The Suicide of Europe Books by Prince Michel Sturdza

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Suicide of Europe Books by Prince Michel Sturdza THE SUICIDE OF EUROPE BOOKS BY PRINCE MICHEL STURDZA The Suicide of Europe La Roumaine Peut-elle Combattre sur Deux Fronts? Avec 1'Armee Roumaine Crise Econimique et Reforme Monetaire Czecho-Soviet Protectorate or Independent Rumanian Kingdom? La Bete sans Nom Katanga : El Occidente al Servicio del Communismo Open Letter to Their Excellencies World Government and International Assassination And You Tomorrow (To be published) Introduction to a Parabiology (To be published) THE SUICIDE OF EUROPE MEMOIRS OF PRINCE MICHEL STURDZA, FORMER FOREIGN MINISTER OF RUMANIA WESTERN ISLANDS PUBLISHERS BOSTON LON ANGELES COPYRIGHT © 1968 BY MICHEL STURDZA ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WESTERN ISLANDS 395 CONCORD AVENUE BELMONT, MASSACHUSETTS 02178 Direct quotations taken from the following sources have been reprinted in this book with written permission of the respective publishers : F . J . P . Veale, Advance to Barbarism (C . C . Nelson Publishing Company, Appleton, Wisconsin, © 1953) Hans Rogger and Eugene Weber, eds., The European Right, a Historical Profile (University of California Press, Berkeley, © 1965) Winston Churchill, The Hinge of Fate (Houghton Mifflin Company, New York, © 1950) Winston Churchill, Triumph and Tragedy (Houghton Mifflin Company, New York, © 1953) LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOG CARD NUMBER : 68-58294 PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA "Whether you like it or not, history is on our side . We will bury you ." NIKITA KHRUSHCHEV Moscow, November 16, 1956 Table of Contents Introduction ix Analytical Chronology xxxi PART ONE PRELUDE I The Past in Us 3 II Early Posts and World War I 12 III The Beast and Its Friends 17 IV The European Right and Professor Weber's Special Assignment 25 PART TWO TITULESCU, THE ENEMY'S AGENT V Riga and the Pacts of Nonaggression 45 VI Titulescu to the Rescue 52 VII A Strange Railway Agreement 58 VIII The Murder in Marseilles and the Purloined Telegram .. 64 PART THREE KING CAROL THE MURDERER IX Titulescu and the Military Alliances with Soviet Russia 81 X Prelude to War 90 XI Heroes, Scoundrels, and Fools 100 XII From Palm Sunday to Crucifixion 108 XIII Visit to London and Codreanu's Assassination- The Two Grynszpans 116 XIV Codreanu's Suppression and Hitler's Policy 121 XV The Phony Guarantees 127 XVI The First Betrayal of Poland 134 vii viii / Contents XVII Danger of Peace-Massacre of the Legionaries 145 XVIII The Panicky Tyrant 150 XIX The Arbitration of Vienna and the Legionary Movement 157 PART FOUR ANTONESCU, THE INSANE LEADER XX A Tortured Man 167 XXI Bloodshed in Transylvania, Visit to Rome- The Two Forums 175 XXII Visit to Berlin-Four Are Three 183 XXIII Treason by Misinformation-Past and Present 188 XXIV More About Truth and Directed Information 196 XXV Another Night in Jilava 200 XXVI How We Parted 207 XXVII Antonescu's Putsch 211 XXVIII Fooled Again 217 XXIX Too Late, Gentlemen! 225 PART FIVE MICHAEL: THE PUPPET KING XXX Falsehood, The Scoundrels' Weapon 231 XXXI Roving in Foreign Parts 239 XXXII The Betrayed Army 244 XXXIII Posthumous Triumph 250 XXXIV When Only Honor Could Still Be Saved 256 XXXV Hungarian Intermezzo 265 XXXVI The End and After 268 Post Scriptum 279 Appendix Diplomatic Papers of the United States and Rumania's Capitulation 289 A Selected Bibliography 301 Index of Persons 305 General Index 325 Introduction But who dares call the child by its right name? The few who knowing something about it Were foolish enough not to guard it in their hearts, Those who have shown the people their feeling and their thoughts Have been since always crucified or burned at the stake . GOETHE-Faust I This book is not a history of Europe nor of Rumania nor even of the Legion of the Archangel Michael, but rather the memoirs of one man who has been a witness and a participant in the events which, for hundreds of millions of people, have turned a century so full of promise into an eternity of suffering and slavery . From the first days of the Russian Revolution, this man understood the terrible danger which the Soviet regime represented not only for his own country but also for Europe and the entire world . From that time, his political thinking and activities were unswervingly directed by a growing con- sciousness of this danger and by the necessity, to which circumstances made him particularly obligated, to inform or to fight those in his nation who were, or pretended to be, blind to the magnitude and the imminence of this peril . Prince Michel Sturdza, a former Foreign Minister of Rumania, served in the diplomatic corps of his country for twenty-five years without any interruption other than for his tour of duty during World War I, in which he fought first in a squadron of mounted artillery and then as chief of an armored car section, and for a period of service as prefect in Transylvania. During his career, he held posts in Durazzo (Albania), Athens, Bern, Budapest, Vienna, Washington (as Councillor and then Charge d'Affaires of the Rumanian Legation) ; he acted as Envoy Extraordinary and as Minister Plenipotentiary in Riga, Reval, Helsinki, and Copenhagen . His time abroad was interrupted several times by periods of service in the Foreign Office in Bucharest . As a result of violent conflict with King Carol II and his Govern- ment, concerning Rumania's internal and foreign policy, Prince Sturdza was forced to leave the diplomatic service for a short time after the ix x / Introduction outbreak of World War II . In 1940 he was appointed as Foreign Min- ister in the first cabinet following the abdication of King Carol . In 1945 he belonged, again as Foreign Minister, to the Rumanian Govern- ment in Exile, which refused to recognize the capitulation of King Michael to Soviet Russia. Since that time he has continued his fight against the irreconcilable enemy of his motherland and of Western Civilization . These memoirs center around three basic dramas, all of them inter- related and all, for the most part, unknown to the Western reader : the role of pacts of military alliance between France, Czecho-Slovakia and Soviet Russia in bringing on World War II, the attempts of Germany to avoid a Western war, and the story of the Legion of the Archangel Michael . Prince Sturdza maintains that Rumania was the pivotal point in the events leading to the war . So because Rumania plays such an important part in this book, it is wise to briefly review her history . The reader should remember that the Rumanians do not consider their nation a Balkan country, but rather a Danubian state, like Austria and Hungary, and with roots deep in Western Civilization . The Rumanians are not Slavs ; historically, and in a large part ethni- cally, the Rumanian people are the heirs of the Dacians . The ancient kingdom of Dacia covered and went beyond the area of the Rumania of 1939; its population, which was an offshoot of the Thracian race, appears to have developed its own particular characteristics from years of isolation in the valleys of Transylvania whence settlers and warriors spread east to the Dniester and west to the vicinity of what is now Vienna, covering the area which was to become Dacia . The Dacian villages (davae, meaning a confederation of villages, may be the origin of Dacia) were forged into a real power and an actual empire under the kingship of Burebista . This expansion, combined with her geographical position, soon brought Dacia into conflict with Rome . After years of war and hostilities, the Dacians, led by Decebalus, were defeated in 105 A .D . by the Roman Emperor Trajan . The Dacian prisoners sculptured on the column raised by Trajan to commemorate his victory are, in their physical type, their clothes, and their foot-wear, identical with the Rumanian peasants of the present century . Defeat brought Roman garrisons, Roman colonists, and the Latin language ; this occupation went deep enough in its penetration of Dacia to result in Latin becoming the basic element in what has developed into the Rumanian language . With the withdrawal of the Roman legions in 271 A .D . by the Emperor Aurelian, Rumania was left undefended and open to all Introduction / xi attacks . Wave after wave of barbarians passed through the country . All trace of colonial rule would have been obliterated, as happened in Bulgaria, except that the wealth of the country was not great enough or concentrated enough to encourage the marauders to settle down, and, secondly, the inhabitants withdrew into the mountain valleys, par- ticularly those of Transylvania. We do not know when this migration to shelter began, how long it lasted, or at what cost it was undertaken . But late in the Thirteenth Century the process was reversed as a part of the Rumanian nobility, with their followers, left Transylvania and migrated eastward to found what were to become the principalities of Moldavia and Walachia. These two separate states were formed by the merger of the Rumanians from Transylvania with indigenous Ruman- ian settlements . From the very beginning, the Walachians under the Bassarab dynasty and the Moldavians under the Mushats had to struggle constantly against attempted encroachments by their neighbors . Hungary had already occupied much of Transylvania, and continually strove to con- quer more and more Rumanian territory . The Tartars raided, and even launched full scale invasions against, the principalities until the very end of the Sixteenth Century . Poland maintained pretensions over northern Moldavia . And finally towards the end of the Fourteenth Century, the Turks began their raids which would steadily grow in size and ferocity. Thus the Rumanians were perpetually at war, often with both Christians and Moslems at the same time. The independence of Walachia was originally secured by the victory of Ivanco (?-1330) over King Charles Robert of Hungary ; the Walach- ian position was strengthened by Vladislav Bassarab's (1360-1374) defeat of an attack by Charles Robert's son, King Louis the Great .
Recommended publications
  • Analele Universităţii Din Craiova, Seria Istorie, Anul XIX, Nr. 2(26)/2014
    Analele Universităţii din Craiova, Seria Istorie, Anul XIX, Nr. 2(26)/2014 CONTENTS STUDIES AND ARTICLES Anișoara Băbălău, THE FISCAL ORGANISATION OF WALLACHIA IN BRANCOVAN ERA .................................................................................................................................. 5 Elena Steluţa Dinu, HEALTH LAWS IN THE PERIOD 1874-1910 .............................. 15 Adi Schwarz, THE STRUGGLE OF THE JEWS FOR THEIR POLITICAL RIGHTS IN THE VIEW OF WESTERN JOURNALISTS (1876-1914) ............................................. 23 Cosmin-Ştefan Dogaru, LE PORTRAIT DE CHARLES DE HOHENZOLLERN- SIGMARINGEN. UN REPERE DANS L’HISTOIRE DE L’ETAT ROUMAIN ............. 31 Stoica Lascu, THE SITUATION OF THE BALKAN ROMANIANS REFLECTED IN “REVISTA MACEDONIEI” MAGAZINE (BUCHAREST; 1905-1906) ...................... 43 Gheorghe Onişoru, MAY 15, 1943: DISSOLUTION OF THE KOMINTERN AND ITS EFFECTS ON THE COMMUNIST PARTY OF ROMANIA .......................................... 75 Cezar Stanciu, CHALLENGES TO PROLETARIAN INTERNATIONALISM: THE COMMUNIST PARTIES’ CONFERENCE IN MOSCOW, 1969 .................................. 85 Lucian Dindirică, ADMINISTRATIVE-TERRITORIAL ORGANIZATION OF ROMANIA UNDER THE LEADERSHIP OF NICOLAE CEAUŞESCU ........................................... 101 Virginie Wanyaka Bonguen Oyongmen, ARMÉE CAMEROUNAISE ET DÉVELOPPEMENT ÉCONOMIQUE ET SOCIAL DE LA NATION: LE CAS DU GÉNIE MILITAIRE (1962-2012) ................................................................................ 109 Nicolae Melinescu, THE MARITIME
    [Show full text]
  • Rim Nr.5-6-26-NOV.2007.Pmd
    PERCEP}IA ROMÂNIEI ASUPRA DESCURAJ~RII NUCLEARE general-maior (r) dr. MIHAIL E. IONESCU, CARMEN R:JNOVEANU I. Politica nucleară a Pactului de la Varşovia unde necesităţile operaţionale o reclamau planifica- şi poziţia României torilor militari sovietici. Această realitate făcea ca opţiunile României Planificarea nucleară în cadrul Pactului de la să fie extrem de limitate. Evoluţiile internaţionale, Varşovia, a fost apanajul strict şi exclusiv al URSS. în special criza rachetelor din 1962, au transformat Liderii de la Bucureşti, ca şi omologii lor din celelalte problematica armelor nucleare într-o preocupare state comuniste, nu au avut acces la discutarea, şi, majoră pentru liderii de la Bucureşti şi au avut o cu atât mai puţin, la elaborarea strategiilor sovie- influenţă semnificativă asupra atitudinii Bucureş- tice în acest domeniu. În consecinţă, orice analiză tilor în cadrul Pactului. Conştientizând că pot fi asupra acestui subiect suferă de un deficit semni- atraşi, împotriva voinţei lor şi fără nici o consultare ficativ datorat lipsei evidenţelor documentare sau prealabilă, într-o confruntare nucleară sovieto- a caracterului lacunar şi fragmentar al celor americană, liderii români au fost preocupaţi de existente. Documentele declasificate până acum obţinerea unor garanţii directe sau indirecte că, în fostele state comuniste nu conţin, cu mici într-o asemenea eventualitate, teritoriul românesc excepţii, decât referiri vagi sau incomplete la nu se va afla în aria de acţiune a armelor nucleare această problematică. Planurile de război ale ale adversarilor Pactului. Pactului conţin încă multe necunoscute. Printre puţinele evidenţe documentare relative la această Mesajul transmis guvernului american în problematică sunt Planul de război al Tratatului de contextul crizei cubaneze este relevant în acest sens.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical and Legal Study of Sovereignty in the Canadian North : Terrestrial Sovereignty, 1870–1939
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository University of Calgary Press University of Calgary Press Open Access Books 2014 A historical and legal study of sovereignty in the Canadian north : terrestrial sovereignty, 1870–1939 Smith, Gordon W. University of Calgary Press "A historical and legal study of sovereignty in the Canadian north : terrestrial sovereignty, 1870–1939", Gordon W. Smith; edited by P. Whitney Lackenbauer. University of Calgary Press, Calgary, Alberta, 2014 http://hdl.handle.net/1880/50251 book http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 International Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca A HISTORICAL AND LEGAL STUDY OF SOVEREIGNTY IN THE CANADIAN NORTH: TERRESTRIAL SOVEREIGNTY, 1870–1939 By Gordon W. Smith, Edited by P. Whitney Lackenbauer ISBN 978-1-55238-774-0 THIS BOOK IS AN OPEN ACCESS E-BOOK. It is an electronic version of a book that can be purchased in physical form through any bookseller or on-line retailer, or from our distributors. Please support this open access publication by requesting that your university purchase a print copy of this book, or by purchasing a copy yourself. If you have any questions, please contact us at ucpress@ ucalgary.ca Cover Art: The artwork on the cover of this book is not open access and falls under traditional copyright provisions; it cannot be reproduced in any way without written permission of the artists and their agents. The cover can be displayed as a complete cover image for the purposes of publicizing this work, but the artwork cannot be extracted from the context of the cover of this specificwork without breaching the artist’s copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Bătălia Pentru Ardeal
    VALERIU POP BĂTĂLIA PENTRU ARDEAL Ediţie îngrijită de: Sanda Pop e Nicolae C. Nicolescu BCU Cluj-Napoca CD EDITURA ENCICLOPEDICĂ Bucureşti, 1992 *"'r ... r*S.«J.Î T Cfsa Im Redactor : Doina Elena FĂGET Coperta : Olimpiu Popa ISBN 973-45-0021-X / în memoria lui OVIDIU şi a ALEXANDRINEI, fiul cel mare şi soţia lui VALER POR Sanda Pop NOTĂ ASUPRA EDIŢIEI Volumul "Bătălia pentru Ardeal" scris de Valeriu Pop, perso­ nalitate proeminentă a vieţii noastre politice din perioada interbelică, îngăduie să se urmărească, aproapemomentcumomentevenimentele dramatice trăite de România, ameninţată în Ginta ei naţională şi statală, în condiţiile izbucnirii celui de-al doilea război mondial. După propria-i mărturisire, autorul s-a străduit ca lucrarea să fie cit se poate de obiectivă, lăsînd să vorbească mai mult actele şi documentele, cele mai importante fiind reproduse în întregime sau citate pe larg. Pentru înţelegerea corectă a cauzelor evenimentelor care s-au derulat în tot cursul anului 1940, Valeriu Pop fixează cadrul politic european, în general, şi al celui est-european, în special, dominat de interesele Germaniei şi URSS, consfinţite în cele din urmă de Tratatul de amiciţie Ribbentrop-Moloiov (august 1939), cu repercusiuni deosebit de grave asupra unor state din Europa, între care şi România. La tratativele de la Tumu Severin (16-24 august 1940) unde a fost şeful delegaţiei române cit şi cu prilejul Arbitrajului de la Viena (29-30 august 1940) ca al doilea delegat al României, Valeriu Pop s-a ilustrat ca mare român şi patriot, vădind mult tact, curaj, perseverenţă şi mare abilitate diplomatică în apăra­ rea cauzei naţionale.
    [Show full text]
  • Iiistoire Des
    IIISTOIRE DES ET DE LA ROMANITÉ ORIENTALE PAR N. IORGA PUBLIÉE PAR L'ACADEMIE ROUMAINE VOL. x LES REALISATEURS DE L'UNITE NATIONALE SUIVI D'UN TABLEAU CHRONOLOGIQUE DES EVE- NEMENTS DES TROIS REGNES (1866-.1940 13UC AR ES T ''945 HISTOIRE ROU.-NiAINS ET DE LA ROMANITE ORIENTALE PAR N. IORGA PUBLIÉE PAR L'ACADÉMIE ROUMAINE VOL. x LES RÉALISATEURS DE L'UNITÉ NATIONALE SUIVI D'UN TABLEAU CHRONOLOGIQUE DES EVÉ- NEMENTS DES TROIS RÈGNES(1866-1940 PAR N. A. CONSTANTINESCU BUC A R ES T 1 9 4 5 N. Iorga VOLUME X LES RÉALISATEURS DE L'UNITÉ NATIONALE LIVRE PREMIER L'EFFORT POUR L'INDAPENDANCE CHAPITRE I LE CONFLIT AVEC LES PUISSANCES GARANTES En février 1866, les con.suls, qui voulaient se donner des airs de surveillants et de conseillers préts aux remontrances, furent surpris, malgré toutes leurs prévisions répétées, par le coup d'Etat contre Alexandre Jean I-er, que les Puis- sances considéraient alors comme le seul pouvant gouverner cette Roumanie d'où leur étaient venus tant de soucis. Alors que, devant la proclamation rédigée dans un style gonflé jusqu'au ridicule, le public de Bucarest, qui plus d'une fois par ses marchands et ses corporations s'était incliné de- vant le premier prince de la Roumanie unie, et maintenant restait impassible devant le violent changement, accompli par des hommes sans autre popularité que celle du clubrouge », on voyait s'installer unelieutenance » avec le général Go- lescu, qu'on avait presque oublié pendant les dernières an- nées, le colonel Hai alambie, qui ne s'était jamais distingué en rien, et, comme représentant de la Moldavie, Lascar Ca- targiu, un étranger à Bucarest.
    [Show full text]
  • Pro-Contra VOL 3 P-Z.Indd
    FUNDAfiIA EUROPEANÆ TITULESCU Pro øi Contra T I T U L E S C U Lucrare apærutæ cu sprijinul Administrafliei Fondului Cultural Naflional Pro øi Contra T I T U L E S C U ediflia a II°a revæzutæ øi adæugitæ Ediflie îngrijitæ, selecflie, cuvânt înainte øi postfaflæ, note biografice, adnotæri øi explicaflii, indice de GEORGE G. POTRA Volumul III FUNDAfiIA EUROPEANÆ TITULESCU Bucureøti, 2012 Redactor: Ana Potra Coperta: Victor Potra Culegere computerizatæ: Ana Potra Tehnoredactare: Ofelia Coøman Descrierea CIP a Bibliotecii Naflionale a României Pro øi contra Titulescu / ed. îngrijitæ, selecflie, cuvânt înainte øi postfaflæ, note biografice, adnotæri øi explicaflii, indice de George G. Potra. ­ Ed. a 2­a, rev. ­ Bucureøti : Editura Fundaflia Europeanæ Titulescu, 2012 3 vol. ISBN 978­606­8091­13­6 Vol. 3. ­ 2012. ­ Bibliogr. ­ Index. ­ ISBN 978­606­8091­17­4 I. Potra, George G (ed. øt.) 94(498)”19” Titulescu,N. ISBN GENERAL: 978°606°8091°13°6 ISBN: 978­606­8091­17­4 © Toate drepturile asupra prezentei ediflii aparflin autorului Idealul Creator vrea ca Împæræflia Cerurilor care este în noi sæ se realizeze în jurul nostru în lumea vizibilæ a materiei. Idealul Creator nu se mulflumeøte sæ sædeascæ în sufletul omenesc germenul credinflei într­o viaflæ viitoare, unde înflelepciunea îøi va da mâna cu bunætatea; el cere mai ales eforturile necesare, oricât de mari ar fi ele, pentru a integra în materie toate elanurile instinctive ale sufletului omenesc înspre frumos øi înspre bine, pe care nu este de ajuns sæ le întrevedem, ci trebuie sæ øtim sæ le creæm! Idealul Creator nu face deosebire între spirit øi materie; el vede în cel dintâi geniul sculptorului, iar în cea de­a doua marmura care se lasæ ølefuitæ pentru ca sæ aparæ în plinæ luminæ frumosul, ascuns mai înainte în stræfundurile sufletului omenesc.! Nicolae Titulescu J.
    [Show full text]
  • Şcoala Diplomatică Romană
    ALEXANDRU N. LAHOVARI. DIPLOMATUL ŞI OMUL POLITIC LIVIU BRĂTESCU Provenit dintr-o familie cu o situaţie materială deosebită, Alexandru N. Lahovari avea să beneficieze încă din primii ani de viaţă de o educaţie aparte. El se încadra în felul acesta în tiparul generaţiei sale, pentru care educaţia era, până la intrarea efectivă în arena politică, pe primul loc. Viziunea pe care Lahovari o avea asupra societăţii româneşti contribuia la integrarea lui încă de la primele acţiuni politice la care a luat parte, în familia ideologică conservatoare. Agitaţia, care a cuprins viaţa politică românească după 1866 şi dorinţa multor lideri politici de a recurge la reforme radicale pentru reducerea diferenţei dintre noul stat de la Nordul Dunării şi statele apusene, nu au contribuit la pierderea „cumpătului” celui care avea să se remarce în întreaga sa activitate în primul rând prin diplomaţie. Bun observator al scenei politice româneşti şi jucând nu de puţine ori rolul de arbitru în cadrul grupărilor conservatoare, Lahovari a reuşit, prin luările sale de poziţie, să devină apreciat de oameni politici din tot spectrul politic românesc. Abordările atente, dar şi tranşante, pe care le-a avut cu privire la subiecte ce ţineau de politica externă l-au transformat, treptat, într-o adevărată autoritate a acestui domeniu. Toate aceste elemente au contribuit la conturarea unui portret de om politic conectat la problemele societăţii româneşti, pentru care cuvântul de ordine a fost mai degrabă echilibrul decât partizanatul politic. Pentru el, politica externă a presupus o anumită dăruire în favoarea intereselor reale ale statului român şi din acest motiv nu a ezitat, în condiţiile unui climat internaţional agitat, să facă apel la adversarii săi politici, pentru a nu duce nemulţumirile politice interne în plan extern.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics and Education During Charles I
    Annals of the „Constantin Brâncuși” University of Târgu Jiu, Letter and Social Science Series, Supplement 2/2016 POLITICS AND EDUCATION DURING CHARLES I Iulian PÎNIŞOARĂ ABSTRACT: This study does not aim to analize the evolution of educational system in Romania late XIX-th century and early XX-th century, instead the study aims to examine the way in which the political elite was formed intellectually speaking. My personal point of view, puts it that the period I mentioned above is the only when the colocation ”political elite” can be properly used. KEYWORDS: prime minister, Catargiu, politics, government, king, Charles, university, law school. În urmă cu peste o sută de ani, membrii elitei intelectuale erau participanţi activi în viaţa politică, aceştia considerând prezenţa lor în spaţiul public drept o datorie faţă de restul populaţiei ţării. Titu Maiorescu, Nicolae Ionescu, Spiru Haret, Constantin Dissescu, Vasile Alecsandri, Nicolae Iorga, Duiliu Zamfirescu, Barbu Ştefănescu-Delavrancea, sunt doar câteva dintre personalităţile care au deţinut unele dintre cele mai importante funcţii în politica românească1. În afara acestor, să zicem, intelectuali de carieră, majoritatea oamenilor politici de la noi aveau studii universitare atestate de diplome emise de cele mai prestigioase universităţi ale Europei. Chiar dacă, aparent, studiile superioare erau o condiţie sine-qua-nonă pentru accederea la cele mai înalte demnităţi ale ţării, legislaţia electorală din acea vreme nu impunea decât condiţii minimale pentru dobândirea şi exercitarea drepturilor politice (erau excluşi doar cei care nu plăteau nici un fel de impozit precum şi analfabeţii), aproape toţi oamenii politici de mai mare sau mai mica anvergură aveau studii universitare.
    [Show full text]
  • Sumar Contents
    Sumar Contents Fotografii Bucureştilor (1881 -1914) 5 Photographers of Bucharest (1881-1914) Regele Carol l 12 King Carol l Strada Carol 14 Carol Street Palatul Dacia Română 16 The Dacia Romana Palace Casa Capsa 18 Capsa House Piaţa de Flori 20 The Flower Market Ateneul Român şi chibritul lui Pache 22 The Romanian Atheneum and Pache's Matchstick Baia Erdreich 24 The Erdreich Bath Grand Hotel de France 26 Grand Hotel de France Staţia de poştă 28 The Post Station Un pod peste Dâmboviţa 30 Bridge over Dambovitza Hotelul Metropol la 1910 32 The Metropol Hotel in 1910 Bulevardul Măria 34 Măria Boulevard Strada Bărăţiei la 1889 36 Baratiei Street in 1889 Strada Scaune 38 Scaune Street Biserica Grecească 40 The Greek Church Calea Griviţei, colţ cu strada Buzeşti 42 Grivitei Street on Buzeşti Boulevard Catedrala Sf. losif 44 St. Joseph's Cathedral Hotelul Imperial 46 The Imperial Hotel Spitalul Filantropia 48 The Filantropia Hospital Vedere spre Hanul Manuc 50 View of Manuc's Inn Din semnificaţiile statuii lui Pache 52 Statue Of Pache Protopopescu, Mayor of Bucharest Strada Regală 54 The Royal Street Mahalaua Săracă (Flămânda) 56 The Poor Men's Neighbourhood (Flamanda) Palatul Eforiei Spitalelor Civile 58 The Pa/ace of the Civil Hospitals'Administration Grand Hotel Continental 60 Grand Hotel Continental Vedere din Turnul Colţei 62 View of the Colţei Tower Calea Văcăreşti 64 The Văcăreşti Road Şcoala de Arte şi Meserii 66 The School of Arts and Metiers Statuia Domniţei Bâlaşa 68 Princess Balasa's Statue Banca Naţională 70 The National Bank Cheiul
    [Show full text]
  • Iuliu Maniu and Corneliu Zelea Codreanu Against King Carol
    Reluctant Allies? Iuliu Maniu and Corneliu Zelea Codreanu against King Carol II of Romania Introduction Iuliu Maniu is today regarded as the principle upholder of democratic and constitutional propriety in interwar Romania. As leader of the Romanian National Peasant Party throughout much of the interwar period and the Second World War, he is generally considered to have tried to steer Romania away from dictatorship and towards democracy. Nevertheless, in 1947 Maniu was arrested and tried for treason together with other leaders of the National Peasant Party by the communist authorities. The charges brought against Maniu included having links to the ‘terrorist’ and fascist Romanian Legionary movement (also known as the Iron Guard). The prosecutors drew attention not only to the entry of former legionaries into National Peasant Party organizations in the autumn of 1944, but also to Maniu’s electoral non- aggression pact of 1937 with the Legionary movement’s leader, Corneliu Zelea Codreanu. The pact had been drawn up to prevent the incumbent National Liberal government manipulating the elections of December 1937. Maniu had subsequently acted as defence a witness at Codreanu’s trial in 1938. 1 Since the legionaries were regarded by the communists as the agents of Nazism in Romania, Maniu was accordingly accused of having encouraged the growth of German influence and fascism in Romania.2 Maniu was sentenced to life imprisonment and died in Sighet prison in 1953. Possibly no single act of Maniu’s interwar career was more condemned within Romanian communist historiography than his electoral pact with the allegedly Nazi- 1 Marcel-Dumitru Ciucă (ed.), Procesul lui Iuliu Maniu, Documentele procesului conducătorilor Partidului Naţional Ţărănesc, 3 volumes, Bucharest, 2001, vol.
    [Show full text]
  • George G. Potra, Nicolae Titulescu. Arhive Pierdute. Dosarul Unei
    Recenzii. Note – Reviews, Notes 133 George G. Potra, Nicolae Titulescu. Arhive pierdute. Dosarul unei recuperări, Centrul Cultural “Lucian Blaga” – Sebeş, Fundaţia Culturală “Lucian Blaga” – Sebeş, 2015, 600 p. + 209 ilustraţii The archives are some of the main repositories of information we appeal to as individuals, as a community or people. They represent a form of memory we go to for long term research or for immediate interests. We check almost on a daily basis their role and importance in society. Taking the risk of a reproof for exaggerating, I state that in any historical evocation, in any contemporary evaluation and in any future project, we cannot ignore data and ideas kept in archives as premises of any material or spiritual construction. As an institution, the archives in Romania identify their act of birth 170 years ago. The explanation for this tardive reality is to be found in both objective and subjective factors, which have been rigorously identified and analyzed by the historians of the Romanian archives. I am in a rush to underline that, despite all legal regulations, of the stage corrections, administrative, economic and financial measures to consolidate their structures and functionality, under the sign of organicity and efficiency, the institution of the archives has recorded in Romania serious dysfunctions and grave accidents (during war or calamities). With each of these, the informational content of Romanian archives has been affected. The subsequent efforts – no matter how consistent or well-intended – could only reconstruct and restore in a fragmentary and uncertain manner the segments of local and even national history – economic, ethnic, confessional, cultural a.s.o.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 1 SPECIAL AGENTS, SPECIAL THREATS: Creating the Office of the Chief Special Agent, 1914-1933
    CHAPTER 1 SPECIAL AGENTS, SPECIAL THREATS: Creating the Office of the Chief Special Agent, 1914-1933 CHAPTER 1 8 SPECIAL AGENTS, SPECIAL THREATS Creating the Office of the Chief Special Agent, 1914-1933 World War I created a diplomatic security crisis for the United States. Under Secretary of State Joseph C. Grew afterwards would describe the era before the war as “diplomatic serenity – a fool’s paradise.” In retrospect, Grew’s observation indicates more the degree to which World War I altered how U.S. officials perceived diplomatic security than the actual state of pre-war security.1 During the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the Department had developed an effective set of security measures; however, those measures were developed during a long era of trans-Atlantic peace (there had been no major multi-national wars since Napoleon’s defeat at Waterloo in 1814). Moreover, those measures were developed for a nation that was a regional power, not a world power exercising influence in multiple parts of the world. World War I fundamentally altered international politics, global economics, and diplomatic relations and thrust the United States onto the world stage as a key world power. Consequently, U.S. policymakers and diplomats developed a profound sense of insecurity regarding the content of U.S. Government information. The sharp contrast between the pre- and post-World War I eras led U.S. diplomats like Grew to cast the pre-war era in near-idyllic, carefree terms, when in fact the Department had developed several diplomatic security measures to counter acknowledged threats.
    [Show full text]