Ataturk, Founder Or Turkish Republic

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ataturk, Founder Or Turkish Republic THE FOUNDER OF THE REPUBLIC OF TURKEY AND THE FIRST PRESIDENT ATATÜRK Mustafa Kemal Atatürk was born in 1881 in Selanka a three-storey pink house in Kocakasım Quarter, Islâhhâne Street. His father is Ali Riza Efendi and his mother is Zübeyde Hanim. Hafiz Ahmet Efendi dedicates by the father XIV-XV. Kocacık Yörüklerindi placed in Macedonia from Konya and Aydin centuries. Ms. Annu Zubeyde is the daughter of a former Turkish family who settled in the town of Langaza near Salonika. Ali Riza Efendi, who served as a militia officer, an evkaf cleric and lumber trader, married Zübeyde Hanim in 1871. Four of Atatürk's five siblings died at an early age, only Makbule (Atatürk) lived until 1956. When the age of small Mustafa learning came, learning started in Hafez Mehmet Efendi's neighborhood municipality, then at the request of his father Şemsi Efendi Mektebi. Meanwhile, he lost his father (1888). After staying with his uncle at Rapla Farm for a while, he returned to Salonika and finished school. Selannik registered for the Rüstiyesi. Shortly thereafter he entered the Military High School in 1893. In this school, Mathematics teacher added "Kemal" in the name of Mustafa Bey. In 1896-1899, he completed the Military Admission of the Monastery and began studying at the Military Academy in Istanbul. In 1902 he graduated with the rank of lieutenant, continued to the War Academy. On January 11, 1905, he completed the Academy with the rank of captain. From 1905 to 1907 he served at the command of the 5th Army in Damascus. In 1907, he became a Captain (Senior Captain). Monastery III. He was appointed to the army. On April 19, 1909, he served as Chief of Staff in the Movement Army, which entered Istanbul. It was sent to France in 1910. She joined the Picardie Maneuvers. In 1911 he started to work under the command of the General Staff in Istanbul. Mustafa Kemal took part in the Tobruk and Derne region with a group of friends in the battle that started with the attack of Italians in Tripoli in 1911. On December 22, 1911, he won the Tobruk War against the Italians. On March 6, 1912, he was brought to the Commander of the Association. When the Balkan War broke out in October 1912, Mustafa Kemal joined the battle with Gallipoli and Bolayir. Dimetoka and Edirne's great service was seen back. In 1913 he was appointed to Sofia. In 1914, when he was in this position, he became a paramilitary. His military task ended in January 1915. In the meantime, the First World War began, the Ottoman Empire had to enter the war. Mustafa Kemal was assigned to Tekirdağ to build a 19th generation. In World War I, which started in 1914, Mustafa Kemal wrote a heroic legend in Çanakkale and told entente states "Canakkale is inaccessible!" On 18 March 1915 the English and French navy, which crossed the Dardanelles Strait, gave heavy losses and decided to release soldiers to the Gallipoli Peninsula. On April 25, 1915, the 19th Division, commanded by Mustafa Kemal, stopped enemy forces from Arıburnu in Conkbayiri. Mustafa Kemal rose to colonialism on this success. The British attacked again in Arıburnu on August 6-7, 1915. Anafartalar Group Commander Mustafa Kemal won the victory of Anafartalar in August 9-10. This victory on August 17 in Kireçtepe, on August 21 in II. Anafartalar followed the triumphs. The Turkish nation who gave about 253,000 martyrs in the Gallipoli Wars knew about protecting the honor against the Entente States. Mustafa Kemal's soldiers, "I do not command you to attack, I command to die!" The order changed the fate of Cephe. Mustafa Kemal took part in the Edirne and Diyarbakir in 1916 after the Gallipoli Wars. On April 1, 1916, he became a major general. He fought against the Russian forces and provided Mus and Bitlis back. After his brief duties in Damascus and Aleppo, he arrived in Istanbul in 1917. He went to Germany with Velihat Vahidettin Efendi and was in the fronts. He was sick after this tour. He went to Vienna and Karisbad for treatment. On August 15, 1918 he returned to Aleppo as the 7th Army Commander. He made successful defensive battles against British forces on this front. One day after the signing of the Mondros Armistice, on October 31, 1918, it was brought to the Commander of the Lightning Orders Group. Upon the removal of this army, on November 13, 1918, he came to Istanbul and started to see the religion of Harbiye (in his ministry). After the Armistice of Mondros, the Entente States began to invade the Ottoman armies; Mustafa Kemal went to Samsun on May 19, 1919 as the 9th Army Inspector. On June 22, 1919, he published a declaration in Amasya that he declared that "the nation will save the independence of the nation once again and determination" and invited the Sivas Congress to the meeting. Between 23 July and 7 August 1919, Erzurum gathered the Sivas Congress between 4 and 11 September 1919, enabling the determination of the way to be followed for the emancipation of the country. He was enthusiastically welcomed in Ankara on 27 December 1919. On 23 April 1920, an important step was taken towards the establishment of the Republic of Turkey with the opening of the Turkish Grand National Assembly. Mustafa Kemal was elected as President of the Parliament and the Government The Turkish Grand National Assembly began to adopt and implement the necessary legislation for the successful conclusion of the War of Independence. The Turkish War of Independence began on 15 May 1919 when the first shot was thrown at the enemy during the Greek invasion of Izmir. On August 10, 1920, they signed the Treaty of Sevres and fought against the victorious states of the First World War, which shared the Ottoman Empire, with the militia forces called Kuvâ-yi Milliye. The Turkish Grand National Assembly established a regular army, Kuvâ-yi National-army integration ensured the war victory. The important steps of the Turkish War of Independence under Mustafa Kemal are: The rescue of Sarıkamış (20 September 1920), Kars (30 October 1920) and Gümrü (7 November 1920). Cukurova, Gazi Antep, Kahraman Maraş Şanlı Urfa defenses (1919-1921) I. Inonu Victory (6 - 10 January 1921) II. Inonu Victory (March 23-April 1, 1921) Sakarya Victory (August 23-September 13, 1921) Major Offensive, Commander-in-Chief's Majesty and Great Victory (26 August 9 September 1922) After the Sakarya Victory, on September 19, 1921, the Grand National Assembly of Turkey gave Mustafa Kemal the rank of Marshal and the title of Gazi. The War of Independence was concluded with the Treaty of Lausanne signed on 24 July 1923. Thus, there were no obstacles for the establishment of a new Turkish state based on national unity on the territory of Turkey, which had been shattered by the Treaty of Sevr and left homeland of 5-6 provinces. The foundation of the Republic of Turkey was announced with the opening of the Turkish Grand National Assembly in Ankara on 23 April 1920. Successful ruling of the Turkish National Liberation War accelerated the foundation of the new Turkish state. On November 1, 1922, the caliphate and the sultanate were separated and the sultanate was abolished. Thus, the administrative ties with the Ottoman Empire were cut off. On October 13, 1923, the Republican administration was accepted and Atatürk was elected the first president by unanimity. On October 30, 1923, İsmet İnönü established the first government of the Republic. The Republic of Turkey has begun to rise on "the sovereignty unconditionally of the nation" and "peace at home" Ataturk revolutionized Turkey in order to "bring it to the level of contemporary civilization". We can gather these revolutions under five headings: 1. Political Revolutions: · Abolition of the Sultanate (1 November 1922) · Proclamation of the Republic (October 29, 1923) · Removal of the Halifax (March 3, 1924) 2. Social Revolutions: · Equal rights for women to men (1926-1934) · Hats and clothes revolution (25 November 1925) · Closure of Tekke Zaiviye and Türbeler (November 30, 1925) · Surname law (21 June 1934) · Removal of names and titles (November 26, 1934) · Adoption of international time, calendar and length measures (1925-1931), 3. The Law Revolution: · Removal of Mecellen (1924-1937) · Transition to the secular law system by removing the Turkish Civil Code and other laws (1924- 1937) 4. Educational and Cultural Revolutions: · Integration of teaching (March 3, 1924) · Adoption of new Turkish letters (1 November 1928) · Establishment of Turkish Language and History Institutions (1931-1932) · Organization of university education (May 31, 1933) · Innovations in fine arts 5. Revolutions in the Field of Economy: · Removal of the case · Encouragement of the farmer · Establishment of sample farms · Establishment of industrial establishments by removing the Industrial Promotion Law · I. and II. Implementation of the Development Plans (1933-1937), new ways of accommodation According to the Law of Surname, 24th of November 1934, Mustafa Kemal's "Atatürk" surname was given to the Grand National Assembly of Turkey. Atatürk was elected as the President of the Turkish Grand National Assembly on 24 April 1920 and 13 August 1923. This presidential role was at the level of the State-Government. October 29, 1923, the Republic was declared and Atatürk was elected the first president. According to the Constitution, the presidential elections were renewed every four years. In 1927, 1931, 1935, the Turkish Grand National Assembly elected Ataturk to the presidency again. Atatürk frequently visited dormitories and supervised state studies on the spot. He gave orders about directions that were not relevant.
Recommended publications
  • M. Kemal Atatürk's Homesickness for Thessaloniki, His City of Birth
    ISSN 1712-8358[Print] Cross-Cultural Communication ISSN 1923-6700[Online] Vol. 12, No. 9, 2016, pp. 1-9 www.cscanada.net DOI:10.3968/8785 www.cscanada.org M. Kemal Atatürk’s Homesickness for Thessaloniki, His City of Birth Sinan Çaya[a],* [a]Ph.D., Boğaziçi University, Institute of Environmental Sciences, always been prone to hero-worshipping ever since the era Istanbul, Turkey. of successive glorious sultans) invariably consider him *Corresponding author. supra-human! Received 14 June 2016; accepted 19 August 2016 [At the end of the First World War, The Mudros] Published online 26 September 2016 armistice obligated the Ottoman military to demobilize its combat units quickly, the actual demobilization Abstract proceeded slowly and came to a full stop with the start of As Atatürk, the founder of Modern Turkey, grew older; a new war—this time to save what was remained of the he more and more missed his home-city Salonika and its empire in 1919-1921—against Greek, French, Italian, and surroundings. The loss of his home-city during the Balkan Armenian forces. Wars further aggravated his passionate nostalgia. Some of A new generation of combat-tested battlefield his behavior patterns as narrated in history, reveal us his commanders, under the supreme leadership of Mustafa homesickness openly. On various occasions; the meals, Kemal Pasha, found a willing audience within the ranks the accent, and the entire culture of his region with its of the postwar Ottoman military. Most of the surviving songs and ballads; always moved the spirit in him, deeply. Ottoman officers (including reserves and retirees), as well Despite his deliberate emphasis of his logic most of the as the conscripts, were drawn to the nationalist cause (Uyar time, in reality, he was a man full of tender feelings.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Said Nursi
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2015 The Dialectics of Secularism and Revivalism in Turkey: The Case of Said Nursi Zubeyir Nisanci Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Nisanci, Zubeyir, "The Dialectics of Secularism and Revivalism in Turkey: The Case of Said Nursi" (2015). Dissertations. 1482. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/1482 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 2015 Zubeyir Nisanci LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO THE DIALECTICS OF SECULARISM AND REVIVALISM IN TURKEY: THE CASE OF SAID NURSI A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY PROGRAM IN SOCIOLOGY BY ZUBEYIR NISANCI CHICAGO, ILLINOIS MAY 2015 Copyright by Zubeyir Nisanci, 2015 All rights reserved. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am deeply grateful to Dr. Rhys H. Williams who chaired this dissertation project. His theoretical and methodological suggestions and advice guided me in formulating and writing this dissertation. It is because of his guidance that this study proved to be a very fruitful academic research and theoretical learning experience for myself. My gratitude also goes to the other members of the committee, Drs. Michael Agliardo, Laureen Langman and Marcia Hermansen for their suggestions and advice.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreword Introduction: Ł'orient N'existe
    Notes Foreword 1. John Jay Chapman, Practical Agitation, New York: Charles Scribner & Sons 1900, pp. 63–64. 2. See Walter Lippman, Public Opinion, Charleston: BiblioLife 2008. 3. When, in the Summer of 2013, Western European states grounded Evo Morales’ presidential plane on which he was returning from Moscow to Bolivia, suspecting that Edward Snowden was hidden in it on his way to the Bolivian exile, the most humiliating aspect was the Europeans’ attempt to retain their dignity: instead of openly admitting that they were acting under US pressure, or pretending that they were simply following the law, they jus- tified the grounding on pure technicalities, claiming that the flight was not properly registered in their air traffic control. The effect was miserable—the Europeans not only appeared as US servants, they even wanted to cover up their servitude with ridiculous technicalities. Introduction: Ł’Orient n’existe pas 1. The direct result of the 2002 Patriot Act was the 779 detainees in Guantanamo, most of them Muslim and many of them non-combatants, without any access to counsel or habeas corpus, against all international conventions (Chossudovsky 2004). Some of these people allegedly committed sui- cide. Despite President Obama’s promises during both his campaigns, the Guantanamo Camp is still open and functioning. 2. It is not a mere coincidence that Herbert’s Dune (1965) became, almost 50 years later, a perfect, prophetic and almost allegorical metaphor for the Orient subverting the existence of the ‘Empire’, another Lacanian letter eventually arriving at its destination. 3. The same process in the Americas, Australia and New Zealand, although similar in certain respects, is outside the scope of this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Science Versus Religion: the Influence of European Materialism on Turkish Thought, 1860-1960
    Science versus Religion: The Influence of European Materialism on Turkish Thought, 1860-1960 Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Serdar Poyraz, M.A. Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2010 Dissertation Committee: Carter V. Findley, Advisor Jane Hathaway Alan Beyerchen Copyright By Serdar Poyraz 2010 i Abstract My dissertation, entitled “Science versus Religion: The Influence of European Materialism on Turkish Thought, 1860-1960,” is a radical re-evaluation of the history of secularization in the Ottoman Empire and Turkey. I argue that European vulgar materialist ideas put forward by nineteenth-century intellectuals and scientists such as Ludwig Büchner (1824-1899), Karl Vogt (1817-1895) and Jacob Moleschott (1822-1893) affected how Ottoman and Turkish intellectuals thought about religion and society, ultimately paving the way for the radical reforms of Kemal Atatürk and the strict secularism of the early Turkish Republic in the 1930s. In my dissertation, I challenge traditional scholarly accounts of Turkish modernization, notably those of Bernard Lewis and Niyazi Berkes, which portray the process as a Manichean struggle between modernity and tradition resulting in a linear process of secularization. On the basis of extensive research in modern Turkish, Ottoman Turkish and Persian sources, I demonstrate that the ideas of such leading westernizing and secularizing thinkers as Münif Pasha (1830-1910), Beşir Fuad (1852-1887) and Baha Tevfik (1884-1914) who were inspired by European materialism provoked spirited religious, philosophical and literary responses from such conservative anti-materialist thinkers as Şehbenderzade ii Ahmed Hilmi (1865-1914), Said Nursi (1873-1960) and Ahmed Hamdi Tanpınar (1901- 1962).
    [Show full text]
  • Download Thesis
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ Fictionalised history identity, nationalism and nation-building in late Ottoman and early Republican Turkish novels Agaoglu, Aslihan Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 28. Sep. 2021 Fictionalised History: Identity, Nationalism and Nation-building in Late Ottoman and Early Republican Turkish Novels Aslihan Agaoglu Reekers Doctor of Philosophy Institute of Middle Eastern Studies, King’s College London 1 Abstract Nationalism in Turkey was an evolutionary process which took place during the final stages of the Ottoman Empire, the War of Independence and the Republican period.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophical Movements in Ottoman Intellectual Life at the Beginning of the 20Th Century and Their Impact on Young Turk’S Thought
    PHILOSOPHICAL MOVEMENTS IN OTTOMAN INTELLECTUAL LIFE AT THE BEGINNING OF THE 20TH CENTURY AND THEIR IMPACT ON YOUNG TURK’S THOUGHT A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY FATİH TAŞTAN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY SEPTEMBER 2013 i Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Meliha Altunışık Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Prof. Dr. Ahmet İnam Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Prof. Dr. Yasin Ceylan Supervisor Examining Committee Members Prof. Dr. Yasin Ceylan (METU, PHIL) Prof. Dr. Ahmet İnam (METU, PHIL) Prof. Dr. Erdal Cengiz (A. U., DTCF) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Elif Çırakman (METU, PHIL) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ertuğrul R. Turan (A. U., DTCF.) ii I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Fatih Taştan Signature : iii ABSTRACT PHILOSOPHICAL MOVEMENTS IN OTTOMAN INTELLECTUAL LIFE AT THE BEGINNING OF THE 20TH CENTURY AND THEIR IMPACT ON YOUNG TURK’S THOUGHT Taştan, Fatih Ph. D., Department of Philosophy Supervisor: Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Intellectuals in the Modern Islamic World
    INTELLECTUALS IN THE MODERN ISLAMIC WORLD This book reconsiders the typology and history of intellectuals in the Islamic world in the modern and contemporary periods from the late nineteenth century to the present day. Intellectuals in the Modern Islamic World distinguishes itself from other major studies on modern thought in Islam by examining this topic beyond the context of the Arabic world. The first section of this book concentrates on a journal, al-Manar, published between 1898 and 1935, and read by a wide range of audiences throughout the Islamic world, which inspired the imagination and arguments of local intellectuals in the first half of the twentieth century. The second part concentrates on the formation, transmission, and transformation of learning and authority, from the Middle East to Central and South Asia, through the twentieth century. Providing a rich variety of case studies, by international authors of the most varied disciplinary scope, Intellectuals in the Modern Islamic World meets the highest academic requirements in a spirit of comparative vision and openness to the dynamism of contemporary societies of the Islamic world. As such, this book is essential reading for those with research interests in Islam and intellectual thought. Stéphane A. Dudoignon is a research fellow at the National Center for Scientific Research (Paris). Komatsu Hisao is a professor at the Graduate School of Humanities and Sociology, The University of Tokyo. Kosugi Yasushi is a professor at the Graduate School of Asian and African Area Studies, Kyoto University. NEW HORIZONS IN ISLAMIC STUDIES Series editor: Professor Sato Tsugitaka The series New Horizons in Islamic Studies presents the fruitful results of Islamic Area Studies Project conducted in Japan during the years 1997–2001.
    [Show full text]
  • Miniaturizing Ataturk Privatization of State Imagery and Ideology in Turkey
    ESRA O¨ZYU¨ REK University of California, San Diego Miniaturizing Atatu¨rk Privatization of state imagery and ideology in Turkey isitors to Turkey are immediately greeted with images and ABSTRACT reminders of Mustafa Kemal Atatu¨rk, the founding father of Since the late 1990s Turkish consumers have the country. When travelers land at the Atatu¨rk Airport in purchased pictures of Atatu¨rk, the founder of Istanbul, two gigantic pictures of the leader welcome them. modern Turkey and the most potent symbol of the The shuttle from the airport drops travelers in Taksim Square, Turkish state, as popular commodities, displaying acrossV from the Atatu¨rk Library. When they tour the city, visitors pass by the them in homes and private businesses. In this Atatu¨rk Culture Center, notice the Atatu¨rk Monument, and cross the article, I argue that these consumer citizens seek Atatu¨rk Bridge. They encounter the numerous statues, portraits, and say- to reconcile the memory of Atatu¨rk’s state-led ings of the leader that encumber every available public space. modernity of the 1930s with recent international Proliferation of Atatu¨rk images is noticeable not only to newcomers; pressure to achieve a market-based modernity. As since the late 1990s Turkish natives have also observed an exponential citizens try to mask the authority of secularist state increase in the already ubiquitous images of Atatu¨rk. Although I grew up institutions with consumer choice, the market under the penetrating gaze of the founding father, on my return to the carries state symbolism into new, private spheres, country after several years’ absence, I was astonished by the omnipresence which it previously had not been able to infiltrate.
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Culture in the Late Nineteenth Century and the Greek Philological Society of Constantinople Followed Suit in the Early Twentieth Century
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Strengthening Male Bodies and Building Robust Communities: Physical Culture in the Late Ottoman Empire A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in History by Murat Cihan Yıldız 2015 © Copyright by Murat Cihan Yıldız 2015 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Strengthening Male Bodies and Building Robust Communities: Physical Culture in the Late Ottoman Empire by Murat Cihan Yıldız Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Los Angeles, 2015 Professor James L. Gelvin, Chair This dissertation examines the making of modernity in the late Ottoman Empire by tracing the connections between sports, the body, male subject formation, nation building, and communal and imperial identity. It focuses on the development of a shared Ottoman physical culture amongst upper and middle-class Muslim, Christian, and Jewish men of Istanbul from the 1870s until World War I. My research draws from a diverse array of archives and primary sources written in Ottoman-Turkish, Armenian, Armeno- Turkish, French, English, German, and Greek, such as government reports and documents, school and association records, private correspondence, periodicals, books, and pamphlets, as well as vernacular photographs, in order to present an alternative understanding of cultural transformations and the historical linkages between different ethno-religious communities of the late Ottoman Empire. The central argument of this ii dissertation is that Muslims, Christians, and Jews of Istanbul engaged sports as a shared civic activity that offered benefits for the individual, community, and empire. This study investigates how Ottoman physical culture was underpinned by novel understandings of the body and implicated in larger debates and processes concerning the self, gender, ethno-religious communal identity, and the nation by pursuing three principle areas of inquiry.
    [Show full text]
  • Citizenship and Ethnicity in Turkey and Iran a Thesis
    CITIZENSHIP AND ETHNICITY IN TURKEY AND IRAN A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY MUSTAFA SUPHĐ ERDEN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY AUGUST 2010 i Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Meliha Altunışık Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Prof. Dr. Ayşe Saktanber Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Mesut Yeğen Supervisor Examining Committee Members Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ferdan Ergut (METU, HIST) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Mesut Yeğen (METU, SOC) Assist. Prof. Dr. Aykan Erdemir (METU, SOC) Assist. Prof. Dr. Nalan Soyarık-Şentürk (BAŞKENT U., PSIR) Assist. Prof. Dr. Ayça Ergun (METU, SOC) ii PLAGIARISM I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Mustafa Suphi Erden Signature : iii ABSTRACT CITIZESHIP AD ETHICITY I TURKEY AD IRA Erden, Mustafa Suphi Ph.D., Department of Sociology Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Mesut Yeğen August 2010, 268 pages This thesis aims at understanding the citizenship formations in Turkey and Iran by a comparative study of ethnicity, state formation, and nation building in the two lands.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Help Foreign Teachers in Turkey Pronounce Their
    International Journal of Arts Humanities and Social Sciences (IJAHSS) Volume 1 Issue 2 ǁ September 2016. www.ijahss.com HOW COULD FOREIGN TEACHERS IN TURKEY PRONOUNCE THEIR TURKISH STUDENTS’ NAMES CORRECTLY Assist. Prof. Dr. Metin Yurtbaşı Bayburt University, ELT Department, Bayburt, Turkey ABSTRACT: Most of us have read Dale Carnegie’s classic “How to make friends and influence people” in which he reveals the secret of human psychology: giving people the “feeling of importance” that they seek. He claims in that work that people feel more friendly toward those who allows them this feeling by caring about them and showing this by calling them by their names. He explains the reason for this by the age-old motto “the sweetest music to anyone’s ears is the sound of their own names.” Likewise in Turkey, young students love best those teachers who call them by their names, and tend to remain indifferent to those who are aloof. Most foreign-born teachers who teach English in Turkish schools, although aware of the importance of communicating for better education, fail to grasp this missing link to their students’ hearts by not pronouncing their students’ names properly. Considering that Turkish is a difficult language to learn, they simply get by in their own particular mispronunciation or even worse by ridiculously nicknaming them. This practice naturally hurt their students’ feelings, and causes negative consequences in the learning performance. To avoid this, it is suggested that such foreign-born teachers, not familiar with the Turkish language, should first consider that their students’ names are part of their individual and cultural identity and they expect their teachers care for themselves as much as their names.
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Education in Turkey (1860-1950) and Its Impact Upon Journalism and Women's Journals
    WOMEN’S EDUCATION IN TURKEY (1860-1950) AND ITS IMPACT UPON JOURNALISM AND WOMEN’S JOURNALS Valerie Margaret Smallwood School of Oriental and African Studies London University PhD July 2002 ProQuest Number: 10672729 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10672729 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 ABSTRACT This thesis explores certain under-researched aspects of the sociocultural development of late Ottoman Turkish and early republican women from the 1860s until 1950. By concentrating on females, the research aims to produce a more inclusive picture of how society developed in this period. In order to attempt this, the research focuses on four main topics which are presented in the following format: an introduction, four chapters, conclusions, appendix and a bibliography. The introduction sets the research within a historical framework and states its broad aims. Chapter One looks at various attempts to broaden female State education, culminating in a study of the Koy Enstitiilen (Village Institutes). Chapter Two consists of several profiles of female Turkish journalists, active from the late 19th century onwards, who had benefited from improved State education.
    [Show full text]