DOCSLIB.ORG

Table 1. a Short Description of Subfields As an Indicator. Table 2. A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table 1. a Short Description of Subfields As an Indicator. Table 2. A Appendix tables Table 1. A short description of subfields as an indicator. Subfield Description General General bioethics covers topics relevant to the history, development, bioethics methods and overview of the bioethics or its subfields. Clinical ethics Clinical or medical ethics covers general issues of bioethics, including health care systems, provider payment systems, health equity and justice, death and disability. Research ethics Research ethics covers everything relevant with research, including researchers’ integrity, methods and biobanks. Biotech ethics Biotech ethics covers advanced technologies in medicine and health, including nanotechnology, genetics and artificial intelligence. Public health Public health ethics covers topics relevant with public health, including public ethics participation, advertising, community health, smoke control, organ distribution and organ transplantation. Neuroethics Neuroethics covers topics relevant with mental health and psychiatry, including neurocognitive mechanisms of morality and ethics. Professional Professional ethics covers professional ethics, moral distress and education. ethics Religious Religious bioethics covers topics relevant with faith and religion. bioethics Law and Law and bioethics covers every topic relevant with regulations, laws and legal bioethics systems. Environmental Environmental ethics covers ethical issues relevant to local and global ethics environments, climate change and ecosystems. Table 2. A short description of selected topics Topic Description End of life issues Issues such as withdrawing/withholding treatment, brain death, advance directives, terminal care, etc. Patient decision Issues such as patient autonomy, informed consent, and issues relevant making to patient making decision in clinical and research settings. Reproduction issues Issues such as abortion, eugenics, surrogacy, cesarean, and IVF, etc. Enhancement Issues relevant to physical and cognitive enhancement, moral enhance, etc. Ethics education Issues concerning moral/ethics education to healthcare professionals and students Table 3. Top institutions that published highly cited articles Institute 1975-1984 1985-1994 1995-2004 2005-2014 Total Harvard University 6 14 7 8 35 Georgetown University 7 4 7 1 19 University of Oxford 0 2 3 12 17 National Institutes of Health 1 3 5 5 14 University of Michigan 4 2 6 1 13 Johns Hopkins University 2 4 2 4 12 University of Toronto 0 3 6 2 11 Boston University 6 2 2 1 11 Yale University 5 3 2 1 11 University of Washington 5 1 1 3 10 University of Chicago 5 4 0 1 10 University of Pennsylvania 1 3 2 4 10 Duke University 5 3 2 0 10 University of Minnesota 2 4 2 2 10 University of British Columbia 2 3 2 2 9 Stanford University 2 1 0 6 9 Table.4 Variation of the subfield that top cited articles belong to in four decades Subfield 1975-1984 1985-1994 1995-2004 2005-2014 Total Clinical Ethics 119 108 70 60 357 Research Ethics 13 16 36 31 96 Public Health Ethics 17 15 17 23 72 Law and Bioethics 22 23 19 8 72 Professional Ethics 10 9 13 23 55 Biotech Ethics 4 7 14 13 38 General Bioethics 5 8 15 9 37 Neuroethics 6 1 0 24 31 Environmental Ethics 2 10 15 7 34 Religious Bioethics 2 3 1 2 8 Table 5. Variation of highly cited articles on specific topics Topic 1975- 1985- 1995- 2005- Total 1984 1994 2004 2014 End of life issues 14 15 10 13 52 Patient decision making 16 14 9 10 49 Reproduction issues 7 9 3 5 24 Enhancement 0 0 3 15 18 Ethics education 3 3 1 8 15 AIDS 0 11 3 0 14 Moral distress 0 0 3 10 13 Organ transplantation 0 9 3 1 13 Dealing with (incidental) research findings 0 0 0 8 8 Obesity 0 0 0 7 7 Developing countries 0 0 2 3 5 Figure 1 Citation counts of 800 articles from 1975-2014 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999 2004 2009 2014 Figure 2. The distribution of different institutions contributing to bioethics across four decades 200 180 160 Hospital 140 Government agency 120 Research institute 100 Non-profit organization 80 Company 60 Other 40 University 20 0 1975-1984 1985-1994 1995-2004 2005-2014 Figure 3. A closer look at the distribution of non-university author affiliations 50 45 40 35 30 25 Hospital 20 Government agency 15 Research institute Non-profit organization 10 Company 5 Other 0 1975-1984 1985-1994 1995-2004 2005-2014 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Impossibility of Informed Consent?
    JME40: Good medical ethics J Med Ethics: first published as 10.1136/medethics-2014-102308 on 16 December 2014. Downloaded from PAPER The impossibility of informed consent? Kenneth Boyd Correspondence to ABSTRACT medical ethics’ over the 40 years of the Journal’s Professor Kenneth Boyd, The problematic nature of informed consent to medical publication. Biomedical Teaching Organisation, Edinburgh treatment and research, and its relation to autonomy, trust and clinical practice, has been addressed on many University, Edinburgh, Scotland Surveying the scene: the law and ethics of EH89AG, UK; occasions and from a variety of ethical perspectives in informed consent to treatment and research [email protected] the pages of the Journal of Medical Ethics. This paper Two early and wide-ranging contributions on medi- gives an account of how discussion of these issues has Received 1 September 2014 colegal and ethical aspects of informed consent developed and changed, by describing a number of Revised 26 September 2014 were made in papers by judge Kirby3 of Australia Accepted 23 October 2014 significant contributions to these debates which provide in 1983 and paediatrician Silverman4 of the USA in examples of ‘doing good medical ethics’ over the 1989. Both agreed that a paternalist or beneficence- 40 years of the Journal’s publication. based approach, in which the doctor recommends a course of treatment to which the patient either con- sents or refuses, had properly been superseded by THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF INFORMED CONSENT? an approach based on respect for the autonomy or Awareness that informed consent is problematic, in right to self-determination of the individual theory and in practice, was already evident in the patient.
    [Show full text]
  • Professional Ethics: Responsible Practice in the Professions
    Society for Ethics Across the Curriculum 13th International Conference on Ethics Across the Curriculum Professional Ethics: Responsible Practice in the Professions Saint Louis, Missouri November 3 – 5, 2011 Directors Donna J. Werner (St. Louis Community College) Jeanne Sokolec (Loyola University Chicago) Society for Ethics Across the Curriculum The purpose of the Society for Ethics Across the Curriculum is to stimulate scholarship on ethics and the teaching of ethics in all academic disciplines and to afford an opportunity for the exchange of research. President Dan Wueste (Clemson University) Executive Committee: Doug Chismar (Ringling College of Art and Design) Deborah Mower (Youngstown State University) Lisa Newton (Fairfield University) Wade Robison (Rochester Institute of Technology) Stephen Satris (Clemson University) Stephen Scales (Towson University) Jeanne Sokolec (Loyola University Chicago) Kelly Smith (Clemson University) Secretary-Treasurer Donna Werner (St Louis Community College) Editors of Teaching Ethics Elaine Englehardt (Utah Valley University) & Michael Pritchard (Western Michigan University) Special thanks to the following institutions for their generous support of SEAC: Dr. James Dale Ethics Center, Youngstown State University Center for the Study of Ethics, Utah Valley University Ezra A. Hale Chair in Applied Ethics, Rochester Institute of Technology Robert J. Rutland Institute for Ethics, Clemson University Program in Applied Ethics, Fairfield University Center for the Study of Ethics in Society, Western Michigan University Young Harris College Georgia Military College Special thanks to the following individuals for their generous support of the 2011 conference: Ellen Harshman, Dean of the John Cook School of Business at Saint Louis University Donna Dare, Vice Chancellor for Academic and Student Affairs, St.
    [Show full text]
  • War Rights and Military Virtues: a Philosophical Re-Appraisal of Just War Theory
    The University of Notre Dame Australia ResearchOnline@ND Theses 2014 War rights and military virtues: A philosophical re-appraisal of Just War Theory Matthew T. Beard University of Notre Dame Australia Follow this and additional works at: https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theses Part of the Philosophy Commons COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 WARNING The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further copying or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Do not remove this notice. Publication Details Beard, M. T. (2014). War rights and military virtues: A philosophical re-appraisal of Just War Theory (Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)). University of Notre Dame Australia. https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theses/96 This dissertation/thesis is brought to you by ResearchOnline@ND. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of ResearchOnline@ND. For more information, please contact [email protected]. War Rights and Military Virtues A Philosophical Re-appraisal of Just War Theory Doctoral Thesis Prepared by Matthew T. Beard School of Philosophy and Theology University of Notre Dame, Australia Supervised by Christian Enemark and Hayden Ramsay Supported by The Morris Research Scholarship Declaration I, Matthew Thomas Beard, declare that this PhD thesis, entitled War Rights and Military Virtues: A Philosophical Re-appraisal of Just War Theory is no more than 100,000 words exclusive of title pages, table of contents, acknowledgements, list of figures, reference list, and footnotes. The thesis is my own original work, prepared for the specific and unique purposes of this academic degree and has not been submitted in whole or part for the awarding of any other academic degree at any institution.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Association of Social Workers (NASW) Code of Ethics
    The National Association of Social Workers (NASW) The Code offers a set of values, principles, and standards to guide decision making and conduct when ethical issues arise. It does not provide a set of rules Code of Ethics that prescribe how social workers should act in all situations. Specific applications of the Code must take into account the context in which it is being considered and the possibility of conflicts among the Code’s values, principles, Preamble and standards. Ethical responsibilities flow from all human relationships, from the personal and familial to the social and professional. The primary mission of the social work profession is to enhance human well- being and help meet basic human needs of all people, with particular attention Further, the NASW Code of Ethics does not specify which values, principles, and to the needs and empowerment of people who are vulnerable, oppressed, and standards are most important and ought to outweigh others in instances when living in poverty. A historic and defining feature of social work is the they conflict. Reasonable differences of opinion can and do exist among social profession’s focus on individual well-being in a social context and the well- workers with respect to the ways in which values, ethical principles, and ethical being of society. Fundamental to social work is attention to the environmental standards should be rank ordered when they conflict. Ethical decision making in forces that create, contribute to, and address problems in living. a given situation must apply the informed judgment of the individual social worker and should also consider how the issues would be judged in a peer Social workers promote social justice and social change with and on behalf of review process where the ethical standards of the profession would be applied.
    [Show full text]
  • Altruism–Self-Interest Archetypes
    Altruism–Self-Interest Archetypes: A Paradigmatic Narrative of Counseling The Professional Counselor VolumeVolume 3, Issue 3, Issue 2, Pages 2, Pages 54–66 – Professionals http://tpcjournal.nbcc.org http://tpcjournal.nbcc.org © 2013 NBCC, Inc. and Affiliates doi:10.15241/svf.3.2.54 Stephen V. Flynn Linda L. Black The quality of the therapeutic relationship and the personal characteristics of professional counselors are key determinants of positive counseling outcomes and decision making, and they are believed to be influenced by conscious and unconscious processes. Beliefs about the unconscious nature of altruism and self-interest among 25 mental health professionals were examined through a paradigmatic narrative analysis. Data from 19 semi-structured individual interviews, one focus group, 19 artifacts and participant member checks were subjected to a secondary qualitative analysis. The results of the analysis generated three salient archetypes representative of the altruism–self-interest dynamic: exocentric altruist, endocentric altruist, and psychological egoist. Keywords: professional counselors, altruism, self-interest, archetype, qualitative, paradigmatic narrative analysis The constructs altruism and self-interest have long been described in dichotomous terms and as the sole motivators of human behavior (Holmes, Miller, & Lerner, 2002; Simpson, Irwin, & Lawrence, 2006). In 1851, Comte defined the term altruism as “self-sacrifice for the benefit of others” (1875/2001, p. 565). More than a century later, Sober (1993) defined self-interest as “the sole fixation on gaining pleasure and avoiding pain.” Because these two constructs typically have been associated with individuals’ actions and viewed through a polarized lens, there is a dearth of research examining the unified and unconscious nature of both altruism and self- interest (Bishop, 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Whose Life Is It Anyway? a Study in Respect for Autonomy
    Journal ofmedical ethics 1995; 21: 179-183 J Med Ethics: first published as 10.1136/jme.21.3.179 on 1 June 1995. Downloaded from Medicine and literature Whose Life Is It Anyway? A study in respect for autonomy Margaret Norden Marymount University, Arlington, Virginia, USA Abstract Precis of the story Brian Clark's drama, Whose Life Is It Anyway? (1), Whose Life Is It Anyway? opens with the explores the difficulties ofapplying the principle of hospitalization of Ken Harrison who was critically respect for autonomy to real-life circumstances. In the injured in an automobile accident four months play a permanently disabled patient, who wishes to be earlier and permanently paralyzed from the neck allowed to die, raises moral questions about the down. Although Ken arrived in critical condition, he adequacy of the autonomous agent, respect for the has since been stabilized, informed by his doctors autonomy ofothers, the authority of the law, the that his paralysis is permanent, and advised that he allocation ofsociety's resources, and the intrinsic value will be transferred to a long-term care facility. Facing ofhuman life. After a brief review of the story and the prospect of such an existence, Ken chooses not definition of respect for autonomy, this paper cites to live. He realizes that he could not survive outside passages from the play that dramatize the tension of an institution, and therefore, requests a discharge. between respect for autonomy and these other moral Although a psychiatrist confirms Ken's mental copyright. concerns. There follows a review of relevant competence, the hospital doctors refuse to discharge commentary from the classicists Kant and Mill and the him.
    [Show full text]
  • Professional Ethics 1.9
    CANDIDATE GUIDE PROFESSIONAL ETHICS OUTCOME 8 T ABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. CANDIDATE INFORMATION 4 COMPETENCY STANDARD REQUIREMENTS 5 KEYS TO ICONS 6 GENERAL GUIDELINES 7 CANDIDATE SUPPORT 9 SECTION 1: AN INTRODUCTION TO THE CONCEPT OF ETHICS AND 10 ETHICAL BEHAVIOUR 1.1. What are Ethics? 1.2. Value Systems 1.3. A Brief History of Ethics 1.4. Ethics Definitions 1.5. Key Concepts 1.6. Ethics Alarms 1.7. Importance of Ethical Conduct in Business 1.8. Professional Ethics 1.9. Ethical Issues Facing Engineers 1.10. Code of Ethics 1.11. SAIMechE‟s Code of Conduct INITIAL TEST 2 SECTION 2: PRACTICAL ETHICAL DECISION MAKING MODEL AS 37 PER THE ASSESSMENT CRITERIA 2.1. Introduction 2.2. Steps in Ethical Decision Making STEP 1: Define the Ethical Problem STEP 2: Identify Affected Parties STEP 3: Explore Optional Solutions STEP 4: Evaluate Solutions STEP 5: Select and Justify a Solution ASSESSMENT TEST SECTION 3: GENERIC GUIDELINES: LEARNING OUTCOMES AND 57 ASSESSMENT CRITERIA ARE THE GUIDING PRINCIPLES OF PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE APPENDICES 59 REFERENCES 70 RECORDING OF REPORTS 73 ASSESSMENT PROCESS 74 3 CANDIDATE INFORMATION Details Please Complete details Name of candidate Name of supervisor Work Unit Name of mentor Date started Date of completion & Assessment 4 COMPETENCY STANDARD REQUIREMENTS (Direct extract from SAIMechE‟s Standard of Professional Competency (SPC)) LEARNING OUTCOME 8 Conduct his or her engineering activities ethically. Assessment Criteria: The candidate is expected to be sensitive to ethical issues and adopt a systematic approach to resolving these issues, typified by: 1. Identify the central ethical problem; 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Bioethics a Profession? Craig M
    Online Journal of Health Ethics Volume 5 | Issue 2 Article 6 Is Bioethics A Profession? Craig M. Klugman Ph.D. University of Nevada Reno, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://aquila.usm.edu/ojhe Recommended Citation Klugman, C. M. (2008). Is Bioethics A Profession?. Online Journal of Health Ethics, 5(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.18785/ojhe.0502.06 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Online Journal of Health Ethics by an authorized administrator of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Running head: BIOETHICS 1 Is Bioethics A Profession? Craig M. Klugman, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Bioethics and Medical Humanities University of Nevada Reno [email protected] Abstract The development of an occupation into a profession is an historical process that concerns power, jurisdiction, social contracts, and economic interests. Sociological theories of professionalization view these developments through perspectives of superior work, pay for performance, historical processes, jurisdictional disputes, struggles of social and economic power, and virtues. This essay explores these theories and examines the field of bioethics through each of these lenses looking at such issues amateur versus professional, education, professional organizations, specialized knowledge, code of ethics, jurisdiction, work sites, work focus, research, socialization, professional autonomy, licensure, legislation, and prestige. Bioethics is seen as falling in the middle of Goode’s “profession continuum.” While bioethics has adopted some of the necessary characteristics of a profession, having those elements is not a sufficient condition to being a profession.
    [Show full text]
  • PROFESSIONAL ETHICS PROFESSIONAL ETHICS Ethics Is
    PROFESSIONAL ETHICS The central question of Ethics: “what ought one to do?” In seeking to answer this question we are left with some enduring truths…. • Ethics is about relationships • It’s about struggling to develop a well-informed conscience • It’s about being true to the idea of who we are and what we stand for • It’s about having the courage to explore difficult questions • It’s about accepting the cost • PROFESSIONAL ETHICS Ethics is a matter of practical concern. Plato records Socrates as having asked the fundamental question of ethics, “What ought one do?” • Whenever one seeks to answer that question then one is operating in the ethical dimension. • There are a number of things that should be noted about this question. • The first thing to note relates to what Socrates did not ask! • Socrates did not begin by asking questions such as, “What is good, what is evil?” or, “What is right, what is wrong?” rather, he asked an immensely practical question that confronts people whenever they have a decision to make, whenever they are in a position to exercise their capacity to choose. • PROFESSIONAL ETHICS Our aim is to make you unconsciously competent when confronted with a choice to be either ethical or unethical. • Many professionals find it difficult to accept the generality of Socrates’ question as they often operate under what they call a code of ethics. • The difficulty arises because much of what is placed within such a code is better understood as rules of professional conduct; including rules of etiquette, rules to regulate competition and so on.
    [Show full text]
  • American Psychiatric Association the Principles of Medical Ethics
    American Psychiatric Association The Principles of Medical Ethics With Annotations Especially Applicable to Psychiatry 2013 Edition Copyright © 2010 American Psychiatric Association ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Manufactured in the United States of America 08 07 06 3 2 1 The Principles of Medical Ethics 2013 Edition (Previous editions 1973, 1978, 1981, 1984, 1985, 1989, 1992, 1993, 1995, 1995 Revised, 1998, 2001, 2001 Revised, 2006, 2008, 2009. 2009 Revised, and 2010 American Psychiatric Association 1000 Wilson Boulevard #1825 Arlington, VA 22209 THE PRINCIPLES OF MEDICAL ETHICS With Annotations Especially Applicable to Psychiatry 2013 Edition In 1973, the American Psychiatric Association (APA) published the first edition of The Principles of Medical Ethics with Annotations Especially Applicable to Psychiatry. Subsequently, revisions were published as the APA Board of Trustees and the APA Assembly approved additional annotations. In July of 1980, the American Medical Association (AMA) approved a new version of the Principles of Medical Ethics (the first revision since 1957), and the APA Ethics Committee1 incorporated many of its annotations into the new Principles, which resulted in the 1981 edition and subsequent revisions. This version includes changes to the Principles approved by the AMA in 2001. Foreword ALL PHYSICIANS should practice in accordance with the medical code of ethics set forth in the Principles of Medical Ethics of the American Medical Association. An up-to-date expression and elaboration of these statements is found in the Opinions and Reports of the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs of the American Medical Association.2 Psychiatrists are strongly advised to 3 be familiar with these documents. However, these general guidelines have sometimes been difficult to interpret for psychiatry, so further annotations to the basic principles are offered in this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinician Conscience Objection and Ethical Care of Patients
    1 VERMONT MEDICAL SOCIETY RESOLUTION 2 3 Clinician Conscience Objection and Ethical Care of Patients 4 5 As adopted at the VMS Annual Meeting on November 2, 2019 6 7 RESOLVED, that the VMS Policy on Physician Conscience be amended to read: The 8 Vermont Medical Society recognizes that the provision of certain types of medical care 9 or treatment can come in conflict with members’ cultural values, ethics or religious 10 beliefs. The Vermont Medical Society commits to protecting its members’ (physicians, 11 physician assistants, medical students) freedom to follow their own conscience in 12 deciding whether to participate in providing care or treatment, consistent with the 13 ethical norms of their professions, stated for physicians in AMA Code of Ethics Section 14 1.1.7, found in its entirety below, including fidelity to patients, respect for patient self- 15 determination, non-discrimination and informing the patient about all relevant options 16 for treatment, including options to which the physician morally objects, and information 17 regarding how to access such services. 18 19 AMA Code of Medical Ethics Opinion 1.1.7 20 Physicians are expected to uphold the ethical norms of their profession, including fidelity 21 to patients and respect for patient self-determination. Yet physicians are not defined 22 solely by their profession. They are moral agents in their own right and, like their 23 patients, are informed by and committed to diverse cultural, religious, and philosophical 24 traditions and beliefs. For some physicians, their professional calling is imbued with their 25 foundational beliefs as persons, and at times the expectation that physicians will put 26 patients’ needs and preferences first may be in tension with the need to sustain moral 27 integrity and continuity across both personal and professional life.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hippocratic Oath and Principles of Medical Ethics
    MEDICINE AND PUBLIC POLICY The Hippocratic Oath and Principles of Medical Ethics Gilbert Berdine MD The Hippocratic Oath is associated with the morally right. This tradition remains in the modern practice of medicine, but over time fewer medical era. “As God is my witness I hereby pledge to …” can graduates have taken any form of the Hippocratic be found in modern rituals to stress the seriousness Oath. As of 2006, the State University of New York of purpose. Courts in the U.S. require prospective Upstate Medical School in Syracuse was the only witnesses to pledge their truthfulness: “Do you sol- U.S. medical school that administered the classic emnly swear or affirm that you will tell the truth, the version of the Hippocratic Oath to its graduates. The whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you Hippocratic Oath has been revised to make it more God?” This pledge becomes a source of contention in acceptable to modern schools, but the medical pro- a multi-cultural society as some members believe in fession no longer has a common set of promises that other deities. guide it. This article will look at the classic version of the Hippocratic Oath to see why it has been aban- Anyone who takes his or her religion seriously doned. Modern medical students wish to graduate would not pledge to a pagan god as this would be a into an ancient order of physicians, so they long for form of idolatry. This pledge is probably the main rea- a solemn ceremony, but it is difficult to craft a solemn son that the Oath has been abandoned in the modern ceremony that remains agreeable to a diverse group era, but what can take its place as a symbol of seri- of students.
    [Show full text]