASTRUCTURE ADVISORY FACILITY THE WORLD BANK A Country Framework Report Private Solutions for Infrastructure in Lesotho THE WORLD BANK Washington, D.C. Copyright © 2004 The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ this report are entirely those of the authors and should not be THE WORLD BANK attributed in any manner to the Public-Private Infrastructure 1818 H Street,NW Advisory Facility (PPIAF) or to the World Bank, to its affil- Washington, DC 20433, USA iated organizations, or to members of its Board of Executive Telephone 202-473-1000 Directors or the countries they represent. Internet www.worldbank.org Neither PPIAF nor the World Bank guarantees the accu- E-mail [email protected] racy of the data included in this publication or accepts All rights reserved responsibility for any consequence of their use. The bound- Manufactured in the aries, colors, denominations, and other information shown United States of America on any map in this report do not imply on the part of PPIAF or the World Bank Group any judgment on the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copyright is held by the World Bank on behalf of both the World Bank and PPIAF. Dissemination of this work is encouraged, and the World Bank will normally grant per- mission promptly and, when reproduction is for non-commercial purposes, without asking a fee. Permission to photocopy portions of this publication should be addressed to: Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, U.S.A., telephone 978-750-8400, fax 978-750-4470, or through the Internet at www.copyright.com For questions about this publication or information about ordering more copies, please refer to the PPIAF web- site or contact PPIAF c/o the World Bank, 1818 H.
    [Show full text]
  • "TV D>( 14 Zdthd
    ( l ? 1 ) 0 MAFETENG TOWN : ITS ECONOMIC STRUCTURE AND REGIONAL FUNCTIONS INSTITUTE OPj£ 1 1 APR 1934 ■ MVtlOmiOT STUDIES U G iU ftY t J f m "TV d>( 14 ZdTHD ^ Durban and regional planning programme t> DEPARTMENT OF GEOGRAPHY N.U.L. ROMA LESOTHO AFRICA (RESEARCH REPORTj I Henk Huismpn 1S83 X t > u i Preface For the research programme undertaken in the context of the Urban and Regional Planning Programme, established at the National University of Lesotho in 1978, emphasis has been put on the spatial organization of develooment efforts and activities in the rural areas of Lesotho. This focus on the rural parts of the country also includes an assess­ ment of the role of urban centres in providing both agricultural and non-agricultursl services to the rural populati on. The present report focusses on the only urban centre in the Mafeteng District, viz. Mafeteng town. Services provided from the centre to the district's population are analysed in relation to the town 1s internal production structure. The information for this report was collected in 1981 by means of a sample survey of households and a number of special studies in which attention was paid to specific aspects of the urban economy and the town's population which were considered crucial for the analysis of structure and function of the town. The report should be seen as the urban counterpart to the URPP research report on households, production and resources in Mafeteng District, which was published in 1987. These reports will be followed by a planning survey of Mafeteng District, which contains an analysis of the district economy.
    ( 14 Zdthd" class="panel-rg color-a">[Show full text]
  • 3· PB Sanders, Moshoeshoe: Chief Rif the Sotho (London, 1975)
    Notes INTRODUCTION 1. J. A. Benyon, 'Basutoland and the High Commission with particular reference to the years 1868-1884: The Changing Nature of the Imperial Government's "Special Responsibility" for the Territory' (Oxford Univ. D.Phil., 1968). 2. A. Atmore and S. Marks, 'The lmpe~ial Factor in South Africa in the Nineteenth Century: Towards a Reassessment', Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, iii, 1 ( 1974). 3· P. B. Sanders, Moshoeshoe: Chief rif the Sotho (London, 1975) appendix. CHAPTER I CREATING A NATION 1. E. H. Brookes and C. de B. Webb, A History of Natal (Pietermaritzburg, 1965) PP· 14-15. 2. For the etymology of the word, see Sanders, Moshoeshoe, p. 27, n. 1. 3· The exact date of his birth is unknown: see Sanders, ibid., p. 5· 4· For other names, see D. F. Ellenberger, History rifthe Basuto, Ancient and Modern (rewritten in English by J. C. MacGregor, London, 1912) pp. 106-7. Amongst the English and settlers he became known as Moshesh. 5· Probably so-named because of the illusion created by the setting sun, and subsequent legend which arose, that the mountain grows larger at night. See Sanders, Moshoeshoe, p. 35, n. 21. Often called 'Thaba Bosigo' by nineteenth­ century writers. 6. Though his son, Thlali, and Dr John Philip, the L.M.S. missionary, described him as short. 7· G. Tylden, The Rise rifthe Basuto (Cape Town, 1950) pp. 14-16. 8. Sanders, Moshoeshoe, p. 138, quoting Arbousset to P.E.M.S. Committee, 2 Mar. 1852, J.M.E. (1852) p. 208. Sanders does also point out that Moshoeshoe's temper was much feared, and that when enraged he had been known to attack and even to attempt to kill offenders: see Sanders, ibid., p.
    [Show full text]