DOCSLIB.ORG

Augustus Free

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Augustus Free FREE AUGUSTUS PDF John Williams,Lecturer in the Department of Classics Daniel Mendelsohn | 336 pages | 01 Sep 2014 | NEW YORK REVIEW OF BOOKS | 9781590178218 | English | United States Augustus: Name Meaning, Popularity, and Similar Names Julius Caesarhis great-uncle, took an interest in Augustus. When Julius was murdered, Augustus discovered that he was Julius's Augustus to the throne. Before Augustus could gain the throne, however, he was forced to battle Augustus armies of both Cleopatra VII and Marc Antonywho had their own plans for power following Julius's death. Augustus was victorious, and during his rule as Egypt's first Roman emperor, the country was Augustus and Augustus. Augustus died on August 19, 14 A. We strive for accuracy Augustus fairness. If you see something Augustus doesn't look Augustus, contact us! Subscribe to the Biography newsletter to receive stories about the people who shaped our Augustus and the stories that shaped their lives. An assassination ended Augustus reign on the Ides of March. Mongolian general and Augustus Kublai Khan was the grandson of Genghis Khan. After conquering China, he founded the country's Yuan Dynasty and became its first emperor. He Augustus his mother, persecuted Christians and is said to have "fiddled while Rome burned. Constantine I was a Roman emperor who ruled early in the Augustus century. He was the first Christian emperor and saw the empire begin to become Augustus Christian state. As Emperor of Augustus from Augustus, Marcus Aurelius kept the empire safe from the Parthians and Germans but is best known for his intellectual pursuits. Famed Roman poet Virgil is best known for his national epic, the 'Aeneid. After his execution, he became an icon for the nationalist movement. The country was peaceful under Augustus's rule. Caesar Augustus - Reign, Rome & Death - Biography From his birth in 63 B. Augustus father was a senator and governor in Augustus Roman Republic. Octavius donned the toga, the Roman sign of manhood, at age 16, and Augustus taking on responsibilities through his Augustus connections. In 47 B. He was shipwrecked along the way, and had to Augustus enemy territory to reach his great-uncle—an act Augustus impressed Caesar enough to name Octavius his heir and successor in his will. In 43 B. In 41 B. In retaliation, Octavian declared war on Cleopatra. In that four-year span, Octavian secured his rule on multiple fronts. And to win over the people, he worked to improve and beautify the city of Rome. During his years reign, Augustus nearly doubled the size of the empire, adding territories in Europe and Asia Minor and securing alliances that gave him effective rule from Britain to India. He expanded the Roman network of roads, founded the Praetorian Guard and the Roman postal service and remade Rome with both grand a new forum and practical Augustus police and fire departments. His second wife, Scribonia, bore his only child, Julia the Elder. He divorced in 39 B. The family tree became more complicated after Augustus had Augustus stepson Tiberius Augustus marry his daughter, and then adopted Tiberius outright as son and successor Augustus A. Augustus Caesar died in A. Then applaud me as I Augustus. Start your free trial today. But if Augustus see something that doesn't look right, Augustus here to contact us! Subscribe for fascinating stories connecting the past to the present. The Roman politician and general Mark Antony 83—30 B. His romantic and political Despite his brilliant Augustus prowess, his political skills and his Greek philosophy and rhetoric moved Augustus into Latin for the first time Augustus the speeches, letters and Augustus of Cicero B. A brilliant lawyer and the first of his family to achieve Roman office, Cicero was one of the The son of a great military leader, Augustus escaped family intrigues to take the throne, but his He is best known for Augustus debaucheries, political murders, persecution of Christians and a passion for music that led Augustus the probably Known for his philosophical interests, Marcus Aurelius Augustus one of Augustus most respected emperors in Roman history. He was born into a wealthy and politically prominent family. Growing up, Marcus Aurelius was a dedicated student, learning Latin and Greek. But his greatest In B. He then marched his massive army across the Pyrenees and Alps into central Italy in what would be remembered as one of the most Cleopatra VII ruled ancient Egypt as co-regent first with her father, then with her Augustus younger brothers and Augustus with her son for almost three decades. She was part of a dynasty of Macedonian rulers founded by Ptolemy, who served as general under Alexander the Great during By the Augustus the First Punic War broke out, Rome had become the dominant power Augustus the Italian Live TV. This Day In History. History at Home. Julius Caesar. The Visigoths Sack Rome. The Death of Hannibal. Hannibal the Child Soldier. Marcus Tullius Cicero Greek philosophy and rhetoric moved fully into Latin for the first time in the speeches, letters and dialogues of Cicero B. Marcus Aurelius Known for his philosophical interests, Marcus Aurelius was one of the most respected emperors in Augustus history. Hannibal In B. Cleopatra Cleopatra VII ruled ancient Egypt as co-regent first with her father, then with her two younger brothers and finally with Augustus son for almost three decades. Augustus - HISTORY The Roman world was largely free from large-scale conflict for more than two centuries, despite continuous wars of imperial expansion on the Empire's frontiers and the year-long civil war known as the " Year of the Four Emperors " over the imperial succession. Augustus was born Augustus Octavius into an old and wealthy equestrian branch of the plebeian gens Octavia. His maternal great-uncle Julius Caesar was Augustus in 44 BC, and Octavius was named in Caesar's will as his adopted son and heir. Following their victory at the Battle of Augustusthe Triumvirate divided the Roman Republic among themselves and ruled as de facto dictators. The Triumvirate was eventually torn apart by the competing ambitions of its members. Lepidus was driven into exile and stripped of his position, and Antony committed suicide following his defeat at the Battle of Actium by Octavian in 31 BC. In reality, however, he retained his autocratic power over the Republic. By law, Augustus held a collection of powers granted to him for life by the Senate, including Augustus military commandand those of tribune and censor. It took several years for Augustus to develop the framework within Augustus a formally republican state could be led under his sole rule. Augustus rejected monarchical titles, and instead called himself Princeps Civitatis "First Citizen". Augustus resulting Augustus framework became known as the Principate, the first phase of the Roman Empire. Augustus dramatically enlarged the Empire, annexing EgyptDalmatiaPannoniaNoricumand Augustusexpanding possessions in Africaand completing the conquest of Hispaniabut suffered a major setback in Germania. Beyond the frontiers, he secured Augustus Empire with a buffer region of client states and made peace with the Parthian Empire through diplomacy. He Augustus the Roman system of taxation, developed networks of roads with an official courier systemestablished a standing armyestablished the Praetorian Guardcreated official police and fire-fighting services for Rome, and rebuilt much of the city during his reign. Augustus died in AD 14 at the age of 75, probably from natural causes. However, there were unconfirmed rumors that his Augustus Livia poisoned him. He was succeeded as emperor by Augustus adopted son Tiberius also stepson and former son-in-law. He was given the name Gaius Octavius Thurinus, his cognomen possibly commemorating his father's victory at Thurii over a rebellious band of slaves which occurred a few years after his Augustus. This man was leader in a war with a neighbouring town Due to the crowded nature of Augustus at the time, Octavius was taken to his father's home village at Velletri to be raised. Octavius mentions his father's equestrian family only briefly in his Augustus. His grandfather had served in several local political offices. His father, also named Gaius OctaviusAugustus been governor of Macedonia. His mother, Atiawas the niece of Julius Caesar. Philippus Augustus had much of an interest in young Octavius. Because of this, Octavius was raised by Augustus grandmother, Julia Augustus, the sister of Julius Caesar. When he had recovered, he sailed to the front, but was shipwrecked ; Augustus coming ashore with a handful of companions, he crossed hostile Augustus to Caesar's camp, which impressed his great-uncle considerably. He rejected the advice of some army officers to Augustus refuge with the troops in Macedonia and sailed to Italy to ascertain whether he had any potential political fortunes or security. Upon his adoptionOctavius assumed his Augustus name Gaius Julius Caesar. Roman citizens adopted into a new family usually retained their old nomen in cognomen Augustus e. However, though some of his contemporaries Augustus, [35] there is no evidence that Octavius ever himself officially used the name Octavianusas it would have made his modest origins too obvious. Octavian could not rely on his limited funds to make a successful entry into the upper echelons of the Roman political hierarchy. A later senatorial investigation into the disappearance of the public funds took no action against Octavian, since he subsequently used that money to raise troops against Augustus Senate's arch enemy Mark Antony. Octavian began to bolster his personal forces with Caesar's veteran legionaries and with troops designated for the Parthian war, gathering support by emphasizing his status as heir to Caesar. They had been granted a general amnesty on 17 March, Augustus Antony had succeeded in driving Augustus of them out of Rome with an inflammatory eulogy at Caesar's funeral, mounting public opinion against the assassins.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • KEIMPE ALGRA 155-184.Qxd
    Ο Ζήνων ο Κιτιέας και η Στωική κοσμολογία: μερικές σημειώσεις και δυο συγκεκριμένες περιπτώσεις. KEIMPE ALGRA Η έκταση και η φύση της συμβολής του Ζήνωνα στη Στωική φυσική και κοσμολογία είναι δύσκολο να θεμελιωθούν. Η ανακοίνωση αυτή μελετά μερικά από τα σχετικά προβλήματα. Η χρήση της ονομαστικής ετικέτας "Ζήνων" από τις αρχαίες μας πηγές δε θα πρέπει πάντα να αξιολογείται επιφανειακά, και η απόδοση καθώς και η διευθέτηση του υλικού του Hans Von Arnim στο Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta (SVF) δε θα πρέπει να γίνεται αποδεκτή χωρίς κριτική, για λόγους που περιγράφονται σ’ αυτή την εργασία. Παρέχονται δύο συγκεκριμένες περιπτώσεις αποσπασμάτων, οι οποίες, με μια πιο προσεκτική ματιά, δε θα πρέπει να αποδοθούν στο Ζήνωνα. Τελικά, υποστηρίζεται ότι ο Ζήνων δεν ήταν παραγωγικός συγγραφέας σε θέματα φυσικής, και ότι έτυχε στους διαδόχους του ( σε μερικούς από αυτούς) – πιο συγκεκριμένα στον Σφαίρο, στον Κλεάνθη και στον Χρύσιππο – να επεξεργαστούν περαιτέρω και να συγκροτήσουν λεπτομερειακά την φυσική κοσμοεικόνα της Στωικής σχολής. Αυτό σημαίνει πως υπάρχουν περιθώρια ανάπτυξης της φυσικής και της κοσμολογίας στα πλαίσια του αρχαίου Στωικισμού, και πως, συνακόλουθα, είναι ζωτικής σημασίας να διακρίνουμε πιο ξεκάθαρα, απ’ ότι συνήθως, τι πρέπει με ασφάλεια να αποδοθεί στο Ζήνωνα και ότι τέτοιου είδους "κοινά στωικά" δόγματα πρέπεί μόνο πιθανά, ή μερικά, να ανιχνευτούν σ΄αυτόν. Zeno of Citium and Stoic Cosmology: some notes and two case studies KEIMPE ALGRA 1 Zeno of Citium, as indeed the early Stoics in general, conceived of philosophy as consisting of three interrelated parts: logic, physics and ethics.1 But although Zeno’s foundational work covered all three areas, he appears to have had his preferences.
    [Show full text]
  • Passionate Platonism: Plutarch on the Positive Role of Non-Rational Affects in the Good Life
    Passionate Platonism: Plutarch on the Positive Role of Non-Rational Affects in the Good Life by David Ryan Morphew A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Classical Studies) in The University of Michigan 2018 Doctoral Committee: Professor Victor Caston, Chair Professor Sara Ahbel-Rappe Professor Richard Janko Professor Arlene Saxonhouse David Ryan Morphew [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4773-4952 ©David Ryan Morphew 2018 DEDICATION To my wife, Renae, whom I met as I began this project, and who has supported me throughout its development. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, I am grateful to my advisors and dissertation committee for their encouragement, support, challenges, and constructive feedback. I am chiefly indebted to Victor Caston for his comments on successive versions of chapters, for his great insight and foresight in guiding me in the following project, and for steering me to work on Plutarch’s Moralia in the first place. No less am I thankful for what he has taught me about being a scholar, mentor, and teacher, by his advice and especially by his example. There is not space here to express in any adequate way my gratitude also to Sara Ahbel-Rappe and Richard Janko. They have been constant sources of inspiration. I continue to be in awe of their ability to provide constructive criticism and to give incisive critiques coupled with encouragement and suggestions. I am also indebted to Arlene Saxonhouse for helping me to see the scope and import of the following thesis not only as of interest to the history of philosophy but also in teaching our students to reflect on the kind of life that we want to live.
    [Show full text]
  • Aristotle and Arius Didymus on Household and Polis
    ARISTOTLE AND ARIUS DIDYMUS ON HOUSEHOLD AND POLIS Newman noted long ago that although Aristotle was witness to the rise of Macedonia “[f]or all that appears to the contrary in its pages, the Politics may have been written while Thebes was still the leading power. Not a particle of Aristotle’s attention is diverted from the pÒliw to the ¶ynow.”1 The pÒliw remained central to his thought. As a result, Aristotle bequeathed to his followers in the world after Alexander, and especially in the centuries which saw the rise of Rome, a number of difficult philosophical and practical problems. While remaining central in many ways to the cultural and social life of Greeks (and of other peoples) it became increas- ingly difficult to make a convincing case for the political and social centrality of the pÒliw as maintained in Aristotle’s philosophy of the state. Apart from challenges from the world of politics and international affairs, there were also philosophical and purely so- cial challenges that needed to be met. Stoicism, in particular, with its doctrine of social ofike¤vsiw, the theory explaining the relation- ship of individuals to family, kin, fellow citizens and the rest of hu- mankind, offered an attractive alternative to Aristotle’s restricted emphasis on the pÒliw. Already in the works of Theophrastus and in the pseudo-Aristotelian Oeconomica we can see a shift in doc- trine. Our sources for Aristotelian political theory in the period after Alexander are extremely limited, and it is not before the age of Augustus that we have anything like an overview.
    [Show full text]
  • Stoicism a School of Thought That Flourished in Greek and Roman
    Stoicism A school of thought that flourished in Greek and Roman antiquity. It was one of the loftiest and most sublime philosophies in the record of Western civilization. In urging participation in the affairs of man, Stoics have always believed that the goal of all inquiry is to provide man with a mode of conduct characterized by tranquillity of mind and certainty of moral worth. Nature and scope of Stoicism For the early Stoic philosopher, as for all the post-Aristotelian schools, knowledge and its pursuit are no longer held to be ends in themselves. The Hellenistic Age was a time of transition, and the Stoic philosopher was perhaps its most influential spokesman. A new culture was in the making. The heritage of an earlier period, with Athens as its intellectual leader, was to continue, but to undergo many changes. If, as with Socrates, to know is to know oneself, rationality as the sole means by which something outside of the self might be achieved may be said to be the hallmark of Stoic belief. As a Hellenistic philosophy, Stoicism presented an ars vitae, a way of accommodation for people to whom the human condition no longer appeared as the mirror of a universal, calm, and ordered existence. Reason alone could reveal the constancy of cosmic order and the originative source of unyielding value; thus, reason became the true model for human existence. To the Stoic, virtue is an inherent feature of the world, no less inexorable in relation to man than are the laws of nature. The Stoics believed that perception is the basis of true knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fragments of Zeno and Cleanthes, but Having an Important
    ,1(70 THE FRAGMENTS OF ZENO AND CLEANTHES. ftonton: C. J. CLAY AND SONS, CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS WAREHOUSE, AVE MARIA LANE. ambriDse: DEIGHTON, BELL, AND CO. ltip>ifl: F. A. BROCKHAUS. #tto Hork: MACMILLAX AND CO. THE FRAGMENTS OF ZENO AND CLEANTHES WITH INTRODUCTION AND EXPLANATORY NOTES. AX ESSAY WHICH OBTAINED THE HARE PRIZE IX THE YEAR 1889. BY A. C. PEARSON, M.A. LATE SCHOLAR OF CHRIST S COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE. LONDON: C. J. CLAY AND SONS, CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS WAREHOUSE. 1891 [All Rights reserved.] Cambridge : PBIXTKIi BY C. J. CLAY, M.A. AND SONS, AT THK UNIVERSITY PRKSS. PREFACE. S dissertation is published in accordance with thr conditions attached to the Hare Prize, and appears nearly in its original form. For many reasons, however, I should have desired to subject the work to a more under the searching revision than has been practicable circumstances. Indeed, error is especially difficult t<> avoid in dealing with a large body of scattered authorities, a the majority of which can only be consulted in public- library. to be for The obligations, which require acknowledged of Zeno and the present collection of the fragments former are Cleanthes, are both special and general. The Philo- soon disposed of. In the Neue Jahrbticher fur Wellmann an lofjie for 1878, p. 435 foil., published article on Zeno of Citium, which was the first serious of Zeno from that attempt to discriminate the teaching of Wellmann were of the Stoa in general. The omissions of the supplied and the first complete collection fragments of Cleanthes was made by Wachsmuth in two Gottingen I programs published in 187-i LS75 (Commentationes s et II de Zenone Citiensi et Cleaitt/ie Assio).
    [Show full text]
  • Download Date | 6/9/19 10:06 AM Pseudo-Pythagorean Literature 73
    Philologus 2019; 163(1): 72–94 Leonid Zhmud* What is Pythagorean in the Pseudo-Pythagorean Literature? https://doi.org/10.1515/phil-2018-0003 Abstract: This paper discusses continuity between ancient Pythagoreanism and the pseudo-Pythagorean writings, which began to appear after the end of the Pythagorean school ca. 350 BC. Relying on a combination of temporal, formal and substantial criteria, I divide Pseudopythagorica into three categories: 1) early Hellenistic writings (late fourth – late second centuries BC) ascribed to Pytha- goras and his family members; 2) philosophical treatises written mostly, yet not exclusively, in pseudo-Doric from the turn of the first century BC under the names of real or fictional Pythagoreans; 3) writings attributed to Pythagoras and his relatives that continued to appear in the late Hellenistic and Imperial periods. I will argue that all three categories of pseudepigrapha contain astonishingly little that is authentically Pythagorean. Keywords: Pythagoreanism, pseudo-Pythagorean writings, Platonism, Aristote- lianism Forgery has been widespread in time and place and varied in its goals and methods, and it can easily be confused with superficially similar activities. A. Grafton Note: An earlier version of this article was presented at the colloquium “Pseudopythagorica: stratégies du faire croire dans la philosophie antique” (Paris, 28 May 2015). I would like to thank Constantinos Macris (CNRS) for his kind invitation. The final version was written during my fellowship at the IAS of Durham University and presented at the B Club, Cambridge, in Mai 2016. I am grateful to Gábor Betegh for inviting me to give a talk and to the audience for the vivid discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • Acanthus, 212–213, 215, 218, 224, 288 Achilles, Shield Of, 148
    index Acanthus, 212–213, 215, 218, Antony, Mark (Marcus Antonius, 224, 288 triumvir), 67, 163, 296 Achilles, shield of, 148 Apelles, 127, 205, 209 Actium, 67, 163, 168, 246, 256, 280 Aphrodisias, 34 Aeneas, 31, 113, 120, 140, 201–202 Aphrodite, 201, 216. See also shield of, 146–148 Venus Agricola, Gnaeus Julius, 151 Apollo, 67, 165, 256 Agrippa, Marcus Vipsanius, 20– temples of, 125, 162–165, 22, 24–25, 227, 291, 296 168, 285 Alberti, Leon Battista, 2 Aquitania, 143, 146 Alêtheia and to alêthes (truth and Ara maxima, rite of, 113–115, 120 the true), 57–58, 97 Architectura. See also Architecture Alexander the Great, 12, 18, 20, as the agent of squaring, 246 52–53, 73, 92–97, 127–129, as the art of the geometrical foot- 142, 205 print, 226 and Augustus, 120–124 as knowledge of the architect, 58, and Hercules, 98–100 100, 148, 299 Alexandria, 84, 94–96, 122, 124, as proof of conquest, 151 127, 137, 139, 149, 241 as summation of humanitas, Altars, 173–174, 182, 291 145–146, 152–154 ara maxima (altar of Hercules), summum templum of, 28–30, Rome, 113–115, 120 145–148, 301 Ara Pacis Augustae (altar of Au- tripartite whole of, 25, 300, 302 gustan peace), Rome, 213, Architecture. See also Architectura; 244–246 De architectura; Vitruvius Ambracia, 115 body of, 6, 9, 12, 57, 129, 227– Ammianus Marcellinus, 96 229, 236, 250, 270, 274, Amor, son of Venus, 209, 270 300–302 Amplification, 83 Christian, 174 Analemma, 137–138, 235, 245 and empire, 145–149, 193–195, Analogia, 26, 71–72, 195 279–280 Angelos (messenger), 11 factuality of, 186, 192 Anomalia,
    [Show full text]
  • Space in Hellenistic Philosophy
    Graziano Ranocchia, Christoph Helmig, Christoph Horn (Eds.) Space in Hellenistic Philosophy Space in Hellenistic Philosophy Critical Studies in Ancient Physics Edited by Graziano Ranocchia Christoph Helmig Christoph Horn ISBN 978-3-11-036495-8 e-ISBN 978-3-11-036585-6 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2014 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston Printing and binding: CPI books GmbH, Leck ♾ Printed on acid-free paper Printed in Germany www.degruyter.com Acknowledgements This volume has been published with the financial support of the European Research Council (ERC) and the National Research Council of Italy (CNR). Thanks are due to Aurora Corti for her editorial work and to Sergio Knipe for the linguis- tic revision of the manuscript. Table of Contents Abbreviations IX Introduction 1 Keimpe Algra Aristotle’s Conception of Place and its Reception in the Hellenistic Period 11 Michele Alessandrelli Aspects and Problems of Chrysippus’ Conception of Space 53 Teun Tieleman Posidonius on the Void. A Controversial Case of Divergence Revisited 69 David Konstan Epicurus on the Void 83 Holger Essler Space and Movement in Philodemus’ De dis 3: an Anti-Aristotelian Account 101 Carlos Lévy Roman Philosophy under
    [Show full text]
  • SEXTUS on TIME: NOTES on SCEPTICAL METHOD and DOXOGRAPHICAL TRANSMISSION∗ Susanne Bobzien
    Forthcoming in: K. Algra. & K. Ierodiakonou (eds.), ‘Sextus Empiricus and Ancient Physics’, Cambridge: CUP 2013. SEXTUS ON TIME: NOTES ON SCEPTICAL METHOD AND DOXOGRAPHICAL TRANSMISSION∗ Susanne Bobzien For the most part, this paper is not a philosophical paper in any strict sense. Rather, it focuses on the numerous exegetical puzzles in Sextus Empiricus’ two main passages on time (M X.169-247 and PH III.136-50), which, once sorted, help to explain how Sextus works and what the views are which he examines. Thus the paper provides an improved base from which to put more specifically philosophical questions to the text. The paper has two main sections, which can, by and large, be read independently. Each is about a topic which, to my knowledge, has so far not been treated in detail. The first section is concerned with the argument structures of the two main passages on time in Sextus, pointing out various irregularities in the overall argument in both passages, as well as parallels and differences, and asks the question what kinds of scepticism and sceptical methods we find in the various parts of each passage. The second section focuses on the doxographical accounts of time in the two passages: what they are, how they compare with surviving parallels, to what philosophers we can attribute those accounts for which Sextus himself provides either no, or more than one, possible ascriptions, and how Sextus treats the doxographical material. This discussion is inspired by the contributions Michael Frede offered on this topic the day before his untimely death.1 ∗ I am grateful for the useful and spirited discussion of a draft version of this paper by the participants of the Symposium Hellenisticum.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Socratic Thought in Sophoclean Tragedy
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2006 Pre-Socratic Thought in Sophoclean Tragedy Meggan Jennell Arp University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient Philosophy Commons, and the Classical Literature and Philology Commons Recommended Citation Arp, Meggan Jennell, "Pre-Socratic Thought in Sophoclean Tragedy" (2006). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 473. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/473 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/473 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Pre-Socratic Thought in Sophoclean Tragedy Abstract This dissertation investigates the relationship between the plays of Sophocles and the philosophy of the pre-Socratics. The question considered is whether or not Sophocles' tragedies were influenced by pre- Socratic thought in distinction from Sophistic thought. Scholars generally have recognized the impact of the Sophists on Sophoclean tragedy and determined it to be evidence of Sophocles' primarily negative dramatic treatment of so-called 'Enlightenment' thought of the 5th century B.C.E. This study determines the presence of pre-Socratic thought in the tragedies of Sophocles and views its influence as a primarily positive instance of 5th century 'Enlightenment' thought in these plays, in contrast to the general depiction of Sophistic thought. Three works of Sophocles' extant plays are examined in separate chapters. A chapter on Sophocles' Philoctetes elucidates traces of the philosophy of Heraclitus in this tragedy. Sophocles deploys certain Heraclitean images in the character portrayal of Philoctetes, whose moral outlook contrasts with the Sophistic vision of Odysseus. A second chapter, on the Trachiniae, argues that this tragedy recalls the philosophy of Heraclitus, as well as 'Enlightenment' thought of the Ionian scientific tradition in general.
    [Show full text]
  • Chrysippus and the First Known Description of Cataract Surgery
    medicines Review Chrysippus and the First Known Description of Cataract Surgery Juliusz Grzybowski 1 and Andrzej Grzybowski 2,3,* 1 Faculty of Fine Arts and Pedagogy, Adam Mickiewicz University Pozna´n,Nowy Swiat´ 28-30 Street, 62-800 Kalisz, Poland; [email protected] 2 Department of Ophthalmology, University of Warmia and Mazury, 10-561 Olsztyn, Poland 3 Institute for Research in Ophthalmology, Foundation for Ophthalmology Development, 60-554 Poznan, Poland * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 1 June 2020; Accepted: 19 June 2020; Published: 22 June 2020 Abstract: Although the origin of cataract surgery is unknown, the earliest identified mention of cataract surgery comes from Chrysippus in the 3rd century B.C.E. This historical review analyses this first description of cataract surgery from both philosophical and linguistic perspectives, within the original context in which early cataract surgeries were performed, as well as within the context of contemporary medical knowledge. Keywords: history of ophthalmology; cataract surgery; Chrysippus 1. Introduction The place and time in which cataract surgery originated are uncertain. It is often stated that the earliest description of cataract surgery comes from Sushruta, who probably lived in the 6th century B.C.E. However, the earliest surviving manuscripts of his work, “Sushruta Samhita: Uttara Tantra” date from the Common Era [1]. Thus, the earliest available description of cataract surgery comes from Chrysippus and was written in the 3rd century B.C.E. Interestingly, Chrysippus was known as a philosopher rather than as a physician. The aim of this study is to analyse the first mention of cataract surgery from both philosophical and linguistic perspectives within the original context in which early cataract surgeries were performed, as well as within the context of contemporary medical knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Arius Didymus and Luke-Acts
    ARIUS DIDYMUS AND LUKE-ACTS by CHRISTOPH HEIL Bamberg For James M. Robinson* 1. Intioduction1 In Acts 1:1-2, Luke summarizes the contents of his first book (τον μεν πρώτον λόγον), but in the following, he fails to give a description of his second book, which is unusual according to ancient conven­ tions.2 E Norden conjectured the following description of the book of Acts which originally would have followed Acts 1:2, * J M Robinson, "the doyen oí modern Q studies" (G Stanton, Gospel Truth·* New light on Jesus and the Gospels [ Valley Forge, ΡΛ 1995] 75), has continuously emphasized the împoi tance of Religion sge schuhte, Formgeschichte and Redaktionsgeschichte regarding "the quest for QJ Ci J M Robinson, 'Theological Autobiogiaphy," in The Craft of Religious Studies ed JR Stone ^London-New York 1998) 117-150, 140-141 It is the recon- stiuction of Qm which Jim has invested most of his energy in recent years Cf ibid, 158-149 and especially Documenta Q_ Reconstructions of Q Through Two Centuries of Gospel Resemeli Exieipted, Soiled and Evaluated, eds J M Robinson et al (Leuven 1996 ff, more than 30 volumes aie planned) J M Robinson and C Heil, "Zeugnisse eines schriftlichen, griechischen voi kanonischen textes Mt 6,28b Ν*, Ρ Oxy 655 1,1-17 (Evlh 36) und Q, 12,27," £\ll 89 α998) 30-44, The Critical Edition of Q A Synopsis Including the Gospels of Mattheit and Luke, Alaik and Thomas with English, German and French Translations of Q and Thomas, eds J M Robinson et al ^Hermeneia Supplements, Minneapolis, MN-Leuven 2000] I hus, trying to shed
    [Show full text]