<<

he extraordinary pro­ guish traditional medical from The most important obligations of gress of biomedical ethical issues that arise from recent the toward the patient are sciences and medical progress in biology and . fidelity to the patient's interest, truth­ technology during the Health policy ethics concerns ethical telling of and last three decades and issues relevant to the organizing, finan­ of patient information. In a physician­ itsT application in medical practice con­ cing and delivering of patient relationship where there are front our with new ethical services. emotional and physical intimacies, dilemmas. The numbers of articles in patients often entrust their bodies and daily and professional journals bear sometimes even their lives to physi­ witness to the importance of the The central role of ethics in the cians, and therefore must exist. subject and 's preoccupation practice of medicine cannot be too Medical ethics provides the basis for with it. The terms "medical ethics," highly rated. Medicine presupposes this trust. To assure patients that their "" and "health policy ethics" certain fundamental values such as the interests are the most important, to appear more and more often - and preservation of life and the relief of promise to keep their confidences, and usually in confusing contexts. Before . These values distinguish to deal honestly with them are fun­ going further, it may be useful to medicine from other sciences and damental values of medicine to which provide some definitions. imply some special responsibilities, physicians must adhere. Health is a state of complete physi­ particularly for the physician and other Ethical problems arise when these cal, mental and social well-being and members of the health professions. values conflict with one another or not merely the absence of disease or with other interests. For example, there infirmity. may be conflict between fidelity to the Ethics is a set of of right Dr Zbigniew Bankowski is patient's best interest and the physi­ conduct, such as those governing the cian's financial interests, or conflict actions of an individual or of a profes­ ·Executive Secretary of the between the obligation to tell the truth sional group, or the under­ Counci I for International and the obligation to protect the lying such principles. Organizations of Medical patient's well-being - in a case where Medical ethics deals with those ethi­ Sciences (CIOMS). In colla­ the physician fears that an honest cal principles that govern professional boration with WHO. CIOMS description of a hopeless prognosis conduct in medicine. Medical ethics has conducted a series of would seriously upset the patient. implies obligations of the physician international conferences Because of the physicians' central toward the patient as well as some dealing with ethics. human role as decision-makers about the obligations towards other physicians. values and he-alth pol health and welfare of their patients, the Bioethics is the term used to distin- dilemmas they face are the primary

2 WoRLD HEALTH, April 1989 concern of medical ethics. This role of Society, together with the medical decision-maker has created a degree profession, is developing measures Cover: Coll aboration of , in that the physicians aimed at protecting against possible or confrontation? - are qualified by their expertise and are abuses. Thus, immediately following the "little theatre" obligated by this relationship to their the Second World War, the judge­ w here ethics and the patients to take the responsibility for ments passed by the Nuremburg Tribu­ health profess ions meet. as see n by Peter decision-making. The patient expects nal on those who ran the Nazi Dav ies. lt~-...... ,_-'l' ~ his physician to possess both technical concentration camps articulated the knowledge and ethical wisdom. standard for carrying out human experimentation, emphasising the Bioethics subject's voluntary . Repre­ Recent progress in biomedical sented by the World Medical Associa­ IX ISSN 0043-8502 science, the resulting development of tion, the medical profession took an World Health is the official illustrated new medical technology and the grow­ important step further to reassure mag azine of th e World Health Orga ni zation . ing possibility of its applications pro­ society: the Helsinki Declaration of Editor: voke a certain anxiety. In order to 1964, elaborated and revised in 1975 explain society's concern it may be and 1983, provides ethical principles J oh n Bland useful to describe briefly the methods for involving human subjects. Deputy Editor: of biomedical experimental research It adheres entirely to the concept of Christian e Vi edma and their application. Investigation voluntary and begins with the construction of imposes other protective measures Art Editor: hypotheses which are tested in a such as a review of research protocols Peter Davies laboratory and with experimental by independent ethical review com­ animals. For the findings to be clinically mittees. News Page Editor: useful, experiments must be done on These issues were further expanded Philippe Stroot human subjects and, even when by the Council for International World Health appears ten times a year in English. carefully designed, such research Organizations of Medical Sciences French. Portuguese. Russian and Spanish. and entails some risk to the subjects. This (CIOMS) and WHO, which published four times a year in Arabic and Farsi. The German edition is obtainable from: German Green Cross. risk is justified not by any personal international ethical guidelines for such Schuhmarkt 4. 3550 Marburg. FRG . benefit to the researcher or the institu­ research. Besides prior review of Articles and photographs not copyrighted may tion at which research is conducted, research protocols, the ethical review be reproduced provided credit is given to the World Health Organization. Signed articles do but by its benefit to the human subject committee at the hospital, university or not necessari ly reflect WHO's views. involved, its potential contribution to other facility where the research is World Health. WHO. human knowledge, to the relief of conducted may only approve research Av. Appia. 1211 Geneva 27. Switze rl and. suffering or to the prolongation of life. when the expected ratio of benefit is Long-term, the benefits are likely to be favourable compared with the risk to collective. the subjects, and when the subjects' informed consent has been obtained. Contents New and very complicated bio­ Ethics and Health ethical questions arise today. For by Zbigniew Bankowski 2 In the remote Tunisian countryside or in example, the resuscitation of patients a crowded hospital in Sri Lanka, whose hearts and respiration have Family planning and the law wherever people gather to talk health, stopped functioning. Is an unconscious by Anne-Marie Dourlen Rollier . . . 7 certain fundamental values hold true body in which respiration and blood Medical confidentiality ...... 9 about the preservation of life and the circulation are artificially maintained relief of suffering. still a living person or merely a corpse Health ethics and the law by Susan Scholle Connor and Hernan L. Fuenzalida- Puelma 10 AIDS and discrimination by Jonathan M . Mann ...... 14 The doctor's dilemma ...... 16-17 Research in human reproduction by Jose Barzelatto ...... 18 Islam and family planning by Maher Mahran ...... 22 They condone tortune by Cesar A. Chelala ...... 24 The Ethical Grid ...... 25 World's 2nd No-Tobacco Day by Peter Ozorio ...... 26 Food irradiation - scientists' toy or everyman's joy? by Valery Abramov ...... 28 News Page ...... 30-31 WHO/ J Mohr

WORLD HEALTH , April 1989 Ethics and health with the appearance of life? Likewise, methods of artificial reproduction offer the possibility of child-bearing to infer­ tile couples. But who are the parents of a child resulting from in vitro fertilisation of the egg taken from Mrs A and sperm from Mr B, implanted into the uterus of Mrs C and then offered to Mr D and Mrs E upon birth? The sperm and the ovum, and the fertilised ovum resulting from their in vitro union, can be manipulated to a hitherto unknown extent. Artificial insemination by donor other than the husband is an established procedure; a ~ husband's sperm can be frozen and ~ stored for future use, even after his ~ ; similarly, the fertilised ovum can ~ be frozen and stored for later use; and women "lease" their wombs to carry other women's embyros. Genetic The doctor-patient relationship has required patients to entrust their engineering is already capable of bodies and even their lives to the physician. Medical ethics prollidf:?S the changing some inherited characteris­ basis for this trust. tics, and genetic selection is feasible, based on prenatal diagnosis. Research at present under way on molecular , and particularly on human genome mapping and sequencing (as described in the December 1988 issue of World Health) , presages a new scientific era, perhaps a revolution, in the medicine of the 21st century. It opens up the possibility of changing the ways in which certain genes function in order to prevent or to treat many diseases and disorders. The particular dilemmas raised by genetic screening and counselling are: the ownership of gen­ etic information, and the advantages and pitfalls associated with genetic counselling and engineering. Who owns genetic information? The traditional moral viewpoint has been that professional secrecy is in both the patient's and the doctor's interests. But today, ought we not to be concerned to make genetic information available to the relatives (or the potential spouse) of the patient? If the health and well-being of relatives or of future offspring are at issue, does the obliga­ tion to keep a secret then turn into an obligation to tell? It now seems that the totality of one's physical existence exceeds the limits of one's body, and consequently the traditional right to secrecy may turn into a to share information with the family or even with others in society. The burden of knowledge ~-~r---~~ _ There is also a right not to know. ~ For one reason, false-positive test :ii results give inaccurate predictions. •---.---.'l._-l ~ Then, some people are unable to cope ~ with the burden of knowledge. Thirdly, ~r;..._....l..,_ __..Jiw._.....J § information obtained from predictive ~ testing can be misused. A fundamental s of patient would

WORLD HEALTH, April 1989 WHO/T Farkas seem to be that it is the basic right of answer the questions about the moral Laboratory in Singapore specialising in the person to be tested or not to be status of human germinal material, sexually transmitted diseases. The tradi­ tested, and to choose to be informed eggs, sperm and embryos, whether in tional right to medical secrecy may turn fully or only in part. Here is an area of the human body, in the laboratory test into a duty to share information with interaction between the developments tube or even frozen in laboratory the family. in biomedical science, ethics and containers? health policy-making that cries out for Society is largely unprepared for, further elaboration. and unconcerned about, such rapid decisions raise ethical questions. Poli­ What are the advantages and pitfalls scientific and technological develop­ cies having to do with who shall of genetic screening and engineering? ments. The ethical issues to which they receive health care, what resources Both geneticists and the public must give rise need to be examined should be allocated, what criteria know clearly that prenatal diagnosis, as thoroughly in the light of social norms, should be used in setting priorities, one of the options in genetic counsel­ legal codes and human values. what constitutes an acceptable form of ling, does not lead to a "handicap­ health care, when should health care free" society; and that, even when used Health policy ethics begin or end, and even the matter of to the maximum, there would not be a The ways in which health policy, who should be involved in making significant reduction in the percentage ethics and human values interrelate policy decisions, all have inherent of congenital handicaps and diseases. are described by the American physi­ ethical components. Different national, Predictive screening is warranted cian and , Edmund Pelle­ cultural and religious traditions yield only if a free and informed decision is grino: "The health policy of a nation or different ethical -systems, and possible, and if adequate facilities are a community is its strategy for control­ their interaction with health policy­ available for long-term follow-up of ling and optimising the social uses of makers will therefore vary from country those identified as disease-gene its medical knowledge and resources. to country. carriers at an early age. Another Human values are the guides and Three general considerations should reason for concern is the risk of social justifications that people use for motivate health policies: First, to discrimination by employers, insurance choosing the goals, priorities and attempt to control the social and companies and so on against someone means that make up that strategy. economic impact of the unrestrained known to have some genetic pre­ Ethics acts as the bridge between use of advanced medical technology in disposition. health policy and values. It examines treating individual patients; second, to These and similar questions seem to the moral validity of the choices that achieve a more equitable distribution go beyond the terms of reference of must be made, and seeks to resolve of the benefits of medical knowledge; the medical profession alone. Can we conflicts between values which inevit­ and third, to use the medical know­ consider that the neurologist or the ably occur in making those choices. ledge in an anticipatory way for the cardiologist is the only person to Ethics, therefore, orders human collective of present and future decide who is alive and who is dead? choices in accordance with normative generations. Are the geneticists, obstetricians and principles." Let us try to identify the levels of embryologists the only people to Many, perhaps most, health policy that physicians

WORLD HEALTH, April 1989 5 Ethics and health

The poor man's medicine; a street­ vendor offers drugs in Nepal. One goal of health policies should be to achieve a more equitable distribution of the bene­ fits of medical knowledge. should exercise in making the judge­ ments and choices essential to policy formation and operation: - The physician as the patient's advo­ cate. The physician who offers to treat or help a sick person is bonded in a special way with the patient. He (or she) invites the patient's trust that he will be competent and will place that competence at the patient's disposal. - The physician as technical expert When not locked into a trust relation with a particular patient, the physician is obliged to partici­ pate in policy formulation as a person with the technical know­ ledge which policy-makers need to make rational choices among alter­ natives. This is an obligation owed to society since that knowledge is not proprietary. - The physician as citizen. The duty to act as a technical witness in policy formation does not exempt the physician from obligations as a citizen. Thus, he must favour poli­ cies that are morally sound, and oppose those that are immoral. - The physician implementing health policies. Sooner or later, health policies must be applied to the care of individual patients. It is here that the physician faces the most diffi­ cult moral conflicts and the most direct challenge to the traditional ethic of . - The physician as moral agent. The physician, like any other person, is morally accountable and therefore cannot carry out a health policy - for example, mandatory sterilisation of carriers of genetic disorders, or refusal of care because of inability to pay - that he considers fun­ damentally immoral. The complexity of these role rela­ tionships illustrates the urgent need for careful reconstruction of so as to address the new dilemmas and conflicts that medical , technology and evolving health poli­ cies introduce into the physician's role. ' Today, it is possible, and indeed ,~ necessary, to examine these questions not only as the but much more extensively as the ethics of health policy and biotechnology as a whole. The intention is not to under-value moral and ethical aspects at the indi­ vidual level, but rather to view them within a wider frame of reference. • Photo W HO/J Schytte

6 WORLD HEALTH, April 1989