DOCSLIB.ORG

The Relationship Between Carbohydrate Restrictive Diets and Body Fat Percentage in the Female Athlete

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Nutrition Theses Department of Nutrition Summer 7-22-2011 The Relationship Between Carbohydrate Restrictive Diets And Body Fat Percentage in the Female Athlete Lauren L. Lorenzo Georgia State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/nutrition_theses Part of the Nutrition Commons Recommended Citation Lorenzo, Lauren L., "The Relationship Between Carbohydrate Restrictive Diets And Body Fat Percentage in the Female Athlete." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2011. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/nutrition_theses/13 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Nutrition at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Nutrition Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. APPROVAL THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CARBOHYDRATE RESTRICTIVE DIETS AND BODY FAT PERCENTAGE IN THE FEMALE ATHLETE BY LAUREN LYNCH LORENZO Approved: ________________________________________________ Dan Benardot, PhD, DHC, RD, LD, FACSM, Major Professor ________________________________________________ Anita Nucci, PhD, RD, LD, Committee Member ________________________________________________ Walter R. Thompson, PhD, FACSM, Committee Member ___________________ Date AUTHOR’S STATEMENT In presenting this thesis as a partial fulfillment of the requirements for an advanced degree from Georgia State University, I agree that the Library of the University shall make it available for inspection and circulation in accordance with its regulations governing materials of the type. I agree that permission to quote from, to copy from, or to publish this thesis may be granted by the author, or in his/her absence, by the Associate Dean, College of Health and Human Sciences. Such quoting, copying, or publishing must be solely for scholarly purposes and will not involve potential financial gain. It is understood that any copying from or publication of this dissertation which involves potential gain will not be allowed without the written permission from the author. ________________________________ Signature of Author NOTICE TO BORROWERS All theses deposited in the Georgia State University Library must be used in accordance with the stipulations prescribed by the author in the preceding statement. The author of this thesis is: Lauren Lynch Lorenzo 6013 Brookside Oak Circle Norcross, GA 30093 The director of this thesis is: Dr. Dan Benardot Division of Nutrition School of Health Professions College of Health and Human Sciences Georgia State University Atlanta, GA 30307 Users of this thesis not regularly enrolled as students at Georgia State University are required to attest acceptance of the preceding stipulation by signing below. Libraries borrowing this thesis for the use of their patrons are required to see that each user records here the information requested. VITA LAUREN LYNCH LORENZO EDUCATION: JAMES MADISION UNIVERSITY B.B.A. HOSPITALITY AND TOURISM MANAGEMENT 1999 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: AMERICAN SPORTS MANAGEMENT VICE PRESIDENT OF TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 2007-2010 BUSINESS MANAGER 2003-2004 THE RITZ-CARLTON BUCKHEAD SENIOR MEETING & SPECIAL EVENTS MANAGER 2005-2006 THE WESTIN BUCKEAD CATERING MANAGER CONVENTION SERVICES MANAGER 2004-2005 TORI, INC. CATERING CATERING & BUSINESS MANAGER 2001-2002 THE GREENBRIER HOTEL & SPA FOOD AND BEVERAGE MANAGER CULINARY APPRENTICE/ROUNDS CHEF 1999-2001 AFFILIATIONS: AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION, STUDENT MEMBER 2008-2011 AMERICAN COUNCIL ON EXERCISE, MEMBER 2008-2011 SPORTS, CARDIOVASCULAR, & WELLNESS NUTRITIONISTS 2008-2011 AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SPORTS MEDICINE, MEMBER 2010-2011 NATIONAL STRENGTH & CONDITIONING ASSOCIATION 2008-2009 AEROBICS & FITNESS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA 1999-2011 POWER PILATES METHOD ALLIANCE, MEMBER 2008-2009 ABSTRACT Purpose: To assess the dietary intake and body composition of recreational and competitive female athletes, for the purpose of analyzing the relationships between macronutrient intake and body composition.. The main aim was to determine the relationship between caloric intake, carbohydrate (CHO) intake and protein intake with body fat percentage in active females. Methods: Using an IRB approved protocol, 44 volunteer female recreational and competitive athletes 18 years of age or older were recruited. Interviews were conducted to gather information on within day energy balance by assessing the time and amount of foods/beverages consumed, and the duration and intensity (using a Rating of Perceived Exertion scale) of activity performed on the day of assessment. All analyses were performed using Nutritiming™ (Calorie and Pulse Technologies, Atlanta, GA) to assess energy surpluses, energy deficits, and end of day energy balance. Information on date of birth, race/ethnicity, menstrual status, sleep and wake times, and prior diagnoses of metabolic disease and/or eating disorders were collected at the time of the interview. Height was assessed using a standard stadiometer. Weight and body composition were assessed via Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) using InBody 230 (BioSpace Co. USA). The BIA assessment was performed to determine body fat percentage, Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR), Body Mass Index (BMI), segmental body composition, and fat and lean mass in kilograms. Nutrient data were derived using an interviewer-led, 24-hour recall. Results: CHO intake/kg total mass was significantly and inversely correlated with body fat percentage and BMI, (p=0.018 and p=0.001 respectively). Protein intake/kg total mass was also inversely and significantly correlated with body fat percentage (p=0.006). Fat intake was not significantly associated with BMI, body fat percent, or lean mass in kilograms. Total energy intake/kg total mass was inversely associated with BMI (p=0.001), with fat mass (p=0.001), and with body fat percentage, (p=0.001). CHO intake/kg total mass was positively associated with the total number of hours spent in an anabolic (i.e., EB>0) state (p=0.001), and was inversely associated with the total number of hours spent in a catabolic (i.e., EB < 0) state (p=0.001). CHO intake/kg total mass was the only substrate to be significantly correlated with the number of hours spent ± 400 kcal EB over a 24 hour period (p=0.001). Z-scores were created to establish categories of body composition and energy balance values. Utilizing Chi-Square tests, it was determined that more hours spent in an energy surplus (> 400kcal) was associated with higher body fat percent (p=0.042). Conclusions: CHO restriction, whether done intentionally or as a function of an energy restrictive intake, was commonly observed in this subject pool. Of the females surveyed, 79% did not meet their daily energy needs and, on average, consumed 49% of the recommended daily intake of CHO established for active people. The findings that subjects with lower CHO intakes had higher body fat levels, and that CHO was associated with improved maintenance of energy balance, which was also associated with lower body fat percent, suggest that physically active women should not restrict CHO to achieve a desired body composition. It was also observed that end-of-day energy balance was not associated with either energy substrate consumption or body composition. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CARBOHYDRATE RESTRICTIVE DIETS AND BODY FAT PERCENTAGE IN THE FEMALE ATHLETE BY LAUREN LYNCH LORENZO B.B.A., JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY, 1999 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty Of Georgia State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF SCIENCE SCHOOL OF HEALTH PROFESSIONS DIVISION OF NUTRITION GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY Atlanta, GA July 22, 2011 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to acknowledge and thank the following people who contributed to this thesis research and were important to making this work possible: Dr. Dan Benardot for his undying patience and guidance through this journey. He has not only taught me about the field of nutrition, but about how to inspire others. I am forever in his debt. Matthew Lorenzo for sticking with me through all the twist and turns of the last 3 years. You have sacrificed as much as I have. You are my hero. Luke Lorenzo for putting up with my stressful days. Dr. Anita Nucci Dr. Walter Thompson Barbara Hopkins Stephen & Joanne Lynch Dr. Deron Boyles Rod Renner Tracy Blakely Eve Cohen Luis Boscan Karen S. Foley Cami & Abel Brand Mari Fridenmaker iii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables……………………………………………………………………. iv List of Figures …………………………………………………………………... vi Abbreviations ………………………………………………………………….... vii Definitions ………………………………………………………………………. ix CHAPTER I Introduction……………………………………………………… 1 CHAPTER II Review of Literature………………….…………………………. 4 CHAPTER III Methods ….……………………………………………………… 30 CHAPTER IV Results…………………………………………………………… 33 CHAPTER V Discussion and Conclusions..…………………………………… 55 References ……………………………………………………………………… 63 Appendices ……………………………………………………………………... 70 iv LIST OF TABLES Results Tables Table 1: Study Participants Demographic Data …………………………………………… 33 Table 2: Athlete Type of Study Participants………………………………………………. 34 Table 3: Sport/Activity Type of Study Participants……………………………………….. 34 Table 4: Anthropometric/Activity Data…………………………………………………… 35 Table 5: Body Fat Percentage by Athlete Type ……………………………………………. 36 Table 6: Body Fat Percentage and Athlete Type (ANOVA) ………………………………. 36 Table 7: Body Fat Percentage by Age (ANOVA) …………………………………………
Recommended publications
  • 7 Live Lean Nutrition Laws Brad Gouthro

    7 Live Lean Nutrition Laws Brad Gouthro

    7 Live Lean Nutrition Laws Brad Gouthro Host, Living Lean With The Ultimate Body Press Certified Trainer & Nutrition Specialist Live Lean Nutrition Law #1 Set A Measurable & Realistic Goal Most people come to me and say… “Brad, I need to lose 10 lbs before summer in 2 months.” That's a great start. You have a set measurable goal… 10 lbs in 8 weeks. But is this realistic (and healthy)? Typically, a healthy fat loss plan will allow you to lose 1-2 pounds of fat per week with exercise and a nutrition plan that puts you in a caloric deficit. A caloric deficit simply means you're burning more calories than you're eating. However, everyone's calorie requirements are different based on your current body composition and activity levels. Lets take a closer look. How many calories should I be eating to lose fat? Going into a severe calorie deficit through dieting alone IS NOT the most effective approach. Not only is this crash diet unhealthy and unsustainable, your body will also go into starvation mode. This means it’ll end up storing fat and burning your muscle for fuel. This loss of muscle slows your metabolism and adds up to a “lighter” but fatter version of your current self. Heard of the term “skinny fat”…well that’s what happens on crash diets. The two healthiest ways to create a calorie deficit is by following a diet that puts you in a modest caloric deficit AND THEN follow that up with an intense exercise program to create an even higher caloric deficit.
  • Body Fat Percentage, Body Mass Index, Fat Mass Index and the Ageing Bone: Their Singular and Combined Roles Linked to Physical Activity and Diet

    Body Fat Percentage, Body Mass Index, Fat Mass Index and the Ageing Bone: Their Singular and Combined Roles Linked to Physical Activity and Diet

    nutrients Article Body Fat Percentage, Body Mass Index, Fat Mass Index and the Ageing Bone: Their Singular and Combined Roles Linked to Physical Activity and Diet David J. Tomlinson 1,* , Robert M. Erskine 2,3 , Christopher I. Morse 1 and Gladys L. Onambélé 1 1 Musculoskeletal Sciences and Sport Medicine Research Centre, Manchester Metropolitan University, Crewe CW1 5DU, UK; [email protected] (C.I.M.); [email protected] (G.L.O.) 2 Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 3AF, UK; [email protected] 3 Institute of Sport, Exercise and Health, University College London, London W1T 7HA, UK * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +44-(0)161-247-5590 Received: 12 December 2018; Accepted: 16 January 2019; Published: 18 January 2019 Abstract: This study took a multi-analytical approach including group differences, correlations and unit-weighed directional z-score comparisons to identify the key mediators of bone health. A total of 190 participants (18–80 years) were categorized by body fat%, body mass index (BMI) and fat mass index (FMI) to examine the effect of differing obesity criteria on bone characteristics. A subset of 50 healthy-eating middle-to-older aged adults (44–80 years) was randomly selected to examine any added impact of lifestyle and inflammatory profiles. Diet was assessed using a 3-day food diary, bone mineral density (BMD) and content (BMC) by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in the lumbar, thoracic, (upper and lower) appendicular and pelvic areas. Physical activity was assessed using the Baecke questionnaire, and endocrine profiling was assessed using multiplex luminometry.
  • Understanding 7 Understanding Body Composition

    Understanding 7 Understanding Body Composition

    PowerPoint ® Lecture Outlines 7 Understanding Body Composition Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Objectives • Define body composition . • Explain why the assessment of body size, shape, and composition is useful. • Explain how to perform assessments of body size, shape, and composition. • Evaluate your personal body weight, size, shape, and composition. • Set goals for a healthy body fat percentage. • Plan for regular monitoring of your body weight, size, shape, and composition. Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Body Composition Concepts • Body Composition The relative amounts of lean tissue and fat tissue in your body. • Lean Body Mass Your body’s total amount of lean/fat-free tissue (muscles, bones, skin, organs, body fluids). • Fat Mass Body mass made up of fat tissue. Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Body Composition Concepts • Percent Body Fat The percentage of your total weight that is fat tissue (weight of fat divided by total body weight). • Essential Fat Fat necessary for normal body functioning (including in the brain, muscles, nerves, lungs, heart, and digestive and reproductive systems). • Storage Fat Nonessential fat stored in tissue near the body’s surface. Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Why Body Size, Shape, and Composition Matter Knowing body composition can help assess health risks. • More people are now overweight or obese. • Estimates of body composition provide useful information for determining disease risks. Evaluating body size and shape can motivate healthy behavior change. • Changes in body size and shape can be more useful measures of progress than body weight. Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Body Composition for Men and Women Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.
  • Full Obesity Web File

    Full Obesity Web File

    Obesity Education Initiative PREPRINT JUNE 1998 CLINICALGUIDELINES ONTHE IDENTIFICATION, EVALUATION, AND TREATMENTOF OVERWEIGHTAND OBESITYINADULTS Executive Summary NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction: tural, physiological, metabolic and genetic factors. An estimated 97 million adults in the United While there is agreement about the health risks States are overweight or obese, a condition that of overweight and obesity, there is less agreement substantially raises their risk of morbidity from about their management. Some have argued hypertension, dyslipidemia, type 2 diabetes, against treating obesity because of the difficulty coronary heart disease, stroke, gallbladder dis- in maintaining long-term weight loss and of ease, osteoarthritis, sleep apnea and respiratory potentially negative consequences of the fre- problems, and endometrial, breast, prostate, and quently seen pattern of weight cycling in obese colon cancers. Higher body weights are also asso- subjects. Others argue that the potential hazards ciated with increases in all-cause mortality. Obese of treatment do not outweigh the known hazards individuals may also suffer from social stigmati- of being obese. The intent of these guidelines is zation and discrimination. As the second leading to provide evidence for the effects of treatment cause of preventable death in the United States on overweight and obesity. The guidelines focus today, overweight and obesity pose a major pub- on the role of the primary care practitioner in lic health challenge. treating overweight and obesity. Overweight is here defined as a body mass index Evidence-Based Guidelines. (BMI) of 25 to 29.9 kg/m2 and obesity as a BMI To evaluate published information and to deter- of ≥ 30 kg/m2.
  • Fat Loss Facts Vs. Fiction

    Fat Loss Facts Vs. Fiction

    FAT LOSS FACTS VS. FICTION The Top 5 Fat-Loss Myths & The 5 Fat-Loss Secrets that can Revolutionize Your Life With type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and America’s waistline bulging to frightening highs, it is clear that what we think we know, and what we’ve been led to believe about fat loss, is not only wrong, but completely backwards. That’s right. Your difficulty losing weight is truly not your fault. You have been misinformed for years about healthy eating (i.e., fat makes you fat; replace fat with carbs). You have been misinformed about exercise’s role in reducing body fat. And, you have been bombarded by celebrity messages that claim, “This worked for me, so it will work for you.” At The Exercise Coach® we make it our policy not to cave in to popular fitness trends, but rather to go wherever the science of fat loss and exercise leads us. It is our hope that you take the time to read, understand, and pass along this information to as many people as you can. Share it with others so together you can maximize your fitness and fat-loss efforts while enjoying total freedom from time-consuming and defeating conventional approaches. You can enjoy maximum fitness and fat loss results with just 20-40 minutes of exercise per week - and I will tell you how. First, let’s start tearing down the myths. Enjoy! MYTH #1: Aerobic Exercise is Crucial for Fat Loss Everybody’s favorite! Hop on a treadmill, • We eat calories. stepper, elliptical; go for a run, walk, or skip • Too many calories make us fat.
  • Dieting Done Right Resources for You and Your Employees

    Dieting Done Right Resources for You and Your Employees

    Dieting Done Right Resources For You and Your Employees BMR Calculator http://www.bmi-calculator.net/bmr-calculator/ BMR stands for Basal Metabolic Rate, and it represents the amount of calories your body, at its current weight, burns at rest. Daily activity and exercise are not included in the BMR number. To lose weight, begin with your BMR calories and estimate daily activity - then reduce your caloric intake in order to lose weight. To lose 1lb per week, you must decrease your caloric intake, or create a deficit through exercise, by 500 calories per day. Example: Mary is 150lbs. She would like to lose 10lbs to get to a weight that is suitable for her age and height. Her BMR is 1392 calories per day. She also walks 2 miles each day, so she has an estimated 1500 calorie allotment per day to stay at her current weight. Mary would like to lose 10lbs in 3 months, which means she needs to create a caloric deficit of around 400 calories per day to successfully do this. Diet Template Options The Food and Mood Template http://www.personal-nutrition-guide.com/support-files/ food_mood_journal.pdf Daily Food Checklist http://www.personal-nutrition-guide.com/support-files/ food_group_journal.pdf Weekly Menu Planner https://docs.google.com/file/d/ 0B4DW30-8_eVxN2Y2ZDBiZDgtMDIzYy00YzE3LTk3ZjItNzdlZDU0ZjMx ODkz/edit?pli=1&hl=en# Structured and Detailed Menu Planner https://docs.google.com/file/d/ 0B4DW30-8_eVxNmUzYmIxN2UtNTMwMS00ZmIzLWI0ZDAtYTg5NTc4 Y2E2YmJk/edit?hl=en# Diet App Options Calorie Count http://caloriecount.about.com My Fitness Pal http://www.myfitnesspal.com/ Nutrition Menu http://www.shroomies.com/nutrition_menu/ My Plate http://www.livestrong.com/myplate/ My Net Diary http://www.mynetdiary.com/ Tap and Track http://www.tapandtrack.com/home/index .
  • The Evidence Report

    The Evidence Report

    Obesity Education Initiative C LINICAL GUIDELINES ON THE IDENTIFICATION, EVALUATION, AND TREATMENT OF OVERWEIGHT AND OBESITY IN ADULTS The Evidence Report NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE C LINICAL GUIDELINES ON THE IDENTIFICATION, EVALUATION, AND TREATMENT OF OVERWEIGHT AND OBESITY IN ADULTS The Evidence Report NIH PUBLICATION NO. 98-4083 SEPTEMBER 1998 NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute in cooperation with The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases NHLBI Obesity Education Initiative Expert Panel on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults F. Xavier Pi-Sunyer, M.D., M.P.H. William H. Dietz, M.D., Ph.D. Chair of the Panel Director Chief, Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Nutrition Division of Nutrition and Physical Activity Director, Obesity Research Center National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention St. Luke's/Roosevelt Hospital Center and Health Promotion Professor of Medicine Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Columbia University College of Physicians and Atlanta, GA Surgeons New York, NY John P. Foreyt, Ph.D. Professor of Medicine and Director Diane M. Becker, Sc.D., M.P.H. Nutrition Research Clinic Director Baylor College of Medicine Center for Health Promotion Houston, TX Associate Professor Department of Medicine Robert J. Garrison, Ph.D. The Johns Hopkins University Associate Professor Baltimore, MD Department of Preventive Medicine University of Tennessee, Memphis Claude Bouchard, Ph.D. Memphis, TN Professor of Exercise Physiology Physical Activity Sciences Scott M. Grundy, M.D., Ph.D. Laboratory Director Laval University Center for Human Nutrition Sainte Foy, Quebec University of Texas CANADA Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas Dallas, TX Richard A.
  • Optimal Cut-Off Values for Anthropometric Measures of Obesity in Screening for Cardiometabolic Disorders in Adults

    Optimal Cut-Off Values for Anthropometric Measures of Obesity in Screening for Cardiometabolic Disorders in Adults

    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Optimal cut‑of values for anthropometric measures of obesity in screening for cardiometabolic disorders in adults Pawel Macek1,2, Malgorzata Biskup1,3, Malgorzata Terek‑Derszniak3, Halina Krol1,5, Jolanta Smok‑Kalwat4, Stanislaw Gozdz1,4 & Marek Zak1* Excessive accumulation of body fat (BF) promotes obesity, whilst posing a signifcant health hazard. There being no agreed, optimal quantifying methods, application of BF variable in clinical practice is not deemed an efective assessment option. The study, involving 4,735 patients (33.6% men), aged 45–64, aimed to identify optimal cut‑of values for anthropometric indicators of obesity to evaluate cardiometabolic risk. A minimum P‑value approach was applied to calculate the cut‑ofs for BF%. Threshold values for body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), waist‑to‑hip ratio (WHR), and waist‑to‑height (WHTR) ratio, facilitating optimal diferentiation of cardiometabolic risk, were based on BF%, expressed as a binary classifer. The newly estimated cut‑of values for predicting cardiometabolic risk, based on BMI, were lower than the referential obesity thresholds, whereas the threshold values of WC, WHR, and WHTR were higher. Apart from dyslipidemia, the odds of cardiometabolic disorders were higher, when the anthropometric indicators under study exceeded the cut‑of points in both sexes. The proposed cut‑ofs proved instrumental in predicting cardiometabolic risk, whilst highlighting diagnostic and clinical potential of BF%, whereas BMI boasted the highest predictive potential. Cardiometabolic risk also proved signifcantly higher even in the overweight patients. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), obesity entails excessive and life-threatening accumulation of body fat (BF), which poses a signifcant risk factor for cardiometabolic disorders1–5.
  • Recommended Percentage of Fat Per Day

    Recommended Percentage of Fat Per Day

    Recommended Percentage Of Fat Per Day Alphonse outcries glisteringly. Robin is cyclical: she dele Judaically and excite her pacemaker. Lyndon demonised aloofly. Of fat per day to healthy for adding up in your organs which ultimately has worked for Have per day of recommended percentages than the recommendations for high temperatures and cardiovascular and similar associations of foods and shifts the bad carbs are just started? What the Saturated Fat tissue Much Should but Have Nutrition. Reviewed by type Department on Nutrition Therapy at The Cleveland Clinic. This is looking great article. While fats lower fat? The fda and heart health survey: all need all of recommended fat percentage of medicine position stand the body fat in select a dogs can be consuming a few people consume? Add fat recommendation by day of fats are turning off your body functions such as soon as they need the recommendations. On fat percentages. In party it's recommended that 1035 of gum daily calories come from protein. These percentages of recreation will carefully weight offset and. Having high levels of VLDL cholesterol can lead to correct health conditions. Does more of fats in percentages, per day of vitamin and recommendations based on gender, helping to chew more and fitness pal app or worsen anxiety. The guidelines were primarily established for nutritional professionals to help some develop realistic, individualized eating plans for their clients. The percent daily expenditure on rabbit nutrition facts label over a lane to the nutrients in one. How many carbs enough calcium and others may find that the brain development including conflicting information has been widely from person uses akismet to.
  • Effective Management of Obesity

    Effective Management of Obesity

    Applied Evidence R ESEARCH F INDINGS T HAT A RE C HANGING C LINICAL P RACTICE Effective management of obesity Todd M. Sheperd, MD; assistant professor of family medicine, Medical University of South Carolina Abstract hysician intervention to encourage and assist obese patients to lose weight is warranted, Successful treatment of obesity usually requires Pfor these reasons: multiple interventions. The choice of therapies should be guided by the initial assessment of a • Prevention of adverse outcomes. Left untreated, patient’s degree of obesity and comorbid condi- obesity is clearly related to the development of many tions, if present. A variety of interventions can adverse health outcomes, including diabetes melli- achieve short-term weight loss, but rebound tus, hypertension, stroke, hyperlipidemia, coronary weight gain is common when therapy is artery disease, gallstones, osteoarthritis, obstructive stopped. Thus, programs for weight mainte- sleep apnea, vascular disease, depression, and cer- nance are critical to ultimate success. tain cancers (breast, endometrial, prostate, colon).1–4 • Reduction of morbidity and mortality. A causal Key Points effect between intentional weight loss and mortality has been difficult to prove, but even modest weight ■ Diet and exercise coupled with behavioral loss can reduce the morbidity of obesity-related dis- modification can improve both patient-related ease, such as arthritis and obstructive sleep apnea and disease-related outcomes in the (Strength of recommendation: A).5–7 For those at short term; however, long-term efficacy increased risk of death from cardiovascular disease, is lacking (A). such as persons with obesity and diabetes mellitus, ■ Drugs such as sibutramine or orlistat may intentional weight loss coupled with lifestyle change achieve modest, short-term weight loss, but can significantly reduce mortality (SOR: C).8 Nearly their long-term effectiveness is unproven (A).
  • Journal of Obesity and Weight-Loss Medication

    Journal of Obesity and Weight-Loss Medication

    ISSN: 2572-4010 Grief and Waterman. J Obes Weight-Loss Medic 2019, 5:024 DOI: 10.23937/2572-4010.1510024 Volume 5 | Issue 1 Journal of Open Access Obesity and Weight-Loss Medication RESEARCH ARTICLE Approach to Obesity Management in the Primary Care Setting Samuel N Grief* and Megan Waterman Check for Department of Family Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, USA updates *Corresponding author: Dr. Samuel N Grief, MD, FCFP, FAAFP, Professor, Clinical Family Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1919 West Taylor Street, Suite 143, Chicago, IL 60612, USA development of obesity [8,9]. Children are exposed to Abstract a large number of television advertising throughout Obesity is an American epidemic, affecting 35% of US childhood, including exposure to high-calorie, low adults, and 17% of US children [1]. These rates of obesity are above the Healthy People 2020 targets of 30.5% and nutrition-dense food ads. A study undertaken by the 14.5%, respectively [2]. Obesity is defined as a Body Mass Kaiser Foundation confirmed the pervasive nature of Index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 [2]. media advertising and its link to the development of Obesity costs hundreds of billions of dollars to the health childhood obesity [10]. care system annually, is associated or directly related to 60% of type 2 diabetes and is a well-recognized risk factor Socioeconomic status (SES) is often implicated as a for high blood pressure, heart disease and stroke [3,4]. risk factor for obesity. Disparity among socioeconomic groups is thought to be a primary cause of obesity, This article will review the causes, screening recommenda- tions, and roles of diet, exercise, lifestyle counseling, phar- with the higher income groups enjoying lower rates of macotherapy and bariatric surgery related to obesity and its obesity in Westernized countries [11].
  • Determination of Body Composition

    Determination of Body Composition

    Determination of Body Composition Introduction A variety of methods have been developed for assessing body composition, including isotopic determination of total body water, whole body 40K counting, radiography, electrical conductance and impedance, etc. Two of the most common methods of assessing body composition, however, are hydrostatic weighing and determination of skinfold thicknesses. Although we won’t be doing hydrostatic weighing as part of the lab activities, the method is important for you to understand. The hydrostatic or underwater weighing method is based upon the assumption that the body is composed of two components or compartments. The components are fat-free or lean mass (FFM), which is assumed to have a density of 1.10 kg/L, and a fat component, which is assumed to have a density of 0.90 kg/L. The density of the whole body, therefore, will depend upon the relative size of these two components. If the body density is known, it is possible to convert this to a % body fat using the following equation, which was derived by Siri: % fat= (495/body density)-450 Although the concept involved in determining body composition from body density is relatively simple, actually measuring body density can be difficult. By definition, density is the mass of an object divided by its volume (D=M/V). Although it is easy to determine the mass of an object using scales, it is very difficult to determine the volume of an object that has an irregular shape such as the human body. It is possible to measure the volume of the human body by submerging a person in water, and measuring their weight.