DOCSLIB.ORG

New World Order”

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

MAANPUOLUSTUSKORKEAKOULU STRATEGIAN LAITOS JULKAISUSARJA 1: STRATEGIAN TUTKIMUKSIA No 26 NATIONAL DEFENCE UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF STRATEGIC AND DEFENCE STUDIES SERIES 1: STRATEGIC RESEARCH No 26 STATE AGENT, IDENTITY AND THE “NEW WORLD ORDER” Reconstructing Polish Defence Identity after the Cold War Era TORSTI SIRÉN MAANPUOLUSTUSKORKEAKOULU – NATIONAL DEFENCE UNIVERSITY Strategian laitos – Department of Strategic and Defence Studies HELSINKI 2009 Torsti Sirén: State Agent, Identity and the “New World Order” – Reconstructing Polish Defence Identity after the Cold War Era Maanpuolustuskorkeakoulu, Strategian laitos Julkaisusarja 1: Strategian tutkimuksia No 26 National Defence University, Department of Strategic and Defence Studies Series 1: Strategic Research No 26 To download our latest publications in English in pdf format, please visit http://www.mpkk.fi/fi/tutkimus-opetus/julkaisut/stratl/ Graphic design of the cover: Ari Palo Cover illustration: Coat-of-arms of the Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth 1569–1795 (above); Coat-of-arms of Poland (below); King Jan III Sobieski at Vienna 1683, painting by Jan Matejko, 1883 (Vatican art collection; So- bieski Room); image of the medieval map of the Polish Lithuanian Com- monwealth (on the background) ISBN 978-951-25-1979-8 ISBN 978-951-25-1988-0 PDF ISSN 1236-4959 Maanpuolustuskorkeakoulu – National Defence University Strategian laitos – Department of Strategic and Defence Studies Edita Prima Oy Helsinki 2009 To all who wonder and doubt Contents Pictures and Tables iv Abbreviations v 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Purpose of the Thesis 8 1.2. Previous Research 11 1.3. Research Questions, Outline of the Thesis and Sources 13 1.4. Methodological and Empirical Arguments 19 Part I Methodology 21 2. Philosophy of Science and Method 23 2.1. From Beliefs to Realist Ontology and Epistemological Relativism 23 2.1.1. Religion and Magic – ‘What Is, Is’ 25 2.1.2. Empiricism and rationalism – ‘What is, May not Be’ 28 2.1.3. Pragmatism and Social Ontology – ‘What Is, May Only Be, Because We Have Agreed Upon It Being So’ 31 2.2. Method 36 2.2.1. Identity and the Problem of Causation in the Social Sciences 37 2.2.2. Social Theoretical Orientation 39 2.2.3. Frame(s) of Reference and Research Frame(s) 52 2.2.4. Double Hermeneutics 55 2.2.5. Language 58 2.2.6. Discourse Analysis 60 2.2.7. Contexts, Iconic Modelling and Causal Complex 65 2.2.8. Structuration Theorem and the Thematized Messages of National ‘Sub-Identity Holders’ 68 3. From Implicit to Explicit Identity Theories in IR 73 3.1. Constructivism 75 3.1.1. The Interactionist Perspective and Learning 77 3.1.2. The Endogenous Perspective and Domestic Constitutive Narratives 83 3.1.3. The Cultural Perspective and Habituation 85 3.1.4. The Normative Perspective and Shared Need for Change? 91 3.2. Methodological Conclusions 93 ii Part II Structuring the State, Collective Identity and World Order 95 4. State Agent and Identity – National Ethos and Cultural Habituation 97 4.1. ‘Socialized’ State Agency and National Identity 97 4.1.1. Socialization Process – Creating Identity 99 4.1.2. Nation, Society and Community 103 4.1.3. Corporate Identity, State Identity and National Identity 109 4.2. Constructors and Sources of National Identity 111 4.3. State Agent and the Limits of Good Intentions 114 4.3.1. Internal Constitutive Restraints and Enablers 115 4.3.2. External Social and Material Restraints and Enablers 116 4.4. Defence Identity and Security Policy Practices 119 4.5. Conclusions 121 5. The “New World Order” and the Quest for Global Tolerance 123 5.1. About Current and Future World Orders 126 5.1.1. Institutions and Institutionalization 130 5.1.2. International System and the Struggle for Power 134 5.1.3. International Society and the Status Quo World Order 136 5.1.4. World Society and Collective World Order 140 5.2. ‘Order Is What States Make of It’? 146 5.2.1. The Process of Continuous Change and Identity Reconstruction 147 5.3. Social and Material Unexpectedness as Sources of Identity Reconstruction 150 5.3.1. Revolutionary Structural Changes 151 5.3.2 Global Climate Change 156 5.4. About Possible Future World Orders 158 5.5. Conclusions 161 Part III The Polish Case 165 6. Constructing a Nation and National Identity – The Endogenous Perspective 167 6.1. ‘Rebirth of the Nation’ 167 6.2. The Genealogy of Polish National Identity 171 6.2.1. Romantic Polishness as the Property of the Gentry 173 6.2.2. Positivist Polishness as the Property of the Intelligentsia-Elite 176 6.2.3. Ethnonationalist Polishness as the Property of the Nation 177 6.2.4. Enforced Polishness ‘Without a Yesterday’ 179 6.3. Conclusions 181 7. Internal Constitutive Habituation – The Cultural Perspective 183 7.1. National ‘Grand-Narratives’ – A Legacy of the Past 184 iii 7.1.1. ‘Antemurale Christianitatis and the Marian Cult’ 185 7.1.2. ‘The Miracle of the Vistula’ 188 7.1.3. ‘Between East and West: the Katyń Forest, the Warsaw Uprising and the Betrayal of Yalta’ 192 7.1.4. ‘Polish Anti-Semitism’ 199 7.2. National ‘Sub-Identity Holders’ 202 7.2.1. The State and Political Culture 203 7.2.2. The Armed Forces of Poland and the Strategic Culture 210 7.2.3. The Catholic Church – “State Church” vs. “Activist Church” 212 7.3. The Constitution as a ‘Primary Official’ Identity Expression 219 7.4. Security Policy ‘White Books’ as ‘Secondary Official’ Identity Expressions 221 7.4.1. World View and Fundamental Goals 223 7.4.2. Instrumental Goals 224 7.4.3. Means 226 7.5. National and Ethnic Minorities 230 7.6. Conclusions 233 8. Reconstructing Polish Defence Identity – The Interactionist and Normative Perspective 237 8.1. Regional Contexts 237 8.1.1. NATO-Cooperation 237 8.1.2. European Integration and the CFSP 240 8.2. International System – ‘Prepare for Self-Help’ 244 8.2.1. Russia as the ‘Essential Other’ 244 8.3. International Society – ‘The Changing Borders of Otherness Through Adaptation and Learning’ 255 8.3.1. NATO-Cooperation and Strategic Culture – ‘Adaptation Through Persuasion’ 256 8.3.2 .The United States as the ‘Instinctive and Primary West’? 263 8.3.3. The European Union as the ‘Secondary West’? 273 8.3.4. Germany as the ‘Secondary Other’ 281 8.3.5. Ukraine, Belarus, Lithuania and Poland’s “Imperial Complex” 286 8.4. World Society – ‘Give Whoeverism a Chance?’ 294 8.4.1. Collective World Order and Polish Defence Identity 295 8.4.2. Christian ‘Tolerance’ and Global Equality? 296 8.4.3. Globalization and the “Moral Superiority Complex” 300 8.4.4. The Power of Recognition and Teleological Evolution 303 8.5. Conclusions and Discussion 305 8.5.1. Conclusions of the Polish Case 305 8.5.2. Discussion and Avenues for further research 310 References 317 iv Pictures and Tables Pictures Picture 1: Metatheoretical assumptions 35 Picture 2: Identity and causality in IR 39 Picture 3: Social theoretical orientation of the thesis 41 Picture 4: General frame of reference and research frame 53 Picture 5: Frame of reference and research frame – ‘the Polish case’ 54 Picture 6: Iconic modelling 66 Picture 7: Causal complex, contexts and structure 70 Picture 8: Constructing the ‘Self’ 101 Picture 9: State, Nation, Society and Community 107 Picture 10: State identity, collective identity, national identity and the Other(s) 110 Picture 11: Doctrine, argumentation and strategy 121 Picture 12: Variants of international order and possible futures 149 Picture 13: The Eastern border of Western civilization, according to Samuel Huntington 155 Picture 14: Geopolitics – Poland as a gateway to the east (Operation Barbarossa, 22 June 1941) 194 Picture 15: Geopolitics – Poland as a gateway to the west (the Soviet thrust towards the west in 1944 –45) 195 Picture 16: The National borders of Poland before and after WWII 198 Tables Table 1: The thematized narratives and discourses of national ‘sub-identity holders’ 71 Table 2: The Presidents and Prime Ministers of the Republic of Poland between 24 August 1989 and 2008 205 Table 3: Parliamentary ( Sejm ) elections in Poland between 1989 and 2007; the winners and shares of the vote of the German minority 207 Table 4: Public opinion on Polish-Russian relations 254 Table 5: Public opinion on Polish participation in the NATO-led operation in Afghanistan 262 Table 6: The chances for Polish-German reconciliation? 286 Table 7: The chances for Polish-Ukrainian reconciliation? 291 Table 8: Conclusions regarding the thematized narratives and discourses of national ‘sub-identity holders’ 307 v Abbreviations AK Armia Krajowa (the Home Army) AL Armia Ludowa (the People’s Army) AWS Akcja Wyborcza Solidarno ść (Solidarity Electoral Action) BG Battlegroup (EU) CBOS Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej (Public Opinion Research Center) CFSP Common Foreign and Security Policy CR Critical Realism EDA European Defence Agency (EU) ESDP European Security and Defence Policy ESDI European Security and Defence Identity ESS European Security Strategy (EU) EU European Union EUMC European Union Military Committee EUMS European Union Military Staff GS General Staff ( Stab Generalnego) IGC The Intergovernmental Conference (EU) IPP Individual Partnership Programme (NATO-PfP) KLD Kongres Liberalno-Demokratyczny (The Liberal Democratic Congress) Kresy (Kresy Wschodnie ; Mythical eastern borderlands of the former Poland) MN Mniejszo ść Niemiecka (German Minority) MoD Ministry of Defence NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organization NRF NATO Response Force OECD Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development OSCE Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe PC Porozumienie Centrum (The Centre Party)
Recommended publications
  • Czechoslovak-Polish Relations 1918-1968: the Prospects for Mutual Support in the Case of Revolt

    Czechoslovak-Polish Relations 1918-1968: the Prospects for Mutual Support in the Case of Revolt

    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1977 Czechoslovak-Polish relations 1918-1968: The prospects for mutual support in the case of revolt Stephen Edward Medvec The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Medvec, Stephen Edward, "Czechoslovak-Polish relations 1918-1968: The prospects for mutual support in the case of revolt" (1977). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 5197. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/5197 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CZECHOSLOVAK-POLISH RELATIONS, 191(3-1968: THE PROSPECTS FOR MUTUAL SUPPORT IN THE CASE OF REVOLT By Stephen E. Medvec B. A. , University of Montana,. 1972. Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA 1977 Approved by: ^ .'■\4 i Chairman, Board of Examiners raduat'e School Date UMI Number: EP40661 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
  • February 21, 1948 Report of the Special Action of the Polish Socialist Party in Prague, 21-25 February 1948

    February 21, 1948 Report of the Special Action of the Polish Socialist Party in Prague, 21-25 February 1948

    Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified February 21, 1948 Report of the Special Action of the Polish Socialist Party in Prague, 21-25 February 1948 Citation: “Report of the Special Action of the Polish Socialist Party in Prague, 21-25 February 1948,” February 21, 1948, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, Archive of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Warsaw), file 217, packet 16, pp. 1-11. Translated by Anna Elliot-Zielinska. http://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/117117 Summary: In the midst of a cabinet crisis in Czechoslovakia that would lead to the February Communist coup, several delegates from the Polish Socialist Party were sent to Prague to spread socialist influence. The crisis is outlined, as well as a thorough report of the conference in Prague. Credits: This document was made possible with support from the Leon Levy Foundation. Original Language: Polish Contents: English Translation In accordance with the resolution of the Political Commission and General Secretariat of the Central Executive Committee (CKW) of the Polish Socialist Party (PPS), made late on the night of 20 February 1948, Com. Kazimierz Rusinek, Adam Rapacki, Henryk Jablonski, and Stefan Arski were delegated to go to Prague. This decision was made after a thorough analysis of the political situation in Czechoslovakia brought on by a cabinet crisis there. The goal of the delegation was to inform the Central Committee of the Czechoslovak Social Democratic Party (SD) about the basic stance of the PPS and possibly to influence the SD Central Committee in the spirit of leftist-socialist and revolutionary politics. The motive behind the decision of the Political Commission and General Secretariat was the fear that, from the leftist socialist point of view, the situation at the heart of SD after the Brno Congress was taking an unfavorable shape.
  • Druki Ulotne Lp

    Druki Ulotne Lp

    Druki ulotne Lp. Autor Tytuł Miejsce wydania Data wydania Sygnatura 1. Bardon, Ludwik. Fotografie Wydawca Wisła : basen Trzyniec 01 styczeń 1938 DŻS XII 8b/p.20/28 2. Bardon, Ludwik. Fotografie Wydawca Wisła : Pomnik Żródeł Wisły Trzyniec 01 styczeń 1938 DŻS XII 8b/p.20/28 Do obywateli powiatu Garwolińskiego! [Inc.:] Pracowałem z Wami i wśród Was przez dwa lata 3. Boguszewski, St. Autor Garwolin 01 styczeń 1922 DŻS IA 6c Cim. jako starosta [...] Proklamacja Generalnego Gubernatora : z dnia 26 października 1939 r. [Inc.:] Führer i Kanclerz Rzeszy Niemieckiej, Adolf Hitler, powierzył mi rozporządzeniem z dnia 12 października 1939 r. 4. Frank, Hans (1900-1946) 01 styczeń 1939 DŻS IA 7 Cim. ważnością od 26 października 1939 r. władzę Gubernatorstwa Generalnego na okupowanych obszarach polskich [...] Odezwa do ludności wiejskiej w Generalnym Gubernatorstwie. [Inc.:] Zaburzenia wojenne ubiegłego roku zniszczyły w znacznej mierze gospodarkę wyżywienia w Generalnym 5. Frank, Hans (1900-1946). Autor Kraków 01 styczeń 1940 DŻS IA 7 Cim. Gubernatorstwie. Wielkie ilości zboża chlebowego musiano sprowadzić z Rzeszy, ażeby ulżyć największej biedzie ludności wiejskiej [...] : [Krakau (Kraków), dnia 12 lipca 1940 r. 6. Gazda, Franciszek (1893-1942). Fotografie Warszawa : zamek królewski Miejsce nieznane 01 styczeń 1921 DŻS XII 8b/p.19/88 7. Grodnicki, W. Ilustracje Konwalie Miejsce nieznane 01 styczeń 1916 DŻS XII 8b/p.53/1 8. Grodnicki, W. Ilustracje Wedeta Miejsce nieznane 01 styczeń 1916 DŻS XII 8b/p.53/1 9. Grodzicki, W. Ilustracje [Kobieta z walizką i parasolką] Miejsce nieznane 01 styczeń 1916 DŻS XII 8b/p.53/1 10. Grodzicki, W. Ilustracje Na urlop Miejsce nieznane 01 styczeń 1916 DŻS XII 8b/p.53/1 Mieszkańcy Pomorza! [Inc.:] Po blizko 150 latach niewoli nadeszła chwila wyzwolenia [...] : 11.
  • The Rapacki Plan During the Cold War

    The Rapacki Plan During the Cold War

    ONLINE PUBLICATION NOVEMBER 2010 Maruzsa Zoltán Denuclearization in Central Europe? The Rapacki Plan during the Cold War. Document first published in print: Öt kontinens. Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem, Budapest, 2008 225-264. pp. 1 Zoltán Maruzsa: Denuclearization in Central Europe? The Rapacki Plan during the Cold War As the Cold War started after the Second World War, Europe quickly became its most important political battleground for many years. The majority of European countries became members of a belligerent alliance system, and most countries raised their defence budgets considerably. There was a rising menace of war between these groups, lead by the USA and the USSR, as humanity entered the atomic age in August 1945. After the destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki nobody could realistically believe that nuclear weapons would not be used in the event of a Third World War. This became obvious when the USA lost its monopoly on nuclear weaponry, following successful English and Soviet test detonations. Many public figures, including leading scientists, politicians, and artists soon began to voice their concerns, and various plans were hastily developed to circumvent such a catastrophe. If we examine it superficially, the plan proposed by Polish Foreign Minister Adam Rapacki on October 2nd, 1957 fits into these ideas. During the 12th term of the United Nations General Assembly, the Polish Foreign Affairs Minister suggested1 that creating a ‗nuclear-free‘ zone in Central Europe would go a long way to alleviating the political tension of the times. According to his proposal, if the two German states were willing to prohibit the production and storage of nuclear weapons on their territory, the Polish People's Republic would follow suit.
  • Kubiak Poland and The

    Kubiak Poland and The

    Poland and the B61 Theory-led Analysis of the Polish Official Position on American Extended Nuclear Deterrence in Europe Universität Hamburg Fakultät für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften Dissertation Zur Erlangung der Würde der Doktorin der Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften „Dr. phil.“ (gemäß der PromO vom 08.11.2000) vorgelegt von Katarzyna Anna Kubiak Hamburg, 31. Januar 2018 Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Michael Brzoska Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Michael Staack Datum der Disputation: 19. Mai 2016 To Romcia Abstract The United States continues to deploy nuclear bombs (B61) to Europe. By doing so, Washington extends its nuclear deterrence to its European NATO allies. In-between 2008-2014, NATO discussed whether it should keep or withdraw these weapons from Europe. The weapons were subject to controversy. Perceived as unnecessary remnants of the Cold War arms race by some, and as a vital part of NATO deterrence and defence strategy by others. Eventually, allies decided to leave the nuclear bombs in Europe. This work analyses the motivation behind the Polish governments’ support for American extended nuclear deterrence in Europe. It aims at finding out (1) what role the B61 plays for a European NATO non- nuclear weapon state, which does not host these bombs on its territory and (2) what motivation stands behind framing it that way. I structure my argument along three main paradigms of international relations - neorealism, utilitarian liberalism and social constructivism. I examine official and expert writings as well as 25 expert interviews I have conducted with Polish diplomats, politicians, researchers, former high officials, employees at the NATO International Staff and representatives of NATO member states governments.
  • The “Belarus Factor” from Balancing to Bridging Geopolitical Dividing Lines in Europe?

    The “Belarus Factor” from Balancing to Bridging Geopolitical Dividing Lines in Europe?

    The “Belarus factor” From balancing to bridging geopolitical dividing lines in Europe? Clingendael Report Tony van der Togt The “Belarus factor” From balancing to bridging geopolitical dividing lines in Europe? Tony van der Togt Clingendael Report January 2017 January 2017 © Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’. Cover photo: The leaders of Belarus, Russia, Germany, France and Ukraine after signing the Minsk II agreement, February 2015. © In Terris Online Newspaper Unauthorized use of any materials violates copyright, trademark and / or other laws. Should a user download material from the website or any other source related to the Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’, or the Clingendael Institute, for personal or non-commercial use, the user must retain all copyright, trademark or other similar notices contained in the original material or on any copies of this material. Material on the website of the Clingendael Institute may be reproduced or publicly displayed, distributed or used for any public and non-commercial purposes, but only by mentioning the Clingendael Institute as its source. Permission is required to use the logo of the Clingendael Institute. This can be obtained by contacting the Communication desk of the Clingendael Institute ([email protected]). The following web link activities are prohibited by the Clingendael Institute and may present trademark and copyright infringement issues: links that involve unauthorized use of our logo, framing, inline links, or metatags, as well as hyperlinks or a form of link disguising the URL. About the author Tony van der Togt is Senior Research Fellow at the Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’ in The Hague.
  • Journalists and Religious Activists in Polish-German Relations

    Journalists and Religious Activists in Polish-German Relations

    THE PROJECT OF RECONCILIATION: JOURNALISTS AND RELIGIOUS ACTIVISTS IN POLISH-GERMAN RELATIONS, 1956-1972 Annika Frieberg A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2008 Approved by: Dr. Konrad H. Jarausch Dr. Christopher Browning Dr. Chad Bryant Dr. Karen Hagemann Dr. Madeline Levine ©2008 Annika Frieberg ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT ANNIKA FRIEBERG: The Project of Reconciliation: Journalists and Religious Activists in Polish-German Relations, 1956-1972 (under the direction of Konrad Jarausch) My dissertation, “The Project of Reconciliation,” analyzes the impact of a transnational network of journalists, intellectuals, and publishers on the postwar process of reconciliation between Germans and Poles. In their foreign relations work, these non-state actors preceded the Polish-West German political relations that were established in 1970. The dissertation has a twofold focus on private contacts between these activists, and on public discourse through radio, television and print media, primarily its effects on political and social change between the peoples. My sources include the activists’ private correspondences, interviews, and memoirs as well as radio and television manuscripts, articles and business correspondences. Earlier research on Polish-German relations is generally situated firmly in a nation-state framework in which the West German, East German or Polish context takes precedent. My work utilizes international relations theory and comparative reconciliation research to explore the long-term and short-term consequences of the discourse and the concrete measures which were taken during the 1960s to end official deadlock and nationalist antagonisms and to overcome the destructive memories of the Second World War dividing Poles and Germans.
  • Akt Normalizacyjny –Rfn

    Akt Normalizacyjny –Rfn

    AKT NORMALIZACYJNY 50 lat układu o podstawach normalizacji stosunków prl–rfn z 7 grudnia 1970 roku Centrum Studiów Niemieckich i Europejskich im. Willy’ego Brandta Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego Katedra Prawa Międzynarodowego i Prawa UE Kolegium Prawa Akademii Leona Koźmińskiego AKT NORMALIZACYJNY 50 lat układu o podstawach normalizacji stosunków prl–rfn z 7 grudnia 1970 roku redakcja naukowa Jan Barcz i Krzysztof Ruchniewicz Wrocław – Warszawa 2021 Wydanie książki zostało sfinansowane przez Ambasadę Republiki Federalnej Niemiec w Warszawie Recenzenci prof. dr hab. Stanisław Sulowski, Uniwersytet Warszawski dr hab. Dariusz Wojtaszyn, Uniwersytet Wrocławski Redakcja naukowa Jan Barcz (ORCID: 0000-0002-2826-1945) Krzysztof Ruchniewicz (ORCID: 0000-0002-6288-2139) Opracowanie redakcyjne i korekta Hanna Januszewska Projekt okładki Agnieszka Miłaszewicz Zdjęcia wykorzystane na okładce i zdjęcie Układu pochodzą z archiwum Rządu Federalnego RFN Zezwolenie na umieszczenie Presse- und Informationsamt der Bundesregierung © Copyright by Authors and Dom Wydawniczy ELIPSA, Warszawa 2021 Zeskanowany tekst Układu podpisanego 7 grudnia 1970 r. Dziennik Ustaw 1972, nr 34, poz. 168 ISBN 978-83-8017-368-2 Opracowanie komputerowe, druk i oprawa: Dom Wydawniczy ELIPSA ul. Inflancka 15/198, 00-189 Warszawa tel. 22 635 03 01 e-mail: [email protected], www.elipsa.pl Spis treści Notki biograficzne autorów . 9 Tekst Układu z 7 grudnia 1970 roku . 14 Słowo wstępne Rektora Uniwersytet Wrocławskiego (Przemysław Wiszewski) ..................................... 17 Słowo wstępne Ambasadora RFN w Warszawie (Arndt Freytag von Loringhoven) . 19 Wstęp od redaktorów naukowych (Jan Barcz i Krzysztof Ruchniewicz)........................... 21 Rozdział 1 „Dobre stosunki z Polską są dla nas szczególnie ważne”. Stosunki polsko-niemieckie 1945–1970 (Krzysztof Ruchniewicz) . 25 1. Ogólne uwarunkowania . 25 2.
  • Polish Culture Yearbook 2018

    Polish Culture Yearbook 2018

    2018 POLISH CULTURE YEARBOOK 2018 POLISH CULTURE YEARBOOK Warsaw 2019 INTRODUCTION Prof. Piotr Gliński, Deputy Prime Minister, Minister of Culture and National Heritage 5 REFLECTIONS ON CULTURE IN POLAND 1918–2018 Prof. Rafał Wiśniewski, Director of the National Centre for Culture Poland 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE 1. CELEBRATIONS OF THE 100TH ANNIVERSARY OF POLAND REGAINING INDEPENDENCE 17 CELEBRATIONS OF THE 100TH ANNIVERSARY OF POLAND REGAINING INDEPENDENCE Office of the ‘Niepodległa’ Program 18 2. CULTURE 1918–2018 27 POLISH STATE ARCHIVES Head Office of State Archives 28 LIBRARIES National Library of Poland 39 READERSHIP National Library of Poland 79 CULTURAL CENTRES Centre for Cultural Statistics, Statistical Office in Kraków 89 MUSEUMS National Institute for Museums and Public Collections 96 MUSICAL INSTITUTIONS Institute of Music and Dance 111 PUBLISHING PRODUCTION National Library of Poland 121 ARTISTIC EDUCATION Centre for Art Education 134 THEATRE IN POLAND Zbigniew Raszewski Theatre Institute 142 IMMOVABLE MONUMENTS National Heritage Board of Poland 160 3. CULTURAL POLICY 2018 173 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE LOCAL GOVERNMENT SPENDING ON CULTURE National Centre for Culture Poland 174 CINEMATOGRAPHY Polish Film Institute 181 NATIONAL MEMORIAL SITES ABROAD Department of Cultural Heritage Abroad and Wartime Losses, Ministry of Culture and National Heritage 189 POLISH CULTURAL HERITAGE ABROAD Department of Cultural Heritage Abroad and Wartime Losses, Ministry of Culture and National Heritage 196 RESTITUTION OF CULTURAL OBJECTS Department of Cultural Heritage Abroad and Wartime Losses, Ministry of Culture and National Heritage 204 DEVELOPMENT OF LIBRARY INFRASTRUCTURE AND PROGRAMMES ADDRESSED TO PUBLIC LIBRARIES Polish Book Institute 212 EXPENDITURE OF THE POLISH STATE ON CULTURE Department of Intellectual Property Rights and Media, Ministry of Culture and National Heritage 217 4.
  • The Geopolitical Place of Belarus in Europe and the World

    The Geopolitical Place of Belarus in Europe and the World

    The Geopolitical Place of Belarus in Europe and the World Edited by Valer Bulhakau The Geopolitical Place of Belarus in Europe and the World Edited by Valer Bulhakau Warsaw 2006 Komitet Redakcyjny: Andrzej Sulima-Kamiński, Valer Bulhakau, Maria Furman, Eulalia Łazarska, Alena Kazlova, Anna Juras, Siobhan Doucette © Copyright by Wyższa Szkoła Handlu i Prawa im. Ryszarda Łazarskiego w Warszawie, Instytut Przestrzeni Obywatelskiej i Polityki Społecznej, Warszawa 2006 Projekt jest współfinansowany w ramach programu pomocy zagranicznej Ministerstwa Spraw Zagranicznych RP w 2006 r. Oficyna Wydawnicza Wyższej Szkoły Handlu i Prawa im. Ryszarda Łazarskiego 02-662 Warszawa ul. Świeradowska 43 tel. 022 54-35-450 e-mail: [email protected] www.lazarski.edu.pl ISBN 978-83-60694-03-9 Materiały z konferencji w dniach 11-12 listopada 2006 r. Nakład 300 egz. Opracowanie komputerowe, druk i oprawa: Dom Wydawniczy ELIPSA, ul. Inflancka 15/198, 00-189 Warszawa tel./fax 022 635 03 01, 022 635 17 85, e-mail: [email protected], www.elipsa.pl TABLE OF CONTENTS Andrzej Sulima-Kamiński – Introduction................................................ 7 I. Belarus as a Geopolitical Pariah Ethan S. Burger – The Divergence between Declaratory and Action Policy: U.S. Non-Recognition of the Results of the Belarusian March 2006 Presidential Election ........................ 21 Mykoła Ryabchuk – Is the West Serious about the ‘Last European Dictatorship’? ........................................................................ 43 Vital Silicki – Belarus: Anatomy of Preemptive Authoritarianism . 59 Andrew Wilson – Belarus Between ‘Colored Revolution’ and ‘Counter-Revolutionary Technology’ .................................................... 91 Vital Silicki, Ethan S. Burger, Alaksandr Lahviniec, Mykoła Ryabchuk, Stephen L. White, Andrew Wilson, Rafał Sadowski, Karen Akopaŭ, Alastair Rabagliaati, Paveł Usaŭ, Grigory Ioffe and Andrej Dyńko – Statements ..................................................................
  • Multilateralna Dyplomacja Państw Środkowoeuropejskich Przed I Po 1989 Roku*

    Multilateralna Dyplomacja Państw Środkowoeuropejskich Przed I Po 1989 Roku*

    DOI: 10�17951/m�2016�1�9 ANNALES UNIVERSITATIS MARIAE CURIE-SKŁODOWSKA LUBLIN – POLONIA VOL. I SECTIO M 2016 Jacek Czaputowicz Uniwersytet Warszawski Multilateralna dyplomacja państw środkowoeuropejskich przed i po 1989 roku* 1. Wstęp Pojęcie Europy Środkowej jest różnie definiowane� W węższym rozumieniu obszar ten tworzą Polska, Czechy, Słowacja, Węgry, Rumunia i Bułgaria� Państwa te były niepodległe w okresie międzywojennym i zachowały swoją państwowość w czasie zimnej wojny� W szerszym rozumieniu do Europy Środkowej zalicza się państwa leżące między Niemcami a obszarem Wspólnoty Niepodległych Państw, a więc także państwa bałtyckie, które wchodziły w skład ZSRR – Litwę, Łotwę i Estonię, oraz państwa bałkańskie, powstałe z rozpadu Jugosławii – Chorwację, Słowenię, Bośnię i Hercegowinę, Jugosławię, Macedonię, Czarnogórę i Albanię� W niniejszym artykule stosowane będzie węższe rozumienie Europy Środkowej� Z kolei multilateralizm będziemy rozumieć nie tylko jako praktykę koordynowa- nia polityki przez grupę państw, lecz także jako czynienie tego zgodnie z pewnymi zasadami1� Zasady te to niepodzielność, rozszerzona wzajemność oraz powszechne zasady postępowania� Zasada niepodzielności oznacza, że grupa państw nie tworzy * Wcześniejsza wersja artykułu ukazała się w języku angielskim – Multilateral Diplomats of Central European States Before and After 1989, [w:] Routledge Handbook of International Or- ganizations, ed� B� Reinalda, [b�o�w�], London–New York 2013, s� 244–256� 1 R. O� Keohane, Multilateralism. An Agenda for Research, „International
  • Meetings Roman Ingarden in Recollections

    Meetings Roman Ingarden in Recollections

    MEETINGSRoman Ingarden in Recollections Edited by Leszek Sosnowski 1 MEETINGSRoman Ingarden in Recollections Edited by Leszek Sosnowski MEETINGS Roman Ingarden in Recollections 2 Andrzej Ingarden Krzysztof Ingarden Jerzy Aleksandrowicz Maria Gołaszewska Andrzej Kowal Józef Lipiec Janina Makota MEETINGS Andrzej Półtawski Roman Ingarden in Recollections Ewa Sowa Władysław Stróżewski Beata Szymańska edited by Leszek Sosnowski Jan Woleński Krzysztof Zanussi Leopold Zgoda Klaudia Adamowicz Dominika Czakon Karol Kapelko Monika Komaniecka-Łyp Rafał Kur Natalia Anna Michna Patryk Miernik Leszek Sosnowski Jan Turlej Paulina Tendera Krakow 2020 3 MEETINGS Roman Ingarden in Recollections edited by Leszek Sosnowski WYDAWNICTWO WYDAWNICTWO Krakow 2020 4 © Copyright by individual authors, Krakow 2020 Proofreading Michelle Atallah Maria Macko Cover design Agnieszka Gogola ISBN 978-83-8138-124-6 (print) ISBN 978-83-8138-288-5 (on-line, pdf) The publication is financed by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Poland under the program “DIALOG” in the years 2019-2020 KSIĘGARNIA AKADEMICKA PRESS ul. św. Anny 6, 31-008 Krakow tel./faks: 12 431-27-43, 12 421-13-87 e-mail: [email protected] https://akademicka.pl/ 5 Table of contents I . Introduction 11 <right> Introduction 17 <right> Dominika Czakon, Natalia Anna Michna Roman Ingarden – Life and Work from a Subjective Perspective 31 <right> Monika Komaniecka-Łyp Roman W. Ingarden In the Files of the Security Service 63 <right> Leszek Sosnowski Roman Ingarden. Portrait of a Teacher