DOCSLIB.ORG

Desecheo Island National Wildlife Refuge

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Desecheo Island National Wildlife Refuge Desecheo Island National Wildlife Refuge Rat Eradication to Promote Ecosystem Restoration Final Environmental Assessment FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Desecheo National Wildlife Refuge Rat Eradication Project U.S. Department of the Interior Fish & Wildlife Service Prepared by: Caribbean Islands National Wildlife Refuge Complex, Puerto Rico November 2011 i This page is intentionally left blank ii Executive Summary Desecheo National Wildlife Refuge is managed by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and was historically known as an important center of biodiversity and species abundance in the Caribbean. Desecheo was a major seabird rookery and formerly home to one of the largest brown booby (Sula leucogaster) breeding populations in the world. The extirpation of nesting seabirds has been linked to the presence of invasive mammals including: goats, rats and macaques. Introduced non-native species are a leading cause of extinctions in island communities worldwide. Increasingly, land managers are removing introduced species to aid in the restoration of native ecosystems. Rats are responsible for 40-60 percent of all recorded island bird and reptile extinctions worldwide. Given their widespread successful colonization on islands and the resulting impact to native species, introduced rats have been identified as key species for eradication. Removing black rats (Rattus rattus) from Desecheo will result in obvious, empirically tested biodiversity benefits for seabirds, plants, reptiles, terrestrial invertebrates and other components of the islands terrestrial ecosystem. Additionally, it is anticipated that the removal of non-native rats from Desecheo will allow the recolonization by nesting seabirds, promote recovery of the island’s seabird colonies, increase the abundance of resident landbirds, remove the predation threats to the islands endemic reptiles, increase woodland vegetative cover and abundance, restore ecosystem functioning as a high density seabird island, and improve the overall abundance of the endangered higo chumbo (Harrisia portoricensis) cactus. The action alternatives were developed to focus on the issues identified by resource specialists within the Service, experts in island rodent eradication and government regulatory agencies. All individuals, agencies and organizations that provided substantive input regarding the proposed action are listed in Chapter 5. In order to be retained for consideration, an alternative had to 1) have a high likelihood of success, 2) have an acceptably low probability for adverse effects on the populations of non-target species and the environment, and 3) be permitted under regulations governing Desecheo National Wildlife Refuge (“the Refuge”). The action alternatives would be: • Alternative B: Aerial broadcast of brodifacoum, with mitigation actions for endemic reptile taxa • Alternative C: Aerial broadcast of brodifacoum, without proactive risk reduction actions for endemic reptile taxa • Alternative D: Aerial broadcast of diphacinone, with mitigation actions for endemic reptile taxa • Alternative E: Aerial broadcast of diphacinone, without proactive risk reduction actions for endemic reptile taxa iii Table of Contents 1 Purpose and Need ................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of the Proposed Action ...................................................................................... 1 1.3 Need for Action............................................................................................................... 1 1.3.1 Summary of Suspected and Potential Rat Impacts to Desecheo Island, and Anticipated Benefits from Rat Eradication ............................................................. 1 1.4 Background: The Problem of Invasive Rats on Islands .................................................. 3 1.4.1 The Importance of Island Ecosystems .................................................................... 3 1.4.1.1 Impacts of Rats on Island Ecosystems ............................................................. 4 1.4.1.2 Eradication of Rodents from Islands ............................................................... 5 1.4.1.3 Benefits of Rat Eradication ............................................................................... 6 1.5 Authority and Responsibility to Act ............................................................................... 7 1.6 Regulatory Framework of the Alternatives..................................................................... 8 1.6.1 Federal Laws ........................................................................................................... 8 1.7 Scope of the Proposed Action ......................................................................................... 9 1.8 Environmental Issues (Impact Topics) Identified ........................................................... 9 1.8.1 Summary of Scoping............................................................................................... 9 1.8.2 Impact Topic: Physical Resources ........................................................................ 11 1.8.3 Impact Topic: Biological Resources ..................................................................... 11 1.8.4 Impact Topic: Social and Economic Environment ............................................... 11 2 Alternatives ........................................................................................................ 12 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 12 2.2 Alternative A: No Action .............................................................................................. 12 2.3 Features Common to All Action Alternatives .............................................................. 13 2.3.1 Rodent Bait ........................................................................................................... 13 2.3.2 A Comparison of Two Bait Products Registered for Conservation Purposes: Brodifacoum-25D (Alternatives B and C) and Diphacinone-50 (Alternatives D and E) .................................................................................................................... 13 2.3.2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 13 2.3.2.2 Brodifacoum and Brodifacoum-25D bait product ............................................ 15 2.3.2.3 Diphacinone and Diphacinone-50 bait product ................................................ 17 2.3.3 Comparative Likelihood of Success ..................................................................... 21 2.3.4 Bait Trials Conducted on Desecheo Island ........................................................... 25 2.3.4.1 Rat Eradication Feasibility Study, February 2009 ............................................ 25 2.3.4.2 Bait Uptake Field Trials, February - March 2010............................................. 26 2.3.4.3 Bait degradation trials, June 2010 ..................................................................... 28 2.3.5 Aerial Broadcast.................................................................................................... 30 2.3.6 Timing Considerations .......................................................................................... 30 2.3.7 Biology of Rats & Timing of Eradication Operation............................................ 31 2.3.8 Seasonal Patterns of Native Wildlife .................................................................... 31 2.3.8.1 Weather Considerations .................................................................................... 32 2.3.9 Project Staging and Support Operations ............................................................... 33 2.3.10 Reducing Wildlife Disturbance during Operations............................................... 34 2.3.11 Protecting Cultural Resources............................................................................... 34 iv 2.3.12 Monitoring Eradication Efficacy .......................................................................... 34 2.3.13 Monitoring Ecosystem Response .......................................................................... 34 2.3.14 Public Information ................................................................................................ 35 2.3.15 Re-introduction Prevention ................................................................................... 35 2.3.16 Detection & Response........................................................................................... 36 2.4 Alternatives B and C: Aerial Broadcast as Primary Delivery Technique of Brodifacoum-25D Bait Product ............................................................................ 36 2.4.1 Rationale ............................................................................................................... 36 2.4.2 Summary of Bait Delivery Methods ..................................................................... 36 2.4.3 Timing ................................................................................................................... 37 2.4.4 Equipment and Materials ...................................................................................... 37 2.4.4.1 Bait ...................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Checklist of the Non -Acarine Arachnids
    Original Research A CHECKLIST OF THE NON -A C A RINE A R A CHNIDS (CHELICER A T A : AR A CHNID A ) OF THE DE HOOP NA TURE RESERVE , WESTERN CA PE PROVINCE , SOUTH AFRIC A Authors: ABSTRACT Charles R. Haddad1 As part of the South African National Survey of Arachnida (SANSA) in conserved areas, arachnids Ansie S. Dippenaar- were collected in the De Hoop Nature Reserve in the Western Cape Province, South Africa. The Schoeman2 survey was carried out between 1999 and 2007, and consisted of five intensive surveys between Affiliations: two and 12 days in duration. Arachnids were sampled in five broad habitat types, namely fynbos, 1Department of Zoology & wetlands, i.e. De Hoop Vlei, Eucalyptus plantations at Potberg and Cupido’s Kraal, coastal dunes Entomology University of near Koppie Alleen and the intertidal zone at Koppie Alleen. A total of 274 species representing the Free State, five orders, 65 families and 191 determined genera were collected, of which spiders (Araneae) South Africa were the dominant taxon (252 spp., 174 genera, 53 families). The most species rich families collected were the Salticidae (32 spp.), Thomisidae (26 spp.), Gnaphosidae (21 spp.), Araneidae (18 2 Biosystematics: spp.), Theridiidae (16 spp.) and Corinnidae (15 spp.). Notes are provided on the most commonly Arachnology collected arachnids in each habitat. ARC - Plant Protection Research Institute Conservation implications: This study provides valuable baseline data on arachnids conserved South Africa in De Hoop Nature Reserve, which can be used for future assessments of habitat transformation, 2Department of Zoology & alien invasive species and climate change on arachnid biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • In Search of the Extinct Hutia in Cave Deposits of Isla De Mona, P.R. by Ángel M
    In Search of the Extinct Hutia in Cave Deposits of Isla de Mona, P.R. by Ángel M. Nieves-Rivera, M.S. and Donald A. McFarlane, Ph.D. Isolobodon portoricensis, the extinct have been domesticated, and its abundant (14C) date was obtained on charcoal and Puerto Rican hutia (a large guinea-pig like remains in kitchen middens indicate that it bone fragments from Cueva Negra, rodent), was about the size of the surviving formed part of the diet for the early settlers associated with hutia bones (Frank, 1998). Hispaniolan hutia Plagiodontia (Rodentia: (Nowak, 1991; Flemming and MacPhee, This analysis yielded an uncorrected 14C age Capromydae). Isolobodon portoricensis was 1999). This species of hutia was extinct, of 380 ±60 before present, and a corrected originally reported from Cueva Ceiba (next apparently shortly after the coming of calendar age of 1525 AD, (1 sigma range to Utuado, P.R.) in 1916 by J. A. Allen (1916), European explorers, according to most 1480-1655 AD). This date coincides with the and it is known today only by skeletal remains historians. final occupation of Isla de Mona by the Taino from Hispaniola (Dominican Republic, Haiti, The first person to take an interest in the Indians (1578 AD; Wadsworth 1977). The Île de la Gonâve, ÎIe de la Tortue), Puerto faunal remains of the caves of Isla de Mona purpose of this article is to report some new Rico (mainland, Isla de Mona, Caja de was mammalogist Harold E. Anthony, who paleontological discoveries of the Puerto Muertos, Vieques), the Virgin Islands (St. in 1926 collected the first Puerto Rican hutia Rican hutia in cave deposits of Isla de Mona Croix, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa, Molecular Phylogeny, Classification, and Biogeography Of
    Zootaxa 2067: 1–28 (2009) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2009 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Molecular phylogeny, classification, and biogeography of West Indian racer snakes of the Tribe Alsophiini (Squamata, Dipsadidae, Xenodontinae) S. BLAIR HEDGES1, ARNAUD COULOUX2, & NICOLAS VIDAL3,4 1Department of Biology, 208 Mueller Lab, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802-5301 USA. E-mail: [email protected] 2Genoscope. Centre National de Séquençage, 2 rue Gaston Crémieux, CP5706, 91057 Evry Cedex, France www.genoscope.fr 3UMR 7138, Département Systématique et Evolution, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, CP 26, 57 rue Cuvier, 75005 Paris, France 4Corresponding author. E-mail : [email protected] Abstract Most West Indian snakes of the family Dipsadidae belong to the Subfamily Xenodontinae and Tribe Alsophiini. As recognized here, alsophiine snakes are exclusively West Indian and comprise 43 species distributed throughout the region. These snakes are slender and typically fast-moving (active foraging), diurnal species often called racers. For the last four decades, their classification into six genera was based on a study utilizing hemipenial and external morphology and which concluded that their biogeographic history involved multiple colonizations from the mainland. Although subsequent studies have mostly disagreed with that phylogeny and taxonomy, no major changes in the classification have been proposed until now. Here we present a DNA sequence analysis of five mitochondrial genes and one nuclear gene in 35 species and subspecies of alsophiines. Our results are more consistent with geography than previous classifications based on morphology, and support a reclassification of the species of alsophiines into seven named and three new genera: Alsophis Fitzinger (Lesser Antilles), Arrhyton Günther (Cuba), Borikenophis Hedges & Vidal gen.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of Gunung Tambora, Sumbawa, Indonesia: Effects of Altitude, the 1815 Cataclysmic Volcanic Eruption and Trade
    FORKTAIL 18 (2002): 49–61 Birds of Gunung Tambora, Sumbawa, Indonesia: effects of altitude, the 1815 cataclysmic volcanic eruption and trade COLIN R. TRAINOR In June-July 2000, a 10-day avifaunal survey on Gunung Tambora (2,850 m, site of the greatest volcanic eruption in recorded history), revealed an extraordinary mountain with a rather ordinary Sumbawan avifauna: low in total species number, with all species except two oriental montane specialists (Sunda Bush Warbler Cettia vulcania and Lesser Shortwing Brachypteryx leucophrys) occurring widely elsewhere on Sumbawa. Only 11 of 19 restricted-range bird species known for Sumbawa were recorded, with several exceptional absences speculated to result from the eruption. These included: Flores Green Pigeon Treron floris, Russet-capped Tesia Tesia everetti, Bare-throated Whistler Pachycephala nudigula, Flame-breasted Sunbird Nectarinia solaris, Yellow-browed White- eye Lophozosterops superciliaris and Scaly-crowned Honeyeater Lichmera lombokia. All 11 resticted- range species occurred at 1,200-1,600 m, and ten were found above 1,600 m, highlighting the conservation significance of hill and montane habitat. Populations of the Yellow-crested Cockatoo Cacatua sulphurea, Hill Myna Gracula religiosa, Chestnut-backed Thrush Zoothera dohertyi and Chestnut-capped Thrush Zoothera interpres have been greatly reduced by bird trade and hunting in the Tambora Important Bird Area, as has occurred through much of Nusa Tenggara. ‘in its fury, the eruption spared, of the inhabitants, not a although in other places some vegetation had re- single person, of the fauna, not a worm, of the flora, not a established (Vetter 1820 quoted in de Jong Boers 1995). blade of grass’ Francis (1831) in de Jong Boers (1995), Nine years after the eruption the former kingdoms of referring to the 1815 Tambora eruption.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Extinct Rebuilding the Socorro Dove Population by Peter Shannon, Rio Grande Zoo Curator of Birds
    B BIO VIEW Curator Notes From the Brink of Extinct Rebuilding the Socorro Dove Population by Peter Shannon, Rio Grande Zoo Curator of Birds In terms of conservation efforts, the Rio Grande Zoo is a rare breed in its own right, using its expertise to preserve and breed species whose numbers have dwindled to almost nothing both in the wild and in captivity. Recently, we took charge of a little over one-tenth of the entire world’s population of Socorro doves which have been officially extinct in the wild since 1978 and are now represented by only 100 genetically pure captive individuals that have been carefully preserved in European institutions. Of these 100 unique birds, 13 of them are now here at RGZ, making us the only holding facility in North America for this species and the beginning of this continent’s population for them. After spending a month in quarantine, the birds arrived safe and sound on November 18 from the Edinburgh and Paignton Zoos in England. Other doves have been kept in private aviaries in California, but have been hybridized with the closely related mourning dove, so are not genetically pure. History and Background Socorro doves were once common on Socorro Island, the largest of the four islands making up the Revillagigedo Archipelago in the East- ern Pacific ocean about 430 miles due west of Manzanillo, Mexico and 290 miles south of the tip of Baja, California. Although the doves were first described by 19th century American naturalist Andrew Jackson Grayson, virtually nothing is known about their breeding behavior in the wild.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesser Sundas and Remote Moluccas
    ISLANDS OF THE LESSER SUNDAS AND REMOTE MOLUCCAS 12 August – 7 October 2009 and 27 October - 7 November 2009 George Wagner [email protected] ISLANDS VISITED: Bali, Sumba, Timor, Flores, Komoto, Ambon, Tanimbars, Kais, Seram and Buru INTRODUCTION Indonesia, being a nation of islands, contains over 350 endemic species of birds. Of those, over 100 are only found in the Lesser Sundas and remote Moluccas. Having visited Indonesia in past years, I knew it to be safe and cheap for independent birders like myself. I decided to dedicate some four months to the process of birding these remote destinations. Richard Hopf, whom I have joined on other trips, also expressed interest in such a venture, at least for the Lesser Sundas. We started planning a trip for July 2009. Much of the most recent information in the birding public domain was in the form of tour trip reports, which are self- serving and don’t impart much information about specific sites or logistics. There are a few exceptions and one outstanding one is the trip report by Henk Hendriks for the Lesser Sundas (2008). It has all the information that anyone might need when planning such a trip, including maps. We followed it religiously and I would encourage others to consult it before all others. My modest contribution in the form of this trip report is to simply offer an independent approach to visiting some of the most out of the ordinary birding sites in the world. It became clear from the beginning that the best approach was simply to go and make arrangements along the way.
    [Show full text]
  • Antarctic Primer
    Antarctic Primer By Nigel Sitwell, Tom Ritchie & Gary Miller By Nigel Sitwell, Tom Ritchie & Gary Miller Designed by: Olivia Young, Aurora Expeditions October 2018 Cover image © I.Tortosa Morgan Suite 12, Level 2 35 Buckingham Street Surry Hills, Sydney NSW 2010, Australia To anyone who goes to the Antarctic, there is a tremendous appeal, an unparalleled combination of grandeur, beauty, vastness, loneliness, and malevolence —all of which sound terribly melodramatic — but which truly convey the actual feeling of Antarctica. Where else in the world are all of these descriptions really true? —Captain T.L.M. Sunter, ‘The Antarctic Century Newsletter ANTARCTIC PRIMER 2018 | 3 CONTENTS I. CONSERVING ANTARCTICA Guidance for Visitors to the Antarctic Antarctica’s Historic Heritage South Georgia Biosecurity II. THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT Antarctica The Southern Ocean The Continent Climate Atmospheric Phenomena The Ozone Hole Climate Change Sea Ice The Antarctic Ice Cap Icebergs A Short Glossary of Ice Terms III. THE BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT Life in Antarctica Adapting to the Cold The Kingdom of Krill IV. THE WILDLIFE Antarctic Squids Antarctic Fishes Antarctic Birds Antarctic Seals Antarctic Whales 4 AURORA EXPEDITIONS | Pioneering expedition travel to the heart of nature. CONTENTS V. EXPLORERS AND SCIENTISTS The Exploration of Antarctica The Antarctic Treaty VI. PLACES YOU MAY VISIT South Shetland Islands Antarctic Peninsula Weddell Sea South Orkney Islands South Georgia The Falkland Islands South Sandwich Islands The Historic Ross Sea Sector Commonwealth Bay VII. FURTHER READING VIII. WILDLIFE CHECKLISTS ANTARCTIC PRIMER 2018 | 5 Adélie penguins in the Antarctic Peninsula I. CONSERVING ANTARCTICA Antarctica is the largest wilderness area on earth, a place that must be preserved in its present, virtually pristine state.
    [Show full text]
  • Two New Scorpions from the Puerto Rican Island of Vieques, Greater Antilles (Scorpiones: Buthidae)
    Two new scorpions from the Puerto Rican island of Vieques, Greater Antilles (Scorpiones: Buthidae) Rolando Teruel, Mel J. Rivera & Carlos J. Santos September 2015 — No. 208 Euscorpius Occasional Publications in Scorpiology EDITOR: Victor Fet, Marshall University, ‘[email protected]’ ASSOCIATE EDITOR: Michael E. Soleglad, ‘[email protected]’ Euscorpius is the first research publication completely devoted to scorpions (Arachnida: Scorpiones). Euscorpius takes advantage of the rapidly evolving medium of quick online publication, at the same time maintaining high research standards for the burgeoning field of scorpion science (scorpiology). Euscorpius is an expedient and viable medium for the publication of serious papers in scorpiology, including (but not limited to): systematics, evolution, ecology, biogeography, and general biology of scorpions. Review papers, descriptions of new taxa, faunistic surveys, lists of museum collections, and book reviews are welcome. Derivatio Nominis The name Euscorpius Thorell, 1876 refers to the most common genus of scorpions in the Mediterranean region and southern Europe (family Euscorpiidae). Euscorpius is located at: http://www.science.marshall.edu/fet/Euscorpius (Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia 25755-2510, USA) ICZN COMPLIANCE OF ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS: Electronic (“e-only”) publications are fully compliant with ICZN (International Code of Zoological Nomenclature) (i.e. for the purposes of new names and new nomenclatural acts) when properly archived and registered. All Euscorpius issues starting from No. 156 (2013) are archived in two electronic archives: Biotaxa, http://biotaxa.org/Euscorpius (ICZN-approved and ZooBank-enabled) Marshall Digital Scholar, http://mds.marshall.edu/euscorpius/. (This website also archives all Euscorpius issues previously published on CD-ROMs.) Between 2000 and 2013, ICZN did not accept online texts as "published work" (Article 9.8).
    [Show full text]
  • Template Forest Management Plan in Accordance with Smartwood Outline
    China Forestry Group New Zealand Company Ltd Northern Region FSC Forest Management Plan For the period 2018 - 2023 Prepared by S E Moore PO Box 1127 ROTORUA Tel: 07 921 1010 Fax: 07 921 1020 [email protected] www.pfolsen.com FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN FSCGS04 China Forestry Group New Zealand Company Limited Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................5 Foundation Principle ...................................................................................................................5 About this plan ............................................................................................................................5 The Landscape Context ............................................................................................................................6 2. The Forest Land ...........................................................................................................................6 Overview ......................................................................................................................................6 Legal ownership ...........................................................................................................................6 Forests & location ........................................................................................................................7 Topography ..................................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Biological and Proteomic Analysis of Venom from the Puerto Rican Racer (Alsophis Portoricensis: Dipsadidae)
    Toxicon 55 (2010) 558–569 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Toxicon journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/toxicon Biological and proteomic analysis of venom from the Puerto Rican Racer (Alsophis portoricensis: Dipsadidae) Caroline L. Weldon, Stephen P. Mackessy* School of Biological Sciences, University of Northern Colorado, 501 20th Street, CB 92, Greeley, CO 80639-0017, USA article info abstract Article history: The Puerto Rican Racer Alsophis portoricensis is known to use venom to subdue lizard prey, Received 12 August 2009 and extensive damage to specific lizard body tissues has been well documented. The Received in revised form toxicity and biochemistry of the venom, however, has not been explored extensively. We 27 September 2009 employed biological assays and proteomic techniques to characterize venom from Accepted 2 October 2009 A. portoricensis anegadae collected from Guana Island, British Virgin Islands. High metal- Available online 14 October 2009 loproteinase and gelatinase, as well as low acetylcholinesterase and phosphodiesterase activities were detected, and the venom hydrolyzed the a-subunit of human fibrinogen Keywords: Biological roles very rapidly. SDS-PAGE analysis of venoms revealed up to 22 protein bands, with masses of w Colubrid 5–160 kDa; very little variation among individual snakes or within one snake between CRISP venom extractions was observed. Most bands were approximately 25–62 kD, but MALDI- Enzymes TOF analysis of crude venom indicated considerable complexity in the 1.5–13 kD mass a-Fibrinogenase range, including low intensity peaks in the 6.2–8.8 kD mass range (potential three-finger Gland histology toxins). MALDI-TOF/TOF MS analysis of tryptic peptides confirmed that a 25 kDa band was Hemorrhage a venom cysteine-rich secretory protein (CRiSP) with sequence homology with tigrin, Mass spectrometry a CRiSP from the natricine colubrid Rhabdophis tigrinus.
    [Show full text]
  • ATOLL RESEARCH BULLETIN NO. 251 BIOGEOGRAPHY of the PUERTO RICAN BANK by Harold Heatwole, Richard Levins and Michael D. Byer
    ATOLL RESEARCH BULLETIN NO. 251 BIOGEOGRAPHY OF THE PUERTO RICAN BANK by Harold Heatwole, Richard Levins and Michael D. Byer Issued by THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Washington, D. C., U.S.A. July 1981 VIRGIN ISLANDS CULEBRA PUERTO RlCO Fig. 1. Map of the Puerto Rican Island Shelf. Rectangles A - E indicate boundaries of maps presented in more detail in Appendix I. 1. Cayo Santiago, 2. Cayo Batata, 3. Cayo de Afuera, 4. Cayo de Tierra, 5. Cardona Key, 6. Protestant Key, 7. Green Key (st. ~roix), 8. Caiia Azul ATOLL RESEARCH BULLETIN 251 ERRATUM The following caption should be inserted for figure 7: Fig. 7. Temperature in and near a small clump of vegetation on Cayo Ahogado. Dots: 5 cm deep in soil under clump. Circles: 1 cm deep in soil under clump. Triangles: Soil surface under clump. Squares: Surface of vegetation. X's: Air at center of clump. Broken line indicates intervals of more than one hour between measurements. BIOGEOGRAPHY OF THE PUERTO RICAN BANK by Harold Heatwolel, Richard Levins2 and Michael D. Byer3 INTRODUCTION There has been a recent surge of interest in the biogeography of archipelagoes owing to a reinterpretation of classical concepts of evolution of insular populations, factors controlling numbers of species on islands, and the dynamics of inter-island dispersal. The literature on these subjects is rapidly accumulating; general reviews are presented by Mayr (1963) , and Baker and Stebbins (1965) . Carlquist (1965, 1974), Preston (1962 a, b), ~ac~rthurand Wilson (1963, 1967) , MacArthur et al. (1973) , Hamilton and Rubinoff (1963, 1967), Hamilton et al. (1963) , Crowell (19641, Johnson (1975) , Whitehead and Jones (1969), Simberloff (1969, 19701, Simberloff and Wilson (1969), Wilson and Taylor (19671, Carson (1970), Heatwole and Levins (1973) , Abbott (1974) , Johnson and Raven (1973) and Lynch and Johnson (1974), have provided major impetuses through theoretical and/ or general papers on numbers of species on islands and the dynamics of insular biogeography and evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case of Envenomation by the False Fer-De-Lance Snake Leptodeira Annulata (Linnaeus, 1758) in the Department of La Guajira, Colombia
    Biomédica ISSN: 0120-4157 Instituto Nacional de Salud A case of envenomation by the false fer-de-lance snake Leptodeira annulata (Linnaeus, 1758) in the department of La Guajira, Colombia Angarita-Sierra, Teddy; Montañez-Méndez, Alejandro; Toro-Sánchez, Tatiana; Rodríguez-Vargas, Ariadna A case of envenomation by the false fer-de-lance snake Leptodeira annulata (Linnaeus, 1758) in the department of La Guajira, Colombia Biomédica, vol. 40, no. 1, 2020 Instituto Nacional de Salud Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=84362871004 DOI: 10.7705/biomedica.4773 PDF generated from XML JATS4R by Redalyc Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative Case report A case of envenomation by the false fer-de-lance snake Leptodeira annulata (Linnaeus, 1758) in the department of La Guajira, Colombia Un caso de envenenamiento por mordedura de una serpiente falsa cabeza de lanza, Leptodeira annulata (Linnaeus, 1758), en el departamento de La Guajira, Colombia Teddy Angarita-Sierra 12* Universidad Manuela Beltrán, Colombia Alejandro Montañez-Méndez 2 Fundación de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Conservación, Colombia Tatiana Toro-Sánchez 2 Fundación de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Conservación, Colombia 3 Biomédica, vol. 40, no. 1, 2020 Ariadna Rodríguez-Vargas Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Colombia Instituto Nacional de Salud Received: 17 October 2018 Revised document received: 05 August 2019 Accepted: 09 August 2019 Abstract: Envenomations by colubrid snakes in Colombia are poorly known, DOI: 10.7705/biomedica.4773 consequently, the clinical relevance of these species in snakebite accidents has been historically underestimated. Herein, we report the first case of envenomation by CC BY opisthoglyphous snakes in Colombia occurred under fieldwork conditions at the municipality of Distracción, in the department of La Guajira.
    [Show full text]