Federal Register/Vol. 68, No. 143/Friday, July 25, 2003/Rules and Regulations

43964 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 143 / Friday, July 25, 2003 / Rules and Regulations

[FR Doc. 03–18378 Filed 7–24–03; 8:45 am] Federal glazing performance II. Summary of the Notice of Proposed BILLING CODE 4910–62–C requirements for most purposes. Rulemaking (NPRM) In addition, this final rule addresses A. Benefits of Incorporating ANSI/SAE several issues not covered by the 1996 Z26.1–1996 1. Improved Safety DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION American National Standards Institute 2. Harmonization with Foreign Glazing (ANSI) standard. For example, this Standards National Highway Traffic Safety action limits the size of the shade band 3. Streamlining and Clarification Administration that glazing manufacturers place at the B. Proposed Revisions to FMVSS No. 205 top of windshields and clarifies the III. Summary of Comments to the NPRM 49 CFR Part 571 meaning of the phrase ‘‘the most A. Meaning of the ‘‘Most Difficult Part or difficult part or pattern’’ for the fracture Pattern’’ for the Fracture Test [Docket No. NHTSA–03–15712] test in the 1996 ANSI standard. This B. Xenon Light Source for the Weathering Test action also makes minor conforming C. Limiting the Width of the Shade Band RIN 2127–AH08 amendments to the standard on low D. Certification and Verification of DOT speed vehicles. Numbers Federal Motor Vehicle Safety DATES: Effective date: This final rule is E. Other Issues Standards; Glazing Materials; Low effective September 23, 2003. The 1. Applicability of Proposal to MPVs Speed Vehicles incorporation by reference of certain 2. Edge Treatment for Automotive Safety publications listed in this rule is Glass AGENCY: National Highway Traffic 3. Labeling approved by the Director of the Federal 4. Additional Tests Safety Administration (NHTSA), Register as of September 23, 2003. If you Department of Transportation. IV. Agency Discussion of Issues and wish to submit a petition for Response to Comments ACTION: Final rule. reconsideration of this rule, your A. Summary of Changes from the NPRM petition must be received by September B. Meaning of the ‘‘Most Difficult Part or SUMMARY: This rule updates the Federal 8, 2003. Pattern’’ for the Fracture Test C. Xenon Light Source for the Weathering motor vehicle safety standard on glazing ADDRESSES: Petitions for reconsideration materials so that it incorporates by Test should refer to the docket number and D. Limiting the Width of the Shade Band reference the 1996 version of the be submitted to: Administrator, Room industry standard on motor vehicle E. Certification and Verification of DOT 5220, National Highway Traffic Safety Numbers glazing. Currently, the Federal standard Administration, 400 Seventh Street, F. Other Issues references the 1977 version of the SW., Washington, DC 20590. 1. Applicability of Standard to MPVs industry standard and the 1980 2. Edge Treatment for Automotive Safety FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For supplement to that standard. Glass technical and policy issues: Mr. John 3. Labeling Today’s final rule also simplifies Lee, Office of Crashworthiness understanding the Federal glazing 4. Additional Tests Standards, NVS–112, National Highway V. Effective Date performance requirements. The Traffic Safety Administration, 400 VI. Plain Language amendments of the past 20 years have Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC VII. Rulemaking Analyses resulted in a patchwork of requirements 20590. Telephone: (202) 366–4924. Fax: VIII. Regulatory Text in the Federal standard that must be (202) 366–4329. I. Background read alongside the industry standard in For legal issues: Nancy Bell, Attorney order to gain a comprehensive Advisor, Office of the Chief Counsel, By letter dated August 12, 1997, the understanding of the overall NCC–112, National Highway Traffic American Automobile Manufacturers requirements of the Federal standard. Safety Administration, 400 Seventh Association (AAMA) (which has since The incorporation by reference of the Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590. evolved into the Alliance of Automobile 1996 version of the industry standard Telephone: (202) 366–2992. Fax: (202) Manufacturers) petitioned us to amend permits the deletion of most of the 366–3820. Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard existing text of the Federal standard. (FMVSS) No. 205, ‘‘Glazing Materials’’ SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This change to the Federal standard (49 CFR 571.205), to incorporate the means that the industry standard will Table of Contents most recent update of the American henceforth provide a single source of I. Background National Standards Institute (ANSI)

VerDate Jan<31>2003 15:04 Jul 24, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00064 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\25JYR1.SGM 25JYR1 ER25JY03.015 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 143 / Friday, July 25, 2003 / Rules and Regulations 43965

standard: American National Standard A. Benefits of Incorporating ANSI/SAE Transfer Advancement Act), which for Safety Glazing Materials for Glazing Z26.1–1996 requires use of voluntary consensus Motor Vehicles and Motor Vehicle NHTSA tentatively concluded that standards unless such use is infeasible Equipment Operating on Land incorporating ANSI/SAE Z26.1–1996 or otherwise inconsistent with law. • Canadian Motor Vehicle Safety Highways—ANSI/SAE Z26.1–1996 would be beneficial for (1) improved Standard No. 205, ‘‘Glazing Materials,’’ (‘‘ANSI/SAE Z26.1–1996’’). AAMA safety, (2) harmonization with foreign already incorporates ANSI/SAE Z26.1– stated in its petition that incorporating glazing standards, and (3) streamlining 1996. Therefore, we would achieve ANSI/SAE Z26.1–1996 would improve and clarification. safety, achieve international closer harmonization of our Standard harmonization, streamline and clarify 1. Improved Safety No. 205 and Canadian Standard No. 205. FMVSS No. 205, and eliminate wire ANSI Z26.1 requires a fracture test glass as an approved safety glazing (Test No. 7) of a 305 mm (12 in.) square, 3. Streamlining and Clarification option. On January 2, 1998, we granted flat sample of glazing. In contrast, ANSI/ the AAMA’s petition. The proposed incorporation by SAE Z26.1–1996 requires the use of a reference of ANSI/SAE Z26.1–1996 FMVSS No. 205 specifies performance full-size production piece of vehicle would permit the deletion of most of the requirements for the types of glazing window glass. Paragraph 5.7.2 of ANSI/ existing text of FMVSS No. 205. The that may be installed in motor vehicles. SAE Z26.1–1996 states that the amendments of the past 20 years have It also specifies the vehicle locations in specimens of glazing selected for testing resulted in a patchwork of requirements which the various types of glazing may ‘‘’shall be of the most difficult part or that must be read in conjunction with be installed. The standard incorporates pattern designation within the model the ANSI Z26.1 in order to gain a by reference ANSI Standard Z26.1, number.’’ NHTSA stated that it comprehensive understanding of the ‘‘Safety Code for Safety Glazing interpreted this to mean the portion of overall requirements of FMVSS No. 205. Materials for Glazing Motor Vehicles glazing which we consider most likely Adoption of the proposal would Operating on Land Highways,’’ as to fail the test. simplify FMVSS No. 205, consistent 1 amended through 1980 (‘‘ANS Z26.1’’). ANSI/SAE Z26.1–1996 also improves with our regulatory reform efforts. The requirements in ANS Z26.1 are safety by eliminating wire glass as an specified in terms of performance tests approved glazing material. Wire glass is B. Proposed Revisions to FMVSS No. that the various types or ‘‘items’’ of flat-rolled glass reinforced with wire 205 glazing must pass. There are 21 ‘‘items’’ mesh. Wire glass is known to shatter NHTSA discussed some proposed of glazing for which requirements are more readily at lower impact speeds and revisions to FMVSS No. 205, as currently specified in FMVSS No. 205. is more lacerative than laminated glass. described below. The Society of Automotive Engineers Wire glass was used in past automotive First, NHTSA discussed the general (SAE) Glazing Materials Standards applications. However, this practice has nature of the textual changes to ANSI Committee, acting under the been discontinued and, to our Z26.1. We stated that our substitution of sponsorship of ANSI, has revised the knowledge, no company currently the 1996 version for the 1980 version of ANSI standard periodically. However, produces wire glass for vehicle use. the ANSI standard would not make since the FMVSS cannot be changed 2. Harmonization with Foreign Glazing many substantive changes to our except through rulemaking, revisions to Standards standard since our current standard the ANSI standard do not become part already contains many provisions of the of FMVSS No. 205 unless we expressly Incorporating ANSI/SAE Z26.1–1996 1996 version. They were directly added identify and incorporate them through a will improve harmonization between to our standard in various rulemaking rulemaking. SAE previously petitioned US, Canadian, and European glazing proceedings between 1977 and 1996 to us to upgrade ANS Z26.1 with 1983 and standards in the following ways: supplement the 1977 version of the • 1990 revisions. However, we denied The test fixture for the impact, ANSI standard.2 Therefore, the practical those petitions. fracture and penetration resistance tests effect of our incorporation by reference (Tests 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and of the 1996 ANSI standard is that it In addition to incorporating some of 26) is identical to the support frame the revisions of the ANSI standard, we would enable us to eliminate the required in Economic Commission for provisions added to our standard have occasionally updated FMVSS No. Europe (ECE) Regulation R43. 205 directly by adding provisions between 1977 and 1996. • The equipment used for the Second, NHTSA proposed to modify similar or identical to those in various abrasion test (Tests 17 and 18) is similar the application section of FMVSS No. revisions of the ANSI standard. to that used under ECE R43. 205 so that the standard explicitly II. Summary of the Notice of Proposed • The Weathering Test (Test 16) is applied to vehicles. Rulemaking (NPRM) similar to International Organization for Third, NHTSA proposed that ‘‘the Standardization (‘‘ISO’’) Standard 3917, most difficult part or pattern’’ for the On August 4, 1999, NHTSA published which requires a xenon light source, Fracture Test means that all portions of a NPRM (64 FR 42330) proposing to instead of the carbon arc light source the glazing surface must be able to pass amend FMVSS No. 205 by incorporating currently specified in FMVSS No. 205. the test requirements.3 We explained by reference ANSI/SAE Z26.1–1996. In • The solvents specified in the this notice, NHTSA discussed the chemical resistance test (Test 20) have 2 The 1996 provisions include new types of benefits of incorporating ANSI/SAE been revised to conform to the glazing, e.g. items 4A, 11C, 12, 13, 14, 15A, 15B, Z26.1–1996, and proposed revisions to 16A, and 16B. ANSI/SAE Z26.1–1996 also includes requirements of the American Society numerous editorial and minor substantive changes FMVSS No. 205. for Testing and Materials (ASTM) and made to be consistent with FMVSS No. 205 or to Occupant Safety and Health be internally consistent. We have listed these 1 The most recent revision we incorporated into Administration (OSHA). These are the changes in a table submitted to the docket for the FMVSS No. 205 was ANSI Z26.1a–1980, which NPRM (Docket No. NHTSA 99–6024). supplemented the 1977 version. It was incorporated same solvents specified in ECE R43. 3 The requirement for specimens to be tested for by a final rule published on February 23, 1984 (49 This will also result in consistency with the fracture test in section 5.7.2 of ANSI/SAE FR 6732). the NTTAA (National Technology Continued

VerDate Jan<31>2003 15:04 Jul 24, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00065 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\25JYR1.SGM 25JYR1 43966 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 143 / Friday, July 25, 2003 / Rules and Regulations

that we believe ‘‘the most difficult part Currently, neither FMVSS No. 205 nor Manufacturer list.9 SAE has contended or pattern’’ was intended to mean the the updated ANSI/SAE Z26.1–1996 set that only 25 percent of the part of the glazing that provides for boundaries for the area of glazing that manufacturers listed with DOT numbers ‘‘worst case’’ testing, not the type of does not have to meet the 70 percent are currently active; some of the difficulty contemplated or how we light transmittance requirement. SAE manufacturers have gone out of business select the most difficult part or pattern J100 sets limits for the shade band on without notifying us, and many other in our compliance testing. Therefore, all the windshield, rear window and fixed manufacturers have moved or merged. portions of the glazing surface must be side windows based upon the eyellipse able to pass the test requirements. of the 95th percentile male driver’s eye III. Summary of Public Comments to NHTSA proposed that this positions in a vehicle.7 the NPRM interpretation would be made explicit in Sixth, NHTSA proposed modifying NHTSA received eight comments on the regulatory text of FMVSS No. 205. S5(b)(8) of FMVSS No. 500, ‘‘Low-speed the August 1999 NPRM. Three glazing Fourth, NHTSA tentatively concluded vehicles’’ (49 CFR 571.500), to eliminate manufacturers, three vehicle that a xenon arc light source produces the incorporation by reference of ANSI manufacturers, one glazing a spectral power distribution closer to Z26.1 and any reference to the manufacturers association, and one that of sunlight than the carbon arc permitted types of glazing.8 Instead, automotive standards organization lamp currently utilized in the S5(b)(8) would simply state that low submitted the eight comments. The weathering test procedures of ANSI speed vehicles must have windshield comments are summarized below. Z26.1 and requested comment on this glazing that meets the requirements of issue.4 We said that carbon arc FMVSS No. 205. A. Meaning of the ‘‘Most Difficult Part technology, which was developed in NHTSA also proposed to revise the or Pattern’’ for the Fracture Test 1919 for textile and printing industries, applicability paragraph of FMVSS No. Several manufacturers stated that is no longer the best light source for 205 to add low speed vehicles to the list NHTSA had misinterpreted the meaning simulating sunlight because the spectral of vehicles to which the standard of ‘‘most difficult part or pattern’’ and power distribution of carbon arc is applies. This would assure that that the fracture test could be unlike that of natural sunlight.5 Further, manufacturers of glazing materials in interpreted to have many fracture we noted that most of the testing low speed vehicles certify compliance points, instead of a single point 25 mm industry is currently using xenon-arc with FMVSS No. 205. In addition, we (1 in.) in-bound along the center of the lamp test devices to simulate proposed adding a paragraph to the longest edge. weathering. requirements specifying the use of AS– Sekurit Saint-Gobain (Sekurit), a Fifth, NHTSA proposed to modify 1 or AS–4 glazing in the windshields of glazing manufacturer, suggested that FMVSS No. 205 to incorporate the June low speed vehicles. This section is NHTSA adopt ISO 3537. ISO 3537 has 1995 version of the Society of necessary because the descriptions of several fracture points [(point 1, 30 mm Automotive Engineers, Inc. (SAE), the locations of glazing specified by the (1.2 in.) from the edge in one corner; Recommended Practice J100, ‘‘Class ‘A’ ANSI standard would not otherwise point 2, 30 mm (1.2 in.) from the nearest Vehicle Glazing Shade Bands’’ (SAE allow AS–5 glazing. edge; point 3 at the geometric center, Also, NHTSA proposed to correct a J100) and requested comments on the and for curved materials, point 4 on the technical error in FMVSS No. 500. We appropriateness of that shade band longest median at a point of maximum replaced AS–5 glazing with AS–4 standard or any alternative shade band curvature)] and allows for fracture of the glazing as a permitted glazing type in standard that should be considered. windshield. NHTSA said that a visibility low speed vehicles. AS–4 is equivalent SAE encouraged NHTSA to revise requirement needs to be set to establish glazing to AS–5 but contains a light S5.1.2 to read as follows: ‘‘NHTSA may boundaries for shade bands on glazed transmittance requirement so that it can conduct the Fracture Test as specified in surfaces since we need to be able, for be used in windshields, since the ANSI/SAE Z26.1–1996 Section 5.7 on the purposes of compliance testing, to windshield is a location considered any piece of glazing material that is differentiate between those areas of a requisite for driving visibility. window that are intended to meet the 70 Finally, NHTSA requested comments required to comply with Section 5.7.’’ percent transmittance requirements and on the need to verify DOT numbers B. Xenon Light Source for Weathering those areas that are not so intended.6 based on the concern of SAE’s Glazing Test Materials Standards Committee Ford Motor Company (Ford) and SAE Z26.1–1996 states, ‘‘[t]he number of specimens regarding the accuracy of our Glazing selected from each model number of glazing shall both commented that a xenon arc light be six (6) and shall all be of the most difficult part for driving visibility may be tinted. The most source more closely simulates sunlight or pattern designation within the model number.’’ familiar location for the tinted areas is the upper than does a carbon arc and that the 4 Laboratory-accelerated weathering tests are used region of the windshield. This area is typically xenon arc is a much-improved light to test the durability of glazing materials by called a ‘‘shade band.’’ source for the weathering tests. Ford simulating the damaging effects of sunlight over an 7 As defined in SAE’s Recommended Practices, an extended period of time. The weathering tests are eyellipse is a statistical representation of driver eye also said that a xenon arc lamp would used to identify materials that are more susceptible locations in road vehicles. It is an eye movement/ meet the requirement of ECE R43 stating to sun damage, such as rigid plastics, flexible position survey designed to identify vision and that any source of radiation which plastics and glass-plastics (annealed and tempered). field of view contours. The 95th percentile male produces the same effect as a mercury Currently, the weathering test procedures of ANSI eyellipse is specified in SAE J100 because it is the Z26.1 simulate sunlight using a carbon arc lamp. highest eyellipse, and therefore is the eyellipse 5 Narrow spikes of energy in the ultraviolet range most likely to be blocked by the shade band. 9 Paragraph S6.2 of FMVSS No. 205 requires that of the electromagnetic spectrum (wavelengths of 8 On June 17, 1998, we published (63 FR 33194) the prime glazing manufacturer mark the glazing 400 nm and below) can affect how some materials a new standard for ‘‘low-speed vehicles’’ (49 CFR with, among other things, a manufacturer’s mark. will degrade. 571.500). The rule defines low-speed vehicles as a We assign the mark upon written request of the 6 ANSI Z26.1 requires most passenger car separate vehicle type, and S5(b)(8) of the rule manufacturer. We maintain a list of glazing windows to pass a light transmittance test that specifies the use of either AS–1 or AS–5 glazing for manufacturers and the marks assigned to them. One assures that they transmit 70 percent of the incident the windshield of these vehicles. The rule also use of these code marks (often referred to as a ‘‘DOT light. While all windows in passenger cars are separately incorporates by reference the 1977/1980 number’’) is during an enforcement action to considered requisite for driving visibility, certain version of ANSI Z26.1, rather than cross-referencing identify the manufacturer that produced a areas of the glazing that are not at levels requisite FMVSS No. 205. particular piece of glazing.

VerDate Jan<31>2003 15:04 Jul 24, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00066 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\25JYR1.SGM 25JYR1 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 143 / Friday, July 25, 2003 / Rules and Regulations 43967

vapor lamp may be used for the test application obtain a separate DOT code temperatures. According to Sekurit, ISO procedure. number from that of the prime glazing 3538 takes windscreen design, rake manufacturer who produces the glazing. angle, and field of vision into account C. Limiting the Width of the Shade Band Additionally, FGMAJ suggested that the while ANSI/SAE Z26.1–1996 tests DaimlerChrysler (DC) and SAE definition of ‘‘prime glazing optical properties by an obsolete supported the adoption of SAE J100 to manufacturer’’ should specify the method that does not take into account identify areas of glazing not requisite for inclusion of aftermarket manufacturers. the current design of windshields. driving visibility. DC also urged the E. Other Issues Additionally, Sekurit argued that a agency to clarify the definition of shade mechanical strength test using a 227 g band to mean any obscuration band on 1. Applicability of Proposal to MPVs (0.5 lb.) ball would more closely a glazing because of the variations in DC and SAE encouraged NHTSA not proximate real-life conditions than the band application to laminated safety to delete paragraph S5.1.1.6 of FMVSS strength test in ANSI. glass (dye or pigment added to No. 205, which states that glazing interlayer material prior to application) IV. Agency Discussion of Issues and intended for use in multipurpose and tempered safety glass (pattern of Response to Comments passenger vehicles (MPVs) is treated lines and dots printed onto the glass identically to glazing used in trucks. A. Summary of Changes from the NPRM surface). Toyota Motor Corporation (Toyota) ANSI/SAE Z26.1–1996 expressly In response to the comments, the and the Flat Glass Manufacturers prohibits the use of deep tinted agency is modifying the approach it Association of Japan (FGMAJ), however, windows adjacent to the driver in trucks proposed in the NPRM. The major suggested incorporating ‘‘area B,’’ but is silent with regard to tinting in deviations from the proposal are specified in ECE R43 92/22EC to MPVs. summarized below. • establish boundaries for the shade band 2. Edge Treatment for Automotive The fracture test of ANSI/SAE instead of incorporating SAE J100 Safety Glass Z26.1–1996 is clarified to indicate that any piece of glazing subject to the because it would harmonize FMVSS No. The SAE recommended that NHTSA fracture test may be tested, and that the 205 with the requirements adopted in eliminate paragraph S5.2 of FMVSS No. test procedure is a single fracture origin Europe and Japan and because 205 because it incorporates by reference or break point 25 mm (1 in.) inboard at application of the ‘‘area B’’ requirement the edge treatment requirements (SAE the edge of the midpoint of the longest of ECE R43 is current practice for Recommended Practice J673, edge of the specimen as specified in Toyota. More specifically, Toyota stated ‘‘Automotive Safety Glasses’’) that are ANSI/SAE Z26.1–1996. that FMVSS No. 205 should ‘‘prescribe already incorporated by reference in • Shade band areas are required to that the area of the windshield other ANSI/SAE Z26.1–1996.10 than the ‘area B’ may be tinted’’ and conform with the SAE J100 FGMAJ stated that the ‘‘[d]etermination 3. Labeling recommended practice. However, a of the top boundary of windshield for Toyota suggested that FMVSS No. 205 substitution of the ECE R43 procedure driving visibility should be the upper specify that the cleaning instruction ‘‘up angle’’ of 7 degrees, instead of the edge of Zone B, which is drawn in label currently required for Items 12, 13, SAE procedure ‘‘up angle’’ of 5 degrees, accordance with V1 prescribed in ECE 16A and 16B not be required for these will be used to determine the upper R43.’’ items of glazing because these items of limit of the area for driving visibility. Additionally, on the issue of whether glazing are not required to meet the 70% B. Meaning of the ‘‘Most Difficult Part or shade band requirements should be light transmittance requirement (Test 2 Pattern’’ for the Fracture Test applied to side and rear windows, of the ANSI standard). The NPRM FGMAJ stated, ‘‘[t]his non-requirement proposed deleting S5.1.2.2 and Currently, Fracture Test No. 7 provision for driving visibility should specifies dropping a 227 g (0.5 lb) ball S5.1.2.10, which contains cleaning × × be limited to the windshield, which instruction label requirements from onto 305 mm 305 mm (12 in. 12 in.) would harmonize with the international FMVSS No. 205. Since ANSI/SAE laboratory samples of glazing. The drop standard.’’ Z26.1–1996 contains the cleaning height starts at ten feet and increases instruction label requirements for the until the samples break. To pass the test, D. Certification and Verification of DOT the largest fractured particle must weigh Numbers aforementioned Items, FMVSS No. 205 would incorporate them by reference. 4.3 g (0.15 oz.) or less. Pilkington Libbey Owens Ford (LOF), The proposed fracture test in S5.7.2 and Glassig Inc. (Glassig), both glazing 4. Additional Tests specified six production parts manufacturers, commented that DOT Sekurit expressed the view that representing each construction type numbers should be kept current and additional tests, not included in ANSI/ model number. Fracture Test No. 7 suggested notification to the agency or SAE Z26.1–1996, could have been stated, ‘‘[T]he number of specimens re-certification every five years so that added to FMVSS No. 205. These tests selected from each model number of separate active and non-active include a head-impact test for glazing shall be six (6) and shall all be manufacturer lists can be prepared. SAE windshields (ISO 3537), a requirement of the most difficult part or pattern suggested that NHTSA avoid reassigning for testing of optical properties of a (emphasis added) designation within DOT numbers and also supported the windshield according to ISO 3538, and the model number.’’ The fracture origin use of separate active and non-active a mechanical strength test using a 227 or break point is 25 mm (1 in.) inboard manufacturer lists. Sekurit said that the g (0.5 lb.) ball at high and low of the edge at the midpoint of the confusion that results from the longest edge of the specimen. If the reassigning of DOT numbers could be 10 SAE Recommended Practice J673 provides specimen has two long edges of equal avoided if glass manufacturers were several mechanical treatments that shape the edge length, the edge nearer the required to apply their trade names to of the finished glazing for either laminated glazing manufacturer’s trademark is chosen. To or tempered glass glazing. The intent of these their products. FGMAJ suggested that a treatments is to reduce the risk of a lacerative injury obtain fracture, a spring loaded center manufacturer who simply cuts sections due to an exposed sharp edge or corner in the punch or a hammer of about 75 g (2.65 of glazing for use in a motor vehicle finished glazing product. oz.), each with a point having a radius

VerDate Jan<31>2003 15:04 Jul 24, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\25JYR1.SGM 25JYR1 43968 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 143 / Friday, July 25, 2003 / Rules and Regulations

of curvature of 0.2 mm ± 0.05 mm fracture origin or breakpoint 25 mm (1 NHTSA commissioned a study at (0.0008 in. ± 0.002 in.), is used. To pass in.) inboard at the edge of the midpoint General Test Laboratories (GTL) of the test, the largest fractured particle of the longest edge of the specimen. current industry practices (SAE J100 must weigh 4.3g (0.15 oz.) or less. They stated that the fracture test could and ECE R43) concerning shade band In the NPRM, NHTSA stated ‘‘we be interpreted to have many fracture areas.12 believe that the phrase ‘‘most difficult points. These manufacturers, however, As a preliminary matter, NHTSA part or pattern’’ was intended to mean have not demonstrated a safety need to collected data for a series of five the part of the glazing that provides for deviate from the testing specified in windshields from current production ‘worst-case’ testing.’’ After ANSI/SAE Z26.1–1996. For this reason, vehicles to evaluate the lower boundary consideration of the comments, NHTSA NHSTA believes that the test procedures of actual windshield shade bands in now agrees that this interpretation of the need not be revised at this time. comparison to the SAE J100 phrase was not the intent of the authors However, as suggested by Sekurit, recommendations. The vehicle of ANSI/SAE Z26.1–1996. In the context NHTSA will continue to explore the manufacturers supplied full size of ANSI/SAE Z26.1–1996, as clarified desirability of extending the test templates for each windshield. On these by SAE in its comment to the NPRM, procedures to multiple break points in templates, NHTSA engineers measured the ‘‘most difficult part or pattern’’ the future, through participation in the the difference between the AS–1 line refers to the most difficult application or UN/ECE Working Party 29’s Working and the boundary of the shade band component with respect to the fracture Party on General Safety Provisions zone defined in Section 4.1 of SAE J100 performance for a given glazing model (GRSG). for forward glazing (J100 line). The number. In other words, ANSI/SAE In retaining the ‘‘most difficult part or boundary value for the upper limit of Z26.1 calls for fracture testing on the pattern’’ requirement, NHTSA agrees level of visibility in SAE J100 is defined ‘‘worst-case’’ use, rather than on the with the SAE and has decided to clarify as the intersection of the windshield’s worst case target area. It does not refer that any piece of glazing subject to the centerline with an inclined plane to the fracture location on a given piece fracture test may be tested, and that the tangent to the upper edge of the 95th of glazing, nor does it refer to the part test procedure will be a single fracture eyellipse. The AS–1 line marked on the of the glazing that provides for ‘‘worst- origin or break point 25 mm (1 in.) upper edge of the windshield equipped case’’ testing. inboard at the edge of the midpoint of with a shade band shows the current For the purposes of FMVSS No. 205, the longest edge of the specimen as the phrase ‘‘the most difficult part or shade band practice by the specified in ANSI/SAE Z26.1–1996. 13 pattern’’ means the worst-case manufacturer. NHTSA’s limited component with respect to fracture C. Xenon Light Source for the survey of vehicles found that the performance, not the worst-case test Weathering Test manufacturer-provided shade bands did not extend as far downward as location on that component. The worst- As noted above, Ford and SAE permitted by SAE J100, and the distance case component could be picked from concurred with the agency’s tentative between the lower boundary of the the grouping of such articles that are conclusion that a xenon arc produces a shade bands and the boundary limit described by a common manufacturer’s spectral power distribution closer to recommended in SAE J100 ranged from model number. For instance, using the that of sunlight than carbon arc lamps 45 mm (1.8 in.) for the Chevrolet example cited by SAE in its comments and that it is an improved light source Camaro to about 191 mm (7.5 in.) for the to the NPRM,11 if a manufacturer for the weathering tests. As in the Pontiac Grand Am (Table 1). Based on produces side and rear windows with NPRM, we also note that most of the these measurements, all vehicles tested the same model number and the rear testing industry is currently using xenon exceeded the recommendations set forth window performs worse in the fracture arc lamp test devices to simulate in SAE J100. performance test, then the rear window weathering. For these reasons, the must pass the fracture performance test. agency has decided to adopt the use of Next, NHTSA determined the extent The difficulty referred to is in regard to the xenon arc lamp test device for the to which the ECE R43 requirement (ECE meeting the particle weight requirement weathering tests as specified in ANSI/ R43 line) was exceeded. It then of the fracture test. SAE Z26.1–1996. compared the extent to which the ECE Sekurit suggested requiring multiple R43 line was exceeded with the extent fracture points and other manufacturers D. Limiting the Width of the Shade Band to which the J100 line was exceeded. have objected to conducting fracture In response to comments by These comparisons are shown in Table testing on production parts with a single DaimlerChrysler, Toyota, and FGMAJ, 1.

TABLE 1.—COMPARISON OF ESTIMATED SHADE BAND COMPLIANCE WITH SAE J100 AND ECE–R43

(b) AS–1 (a) AS–1 Pass line, ECE– Manufacturer Model line, SAE SAE R43 Pass exceedance*, J100? exceedance*, ECE 43? inches inches

General Motors ...... Chevrolet Camaro ...... 1.8 Yes –0.8 No General Motors ...... Saturn LS2 ...... 4 Yes 2.4 Yes General Motors ...... Pontiac Grand Am ...... 7.5 Yes 5 Yes Mitsubishi ...... Galant ...... N/A** N/A** N/A** N/A**

11 Docket No. NHTSA–99–6024–10. having a luminous transmittance of less than 70%. which points to the area compliant with the 12 GTL is a test facility used by NHTSA to For example, if a manufacturer chooses to install a visibility requirements [minimum level of light evaluate vehicle equipment for compliance with the shade band at the upper edge of the windshield, the transmittance required for a windshield in the area FMVSSs. windshield must be permanently marked with a indicated by the direction of the arrow] of FMVSS 13 FMVSS No. 205 requires that manufacturers line indicating the line of demarcation. An arrow No. 205. mark the windshields to show the limits of the area and ‘‘AS–1’’ must also be marked on the glazing

VerDate Jan<31>2003 15:04 Jul 24, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00068 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\25JYR1.SGM 25JYR1 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 143 / Friday, July 25, 2003 / Rules and Regulations 43969

TABLE 1.—COMPARISON OF ESTIMATED SHADE BAND COMPLIANCE WITH SAE J100 AND ECE–R43—Continued

(b) AS–1 (a) AS–1 Pass line, ECE– Manufacturer Model line, SAE SAE R43 Pass exceedance*, J100? exceedance*, ECE 43? inches inches

Ford ...... Focus ...... 6.1 Yes 4.3 Yes * Linear distance measured on the windshield surface between the location of the AS–1 line indicated on the windshield and the lowest allowable AS–1 line in accordance with SAE J100 or ECE R43. A positive value indicates that the AS–1 line lies above the lowest allowable AS–1 line. A negative value indicates noncompliance with the requirement, i.e., it represents a hypothetical test failure. ** Not applicable. There was no AS–1 line on the windshield because it had no shade band.

As demonstrated in Table 1, not all only slight technical differences shade bands to meet the new tested vehicles comply with ECE R43, between the two methods and the use of requirement. and differing results occur for the SAE SgRP in other FMVSS, NHTSA has With regard to shade band J100 procedure and the ECE R43 decided to adopt the SAE J100 requirements for glazing areas other procedure. The SAE procedure uses an recommended practice. This adoption than the upper edge of the windshield, ‘‘up angle’’ of 5 degrees to determine the includes, however, a substitution of the SAE J100 does not address driver lower limit of the shade band area and ECE R43 procedure ‘‘up angle’’ of 7 visibility for the bottom edge of the the ECE R43 procedure uses an ‘‘up degrees, instead of the SAE procedure windshield or for the side of the angle’’ of 7 degrees to determine the ‘‘up angle’’ of 5 degrees, to determine windshield. SAE J100 does include upper limit of the area for driving the upper limit of the area for driving shade band requirements for fixed side visibility. Other minor factors visibility. and rear windows. While SAE J100 distinguish the SAE method from the Using the 7 degree ‘‘up angle’’ method includes this requirement for side and ECE method, but these differences are for determining the location of the AS– rear windows, the majority of side and due only to the method by which the 1 line increases the total windshield rear windows are tempered glass. Shade point of origin for the 5 degree and 7 visibility. Additionally, manufacturers bands can only be applied to laminated degree lines is established.14 that presently manufacture their shade glazing (by tinting the inner layer). As stated in the NPRM, NHTSA bands in accordance with SAE J100 can Laminated glazing is required only for believes that establishing a lower continue using the same testing windshield applications. Therefore, boundary for windshield shade bands is conditions and procedures defined in shade bands rarely exist on fixed side a necessary component of the amended SAE J100, except for the ‘‘up angle.’’ and rear windows. Further, ECE R43 glazing standard. Further, no negative However, due to the substantial does not contain shade band comments were received on the similarity between the provisions of requirements for side or rear windows. proposal to institute a requirement for SAE J100 and ECE R43, except for the Because of the limited number of fixed the lower boundary for a shade band on degree of the ‘‘up angle,’’ the agency side and rear windows containing shade a windshield. anticipates the shade band boundary bands and because of harmonization The net safety benefit from the slight line under the new rule would more concerns, as commented by FGMAJ, the differences in allowable shade band closely approximate the ECE R43 line agency has decided to apply the design between SAE J100 and ECE R43 due to the 7 degree ‘‘up angle’’ for most provisions of SAE J100 exclusively to is negligible. While the SAE procedure vehicles. Therefore, we believe windshield applications. However, the offers slightly greater glare protection, manufacturers would be able to market light transmittance requirements for the ECE R43 procedure allows a greater vehicles with the same AS–1 line in side and rear windows contained in daylight opening for visibility at both Europe and the United States. FMVSS No. 205 and ANSI/SAE Z26.1– luminous transmittance values of 70% Agency testing indicates that most 1996 will continue to apply to side and or greater. NHTSA believes that the manufacturers do not use all of the rear windows. approaches set forth in both ECE R43 potential available windshield shade and SAE J100 represent reasonable band area available under ECE R43 for E. Certification and Verification of DOT approaches to determining the limits of shade band coverage. However, as Numbers a windshield shade band. demonstrated above in Table 1, not all Comments concerning the However, each procedure is tested vehicles complied with ECE R43 certification and verification of DOT dependent upon the location of a (one out of four did not comply). numbers suggest that NHTSA’s DOT seating design point defined by the Therefore, a small percentage of current registry process should require vehicle manufacturer. The ECE method production vehicles may not comply additional certification and verification relies upon the location of the European with the new shade band requirement. activities such as the re-certification of ‘‘R-point’’ whereas the SAE method However, as with the 2000 Chevrolet numbers every 5 years and the relies upon the SAE seating reference Camaro, the anticipated extent of failure maintenance of active and non-active point (SgRP). Due to the existence of for this small percentage of vehicles is manufacturer lists. Commenters did not, slight. The agency believes that however, provide evidence that the 14 The test zones used by each standard are modifying the shade band location by additional certification and verification generated using different methods. The European test zone uses the ISO ‘‘V’’ points (coordinates 25 mm (1 inch) or less on most vehicles activities would yield safety benefits. related to seat back angle) while the U.S. zones are represents a reasonable undertaking that Further, the agency believes that based on the SAE J941 eyellipse. However, the ISO should not be costly for manufacturers additional certification and verification ‘‘V’’ points are a derivative of the SAE eyellipse, and that can be accomplished within a activities would require additional and generate substantially similar zones. While the zones are not identical, the differences in practice short lead time. Based on the results of resources and manpower which would, account for only slight variations in calculated the agency’s testing, manufacturers in turn, adversely impact the agency’s outcomes. should have no difficulty adjusting use of its resources to upgrade its safety

VerDate Jan<31>2003 15:04 Jul 24, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00069 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\25JYR1.SGM 25JYR1 43970 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 143 / Friday, July 25, 2003 / Rules and Regulations

standards. Due to the absence of manufacturer.’’ Therefore, the agency state. This indicates to NHTSA that, apparent safety benefits and because has decided to adopt the definition of while Items 12, 13, 16A and 16B need additional registry and certification ‘‘prime glazing manufacturer’’ as not meet the 70% light transmittance activities would detract resources from proposed in the NPRM. test, it is important for these items of its safety mission, the agency is not glazing to maintain a luminous D. Other Issues amending the current DOT registry transmittance which is achieved, in process at this time. 1. Applicability of Standard to MPVs part, by proper maintenance and cleaning indicated on the cleaning As stated above, FGMAJ suggested Today’s rule retains S5.1.1.6 in the instruction label on the glazing. that a manufacturer who cuts glazing regulatory text of FMVSS 205. Additionally, ANSI/SAE Z26.1–1996 should be required to obtain a separate Paragraph S5.1.1.6 ensures that MPVs provides manufacturers with the option DOT code number from the one used by must meet the same glazing of placing cleaning instructions in the the prime glazing manufacturer who requirements as those required for vehicle’s owner’s manual rather than on produces the glazing. NHTSA is trucks. NHTSA agrees with DC and SAE a label affixed to the glazing for Items unaware of any safety benefits that the requirements for glazing to be 16A and 16B. The agency believes that associated with this suggestion. used in trucks should be applied to Additionally, this suggested action the option of placing the cleaning glazing for use in MPVs. This approach instructions in the owner’s manual would create an additional resource of applying identical requirements to 15 rather than on a cleaning instruction burden for the agency. Therefore, both trucks and MPVs is consistent with NHTSA is not adopting the suggested label on the glazing partially alleviates the treatment of trucks and MPVs in Toyota’s concern. requirement. NHTSA, however, is aware past interpretations (57 FR 2496; 63 FR of the need for clarification regarding 37820). 4. Additional Tests certification responsibilities and is adopting the language proposed in the 2. Edge Treatment for Automotive As discussed above, Sekurit suggested NPRM for S6 of FMVSS No. 205. This Safety Glass that the agency incorporate additional revised section provides a more tests for head impact into windscreens, NHTSA agrees with SAE that the optical properties, and mechanical straightforward and clearer statement of requirements of S5.2 of FMVSS No. 205 the certification and marking strength into FMVSS No. 205. Currently, are redundant with the edge treatment the agency, through participation in responsibilities of a manufacturer who provisions of Section 6 of ANSI/SAE fabricates, laminates, or tempers glazing GRSG meetings on the proposed Global Z26.1–1996, which requires that Glazing Regulation, is evaluating the material and distinguishes those exposed edges in vehicles other than responsibilities from those of a tests recommended by Sekurit. If school buses shall be treated in NHTSA tentatively concludes that these manufacturer who cuts a section of accordance with SAE J673 (April 1993 glazing material for subsequent use in a tests would have a safety benefit, the version) and that exposed edges in agency may propose adoption of one or motor vehicle application. This text also school buses shall be banded. Section 6 makes clear that the requirement to affix more of these tests in a future of ANSI/SAE Z26.1–1996 is identical to rulemaking. a manufacturer’s code mark to the the current requirements for edge glazing applies only to the prime glazing treatment in FMVSS No. 205, except V. Effective Date 16 manufacturer and not to a that FMVSS No. 205 incorporates by The agency proposed a leadtime of 45 manufacturer or distributor who simply reference an outdated (1967) version of days. AP Technoglass, a glazing cuts a piece of glazing. SAE J673. Due to the redundancy manufacturer, commented that the new The proposed regulatory text in the between FMVSS No. 205 and ANSI/SAE requirements, including shade band, NPRM included a definition of ‘‘prime Z26.1–1996 concerning the glass fracture test, and weathering test glazing manufacturer’’ as ‘‘a requirements for edge treatment and requirements, may affect glazing manufacturer that fabricates, laminates, because ANSI/SAE Z26.1–1996 contains currently under production that does or tempers glazing materials.’’ FGMAJ a more recent version of SAE J673, the not conform to the new requirements. commented that this definition should agency will delete S5.2 from FMVSS For instance, manufacturers may need also include a reference to aftermarket No. 205 and revise the regulatory text to purchase new equipment to perform manufacturers. The agency considers it accordingly. the weathering test with a xenon arc unnecessary to add a reference to 3. Labeling lamp. NHTSA agrees that these new aftermarket manufacturers in the requirements may take longer than 45 definition of ‘‘prime glazing Toyota has requested that FMVSS No. days to incorporate. In NHTSA’s manufacturer.’’ FMVSS No. 205 applies 205 state that the cleaning instruction judgment, these changes can be to all glazing for use in motor vehicles, label requirement in ANSI/SAE Z26.1– accomplished within 180 days. whether it is supplied as original 1996 is not applicable to Items 12, 13, Consequently, the changes to FMVSS equipment in a vehicle or as an 16A and 16 B. With the deletion of No. 205 will become effective, and aftermarket product. Besides this S5.1.2.2 and S5.1.2.10, the cleaning compliance will be required, 180 days suggestion by FGMAJ, the agency instruction requirements for these items following the publication of the final received no other comments concerning would be found in ANSI/SAE Z26.1– rule. However, manufacturers may the definition of ‘‘prime glazing 1996. voluntarily comply with this rule Toyota is correct that Items 12, 13, earlier. 15 The Automotive Manufacturers Equipment 16A and 16B are not required to meet Compliance Agency (AMECA) and AP Technoglass VI. Plain Language Company estimate that there are in excess of 700 the light transmittance test in ANSI/SAE prime glazing manufacturers. They further estimate Z26.1–1996. However, ANSI/SAE In accordance with Executive Order that the number of manufacturers that cut glass is Z26.1–1996 does include tests, e.g., the 12866, we have rewritten or reorganized the same or slightly more than the number of prime weathering test, which ensure that they portions of the regulatory text for clarity glazing manufacturers. 16 A ‘‘prime glazing manufacturer’’ is defined as maintain a luminous transmittance that and conformance to Plain Language one who ‘‘fabricates, laminates, or tempers the closely approximates the transmittance practices. These include portions of the glazing material.’’ found in their original manufactured regulatory text that are not being

VerDate Jan<31>2003 15:04 Jul 24, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00070 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\25JYR1.SGM 25JYR1 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 143 / Friday, July 25, 2003 / Rules and Regulations 43971

substantively changed by this rule. For significantly affected because this National Technology and Transfer and example, we have replaced passive rulemaking will not cause price Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA) verbs with active verbs, replaced ‘‘shall’’ increases. Accordingly, we have not Under the National Technology and with ‘‘must,’’ and made explicitly clear prepared a Regulatory Flexibility Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 who has the responsibility for acting. Analysis. (NTTAA) (Public Law 104–113), ‘‘all Rewriting is especially apparent in Federalism Federal agencies and departments shall the certification and marking Executive Order 13132 requires us to use technical standards that are requirements of section 6. We developed or adopted by voluntary eliminated the marking requirement of develop an accountable process to ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input by consensus standards bodies, using such former S6.1 because it is already technical standards as a means to carry incorporated in section 7 of ANSI/SAE State and local officials in the development of regulatory policies that out policy objectives or activities Z26.1–1996. We moved the definition of determined by the agencies and prime glazing manufacturer in S6.1 into have federalism implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have federalism implications’’ is departments.’’ Certain technical the S4 definitions section. To eliminate standards developed by the American redundancy, former S6.2 and S6.3 have defined in the Executive Order to include regulations that have National Standards Institute (ANSI) and been combined in S6.1, and former S6.4 Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) and S6.5 have been combined in S6.3. ‘‘substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national have been considered and incorporated We do not intend by this rule to make by reference in the formulation of these any substantive changes in S6. government and the States, or on the distribution of power and requirements. VII. Rulemaking Analyses responsibilities among the various Paperwork Reduction Act levels of government.’’ Under Executive Executive Order 12866 and DOT Under the Paperwork Reduction Act Regulatory Policies and Procedures Order 13132, we may not issue a regulation with Federalism of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501, et. seq.), This rulemaking action was not implications, that imposes substantial Federal agencies must obtain approval reviewed under Executive Order 12866. direct compliance costs, and that is not from the Office of Management and The rulemaking action is not significant required by statute, unless the Federal Budget (OMB) for each collection of under Department of Transportation government provides the funds information they conduct, sponsor, or regulatory policies and procedures. The necessary to pay the direct compliance require through regulations. NHTSA has effect of the rulemaking action is to costs incurred by State and local reviewed this proposal and determined clarify existing requirements. It will not governments, or unless we consult with that it does not contain collection of impose any additional burden upon any State and local governments, or unless information requirements. person. Impacts of the final rule are, we consult with State and local officials Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 therefore, so minimal that preparation of early in the process of developing the a full regulatory evaluation is not proposed regulation. We also may not This rule does not impose a Federal warranted. issue a regulation with Federalism mandate resulting in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in Regulatory Flexibility Act implications and that preempts State law unless we consult with State and the aggregate, or by the private sector, of We have considered the impacts of local officials early in the process of $100 million or more in any one year. this rulemaking action in relation to the developing the proposed regulation. (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 This final rule will not have any VIII. Regulatory Text et seq.). I certify that this rulemaking substantial direct effects on the States, action will not have a significant on the relationship between the national List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 571 economic impact upon a substantial government and the States, or on the Imports, Incorporation by reference, number of small entities. distribution of power and Motor vehicle safety, Reporting and The following is our statement responsibilities among the various recordkeeping requirements, Tires. providing the factual basis for the levels of government, as specified in ■ In consideration of the foregoing, 49 certification (5 U.S.C. 605(b)). The final Executive Order 13132. Thus, the CFR Part 571 is amended as follows: rule affects manufacturers of motor requirements of Section 6 of the vehicles and motor vehicle glazing. Executive Order do not apply to this PART 571—FEDERAL MOTOR According to the size standards of the rule. VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARDS Small Business Association (at 13 CFR part 121.601), manufacturers of glazing Civil Justice Reform ■ 1. The authority citation for Part 571 are considered manufacturers of ‘‘Motor This rule does not have any continues to read as follows: Vehicle Parts and Accessories’’ (SIC retroactive effect. According to 49 Authority: 49 U.S.C. 322, 30111, 30115, Code 3714). The size standard for SIC U.S.C. 30103, whenever a Federal motor 30117, and 30166; delegation of authority at Code 3714 is 750 employees or fewer. vehicle safety standard is in effect, a 49 CFR 1.50. The size standard for manufacturers of state may not adopt or maintain a safety ■ 2. Section 571.205 is amended by: ‘‘Motor Vehicles and Passenger Car standard applicable to the same aspect ■ a. Revising paragraph S3, Bodies’’ (SIC Code 3711) is 1,000 of performance which is not identical to ■ b. Amending S4 by adding a new employees or fewer. This Final Rule the Federal standard. 49 U.S.C. 30161 definition in alphabetical order, will not have any significant economic sets forth a procedure for judicial review ■ c. Revising paragraph S5.1, impact on a small business in these of final rules establishing, amending, or ■ d. Revising paragraph S5.2, industries because it makes no revoking Federal motor vehicle safety ■ e. Adding paragraph S5.3, significant substantive change to standards. That section does not require ■ f. Adding paragraph S5.4, requirements currently specified in submission of a petition for ■ g. Revising paragraphs S6.1 through FMVSS No. 205. Small organizations reconsideration or other administrative S6.3, and governmental jurisdictions that proceedings before parties may file suit ■ h. Removing paragraphs S6.4 and S6.5, purchase glazing will not be in court. and

VerDate Jan<31>2003 15:04 Jul 24, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00071 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\25JYR1.SGM 25JYR1 43972 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 143 / Friday, July 25, 2003 / Rules and Regulations

■ i. Removing Figure 1, at the end of the J100, revised June 1995, ‘‘Class ‘A’ to the Office of Vehicle Safety section. Vehicle Glazing Shade Bands’’ (SAE Compliance, National Highway Traffic The additions and revisions read as J100, rev. June 95) is incorporated by Safety Administration, 400 Seventh follows: reference in Section S5.3, and is hereby Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590. The made part of this Standard. The Director request must include the company § 571.205 Standard No. 205, Glazing materials. of the Federal Register approved the name, address, and a statement from the material incorporated by reference in manufacturer certifying its status as a * * * * * accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 prime glazing manufacturer as defined S3. Application and Incorporation CFR part 51 (see § 571.5 of this part). A in S4. by Reference. copy of SAE J100, rev. June 95 may be S6.3 A manufacturer or distributor S3.1 Application. This standard obtained from SAE at the Society of who cuts a section of glazing material to applies to passenger cars, multipurpose Automotive Engineers, Inc., 400 which this standard applies, for use in passenger vehicles, trucks, buses, Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA a motor vehicle or camper, must— motorcycles, slide-in campers, pickup 15096. A copy of SAE J100, rev. 95 may (a) Mark that material in accordance covers designed to carry persons while be inspected at NHTSA’s technical with section 7 of ANSI/SAE Z26.1– in motion, and low speed vehicles, and reference library, 400 Seventh Street, 1996; and to glazing materials for use in those SW., Room 5109, Washington, DC, or at (b) Certify that its product complies vehicles. with this standard in accordance with S3.2 Incorporation by Reference. the Office of the Federal Register, 900 (a) ‘‘American National Standard for North Capitol Street, NW., Suite 700, 49 U.S.C. 30115. Safety Glazing Materials for Glazing Washington, DC. ■ 3. Section 571.500 is amended by Motor Vehicles and Motor Vehicle S4. Definitions. revising paragraph (b)(8) of S5, to read as Equipment Operating on Land *** follows: Highways-Safety Standard’’ ANSI/SAE Prime glazing manufacturer means a manufacturer that fabricates, laminates, § 571.500 Standard No. 500; Low-speed Z26.1–1996, Approved by American vehicles. National Standards Institute August 11, or tempers glazing materials. S5. Requirements 1997 (ANSI/SAE Z26.1–1996) is * * * * * incorporated by reference in Section 5.1 S5. Requirements. * * * * * and is hereby made part of this S5.1 Glazing materials for use in (b) * * * Standard. The Director of the Federal motor vehicles must conform to ANSI/ (8) A windshield that conforms to the Register approved the material SAE Z26.1–1996 unless this standard Federal motor vehicle safety standard incorporated by reference in accordance provides otherwise. on glazing materials (49 CFR 571.205). with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51 S5.2 NHTSA may test any portion of * * * * * (see § 571.5 of this part). A copy of the glazing when doing the fracture test Issued on: July 21, 2003. ANSI/SAE Z26.1–1996 may be obtained (Test No. 7) described in section 5.7 of Jeffrey W. Runge, ANSI/SAE Z26.1–1996. from the Society of Automotive Administrator. S5.3 Shade bands. Shade band areas Engineers, Inc., 400 Commonwealth [FR Doc. 03–18924 Filed 7–24–03; 8:45 am] Drive, Warrendale, PA 15096–0007. A for windshields shall comply with SAE copy of ANSI/SAE Z26.1–1996 may be J100, rev. June 95 except that the value BILLING CODE 4910–59–P inspected at NHTSA’s technical of 7 degrees must be used in place of the value of 5 degrees specified in Section reference library, 400 Seventh Street, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SW., Room 5109, Washington, DC or at 4, Shade Band Boundary Requirements, the Office of the Federal Register, 900 of SAE J100, rev. June 95. National Highway Traffic Safety North Capitol Street, NW., Suite 700, S5.4 Low speed vehicles. Administration Washington, DC. Windshields of low speed vehicles must (b) The Society of Automotive meet the ANSI/SAE Z26.1–1996 49 CFR Part 571 Engineers (SAE) Recommended Practice specifications for either AS–1 or AS–4 J673, revised April 1993, ‘‘Automotive glazing. [Docket No. NHTSA–2003–15505] S6. Certification and marking. Safety Glasses’’ (SAE J673, rev. April 93) NHTSA Vehicle Safety Rulemaking and S6.1 A prime glazing material is incorporated by reference in Section Supporting Research: Calendar Years manufacturer must certify, in S5.1, and is hereby made part of this 2003–2006 Standard. The Director of the Federal accordance with 49 U.S.C. 30115, each Register approved the material piece of glazing material to which this AGENCY: National Highway Traffic incorporated by reference in accordance standard applies that is designed— Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT. with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51 (a) As a component of any specific ACTION: Vehicle safety rulemaking (see § 571.5 of this part). A copy of SAE motor vehicle or camper; or priorities document; notice of J673, rev. April 93 may be obtained from (b) To be cut into components for use availability. SAE at the Society of Automotive in motor vehicles or items of motor Engineers, Inc., 400 Commonwealth vehicle equipment. SUMMARY: This document announces the Drive, Warrendale, PA 15096. A copy of S6.2 A prime glazing manufacturer availability of a planning document that SAE J673, rev. April 93 may be certifies its glazing by adding to the describes NHTSA’s vehicle safety inspected at NHTSA’s technical marks required by section 7 of ANSI/ rulemaking priorities with supporting reference library, 400 Seventh Street, SAE Z26.1–1996, in letters and research through 2006. The plan SW., Room 5109, Washington, DC, or at numerals of the same size, the symbol includes those rulemaking actions of the Office of the Federal Register, 900 ‘‘DOT’’ and a manufacturer’s code mark highest priority for the period 2003 to North Capitol Street, NW., Suite 700, that NHTSA assigns to the 2006, based primarily on the greatest Washington, DC. manufacturer. NHTSA will assign a potential protection of lives and (c) The Society of Automotive code mark to a manufacturer after the prevention of injury, that fall within the Engineers (SAE) Recommended Practice manufacturer submits a written request immediate four-year time frame. In

VerDate Jan<31>2003 15:04 Jul 24, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00072 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\25JYR1.SGM 25JYR1