DOCSLIB.ORG

Cicero the Dialogician Done

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cicero the Dialogician Done Copyright by Daniel Parker Hanchey 2009 The Dissertation Committee for Daniel Parker Hanchey certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Cicero the Dialogician: The Construction of Community at the End of the Republic Committee: __________________________________ Andrew M. Riggsby, Supervisor __________________________________ Stephen A. White __________________________________ Jennifer V. Ebbeler __________________________________ Lawrence Y. Kim __________________________________ Joy Connolly Cicero the Dialogician: The Construction of Community at the End of the Republic by Daniel Parker Hanchey, B.A.; M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Andrew Riggsby for his sustained instruction and input over the entire course of my graduate school career, including the direction of both my Master’s report and my dissertation. I am also grateful to the members of my committee, Steve White, Jen Ebbeler, and Larry Kim, each of whom helped me to complete this project under unusual circumstances. And I owe a particular debt of gratitude to Joy Connolly, who gave me comments and help as if I were her own student and colleague, rather than a student half of a continent away. I would also like to thank my parents and in-laws for their constant support. Most of all I wish to say thank you to my wife, Ginger, who has been so selflessly supportive, even as she has worked and attended graduate school, and my son, Oliver, who has known me only as a graduate student until now. It is to them that I dedicate this project. iv Cicero the Dialogician: The Construction of Community at the End of the Republic Daniel Parker Hanchey, Ph.D. The University of Texas at Austin, 2009 Supervisor: Andrew M. Riggsby In the opening lines of the preface to De Divinatione 2, Cicero describes his motivation in composing of the complures libros of his post-exilic years. Most of all, he says, he wished to prevent any interruption in his service to the state. Though he does not say so explicitly, he clearly refers to an interruption occasioned by his exile and Caesar’s ascension. Elsewhere Cicero describes this period of his life as enforced otium, an otium threatened by the absence of the dignitas which Cicero identifies with the otium of L. Crassus in the opening words of De Oratore. As he claims in Div. 2, Cicero achieved a level of usefulness to the state (and so maintained a certain amount of dignitas) by writing his theoretical books, books which he says communicate the optimarum artium vias to the Roman reading public. What Cicero does not explicitly explain is why the great majority of those works assume the form of the dialogue. In this dissertation I seek to explore the formal capabilities of the dialogue which would make it attractive to a Cicero seeking to v maintain dignitas and to render significant service to a state faced with a rapid shift of political and social structure. In general I argue that the dialogue form itself represents an antidote to the decommunalizing and populizing nature of Caesarian hegemony. As I contend, the dialogue achieves its communal nature through an emphasis on three major ethics, each of which is demonstrated in the theories expressed within the dialogues, in the actions of the interlocutors, and in the activity of Cicero himself as author. These three ethics (imitatio, memoria, gratia) each depend on community for their actualization and themselves generate the bonds that lead to community. By placing significant, multi-layered emphasis on each of these ethics, Cicero aims to communicate their validity to a generation of boni faced with the non-traditional, non-communal power of Julius Caesar. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 - Introduction ......................................................................................................1 Chapter 2 - Imitatio …………...…………………………………………………………18 Chapter 3 - Memoria …………...………………………………………………………..69 Chapter 4 - Gratia ………………...……………………………………………………144 Conclusion ……………………………………………………………………………..229 Bibliography …………………………………………………………………………...233 Vita ……………………………………………………………………………………..245 vii Chapter 1 - Introduction Upon his return from the imposed silence of his exile in 57, Cicero quickly and regularly made his voice heard in Rome, delivering speeches in thanks for his recall, de domo sua, de haruspicum responsis, pro Sestio, in Vatinium, pro Caelio, pro Balbo, and in Pisonem all between 57 and 55. Over the remaining twelve years of his life, however, Cicero’s opportunities for public speaking became rarer and rarer, limited by civil unrest and the transfer of power into new hands. He delivered only a handful of speeches between 55 and 43, the majority of which at times feel like little more than Caesarian flattery. Faced with the realities of Rome’s new political climate, Cicero had to turn gradually to a new medium for self-expression and public communication. For Cicero this medium was the literary dialogue. In this dissertation I examine Cicero’s use of the dialogue form in an effort to determine why Cicero considered it the best choice to replace his oratory and to communicate his ideas on the republic. On a certain level, Cicero the orator turned to dialogue partly because of the influence of predecessors like Plato and partly because of a general affinity for the methods of Academic skepticism. 1 But the form also has a fundamental connection to his theoretical project of the same period. This theoretical project, reiterated over the course of all of his dialogues, through a wide variety of topics and characters states in its essence that: Rome needs a republic; a republic needs an aristocracy of good men; and 1 The philosophical influences on Cicero should not be underestimated. In the following chapter on imitatio I will specifically examine the suitability of Plato as a model for Cicero. On Cicero’s philosophical affiliations, see the work of Glucker and Görler, including their respective chapters in J.G.F. Powell, ed., Cicero the Philosopher. Glucker has argued that, at first, Cicero’s loyalties lay with Philo of Larissa and the “New Academy,” that he later became an adherent to the “Old Academy” of Antiochus of Ascalon, and finally returned to the “New Academy” and its methodology of skepticism. Görler argues that Cicero was always a disciple of Philo and never changed his affiliation. 1 the aristocracy must be a unified group.2 This syllogism locates the survival of Rome in community, however restricted it may be. And it is the dialogue form’s emphasis on community that made it the most suitable mode of political expression for Cicero; in contrast to the monologic perspective of a literary treatise or even a speech given to a limited audience, such as Cicero’s speeches of 46, the dialogue form is a polyphonic medium for the expression and exhibition of right community. Cicero had conceived early in his career of the unity of form and content in the written word. In his first theoretical work, De Inventione, Cicero opens with an Isocratean argument on the importance of the unity of philosophy and oratory for the leader of the state. This argument, as it had for Isocrates, arises from the general principles that eloquence gives a wise man influence and wisdom tempers an eloquent man’s temptation toward manipulation. Such had been the case ever since the dawn of society. Before eloquence men had wandered about as animals, unable to employ their ratio for any positive purpose. There was no system of governance and physical might carried the day. Only when an unnamed vir joined oratio to ratio did men decide to arrange themselves in societies governed by laws.3 Community was the offspring of speech. 2 Robert Hariman describes this project as ‘republican style.’ As he says, the “republican style begins with a relish for the pleasures of composing and delivering persuasive public discourse, it includes other modes of exchange and becomes a more focused mode of action by defining consensus as the foundational means and end of governance, and it culminates in a model of leadership that features personal embodiment of the civic culture” (102). After his exile, Cicero uses the dialogue as his “other mode of exchange” precisely because the forum for “delivering persuasive public discourse” through oratory had become so limited. 3 DInv 1.2: Quo tempore quidam magnus videlicet vir et sapiens cognovit, quae materia esset et quanta ad maximas res opportunitas in animis inesset hominum, si quis eam posset elicere et praecipiendo meliorem reddere; qui dispersos homines in agros et in tectis silvestribus abditos ratione quadam conpulit unum in locum et congregavit et eos in unam quamque rem inducens utilem atque honestam primo propter insolentiam reclamantes, deinde propter rationem atque orationem studiosius audientes ex feris et inmanibus mites reddidit et mansuetos. 2 In this proem, the first words of Cicero’s career as a theorist, he adumbrates two general ethical ideas, neither specific to oratory, which remain true for him until his death in 43. In the first place, Cicero justifies his project (in this case, the explanation of the principles of oratory) with an appeal to its role in the construction of community. While Cicero would go on to show himself a divisive figure in many instances leading up to his exile, two of his clearest political ideals were the concordia ordinum and its partner, the consensus omnium bonorum. His objections to figures from Verres to Catiline to Clodius to Antony centered on their rejections or manipulations of traditional principles of Roman society. In the second place, even at this early stage, Cicero demonstrates an appreciation of the unity of form and content in the written word. So he synthesizes the beginning of this treatise with the origins of society in general, and implies a further synthesis of ratio and oratio in the treatise to follow.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 3 Arcesilaus and Carneades
    C:/ITOOLS/WMS/CUP/552750/WORKINGFOLDER/BCP/9780521874762C03.3D 58 [58–80] 24.9.2009 7:15AM harald thorsrud 3 Arcesilaus and Carneades Arcesilaus initiated a sceptical phase in the Academy after taking over in c. 268 BCE. He was motivated in part by an innovative reading of Plato’s dialogues. Where his predecessors found positive doctrines to be systematically developed, he found a dialectical method of arguing and the sceptical view that nothing can be known (akatalêpsia, De Or. 3.67,seeDL4.28, 4.32). He also advanced this conclusion in opposition to the ambitious system of the Stoics, claiming further that the appropriate response to the pervasive uncertainty generated by his method is the suspension of judgement (epochê). Arcesilaus’ dialectical method was practiced without significant modification in the Academy until Carneades, who became head sometime before 155 BCE.1 Carneades both continued and strength- ened Arcesilaus’ method (ND 1.11, Acad. 2.16, see also Acad. 1.46, and Eusebius, Praep. evang. 14.7.15). Sextus marks the change by referring to Plato’s Academy as Old, Arcesilaus’ as Middle, and Carneades’ as New (PH 1.220). Since the main interpretative issues regarding both Arcesilaus and Carneades depend on the concepts of akatalêpsia and epochê,we must try to determine what they mean, how they are related, and what attitude the Academics take towards them – i.e. in what sense, if any, are these their sceptical doctrines? iarcesilaus The view that Arcesilaus derived from Plato’s dialogues might have taken one of two very different forms. He might have discovered some arguments that show knowledge is not possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Andrea Corsali and the Southern Cross
    Andrea Corsali and the Southern Cross Anne McCormick Hordern House 2019 1 In 1515 Andrea Corsali, an Italian under the patronage of the Medici family, accompanied a Portuguese voyage down the African coast and around the Cape of Good Hope, en route to Cochin, India. On his return Corsali’s letter to his patron describing the voyage was published as a book which survives in only a handful of copies: CORSALI, Andrea. Lettera di Andrea Corsali allo Illustrissimo Signore Duca Iuliano de Medici, Venuta Dellindia del Mese di Octobre Nel M.D.XVI. [Colophon:] Stampato in Firenze per Io. Stephano di Carlo da Pavia. Adi. xi.di Dicembre Nel. M.D.XV1. This book included the earliest illustration of the stars of the Crux, the group of stars today known as the Southern Cross. This paper will explore the cultural context of that publication, along with the significance of this expedition, paying attention to the identification and illustration of the stars of the Southern Cross; in particular, I shall investigate why the book was important to the Medici family; the secrecy often attaching to geographical information acquired during the Age of Discovery; Andrea Corsali’s biography; and printing in Florence at this period; and other works issued by the printer Giovanni Stefano from Pavia. Corsali’s discoveries, particularly the ground-breaking astronomical report and illustration of the Southern Cross off the Cape of Good Hope, remained a navigational aid to voyages into the Southern Ocean and on to The East and the New World for centuries to follow, and ultimately even played a part in the European discovery of Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Cicero's Life
    Cicero Philippic II Cicero’s Life Lives of Cicero of all lengths and depths abound; what follows is intended to highlight the main landmarks in Cicero’s career. A separate table chronicles the events of 44 BC in more detail. Date (BC) Cicero and his circle Rome 107 Marius elected consul for the first time 106 Birth of Marcus Tullius Cicero and Gnaeus Pompeius (Pompey), later called ‘Magnus’; both equestrians. 104 – 100 Marius consul for five successive years. 104/2 Birth of Cicero’s brother, Quintus. 90s Cicero is educated at Rome in house of L. Licinius Crassus and later continues his studies with the augur Q. Mucius Scaevola. 91 – 88 Cicero and Pompey both serve under The Social War, in which Rome’s Sulla, Pompey as a successful Italian allies fight against Rome’s general. predominance and win citizenship. 88 – 84 Occupation of Rome first by Sulla (88) and then by Marius and Cinna (87 – 6). Marius dies in 86, Cinna continues to control affairs until his death in 84. ?86 Cicero writes a rhetorical treatise, de Inventione. 82 Sulla marches on Rome and is made dictator. Proscriptions follow (in 81). He retires from office in 79 and dies in 78. Date (BC) Cicero and his circle Rome 81 Cicero’s first civil case, pro Quinctio Sulla’s reforms curtailing powers of (which he probably loses). tribunate, increasing size of senate and constituting seven senatorial courts. 80 Cicero’s first criminal case, pro Roscio Amerino (which he wins). 79 – 77 Cicero marries Terentia and travels abroad, including to Athens for six months to study rhetoric under Apollonius Molo.
    [Show full text]
  • INGO GILDENHARD Cicero, Philippic 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119 Latin Text, Study Aids with Vocabulary, and Commentary CICERO, PHILIPPIC 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119
    INGO GILDENHARD Cicero, Philippic 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119 Latin text, study aids with vocabulary, and commentary CICERO, PHILIPPIC 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119 Cicero, Philippic 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119 Latin text, study aids with vocabulary, and commentary Ingo Gildenhard https://www.openbookpublishers.com © 2018 Ingo Gildenhard The text of this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the text; to adapt the text and to make commercial use of the text providing attribution is made to the author(s), but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work. Attribution should include the following information: Ingo Gildenhard, Cicero, Philippic 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119. Latin Text, Study Aids with Vocabulary, and Commentary. Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers, 2018. https://doi. org/10.11647/OBP.0156 Every effort has been made to identify and contact copyright holders and any omission or error will be corrected if notification is made to the publisher. In order to access detailed and updated information on the license, please visit https:// www.openbookpublishers.com/product/845#copyright Further details about CC BY licenses are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/ All external links were active at the time of publication unless otherwise stated and have been archived via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine at https://archive.org/web Digital material and resources associated with this volume are available at https://www.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cultural Creation of Fulvia Flacca Bambula
    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 5-2017 The cultural creation of Fulvia Flacca Bambula. Erin Leigh Wotring University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Part of the European History Commons, History of Gender Commons, Intellectual History Commons, Political History Commons, Social History Commons, and the Women's History Commons Recommended Citation Wotring, Erin Leigh, "The cultural creation of Fulvia Flacca Bambula." (2017). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 2691. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/2691 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE CULTURAL CREATION OF FULVIA FLACCA BAMBULA By Erin Leigh Wotring A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of the University of Louisville In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts in History Department of History University of Louisville Louisville, KY May, 2017 Copyright 2017 by Erin Leigh Wotring All rights reserved THE CULTURAL CREATION OF FULVIA FLACCA BAMBULA By Erin Leigh Wotring A Thesis Approved on April 14, 2017 by the following Thesis Committee: Dr. Jennifer Westerfeld, Director Dr. Blake Beattie Dr. Carmen Hardin ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Congregationesparticu Lares
    S e rie s II. « ANALECTA OSBM » — Sectio III. Сер і я II. а ЗАПИСКИ ЧСВВ» — Секція III. CONGREGATIONES PARTICULARES ECCLESIAM CATHOLICAM UCRAINAE ET B1ELARUSJAE SPECTANTES VOL. I. 1622-1728 COLLEOIT ET ANNOTATIONIBUS ILLUSTRAVIT EDITIONEMQUE CURAVIT P. Athanasius G. W elykyj OSBM ADLABORANTE Sac . Euoenio Kaminskyj R omae 1956 PP. BASILIANI - PIAZZA MADONNA DEI MONTI 3 S umptibus O rdinis Basiliani — in honorem S. O loae R eginae ANALECTA ORDINIS S. BASILII MAGNI Sectio III Sectio III: DOCUMENTA ROMANA ECCLESIAE CATHOLICAE IN TERRIS UCRAINAE ET BIELARUSJAE CURA PP. BASILIANORUM COLLECTA ET EDITA ACTA LITTERAE ET DECRETA SACRARUM CONGREGATIONUM CONGREGATIONES PARTICULARES Voi. I: 1622-1728 S umptibus O rdinis Basiliani S-ti Josaphat in memoriam primi a baptismate S. O lgae millenii editum Romae Series IL «ANALECTA О S В М » Сер ія II. ((ЗАПИСКИ ЧСВВ» CONGREGATIONES PARTICULARES ECCLESIAM CATHOLICAM UCRAINAE ET BÌELARUSJAE SPECTANTES VOL. I. 1622-1728 COLLEGIT ET ADNOTATIONIBUS ILLUSTRAVIT EDITIONEMQUE CURAVIT P. Athanasius G. W elykyj OSBM ADLABORANTE Sac. Eugenio Kaminskyj Romae 1956 PP. basiliani - piazza madonna dei monti 3 S umptibus O rdinis Basiliani — in honorem S. O lgae Reginae Romae, e Curia Generali Ordinis Basiliani S.ti Josaphat, die 20-VII-1956. P. Paulus P. Myskiv Proioarchimandrita - Superior generalis Imprimatur Romae, e Vicariatu Urbis, die 16-X-1956. Ф Aloysius Traolia Archiep. Caesarien. Vices gerens r CMLV - MCMLV J ANNO . A . BAPTISMATE . SANCTAE . OLOAE . DECIES . SAECVLARI MVLIERIS . REGINAE . SANCTAE DVM . POPVLVS . VCRAINAE . DISPERSVS . PER . ORBEM EIVSDEM . CELEBRAT . PERGRATAM . MEMORIAM SVMMO . PONTIFICE . BENEDICENTE ANTISTITIBVS . SACRORVM . CELEBRANTIBVS CLERO . COOPERANTE IVVENTVTE . GAVDENTE POPVLOQVE . VNIVERSO . PLAVDENTE BASILII . SANCTI . PER . ORBEM .
    [Show full text]
  • Cicero and St. Augustine's Just War Theory: Classical Influences on a Christian Idea Berit Van Neste University of South Florida
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 4-12-2006 Cicero and St. Augustine's Just War Theory: Classical Influences on a Christian Idea Berit Van Neste University of South Florida Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons, and the Religion Commons Scholar Commons Citation Neste, Berit Van, "Cicero and St. Augustine's Just War Theory: Classical Influences on a Christian Idea" (2006). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/3782 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cicero and St. Augustine's Just War Theory: Classical Influences on a Christian Idea by Berit Van Neste A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Religious Studies College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: James F. Strange, Ph.D. Paul G. Schneider, Ph.D. Michael J. Decker, Ph.D. Date of Approval: April 12, 2006 Keywords: theology, philosophy, politics, patristic, medieval © Copyright 2006 , Berit Van Neste For Elizabeth and Calista Table of Contents Abstract ii Chapter 1 1 Introduction 1 Cicero’s Influence on Augustine 7 Chapter 2 13 Justice 13 Natural and Temporal Law 19 Commonwealth 34 Chapter 3 49 Just War 49 Chapter 4 60 Conclusion 60 References 64 i Cicero and St.
    [Show full text]
  • Ennius Or Cicero? the Disreputable Diviners at Cic
    ACTA CLASSICAXLIV(200/) 153-166 ISSN 0065-1141 ENNIUS OR CICERO? THE DISREPUTABLE DIVINERS AT CIC. DE DIV. 1.132 A.T. Nice University of the Witwatersrand ABSTRACT At the end of the first book of Cicero's De Divir1atior1e, Quintus remarks that, even though he believes in divination, there are some diviners whom he would not trust to give accurate predictions. These comments are followed by a quotation from Ennius' Telamo. Most modem scholars have assumed, therefore, that the previous lines also contain an echo, if not a paraphrase of Ennius' work. This supposition does not seem to be supported by the language or style employed by Cicero. The lines should rather be understood as embodying the parochial view that elite Romans had towards forms of divination that were foreign, rustic or mercenary and not practised by the Roman state. I At the end of the first book of De Divinatione ( 1.132), Quintus completes his argument in favour of divination by denying the respectability of certain kinds ofdiviners: Nunc illa testabor, non me sortilegos neque eos, qui quaestus causa hariolentur, ne psychomantia quidem, quibus Appius, amicus tuus, uti solebat, agnoscere; non habeo denique nauci Marsum augurem, non vicanos haruspices, non de circo astrologos, non Isiacos coniectores, non interpretes somniorum; non enim sunt ii aut scientia aut arte divini. 1 The lines that follow, '(sed)2 superstitiosi vates inpudentes harioli ... de his di vitiis sibi deducant drachmam, reddant cetera,' are normally attributed to Ennius. Some previous commentators considered that the Ennius quotation should begin earlier, specifically from 'non habeo denique nauci.' 3 In favour 1 I use here the Teubner edition of R.
    [Show full text]
  • 1996 Njcl Certamen Round A1 (Revised)
    1996 NJCL CERTAMEN ROUND A1 (REVISED) 1. Who immortalized the wife of Quintus Caecilius Metellus as Lesbia in his poetry? (GAIUS VALERIUS) CATULLUS What was probably the real name of Lesbia? CLODIA What orator fiercely attacked Clodia in his Pro Caelio? (MARCUS TULLIUS) CICERO 2. According to Hesiod, who was the first born of Cronus and Rhea? HESTIA Who was the second born? DEMETER Who was the fifth born? POSEIDON 3. Name the twin brothers who fought in their mother's womb. PROETUS & ACRISIUS Whom did Proetus marry? ANTIA (ANTEIA) (STHENEBOEA) With what hero did Antia fall in love? BELLEROPHON 4. Give the comparative and superlative forms of mult§ PLâRS, PLâRIM¦ ...of prÇ. PRIOR, PR¦MUS ...of hebes. HEBETIOR, HEBETISSIMUS 5. LegÇ means “I collect.” What does lectitÇ mean? (I) COLLECT OFTEN, EAGERLY Sitis means “thirst.” What does the verb sitiÇ mean? (I) AM THIRSTY / THIRST CantÇ means “I sing.” What does cantillÇ mean? (I) CHIRP, WARBLE, HUM, SING LOW 6. Differentiate in meaning between p~vÇ and paveÇ. P}VÆ -- PEACOCK PAVEÆ -- (I) FEAR, TREMBLE Differentiate in meaning between cavÇ and caveÇ. CAVÆ -- I HOLLOW OUT CAVEÆ -- I TAKE HEED, BEWARE Differentiate in meaning between modo (must pronounce with short “o”) and madeÇ. MODO -- ONLY, MERELY, BUT, JUST, IMMEDIATELY, PROVIDED THAT MADEÆ -- I AM WET, DRUNK Page 1 -- A1 7. What two words combine to form the Latin verb malÇ? MAGIS & VOLÆ What does malÇ mean? PREFER M~la is a contracted form of maxilla. What is a m~la? CHEEK, JAW 8. Which of the emperors of AD 193 executed the assassins of Commodus? DIDIUS JULIANUS How had Julianus gained imperial power? BOUGHT THE THRONE AT AN AUCTION (HELD BY THE PRAETORIANS) Whom had the Praetorians murdered after his reign of 87 days? PERTINAX 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Gulino 1 Pleasure and the Stoic Sage a Thesis Presented to the Honors
    Gulino 1 Pleasure and the Stoic Sage A Thesis Presented to The Honors Tutorial College of Ohio University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Graduation from the Honors Tutorial College with the Degree of Bachelor of Arts in Philosophy By Kathleen R. Gulino June 2011 Gulino 2 Table of Contents Sources and Abbreviations 2 Introduction 3 Chapter 1: Οἰκείωζις 9 Chapter 2: Χαρά 25 Conclusions 42 References 50 Gulino 3 Sources and Abbreviations Throughout this work, I cite several traditional sources for Stoic and Hellenistic texts. Here I have provided a list of the abbreviations I will use to refer to those texts. The References page lists the specific editions from which I have cited. Fin. Cicero, De Finibus (On Moral Ends) NA Gellius, Noctes Atticae (Attic Nights) Div. Inst. Lactantius, Divine Institutes DL Diogenes Laertius, Lives of the Eminent Philosophers LS A.A. Long and D.N. Sedley, The Hellenistic Philosophers Ep. Seneca, Epistulae (Letters) Gulino 4 Introduction. The Hellenistic period refers, generally speaking, to the years beginning with the death of Alexander the Great in 323 BCE and ending with the downfall of the Roman Republic, considered as Octavian‘s victory at the battle of Actium, in 31 BCE. Philosophy was a Greek activity throughout this period, and at the outset, the works of Plato and Aristotle were the main texts used in philosophical study. However, as the Hellenistic culture came into its own, philosophy came to be dominated by three schools unique to the period: Epicureanism, Stoicism, and Skepticism. All of these, having come about after Aristotle, are distinctively Hellenistic, and it was these schools that held primary influence over thought in the Hellenistic world, at least until the revival of Platonism during the first century.1 Today, in the English-speaking world, the names of these traditions are still familiar, remaining in popular usage as ordinary adjectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Dirk Held on Eros Beauty and the Divine in Plato
    Nina C. Coppolino, editor ARTICLES & NOTES New England Classical Journal 36.3 (2009) 155-167 Eros, Beauty, and the Divine in Plato Dirk t. D. Held Connecticut College ontemporary intellectual culture is diffident, perhaps hostile, towards the transcendent aspects of Plato’s metaphysics; instead, preference is given to the openness and inconclusiveness of CSocratic inquiry. But it is not possible to distinguish clearly between the philosophy of Socrates and Plato. This essay argues first that Socrates does more than inquire: he enlarges the search for truth with attention to erotics. It further contends that Plato’s transformative vision of beauty and the divine directs the soul, also through erotics, to truth not accessible to syllogisms alone. We must therefore acknowledge that Plato’s philosophy relies at times on affective and even supra-rational means. Debate over the function of philosophy for Socrates and Plato arose immediately following the latter’s death. The early Academy discussed the mode and intent of reason for Socrates and Plato in terms of whether it was best characterized as skepticism or dogmatism. The issue remains pertinent to the present discussion of how Plato intends mortals both to live a life of reason and strive for the divine which is beyond the normal grasp of reason. What we regard as the traditional “Socratic question” arose in the early nineteenth century from studies of Plato by the Protestant theologian and philosopher, Friedrich Schleiermacher. The phrase stands for the attempt to winnow out an historical figure from the disparate accounts of Socrates found in Plato, Xenophon, and Aristophanes.
    [Show full text]
  • Diccionario Del Cónclave
    DICCIONARIO DEL CÓNCLAVE - Explicaciones jurídicas tomadas del DGDC(*): • Cónclave. • Elección del Romano Pontífice. • Secreto en la Elección del Romano Pontífice. • Cardenal. • Colegio Cardenalicio. • Sede apostólica vacante e impedida. - Ofrecemos también el texto del motu proprio de Benedicto XVI, de 22 de febrero, que facilita el recorte de tiempo para el inicio del cónclave, endurece algunas mayorías para la elección y también introduce la excomunión latae sententiae para la ruptura del secreto. (*) J. Otaduy - A. Viana - J. Sedano (dir.), Diccionario General de Derecho Canónico, ed. Thomson-Reuters-Aranzadi, vol. I-VII, Pamplona 2012. Oficina de Información del Opus Dei en España www.opusdei.es con la colaboración de la Facultad de Derecho Canónico de la Universidad de Navarra www.unav.es CONCILIOS PARTICULARES DGDC II apostolorum, I, Paderbornae 1905; F.L. FERRARIS, Bi- institución del cónclave y de las distintas pie- bliotheca canonica iuridica moralis theologica, II, zas del sistema electoral del Romano Pontí- Romae 1886; L. CHIAPPETTA, Il Codice di Diritto Ca- fice, atendiendo a las necesidades del mo- nonico. Commento giuridico-pastorale, I, Bologna mento histórico concreto, estas bases no han 32011, 544-553; P.GASPARRI (a cura di), Codicis Iuris Canonici Fontes, III, Romae 1933, 534-545; S. C. sufrido modificaciones esenciales. La regula- BONICELLI, I concili particolari da Graziano a Trento. ción detallada, sistemática e integral del cón- Studio sulla evoluzione del diritto della Chiesa la- clave vino con la constitución apostólica de tina, Brescia 1971; J. I. ARRIETA, Instrumentos supra- san Pío X Vacante Sede Apostolica del diocesanos para el gobierno de la Iglesia particular, 25.XII.1904, que puede considerarse como la Ius canonicum 24 (1984) 607-647; J.
    [Show full text]