Luftwaffe Airfields 1935-45 Russia (Incl

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Luftwaffe Airfields 1935-45 Russia (Incl Luftwaffe Airfields 1935-45 Russia (incl. Ukraine, Belarus & Bessarabia) By Henry L. deZeng IV Kharkov-Rogan I Photo credit: U.S. National Archives, Photographic and Cartographic Division.; taken 14 Sept. 1941. Kharkov-Rogan I was built in 1930 for use as a military flight school. It had 8 medium and large aircraft hangars and 1 very large repair hangar, approx. 40 permanent barrack buildings, 3 workshops, admin buildings and storage structures, an oval athletic track and other facilities all grouped along the W boundary and SW corner of the landing area. There were about 10 additional structures along the S boundary that may have been for aircraft servicing and stores. Additionally, there were 22 blast bays for twin-engine and single-engine aircraft spaced along the W and S boundaries of the landing area. A separate supply dump with its own rail spur was approx. 1 km S of the airfield. Nearly all of these buildings had been destroyed or badly damaged by 1944, the majority of them blown up by the retreating Germans. Edition: February 2020 Airfields Russia (incl. Ukraine, Belarus & Bessarabia) Introduction Conventions 1. For the purpose of this reference work, “Russia” generally means the territory belonging to the country in September 1939, the month of the German attack on Poland and the generally accepted beginning of World War II, including that part of eastern Poland (i.e., Belarus, Belorussia, Weissruthenien) and western Ukraine annexed by the Soviet Union on 29 September 1939 following the USSR’s invasion of Poland on 17 September 1939. Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina were seized by the USSR between 26 June and 3 July 1940. Cross-references have been provided for airfield names except for a few that may have been missed. Thus, listings of the airfields at Baranowitschi, Biala Podlaska, Brest Litovsk, Dubno, Kolomea, Kowel, Lemberg (Lvov), Pinsk and many, many others will be found in both the monograph on Poland (as a cross-reference listing) in this series since they belonged to Poland on 1 September 1939, and this monograph since they were annexed to Russia on 29 September 1939 (as the main listing with details). 2. Another important justification for listing the Belorussian airfields under Russia is that of language. During the 1920’s and 1930’s, 53% of the people living in the annexed territory that was then referred to as “Eastern Poland” spoke Belorussian as their native language, 37.5% Russian and only 6% Polish. 3. All spellings are as they appear in wartime German documents and maps with the addition of alternate spellings where known. 4. A search within the monograph (Airfields – Russia) by right-clicking and then using the “Find” function or by using an alternative means of searching within a document should bring up alternate names. However, you may have to download the monograph first to your own computer. 5. See the General Introduction to the monograph series for matters concerning other conventions such as format, limitations of data, abbreviations, glossary, sources, etc. 6. If you are one of the 99.9% of researchers who might have cause to use this monograph and have never taken the time to memorize the thousands and thousands of German World War II military abbreviations and acronyms, a word of caution: you would be well-advised to print the Glossary in the General Introduction and keep it handy as you use these monographs. Additionally, a special glossary of Soviet Air Force (VVS) wartime abbreviations has been provided below since some of them appear in this monograph. 7. Attacks on Airfields: for the most part, only those airfield attacks that caused reportable damage are shown. Most other attacks were either not found or too insignificant to report. 8. Large Aerodromes: the Germans did not build from the ground up any large hub-type airfields with extensive hangars and workshops in Russia, but rather repaired and improved existing ones that had been built by the Russians. 9. Large Airfield Complexes: in those cases of cities with a large complex of airfields in and around them, it has not always been possible to distinguish the principal airfield from the satellites and dispersal fields. Accordingly, the largest airfield or the one with the most infrastructure has been automatically chosen. 10. Airfield Dimensions: it is not known whether the measurements given are the over all size of the airfield property or of just the landing area. The original German source material rarely states which. Preface The objective of the preface is to provide some basic background for this subject, which is German-built and German-occupied airfields in Russia, Ukraine, Belarus and Bessarabia from 22 June 1941 to 1944. Soviet Airfield Development and Construction 1939 - 1945 Development Citing postwar Soviet sources (1977), researcher, historian and author Von Hardesty of NASM/Smithsonian Institution in Washington, D.C., states that the entire Soviet Air Force (hereafter VVS) ground organization began a complete overhaul in 1940-41 not long after the Winter War with Finland concluded on 12 March 1940. Airfield regional commands (RAB) and airfield battalions (BAO) were created along with airfield construction units, aviation engineer units, workshop units and a host of other aviation servicing and support units and facilities. No definitive and reliable figures have been found for the total number of new airfields actually build, or existing airfields actually expanded, improved and modernized by 22 June 1941 because so many of them were still under construction, but the plan called for three for each aviation regiment (a permanent primary, an operational airstrip and a dispersal airstrip) and 250 are said to have been built in spring 1941 alone.1 Since the Von Hardesty book appeared many years ago, the Russian archives have opened up and droves of new documents have been located, including the directives and reports concerning the 1940-41 VVS reorganization and airfield construction. These are covered in immense detail in a 2018 English language book by Russian aviation author Mikhail Timin. The first directive for airfield construction was issued on 28 September 1940, followed by another on 17 December 1940, a third on 27 February 1941 and finally the last on 10 April 1941 which called for 797 new or redeveloped operational airfields (i.e., field airstrips) to be constructed by the end of 1941. The total number of VVS military airfields across the entire USSR by the end of 1941 was to be 275 permanent (mostly with concrete, macadam, or even dirt, sand and gravel runways that were rolled and hardened) and 1,543 operational for a total of 1,818 airfields. Hundreds of satellites, dispersal fields, landing grounds and emergency 1 Hardesty, Red Phoenix, p.57. landing grounds do not appear to be included in these figures. This massive construction project was to be carried out by 35,000 men in 5 engineer construction brigades equipped with 220 tractors, 560 vehicles and 920 rollers. Additionally, 25,000 men were reassigned from road building work to airfield construction, 100 airfield construction battalions of 1,000 men each were formed, and many thousands of locals were put to work.2 So, that was the plan. But the reality was different and by 22 June 1941, the date of the German invasion of Russia, the Soviet VVS is estimated to have had approximately 1,147 military airfields, which do not include undeveloped satellites and dispersal fields. Of those 1,147, only some 200 had concrete runways and the great majority of these were in the rear areas where they were mostly used by VVS long-range aviation (DBA). According to a statistical digest of the VVS, a further 2,219 airfields were constructed by the end of 1941. As noted above, VVS doctrine at the time called for one permanent airfield for each aviation regiment, but there were far too few in the western military districts that had mostly belonged to Poland and the Baltic countries prior to 17 September 1939. The Western Special Military District, for example, had just 62 airfields (16 of these with concrete runways) while the Baltic Special Military District had 23 and the Kiev and Odessa Military Districts together reportedly had 63. Many of these airfields were occupied by two and sometimes three VVS regiments with each regiment having three squadrons (36 aircraft) or 5 squadrons (60 aircraft). There is some dispute over these airfield numbers, at least the total. The eminent German military aviation historian Dr. Horst Boog had this to say in 1998: “Of the 2,000 airfields in the western Soviet Union [note: by June 1941 - author], just 200 were considered to be of use for bomber operations. In fact, over 250 had been extended, and 164 more main bases were constructed between 8 April and 15 July 1941.3 In addition to these lists of ever-changing and increasingly confusing numbers, there are separate lists of airfields constructed by the NKVD, the Soviet internal security bureaucracy. Soviet documents state that by June 1941 the NKVD’s department for airfield construction administered the construction of 254 airfields, including 61 in Belorussia, 82 in Ukraine, 8 in Moldavia, 23 in the Baltic States, 10 in the Murmansk and Karelia region, 19 in the Far East, 10 in Transcaucasus, 19 in the Leningrad district and 29 elsewhere. The work was done by c. 250,000 prison inmates, 50,000 people sentenced to hard labor and 16,000 prisoners of war. In addition, 2 Timin, Mikhail. Air Battles Over the Baltic 1941: The Air War on 22 June 1941 – The Battle for Stalin’s Baltic Region, pp.121-30. 3 Hooten, Steppes, pp.25-26; Radtke, Kampfgeschwader 54, p.70; Boog, Horst, PhD, from Wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axis and Soviet air operations during Operation_Barbarossa; Soviet Air Forces in Numbers, a statistical digest, extracts provided by “Art” on website thread https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?f=79&t=239117&p=2177042#p2177042.
Recommended publications
  • 2008 Hate Crime Survey
    2008 Hate Crime Survey About Human Rights First HRF’s Fighting Discrimination Program Human Rights First believes that building respect for human The Fighting Discrimination Program has been working since rights and the rule of law will help ensure the dignity to which 2002 to reverse the rising tide of antisemitic, racist, anti- every individual is entitled and will stem tyranny, extremism, Muslim, anti-immigrant, and homophobic violence and other intolerance, and violence. bias crime in Europe, the Russian Federation, and North America. We report on the reality of violence driven by Human Rights First protects people at risk: refugees who flee discrimination, and work to strengthen the response of persecution, victims of crimes against humanity or other mass governments to combat this violence. We advance concrete, human rights violations, victims of discrimination, those whose practical recommendations to improve hate crimes legislation rights are eroded in the name of national security, and human and its implementation, monitoring and public reporting, the rights advocates who are targeted for defending the rights of training of police and prosecutors, the work of official anti- others. These groups are often the first victims of societal discrimination bodies, and the capacity of civil society instability and breakdown; their treatment is a harbinger of organizations and international institutions to combat violent wider-scale repression. Human Rights First works to prevent hate crimes. For more information on the program, visit violations against these groups and to seek justice and www.humanrightsfirst.org/discrimination or email accountability for violations against them. [email protected]. Human Rights First is practical and effective.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Cooperation Between Russia and Belarus: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives
    ISSN 2335-870X LITHUANIAN ANNUAL STRATEGIC REVIEW 2019 Volume 17 231 Virgilijus Pugačiauskas* General Jonas Žemaitis Military Academy of Lithuania Military Cooperation between Russia and Belarus: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives The article analyses the dynamics of military cooperation between Russia and Belarus at the time when Russia’s aggression against Ukraine revealed president Vladimir Putin’s objective to consolidate control over his interest zone in the nearest post-soviet area at all hazards. This could be called the time-period during which endurance of military cooperation is increased and during which Rus- sia demonstrates its principle ambition to expand the use of military capabilities while leaning on Belorussian military capabilities, military infrastructure and territory as a bridgehead for potential military actions. For this reason, the aim of the paper is to outline the key factors which determine military integration of the both countries, or, more specifically, to discuss orientations and objectives set forth for building military cooperation as laid down in the documents regulating military policy, to discuss and assess practical cases of strengthening of interaction between military capabilities (stra- tegic military exercises), to reveal the accomplishments of military and technical cooperation, prob- lems it might pose and potential prospects of its development. Introduction In the relationship between Belarus and Russia, the field of military co- operation could be highlighted as the most stable over the past three decades, though the relationship of the both countries is accompanied by alleged, sta- ged and still emerging disagreements or flashes of short-term tension which notably remind of movement of meteors, which illuminate the sky, towards the sinful planet of Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • SS-Totenkopfverbände from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia (Redirected from SS-Totenkopfverbande)
    Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history SS-Totenkopfverbände From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Redirected from SS-Totenkopfverbande) Navigation Not to be confused with 3rd SS Division Totenkopf, the Waffen-SS fighting unit. Main page This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. No cleanup reason Contents has been specified. Please help improve this article if you can. (December 2010) Featured content Current events This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding Random article citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (September 2010) Donate to Wikipedia [2] SS-Totenkopfverbände (SS-TV), rendered in English as "Death's-Head Units" (literally SS-TV meaning "Skull Units"), was the SS organization responsible for administering the Nazi SS-Totenkopfverbände Interaction concentration camps for the Third Reich. Help The SS-TV was an independent unit within the SS with its own ranks and command About Wikipedia structure. It ran the camps throughout Germany, such as Dachau, Bergen-Belsen and Community portal Buchenwald; in Nazi-occupied Europe, it ran Auschwitz in German occupied Poland and Recent changes Mauthausen in Austria as well as numerous other concentration and death camps. The Contact Wikipedia death camps' primary function was genocide and included Treblinka, Bełżec extermination camp and Sobibor. It was responsible for facilitating what was called the Final Solution, Totenkopf (Death's head) collar insignia, 13th Standarte known since as the Holocaust, in collaboration with the Reich Main Security Office[3] and the Toolbox of the SS-Totenkopfverbände SS Economic and Administrative Main Office or WVHA.
    [Show full text]
  • ZRBG – Ghetto-Liste (Stand: 01.08.2014) Sofern Eine Beschäftigung I
    ZRBG – Ghetto-Liste (Stand: 01.08.2014) Sofern eine Beschäftigung i. S. d. ZRBG schon vor dem angegebenen Eröffnungszeitpunkt glaubhaft gemacht ist, kann für die folgenden Gebiete auf den Beginn der Ghettoisierung nach Verordnungslage abgestellt werden: - Generalgouvernement (ohne Galizien): 01.01.1940 - Galizien: 06.09.1941 - Bialystok: 02.08.1941 - Reichskommissariat Ostland (Weißrussland/Weißruthenien): 02.08.1941 - Reichskommissariat Ukraine (Wolhynien/Shitomir): 05.09.1941 Eine Vorlage an die Untergruppe ZRBG ist in diesen Fällen nicht erforderlich. Datum der Nr. Ort: Gebiet: Eröffnung: Liquidierung: Deportationen: Bemerkungen: Quelle: Ergänzung Abaujszanto, 5613 Ungarn, Encyclopedia of Jewish Life, Braham: Abaújszántó [Hun] 16.04.1944 13.07.1944 Kassa, Auschwitz 27.04.2010 (5010) Operationszone I Enciklopédiája (Szántó) Reichskommissariat Aboltsy [Bel] Ostland (1941-1944), (Oboltsy [Rus], 5614 Generalbezirk 14.08.1941 04.06.1942 Encyclopedia of Jewish Life, 2001 24.03.2009 Oboltzi [Yid], Weißruthenien, heute Obolce [Pol]) Gebiet Vitebsk Abony [Hun] (Abon, Ungarn, 5443 Nagyabony, 16.04.1944 13.07.1944 Encyclopedia of Jewish Life 2001 11.11.2009 Operationszone IV Szolnokabony) Ungarn, Szeged, 3500 Ada 16.04.1944 13.07.1944 Braham: Enciklopédiája 09.11.2009 Operationszone IV Auschwitz Generalgouvernement, 3501 Adamow Distrikt Lublin (1939- 01.01.1940 20.12.1942 Kossoy, Encyclopedia of Jewish Life 09.11.2009 1944) Reichskommissariat Aizpute 3502 Ostland (1941-1944), 02.08.1941 27.10.1941 USHMM 02.2008 09.11.2009 (Hosenpoth) Generalbezirk
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly 1992, No.26
    www.ukrweekly.com Published by the Ukrainian National Association Inc.ic, a, fraternal non-profit association! ramian V Vol. LX No. 26 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY0, JUNE 28, 1992 50 cents Orthodox Churches Kravchuk, Yeltsin conclude accord at Dagomys summit by Marta Kolomayets Underscoring their commitment to signed by the two presidents, as well as Kiev Press Bureau the development of the democratic their Supreme Council chairmen, Ivan announce union process, the two sides agreed they will Pliushch of Ukraine and Ruslan Khas- by Marta Kolomayets DAGOMYS, Russia - "The agree­ "build their relations as friendly states bulatov of Russia, and Ukrainian Prime Kiev Press Bureau ment in Dagomys marks a radical turn and will immediately start working out Minister Vitold Fokin and acting Rus­ KIEV — As The Weekly was going to in relations between two great states, a large-scale political agreements which sian Prime Minister Yegor Gaidar. press, the Ukrainian Orthodox Church change which must lead our relations to would reflect the new qualities of rela­ The Crimea, another difficult issue in faction led by Metropolitan Filaret and a full-fledged and equal inter-state tions between them." Ukrainian-Russian relations was offi­ the Ukrainian Autocephalous Ortho­ level," Ukrainian President Leonid But several political breakthroughs cially not on the agenda of the one-day dox Church, which is headed by Metro­ Kravchuk told a press conference after came at the one-day meeting held at this summit, but according to Mr. Khasbu- politan Antoniy of Sicheslav and the conclusion of the first Ukrainian- beach resort, where the Black Sea is an latov, the topic was discussed in various Pereyaslav in the absence of Mstyslav I, Russian summit in Dagomys, a resort inviting front yard and the Caucasus circles.
    [Show full text]
  • QUARTERLY REPORT for the Development Initiative for Advocating Local Governance in Ukraine (DIALOGUE) Project
    QUARTERLY REPORT for the Development Initiative for Advocating Local Governance in Ukraine (DIALOGUE) Project October – December, 2013 QUARTERLY REPORT October – December, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS RESUME 5 Chapter 1. KEY ACHIEVEMENTS IN THE REPORTING PERIOD 6 Chapter 2. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION 9 2.1. Component 1: Legal Framework 9 Activity 2.1.1. Legislation drafting based on local governments legislative needs 9 Local government legislation need assessment 9 and work on local government technical profiles Legislation monitoring 11 Activity 2.1.2. Expert evaluation of conformity of draft legislation 15 to the European Charter of Local Self-Governance Activity 2.1.3. Introduction of institutional tools for local governments 15 to participate in legislation drafting Round table discussions in AUC Regional Offices and meetings of AUC Professional 15 Groups Setting up a network of lawyers to participate in legislation drafting 19 2.2. Component 2: Policy dialogue 20 Activity 2.2.1. Increasing the participation of the AUC member cities 20 in the policy dialogue established be the Association at the national level Dialogue Day: answers to the questions raised 20 Cooperation with central government authorities 20 Parliamentary local government support inter-faction group (local government caucus) 24 Participation in the work of parliamentary committees 26 Activity 2.2.2. Setting up advisory boards at the regional level with participation 31 of AUC Regional Offices and local State Executive agencies at the oblast level Working sessions of Local Government Regional Advisory Boards 31 Activity 2.2.3. Establishing formal and regular coordination 35 mechanisms with other USAID supported activities and other donor organizations Forum of Donor Organisations working in the local government sector 35 Cooperation with other USAID projects and projects supported by other donor 35 organisations 2.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Book
    84 823 65 Special thanks to the Independent Institute of Socio-Economic and Political Studies for assistance in getting access to archival data. The author also expresses sincere thanks to the International Consortium "EuroBelarus" and the Belarusian Association of Journalists for information support in preparing this book. Photos by ByMedia.Net and from family albums. Aliaksandr Tamkovich Contemporary History in Faces / Aliaksandr Tamkovich. — 2014. — ... pages. The book contains political essays about people who are well known in Belarus and abroad and who had the most direct relevance to the contemporary history of Belarus over the last 15 to 20 years. The author not only recalls some biographical data but also analyses the role of each of them in the development of Belarus. And there is another very important point. The articles collected in this book were written at different times, so today some changes can be introduced to dates, facts and opinions but the author did not do this INTENTIONALLY. People are not less interested in what we thought yesterday than in what we think today. Information and Op-Ed Publication 84 823 © Aliaksandr Tamkovich, 2014 AUTHOR’S PROLOGUE Probably, it is already known to many of those who talked to the author "on tape" but I will reiterate this idea. I have two encyclopedias on my bookshelves. One was published before 1995 when many people were not in the position yet to take their place in the contemporary history of Belarus. The other one was made recently. The fi rst book was very modest and the second book was printed on classy coated paper and richly decorated with photos.
    [Show full text]
  • National Threat Assessment 2021
    DEFENCE INTELLIGENCE STATE SECURITY AND SECURITY DEPARTMENT OF SERVICE UNDER THE REPUBLIC OF THE MINISTRY OF LITHUANIA NATIONAL DEFENCE NATIONAL THREAT ASSESSMENT 2021 DEFENCE INTELLIGENCE STATE SECURITY AND SECURITY DEPARTMENT OF SERVICE UNDER THE REPUBLIC OF THE MINISTRY OF LITHUANIA NATIONAL DEFENCE NATIONAL THREAT ASSESSMENT 2021 VILNIUS, 2021 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 3 FOREWORD 5 SUMMARY 8 NEW SECURITY CHALLENGES 12 REGIONAL SECURITY 17 MILITARY SECURITY 27 ACTIVITIES OF HOSTILE INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY SERVICES 41 PROTECTION OF CONSTITUTIONAL ORDER 50 INFORMATION SECURITY 54 ECONOMIC AND ENERGY SECURITY 61 TERRORISM AND GLOBAL SECURITY 67 3 INTRODUCTION The National Threat Assessment by the State Security Department of the Republic of Lithuania (VSD) and the Defence Intelligence and Security Service under the Ministry of National Defence of the Republic of Lithuania (AOTD) is presented to the public in accordance with Articles 8 and 26 of the Law on Intelligence of the Republic of Lithuania. The document provides consolidated, unclassified assessment of threats and risks to national security of the Repub- lic of Lithuania prepared by both intelligence services. The document assesses events, processes and trends that correspond to the intelligence requirements approved by the State Defence Council. Based on them and considering the long-term trends affecting national security, the document provides the assessment of major challenges that the Lithuanian national security is to face in the near term (2021–2022). The assessments of long-term
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Cemetries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine
    Syracuse University SURFACE Religion College of Arts and Sciences 2005 Jewish Cemetries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine Samuel D. Gruber United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/rel Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Gruber, Samuel D., "Jewish Cemeteries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine" (2005). Full list of publications from School of Architecture. Paper 94. http://surface.syr.edu/arc/94 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts and Sciences at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Religion by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JEWISH CEMETERIES, SYNAGOGUES, AND MASS GRAVE SITES IN UKRAINE United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad 2005 UNITED STATES COMMISSION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF AMERICA’S HERITAGE ABROAD Warren L. Miller, Chairman McLean, VA Members: Ned Bandler August B. Pust Bridgewater, CT Euclid, OH Chaskel Besser Menno Ratzker New York, NY Monsey, NY Amy S. Epstein Harriet Rotter Pinellas Park, FL Bingham Farms, MI Edgar Gluck Lee Seeman Brooklyn, NY Great Neck, NY Phyllis Kaminsky Steven E. Some Potomac, MD Princeton, NJ Zvi Kestenbaum Irving Stolberg Brooklyn, NY New Haven, CT Daniel Lapin Ari Storch Mercer Island, WA Potomac, MD Gary J. Lavine Staff: Fayetteville, NY Jeffrey L. Farrow Michael B. Levy Executive Director Washington, DC Samuel Gruber Rachmiel
    [Show full text]
  • Safety of Technogenic and Natural Systems 2020
    №3 Safety of Technogenic and Natural Systems 2020 UDC 614.849 https://doi.org/10.23947/2541-9129-2020-3-21-32 Territorial fire statistics and assessment of their causes and consequences on the example of the Rostov region V. G. Ustin1, Yu. I. Bulygin2, P. P. Tretyakov3, V. V. Maslenskiy4 1 MD of the MES of Russia for the Rostov region (Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation) 2,3,4 Don State Technical University (Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation) Introduction. A deep and comprehensive analysis of the parameters of the situation with fires in the territories of the Russian Federation and its relationship with socio-economic processes is more relevant than ever for Russia. The article presents, summarizes and analyzes statistical data on the situation with fires and their consequences on the territory of the Rostov region for 2018-2019. Problem Statement. The paper considers the problem of official statistical accounting of fires, the procedure for accounting for people killed and injured in a fire in the context of a changing regulatory framework in this area. The analysis of the situation, official and verified information on fires and their consequences will create a reliable socio- economic characteristic of the Rostov region. Theoretical Part. The paper deals with the peculiarities of accounting of fires and their consequences in Russia. The source materials are the official statistics of the MD of the MES of Russia for the Rostov region on the number of fires on the territory, months, the number of people injured and killed in fires and their distribution by gender, age and time of death, objects and causes of fires.
    [Show full text]
  • APPLICATION of the CHARTER in UKRAINE 2Nd Monitoring Cycle A
    Strasbourg, 15 January 2014 ECRML (2014) 3 EUROPEAN CHARTER FOR REGIONAL OR MINORITY LANGUAGES APPLICATION OF THE CHARTER IN UKRAINE 2nd monitoring cycle A. Report of the Committee of Experts on the Charter B. Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on the application of the Charter by Ukraine The European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages provides for a control mechanism to evaluate how the Charter is applied in a State Party with a view to, where necessary, making recommendations for improving its language legislation, policy and practices. The central element of this procedure is the Committee of Experts, set up under Article 17 of the Charter. Its principal purpose is to report to the Committee of Ministers on its evaluation of compliance by a Party with its undertakings, to examine the real situation of regional or minority languages in the State and, where appropriate, to encourage the Party to gradually reach a higher level of commitment. To facilitate this task, the Committee of Ministers adopted, in accordance with Article 15, paragraph1, an outline for periodical reports that a Party is required to submit to the Secretary General. The report should be made public by the State. This outline requires the State to give an account of the concrete application of the Charter, the general policy for the languages protected under Part II and, in more precise terms, all measures that have been taken in application of the provisions chosen for each language protected under Part III of the Charter. The Committee of Experts’ first task is therefore to examine the information contained in the periodical report for all the relevant regional or minority languages on the territory of the State concerned.
    [Show full text]
  • MEGA Rostov-On-Don Rostov-On-Don, Russia a Way of 15 MLN Life for All VISITORS ANNUALLY
    MEGA Rostov-on-Don Rostov-on-Don, Russia A way of 15 MLN life for all VISITORS ANNUALLY Conveniently located near the M4 federal highway, with Enjoying over 15 million visitors a year, MEGA Rostov-on-Don a competitive mix of anchor tenants, affordable family has the highest footfall in the region. Our concept allows every value, and an exceptional food and beverage offer, guest to find something which appeals to the whole family, be MEGA Rostov-on-Don has the highest brand awareness that leisure or shopping. Our wide range of stores, services and among our competitors. leisure opportunities significantly increases dwell time, providing Luhansk high sales and a fun day out for our guests. Kamensk-Shakhtinskiy Gukovo Donetsk Novoshakhtinsk ShakhtyShakaty Novocherkassk Volgodonsk ROSTOV-ON-DON City Centre Taganrog Bataysk Azov Catchment Areas People Distance ● Primary 40,720 11 km ● Secondary 1,450,920 11–18 km ● Tertiary 2,831,070 > 18–211 km 59% EyskTotal area: 4,322,710 9 33% CUSTOMERS COME BUS ROUTES LIFESTYLE BY CAR GUESTS Sal’sk Tikhoretsk A region with Loyal customers MEGA Rostov is located in the city of Rostov–on-Don and attracts shoppers from all over the strong potential city and surrounding area. MEGA is loved by families, lifestyle and experienced guests alike. Rostov region The city of Rostov-on-Don Rostov region is a part of the Southern Federal District. Considered as a southern capital of Russia, Rostov- GUESTS VISIT MEGA 125 MINS 756km away from Moscow it has major railway routes on-Don has a diverse economical profile, with major AVERAGE 34% 62% 2.7 TIMES PER MONTH DWELL TIME passing in many directions across Russia and abroad.
    [Show full text]