DOCSLIB.ORG

Paul Martin: Mr

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Paul Martin: Mr PAUL MARTIN: MR. PRIME MINISTER Introduction On November 14, 2003, Paul Martin animosity and past political rivalries, Focus finally achieved his long-sought politi- there were also significant political This News in Re- cal goal, winning the leadership of the differences between the Prime Minister view story focuses on Paul Martin, federal Liberal Party. Martin’s cam- and his former finance minister. Canada’s 21st paign to replace retiring Jean Chrétien Chrétien liked to portray himself as “the prime minister, resulted in a very strong finish, as he little guy from Shawinigan,” the popu- who replaced Jean won over 90 per cent of the voting list who represented the Liberal Party’s Chrétien December delegates at the party’s Toronto conven- left, or progressive, wing. Martin was 12, 2003. It exam- tion. Heritage Minister Sheila Copps, widely perceived as a “Bay Street ines Martin’s political back- his one rival for the top job after John Liberal,” closely connected with big ground, his leader- Manley quit the race in July 2003, was business and leaning toward “small-c” ship campaign, his only able to gain a handful of votes. In conservative positions on social and stormy relationship his acceptance speech to the delegates, economic policies. As an example of with Chrétien, and Martin pledged himself to ensuring a this, Martin’s proudest boast during his what his rise to power will mean fourth consecutive Liberal victory in the successful leadership campaign was for Canadian next federal election, widely expected that he had almost single-handedly politics in the early in the spring of 2004. He set out an wrestled Canada’s massive budgetary 21st century. ambitious agenda for change, calling deficits to the ground during the 1990s. for the party he was about to lead to But critics of this achievement pointed commit to a new sense of national out that restoring fiscal responsibility YV Sections purpose. He said: “in recent times, a had also led to some serious negative marked with this symbol indicate kind of complacency, a certain drift, has consequences, such as the gutting of content suitable for set in and we’ve lost some of the great social programs and an increase in younger viewers. energy and enthusiasm that Canadians poverty in Canada. are looking for. In my view, new times Martin’s personal and family history require new approaches, and I want to also drove his political ambitions. His lead a new government with a renewed father, Paul Martin Sr., had been a sense of purpose, and a sharper focus, prominent Liberal cabinet minister in and a clearer plan” (Toronto Star, the governments of Louis St. Laurent November 15, 2003). and Lester B. Pearson during the 1950s Some read into Martin’s comments and 60s. He had tried and failed twice an implied criticism of the leadership of to win the party’s leadership, losing to Jean Chrétien, the man he had lost out Pearson in 1958 and to Pierre Trudeau to in the 1990 Liberal leadership race. It 10 years later. He left federal politics a was an open secret that Martin had long bitter and disappointed man. He placed coveted the prime minister’s job, and his hopes on his son to succeed where that Chrétien had strongly resented his he had failed and eventually win the rival’s thinly disguised longing for his party leadership. Paul Jr. never lost post. The two had never been friendly, sight of this goal, despite his loss to and when Martin was dropped from the Chrétien in the 1990 race. Thirteen federal cabinet in May 2002, relations years later, he was finally able to savour between them dipped to their lowest his moment of triumph. ebb ever. Besides their strong personal CBC News in Review • December 2003 • Page 6 In the aftermath of his victory, there program with the U.S. Quote is widespread speculation regarding Whether or not Martin will steer the “To govern is to what direction Martin plans to lead the Liberal Party to the right or seek to lead. We define ourselves by the party he now heads and the country he follow some of Chrétien’s more popular hard choices we hopes to govern if he wins the next progressive policy initiatives remains to make. We saw that federal election. His past record would be seen. His first task will be to as- with the deficit. We indicate that he is likely to continue on semble a new cabinet, likely to be saw it with the a fiscally conservative path, but during composed mainly of Liberal MPs who Clarity Act. We saw his successful leadership campaign he supported him. He will then have to it with Iraq. We saw it every time also made promises about spending prepare for the next federal election, we stood tall for more on social programs and foreign where he is likely to face a more formi- Canada.” — Jean aid abroad. His much-publicized meet- dable opposition than Chrétien ever had Chrétien (The ings with rock star Bono, a well-known to confront in the three elections he won Globe and Mail, international spokesperson for the so handily. Competing against the November 14, 2003) world’s poor nations, raised hopes that Liberals in 2004 will likely be a unified a Martin government would commit Conservative Party with a new leader, Canada to offering greater assistance as well as a revitalized NDP led by Jack for global debt relief. He also pledged Layton. Martin will need all of the to maintain Canada’s friendly but political savvy, determination, and independent relationship with the ability he demonstrated in his bid to win United States, while indicating that he the Liberal leadership if he is to per- might support this country’s integration suade a majority of Canadian voters to into a controversial missile defence give his party yet another term in office. To Consider 1. Why were relations between Prime Minister Chrétien and Paul Martin so strained? What were the main differences between them? 2. Why was winning the position of federal Liberal Party leader so important for Martin? In what respect does he view his victory as a personal vindica- tion? 3. Why is Paul Martin viewed as a “small-c” conservative, even though he now leads the Liberal Party? What indications are there that he may seek to change this perception of his policies and leadership? 4. Why might winning the next federal election pose more of a challenge to Paul Martin than it did to Jean Chrétien in the three elections he won? 5. If you could vote today, would you vote for Paul Martin and the Liberal Party? Explain. CBC News in Review • December 2003 • Page 7 PAUL MARTIN: MR. PRIME MINISTER YV Video Review This video provides 1. Forming Initial Impressions considerable back- Watch the video, and while doing so jot down any information you think is ground informa- important or interesting about Paul Martin and Jean Chrétien. Note any signifi- tion on Paul Mar- cant points of similarity and/or difference between the two men, in terms of tin’s rise to power their personalities, political ideas, styles of leadership, and accomplishments. in the Liberal Party When you have finished watching the video, form groups with your classmates and the conflicts he to share your impressions of the two men. As a group, prepare a comparison/ faced with Jean contrast between Martin and Chrétien, and also an evaluation of the two Chrétien during his politicians. State which of them you think is a more effective leader and why. years in politics. It Once the groups have finished the brainstorming sessions and have developed also focuses on the their comparisons and evaluations, select one person from each group to personalities, present their ideas to the rest of the class. After all groups have reported, leadership styles, conduct a whole-class debriefing session, encouraging students to share their and accomplish- reactions to and impressions of the two Canadian politicians featured in the ments of the two video. men, comparing and contrasting 2. Viewing for Information them as politicians. Watch the video again, this time recording the following information: 1. a) Who is the new leader of the federal Liberal Party?___________________ b) Whom did he replace? _____________________________________________ 2. Who was the only other candidate for the party leadership? 3. What major international rock star made a guest appearance at the Lib- eral convention? 4. a) What cabinet position did Paul Martin hold in the Chrétien government? b) When was he dropped from the cabinet? ____________________________ 5. a) Where was Paul Martin born? _______________________________________ b) Where does he live now?___________________________________________ c) When was he first elected to Parliament? ____________________________ d) When did he first seek the Liberal leadership? _______________________ 6. Who was Paul Martin’s father, and why was he important politically? 7. How many federal elections did Jean Chrétien win for the Liberals? ______ CBC News in Review • December 2003 • Page 8 8. Why did Chrétien drop Paul Martin from the federal cabinet in 2002? 9. What is the name of the Liberal MP who was a strong Martin supporter within the federal caucus? 10. What did Chrétien list as his three main accomplishments as prime minis- ter during his farewell speech to the delegates at the Liberal convention? 11. a) Who is one of Chrétien’s oldest friends? _____________________________ b) To whom did Chrétien lose in his first try for the Liberal leadership in 1984? 12. What are Paul Martin’s main priorities as prime minister likely to be? 13. When is the next federal election likely to be called? ____________________ 3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rt. Honourable Paul Martin by Tahreem Fatima
    Rt. Honourable Paul Martin By Tahreem Fatima Former Prime Minister Paul Martin is optimistic about the role of indigenous youth in the future but says there is much work still to do on the indigenous file. Although 82 and retired from politics, Martin continues to play a significant role designed to provide indigenous people with opportunities and resources to succeed. "I created a foundation when I stepped down from government. The purpose of the (foundation) is to work with Canada's indigenous people in terms of the various matters that they face, primarily education but also, economic issues with the indigenous people." Martin played various political roles: he was a member of Parliament for 20 years, finance minister for a decade and was the 21st prime minister of Canada from 2003- 2006. After retiring from a full political career spread over nearly three decades, he is now busy with his foundation, Martin Family Initiative. It is a charity aimed at improving education, health and well-being outcomes for Indigenous children and youth in Canada. Looking back, Martin points to the Kelowna Accord as his most significant achievement as prime minister. The accord was a series of agreements between the Government of Canada, first ministers of the provinces, territorial leaders, and the leaders of five national Aboriginal organizations in the country. It was a 10-year plan, with a $5-billion agreement to close the social and economic gap within five years between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Canadians. The purpose of the accord was to improve Aboriginal peoples' education, employment, and living conditions with government funding and other programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Ellsworth American IS DEALWITH SUPERS Nnd Democratic Ods
    | loswwimo* ruoi, *3.M ram tub. ( Vol. LIV. I ir rare i» abtabcb. tiM. | WEDNESDAY ELLSWORTH, MAINE, AFTERNOON. SEPTEMBER 9. 1908 AT mi Tuiwom «wrowrp?. No 37. £t&rrti*rmmt*. LOCAL AFFAIRS. 1 distributed, not only by the many callen F03 REPFESKHTATiVK. LAKEWOOD. •* rooms, bat also by the eommitteM J Winnie Garland has NSW of the surrounding towns. Sketch of 31an Ellsworth Pro- employment at tlM ADVEKI HKMKMT4 THIS WKKK. fhc ba teller;. of Mr. and Mrs. Petes poses to Sfend to the Legislature. The May, daughter Abie Garland and have been tak- Edward U Dammera Co—Optician*. John A. the nomine* (ami!; D W Carney-Sheriff sale. Fortier, died at her home on Grant streel Peters, republican ing an outing ot a (ew days up the lake. for for to the from Spencer Higgins place sale. last Wednesday eleven representative legislature Fred with wife and at RU sale. night, aged yean, Rollins, child, Haines-Opening Funeral services were was born in Burrill Nat’l Bank. held Friday after- Ellsworth, Ellsworth in 1864 Bangor, spent a few days last week at bis noon. The parents have the sympathy oj He graduated from the schools and childhood home. Egypt, Me: all their public ip bereavement. Schools with M C Austin—Lumber and wood for sale. fitted at the high school for college, and begin Tuesday the same James E. teachers as last Garland Mary C Frets Austin—Trespass notice. Parsons, cashier of the Bnrrill entered Bowdoin college in 1881, graduat- spring—Martin ia national will leave next week foi No. 1 and Miss Minerva Jordan in No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Government of Canada's Search for Environmental Legitimacy: 1971-2008 Douglas Macdonald
    Document generated on 09/24/2021 6:23 a.m. International Journal of Canadian Studies Revue internationale d’études canadiennes The Government of Canada's Search for Environmental Legitimacy: 1971-2008 Douglas Macdonald Culture — Natures in Canada Article abstract Culture — natures au Canada Although the term "greenwash" has now entered the language, there has Number 39-40, 2009 beenlittle academic analysis of environmental legitimacy as a factor in environmentalpolitics. This article examines claims to environmental URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/040829ar legitimacy made by theGovernment of Canada with respect to seven policy DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/040829ar initiatives. The most commonclaims have been: (1) action exceeds that of previous governments; (2) Canada isdoing more than other countries; (3) the policy will aid economy as well asenvironment (sustainable development); See table of contents and, (4) the transparent policy process isitself legitimate. Exaggeration and downplaying related action by the provinces areother common themes. Publisher(s) Conseil international d'études canadiennes ISSN 1180-3991 (print) 1923-5291 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Macdonald, D. (2009). The Government of Canada's Search for Environmental Legitimacy: 1971-2008. International Journal of Canadian Studies / Revue internationale d’études canadiennes, (39-40), 191–210. https://doi.org/10.7202/040829ar Tous droits réservés © Conseil international d'études canadiennes, 2009 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada and the Middle East Today: Electoral Politics and Foreign Policy
    CANADA AND THE MIDDLE EAST TODAY: ELECTORAL POLITICS AND FOREIGN POLICY Donald Barry Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper came to power in 2006 with little experience in foreign affairs but with a well developed plan to transform his minority Conservative administration into a majority government replacing the Liberals as Canada’s “natural governing party.”1 Because his party’s core of Anglo-Protestant supporters was not large enough to achieve this goal, Harper appealed to non- traditional Conservatives, including Jews, on the basis of shared social values. His efforts were matched by those of Jewish leaders and the government of Israel to win the backing of the government and its followers in the face of declining domestic support for Israel and the rise of militant Islamic fundamentalism. These factors accelerated a change in Canada’s Middle East policy that began under Prime Minister Paul Martin, from a carefully balanced stance to one that overwhelm- ingly favors Israel. Harper’s “pro-Israel politics,” Michelle Collins observes, has “won the respect—and support—of a large segment of Canada’s organized Jewish community.”2 However, it has isolated Canada from significant shifts in Middle East diplomacy and marginalized its ability to play a constructive role in the region. Harper and the Jewish Vote When he became leader of the Canadian Alliance party, which merged with the Progressive Conservatives to form the Conservative Party of Canada in 2004, Tom Flanagan says that Harper realized “The traditional Conservative base of Anglophone Protestants [was] too narrow to win modern Canadian elections.”3 In a speech to the conservative organization Civitas, in 2003, Harper argued that the only way to achieve power was to focus not on the tired wish list of economic conservatives or “neo-cons,” as they’d become known, but on what he called “theo-cons”—those social conservatives who care passionately about hot-button issues that turn on family, crime, and defense.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative North Americas: What Canada and The
    ALTERNATIVE NORTH AMERICAS What Canada and the United States Can Learn from Each Other David T. Jones ALTERNATIVE NORTH AMERICAS Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars One Woodrow Wilson Plaza 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, D.C. 20004 Copyright © 2014 by David T. Jones All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, scanned, or distributed in any printed or electronic form without permission. Please do not participate in or encourage piracy of copyrighted materials in violation of author’s rights. Published online. ISBN: 978-1-938027-36-9 DEDICATION Once more for Teresa The be and end of it all A Journey of Ten Thousand Years Begins with a Single Day (Forever Tandem) TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .................................................................................................................1 Chapter 1 Borders—Open Borders and Closing Threats .......................................... 12 Chapter 2 Unsettled Boundaries—That Not Yet Settled Border ................................ 24 Chapter 3 Arctic Sovereignty—Arctic Antics ............................................................. 45 Chapter 4 Immigrants and Refugees .........................................................................54 Chapter 5 Crime and (Lack of) Punishment .............................................................. 78 Chapter 6 Human Rights and Wrongs .................................................................... 102 Chapter 7 Language and Discord ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Liberals: a House Divided Introduction
    The Liberals: A House Divided Introduction “I will fulfill my mandate and focus entirely on governing from now until February Focus 2004. At which time my work will be done and at which time my successor will be In an unprec- chosen. And then, at the age of 70, I will look back with great satisfaction as I take edented move against a sitting my rest with Aline, secure in the knowledge that the future of Canada is unlim- Canadian prime ited.” — Prime Minister Jean Chrétien, August 21, 2002 minister, a signifi- cant number of Struggle for Power media and political organizers, the buzz Liberal Party mem- The summer of 2002 will be remem- about his future grew louder and louder. bers appeared The Martin camp was particularly ready to vote bered for both the hot weather and the against Jean equally hot political battle waged within active in promoting their man for the Chrétien in a the ranks of the Liberal Party of next leadership campaign. They built a planned leadership Canada. Open political warfare raged powerful organization and raised sub- review next year. inside the heart of Canada’s most stantial funds. Incensed by this pressure The split in the to leave, Chrétien and Martin had a Liberal camp was successful political machine. A party highlighted this that traditionally rallied around its falling out, and Martin left cabinet. spring when Paul leader appeared ready to tear itself apart Liberals were increasingly divided Martin, one of the over the question of leadership. and feared an open battle at a planned main contenders to After the Liberal victory of 2000, convention to review Chrétien’s leader- replace the PM, attention was drawn to the question of ship in February 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Ombudsman Would Reduce Democratic Deficit
    FEDERAL OMBUDSMAN WOULD REDUCE DEMOCRATIC DEFICIT Donald C. Rowat Paul Martin has long been an advocate of reducing the democratic deficit, but one of the most effective means of doing so would be the appointment of a federal ombudsman as an independent officer of Parliament. A national ombudsman is now in place in some 65 democratic countries, including Australia, as well as in the Canadian provinces, but not as yet in Ottawa. It is now five years since provincial ombudsmen urged Ottawa to create such a position, “so far to no avail,” writes a longtime Canadian ombudsman scholar. “Why the federal government has so far failed to adopt a scheme to match the provincial ones is somewhat of a mystery,” writes Donald Rowat. “Now that he is leading the government, Prime Minister Martin has a golden opportunity to reduce the democratic deficit and to leave a permanent legacy by instituting this important democratic reform.” Paul Martin affirme depuis longtemps vouloir combler le déficit démocratique, et l’un des meilleurs moyens d’y parvenir serait de nommer un ombudsman fédéral agissant au Parlement comme fonctionnaire indépendant. Ce poste existe aujourd’hui dans quelques 65 pays, dont l’Australie, ainsi que dans plusieurs provinces canadiennes. Mais Ottawa fait toujours la sourde oreille cinq ans après que les ombudsmen provinciaux l’eurent exhorté à créer un tel poste. Pourquoi le gouvernement fédéral tarde-t-il tant à répondre à leur demande ? Le mystère reste entier, selon Donald Rowat, spécialiste de la question. Maintenant qu’il tient les rênes du pouvoir, Paul Martin dispose pourtant d’une occasion en or de tenir son engagement et de laisser un héritage politique signifiant en instituant cette fonction.
    [Show full text]
  • If We Could All Be Peter Lougheed” Provincial Premiers and Their Legacies, 1967-2007 1
    “If we could all be Peter Lougheed” Provincial premiers and their legacies, 1967-2007 1 J.P. Lewis Carleton University [email protected] Paper for Presentation at The Annual Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association Concordia University, Montreal June 2010 Introduction For a variety of reasons, the careers of Canadian provincial premiers have escaped explicit academic attention. Premiers are found frequently in Canadian political science literature, but more for direct roles and actions – in questions of the constitution, federalism, public policy and electoral and legislative studies – instead of longitudinal study and analysis. This fits a pattern of neglect in the field; some academics have lamented the lack of direct attention to provincial politics and history (Brownsey and Howlett 2001). The aggregate imprints of premiers are relatively ignored outside of regional and provincial treatments. No pan- Canadian assessment of premiers exists, and probably for good reason. The theoretical and methodological concerns with asking general research questions about premiers are plenty; leadership theory and historical approaches provide some foundations but any approach is going to confront conceptual challenges. This is where this study is found – in a void of precedents but a plethora of qualitative data. 2 Regardless of methodological challenges, some historians, political scientists and members of the media have not shied away from ranking and assessing national leaders. Some of the more popular treatments (from the popular culture version to the more academic approach) include Ferguson’s Bastards and Boneheads , Granatstein and Hillmer’s Prime Ministers: Ranking Canada’s Leaders , and Bliss’s Right Honourable Men . Bliss (xiv), the esteemed historian, is skeptical of such endeavours, “While this is Canadian history from Parliament Hill, I am not a Hegelian and I do not believe that political leaders, least of all prime ministers of Canada, are personifications of the world spirit.
    [Show full text]
  • Jba2426final Copy
    426 Kim Campbell 427 WHAT’S A NICE COUNTRY LIKE US DOING IN A PLACE LIKE THIS? The Rt. Honorable A. Kim Campbell, P.C., Q.C. Prime Minister of Canada, 1993 March 2, 1996 I do a great deal of travelling and speaking outside of Canada — one of the things that happens when politicians leave office. I commented that some people choose retirement and some people reach retire- ment age and others have retirement thrust upon them. But one be- comes a member of that international coterie of people who go about expressing their opinions, occasionally for very high fees in various international venues. I chose the topic for tonight’s speech because it’s the question that I’m asked more and more as people around the world — people in the United States and in Europe — look at Canada infinitely puzzled, infinitely perplexed about what it is that’s going on in our country. Last summer I received an invitation from the British Broadcasting Corporation to do a radio documentary on Canada. They were going to do a series of three on the old domin- ions — Australia, Canada and New Zealand — and former prime ministers present them all — Malcolm Fraser has done the one for Australia and David Lange for New Zealand. I welcomed the oppor- tunity and thought, “This would be wonderful.” I was told we would start the work at the end of January, and I thought, “That would be great, my book would be done. There won’t be time to go on the book tour yet, so I’ll have a chance to turn my mind from things in the past, that are part of my memoir, and to look at the present and future.” Then came the October 30th referendum result, and I’ll have to tell you that I was in a complete funk.
    [Show full text]
  • Poll Conducted by Research Co. on Recent Prime Ministers in Canada - July 23, 2021
    Poll conducted by Research Co. on Recent Prime Ministers in Canada - July 23, 2021 We would like to ask you some Questions about the people who have served as prime minister of Canada since 1968. Which of these politicians do you think has been Canada’s best prime minister? GENDER AGE REGION VOTE IN 2019 FEDERAL ELECTION Canada Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+ BC Alberta SK / MB Ontario Quebec Atlantic Liberal Conserv. NDP Pierre Trudeau 20% 21% 19% 15% 15% 29% 20% 12% 14% 24% 21% 17% 36% 7% 23% Joe Clark 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% 3% 1% 3% 3% 0% 1% 6% 2% 1% 1% John Turner 2% 3% 1% 3% 1% 1% 3% 1% 1% 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 1% Brian Mulroney 7% 9% 5% 4% 8% 9% 4% 6% 6% 3% 14% 8% 5% 11% 8% Kim Campbell 1% 1% 1% 3% 0% 1% 2% 3% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% Jean Chrétien 7% 10% 5% 7% 8% 7% 3% 4% 9% 9% 8% 8% 6% 6% 12% Paul Martin 3% 3% 2% 3% 1% 5% 6% 2% 4% 2% 2% 0% 3% 2% 4% Stephen Harper 16% 17% 15% 12% 18% 18% 12% 32% 26% 15% 12% 10% 5% 48% 2% Justin Trudeau 13% 11% 14% 18% 14% 6% 16% 5% 5% 13% 16% 14% 25% 1% 15% Not sure 29% 23% 35% 35% 32% 21% 32% 32% 30% 30% 23% 36% 17% 20% 34% Poll conducted by Research Co. on Recent Prime Ministers in Canada - July 23, 2021 And which of these politicians do you think has been Canada’s worst prime minister? GENDER AGE REGION VOTE IN 2019 FEDERAL ELECTION Canada Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+ BC Alberta SK / MB Ontario Quebec Atlantic Liberal Conserv.
    [Show full text]
  • What Has He Really Done Wrong?
    The Chrétien legacy Canada was in such a state that it WHAT HAS HE REALLY elected Brian Mulroney. By this stan- dard, William Lyon Mackenzie King DONE WRONG? easily turned out to be our best prime minister. In 1921, he inherited a Desmond Morton deeply divided country, a treasury near ruin because of over-expansion of rail- ways, and an economy gripped by a brutal depression. By 1948, Canada had emerged unscathed, enriched and almost undivided from the war into spent last summer’s dismal August Canadian Pension Commission. In a the durable prosperity that bred our revising a book called A Short few days of nimble invention, Bennett Baby Boom generation. Who cared if I History of Canada and staring rescued veterans’ benefits from 15 King had halitosis and a professorial across Lake Memphrémagog at the years of political logrolling and talent for boring audiences? astonishing architecture of the Abbaye launched a half century of relatively St-Benoît. Brief as it is, the Short History just and generous dealing. Did anyone ll of which is a lengthy prelude to tries to cover the whole 12,000 years of notice? Do similar achievements lie to A passing premature and imperfect Canadian history but, since most buy- the credit of Jean Chrétien or, for that judgement on Jean Chrétien. Using ers prefer their own life’s history to a matter, Brian Mulroney or Pierre Elliott the same criteria that put King first more extensive past, Jean Chrétien’s Trudeau? Dependent on the media, and Trudeau deep in the pack, where last seven years will get about as much the Opposition and government prop- does Chrétien stand? In 1993, most space as the First Nations’ first dozen aganda, what do I know? Do I refuse to Canadians were still caught in the millennia.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Publication
    CANADA Canada Institute INSTITUTE JANUARY 2006 Occasional Paper Series The Foreign and THE PROVINCE OF QUEBEC held a referendum on separation from Canada on October 30, 1995. It was not the first time this issue had been Defense Policies of brought before the provincial electorate, but this time the proposal was only narrowly defeated. For the first time, a majority of francophones voted for an Independent separation. The separatists lost because anglophones and speakers of other lan- guages voted overwhelmingly against separation, and their votes were just Quebec barely sufficient to tip the balance. The result strengthened the separatists and endowed them with a sense of momentum—while English-speaking DWIGHT N. MASON Canadians were left with pessimism about the future of the country. The two sides’ conflicting visions of Canada seemed impossible to reconcile. The referendum results raised the real possibility that Quebec might soon become independent, either through agreement with Canada or unilaterally. This outcome now seems unlikely, but the issue is not going to disappear. Ten years later, there remains a hard core of separatists. Their position has been strengthened, for the moment at least, by the growing number of scandals, prin- cipally the “sponsorship” scandal, engulfing the Liberal Party of Canada. The essence of the sponsorship scandal is the allegation that persons close to the Liberal government of former Prime Minister Jean Chrétien (and perhaps to the current Paul Martin government) used federal funds for partisan purposes in Quebec, among them to weaken support for separatism in the province. These activities allegedly included bribery and kickbacks.
    [Show full text]