DOCSLIB.ORG

Highways to Hell

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Highways to Hell Highways to Hell A critical examination of the environmental impacts of the Security and Prosperity Partnership A CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY REPORT Highways to Hell: A critical examination of the environmental impacts of the Security and Prosperity Partnership Jaclyn Lopez, Principal Author December 2009 Layout & Design: Cassie Holmgren Maps: Curt Bradley Front Cover: A highway cuts through Texas Hill Country. Photo © iStockphoto.com/Tom Wald Center for Biological Diversity P.O. Box 710 Tucson, AZ 85702 520.623.5252 www.biologicaldiversity.org The Center for Biological Diversity is a national nonprofit conservation organization with more than 240,000 members and online activists dedicated to the protection of endangered species and wild places. Table of Contents Introduction . 1 Chapter 1: Overview of the NAFTA Corridors . 4 Chapter 2: The Trans-Texas Corridor and the National Environmental Policy Act . 14 Chapter 3: The West Coast Corridor and the California Environmental Quality Act . 28 Chapter 4: CANAMEX and the Endangered Species Act . 4 1 Chapter 5: I-95 Corridor and the Clean Air Act . 48 Chapter 6: The Continental One International Trade and Travel Corridor and the National Historic Preservation Act and Section 4(f) of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act, a Legacy for Users . 52 Chapter 7: The Great Plains International Trade Corridor and the Clean Water Act . 60 Chapter 8: KC SmartPort and Lazaro Cardenas and the North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation . 77 Chapter 9: Conclusions and Recommendations . 92 This guide does not constitute legal advice. This guide provides legal information about the law and is designed to help readers understand litigation options. Legal information differs from legal advice—legal advice refers to the application of law to an individual’s specific circumstances. Therefore, this guide should not be construed as providing specific legal advice for a particular person’s case or situation. Furthermore, this guide does not explain everything a reader needs to know about the litigation process, including standing, attorney-client privilege, discovery, liability, and strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPP suits). Introduction There is growing concern across the political spectrum about the implications of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP). This initiative, launched in March 2005 at a summit of the heads of state of the United States, Canada, and Mexico, was a follow- up to the 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Unlike other international free trade agreements, the SPP is not the result of a U.S. law, treaty, or formal signed agreement. Therefore, there are no mechanisms for public accountability nor is there built-in oversight. Instead, the SPP operates through nineteen working groups that operate outside the legislative process. Members of U.S. federal agencies such as the Departments of Transportation, State, Agriculture, Energy, and Homeland Security, sit on these working groups to “consult with stakeholders; set specific, measurable, and achievable goals and implementation dates; and identify concrete steps the governments can take to achieve these goals.”1 Proponents of the SPP promote it as a necessary response to the challenges of globalization. They claim that it will increase North American economic competitiveness, facilitate extraction of critical natural resources, and greatly enhance the freer movement of industrial and consumer goods between the three countries. Critics representing a wide range of political interests in all three countries argue that the SPP is primarily geared toward increasing the profits of multinational corporations and U.S. big business.2 Environmentalists in particular have raised a host of concerns about the possible consequences of the SPP on global warming, water and air quality, and species and habitat. They insist that the adverse environmental impacts of SPP policies are being deliberately ignored in the rush to implement a pro-corporate agenda. This fear may be justified given that to date, 40 percent of NAFTA challenges have been about environmental concerns,3 and the SPP is now inviting “recommendations and views on ways to cut red tape and eliminate unnecessary barriers to trade.”4 The only formal advisory board to the SPP is the North American Competitiveness Council (NACC), comprised entirely of corporate CEOs. U.S. members include Wal-Mart, Merck, General Electric, UPS, and FedEx. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Council of the Americas serve as the U.S. secretariat of the NACC. At least one court has determined that the NACC is not a federal advisory committee and is therefore not subject to public input or scrutiny.5 The SPP’s approach to policy development thus represents a further extension of the privatization of governmental regulatory functions inaugurated by NAFTA and other World 1 SPP Prosperity Working Groups, http://www.spp.gov/prosperity_working/index.asp?dName=prosperity_working. 2 Opponents include several states: Alabama (SJR68), Arizona (SCM 1002; HCM2003), Florida (S670), Georgia (Senate Resolution 124), Idaho (HJK-5), Illinois (House Joint Resolution 29), Kansas (H.C.R. 5033), Massachusetts (MA H. 341), Mis- souri (Senate Concurrent Resolution 15 House Concurrent Resolution 33), Montana (House Joint Resolution 25), Ohio (H.C.R. No. 31), Oklahoma (Senate Concurrent Resolution 10), Oregon (Senate Joint Memorial 5), South Carolina (House Concurrent Resolution H 3185), South Dakota (S.C.R. 13), Tennessee (Senate Joint Resolution 88), Texas (HB 3647), Utah (H.R. 1), Vir- ginia (Senate Joint Resolution 442, House Joint Resolution No. 86), and Washington (Senate Joint Memorial 8004 House Joint Memorial 4018). 3 Martin Mittelstaedt, “Will Dow challenge Quebec pesticide law?,” Global and Mail, Apr. 3, 2009, available at http://www. bilaterals.org/article.php3?id_article=14766. 4 SPP Prosperity Working Groups, supra note 1. 5 Judicial Watch v. Dep’t of Commerce, 576 F. Supp. 2d 172 (Dist. D.C. 2008); Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Dep’t of Commerce, 501 F. Supp. 2d 83 (D.C. Dist. 2007). 1 Trade Organization agreements, inspired by neo-liberal economic theory and closed to public input. As the name indicates, the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America has two basic components: the “Security Agenda” and the “Prosperity Agenda.” The Security Agenda involves extensive military coordination, much of it focused on anti-terrorism policies, but also geared toward protecting energy and transportation infrastructures. It aims to streamline the movement of critical goods across borders while curbing “illegal” immigration. The Prosperity Agenda also focuses on promoting the transcontinental movement of goods and services. Its goals include expanded and streamlined cross-border transportation networks—networks that will facilitate not only trade within the continent, but also imports into North America of cheaply made foreign goods. It is precisely these proposed transportation networks and their potential for significant environmental damage that have raised widespread concern among environmentalists in all three North American countries. Goals of This Guide Over the coming years, the SPP’s proposed transportation projects will likely have significant cumulative effects on the environment. Although the Federal Highway Administration is behind most of the transportation projects, a reliable nationwide map indicating the planned projects has not been produced, nor has there been an assessment of the cumulative effects of the planned projects.6 Therefore, this report seeks to accomplish the following: 1) identify and map the NAFTA corridors 2) identify and map critical environmental features of the affected landscape, including a. the presence of endangered species and designated critical habitat b. air attainment and nonattainment areas c. waterways and wetlands d. farmlands, private and public lands e. national historic sites, public parks, recreation areas, and wildlife and waterfowl refuges 3) analyze the projects, corridors, and larger SPP transportation framework through the application of key environmental laws 4) provide advocates with information about the SPP and its likely impacts to the American landscape, as well as tools to ensure that SPP-related construction does not harm the environment. How To Use This Guide This report analyzes seven major NAFTA corridors. The guide is intended to provide a landscape-level portrait of what the cumulative impacts of the proposed corridors could look like, as well as a magnified view of a select number of projects and corridors. Each chapter focuses on one corridor and one environmental law, but the guide is written so that lessons 6 The Commission on Environmental Cooperation is currently researching similar issues in a project called Greening the North American Trade and Transportation Corridors (personal communication, June 2009). 2 learned from any of the chapters can be applied to other projects. Limitations of the Guide This guide is national in scope and does not provide information on local effects beyond what is described in the highlighted projects, nor does it address the effects these projects are having on Canada or Mexico. We have attempted to give the U.S. reader enough information to conduct independent, site-specific investigations of local projects. Also, the guide does not offer suggestions or alternatives to the planned corridor construction, nor is it
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide
    Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide A Complete Compendium Of RV Dump Stations Across The USA Publiished By: Covenant Publishing LLC 1201 N Orange St. Suite 7003 Wilmington, DE 19801 Copyrighted Material Copyright 2010 Covenant Publishing. All rights reserved worldwide. Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide Page 2 Contents New Mexico ............................................................... 87 New York .................................................................... 89 Introduction ................................................................. 3 North Carolina ........................................................... 91 Alabama ........................................................................ 5 North Dakota ............................................................. 93 Alaska ............................................................................ 8 Ohio ............................................................................ 95 Arizona ......................................................................... 9 Oklahoma ................................................................... 98 Arkansas ..................................................................... 13 Oregon ...................................................................... 100 California .................................................................... 15 Pennsylvania ............................................................ 104 Colorado ..................................................................... 23 Rhode Island ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Classification Update Report for the Pocatello/Chubbuck Urbanized Area
    Functional Classification Update Report For the Pocatello/Chubbuck Urbanized Area Functional Classification Update Report Introduction The Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973 required the use of functional highway classification to update and modify the Federal-aid highway systems by July 1, 1976. This legislative requirement is still effective today. Functional classification is the process by which streets and highways are grouped into classes, or systems, according to the character of service they are intended to provide. The functional classification system recognizes that streets cannot be treated as independent, but rather they are intertwined and should be considered as a whole. Each street has a specific purpose or function. This function can be characterized by the level of access to surrounding properties and the length of the trip on that specific roadway. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) functional classification system for urban areas is divided into urban principal arterials, minor arterial streets, collector streets, and local streets. Principal arterials include interstates, expressways, and principal arterials. Eligibility for Federal Highway Administration funding and to provide design standards and access criteria are two important reasons to classify roadway. The region is served by Interstate 15 (north/South) and Interstate 86 (east/west). While classified within the arterial class, they are designated federally and do not change locally. Interstates will be shown in the functional classification map, but they will not be specifically addressed in this report. Functional Classification Update The Idaho Transportation Department has the primary responsibility for developing and updating a statewide highway functional classification in rural and urban areas to determine the functional usage of the existing roads and streets.
    [Show full text]
  • Klickitat County Regional Transportation Plan, Amended
    Klickitat County Regional Transportation Plan Updated: May 2009 Amended: February 2012 Southwest Washington Regional Transportation Council KLICKITAT COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN Updated: May 2009 Amended: February 2012 Prepared by: Southwest Washington Regional Transportation Council PO Box 1366 Vancouver, WA 98666-1366 (360) 397-6067 February 2012 Amendment Page ii: List of amendment RTP changes. Page vi: The Klickitat County Transportation Policy Committee Members were updated to reflect current committee members. Page 12: The Growth in Klickitat County section was updated to reflect 2010 demographics including population, housing units and BEA employment data. Page 22: Update Bridge section to reflect the completion of the Type, Size, and Location phase of the SR-35 Columbia River Crossing project. Page 26: Update to show change to Dock Grade Road, moving to one-way uphill with no trucks. Pages 37-40: Updated Chapter 5 to reflect updated System Improvement Needs. Improvement Needs updates include: 1) Remove SR-142 Bowman Grade Project (completed), 2) revised Bingen Point Access project description, and 3) add SR-197/Dock Road intersection improvement. Page 43: Updated RTP Update Process section to reflect the 2012 Update elements and next anticipated update to the RTP. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page Title Page ...................................................................................................................... i Table of Contents ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Interchange Modification Report
    I-26 / Naval Base Terminal Access Road Interchange INTERCHANGE MODIFICATION REPORT CHARLESTON COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA Prepared for: South Carolina Department of Transportation Prepared by: Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc. May 2012 I-26ȀPortAccessRoadInterchangeModificationReport TABLEOFCONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................ 1 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................. 3 Project Location.................................................................................................................................................. 3 Project History.................................................................................................................................................... 3 Project Description ............................................................................................................................................. 7 Project Purpose and Need .................................................................................................................................. 9 Project Conceptual Design ................................................................................................................................ 11 Interchange Modification Report (IMR) Scope..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • White Salmon Planning Commission Meeting AGENDA February 24, 2021
    White Salmon Planning Commission Meeting AGENDA February 24, 2021 – 5:30 PM Via Zoom Teleconference Meeting ID: 840 1289 8223 Passcode: 623377 Call in Numbers: 669-900-6833 929-205-6099 301-715-8592 346-248-7799 253-215-8782 312-626-6799 We ask that the audience call in instead of videoing in or turn off your camera, so video does not show during the meeting to prevent disruption. Thank you. Call to Order/Roll Call Public Comment – Draft Elements 1. Public comment will not be taken during the teleconference. Public comment submitted by email to Jan Brending at [email protected] by 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday, February 24, 2021 will be read during the planning commission meeting and forwarded to all planning commissioners. Please include in the subject line "Public Comment - February 24, 2021 - Planning Commission Meeting." Please indicate whether you live in or outside of the city limits of White Salmon. Discussion Items 2. Presentation and Discussion of Draft Elements a. History and Historic Places b. Transportation c. Public Facilities and Services d. Capital Improvement Program 3. Comprehensive Plan Update Workshop a. Environmental Quality and Critical Areas Element b. Economics Element c. Parks and Recreation Element d. HIstory and Historic Places Element (if time allows) Adjournment 1 File Attachments for Item: 2. Presentation and Discussion of Draft Elements a. HIstory and HIstoric Places b. Transportation c. Public Facilities and Services d. Capital Improvement Program 2 II. HISTORY AND HISTORIC PLACES Background Context and History Environmental context The City of White Salmon lies in a transition zone between the maritime climate west of the Cascade Mountain Range and the dry continental climate of the inter-mountain region to the east.
    [Show full text]
  • Directions to Cleveland Operations
    Directions to Cleveland Works 1600 Harvard Avenue Cleveland, OH 44105 Please note that there are no sleeping areas at this facility. You must stop at a rest area or truck stop. From Interstate 71 th North bound: Take 1-71 North to Exit 247A, W. 14 St. and Clark Ave. Make a right at the end of the exit ramp. nd Then take route 176 south, approx. ¼ mile on your left. Harvard Ave. will be your 2 exit. At the end of the rd ramp take a left. Gate 6 will be at the 3 traffic light on your right. ¾ Closest Rest Area Exit 209, Lodi From Interstate 77 North bound: Take 1-77 North to exit 159A (Harvard Ave). At the end of the ramp take a left. Gate 6 will be about 1 mile on your left. ¾ Closest Rest Area Exit 111, North Canton From Interstate 80 East East or West bound: Exit 11 / 173 to I-77 North. Take I-77 North to exit 159A (Harvard Ave). At the end of the ramp take a left. Gate 6 will be about 1 mile on your left. ¾ Closest Rest Area East Bound between exits 10 / 161 and 11 / 173 West Bound between exits 14 / 209 and 13A / 193 From Interstate 480 East bound: Exit 17 onto Route 176 North. Exit onto Harvard Ave. Take a right onto Harvard Ave. Gate 6 will rd be at the 3 traffic light on your right. ¾ Closest Rest Area None West bound: Exit 20B onto I-77 North. Take 1-77 North to exit 159A (Harvard Ave).
    [Show full text]
  • The Canada-Mexico Relationship: the Unfinished Highway Olga Abizaid Bucio
    POLICY PAPER DOCUMENT DE POLITIQUE DOCUMENTO DE POLÍTICA FPP-04-8 The Canada-Mexico Relationship: The Unfinished Highway Olga Abizaid Bucio EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This paper sets out to illustrate the nature of the Canada-Mexico bilateral relationship and to identify some of the potential areas for mutual cooperation. In the remarkably short span of the last ten years, Canada and Mexico have developed a more dynamic and mature relationship based on frequent exchanges within ad hoc working groups and informal exchanges that cover a broad range of economic, political and social issues, including human rights, elections, good governance, federalism, and trade; all of them priority areas for Canada's foreign policy. While this strategy has enabled both countries to deal with these issues in a very flexible way and with visible and concrete results, thus facilitating the strengthening of their bilateral relationship, this relationship is practiced in so many areas at lower levels of government that although effective it remains invisible for the people who are not involved in it directly. The challenge for these two countries as they try to redefine their foreign policy (and with it their role in the world) is to build on the achievements of this bilateral relationship and to use them as a basis for joint actions in other regional settings. RESUMEN Este trabajo busca elucidar la naturaleza de las relaciones entre Canadá y México e identificar algunas de las áreas en las que ambos países podrían colaborar. En un lapso de apenas diez años, estos países han sido capaces de establecer una relación más dinámica y madura basada en intercambios frecuentes en grupos de trabajo ad hoc y encuentros informales que abarcan una amplia gama de asuntos económicos, políticos, y sociales, incluyendo derechos humanos, elecciones, buen gobierno, federalismo, y comercio, todos ellos asuntos prioritarios dentro de la agenda de política exterior de Canadá.
    [Show full text]
  • ITD Board Sets Wish List for Potential Stimulus
    ITD board sets wish list for potential stimulus The priorities include six road projects that wouldn't otherwise be done. None are in the Valley. Idaho Statesman, January 8, 2009 By: Cynthia Sewell Idaho transportation leaders want to spend $94 million on six otherwise unfunded road projects if President-elect Barack Obama and the new Congress pass a stimulus package dedicated to infrastructure. The windfall could create between 2,000 and 4,000 Idaho jobs, officials said. None of the six roads are in the Treasure Valley, but the region's section of Interstate 84 has been getting - and is expecting to keep getting - most of the borrowed federal dollars from the Connecting Idaho project. The stimulus projects officials have identified would upgrade treacherous Idaho 95 in North Idaho and jump-start road projects in Pocatello, Twin Falls and East Idaho. The Idaho Transportation Department board picked these projects during a special meeting Wednesday, and officials say they could be under construction by June. Several versions of possible stimulus bills are circulating in Washington, and details are still sketchy. ITD expects Idaho could receive about $100 million for roads. Agency staff had identified $817 million in projects that could be ready for construction within 180 days. The six board members disagreed on two points on how best to spend the $100 million: Whether to put the money toward new projects or use it to repair the state's existing roads. Whether to divide the money equally around the state or give it to the areas with the most need. Jim Coleman, who represents North Idaho, argued that the state should use one-time money to finance key projects it is unlikely to be able to afford under current revenue sources.
    [Show full text]
  • The Theodore Roosevelt Expressway and the Central North American Trade Corridor
    The Theodore Roosevelt Expressway and the Central North American Trade Corridor Prepared by Esther Tumuhairwe Mark Berwick Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute North Dakota State University Fargo, ND October 2008 Disclaimer The contents of this report reflect the work of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Mountain-Plains Consortium in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. North Dakota State University does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, disability, age, Vietnam Era Veterans status, sexual orientation, marital status or public assistance status. Direct inquiries to the Executive Director and Chief Diversity Officer, 202 Old Main, (701) 231-7708. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Corridor analysis has been completed for many different designations since the passage of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) in 1991. These studies have been conducted without a clear understanding or blueprint of what should be analyzed. Differences exist in corridor analysis between rural and urban, passengers and freight, the reason for the corridor analysis, and whether the corridor is recognized by all states, provinces, and counties it passes through. The steps necessary to establish a freight corridor are ambiguous therefore, a document that describes the analysis/study process would be beneficial. A review of other corridor studies is provided. The Theodore Roosevelt Expressway and the Central North American Trade Corridors are described, including how they connect to other corridors. This paper provides some demographic and geographic information, but does not address highway capacity needs, right of way needs, restricted speed policy, processes for determining future access, evaluation of current access right of way needs for future frontage roads, and bypass opportunities in and around communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Arizona Future Connectivity Corridor Feasibility Assessment Report
    I-11 I-11 I-11 and Intermountain West Corridor Study & Southern Arizona Future INTERMOUNTAIN WEST CORRIDOR STUDY Connectivity Corridor Feasibility Assessment Report Prepared for and July 2014 I-11 AND INTERMOUNTAIN WEST CORRIDOR STUDY Southern Arizona Future Connectivity Corridor Feasibility Assessment Report Prepared for Nevada Department of Transportation and Arizona Department of Transportation July 2014 Prepared by and . DISCLAIMER The contents of this planning document are based on information available to the Arizona Department of Transportation and the Nevada Department of Transportation (herein referred to as the Sponsoring Agencies) as of the date of this report. Accordingly, this report may be subject to change. The Sponsoring Agencies’ acceptance of this report as evidence of fulfillment of the objectives of this planning study does not constitute endorsement/approval of any recommended improvements nor does it constitute approval of their location and design or a commitment to fund any such improvements. Additional project‐level environmental impact assessments and/or studies of alternatives will be necessary. The Sponsoring Agencies do not warrant the use of this report, or any information contained in this report, for use or consideration by any third party. Nor do the Sponsoring Agencies accept any liability arising out of reliance by a third party on this report, or any information contained in this report. Any use or reliance by third parties is at their own risk. iv Contents 1. Introduction and Overview ........................................................................1 2. Corridor Context ........................................................................................5 3. Existing and Future Conditions Overview .................................................. 11 4. Evaluation Framework and Alternatives Development .............................. 17 5. Alternatives Evaluation Summary and Results .......................................... 21 6.
    [Show full text]
  • International Trade Corridor Plan 2018
    International Trade Corridor Plan 2018 Table of Contents FIGURES ................................................................................................................................................................ 4 TABLES .................................................................................................................................................................. 5 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 6 2. TRADE HELPS DRIVE THE TEXAS ECONOMY ........................................................................................ 7 2.1 U.S. AND TEXAS TRADE .......................................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 TEXAS’ TRADING PARTNERS .................................................................................................................................. 11 2.3 WHAT COMMODITIES DOES TEXAS TRADE? ............................................................................................................. 13 2.3.1 Texas Exports to Its Top Trading Partners ............................................................................................ 13 2.3.2 Texas Imports from Its Major Trading Partners .................................................................................... 15 2.4 TRADE BENEFITS ................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America: an Overview and Selected Issues
    Order Code RS22701 August 2, 2007 Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America: An Overview and Selected Issues M. Angeles Villarreal Analyst in International Trade and Finance Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Jennifer E. Lake Analyst in Domestic Security Domestic Social Policy Division Summary The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP) is a three-country initiative that is intended to increase cooperation and information sharing in an effort to increase and enhance prosperity in the United States, Canada, and Mexico. The SPP was endorsed by the leaders of the three countries, but it is not a signed agreement or treaty and, therefore, contains no legally binding commitments or obligations. The goals of the prosperity components of the SPP are to increase cooperation and sharing of information in order to improve productivity, reduce the costs of trade, and enhance the quality of life. The goal of the security components of the SPP is to coordinate the security efforts undertaken by each of the three participating nations to better protect citizens from terrorist threats and transnational crime while promoting the safe and efficient movement of legitimate people and goods. Congressional interest in the SPP concerns possible implications related to national sovereignty, transportation corridors, cargo security and border facilitation. This report will not be updated. Background The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP) is a trilateral initiative, launched in March 2005, that is intended to increase cooperation and information sharing in an effort to increase and enhance prosperity in the United States, Canada, and Mexico. The SPP is a government initiative that was endorsed by the leaders of the three countries, but it is not a signed agreement or treaty and, therefore, contains no legally binding commitments or obligations.
    [Show full text]