DOCSLIB.ORG

OPERATIONS EVALUATION Protracted Relief and Recovery Operation 200735

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
OPERATIONS EVALUATION Protracted Relief and Recovery Operation 200735 OPERATIONS EVALUATION Protracted Relief and Recovery Operation 200735 Measuring results, sharing lessons sharing Measuring results, Response to food security and nutrition needs of population affected by natural disasters, and resilience building of food insecure communities in south-western, southern and south-eastern regions of Madagascar: mid-term evaluation of WFP Operations (January 2015 – June 2017) Evaluation Report January 2017 Evaluation team: Pierre Leguéné, Team Leader; Claire Ficini, Nutrition Expert; Holy Raharinjanahary, Rural Development Expert Evaluation Manager: Anne Bichard Commissioned by the WFP Office of Evaluation Report number: OEV/2016/009 Report number: OEV/20XX/XXX Acknowledgements The evaluation team would like to warmly thank all the persons who have contributed to the organization of this evaluation, in particular the WFP partners, beneficiaries and other stakeholders who have accepted to meet with the team and answer our questions. The team would particularly like to thank the WFP country office that has dedicated a great amount of time and energy in a particular moment due to the response to an emergency in the south of Madagascar, for the organization and the implementation of the evaluation. Disclaimer The opinions expressed are those of the Evaluation Team, and do not necessarily reflect those of the World Food Programme. Responsibility for the opinions expressed in this report rests solely with the authors. Publication of this document does not imply endorsement by WFP of the opinions expressed. The designation employed and the presentation of material in the maps do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of WFP concerning the legal or constitutional status of any country, territory or sea area, or concerning the delimitation of frontiers. Evaluation management Evaluation Manager: Anne Bichard, Iram Evaluation focal point: Miranda Sende, OEV Operations Evaluation Project Manager: Elise Benoit, WFP TABLE OF CONTENTS Operational Fact Sheet .................................................................................................... i Executive Summary ..................................................................................................... xiv 1 Introduction ..................................................................................... 1 1.1 Evaluation Features .................................................................... 1 1.2 Country Context .......................................................................... 2 1.2.1 Geography, economy and political context ................................................. 2 1.2.2 Climate change and disasters ...................................................................... 3 1.2.3 Food Security and Livelihoods .................................................................... 4 1.2.4 Nutrition and health .................................................................................... 5 1.2.5 Gender .......................................................................................................... 6 1.2.6 International assistance ............................................................................... 6 1.2.7 WFP interventions ....................................................................................... 7 1.3 Operation Overview .................................................................... 7 2 Evaluation Findings ........................................................................ 10 2.1 Appropriateness of the Operation ............................................. 10 2.1.1 Relevance to needs ..................................................................................... 10 2.1.2 Coherence with WFP policies .................................................................... 15 2.1.3 Coherence with national policies ............................................................... 17 2.1.4 Coherence with other interventions .......................................................... 18 2.2 Results of the Operation ........................................................... 19 2.2.1 Capacity building in Disaster Risk Management ...................................... 20 2.2.2 Treatment of Moderate Acute Malnutrition ............................................. 21 2.2.3 Prevention of malnutrition ........................................................................ 23 2.2.4 Response to emergencies (SO 1) ................................................................ 25 2.2.5 Building resilience ..................................................................................... 28 2.2.6 Cross-cutting issues ................................................................................... 29 2.3 Factors Affecting the Results .................................................... 31 2.3.1 Internal factors .......................................................................................... 31 2.3.2 External factors: Evolution of the food security and nutritional situation ................................................................................................................ 34 3 Conclusions and Recommendations ............................................... 37 3.1 Overall Assessment ................................................................... 37 3.2 Key Lessons for the future ........................................................ 39 3.3 Recommendations ................................................................... 40 Annexes Annex 1: Terms of Reference for the evaluation .......................................................... 45 Annex 2: Evaluation matrix ......................................................................................... 62 Annex 3: List of sites selected for field visits ............................................................... 71 Annex 4: Literature ...................................................................................................... 73 Annex 5: List of persons met ........................................................................................ 77 Annex 6: Evaluation mission schedule ....................................................................... 80 Annex 7: Maps: distribution of malnutrition in Madagascar ...................................... 83 Annex 8: Scaling up nutrition activities ...................................................................... 84 Annex 9: Map of food insecurity .................................................................................. 85 Annex 10 : List of Acronyms ........................................................................................ 86 List of tables Table 1: Planned beneficiaries for each activity ............................................................. 9 Table 2: Recurrent shocks in Madagascar cited in CFSAM surveys ........................... 14 Table 3: Total beneficiaries assisted and food and cash distributed ........................... 19 Table 4: Planned and actual figures for beneficiaries reached and food distributed for Nutrition treatment ............................................................................. 21 Table 5: Outcome indicators for MAM treatment ....................................................... 22 Table 6: Planned and actual beneficiaries reached and food distributed: Nutrition prevention (BSFP) ........................................................................................ 23 Table 7: Outcome indicators for MAM Prevention...................................................... 24 Table 8: Beneficiaries reached and food and cash distributed through GFD and FFA activities ......................................................................................................... 26 Table 9: Assets created/rehabilitated through SO1 and SO3 ...................................... 26 Table 10: Outcome indicators for response to emergencies and resilience building .. 27 Table 11: Evaluation synthesis matrix .......................................................................... 39 List of figures Figure 1: Contribution received vs. needed .................................................................. iii Figure 2: Operation’s donors ........................................................................................ iii Figure 3: % of planned beneficiaries by component..................................................... iv Figure 4: % of actual beneficiaries by component (2015) ............................................ iv Figure 5: % of actual beneficiaries by component (2016 January to October) ............ iv Figure 6: Planned and actual beneficiaries by component (2015) ................................ v Figure 7: Planned and actual beneficiaries by component (2016 January to October) ............................................................................................. v Figure 8: % of women/girls versus men/boys by component, planned and actual (2015) ............................................................................................................ v Figure 9: Nutrition planned and actual beneficiaries by type of beneficiaries (2015) vi Figure 10: Nutrition planned and actual beneficiaries by type of beneficiaries (2016 January to October) ............................................................................................ vi Figure 11: Planned vs. actual food distributed by component (2015) ......................... vii Figure 12 : Planned vs. actual food distributed by component (2016 January to October)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bulletin De Situation Acridienne Madagascar
    BULLETIN DE SITUATION ACRIDIENNE MADAGASCAR Bulletin de la première décade de janvier 2015 (2015-D01) SOMMAIRE CELLULE DE VEILLE ACRIDIENNE Situation éco-météorologique : page 1 Situation acridienne : page 3 Ministère de l’Agriculture Situation antiacridienne : page 8 Synthèse : page 10 Annexes : page 13 SITUATION ÉCO-MÉTÉOROLOGIQUE Durant la 1ère décade de janvier 2015, un fort gradient pluviométrique Nord-Est/Sud-Ouest concernait Madagascar induisant une très forte pluviosité dans l’Aire d’invasion Nord, une pluviosité moyenne à forte dans l'Aire d’invasion Centre et une pluviosité souvent faible à moyenne dans l'Aire grégarigène. Les informations pluviométriques étaient contradictoires, selon les sources : x les estimations de FEWS-NET (figure 1) indiquaient que la pluviosité était supérieure à 125 mm au nord de la Grande-Île et qu’elle diminuait progressivement de 20 à 30 mm sur des bandes diagonales successives de 100 à 200 km de large à partir du nord et jusqu’au sud du pays ; x le peu de relevés transmis par le Centre National Antiacridien (annexe 1) indiquait que la pluviosité était très forte dans l’Aire grégarigène transitoire, moyenne à forte dans l’Aire de multiplication initiale ainsi que dans la majeure partie de l’Aire transitoire de multiplication et faible à moyenne dans l’Aire de densation, ce qui différait des estimations de FEWS-NET pour l’Aire grégarigène. Dans l’Aire grégarigène, compte tenu des relevés pluviométriques faits par le CNA, les conditions hydriques étaient fort erratiques : dans l’Aire grégarigène transitoire, elles étaient excédentaires par rapport aux besoins du Criquet migrateur malgache solitaire, dans l’Aire de multiplication initiale Centre, elles étaient favorables au développement et à la reproduction du Locusta migratoria capito et dans les secteurs Sud de l’Aire transitoire de multiplication et de l’Aire de densation, les pluies restaient peu abondantes.
    [Show full text]
  • Mitteilungen Der Münchner Entomologischen Gesellschaft
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Mitteilungen der Münchner Entomologischen Gesellschaft Jahr/Year: 1964 Band/Volume: 054 Autor(en)/Author(s): Bechyne Jan Artikel/Article: Notizen zu den madagassischen Chrysomeloidea (Col. Phytophaga). 68-161 © Münchner Ent. Ges., Download from The BHL http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.biologiezentrum.at gg J. Bechyne: Notizen zu den madagassischen Chrysomeloidea Notizen zu den madagassischen Chrysomeloidea (Col. Phytophaga) Von Jan Bechyne In den folgenden Zeilen sind nebst Neubeschreibungen ver- schiedene taxionomische, synonymische und faunistische Noti- zen zusammengetragen. Ob die auf den ersten Blick außerordentlich artenreiche Fauna Madagaskars im Vergleich zu der kontinental-afrikanischen auch in Wirklichkeit so ist, läßt sich nicht sagen. Der gegenüber- liegende Teil Afrikas ist nämlich nur oberflächlich exploitiert, während die Durchforschung Madagaskars von mehreren aus- gezeichneten Entomologen intensiv vorangetrieben war. Die geologisch begründeten Zusammenhänge mit der orienta- lischen Fauna sind bei den Eumolpiden, Chrysomeliden s. str., Galeruciden und Alticiden nicht feststellbar. Die gesamten Ver- treter der genannten Gruppen gehören entweder zu den paläo- tropischen (= ostgondwanischen) Gattungen bzw. Gattungs- gruppen oder (z. B. die Chrysomeliden s. str.; insgesamt viel weniger als 5 ^/o der bekannten Arten) zu den Deszendenten der paläantarktischen Fauna mit Beziehungen vor allem zum süd- lichsten Teil Afrika,s. Da, von sehr seltenen Ausnahmen abge- sehen, alle Arten und auch die meisten Gattungen endemisch sind, kann Madagaskar mit den Komoren als eine eigene fau- nistische Subregion betrachtet werden. Die einzelnen faunisti- schen Gebiete Madagaskars sind ausführlich von Jeannel, R.: Coleopteres Carabiques de la region malgache (premiere partie). Faune de l'Empire franc., Paris (1946) charakterisiert.
    [Show full text]
  • MADAGASCAR Food Security Outlook February to September 2016
    MADAGASCAR Food Security Outlook February to September 2016 Ongoing drought will drive food insecurity during the 2016/17 consumption year KEY MESSAGES Current food security outcomes for February 2016 An El Niño-related drought is ongoing in the South and West, with certain areas facing one of the driest rainy seasons in 35 years. Although sufficient rainfall in central and northern parts of country will contribute to near-average harvests in those areas, staple food production at a national-level will likely be below- average due to significant declines in production in drought-affected areas. Poor households in the south, particularly in Androy, Atsimo Andrefana, Tsihombe and Ambovombe, will continue to face Crisis (IPC Phase 3) or Stressed (IPC Phase 2) food insecurity between February and April 2016 due to the effects of two consecutive years of below-average crop production in 2014 and 2015 and an ongoing, extended lean season caused by drought-related delays in 2016 harvests. Between April and August, main season harvests will slightly improve food insecurity in the South, although many households will still face Stressed (IPC Phase 2) outcomes given the effects of expected below-average harvests. Crop failures in the districts of Tsihombe and Ambovombe, however, will likely result Source: FEWS NET in a continuation of Crisis (IPC Phase 3) outcomes for affected populations in This map represents acute food insecurity these districts. outcomes relevant for emergency decision- making. It does not necessarily reflect chronic food insecurity. Visit www.fews.net/IPC for Looking towards the next lean season (December 2016 to February 2017), food more on this scale.
    [Show full text]
  • District De Bekily, Region Androy
    UNIVERSITE D’ANTANANARIVO ----------------- DOMAINE DE L’ART, LETTRES ET SCIENCES HUMAINES ---------- MENTION GEOGRAPHIE Parcours Société et Territorialité ---------- Mémoire de Master RESILIENCE COMMUNAUTAIRE ET APPUI DES ONG DANS LES COMMUNES RURALES DE BESAKOA, TSIKOLAKY ET AMBATOSOLA – DISTRICT DE BEKILY, REGION ANDROY Soutenu publiquement par ANDRIANINTSOA MBOLAMANITRA 28 MARS 2018 Sous l’encadrement de Madame RAKOTOARISOA JACQUELINE Maitre de conférences 1 2 UNIVERSITE D’ANTANANARIVO DOMAINE DE L’ART, LETTRES ET SCIENCES HUMAINES MENTION GEOGRAPHIE Parcours Société et Territorialité ---------- Mémoire de Master RESILIENCE COMMUNAUTAIRE ET APPUI DES ONG DANS LES COMMUNES RURALES DE BESAKOA, TSIKOLAKY ET AMBATOSOLA – DISTRICT DE BEKILY, REGION ANDROY Soutenu publiquement par ANDRIANINTSOA MBOLAMANITRA 28 MARS 2018 Membres du jury Président du jury : Madame Joselyne RAMAMONJISOA, Professeur Emérite Examinateur : Madame Fanja Tahiana RALINIRINA, Maitre de conférences Rapporteur : Madame Jacqueline RAKOTOARISOA, Maitre de conférences 3 REMERCIEMENTS La conception et la présentation de ce mémoire n’auraient pas eu lieu sans l’aide de quelques personnes à qui nous tenons à remercier particulièrement. En premier lieu, nos remerciements s’adressent à Madame Joselyne RAMAMONJISOA, Professeur Emérite à l’Université d’Antananarivo, qui, malgré ses lourdes tâches, a accepté de présider le jury de ce mémoire. En second lieu, nos remerciements s’adressent à Madame Fanja Tahiana RALINIRINA, Maitre de conférences à l’Université d’Antananarivo pour avoir accepté de juger ce travail. Nous tenons à remercier particulièrement Madame Jacqueline RAKOTOARISOA, Maitre de conférences à l’Université d’Antananarivo d’avoir accepté de diriger ce dossier de recherche car ses conseils et ses recommandations nous ont permis d’élaborer ce travail depuis la M1 jusqu’en M2.
    [Show full text]
  • UNICEF Madagascar Country Office Humanitarian Situation
    ary Madagascar u Country Office Humanitarian Situation Report No. 1 Rakotomanga © UNICEF Madagascar/Jan © UNICEF 2020/ UNICEF/UN0267547/Raoelison Reporting Period: 01 January to 31 March 2020 Highlights Situation in Numbers Between January 19, 2020 till January 23,2020, there was heavy rains in the northwestern part of Madagascar, more than twice the normal precipitation 1.1 million during the rainy season, resulting in floods in 13 districts. Children in need of humanitarian assistance Emergency response was initially undertaken using prepositioned stocks. Since February 27, the affected districts such as Amparafaravola, Ambatondrazaka, Mampikony, Marovoay. Mitsinjo, Soalalaand Ambato Boeny districts are supplied 2 million by a combination of land, and river transportation. People in need UNICEF Madagascar currently focuses on disaster risk reduction to build resilience, reaching vulnerable people in the drought-prone south suffering from malnutrition and lack of access to safe water in addition to reinforcing 337.200 government systems in preparation for a full-fledged nation-wide response to the Children to be reached COVID_19 Pandemic. From January to March 2020, 3542 children with severe acute malnutrition (SAM) were admitted and treated,22 % percent of the 2020 target of 16 000 SAM 441.000 children accessing therapeutic treatment. of peo People to be reached A total of 60,910 people in the south gained access to safe water through water trucking and rehabilitation of boreholes. In preparation for Covid19 response: WASH Needs assessments have been carried out in Health centres and Airports, items have been pre-positioned at 9 entry points, Infection prevention communication through posters is ongoing, and programming for cash transfers to vulnerable households to support basic consumption and compensation for loss of revenues is underway.
    [Show full text]
  • Rep 2 out Public 2010 S Tlet Sur of Ma Urvey Rvey Adagas Repor Scar Rt
    Evidence for Malaria Medicines Policy Outlet Survey Republic of Madagascar 2010 Survey Report MINSTERE DE LA SANTE PUBLIQUE www. ACTwatch.info Copyright © 2010 Population Services International (PSI). All rights reserved. Acknowledgements ACTwatch is funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. This study was implemented by Population Services International (PSI). ACTwatch’s Advisory Committee: Mr. Suprotik Basu Advisor to the UN Secretary General's Special Envoy for Malaria Mr. Rik Bosman Supply Chain Expert, Former Senior Vice President, Unilever Ms. Renia Coghlan Global Access Associate Director, Medicines for Malaria Venture (MMV) Dr. Thom Eisele Assistant Professor, Tulane University Mr. Louis Da Gama Malaria Advocacy & Communications Director, Global Health Advocates Dr. Paul Lavani Executive Director, RaPID Pharmacovigilance Program Dr. Ramanan Senior Fellow, Resources for the Future Dr. Matthew Lynch Project Director, VOICES, Johns Hopkins University Centre for Dr. Bernard Nahlen Deputy Coordinator, President's Malaria Initiative (PMI) Dr. Jayesh M. Pandit Head, Pharmacovigilance Department, Pharmacy and Poisons Board‐Kenya Dr. Melanie Renshaw Advisor to the UN Secretary General's Special Envoy for Malaria Mr. Oliver Sabot Vice‐President, Vaccines Clinton Foundation Ms. Rima Shretta Senior Program Associate, Strengthening Pharmaceutical Systems Dr. Rick Steketee Science Director, Malaria Control and Evaluation Partnership in Africa Dr. Warren Stevens Health Economist Dr. Gladys Tetteh CDC Resident Advisor, President’s Malaria
    [Show full text]
  • Madagascar - Grand Sud Humanitarian Key Messages
    MADAGASCAR - GRAND SUD HUMANITARIAN KEY MESSAGES Photo: UNICEF/ Safidy Andrian HIGHLIGHTS People in the Grand Sud of Some 1.13 million people—nearly Global acute malnutrition rates Madagascar are facing the most two in every five people in the Grand have risen sharply. The number of acute drought the region has seen Sud—are severely food insecure communes in nutrition emergency since 1981, leading to a severe and the situation is expected to has increased from 38 in December humanitarian crisis. deteriorate further. 2020 to 97 in April 2021. KEY MESSAGES 1. The Grand Sud of Madagascar has been buffeted by back to back droughts during the 2019/2020 and 2020/2021 rainy seasons, forcing people to resort to desperate survival measures, such as eating locusts, raw red cactus fruits or wild leaves. The agriculture sector has been severely impacted. Between November 2020 and January 2021, less than 50 per cent of the normal rainfall was received in the Grand Sud, leading to the most acute drought in the region since 1981. By January 2021, almost 69 per cent of the Grand Sud was impacted by extreme drought. The water table is critically low in many districts, reducing access to potable water. 2. Nearly two in every five people in the Grand-Sud (1.13 million people) are severely food insecure and five districts—Amboasary Atsimo, Ambovombe Androy, Beloha, Tsihombe and Ampanihy Ouest—are in IPC Phase 4 (Emergency) from April to September 2021. In Amboasary Atsimo, about 75 per cent of the population is severely food insecure and about 14,000 people are estimated to be in IPC Phase 5 (Catastrophe), according to the latest Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Résultats Détaillés Toliary
    RESULTATS SENATORIALES DU 29/12/2015 FARITANY: 6 TOLIARY BV reçus: 304 sur 304 HVM IND OBAMA FITIBA AVOTS AREMA MAPAR IND IND TIM IND IND MONIM AJFO E OMBILA MIARA- MASOA TSIMAN A TANIND HY DIA NDRO AVAKE N°BV Emplacement AP AT Inscrits Votants B N S E RAZA MAHER Y REGION 61 ANDROY BV reçus 58 sur 58 DISTRICT: 6101 AMBOVOMBE ANDROY BV reçus21 sur 21 01 AMBANISARIKA 0 0 8 8 0 8 5 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 02 AMBAZOA 0 0 8 7 1 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 03 AMBOHIMALAZA 0 0 8 8 0 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 04 AMBONAIVO 0 0 8 8 0 8 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 05 AMBONDRO 0 0 8 7 0 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06 AMBOVOMBE ANDRO 1 0 12 12 2 10 7 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 07 AMPAMATA 1 0 8 8 1 7 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 08 ANALAMARY 0 0 6 6 1 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 09 ANDALATANOSY 0 0 8 7 0 7 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 ANDOHARANO 1 0 6 5 2 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 ANDRAGNANIVO 0 0 6 6 0 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 12 ANJEKY ANKILIKIRA 1 0 8 8 1 7 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 13 ANTANIMORA SUD 0 0 8 8 0 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 14 ERADA 0 0 8 8 1 7 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 15 IMANOMBO 0 0 8 8 0 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 16 JAFARO 0 0 8 8 0 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 17 MAROALOMAINTE 1 0 8 8 2 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 18 MAROALOPOTY 0 7 8 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 MAROVATO BEFENO 0 0 8 7 0 7 4 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 20 SIHANAMARO 0 0 8 8 0 8 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 21 TSIMANANADA 0 0 8 8 0 8 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 TOTAL DISTRICT 5 7 166 160 18 142 91 1 0 0 2 1 3 7 9 0 0 0 28 DISTRICT: 6102 BEKILY BV reçus20 sur
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin De Situation Acridienne Madagascar
    BULLETIN DE SITUATION ACRIDIENNE MADAGASCAR Bulletin de la première décade de juin 2014 (2014-D16) SOMMAIRE CELLULE DE VEILLE ACRIDIENNE Conditions éco-météorologiques : page 1 Situation acridienne : page 2 Situation antiacridienne : page 6 Annexes : page 10 CONDITIONS CONDITIONS ÉCO-MÉTÉOROLOGIQUES ECO-METEOROLOGIQUES DURANT DURANT LA LA PREMIÈRE DEUXIEME DÉCADE DECADE DEDE JUIN JANVIER 2014 2014 Durant la 1ère décade, la pluviosité était nulle à très faible et donc hyper-déficitaire par rapport aux besoins du Criquet migrateur malgache dans toute la Grande-Île (figure 1). Les relevés (CNA) effectués dans l’Aire grégarigène montraient cependant que la plage optimale pluviométrique (annexe 1) était atteinte dans certaines localités des compartiments Centre et Sud de l’Aire de densation (11,5 mm à Efoetse, 38,0 mm à Beloha et 28,0 mm à Lavanono). Dans les zones à faible pluviosité, à l’exception de l’Aire d’invasion Est, les réserves hydriques des sols devenaient de plus en plus difficilement utilisables, le point de flétrissement permanent pouvant être atteint dans les biotopes les plus arides. Les strates herbeuses dans les différentes régions naturelles se desséchaient rapidement. En général, la hauteur des strates herbeuses variait de 10 à 80 cm selon les régions naturelles, les biotopes et les espèces graminéennes. Le taux de verdissement variait de 20 à 40 % dans l’Aire grégarigène et de 30 à 50 % dans l’Aire d’invasion. Les biotopes favorables au développement des acridiens se limitaient progressivement aux bas-fonds. Dans l’Aire grégarigène, le vent était de secteur Est tandis que, dans l’Aire d’invasion, les vents dominants soufflaient du Sud-Est vers le Nord- Ouest.
    [Show full text]
  • M C D I World Wide Web URL
    Medical Care Development International 1742 R Street NW, Washington, DC 20009 * USA Telephone: (202) 462-1920; Fax: (202) 265-4078 Internet Electronic Mail: [email protected] M C D I World Wide Web URL: WWW.MCD.ORG BETIOKY CHILD SURVIVAL PROJECT FIRST ANNUAL REPORT (OCTOBER 1, 1998 – SEPTEMBER 30, 1999) Cooperative Agreement No. FAO-A-00-98-00027-00 Submission Date: November 18, 1999 Betioky Sud Child Survival Project Annual Report FY 1999 Translation of French original The staff of Medical Care Development International wish to thank BHR/PVC, CSTS Project, USAID Mission personnel as well as MOH staff for their counsel and support during Fiscal Year 1999. MEDICAL CARE DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL 1 Betioky Sud Child Survival Project Annual Report FY 1999 Translation of French original TABLE OF CONTENTS 1- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................... 4 2- BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND OVERVIEW OF PLANNED ACTIVITIES........................................................................................... 5 2.1 REORIENTATION OF MCDI’S STRATEGY ...............................................................5 2.2 PROJECT CONTEXT .........................................................................................6 2.3 PLANNED ACTIVITIES/REVISED PLAN ...................................................................7 3- RESULTS AND COMMENTS .................................................................. 13 3.1 BIRTH SPACING ...........................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation Rapide Des Marchés Dans Les Huit Districts Du Sud Affectés Par La Sécheresse
    Evaluation rapide des marchés dans les huit districts du Sud affectés par la sécheresse Indice de Fonctionnalité des Marchés Market Functionnality Index (IFM) December 2020 Contents Résumé exécutif ....................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 4 Contexte et justification ........................................................................................................ 4 Objectifs ................................................................................................................................. 4 Méthodologie ............................................................................................................................ 5 Vue d’ensemble ........................................................................................................................ 7 1. Assortiment ........................................................................................................................ 9 2. Disponibilité ..................................................................................................................... 10 3. Prix .................................................................................................................................... 11 4. Résilience de la chaîne d'approvisionnement ............................................................... 12 5. Concurrence
    [Show full text]
  • MADAGASCAR Food Security Outlook June 2016 to January 2017
    MADAGASCAR Food Security Outlook June 2016 to January 2017 Poor harvest in the South results in an early start to the lean season KEY MESSAGES Current food security outcomes for June 2016 • As a result of an El Niño driven drought that affected the 2015/2016 agricultural season, main and off-season harvests were well below-average or failed, depending on the crop and zone, in parts of southern Madagascar including Tsihombe, Ambovombe, the southern part of Amboasary, Beloha, Bekily, Ampanihy coastal, and Betioky Atsimo. • In worst-affected pockets of Androy region, particularly in the municipalities of Anjampaly, Betanty, Antaritarika, and Marovato in Tsihombe and Tranovaho and Beabobo in Beloha, households are expected to face large food consumption gaps, in line with Emergency (IPC Phase 4) outcomes between October and January. Humanitarian assistance will be needed to fill these food deficits, protect livelihoods, and prevent acute malnutrition. Other drought-affected areas of the south will face Stressed (IPc Phase 2) or Crisis (IPC Phase 3) food insecurity. • In central and northern areas of the country, a near-average or above-average rice Source: FEWS NET harvest (depending on the zone), favorable cash crop prices, and normal livelihood This map represents acute food strategies will enable seasonally normal food access. Consequently, these areas insecurity outcomes relevant for emergency decision-making. It does not will remain in Minimal (IPC Phase 1) acute food insecurity throughout the scenario necessarily reflect chronic food insecurity. period. Visit www.fews.net/IPC for more on this scale. SEASONAL CALENDAR FOR A TYPICAL YEAR Source: FEWS NET FEWS NET MADAGASCAR FEWS NET is a USAID-funded activity.
    [Show full text]