EIA & EC for Kathalchari Field Development, Block (AA-ONN-2002/1),

Final EIA Report

Prepared for:

Jubilant Oil and Gas Private Limited

Prepared by:

SENES Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

June, 2016

EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

FINAL REPORT

EIA & EC for Kathalchari Field Development, Block (AA-ONN-2002/1), Tripura M/s Jubilant Oil and Gas Private Limited

For on and behalf of SENES Consultants India Ltd

Approved by Mr. Mangesh Dakhore Position held NABET-QCI Accredited EIA Coordinator for Offshore & Onshore Oil and Gas Development and Production Date 28.12.2015

Approved by Mr. Sunil Gupta Position held NABET-QCI Accredited EIA Coordinator for Offshore & Onshore Oil and Gas Development and Production Date February 2016

The EIA report preparation have been undertaken in compliance with the ToR issued by MoEF vide letter no. J-11011/248/2013-IA II (I) dated 28th January, 2014. Information and content provided in the report is factually correct for the purpose and objective for such study undertaken.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 i JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

INFORMATION ABOUT EIA CONSULTANTS

Brief Company Profile

This Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) report has been prepared by SENES Consultants India Pvt. Ltd. SENES India, registered with the Companies Act of 1956 (Ranked No. 1 in 1956), has been operating in the county for more than 11 years and holds expertise in conducting Environmental Impact Assessments, Social Impact Assessments, Environment Health and Safety Compliance Audits, Designing and Planning of Solid Waste Management Facilities and Carbon Advisory Services.

Addresses of SENES offices across India are as below:

Noida (Head Office): Mumbai: 3rd Floor, Tower B, Logix Techno Park, 103, Akruti SMC, Khopat Junction Plot No. 5, Sector – 127, Noida Uttar Thane (W), Mumbai – 400 Pradesh -201301 Tel: +91-22-27576298 Tel: +91-020-4368400 Fax: +91-22-27564781 Fax: +91-020-4368401 : Hyderabad: Stesalit Tower 305, Third Floor, 6th Floor, E 2-3, 12-13-97, Tata Tycoon Tarnaka EP &GP, Block Hyderabad – 500017 Sector V, Salt Lake Tel: +91-40-40180801 Kolkata – 700091 Fax: +91-40-40180802 Tel: +91-33-23578070/73

QCI/NABET Accreditation Status

As on date, SENES has been granted accreditation by the Quality Council of India / National Accreditation Board for Education & Training (QCI / NABET) vide Certificate No. NABET/EIA/RA016/040 valid up to March 5, 2017. The certificate of accreditation is enclosed in the following page.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 i JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Declaration by Experts contributing to the EIA - “EIA & EC for Kathalchari Field Development, Block (AA-ONN-2002/1), Tripura

I, hereby, certify that I was a part of the EIA team in the following capacity that developed the above EIA.

EIA coordinator: Mangesh Dakhore (inhouse)

Period of Involvement: Feb 2014-Dec 2015

Signature:

(Note: Since Jan 2016 Mangesh involvement was discontinue as he has resigned)

EIA coordinator: Sunil Gupta (Empanelled)

Period of Involvement: Feb 2016-July 2016

Signature:

Team Member: Assisted EC during the entire project

Name: Girish Shukla

Period of involvement: February 2014 till July 2016

Signature and Date:

Contact information: Arcadis India Pvt. Ltd. 3rd FLOOR, TOWER B, LOGIX TECHNO PARK PLOT NO. 5 SECTOR 127, NOIDA, UP

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 ii JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Functional area experts:

Involvement Functional Signature and S. No. Name of the expert/s (period and areas date task**)

Feb’14 – Debanjan 1 AP March’15 Bandyopadhyay

Feb’14 – Feb’ 2 WP Dhritiman Ray 15

Feb ’14 – Dec 3 SHW Mangesh Dakhore ’15.

Feb’14 – 4 SE Ranjit Mukherjee Feb’15.

February’14- 5 EB Abhishek Roy Goswami Feb 15

AQ Feb’14 – 6 Debanjan Bandopadhaya March’15 AP

July ’14 – Feb 7 AQ Girish Shukla ( assisted 2015 A category FAE)

Debanjan Mar ’14 – 8 NV Bandyopadhyay March ‘15

Debanjan Mar ’14 – 9 LU Bandyopadhyay March ‘15

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 iii JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Involvement Functional Signature and S. No. Name of the expert/s (period and areas date task**)

July ’14 – Feb 10 LU Girish Shukla ( assisted 2015 A category FAE))

March’ 14– 11 RH Mangesh Dakhore December’ 15,

Declaration by the Head of the accredited consultant organization/ authorized person

I, Mainak Hazra, hereby, confirm that the above mentioned experts prepared the EIA & EC for Kathalchari Field Development, Block (AA-ONN-2002/1), Tripura. I also confirm that the consultant organization shall be fully accountable for any mis-leading information mentioned in this statement.

Signature:

Name: Mainak Hazra

Designation: Head of Environment

Name of the EIA consultant organization: ARCADIS India Pvt. Ltd. NABET Certificate No. & Issue Date: NABET/EIA/1013/43 & 21st March 2014

Functional Area S. N Complete name of the Functional Areas Code

1 AP Air Pollution Prevention, Monitoring & Control

2 WP Water Pollution Prevention, Control & Prediction of Impacts

3 SE Socio-Economics

4 EB Ecology and Biodiversity

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 iv JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

5 AQ Meteorology, Air Quality Modeling & Prediction

6 NV Noise/ Vibration

7 LU Land Use

8 RH Risk Assessment & Hazard Management

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 v JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Abbreviation

ALARP As Low As Reasonably Practicable BIS Bureau of Indian Standards Block Kathalchari Field BOD Biological Oxygen Demand BOP Blow out Preventer Cd Cadmium CGWB Central Ground Water Board COD Chemical Oxygen Demand CPCB Central Pollution Control Board Cr Chromium CSR Corporate Social Responsibility Cu Copper DFO Divisional Forest Officer DG Diesel Generator DGH Directorate General of Hydrocarbons DMP Disaster Management Plan DO Dissolved Oxygen EC Environmental Clearance ECO Environment Compliance Officer EGIG European Gas Incident Group EGIG European Gas Pipeline Incident Data Group EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMC Environment Management Cell EMP Environment Management Plan EPIs Environmental Performance Indicators EQIs Environmental Quality Indicators ERT Emergency Response Team ERT Emergency Response Team ESDs Emergency Shut Down ETP Effluent Treatment FC Forest Clearance GCS Gas Compressor Station GGS Group Gathering Station GLC Ground Level Concentrations

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 i JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

GoI Government of India GAIL Gail (India) Pvt. Ltd. HC Hydrocarbon HFL High Flood Level HDD Horizontal Directional Drilling HDPE High Density Polyethylene HSD High Speed Diesel HSE Health, Safety and Environmental ITOPF International Tanker Owners Pollution Federation IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature & Natural Resources JOGPL Jubilant Oil and Gas Private Ltd. KLD Kilo Liter per Day KW Kilo Watt LEL Lower Explosive Limits LFL Lower Flammability Limit LOC Level of Concern LOC Level of Concern MoEF Ministry of Environment and Forests MSDS Materials Safety Data Sheets NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards NABET National Accreditation Board for Education and Training NABL National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories NELP New Licensing Policy NH National Highway NIHL Noise Induced Hearing Loss NOx Oxides of Nitrogen NRSA National Remote Sensing Agency O&G Oil & Gas OCS Oil Collection Station OGP Oil and Gas Producers OREDA Offshore Reliability Data OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration Pb Lead PEL Petroleum License PM Particulate Matter PMP Petroleum & Mineral Pipelines

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 ii JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

PPAP Pollution Prevention and Abatement Plan PPE Personnel Protective Equipment PSC Production Sharing Contract PUCC Pollution Under Control Certificate QCI Quality Council of India QRA Quantitative Risk Assessment RADD Risk Assessment Data Directory RF Reserved Forest RFCC Residual Fluid Catalytic Cracking R&R Relocation and Resettlement SAR Sodium Adsorption Ratio SCADA Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition

SO2 Sulphur Dioxide SOPs Safe Operating Procedures SPCB State Pollution Control Board SPL Sound Pressure Level SWMP Storm Water Management Plan TDS Total Dissolved Solid TDS Total Dissolved Solids TG Tea Garden TSS Total Suspended Solids UEL Upper Explosive Limits UKOPA UK Onshore Pipeline Operators Association VOC Volatile Organic Compound WBM Water Based Mud WLS Wild Life Sanctuary WMP Waste Management Plan WOAD Worldwide Offshore Accident Databank WOAD World Offshore Accident Database

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 iii JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Table of Contents

1 Introduction ...... 1 1.1 Background ...... 1 1.2 Objective of the study ...... 1 1.3 Scope of the study ...... 2 1.4 Structure of the EIA report...... 2 2 Project Description ...... 10 2.1 Overview of the Project ...... 10 2.2 Description of Development Concept...... 10 2.3 Alternative Analysis...... 11 2.4 Objectives and Benefits of Proposed Drilling Activity ...... 11 2.5 Field Location and Description...... 16 2.5.1 Location ...... 16 2.5.2 Accessibility ...... 19 2.6 Kathalchari Field setting ...... 21 2.7 Existing Activities in the Area ...... 24 2.8 Well locations and Environmental Settings ...... 25 2.8.1 Location of Wells and Alternatives ...... 25 2.8.2 Environmental Settings of the Wells & Alternatives ...... 27

2.9 Development Well Drilling...... 48 2.9.1 Site preparation and Access Road Construction ...... 48 2.9.2 Drilling and testing of well ...... 51 2.9.3 Well Decommissioning ...... 56

2.10 Utilities and Resource Requirements ...... 57 2.10.1 Power requirement and generation ...... 57 2.10.2 Fuel Consumption, Supply and Storage ...... 57 2.10.3 Water Requirement...... 57 2.10.4 Manpower ...... 58

2.11 Pipeline Laying ...... 59 2.11.1 Working Corridor Preparation...... 59 2.11.2 Topsoil and Vegetation Removal ...... 59 2.11.3 Pipe Hauling and Fabrication ...... 59 2.11.4 Trenching and Boring ...... 60 2.11.5 Bending & Welding...... 60

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 iv JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

2.11.6 Pipeline Lowering ...... 60 2.11.7 Backfilling ...... 60 2.11.8 Reinstatement ...... 60 2.11.9 Pipeline Markers...... 61 2.11.10 Construction Considerations – Major Water Crossings...... 61 2.11.11 Manpower Requirement for pipeline laying ...... 61 2.12 Group Gathering Station ...... 61 2.12.1 Construction of GGS ...... 61 2.12.2 Project Components...... 62 2.12.3 Scope of facilities ...... 62 2.12.4 Fire Water Pump House ...... 67 2.12.5 Resource Requirements ...... 68 2.13 Pollution Sources and Characterization ...... 70 2.13.1 Noise and Vibrations ...... 70 2.13.2 Air Emissions ...... 70 2.13.3 Liquid wastes ...... 71 2.13.4 Effluent Generation, Treatment and Disposal ...... 71 2.13.5 Solid and Hazardous Waste Streams ...... 71

2.14 Drilling Hazards ...... 72 2.15 HSE Policy ...... 73 2.16 Project Cost ...... 73 2.16.1 Development Well Drilling and Pipeline Laying ...... 73 2.16.2 GGS and Ancillary Infrastructure Construction ...... 73

3 Description of the Environment ...... 74 3.1 Physical Environment ...... 74 3.1.1 Climate & Meteorology...... 74 3.1.2 Ambient Air Quality ...... 77 3.1.3 Ambient Noise Quality ...... 82 3.1.4 Physiography ...... 84 3.1.5 Geology and Hydrogeology ...... 88 3.1.6 Ground Water Resources...... 90 3.1.7 Drainage ...... 97 3.1.8 Surface water quality ...... 98

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 v JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

3.1.9 Land-Use and Land Cover...... 102 3.1.10 Soil Quality...... 105 3.1.11 Transport and Traffic...... 110 3.1.12 Natural Hazards ...... 111

3.2 Biological Environment ...... 114 3.2.1 Introduction ...... 114 3.2.2 Methodology...... 114 3.2.3 Terrestrial Ecosystem ...... 115 3.2.4 Endemic, Threatened & Endangered Floral Species ...... 118 3.2.5 Faunal Diversity ...... 120 3.2.6 Endemic, Endangered & Threatened Fauna ...... 122 3.2.7 Aquatic Ecosystem ...... 122 3.3 Agricultural Diversity ...... 123 3.4 Livestock ...... 124 3.5 Socioeconomic Environment ...... 124 3.5.1 Methodology...... 125 3.6 General Socioeconomic Profile ...... 125 3.6.1 Demographic Profile ...... 127

3.7 Basic Amenities and Infrastructure...... 137 3.8 Cultural and historical sites...... 141 4 Environmental Impact Assessment ...... 143 4.1 Impact Assessment Methodology ...... 143 4.1.1 Impact Criteria and Ranking ...... 143 4.1.2 Impact Significance ...... 144

4.2 Impact Assessment...... 148 4.2.1 Visual Impacts & Aesthetics ...... 148 4.2.2 Impacts on Air Quality ...... 150 4.2.3 Impact on Noise Quality...... 157 4.2.4 Potential Impact on Land Use ...... 160 4.2.5 Impact on Soil Quality...... 161 4.2.6 Impact on Topography & Drainage...... 164 4.2.7 Impact on Surface Water Quality ...... 166 4.2.8 Impact on Hydrogeology & Ground Water Quality ...... 168

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 vi JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

4.2.9 Impact on Biological Environment ...... 170 4.2.10 Impact on Socioeconomic Environment ...... 173 4.2.11 Impact on Occupational Health and Safety ...... 175 5 Quantitative Risk Assessment...... 181 5.1 Objective of the QRA Study ...... 181 5.2 Risk Assessment Methodology ...... 182 5.2.1 Hazard Identification ...... 183 5.2.2 Frequency Analysis ...... 184 5.2.3 Consequence Analysis ...... 185 5.2.4 Risk Evaluation ...... 186 5.3 Risk Assessment of Identified Project Hazards ...... 187 5.3.1 Blow Outs/Loss of Well Control ...... 188 5.3.2 Pipeline Failure Causes ...... 198 5.3.3 Process Leaks/Fires ...... 211 5.3.4 Non-process fires/explosions...... 214 6 Environmental Management Plan & Monitoring Framework ...... 216 6.1 Environment Management Plans ...... 218 6.1.1 Pollution Prevention and Abatement Plan (PPAP) ...... 218 6.1.2 Waste Management Plan ...... 223 6.1.3 Storm Water Management Plan...... 228 6.1.4 Site Closure Plan ...... 228 6.1.5 Wildlife Management Plan ...... 230 6.1.6 Road Safety & Traffic Management Plan ...... 231 6.1.7 Occupational Health & Safety Management Plan ...... 233

6.2 EMP Budget ...... 234 6.3 Environmental Monitoring Program ...... 241 7 Public Consultation...... 249 8 Disclosure of Consultants ...... 255

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 vii JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

List of Tables

Table 1-1 : Compliance to MoEF ToR ...... 3 Table 2-1: Details of Proposed Wells, Alternative Wells & GGS ...... 13 Table 2-2: Geo-co-ordinates of the Kathalchari Field ...... 16 Table 2-3: Construction Equipment Noise Levels ...... 70 Table 2-4: Liquid Wastes Generated during Drilling and their Disposal ...... 71 Table 2-5: Waste Streams Generated during Drilling and Their Disposal ...... 72 Table 3-1: Average Hydrocarbon and VOC Values at Monitoring Stations Error! Bookmark not defined. Table 3-2: Source of Noise in Kathalchari field ...... 83 Table 3-3: The Stratigraphy of The Tripura...... 88 Table 3-4: Ground water Resource of Tripura, 2008 and 2009 ...... 90 Table 3-5: Ground water resource of Districts of Tripura ...... 91 Table 3-6: Groundwater Monitoring Results ...... 94 Table 3-7: Major Drainage Channels in Kathalchari Field ...... 97 Table 3-8: Surface Water Quality Results ...... 101 Table 3-9: Soil Analysis Result ...... 109 Table 3-10: Traffic Monitoring Results ...... 110 Table 3-11: Significant earthquakes of Tripura ...... 112 Table 3-12: Flood ...... 113 Table 3-13: Vegetation Types in Study Area...... 115 Table 3-14: Scheduled Species in the Study Area ...... 122 Table 3-15: Details of operating districts in tripura ...... 127 Table 3-16: List of the study area villages in the Kathalchari gas field in Tripura...... 127 Table 3-17: List of the selected villages near to proposed well location in Kathalchari gas field ...... 128 Table 3-18: population and household size selected villages near to proposed well location in Kathalchari gas field ...... 129 Table 3-19: Sex ratio selected villages near to proposed well location in Kathalchari gas field...... 130 Table 3-20: SC & ST population selected villages near to proposed well location in Kathalchari gas field ...... 132 Table 3-21: Literacy rate of selected villages near to proposed well location in Kathalchari gas field ...... 133 Table 3-22: work force participation of selected villages near to proposed well location in Kathalchari gas field ...... 136

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 viii JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Table 4-1: Impact Prediction Criteria ...... 144 Table 4-2: Criteria based Significance of Impacts ...... 145 Table 4-3: Impact Identification Matrix ...... 146 Table 4-4: Input Parameters Considered for Monitoring...... 152 Table 4-5: Predicted GLCs for Air Pollutants from Well ...... 152 Table 4-6: Predicted GLCs for Air Pollutants from GGS ...... 154 Table 4-7: Impact Significance Matrix (without mitigation) ...... 177 Table 4-8: Impact Significance Matrix (with mitigation) ...... 179 Table 5-1: Frequency Categories and Criteria ...... 185 Table 5-2: Severity Categories and Criteria...... 186 Table 5-3: Risk Matrix ...... 187 Table 5-4: Risk Criteria and Action Requirements ...... 187 Table 5-5: Blow Out Cause Distribution for Failures during Drilling Operations ...... 190 Table 5-6: Natural Gas Release Modeling Scenarios...... 193 Table 5-7: Zone of Flammable Vapour Cloud – Natural Gas Release Scenarios ...... 196 Table 5-8: Primary Gas Pipeline Failure Frequency...... 201 Table 5-9: Gas Pipeline Failure Frequency & Class...... 204 Table 5-10: Ignition Probabilities Per Leak ...... 206 Table 5-11: Hypothetical Failure Cases for Modeling of Proposed Pipeline Risks ...... 207 Table 5-12: Threat Zone Distance for Pipeline Failure Hypothetical Scenarios ...... 211 Table 5-13: Leak Frequencies for Process Equipment...... 212 Table 5-14: Project Process Equipment’s Leak Frequencies ...... 212 Table 5-15: Generic Ignition Probabilities ...... 213 Table 5-16: Frequency of Occurrence - Non-Process Fires ...... 215 Table 6-1: Environmental Management Matrix ...... 219 Table 6-2: Waste Management Plan ...... 224 Table 6-3: Tentative Budget for EMP Implementation ...... 234 Table 6-4: Environmental Management Matrix ...... 237 Table 6-5: Proposed Monitoring Requirements of the Project ...... 242

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 ix JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

List of Figures

Figure 2-1: Regional Setting Map of Kathalchari Field ...... 17 Figure 2-2: Kathalchari Field Location Map ...... 18 Figure 2-3: Kathalchari Field Accessibility Map ...... 20 Figure 2-4: Field Settings of Kathalchari Field...... 22 Figure 2-5: Well and GGS Location Map...... 26 Figure 2-6: Comparative Analysis of Land Cover Map ...... 35 Figure 2-7: Typical Drilling Rig Configuration ...... 52 Figure 2-8: Drilling Waste Management ...... 54 Figure 2-9: Typical Drilling Fluid Circulation System ...... 55 Figure 2-10: Water Balance Diagram ...... 58 Figure 2-11: Layout of Kathalchari Development wells, GGS and In Field Pipelines ....63 Figure 2-12: Process Schematic Diagram of GGS ...... 69 Figure 3-1: Wind Rose Diagram for Pre Monsoon season...... 76 Figure 3-2: Location of Air, Noise, Meteorology And Traffic Monitoring Locations within Kathalchari Field ...... 79

Figure 3-3: Average PM 10 Values at the Monitoring Locations ...... 80 Figure 3-4: Average NO2 Values at the Monitoring Locations ...... 81

Figure 3-5: Average SO2 Values at The Monitoring Locations ...... 81 Figure 3-6: Day and Night Time Equivalent Noise Levels ...... 84 Figure 3-7: Topography of Kathalchari Field ...... 87 Figure 3-8: Location of Groundwater, Surface Water and Soil Monitoring Locations within Kathalchari Field ...... 96 Figure 3-9: Drainage Map of Kathalchari Field ...... 99 Figure 3-10: Percentage Land Use-Land Cover Distribution of Kathalchari Field ...... 103 Figure 3-11: Land Use Land Cover Map of Kathalchari Field ...... 104 Figure 3-12: Ecological Sensitivity Map ...... 121 Figure 3-13: Distribution of male and female population in selected villages in Kathalchari gas field ...... 131 Figure 3-14: Distribution of SC& ST population in selected villages in Kathalchari gas field...... 133 Figure 3-15: sex wise literacy rate in selected villages in Kathalchari gas field...... 135 Figure 3-16: work force participation in selected villages in Kathalchari gas field ...... 137 Figure 4-1: Predicted NOx concentration plot (2 X 1000 KVA DG Set) ...... 155

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 x JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Figure 4-2: Predicted PM10 concentration plot (2 X 1000 KVA DG Set) ...... 156 Figure 4-3: Predicted NOx concentration plot (Flaring + 1X 125 KVA DG Set) ...... 157 Figure 4-4: Predicted Noise Levels with and without Attenuation ...... 159 Figure 5-1: Risk Assessment Methodology ...... 183 Figure 5-2: Ignition Probability Vs Release Rate ...... 191 Figure 5-3: Scenario I - Risk Contour Map...... 194 Figure 5-4: Scenario II - Risk Contour Map ...... 195 Figure 5-5: Scenario III - Risk Contour Map ...... 196 Figure 5-6: Scenario III (Worst Case) – Overpressure Risk Modeling Results...... 197 Figure 5-7: Natural Gas Pipeline Failure Incidents (1970-2010)...... 199 Figure 5-8: Evolution of Primary Failure Frequencies ...... 202 Figure 5-9: Natural Gas Pipeline Failure – Distribution of Incident & Causes...... 203 Figure 5-10: Natural Gas Pipeline Primary Failure Frequencies Per Cause ...... 203 Figure 5-11: External Failure Frequency – Relation with Damage Type & Diamter Class...... 205 Figure 5-12: Threat Zone Plot for Jet Fire – 0.5” Dia Pipeline Leak ...... 208 Figure 5-13: Threat Zone Plot for Jet Fire - 1” Dia Pipeline Leak ...... 209 Figure 5-14: Threat Zone Plot for Fireball - 4” Pipeline Rupture ...... 210 Figure 6-1: Environment Management Measures at Drill Site ...... 227

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 xi JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

List of Photos

Photo 2-1: KL-1 Well site ...... 23 Photo 2-2: Matabari-1 Well Site ...... 23 Photo 2-3: Jhum Cultivation near Well KL-Dev-5 ...... 23 Photo 2-4: Well KL-Dev -3 Location...... 23 Photo 2-5: Gomati River...... 23 Photo 2-6: Rubber plantation within the Field ...... 23 Photo 2-7: Golachiba Lake...... 24 Photo 2-8: Brick Kiln near Kuwaifung Bazaar...... 24 Photo 2-9: KL-1 Well site ...... 27 Photo 2-10: Matabari-1 Well Site ...... 28 Photo 2-11: Proposed GGS Location ...... 28 Photo 2-12: Kl-Dev-1 well...... 29 Photo 2-13: KL-Dev 2 ...... 29 Photo 2-14: KL-Dev 2A location...... 30 Photo 2-15: KL-Dev-3A ...... 31 Photo 2-16: KL-Dev 4 location...... 31 Photo 2-17: KL-Dev 4A and KL-Dev4B locations (on each side of the road) ...... 32 Photo 2-18: KL-Dev 5 location...... 32 Photo 2-19: KL-Dev-7 location ...... 33 Photo 2-20: KL-Dev 7 A ...... 34 Photo 3-1: Community consultation in Purba Pillak...... 141 Photo 3-2: Community Consultation in Abhangachara Village ...... 141 Photo 3-3: Community Consultation in Paschim Daluma ...... 142 Photo 3-4: Community Consultation in Laogang ...... 142 Photo 3-5: Community Consultation in Taruimachhara ...... 142 Photo 3-6: Community Consultation In Chalita Bankul...... 142

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 xii JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

1 Introduction

1.1 BACKGROUND Kathalchari Field is part of AA-ONN-2002/1 Block for which PSC was signed on 6th Feb 2004. The block was awarded to a consortium of Gas Authority of India Limited (GAIL) having 80% share, and Jubilant Oil and Gas Private Limited (JOGPL) having 20% share. JOGPL is the operator of the Block. The overall area of the Block AA-ONN-2002/1 is 1260 km2 after relinquishment of 25% area in Phase-1. The EIA for the Block was conducted during 2008-09 and the Block was awarded Environmental Clearance from the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) dated 11th June, 2009 for exploratory and appraisal drilling. The Block is located in Dhalai, West Tripura, Gomati and South Tripura districts of Tripura. As part of the process JOGPL has drilled two (2) exploratory and two (2) appraisal wells in the Kathalchari Field. Based on the activities and studies carried out during exploration and appraisal period, JOGPL as Operator, has proposed to Directorate General of Hydrocarbon (DGH) to consider a 249 sq. km (approximately) of area as Development Area under “Kathalchari Field”. JOGPL now intends to drill development wells in Kathalchari Field. The development and testing of hydrocarbons, constructing Group Gathering Station (GGS) and laying of pipelines for hydrocarbon transportation as proposed in the Kathalchari Field Development Plan is included under activities specified in Schedule (Activity 1b) of the new EIA Notification dated 14th September 2006. It requires Environmental Clearance (EC) from the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF). JOGPL has submitted Form-1 of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification, along with a draft Terms of Reference (ToR) for EIA study to MoEF. MoEF has issued approved ToR. The approved ToR is attached as Annexure 1.1 and is in compliance with ToR presented in Table 1.1. SENES India has been entrusted with the task of conducting the EIA study for the proposed activities in the Kathalchari Field by JOGPL. Additionally, as a part of JOGPL’s Corporate Health, Safety and Environmental (HSE) Policy, - this EIA study will play important role in formulating appropriate control and management of environment related response(s) for the proposed development project. In this perspective SENES has strived to fulfill the Project objectives delineated in the section below.

1.2 OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY The objectives of the EIA study are as follows:  To establish the prevailing environmental and socio-economic condition of the Kathalchari Field Area and its surroundings;  To assess environmental and socioeconomic impacts arising out of the proposed field development activities;

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 1 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

 To recommend appropriate preventive and mitigation measures to eliminate or minimize pollution, environmental and social disturbances during the life-cycle of the project, ensuring compliance with environmental laws and regulation as applicable;  To identify and propose alternative action in terms of good practices that may help in abating environmental or socio-economic impacts due to the project;

1.3 SCOPE OF THE STUDY The basic scope for this study involves conducting an EIA study to understand the environmental and social impacts of the Project and recommend suitable preventive, and/or measure for mitigation actions through the Environmental Management Plan (EMP). The scope for the study finalized in ToR has been summarized below:  Undertake site visits for collection of primary and secondary information on environmental and social setting;  Formulate environmental monitoring plan and supervision of the onsite monitoring program as per plan;  Conduct public consultation;  Assess environmental and social impacts; and  Formulate EMP

1.4 STRUCTURE OF THE EIA REPORT The EIA report documents results and findings of the EIA study conducted by SENES. The subsequent sections of the report present description of project activities, environmental and social baseline scenario, impact and risk assessment that might arise during the lifecycle of the Project. Consequently, the EMP along with mitigation measures has been put forth to combat the adverse impacts on the environment. The content of the report is structured as follows: Executive Summary Chapter 1: Introduction Chapter 2: Description of the Project Chapter 3: Description of the Environment Chapter 4: Impact Assessment Chapter 5: Quantitative Risk Assessment Chapter 6: Environmental Management Plan Chapter 7: EIA Preparers

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 2 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

TABLE 1-1 : COMPLIANCE TO MOEF TOR Sl. No. ToR Points Issued Addressed with EIA 1. A certified report of the status of Certificate of the status of compliance of the compliance of the conditions stipulated in conditions stipulated in the Consent to Operate the environmental clearance and Consent for the ongoing /existing operation of the to Operate for the ongoing /existing project has been obtained from Tripura State operation of the project by the Regional Pollution Control Board and attached as Office of the Ministry of Environment and Annexure- 1.2 Forests and SPCB. JOGPL has also obtained compliance certificate report from Regional Office of MoEF, at and attached as Annexure- 1.3 in this report. 2. Executive summary of a project Included in the Report 3. Project description, project objectives and The objective of the project is safe extraction project benefits. of hydrocarbon by reentry into two existing wells along with drilling of more development wells. In addition to the re-entry and drilling of development wells, facilities will be constructed for hydrocarbon processing and transportation from wells to GGS. The Project benefits include augmentation to the growing demand of fuel source in the country. Direct and indirect benefits for the local people and finally creation or improvement of infrastructures. Details provided in Section 2.2 4. Site details within 1 km of the each Site details within 1 km of each proposed well proposed well, any habitation, any other is given in Section 2.7 and the figures are installation/activity, flora and fauna, placed in Figure 2.3. approachability to site, other activities including agriculture/land, satellite imagery for 10 km area. 5. Details of forest land involved in the JOGPL has identified locations of the proposed project. A copy of forest proposed wells along with alternatives sites. clearance letter, if applicable. However, some of the wells and alternative locations are on forest land. JOGPL will try to ensure drilling of wells on non-forest land but if well(s) are required to be drilled on forest land then JOGPL will drill such well after taking necessary permission of forest diversion. Provided in Section 2.3 6. Permission from the State Forest No wells and alternatives falls within and Department regarding the impact of the under 10 km radius of the National Park and proposed plant on the surrounding National Wildlife Sanctuary. However, forest land has Park/ Wild life Sanctuary /Reserve Forest/ been identified at four locations and Eco sensitive area, if any. Approval application of forest diversion has been filed.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 3 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Sl. No. ToR Points Issued Addressed with EIA obtained from the State/ Central Details of wells are pprovided in Section 2.8.2 Government under Forest (Conservation Act, 1980) for the forestland shall be submitted. 7. Distance from nearby critically/ severely There are no critically polluted area within polluted area as per Notification dated 13th 10km of Block boundary January, 2010, if applicable. 8. Does proposal involves rehabilitation and The project activities will not require any resettlement? If yes, details thereof. rehabilitation and resettlement of human habitation. 9. Details of project cost. An approximate cost of drilling 11 development wells with associated flow lines and GGS is estimated to be approx. INR 550 Cr. The details are provided in Section 2.16. 10. Details of facilities (GCS, OCS, disposal The GGS will be constructed near at of produced water, treatment facility etc.) Kuwaifung Bazaar. The produced water will to be developed/has been developed for the be treated in an Effluent Treatment Plant project. (ETP) and such treated water will be tested prior to reuse and alternatively released into stream. Provided in Section. 2.10 & 2.11 11. Environmental considerations in the Based on geological considerations, well sites selection of the drilling locations for which have been identified. However, alternative environmental clearance is being sought. analysis with certain environmental Present any analysis suggested for considerations have been undertaken. The minimizing the foot print giving details of alternative analysis details are given in drilling and development options Section 2.3 considered. 12. Baseline data collection for air, water and The baseline of air water (ground and surface) soil for one season leaving the monsoon and soil is provided in Section 3.1.2, 3.1.6 & season in an area of 10 km radius with 3.1.8 and 3.1.10 respectively centre of Oil Field as its centre covering the area of all proposed drilling wells. (i) Topography of the project site. Kathalchari Field comprises of a mix of low relief structures that are highly dissected, or flat topped denuded hills dissected by flat lands-lungas. Topography in detail is given in Section.3.1.4

(ii) Ambient Air Quality monitoring at 8 Results of Ambient air (PM10, SO2, NOx, locations for PM10, SO2, NOx, VOCs, VOCs, Methane and non-methane HC) Methane and non-methane HC. monitored at 8 locations in the Field reveal that all the values are below the Standards stipulated as per National Ambient Air Quality Standards. Provided in Section. 3.1.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 4 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Sl. No. ToR Points Issued Addressed with EIA (iii) Soil sample analysis (physical and Soil from Forest, rubber and agricultural land chemical properties) at the areas located at has been analyzed. This soil is acidic in nature, 5 locations. heavy metal contamination has not been found. Provided in Section. 3.1.10 (iv) Ground Water (GW) and Surface GW (6 sites) and SW (4 sites) were monitored Water (SW) quality in the vicinity of the at 10 locations. The parameters tested for proposed wells site. groundwater were within the acceptable limits of IS:10500, except for Iron exceeded the acceptable limits at all locations. Faecal coliform was not detected in any samples. The surface water monitored in Muhuri, Gomati, Kuwaifung and Manuji river indicates that the water quality of these water channels conform to Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) Class B,C,D and E quality water. Provided in Section 3.1.6 & 3.1.8 (v) Climatology and Meteorology Light to medium wind blowing from South- including wind speed, wind direction, East. Provided in Section 3.1.1 temperature rainfall relative humidity etc. (vi) Measurement of Noise levels within 1 The result of 24 hr noise level monitored at 8 km radius of the proposed wells. locations show that the ambient noise level is below the standards as stipulated for residential area. Provided in Section 3.1.3 (vii) Vegetation and land use; Animal The field is rich in biodiversity dominated by resources vegetation dominated by Cachar Tropical Evergreen Forest, Moist mixed Deciduous Forest without Sal, Moist, mixed deciduous forests, dry bamboo, brakes, Secondary moist bamboo brakes, East Himalayan lower Bhabhar Sal and Low alluvial savannah woodlands. Large herbivores and carnivores are absent. The flat lands are used for agricultural purpose, the degraded natural forest has been replaced by rubber plantation. Small settlements and roads connecting them from other landforms. In detail study is provided in Section 3.2. and 3.1.9 13. Incremental Ground Level Contamination Incremental GLC given in Table 4.6 in 4.2.2 (GLC) as a result of DG set operation. 14. Potential environmental impact envisages Potential Environmental Impacts envisaged during various stages of project activities during various stages of Project activities is such as site activation, development, given in Chapter 4. operation/ maintenance and decommissioning. 15. Actual source of water and ‘Permission’ JOGPL intends to buy water from authorized for the drawl of water from the Competent vendor as given in Section 2.10.3

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 5 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Sl. No. ToR Points Issued Addressed with EIA Authority. Detailed water balance, waste water generation and discharge. 16. Noise abatement measures and measures to Block is not located in Coastal Area. Noise minimize disturbance due to light and abatement measures and measures due to light visual intrusions in case coastally located. and visual intrusion are given in Section 4.2.3 and 4.2.1. 17. Treatment and disposal of waste water The treatment and disposal of wastewater is generated during drilling process. given in Section 6.1.2 18. Treatment and disposal of produced water Produced water will be treated in ETP as given in Sub section 2.12.2 19. Treatment and disposal of solid waste The treatment and disposal of solid waste generation. generation in Section 6.1.2 20. Disposal of spent oil and loose. The spent oil and loose will be sold to authorized Vendors Refer in Section 6.1.1 21. Storage of chemicals and diesel at site. The chemicals and diesel will be stored in an enclosed covered as given in Section 2.10.2 22. Commitment for the use of Water Based Water based mud will only be used as given in Mud (WBM) only Section 4.2.5. But eco-friendly synthetic mud will also be used if required. 23. Mud make up and mud and cutting The mud will be made up partly with recycled disposal – all options considered shall be water from Rig wash and fresh water and mud listed with selective option. cutting will be temporarily stored at High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) lined pits at the site. Later it will be disposed according to its hazardous and non-hazardous classification. Given in detail in Section 2.9.2 24. Hazardous material usage, storage All hazardous materials usage, storage, accounting and disposal. handling and disposal would be undertaken in compliance to the norms specified in Hazardous Wastes (Management, Handling & Trans-boundary Movement) Rules, 2008. 25. Disposal of packaging waste from site. The packaging waste will be segregated, stored and given to the local vendors. Refer Section 6.1.2 26. Oil spill emergency plans in respect of Oil spill emergency plan is given in Section recovery/ reclamation. 6.1.2

27. H2S emissions control. Earlier exploration shows the absence of H2S

in this Block. Though a H2S contingency plan exists for JOGPL that will come into action on

detecting H2S at any stage of drilling. 28. Produced oil handling and storage. Condensate oil and water is expected during separation. It is then stored in the storage tank

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 6 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Sl. No. ToR Points Issued Addressed with EIA for subsequent loading as given in Section 2.12.3 29. Details of scheme for oil collection system NA - Only Gas will be produced. along with process flow diagram and its capacity. 30. Details of control of air, water and noise NA - Only Gas will be produced. pollution in oil collection system. 31. Disposal of produced/formation water. Produced water will be generated in the proposed GGS. This water will be treated at the installed ETP and then discharged as per CPCB inland water discharge standards. Formation water will be contained in pits as given in Section 2.12.3 32. Whether any burn pits being utilized for Burn pits will not be utilized. well test operations. 33. Restoration and decommissioning plans Restoration and decommissioning plans given which shall include mud pits and wastage in Section 6.1.4 restoration also and documentation and monitoring of site recovery. 34. Measures to protect ground water and Use of low toxicity water based mud and shallow aquifers from contamination. proper casing and cementing of well will be done to prevent contamination of sub-surface aquifers Measures to protect groundwater and shallow aquifers given in Section 4.2.8 35. Risk assessment and disaster management Risk Assessment and Disaster Management plan for independent reviews of well- plan given in Chapter 5 designed construction etc. for prevention of blow out. 36. Environmental Management Plan. Environmental Management Plan and Monitoring Framework given in Chapter 6 37. Documentary proof of membership of Facility not available in Tripura common disposal facilities, if any. 38. Details of environmental and safety related Regular health checkup of personnel documentation within the company conducted as per Occupational Health including documentation and proposed Surveillance. Surveillance Safety Programs occupational health and safety Surveillance will be carried at regular intervals and Safety Programme for all personnel at site. documented. This shall also include monitoring programme for the environmental. 39. Total capital and recurring cost for Recurring cost for environmental control environmental control measures. measures has been calculated to be about INR 119.20 Lakhs. Provided in Table 6.3 40. A copy of Corporate Environment Policy A copy of Corporate Environment Policy

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 7 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Sl. No. ToR Points Issued Addressed with EIA of the Jubilant Oil & gas Pvt Ltd as per the given in Box 6.1 in Chapter 6 Ministry’s O.M. No. J-11013/41/2006- IA.II (I) dated 26th April, 2011 available on the Ministry’s website. 41. District wise Public Hearing and issues As the well locations falls under two raised and commitments made by the district therefore public hearing was project proponent on the same shall be organized by Tripura Pollution Control included separately in EIA/EMP report in Board in two district “South Tripura” and the form of tabular chart. “Gomati” on 29th and 31st December 2015 respectively.

42. Any litigation pending against the project No and or any direction/order passed by any court of law against the project. If so details thereof. 43. A tabular chart with index for point-wise ToR has been provided in Chapter 1, Table compliance of above ToRs. 1.1 The following general points should be noted: (i) All documents should be properly indexed, page numbered. (ii) Period/date of data collection should be clearly indicated. (iii) Authenticated English translation of all material provided in Regional languages. (iv) The letter/application for EC should quote the MoEF file No. and also attach a copy of the letter. (v) A copy of the letter received from the Ministry should be also attached as an annexure to the final EIA-EMP Report. (vi) The final EIA-EMP report submitted to the Ministry must incorporate the issues in his letter. The index of the final EIA- EMP report must indicate the specific chapter and page no. of the EIA-EMP Report where the above issues have been incorporated. (vii) ‘Certificate of Accreditation’ issued by the Quality Council of India (QCI) to the environmental consultant shall be

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 8 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Sl. No. ToR Points Issued Addressed with EIA included.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 9 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

2 Project Description

2.1 OVERVIEW OF THE PROJECT The Production Sharing Contract for Block AA-ONN-2002/1 was executed between the Government of India (GoI), Jubilant Oil & Gas Pvt. Ltd. (JOGPL) and GAIL (India) Ltd. on 6th February, 2004. The respective participating interests of JOGPL and GAIL are 20% (twenty per cent) and 80% (eighty percent), respectively. JOGPL being the Operator of the Block. Block AA-ONN-2002/1 is located in the central part of the state of Tripura. The Contract Area covered 1680 sq km. Post relinquishment of 420 sq km after Exploration Phase-I period, the current area is 1260 sq km. The Petroleum Exploration License (PEL) was effective from 7th April 2004. Gas discovery was made in the Kathalchari-1 (KL-1) and Matabari -1 well during Exploration Phase-1. The Kathalchari-1 discovery was further appraised. Based on the activities and studies carried out during exploration & appraisal period Declaration of Commerciality Document has been reviewed by Directorate General Of Hydrocarbon (DGH). JOGPL as Operator, has submitted the Field Development Plan to Directorate General of Hydrocarbon (DGH) to consider a 249 sq km (approximately) as Development Area.

2.2 DESCRIPTION OF DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT The development concept has been prepared for a total 11 development wells, installation of a GGS and in-field pipeline and a major pipeline to transport the hydrocarbon from GGS to buyer. The eleven (11) development wells planned in this project includes drilling of nine (9) new development wells, completion of two (2) existing wells (KL-1 and Matabari-1) drilled during exploration period. The entire project is planned to complete in two phase i.e. initial and subsequent phase. During initial phase, four (4) wells out of eleven (11) wells, are planned for drilling and based on drilling result, remaining 7 wells will be drilled in subsequent phase of field development. As some of the well locations falls on forest land therefore alternative analysis is conducted to minimize the ecological disturbances. Forest clearance application has been filed for the locations which are identified on forest land. Acknowledgement copy of forest clearance has been attached as Annexure-2.2. Detailed description of proposed wells and alternative analysis planned in initial and subsequent phases of field development are presented below: Description of Wells and GGS Proposed in Initial Phase of Field Development: Total four wells and GGS are proposed in initial phase of the field development. Out of four wells, two are existing wells “KL-1” & “Matabari-1” which were drilled in exploration phase while rest two are new development wells proposed for drilling. These locations are identified based on the detailed geological and geophysical survey’s findings. The permission of forest diversion will be obtained for locations which are identified on forest land such as

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 10 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari well “KL-Dev—1(Dev-37B)”, its alternatives and KL-Dev-2A. JOGPL has already applied for the forest diversion for these locations. Description of Wells with Tentative Locations and Proposed to Be Drilled in Subsequent Phase of Field Development: There are total seven wells planned for drilling in subsequent phase of field development plan. The location of these wells are tentative and their drilling will depend on the result of four development well’s drilling planned in initial phase of the project. The alternative analysis of these wells are also undertaken and presented in section 2.3

2.3 ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS Most of the well locations, identified on the basis of interpretation of geological and seismic data, have been identified to be falling in forest land, resulting in disturbance to flora and fauna due to forest diversion. During the site selection for wells and their alternatives, following criteria have been considered:  Forest Land,  Sensitive ecological habitats,  Settlements, schools/ hospitals,

 Water bodies Care had also been taken to locate the wells at a distance from the above mentioned receptors. As stated earlier, objectives are to avoid forest land and ecological sensitive area. In addition, alternatives have been identified. However, non-forest land i.e. private agricultural land could be identified for few locations only. Detailed description on environmental setting around wells and their alternatives (within 1 km) is presented in section 2.7. The wells and alternatives which are on forest land or locations for which private agricultural land could not be obtained, forest diversion permission will be obtained from Forest Department. JOGPL has already applied the forest diversion for the well KL-Dev-1 (Dev-37B), its alternatives (Dev-37A and Dev-34 A-1) and KL-Dev-2A. The detail of wells and their alternatives locations is presented in Table 2.2.

2.4 OBJECTIVES AND BENEFITS OF PROPOSED DRILLING ACTIVITY After the analysis of geological formation of the Kathalchari Field and estimation of hydrocarbon potential by drilling 2 exploratory wells and 2 appraisal wells, JOGPL now plans to drill development wells and setup facilities for processing and transportation of the hydrocarbon through pipelines in Kathalchari Field.

Project Objectives Objectives of the proposed drilling activities are summarized below:  To drill and extract hydrocarbons’ safely

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 11 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

 To construct facilities for hydrocarbon processing and transportation

Project Benefits JOGPL expects to augment the production of hydrocarbons in the present scenario of growing demand of oil and gas in the country. The neighboring village dwellers will benefit by direct or indirect means as this will result in jobs that will supplement their livelihood. The proposed project will also result in the improvement of existing infrastructure.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 12 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

TABLE 2-1: DETAILS OF PROPOSED WELLS , ALTERNATIVE WELLS & GGS Land Status as determined by Alternative Revenue Sl. Location Development Well Name Well Land Cover Department Panchayat District No coordinate Block/Tehsil Location and verified during Site visit A Details of wells and GGS proposed in initial phase of Field Development 1 KL-1 N-23°13'08.7" Pvt. Agricultural Pvt. Jote Land Purba Pilak Jolaibari South E-91°40'52.6" land Tripura 2 Matabari N-23°12'30.79" Pvt. Agricultural Pvt. Jote Land Taimura Jolaibari South E-91°42'46.76" land Kuwaifung Tripura 3 KL-Dev-1 (Dev- N-23°20'36.86" Forest land Forest Land Birendranagar Jolaibari South 37B) E-91°41'32.51" Tripura

DEV-37 A N-23°20'43.67" Forest land Forest land Birendranagar Jolaibari South E-91°41'50.29" Tripura DEV-34 A-1 N-23°21'04.64" Forest land Forest land Lawgansom Jolaibari South E-91°41'40.31" Tripura 4 KL-Dev-2 N-23°13'41.65" Pvt. Agricultural Pvt. Jote Land Purba Pilak Jolaibari South E-91°40'41.90" land Tripura KL-Dev-2A N-23°14'05.25" Forest Land Forest Land Purba Pilak Jolaibari South E-91°40'38.03" Tripura 5 GGS N-23°12'58.60" Pvt. Agricultural Pvt. Jote Land Purba Pilak Jolaibari South E-91°42'17.10" land Tripura

SENES/M-ESM-20241/ June, 2016 13 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Land Status as determined by Alternative Revenue Sl. Location Development Well Name Well Land Cover Department Panchayat District No coordinate Block/Tehsil Location and verified during Site visit B Details of Wells with tentative locations and proposed to be drilled in subsequent phase of field development 1 KL-Dev-3 N-23°10'26.72" Forest Patta land Forest Patta Uttar Taichhama Satchand South E-91°41'47.6" Land Tripura KL-Dev-3A N-23°10'20.11" Pvt. Agricultural Pvt. Jote Land Uttar Taichhama Satchand South E-91°41'58.72" Land Tripura

2 KL-Dev-4 N-23°12'29.65" Plantation Forest Patta Purba Pilak Jolaibari South E-91°40'45.23" Land Tripura KL-Dev-4A N-23°12'44.20" Pvt. Agricultural Pvt. Jote Land Purba Pilak Jolaibari South E-91°40'20.82" land Tripura KL-Dev-4B N-23°12'43.30" Pvt. Agricultural Pvt. Jote Land Purba Pilak Jolaibari South E-91°40'21.60" land Tripura KL-Dev-4C N-23°12'09.20" Pvt. Agricultural Pvt. Jote Tilla Taimura Jolaibari South E-91°41'04.4" land Kuwaifung Tripura 3 KL-Dev-5 N-23°19'57.46" Forest Patta land Forest Patta Lakkhichara Jolaibari South E-91°40'33.56" Land Tripura KL-Dev-5A N-23°20'19.30" Pvt. land Pvt. Jote Tilla Lakkhichara Joalibari South E-91°40'41.80" Tripura 4 KL-Dev-6 N-23°23'47.35" Forest Patta land Forest Patta Pachim Ekchari Karbook Gomati E-91°41'58.39" Land

SENES/M-ESM-20241/ June, 2016 14 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Land Status as determined by Alternative Revenue Sl. Location Development Well Name Well Land Cover Department Panchayat District No coordinate Block/Tehsil Location and verified during Site visit 5 KL-Dev-7 N-23°13'20.41" Pvt. Agricultural Pvt. Jote Land Purba Pilak Jolaibari South E-91°42'7.41" land Tripura KL-Dev-7A N-23°13'13.20" Pvt. Agricultural Pvt. Jote Land Purba Pilak Jolaibari South E-91°42'05.02" land Tripura 6 KL-Dev-25A N-23°23'3.844" Forest land Dense Forest Pachim Ekchari Karbook Gomati E-91°40'50.809" KL-Dev-26 N-23°22'57.037" Forest land Dense Forest Pachim Ekchari Karbook Gomati E-91°41'32.016" Gomati 7 KL-Dev-50A N-23°15'52.488" Forest land Forest Land Birendranagar Jolaibari South E-91°40'23.219" Tripura Dev-50A_Alt N-23°16'5.617" Forest land Forest Land Birendranagar Jolaibari South E-91°40'37.904" Tripura

SENES/M-ESM-20241/ June, 2016 15 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

2.5 FIELD LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION 2.5.1 Location The Kathalchari Field is located in the Gomati and South Tripura districts in Tripura. The Field is approximately 249 sq km in area. The geo co-ordinates of the Block are given in Table 2.1. The international boundary of is located at a distance of 4 km from the Block. The regional setting of the Kathalchari Field is given in Figure 2.1. The Kathalchari Field is also shown in satellite imagery in Figure 2.2. Apart from development wells, a GGS has been proposed within the Kathalchari Field. Approximately 150 km pipeline has also been proposed that will connect the proposed GGS with the proposed wells

TABLE 2-2: GEO -CO-ORDINATES OF THE KATHALCHARI FIELD

Point Latitude (N) Longitude (E) Deg Min Sec Deg Min Sec B' 23 3 14.00 91 40 42.00 C' 23 6 43.00 91 44 25.00 D' 23 23 2.00 91 43 0.00 D1 23 25 34.70 91 42 45.15 D2 23 30 54.20 91 39 34.39 B' 23 3 14.00 91 40 42.00

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 16 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

FIGURE 2-1: REGIONAL SETTING MAP OF KATHALCHARI FIELD

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 17 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

FIGURE 2-2: KATHALCHARI FIELD LOCATION MAP

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 18 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

2.5.2 Accessibility

Roads Kathalchari field can be accessed from the state capital by the NH-44 which connects the with Sabroom, the town located at proximity to the International Border of Bangladesh in . Northern portion of Kathalchari Field could be accessed from Udaipur town, which is the district headquarter of . Well KL- Dev-5, KL-Dev-1(Dev-37B) and their alternatives could be approached from Karbook. The other wells (KL-Dev-2, KL-Dev-7, KL-Dev-4), their alternatives and the existing exploratory well sites Kathalchari, KL-1and Matabari-1) could be approached from Kuwaifung Bazaar which is located at about 20 Km from the NH-44 and could be accessed from the NH near Jolaibari. KL-Dev-3 well and its alternative could be approached from Manu Bazar via. Manu Bankul and Chalita Bankul and is located at about 17 km from Manu Bazar.

Railways Broad Guage Railway line is under construction which will connect Sabrum in South Tripura District with Agartala & rest of the country via Lumding Guwahati therefore Railway Station is under Construction at Belonia in South Tripura District which is approximately 35 kms from the Development locations. Presently the nearest Railway station (meter guage) is at approximately 40 km from the Field. This station lies on the North East Frontier Railways connecting Agartala with Lumding. The road in North of Amarpur will lead towards Teliamura Railway Station via Bampur, Taidu, Teliamura.

Airport The nearest airport is Agartala domestic airport at Singerbil that is approximately 110 km away from the Field.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 19 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

FIGURE 2-3: KATHALCHARI FIELD ACCESSIBILITY MAP

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 20 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

2.6 KATHALCHARI FIELD SETTING Kathalchari Field is located at the south eastern side of Tripura. JOGPL plans to drill eleven (11) developmental wells in two phases. The plans also includes construction of a GGS facility and pipelines connecting well sites with the GGS. Key physical features of the Kathalchari Field have been shown in Figure 2.4 and are outlined below:  The Field has an area of 249 sq. km. having a length of approximately 50 km and width of 5 km. The Field is located within Gomati and South Tripura districts of Tripura. The international boundary of India and Bangladesh lies about 4 km east of the Field.  Entire Field area is undulating in nature having valleys or flat lands called lungas in between where agricultural lands and settlements are located. Major part of the Field area is also included under unclassified forest. A portion of the Field is included under the Baramura Debtamura Reserve Forest. Extensive rubber plantation is practiced at the forest areas (on forest patta land) within the Field. Jhum cultivation is also practiced extensively within the Field area.  Major settlements within the Field area are Purba Pilak, Baghmara, Ananta Sardar Para, Kuwaifung, Paschim Karbook, Kurmachhara, Paschim Daluma, Raibari, Tairuma Chhara, Birendra Nagar, Uttar Taichama, Chalita Bankul, Manu Bankul etc.  The major drainage channels within the Field are Gomati River at the north, Muhuri River at the central portion and Manu River at the south. These are also the major perennial channels within the Field. Apart from the major drainage channels, numerous small ephemeral channels are also observed within the Field area. In general the slope of the Field is towards east and south east.  The nearest ecologically protected areas close to the Field is Gomati and Trishna Wildlife Sanctuary. However, none of the well locations falls within 10 km radius of these wildlife sanctuaries.  No critically or severely polluted area is located within 10 km of the proposed field.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 21 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

FIGURE 2-4: FIELD SETTINGS OF KATHALCHARI FIELD

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 22 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Photo 2-1: KL-1 Well site Photo 2-2: Matabari-1 Well Site

Photo 2-3: Jhum Cultivation near Well KL-Dev-5 Photo 2-4: Well KL-Dev -3 Location

Photo 2-5: Gomati River Photo 2-6: Rubber plantation within the Field

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 23 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Photo 2-7: Golachiba Lake Photo 2-8: Brick Kiln near Kuwaifung Bazaar

2.7 EXISTING ACTIVITIES IN THE AREA The Block AA-ONN-2002/1 Production Sharing Contract was executed between the Government of India (GoI), Enpro Finance Private Limited (EFPL) and GAIL (India) Ltd. on 6th February, 2004. EFPL later changed its name to Jubilant Oil & Gas Pvt. Ltd. (JOGPL) with effect from 11th February, 2005. The respective participating interests of JOGPL and GAIL are 20% (twenty per cent) and 80% (eighty percent), JOGPL being the Operator. The Petroleum Exploration License (PEL) was effective from 7th April 2004. The PSC stipulated three Exploration Phases, with three consecutive years for Phase-I, two consecutive years for Phase-II and another two consecutive years for Phase-III. Exploration Phase-I period was effective from 7th April, 2004 to 8th July, 2010, including various extensions from time to time as per the PSC (Production Sharing Contract) guidelines. JOGPL has obtained EC from MoEF for drilling of 15 exploratory and appraisal wells in 2009 (vide letter J-11011/1109/2007-IA II (I) dated 11th June, 2009. During the Phase-I Exploration Period, the following work was done:  209.4 line kilometer of 2D seismic data were acquired, processed and interpreted  357 line kilometer of 2D seismic data were reprocessed  Geological mapping of 500 sq. km. area was carried out  Geochemical analysis of 502 samples was carried out  Three (3) exploration wells Jailungpara-1 (JL-1; TD 3260m MD), Kathalchari-1 (KL- 1; TD 3428m MD) and Ambasa N (TD 3493m MD) were drilled in the block. JL-1 and Ambasa N were drilled in the Atharamura anticline while Kathalchari-1 was drilled in the Tulamura anticline.  Gas discovery was made in the Kathalchari-1 (KL-1) well in the intervals 3370- 3392m MD and 3216-3220m MD within Middle Bhuban. A Notice of Discovery

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 24 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

(Format A) was submitted on 29th December, 2009. Format B to declare that the discovery is of potential commercial interest was submitted on 25th February 2010. Appraisal Program for Kathalchari discovery was submitted and was approved by the Management Committee. Two (2) appraisal wells were drilled in the Tulamura anticline. The first appraisal well Srikantabari-1 (SK-A1) was spudded on 18th July, 2011 and was drilled to a TD of 2973m MD. The second appraisal well Kathalchari-NE (KL-NE) was spudded on 21st February 2012 and was drilled to a TD of 3200m MD. 252.5 LKM of apparaisal 2D seismic has been acquired, processed and interpreted within the appraisal area. Apart from the same, reprocessing of old data was also done. The Declaration of Commerciality Document for Kathalchari was submitted to MC for review on 28th December 2012. MC has reviewed the document on 13th Jan 2014 and instructed Operator to submit the Field Development Plan. The Field Development Plan was submitted to DGH for approval on 12th Jan 2015. Phase-II Exploration Period was effective from 25th Jan 2012 to 07th June 2013. During Phase II following work was done: 1. 125 lkm of 2D Seismic was acquired, processed and interpreted 2. Drilling and testing of two (2) exploration wells a. Matabari-1 (TD 3287m MD) in Tulamura Area b. North Atharamura-1 (TD 3400m MD) in Atharamura Area Gas discovery has been made in the North Atharamura-1 (NA-1) well within the intervals 610-635m MD within Middle Bhuban (Object-II) and 2175-2195m MD within Lower Bhuban (Object-I). The details of the Discovery for Object-I & Object-II have been notified to MOP&NG/DGH and Management Committee (MC) on 27th May, 2013 and 31st May 2013 by the submission of Format A. Format B for Discovery in Lower Bhuban (Object I and IA) and in Middle Bhuban (Object-II) have been submitted on 29th July, 2013 and 4th July 2013. Appraisal Plan has been reviewed by MC and appraisal activities are under way to appraise the area.

2.8 WELL LOCATIONS AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTINGS 2.8.1 Location of Wells and Alternatives Total eleven (11) development wells are planned based on the geological formations that are most suitable to contain gas reserves. However, the preliminary locations (identified well locations) were found to be located in forest lands for most of the wells. In order to reduce the impact of drilling on the floral and faunal species, JOGPL has identified alternatives sites to the preliminary selected locations. Details of the preliminary well locations along with their alternatives lying within the Kathalchari Field are provided in Table 2.2. The detailed analysis of environmental setting and land cover are presented in section 2.7.2

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 25 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

FIGURE 2-5: WELL AND GGS LOCATION MAP

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 26 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

2.8.2 Environmental Settings of the Wells & Alternatives The environmental settings and land cover within 1 km of the wells, their alternatives and the Group Gathering Station (GGS) (study area) are analyzed with the help of comparative analysis of satellite imagery and land cover maps prepared by Tripura Space Application Centre (TSAC). In addition to the comparative analysis, land use was also verified by ground trothing and database of revenue department. The detailed description of findings are presented below and summarized in Table 2.1. The land cover of wells and their alternatives are also presented as Table 2.1.

Environmental Setting of Wells planned in Initial Phase of field Development

KL-1 Re-entry to this well site will be conducted as part of the proposed plan. The existing well site is located on private agricultural (private jote land) land surrounded by forest and hillocks on all sides. The site could be accessed from the road connecting Jolaibari with Kuwaifung Bazaar and then by a motorable non-metalled road (approximately 1 km) branching from the main road. The branch road was widened and strengthened by JOGPL during the exploratory drilling for movement of heavy vehicles. Nearest settlement of Purba Pilak is located at a distance of 0.5 km SW of the well site. A water body is located 0.1 km N of the well location. Land cover within 1 km area surrounding the well site primarily consists of evergreen and shrub forest, rubber plantation areas, scrub land, agricultural land and settlements.

Photo 2-9: KL-1 Well site

Matabari-1 Re-entry to the existing Matabari-1 will be conducted as part of the proposed development plan. The existing well site is on private agricultural land (private jote land) and is surrounded by agricultural land of Ananta Sardar Para (a hamlet of Tairumachhara) on all sides. Nearest settlement of Ananta Sardar Para is located at a distance of 0.2 km NE and NW of the proposed well site. The site could be accessed through a motorable village road and is about 5 km from Kuwaifung Bazaar. Land cover within 1 km area surrounding the well site primarily

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 27 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari consists of agricultural land, settlements, unclassified forestland. Rubber plantation in degraded forest areas is also practiced.

Photo 2-10: Matabari-1 Well Site

GGS The land for the proposed GGS has been identified at the agricultural land (private jote land) of Turma Kuwaifung (a hamlet of Purba Pilak village). Undulating hillocks enfold the valley in which the proposed location for the GGS is selected. Nearest settlement of Turma Kuwaifung and an English Medium Christian Primary School is located 0.08 km NW of the proposed location. Srikantabari High School is located 0.5 km south of the proposed location. A camp of Tripura State Rifles is located at a distance of 0.15 km NE of the location. The site could be accessed by the same motorable morrum road as for Matabari-1 and is located about 0.2 km from Kuwaifung Bazaar. Kuwaifung River flows 0.1 km west of the location from south to north. A large brick kiln is located 0.5 km NW of the proposed location. The land cover within 1 km around the GGS comprise of unclassified forest, scrub land, settlement and plantation on scrub forest land.

Photo 2-11: Proposed GGS Location

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 28 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

KL-Dev-1 (Dev 37 B): The proposed well location lies in Baramura –Debtamura reserve forest. The area could be approached by brick soiling road. The settlement of Raibari is located about 0.9 km SW of proposed location.

Photo 2-12: Kl-Dev-1 well There are two alternatives of KL-Dev -1(Dev 37 B) has been identified namely Dev – 37A and Dev -34 A-1. Both the alternatives falls under the Baramura – Debtamura reserve forest. The application of forest diversion has been filed for the well as well as alternatives. KL-Dev 2 The proposed location is situated at the agricultural land (private jote land) of Birendranagar. The site is located adjacent to the Jolaibari-Kuwaifung road. Nearest settlement of Birendranagar is located 0.07 km SW of the proposed location. Golachiba Lake is located 0.64 km NW. A small stream flows at about 0.17 km north of the site. Land cover within 1 km have unclassified forest with rubber plantation areas, agricultural lands, settlement and degraded forest land are also present.

Photo 2-13: KL-Dev 2

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 29 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

The alternative location KL-Dev-2A of well KL-Dev-2 is identified on forest land and forest application has already been filed. Receipt of forest clearance application is attached as annexure-2.2. The site can be accessed from the road connecting Jolaibari to Kuwaifung Bazaar by a morrum road branching off from the former approximately 2 km before Kuwaifung Bazaar. However, the site is located at the top of a hillock and do not have an approach road. A large waterbody, Golachiba Lake is located 0.4 km east of the site. Nearest settlement of Purba Pilak village is located 0.35 km SW. The land cover within 1 km shows the existence of primarily unclassified forest areas with rubber plantation in many parts.

Photo 2-14: KL-Dev 2A location

Environmental Setting of Wells planned in Subsequent Phase of field Development

KL-Dev-3 The site is located at the top of a hillock in forest patta land near Uttar Taichhama. Uttar Taichhama (via Uttar Chalita Bankul) can be accessed from NH-44 by a motorable road and is located 15 km from the NH. From Uttar Chalita Bankul the location could be accessed by a motorable village road, however, the site is located at the top of a hillock and do not have an approach road. Small settlement of Gobindapara (a hamlet of Uttar Taichhama) is located adjacent to the location. A small stream flows about 0.04 km east of the site along the base of the hillock. A church is located 0.8 km SE of the well site. Major land cover within 1 km of the well site consists of unclassified forest, rubber plantation areas, agricultural lands and settlements. The alternative location KL-Dev-3A is identified for well KL-Dev-3, is on agricultural land (private jote land) of Uttar Taichhama adjacent to the hillock in which the preliminary location of well selected. This location is at a distance of 0.4 km SE of the preliminary well location. The site can be approached by the motorable village road from Uttar Chalita Bankul as mentioned earlier. Settlement of Padmalochan Para (a hamlet of Uttar Taichhama) is located at a distance of 0.09 km NE of the site. A church is located at 0.8 km and Uttar Chalita Bankul SE School is located at 0.8 km south. Land cover within 1 km area

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 30 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari surrounding the alternate consist of unclassified forest land, agricultural land, settlements and rubber plantation.

Photo 2-15: KL-Dev-3A

KL-Dev-4 The proposed location is on the forest patta land which is being used for rubber plantation. The site does not have a direct access and the nearest settlement of Purba Pilak to the site is located 0.25 km SW. A stream flows at about 0.7 km south of the site from east to west. A waterbody is located 0.3 km south of the site. Major land cover within 1 km encompasses unclassified forest, rubber plantation, agricultural lands and settlements.

Photo 2-16: KL-Dev 4 location There are total 3 alternatives locations identified for the well KL-Dev-4. The alternate well locations KL-Dev-4A and KL-Dev-4B are situated on the agricultural land (private jote land) of Purba Pilak about 0.8 km NW of the preliminary location. The locations are selected on either side of the road connecting Jolaibari with Kuwaifung Bazaar; and located about 6 km from the later. The nearest settlement of Narayanpur (a hamlet of Purba Pilak village) located at a distance of 0.25 km NW of both the locations. A small stream is located adjacent to the

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 31 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari eastern site of Alternate Location 4B. Another stream is located 0.3 km NW of Alternate Location-4A. Major land cover within 1 km of the proposed alternative locations includes unclassified forest, rubber plantation areas, agricultural land and settlements.

Photo 2-17: KL-Dev 4A and KL-Dev4B locations (on each side of the road)

The third alternative location of well KL-Dev-4 is KL-Dev-4C and this location is situated 0.8 km SE of KL-Dev 4 at the agricultural land (private jote tilla) within the rural area of Purba Pilak. The Undulating hillocks surround the valley (where the well site is located) in which agriculture is practiced and rubber plantation is prominent at the hill tops. The site is located adjacent to the motorable village road.

KL-Dev-5 The proposed location is within the Baramura Debtamura Reserve Forest, about 20 km from the road connecting Shantir Bazaar to Durgabari Camp. The land identified for this well is forest patta land. The brick soling road extends upto Karbook on the other side. The study area revealed the presence of primarily reserved forest areas. The land cover within the 1 km surrounding the well site primarily consist of forestland and shifting cultivation.

Photo 2-18: KL-Dev 5 location

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 32 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

The alternate location identified for this well is about 0.7 km north of the preliminary location (KL-Dev-5) within the Baramura-Debtamura Reserve Forest. The well location is identified on private jote tilla. The area could be approached by the same brick soiling road as mentioned earlier. The settlement of Raibari is located about 0.9 km SW of the proposed location.

KL-Dev-6 The site is located on forest patta land. The land cover within 1 km of this location comprise of deciduous forest land and crop land. Settlement exist within the 250 m north of the well.

KL-Dev-7 The site is located at the agricultural land (private Jote Land) of Pawan Sardar Para (a hamlet of Purba Pilak village) and surrounded by forest land. The site can be approached from the Kuwaifung Bazaar by a morrum road and is about 2 km from Kuwaifung Bazaar. Few houses of Pawan Sardar Para is located 0.05 km NE of the proposed location. Tiruma nala is located 0.06 km N and Kuwaifung river is located 0.18 km N of the site. Land cover within 1 km primarily consists of unclassified forest area, rubber plantation areas, agricultural land and settlements. Undulating hillocks surrounds the valley (in which the well site is located) in which agriculture is practiced and rubber plantation is prominent at the hill tops.

Photo 2-19: KL-Dev-7 location

The alterative location KL-Dev-7A is identified at a distance of 0.23 km south of the preliminary location and this alternative location is on agriculture land (private jote land). Tiruma nala and Kuwaifung river is located at a distance of 0.3 km and 0.4 km north of the proposed location. Nearest settlement of Pawan Sardar Para is located 0.1 km. The site has similar land cover and land form as that of the preliminary location.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 33 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Photo 2-20: KL-Dev 7 A

KL-Dev-25A The site is located within the Baramura-Debtamura Reserve Forest. The site is located on forest land. The land cover within 1 km of this location comprise of deciduous and evergreen forest land. The site of alternative location KL-Dev-26 is also within the forest land in Baramura- Debtamura Reserve Forest. The alternative location on non-forest land could not be identified for the KL-Dev-25A well. The land cover within 1 km of this location consist of evergreen forest land.

KL-Dev-50A The site is identified on forest land. The drainages of Muhuri river flows at 500 m southeast and 700 m west of the well location. The land cover within 1 km of this location primarily consist of evergreen and semi evergreen type of forest, crop land and river. The alternative well location Kl-Dev-50A_Alt is also identified on forest land. The drainages of Muhuri river flows at 900 m southeast and 500 m west of the well location. The land cover within 1 km of this location primarily consist of evergreen and semi evergreen type of forest, crop land and river.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 34 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

FIGURE 2-6: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LAND COVER MAP Source of Land Visual Analysis of Land Cover Analysis Well Name Cover Analysis

Tripura State Application Centre Image

Well KL-1

Google Earth Image

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 35 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Agency Image Well Name

Tripura State Application Centre Image

Matabari-1

Google Earth Image

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 36 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Agency Image Well Name

Tripura State Application Centre Image

Well KL- Dev-1(Dev- 37B) Alternative: Dev-34A-1 Dev-37A

Google Earth Image

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 37 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Agency Image Well Name

Tripura State Application Centre Image

Well- KL- Dev-2 and KL-Dev-2A (alternative)

Google Earth Image

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 38 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Agency Image Well Name

Tripura State Application Centre Image

GGS

Google Earth Image

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 39 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Agency Image Well Name

Tripura State Application Centre Image

Well KL- Dev-3 and alternative - KL-Dev-3A

Google Earth Image

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 40 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Agency Image Well Name

Tripura State Application Centre Image

Well KL- Dev-4 and alternative - KL-Dev-4A, KL-Dev-4A,

Google Earth Image

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 41 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Agency Image Well Name

Tripura State Application Centre Image

Well KL- Dev-5 Alternative: KL-Dev-5A

Google Earth Image

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 42 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Agency Image Well Name

Tripura State Application Centre Image

Well KL- Dev-6

Google Earth Image

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 43 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Agency Image Well Name

Tripura State Application Centre Image

Well KL- Dev-7 Alternative: KL-Dev-7A

Google Earth Image

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 44 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Agency Image Well Name

Tripura State Application Centre Image

Well KL- Dev-25A Alternative: KL-Dev- 5A

Google Earth Image

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 45 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Agency Image Well Name

Tripura State Application Centre Image

KL-Dev-26 (alternative of KL-Dev- 25)

Google Earth Image

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 46 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Agency Image Well Name

Tripura State Application Centre Image

Well KL- Dev-50A Alternative: Dev-50A Alt

Google Earth Image

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 47 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

2.9 DEVELOPMENT WELL DRILLING The project activities related to development drilling of wells have been outlined in the following sections in the above sequence. 2.9.1 Site preparation and Access Road Construction Site preparation will involve all activities required to facilitate the transport and operation of the drilling rig and associated equipments and machineries. The different stages involved in site preparation are described as follows:

 Site selection  Land lease  Construction of approach road  Construction of drill site  Rig mobilization and rigging up

 Installation of support facility

Site selection The major consideration for the site selection is direct vertical access to geological formation. All locations were selected by JOGPL based on geological data available and generated during Exploration and Appraisal activities and based on the physical (terrain and access) suitability. Based on above geological consideration, the following environmental considerations were adopted during selection of drill site  Cognizance of human habitats with the intention for least disturbance and impact to human habitats. Away from organized human habitats.  Easy access to area of interest

Land Lease The land required for each new development well will be approximately 4 ha Two development wells will be drilled at existing exploratory locations of KL-1 and Matabari- 1 for which land has already been leased. Land for development well sites and GGS facility will be taken on long term renewable lease/permanent acquisition. In situations where the site lies in Forest Land, an application for diversion of land under Forest Conservation Act, 1980 becomes a pre-requisite for obtaining EC. Further, if the site lies in the patta land accorded as per The Scheduled Tribes and other Traditional Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006, an application under Recognition of Forest Rights, Act, 2006 for diversion of land has to be made to the Gramsabha and the resolution of the Gramsabha has to be submitted to Forest office for further chain of approval.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 48 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Total length of proposed pipeline is approximately 150 km. This pipeline will be laid below the ground. The land for laying the pipeline will be acquired on Right of Use (RoU) basis. The RoU width of the land on which the proposed pipeline will be laid will be 12 -15 m.. No resettlement issues are envisaged. Residential / built-up land will not be acquired for the proposed pipeline; hence rehabilitation and resettlement will not be associated with the project activities. Therefore, the proposed project does not involve any displacement of people. Along the entire stretch of pipeline alignment, the landowners will be compensated monetarily. The land for laying the underground pipeline will be used under the provisions of the Right of User of Land (Petroleum and Pipelines Act, 1962) as amended in 2011. The land ownership is permanently rested with the landowner and the owner of the pipeline has the right to use the land above the pipeline whenever required, however barring constructions and planting trees. Whenever maintenance of the pipeline needed to be undertaken during the crop period, the landowner will be compensated for the loss of any standing crops by JOGPL. There will not be major changes in the land-use pattern. The landowner, after the pipeline lying, is entitled to use the land for the purpose for which the land was put to use, immediately before the acquisition. This will not affect the economic status of the owner, as monetary compensation will be paid as per legislation. Forest Land & Forest Clearance The preliminary drilling locations were all within the unclassified forest land except for KL- Dev-6 that lies within the Baramura Debtamura Reserve Forest. As per Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 Forest clearance is necessary for using the land for drilling activities from the Forest Department. However, JOGPL is in the process for selection of alternate locations for each well sites at non- forest area. In case forestland could not be avoided, necessary clearance from the forest department would be undertaken prior to land acquisition for drilling. The people residing in the area are mostly tribals, moreover, their livelihood is also dependent on these forest land. Therefore, as per provision of The Scheduled Tribes and other Traditional Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act 2006, JOGPL has taken the proposed land (short term or long term lease) from the villagers who are presently cultivating the land. For development wells and GGS where the period of activity stretches for several years, long term renewable lease will be taken. The villagers will be adequately compensated for the above-mentioned period of activity and crop yield. Human Settlement and Resettlement and Rehabilitation(R&R) Issue The existing land use map and ground verification clearly shows no human settlement will be affected by proposed activity and no human settlement area also would be required to rehabilitate for construction of drill site, GGS and pipeline. Kathalchari Field Development Plan does not anticipate any R&R implications.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 49 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Construction of Access Road The Matabari-1 and KL-1 development drill sites will be drilled at the existing drill sites for which approach road already exists. The preliminary well locations are all located in forest land and almost all of them do not have approach roads. In case drilling is planned at the preliminary locations approach road to the sites would have to be constructed. It is envisaged, the approach roads would also be within forest lands and for that also Forest Clearance as per Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 would have to be taken by JOGPL. The approach roads for the GGS would be located within Private Jote land. The villagers dependant on the agricultural land that would be diverted for approach road construction would have to be compensated for permanently acquisition and crop compensation. The preliminary alignment of the proposed new approach roads for the alternative well locations and GGS reveal that, there are no settlement. Therefore, construction of new approach road will not require resettlement of any household.

Construction of Drill Site Fencing: The proposed well site will be duly fenced to a height of about 2 m using chain link and barbed wires to restrict unlawful entry into the site. Top Soil Scraping: The depth of the top soil of the entire drill site will be gauged, scraped and stored in designated top soil storage site for future use (site reclamation and rehabilitation). Construction of Drill Platform Once the top soil removal process is completed, the entire drill site will be elevated and leveled and compacted. Drill sites may require filling of earth to elevate the drilling platform based on local topography and High Flood Level (HFL). Quantity of fill material required for each drill sites depends upon the site elevation and HFL. Fill material will be met from excavated material for pit required for drill site and balance amount will be sourced from authorized quarry area. Pits will be required for storage of mud, drill cutting, waste water, formation water, etc. These are as follows:  Construction of cellar pit 3m X 3m X 3 m for installation of well head and BOP  Construction of 1 HDPE lined pit of dimensions 30’X 33’X 5’ at well site for temporary storage and disposal of drill cutting and waste mud  Construction of 2 HDPE lined pit of dimensions 30’X 33’X 5’ for temporary storage and disposal of drilling wash water  Septic tanks and Soak pits will be constructed to dispose the faecal waste and wastewater and sewage respectively at the drill site.  Construction of Bunds & Storm Water Drains: The soil excavated from the pits will be used to build a raised bund/embankment bordering the periphery of the drill site. A storm water drain is constructed before the bund. Oil-water separator and silt-trap will be constructed at one end of the storm water drain.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 50 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

 Construction of Drill Pad: A flat rectangular/square drilling site (pad) of 15m x 15m m (approximate) at site to facilitate drilling and testing of hydrocarbons will be required. Reinforced Cement Concrete (RCC) will be used for the construction of foundation system. For the construction of a drill site, a total of about 100 tonnes of cement, 100 tonnes of sand, and 100 tonnes of stones will be procured from local dealers.

Rig Mobilization and Rigging up A rig building process will follow the site preparation activities. This process involves transport of rig and auxiliary equipments, assembling of various rig parts and equipment to drill a well. The rig including auxiliary equipments and camp facilities will be transported in approximately 60 trailer loads. Once the drilling rig is assembled, thorough rig inspection will be carried out to check equipment working capability and quality standards. The rig will have various allied equipments like mud tanks, mud pumps, compressors, fuel tank, DG sets etc. Well spudding is the start of drilling activity. Cellar Pit will be drilled to a desired depth based on well design. After drilling Cellar Pit, it will be cased with a pipe and this process is called “Casing”. Casing provides support to hole wall and secures hole section. Other than that, it isolates problematic hole sections such as loss zones, shale sections, over pressurized formations etc. After running casing, space between hole wall and “Casing” will be cemented. This process of drilling and casing the hole section continues until the final well depth (3500 m) is achieved. Lengths and diameters of each section of the well are determined prior to drilling and are dependent on the geological conditions through which the well is to be drilled. Once each section of the well is completed, the drill string is lifted and protective steel pipe or casing lowered into the well and cemented into place.

Installation of Support Facility

To support the drilling operation, the following systems and services will be included at the rig package:  Environmental Protection – Blow Out Prevention (BOP) system, wastewater treatment unit, cuttings handling equipment. 2.9.2 Drilling and testing of well The exploitation of hydrocarbons require the construction of a conduit between the surface and the reservoir. This is achieved by the drilling process. The well will be drilled using a standard land rig or a “Mobile Land Rig” with standard water based drilling fluid treatment system. This rig will be suitable for drilling up to the desired depth of 3500 meters as planned for the project. The typical configuration of a Drilling Rig is shown in the Figure 2.7. Drilling is a temporary activity which will continue for about 45-60 days for each well in the

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 51 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari block. The rigs are self-contained for all routine jobs. Once the drilling operations are completed, and if sufficient indications of hydrocarbons are noticed while drilling, the well is tested by perforation in the production casing. This normally takes 2-3 days. If the well is found to be a successful hydrocarbon bearing structure, it is sealed off for future development, if any.

FIGURE 2-7: TYPICAL DRILLING RIG CONFIGURATION

Additionally, there will be other ancillary facilities like drilling mud system, ETP, Cuttings disposal, drill cementing equipment, etc. and utilities to supply power (DG sets), water, fuel (HSD) to the drilling process and will be set up as a part of the project.

Mud System and Cuttings During drilling operations a fluid known as drilling fluid (or ‘mud’) is pumped through the drill string down to the drilling bit and returns between the drill pipe –casing annulus up to surface back into the circulation system after separation of drill cuttings /solids through solids control equipment. Drilling fluid is essential to the operation and helps in controlling

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 52 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari downhole pressure, lift soil/rock cuttings to the mud pit, prevent cuttings from settling in the drill pipe, lubricate, cool and clean the drill bit amongst other functions. Drilling Mud: It has been decided that a uniform water-based mud system will be used in all the wells. Unlike an oil-based mud system, usage of water-based mud will not pose higher risk of contamination to subsurface formations and will be easy to dispose off the fluid and cuttings. The ingredient of water based drilling fluid is given in Figure 2.4. Drill Cuttings: Mud used during the operation will flush out formation cuttings from the well hole. These cuttings will be separated from the drilling mud by thoroughly washing. Cuttings will then be stored in the HDPE lined pits and after completion of the drilling activities, cuttings will be tested for hazardous nature and based on nature of the drill cuttings, final disposal pathway will be finalized by JOGPL. The total amount of cuttings produced during the entire drilling period is projected to be about 750-850 m3. Once the cuttings have been separated, the drilling fluid will be reused or processed after further treatment in a Chemically Enhanced Dewatering (CED) system designed to remove suspended solids that are too fine for mechanical separation in solids control package producing inlet particles called ‘flocs’. The flocs will be removed in the decanting centrifuges and the resultant sludge disposed off in High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) lined pits. The cleaned waste water will also be stored in HDPE lined pits and disposed off, after testing and any necessary treatment, to meet the regulatory requirements. The whole process by which the drilling fluid will be reused during the drilling operation is commonly known as a “closed loop system.” This system is ideal for drilling operations in sensitive environments as it cuts down immensely on the total water consumption for the formulation of drilling mud and also saves on the consumption of chemicals. Figure 2.8 shows the schematic layout of the drilling waste management. Figure 2.9 shows the drilling fluid circulation system which is designed to enable the drilling fluid to be recycled and maintained in good condition throughout the operation. Various components of the drilling mud will be selected carefully to be able to provide desired properties to the mud. Mud chemicals will be added to the uniform mud system to adjust the mud properties and ensure fluid loss control/circulation, lubricity, shale inhibition, pH control and pressure control in the well during drilling. Storage of Chemicals: Chemicals required for the preparation of drilling fluid will be stored in the drill site. The storage area will be paved and bunded and will be provided with a shed.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 53 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Drilling Operation

Drilling mud separation in Drill cuttings plus drilling shale shaker mud

Drilling mud reused

Washed & oil free drill cuttings to HDPE lined drill cutting pit

Drill cutting washing

Disposal after testing & treatment to Washed waste water to HDPE

meet regulatory requirement lined waste water pit

FIGURE 2-8: DRILLING WASTE MANAGEMENT

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 54 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

FIGURE 2-9: TYPICAL DRILLING FLUID CIRCULATION SYSTEM

Cementing Programme Cementing is a necessary aspect of drilling oil and gas wells. Cement is used to  Secure/support casing strings  Isolate zones for production purposes  Solve various hole problems Cementing generally utilizes Portland Cement (API Class G Oil Well Cement) with various additives in small quantities as accelerators/retarders, density adjusters, dispersants, fluid loss additives, anti-gas migration additives, etc.

Well Testing Between drilling operations for different zones, logging operations are undertaken to provide information on the potential type and quantities of hydrocarbons present in the target formations. Technicians employed by a JOGPL/specialist Logging Service Company will be entrusted with the job of well logging. Logging instruments (sensors) will be attached to the bottom of a wire line and lowered to the bottom of the well. They are then slowly brought back, the devices reading different data as they pass each formation and recording it on graphs, which can be interpreted by the geologist, geophysicist and drilling engineer. There are no emissions to the environment associated with wire line logging operations. The radioactive source required for well logging operations will be kept in specially designed container.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 55 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

2.9.3 Well Decommissioning

Well Abandonment On completion of activities, the wells will be either plugged or suspended. In the event of a decision to suspend the well, it will be filled with a brine solution containing very small quantities of inhibitors to protect the well. The well will be sealed with cement plugs and few wellhead equipment (Blind Flange) left on the surface (Cellar). After the development activities the well will be sealed with a series of cement plugs, all the wellhead equipment will be removed leaving the surface clear of any debris and site will be restored. In case JOGPL strikes hydrocarbon, the well head will be connected to flowlines that will connect the wells with the GGS at Kuwaifung Bazaar. An area of 50x150m around the well head will be cordoned with iron cage barricades. The remaining land will be restored and either returned to the owners from whom the lease was obtained or retained as per the futuristic requirement of JOGPL.

Site Closure and Decommissioning After completion of the drilling activity, partial de-mobilisation of the drilling rig and associated infrastructure will be initiated. As discussed earlier, well testing may be carried out immediately after the drilling is completed or about 3 months depending on initial evaluation timing. This will involve the dismantling of the rig, all associated equipments and the residential camp, and transporting it out of the project area. It is expected that demobilization phase will last about 10-15 days and will involve the trucking away of materials, equipments and other materials from site to bring it back to preliminary condition. It is estimated that about 60 truckloads will be transported out of site during this period. Subsequently, following steps will be typically involved to restore and rehabilitate the area:  The wellhead and all casing string will be cut off to a minimum depth of 3 m (10 ft) below ground level.  All concrete structures will be broken up, and the debris disposed off as per the regulatory requirements.  Drill cuttings and drill mud will be treated as per G.S.R 546 (E) dated 30th August 2005 to render them harmless.  Drilling wastewater including drill cuttings wash water shall be collected in HDPE lined disposal pit, evaporated and treated and shall comply with the S No. 72, Schedule I-Standards for Emission or Discharge of Environmental Pollutants from various industries.  All fencing and access gates will be removed.  All pits whose contents will show regulatory compliance for on-site disposal, at the time of site closure, will be backfilled and closed out as per the legal requirements.  Restoration of unusable portion of the access track, removal of pilings

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 56 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Site Restoration All abandoned drill sites will be restored back to its near preliminary condition. After decommissioning of site, it will be de-compacted and the embanked top soil will be overlain on the de-compacted site with certain moisture conservation measures and seeding of leguminous plant for restoration soil nutrient level naturally.

2.10 UTILITIES AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS Drilling programme requires the following common facilities: 2.10.1 Power requirement and generation The drilling process requires movement of drill bit through the draw works which require power. The electricity requirement for the project activities is high and continuous once drilling begins. Hence the dependency is more on DG sets. Total power requirement for drilling would be 2000 KVA. The power requirement will be met by using the three Diesel Generator Sets each having a capacity of 1000 KVA throughout the project period of which 2 would be kept running and 1 would be kept standby. The exhaust stacks of the DG sets are likely to vent the emissions. In addition to that lighting and other power resource will be met though 125 KVA DG set.

2.10.2 Fuel Consumption, Supply and Storage It is estimated that about 3 KLD HSD per day will be required to power the off-road construction equipment and vehicles during site preparation phase. During the drilling phase, consumption about 4-7 KLD of HSD will be required. Out of this, a major part, about 85% will be consumed by the rig and about 15% will be required for the campsite. Fuel will be supplied onsite by local supplier through mobile tankers. Fuel in excess approximately 47 KL (7 day’s reserve) will be stored at onsite storage facility as per Petroleum Rules, 2002. In case the storage exceeds the threshold limits specified in the Petroleum Rules, 2002, JOGPL will comply with the relevant provision of such rules. 2.10.3 Water Requirement Approximately 12 KLD water will be required for construction and 8 KLD for workers during construction phase. The water requirement in a drilling rig is mainly meant for preparation of drilling mud apart from washings and domestic use. While the former two activities consume the majority of water requirement, the water requirement for domestic use is very less. The daily water consumption will be 75 KLD during drilling and testing of wells. 40 KLD will be used for mud preparation, 28 KLD for rig washing and 7 KLD will be used for domestic purposes.

Water Source and Permission Water will be sourced from contractors after validating their permission from concerned authorities.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 57 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

A provision for storage of about 375 KLD of water (5 days water requirement during peak period) will be made on site. Potable water requirement at site will be met through packaged drinking water. In addition, a water storage pit of around 1000 KL is proposed to store water for fire water supply the likely source being surface water. The water balance diagram is provided at Figure 2.10. 2.10.4 Manpower The drilling rig will be operated by approx 50 persons on the rig at anytime. The manpower will operate in two shifts with continuous operations on the rig. This will include technical experts (including expats), who will be responsible for various drilling related activities and some local workmen who will be hired from nearby villages for the entire duration of the project. Technical staff will be housed in the Drilling Camp Site which will be adequately supported by facilities like kitchen, wash rooms, laundry, etc.

FIGURE 2-10: WATER BALANCE DIAGRAM

Water sourced from surface water source (75 KLD)

28 KLD

7 KLD

40 KLD

Rig wash Mud Domestic Use Preparation

16.8 KLD

Treated at ETP to conform with CPCB

5.6 KLD discharge standards

Septic tank

and soak pit

15.2 KLD

Recycle and Reuse

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 58 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

2.11 PIPELINE LAYING It is planned to lay approximately 150 km pipeline connecting the well sites with the proposed GGS. The diameter of the pipeline would be of approx.4 inch. RoU required for the pipeline would be of 12-15 m. The laying of pipeline from connecting the well sites with the proposed GGS will involve various sequential activities. The pipeline laying will be conforming to the guidelines specified under OISD Standard “OISD-STD-141- Design & Construction Requirements of Cross Country Hydrocarbon Pipelines”. The construction details regarding the laying of pipeline have been discussed in detail below 2.11.1 Working Corridor Preparation A detailed route survey will be undertaken to document the existing condition of the pipeline route and the access roads before starting the construction work. These records will be used as the standard against which the quality of the restoration work will be judged when the construction work is completed. The exact route of the pipeline will first be pegged out, while simultaneously staking out the width of the work strip on both sides of the route. Efforts will be taken to align the route of the pipeline along the existing road. Obstructions such as walls, fences and paths will be disturbed to the minimum amount necessary for safe working. Records of buried underground utilities such as drains, OFC cables etc will be prepared and existing third party services will be located, marked, and either safeguarded or diverted. Warning posts will be erected for overhead cables, and temporary crossing points clearly identified. 2.11.2 Topsoil and Vegetation Removal The existing Right of Use (RoU) area will be cleared off vegetation and other obstacles such as boulders. Stripping of top soil will be undertaken and will be stockpiled in the form of a continuous ridge along the edge of the strip. Required height of top soil will be maintained to prevent depredation of the soil and will be kept free from disturbance to reduce the possibility of physical damage and compaction. The work strip will then be made level, using typical construction site machinery to eliminate irregularities, large stones, tree stumps and other features. 2.11.3 Pipe Hauling and Fabrication The pipes will be transported to the site from the pipe yard along the existing roads. The selection of access road for pipeline transportation will be based on prior study to minimize adverse effects on the local traffic and commuters. The pipes transported through trucks will be offloaded using the side booms and strung adjacent to the trench. Trailers and cranes will be used for the maneuvering of pipes. No pipe or other material shall be strung along the RoU before all clearing and grading operations have been carried out. However necessary care will be taken during stringing to prevent any possible disturbance to the surrounding land use.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 59 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

2.11.4 Trenching and Boring The pipeline sections will be installed in separate, parallel trenches which will be excavated using mechanical excavators straddling or running alongside the pipeline trench. The width of trench shall be such that a minimum clear distance of 200 mm for trench in normal soil and 300mm for trench in rock is maintained between edge of pipe and the trench wall at the bottom of trench. Pipelines shall be buried below ground level, unless construction above ground is found to be desirable for exceptional technical, economic or topographical reasons. The pipeline will be generally buried to a minimum depth of 1m however in case of rivers/water bodies, which are prone to scour and erosion, adequate safe cover (minimum 1.5 meter) shall be provided below the predicted scour profile expected during the life time of the pipeline. Further details regarding minimum cover for buried have been discussed in section 7.3.3 of the OISD-STD-141. 2.11.5 Bending & Welding The pipe will be bent using a bending machine to the appropriate angle to match the vertical and horizontal alignment of the trench. Following alignment, they will be joined together using both automatic and manual welding equipment along the length of the pipeline. The process is likely to be carried out inside a mobile shelter that covers the section that is being welded and worker group involved, thereby controlling the environment under which the weld is made. All welds will be subject to Non Destructive Examination (NDE) prior to application of the field joint coating. 2.11.6 Pipeline Lowering Following weld NDE and field joint coating of the welds, the joined pipeline sections will be carefully laid in their individual, parallel trenches. This operation will be completed using side boom tractors in a continuous operation. In rocky or uneven ground where the potential for pipe coating damage exists, the trench bottom will be given a protective bed of sand. 2.11.7 Backfilling The pipe trench will be backfilled in the reverse order in which it was excavated, and where possible, using the same soil that was taken from the trench. In areas where the backfill material is deemed likely to damage the pipe coating due to the presence of rocks or stones, sand will be used to protect the pipeline. Backfilling will be completed by covering the trench with topsoil from the previously established stockpile. To minimize damaging exposure of the excavated soils while they are in storage, the trench will be back-filled as early as possible after each pipeline section is installed, so creating a single, continually advancing work-front. 2.11.8 Reinstatement After re-grading of the work strip to reflect the original ground profile, it will be de- compacted using bulldozers to spike and drag the soil in all directions, followed by spreading of the remaining topsoil over the entire surface. Large stones and debris will be removed prior to topsoil replacement. The final step in the restoration process will be the

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 60 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari reconstruction of walls, fences and other such features that may have been affected by the works. After re-instatement, the area will be monitored and maintained, as required, over a fixed period until normal growth patterns are re-established. 2.11.9 Pipeline Markers After re-instatement, the only visible evidence of the pipeline will be marker posts placed along the route for future monitoring and line walking purposes. The posts will be installed at a maximum distance of 250 m to 300 m, depending on the type of terrain. Each marker will have line of sight to its previous and following marker. 2.11.10 Construction Considerations – Major Water Crossings With proposed pipeline likely to traverse through nalas, canals and rivers (Gomati and Muhuri) appropriate construction techniques viz. Open Cut and/or Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD) is likely to be utilized by JOGPL. In this regard specific work procedures and method statements will be developed and implemented by JOGPL to prevent and/or minimize any potential significant impact on the water bodies. 2.11.11 Manpower Requirement for pipeline laying It is estimated that 100 laborers and contractor personnel are likely to be involved during the project construction phase. A temporary rest room/shelter will be made available for the workforce at the terminals and pipeline spread during construction phase.

2.12 GROUP GATHERING STATION The Group Gathering Stations (hence forth GGS) are meant for Gas/Water/Condensation separation and associated gas treatment and compression. GGS will be constructed at Turma Kuwaifung village (a hamlet of Purba Pilak village) on approximately 4.0 ha of land. The land is presently used for agricultural purpose. 2.12.1 Construction of GGS Trees and permanent structures do not exist in the site proposed for construction of GGS. . Therefore, tree felling and any demolition will not be required. The following sub-activity will be carried out for construction of new drill sites: Fencing: The proposed GGS facility will be duly fenced to a height of about 2 m using RCC structure and brick wall to restrict unlawful entry into the site. Top Soil Scraping: The depth of the top soil of the entire site will be gauged scraped and stored in designated top soil storage site for future use (plantation around the GGS). Site Elevation Once top soil removal process is completed, the entire site will be elevated, leveled and compacted. The site may require filling of earth to elevate the drilling platform based on local topography and High Flood Level (HFL). Quantity of fill material required for the site depends upon the site elevation and HFL. Fill material will be sourced from authorized quarry area.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 61 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

2.12.2 Project Components A brief description of the Facilities at GGS is given below. A Process Schematic Diagram of Group Gathering Station is shown in Figure 2.11. 2.12.3 Scope of facilities The facilities will consist of wells connected to one Group Gathering Station (GGS) located within the Kathalchari Field. In addition to two existing wells – Kathalchari-1 and Matabari It is envisaged that two (2) more development wells will be drilled in Phase-I. GGS along with in field pipelines, with a capacity of 20 MMscfd are designed for production from two new development wells and two existing wells i.e. Kathalchari-1 and Matabari-1. Provision will be kept to connect future wells after sucess of phase-1. The success of development wells in Phase-I will establish the higher potential coupled with high plateau production rate. After successful execution of Phase-I, a revised FDP will be submitted. DELIVERY POINT The gas will be delivered at outlet flange of the GGS Facilities. DESIGN PARAMETERS Based on the development approach, it is planned that a total number of 4 wells shall be connected to the facility via manifold through various pipelines in first phase which can extend up to 11 in subsequent phase. The well fluid will be first routed to a three-phase inlet separator from manifold, where condensate and water from the gas is separated at a pressure of 63.07 bars (900 psig). The approximate length of the pipeline between all wells and GGS is expected to be 150 kms.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 62 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

FIGURE 2-11: LAYOUT OF KATHALCHARI DEVELOPMENT WELLS , GGS AND IN FIELD PIPELINES

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 63 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

After separating the liquid, the gas will be sent to a JT Valve Skid, where refrigeration obtained by pressure reduction shall be used to achieve the Gas Dew Point. This cooling effect can be further amplified by using the cooled gas to pre-cool the inlet gas. As part of this process, before pressure reduction in the JT valve, the gas from the inlet separator is pre- cooled using the liquid and cold gas product streams in two exchangers within the JT Valve skid. The gas will then be passed through the JT Valve to get a downstream pressure of 45.52 bar (660.2 Psig) and a temperature of -1.089 ⁰C from where it will go to a Cold Separator where gas and liquid will be separated. The gas, after exchanging heat with the incoming stream, will be sent out as export gas in 10” pipeline. The operating temperature and Dew Point of export gas is found to be 24.46⁰C and 8.4⁰C. The liquid from Cold Separator, after exchanging heat with the incoming stream in the JT skid, will be sent to LP separator along with the condensate from the inlet separator to separate gas, liquid and water. The condensate from LP separator will be stored in storage tank for subsequent loading into the road tanker. The water from inlet separator and LP separator will then be sent to Produced Water Tank for storage. This water from the Produced Water Tank will be treated. The flash gas from inlet separator, LP separator, storage tanks of condensate and produced water shall be continuously fed to flare system where it will be burned safely. All the vents will be connected to the flare header. The signals from each pipeline shall be indicated in the GGS facility control room in case of low pressure or high pressure, if any. Based on this, the Operator will take action as required and decide whether remote or manual intervention is needed. The export gas may not require the compressor facility as the pressure can be regulated based on battery limit requirements within the facility. The process flow diagram is given as Figure 5-2. WELL HEAD FACILITIES Gas from X-Mas tree will be routed to gas pipeline connecting well locations to GGS. PROCESS FACILITIES AND UTILITIES The following sections include a brief description of Process Facilities and Utilities at the GGS, as envisaged in this study. In general, the GGS will comprise of Manifold area, Process Area, Office building, fire water tanks and associated pumps. The Layout of GGS is given as Figure-5-3. Manifold Area This is the space where the interconnecting pipelines from different wells join the manifold header. The manifold shall consist of One High Pressure (HP) header, One Test header and One Flare header. The pressure and temperature of each well will be available from each flow line connected to the Header. Each well can be connected to any header i.e. HP, Test or Flare Header as per requirement. Process Area: The Process area shall consist of the following:

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 64 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

i. Separators: Gas from each well shall be routed to any of the two separators i.e. HP or Test Separator for three-phase separation of Produced Water, Condensate and Gas. Gas from Inlet Three Phase Separator (HP Separator) will go to JT Skid through Pressure Control Valve (PCV). Condensate from Inlet Three Phase Separator will flow to LP Separator and produced water will flow to Produced Water tank.

ii. The well-flow from one or more wells, for which detailed analysis and flow measurement is required, shall be diverted to the Test separator. In this way, the behavior of each well under different pressure and flow conditions can be defined. The separated components from the separator will be analyzed in the laboratory to determine hydrocarbon composition of the gas, condensate and produced water.

iii. JT Skid: The JT Skid consists of Gas/Liquid Exchanger, Gas/Gas Exchanger and a Cold Separator. The gas from the Inlet Three Phase Separator which enters the JT Skid will be used for reducing the pressure of the gas by passing through a Joule Thomson Valve and thereby chilling the gas. More liquid will separate when the gas is cooled. This liquid shall be separated from the gas in the Cold Separator. Further, cold temperature in both streams can be utilized to cool the incoming gas to the skid so that a still lower temperature will be attained leading to optimum separation of liquid from gas. Gas Dew Point of less than 10 degrees will be achieved in the JT Skid to meet the pipeline specifications before the gas is sent for export. The Joule Thomson valve is actually a control valve which controls the pressure of the outlet stream to a set point based on flow and consequently attains a definite amount of cooling. A Methanol Injection skid shall be provided at JT Skid to prevent hydrate formation in the system which otherwise plugs the equipment, pipes and pipeline.

iv. LP Separator: The condensate from the JT Skid and from the Inlet Three Phase Separator enters the LP Separator (a three phase separator) which separates the condensate, water and the gas phases. A pressure transmitter will be provided on the separator. The pressure in the separator is maintained by means of a pressure control valve. A provision for continuous venting will be given in the Three Phase Separator; the excess over-pressurized gas will be directed to a Flare Header through the PCV. Two LCV’s shall be provided – one on condensate line and the other on the produced water line to control the levels in the separator.

v. Storage Tanks: The condensate and produced water from the HP separator and LP separator will be sent to their respective Storage Tanks. To release the excess pressure from each tank, two PVRV’s shall be provided – one on the condensate storage tank and the other on the produced water. Two on/off valves will be provided in the inlet of each of the tank to control the level of the tanks by sensing through the level transmitter provided on each of the tanks.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 65 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

vi. Instrument Air: An individual Instrument Air Compressor with instrument air distribution network will be provided to facilitate instrument air requirement at wellhead, pipelines and GGS facility respectively.

vii. Instrument air compressor package will consist of two air compressors (one duty and one standby), air intake filters, air coolers, wet air receivers, air dryer, filter, dry air receiver and all necessary connected instrumentation. A dew point analyzer shall be provided at the outlet of instrument air dryer to measure the quality of air. viii. The Instrument Air will be used for operation of Electro Pneumatic Instruments like LCVs, PCVs, Shut-Down Valves (SDV) and various setting alarms. The Instrument Air Compressor PLC at wellhead and GGS facility shall be interfaced with control room provided at GGS facility. The Air Compressor local control panel will be skid mounted type and will be located in the air compressor room.

Flare KOD The gas from the Manifold Header and equipment will be diverted to the Flare Header in case of any process abnormality or due to popping of any pressure safety valve and also, during depressurization of any vessel for maintenance reasons. The Flare Gas will flow to the Flare Header. Knock-Out Drum (Flare KOD) will be provided where liquid droplets will be collected and transferred to the collection pit. Flare The gas from the Manifold or Separators will be diverted to the flare in case of any process abnormality or due to popping of any pressure safety valve. Elevated flare with remote ignition facility shall also be provided for safe disposal of the gas. Export Gas The moisture free gas from JT Skid will be metered through a Flow Meter and supplied to the consumers. Gas Chromatograph will be installed to measure the energy content of the sales gas. Electrical Room Electrical room will consist of main MCC panel, main circuit breakers, changeover switches and shockproof rubber mats etc. There will be provision for electrical isolation of electrical equipments, in case of any maintenance activity to be carried out. High Masts will also be provided for the illumination of the entire GGS. Diesel Generator Shed The Generator Set will be designed to start automatically on power failure of TSECL and feed the selected loads. The regulation or regenerator voltage will be automatic and necessary instruments for metering shall be included in control panel.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 66 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Security Accommodation This area will consist of barracks and office of the post commandant for the security personnel stationed at GGS. Administrative Building This area will consist of conference room, In-charge room, instrument laboratory and material store room. Control Room: The monitoring and controlling of the process parameters of the entire plant will be done from the control room. The control room will contain all the important panel instruments required for safe startup, shutdown and smooth operation of the plant. The control panel shall consist of mimic of the plant, enunciator, Single Loop Controllers, Multi Channel Electronic Indicators, Electronic Pen Recorder, Integrator Cum Totalizer, Flow Computer, Relay based Interlocking Circuits, Dual Channel active Zener Barrier, Push buttons for Start, Stop and Emergency Shutdown, Selector Switches and Data Acquisition System (DAS). The Hydrocarbon Gas Detector Panel and Fire Alarm Panel will also be located inside the control room. For providing uninterrupted power supply to the critical areas, UPS with necessary bypass arrangements per standard UPS module will be provided. The UPS will provide power to the instrument panel. A SCADA system for monitoring process parameters of the plant will also be installed in the control room. This will consist of UPS with back up batteries. For providing adequate cooling for the instrument panels in the control room A/Cs will be provided. Produced Water Produced Water from facilities shall be sent to Effluent Treatment Plant for treatment and treated water will be tested to meet the requirement of discharge standards prescribed for oil drilling and gas extraction industry. The treated water meeting the discharge standards will be discharged to nearby water streams. The maximum estimated quantitiy of produced water over the period of 20 years will be 102 m3/day whereas minimum and average quantity will be 47.5 and 84.5 m3/day respectively. 2.12.4 Fire Water Pump House The Fire Water Pump House shall consist of the following: 1. Diesel Fire Water Pump 2. Electrical Fire Water Pump 3. Electrical Jockey Fire Water Pump Condensate Loading Area Condensate storage tanks with condensate transfer pumps will be located in this area. The condensate shall be transferred through transfer pumps to the truck/tankers.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 67 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Drainage and Sewage Disposal The Process area will be provided with a network of surface drains to cater to the 20-year maximum intensity of rainfall expected in the area. The process drains will be closed type and will be kept segregated from the storm water flows. Rain water flows from the area, which may be potentially contaminated due to the facility operation, will be routed to the process drain through suitable valve/isolation gate control. A check oil trap will be provided near the outlet of the storm water drain. Arrangements will be made to divert the storm water for rain water harvesting. Drains from the Pig Launcher/Receiver’s, Manifold and from other sources in GGS facility will be collected and routed to the required destination as per requirement. Drain connections will be provided for all the equipment's and piping in the GGS facility. Sewage from the toilets of the buildings will be connected to either septic tanks / soak-away system or provided treatment in a package sewage treatment plant. The treated sewage will be used for greenbelt development. Fire Fighting Facilities The overhead tanks with containment provisions will be provided with water spray system and other firefighting provisions like portable fire extinguishers, sand filled buckets, fire water tank, fire water pumps, jockey pumps, fire hydrants, monitors firewater rings, etc as per NFPA/OISD Standards. For gas leak detection, Gas Detectors in the facility will be placed at different locations. The tanks will be grouped so as to provide optimum containment arrangement and prevent any spills and leaks to spread throughout the tank farm area.

2.12.5 Resource Requirements

Power The power requirement will be met from the State Electricity Power Grid. An Emergency backup of 300 KVA DG set will be kept in the facilities. In general, all facilities will have the necessary electrical energy receiving, distribution, earthing and control systems. The systems will be designed and operated to international safety norms for gas field installations.

Manpower Requirement It is estimated that 150 labourers and contractor personnel is likely to be involved during the project construction phase. A temporary rest room/shelter will be made available for the workforce at the terminals and pipeline spread during construction phase.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 68 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

FIGURE 2-12: PROCESS SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF GGS

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 69 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

2.13 POLLUTION SOURCES AND CHARACTERIZATION 2.13.1 Noise and Vibrations Noise will be emitted from drill site during site preparation, drilling and decommissioning phases. The major noise generating operations from the proposed activity during drilling, testing are operation of rotary drilling equipment as part of rig, diesel engines for power generation, mud pumps and operation of vehicles. Noise during the site preparatory phase will primarily be contributed by heavy construction machinery operating on site and vehicular sources for constructing the facilities for wells, GGS and pipeline. Average noise emission ranges for different types of construction machinery are provided in Table 2.3.

TABLE 2-3: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT NOISE LEVELS Sound Level At Operator (in decibels) Equipment Range Earth Moving Equipment Front End Loader 85-91 Back Hoe 79-89 Bull Dozer 89-103 Roller 79-93 Truck 89-103 Material Handling Equipment Concrete Mixer <85.0 Crane/Hydra <85.0 Derrick 97-102 Air Compressors 35-38 Source: British Columbia, “Construction Noise,” Workers Compensation Board of BC 2.13.2 Air Emissions Air emissions from point sources expected from the proposed drilling will be mainly from combustion of diesel in the diesel engines and power generators which will be operated to meet power requirement of the drilling rig and the campsite. The principal pollutants will comprise of Particulate Matter (PM), Sulphur and Nitrogen Dioxides (SO2 and NO2) and other Hydrocarbons (HC). The quantity of High Speed Diesel (HSD) consumed during construction and drilling will be in order of 3 KLD and 4-7 KLD per well site. Additionally, the flaring and burning of gas during the testing of well and from GGS will also lead to the release of some pollutants including un-burnt hydrocarbons to the atmosphere. Some fugitive emissions of dust and air pollutants from vehicular exhaust will also happen during the project lifecycle, mostly during the construction and decommissioning activities. Additionally, there will be re-entrainment of dust from the approach road leading to the site mainly during the dry season.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 70 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Analysis of natural gas generated earlier from the wells drilled in the area reveals absence of hydrogen sulfide. If hydrogen sulfide is found then contingency measures will be taken as outlined in the safety protocol and in accordance to Industrial Best Practice. 2.13.3 Liquid wastes During the drilling operations, drilling wastewater generated (approximately 9 m3 per day) as a result of rig wash and dewatering of spent mud and washing of drill cuttings will be treated and reused and recycled. Effluents from, floor washings, pump, seal leakages, spillages will comprise of chemical ingredients of drilling fluid thereby rendering effluent to be polluted. The characteristics of drilling and wash wastewater will be primarily dependent on type and composition of drilling fluid used for drilling. As JOGPL is proposing the use of water-based drilling mud, the potential for contamination of such waste water is significantly lower. The drilling wastewater will contain spent drilling fluid generated as a result of washings. The rig wash water and drilling wastewater generated is proposed to be collected in a wastewater pit (constructed at the drilling site. Domestic waste water generated (about 5.6 m3 per day for the drilling camp) will be treated through a soak pit/septic tank arrangement. The quantities of the liquid wastes, their characteristics and anticipated disposal methods are given in Table 2.4.

TABLE 2-4: LIQUID WASTES GENERATED DURING DRILLING AND THEIR DISPOSAL Waste Type Quantity Disposal The water will be adequately treated in an ETP to Drilling and Wash 16.8 m3 per day ensure conformance to the CPCB onshore oil and wastewater gas extraction industry effluent standards 5.6 m3 per day from Domestic wastewater Septic tank followed by soak pit drilling site 2.13.4 Effluent Generation, Treatment and Disposal The drilling waste water around 400-500 m3 will be generated during the entire drilling period from rig wash and dewatering of spent drilling mud. To ensure that effluent from the project comply with the waste water discharge standards as mentioned in the S No. 72 A (ii) Schedule I Standards for Emission or Discharge of Environmental Pollutants from Oil Drilling and Gas Extraction Industry of CPCB, a mobile Effluent Treatment Plant will be installed. The plant would be capable of handling 125 m3/day of drilling effluents. Domestic waste water generated (about 5.6m3 for the drilling camp) will be treated through a soak pit/septic tank arrangement. 2.13.5 Solid and Hazardous Waste Streams The different solid and hazardous waste streams generated during drilling and their disposal methodology has been presented in Table 2.5.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 71 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

TABLE 2-5: WASTE STREAMS GENERATED DURING DRILLING AND THEIR DISPOSAL Waste Type Quantity Characteristics Disposal Kitchen Waste 25 kg Organic waste Will be stored in compost pits on per day (Non HW) daily basis. Drill Cuttings 750-850 Mainly Inert material Drill cuttings will be disposed off in m3/ well Consisting of shales, a well-designed pit lined with sands and clay; about impervious liner located on site as 1% of drilling mud. per S No. 72 C.1.a Schedule I (Non HW) Standards for Emission or Discharge of Environmental Pollutants from Oil Drilling and Gas Extraction Industry of CPCB as modified in 2005. Waste Drilling 400-500 Barite, Bentonite and The mud will be tested for hazardous Mud m3/well Traces of contaminants and will be disposed as (Fluid) Heavy metals (HW) per S No. 72 C.1.a Schedule I Standards for Emission or Discharge of Environmental Pollutants from Oil Drilling and Gas Extraction Industry of CPCB as modified in 2005 Acid – Lead 2 – 3 Lead – Acid (HW) Will be recycled through the vendors Batteries Batteries supplying acid – lead batteries as per required under the Batteries (Management & Handling) Rules, drilling of 2001. well Used oil 3 m3/well Used & Waste oil Will be collected in metal drums kept in secured dyked area & disposed as per Used Oil rules in approved used

oil recycling facility Recyclables Depending - Proper segregation and storage of viz. packaging on usage recyclable waste in designated bins wastes, paper, onsite. Recyclables will be plastic, periodically sold to local waste packaging recyclers. wastes

2.14 DRILLING HAZARDS Loss of well control / blow-out, fire, explosion and oil spills are the major potential hazards associated with drilling for oil and gas. Effective response plans to foreseeable emergencies will be developed by JOGPL and communicated to the project teams. A risk assessment to be carried out as part of this EIA will also contribute towards identification of hazards, risks and formulating management plans for emergency response, blowout, oil spills.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 72 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

2.15 HSE POLICY JOGPL is committed to protecting environment, health and safety of the people who may be affected, directly or indirectly by its operations. The Drilling Management System (DMS) framework lays down the corporate Health, Safety and Environment Policy for the entire organization and the range of operations it undertakes as a part of oil and gas exploration and development. The overall corporate health environmental safety policy of JOGPL may be supplemented by a local policy document whenever so required. It is understood that JOGPL will formulate a local site level policy taking from the parent corporate policy of JOGPL to adequately address the environmental impacts of the proposed drilling projects in Kathalchari Field through the DMS.

2.16 PROJECT COST 2.16.1 Development Well Drilling and Pipeline Laying Based on JOGPLs previous experience of drilling in the area, cost for drilling for of 11 wells (including well site construction and site decommissioning), will be approximately INR 550 crores estimating 50 crore for drilling each well. 2.16.2 GGS and Ancillary Infrastructure Construction The cost of GGS and ancillary facilities have been estimated at INR 72 crs.

Adopted from PFR report for Kathalchari Field

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 73 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

3 Description of the Environment

This chapter describes the existing environmental settings around the development wells located in Kathalchari Gas Field and its immediate surroundings. Entire block is comprises of the area that comes under two districts – Northern part of this block falls in Gomati dist. and Southern portion comes under South Tripura dist. The description of existing environmental setting includes the physical environment comprising air, water and land components, the biological environment, and socio-economic environment. Attributes of the physical environment like air, water, soil, and noise quality in surrounding area were assessed primarily through monitoring and analysis of samples collected from field. Air, traffic and noise primary monitoring was carried out by Cleenviron Private Limited (CPL), Rourkela (a NABL certified laboratory); water and soil monitoring were conducted by Mitra S. K Pvt. Ltd (also a NABL certified laboratory). All monitoring at field were undertaken under the guidance and supervision of SENES personnel during pre-monsoon season of 2014. Information about geology, hydrology, prevailing natural hazards like floods, earthquakes etc. have been collected from literature reviews and authenticated information made available by government departments. Surveys were carried out to understand and record the biological environment prevailing in the area and the same was verified against published information and literature. The socioeconomic environment has been studied through consultations with various stakeholders in the villages within Kathalchari Field. Additionally, socioeconomic data have been obtained from the Census of India reports. To conduct the baseline survey to describe existing environmental setting, area that is adjacent to proposed well locations and falls within the field boundary of Kathalchari block was taken as study areas. If any deviation or expansion was made in study area in any section for better understanding of existing environmental settings, the same has been mentioned in the subsequent section of this chapter. The study area to draw baseline environmental scenario is shown in Figure 3-1.

3.1 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT 3.1.1 Climate & Meteorology Climate and meteorology of a place can play an important role in the implementation of any developmental project. Meteorology (weather and climate) plays a key role in understanding local air quality as there is an essential relationship between meteorology and atmospheric dispersion involving the wind speed/direction, stability class and other factors. The state of Tripura enjoys a typical climate with variation ranging from sub–tropical to temperate conditions in hilly areas. Thus this blocks fall under the 1humid sub tropical climate zone

1 Tripura State Pollution Control Board Report

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 74 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari with warm. It indicates that climate of this block is characterized by moderate temperature and is highly humid in nature.2

Seasons The climate of Tripura exhibits a strong seasonal rhythm. The following are the well-defined seasons of the region:  Pre-monsoon : March-May  Monsoon : June- September  Post-monsoon : October- November  Winter : December- February

However, among these four seasons, pre-monsoon, monsoon and winter seasons can be distinguished easily. Based on the analysis of meteorological data of IMD station at A.D. Nagar ( District) for pre–monsoon season, 2014 the temperature profile, rainfall pattern relative humidity, wind speed and wind direction of the region have been discussed below3.

Temperature The4 temperature of the State shows a declining trend from west to east. This phenomenon can be attributed to the increase of height in eastern part of Tripura and increase in distance from Bay of Bengal. The summer in the state of Tripura is intense. Cold weather starts from about the end of November when the temperature of both day and night decreases steadily. January is the coldest month of the year. The highest5 temperature recorded from the monitoring conducted by IMD at A.D. Nagar weather monitoring station, Agartala during pre-monsoon was 39.5⁰C and the minimum temperature recorded during this period was 12.7⁰C. Relative Humidity The relative humidity of the state stays at higher side throughout the year. In summer, the relative humidity lies between 50 to 74 percent where as during rainy season it goes beyond 85 percent. The maximum and minimum relative humidity is 85 percent and 57 percent in the month of July and January respectively6. Rainfall

2 Ground Water Information Booklet South Tripura District, Tripura, Central Ground Water Board, March 2012 3Automatic Weather Station (AWS, Virtual Electronics Company; Serial No.AWS – 4) was used for meteorological study 4State of Environment Report of Tripura, 2002. 5Tripura Disaster Management, Govt. of Tripura, website: http://sdmtripura.nic.in/tripuradm.htm 6 “Tripura Towards Prosperity” Government of Tripura, Dept. of Agriculture, March 2011 - http://agri.tripura.gov.in/links/sov.pdf

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 75 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Analysis of rainfall pattern is of great importance since after rainfall the runoff from different areas through narrow rain-fed drainage channel, get discharged into eventually big streams or in rivers. The rainfall pattern in Tripura varies not only from place to place but also between seasons. Tripura experiences very heavy rain from June to September/October from the South West Monsoon. The rainfall is at higher side at southern and northern side of the state of Tripura7. Winter seasons in Tripura are mostly dry. The annual average rainfall of the State is 212.28 cm. with on an average, 92 numbers of rainy days. The IMD data collected from A.D. Nagar showed that total rainfall for the pre-monsoon season, 2014 was 75mm. Wind Speed and Wind Direction The wind speed and wind direction of an area influences the dispersal of pollutants from a point and non-point sources. As the proposed drilling and testing activities involve the operation of point (DG sets), line (vehicular movement on road network) and non-point pollutant emissions sources, analysis of wind speed and direction data is considered important for predicting the air quality impacts based on pollutant dispersion. Analysis of climate data collected from A.D. Nagar observatory for April for past 30 years (1971-2000), revealed average wind speed of 1.5 to 4.5 m/ hour. However, in some occasions during this span of time, wind speed was 4.5-7 m/ hour.

FIGURE 3-1: WIND ROSE DIAGRAM FOR PRE MONSOON SEASON

7 http://tsac.tripura.gov.in/tsac/index.html 8 Tripura Disaster Management Authority, website: http://tdma.nic.in/V_Flood.htm

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 76 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

3.1.2 Ambient Air Quality Primary monitoring of the existing air environment was undertaken in Kathalchari Field to establish existing baseline ambient air quality within the proposed Field. Location of the proposed wells and the predominant wind direction was given importance in selection of the ambient air quality sampling stations as any gaseous and particulate emissions from the project activities will disperse based on the predominant wind directions and affect the receptors located at downwind. The analyzed values for the pre project ambient air environment can be compared during and after the completion of project activities to find out deterioration in local air quality if any. The major sources of air emission at this field will be likely to come out from hydrocarbon development and production, GGS, vehicular movement, and emission from adjacent areas etc. During field survey, burning of remnants of previous crop-cycle on the slope of small and denuded hillock was observed and this practice was done for soil preparation for next cycle of ‘Jhum’ cultivation. As per observation made during site visit, ‘Jhum’ cultivation is very common in this Field, It was also observed that most of the people living in this block are using either wood or coal for cooking purpose. Ambient air quality monitoring was conducted in eight different locations present within the Kathalchari Field. The monitoring was conducted during pre- monsoon season, 2014 and the scope of this monitoring was to capture existing ambient air quality in the block, especially at proposed wells and at their adjacent areas. Parameters such as PM10, SO2, NO2, methane hydrocarbon, non-methane hydrocarbon, VOC were monitored in compliance with approved ToR obtained from MoEF.

Rationale for selection of the monitoring locations DG set emission and release of hydrocarbons from wells during construction and operation phase are two major sources of pollutants. Beside these, activities associated with JOGPL well construction such as site preparation activity, movement of vehicles on earthen road, fugitive emission from vehicular movement, flaring activity etc. will also contribute certain amount of pollutants in ambient air around well location. All these pollutants from different sources could affect the nearest human settlements and their direction of dispersion depends on prevailing wind direction that changes from season to season. Thus in Kathalchari Field, ambient air quality monitoring stations are placed at settlements in both upwind and downwind direction of wells/ well cluster. The ambient air monitoring stations located to the upwind direction of well were selected to assess the existing baseline level of pollutants present in the ambient air. The sampling location at downwind direction of wells, were selected to assess the existing baseline air quality of that area which will likely to be impacted from the air pollutants that may come out from activities pertaining to the well development and from sources located at upwind. The result of this monitoring can be compared with the air quality after initiation of project activity to assess any deterioration in the ambient air of sampling locations. Apart from the aforesaid reasons of selecting an ambient air quality

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 77 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari monitoring station, other criteria are availability of electricity, accessibility etc. Rationale for choosing ambient air quality monitoring station has been incorporated in Annexure 3.1.

Air quality monitoring was carried out during the pre-monsoon months of 2014. The number of monitoring stations and parameters (PM10, SO2, NO2, methane hydrocarbon, non-methane hydrocarbon, VOC) for monitoring were based on the approved ToR obtained from MoEF. Monitoring was conducted 24 hours a day twice a week for the aforesaid parameters. A respiratory dust sampler (APM 460 DX, Envirotech Instruments Pvt. Ltd; Sl No. 17-DATE-

E-2001) was used for sampling of PM10, SO2 and NO2. Benzene sampler (AAS 172, Ecotech Instruments Sl. No. 10-A-01) was used for sampling of VOC, methane and non-methane hydrocarbon. The ambient air quality locations are shown in Figure 3-2. The concentrations of various pollutants were processed for different statistical parameters like arithmetic mean, minimum concentration, maximum concentration and percentile values. Detailed ambient air quality results are presented in Figure 3-3.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 78 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

FIGURE 3-2: LOCATION OF AIR, NOISE, METEOROLOGY AND TRAFFIC MONITORING LOCATIONS WITHIN KATHALCHARI FIELD

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 79 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Interpretation of Air Quality Results

Particulate Matter (PM 10): The 24 hourly average of PM10 at different monitoring locations ranged from 38.1 µg/m3 in Keshabchandrapara to 89.5 µg/m3 in Anantasardarpara (Figure 3 3.3). The average PM10 concentration at all monitoring stations were less than 100 µg/m as stipulated by National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). Detailed results has been given in Annexure 3.2.

FIGURE 3-3: AVERAGE PM 10 VALUES AT THE MONITORING LOCATIONS

Nitrogen di-Oxide (NO2): The 24 hourly average of PM10 at different monitoring locations ranged from 13.4µg/m3 in Tejmukpara to 24.3 µg/m3 in Keshabchandrapara (Figure 3.4). All the values monitored across 8 monitoring locations were found to be below the National standard of 80 µg/m3. The in-detail results are given in Annexure 3.2.

Sulfur di-oxide (SO2): The 24 hourly average of PM10 at different monitoring locations ranged from 3.6 µg/m3 in Tejmukpara to 6.6 µg/m3 in Keshabchandrapara. All the values monitored across 8 monitoring locations were found to be below the National standard of 80 µg/m3. The in-detail results are given in Annexure 3.2.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 80 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

FIGURE 3-4: AVERAGE NO2 VALUES AT THE MONITORING LOCATIONS

FIGURE 3-5: AVERAGE SO2 VALUES AT THE MONITORING LOCATIONS

Methane and Non- Methane Hydrocarbon: Mean values of methane ranged from 16.4ppmv in Gunarajpara to 24.1ppmv in Anantasardapara. Mean values of non–methane Hydrocarbon ranged from 5.6ppmv in Gunarajpara to 9.9ppmv in Anantasardapara. The presence of methane is majorly due to the presence of marshy lands near the monitoring sites. Volatile Organic Carbon (VOCs):

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 81 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

The mean value of VOC ranged from 1.5 ppmv to 2.6 ppmv in TurmaKuwaifung. Presence of VOC in ambient air could be attributed to incomplete combustion of fossil fuel used in vehicles – both roaming on NH 44 and on village road and presence of leakage in natural gas distribution systems.9

TABLE 3-1: AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONITORING RESULT

if

Sl.

Name of howai N

ung ara

nkul

mukpara

Pollutants para

o. a

Daluma

Paschim

Gunarajpara

Tej

Nabarampara

Uttarchalitaba

Keshabchandra Turmak Anantasardarp Particulate matter 1 (<10 µm) in 69.67 68.50 71.92 93.50 82.42 79.67 84.42 76.67 µg/m3 Particulate matter 2 (<2.5µm) in 34.67 34.67 38.00 57.50 40.17 43.50 42.50 44.50 µg/m3 Sulphur dioxide 3 3 6.11 6.18 6.37 7.18 6.64 9.03 6.37 5.86 as SO2 in µg/m Nitrogen dioxide 4 3 35.51 32.36 31.99 44.16 36.65 37.14 34.53 33.95 as NO2 in µg/m Hydrocarbon as 19.2 22.4 16.4 16.8 16.5 19.7 24.1 19.3 5 Methane in ppm Hydrocarbon as 6 Non methane in 7.3 8.7 5.6 4.8 6.6 7.1 9.9 7.1 ppm 7 VOCs (ppm) 2.2 2.1 2 1.5 2.6 2.2 3.3 2.2

3.1.3 Ambient Noise Quality The ambient noise monitoring was conducted during pre monsoon season of 2014 at 8 locations within Kathalchari Field. Baseline monitoring was conducted to assess existing noise level in human settlements in proximity to the proposed well locations that might get affected from noise generation due to drilling and other activities pertaining to project. Major factors that were considered during selection of the noise monitoring stations were, distance between wells from nearest settlements which are likely to be impacted from project activity, presence of any anthropogenic activity in the Field that can interfere with the noise that will be generated from project activity, prevailing wind direction and possibility of natural attenuation of noise due to distance from source, presence of vegetation and hillocks etc. To comply with the approved ToR, these noise monitoring locations were selected within one

9 http://www.air-quality.org.uk/04.php

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 82 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari km radius of proposed well or based on the availability of human settlements that are likely to be impacted. Existing sources of noise in Kathalchari-Gas Field has been incorporated in the Table 3-2.

TABLE 3-2: SOURCE OF NOISE IN KATHALCHARI FIELD Sl. Name of the Monitoring Existing Noise source No. location 1 Paschim Daluma This sampling location was selected in the vicinity of Dev 2. Major source of ambient noise were movement of vehicles on the village road and other anthropogenic activity. 2 Keshabchandra Para This sampling location was selected near to Karbook market. Major source of ambient noise were movement of vehicles to and fro Paschim Daluma, activities in Karbook market etc. This noise monitoring point is present on the access road to Matabari well. Thus activities associated with this well are likely to impact ambient noise level of this area. 3 Gunarajpara No major source of noise was present in this sampling point adjacent area. However, this area is likely to be impacted from the activities associated with the proposed well number Dev2S and proposed GGS. 4 Nabarampara This sampling point was located at downwind direction to Dev2S and is likely to be affected from the activities associated with this well especially during construction phase. 5 Turma Kuwaifung Local market and movement of vehicles- to and from nearby villages and other anthropogenic activities, movement of CRPF vehicles, road and bridge repairing activity were some of the major noise sources of the sampling location. Moreover, this ambient noise quality sampling point was present near the access road to well locations Dev5S, Matabari and proposed GGS. It indicates that, proposed project activity may impact local noise level of the sampling area. 6 Tejamukpara No major noise source was present in this area. Surrounding area of this ambient air quality monitoring location is likely to be affected from the construction activities pertaining to well Dev 6S. 7 Ananta Sardar Para No major noise source was present near to this monitoring location. This sampling location was adjacent to Matabari well; thus susceptible to any noise pollution that may arise from proposed project activity. 8 Uttal Chalita Bankul No citable noise source was present near to this monitoring location. This sampling location was a small settlement near proposed well Dev42A and thus likely to be impacted from proposed project activity.

During field visit it was observed that all the proposed or existing well, proposed GCS and were located in such places that were either surrounded by vegetation or located in the ridge or located in the narrow valley strips.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 83 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Sound pressure level (SPL) measurements in dB (A) were recorded for every hour continuously for 24 hours at 15 minutes interval for the monitoring stations and equivalent noise levels in the form of Leq day and Leq night were computed. The results obtained were compared with the standard specified in Schedule III, Rule 3 of Environmental Protection Rules10. The ambient noise quality monitoring locations within the study area are shown in Figure 3-2. Interpretation of Noise Quality Results The noise monitoring results reveal that the average daytime noise level does not exceed 55dBA and 45 DBA the daytime and nighttime standard respectively as stipulated in the Noise Pollution (Regulations and Control) Rules, 2000. The average noise at daytime ranges from 37.3dBA in Gunarajpara to 40.7dBA in Keshabchandrapara whereas the average noise at nighttime ranges from 35.0 in Gunarajpara to 37.0dBA in Keshabchandrapara. Vehicular movement was the major source of noise in Keshabchandrapara.

FIGURE 3-6: DAY AND NIGHT TIME EQUIVALENT NOISE LEVELS

Hourly noise monitoring results are presented in Annexure 3.3.

3.1.4 Physiography The state of Tripura resides in the North-East corner of India and lying between the latitude of 22o56'N to 24o32'N and longitude 91o09'E to 92o20'E. Tripura covers an area of

10 Sound Level Meter: SL 4001, Lutron & SLM 100, Envirotech CPL-4, 11

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 84 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari approximately 10,491 sq-km (4051 sq-mile). The state shares state boundary with and in the east (53 and 109 km respectively) and international boundary – with Bangladesh (839 km.) General altitude of the state differs between 15m to 750m from MSL. The Physiography of Tripura tends to flatten towards west. The longitudinal valleys are juxtaposed in between the numerous hillocks and undulating surfaces. Agricultural activities occur in the fertile soil of these valleys. Series of parallel hill-ranges running north to south divide the state into broad parallel valleys, consisting of undulating hillocks covered with jungle & meandering streams. The range of hills rises from the plains of Sylhet in Bangladesh at the north and proceeds southwards until they join the hill tracts in the east. Principal ranges of western part of the state are Baramura – Debtamura and Atharamura ranges. A brief description of these ranges is as follows11: 1. Baramura- Debtamura Range: North Baramura range lying in West Tripura, Khowai and Sipahi Jala District and almost 47km (avg. ht. 200m to 500m) in length. The South Kathalchari and Debtamura hill ranges are located completely in South Tripura and Gomati districts. Debtamura is the principal hill range of South Tripura dist. with a length of 85 Km. 2. Atharamura Range: It starts from South Tripura District, and enters in . A portion of this range also enters in Gomati district. The highest peak is Niungnawra (481m). On the basis of contour the state can be categorized in three groups.12 They are:  High Physiographic Zone (Hills): Almost the entire North and Dhalai Districts are having high physiography. High physiography areas i.e. Kathalchari and Atharamura ranges are also present in West Tripura, Khowai, Part of Sipahijala, Gomati and South Tripura dist.  Medium Physiographic (Undulating land) Zone: It is mainly present in . However, undulating land is also present in western and southern districts of Tripura.  Low Physiographic Zone (Plains): Low physiographic area is present in West and South districts. A portion of North Tripura district also has low physiographic zones. Structurally, the State of Tripura represents the western fringe of the typical ‘ridge and valley’ structural province of the late tertiary fold mountain belt, commonly known as the Indo-Burma Ranges (Purbachal Range).

11 Forest Management Plan, Sadar div., Bagafa Div., Khowai Div., Gomati Div., Udaipur Div, Teliamura Div. 12 Tripura State Pollution Control Board - http://tspcb.tripura.gov.in/envplan.htm.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 85 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Topography of Kathalchari Field: Kathalchari Field is located in eastern part of Tripura. Entire Tripura, which is a part of North-Eastern Ranges and Brahmaputra Valley, has been divided in ten physiographic units. A brief description of topography of this Field is provided below13: This field mainly comprises of low relief structural hills that are highly dissected and ridges with moderate slope and thus falls under high physiographic zone. Flat topped denuded hills with moderate to gentle slope and with moderate dissect are present at south-east part of this Field. The entire Field is covered by open to moderately dense forest with some small settlements in between. A part of Kathalchari field particularly at the eastern and south eastern part is located within Baramura - Debtamura Ridge having height of 224 m to 356 m. Thus this field comes under high physiographic zone. Moreover, South Baramura range occupies a small portion of this field. Some narrow strips of flat valleys are also present in this field. One of such narrow valley has been started from Uttar (North) Barapathary area and extends beyond Uttar (North) Bijoypur in South. Two other such flat valleys are present near Chalita Bankul – Kathalchari – South & North Manu Bankul area. These are actually the flood plains of tributaries of Kuwaifung and Muhuri River. Many narrow ephemeral streams are coming down from the foothills and hillocks and flows towards master stream or rivers. Topography of Kathalchari Field is shown in Figure 3-7. In this Field, human settlements are located mainly on the flat or moderately flat terrains. However, small conglomerations of human settlements are present on the flat top as well as on the slope of hillocks.

13 Report “State Level Perspective Plan for Watershed Development in Tripura under Integrated Watershed Management Projects (I.W.M.P)” by Govt. of Tripura, Dept of Agriculture, Directorate of Horticulture & Soil Conservation

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 86 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

FIGURE 3-7: TOPOGRAPHY OF KATHALCHARI FIELD

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 87 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

3.1.5 Geology and Hydrogeology The major geomorphic element observed in Tripura is north-south running parallel hill regions and intervening valleys. The hills are tightly folded anticlines with broad synclinal valleys. Geologically, the area is occupied by the folded sedimentary formations ranging in age from lower Tertiary to Recent14. The Stratigraphy of the state of Tripura has been incorporated in Table 3-3.

TABLE 3-3: THE STRATIGRAPHY OF THE TRIPURA15 Age Group Formation(s) Holocene - i. Khowai Formation ii. Ghilatoli Formation iii. Teliamura Formation iv. Kalyanpur Formation Quaternary Dupitila Dupitila Formation Upper Pliocene to Pleistocene Tipam Upper Tipam Formation Lower Tipam Formation Pliocene Surma Bokabil Formation Micocene – Late Pliocene - Upper Bhuban Formation

In Tripura, the loamy soil type facilitates the percolation and infiltration of water from the surface into the ground water regime. Moreover, presence of sand stone facilitates the movement of water under the ground as well and acts as storage of water. It indicates that soil profile and nature of the bedrock helps runoff water to move into the ground water regime from recharge zone. Regional Geology The Baramura- Debtamura range passes through the Field from north to south direction and influencing regional geology. Presence of valleys and residual mound valley surrounded by moderate to highly dissected structural hills is one of the characteristic features of the northern part of this Field. Some major as well as minor fracture lines are also present in the north-eastern part of this Field. This area is influenced by the presence of Southern Baramura range that passes from west to east. Presence of narrow valleys and presence of major as well as minor faults are two common features of this area. Lithologically four different types of formations are present in this Field and they are sandstone or pebble bed conglomerates; shale with sand stone or lime stone bed; sand stone or pebble bed conglomerate; and alluvium land with silt and clay – mainly present in the flood plains of major river present in this Field, such as Gomati, Manu, Muhuri etc. Since sandstone is the major lithologic formation, it

14 Ground Water Information Booklet North Tripura and South Tripura District, Tripura – Central Ground Water Board, Ministry of Water Resource, 2012 and State of Environment Report of Tripura, 2002. 15 State of Environment Report of Tripura for the year of 2002

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 88 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari facilitates the movement of large volumes of surface run-off through sinkholes and swallow- holes mostly during monsoon season. This surface runoff water is likely to move into the ground water regime through a network of cavities and fissures present in the sand stone. Hydrogeology In the state of Tripura, the ground water occurs in shallow aquifers under unconfined and semi–confined to confined conditions. Fine to medium grained sand stones form the principal aquifer. In major part of the state, ground water occurs under unconfined condition in shallow depth. Ground water occurs under confined condition within shallow depths in small isolated zones. Aquifer system of the area is divided into two types, viz, shallow aquifer within 50 m bgl and deep aquifer between 50 to 300 m bgl. As per CGWB Report, 2008, the wells are constructed within a depth range of 6 to 171 m bgl. Discharge of the wells varies from 0.01 to 2.00 lit/sec during pre-monsoon period and from 0.02 to 2.5 lit/sec during post-monsoon period. Three types of hydro-geological formations identified in the state of Tripura and they are as follows:  Alluvial formation with thickness varies between 10-15 m and occurs along the bank of rivers and water can be extracted through dug well and ordinary hand pumps;  Dupitila formation with thickness from 10-15m and nearly horizontal in disposition and it has low permeability and low storage capacity due to high clay content. It indicates that the water yielding capacity from this type of formation is very low;  Sand stone of Tipam formation constituted the principle aquifer of this area and it consists of sub rounded fine to medium grained, friable sandstone with intercalated clay. Tipam formation is found in valleys of Tripura. The permeability of this formation is much higher than Dupitila and Surma sandstone. These formations divide the state into three main hydrogeological zones16. The first one is confined to central part of Agartala-Udaipur, Khowai-Amarpur, Ambasa, Kailashsahar, Kumarghat and Dharam Nagar syncline valley; where the yield prospects are good. Fine to medium grained sand stones form the principal aquifer. The second one is confined to unconfined aquifers of moderate regional extent with yield prospect of 50-100 m3/hr. This zone extends bordering the hill ranges i.e. the marginal part of Agartala-Udaipur, Khowai- Amarpur, Kamalpur-Ambassa, Kailashsahar- Kumarghat and Dharam Nagar valleys. The third zone, comprising moderately thick discontinuous aquifers with yield prospects less than 50m 3/hr, is located in the intermountain and smaller valleys. These areas are mostly occupied by argillaceous formations belonging to Surma series

16 Ground water Scenario of Tripura – Central Ground Water Board.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 89 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Besides this, 17springs or seepage zones are also present in the state. Tribal people living in the hilly areas are using spring water for drinking and domestic purposes. In the foothill areas, people arrest the spring water by constructing seasonal/permanent bund and use that water for irrigation purpose and sometimes for drinking and domestic purposes also. Moreover, it has been also observed during field survey that villagers made ‘kaccha’ wells having depth of 15-30 ft at the foot-hills of small hillocks. This water is being used in both domestic and agricultural purposes. It indicates that the recharge area of such ground water sources are located on the top of the adjacent anticline hillocks. Loamy soil with medium permeability facilitates the accumulation of water and moisture in the narrow valleys. Artesian zones also occur in the state of Tripura and local people are mainly using these wells for drinking and domestic purpose. Artesian belt has been delineated in West of Tripura and the yield of such wells are found to be in the order of 1 to 3 cubic meter /hr. High auto flow discharge of 54 cubic meter/hr is observed in Khowai valley. 3.1.6 Ground Water Resources Groundwater in the state of Tripura is primarily used for agricultural activities, drinking and other domestic purposes. Groundwater is primarily tapped by tube wells from depths ranging mostly between 35-70 m. A decadal (1999 to 2009) study conducted by CGWB, Ground water depth also varies during pre-monsoon and post monsoon period. Details of this variation have been furnished in Table: 3-4

TABLE 3-4: GROUND WATER RESOURCE OF TRIPURA, 2008 AND 2009 Parameter Tripura Major Water Bearing Formation Tipam Sandstone Pre-monsoon depth to water level during 2008 1.42 – 8.14 m bgl Post-monsoon depth to water level during 2008 1.20 – 5.10 m bgl Annual Replenishable Ground water Resource during 200918 2.97 BCM Net Annual Ground Water Availability during 2009 2.74 BCM Annual Ground Water Draft during 2009 0.16 BCM Stage of Ground Water Development during 2009 6 % Bgl = Below Ground Level; BCM = Billion Cubic Meter

Regional Ground Water Resource Prior to the division of West and South Tripura district in 2012, Kathalchari Field was comprised of portions from Dhalai, West and South Tripura dist. As proposed, all the proposed wells will be located in South Tripura dist. (Un-divided). As stated in Dynamic

17 USEPA: http://www.epa.gov/region1/students/pdfs/ww_well.pdf; Tripura State Pollution Control Board : http://tspcb.tripura.gov.in/gwater.htm; CGWB Ground Water Information Booklet, 2012. 18 http://cgwb.gov.in/gw_profiles/st_tripura.html

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 90 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Ground Water Resources of India, 2009 by Central Ground Water Board, the estimation of ground water resource has been furnished below in Table 3-5.

TABLE 3-5: GROUND WATER RESOURCE OF DISTRICTS OF TRIPURA Parameter West Tripura Dhalai South Tripura The annual replenishable ground water 113095 ham 50921 ham 84770 ham resources Net ground water available 101785 ham 46774 ham 79687 ham Net annual ground water draft 10415 ham 760 ham 3568 ham Stage of ground water development 10% 2% 4% Projected demand (upto 2025) for use of 10526 ham 1922 ham 4910 ham ground water in domestic and irrigation sector Projected demand (upto 2025) for use of 84125 ham 44822 ham 72797 ham ground water for irrigation purpose ham = hectare meter. Ground Water Quality Primary monitoring of ground water quality was considered important in order to understand the probable impacts of the proposed project activities on the sub surface aquifers. Potential pollution of subsurface and unconfined aquifers may occur due to improper casing and cementing of well leading to infiltration or seeping of drilling chemicals or mud into nearby aquifer. Contamination of aquifers may also occur from disposal of drilling waste and mud in an open/unpaved pit. Ground Water Sampling Points Drilling of the proposed wells and this process may affect the shallow aquifers, from which local people extracts water for irrigation, drinking and other domestic purpose. During selection of a ground water sampling point the main factors considered were the availability of potential ground water sourcing locations for the proposed project activities i.e. for site preparation and to fulfill domestic requirements of workers and availability of dug well/ bore well/ hand pumps that is being used as ground water source by the settlements residing in close proximity to the proposed well sites. A monitoring network consisting of 6 locations for groundwater was selected and representative sampling was carried out at each of the locations (Refer Figure 3-8) and detail results of ground water analysis are presented in Table 3-6. The rationale for selecting these sampling locations has been incorporated in Annexure 3-4. A total of 6 nos. ground water samples were collected from wells, shallow and deep tube wells of the study area comprising of Hapaia Bari village (Paschim Daluma), Kuwaifung area, Tejamuk Para, Ananta Sardar Para, Gobinda Para (Uttar Chalita Bankul) and Hichachhara. Samples were analyzed for physicochemical and bacteriological parameters and results compared with IS: 10500 drinking water standards to identify and interpret any

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 91 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari deviation in the statutory limits set for parameters under this standard. Details of these sampling locations have been showed in Figure 3-8. Interpretation of Ground Water Quality Results Turbidity: Analysis of ground water showed that turbidity values for samples taken from Ananta Sardar Para and Tejamuk Para were within acceptable limit as per IS: 10500. However, turbidity values were beyond acceptable limit but within permissible limit in samples taken from Hapia Bari village, Kuwaifung village, Gobinda Para and Hichachara village. Turbidity values were ranged from 1.7 NTU (at Kuwaifung village) to 3.2 NTU (at Hichachhara village). During ground water sampling, consultation with local villagers of Hapai Bari revealed that the water of tube well, where from the sample was taken, was not being used as drinking water due to presence of odor and awful taste. Chlorides and Total Dissolve Solids: As per IS: 10500 standards, acceptable limit of chloride is 250 mg/l while the permissible limit of the said parameter (in absence of alternate source) is 1000 mg/l. However, with chloride concentration above 250 mg/l, the water will render a salty taste which may be considered as objectionable in terms of human consumption for drinking purpose. The chloride concentration in the ground water samples of the study area villages have been found to be well within the acceptable limit of IS: 10500 ranging from 5.81 mg/l at Tejamuk Para village to 11.64 mg/l at Hapaia Bari, Kuwaifung village and at Gobinda Para. The concentration of total dissolved solids (TDS) in ground water is a measure of its suitability for domestic use. In general, TDS values at 500 mg/l or below is considered to be acceptable for drinking purpose being specified under IS: 10500 drinking water standards. The TDS values for the ground water samples analyzed vary in the range of 34 mg/l in Tejamuk Para village to 156 mg/l in Paschim Daluma village. Total Hardness: Hardness of water is considered to be an important parameter in determining the suitability of water for domestic uses particularly washing. Hardness of water is correlated to the presence of bivalent metallic ions viz. calcium and magnesium. Total hardness values for the ground water samples analyzed ranged between 16 mg/l at Tejamuk Para village to 124 mg/l at Hapia Bari. The acceptable limit for total hardness was 200 mg/l specified under IS: 10500. It indicates that results of total hardness analysis in ground water samples were within the acceptable limit. Moreover, the hardness values recorded at each ground water monitoring station was found to be in correlation with the calcium and magnesium ions analyzed for such samples. The concentration of calcium and magnesium ions was found to be within both acceptable and permissible limits specified for the aforesaid parameters as per IS: 10500 standards.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 92 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Iron and Fluoride: Iron is considered to be an important ground water parameter since at higher concentration it interferes with laundering operations and imparts objectionable stains. Analysis of ground water showed that iron values for samples taken from all the locations have exceeded the acceptable limit as per standard i.e. 0.3 mg/lit. The value of iron content in representative ground water samples were ranged between 0.38 mg/lit at Tejamuk Para to 3.5mg/lit at Gobinda Para. Moreover, it has been mentioned in Tripura Ground Water Information Booklet – North and South Tripura District, 2012 that iron as a chemical constituent is present in aquifer at more than permissible limit. High Iron content recorded at the groundwater is probably due to local geological features of the area. Fluoride contents in the ground water samples were in compliance to the acceptable and permissible limit (in absence of alternative source) of the potable drinking water standard of 1.0 mg/l and 1.5mg/l respectively. Heavy Metals: The monitoring results showed that the concentration of heavy metals is within permissible limit as per IS: 10500 standards. Coliforms: Coliform are indicators of contamination from sewage and faecal matter. Coliforms were only detected in Hapaia Bari (Paschim Daluma) (76 MPN/100ml), however for the other groundwater samples coliform content was <2 MPN/100 ml. Faecal coliform were not detected in any of the collected samples. Absence of faecal Coliform in the samples did conclusively reveal absence of faecal contamination in groundwater.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 93 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

TABLE 3-6: GROUNDWATER MONITORING RESULTS Permissible Hapaia Gobinda Required limit in the Ananta SL. Test Bari Kuwaifung Para Hichachara Tejamuk Unit (Acceptable absence of Sardar No. Parameters (Paschim Market (Chalita Village Limit) alternative Para Para Daluma) Bonkul) source Sample ID GW1 GW2 GW3 GW4 GW5 GW6 1. pH at 26⁰ C 6.5-8.5 No relaxation 6.81 6.85 6.77 6.5 6.63 6.66

2. Colour Hazen 5 15 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 3. Unobjection Unobjection Unobjecti Unobjecti Unobjection Unobjecti Odour - Agreeable Agreeable able able onable onable able onable 4. Turbidity NTU 1 5 2.7 1.7 <1.0 1.9 3.2 <1.0 5. Total Hardness as mg/l 200 600 124 56 88 64 28 16 CaCO3 6. Calcium as mg/l 75 200 30.4 9.6 19.2 12.8 4.8 3.2 Ca 7. Magnesium mg/l 30 100 11.52 7.68 9.6 7.68 3.84 1.92 as Mg 8. Alkalinity mg/l 200 600 144 80 108 84 36 12 9. Chlorides as mg/l 250 1000 11.64 11.64 7.76 11.64 9.7 5.81 Cl 10. Sulphate as mg/l 200 400 7.04 5 2.7 4.76 10.8 <1.0 SO4 11. Nitrate as mg/l 45 No relaxation <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 3.2 NO3 12. Copper as Cu mg/l 0.05 1.5 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 13. Iron as Fe mg/l 0.3 - 3.15 2.51 0.39 3.5 0.97 0.38 14. Fluorides as mg/l 1.0 1.5 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 F 15. Zinc as Zn mg/l 5 15 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 94 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Permissible Hapaia Gobinda Required limit in the Ananta SL. Test Bari Kuwaifung Para Hichachara Tejamuk Unit (Acceptable absence of Sardar No. Parameters (Paschim Market (Chalita Village Limit) alternative Para Para Daluma) Bonkul) source 16. Phenolic Compound as mg/l 0.001 0.002 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 C6H5OH 19. Arsenic as As mg/l 0.01 0.05 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 20 Hexavalent 0.05 (for Total Chromium as mg/l No relaxation <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Chromium) Cr+6 21. Total Dissolved mg/l 500 2000 156 88 120 96 52 34 Solids 22 Shall not be Shall not be Total MPN/1 delectable in delectable in 76 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 Coliform 00 ml 100 ml 100 ml 23 Faecal MPN/1 Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent Coliform 00 ml

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 95 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

FIGURE 3-8: LOCATION OF GROUNDWATER, SURFACE WATER AND SOIL MONITORING LOCATIONS WITHIN KATHALCHARI FIELD

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 96 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

3.1.7 Drainage The state of Tripura is gifted with surface water resources. Entire drainage system in the state of Tripura is rain-fed and ephemeral in nature. Governed by the topographic gradient and soil types, these streams meet with other streams to form larger stream. Subsequently all such streams fall in a river. All major rivers originate from hill ranges and show a typical drainage pattern called trellis drainage, except a few instances of dendrite pattern. Drainage pattern of Kathalchari Field Out of ten major riverine system of Tripura, the Kathalchari Field comes under the catchment of three major rivers of Tripura namely Muhuri River, Gomati River and Manu River. A detail of these two rivers has been furnished in Table 3-7.

TABLE 3-7: MAJOR DRAINAGE CHANNELS IN KATHALCHARI FIELD Annual Flow Name of Total Basin Origin and flow the river area (sq-km) (in thousand cubic-meter) Gomati19 The length of the river is approximately 53 km. 2378 249399 River It is originated from Atharamura range and flows from east to west and entered in Bangladesh territory. This river flows through the northern part of the Kathalchari Field Muhuri Flow west ward and entered Bangladesh via 839 76247 River Belonia. This river flows through the central part of the Kathalchari Field Manu The length of the river is approximately 98 km 1979 170034 River long and originated from Sakhan Range. This river entered Bangladesh via Kailashsahar. This river flows through the southern part of the Kathalchari Field

All these rivers and their tributaries, narrow streams originated from elevated topography, are passing through the area having loamy soil. During monsoon season, the flow and the velocity of water in all theses ephemeral rivers increases and induces erosion along two banks of the river. During rain, surface run off from elevated topography carries huge amount of sand and other coarse particles to the river bed. The carrying capacity of the river channel gets decreased due to this and causes flood in these rivers. Sand carried by surface runoff during rainy season gets deposited on the fertile agricultural lands adjacent to river channel (Source: Forest Management Plan, 2012-2013). Drainage pattern prevail in Kathalchari Field is as follows20:

19 State of Environment Report of Tripura, 2002 20 tsac.tripura.gov.in/tsac

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 97 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

South Baramura ridge and its adjacent elevated areas occupies major portion of this block. During rainy season, surface runoff from hillocks and elevated landmass forms narrow streams. Theses narrow streams meet with each other and forms relatively larger stream which finally falls in the river. Stream and river originate from this block forms dendritic drainage pattern and their direction of flow is East to West and Kuwaifung Kuwaifung River – flowing from South to North direction. Beside, dendritic drainage pattern parallel and radial drainage pattern is also present in this block- in tributaries of Muhuri and Gomati River. At northern part of this block, ephemeral channels from Baramura range are flowing from east to west as per the topography and meet with the main course of Gomati River. On the other hand, ephemeral channels originated from eastern part of North as well as South Baramura ridge are coming under the watershed of Kuwaifung River and discharges their content in the river by flowing from west to east, guided by gradient. A group of ephemeral streams originated from middle and southern part of Kathalchari Field finally discharge their content into Muhuri River. These narrow streams are flowing from east to west as per regional topography and meets with Muhuri River as part of the water shed of this riverine system. Irrigation canals serve as either third or second order stream and discharge their contents in the large rivers. The surface water channels within the field are primarily used for irrigation purpose bathing purpose, washing of cloths and utensils and for catching fish. Surface run-off and discharge of drilling wastewater from the proposed wells located close to these channels have the potential to affect the water quality of these channels. The drainage map of the study area is presented in Figure 3-9 3.1.8 Surface water quality Primary monitoring of surface water quality was given importance during scoping of the EIA study as the effluent generated during development well drilling operations, GGS and pipline construction are likely to be discharged to nearby surface water bodies/natural drainage channels/rivers after ensuring that it meets prescribed norms of CPCB. Further, an effort has been made to establish the baseline quality of the existing major watersheds and sub watersheds (comprising the major drainage of the study area) to identify any possible contamination due to any proposed gas field development activities.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 98 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

FIGURE 3-9: DRAINAGE MAP OF KATHALCHARI FIELD

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 99 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Surface Water Sampling Points Surface water samples were collected from four surface water sampling locations. Location of proposed wells, direction of slope of the Kathalchari Field, micro as well as macro- water shed as well as drainage pattern, availability of surface water channel that are likely to be impacted from the discharge that may occur from proposed well side or from the activities related to the development of this well side etc. were considered during selection of sampling points of surface water. Moreover, all the third order i.e. micro water channels are the part of local micro water shed as well as constituting units of major river’s watershed and are governed by the gradient and discharging their contents in relatively larger channels which finally meets with larger rivers or streams. Thus all the samples were collected from rivers that had flow during sampling period. Representative samples were collected from Manu River, Gomati River, Kuwaifung River and Muhuri River for surface water quality assessment. The rationale for selecting these sampling locations has been incorporated in Annexure 3-5. Water sampling and analysis21 was done following CPCB standard guidelines for physical, chemical and bacteriological parameters. The monitoring locations are shown in Figure 3-8. So, surface water samples were collected from all major water channels of the study area i.e. Kuwaifung River, Manu River, Gomati River and Muhuri River. Samples were collected to understand the surface water quality of study area and to assess potential impact on them which may arise from well development. Surface water quality was finally assessed against water quality criteria as per CPCB guidelines for water resources. Interpretation of Surface Water Quality Results The pH of the surface water samples was varied from 6.51 (Kuwaifung River) -7.39 (Muhuri River), which could be attributed mainly due to the dissolved substances and the geology of the area. The DO levels at all the locations exhibited values ranging from 3.9mg/lit (Muhuri River) -6.0 mg/lit (Kuwaifung River) indicating favorable conditions for the growth and reproduction of normal population of fish and other aquatic organisms in the these river channels. BOD values in all the surface water samples were detected at concentration between 2.2 mg/l (Muhuri River) to 3.1 mg/lit (Manu River). Such low BOD values confirmed the presence of low concentrations of biochemically oxidizable organic matter in these river channels. The COD values of all the monitoring stations were ranged between 7.97 mg/lit (Gomati River) - 23.9 mg/lit (Manu River). The higher COD was found in the Manu River. The higher value of COD can be attributed to the addition of agricultural runoff in the main river channel from adjacent areas.

21 http://www.cpcb.nic.in/latest/guidelines-water.doc

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 100 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Electrical conductivity values of the samples ranged between 113 millisiemens/ cm in Manu River to 197 millisiemens/ cm in Muhuri River, which could be attributed mainly due to addition of runoff from the areas present on the either bank of river channel. Sodium Absorption Ratio varied between 0.41-0.71. Free ammonia contents of all the samples were found to be less than 0.1 mg/l. Total Coliform count of the surface water samples varied between 8 MPN/100ml in Gomati River to 48 MPN/100 ml in Muhuri River. The presence of contaminants in the form of oil and grease in all surface water sources was found to be negligible. Iron content in all the surface water sample varies from 1.32 mg/lit in Kuwaifung River to 3.91 mg/l in Manu River whereas chromium content was found to be negligible (<0.01mg/l). The toxic organic component, phenol, was also found be below detectable limit (<0.001 mg/l) in all the surface water samples. Presence of iron in sampled water could be attributed to regional geology. Detailed surface water analysis results have been provided at Table 3-8. As discussed in the previous section the river from which samples were taken and analyzed were primarily used for irrigation, bathing, cleaning and for catching fish. The analyzed values of the samples after comparing with the CPCB Water Use Criteria (Refer Annexure 3.6) justifies their use in compliance to water use criteria. It indicates that the water quality of these water channels conform the quality of - B Class of water i.e. suitable for outdoor bathing; C class of water i.e. the water of these river channel can be taken as drinking water source after conventional treatment and disinfection; D class of water i.e. suitable for fisheries and E class i.e. suitable for irrigation and industrial use.22

TABLE 3-8: SURFACE WATER QUALITY RESULTS SL. Test Gomati Kuwaifung Manu River Muhuri Unit No. Parameters River River River Sample ID SW1 SW2 SW3 SW4 1. Temperature 0C 31 33 31 31.5 2. Free Ammonia mg/l <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 3. pH at 260C - 6.63 6.51 6.53 7.39 4. Dissolved mg/l 5.9 6 5.9 3.9 Oxygen 5. BOD (3 days at mg/l <2.0 2.4 3.1 2.2 270C) 6. COD mg/l 7.97 11.95 23.9 11.95

7. Electrical µs/cm 117 169 113 197 Conductivity at

22 Central Pollution Control Board – Water Quality Criteria : http://cpcb.nic.in/Water_Quality_Criteria.php

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 101 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

SL. Test Gomati Kuwaifung Manu River Muhuri Unit No. Parameters River River River 250C 8. Sodium - 0.71 1.71 2.71 3.71 Absorption Ratio 9. Boron as B mg/l <0.5 <0.6 <0.7 <0.8 10. Oil & Grease mg/l <1.4 <1.5 <1.6 <1.7 11. Total Dissolved mg/l 68 68 68 68 Solids (TDS) 12. Total Suspended mg/l 68.4 68.4 68.4 68.4 Solids (TSS) 13. Dissolved Phosphate as mg/l <0.15 <0.16 <0.17 <0.18 PO4

14. Nitrate as NO3 mg/l 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 15. Chlorides as Cl mg/l 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75

16. Sulphate as SO4 mg/l 4.97 4.97 4.97 4.97 17. Iron as Fe mg/l 3 3 3 3 18. Total Chromium mg/l <0.1 <0.2 <0.3 <0.4 as Cr 19. Phenolic compound as mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 C6H5OH 20. Total Coliform MPN/10 8 5 22 48 Organism 0 ml 3.1.9 Land-Use and Land Cover The Kathalchari Field covers an area of 249 sq. km. Majority of the land within the Kathalchari Field is included under forests. Baramura-Debtamura Reserve forest covers an area of about 40% of the total Field Area (Refer Figure 3-10). Unclassified forests cover about 52% of the total area of the Field. Agricultural lands cover an area of about 5.58% of the total Field area. Settlements of Paschim Daluma, Purba Pilak, Uttar Chalita Bankul, Tairumachhara, Abhangachhara, Raibari etc. covers an area of 0.93% of the total Field. The land use of the proposed well locations and surrounding area comprises of private agricultural and forest land.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 102 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

FIGURE 3-10: PERCENTAGE LAND USE-LAND COVER DISTRIBUTION OF KATHALCHARI FIELD

The land use land cover map of Kathalchari Field is provide in Figure 3-11

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 103 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

FIGURE 3-11: LAND USE LAND COVER MAP OF KATHALCHARI FIELD

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 104 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

3.1.10 Soil Quality High rainfall in Tripura induces chemical weathering of rocks and acts as one of the main factors of soil formation. However, heavy rain also causes rapid erosion of soil and bed rocks. The soil type of the state of Tripura can be classified in five major groups. They are reddish yellow brown sandy soils, red loam and sandy loam soils, older alluvial soils, younger alluvial soils and lateritic soils. Among these soil categories, reddish yellow brown sandy soil covers approximately 33 percent of the total geographic area and distributed along north- south axis of Tripura. Red loam and sandy loam soil covers 43.07 percent of total soil cover in state of Tripura. This soil type is associated with forest ecosystem and rich in nutrients. Older alluvial soil type covers 10 percent of total soil cover in Tripura and found mainly in river terraces and in high plains. Approximately 9 percent of the state’s soil cover is constituted by younger alluvial soil. This type of soil is confined to the flood plains of river such as Khowai, Gomati etc. This nutrient rich soil type is composed of clay loam and loam. Approximately 5 percent of the state’s total soil cover comes under “lateritic soil” which is very poor in nutrient content. This can be recognized along the western boundary of the state of Tripura. Soils of Tripura have been grouped into five soil reaction classes viz. extremely acidic (<4.5 pH)-10%, very strongly acidic (4.6-5.0)-26%, strongly acidic (5.1-5.5) - 54% and medium (5.6-6.0)-8% and slightly acidic (6.1-6.5)-2%. Soil characteristic of Kathalchari Field Major portion of the Kathalchari block comes under thick forest cover. Soil of this gas field is very strongly acidic (pH ranges from 4.6 to 5.5). This block is approximately 107 km long from north to south and it clearly indicates that wide ranges of soil classes as well as sub- classes are present in this block. Like most other portions of the Tripura, loamy soil is predominant in this block. The northern and western part of this block23 is constituted of deep fine loamy soil with few patches of very deep clayey soil. Besides these, shallow to moderately deep fine to coarse loamy and skeletal loamy soil is also present in northern part of this block. Moderately shallow deep to shallow deep coarse loamy soil is predominant in the middle portion of this block. However, few area located on the eastern side of the middle portion of this block are with deep clayey and deep coarse loamy soil. The southern part of this block is with deep to moderately deep loamy soil with patches of very deep clayey soil. It indicates that texture of soil includes very fine sand and finer textures of clay and predominant soil-sub groups present in this field is coarse loamy soil with 15 percent or more (by wt.) sand or coarse particles (fragments upto 75 mm) and fine has clay fraction of less than 18 (by wt.); fine loamy soil with either fine sand or coarse particles and has clay fraction of 18 -35 percent (by wt.); deep to moderately deep loamy skeletal soil with particles having

23 Tripura Space Application Center; http://tsac.tripura.gov.in/tsac/index.html

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 105 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari size of > 2 mm (35 to 90 percent by wt.); and clayey soil with clay ( 35 percent or more by wt.) and particles having size >2 mm. occupies less than 35 percent (by volume) In this Field, cultivation of paddy and other crops, fruits and vegetables is in practice in moderately flat narrow agricultural lands as well as in gentle hill slopes and on flat hill top area. During filed visit it had been observed that ‘Jhum’ cultivation is in practice in hill slopes and it is quite common in this block. Like the state of Tripura, in Kathalchari block agricultural land is present only in the narrow valleys and thus of great importance. Implementation of the proposed project activity may lead to the temporary change/loss of soil fertility at the drilling site. The understanding of soil quality therefore assumes significance considering the Field soil fertility characteristics and also given the responsibility of the proponent to restore the site back to its preliminary condition following decommissioning. Therefore effort has been made to establish the soil quality of this Jubilant gas fields especially the area that is present at the neighborhood of proposed wells through primary monitoring study as discussed in the section below

Primary Soil Sampling and Analysis The soil characteristics within the study area, especially the physical quality and fertility of the soil have been characterized by analyzing the representative soil samples collected from five locations as mentioned in ToR provided by MoEF. As per ToR, five representative samples were collected from five different locations of this Field to assess existing soil quality of the entire Field. Out of these five representative soil samples, two were collected from forest land, two from agricultural land and one from rubber plantation area. The soil sampling locations for the proposed Kathalchari Field were selected on the basis of existing land cover within the block as well as on the basis of major land use pattern. Moreover, soil samples were collected only from those areas which are likely to be impacted from proposed project activity. The rationale of selecting soil sampling locations has been incorporated in Annexure 3.7 and sampling locations is shown in Figure 3-8.

Interpretation of Soil Analysis Results

Soil Quality of Forest Land The texture of soil samples collected from forest lands was clayey with silt percentage 18.3 and clay content was 52.1 percent at Kuwaifung and 54.2 percent at Ananta Sardar Para. The sand percentages were 27.5 at Ananta Sardar Para and 29.7 at Kuwaifung area. pH of the soil samples taken from forest areas of Kuwaifung and Ananta Sardar Para were 5.29 and 5.43 successively and it indicates acidic nature of the soil. The nitrogen content of these samples were 181.02 mg/kg (at Kuwaifung) and 197.27 mg/kg (at Ananta Sardar Para) and this can be attributed to the presence of thick decomposed to semi-decomposed litters on the forest soil. Moreover, this decomposed to partially decomposed litters also contributes in soil acidity. The EC value of these soil samples were 54.2 microsiemens/cm and 62.5 microsiemens/cm successively. Sample taken from Kuwaifung forest land showed presence of more iron as

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 106 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari micro-nutrient than that of Ananta Sardar Para and the iron content were 7.36 mg/kg and 3.83 mg/kg successively. The manganese content was at higher side in both the forest soil samples and it was 407.93 mg/kg at Kuwaifung and 371 .48 mg/kg at Ananta Sardar Para. It indicates that this forest soils are extremely rich in manganese and other micro nutrients which can be attributed to the nature of regional geology. The total organic carbon value in soil samples taken from Kuwaifung and Ananta Sardar Para were 0.43 % and 0.53% and the SAR values of the samples collected were 0.10 and 0.11 successively. The sodium hazard of soil usually is expressed as the Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR). Soils with high levels of exchangeable sodium may cause dispersion of soil particles leading to the replacement of major cations (calcium and magnesium) adsorbed on the soil. This could possibly lead to deterioration of soil structures as well characteristics and water infiltration problems. Reductions in infiltration were observed in soils for SAR above 2, and the reductions became more severe with increasing SAR24 Further, soil analysis results exhibits higher concentration of calcium (values were 783.45 mg/ kg and 1371.66 mg/kg successively) and magnesium (values were 646.35 mg/ kg to 764.21 mg/kg successively) ions compared to sodium (ranged between 59.91 mg/kg to 80.0 mg/kg successively) concentration. Higher Ca2+ values observed in the samples are indicative of good soil permeability and structure. Soil Quality of Rubber Plantation Area Slight to moderate slope is favorable for rubber plantation and this practice was observed especially at Hapaia Bari area. However, rubber plantation is restricted in small pockets of this block. Texture wise this soil was clayey in nature with 61.8 % of clay and 35.6 % of sand content. High clay content helps top soil to retain desired level moisture content. pH of this soil was 4.20 which indicates acidic nature of soil and suitability for Rubber plantation along with it’s clayey nature25. The conductivity of the soil was 46.50 microsiemens/cm and available nitrogen content was 246.89 mg/kg. The levels of other cations in this sample were: Calcium – 195.70 mg/kg, Magnesium – 234.84 mg/kg and lower Sodium – 19.98 mg/kg. Chloride value of this soil was 39.19 mg/kg. Level of micronutrients in this soil sample such as iron was 30.29 mg/kg, copper was 3.9 mg/kg, zinc was 8.81 mg/kg and manganese was 24.15 mg/kg. SAR value for this soil sample was 0.06 mg/kg. Calcium and magnesium values were 195.7 mg/kg and 234.84 mg/kg successively.

Soil Quality of Agricultural Land The texture of soil samples collected from Agricultural lands within project field areas was found to be sandy loam in nature. These samples were collected from Gobinda Para and Tejamuk Para. The sand percentages of the samples were 67.4 % and 68.9%; the silt percentages were 13.9% and 11.7%; and the clay percentage of the soil samples collected

24 Infiltration into Cropped Soils: Effect of Rain and Sodium Adsorption Ratio –Impacted Irrigation Water; Donald L. Suarez *a, D. Wooda and Scott M. Leschb; https://www.soils.org/publications/jeq/abstracts/37/5_Supplement/S-169?access=0&view=pdf 25 http://www.pineappleindia.com/Pineapple-Farming.html

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 107 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari from agricultural land were 18.7% and 19.8% - successively in Gobinda Para and in Tejamuk Para. The pH level in soil samples were 5.35 and 5.62 indicating presence of strongly to slightly acidic soils as per standard soil classification. Electrical conductivity is used to estimate the soluble salt concentration in soil, and is commonly used as a measure of salinity. The EC values for soil samples collected from agricultural lands ware varied between 34.3 microsiemens/cm (at Gobinda Para) and 103.1 microsiemens/cm (at Tejamuk Para). During field visit it was revealed that farmers of Tejamuk Para were lacking irrigation facility though the agricultural land of this village is located near to Pilak River (Local name of a second order channel) but they use different kinds of chemical manures and pesticides. High EC value in the soil sample taken from Tejamuk Para could be attributed to aforesaid phenomenon. The soil samples collected from Agricultural lands were with available nitrogen content of 153.54 mg/kg and 224.96 mg/kg successively in Gobinda Para and in Tejamuk Para. These results indicate that these soils are suitable for paddy cultivation. The available phosphorus is below 3 mg/kg at Gobinda Para but 154.52 mg/kg at Tejamuk Para and this could be due to regional geo-chemical properties of soil. Potassium content of the soil also revealed suitability of the soil for paddy cultivation and its value was 80 mg/kg and 179.66 mg/kg successively. Heavy metals viz. iron, copper, zinc and manganese are important soil micronutrients being considered essential for the normal growth of . Deficiencies of micronutrient drastically affect the plant growth and metabolism. The levels micronutrients in the samples taken from Gobinda Para and Tejamuk Para were: Iron – 30.55 mg/kg and 9.46 mg/kg successively; Copper – 2.8 and 5.02 mg/kg successively; zinc – 9.81 and 19.56 mg/kg successively; Manganese – 65.59 and 99.14 mg/kg successively. Micronutrient analysis in soil samples taken from agricultural fields showed excessive enrichment in micro-nutrients. Enrichment in micro-nutrient level could be attributed to regional soil characteristics as well as to local geology. The SAR values in the soil samples collected from agricultural lands were 0.11 and 0.07. Soils with high levels of exchangeable sodium may cause dispersion of soil particles leading to the replacement of major cations (calcium and magnesium) adsorbed on the soil and could possibly lead to deterioration of soil structures and water infiltration problems. Further, soil analysis results exhibits higher concentration of calcium (values were 293.85 mg/ kg and 783.65 mg/kg successively) ions compared to sodium (values were 40.0 mg/ kg and 39.92 mg/kg successively) concentration. Higher Ca2+ values observed in the samples are indicative of good soil permeability and structure. Detailed soil quality analysis results have been provided at Table 3-9.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 108 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

TABLE 3-9: SOIL ANALYSIS RESULT Ananta Hapaia Bari Gobinda Tejamuk Kuwaifung Sardar Location (Rubber Para Para Para Plantation ( Agriculture (Forest (Agricultural (Forest Area) Land) land) Land) Land) Sample ID S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 Parameter Unit Texture Clay Sandy Loam Clay Sandy Loam Clay

Moisture % 19.23 19.42 19.13 19.64 16.72 Sand % 35.6 67.4 29.7 68.9 27.5 Silt % 2.6 13.9 18.2 11.7 18.3 Clay % 61.8 18.7 52.1 19.4 54.2 OM % 1.67 0.45 0.74 1.29 0.91 Alkalinity mg/kg <10 19.8 19.8 19.8 19.8 Acidity mg/kg 19.8 <10 <10 <10 <10 Sp.Gravity 2.25 2.34 2.42 2.28 2.37 pH(I:2.5) at 26 deg c 4.2 5.35 5.29 5.62 5.43

EC(1:2.5) at 25 deg us/cm 46.5 34.3 54.2 103.1 62.5 c Av.N mg/kg 246.89 153.54 181.02 224.96 197.27 Av.P mg/kg <3 <3 <3 154.52 <3 Av.K mg/kg 59.94 80 119.82 179.66 140 Ca mg/kg 195.7 293.85 783.45 783.65 1371.66 Mg mg/kg 234.84 176.31 646.35 352.64 764.21 Cl mg/kg 39.19 48.98 39.19 48.98 58.77 SO4 mg/kg <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 TOC % 0.97 0.26 0.43 0.75 0.53 Fe mg/kg 30.29 30.55 7.36 9.46 3.83 Cu mg/kg 3.9 2.8 18.12 5.02 29.66 Zn mg/kg 8.81 9.81 43.23 19.56 26.3 Pb mg/kg <5 <5 <5 <5 10 Mn mg/kg 24.15 65.59 407.93 99.14 371.48 B mg/kg <0.25 <0.25 <0.25 <0.25 <0.25 Na mg/kg 19.98 40 59.91 39.92 80 SAR - 0.06 0.11 0.1 0.07 0.11

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 109 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

3.1.11 Transport and Traffic The major road that connects Kathalchari Field with Agartala, the capital of State is NH 44 (It connects Guwahati and Silchar with the state capital Agartala). All the well locations can be approached either by black top road or brick soling roads or by ‘Kaccha’ roads arising from NH 44 and from a web of road network in the state. During field visit, it has been observed that major mode of public transport is light motor vehicles such as auto rickshaw, most frequently seen vehicle; medium motor vehicles such as four wheelers and heavy motor vehicles such as bus. Trucks are being used for the transportation of goods. CRPF and BSF personnel use trucks and medium motor vehicles for patrolling and transportation. Beside this, two wheelers are frequently used in cities and in urban areas as well. Traffic count survey was conducted at two locations; on Karbook-Amarpur Road towards Paschim Daluma and on road that connects Kuwaifung with NH-44 near Jolaibari (Syndicate), to assess the existing traffic density and traffic pattern of the entire Kathalchari Field, and also to suggest the proponent to select vehicle route and also to formulate and implement a traffic management plan during project development as well as for operation phase. To select this location, an assessment was made on existing road network on GIS imageries. Moreover, reconnaissance surveys were conducted by SENES team on the same. The traffic monitoring location was located on the approach road to gas fields and adjacent villages generated from a road that has a direct connection with NH -44. The traffic count was monitored continuously for 24 hours once during the study period. Traffic survey was conducted for vehicles categorized into heavy vehicles (truck, bus, trailer, Lorries, etc.), four wheelers (car, matador, jeep, etc.), three wheelers (auto, tempo, etc.) and two wheelers (motorcycle, etc.). The traffic survey results are provided in Table 3-10 and the traffic monitoring locations are shown in Figure 3-2.

TABLE 3-10: TRAFFIC MONITORING RESULTS Two Three Light Heavy Total Traffic Stations Wheeler Wheeler Vehicles Vehicles (nos.) (nos.) (nos.) (nos.) (nos.) Road connecting Kuwaifung with NH-44 603 232 61 30 926 near Jolaibari syndicate Karbook-Amarpur Road 926 331 565 322 2144 towards Paschim Daluma

Interpretation of Traffic Survey Results:  Traffic load was much higher at the Karbook- Amarpur road (2144 nos) compared to the Kuwaifung road (926 nos)  At Karbook-Amarpur road highest vehicular traffic (272 nos.) was recorded during 0900-1000 hours, while the lowest vehicular traffic load was recorded at 2400-0500

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 110 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

hrs (0 nos.). Percentage distribution of traffic load reveal 43.19% two wheelers, 15.44% three wheelers, 26.35% light vehicles and 15.02% heavy vehicles.  Highest vehicular traffic load at Kuwaifung Road was recorded at 0900-1000 hrs (93 nos.) while the lowest load was recorded during 2300-0500 hrs (0 nos.). Percentage distribution of traffic load reveal 65.12% two wheelers, 25.05% three wheelers, 6.59% light vehicles and 3.24% heavy vehicles. 3.1.12 Natural Hazards Natural hazards such as earth quake, flood, drought, cyclone etc. cause destruction of human life and properties. A natural calamity and disaster during the life cycle of the project may exert significant effects on the project activity, project function and also inhibits the availability of resources for the project. The access to the project site may also get disturbed through disruption of transportation links. Major natural calamities pertaining to the state of Tripura are furnished below: Seismicity & Earthquakes:

PROJECT AREA

The State of Tripura comes under the most severe seismic zone in the country, namely, Zone V of seismic Zoning Map of India (Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) 2000). A large number of moderate to large magnitude earthquakes have occurred within the State boundary as well

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 111 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari as within 100 km distance around it. Major and significant earth quakes have been furnished in Table 3-1126:

TABLE 3-11: SIGNIFICANT EARTHQUAKES OF TRIPURA Date/ Year Location of Remarks of Quake Epicentre 1869 within 18 km of the An earth quake of M 7.5 occurred, caused massive district town destruction in permanent infrastructures and lives. The old of Dharmanagar royal palace at Udaypur got destroyed form this earth quake. 12th June In Shillong Plateau, An earthquake took place in the state and adjacent areas of 1897 near Rangjoli, Assam which magnitude M 8.7. This was one of the most powerful earthquakes in the Indian sub-continent. The quake wreaked havoc across the present states of Tripura, Assam and Meghalaya. 1918 N.A. Srimangal area experienced an earth quake with a magnitude of M 7.6 1930 Dubri An earth quake took place with a magnitude of M 7.1 15th Indo-China Border An earth quake hit mainly the northern part of Tripura and it Aug,1950 Region was originated from Indo-China boarder region. The magnitude of this earth quake was 8.5 Richter. It was the 6th Largest earth quake of 20th century. 1950 N.A. An Earthquake of magnitude 6.3 Richter occurred within North Tripura district caused damage to the buildings and other infrastructures 1970 to N.A. According to the records of the Indian Meteorological 2000 Department, 41 earthquakes of 5.6 or lower magnitude have occurred within the coordinates 23.00º-25.00ºN and 91.00º- 93.00ºE 2013 In the state of little tremor felt in the southern part of the state and the Mizoram epicenter of which was located at Mizoram

It indicates that all the proposed well of Kathalchari block will be located in one of the most severe seismically active zones of the country. Flood: 750 km2 of land area of Tripura is considered to be flood prone. Nearly all the rivers are rain- fed and are prone to flood. The State is bestowed with a relatively high average annual rainfall of 192.727 cm with average number of rainy days at 92. Normally rain arrives in the State in late April and continues up to October. However, the intensity of rainfall increases during the months of June to September. Higher rainfall, that occurs during this period

26 Source: 1. Tripura Disaster Management Authority, Tripura India http://tdma.nic.in/V_EARTHQUACK.htm 27 Tripura State Disaster Management Authority . http://tdma.nic.in/V_Flood.htm

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 112 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari causing floods in low lying areas and erosion of land. Tripura, in the past witnessed worst form of disasters by disruption of means of communications caused due to damage of roads and bridges and also blockage of roads due to landslides. Flash flood is also a common phenomenon during rainy season. In last twenty years two major flood events occurred in the state of Tripura – One in 1999 and another in 2004 causing huge economic loss. The Historic records of major flood events have been incorporated in Table 3-12.

TABLE 3-12: FLOOD HISTORY OF TRIPURA28 Year Affected Areas Total Damage 1999 South Tripura, Gomati, Sipahijala, and 498.50 million INR West Tripura districts 2004 Two flood events occurred in June and N.A. September, 2004.Entire state of Tripura, especially Gomati and South Tripura and North Tripura

It has revealed from the Flood Hazard Maps of Tripura in State Disaster Management Plan (Draft) 2012-13 prepared by Tripura Disaster Management Authority and Revenue Dept, Govt. of Tripura that the areas adjacent to proposed well location of Kathalchari Field will experience flood at least 3-4 times a year. This phenomenon will be experienced mostly in areas adjacent to flood plains of ephemeral channels, second degree drainage and rivers present in Kathalchari Field. Dev 2 and its alternate locations (located in watershed of Gomati River); GGS location, Matabari, Dev 5S and its alternate locations (located in flood plain of Kuwaifung River); KL-1, Dev 1S and its alternate locations (located in the micro water-shed of a ephemeral channel that discharges in Muhuri River); Dev 6S and its alternate locations, Dev 42A and its alternate location (located in water-shed of Manu River) are in flood prone areas. Dev 8A and its alternate well locations are potential to flash flood.

Drought: Drought is an infrequent calamity in the state. However, it normally occurs in the State of Tripura due to delayed rainfall in the months of April-May. Deficient rainfall in those months results scarcity of drinking water as ground water level go down. The impact of dry spell hampers most on agricultural activities. It also adversely affects the Pisciculture, Sericulture and Tea plantations resulting to production loss in these sectors. Some historic draught events occurred in the state of Tripura has been furnished below: Induced29 by extremely low rainfall, drought occurred in the year 1988 and in the year 1999. Summer vegetables, paddy, sesamum, maize, etc were among the crops that had been damaged. Most affected districts were West Tripura, South Tripura and Gomati District.

28 http://www.tripurainfo.com/info/ATripura/Natural-Disasters.htm;

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 113 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

3.2 BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT 3.2.1 Introduction The proposed 12 development wells, GGS facility and pipeline are located in Kathalchari Field in Tripura. The gas field is located in Gomati and South Tripura districts of Tripura. The State is located in the Bio-geographic zone of 9B-North-East Hills and is rich in bio- diversity that is under continuous threat. Situated in the Indian sub-region of Oriental Zoo- geographic region, local flora and fauna bear a very close affinity and resemblance with floral and faunal components of Indo-Malayan and Indo-Chinese sub-regions.

The primary objectives of the biological environment study are:  Assess the vegetation types

 Identify common flora & fauna in the study area  Find out rare and endangered floral and faunal species (if any)  Evaluate wildlife habitat of the area and assess impact of the proposed project on wildlife & their habitats.  Assess impact of the proposed project on agriculture and domestic livestock. 3.2.2 Methodology

Desktop Review and Reconnaissance Survey A desktop review (published document, etc.) was conducted to determine the forest area, vegetation type (Champion and Seth, 1962), floral and faunal assemblage in the study area. A site reconnaissance visit was conducted on 27th to 30th March 2014 to identify different ecological habitats, sensitive ecological habitat and also to identify the targeted study area for baseline survey.

Baseline Survey Baseline survey was carried out to determine the existing ecological conditions and was designed to fill any data gaps, and to facilitate an adequate assessment of the project’s impacts upon ecology and the development of appropriate mitigation measures. Baseline survey was conducted on 24th to 28th April, 2014 for habitat survey, flora & faunal assemblage, in the study area. Baseline survey has two part- (i) Secondary data collection and (ii) Primary Survey.

Secondary Data Collection Secondary baseline data regarding sensitive ecological habitat (National Park, Sanctuary, Ecological Sensitive Area, Migratory Corridor, etc.), flora & fauna in the study area, forest

29 Droughts: http://www.tripurainfo.com/info/ATripura/Natural-Disasters.htm

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 114 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari cover was collected for Forest Working Plans; and other publish and unpublished documents. Stakeholder consultations (Forest Department, Local People, Panchayat, etc) were also carried out to understand the major flora & fauna in the study area, pressure on forest resources, presence of any Schedule I species.

Primary Survey Primary survey was carried out the targeted study area for habitat (terrestrial and aquatic), floral and faunal survey (terrestrial and aquatic). Special attention was paid to those areas, which will be directly impacted by proposed oil & gas drilling activity. 3.2.3 Terrestrial Ecosystem

Forest Resources The recorded forest area of the state is 6294 sq km, which constitutes 60.02% of its geographical area. The Reserved Forest (RF) constitute 66.33%, Protected Forest (PF) 0.03% and Unclassified Forest constitute 33.64%30. The forest cover in the state, based on interpretation of satellite imagery of January 2009 is 7977 sq. km which is 76.04% of the total geographical area. In terms of forest canopy density classes, the state has very dense forest 1.04%, moderately dense forest 44.67%, open forest 30.33%, scrub 0.69% and non- forest 23.27%31.

Forest Land for Proposed Activity The natural forest is mainly located in the sites where preliminary well locations have been proposed.

Vegetation Types The study area lies in Gomati and Bagafa Forest Division. The important forest types found in study area (Source: Forest Types of India 1962 by Champion and Seth) are presented in Table 3.13.

TABLE 3-13: VEGETATION TYPES IN STUDY AREA Types of Forest Forest Division Cachar Tropical Evergreen Forests (I/I/IB/C3) Bagafa Moist Mixed Deciduous Forests without Sal Bagafa, Gomati (I/3/3C/C3) Moist Mixed Deciduous Forests, Dry Bamboo Bagafa, Gomati Brakes (I/I/3C/2SI) Secondary Moist Bamboo Brakes (I/I/2/2B/2SI) Bagafa

30 FSI, 2011 31 FSI 2011

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 115 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Types of Forest Forest Division East Himalayan Lower Bhabar Sal (I/I/3/3C/CIb) Bagafa Low alluvial savannah woodland 1/3/3C/EI/IS1 Bagafa, Gomati

Cachar Tropical Evergreen Forests: This type of forest is found in low lying areas of the division where soil moisture is moderate or high. The garjan forests and the other evergreen tree forests of the areas are included in this type. The garjan trees occur in gregarious form in some patches of the blocks. It occurs in association with some other species in some place. The garjan is seen to have its associates like kanak (Schima wallichii), jam (Syzigium cuminii), bahera (Terminalia bakrica), awal (Vitex peduncularis), jarul (Lagerstremia parviflora), etc in several places. Moist Mixed Deciduous Forests: These forests are comprised of deciduous and evergreen trees. The deciduous trees are significantly present. These forests are found in small pockets of Barmura-Debtamura Block. The high hills are seen to have mostly deciduous trees. The evergreen trees are seen to have their presence in low hills, undulated lands and flat tilas. These forests have good density in many interior isolated areas. The undergrowth is thin to moderate. Three distinct stories in good density areas of the forests are noticed. The top story consists of kanak (Schima wallichi), jam (Syziguim cuminii), karai (Albizia procerra), chamal (Artocarpas chaplasa), jarul (Lagerstromia parviflora), chhatian (Alstonia scholaris) etc. The middle store consists of hargaza (Dillenia pentagyna), kumira (careya arborea), bhadi (Lannea grandis), rata (Amoora wallichii), poma (Cedrella toona), chhotamel (Sapium baccatum), medda (Trewia nudiflora), pichla (Grewia microcos) kaimala (Odina wodier), kajikara (Garuga pinnata) etc. The undergrowth consists of Eupotarium, Melastomia, Mecaranga, Strablus asper, Clerodendron infortunatun, acacias etc. Moist Mixed Deciduous Forests, Dry Bamboo Brakes: This type of bamboo forest is found in the areas of Moist Mixed Deciduous Forests in heavily jhumed areas of certain blocks of Baramura-Debtamura Forest. Muli (Melocana baciferra), mritinga (Bambusa tulda) and powra (Bambusa teres) are the major bamboo species found in these forests. Thatch and other tall grasses are seen to be present. Jhuming is responsible in many areas for existing of such type of forests; otherwise the bamboo forests would exist in small patches in this Moist Mixed Deciduous Forests. The quality of bamboo in moist areas of low hills, lunga lands and undulated areas is good but in drier areas, it is poor. Secondary Moist Bamboo Brakes: This type of bamboo forest is found to exist in parts of semi-evergreen forests of Baramura Debtamura Forest. This type of bamboo forest has low spreading habit and usually do not allow other vegetation to grow under them. Pecha (Dendrocalamus hamiltonaii), makal (Bambusa pallida), dolu (Schizostachium dullooa), bari (Bambusa polymorpha), barak (Bambusa balcooa), etc. valuable bamboos grown in these forest. Their presence might not be seen in the forests for over exploitation in the past

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 116 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari and excessive illegal extraction. But they grow abundantly in the house sites of the villagers living in the forests and in the vicinity of the forest areas. East Himalayan Lower Bhabar Sal: This type is characterized by tall and high sal trees, where the soil is deep, loamy and well drained. The sal forests are seen to have three distinct stories in many places. The top story consists of sal and kanak (Schima wallichii),. The principal associates are bahera (Terminalis balerica), arjun (Terminalia arjuna), udal (Sterculia villosa), awal (Vitex penduncularis), chamal (Artocarpus chaplasa), karai Albizzia procera), gamar (Gmelina arborea), jam (Syzigium cumini), neur (Bursera serrata), etc. A moderate to thin middle story is found to exist with the species mainly hargaza (Dilleniya pentagyna), kumira (Careya abrorea), jinari (Premna bangalensis), sidha jaral (Lagersroemia parviflora), Shonal (Casia fistula), amlaki (Emblica officinalis), etc. the undergrowth consists of bhait (Clerodendron viscosum), flemengia, eupatorium, thatch (Imperata cylendrica), etc. Low alluvial savannah woodland: This type of forest is found in low hills, hillocks and undulated areas throughout the higher reaches of Gomati and Bagafa division. The presence of thatch, various tall grasses, scrubs, bamboos and scattered karai, simul, Acacia catechu, Terminalia balerica, etc trees are the characteristic of this type of forests and these are the species of preliminary succession stage. It is important to bear in mind that this type of forest is the result of retrogression set in by repeated clear felling in the forests and burning down the debris for practicing shifting cultivation. Had the shifting cultivation not been practiced, the vegetation would gradually progress towards Moist Mixed Deciduous Forests and Cachar Tropical Evergreen Forests.

Man Made Forest and Non-Forest Vegetation: The plantation of commercially important species like rubber and teak are being raised regularly in the degraded forest areas of these forest divisions. Vegetations are also recorded in the non-forest are of the block. Tree species in these sites are mostly planted and few are natural. The village woodlot, road side plantation and riparian vegetation are recorded in the study area, these are as follows: Village Woodlot: Naturally or planted trees on community or private land. Bamboo and timber woods are planted in this area. Some important tree species are Mangifera indica, Aegle mermelos, Delonix regia, Dalberjia sisso, Ficus religiosa, Ficus bengalensis, Gmelina arborea Vitex neuganda, etc. Road side Plantation: Trees planted along the major roads in the study area. Some important tree species are Alistonia scholaris, Anthrocephalus sinensis, Azadirchta indica, Acacia auriculoformis, Artocarpus heterophyllus, Delonix regia, Phyllanthus embilica, Ficus religiosa, Mangifera indica, Lagerstroemia speciosa. Riparian Vegetation: Vegetation along river bank, major plant species are Anthocephalus sinensis, Alistonia scholaris, Bombax ceiba, Terminalia arjuna, etc.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 117 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Floral Diversity Important flora in the gas fields are Schima wallichi, Syziguim cuminii, Albizia procerra, Artocarpas chaplasa, Lagerstromia parviflora, Alstonia scholaris, Dillenia pentagyna, careya arborea, Lannea grandis, Amoora wallichii, Cedrella toona, Sapium baccatum, Trewia nudiflora, Grewia microcos, Odina wodier, Garuga pinnata, etc. Bamboo: Bamboo plays a very vital role in the economy of the State as it serves the artisan & non-artisan users of the state. A total of 19 species of bamboo are reported in the state. Species of bamboo found in Tripura are Barak (Bambusa balcooa), Bari (Bambusa polymorpha), Mritinga (Bambusa tulda), Muli (Melocanna baccifera), Kai (Bambusa nutans), Paora (Bambusa teres), Rupai (Dendrocalamus longispathus), Dolu (Neohuzeaua dullooa), Makal (Bambusa pallida), Pecha (Dendrocalamus hamiltonii), Kailyai (Oxytenanthera nigrociliata), Kanak kaich (Bambusa offinis), Lanthi bans (Dendrocalamus strictus), Tetua (Bambusa spp.), Ish (Bambusa spp.), Jai (Bambusa spp.), Bombash (Bambusa spp.), Sairil/Wadu bamboo (Melocalamus compactiflorus), Bosai (Bambusa spp.) Cane: A total of six (6) cane species are reported from Tripura (C. viminalis, C. floribundus, C. tenuis, C. leptospadix, C. guruba, C. erectus). However, no estimates on the existing growing stock of aforesaid cane species are available. Medicinal plants resource: Tripura has one of the oldest, richest & most diverse cultural traditions associated with use of medical plants. There are large number of village based herbal medicines practitioners who have traditional knowledge of herbal home remedies of ailments & nutrition. So far about 266 species of medicinal plants (68 trees, 39 shrubs, 71 herbs and 88 climbers) have been identified and documented Plant Diversity: During the terrestrial plant survey, about 149 numbers of plant species was recorded, which includes trees, bamboos, canes, shrubs, herbs, climbers, grasses & reeds. The detailed listing of floral species recorded in the study area is given in Annexure 3.8. 3.2.4 Endemic, Threatened & Endangered Floral Species The Wildlife (Protection) Act 1972 prohibits picking, uprooting, damaging, destroying, acquiring or collecting six species of plants from forest land and any area specified, by notification, by the Central Government [Clause 17A of Chapter IIIA (Protection of Specified Plants), page 346 of Handbook Vol. 1]. The six species are: Beddome’s cycad (Cycas beddomei), Blue Vanda (Vanda coerulea), Kuth (Sassurea lappa), Ladies slipper orchids (Paphiopedilum spp.), Pitcher plant (Nepenthes khasiana), Red Vanda (Rananthera imshootiana). The research on status of flora identifying 379 species of trees, 320 shrubs, 581 herbs, 165 climbers, 16 climbing shrubs, 35 ferns, 45 epiphytes and 4 parasites (Total 1,545 taxa) reveal that there are 50 plants species restricted to Tripura and its neighbouring States. Out of them 7 are endemic and 18 are rare plants. Angiopteris evecta, a fern and Gnetum montanum, a giant climber belonging to Gymnosperm are two rare species but occur in profusely in Trishna Sanctuary. Tree ferns (Cyathia spp.), which are also primitive and endangered, are

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 118 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari found in South Tripura. There are 24 species of orchids of which and Dendrobium has the highest species diversity (14 species). Endangered orchids like Blue vanda (Vanda caerulea) and Red vanda (Renunthera imschootiana) are found in the state. None of these species is recorded in the proposed well sites during the EIA.

Wildlife Habitat Tripura is home to a number of mammalian fauna like Indian Elephant, Gaur, Golden langur, Leopard, Golden Cat, Sloth bear, Hollock Gibbon, slow loris, capped langur, Phayre’s langur, stump-tailed macaquae and pig-tailed macaque, Sambar, Barking deer, etc. Wildlife in Tripura is given protection through a network 4 Wildlife Sanctuaries namely Sepahijala Wildlife Sanctuary (WLS), Gomati WLS, Trishna WLS and Roa WLS. The Kathalchari Field does not lie within the 10km boundary of any Wildlife Sanctuary. The ecological sensitive map of the project site is presented in Figure 3.12. Important Area (IBA): The State has four wildlife sanctuaries, namely Gomati, Trishna, Sipahijala and Roa. Only two protected areas are identified as IBAs, Gomati and Trishna. None of the protected areas are within the ten kilometer of the Field Boundary. The closest wildlife sanctuary is Gomati that is nearly 14-15 kilometer away from the Field on the North East. Tripura is one of the states of India where very little is known about . It is a completely Data Deficient State. Both the IBAs fall in the Eastern Himalayas Endemic Bird Area (EBA 130) (Stattersfield, et al. 1998). Twenty one birds are listed in this EBA as restricted range species. Many species are likely to occur in Gomati and Trishna wildlife sanctuaries. Two threatened birds, the White Winged Duck Cairina scutulata and the Green Peafowl Pavo muticus were reportedly present in the part; however, there is no recent report (A. U. Choudhury pers. comm. 2004). He has reported only one vulnerable species, the Lesser Adjutant Leptoptilos javanicus and two near threatened species- Dartar (Anhinga melanogaster) and Great Pied Hornbill (Buceros bicornis) in IBA. Elephant Habitat; A small herd of nine elephants occurs in Tilbhum, Longai and Patharia hill Reserved Forests of southern Assam, adjoining area of Tripura and Bangladesh (Sylhet area). The habitat in the range is mostly semi-evergreen with patches of teak plantations and stretches of bamboo. The total area of the habitat is approximately 140 sq. km, the break-up being, Assam - 80 sq. km, Tripura 20 sq. km and Bangladesh 40 sq. km. Another group of around 50 elephants occurs in the forests of Tripura and north-west Mizoram. This population was continuous with those of the Chittagong Hill Tracts of Bangladesh. These elephants are now concentrating mostly in the PAs such as Gomati WLS in Tripura and in Mizoram. The forest type is of tropical semi- evergreen with large stretches of bamboo. The area of the total elephant range is 2,100 sq. km, the break-up being: Tripura 1,600 sq. km and Mizoram 500 sq. km. Primate Habitat: Seven primate species have been documented in Tripura out of a total 15 found in India. Of these primates slow loris and stumped tailed monkeys have become rare. Phayre’s monkey (locally known as ‘Chashma Banar’), has a very restricted distribution in India, and is found in Tripura. Hoolock gibbon is the only ape found in India, and its

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 119 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari population has been rapidly dwindling in Tripura. Distribution of Hoolock gibbon is reported from Gomati WLS, Trishna WLS and North Tripura. Carnivores: Sloth Bear, Leopard, Leopard cat, Golden cat, wild dog are reported from Tripura. The lesser carnivores like, jungle cat (Felis chaus) the large Indian civet (Viverra zibetha), the small Indian civet (Viverricula indica), the Indian fox (Vulpes bengalensis), the common mongoose (Herpestes edwardsi), the small Indian mongoose (Herpestes auropunctatus) etc. was reported in the Tripura. 3.2.5 Faunal Diversity Mammals: Mammals within the study area are represented by 17 species of mammals. The checklist of mammals in the study area is given in Annexure 3.9. There is no record of large herbivores and large carnivores in the Kathalchari Field. Among mammalian species, langurs, leaf monkey, Pangolin, Wild Boar, Indian Civet Cat, etc are reported in the gas fields. Avifauna: Avifauna in the study area are represented by Indian pied hornbill, Bengal vultureGrey-bellied Tesia, Blyth’s Kingfisher, Bluethroated Barbet, Bay Woodpecker, Maroon Oriole, Black-naped Oriole, Grey Treepie, Black-winged Cuckoo Shrike, Short- billed Minivet, White-throated Bulbu, Black Bulbul and Grey Peacock Pheasant, Lesser Adjutant Stork, White Winged Wood duck, White cheeked Hill Partridge, Black-browed Leaf Wabler, Green , Purple wood or Pale capped Pigeon etc. A total of 48 species of avi-fauna were recorded from the forest area. The detailed checklist of avi-fauna in has been presented in Annexure 3.10. Herpetofauna: Review of available literature - J. Majumder, et al., (2012)32 reported 55 species of herpetofauna belonging to 39 genera and 15 families from Tripura. Out of which, 18 species were snakes, 17 species of lizards, 3 species of turtles and 17 species of amphibians. Twenty six species are new record for the state. Twenty four species were enlisted in IUCN Red List category. The study also mentioned about the threats to herpetofauna. Major threats for herpetofauna of the state were the jhum cultivation in the hilly areas, forest destruction for fodder and fuel wood collections, habitat fragmentation, illegal logging, hunting for ethno medicinal preparations, excessive use of agrochemicals and pesticides in agricultural fields. In addition elimination of forested areas and extensive rubber plantation throughout the state of Tripura will pose threat to the herpetofauna due to modification of their foraging and breeding grounds. In the study area 11 species of reptiles and 6 species of amphibian was reported. The detailed checklist of reptiles and amphibians has been presented in Annexure 3.11 and 3.12 respectively.

32 Joydeb Majumder, et al, 2013, Documentation of herpetofaunal species richness in Tripura, , NeBIO, Vol. 3, No. 1, March 2012, 60-70

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 120 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

FIGURE 3-12: ECOLOGICAL SENSITIVITY MAP

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 121 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

3.2.6 Endemic, Endangered & Threatened Fauna The non- forest area and forest area form the habitat of some endangered and threatened species which are listed in the Schedule I of the Indian Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 and amendment in 1991. About 6 species of Schedule I were reported from the study area. (Refer Table 3.14).

TABLE 3-14: SCHEDULED ANIMAL SPECIES IN THE STUDY AREA Wildlife Schedule Sl. No. Scientific Name Common Name A. Schedule I

A.1 : Mammals A.1.1 Trachypithecus phayrei Phayre’s Leaf Monkey

A.1.2 Manis crassicaudata Indian Pangolin A.2 Birds

A.2.1 Anthracocerus albirustris Indian pied hornbill A.2.2 Bucerus bicornis Great pied hornbill

A 2.3 Gyps benghalensis Whitebacked of Bengal vulture A.2 Reptiles Gecko gecko Tucktoo

3.2.7 Aquatic Ecosystem

Aquatic Habitat There are numerous rivers and streams of Tripura support a rich diversity of inland wetland habitats. According to the National Wetland Atlas, Tripura there are 432 Wetlands in Tripura covering an area of 14559 ha. These wetlands vary in site from 2.5 ha. and above. All these wetlands falls in following 6 (six) categories- Lakes/ponds, Oxbow lakes, Waterlogged (seasonal), Reservoirs, Tanks and Waterlogged33. Besides the above wetlands, there are large numbers of water harvesting structures in different Forest Divisions which also qualify as wetland areas. These wetlands also support diverse birds and fish species. There are no lakes, reservoirs in the gas fields. Following aquatic ecological groups has been studied.

Macrophytes Aquatic vegetation is observed in pond, cut-off meanders, waterlogged, tank/pond wetland types. The most dominant macrophytes are Azolla pinnata, Eichhornia crassipes, Hydrilla verticillata, Ipomea aquatica, Lemna minor, Najas graminea, Pistia stratiotes, Salvinia

33 National Wetland Atlas, Tripura; Space Applications Centre (ISRO), Ahmedabad, 2010

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 122 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari natans, Trapa natans, Typha angustifolia, Utricularia striatula and vallisneria spiralis. A total of 11 species of aquatic macrophytes were recorded from these aquatic ecosystems within the study area (Annexure 3.13).

Fishes & Fisheries Fish is widely available in the still (Bills / Ponds) and flowing water bodies (Rivers/Nalas), reservoir of this region. Freshwater fish species in the wetlands of Tripura has been well represented. More than 47 species have been reported from the Lakes/ponds, Oxbow lakes, Waterlogged (seasonal), Reservoirs, Tanks and Waterlogged, commercially important among them being Aorichthys aor, Channa marulius, C. punctatus, Mastacembelus pancalus, M. guentheri, Puntius stigma, P. ticto, P. sarana, Xenentodon cancila, Amblypharyngodon mola, Chanda ranga, Heteropneustes fossilis, Clarias batrachus, Notopterus notopterus, Tor tor and Labeo gonius. Besides, the Indian and exotic carps, viz., Catla catla, Labeo rohita, Cirrhinus mrigala, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix, Ctenopharyngodon idella and Cyprinus carpio, have been introduced successfully in the reservoir. Catla-rohu and rohu-catla hybrids are also reported from the reservoir. 31 species of fishes were reported from the study area that is given in Annexure 3.14.

3.3 AGRICULTURAL DIVERSITY Most of the rural poor living in and around the forest is dependent on agriculture for their livelihood. The terrain of Tripura consists of hilly land (tillas) and flat lands (Lungas). Most of the rice cultivation takes place in the lunga lands that may extended to the forest areas. Among the tribal population occupying the forest for centuries jhuming or shifting cultivation has become social custom. The major cropping systems of these districts are rice based cropping system, plantation based cropping system, and horticultural crop based cropping system and forest. Rice is grown mainly as mono crop or double crop, rice in sequence with vegetable / oilseed. There are systems of intercropping like areca nut, banana, , potato, French bean etc. The district is suitable for growing fruits like coconut, areca nut, banana, pineapple, jackfruits, guava and citrus. Extensive rubber plantation is recorded in the Kathalchari field. Tripura Forest Development and Plantation Corporation Limited (TFDPCL) manages commercial rubber & bamboo plantations spread over 38 field stations or Rubber Plantation Centers (RPC) spread over all the eight districts of Tripura. The Corporation adopted rehabilitation of degraded forestland through commercial rubber plantations on 7087 hectare area as its primary objective along with sustainable rehabilitation of tribal shifting cultivators in the state of Tripura. One existing well KL-1 is located within unclassed forest and Matabari-1 is located within agricultural field. Out of the preliminary well locations three are located in Reserved Forest; and five locations are within unclassified forest. The proposed alternative well locations are mostly located in agricultural land (10 nos).

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 123 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

3.4 LIVESTOCK Livestock like cattle, buffalo, goat sheep, duck, and pig are reared for dairy products, meat, egg and for agriculture purpose. Majority of cattle and buffalo are local variety. Backyard poultry farms are mostly common in this area; however, some commercial poultry farms are also recorded in the district. Livestock use agriculture field during the off-season as a seasonal grazing field, and their source of drinking water is surface water (ponds and stream). As the proposed drilling site is mono-crop area and there is no water body, therefore due to the proposed project there will be no direct impact on domesticated animals. But due to discharge of waste water from the drilling activity the nearby surface water (stream) may be chemically polluted and affect one of the drinking water resources for domesticated animals

3.5 SOCIOECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT A socio economic assessment of the positive and negative impacts on the people likely to be directly and indirectly affected by the project was conducted along with other studies during the EIA. The assessment facilitated an understanding of the needs, demands, preferences, capacities and constraints of the people in the vicinity of the project operation. It was undertaken primarily to enhance the understanding of other relevant factors such as social organizations and networks, livelihood patterns, social infrastructure etc. The assessment attempts to predict and evaluate future impacts of project upon people, their physical and psychological health and well-being, their economic facilities, cultural heritage, lifestyle and other value system and also helped in prioritizing JOGPL’s commitment towards the CSR initiatives. Inputs from the social assessment into the design phase facilitated in:  Tracking potential adverse effects over different time frames and different activities  Reviewing options to eliminate such negative impacts through design changes or mitigate them through specific social protection or mitigation measures  Reviewing options to extend or enhance benefits for the population in the vicinity of the project site. This section deals with the baseline socio-economic environment of the Kathalchari Gas Field in the State of Tripura with respect to Jubilant Energy’s proposed development well drilling activity. The following section discusses the methodology used for the socio- economic assessment. The subsequent sections discuss the baseline profile of the district and the villages within the study area. The information provided has been primarily derived from the secondary sources (Census of India). In addition primary information was also collected during the discussions at the villages with the local community members. The village-wise secondary data (obtained from Census, 2011) has been taken into consideration for analyzing the socio-economic profile for the Kathalchari Gas Field.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 124 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

3.5.1 Methodology The social assessment was primarily based on the analysis of the secondary data obtained from the census survey 2011 and Community consultations. Following tools were used for gathering information and validating secondary data after considering nature of project operation and understanding the demographic characteristic of the area:

Study Area Demarcation The local communities which would primarily be affected were identified based on the location of the tentative drilling operations as proposed by Jubilant Energy. The villages were selected within 1-2 km radius of the proposed well location considering the fact that there might be potential impacts on the socio-economic-cultural and environment of the local communities residing in these villages. For further assessment of socioeconomic issues and impacts on different stakeholders, detailed consultations with the community were planned in these villages. The discussions focused on the issues of population/demography, education profile, medical facilities and amenities like drinking water, transport and communication and also on primary and secondary occupation of the villagers.

Community Consultations Consultations with community are a continuous process that was carried in the EIA process and would be continued during the construction and operation phases of the project. Issues like land and resource damage, social disturbance, severance and increased congestion, noise and air pollution, employment opportunities, need for development of basic infrastructure, safe drinking water, sanitation facilities in the villages located in 1-2 Km periphery were discussed during the consultations so that they can be adequately addressed through the environment management plans. The consultations also helped in developing preliminary understanding of the requirement of social development initiatives, which are required in the project village and may be undertaken as part of the Jubilant Energy’s CSR activity.

3.6 GENERAL SOCIOECONOMIC PROFILE This EIA deals with Kathalchari Gas Field located in Gomati and South Tripura districts of the state of Tripura. Tripura is the 2nd smallest state in terms of area, but the 2nd most populous state in the North Eastern Region. Although the state is small with a population of only over three million, the social composition of the population of Tripura is diverse. In particular, around one-third of the population comprises people belonging to the Scheduled Tribes. For administrative convenience and decentralization of power Tripura which had once been a single district only is now divided into altogether eight districts, twenty three subdivisions and forty five rural development blocks. Besides, a special feature of the state is the vibrant existence of an Autonomous District Council (ADC) for tribal based on 6th schedule of the Indian constitution. The ADC in Tripura encompasses 68.10% of the state's total geographical territory.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 125 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Tribal of Tripura Tripura a hilly State in the North-Eastern region of India is the homeland of different tribes. Altogether there are 19(nineteen) tribes in the State. They could be divided into 2(two) major groups as (i) Ab-original and (ii) Immigrants. All the aboriginal tribes have been migrated in this territory from a place in-between Tibet, up hills of Burma like Arakan Hills Tracts and Shan State and adjacent to China. Aboriginal tribes are Tripuri, Reang, , , Lusai, Uchai, Chaimal, Halam, Kukis, Garos, Mog and Chakma. Other tribes like Bill, Munda, Orang, Santal, Lepcha, Khasia, Bhutias are the immigrant tribes came and settled here for economic reasons. Most of them are Central Indian Tribes and came from Madhya Pradesh, Bihar, Orissa and West Bengal. Some of these tribes are however Northern-Frontier tribes came from , Meghalaya, Sikkim and North Bengal. Chakmas and Mogs are Arakan Tribes entered Tripura through Chittagang Hills Tracts. Linguistically tribes of Tripura could be divided into 3(three) groups (i) Bodo Groups, (ii) Kuki-Chin Groups and (iii) Arakan Groups. Tripuri, Reang, Jamatia, Uchai and Noatias are Mongoloid tribes and belong to Bodo linguistic group of tribes. Kukis, Lusai and most of the tribes under Halam tribes are linguistically belongs to Kuki-Chin group and speak in Kuki-chin language. Mog and Chakmas speak in Arakan Language. By religion, most of the Tripura tribes follow Hinduism. But Lusai-Kukis are mostly Christian. Chakmas and Mogs follow Buddhism.

As of 2011 Census, the state had 3,671,032 residents with a density of 350 persons per sq. km., constituting 0.3% of the country's population. Scheduled tribes, form about 30 per cent of Tripura's population. The -speaking are the major group among 19 tribes and many subtribes; Bengali people form the ethno-linguistic majority in Tripura. Together with the neighboring nation of Bangladesh and the state of West Bengal, it makes up the ethno-linguistic region of Bengal. The population of the state has increased at the decadal growth rate of 14.8% between 2001-2011whereas Total number of Households increased from 664334 in 2001 to 855556 in 2011 (increased by 28.8%). The 2001 Census represents the sex ratio of Tripura is 960 (in 2001 it was 948), all India it is 943. The Schedule Cast Population is 17.8% of total population. Sex ratio was 962 in 2001 now in 2011 are 959 and the Schedule Tribe Population is 31.8% of total Population and Sex ratio was 970 in 2001 now in 2011 it is 983. Sate literacy rate is 87.22% (against 73.19% in 2001) 4th in India. Male-Female Literacy gap is decreased significantly. Female literacy increased from 64.9 in 2001 to 82.7 in 2011. 40% of total populations in Tripura are workers. Total workers increases by 26.7% (1159561 in 2001 to 1469521 in 2011). Percentage of Main workers to total workers is 73.3% and Percentage of Marginal workers to total workers is 26.7%. 20.1% of the total workers are cultivators and number of cultivators as main worker decreases by 2.2% (252343 in 2001 to 246707 in 2011). 24.1% of the total workers is agriculture labourers and also number of Agriculture labourers as main activity increases by 19.8% (168519 in 2001 to 201863 in 2011). 2.8% of the total workers are household industry workers. Total Population with household industry as main activity decreases by 3% (19896 in 2001 to 19296 in 2011). 53 percent of total workers are other workers. Population of workers engaged in other activity increases by 29.2% (471534 in 2001 to 609153 in 2011). They are mainly salaried personnel, self-employed & involved in non-agricultural activities etc.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 126 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

As the study area defined for the proposed project encompasses South Tripura and Gomati districts therefore details of the aforesaid districts are summarized in Table 3-15 below

TABLE 3-15: DETAILS OF OPERATING DISTRICTS IN TRIPURA Details South Tripura Gomati Sub-Division 3 (Belonia, Sabroom, Shantir 3 (Udaipur, Amarpur, Karbook) Bazar) RD Block/ Nagar Pnachayet 6 (Bogafa, Raj Nagar, 7 (Matabari, Kakraban, Killa, Hrishyamukh, Satchand, Amarpur, Ompi, Karbook, Rupaichari, Jolaibari) Silachari) No of Panchayet/ADC in the NA NA district Geographical area of the district 2152 2966.2 Total Population of the District 433737 436868 (As per census 2011) Population density of the 201 259 district Male Population in the District 221796 222957 Female Population in the 211941 213911 District Sex Ratio Of the District 956 959 Literacy Rate of the district 85.09% 86.19% Male Literacy 93.39% 91.92% Female literacy Rate 79.54% 80.13%

3.6.1 Demographic Profile

The study area for socio economic profiling was defined within block and surrounding areas based on the proposed location of production wells and its proximity to the village and professional judgment. The baseline study primarily focuses on twenty one villages within Kathalchari gas field. This comprises of twelve villages of South Tripura district, nine villages in Gomati district. The list of villages with their respective Rural Development (R. D.) Blocks and District have been provided in the Table 3-16 below.

TABLE 3-16: LIST OF THE STUDY AREA VILLAGES IN THE KATHALCHARI GAS FIELD IN TRIPURA District R.D. Block Village Dakshin Barapathary, Purba Pillak, Tairumachhara, Jolaibari Abhangachhara, Uttar Taichama, Uttar Hichachara, South Chalita Bankul, Uttar manu Bankul, Dakhin Manu Bankul, Tripura Rupaichari Kathalchhari, Bagmara Bagafa Baramura Debtamura RF

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 127 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

District R.D. Block Village Purba Sarbang, Gungia, Paschim Daluma, Lebachhara, , Paharpur, Amarpur Gomati Dalak, Birganj, Paschim Sarbang, Karbook Laogang

The study area for further detailed socio economic assessment and community consultation was conducted in the villages located within 1-2 km radius around the proposed development wells in Kathalchari gas fields, as these are the villages which are directly or indirectly most impacted by the project. These villages are primarily selected based on reconnaissance surveys, census data information, topo sheet maps, understanding of the project and professional judgment. Jubilant Energy proposes to drill 9 new development wells, re-entry to 2 existing wells and one GGS but the study covers all the proposed preliminary and alternate locations and GGS in Kathalchari gas field. Village within 1-2 km radius around the proposed production wells with their respective R. D. Block and District has been summarized in the Table 3-17 below.

TABLE 3-17: LIST OF THE SELECTED VILLAGES NEAR TO PROPOSED WELL LOCATION IN KATHALCHARI GAS FIELD Village Well Name R.D. Block District KL-Dev-4 KL-Dev-4B KL-Dev-4A KL-Dev-7 Purba Pilak KL-Dev-7A Jolaibari South Tripura GGS KL-Dev-2A KL-Dev-2 KL-1 Abhangachhara KL-Dev-4C Jolaibari South Tripura Tairumachhara Matabari-1 Jolaibari South Tripura KL-Dev-5 Jolaibari South Tripura KL-Dev-5A Baramura Debtamura KL-Dev-1(Dev-37B) Jolaibari South Tripura Reserved Forest Dev-34A-1 Jolaibari South Tripura Dev-37A Jolaibari South Tripura KL-Dev-6 Karbook Gomati Laogang KL-Dev-25A Karbook Gomati KL-Dev-26 Karbook Gomati

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 128 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Village Well Name R.D. Block District Uttar Taichhama KL-Dev-3 Satchand South Tripura Chalita Bankul KL-Dev-3A Satchand South Tripura Dev 50A_Alt Jolaibari South Tripura Dakshin Barapatray KL-Dev-50A Jolaibari South Tripura

The demographic profile in terms of total population, household size, and sex-ratio of the selected villages in the block has been summarized in the sections below, while the detailed demographic profile of the study area villages has been provided in Annexure 3.15. The village level demography, literacy, work class and socioeconomic data of the 2011 census has been used. However, village amenities data has been taken from 2001 Census due to non- availability of 2011 database.

Population and Household Size Among above mentioned the villages located in 1-2 km periphery of the proposed well location in the Kathalchari gas field, Purba Pillak (4073) has the highest population among the study area villages followed by Baramura Debtamura R.F. (3328). The lowest populations were recorded for Laogang with a total population of 1004. The household size of the study area villages generally ranged within 3.97 to 4.95 with an average household size of 4.54. The demographic profile of villages is given in Annexure 3.15 Population and household of villages where wells location have been identified is summarized in the Table 3-18 below

TABLE 3-18: POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLD SIZE SELECTED VILLAGES NEAR TO PROPOSED WELL LOCATION IN KATHALCHARI GAS FIELD No of House Total Household Village Well Name Hold Population Size KL-Dev-4 KL-Dev-4B KL-Dev-4A KL-Dev-7 Purba Pilak KL-Dev-7A 881 4073 4.62 GGS KL-Dev-2A KL-Dev-2 KL-1 Abhangachhara KL-Dev-4C 242 1123 4.64 Tairumachhara Matabari-1 426 2107 4.95

Baramura Debtamura KL-Dev-5 765 3328 4.35 RF KL-Dev-5A

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 129 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

No of House Total Household Village Well Name Hold Population Size KL-Dev-1(Dev-37B) Dev-34A-1 Dev-37A KL-Dev-6 Laogang KL-Dev-25A 253 1004 3.97 KL-Dev-26 Uttar Taichhama KL-Dev-3 284 1331 4.69 Chalita Bankul KL-Dev-3A 309 1498 4.85 Dev 50A_Alt Dakshin Barapatray 415 1772 4.27 KL-Dev-50A

Sex Ratio The average sex ratio of 966 recorded for the study area villages and is higher than the state averages of Tripura (960) and the country average (943) .The highest sex ratio is recorded for Abhangachhara (1053) followed by Chalita Bankul (1003) village. Of all the villages within the study area, 75% of the villages have a sex-ratio of more than 900 and the lowest sex-ratio was been recorded at Dakshin Barapathary (875) and Tairumachhara (875). Detail is given in Annexure 3.15. Detail is given in Table 3.19 below.

TABLE 3-19: SEX RATIO SELECTED VILLAGES NEAR TO PROPOSED WELL LOCATION IN KATHALCHARI GAS FIELD % of Male % of Female Village Well Name Sex Ratio Population Population KL-Dev-4 KL-Dev-4B KL-Dev-4A

KL-Dev-7 Purba Pilak KL-Dev-7A 50.43 49.57 983 GGS KL-Dev-2A KL-Dev-2 KL-1 Abhangachhara KL-Dev-4C 48.71 51.29 1053 Tairumachhara Matabari-1 53.35 46.65 875 Baramura Debtamura KL-Dev-5 49.97 50.03 1001 RF KL-Dev-5A

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 130 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

% of Male % of Female Village Well Name Sex Ratio Population Population KL-Dev-1(Dev-37B) Dev-34A-1 Dev-37A KL-Dev-6 Laogang KL-Dev-25A 51.10 48.90 957 KL-Dev-26 Uttar Taichhama KL-Dev-3 50.56 49.44 978 Chalita Bankul KL-Dev-3A 49.93 50.07 1003 Dev 50A_Alt Dakshin Barapatray 53.33 46.67 875 KL-Dev-50A

FIGURE 3-13: DISTRIBUTION OF MALE AND FEMALE POPULATION IN SELECTED VILLAGES IN KATHALCHARI GAS FIELD

Scheduled Caste (SC) & Scheduled Tribes (ST) The overall demographic data of study area villages shows that more than 95% schedule tribe population was observed in seven villages within the study area whereas the schedule caste population was observed in four villages and the highest SC population recorded in AbhangachharaVillage (2.76%). Details of SC and ST population are given in Annexure 3.15. Detail is given in Table 3-20 below.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 131 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

TABLE 3-20: SC & ST POPULATION SELECTED VILLAGES NEAR TO PROPOSED WELL LOCATION IN KATHALCHARI GAS FIELD % SC % of ST Village Well Name Population Population KL-Dev-4 KL-Dev-4B KL-Dev-4A KL-Dev-7 0.00 95.56 Purba Pilak KL-Dev-7A

GGS KL-Dev-2A KL-Dev-2 KL-1 Abhangachhara KL-Dev-4C 2.76 77.20 Tairumachhara Matabari-1 0.28 98.20 KL-Dev-5 KL-Dev-5A Baramura Debtamura RF KL-Dev-1(Dev-37B) 0.15 98.11 Dev-34A-1 Dev-37A KL-Dev-6 Laogang KL-Dev-25A 0.00 98.71 KL-Dev-26 Uttar Taichhama KL-Dev-3 0.45 98.80 Chalita Bankul KL-Dev-3A 0.00 98.60 Dev 50A_Alt Dakshin Barapatray 0.00 99.60 KL-Dev-50A

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 132 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

FIGURE 3-14: DISTRIBUTION OF SC& ST POPULATION IN SELECTED VILLAGES IN KATHALCHARI GAS FIELD

Education & Literacy The study of the education and literacy profile in the region is relevant in order to have an understanding whether the proposed project can utilize skilled human resources available within the area. Average literacy rate of the study area observed as 63.89% which is below the state literacy rate. The highest literacy rate was observed in Abhangachhara (76.63%) and the lowest in Dakshin Barapathary. (46. 94%). Average male and female literacy rate in the study area was recorded at 74.89% and 52.49% which lower than the state average of 91.5 % and 82.7 % respectively. Details are given in Annexure 3.16. Detail is given in Table 3-21 below.

TABLE 3-21: LITERACY RATE OF SELECTED VILLAGES NEAR TO PROPOSED WELL LOCATION IN KATHALCHARI GAS FIELD % Male % Female Village Well Name % Literate Literate Literate KL-Dev-4 KL-Dev-4B KL-Dev-4A KL-Dev-7 Purba Pilak 78.76 58.33 45.38 KL-Dev-7A GGS KL-Dev-2A KL-Dev-2

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 133 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

% Male % Female Village Well Name % Literate Literate Literate KL-1 Abhangachhara KL-Dev-4C 90.13 63.46 52.27 Tairumachhara Matabari-1 78.69 54.99 45.98 KL-Dev-5 KL-Dev-5A Baramura Debtamura KL-Dev-1(Dev-37B) 64.16 42.13 32.05 RF Dev-34A-1 Dev-37A KL-Dev-6 Laogang KL-Dev-25A 83.72 55.90 53.26 KL-Dev-26 Uttar Taichhama KL-Dev-3 80.11 61.95 45.71 Chalita Bankul KL-Dev-3A 67.28 46.73 32.86 Dev 50A_Alt Dakshin Barapathary 56.24 36.44 53.06 KL-Dev-50A

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 134 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

FIGURE 3-15: SEX WISE LITERACY RATE IN SELECTED VILLAGES IN KATHALCHARI GAS FIELD

Economic Activity & Livelihood Pattern

The relevance of economic activity and livelihood pattern is important in the context of the study since depending on the existing situation one can predict the impact of the project activity on the economy of the region. The total working population in the study area villages varies from 39.31% to 56. 57%. Of the total workforce, Laogang revealed the highest percentage of workforce with 56. 57% workers while Purba pillak revealed the lowest workforce percentage (39.31%) Village wise details are incorporated in Annexure 3.17. Summary of work force participation in different selected villages in Kathalchari gas filled mentioned in Table -3-22 below.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 135 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

TABLE 3-22: WORK FORCE PARTICIPATION OF SELECTED VILLAGES NEAR TO PROPOSED WELL LOCATION IN KATHALCHARI GAS FIELD % Total % % % Household Village Well Name worker Agricultural Other cultivator Industry Population Labour Worker Worker KL-Dev-4 KL-Dev-4B KL-Dev-4A KL-Dev-7 Purba Pilak KL-Dev-7A 1601 15.18 26.80 0.31 19.86 GGS KL-Dev-2A KL-Dev-2 KL-1

Abhangachhara KL-Dev-4C 453 16.78 4.42 0.22 28.04

Tairumachhara Matabari-1 857 26.60 15.29 0.00 9.33 KL-Dev-5 KL-Dev-5A Baramura KL-Dev- 1754 37.00 17.27 0.06 5.30 Debtamura RF 1(Dev-37B) Dev-34A-1 Dev-37A KL-Dev-6 Laogang KL-Dev-25A 568 15.32 8.10 0.00 1.94 KL-Dev-26 Uttar KL-Dev-3 660 51.97 13.03 0.30 5.61 Taichhama Chalita Bankul KL-Dev-3A 698 23.35 19.20 1.29 5.44 Dakshin Dev 50A_Alt 948 14.56 38.08 0.11 5.70 Barapathary KL-Dev-50A

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 136 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

FIGURE 3-16: WORK FORCE PARTICIPATION IN SELECTED VILLAGES IN KATHALCHARI GAS FIELD

Major populations in the study area villages are either involved in agricultural crop cultivation or involved in horticulture in individual level or community level as a source of their livelihood. Study area mainly comprises of mono cropped plane land other than that jhum cultivation is another type agricultural practice observed among the tribal people (Jhum productivity in state is 1035 kg/ha). Paddy being the major agricultural produce (713222MT production in 2012-13) apart from that, inhabitants of study area villages are also involved in Wheat, Sugar cane, Cotton, Jute, Pulse, Oil seeds Potato cultivation in their agricultural land. People of hilly region also earn their livelihood by producing Pineapple, Jackfruit, Banana, orange etc in individual level or community. Tea and Rubber plantation also observed in some of the places. Majority of the people in Tripura also involved in rubber plantation for their livelihood as rubber is the main cash crop in this area. Total rubber plantation area in the state is 11740.42 ha and tapping area of rubber 3438 ha. Total rubber production in the state in the year 2012- 13 is 2704 MT.

3.7 BASIC AMENITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE

Drinking Water facilities The Census data reveals that drinking water facility exist in all the villages. There are different type of drinking water facility available in study are. Accelerated Rural Water Supply (ARWS scheme) is the major source of water. Under this scheme drinking water facility installed in Panchayat level or ADC level and it’s cater water through pipeline to 60% of villagers in average of this panchayat. As in general iron content in ground water is high in

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 137 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Tripura, one Iron filtration unit also provided with thin ARWS scheme. Other than ARWS, in plane land people collects drinking water from tube well, earthen ring well or from mini deep tube well installed by local administration. But in hilly terrain where ground water level is much lower than the plan land, people suffer a lot for drinking water. They depend on mini deep tube well installed by local administration or tanker supply by Panchayat or ADC. Other than drinking water people also depends on the above mention facility for their daily activity. Villages where river or stream present, people also use this for their domestic purpose. Other than river or stream, surface water body in the villages is very less in number. In Kathalchhari gas field drinking water is really a scarce resource as this is located in hilly terrain. Although in most villages has ARWS scheme water supply but the supply is very irregular. Villages located in the hills where water supply is not available people depends on the kutchha ring well to meet their requirement. But during peak summer when the ring well gets dried, they depend on the tanker supply of water arranged by the local administration. Tube well installation is not possible in this hilly area. As Chalita Bankul, Bagmara, kathalchheri etc village located in flat terrain, people meet their drinking water requirement mainly from ARWS scheme and also from tube well when water supply is not available.

Medical Facilities Medical facilities are one of the basic service indicators which need to be studied so as to know the quality of life in the area. In the all 29 study area villages of four districts considered for the study, all villages have health sub center in panchayat or ADC level. Primary Health centre is present only at Block. Other than that villagers have to go to nearest town to avail the medical facility.

Educational Facilities The study area possesses necessary educational infrastructure to cater to the educational needs of the both rural and urban population. Among the study area one junior basic School and one senior basic school present in every panchayat and ADC. There are some of Panchayat and ADC where more than one JB school is present. ICDS is present in all the villages. For higher education student have to go to nearest town.

Transport & Communication NH-44 is the major road connecting the study area with Agartala and Santir Bazaar is being used by the local people as a route of transportation. There are also some State High Way and Major District road which connecting the study area with NH-44 and nearest town. Pucca paved road is present in almost every village. The public transport system is yet to reach its highest efficacy since there is no public transport system in most of the sampled villages. Villagers depend on the private auto or jeep. The post and telegraph facility is available within 5 to 10 km from all sample villages.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 138 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Market Facilities The study on availability of market place not only tells the buying power of the common people but also gives an inner sight of services it provides for the attainment of a better living. All the sampled villages do not have market facility. For market place, villages solely depend on urban places or towns or of adjacent areas namely Santir Bazaar, Manu Bazaar, Kuwaifung Bazaar etc. There are only some shops present with in the village.

Power Supply Electricity is available in all study area villages through a stable 220V electricity supply adequate for domestic, agricultural and other purposes.

Post and Telecommunication In this era of telecommunication, access to mobile phone is within every bodies reach. All villages from sample study area have the access to post- office and other private courier services.

Festivals

Since Hinduism is predominant in this region, common festivals of Hindu‟s like Holi, Rath yatra, Durga puja, Kali puja – Diwali are quite common. Apart from these, many tribal festivals such as Kharchi Puja, Ker Festival, Garia Puja, Ganga Puja are celebrated in this region.

Tribal festival of Tripura

Kharchi Puja Of the many festivals in Tripura, the one that occupies the pride of place is the worship of the fourteen deities popularly known as Kharchi Puja. This festival is celebrated in July at Agartala (Puran Agartala). The week-long celebration is held in the temple premises and is joined by thousands of people. The word Kharchi is said to be a corrupt form of Khya which means earth. Kharchi Puja is, therefore, the worship of the earth - the earth that sustains mankind with all her resources. Sacrifice of goats and pigeons at the altar of gods is a usual feature of the festival. Both tribal and non-tribal people join together and celebrate the festival in a joyous mood and be part of it.

Ker Festival Ker is a traditional tribal festival. It is celebrated two weeks after Kharchi Puja. The guardian deity of Vastu Devata is Ker. The literal meaning of Ker is boundary or specified area. A large piece of bamboo when bent in a particular fashion assumes the image of Ker. It is generally believed that the former rulers used to perform this Puja for the general welfare of the people of the state. Two age old beliefs may lie behind the ritualistic incantation of a specified boundary for the Ker Puja. One is to safeguard the interest of the people from any calamitous misfortunes, diseases, and destitution. The other is to save people from any external aggression. Offering and sacrifices constitute an important aspect of Ker Puja.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 139 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Garia Puja Another important festival for the tribals of the state is held on the seventh day of the month of April known as Garia Puja. The celebration starts from the last day of March-April. Two deities, Kalia and Garia are worshipped. The Puja is held to propitiate the deity for blessings. The Garia is a community festival. Sacrifice of cocks is an important feature of the Puja. Another equally important feature is dancing and rejoicing after the Puja. The Garia dance is very popular among the Tripuris and the Reangs. Symbolic of the worship of the deities as well as of the socio-economic activities of the households, these dances represent hunting, fishing, food-gathering and various other activities.

Ganga Puja The festival of new rice, Ganga Puja is celebrated in March-April every year. This is another remarkable tribal festival. Ganga, it may be recalled, is one of the fourteen deities of the land. Like Garia Puja, this too is a community festival. People gather by the streamside, pare three piece of bamboo into beautiful flowers, the villagers then build a temple with bamboos in the middle of the stream, and the ageless rituals take place amidst joy and splendor. God is propitiated by the sacrifice of goats and buffaloes to save the people from any epidemic.

Community Consultation Public consultation was carried out with the objective of finding out about people's views and opinion on issues relating to the project, its operations and also to the peripheral development. In this backdrop, extensive public consultations were conducted during the socio economic assessment as part of EIA study. Suggestions were also received from participants on managing of project functions so that it does not have any adverse impacts on the community living in the area adjoining the project, better targeting community development programs, ensuring community involvement and cooperation in the operation of the project. The feedback from the continued consultation will facilitate the project in developing strategies to address these issues in consensus with the communities residing around the project. Community consultations in this project are mainly carried out the village located in 1-2 km periphery of proposed development well location of Kathalchari Gas Field. The summary findings of the consultations carried out have been discussed below:  Majority of the houses in the rural and urban areas have electrical connections. However frequent power failures were reported by the locals during the consultation.  Drinking water is the major problem as per the community. Majority of local people meets their water requirement through ARWS Scheme but water supply is very irregular and supply water for only two hour in the day. Other than that tube well, ring well, mini deep tube well and tanker supply of drinking water help people to meet their requirement. People want to get some help from Jubilant Energy in terms of drinking water.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 140 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

 Sanitation is also a major concern of the locality as most of houses do not have the facility of latrine. Local people also wish to have some support from Jubilant Energy to provide community facility in the villages.  During the public consultations the household members expressed their concern about the health facilities. Villagers lived near to the town are not faced problem but people who are lived in hills and far away from the town faced huge problem.  Majority of the people in the area are cultivators and paddy is the major agricultural produce. Apart from paddy cultivation, horticulture (Mainly fruit cultivations), rubber plantation also common. Many people are engaged in public and private organizations in the urban areas etc.  It was reported during consultations that all parents send their children to the primary school. Almost every village has a primary school; however, percentage of students pursuing higher education is comparatively less.  As villages located in new gas field, villagers are not aware about Oil and Gas activity. Summary of public discussions at Kathalchari Field is given in Annexure 3.18.

3.8 CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL SITES There are no designated archaeological sites within five districts of Tripura. As is typical of rural India settlements, each village in the Field has some cultural sites or sites of religious significance, like temples, mosques, graveyards etc. Some of them are of significance for the community. Sometimes their significance is related during specific seasons/or time of the year. Community consultation in selected villages in Kathalchari Gas Field

Photo 3-1: Community consultation in Purba Photo 3-2: Community Consultation in Pillak Abhangachara Village

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 141 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Photo 3-3: Community Consultation in Paschim Photo 3-4: Community Consultation in Laogang Daluma

Photo 3-5: Community Consultation in Photo 3-6: Community Consultation In Chalita Taruimachhara Bankul

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 142 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

4 Environmental Impact Assessment

The impact assessment section of the EIA study systematically identifies, characterizes and evaluates the potential impacts arising out of the project and prioritizes them through a semi- quantitative system so that they can be effectively addressed by Environment Management Plans. Potential environmental impacts may arise out of various sequential activities (as discussed in Section 2.6 of this report) to be undertaken as part of proposed project development drilling operations, GGS and laying of pipeline.

4.1 IMPACT ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY An environmental impact identification matrix has been developed to present an overview of possible interactions between project aspects and components of the environment which may get affected. The matrix structure takes into account physical, biological and socioeconomic components of the environment on one axis (X axis) and activities / aspects of the proposed development well drilling project on the other side (Y axis). Aspects (based on phases of activities like pre-drilling activities, drilling, decommissioning and potential accidental events) and impacts on environmental components that have been taken into consideration were in line with standard environment management system terminology. Environmental and socioeconomic components were identified based on reviewing of applicable legislation and baseline environment, site reconnaissance visits, discussions with stakeholders and SENES’ professional judgment. Potential environmental and socio-economic impacts that may result from any of the identified project aspects has been identified in a matrix based on activity-component interaction and has subsequently been used to develop an impact evaluation matrix that list evaluation scores based on significance criteria delineated in Section 4.1.2.

4.1.1 Impact Criteria and Ranking Once all project environmental aspects were comprehensively identified for the different activities of the project, the level of impact that may result from each of the activity- component interactions has been assessed based on subjective criteria. For this, three key elements have been taken into consideration based on standard environmental assessment methodologies:  Severity of Impact: Degree of damage that may be caused to the environmental components concerned;  Extent of Impact : Geographical spread of impact around project location and corridors of activities; and  Duration of Impact: Time for which impact lasts taking project lifecycle into account. These elements have been ranked in three levels viz. 1 (low), 2 (moderate) and 3 (high) based on the following criteria provided in Table 4.1 below:

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 143 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

TABLE 4-1: IMPACT PREDICTION CRITERIA Impact Criteria Ranking Elements Severity  Impact resulting in long term and/ or medium damage to the natural 3 environment.  Major impact on community and occupational health (e.g. serious injury, loss of life) on account of accidental events viz. well blow- outs and related operational activities.  Adverse national media attention.  Permanent loss of land/livelihood  Impact resulting in short term change and / or damage to the natural 2 environment.  Temporary loss of land, livelihood source of affected communities  Impact on terrestrial habitat, endangered species, drainage pattern and community resources.  Moderate impact on occupation and community health & well being (e.g. noise, light, odour, dust, injuries to individuals)  Complaints from the public, authorities and possible local media attention.  Limited impact causing temporary loss of some species etc. 1  Limited impact on human health and well-being (e.g. occasional dust, odour, light, and traffic noise).  Public Perception/Concern Extent  Regional scale impact and including impacts to physical, biological 3 and socio-economic environment of Kathalchari Field  Largely local level impact limited to a kilometer of the drilling site, 2 GGS  Impact discernible within 200m in the immediate vicinity of the 1 drilling site Duration  The impact is likely to occur during the entire project life cycle and 3 beyond  The impact is likely to occur in some phases of project life under 2 normal operating conditions.  The impact is very unlikely to occur at any time during project life 1 cycle but may occur in exceptional circumstances.

A positive or beneficial impact that may result from this project has not been ranked and has been depicted in the form of ++.

4.1.2 Impact Significance The significance of impact has been adjudged based on a multiplicative factor of three element rankings. The Table 4.2 (below) depicts impact significance in a scale of LOW- MEDIUM-HIGH and will be used for delineation of preventive actions, if any, and management plans for mitigation of impacts. Impact significance has been determined taking into account measures which have been factored in the design and planning phase of the project. Legal issues have been taken into account, wherever appropriate in the criterion sets,

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 144 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari to aid in JOGPL’s effort to comply with all relevant legislation and project HSE requirements. Additionally, the results of quantitative impact prediction exercise, wherever undertaken, have also been fed into the process.

TABLE 4-2: CRITERIA BASED SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACTS

Severity of Impact Extent of Impact Duration of Impact Impact Significance (A) (B) (C) (A X B X C) 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 Low 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 4 1 2 2 4 3 1 2 6 1 3 2 6 2 2 2 8 Medium 3 2 2 12 2 3 2 12 2 2 3 12 3 3 2 18 3 2 3 18 High 2 3 3 18 3 3 3 27 - Beneficial Impact - ++

To assist in determining and presenting significance of an impact, an impact evaluation matrix (Table 4.3) has been developed based on the one developed for the impact identification exercise. In case an environmental component be impacted by more than one project activity, higher impact significance ranking has been taken as the significance ranking for subject receptor. Impacts that have been determined to be having high significance ranking of “>12” are considered significant and hence require examination in terms of preventive actions and/or additional mitigation to reduce level of the potential impact. Recommended additional mitigation measures and management plans are presented in Chapter 6. The identified impacts are further discussed in detail in the following section with discussion focusing on impacts of higher significance. This is followed by a point wise outline of mitigation measures recommended.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 145 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

TABLE 4-3: IMPACT IDENTIFICATION MATRIX Environment Physical Environment Biological Environment Socio-economic Environment

species

Land Use

Air Air Quality and faunal habitat

Soil Soil Quality

Activity Productivity

Noise Quality

Wildlife Wildlife Habitat Aquatic Habitat quality Surface water quality Ground water

Loss of Livelihood

Surface Water Surface Resources Water GroundResources Water

Transport & Traffic

Loss of Agricultural

Influx of Population

Aesthetics & Visuals cal Drainage & Physiography

Flora & Floral Habitat

Aquatic Flora & Fauna

Cultural & Heritage Site

Fauna

Lo

Dust & Noise Discomfort

Migratory corridor & rout

Threatened & Endangered

Disruption of Infrastructure Conflict on Job opportunity

Community Health & Safety

CommonProperty Resources EconomicJobOpportunity& Safety & Occupational Health A. Pre-Drilling Activities for Wells and GGS Site selection and land acquisition x x x x Site clearance and top soil removal x x x x x x x x + x Well site & access road construction x x x x x x x x + x x Sourcing & transportation of burrow material etc x x x x x x x x x + x x Storage and handling of construction debris x x x Transportation of drilling rig and ancillaries x x x x x x x x Operation of DG set x x x x x x Workforce engagement & accommodation at construction site x x + Consumption of water for construction & domestic use for labourer x x x x Generation of domestic solid waste & disposal x x x x x x Generation of waste water & discharge from construction activity & labour camp x x x Surface run-off from construction site x x x x x x B. Development Well Drilling & Testing Physical Presence of drill site x x Operation of DG sets and machinery x x x x x x x x Operation of drilling rig x x x x x x Storage and disposal of drill cuttings and mud x x x x x Generation of process waste water & discharge x Surface run-off from drill site x x x x Generation of domestic waste water & discharge x x x x Generation of Municipal waste & disposal x x x x Workforce engagement & accommodation at drill site x x x x + x Flaring during production testing and process upset x x x x Accidental events – blow out x x x x x x x x x x Accidental events-spillage of chemical & oil x x x C. Decommissioning and Reinstatement of Wells Dismantling of rig and associated facilities x x x Transportation of drilling rig and ancillaries x x x x Removal of well site construction materials & disposal x x Site Restoration + +

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 146 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Environment Physical Environment Biological Environment Socio-economic Environment

species

Land Use

Air Air Quality and faunal habitat

Soil Soil Quality

Productivity

Activity

Noise Quality

Wildlife Wildlife Habitat Aquatic Habitat quality Surface water quality Ground water

Loss of Livelihood

Surface Water Surface Resources Water GroundResources Water

Transport & Traffic

Loss of Agricultural

Influx of Population

Aesthetics & Visuals cal Drainage & Physiography

Flora & Floral Habitat

Aquatic Flora & Fauna

Cultural & Heritage Site

Fauna

Lo

Dust & Noise Discomfort

Migratory corridor & rout

Threatened & Endangered

Disruption of Infrastructure Conflict on Job opportunity

Community Health & Safety

CommonProperty Resources EconomicJobOpportunity& Safety & Occupational Health D. Operation of GGS Physical Presence of GGS x x Operation of DG sets and machinery x x x x x x x Generation of waste & disposal Souring of Water x Produce water storage and treatment Flaring x x x x Accidental events – blow out x x x x x x x x Accidental events-spillage of chemical & oil x x x x x E. Construction of Pipeline Site selection and land acquisition x x x Site clearance and top soil removal x x x x x x x x + x Trenching x x x x x x x + x x Sourcing & transportation of burrow material etc x x x x x x x x x x + x x Storage and handling of construction debris x x x Transfer of pipes to construction site x x x x x x x Operation of DG set x x x Workforce engagement & accommodation at construction site x x x + x Consumption of water for construction & domestic use for labourer x x x Generation of domestic solid waste & disposal x x x x x x Generation of waste water & discharge from construction activity & labour camp x x x Surface run-off from construction site x x x x x A. Operation of Pipeline Accidental events – blow out x x x x x x x x x x

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 147 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

4.2 IMPACT ASSESSMENT This section discusses the impacts of the project activities (development drilling, GGS construction and pipeline laying) on the environmental receptors that stand to get affected adversely by the project. It discusses probable impacts during various phases of the project lifecycle on the environmental and socioeconomic components. Rankings for every activity – component interaction is based on the criterion set earlier and resulting environmental significance with necessary justification that has been recorded below for every set of impacts and the same has been represented in evaluation matrices. In broader context, it is however important to remember that operations related to development well drilling, testing and completion activities, GGS and pipeline construction also include positive socioeconomic impacts in terms of increase in local business opportunities and on a larger perspective, by providing potential energy security at a national level.

4.2.1 Visual Impacts & Aesthetics

Production Wells Kathalchari Field is an operating gas field, which has 4 exploratory wells drilled by JOGPL. In this Field, awareness about drilling activity persists amongst local people. Visual impacts on the local people are envisaged during the construction as well as operation phase of the project. For drilling site preparation nearly 3 ha land will be cleared for construction of new drill sites. However, land clearance will not be required for re-entry at KL-1 and Matabari-1 well sites as the existing site would be used for development drilling. During site construction activity, dust will be generated from movement of vehicles during construction material, machinery and personnel transportation, dumping of construction waste, domestic waste from labour camp. These may cause visual and aesthetic impacts. Such impacts are likely to be experienced by communities residing in or traversing through settlements like Paschim Daluma, Raibari, Purba Pilak, Paban Sardar Para, Uttar Chalita Bankul, Kuwaifung etc. located in the vicinity of well sites and GGS. However, taking into account the temporary nature of site preparatory activities and necessary mitigation measures to be implemented by the proponent with respect to the location of well away from human settlements (use of existing infrastructure etc.), the impact will be of low significance. The wells once drilled will be capped and connected with pipeline to the proposed GGS. The area will be cordoned with iron cage barricades. The visual impacts will be for a long term due to presence of the barricaded wells. The drilling waste and process waste water is likely to be temporarily stored in impervious pits, visual impact in this regard is not envisaged Visual impact due to the operation of drilling rig and presence of base camp will not be considered significant given the temporary nature of development activities (about 45-60 days) and provided the well is not indicative of any commercial hydrocarbon reserve. The

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 148 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

DG sets will be housed in acoustic enclosure but the size of the DG set in the enclosure along with its stack that is continuously emitting is not aesthetically or visually pleasing. The construction of drill pad, drilling of development wells will involve a continuous day and night process, hence the high power lighting (halogen) at night will be a source of visual discomfort to the residents of nearby settlements. Other than that light generated from flaring events might also be visually discomforting at night. However, flaring is likely to be of intermittent in nature, to occur only during process upset and production testing.

Mitigation Measures  All the construction activity will be restricted within the designated site  Dust nuisance from construction site will be suppressed through periodical water spraying at disturbance area;  On completion of work all temporary structures, surplus materials and wastes will be completely removed;  Construction wastes and municipal solid waste temporarily stored at the sites will be transported to the designated disposal site/facility at regular intervals;  Care will be taken to orient the halogens downward during the drilling operations to reduce the effect of residual lighting.  After decommissioning of rig and associated facilities, drill sites will be restored – drill platform will be removed, pits & garland drains will be filled up, construction material will be buried in the pit;  Site will be rehabilitated through laying of top soil

Significance without Significance with Impact criteria mitigation measures mitigation measures Severity of Impact 1 1 Extent of Impact 2 1 Duration of Impact 2 2 Total Significance 4 (low) 2 (low)

GGS and Pipeline GGS and pipeline will be permanent structures compared to development well. The visual impacts associated with the construction of development wells, GGS and pipeline will also be relevant. Apart from that the following visual impairments are expected. Since this area is devoid of industries (except for few brick kilns), hence the construction of GGS will add a physical feature that will be a outlier in the agrarian landscape near Kuwaifung Bazaar. Construction of pipeline will require a narrow strip of land (12m in width) and traverse through the landscape for 150 km. The pipes will be stored temporarily beside the trenches

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 149 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari and will not be visibly pleasant or safe for the passerby especially in places where the pipeline is crossing a sloping region. The impact significance will be low as the visual impact will be highest during the construction phase and wane in the operation phase. Mitigation Measures  Water sprinkling should be done for dust suppression where the pipeline crosses human habitation  The pipelines once laid will be covered with burrowed soil and leveled as per the surrounding land.  The boundary wall of the GGS will be covered with creepers to blend with the surrounding.

Significance without Significance with Impact criteria mitigation measures mitigation measures Severity of Impact 2 1 Extent of Impact 2 2 Duration of Impact 2 2 Total Significance 8 (medium) 4 (low)

4.2.2 Impacts on Air Quality

Development Wells, GGS and Pipeline

Operation of vehicles and construction machinery Exhaust emissions from operation of construction machinery is likely to contribute to air pollutant load (primarily PM, NO2, SO2 etc.) in the ambient air near well site facilities, GGS construction and pipeline laying sites. However, considering localized nature of impacts, temporary nature of construction activities along with mitigation measures likely to be adopted by the proponent (regular maintenance of vehicles and machineries, checking of vehicular pollutant emission etc.) the impact is considered to be of low significance.

Significance without Significance with Impact criteria mitigation measures mitigation measures Severity of Impact 2 1 Extent of Impact 2 2 Duration of Impact 3 2 Total Significance 12 (medium) 4 (low)

Construction material transport, storage and handling During construction phase it is estimated that about 100 tonnes of sand, stones and cement will be required per well site location for road construction/strengthening and site preparatory

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 150 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari activities. Fugitive emission is therefore anticipated from transportation, storage and handling of construction material. The drilling activity will be carried out primarily in dry season and few of the internal roads are kutcha or in degraded condition viz. the access roads to well sites KL-1, Matabari-1, KL-Dev 7 and alternatives, KL-Dev-3and alternatives, KL-Dev 5 and alternative etc. However, movement of such fugitive dust is likely to be governed by micro- meteorological conditions (wind speed and direction) and could affect the communities residing adjacent to the well sites, haul routes, GGS and pipeline RoW. Such impacts will be considered to be of medium significance. Construction activity would be temporary in nature and take place for about a month with limited movement of project vehicles (5 nos. /well) will take place. Moreover, adopting mitigation measures (viz. water spraying in haul routes, using covered trucks for transportation etc.), the significance of the impact to the local communities would be reduced.

Significance without Significance with Impact criteria mitigation measures mitigation measures Severity of Impact 2 1 Extent of Impact 2 1 Duration of Impact 2 2 Total Significance 8 (medium) 2 (low)

Operation of Diesel Generator (DG) Sets The proposed project will involve the operation of two diesel driven 1000 KVA generators for drilling of development well; additionally one 125 KVA generator will be used for lighting. The operation of DG sets will therefore result in the generation of air pollutants viz. PM and NO2, thereby affecting the ambient air quality. As HSD diesel (BSIV) with Sulphur content 0.005 % will be used, emission of SO2 from burning of diesel is insignificant. The dispersion of these air pollutants have the potential to affect the receptors viz. village settlements located in near vicinity of the well site (Paschim Daluma, Raibari, Purba Pilak, Paban Sardar Para, Uttar Chalita Bankul, Kuwaifung etc.) only under exceptional combination of meteorological conditions. However, considering the temporary nature of drilling phase (45-60 days), wet and humid conditions prevalent in the Field and provision of adequate DG set stack height for effective dispersion of air pollutants, no significant impact to this regard is envisaged. Additionally, the proponent also plans to adopt and implement necessary mitigation measures, as discussed in the subsequent section, to effectively address potential air quality impacts from DG set operation. In order to predict the Ground Level Concentrations (GLCs) at various distances from the source, of the above mentioned pollutants, an air modeling exercise ISCST3 has been undertaken and is discussed in the impact prediction section below. The following input parameters (Refer Table 4.4) have been considered in the impact prediction modeling undertaken using ISC- ST 3.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 151 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

TABLE 4-4: INPUT PARAMETERS CONSIDERED FOR MONITORING

Stack Emission Rate Emission Stack Diameter Stack gas Stack gas (g/sec) Source Height (m) temp (K) velocity (m/s) (m) PM NO2 1000 KVA DG 10 0.31 698 22.4 0.062 1.91 set 125 KVA DG 7 0.3 723 25 0.07 set in GGS Flaring 30 0.5 773 17 0.1496

Though, ISC3 is a refined model, the model run was carried out based on micro- meteorology to predict air quality impacts for an average 24 hr period that may be caused by peak power utilization at the drill site. The model was run for operation of two 1000 KVA DG sets at KL- Dev 2during drilling and one 125 KVA DG set and Flaring from GGS. ISCST3 model considers wind towards the direction of flow. To predict the incremental concentrations of the pollutants due to the proposed project activities the concentration values for these pollutants estimated during the baseline monitoring was also taken into account (Refer Table 4.5).

TABLE 4-5: PREDICTED GLCS FOR AIR POLLUTANTS FROM WELL Predicted GLC at Nabarampara Predicted Maximum GLC at Turma (μg/m3) Kuwaifung (μg/m3) Pollutants Incremental Predicted Incremental Baseline Predicted Baseline Concentration GLC Concentration GLC 2 X 1000 KVA DG Sets at well site KL-Dev 2 NO 2 2.727 11.5 14.727 9.493 13.75 23.243 (μg/m3) PM 0.088 64.75 64.838 0.308 78.5 78.808 (μg/m3)

Pollutants Predicted Maximum GLC (μg/m3) Incremental Distance from Well (m) Direction Concentration 2 X 1000 KVA DG Sets at well site KL-Dev 2 3 NO2 (μg/m ) 44.14 1984.94 N PM (μg/m3) 1.433 1984.94 N

For spatial mapping of pollutants, the GLCs revealing worst case scenarios were superimposed on land use (5km x 5 km area) with KL-Dev 2at the center. The isopleths of the various pollutants with distance from the sources (DG set) has been given in Figures 4.1- 4.3. The baseline air pollutant concentration of Air Quality Monitoring stations at

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 152 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Nabarampara, TumaKuwaifung and the settlement of Purba Pilak was while determining predicted GLCs. Table 4-5 shows that the predicted GLC at the above mentioned locations is far below the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (2009) for NO 2 value given for Residential area (80 μg/m3). The maximum impact of the pollutants will be at approximately 2 km from the well site. The incremental value for operation of DG set for the pollutant – 3 NOx is 44.14 μg/m . This increment is not of much significance and as the DG set will be operated for a limited period of time, hence the significance of impact is considered to be low.

Significance without Significance with Impact criteria mitigation measures mitigation measures Severity of Impact 2 1 Extent of Impact 2 1 Duration of Impact 2 2 Total Significance 8 (medium) 2 (low)

Summary of mitigation measures to control air quality impacts:  All the vehicles should be PUC certified  All vehicles used for transportation of loose and friable materials will not be loaded over the freeboard limit and will be covered.  Water spraying will be done on the access roads to control re-entrained dust during dry season;  Equipment, machinery and vehicles having inbuilt pollution control devices will be considered as a measure for prevention of air pollution at source  Engines and exhaust systems of all vehicles and equipment used for the project will be maintained so that exhaust emissions are low and do not breach statutory limits set for that vehicle/equipment type.  DG set with appropriate stack height will be utilized.

Flaring of Gases Flaring provides a means of safe disposal of the vapor streams from its facilities, by burning them under controlled conditions such that adjacent equipment or personnel are not exposed to hazards. With the combustion gas products depending on the feed gas composition, the flaring of gases may lead to the generation of un-burnt hydrocarbons and other pollutants viz. soot and NOx. These pollutants emitted may therefore contribute to air pollutant load of the ambient air thereby affecting the well site receptors nearby viz. village settlements, schools etc. However such impact will again be governed by the location of flare stack and prevalent micro-meteorological conditions which may assist in the localized dispersion of air pollutants. Further considering the intermittent nature of flaring operation only during process upset, use of elevated flaring system, related design considerations with respect to fuel-air

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 153 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari mixture, and JOGPL’s conformance with CPCB Flaring Guidelines the impact is not envisaged to be of significance. ISC ST-3 model was used for prediction of GLCs for NOx. The input parameters were provided at Table 4.4 and the maximum GLCs were provided at Table 4.6.

TABLE 4-6: PREDICTED GLCS FOR AIR POLLUTANTS FROM FLARING AND 125 KVA DG SET Predicted GLC at Nambarampara Predicted at Gunarajpara (μg/m3) (μg/m3) Pollutants Incremental Predicted Incremental Predicted Baseline Baseline Concentration GLC Concentration GLC 1 X 125 KVA DG Sets + Flaring NO 2 0.2057 11.5 11.7057 0.312 13.75 14.062 (μg/m3)

Predicted GLC at Turma Kuwaifung Predicted Maximum GLC (μg/m3) (μg/m3) Pollutants Distance Incremental Predicted Incremental Baseline from Direction Concentration GLC Concentration Well (m) 1 X 125 KVA DG Sets + Flaring NO 2 0.0217 13.75 13.771 1.2571 3265 N (μg/m3)

The ground level concentration of NO2 at the monitoring locations - Nabarampara, Gunorajpara and Turma Kuwaifung due to flaring of gas and operation of 125 KVA at Kuwaifung is less than national ambient air quality concentration. The maximum incremental 3 concentration of NO2 is 1.257 μg/m due to flaring of gas and operation of 125 KVA DG set will be approximately at 3.3km North. There are no settlements at this location and moreover the value is low compared to the National Ambient Air Quality Standard of 80 μg/m3.

Significance without Significance with Impact criteria mitigation measures mitigation measures Severity of Impact 2 1 Extent of Impact 2 2 Duration of Impact 2 2 Total Significance 8 (medium) 4 (low)

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 154 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

FIGURE 4-1: PREDICTED NOX CONCENTRATION PLOT (2 X 1000 KVA DG SET)

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 155 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

FIGURE 4-2: PREDICTED PM10 CONCENTRATION PLOT (2 X 1000 KVA DG SET)

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 156 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

FIGURE 4-3: PREDICTED NOX CONCENTRATION PLOT (FLARING + 1X 125 KVA DG SET)

4.2.3 Impact on Noise Quality

Development Wells Potential impact on noise quality is anticipated from noise vehicular movement, operation of construction machinery during well site preparation and access road strengthening and operation of drilling rig. Operation of construction machinery/equipments Operation of heavy machinery/equipments and vehicular movement during site preparatory and road strengthening/construction activities may result in the generation of increased noise levels as specified in the Table 2.3. The noise related disturbance is likely to be experienced by communities residing in proximity of the construction site and along material transportation routes. The environmental setting of well sites reveals that settlements are close to the proposed well site and site access road. Distance of settlement varies between 250 m (Paschim Daluma, Raibari, Purba Pilak,

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 157 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Uttar Chalita Bankul, Tairumachhara, Abhangachhara etc.). Considering the construction activities to be of temporary nature with limited daily movement of project vehicles (3-4 nos. vehicle for transportation of personnel and 8-10 nos. for material transport) and adequate mitigation measures viz. equipment maintenance etc. to be implemented by the project proponent, impact is considered to be of medium significance.

Significance without Significance with Impact criteria mitigation measures mitigation measures Severity of Impact 2 1 Extent of Impact 2 2 Duration of Impact 2 2 Total Significance 8 (medium) 4 (low)

Operation of drilling rig and ancillary equipments Operational phase noise impacts are anticipated from operation of drilling rig and ancillary equipment viz. shale shakers, mud pumps and diesel generators. Studies indicated that noise generated from operation of drilling rig generally varies in the range of 88-103 dB(A). Other contributors of high noise level at the well site include shale shakers, mud pumps and diesel generators. The average equivalent noise levels of drilling rig and ancillary equipment is estimated to 96 dBA. Further, considering drilling to be a continuous operation, noise generated from aforesaid equipment has the potential to cause discomfort to the local communities residing in proximity (within 250 m) of the rig facility. Occupational health and safety impacts viz. Noise Induced Hearing Loss (NIHL) is also anticipated on personnel working close to such noise generating equipment. However, considering short duration of drilling period (approx 45-60 days) and necessary noise prevention and control measures viz. use of acoustic barriers, provisions for proper PPEs, regular preventive maintenance of equipments etc. to be implemented by the-proponent medium significant impact to this regard is envisaged.

Noise Level Prediction A noise modeling exercise has been undertaken based on standard noise attenuation equations to predict noise levels from drilling rig near sensitive receptors. A noise attenuation plot has been developed considering natural attenuation by distance with noise level predictions only expected to help in planning and decision making. The cumulative noise generated from rig, mud pump, DG and shale Shaker was calculated to be 95.0 dB (A). Noise attenuation equations (without any noise barrier) show that the normal attenuated noise at any receptor points located at a distance of about 100 m and 200 m from the fence-line of the rig, will be in the range of about 75.0 dB(A) and 69.0 dB(A) respectively. In the absence of an acoustic barrier, the predicted noise levels were found to exceed the day time noise standard of i.e. 55 dB (A) leading to discomfort to neighboring communities. However, with the introduction of a noise barrier at the fence-line with a height

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 158 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari of 4 m the noise level may be controlled. This control measure will be enough to decrease noise levels near sensitive receptors at 200m to about 55.98 dB (A). However a detailed noise modeling exercise to look at option of noise reductions will be conducted at the design stage to determine the barrier specifications. The formula for noise calculation is given in Annexure 4.1. The noise attenuation plot with and without acoustic barrier is presented in Figure 4.4 below.

FIGURE 4-4: PREDICTED NOISE LEVELS WITH AND WITHOUT ATTENUATION

Significance without Significance with Impact criteria mitigation measures mitigation measures Severity of Impact 2 1 Extent of Impact 2 2 Duration of Impact 3 3 Total Significance 12 (medium) 6 (medium)

Mitigation measures to control noise quality impacts  Installation of sufficient engineering control on equipment and machinery (like mufflers & noise enclosures for DG sets and PC pumps) to reduce noise and vibration emission levels at source, carrying out proper maintenance and subjecting them to rigid noise and vibration control procedures.

 Re-locating noise sources to less sensitive areas to take advantage of distance and shielding  Providing Personnel Protective Equipments (PPEs) like ear plugs/muffs to workers at site.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 159 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

 Undertaking preventive maintenance of vehicles and machinery to reduce noise levels.

GGS and Pipeline construction The construction of GGS and pipeline will involve noisy activities though the scale of noise will be far lower compared to the drilling activity in case of development wells. The major source of noise during construction of GGS would be during concretization that will involve site clearance, top soil removal, site and access road construction and DG set operation. The movement of vehicles for transportation of construction material, site equipments and transportation of waste material will be another source of noise generation. For pipeline laying, apart from the manual trenching, the other major source of noise would be handling of pipelines. Activity related to noise pollution during the operation phase is rare for GGS and pipeline. As mitigation measures (installations of engineering controls; noise barrier near settlements etc.) will be employed, hence the impact significance will be low.

Significance without Significance with Impact criteria mitigation measures mitigation measures Severity of Impact 2 1 Extent of Impact 2 2 Duration of Impact 2 2 Total Significance 8 (Medium) 4 (low)

4.2.4 Potential Impact on Land Use As discussed in Section 3.1.9 approximately 3 ha of land would be required for each development drill site and 4 ha land would be required for construction of GGS. Currently all the proposed wells of JOGPL are placed in forest land. JOGPL is in the process of selection of alternative sites for drilling to avoid forest land. Further, land will also be required for approach road construction. Permission from the State Forest Department will be obtained by JOGPL prior to site construction in case drilling is conducted in forest land. As discussed earlier in Section 2.8.2, if JOGPL have to acquire the revenue land for drilling, GGS and pipeline construction permission from the land owner and through the State Government Land Acquisition Department would be required. This will impact the livelihood of the owners depending on their land holding capacity. Additionally adequate compensation against loss of livelihood will be provided to the land owners. As the land required for development drilling is low (14 ha for 7 drill sites and 4 ha for GGS), hence the impact on the conversion in land use will be of medium significance. As land for KL-1 and Matabari-1 would be drilled at the existing well locations; no additional land acquisition would be required. The land is already under lease with JOGPL. JOGPL will renew the lease with the landowner for the proposed development activity. Further, JOGPL could conduct alternate livelihood workshop as part of CSR activity so that villagers may learn of optional livelihoods that might suit their needs best.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 160 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Mitigation Measures  Obtain necessary permission from the Forest Department and subsequent implementation of Clearance conditions for the wells lying in Forest Land  Provide adequate compensation to landowners against loss of standing crops in accordance to regulatory requirements viz. Petroleum & Mineral Pipelines (PMP) Act 1962, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (amended in 1984) and Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers Right, 2006  Plan for alternative livelihood arrangement for the land loosers

Significance without Significance with Impact Criteria mitigation measures mitigation measures Severity of Impact 3 2 Extent of Impact 1 1 Duration of Impact 3 3 Total Significance 9 ( Medium) 6 (medium)

4.2.5 Impact on Soil Quality

Development Wells Potential impact on soil quality is envisaged in the form of increase in soil erosion and loss of soil fertility resulting site clearance and top soil stripping due to well site preparation. Accidental spillage from storage and handling of mud chemicals also has potential to contaminate soil. Soil quality impacts so identified have been assessed and evaluated in the section below.

Site clearance and top soil removal As discussed in Section 2.6.2, the land in and around the well sites and GGS is majorly used for agriculture and rubber plantation. Stripping of top soil is likely to affect the soil fertility of the well sites. The depth of the top soil is less than 10 cm in uplands/slopes of Tripura. Hence, it is essential to preserve the topsoil and use it during site restoration. Necessary surface run-off control measures will be adopted by the proponent during construction phase to prevent contamination of adjoining lands from discharge of surface run-off characterized by increased sediment load. The top soil will be stored in mound form and preserved in a manner so that its fertility is maintained. The impact is therefore considered to be of low significance.

Mitigation Measures  The top soil will be stored in mound form.  The height of the mound should not be more than 2m  The slope angle should not be more than 30˚

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 161 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

 A jute mat will be overlayed on the mound to contain the erosion of top soil  A garland drain will be constructed around the mound to contain the runoff of top soil.

Significance without Significance with Impact Criteria mitigation measures mitigation measures Severity of Impact 2 1 Extent of Impact 2 2 Duration of Impact 2 2 Total Significance 8 ( Medium) 4 (Low)

Storage and disposal of drill cuttings and waste drilling fluid

3 It is estimated that nearly about 750-850 m of drill cuttings (and waste mud) and 400-500 m3/day of waste drilling fluid is likely to be generated from each well during drilling operation. Improper storage and disposal of process waste on open soil or unlined areas may lead to the contamination of soil onsite and abutting land if not properly managed. The project design takes into account construction of a HDPE lined impervious pits for temporary storage of drill cuttings and drilling fluid respectively and their disposal in accordance with “CPCB Oil & Extraction Industry Standard – Guidelines for Disposal of Solid Wastes” in their planning stage. The flooding history of the area and rainfall intensity has to be taken into account while designing the depth of the pits. Hence, no significant impact in this regard is envisaged. Further with JOGPL committing to the use of water based mud, the drill cuttings and waste drilling mud generated are likely to be non-hazardous in nature and is not anticipated to pose any potential threat to the soil environment. The waste cuttings will be tested and accordingly disposed by JOGPL. The impact is therefore considered to be of low significance.

Significance without Significance with Impact Criteria mitigation measures mitigation measures Severity of Impact 2 2 Extent of Impact 2 2 Duration of Impact 1 1 Total Significance 4 ( Low) 4 ( Low)

Storage and handling of fuel and chemicals Contamination of soil can result from the project activities if certain operations like storage of chemicals and fuels, spent oil and lubricants are not managed efficiently. Storage of chemicals and fuels, spent lubricants on unpaved surfaces also have potential for contamination of soil. However, considering that appropriate spill prevention and control measures (given in Sec 6.1.1.C), sediment control measures will be implemented by JOGPL the impact is not considered to be of low significance.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 162 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Mitigation Measures The following mitigation measures are proposed for reducing impact on soil quality:  Restricted project and related activities during monsoon season;  Implementing adequate sediment control measures to prevent discharge of untreated surface run-off characterized by increased sediment load to adjoining agricultural land.  Ensuring proper storage of drill cutting and chemicals to prevent any potential contamination from spillage.  Implementing appropriate spill prevention and control measures.

Significance without Significance with Impact Criteria mitigation measures mitigation measures Severity of Impact 2 1 Extent of Impact 2 2 Duration of Impact 2 2 Total Significance 8 ( Medium) 4 ( Low)

GGS and Pipeline

Site clearance and top soil removal The construction of the GGS will result in long term diversion of land that is presently being used for agriculture by village dwellers. Hence, instead of simply storing it in mound forms the top soil removed will be used at the periphery of the GGS for greenbelt development of 10 m width. The impact significance is medium as the top soil that was utilized for cultivation will be used for greenbelt plantation, an alteration of fertility. The soil dug during trenching will be reused for concealing after laying the pipelines. Care will be taken to restore the location of the concealed pipelines to its earlier state.

Significance without Significance with Impact Criteria mitigation measures mitigation measures Severity of Impact 3 2 Extent of Impact 1 1 Duration of Impact 3 2 Total Significance 9 ( Medium) 4 ( Low)

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 163 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

4.2.6 Impact on Topography & Drainage

Development Wells Potential impact on drainage and topography viz. alteration of drainage pattern, water logging etc. are anticipated during well site preparation, widening/strengthening of access roads and restoration of development well facilities. The impact details have been discussed below:

Site preparation and road construction/strengthening Potential impact on drainage is primarily anticipated in the form of disruption of natural drainage pattern during site preparation and approach road construction. The site prepared will be raised to a height determined after studying the height attained by the maximum flood level of past ten-twenty years (A brief summary of the location of wells prone to flooding has been given Section 3.1.12). This may lead to alteration of onsite micro-drainage pattern leading to potential problems of water logging in the agricultural land abutting the drill site. This problem is likely to be further aggravated due to heavy rainfall experienced by the area throughout the year (Refer Section 3.1.2). The infrastructure in major portion of the Field is characterized by metalled and unmetalled rural roads which are adversely affected during intense rainfall. Effect of rainfall on unpaved rural roads is more pronounced than the paved ones. Well specific environmental setting study shows that preliminary well locations does not have a direct approach road to the site while the alternative locations are selected beside existing roads. Site approach road to be constructed for each drill site varies to 100 to 1000 m. However, widening and strengthening of existing roads will be required for effective transportation of drilling rig and heavy equipments to the well site. The stability of the hill slops has to be kept in consideration while constructing roads on hill slopes especially for the preliminary drill locations which are mostly located on the top of the hillocks. Care has to be taken to prevent alteration of the slope of the land. The significance of the impact will be reduced with the implementation of mitigation measures described below.

Mitigation Measure  Leveling and grading operations will be undertaken with minimal disturbance to the existing contour, thereby maintaining the general slope of site;  Disruption/alteration of micro-watershed drainage pattern will be minimized to the extent possible.  Loss of micro-watershed drainage, if any, is to be compensated through provision of alternate drainage.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 164 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Significance w/o Significance with Impact Criteria mitigation measures mitigation measures Severity of Impact 2 1 Extent of Impact 2 2 Duration of Impact 3 3 Total Significance 12 ( Medium) 6 ( medium)

Well site restoration Site restoration will be initiated for well site not indicative of any commercially exploitable hydrocarbon reserves. If there is an indication of gas, then a stretch of land 50 m x 150 m with the well head as center will be barricaded. The remaining land will be restored to its preliminary state by laying topsoil and the wellbeing indicative of gas will not be returned to the preliminary owners. Unplanned restoration may lead to the long term disruption in natural drainage pattern and water logging in neighboring agricultural land abutting the site. The land has to be restored taking into consideration the preliminary existing contours and pre- dominant slope. The impact is considered to be of medium significance as onsite drainage will be taken care of during site restoration.

Mitigation Measure  Leveling and grading operations will be undertaken with minimal disturbance to the existing contour, thereby maintaining the general slope of site;  Disruption/alteration of micro-watershed drainage pattern will be minimized to the extent possible.  Loss of micro-watershed drainage, if any, is to be compensated through provision of alternate drainage.

Significance without Significance with Impact Criteria mitigation measures mitigation measures Severity of Impact 2 1 Extent of Impact 2 2 Duration of Impact 2 2 Total Significance 8 ( Medium) 4 ( Low)

GGS and Pipeline

Site preparation and road construction/strengthening The site for GGS construction will be raised to a height determined after studying the height attained by the maximum flood level of past ten-twenty years. A storm water drain will be built at the periphery of the GGS to contain the site drainage during excessive rain. The storm water drain will be provided with silt and oil trapping equipments. The alignment to the road

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 165 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari to the GGS is not yet fixed but an approach of 50 m will be required for accessing the GGS from the village road connecting Turma Kuwaifung with Ananta Sardar Para. The construction of pipeline will be across a 150 km stretch of varying land use and land cover. The pipeline will cross river like Muhuri, Gomati and several small streams. A suitable depth of land will be excavated beneath the water bodies, both rural and State highways and homestead plantations so that the land cover is undisturbed. As mitigation measures will be employed (as mentioned in the earlier paragraph) and the activities will be of short duration, hence the impact significance will be of low significance.

Significance without Significance with Impact Criteria mitigation measures mitigation measures Severity of Impact 2 1 Extent of Impact 2 2 Duration of Impact 2 2 Total Significance 8( Medium) 4 ( Low)

4.2.7 Impact on Surface Water Quality

Development Wells Impact on surface water quality of natural drainage channels and community water bodies may arise from discharge of contaminated surface run-off, sewage and process waste water generated during various phases of the proposed project.

Surface run-off discharge As discussed under Section 4.2.4, site clearance and stripping of top soil during site construction will result in an increase in soil erosion that might lead to an increased silt load when there is surface run-off during rainfall. The surface run off over drilling waste (cuttings and drilling mud), hazardous waste (waste oil, used oil etc) and chemical storage areas on open soil is likely to be contaminated. Further the surface run-off problem may be compounded by the unquantified flow of formation water. To prevent these run-offs waste pits (dimensions given in 2.8.2), storm water drains and tankers that will regularly carry the treated water will be provided during operation phase. Further, the boundaries of the pits will be raised to prevent any runoff. It is to be noted that the wells are proposed in the hilly slopes and paddy cultivation takes place at the foothills. Any runoff from the construction sites will impact upon the agricultural fields down the slope for all the development well sites. Hence, the pits have to be of sufficient depth to contain the waste fluid and also unprecedented rainfall. Further, the site should be properly restored after the completion of drilling activity. This situation is likely to be more pronounced considering rainfall records of Tripura (Refer section 3.1.2); but, as JOGPL will take into account the provision of onsite drainage system and sediment control measures in the designing stage itself that will be implemented in compliance with the S No. 72 A (ii) Schedule I Standards for Emission or Discharge of

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 166 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Environmental Pollutants from Oil Drilling and Gas Extraction Industry of CPCB, the impact is considered to be of medium significance.

Significance w/o Significance with Impact Criteria mitigation measures mitigation measures Severity of Impact 2 1 Extent of Impact 2 2 Duration of Impact 2 2 Total Significance 8( Medium) 4 ( Low)

Discharge of drilling mud and waste water It is estimated that nearly about 450-500 m3 of drilling waste fluid and waste water is likely to be generated during drilling operation from each well. The drilling waste fluid so generated will be characterized by the presence of oil & grease, barites and heavy metal which on discharge to nearby natural drainage channels may lead to possible surface water contamination. However considering usage of water based mud for the proposed project, temporarily storage of drilling waste in an HDPE lined pit and subsequent treatment to ensure conformance with CPCB Designated Best Use Standards and Oil Drilling & Gas Extraction Industry Standards and guidelines provided by the MoEF under the Hazardous Wastes (Management, Handling & Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2008 the impact is not considered to be of significance.

Mitigation Measures Following mitigation measures will be implemented for water pollution control:  Proper treatment of all wastewater and produced water discharges will be made to ensure that they comply with criteria set by the regulatory body (MoEF and SPCB)  Drainage and sediment control systems at the well site will be efficiently designed  Construction activities viz. stripping, excavation etc. during monsoon season will be restricted to the extent possible.  All chemical and fuel storage areas, process areas will have proper bunds so that contaminated run-off cannot escape into the storm-water drainage system.  An oil-water separator will be provided at the storm water drainage outlet, to prevent discharge of contaminated run-off.

Significance without Significance with Impact Criteria mitigation measures mitigation measures Severity of Impact 2 1 Extent of Impact 2 2 Duration of Impact 2 2 Total Significance 8( Medium) 4 ( Low)

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 167 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

GGS and pipeline

Surface run-off discharge It is estimated that the concretization of the GGS site will be completed within a very short time frame. This will reduce the probability of surface wash-out of silty material if there is no rain within the construction period. Further the surface run off from the site after it is concretized will be collected in a storm water drain that will have requisite silt trap and oil trap. The filtered water of the storm water drain will further be discharged to the nearest channel of river in compliance with the CPCB Inland Water Discharge Standards. The GGS will generate produced water of approximately 7.7 m3/hr. An ETP will be installed at the GGS to treat this produced water and discharge into the Kuwaifung River that will finally discharge into the Muhuri River after meeting the S No. 72 A (ii) Schedule I Standards for Emission or Discharge of Environmental Pollutants from Oil Drilling and Gas Extraction Industry of CPCB. As the surface run off will hardly have any silt or oil and grease load that will impact the adjoining area or contaminate the natural drainage, the significance of impact will be low. The surface level of the pipeline is always well compacted after filling with the subsoil and topsoil and shrubs eventually grow within a normal time frame. Hence, surface run-off is not a problem in the case of pipelines.

Significance without Significance with Impact Criteria mitigation measures mitigation measures Severity of Impact 2 1 Extent of Impact 2 2 Duration of Impact 2 2 Total Significance 8 ( Medium) 4 ( Low)

4.2.8 Impact on Hydrogeology & Ground Water Quality Potential impacts on groundwater resources that could arise as a result of the proposed drilling activities include the following:

Ground water extraction Water to meet domestic requirement of operational workforce, drilling mud preparation and flushing of blast holes will be sourced through vendors who possess relevant permission for water abstraction. If the vendor abstracts water from nearby natural surface water body then there will no impact on the groundwater resources. But if the vendor sources it from the ground water then the scenario will alter. As reported earlier in Section 3.1.5, the net groundwater available differs throughout Tripura. It is reported to be maximum in West Tripura followed by South Tripura and North Tripura. The requirement per well is approximately 75 m3/day. Drilling is a temporary activity (approx. 45-60 days) hence; impact

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 168 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari on ground water resource will be low if JOGPL abstains drawing water from the table from which local people draw water.

Mitigation Measures  Abstraction of water from deeper aquifer that is presently not used by local villagers should be used by JOGPL

Significance without Significance with Impact Criteria mitigation measures mitigation measures Severity of Impact 2 1 Extent of Impact 2 2 Duration of Impact 2 2 Total Significance 8 ( Medium) 4 ( Low)

The other impact on the groundwater resource will be due to the drilling activity. The drilling will be to a depth of 3500 m. There are 2 to 6 prolific aquifer systems existing within the depth of 300m, as reported earlier. Though, through the data logging service one will be aware of the depth where the drill will cut through the aquifer zone, an unquantified sudden huge gush of water does flow out as the rig cuts across the aquifer zone before cementing and casing is done. Since, as part of the project activity cementing and casing is done within few hours to protect the groundwater resource and the project area is demarcated by the Central Ground Water Board (CGWB) as “safe” which do not suffer from heavy withdrawal of water leading to rapid fall in the aquifer level the impact significance is envisaged to be low.

Significance without Significance with Impact Criteria mitigation measures mitigation measures Severity of Impact 2 2 Extent of Impact 2 2 Duration of Impact 1 1 Total Significance 4 ( Low) 4 ( Low)

GGS and Pipeline Water required for daily operation of GGS will be either sourced from surface water or abstracted from the ground water. The generated process water after gas separation (7.7 m3/hr) would be treated in an ETP and the treated water can be used for fire hydrant and floor washing. Water from the groundwater should be abstracted from the aquifer that is deeper than the one used by the local villagers in Purba Pilak. With the mitigation measures in place the impact significance would be reduced.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 169 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Significance without Significance with Impact Criteria mitigation measures mitigation measures Severity of Impact 2 1 Extent of Impact 2 2 Duration of Impact 2 2 Total Significance 8 ( Medium) 4 ( Low)

Storage of drill cuttings and waste drilling mud Possibility of contamination of subsurface and unconfined aquifers may exist if the casing and cementing of the well is not carried out properly leading to infiltration or seeping of drilling chemicals or mud into porous aquifer region. The same is also valid for disposal of drilling waste and mud in an open/unpaved pit. Water based drilling mud will be used for drilling However, the toxicity test of the drill cuttings of nearby wells of Assam Arakan- Assam Basin has shown the absence of any hazardous chemicals. Moreover mitigation measures will be employed thus reducing the impact from medium to low significance.

Mitigation Measures  Proper engineering controls will be used for drilling and cementing operations  Water based, non-hazardous type of drilling mud will be utilized for drilling operation  Drill cuttings & mud will be stored in HDPE lined pits as per S No. 72 C.1.a Schedule I Standards for emission or discharge of Environmental pollutants from Oil Drilling and Gas Extraction Industry of CPCB as modified in 2005.

Significance without Significance with Impact Criteria mitigation measures mitigation measures Severity of Impact 2 1 Extent of Impact 2 2 Duration of Impact 2 2 Total Significance 8 ( Medium) 4 ( Low)

4.2.9 Impact on Biological Environment

Development Wells, GGS and Pipeline The potential impacts on ecological habitat of the development block region due to proposed development drilling operations are discussed below:

Loss of flora and floral habitat Tree felling would be required if the well sites are planned within forest lands (preliminary locations), further plants lying on the approach road will also be required to be felled. If drilling is planned in forestland JOGPL would take necessary permission from the Forest

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 170 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Department for diversion of forest land. As part of the forest clearance JOGPL would also submit the Penal Compensatory Afforestation (PCA) to the forest department for plantation of saplings in compensation to the trees felled.

Significance without Significance with Impact Criteria mitigation measures mitigation measures Severity of Impact 2 1 Extent of Impact 2 2 Duration of Impact 2 2 Total Significance 8 ( Medium) 4 ( Low)

Impact of Fauna & Faunal Habitat Wild animals have not been reported from any of the Fields except for monkeys. Few Schedule II animals are prevalent in the Field that has been listed in Section 3.2. Some impact to the wild fauna may happen if drilling is conducted in forestland which would lead to clearance of trees and loss of habitat for some local fauna. The wells are located more than 10 km away from the Gomati and Trishna Wildlife Sanctuary, hence disturbance to Schedule I species residing in the WLS will not happen. Elephant corridors are absent in the path of the pipeline hence the pit dug during construction will not be a danger to them. The only fauna to be disturbed will be the organisms inhabiting the soil especially the arthropods. As they primarily reside in the top soil which will be preserved in case of developed wells and used immediately in case of GGS and pipelines, hence much significance is not assigned to them.

Significance without Significance with Impact Criteria mitigation measures mitigation measures Severity of Impact 1 1 Extent of Impact 2 2 Duration of Impact 2 2 Total Significance 4 ( Low) 4 ( Low)

Impact on Endangered/Threatened Flora and Fauna Six Schedule I species has been reported from the Kathalchari Field area. Out of the species two mammals (Indian pangolin and Phayre’s leaf monkey), three birds (Indian pied hornbill, Great pied hornbill, Whitebacked of Bengal vulture) and one reptile (Gecko gecko) was reported from the area. Construction activities, movement of vehicles, drilling, GGS operation has the potential to impact the habit and habitat of the Scheduled species. However, drilling would be conducted at 8 new locations where only 2 ha. area would be required. The GGS would be constructed in an area of 3 ha. only. Construction activities and drilling would take place for a short duration (about 3 months) and given the small area of impact and

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 171 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari presence of extensive forest areas within the Field (greater than 90%) the Schedule species could relocate at nearby areas of their habitat if disturbed. In this regard the impact is considered to be of medium significance. The project proponent would also take mitigation measures to reduce the impact on the Scheduled species viz. use of engineering control at high noise generating equipment; use of noise barrier at fence line of the site, use of directional illumination at drill sites etc. the significance of the impact could be reduced. The detailed mitigation measures to reduce the impact on wildlife are explained in Section 6.1.5.

Significance without Significance with Impact Criteria mitigation measures mitigation measures Severity of Impact 3 1 Extent of Impact 2 2 Duration of Impact 2 2 Total Significance 12( Medium) 4 ( Low)

Impact on Migratory Corridor & Route There are no elephant corridors within 10km of Kathalchari Field as already mentioned in Chapter 3. No other wildlife has been spotted as revealed through public consultation in the study area. Hence no impact on the migratory corridor or route of any wild fauna is envisaged.

Aquatic Habitat, Aquatic Flora & Fauna The major rivers viz. Muhuri, Gomati etc. support the aquatic ecosystem in the study area. It has been established in the baseline studies, that existing water quality of the surface water bodies is quite favorable to support diverse range of aquatic fauna and flora. Therefore, in case of any discharge of untreated waste water from development drilling site may result in the possible contamination of receiving streams and their ecological habitat. Surface runoff during monsoon from the construction site of the wells has the potential to contaminate receiving surface water bodies thereby impacting their aquatic ecology. Again, all such process water to be discharged offsite will be undergoing adequate treatment to comply with discharge standards specified by regulatory authorities. Adequate treatment coupled with dilution factor of receiving water bodies will thus significantly contribute in preventing any deleterious effect on the aquatic ecological habitat.

Significance without Significance with Impact Criteria mitigation measures mitigation measures Severity of Impact 2 1 Extent of Impact 2 2 Duration of Impact 2 2 Total Significance 8 ( Medium) 4 ( Low)

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 172 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

4.2.10 Impact on Socioeconomic Environment

Development Wells, GGS and Pipeline Based on the nature and type of impacts, the assessment has been divided into broad categories namely (i) Adverse impacts and (ii) Positive impacts.

Adverse Impact Loss of Livelihood All the proposed well locations lie in land where agriculture is currently practiced. There will be loss of livelihood as revenue land will be lost for development well drilling. Further, land will also be required for constructing approach roads whose length will vary in for each well. The landowners will be adequately compensated for the revenue earned from rubber plantation and also for the land. The proposed project would not require any displacement of villagers. The impact on livelihood is considered to be of medium significance. As compensation will be provided for land livelihood, the significance of the impact will be reduced.

Significance without Significance with Impact Criteria mitigation measures mitigation measures Severity of Impact 2 1 Extent of Impact 2 2 Duration of Impact 3 3 Total Significance 12( Medium) 6 ( Medium)

Conflicts on Job Opportunity Primary survey and public consultation showed that the local people especially in Purba Pilak, Uttar Taichhama etc. desired to work in the JOGPL. Involvement of outside workers in proposed activity may possibly create conflict with the local people, as most of the villagers are cultivators, rubber plantation workers, daily labors, small businessmen. Local people are strongly objecting to outsiders being involved in jobs, and demanded that major proportion of workers be deputed from surrounding villages. The impact on job conflict will be low if local villagers are involved thus reducing the medium significance to low.

Significance without Significance with Impact Criteria mitigation measures mitigation measures Severity of Impact 2 1 Extent of Impact 2 2 Duration of Impact 2 2 Total Significance 8 (Medium) 4 ( Low)

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 173 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Disruption on Infrastructure Road network in Tripura is in good state. The rural roads have been metalled through PMGSY scheme. The link roads branching from NH-44 are metalled. The width of the rural roads are not wide enough to support the movement of heavy vehicles in hilly slopes of Raibari, hence they have to be widened and strengthened. Transportation of drilling rig and associated facilities to drill and decommissioning of rig and associated structure will increase traffic movement. An abrupt increase in vehicular fleet may damage road infrastructure if not properly maintained. The strengthening and widening of the existing road will reduce the significance of impact from medium to low.

Significance without Significance with Impact Criteria mitigation measures mitigation measures Severity of Impact 2 1 Extent of Impact 2 2 Duration of Impact 2 2 Total Significance 8 (Medium) 4 ( Low)

Dust and Noise Discomfort Majority of the proposed well sites are located in proximity settlements. Settlements are alos located adjacent to the access roads to the sites. Inhabitants residing close to access roads will be affected due to noise and dust generated from vehicular movement during site preparation, setting up of rig and associated facilities, decommissioning of rig and associated facilities. Again, during drilling operation, inhabitants residing close to drill sites (within 200 m) will get affected due to noise and emissions from DG sets and occasional flaring activity. Considering proximity of human settlement and short term activity with proper mitigation measures (sprinkling of water in access roads; using covered trucks for transportation of materials; using noise barrier at the boundary of the well sites), the significance of the impact will be reduced from medium to low.

Significance without Significance with Impact Criteria mitigation measures mitigation measures Severity of Impact 2 1 Extent of Impact 2 2 Duration of Impact 2 2 Total Significance 8 (Medium) 4 ( Low)

Influx of Population Influx of population is anticipated in all stages of the project cycle particularly during both development drilling. The drill site will involve the operation of about 50 onsite workers. Hence there might be an impact on the local communities due to the sharing of common resources like space, drinking water, roads, etc. Interaction between workers with villagers of

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 174 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari nearby areas might give rise to various issues like conflict of workers with the local population, nuisance caused by workers due to improper sanitation facilities, etc. However, taking into account that workforce is likely to be sourced from nearby villages and adequate sanitation facilities will be provided chances of such conflicts are negligible.

Significance without Significance with Impact Criteria mitigation measures mitigation measures Severity of Impact 2 1 Extent of Impact 2 2 Duration of Impact 2 2 Total Significance 8 (Medium) 4 ( Low)

Cultural & Heritage Site Impact on cultural environment may occur due to site preparation, operation of drilling rig and also during vehicular movement with respect to the proposed exploration activities. There are no designated historical or cultural spots close to the well clusters in each of the field on Tripura. Hence, no impact is envisaged on them Employment opportunities Project will benefit people living in the neighboring villages by giving preference to them in relation to direct & indirect employment associated with the various project activities. Site preparation phase will involve certain number of laborers and there is a possibility that local people can be engaged for this purpose. Drilling process will involve a number of skilled and unskilled workers. There is a possibility that local people will be engaged for this purpose to the extent possible and hence improve existing employment scenario of the region. However, most jobs will comprise technical involvement. Hence villagers can possibly be employed only in certain non-technical or casual labor jobs and that too for a limited duration. It is proposed that first preference be given to people whose land is to be acquired and to their relations. Next preference will be given to the poorer people and subsequently the other villagers.

Impact Significance = ++ i.e. POSITIVE

4.2.11 Impact on Occupational Health and Safety Occupational injuries and ill-health have huge socio-economic implications on individuals, their families and communities. They also have economic impacts in form of direct and indirect costs for society as a whole. Major occupational health risks encountered in proposed drilling activity include noise from drilling activity, operation of heavy vehicles and machinery, handing of chemicals. However, the proponent will adopt necessary control measures through implementation of mitigation measures and provision of proper PPEs to workers operating in aforesaid area to

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 175 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari prevent and/or mitigate adverse health related impacts. Hence any possible occupational health impact from exposure to such fugitive dust is not likely to be of major significance.

Significance without Significance with Impact Criteria mitigation measures mitigation measures Severity of Impact 2 1 Extent of Impact 2 2 Duration of Impact 2 2 Total Significance 8 (Medium) 4 ( Low)

Community Health & Safety: Community health and safety of inhabitants residing close to the drilling site stands to get affected from frequent heavy vehicular movement along village access roads and due to noise from drilling rig operations. Health and safety impact arising from technological emergencies viz. well blow outs, explosions will be dealt separately in the QRA section. Although the aforesaid activities are temporary in nature it may not adversely affect community health and safety in the long term. Mitigation measures will be taken as outlined Sec 6.1.1 A-E to reduce the impacts arising out of project activities and hence significance will reduce from medium to low significance. Few mitigation measures should be adopted to protect the community are as follows  All activities should be under proper fencing  Proper hoardings in English and should be displayed during construction to prevent people from encroaching the fenced area or to make them aware of the danger associated with the construction  Pipes will be kept in level ground within proper barricade

Significance without Significance with Impact Criteria mitigation measures mitigation measures Severity of Impact 2 1 Extent of Impact 2 2 Duration of Impact 2 2 Total Significance 8 (Medium) 4 ( Low)

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 176 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

TABLE 4-7: IMPACT SIGNIFICANCE MATRIX (WITHOUT MITIGATION) Environment Physical Environment Biological Environment Socio-economic Environment

opportunity

species

quality ce water

Land Use

Air Air Quality and faunal habitat

Soil Soil Quality Activity

Noise Quality

Aquatic Habitat

Wildlife Wildlife Habitat

Surfa quality Ground water

Loss of Livelihood

Transport & Traffic Surface Resources Water GroundResources Water

Topography Topography Drainage and Influx of Population

Aesthetics & Visuals

Flora & Floral Habitat

Aquatic Flora & Fauna

Cultural & Heritage Site

Fauna

Dust & Noise Discomfort

Migratory corridor & rout

Threatened & Endangered

Disruption of Infrastructure

Conflict on Job

Community Health & Safety

Common Property Resources

Job & Economic Opportunity Occupational Health & Safety

Loss of Agricultural Productivity AgriculturalofLoss Pre -Drilling Activities for Wells and GGS Site selection and land acquisition M M L M M Site clearance and top soil removal L L M M M M M M + M Well site & access road construction L L M M M M M M + M M Storage and handling of construction debris L L M Transportation of drilling rig and ancillaries L M M M M M M M Operation of DG set L L M L L M Workforce engagement & accommodation at construction site M M M + M Consumption of water for construction & domestic use for labourer L L L M Generation of domestic solid waste & disposal L L L L L L M Generation of waste water & discharge from construction activity & labour camp L L M Surface run-off from construction site L M L L M M M Development Well Drilling & Testing Physical Presence of drill site L M Operation of DG sets and machinery L L M L M M M Operation of drilling rig M L L M M M Storage and disposal of drill cuttings and mud L L L M Storage and handling of fuels and chemicals M Generation of process waste water & discharge M M M L Surface run-off from drill site M M M M M M Generation of domestic waste water & discharge L L L L L Generation of Municipal waste & disposal L L L Workforce engagement & accommodation at drill site M M M + M Flaring during production testing and process upset L M M Accidental events – blow out L L L L M M M M Accidental events-spillage of chemical & oil L L L Decommissioning and Reinstatement of Wells Dismantling of rig and associated facilities L M M M

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 177 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Environment Physical Environment Biological Environment Socio-economic Environment

opportunity

species

quality ce water

Land Use

Air Air Quality and faunal habitat

Soil Soil Quality Activity

Noise Quality

Aquatic Habitat

Wildlife Wildlife Habitat

Surfa quality Ground water

Loss of Livelihood

Transport & Traffic Surface Resources Water GroundResources Water

Topography Topography Drainage and Influx of Population

Aesthetics & Visuals

Flora & Floral Habitat

Aquatic Flora & Fauna

Cultural & Heritage Site Fauna

Dust & Noise Discomfort

Migratory corridor & rout

Threatened & Endangered

Disruption of Infrastructure

Conflict on Job

Community Health & Safety

Common Property Resources

Job & Economic Opportunity Occupational Health & Safety

Loss of Agricultural Productivity AgriculturalofLoss Transportation of drilling rig and ancillaries L M M M Removal of well site construction materials & disposal L M M Site Restoration + M + + Operation of GGS Physical Presence of GGS L M M Operation of DG sets and machinery M L L L M M M Generation of waste & disposal Souring of Water L Produce water Storage & Treatment Flaring M L L M M Accidental events – blow out M M M L L L L M M Accidental events-spillage of chemical & oil M M L Construction of Pipeline Site selection and land acquisition M M L Site clearance and top soil removal L L L M L L M M + M Trenching L L L M L L M + M M Sourcing & transportation of burrow material etc L L L M L L L M M M + M M Storage and handling of construction debris L L M Transfer of pipes to construction site L L M M M M M Operation of DG set L L L Workforce engagement & accommodation at construction site M M M + M Consumption of water for construction & domestic use for labourer L L M Generation of domestic solid waste & disposal L L L L L L M Generation of waste water & discharge from construction activity & labour camp L L M Surface run-off from construction site M L L L L M Operation of Pipeline Accidental events – blow out M M M L L L L M M

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 178 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

TABLE 4-8: IMPACT SIGNIFICANCE MATRIX (WITH MITIGATION) Environment Physical Environment Biological Environment Socio-economic Environment

esources th & Safety

species

Land Use

Air Air Quality Activity Soil Quality

Noise Quality

Aquatic Habitat

Wildlife Wildlife Habitat

Surface quality Surface water quality Ground water

Loss of Livelihood

Transport & Traffic Surface R Water GroundResources Water

Topography Topography Drainage and Influx of Population

Aesthetics & Visuals

Flora & Floral Habitat

Aquatic Flora & Fauna

Cultural & Heritage Site

Fauna and faunal habitat onflict on Job opportunity

Dust & Noise Discomfort

Migratory corridor & rout

Threatened & Endangered

Disruption of Infrastructure

C

Community Heal

Common Property Resources

Job & Economic Opportunity Occupational Health & Safety

Loss of Agricultural Productivity AgriculturalofLoss Pre-Drilling Activities for Wells and GGS Site selection and land acquisition M L L M L Site clearance and top soil removal L L M L M L L L + L Well site & access road construction L L M M M M L L + L L Storage and handling of construction debris L L L Transportation of drilling rig and ancillaries L M M L L L L L Operation of DG set L L M L L L Workforce engagement & accommodation at construction site L M M + L Consumption of water for construction & domestic use for labourer L L L M Generation of domestic solid waste & disposal L L L L L L L Generation of waste water & discharge from construction activity & labour camp L L L Surface run-off from construction site L M L L L L M Development Well Drilling & Testing Physical Presence of drill site L L Operation of DG sets and machinery L L M L L L L L Operation of drilling rig M L L L M L Storage and disposal of drill cuttings and mud L L L L Storage and handling of fuels and chemicals L Generation of process waste water & discharge L L L L Surface run-off from drill site L L L L L L Generation of domestic waste water & discharge L L L L L Generation of Municipal waste & disposal L L L L Workforce engagement & accommodation at drill site L M M M + L Flaring during production testing and process upset L M M Accidental events – blow out L L L L L M M M M Accidental events-spillage of chemical & oil L L L Decommissioning and Reinstatement of Wells Dismantling of rig and associated facilities L M L L

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 179 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Environment Physical Environment Biological Environment Socio-economic Environment

esources th & Safety

species

Land Use

Air Air Quality Activity Soil Quality

Noise Quality

Aquatic Habitat

Wildlife Wildlife Habitat

Surface quality Surface water quality Ground water

Loss of Livelihood

Transport & Traffic Surface R Water GroundResources Water

Topography Topography Drainage and Influx of Population

Aesthetics & Visuals

Flora & Floral Habitat

Aquatic Flora & Fauna

Cultural & Heritage Site Fauna and faunal habitat onflict on Job opportunity

Dust & Noise Discomfort

Migratory corridor & rout

Threatened & Endangered

Disruption of Infrastructure

C

Community Heal

Common Property Resources

Job & Economic Opportunity Occupational Health & Safety

Loss of Agricultural Productivity AgriculturalofLoss Transportation of drilling rig and ancillaries L M M L Removal of well site construction materials & disposal L M M Site Restoration + L + + Operation of GGS Physical Presence of GGS L M L Operation of DG sets and machinery M L L L L L L Generation of waste & disposal Souring of Water L Produce water Storage & Treatment Flaring M L L M M Accidental events – blow out M M M L L L L M M Accidental events-spillage of chemical & oil M M L Construction of Pipeline Site selection and land acquisition M M L Site clearance and top soil removal L L L L L L L L M + L Trenching L L L M L L + L L Sourcing & transportation of burrow material etc L L L M L L L L M L + L L Storage and handling of construction debris L L L Transfer of pipes to construction site L L M M L L L Operation of DG set L L L Workforce engagement & accommodation at construction site L M M + L Consumption of water for construction & domestic use for labourer L L M Generation of domestic solid waste & disposal L L L L L L L Generation of waste water & discharge from construction activity & labour camp L L L Surface run-off from construction site L L L L L L M Operation of Pipeline Accidental events – blow out M M M L L L L M M

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 180 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

5 Quantitative Risk Assessment

This section on Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) aims to provide a systematic analysis of the major risks that may arise as a result of onshore development drilling activities by JOGPL in Kathalchari Field. The QRA process outlines rational evaluations of the identified risks based on their significance and provides the outline for appropriate preventive and risk mitigation measures. Results of the QRA provides valuable inputs into the overall project planning and the decision making process for effectively addressing the identified risks. This will ensure that the project risks stay below As Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP) levels at all times during project implementation. In addition, the QRA will also help in assessing risks arising from potential emergency situations like a blow out and develop a structured Emergency Response Plan (ERP) to restrict damage to personnel, infrastructure and the environment. The risk study for the onshore development activities in Kathalchari Gas Field has considered all aspects of operation of the drilling rig and other associated activities during the development phase. Loss of well control / blow-out and process leaks constitute the major potential hazards that may be associated with the proposed onshore development drilling of natural gas in Kathalchari Gas Field. Other potential fire hazards/risks are associated with the accidental leakage and ignition of natural gas from proposed GGS at Kathalchari Field. The following section describes objectives, methodology of the risk assessment study and then presents the assessment for each of the potential risk separately. This includes identification of major hazards, hazard screening and ranking, frequency and consequence analysis for major hazards. The hazards have subsequently been quantitatively evaluated through a criteria based risk evaluation matrix. Risk mitigation measures to reduce significant risks to acceptable levels have also been recommended as a part of the risk assessment study.

5.1 OBJECTIVE OF THE QRA STUDY

The overall objective of this As Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP) with respect to the proposed project involves identification and evaluation of major risks, prioritizing risks identified based on their hazard consequences and formulating suitable risk reduction/mitigation measures in line with the ALARP principle. Hence in order to ensure effective management of any emergency situations (with potential individual and societal risks) that may arise during the development drilling activities, following specific objectives need to be achieved.  Identify potential risk scenarios that may arise out of proposed drilling and other associated activities like operation of ancillary facilities and equipment’s, mud chemicals storage and handling etc.  Analyze the possible likelihood and frequency of such risk scenarios by reviewing historical accident related data for onshore & offshore oil and gas industries.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 181 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

 Predict the consequences of such potential risk scenarios and if consequences are high, establish the same by through application of quantitative simulations.  Recommend feasible preventive and risk mitigation measures as well as provide inputs for drawing up of Emergency Management Plan (EMP) for the project.

5.2 RISK ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY The risk assessment process is primarily based on likelihood of occurrence of the risks identified and their possible hazard consequences particularly being evaluated through hypothetical accident scenarios. With respect to the proposed project, major risks viz. blow outs, pipeline and process leaks and fires; non-process fires etc. have been assessed and evaluated through a risk matrix generated to combine the risk severity and likelihood factor. Risk associated with the development drilling activities have been determined semi- quantitatively as the product of likelihood/probability and severity/consequence by using order of magnitude data (risk ranking = severity/consequence factor X likelihood/probability factor). Significance of such project related risks was then established through their classification as high, medium, low, very low depending upon risk ranking. The risk matrix is a widely accepted as standardized method of quantitative risk assessment and is preferred over purely quantitative methods, given that its inherent limitations to define a risk event is certain. Application of this tool has resulted in the prioritization of the potential risks events for the development drilling, GCS and pipeline operations thus providing the basis for drawing up risk mitigation measures and leading to formulation of plans for risk and emergency management. The overall approach is summarized in the Figure 5.1

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 182 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

FIGURE 5-1: RISK ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY

5.2.1 Hazard Identification Hazard identification for the purposes of this QRA comprised of a review of the project and associated activity related information provided by JOGPL as part of its Emergency Response Plan. In addition, guidance provided by knowledge platforms/portals of the upstream oil & gas industry including OGP, ITOPF, EGIG and DNV, Norwegian Petroleum Directorate etc. are used to identify potential hazards that can arise out of proposed project activities. Taking into account the applicability of different risk aspects in context of the development drilling operations to be undertaken in Kathalchari Gas Field, there are three major categories of hazards that can be associated with proposed project which has been dealt with in detail. This includes:

 Blowouts leading to pool fires/jet fires  Process leaks and fires from GCS  Pipeline leakage/rupture leading to jet fires  Non-process fires / explosions Well control incident covers a range of events which have the potential of leading to blow- outs but are generally controlled by necessary technological interventions. Hence, such incidents are considered of minor consequences and as a result not well documented. Other

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 183 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari possible hazard scenarios like mud chemical spills, falls, etc. has also not been considered for detailed assessment as preliminary evaluation has indicated that the overall risk that may arise out of them would be low. In addition, it is understood that, causative factors and mitigation measures for such events can be adequately taken care of through exiting safety management procedures and practices of JOGPL. It must also be noted here that many hazards identified are sometimes interrelated with one hazard often having the ability to trigger off another hazard through a domino effect. For example, a large oil spill in most instances is caused by another hazardous incident like a blowout or process leak. This aspect has been considered while drawing up hazard mitigation measures and such linkages (between hazards) has also been given due importance for managing hazards and associated risks in a composite manner through JOGPL’s Health, Safety & Environmental Management System (HSEMS) and through the Emergency Management Plan, if a contingency situation so arises. 5.2.2 Frequency Analysis Frequency analysis involves estimating the likelihood of each of the failure cases identified during the hazard identification stage. The analysis of frequencies of occurrences for the key hazards that has been listed out is important to assess the likelihood of such hazards to actually unfold during the lifecycle of the project. The frequency analysis approach for the proposed project is based primarily on historical accident frequency data, event tree analysis and judgmental evaluation. Major oil and gas industry information sources viz. statistical data, historical records and global industry experience were considered during the frequency analysis of the major identified risks34. For QRA for the proposed project, various accident statistics and published oil industry databases have been consulted for arriving at probable frequencies of identified hazards. However, taking into account the absence of representative historical data/statistics with respect to onshore operations35, relevant offshore accident databases have been considered in the frequency analysis of identified hazards. The same has been recommended in the “Risk Assessment Data Directory” published by the International Association of Oil & Gas Producers (OGP). Key databases/reports referred as part of the QRA study includes Worldwide Offshore Accident Databank (WOAD), Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Reports, Norwegian Petroleum Directorate Directives, Offshore Reliability Data (OREDA) Handbook, HSE Offshore Incident Database, SINTEF Offshore Blowout Database etc.

34 It is to be noted that the frequency of occurrences are usually obtained by a combination of component probabilities derived on basis of reliability data and /or statistical analysis of historical data.

35 Although Alberta Energy & Utilities Board (EUB) maintains a database for onshore incidents for the period 1975-1990 the same has not been considered in the context of the present study as the Alberta wells are believed to be sour with precaution being taken accordingly to minimize the likelihood of release.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 184 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Based on the range of probabilities arrived at for different potential hazards that may be encountered during the proposed drilling activities, following criteria for likelihood rankings have been drawn up as presented in the Table 5.1.

TABLE 5-1: FREQUENCY CATEGORIES AND CRITERIA Likelihood Ranking Criteria Ranking (cases/year) Frequency Class 5 >1.0 Frequent 4 >10-1 to <1.0 Probable 3 >10-3 to <10-1 Occasional/Rare 2 >10-5 to <10-3 Not Likely 1 >10-6 to <10-5 Improbable

5.2.3 Consequence Analysis In parallel to frequency analysis, hazard prediction / consequence analysis exercise assesses resulting effects in instances when accidents occur and their likely impact on project personnel, infrastructure and environment. In relation to the proposed project, estimation of consequences for each possible event has been based either on accident experience, consequence modeling or professional judgment, as appropriate. Given the high risk perception associated with blow outs in context of onshore drilling operation, a detailed analysis of consequences has been undertaken for blow outs taking into account physical factors and technological interventions. Consequences of such accidental events on the physical, biological and socio-economic environment have been studied to evaluate the potential of the identified risks/hazards. In all, the consequence analysis takes into account the following aspects:  Nature of impact on environment and community;  Occupational health and safety;  Asset and property damage;

 Corporate image  Timeline for restoration of environmental and property damage  Restoration cost for environmental and property damage The following criterion for consequence rankings (Table 5.2) is drawn up in context of the possible consequences of risk events that may occur during proposed development drilling activities:

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 185 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

TABLE 5-2: SEVERITY CATEGORIES AND CRITERIA Consequence Ranking Criteria Definition Catastrophic 5  Multiple fatalities/Permanent total disability to more than 50 persons  Severe violations of national limits for environmental emission  More than 5 years for natural recovery  Net negative financial impact of >10 crores  Long term impact on ecologically sensitive areas  International media coverage  National stakeholder concern and media coverage Major 4  Single fatality/permanent total disability to one or more persons  Major violations of national limits for environmental emissions  2-5 years for natural recovery  Net negative financial impact of 5 -10 crores  Significant impact on endangered and threatened floral and faunal species  Loss of corporate image and reputation Moderate 3  Short term hospitalization & rehabilitation leading to recovery  Short term violations of national limits for environmental emissions  1-2 years for natural recovery  Net negative financial impact of 1-5 crores  Short term impact on protected natural habitats  State wide media coverage Minor 2  Medical treatment injuries  1 year for natural recovery  Net negative financial impact of 0.5 – 1 crore  Temporary environmental impacts which can be mitigated  Local stakeholder concern and public attention Insignificant 1  First Aid treatment with no Lost Time Incidents (LTIs)  Natural recovery < 1year  Net negative financial impact of <0.5 crores.  No significant impact on environmental components  No media coverage 5.2.4 Risk Evaluation Based on ranking of likelihood and frequencies, each identified hazard has been evaluated based on the likelihood of occurrence and the magnitude of consequences. Significance of

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 186 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari risks is expressed as the product of likelihood and consequence of the risk event, expressed as follows: Significance = Likelihood X Consequence The Table 5.3 below illustrates all possible product results for five likelihood and consequence categories while the Table 5.4 assigns risk significance criteria in four regions that identify the limit of risk acceptability. Depending on the position of intersection of a column with a row in the risk matrix, hazard prone activities have been classified as low, medium and high thereby qualifying a set of risk reduction / mitigation strategies.

TABLE 5-3: RISK MATRIX

Likelihood → Frequent Probable Remote Not Likely Improbable

5 4 3 2 1

Catastrophic 5 25 20 15 10 5

Major 4 20 16 12 8 4

Moderate 3 15 12 9 6 3

Consequence Minor 2 10 8 6 4 2

Insignificant 1 5 4 3 2 1

TABLE 5-4: RISK CRITERIA AND ACTION REQUIREMENTS

Risk Significance Criteria Definition & Action Requirements

“Risk requires attention” – Project HSE Management need to ensure High (16 - 25) that necessary mitigation are adopted to ensure that possible risk remains within acceptable limits

“Risk is tolerable” – Project HSE Management needs to adopt necessary Medium (10 – 15) measures to prevent any change/modification of existing risk controls and ensure implementation of all practicable controls.

“Risk is acceptable” – Project related risks are managed by well- Low (5 – 9) established controls and routine processes/procedures. Implementation of additional controls can be considered.

“Risk is acceptable” – All risks are managed by well-established Very Low (1 – 4) controls and routine processes/procedures. Additional risk controls need not to be considered

5.3 RISK ASSESSMENT OF IDENTIFIED PROJECT HAZARDS As already discussed in the previous section, three major categories risk have identified in relation to proposed development drilling activities. A comprehensive risk assessment study

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 187 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari has been undertaken to assess and evaluate significance of135 identified risks in terms of severity of consequences and likelihood of occurrence. Risk assessment study details have been summarized in the subsequent sections below: 5.3.1 Blow Outs/Loss of Well Control Blow out is an uncontrolled release of well fluid (primarily hydrocarbons viz. oil and/or gas and may also include drilling mud, completion fluid, water etc) from an exploratory or development well. Blow outs are the result of failure to control a kick and regain pressure control and are typically caused by equipment failure or human error. The possible blow out cause events occurring in isolation or in combination have been listed below:  Formation fluid entry into well bore  Loss of containment due to malfunction (viz. wire lining)  Well head damage (e.g. by fires, storms, dropped object etc)  Rig forced off station (e.g. by anchor failure) damaging Blow Out Preventor (BOP) or wellhead The most common cause of blow out can be associated with the sudden/unexpected entry/release of formation fluid into well bore that may arise as a result of the following events as discussed in the Box 5.1 below.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 188 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

BOX 5.1: PRIMARY CAUSES OF BLOW OUTS

Shallow gas

In shallow formations there may be pockets of shallow gas. In these instances there is often insufficient mud density in the well and no BOP is in place. If the hole strikes shallow gas the gas may be released on the drilling rig very rapidly. Typical geological features which suggest the presence of shallow gas can then be detected. Historically, striking of shallow gas has been one of the most frequent causes of blowouts in drilling. Swabbing

As the drill pipe is pulled upwards during trips out of the hole or upward movement of the drill string, the pressure in the hole beneath the drill bit is reduced, creating a suction effect. Sufficient drilling mud must be pumped down-hole to compensate for this effect or well fluids may enter the bore. Swabbing is also a frequent cause of drilling blowouts. High formation pressure

Drilling into an unexpected zone of high pressure may allow formation fluids to enter the well before mud weight can be increased to prevent it. Insufficient mud weight

The primary method of well control is the use of drilling mud; in correct operation, the hydrostatic pressure exerted by the mud prevents well fluids from entering the well bore. A high mud weight provides safety against well fluids in-flows. However, a high mud weight reduces drilling speed, therefore, mud weight is calculated to establish weight most suitable to safely control anticipated formation pressures and allows optimum rates of penetration. If the required mud weight is incorrectly calculated then well fluid may be able to enter the bore. Lost Circulation

Drilling mud circulation can be lost if mud enters a permeable formation instead of returning to the rig. This reduces the hydrostatic pressures exerted by the mud throughout the well bore, and may allow well fluids from another formation to enter the bore.

Gas cut mud

Drilling fluids are denser than well fluids; this density is required to provide the hydrostatic pressure which prevents well fluids from entering the bore. If well fluids mix with the mud then its density will be reduced. As mud is circulated back to surface, hydrostatic pressure exerted by the mud column is reduced. Once gas reaches surface it is released into the atmosphere.

Source: A Guide to Quantitative Risk Assessment for Offshore Installations; John Spouge – DNVTechnica Publication 99/100a For better understanding, causes of blow outs have been systematically defined in terms of loss of pressure control (failure of primary barrier), uncontrolled flow of fluid or failure of secondary barrier (BOP). The blow out incidents resulting from primary and secondary failures for proposed operations as obtained through comprehensive root cause analysis of the

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 189 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Gulf Coast (Texas, OCS and US Gulf of Mexico) Blow Outs36 during 1960-1996 have been presented in the Table 5.5 below.

TABLE 5-5: BLOW OUT CAUSE DISTRIBUTION FOR FAILURES DURING DRILLING OPERATIONS

Sl. No. Causal Factors Blow Out Incidents (nos.)

A Primary Barrier 1 Swabbing 77 2 Drilling Break 52 3 Formation breakdown 38 4 Trapped/expanding gas 09 5 Gas cut mud 26 6 Low mud weight 17 7 Wellhead failure 05 8 Cement setting 05 B Secondary Barrier 1 Failure to close BOP 07 2 Failure of BOP after closure 13 3 BOP not in place 10 4 Fracture at casing shoe 03 5 Failure to stab string valve 09 6 Casing leakage 06

Thus, underlying blowout causes as discussed in the above table can be primarily attributed to swabbing as the primary barrier failure which is indicative of insufficient attention given to trip margin and controlling pipe movement speed. Also, it is evident from the above table that lack of proper maintenance, operational failures and absence of BOPs as secondary barrier contributed to majority of blowout incidents (approx. 30 nos.) is recorded.

Blowout Frequency Analysis Blow out frequency estimates is obtained from a combination of incident experience and associated exposure in a given area over a given period. For the purpose of calculation of blow out frequency analysis in context of the present study involving drilling and development operations, blow out frequencies per well drilled have been considered. For onshore blowouts, the Alberta Energy and Utilities Board (EUB) maintain a database of onshore drilling incidents. The database includes drilling occurrence data for Alberta from

36 “Trends extracted from 1200 Gulf Coast blowouts during 1960-1996” – Pal Skalle and A.L.Podio

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 190 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

1975 till 1990 with a total of 87994 wells drilled. During 2002-2006, there were 39 blowouts and 88856 wells drilled. Of the 39 blow outs, 7 involved release of gas, the remainder released only fresh water. Taking the full number of blowouts gives a frequency of 4.4 X 10-4 blowouts per well drilled. Based on the given frequency and information provided by JOGPL on the proposed project development drilling program the blow out frequency is calculated as follows:

No of development wells to be drilled = 10 (A)

Blow out frequency for development drilling = 4.4 X 10-4 per well drilled (B)

Frequency of blow out occurrence for the proposed project = (A X B) = 10 X 4.4 X 10-4

= 4.4 X 10-3 per well drilled

Thus, the blow out frequency for the proposed project is calculated at 4.4 X 10-3 per well drilled i.e. the likelihood of its occurrence is “Occasional/Rare”

Blowout Ignition Probability Review of SINTEF database indicates that a rounded ignition probability of 0.3 has been widely used for the purpose of quantitative risk analysis arising from blow outs. As per this database generally ignition occurred within first 5 minutes in approximately 40% of the blowouts leading to either pool and/or jet fire. Blow out leading to flammable gas release has a greater probability of ignition compared to liquid releases37 (Figure 5.2).

FIGURE 5-2: IGNITION PROBABILITY VS RELEASE RATE

37 Fire and Explosion – Fire Risk Analysis by Daejun Change, Division of Ocean System and Engineering

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 191 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

An alternative to the blowout ignition probabilities given by the UKOOA look-up correlations can be obtained from Scandpowers’s interpretation of the blowout data provided by SINTEF 2. The most significant category is that for deep blowouts which indicates an early ignition probability of 0.09. For the purpose of the QRA study this can be taken as occurring immediately on release and calculation provided below:

No of development wells to be drilled = 10 (A)

Blow out frequency for development drilling = 4.4 X 10-4 per well drilled (B)

Blow out ignition probability = 0.09 (C)

Probability of Blow out ignition for the proposed project = (A X B X C) = 10 X 4.4 X 10-4 X 0.09

= 3.96 X 10-4= ~ 0.0004% Hence based on the aforesaid calculation the probability of ignition of blow out releases of hydrocarbons for the proposed development drilling project will be about ~0.0004% and can be considered to be as negligible.

Blowout Consequence Analysis Blow out from a hydrocarbon exploratory and/or development well may lead to the following possible risk consequences: a) Pool fires and smoke plumes resulting from ignited oil blow outs b) Jet fires resulting from ignited gas blow outs c) Oil slicks resulting from un-ignited oil pools. However for the proposed project involving development of gas wells for natural gas releases leading to jet fire, modeling has been based considering methane which has been identified as the principal constituent (~ 95%) of natural gas. Ignition of Flammable Gas Release leading to Jet Fire Jet fires are burning jet of gas or sprays of atomized liquids resulting from gas and condensate release from high pressure equipment and blow outs. Jet fires may also result in the release of high pressure liquid containing dissolved gas due to gas flashing off and turning the liquid into a spray of small droplets. In context of the present study, formation of jet fires can be attributed by the high pressure release and ignition of natural gas if encountered during exploration of block hydrocarbon reserves.

Natural gas as recovered from underground deposits primarily contains methane (CH4) as a flammable component, but it also contains heavier gaseous hydrocarbons such as ethane (C2H6), propane (C3H8) and butane (C4H10). Other gases such as CO2, nitrogen and hydrogen sulfide (H2S) are also often present. Methane is typically 70-90 percent, ethane 5-15 percent, propane and butane, up to 5 percent. Thus, considering higher percentage of methane in natural gas, the thermo-chemical properties of the same has been utilized in the jet fire blow out consequence modeling. The following risk scenarios (Table 5.6) have been considered for nature gas release consequence modeling:

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 192 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

TABLE 5-6: NATURAL GAS RELEASE MODELING SCENARIOS Scenario Release Rate (kg/s) Release Type Scenario - I 1 Small Scenario - II 5 Medium Scenario – III (Worst Case) 10 Large

As in the case of pool fire, modeling of nature gas releases has also been carried out using ALOHA. A Flammable Level of Concern approach has been utilized for assessing safety risk associated with the release of flammable gases (here methane) from well blow outs. In ALOHA, a flammable Level of Concern (LOC) is a threshold concentration of fuel in the air above which a flammability hazard may exist. While modeling the release of a flammable gas that may catch on fire—but which is not currently burning—ALOHA can predict the flammable area of the vapor cloud so that flammability hazard can be established. The flammable area is the part of a flammable vapor cloud where the concentration is in the flammable range, between the Lower and Upper Explosive Limits (LEL and UEL). These limits are percentages that represent the concentration of the fuel (that is, the chemical vapor) in the air. If the chemical vapor comes into contact with an ignition source (such as a spark), it will burn only if its fuel-air concentration is between the LEL and the UEL—because that portion of the cloud is already pre-mixed to the right mixture of fuel and air for burning to occur. If the fuel-air concentration is below the LEL, there is not enough fuel in the air to sustain a fire or an explosion—it is too lean. If the fuel-air concentration is above the UEL, there is not enough oxygen to sustain a fire or an explosion because there is too much fuel—it is too rich. When a flammable vapor cloud is dispersing, the concentration of fuel in the air is not uniform; there will be areas where the concentration is higher than the average and areas where the concentration is lower than the average. This is called concentration patchiness. Because of concentration patchiness, there will be areas (called pockets) where the chemical is in the flammable range even though the average concentration has fallen below the LEL. Because of this, ALOHA's default flammable LOCs are each a fraction of the LEL, rather than the LEL itself. ALOHA uses 60% of the LEL as the default LOC for the red threat zone, because some experiments have shown that flame pockets can occur in places where the average concentration is above that level. Another common threat level used by responders is 10% of the LEL, which is ALOHA's default LOC for the yellow threat zone. The flammable LOC threat zones for methane release are as follows: Red : 26,400 ppm = 60% LEL = Flame Pockets Yellow: 4,400 ppm = 10% LEL Well site risk contour maps for worst case scenario prepared based on ALOHA modeling of natural gas releases for flammable vapour cloud has been presented in Figure 5.3-5.5 below.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 193 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

FIGURE 5-3: SCENARIO I - RISK CONTOUR MAP

THREAT ZONE: Threat Modeled: Flammable Area of Vapor Cloud Model Run: Gaussian Red : 25 meters --- (26,400 ppm = 60% LEL = Flame Pockets) Note: Threat zone was not drawn because effects of near-field patchiness make dispersion predictions less reliable for short distances. Yellow: 60 meters --- (4,400 ppm = 10% LEL)

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 194 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

FIGURE 5-4: SCENARIO II - RISK CONTOUR MAP

THREAT ZONE:  Threat Modeled: Flammable Area of Vapor Cloud  Model Run: Gaussian  Red : 55 meters --- (26,400 ppm = 60% LEL = Flame Pockets)  Yellow: 131 meters --- (4,400 ppm = 10% LEL)

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 195 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

FIGURE 5-5: SCENARIO III - RISK CONTOUR MAP

THREAT ZONE:  Threat Modeled: Flammable Area of Vapor Cloud  Model Run: Gaussian  Red : 77 meters --- (26,400 ppm = 60% LEL = Flame Pockets)

 Yellow: 183 meters --- (4,400 ppm = 10% LEL) The zone of flammable vapour cloud calculated for hypothetical natural gas release under risk scenarios discussed in the earlier sections have been presented in the Table 5.7 below.

TABLE 5-7: ZONE OF FLAMMABLE VAPOUR CLOUD – NATURAL GAS RELEASE SCENARIOS Release Release Rate Red – 60% Yellow -10% Type (kg/s) LEL (m) LEL (m) Small 1 25 65 Medium 5 55 131 Large 10 77 183

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 196 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Hence for a worst case scenario (10kg/s) the flammable vapor cloud zone/flame pockets’ resulting from accidental release of natural gas will be covering a radial zone of 77m from source with the flammable gas concentration within this zone being 26,400 ppm. Based on the flammable vapour cloud concentration modeled for the worst case scenario (10 kg/s) an effort was made to establish the overpressure (blast force zone) that may result from delayed ignition of vapour cloud generated from any such accidental release. For overpressure risk modeling using ALOHA a delayed ignition time of 5 minutes was considered of the vapour cloud mass. However the threat modeled revealed that Level of Concern (LOC) was never exceeded that may possibly lead to damage to property or life within the blast radius. The results have been provided in Figure 5.6 below

FIGURE 5-6: SCENARIO III (WORST CASE) – OVERPRESSURE RISK MODELING RESULTS

Risk Ranking – Blowout Natural Gas Release (Worst Case Scenario)

Likelihood ranking 3 Consequence ranking 4

Risk Ranking & Significance = 9 i.e. “Medium”

Preventive and Mitigation Measures Blowouts being events which may be catastrophic to any well operation, it is essential to take up as much a preventive measures as feasible. This includes:

 Necessary active barriers (eg. Well-designed Blowout Preventor) be installed to control or contain a potential blowout.  Weekly blow out drills be carried out to test reliability of BOP and preparedness of drilling team.  Close monitoring of drilling activity be done to check for signs of increasing pressure, like from shallow gas formations.  Installation of hydrocarbon detectors.  Periodic monitoring and preventive maintenance be undertaken for primary and secondary barriers installed for blow out prevention, including third party inspection & testing  An appropriate Emergency Response Plan be finalized and implemented by JOGPL.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 197 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

 Marking of hazardous zone (500 meters) around the well site and monitoring of human movements in the zone.  Training and capacity building exercises/programs be carried out for onsite drilling crew on potential risks associated with development drilling and their possible mitigation measures.  Installation of mass communication and public address equipment.

 Good layout of well site and escape routes. Additionally, JOGPL will be adopting and implementing the following Safe Operating Procedures (SOPs) developed as part of its Onsite Emergency Response Plan to prevent and address any blow out risks that may result during drilling and work over activities:  Blow Out Control Equipment  Choke lines and Choke Manifold Installation with Surface BOP  Kill Lines and Kill Manifold Installation with Surface BOP

 Control System for Surface BOP stacks  Testing of Blow Out Prevention Equipment  BOP Drills 5.3.2 Pipeline Failure Causes Pipeline failure causes and their frequency of occurrence with respect to the proposed project have been discussed based on the review of the database of the European Gas Pipeline Incident Data Group (EGIG). The EGIG is a cooperation of 15 major gas transmission systems in Europe with the objective of providing a broad basis for the calculation of safety performance of the pipeline systems thus providing a more realistic picture of the frequencies and probabilities of incidents. The 8th EGIG report recorded a total of 1249 nos. incidents for the period 1970-2010, with 76 nos. incidents being reported for the last three years (2007- 2010). The number of pipeline failure incidents per year for the period 1970-2010 has been presented in the Figure 5.7 below.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 198 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

FIGURE 5-7: Natural Gas Pipeline Failure Incidents (1970-2010)

Source: 8th EGIG Report Pipeline failure leading to release of hydrocarbons may occur under the following circumstances –  Internal corrosion  External corrosion – from defects in protective system, in cased crossings beneath roads and railway lines  External interference – due to construction machinery, unauthorized excavations, missing ground markers;  Structural failure/mechanical defects  Ground movement resulting from natural hazards viz. seismic events, subsidence, landslides, floods etc. External interference and construction defects are also potential cause of pipeline accidents and may also occur at valve and pump stations and have been discussed in detail in the subsequent section of this report. Based on the aforesaid factors, accidental releases from pipelines are classified as either leaks or ruptures (Pluss, Niederbaumer & Sagesser, 2000). Similar failure cases have been considered for the proposed pipeline project.

Pipeline Failure – Potential Hazards Natural gas is flammable when mixed in air at concentrations from 5 to 15% (volume basis). Its fire-related properties are comparable to other light hydrocarbon fuels. Natural gas is buoyant at ambient conditions because of the difference in density between methane and air.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 199 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Pipeline leaks or rupture may possibly result in various fire hazards depending upon whether the ignition is immediate or delayed. The IGEM/TD/238 (Institution of Gas Engineers & Managers) standard recognizes the following possible fire hazards as being applicable following a natural gas pipeline release that ignites:

Ignition of a Leak (Immediate or Delayed) to give a Jet Fire In case of leaks from buried pipelines, the transient flow will be channelized through the voids from the overlaying soil. If the leak is sufficiently large then soil will be ejected above the pipeline. The jet will entrain air as it moves upward and will get disperse depending on the prevailing wind direction and other meteorological conditions. The concentration of gas till its Lower Flammability Limit (LFL) is hazardous, as it can catch fire on availability of ignition source. The total duration of release and its impact/consequence will depend on how quickly the release is identified and the sectionalizing valve isolates the pipeline section. If the material encounters an ignition source while it is in the flammable concentration range, a jet fire may occur. The momentum of released material from a buried pipeline generally results in vertically oriented fires. Such fires have smaller hazard ranges than horizontally orientated fires.

Immediate Ignition of a Rupture to give a Fireball & Crater Fire Following a rupture, or large puncture, there will be rapid depressurization in the vicinity of the failure. For the buried pipelines as in this case, the overlying soil will be ejected with the formation of a crater of a size and shape, which influences the behavior of the released gas. At the start of the release, a highly turbulent mushroom shaped cap is formed which increases in height above the release point due to the source momentum and buoyancy, and is fed by the gas jet and entrained air from the plume which follows. In addition to entrained air the release can also result in entrainment of ejected soil into the cap and plume. Eventually, the cap will disperse due to progressive entrainment and a quasi-steady plume will remain. (Acton, Gosse & McCollum, 2002). If the large scale quasi-instantaneous flammable gas release is under pressure is ignited almost immediately a fireball will result. In order for a fireball to occur, the cloud must be ignited before it has time to disperse hence there must be an ignition source close to the release point at the time of release. The energy released by the rupture of the pipeline typically results in the formation of a crater around the rupture point. Gas enters the crater from each end of the ruptured pipeline. Once the fireball has dissipated, this gas continues to burn as a crater (or trench) fire. Crater fire generally occurs when the ignition of the gas released by rupture is delayed. However the review of historical data indicates that the

38 IGEM/TD/2 provides a framework for carrying out an assessment of the acute safety risks associated with major accident hazard pipelines (MAHPs) containing high pressure Natural Gas. It provides guidance on the selection of pipeline failure frequencies and on the modelling of failure consequences for the prediction of individual and societal risks.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 200 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari concentration of gas in the vapour clouds formed will therefore generally be low and the probability of vapour cloud fires to be produced is relatively lean. Ignition of the cloud is likely to occur at concentrations below the Lower Flammability Limit (LFL) of 2.2 vol.%. In some cases, the cloud if ignited, the flame will not propagate through the cloud and will lead only to the formation of isolated pockets of ignition making any potential cause of fireballs unlikely. Further the probability of ignition of a natural gas release is remote as natural gas is a considerably light gas whose molecular weight is lower than air and also taking into account low ignition probability (2%-4%) of gas pipeline failure as reported by EGIG. Also the surrounding area through which the pipeline traverses is open and there is no area within which the released gas could be confined (Refer Hazardous Chemical Databook, G Weiss, Noyes Data Corporation). In view of the above discussion the occurrence of fireball is remote and hence is not considered for qualitative analysis. Flash Fires The buoyancy of natural gas and momentum of the high pressure release tend to propel the gas away from ground level within a relatively short distance from the source. This means that it is highly unlikely that flammable concentrations of gas will be produced at ground level beyond a short distance from the source. For this reason, flash fires are not included within the QRA.

Pipeline Failure – Frequency Analysis An effort has also been made to understand the primary failure frequencies of natural gas pipeline which is the result of the number of incidents within a period divided by the corresponding total system exposure. Based on the EGIG database the evolution of the primary failure frequencies over the entire period and for the last five years has been provided in Table 5.8 below.

TABLE 5-8: PRIMARY GAS PIPELINE FAILURE FREQUENCY

Total System Exposure Primary failure frequency Period No. of Incidents (km. yr) (1000 km. yr) 1970-2007 1173 3.15.106 0.372 1970-2010 1249 3.55.106 0.351 1971-2010 1222 3.52.106 0.347 1981-2010 860 3.01.106 0.286 1991-2010 460 2.25.106 0.204 2001-2010 207 1.24.106 0.167 2006-2010 106 0.654.106 0.162 Source: 8h EGIG Report As referred in the above table the overall failure frequency (0.35) of the entire period (1970- 2010) is slightly lower than the failure frequency of 0.37 reported in the 7th EGIG report (1970-2007). The failure frequency of the last 5 years was found to be half the primary

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 201 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari failure frequency over the entire period showing the improved performance over the recent years. The evolution of primary failure frequencies over the entire period including the 5 year period of 2006-20010 has been presented in the Figure 5.8 below.

FIGURE 5-8: EVOLUTION OF PRIMARY FAILURE FREQUENCIES

Source: 8th EGIG Report

The above figure depicts a steady drop of the primary failure frequencies and the failure frequencies of the 5 years moving average. The primary failure frequency over the entire period declined from 0.87 per 1000 km.yr in 1970 to 0.35 per 1000 km.yr in 2010. The moving average primary failure frequency over five years decreased by a factor 5 (0.86 to 0.16 per 1000 km.yr). Data published by the UK Onshore Pipeline Operators Association (UKOPA) show a similar trend, with the frequency of accidental releases in the period 2002- 2006 being over 25 times lower than the frequency for the period 1967-1971 (0.028 as opposed to 0.706 releases per 1000 km of pipe per year). Pipeline Failure Frequency Analysis – Incident Causes As discussed earlier natural gas pipeline failure incidents can be attributed to the following major causes viz. external interference, construction defects, corrosion (internal & external), ground movement and hot tap. The distribution of incidents with cause has been presented in the Figure 5.9 below.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 202 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

FIGURE 5-9: NATURAL GAS PIPELINE FAILURE – DISTRIBUTION OF INCIDENT & CAUSES

Source: 8h EGIG Report The interpretation of the aforesaid figure indicated external interference as the major cause of pipeline failure contributing to about 48.4% of the total failure incidents followed by construction defects (16.7%) and corrosion related problems (16.1%). Ground movement resulting from seismic disturbance, landslides, flood etc contributed to only 7.4% of pipeline failure incident causes. The primary failure frequencies per cause for the period 1970-2010 have been presented in Figure 5.10 below.

FIGURE 5-10: NATURAL GAS PIPELINE PRIMARY FAILURE FREQUENCIES PER CAUSE

Source: 8th EGIG Report

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 203 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

The Figure 5.10 illustrate the reducing failure frequency over the years which has been achieved primarily due to technological developments viz. welding, inspection, condition monitoring using in-line inspection and improved procedures for damage prevention and detection. As far as the cause of external interference is concerned, its associated primary failure frequency over the period 1970-2010 decreased to 0.17 per 1000 km.yr while the 5- years moving average has leveled off at around 0.1 per 1000 km.yr since 1997. However external interference to this date remains the main cause of pipeline failure incidents, with nearly 50% of the incidents being attributed to the former over the period 2006-2010. The pipeline failure frequency viz. leaks or rupture for the proposed pipeline project is established based on the interpretation of the database of European Gas Pipeline Incident Data Group (EGIG) representing almost 2 million kilometer year of pipeline operations. The failure rate reported by EGIG for on-shore gas pipeline with design pressure greater than 15 bar is 4.76 x 10-4 km/year. Full Bore Rupture (FBR) represents 13% of the cases (6.188 x 10- 5 failure /km/yr) and 87% of the cases represents Leaks (4.14 x 10-4 failure /km/yr). The EGIG database for gas pipelines suggests that the probability of pipeline failure is “Not Likely” (Refer Table 5.1). The frequency of pipeline failure during transportation of natural gas as recorded by EGIG is presented in the Table 5.9 below.

TABLE 5-9: GAS PIPELINE FAILURE FREQUENCY & CLASS Frequency Sl. No. Pipeline Failure Case Failure Frequency (per km. year) Class Natural Gas Pipeline 1 6.188 x 10-5 Not Likely Rupture

2 Natural Gas Pipeline Leak 4.14 x 10-4 Not Likely

Hence based on the above table and frequency categories defined (Refer Table 5.1) it can be concluded that the failure frequency (leaks and/or rupture) for the proposed project involving laying of pipeline is “Not Likely”. Further considering that the following preventive measures are likely to be adopted by JOGPL for addressing any potential pipeline related safety risks/hazards viz. jet fire etc the failure frequencies for the proposed pipeline project are likely to be minimal.  Pipeline shall be protected from external corrosion by impressed current cathodic protection and suitable external coating.  Corrosion coupons & corrosion sensing probes will be provided as required for monitoring internal and external corrosion.  Provision of SCADA and Leak Detection System.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 204 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Pipeline Failure Frequency Analysis – Damage Type As discussed in the earlier section potential hazards from pipeline failure primarily results from pin-hole cracks, holes and/or ruptures caused due to external disturbances, construction defects, corrosion etc. As external disturbance has been identified as one of the major cause for pipeline incidents (EGIG database) the same has been considered in evaluating the failure frequency with respect to the nature of damage and pipeline design parameters viz. diameter. The pipeline failure frequency in relation with external interference, damage type and diameter class have been presented in the Figure 5.11 below.

FIGURE 5-11: EXTERNAL FAILURE FREQUENCY – RELATION WITH DAMAGE TYPE & DIAMTER CLASS

Source: 8h EGIG Report The above figure reveals that pipeline with smaller diameter are more susceptible to damage by external disturbance as compared to larger diameter pipes. Thinner wall thickness of pipelines with smaller diameter also contributes to the increased failure frequency for such pipelines. Hence based on the aforesaid findings it can be therefore concluded that the failure frequency of the 4” dia pipeline to be laid for the proposed project is likely to be higher.

Pipeline Failure – Ignition Probability Fortunately not every gas release ignites, which seriously limits the consequences of the incidents. In the period 1970-2010, only 4.4% of the gas releases recorded as incidents in the EGIG database ignited. Ignition depends on the existence of random ignition sources. The EGIG database gives the opportunity to evaluate the link between ignition and leak size. The Table 5.10 presents the ignition probabilities per leak type for gas pipelines.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 205 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

TABLE 5-10: IGNITION PROBABILITIES PER LEAK TYPE Sl. No. Size of Leaks Ignition Probabilities (%) 1 Pin Hole Crack 4 2 Hole 2 3 Rupture 13 Source: EGIG Report The above table indicates that ignition probability of a gas pipeline failure event (pin hole crack and holes) is negligible contributing to only 2% - 4% depending upon leak type. The ignition probability of pipeline failure (rupture & leaks) with respect to the proposed project is derived based on the following equations as provided in the IGEM/TD/2 standard

2 P ign = 0.0555 + 0.0137pd2; for 0≤pd ≤57 (Ignition Probability for pipeline ruptures) 2 P ign = 0.81; for pd >57

2 P ign = 0.0555 + 0.0137(0.5pd2); for 0≤0.5pd ≤57 (Ignition Probability for pipeline leaks) 2 P ign = 0.81; for 0.5pd >57

Where:

P ign = Probability of ignition p = Pipeline operating pressure (bar) d = Pipeline diameter (m)

Project Pipeline Failure – Ignition Probability The ignition probability of natural gas release from 4” pipeline leak or rupture is calculated based on the above equations utilizing the following input parameters as discussed below.

 Pipeline Inlet Pressure (bar) = p= 151 bar  Pipeline diameter = d = 4 inches or 0.101 m  For pipeline rupture pd2 = (151) X (0.101)2 = 1.54  For pipeline leak 0.5 pd2 = 0.5 X (151) X (0.101)2 = 0.77  Since 0≤pd2≤57 and 0≤0.5pd2≤57, the following equation has been utilized for deriving the ignition probability for pipeline failure.

2  P ign for pipeline rupture = 0.0555 + 0.0137pd = 0.0555 + 0.0137 (1.54) = 0.076 or 7.6%

2  P ign for pipeline leak = 0.0555 + 0.0137(0.5pd ) = 0.0555 + 0.0137 (0.77) = 0.066 or 6.6%

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 206 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

The ignition probability of natural gas from gas pipeline failure viz. leak (7.6%) and /or rupture (6.6%) for the proposed project is computed to be <10%.

Pipeline Failure – Consequence Analysis Pipeline generally contains large inventories of oil or gas under high pressure; although accidental releases from them are remote they have the potential of catastrophic or major consequences if related risks are not adequately analyzed or controlled. The consequences of possible pipeline failure is generally predicted based on the hypothetical failure scenario considered and defining parameters such as meteorological conditions (stability class), leak hole & rupture size and orientation, pipeline pressure & temperature, physicochemical properties of chemicals released etc. As discussed earlier, jet fire have been identified as the possible consequences resulting from the natural gas pipeline failure and is dependent on the ignition time. Jet fires are generally burning jet of gas or spray of atomized liquid released from high pressure equipment. This may be very damaging to equipment within the fire, and lethal to personnel and local communities at some distance. Fireballs may arise from a rupture in the pipeline followed instantaneous ignition of the cloud of flammable gas released under high pressure. However as discussed earlier occurrence of such an event is considered to be remote and is not considered as part of this exercise. Taking into account the above pipeline failure consequences and frequency analysis as discussed above the following hypothetical risk scenarios (Table 5.11) have been considered for failure consequence modeling with respect to proposed pipeline project:

TABLE 5-11: HYPOTHETICAL FAILURE CASES FOR MODELING OF PROPOSED PIPELINE RISKS Design Pipeline Case Pipeline Failure Hole Size pressure temperature Scenario Description No Case (inch) (bar) (°C) I 0.50 Formation of jet fire 4” pipeline leak II 1.00 151 32 Formation of jet fire III 4” pipeline rupture - Formation of jet fire

The above risk scenarios for pipeline failure are modeled using ALOHA39 and interpreted in terms of Thermal Radiation Level of Concern (LOC). Predominant local meteorological conditions as specified in the baseline chapter been considered in modeling the pipeline risks using ALOHA. Nearly about 98% of the natural gas is constituted by methane with ethane representing the remaining 2%.

39 ALOHA is a public domain computer code that is part of a system of software that is known as the Computer-Aided Management of Emergency Operations (CAMEO) that was developed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), through its Chemical Emergency Preparedness and Prevention Office (CEPPO) to plan for and respond to chemical emergencies

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 207 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Thermal Radiation Level of Concern (LOC) is a threshold level of thermal radiation, usually the level above which a hazard may exist. For each LOC chosen, ALOHA estimates a threat zone where the thermal radiation is predicted to exceed that LOC at some time after a release begins. These zones are displayed on a single Threat Zone plot displayed as red, orange and yellow with red representing the worst hazard. The threat zone displayed by ALOHA represent thermal radiation levels and also indicates the effects on people who are exposed to those thermal radiation levels but are able to seek shelter within one minute. ALOHA uses three threshold values (measured in kilowatts per square meter) to create the default threat zones:

 Red: 10 kW/ (sq m) -- potentially lethal within 60 sec;  Orange: 5 kW/ (sq m) -- second-degree burns within 60 sec; and  Yellow: 2 kW/ (sq m) -- pain within 60 sec

Case I: Release of natural gas from pipeline leak – hole size (0.5”dia) The jet fire threat zone plot for release and ignition of flammable natural gas from pipeline leak of size - diameter 1 inch is represented in Figure 5.12 below.

FIGURE 5-12: THREAT ZONE PLOT FOR JET FIRE – 0.5” DIA PIPELINE LEAK

 Threat Modeled: Thermal radiation from jet fire  Red : less than 10 meters --- (10.0 kW/ (sq m) = potentially lethal within 60 sec)

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 208 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

 Orange: 13 meters --- (5.0 kW/ (sq m) = 2nd degree burns within 60 sec)  Yellow: 20 meters --- (2.0 kW/ (sq m) = pain within 60 sec) The worst hazard for release and ignition of natural gas from pipeline leak (hole size – 1” dia) will be experienced to a maximum radial distance of <10 m from the source with potential lethal effects within 1 minute.

Case II: Release of natural gas from pipeline leak – hole size (1”dia) The jet fire threat zone plot for release and ignition of flammable natural gas from pipeline leak of size - diameter 1 inch is represented in Figure 5.13 below.

FIGURE 5-13: THREAT ZONE PLOT FOR JET FIRE - 1” DIA PIPELINE LEAK

THREAT ZONE:  Threat Modeled: Thermal radiation from jet fire  Red : 20 meters --- (10.0 kW/ (sq m) = potentially lethal within 60 sec)  Orange: 28 meters --- (5.0 kW/ (sq m) = 2nd degree burns within 60 sec)

 Yellow: 44 meters --- (2.0 kW/ (sq m) = pain within 60 sec)

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 209 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

The worst hazard for release and ignition of natural gas from pipeline leak (hole size – 1” dia) will be experienced to a maximum radial distance of 20 m from the source with potential lethal effects within 1 minute.

Case III: Release of natural gas from complete rupture of 4” pipeline The complete rupture of 4” pipeline will result in the formation of flammable vapor cloud which on ignition may lead to the formation of fireball. The threat zone plot of fireball resulting from pipeline rupture is derived using ALOHA and represented in Figure 5.14

FIGURE 5-14: THREAT ZONE PLOT FOR FIREBALL - 4” PIPELINE RUPTURE

THREAT ZONE

 Threat Modeled: Thermal radiation from fireball resulting from full bore rupture  Red : 32 meters --- (10.0 kW/ (sq m) = potentially lethal within 60 sec)  Orange: 45 meters --- (5.0 kW/ (sq m) = 2nd degree burns within 60 sec)  Yellow: 70 meters --- (2.0 kW/ (sq m) = pain within 60 sec) The worst hazard for release and ignition of natural gas from complete rupture of 16” dia pipeline will be experienced to a maximum radial distance of 32 m from the source with potential lethal effects within 1 minute.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 210 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

For various hypothetical scenarios considered with respect to the proposed pipeline from the development wells to GGS, the threat zones calculated using ALOHA for defined thermal radiation intensities have been presented in the Table 5.12 below.

TABLE 5-12: THREAT ZONE DISTANCE FOR PIPELINE FAILURE HYPOTHETICAL SCENARIOS Hole Distance to Distance to Distance to Case Pipeline Failure Case Size 10.0 kW/m2 5.0 kW/m2 2.0 kW/m2 No (inch) (m) (m) (m) I 4” pipeline leak 0.50 <10 13 20 II 4” pipeline leak 1.00 20 28 44 III 4” pipeline rupture - 32 45 70

Thus the risk ranking and significance of project pipeline failure is presented below.

Likelihood ranking 2 Consequence ranking 4

Risk Ranking & Significance = 8 i.e. “Low”

Taking into account the qualitative risk analysis study and potential risk mitigation measures to be adopted by JOGPL for the proposed project the risk significance for the proposed pipeline is considered to be “Low” and can be managed by well established controls and routine processes/procedures as outlined in the DMP. 5.3.3 Process Leaks/Fires Process leaks are can be defined as hydrocarbon releases from process equipments excluding blowouts and are relatively frequent events. In most cases they are small in nature and can be effectively controlled. However, if this is not possible, they can trigger events like fire or explosions which may potentially have higher consequences. Such process leaks/fires are primarily anticipated from the proposed GCS.

Process Leaks – Frequency Analysis The frequency of process leaks can be estimated directly from analysis of historical data obtained from E & P Forum hydrocarbon leak database (E&P forum 1992), World Offshore Accident Database (WOAD) and OREDA. Although onshore data is available for process leaks, the information is not considered representative of the actual scenario. Under such circumstances historical data available on hydrocarbon leaks in the OGP authenticated offshore accident databases have been considered for purpose of process leak frequency analysis. Review of HSE hydrocarbon release database indicates that majority of the leaks (approx 45%) occurred during production with drilling/well operation contributing is only 10%. Range of frequencies for various possible events is presented in the Table 5.13 below.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 211 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

TABLE 5-13: LEAK FREQUENCIES FOR PROCESS EQUIPMENT Frequency Equipment Type (per equipment item year) Flanges 8.8 X 10-5 Valves 2.3 X 10-4 Small Bore Fitting 4.7 X 10-4 Pressure Vessel 1.5 X 10-4 Pumps, centrifugal, double seal 1.7 X 10-2 Pumps, reciprocating, double seal 3.1 X 10-1 Compressors, centrifugal 1.4 X 10-2 Compressors, reciprocating 6.6 X 10-1 Source: HSE Hydrocarbon Release Database Hence, with the development drilling for the proposed project to span over a period of 12 months or 1 year, frequency analysis for the process leaks from various process equipment associated primarily with GCS operations is calculated as follows (Table 5.14)

TABLE 5-14: PROJECT PROCESS EQUIPMENT’S LEAK FREQUENCIES

Frequency (A) Drilling Period Occurrence Frequency Equipment Type (per item year) (yrs) –(B) Frequency (A x B) Class Flanges 8.8 X 10-5 1 8.8 X 10-5 Not Likely

Valves 2.3 X 10-4 1 2.3 X 10-4 Not Likely

Small Bore Fitting 4.7 X 10-4 1 4.7 X 10-4 Not Likely

Pressure Vessel 1.5 X 10-4 1 1.5 X 10-4 Not Likely

Pumps, centrifugal, 1.7 X 10-2 1 1.7 X 10-2 Occasional/Rare double seal Pumps, reciprocating, 3.1 X 10-1 1 3.1 X 10-1 Occasional/Rare double seal Compressors, 1.4 X 10-2 1 1.4 X 10-2 Occasional/Rare centrifugal Compressors, 6.6 X 10-1 1 6.6 X 10-1 Occasional/Rare reciprocating

Thus, as discussed above in most of the cases the frequency of occurrence of process leaks for the proposed project is “Not Likely” with hydrocarbon release from reciprocating pumps and compressor is analyzed to be as “Occasional/Rare”. Further, taking into account that JOGPL plans to undertake periodic monitoring and preventive maintenance of such process equipment’s occurrence of such process leaks is likely to be less frequent.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 212 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Process Leaks – Consequence Analysis The potential consequences of a hydrocarbon leak from process equipments will depend, to a large extent on steps that can be taken to control or mitigate effect. There is considerable chance that a process leak might be ignited (either immediate or delayed) resulting in a fire or explosion. The following scenarios can occur if a gas leak is ignited:  Jet fires resulting from gas releases ignited early The evolution of a fire or explosion scenario as a result of a process leak can follow a complex chain of events which can be studied in further detail through a fault tree or what-if analysis. Fires or explosions resulting from ignition of hydrocarbon leaks can cause severe consequences, if it goes out of control and can damage equipment’s, including the drilling rig itself. The process leak consequences viz. jet fire fire is likely to arise out of an ignition of the vapour cloud formed. However, the same is dependent on the ignition probabilities accounted in relevant databases maintaining records of accidental events occurring over the years with respect to oil and gas industry. Review of the SINTEF database for major and minor process leaks indicated the following generic ignition probabilities (Table 5.15).

TABLE 5-15: GENERIC IGNITION PROBABILITIES Gas Leak Release Rate Category Release Rate (kg/s) Probability Minor <1 0.01 Major 1-50 0.07 Massive >50 0.30

Although records review of the OCS and Norwegian oil and gas installations indicated ignition delay for process leaks whereas the OCB/Technica (1988) revealed that for about 50% of the cases the ignition was delayed by about 5 minutes or more allowing escape of onsite crew and drilling personnel. However, as similar consequences viz. jet fire anticipated from process leaks as in blow outs, identical risk scenarios have been considered (in terms of gas release rates) for leak consequence modeling based on professional judgment and analysis of process leak accident database. Hence, consequence modeling for process leaks/fires will be similar to that undertaken for development well blow outs as discussed in the earlier section (Refer section 5.3.1). Risk Ranking – Process Leak Jet fire (Worst Case Scenario)

Likelihood ranking 3 Consequence ranking 4

Risk Ranking & Significance = 9 i.e. “Medium”

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 213 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Preventive and Mitigation Measures The preventive and mitigation measures for process leaks, fires and explosions will be implemented. Mitigative measures include the following:  Provision for adequate leak and fire detection alarm systems;  Installation of firefighting equipments, portable and fixed.  Potential sources of ignition like welding/hot works, compressors, electrical equipment, compressors etc. be minimized, as far as practicable;  Proper ventilation be arranged for in hazardous area to allow for inflammable gases to dissipate, when a release has occurred;  Proper mechanisms like ESDs which can isolate leaks effectively need to be installed, in high risk process trains.  Effective barriers in the form of blast walls, blast relief panels, etc. be installed to shield workers from high risk area where explosions may occur.

 Strict implementation of permit to work system and hazardous zone classification.  Basic firefighting training to all working on the drilling rig.  Installation of electrical equipment as per the hazardous zone classification. 5.3.4 Non-process fires/explosions Non-process fires are any fires and explosions that involve material other than hydrocarbons (e.g. electrical fires, diesel fires, accommodation fires, DG set fires, miscellaneous sources etc.). Most non-process fires are small incidents which can be managed within the facility using existing firefighting equipment’s. Such fires have however a higher frequency of occurrence compared to process fires and explosions as recorded by HSE database and World Offshore Accident Database (WOAD). Due to the absence of veritable data source recording non-process fire/explosion incidents for onshore installations the aforesaid databases for upstream oil and gas sector have been referred in an effort to analyze non-process fire/explosion risks with respect to the proposed onshore development project. Historically few fatalities have been reported from non-process fires and most of them have been successfully managed at the installation level. Based on the WOAD 1996 statistical report, the average fatality rate for non-process fires is estimated at 10-3 platform year. Again, these fatalities have already been addressed under risks covered under personal accidents and need not be considered for fatalities due to non-process fires. However, as they have a higher probability to occur such incidents may cause inconveniences and come in the way of smooth operation of the drilling activities. The frequency of occurrence of fires due to possible non- process accident has listed in the Table 5.16 below:

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 214 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

TABLE 5-16: FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE - NON-PROCESS FIRES

Non-Process Accidents Frequency (per year)

Electrical fires 7.0 X 10-2

Diesel fires 9.2 X 10-3

Machinery fires 2.2 X 10-3

Miscellaneous fires 2.1 X 10-3 Source: WOAD As a result, though the damage potential is low, it is important to take appropriate safeguard measures to minimize their occurrence. Many of these measures can be implemented through the stipulation of simple work instructions and procedures.

Risk Ranking for Non-Process Fires

Likelihood ranking 3 Consequence ranking 1

Risk Ranking & Significance = 3 i.e. “Low”

Preventive and Mitigation Measures The preventive and mitigation measures for small non-process fires would be implemented by delineating appropriate operational procedures through the existing safety management system.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 215 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

6 Environmental Management Plan & Monitoring Framework This Environmental Management Plan and Monitoring Framework is a site specific document for the development drilling of hydrocarbons that has been developed to ensure that JOGPL can implement the project in an environmentally conscious manner and where all contractors, understand the potential environmental risks arising out of the proposed project and take appropriate actions to properly manage such risk. This EMP will be an overview document that will guide environmental management of all aspects of JOGPL’s activities i.e. construction and operation of /development wells, GGS and Pipelines within the Block. This EMP will be backed up by more specific Environmental Action Plans, Procedures and Bridging Documents with the progress of the well site preparation, development drilling, well testing and site decommissioning activities. The EMP describes the actions to be adopted in terms of:  National Policies and Regulations  Best Practices and guides

 Local Environmental and Social Sensitivities

The Environment Policy of JOGPL is presented at Box 6.1.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 216 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Box: 6.1: JOGPL Corporate Environment Policy

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 217 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

6.1 ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT PLANS The Environment Management Plan details out the mitigation measures to be implemented by JOGPL and the Contractors during various stages of development drilling of hydrocarbons, laying of pipelines and GGS construction within the Kathalchari Field. The following environmental management plans have been formulated in line with the proposed project activities viz. site preparation, development drilling, well testing and decommissioning, pipeline laying and GGS construction.  Pollution Prevention and Abatement Plan  Waste Management Plan  Storm Water Management Plan

 Site Closure Plan  Wildlife Management Plan  Road Safety and Traffic Management Plan  Occupational Health & Safety Management Plan

 Management of Social Issues and Concerns JOGPL will ensure communication and implementation of the aforesaid management plans prior to the commencement of site preparation of development well drilling operations, pipeline laying and GGS construction in the Fields. In addition, the mitigation measures for social issues and concerns are also separately presented in this report. An Emergency Response Plan to address technological emergency situations viz. blow outs, fires, oil spill etc. that may arise out of drilling operations has already been discussed in Chapter 5. In cases, where there are possible overlaps, the plans have been cross-referenced to avoid repetition. Additional mitigation measures to ensure effective management of identified environmental aspects during various phases of the proposed project have been discussed under the aforesaid plans in the subsequent sections and summarized in Table 6.1 for ease of reference.

6.1.1 Pollution Prevention and Abatement Plan (PPAP)

Scope The Pollution Prevention and Abatement Plan (PPAP) is applicable for and encompasses both construction and operational phase activities for the proposed project which has the potential to adversely impact ambient air and noise quality, surface and ground water quality and soil quality of the Kathalchari Field of JOGPL.

Purpose The PPAP establishes specific measures and guidelines aimed at effectively addressing and mitigating the air, noise, water and soil quality impacts that may arise as result of well site, GGS construction, and access road construction/strengthening, drilling operations and

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 218 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari decommissioning/site closure. The plan also details out roles and responsibilities of JOGPL and the contractors to ensure effective implementation of the plan.

Mitigation Measures & Strategies The following mitigation measures need to be adopted and implemented by JOGPL and its contractors during various phases of the proposed project to prevent and control air emissions (both point and fugitive), high noise generation, soil contamination and fertility loss, contamination of ground water resources and storm water discharge.

TABLE 6-1: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT MATRIX A. Control of fugitive and point source emissions

Project Phase Mitigation measures Construction  Sprinkling of water on earthworks, material haulage and transportation routes on a regular basis during dry season.  All vehicles, equipment and machinery used for construction will be subjected to preventive maintenance as per manufacturer norms.  All vehicles utilized in transportation of raw material and personnel will have valid Pollution under Control Certificate (PUC). Vehicular exhaust will be complying with the Bharat Stage III specified emission norms for heavy diesel vehicles.  The top soil generated from site clearance activities will be stored in designated area and stabilized to prevent fugitive dust emissions.

Drilling and well testing,  Flaring will be undertaken in accordance with the Sl No.72. B CPCB Guidelines for Discharge of Gaseous Emissions for Oil & Gas Extraction Industry.  Duration of flaring will be minimized by careful planning;  High combustion efficiency, smokeless flare/burner will be used.  An efficient test flare burner head equipped with an appropriate combustion enhancement system will be selected to minimize incomplete combustion, black smoke, and hydrocarbon fallout.  Volumes of hydrocarbons flared will be recorded.  Exhausts of engines on the drilling rig diesel generators will be positioned at a sufficient height to ensure dispersal of exhaust emissions; engines will not be left running unnecessarily.  Preventive maintenance of DG sets will be undertaken as per manufacturers schedule to ensure compliance with Sl No 94 GSR 371(E) dated 17.5.2002. Decommissioning/Site Mitigation measures to address the air quality impacts resulting from Closure vehicular movement, operation of heavy construction machinery and material handling are similar to those discussed above

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 219 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

B. Control of Noise and Vibration

Project Phase Mitigation measures Construction  Selection and use of low noise generating equipment equipped with engineering controls viz. mufflers, silencers etc  All vehicles utilized in transportation of raw material and personnel will have valid Pollution under Control Certificate (PUC)  All high noise generating equipments will be identified and subjected to periodic preventive maintenance.  No night time operation of vehicles and construction activities will be undertaken.  Engines of vehicles and construction equipment will be turned off when not in use for long periods.  Periodic monitoring of noise levels on site and nearby receptors to ensure compliance with Noise Pollution (Regulation & Control) Rules 2000.

Drilling  Installing acoustic enclosures and muffler on engine exhaust of DG sets to ensure compliance with generator noise limits specified by CPCB in accordance with Sl No 94 GSR 371(E) dated 17.5.2002.  Setup effective noise barrier at the fence-line of the site;  Restrict all noise generating operations ,except drilling, to daytime;  Periodic monitoring of noise levels on site and nearby receptors to ensure compliance with Noise Pollution (Regulation & Control) Rules 2000. Decommissioning/Site Management measures to address noise impacts with respect to operation Closure of heavy equipments/machinery and movement of vehicles during decommissioning/site closure phase are similar to those discussed in the “Construction Phase” of this section C. Prevention and Control of Soil Quality Impacts

Project Phase Mitigation measures Construction  Site preparation and road strengthening/widening activities will be restricted within defined boundaries.  Avoid construction activities during monsoon season as moist soil is most susceptible to compaction.  Use appropriate machinery and/or protective boarding during top soil stripping.  Debris and excavated material generated during construction activities will be stockpiled in designated areas onsite. No material will be disposed in adjacent land surrounding the site boundary.  For cleared areas, retain top soil in stockpile where possible on perimeter of site for subsequent re-spreading onsite during

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 220 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Project Phase Mitigation measures restoration.  Provide embankment all around the heap of excavated top soil and cover it with jute mats to avoid erosion by the action of rains/strong winds.  Install and maintain effective run-off controls, including silt traps, straw barriers etc. so as to minimize erosion.  Drip trays to be used during vehicular/equipment maintenance and during refueling operations.  In case of a spill, the spilled soil is to be removed and stored in hazardous waste storage area Drilling  All chemical and fuel storage areas will be designed considering HFL  Fuel and chemical storage areas will be paved and properly bunded. Bunded areas will be designed to accommodate 110% of the volume of spilled material.  Spill kits will be made available at all fuel and chemical storage areas. All spills/leaks contained, reported and cleaned up immediately.  Drip pans/trays will be used in areas identified having spillage potential but not limited to drill rig engine; electric generator engine; pumps or other motors; maintenance areas; fuel transfer areas.  In case of a spill, the spilled soil is to be removed and stored in hazardous waste storage area  Management of drill cuttings, waste drilling mud and waste oil to be made in accordance with S No. 72 C.1.a Schedule I Standards for Emission or Discharge of Environmental Pollutants from Oil Drilling and Gas Extraction Industry of CPCB as modified in 2005 (Refer Annexure 6.1).

Decommissioning/Site  Decommissioning at the end of project life/drilling will have some Closure adverse impacts in terms of increase in soil erosion and would require adequate mitigation measures to minimize any adverse impacts. The mitigation measures will be similar to those outlined for construction phase activities as discussed earlier.  Monitoring of soil quality to be undertaken after drilling of the wells

D. Prevention and Control of Surface Water Quality Impacts

Project Phase Mitigation measures Construction  Minimize clearing and construction activities during monsoon season (as far as practicable).

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 221 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Project Phase Mitigation measures  Construction work close to the streams or water to be avoided during monsoon  During site preparation and construction, surface water run-off to be managed through implementation of proper drainage system with silt trap and sedimentation tank onsite.  Sediment filters and oil-water interceptor will be installed to intercept run-off and remove sediment before it enters water courses.  Regular inspection of surface water drainage/diversion system and sediment controls will be undertaken.

Drilling  Run-off from vehicular wash and chemical storage areas will be limited to closed drainage system provided with an oil-water separator prior to silt trap and sedimentation tank to disposal to nearby drainage channels/surface water bodies. Spill kits will be made available in these areas.  Drip trays will be used during preventive maintenance of vehicles and machinery.  Hazardous chemicals and fuel drum will be stored in bunded and lined area equipped with proper spill control equipment.  Management of drill cuttings, waste drilling mud, waste oil and domestic waste will be made in accordance with S No. 72 C.1.a Schedule I Standards for Emission or Discharge of Environmental Pollutants from Oil Drilling and Gas Extraction Industry of CPCB as modified in 2005 (Refer Annexure 6.1) Decommissioning/Site No significant impact to surface water quality can be associated with Closure activities during decommissioning/site closure phase. Any possible impacts that may arise due to surface run-off will be mitigated in manner similar to that discussed during construction phase activities.

E. Prevention and Control of Ground Water Quality Impacts

Project Phase Mitigation measures Construction  No significant impact on the ground water quality can be associated with the construction phase activities

Drilling  The development wells, GGS and pipeline will be sited at a sufficient distance away from an existing tube well or open well.  Proper casing and cementing of developmental wells will be done to prevent contamination of sub-surface aquifers.  Water based mud to be used as a drilling fluid for the proposed project

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 222 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Project Phase Mitigation measures  Selection of low toxicity chemicals/additives in the preparation of water based mud.  Periodic monitoring of ground water quality will be carried out for village wells located outside the project boundary to assess the level of ground water contamination, if any.  Storage and disposal of drill cutting and waste mud to be made in accordance with S No. 72 C.1.a Schedule I Standards for Emission or Discharge of Environmental Pollutants from Oil Drilling and Gas Extraction Industry of CPCB as modified in 2005 (Refer Annexure 6.1)

Decommissioning/Site  No significant impacts to ground water quality can be associated Closure with activities during decommissioning/site closure phase

6.1.2 Waste Management Plan

Scope The Waste Management Plan (WMP) is applicable for all process and non-process waste streams which are generated during various phases of JOGPL’s proposed development drilling of hydrocarbons, pipeline laying and GGS Construction in Kathalchari Field. The major waste streams covered under this plan includes drill cuttings, waste drilling mud, wash water, kitchen waste and sewage. In addition, waste oil and lead acid batteries generated from the proposed project operations have also been dealt in this plan.

Purpose The WMP establishes specific measures to ensure proper collection, storage, treatment and disposal of the identified process and non-process waste streams in accordance with the applicable national regulations and guidelines40 and also to ensure compliance with JOGPLs corporate HSE Policy. The plan also outlines roles and responsibilities of both ‘JOGPL and the contractors involved in the implementation of the plan.

Mitigation Measures The following mitigation measures need to be adopted and implemented by JOGPL and its contractors for the major waste streams identified in the plan.

40 “Guidelines for Disposal of Waste – CPCB Oil & Gas Extraction Industry Standard” – EPA Notification [GSR 176(E), April 1996] “Guidelines for disposal of Solid Waste, Drill Cuttings and Drilling Fluids for Offshore & Onshore Drilling Operation” –MoEF Notification, 30th August 2005

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 223 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

TABLE 6-2: WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN Waste Quantity Mitigation Measure Drill Cuttings 212-225  Drill cuttings separated from drilling fluid will be m3/well adequately washed and temporarily stored and disposed in an impervious pit lined by HDPE.  The drilling cuttings pit will be bunded and kept covered using tarpaulin sheets during monsoon  Periodic monitoring and analysis of drill cuttings will be undertaken to establish its nature and characteristics.  The waste pit after it is filled up will be covered with impervious liner over which a thick layer of native top soil with proper top slope will be provided.  Feasibility study for use of drill cuttings for lining or capping of landfill sites or as a road construction material in consultation with nodal authorities Drilling Mud and 1000 m3  Use of water based mud or eco-friendly synthetic mud as wash water the drilling fluid.  Use of low toxicity chemicals for the preparation of drilling fluid.  Barite used in the preparation of drilling fluid shall not contain Hg>1mg/kg and Cd>3mg/kg  Recycling of drilling mud will be ensured to the maximum extent possible.  Temporary storage of drilling fluid and wash waste water will be done in an impervious pit lined with HDPE.  The drilling fluid pit will be bunded to prevent water overflow during heavy monsoon.  Drilling wash water will be treated through onsite Effluent Treatment Plant (ETP) to comply with the S No.72 A (ii) Standard for Liquid effluents of CPCB effluent discharge standard for oil drilling and gas extraction industry for reuse and recycling purpose. Kitchen Waste 10-20 kg/day  The waste will be segregated and stored in designated waste bins.  All such waste bins will be properly labeled and covered.  The kitchen waste will be disposed in nearest municipal dumping site on a daily basis through approved waste handling contractors Waste oil As generated  The hazardous waste (waste and used oil) will be managed in accordance with Hazardous Waste (Management, Handling & Transboundary Movement) Used oil Rules, 2008.  The hazardous waste will be stored in properly labeled and covered bins located in paved and bunded area.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 224 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Waste Quantity Mitigation Measure  Necessary spill prevention measures viz. spill kit will be made available at the hazardous material storage area  Storage details of onsite hazardous waste generated will be maintained and periodically updated.  Adequate care will be taken during storage and handling of such waste viz. use of proper PPEs by personnel  The hazardous waste so stored (not more than 3 months) to be periodically sent to State Pollution Control Board registered user and/or waste oil recyclers/ facilities.  Proper manifest as per Hazardous Waste (Management, Handling & Transboundary Movement) Rules to be maintained during storage, transportation and disposal of hazardous waste. Sewage 2.4 m3/day  The sewage generated will be treated in a combination of per well septic tank and soak pit.  Regular supervision will be undertaken for the domestic waste treatment system to report any overflows, leakage, foul odour etc. Lead Acid Batteries 2-3 batteries  Will be recycled through the vendors supplying lead acid per well batteries as required under the Batteries (Management & Handling) Rules, 2001.  Proper logbook will be maintained as per Batteries (Management & Handling) Rules, 2001. Recyclables viz. paper, Depending  Proper segregation and storage of recyclable waste in plastic, packaging on usage designated bins onsite. waste etc.  Recyclables will be periodically sold to local waste recyclers.

In addition to the management measures specified for the major waste stream, JOGPL will prepare and update periodically a waste management inventory of all waste streams identified for the proposed project. Necessary measure will also be taken by JOGPL to incorporate appropriate waste management and handling procedures in the contractor work document and conduct periodic training of personnel involved in waste handling onsite to ensure proper implementation of the WMP. In this regard, necessary inspection, record keeping, training program and monitoring procedures will be established by JOGPL and made operational to achieve proper management of all wastes generated on site. A typical layout of the environment management plans in a well site is given in Figure 6.1. The salient features of measures taken to safeguard the environment are given below:  The drill pad will be concretized  The top soils will be heaped and bounded by a retaining wall  The Waste pits (refer Sec 2.7.2) will be bunded to prevent the overflow of wastewater

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 225 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

 ETP will be installed  Oil spill kits will be available near Drill pad and Oil storage area  Fluid and chemicals will be stored in enclosed houses with restricted access

 The Hazardous waste will be separated from Non-hazardous waste and stored separately in enclosed area  Recyclable and non-recyclable waste will be collected and stored separately  Sufficient lighting will be provided  A garland drain will be constructed within the external boundary of the site connected to sedimentation tank with oil and water separator

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 226 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

FIGURE 6-1: ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT MEASURES AT DRILL SITE

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 227 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

6.1.3 Storm Water Management Plan

Scope The Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) refers to the proper management of surface run-off generated during monsoons for various phases of activities involved in the project.

Purpose The purpose of Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) is to ensure prevent and control any adverse impact of discharge of storm water from the well site, GGS and road widening/strengthening areas to nearby natural drainage channels and community water bodies. Proper management of storm water runoff will minimize damage to public and private property, reduce effects of development on land, control stream channel erosion, pollution and sediment deposition and also reduce local flooding.

Mitigation Measures

 Storm water from all longitudinal and cross drainage works will be connected to the natural drainage courses.  Necessary measures will be undertaken during construction phase to prevent earth and stone material from blocking cross drainage structures.  Periodic cleaning will be undertaken to cross drainage structures and road drainage system to maintain uninterrupted storm water flow.  Obstructions that may cause temporary flooding of local drainage channels, during construction phase will be removed.  Oil traps will be used to separate oil from runoff water  Sediment control measures in the form of silt traps and sedimentation tank will be provided to treat surface run-off before disposal

6.1.4 Site Closure Plan The site closure plan will identify all the activities which would be performed during the restoration of a particular site in case the well is not economically viable and no further use of that particular well bore is envisaged. Along with the well site the approach road connecting the well will be restored accordingly. Chronological inventory of activities which would be performed during the closure of the site are detailed in this section The following activities have been considered in the closure plan:  Plugging & Abandonment of well: Close the well head properly to prevent any further leakage  Decommissioning Phase : Removal of the materials form the site

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 228 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

 Waste/mud pit closure and reclamation  Reinstatement Phase: regeneration of the land  Handover Phase : Returning the land to the original owner

Plugging & Abandonment of well As and when the well will be declared as non-productive, plugging of the well will be performed to close and abandon the well to prevent any leakage of oil or gas.

Decommissioning The decommissioning phase includes activities dismantling and removal of surface facilities from the well site and storage in the Material Dumping Area. The activities which are envisaged during this phase are:  Waste Management: clean up the site and remove all waste materials e.g. HDPE liners, any waste material etc. The waste will be dumped in the designated area as per the guidelines of local pollution control board.  Road Restoration: The fill materials should be removed and restore the site or it may be left for further local community use as per the agreement with community.

Waste and mud pit closure and reclamation Following decommissioning and abandonment of the well site the waste and mud pits will be subject to closure through onsite burial of solids in accordance with lease and landowner obligations and with local, state and national regulations. Reclamation of closed pits or any other temporary retaining pits, including reserve pits, will be carried out within a period of one year from well closure/abandonment. All such reclamation activities will be carried out based on the climatic conditions and will be in accordance with reasonable landowner's wishes, and/or resemble and contour of the adjoining lands.

Reinstatement The reinstatement phase includes all activities for preparation of the soil for agriculture use (if the land is an agricultural land before operation) or forest land. Reinstatement of agricultural land  Sub soil preparation: The sub soil would be tilled till a depth of 6” to de-compaction the soil.  Overlaying of Topsoil: The topsoil would be spread evenly on each of the terraces as per the thickness specified by the applicable guidelines.  Top soil preparation: The bio manure will be mixed with the top soil to increase its fertility (if required). Regular water with mulching will be carried out for more effective soil preparation.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 229 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

 If the preserved top soil volume found less than the required volume than make up top soil will be out sourced from soil from pond bottom etc.  Seeding of Soil: Seeds of Leguminous crops would be sown on the plots to continuously improve fertility of the soil.  Testing of fertility: The soil would be tested for fertility as per the standard procedure of ICAR and compared to the fertility values done during the Pre Project Baseline Environment Assessment.  Laying of Plot Dividers: The Plot dividers would be put in place as it was before operation. Sub soil would be used for preparation of the dividers and would be seeded with grass to hold it in place. Reinstatement of Forest land  Forest Diversion proposal to be submitted for construction of wells, pipelines within forest areas. Necessary Forest Clearance in this regard would be undertaken from the State Forest Department. Necessary Compensatory Afforestation charges to be deposited to the Forest Department

 The preparation of topsoil and fertility regeneration of topsoil would be same as referred earlier  Forest Department would be consulted for probable site restoration activities  Afforestation program would be undertaken in the area concerned. Selection of plants for plantation would be undertaken based on the species that were cut down at the time of site preparation activities.

6.1.5 Wildlife Management Plan

Scope The proposed development drilling of hydrocarbons, pipeline laying and GGS construction in Kathalchari Field that may impart potential impact on local plant and animal species close to the drill sites, GGS, pipeline route and access roads within the concerned Field. The likely impacts of the project activities on the ecological habitat have been addressed in a Wildlife Management Plan prepared to safeguard local floral and faunal component.

Purpose The purpose of Wildlife Management Plan is to minimize the impact on natural habitat and control any adverse impact due to construction of drill site, GGS and pipeline, air and noise pollution from drilling and well testing activities, discharge of untreated waste water from drilling operation, storm water runoff from the well site and road widening/strengthening activities. The Management Plan details out the mitigation measures and strategies to be adopted by JOGPL and the Contractors during each phase of the project, at the same time

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 230 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari establishing a monitoring network to investigate the effective implementation of the Management Plan.

Mitigation measures  The drill site will be properly fenced (chain-linked) to avoid straying of any outsider as well as wildlife;  No temporary electric supply connection line from the grid will be laid for the proposed project activity. All electric requirements will be supplied from the internal DG sets.

 Noise Levels at the drill site will be controlled through selection of low noise generating equipment and installation of sufficient engineering controls viz. mufflers, silencers etc.  Movement of heavy vehicles will be restricted at night time  Care would be taken while disposal drill cutting & other drilling waste and discharge of waste water from the drilling site.

The following measures and strategies needs to be adopted to safeguard the natural habitat from the possible impacts resulting from the project and its related activities. An Environment Management Cell (EMC) will be developed for implementation of environmental mitigation & management plan. Forest personnel and veterinary doctor will be taken into the management cell for implementing the wildlife management plan. The environment cell would look after the following measures:

 Any wild animal species if trapped during site development or operation of drilling would be released into suitable habitat;

 In case of any accidental injuries to any wild animal by any project related activity, the EMC’s Veterinary Doctor’s help will be taken  All sightings of sensitive species in and around the project site will be reported and adequate steps will be taken with the help of forest personnel to reduce conflict between such animals and project activities or people working at site.  The Environment Compliance Officer will hold training program for all the JOGPL employees and sub-contractor on the applicable practice and mitigation measures contained within the Wildlife Management Plan.

6.1.6 Road Safety & Traffic Management Plan

Scope The Road Safety & Traffic Management Plan is applicable to all operation pertaining to JOGPL and contractor vehicular movement viz. vehicle involved in the transportation of raw

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 231 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari materials, project and contractor personnel, drilling rig and heavy equipment transportation to well site and decommissioning.

Purpose The Road Safety & Traffic Management Plan outlines specific measures to be adopted and implemented by JOGPL to mitigate any potential impact on community health and safety that may arise out of movement of vehicles and transportation of drilling rig and heavy equipments during site preparation, drilling and decommissioning activities.

Mitigation Measures  Project vehicular movement will be restricted to defined access routes to be identified in consultation with locals and concerned authorities.  Proper signage will be displayed at important traffic junctions along the predefined access routes to be used by construction and operational phase traffic. The signage will serve to prevent any diversion from designated routes and ensure proper speed limits are maintained near village residential areas.  The condition of roads and bridges identified for movement of vehicles and drilling rig will be assessed by JOGPL to ensure their safe movement.  Precautions will be taken to avoid damage to the public access routes including highways during vehicular movement.  Safe and convenient passage for vehicles, pedestrians and livestock to and from side roads and property accesses connecting the project road will be provided. Work that affects the use of side roads and existing accesses will not be undertaken without providing adequate provisions.  Parking of project vehicles along village access roads prohibited. Signposted parking facilities will be utilized for such purpose.  Any road diversions and closure will be informed in advance to the villagers who are accessing the defined routes  Traffic flows will be scheduled wherever practicable during period of increased commuter movement.  Personnel will be deployed at major traffic intersection for control of traffic  Clear signs, flagmen & signal will be set up at major traffic junctions and near sensitive receptors viz. schools in discussion with Gram Panchayat and local villagers.

 Movement of vehicles during night time will be restricted. Speed limits will be maintained by vehicles involved in transportation of raw material and drilling rig.  A Journey Management Plan will be formulated and implemented to control construction and operational phase traffic.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 232 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

 Routine maintenance of project vehicles will be ensured to prevent any abnormal emissions and high noise generation.  Adequate training on traffic and road safety operations will be imparted to the drivers of project vehicles. Road safety awareness programs will be organized in coordination with concerned authorities to sensitize target groups viz. school children, commuters on traffic safety rules and signage. In addition, JOGPL will ensure that all vehicles transporting hazardous substances (fuel oil, chemicals, etc.) will be properly labeled in accordance with the specifications of the Motor Vehicles Rules.

6.1.7 Occupational Health & Safety Management Plan Scope The Occupation Health & Safety Management Plan (OHSMP) is applicable for all project operations which have the potential to adversely affect the health and safety of contractors’ workers and onsite JOGPL personnel. Purpose The Occupation Health & Safety Management Plan (OHSMP) has been formulated to address the occupational health and safety related impacts that may arise from proposed project activities viz. construction of well site, GGS, pipeline, development drilling and testing, operation of construction machinery/equipments, storage and handling of fuel and chemicals, operation of drilling rig and associated equipment,. Mitigation Measures

 All machines to be used in the construction will conform to the relevant Indian Standards (IS) codes, will be kept in good working order, will be regularly inspected and properly maintained as per IS provisions and to the satisfaction of the site Engineer.  Contractor workers involved in the handling of construction materials viz. borrow material, cement etc. will be provided with proper PPEs viz. safety boots, nose masks etc.  No employee will be exposed to a noise level greater than 85 dB(A) for a duration of more than 8 hours per day. Provision of ear plugs, ear muffs etc. and rotation of workers operating near high noise generating areas.  Hazardous and risky areas, installations, materials, safety measures, emergency exits, etc. shall be appropriately marked.  All chemicals and hazardous materials storage container will be properly labeled and marked according to national and internationally recognized requirements and standards. Materials Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) or equivalent data/information in an

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 233 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

easily understood language must be readily available to workers and first-aid personnel.  The workplace must be equipped with fire detectors, alarm systems and fire-fighting equipments. Equipments shall be periodically inspected and maintained to keep good working condition.  Health problems of the workers will be taken care of by providing basic health care facilities through health centres temporarily set up for operations base camp.  The sewage system for the camp must be properly designed, built and operated so that no health hazard occurs.  Adequate sanitation facilities will be provided onsite for the operational workforce both during construction and operational phase of the project.  Garbage bins will be provided in the camp and regularly emptied and the garbage disposed off in a hygienic manner.  Training programs will be organized for the operational workforce regarding proper usage of PPEs, handling and storage of fuels and chemicals etc. The Environmental Management Plan Matrix for the proposed project has been presented in the Table 6.4.

6.2 EMP BUDGET The tentative budget for implementation of the environmental management plans has been provided below:

TABLE 6-3: TENTATIVE BUDGET FOR EMP IMPLEMENTATION Sl. Budget (in Particulars of Work No. lakh INR) 1 Air Quality Management Plan Dust suppression through water sprinkling in the internal unpaved roads a. 29.232 (@Rs. 15600 per well per month x 8 months x 1 year) Maintenance of paved internal road and transport route (budgetary provision b. 0 is included in operational cost of drilling) Ambient Air Quality Monitoring -8 monitoring location x 2 weeks per c. location per month x 12 months (@ Rs. 6000 x 16x4 samples per month x 12 46.08 months ) Stack emission monitoring (@ 6000 per sample x 9 sites x 3DG sets x twice d. 3.24 during drilling) 2 Noise Monitoring

Ambient Noise Monitoring – 9 locations, once in a month a. 2.7 (@Rs. 2500 per location x 9 locations x 12 months) Workplace noise monitoring -7 locations per well, twice during drilling b. 3.15 (@Rs.2500 per location x 9 sites X 7 locations x 2 months)

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 234 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Sl. Budget (in Particulars of Work No. lakh INR) 3 Water Quality

Surface Water Quality Monitoring (@ Rs. 6000 x 4 samples from natural a. drainages for four seasons+ 2 from ETP and 1 from oil/water separator from 2.58 9 wells once each during drilling) Ground Water Quality Monitoring b. 0.54 (@ Rs. 6000 x 1 samples for 9 wells once during drilling) Soil Quality Monitoring 4 (@ Rs. 6000 x 9 sites x once each after drilling and for emergency sampling 1.62 during accidental spill over during Site construction, during restoration) 5 Road Safety & Traffic Management a. Signage in the transport route & its maintenance (Rs. 100,000 + Rs. 10,000 ) 1.1 Deployment of traffic personnel in sensitive area – 15 persons b. 10.8 (@ Rs. 6000 per month x 12 months x 15 persons ) 6 Surface Runoff & Soil Erosion Control

Two chamber sedimentation tank at each drill site a. (Budgetary provision is already included in the infrastructure development 0 cost) 7 Municipal Solid Waste a. Provision of two chambered covered collection bins at well site – 32 nos 0.9 b. Transport arrangement of waste from well sites to dumping area 1 8 Hazardous waste management

Construction of dedicated hazardous storage area and record maintenance a. (construction included under project cost; only maintenance included in this 4 budget) Drill Cutting, waste mud and washwater pits; HDPE lined b. 0 (budgetary provision in operation cost of drilling) 9 Surface and Ground Water Protection and Management

Surface runoff control measures for chemical storage area, fuel storage area a. 0 (budgetary provision is already taken care in earlier section) Paved /impervious storage area for chemical storage area, fuel & lubricant b. storage area (Budgetary provision is already included in the infrastructure 0 development cost) Domestic waste water treatment facility through septic tank & soak pits at the c. 0 drill sites (budgetary provision in operation cost of drilling) Commissioning and operational cost of ETP d. (commissioning cost 10 lakhs for 1 ETP; operational cost Rs. 10000 per well 10.9 X 9 sites) 10 Occupational Health & Safety Management

Provision of appropriate PPE to all workers and its maintenance a. 0 (budgetary provision is included in operational cost of drilling)

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 235 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Sl. Budget (in Particulars of Work No. lakh INR) Provision of drinking water, sanitation facility for all workers b. 0 (budgetary provision is included in operational cost of drilling) Provision First aid facility (budgetary provision is included in operational c 0 cost of drilling) d Regular health checkup facility (provided by JOGPL for workers) 0 e Regular occupational health & safety training 1.5 Total COST OF IMPLEMENTATION OF EMP 119.342

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 236 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

TABLE 6-4: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT MATRIX Sl. Activity Potential Impact Mitigation No A Pre-drilling Activities A1 Siting of well site facility Potential adverse impact on environment Selection of drill site taken into account of local environmental in the vicinity of the drill site vulnerability Potential safety issues to local people Sufficient distance maintained in between site and nearest habitation related to drill site preparation and drilling operation A2 Procurement of land for well Loss of agricultural land and crop Provide of compensation for standing crops sites and related facilities productivity Finalization of compensation package in consultation with local Loss of livelihood for affected communities communities Minimal felling of trees and removal of vegetation through proper and careful selection of site. A3 Site preparation and road Loss of top soil and increase in soil Minimal felling of trees and removal of vegetation through proper and strengthening/widening erosion potential careful selection of site. Alternation in onsite drainage pattern Site preparation and road strengthening/widening activities to be restricted within defined boundaries. Avoidance of construction activities during monsoon season. Top soil stockpiles to be stabilized and stored in designated areas Provision of onsite drainage onsite. A4 Sourcing and transportation of Generation of fugitive emission Contractor to source raw materials from approved/licensed quarries. raw materials Community health and safety concerns Proper covering of raw material during transportation to be ensured Periodic water sprinkling along haulage routes near sensitive receptors Project vehicular movement to be restricted to defined access routes to be identified in consultation with locals and concerned authorities. Proper signage to be displayed at important traffic junctions along the predefined access routes. Night time movement of vehicles to be restricted

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 237 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Sl. Activity Potential Impact Mitigation No A5 Operation of construction Fugitive emissions and high noise Selection of low noise generating equipment machinery/equipments generation Installation of engineering controls viz. silencers, mufflers Occupational health and safety concerns Rotation of workers operating in high noise generating areas Use of proper PPEs viz. ear plugs, ear muffs. Periodic preventive maintenance of machinery/equipments A6 Transportation of drilling rig Generation of fugitive emission Periodic water sprinkling along haulage routes near sensitive receptors and ancillaries Community health and safety concerns Project vehicular movement to be restricted to defined access routes to Disruption of public utilities be identified in consultation with locals and concerned authorities. Community health and safety concerns Proper signage to be displayed at important traffic junctions along the predefined access routes. Night time movement of vehicles to be restricted The public utilities viz. telephone and electrical wire to be restored to its original condition at the earliest. Movement of rig and heavy equipments to be carried out in accordance with the Road Safety & Traffic Management Plan formulated. A7 Discharge of surface run-off Increase in sediment load contributing to Provision of onsite sediment control measures viz. silt traps, turbidity of receiving water bodies sedimentation tank Construction work close to the streams or water bodies be avoided during monsoon Run-off discharges to natural drainage channels/water bodies made to conform to CPCB Inland Water Discharge Standards. B Drilling and Testing B1 Physical presence of drilling Temporary change in visual characteristics Restoration of site to its original condition following rig and ancillaries of the area decommissioning/site closure B2 Operation of DG sets and Air emissions and high noise generation Siting of drilling rig and facilities away from sensitive receptors machinery and exploratory Occupational health and safety concerns Installing acoustic enclosures and muffler on engine exhaust of DG drilling Community discomfort sets Setting up effective noise barrier at the fence-line of the site;

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 238 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Sl. Activity Potential Impact Mitigation No Exhausts of engines on the drilling rig diesel generators be positioned at a sufficient height Preventive maintenance of DG sets to be undertaken as per manufacturer’s schedule. B3 Casing & cementing of Damage to subsurface aquifer Use of low toxicity chemicals exploratory well Periodic monitoring of ground water quality be carried out for village wells located outside the project boundary to assess the level of ground water contamination, if any B4 Storage and disposal of drill Soil and ground /surface water Use of water based mud as the drilling fluid. cuttings, mud and process contamination Use of low toxicity chemicals for the preparation of drilling fluid. wastewater Recycling of drilling mud to be ensured to the maximum extent possible. Use of HDPE lined pit for disposal of drill cuttings, process wastewater Disposal of drill cuttings in accordance with CPCB and MoEF guidelines on management of drilling wastes B5 Discharge of surface run-off Soil and surface water contamination Run-off from vehicular wash and chemical storage areas to be channeled through closed drainage system provided with an oil-water separator. Drip trays to be used during preventive maintenance of vehicles and machinery. Hazardous chemicals and fuel drum be stored in bunded and lined area equipped with proper spill control equipment. Drill cuttings and mud pit be bunded and kept covered during monsoon. B6 Sewage treatment Occupational health problems of Sewage to be treated using a combination of septic and soak pits operational workforce The sewage treatment system (septic tank & soak pit) to be regularly monitored for any possible overflows, leakages etc. B7 Flaring during production Air emission leading to discomfort to Siting of flare stack considering nearest habitation and sensitive testing and process upset nearby communities receptor. Elevated flaring to be undertaken as per guidelines issued by CPCB for

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 239 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Sl. Activity Potential Impact Mitigation No Oil & Gas Extraction Industry. Duration of flaring to be minimized by careful planning; C Decommissioning/Site Closure C1 Dismantling of rig and High noise generation and fugitive Rotation of workers operating in high noise generating areas associated facilities emissions causing discomfort to locals Use of proper PPEs viz. ear plugs, ear muffs. C2 Transportation of drilling rig Same as in A6 Same as in A6 and ancillaries

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 240 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

6.3 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM Monitoring is one of the most important components of a management system. Continuous monitoring needs to be carried out for regulatory requirements, to monitor the environmental quality and to determine performance of proposed mitigation measures. Monitoring indicators have been developed for each of the activity considering the mitigation measures proposed. Indicators have been developed for ascertaining the environmental quality and performance of the EMP implementation through Environmental Quality Indicators (EQI’s) and Environmental Performance Indicators (EPI’s) respectively which focus not only on quantifying or indexing activity-environment interactions that may potentially impact the environment but at the same time also help in comparing different components of environmental quality against previously established baseline values. Monitoring results will be documented, analyzed and reported internally to Head - HSE. Monitoring requirements have been described in the following Table 6.5. Frequency of monitoring and responsibility of carrying out the monitoring have also been presented in the table below.

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 241 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

TABLE 6-5: PROPOSED MONITORING REQUIREMENTS OF THE PROJECT A) Environmental Performance Monitoring Environmental EPI Performance Indicator Monitoring Parameter Location Period & Frequency Responsibility No. (EPI) A. Design & Planning A.1 Proximity of sensitive Distance between the drill site and Site Once in project Civil supervisor environmental habitat sensitive environmental habitat lifecycle A.2 Proximity of nearest Distance between the drill site and Site Once in project Civil supervisor habitation nearest habitation lifecycle A.3 Flood History HFL at site Site Once in project Civil supervisor Return period of major floods lifecycle A.4 Location and Size of Land Number of land owners affected Site Once in project Civil Supervisor Leased Total area leased for drill site (Ha) lifecycle A.5 Present Crop Cycle Crop period (in months) Site Once in project Environmental Supervisor lifecycle A.6 Approval / Authorization Validity of the Approval / Quarry Once in project Civil Supervisor of quarries Authorization lifecycle A.7 Land use Land use Type Quarry/ Once in project Civil Supervisor Borrow Area lifecycle A.8 Haul Routes Distance of quarry / borrow area from Quarry / Once in project Civil Supervisor project site Borrow Area lifecycle Condition of haul road A.9 Borrowing practices % of contractors sensitized on best Borrow Area During site planning HSE Manager & HSE practices and relevant EMP provisions Supervisor

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 242 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Environmental EPI Performance Indicator Monitoring Parameter Location Period & Frequency Responsibility No. (EPI) A.10 Undisrupted flow of water Number of cross drainage structures Site & Road Once in project Civil Supervisor in drainage channels planned to number of actual stream lifecycle crossings B Approach Road & Site Development B.1 Topsoil Area occupied for topsoil storage/ Area Site Once during each site HSE Supervisor planned for topsoil storage preparation B.2 Local drainage pattern Number of Cross Drainage structures Site & road Once in project Civil Supervisor constructed to actual number of cross lifecycle drainage structures designed B.3 Fugitive emission of dust Visual observation of dust in air by Site & Daily during site HSE Supervisor with Vehicular during site preparation haziness approach roads preparation / Civil Contractors

B.4 Air emissions from PM 2.5, PM10, NOx, SO2, CO, HC, Exhausts Once in project HSE Supervisor with Civil vehicles and machinery VOC based on emission factors lifecycle Supervisor, Visual observation of emissions (black signifying more pollution) Drilling/Civil Supervisor % of vehicles possessing valid PUC Daily through HSE Supervisor Certificates

Drilling/Civil Supervisor through Drilling/Civil Once in project life Supervisor through HSE cycle Supervisor, Contractors operating vehicles B.5 Noise emissions from Noise pressure level in dB(A) near Site & Daily during site HSE Supervisor vehicles and machinery noise sources (5m) approach road preparation

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 243 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Environmental EPI Performance Indicator Monitoring Parameter Location Period & Frequency Responsibility No. (EPI) B.6 Supervision of material Number of vehicles reported with Site Daily during site HSE Supervisor with Vehicular / transport overloaded material / uncovered preparation Civil Contractors material B.7 Accident reporting Number of casualties / Number of Site & Haul During life cycle of HSE Supervisor fatalities Routes project B.8 Fugitive emission of dust Visual observation of dust in air by Near Daily during the entire HSE Supervisor during material handling haziness stockpiles and project life-cycle and storage storages C Drilling & Testing C.1 Gaseous pollutant Pollutant concentrations in gaseous DG Stack Monthly during drilling HSE Supervisor through Drilling emissions from DG Set emissions and maintenance parameters & testing contractor (air, fuel filters & air-fuel ratio) of DG Daily during drilling & sets influencing air emissions testing Visual observation of exhaust smoke characteristics C.2 Noise emission from DG Noise pressure level in dB(A) Near noise Monthly during the HSE Supervisor through Drilling Sets sources (5m) entire project life-cycle contractor

C.3 Noise emission from rig Noise pressure level in dB(A) On the rig Monthly during HSE Supervisor through Drilling floor Near drilling contractor noise sources Number of cases of workers not using (5m) PPE Site Monthly during drilling C.4 Accident reporting Number of casualties / Number of Site As and when accident HSE Supervisor through Drilling fatalities occurs contractor

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 244 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Environmental EPI Performance Indicator Monitoring Parameter Location Period & Frequency Responsibility No. (EPI) C.5 Spilled Chemicals/Oil Area of Spill / Quantity Spilled / Site As and when spills HSE Supervisor through Drilling Severity of Spill / Characterization of occur contractor Spilled Substances for Contaminants (Heavy Metals, Toxics, etc.) C.6 Fugitive emission of Visual observation of cement dust in air Near Daily during the entire HSE Supervisor cement dust during by haziness stockpiles and project life-cycle handling and storage storages C.7 Runoff from temporary Supervision of functioning of conduits / Site Fortnightly during HSE Supervisor storage areas drains, channels drilling phase C.8 Emissions from Flaring Total CO, total hydrocarbon, Non- Flare Stack As and when flaring HSE Supervisor through Drilling Methane Hydrocarbons, NOx emission occurs contractor estimates based on emission factors C.9 Waste water quantity & Volume estimate At discharge Weekly during drilling HSE Supervisor through Drilling quality (Process water viz. CPCB General discharge parameters point Quarterly during contractor rig wash, formation water and Oil & Gas Extraction Industry drilling etc) Standards C.10 Storm water/wash down CPCB General discharge parameters At discharge Depending on HSE Supervisor through Drilling water discharge and Oil & Gas Extraction Industry point generation particularly contractor Standards during monsoon C.11 Drill cutting storage and Total volume generated At storage Once during drilling HSE Supervisor through Drilling disposal Concentration of hazardous constituents location period contractor as per Hazardous Waste Management and Handling Rules CPCB Onshore discharge standards for Oil & Gas Extraction Industry

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 245 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Environmental EPI Performance Indicator Monitoring Parameter Location Period & Frequency Responsibility No. (EPI) D Decommissioning/ Site Closure D.1 Noise pressure level in Near noise sources (5m) Site & Once per site HSE Supervisor through Drilling dB(A) Approach road & Civil contractor

D.2 Air emissions from PM10, PM2.5, NOx, SO2, CO, HC based Exhausts Once in project HSE Supervisor through vehicles on emission factors lifecycle Vehicle/Civil contractor Visual observation of emissions (black Daily signifying more pollution) D.3 Fugitive emission of dust Visual observation of dust in air by Near Daily during the entire HSE Supervisor during transport of drilling haziness stockpiles and activity facilities storages D.4 Site restoration Visual observation of : Site Daily during Civil Supervisor with HSE Clearing of decommissioning waste decommissioning Supervisor Leveling of site Relaying of top soil Regeneration of top soil

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 246 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

B) Environmental Quality Monitoring

EQI Environmental Quality Monitoring Parameter Location Period & Frequency Responsibility No Indicator (EQI) A Approach Road & Site Development A1 Soil Fertility Fertility parameters like pH, NPK Site & adjacent areas Once before site HSE Supervisor ratio, Total Carbon, etc. preparation A2 Quality of water Analysis of Parameters as per CPCB Natural drainage Monthly during site HSE Supervisor Use-class channel receiving run- and road works off discharges

A4 Ambient Air Quality Measurement of PM10, PM2.5, NOx, At Surrounding Monthly during site HSE Supervisor SO2, CO, HC using ambient air receptor points and road works sampler A5 Ambient noise quality Hearing / perception At surrounding Daily site and road HSE Supervisor Measurement of Noise Pressure Level receptor points works in dB(A) Monthly site and road works A6 Soil Contamination Analysis for suite of contaminants Site, adjacent areas In event of spills over HSE Supervisor (heavy metals, TPH, organics, and Waste disposal an area of 10 sq.m pesticides). site B Drilling & Testing

B1 Ambient Air Quality Measurement of PM10, PM2.5, NOx, At Surrounding Monthly during HSE Supervisor SO2, CO, HC , using ambient air receptor points drilling and testing sampler B2 Ambient noise quality Hearing / perception At surrounding Once during drilling HSE Supervisor Measurement of Noise Pressure Level receptor points and testing in dB(A) Monthly during drilling and testing

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 247 JOGPL EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, installation of GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

EQI Environmental Quality Monitoring Parameter Location Period & Frequency Responsibility No Indicator (EQI) B4 Soil Contamination Analysis for suite of contaminants Site, adjacent areas In event of spills over HSE Supervisor (heavy metals, TPH, organics, and Waste disposal an area of 10 sq.m pesticides). site B5 Quality of water Analysis of Parameters as per CPCB Natural drainage Monthly during HSE Supervisor Use-class channel receiving run- drilling & testing off discharges C Decommissioning / Closure C1 Ambient noise quality Hearing / perception At surrounding Once during HSE Supervisor Measurement of Noise Pressure Level receptor points decommissioning in dB(A) Monthly during decommissioning C2 Quality of water Analysis of Parameters as per CPCB Natural drainage Once after HSE Supervisor Use-class channel receiving run- decommissioning off discharges

C3 Ambient Air Quality Measurement of PM10, PM2.5, NOx, At Surrounding Monthly during HSE Supervisor SO2, CO, HC , using ambient air receptor points decommissioning sampler C4 Soil Fertility Fertility parameters like pH, NPK Site & adjacent areas Once after site HSE Supervisor ratio, Total Carbon, etc. restoration

SENES/M-ESM-20241/June, 2016 248 JOGPL

7 Public Consultation The proposed activities qualify the Project under Category A and hence, the process of Public Hearing forms a pre-requisite for obtaining Environmental Clearance under EIA Notification, 2006. As the project site is located in South Tripura and Gomati Districts of Tripura, JOGPL requested the Member Secretary of Tripura State Pollution Control Board (TSPCB) to arrange the public hearing. Upon receipt of the request the Member Secretary selected 29th December and 31st December 2015 to be the date of Public Hearing in South Tripura and Gomati District respectively. Along with the application JOGPL provided sufficient copies of Draft Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), and Executive Summary in English and Bengali to TSPCB. The announcement of Public hearing was conducted in these two districts (refer Photographs-7.1). Further, Public notices for these public hearing was published on 30th Nov 2015 in following local and national level newspaper:  Dainik Sambad (Bengali newspaper)  Daily Desher Katha (Bengali newspaper)  Telegraph (English newspaper)

Photograph 7.1: Public Hearing Announcement in Gomati and South Tripura Districts

Announcement of Public Hearing scheduled in villages of Gomati District

Announcement of Public Hearing scheduled in villages of South Tripura District

Photograph 7.2: Public Hearing Advertisement in Newspaper

Newspaer - Telegrah

Newspaer – Dainik Sambad Newspaper – Deshar Katha

(1) Public Hearing Venue and Participants (A) South Tripura District The public hearing for South Tripura district was held on 29th Dec 2015 at Kwaifung community hall, Santirbazar. Total 8 nos. development wells of Kathalchari Field falls under South Tripura district. This public hearing was conducted in the presence of Mr. Rawal H. Kumar (Additional District Magistrate & Collector & I/c of District Magistrate & Collector, South Tripura District) and Mr. Rupanjan Das (Deputy Collector & Magistrate, Santirbazar, South Tripura). The officials from TSPCB, Jubilant Oil & Gas Private Ltd. (JOGPL), GAIL (India) Ltd. and environment consultants were also present in this Public Hearing. (B) Gomati District The public hearing for Gomati district was held on 31st Dec 2015 at Amarpur Town hall, Amarpur. Total 3 nos. development wells of Kathalchari Field falls under Gomati district.

This public hearing was conducted in the presence of Mr. Sajal Biswas (SDM, Amarpur) and Mr. Rupan Das (Deputy Collector & Magistrate, Amarpur). The officials from Jubilant Oil & Gas Private Ltd. (JOGPL), GAIL (India) Ltd. and environment consultants were also present in this Public Hearing. TSPCB officials Chairman and Vice Chairman (South Ekchhari Gram Panchayat) were also present in the hearing. (2) Public Hearing Issues A detailed power point presentation was presented to the public as well as district administration on a large screen by JOGPL representative and environment consultant. At the onset of presentation, TSPCB scientist Dr. Mihir Kumar Das addressed the public and shared a brief understanding on the applicability of public hearing in light of EIA notification 2006 and the purpose of public hearing. During the presentation, project planning and associated environmental and social implications were communicated. After the presentation, a round of discussion was initiated to receive comments and suggestion of public at both the hearing locations. The concerns received during the public hearing and response provided by the project proponent for South Tripura and Gomati public hearings are presented below in Table 9.1 and 9.2 respectively. Minutes of public hearing recorded by Tripura State Pollution Control Board for South Tripura and Gomati District are attached as Annex-9.1 and 9.2 respectively. Table 9.1: Public Hearing Issues in South Tripura District S.No. Person Name and Public Concerns Responses of JOGPL to Village Public 1 Mr. Chandimohan Will proposed project cause There is no proof evidences earthquake in the region? which shows that development Village: Tailuma wells drilling will cause earthquake. What will be the impact on After project completion, site soil fertility after will be restored to previous completion of project? condition. Further, control measures will be taken to avoid impact on soil fertility by storing the top soil separately. What type of job We will encourage contractors opportunities we can expect to engage local people as per for locals? the requirement.

Table 9.2: Public Hearing Issues in Gomati District S.No. Person name and Public Concerns Responses of JOGPL to Village Public 1 Mr. Khudiram Enquired about the JOGPL representative assured Reang probability of contamination that control measures will be of drinking and bathing taken to avoid contamination of Village: Gunadhar Para water due to proposed water. project Dr. Das (Scientist C) of TSPCB assured to check the water quality. Also requested to provide CSR and welfare activities will some amenities in school be done on the need based and market. assessment and in consultatation with local elected govt. bodies. 2 Mr. Karnajoy Reang Concerned about the effect Compensation for rubber and Mr. Khatiroy Reang on their rubber and pineapple crops planted in the pineapple plantation and land acquired for drilling ( Village: mode of compensation. either Forest or Private) will be Gunadharpara decided and paid in consultation with District Administration. 3 Mr. Milan Murasing What will be the job We will encourage contractors Village: opportunities from the to engage local people as per Gunadharpara proposed project? the requirement. 4 Smt. Padmarani Concerned was on the Dr. Das (Scientist C) of TSPCB problem that might raise assured that TSPCB and local after gas has been found? administration will take care if any problem arises.

Photographs7.2: Public Hearing in Gomati and South Tripura Districts

Kuwaifung, South Tripura District

Amarpur, Gumati District

8 Disclosure of Consultants

SENES Consultants India Private Limited (SENES India) is a professionally managed, fast growing, wholly owned subsidiary of SENES Consultants Limited (SENES), Canada. SENES specializes in the fields of energy, nuclear, environmental and social sciences with offices spread across Canada, the United States, South America and India. SENES has been operational in India for more than seven years having Head Office in New Delhi with branch offices in Kolkata, Hyderabad and Mumbai with all supportive infrastructure necessary for project implementation. SENES India has accumulated a wide body of knowledge from its National and International Oil and Gas experience worldwide, including the EIAs for upstream oil & gas projects for Ensearch Petroleum in Jordan, Premier Oil in Tripura, Geopetrol in Andhra Pradesh, Eni India in Andaman Sea, JOGPL in Manipur, Cairn Energy in Rajasthan and Gujarat, British Petroleum in West Bengal, etc. The EIA report preparation have been undertaken in compliance with approved MoEF ToR and the information and content provided in the report is factually correct for the purpose and objective for such study undertaken. SENES has already obtained QCI Accreditation under the QCI-NABET Scheme for Accreditation of EIA Consultant Organizations vide certificate no: NABET/ EIA/ RA016/040 dated 11th August 2014. The QCI/NABET accreditation certification is provided below.

QCI/NABET accreditation certification

Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

List of Annexure

Annexure 1.1: Approved ToR Annexure 1.2: Compliance Status Certificate from TSPCB Annexure 1.3: Compliance Status Certificate from Regional Office – MOEF Annexure 2.1: Ingredients of water based drilling fluid Annexure 2.2: Forest Clearance Application Acknowledgment Annexure 3.1: Rationale for Selection of Air Quality Monitoring Locations Annexure 3.2: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Results Annexure 3.3: Hourly Noise Monitoring Results (in decibels (A)) Annexure 3.4: Ground water monitoring location selection criteria Annexure 3.5: Surface water monitoring location selection criteria Annexure 3.6: CPCB Water Quality Criteria for Designated Best Use Classes Annexure 3.7: Soil sampling location selection criteria Annexure 3.8: Checklist of Floral Species in the Study Area Annexure 3.9: Checklist of Mammalian Species in the Study Area Annexure 3.10: Checklist of Birds in the Study Area Annexure 3.11: Checklist Reptilian Fauna in the Study Area Annexure 3.12: Checklist of Amphibian fauna in the Study Area Annexure 3.13: Checklist of Macrophytes in the Study Area Annexure 3.14: Checklist of Fishes in the Study Area Annexure 3.15: Demographic Profile of the Study Area Villages Annexure 3.16: Literacy Profile in the Study Villages Annexure 3.17: Workforce Participation in the Study Villages Annexure 3.18: Proceedings of Public Discussions at Kathalchheri Gas Field In Tripura Annexure 4.1: Formula Used for Calculation of Noise Level Annexure 6.1: CPCB Industrial Guideline for Oil and Gas Extraction Industries Annexure 9.1: TSPCB – Minutes of Public Hearing recorded of South Tripura District Annexure 9.2: TSPCB – Minutes of Public Hearing recorded of Gomati District

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 1 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

ANNEXURE 1.1: APPROVED TOR

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 2 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 3 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 4 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 5 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Annexure 1.2: Compliance Status Certificate from TSPCB

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 6 JOGPL

Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Annexure 1.3: Compliance Status Certificate from Regional Office – MOEF

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 7 JOGPL

Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

ANNEXURE 2.1: INGREDIENTS OF WATER BASED DRILLING FLUID

Sl No. Chemical Used 1. Barite 2. Bentonite 3. Caustic Soda 4. Soda Ash

5. MIL-PAC LV

6. Gel – Starch

7. Xanthan Gum

8. Gel-Bio AM

9. Potassium Sulphate

10. Escaid – 110

11. Ecco - Mul E

12. Carbo - Gel II

13. Gilsonite

14. Sodium Formate

15. Lime

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 8 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Annexure 2.2 Forest Clearance Application Acknowledgment

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 9 JOGPL From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 4:48 PM To: Dinesh Sawan Cc: [email protected] Subject: Email Alert From System Administrator of Online Submission and Monitoring of Forests Clearances Proposal(OSMFCP) portal

This is to acknowledge that a proposal seeking prior approval of Central Government under the Forest (Conservation) Act 1980 as per the details given below has been successfully uploaded on the portal of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change Government of India.

1. Proposal No. : FP/TR/Others/18888/2016 2. Proposal Name : Proposal for diversion of 1.368 Hact.(3.379 Acre) forest land for construction of Drill Site,Waste pit,Drill Site Accommodation,TSR Camp and its approach road for location called Dev2A. 3. Category of the Proposal : Others 4. Date of Submission : 21/04/2016 5. Name of the Applicant with Contact Details Name : Dinesh Mobile No. : 8974036116 State : Tripura District : District West Pincode : 799009

6. Area Applied (ha.) : 1.368 The proposal will be examined by the Nodal Officer, Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 to assess its completeness.

(System Administrator)

*** This is a system generated email, please do not reply. ***

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 6:47 PM To: Dinesh Sawan Cc: [email protected] Subject: Email Alert From System Administrator of Online Submission and Monitoring of Forests Clearances Proposal (OSMFCP) portal

This is to acknowledge that a proposal seeking prior approval of Central Government under the Forest (Conservation) Act 1980 as per the details given below has been successfully uploaded on the portal of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change Government of India. 1. Proposal No. : FP/TR/MIN/8/2015 Tripura Oil and Gas Exploration Block AA-ONN-2002/1 NELP- 2. Proposal Name : IV 3. Category of the Proposal : Mining 4. Date of Submission : 17/03/2015 5. Name of the Applicant with Contact Details

Name : Dinesh Mobile No. : 8974036116 State : Tripura District : West Tripura Pincode : 799009

6. Area Applied (ha.) : 1.572

The proposal will be examined by the Nodal Officer, Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 to assess its completeness.

(System Administrator)

*** This is a system generated email, please do not reply. ***

From: [email protected] [[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 6:12 PM To: Dinesh Sawan Cc: [email protected] Subject: Email Alert From System Administrator of Online Submission and Monitoring of Forests Clearances Proposal (OSMFCP) portal

This is to acknowledge that a proposal seeking prior approval of Central Government under the Forest (Conservation) Act 1980 as per the details given below has been successfully uploaded on the portal of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change Government of India. 1. Proposal No. : FP/TR/MIN/9/2015 Tripura Oil and Gas Exploration Block AA-ONN-2002/1 NELP- 2. Proposal Name : IV 3. Category of the Proposal : Mining 4. Date of Submission : 18/03/2015 5. Name of the Applicant with Contact Details

Name : Dinesh Mobile No. : 8974036116 State : Tripura District : West Tripura Pincode : 799009

6. Area Applied (ha.) : 2.036

The proposal will be examined by the Nodal Officer, Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 to assess its completeness.

(System Administrator)

*** This is a system generated email, please do not reply. ***

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 6:36 PM To: Dinesh Sawan Cc: [email protected] Subject: Email Alert From System Administrator of Online Submission and Monitoring of Forests Clearances Proposal (OSMFCP) portal

This is to acknowledge that a proposal seeking prior approval of Central Government under the Forest (Conservation) Act 1980 as per the details given below has been successfully uploaded on the portal of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change Government of India. 1. Proposal No. : FP/TR/MIN/10/2015 2. Proposal Name : Tripura Oil & Gas Exploration Block AA-ONN-2002/1 NELP-IV 3. Category of the Proposal : Mining 4. Date of Submission : 23/03/2015 5. Name of the Applicant with Contact Details

Name : Dinesh Mobile No. : 8974036116 State : Tripura District : West Tripura Pincode : 799009

6. Area Applied (ha.) : 2.031

The proposal will be examined by the Nodal Officer, Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 to assess its completeness.

(System Administrator)

*** This is a system generated email, please do not reply. ***

Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

ANNEXURE 3.1: RATIONALE FOR SELECTION OF AIR QUALITY MONITORING LOCATIONS Ambient Air Quality Ambient Air Quality Rationale for selecting the sampling location Sampling Location ID Sampling Location AQ1 Paschim Daluma This station had been selected to establish existing ambient air quality of the area in the northern part of the block that is likely to be affected from the movement of vehicles, & transportation of raw materials during project construction and operation phase. AQ2 Keshabchandra Para The station was located at crosswind to KL-Dev 5 well site. This was the closest settlement to this well and its alternate location, with power supply. This village and its neighboring location may get affected from the spreading of pollutants that may come out from proposed project activity in horizontal direction. The station was selected to establish baseline ambient air quality in the region which is likely to be affected from the activities pertaining to KL-Dev-5 well construction and operation phase. AQ3 Gunarajpara This monitoring station was selected as it was the nearest settlement in the downwind direction to well no KL-Dev 50A and alternative with electricity. This area is likely to get affected from the proposed project activity- both during project and operation phase. This station was located approximately 2km north to Khowaifung Bazaar and CRPF camp. Air pollutants generated from this area are likely to travel to this monitoring station by wind direction. AQ 4 Nabarampara This was a settlement on the downwind direction to well KL-Dev-2 and alternative. Moreover, this place is located at crosswind direction to proposed GGS point and Khowaifung Bazaar. Spreading of pollutant in horizontal direction from Khowaifung area is one of the major sources of ambient air pollution in this area. AQ5 Turma Khowaifung This ambient air quality monitoring station was selected in proximity to the proposed GGS, and downwind to the wells KL-Dev-7, Matabari, where the ambient air quality might get impacted due to proposed project activities. So, this sampling area was selected to assess the existing ambient air quality of the sampling station. Moreover, this sampling point is located at Khowaifung Bazaar. Anthropogenic activities at this bazaar area such as vehicular movement, burning of fossil fuel for domestic purpose, ongoing road and bridge repairing work added air pollutants in ambient air. AQ6 Tejamukpara This ambient air quality monitoring station was located in the upwind direction to the well KL- Dev-4 and KL-1. This station was selected to assess the existing ambient air quality of this

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 10 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Ambient Air Quality Ambient Air Quality Rationale for selecting the sampling location Sampling Location ID Sampling Location sampling location which is likely to be impacted from proposed project activity. AQ7 Ananta Sardar Para This ambient air quality monitoring station was located at the upwind direction of the well namely Matabari- an existing well, KL-Dev-7 and proposed GGS. This area was selected to draw the existing scenario of the ambient air quality of the sampling location. AQ8 Uttar Chalita Bankul This was the nearest settlement with electricity present in upwind direction to the proposed KL- Dev-3 well and its alternate location.

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 11 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

ANNEXURE 3.2: AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONITORING RESULTS

Sl Parameters Location Date No PM10 in SO2 in NO2 in HC as CH4 in HC as Non-Methane in VOC in µg/m3 µg/m3 µg/m3 PPM PPM PPM Paschim Daluma 24.04.2014 25 < 3 10 16.9 6.5 2.1 28.04.2014 62 3 22 19.2 7.8 2.4 02.05.2014 42 3 9 22.0 8.4 2.8 06.05.2014 54 7 32 20.0 7.8 2.2 1 AAQ-1 10.05.2014 24 3 23 - - - 14.05.2014 50 8 27 18.8 6.9 2.0 22.05.2014 38 4 20 - - - 26.05.2014 33 6 22 18.0 6.5 1.8 Keshabchandrapara 24.04.2014 26 < 3 9 23.8 9.2 2.1 28.04.2014 31 4 15 24.5 9.8 2.3 02.05.2014 54 4 20 20.9 8.2 1.9 06.05.2014 43 7 49 22.1 8.5 2.0 2 AAQ-2 10.05.2014 46 6 19 - - - 14.05.2014 24 10 34 23.4 8.8 2.2 22.05.2014 53 6 17 - - - 26.05.2014 28 9 31 19.8 7.5 1.8 Gunarajpara 25.04.2014 65 3 14 15.4 5.4 1.2 29.04.2014 86 3 15 16.9 5.9 2.2 3 AAQ-3 03.05.2014 71 < 3 8 17.0 6.1 2.4 07.05.2014 92 5 17 18.2 6.6 2.5 11.05.2014 81 3 10

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 12 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Sl Parameters Location Date No PM10 in SO2 in NO2 in HC as CH4 in HC as Non-Methane in VOC in µg/m3 µg/m3 µg/m3 PPM PPM PPM 19.05.2014 104 4 12 14.5 4.5 1.6 23.05.2014 77 4 15 27.05.2014 62 5 19 16.6 5.2 1.9 Nabarampara 25.04.2014 28 < 3 8 8.9 3.4 0.9 29.04.2014 83 6 19 16.8 4.3 1.2 03.05.2014 63 < 3 10 17.3 4.6 1.5 07.05.2014 89 4 11 19.9 5.6 1.8 4 AAQ-4 11.05.2014 68 4 12 - - - 19.05.2014 108 3 13 15.6 4.2 1.1 23.05.2014 49 3 8 - - - 27.05.2014 30 3 11 22.3 6.8 2.3 TurmaKhowaifung 26.04.2014 52 < 3 8 18.6 6.8 2.3 30.04.2014 91 < 3 9 16.5 7.7 2.7 04.05.2014 96 5 15 13.4 5.4 2.1 08.05.2014 98 4 13 12.9 4.8 1.8 5 AAQ-5 12.05.2014 81 4 15 - - - 20.05.2014 48 3 10 18.4 7.2 3.2 24.05.2014 61 4 23 - - - 28.05.2014 101 3 17 19.2 7.5 3.3 Tejmukpara 26.04.2014 73 < 3 9 20.1 7.8 2.4 6 AAQ-6 30.04.2014 95 4 21 22.3 8.9 2.6 04.05.2014 39 3 9 18.2 7.2 2.6

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 13 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Sl Parameters Location Date No PM10 in SO2 in NO2 in HC as CH4 in HC as Non-Methane in VOC in µg/m3 µg/m3 µg/m3 PPM PPM PPM 08.05.2014 69 5 15 20.3 6.8 2 12.05.2014 57 3 10 - - - 20.05.2014 92 3 10 18.2 5.6 1.5 24.05.2014 55 3 13 - - - 28.05.2014 43 4 20 19.2 6.3 1.8 Anantsadatpara 27.04.2014 98 6 25 24.6 9.2 3.4 01.05.2014 104 4 14 26.5 10.3 3.8 05.05.2014 70 4 15 20.1 8.4 2.1 09.05.2014 101 4 24 24.5 10.5 3.9 7 AAQ-7 13.05.2014 91 4 15 - - - 21.05.2014 78 3 14 26.3 12.2 4.2 25.05.2014 91 5 18 - - - 29.05.2014 83 6 19 22.3 8.9 2.2 Uttarchalitabankul 27.04.2014 86 4 15 19.8 9.2 3.4 01.05.2014 105 4 10 20.3 11.2 2.5 05.05.2014 91 4 17 22.2 12.3 3.3 09.05.2014 105 5 24 26.3 14.4 3.6 8 AAQ-8 13.05.2014 94 5 10 - - - 21.05.2014 69 3 11 23.7 12.8 2.3 25.05.2014 59 4 14 - - - 29.05.2014 65 3 14 24.4 13.2 1.7

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 14 JOGPL Annexure EIA for 30 development wells, GCS & pipeline laying at Tripura

ANNEXURE 3.3: HOURLY NOISE MONITORING RESULTS (IN DECIBELS (A)) Time Paschim Keshab Tejamuk Nabaram Turma Anantasardar Gunaraj Uttar (hour) Daluma chandrapara para para khowaifung para para chalitabankul 6 40.9 39.1 36.7 38.5 37.3 36.7 37.0 36.8 7 40.3 41.9 36.3 38.9 37.2 37.9 38.4 40.1 8 40.8 40.3 45.5 39.5 37.4 37.7 38.4 39.9 9 42.8 40.5 41.4 39.0 36.8 36.9 38.7 40.7 10 41.1 38.0 39.7 36.8 37.4 38.9 37.2 42.6 11 40.5 37.3 38.4 39.2 39.7 38.0 38.7 40.6 12 38.9 39.9 40.1 38.9 42.3 39.8 37.5 41.3 13 39.5 38.5 39.3 37.5 40.9 40.2 36.7 39.7 14 39.9 39.1 39.0 34.3 44.4 37.9 37.8 38.8 15 39.5 39.6 38.7 37.0 38.9 40.4 38.5 40.3 16 39.2 39.9 39.9 37.8 38.3 43.5 39.5 39.4 17 39.0 39.0 45.0 38.2 37.8 40.5 39.2 37.1 18 38.3 48.6 39.1 36.0 37.7 38.6 38.3 38.0 19 39.4 40.5 38.1 36.4 36.7 36.7 36.7 36.3 20 37.8 37.7 36.6 36.2 35.8 36.7 36.0 37.3 21 37.3 38.4 36.0 35.5 35.8 36.3 35.3 35.0 22 37.0 36.1 35.4 35.4 35.7 36.7 35.3 36.3 23 36.2 35.5 36.1 36.1 36.2 35.4 35.1 36.1 24 33.9 34.9 35.0 35.5 35.6 35.7 35.2 35.4 1 34.6 34.9 35.3 35.4 35.5 35.9 35.4 34.9 2 35.9 34.1 35.8 35.4 35.4 35.6 35.2 37.8 3 34.1 36.0 36.1 35.6 35.7 36.0 35.7 36.2 4 34.8 37.6 36.3 35.5 35.5 35.6 35.8 35.3 5 37.8 40.5 35.6 36.8 36.6 36.4 35.7 35.3

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 15 JOGPL Annexure EIA for 30 development wells, GCS & pipeline laying at Tripura

ANNEXURE 3.4: GROUND WATER MONITORING LOCATION SELECTION CRITERIA. Ground water Sampling Rationale for selecting the sampling location sampling location location ID

Hapaia Bari GW1 This location was selected to establish baseline ground water quality in norther part of the field. During sampling it had (Paschim Daluma) been revealed that, this tube well supplies non-potable water throughout the year. The depth of this tube well was 250- 300 ft. Local people use this water for cooking of utensils. Khowaifung GW2 This sampling location is located near to proposed GGS location and north to proposed KL-Dev-2 and KL-1. The slope Market of this area is from south to north. So, extraction and usage of ground water for the aforesaid well and GGS development, may affect regional ground water quality. During sampling it had been revealed that, this tube well supplies potable water throughout the year The depth of this tube well was 40-50 ft. Ananta Sardar Para GW3 This sampling location point is located near to well location Matabari. The sample was collected from a”Kacha well” located at the bottom of a small hillock. As observed, it was a cut in the aquifer located at the bottom of a denuded hillock and ground water was coming out as a spring. Local people are using this water for cooking, drinking and in other house hold process. Gobinda Para GW4 This sampling point was located near to proposed well location KL-Dev-3. This sample was collected from a mini deep (Chalita Bonkul) tube well having depth of 50-60 ft. Consultation with local people revealed that the water contains iron and mainly used in both domestic purpose including drinking and agricultural purpose. Hichachara Village GW5 This sampling point was located near to KL-Dev-2A and is likely to get affected from the water extraction for the proposed well development. The depth of this tube well was approximately 80 ft. Local people use this water for drinking purpose. Tejamok Para GW6 This sampling point located at the close proximity to the proposed well location KL-Dev4 and in the down slope. Consultation with the local villagers revealed that this tube well supplies good quality potable water throughout the year. Approximate depth of this tube well was 50-60 ft.

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 16 JOGPL Annexure EIA for 30 development wells, GCS & pipeline laying at Tripura

ANNEXURE 3.5: SURFACE WATER MONITORING LOCATION SELECTION CRITERIA Surface water sampling Sampling location Rationale for selecting the sampling location location ID Gumti River SW1 In the Kathalchari block, the ephemeral streams that belong to the watershed of river Gumti and main channel of river Gumti flows from west to east through Kathalchari block. This location was selected to to know the current status of this river’s water quality. No notable activity was observed around sampling point. Only a village burning ghat was present in the downstream of sampling location. Khowaifung River SW2 In Kathalchari block, the ephemeral streams that are part of the water shed of Khowaifung River and main channel of Khowaifung river are flowing from South to North through a narrow strip of relatively plain land. It indicates that impact which will be exerted in this ephemeral streams as well as on main river channel from KL-Dev-7 well development and operation activities will finally affect river Khowaifung. Moreover, activities pertaining to Matabari well are also likely to impact on water quality of Khowaifung river. Thus it is important to know the water quality of this tributary. Manu River SW3 This sampling location on Manu River was located in the downstream of proposed KL-Dev-3 well location. This river channel is likely to be affected from the activities pertaining to well KL-Dev-3A since the slope of this area is from north to south. Thus it is important to assess the current status of this river’s water quality. At the sampling location, the river channel is flowing through the paddy field. A brick field is located in the upstream of the sampling location. Muhuri River SW4 This sampling location was present near a tributary of Muhuri River. This tributary brings surface run off from proposed GGS location to Muhuri River. It indicates that any activity at proposed GGS location is likely to affect the water quality of Muhuri River. An existing well is located near to the sampling point.

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 17 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

ANNEXURE 3.6: CPCB WATER QUALITY CRITERIA FOR DESIGNATED BEST USE CLASSES Class of Designated-Best-Use Criteria water Drinking Water Source A Total Coliforms Organism MPN/100ml shall be 50 or less without conventional pH between 6.5 and 8.5 treatment but after Dissolved Oxygen 6mg/l or more disinfection Biochemical Oxygen Demand 5 days 20°C 2mg/l or less Outdoor bathing (Organized) B Total Coliforms Organism MPN/100ml shall be 500 or less pH between 6.5 and 8.5 Dissolved Oxygen 5mg/l or more Biochemical Oxygen Demand 5 days 20°C 3mg/l or less Drinking water source after C Total Coliforms Organism MPN/100ml shall be 5000 or conventional treatment and less disinfection pH between 6 to 9 Dissolved Oxygen 4mg/l or more Biochemical Oxygen Demand 5 days 20°C 3mg/l or less Propagation of Wild life and D pH between 6.5 to 8.5 Fisheries Dissolved Oxygen 4mg/l or more Free Ammonia (as N) 1.2 mg/l or less Irrigation, Industrial Cooling, E pH between 6.0 to 8.5 Controlled Waste disposal Electrical Conductivity at 25°C micro mhos/cm Max.2250 Sodium absorption Ratio Max. 26 Boron Max. 2mg/l Below-E Not Meeting A, B, C, D & E Criteria

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 18 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

ANNEXURE 3.7: SOIL SAMPLING LOCATION SELECTION CRITERIA Soil sampling Sampling Rationale for selecting the sampling location location location ID Hapaia Bari (rubber S1 Cultivation of rubber in small patches of land with moderate Plantation) slope was observed during field visit. Local people are doing coffee cultivation not only as a mode of livelihood support but also for their own consumption. This activity was observed mainly at Paschim (West) Daluma area of this block. To assess the soil quality of the coffee plantation areas in northern part of the field, this sampling point was selected. Gobinda Para S2 This soil sampling location was selected to assess the existing (Agricultural land condition of agricultural land present near to well with unique near Chalita identification number KL-Dev-3 and proposed alternate Bankul) location. Representative sample was collected from the paddy field of Gobinda Para. Forest land Near S3 Major portion of this block comes under forest land and the Khowaifung proposed well location KL-Dev-2A, and proposed GGS will be located very close to this sampling location. To know the soil quality of the forest land of this block, sample had been collected. Agricultural land S4 This soil sampling location was selected to assess the existing near Tejamukpara condition of agricultural land present near to well with unique identification number KL-Dev-4. This agricultural land is located on the flood plain of Pilak river. Forest land Near S5 This representative soil sample was collected from the forest Ananta SardarPara land located at AnantaSardar Para and very close to proposed well location KL-Dev-7 and its proposed alternate locations.

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 19 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

ANNEXURE 3.8: CHECKLIST OF FLORAL SPECIES IN THE STUDY AREA Recorded in Sl. N. Scientific Name Common Name the Oil Field 1. Mirabilis Jalapa Linn, Krishnakali + 2. Bougainvillea spectabilis Wind, + 3. Bougainvillea glabra Choisy, + 4. Achyranthes aspera Linn, (Apang). + 5. Amaranthus tricolor Linn, (Data, Nate, Ranga shak). + 6. Amaranthus spinosus Linn, (Kantamitia). + 7. Celosia argentea, Linn (Swet murgha). + 8. Piper nigrum Linn, Golmarich + 9. Piper longum Linn. + 10. Piper betle Linn. + 11. Cinnamomum amygdalina Nees, (Bhuiagach) + 12. Actinodaphne angustifolia Nees, (Talakung). + 13. Actinodaphne obovata Bl. Mus, (Tala). + 14. Litsea cubeba, Lour + 15. Grevillea robusta Cunn, + 16. Scurrula parasitica Linn, + 17. Tolypanthus involucratus Rox. + 18. Viscum monoicum Rox. + 19. Euphorbia nivulia F. Ham, (Sij). + 20. Bridelia tomentosa BI. Bijdr. + 21. Emblica officinalis Gaertn (Amalaki). + 22. Drypetes roxburghii Hurusawa, (Jaiputa, Putrajiva). + 23. Jatropha curcas Linn, (Sabon, Bherenda). + 24. Trewia mudiflora Linn; (Merua). + 25. Macaranga denticulata Muell, (Jhakura, Ratabura). + 26. Ricinus communis Linn, (Rerhi), + 27. Tragia involucrata Linn, (Bichuti). + 28. Gironniera caspida Planch. + 29. Trema orientalis Bl. Mun, (Chikun, Jiban). + 30. Trema orientalis var. amboinensis, Kurz. + 31. Ficus benghalensis Linn, (Bat). + 32. Ficus rumphii Bl. Bijdr. + 33. Ficus religiosa Linn, (Aswatwa Bat). +

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 20 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Recorded in Sl. N. Scientific Name Common Name the Oil Field 34. Ficus hispida Linn, (Dumur Dhugri). + 35. Ficus microcarpa Linn, (Pakar). + 36. Ficus racemosa Linn, (Janja Dumur). + 37. Ficus elastica Roxb, (Rabargachh). + 38. Artocarpus chaplasha Roxb, (Chamal). + 39. Artocarpus hetrophyllus Lamk, (Kathal, Kanthal). + 40. Artocarpus lakoocha Roxb, (Dehua, Cham). + 41. Morus australes Poir. 42. Dillenia indica Linn, (Chalta). + 43. Dillenia pentagyna Roxb, (Hargaza). + 44. Magnolia grcmdiflora Linn. + 45. Magnolia pterocarpa Roxb, (Duli Champa). + 46. Michelia champaca Linn, (Champa). + 47. Polyalthia longigolia Thw, (Debdaru). + 48. Annona squamosa Linn, (Sitaphal). + 49. Sarcococca saligna Muell. + 50. Schima wallichii Korthals: (Kanak). + 51. Shorea robusta Gaertn, (Shat, Eng-Sal). + 52. Hibiscus macrophyllus Roxb, (Kashia Udal). + 53. Hibiscus rosasinensis Linp, (Jaba). + 54. Thespesia populnea Soland, (Paras, Paras Pipal). + 55. Sida acuta Burm (Berela). + 56. Sterculia villosa Roxb (Udal). + 57. Sterculia indica Merr. + 58. Pterospermum acerifoliurh Willd, (Kanak Champa, + Muskunda). 59. Pterospermum lanceaefolium Roxb. + 60. Grewia viminea. + 61. Elaeocarpus obtusus Bl. Bijdr. + 62. Murraya paniculata Jack, (Kamini). + 63. Micromelum integerrimum Wight &Arn, (Banjamir, Karai). + 64. Citrus medica Linn, (Jamir, Lebu, Patlebu). + 65. Citrus maxima Merr, (Jambura, Batabi). + 66. Aegle marmelos Correa, (Bel. ) + 67. Ailanthus integrifolia Lamk. +

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 21 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Recorded in Sl. N. Scientific Name Common Name the Oil Field 68. Garuga pinnata Roxb, (Bombuk, Engla). + 69. Azadirachta indica A. Juss, (Nim). + 70. Melia azedarach Linn, (Ghoranim). + 71. Toona ciliata M. Roem (Poma, Kuma, Tun). + 72. Swietenia maagoni Jacq, (Mahagoni). + 73. Ventilago madraspatana Gaertn. + 74. Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk, (Barai, Kul). + 75. Ziziphus oenoplia Mill, (Ban Barai). + 76. Ziziphus rugosa Lamk, (Banbarai). + 77. Vitis vinifera Linn. + 78. Litchi chinensis Sonn, (Lichi). + 79. Mangifera sylvatica Roxb, (Banam, Laxmi Am, + Haibamin). 80. Lannea coromandelia Merr, (Bhadi). + 81. Spondias pinnata Kurz, (Amra). + 82. Anacardium occidentale Linn, (Kaju Badam). + 83. Moringa oleifera Lamk, (Sajina). + 84. Dalbergia sisso Roxb, (Shishu). + 85. Cajanus cajan Millsp, (Arhar) + 86. Butea monosperma Taub, (Palas). + 87. Sesbania grandiflora Linn. (Bakphul). + 88. Pongamia pinnata Pierre, (Karanja; Pitagaria). + 89. Bauhinia vdriegata Linn, (Kanchan, Swetkanchan). + 90. Cassia fistula Linn, (Sonari, Shonalu). + 91. Cassia nodosa F. Ham, (Bandar lathi, Latkalutia). + 92. Cassia siamea Lamk, (Minjori). + 93. Delonix regia Raf, (Krishnachura) + 94. Saraca asoka Roxb, (Ashok). + 95. Tamaraidus indica Linn, (Tentul). + 96. Albizia procera Benth, (Karai, Sadakarai). + 97. Albiza lebbeck Benth, (Shirish, Marai, Japhang). + 98. Albizia Iucida Benth, (Silkarai). + 99. Albizia chinensis Merr, (Shirish). + 100. Acacia nilotica Linn, + 101. Terminalia bellirica Roxb, (Bahera). +

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 22 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Recorded in Sl. N. Scientific Name Common Name the Oil Field 102. Terminalia chebula Retz, (Haritaki). + 103. Terminalia myriocarpa Heurck & Muell. + 104. Terminalia arjuna Roxb, (Arjun). + 105. Terminalia alata Heyne. + 106. Syzygium cumini Linn, (Jam, Kalajam) + 107. Syzygium cerasoides Roxb. (Botijam). + 108. Syzygium fruticosum DC Prodr, (Banjam). + 109. Syzygium jambos Linn, (Golapjam). + 110. Syzygium polypetalum Wight, (Panijam). + 111. Syzygium samaramgense Merr & Perry, (Jamrul). + 112. Syzygium syzygioides Merr & Perry, (Panijam). + 113. Psidium guajava Linn, (Peyara, Eng-Guava). + 114. Eugenia macrocarpa Roxb, (Chaltajam). + 115. Careya arborea Roxb, (Khumbi). + 116. Barringtonia acutangula Gaertn, (Hijal). + 117. Lagerstroemia speciosa Linn, (Jarul). + 118. Lagerstroemia parviflora Roxb, (Sidajarul). + 119. Adenia trilobata Eng, (Akand Phal). + 120. Anthocephalus chinensis A. Rich, (Kadam). + 121. Gardenia coronaria F. Ham, (Gandharaj). + 122. Xanthium strumarium Linn. 123. Ageratum conyzoides Linn, (Uchandi). + 124. Carthamus tinctorius Linn, (Kusum). + 125. Mimusops elengi Linn, (Boal, Bakul). + 126. Diospyros peregrina Gurke, (Gab, Makur, Kendu). + 127. Diospyros toposia F. Ham, (Gulal, Kalakura, Gab + Gulal). 128. Carissa carandas Linn, (Karanch, Karancha, + Karamcha). 129. Holarrhena antidysenterica Flem, (Kurchi, Kuruj). + 130. Heliotropium indicum Linn, (Hatisurh). + 131. Solanum surattense Burm, (Kantikari). + 132. Andrographis paniculata Wall, (Kalmegh, Maha Tita). + 133. Adhatoda zeylanica Medik, (Basak). + 134. Lantana camara Linn. +

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 23 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Recorded in Sl. N. Scientific Name Common Name the Oil Field 135. Duranta repens Linn. + 136. Tectona grandis Linn, (Segun, Eng-teak.). + 137. Gmelina arborea Roxb, (Gamair). + 138. Vitex peduncularis Wall, (Awal). + 139. Vitex negundo Linn, (Nishinda). + 140. Clerodendrum viscosum Vent, (Bhait). + 141. Ocimum tenuiflorum Linn, (Tulsi). + 142. Ocimum kilimandscharicum Gurke. + 143. Bambusa trutuans Wall, (Pichli). + 144. Bambusa pallida Munro, (Makal). + 145. Bambusa Polymorpha Munro, (Bethua). + 146. Dendrocalamus hamiltonii Nees & Arn, (Pecha, Kaghzi). + 147. Dendrocalamus longispathus Kurz, (Rupai, Orah). + 148. Melocanna bambusoides Trin, (Muli). + 149. Narenga dullooa A. Camus; (Dalubans). + 150. Oryza sativa Linn, (Dhan, Eng-Rice). + 151. lmperata cylindrica Linn, (Ulu, Kans, Sunn). + 152. Rumex maritimus Linn. 153. Rumex vesicarius Linn. 154. Corculum leptopus Hook & Arn. 155. Peperomia pnllucida Linn. 156. Cinnamonum tamala Nees & Eberm, (Tejpata). 157. Cinnamomum camphora Linn, (Karpur). 158. Litsea salicifolia Hook. 159. Litsea glutinosa Lour, (Kukurchik, Garpur). 160. Neolitsea zeylanica Merr. 161. malaccensis Lamk. 162. Elaeagnus conferta Roxb. 163. Helixanthera ligustrina Danser. 164. Helixanthera parasitica Lour. 165. Dendrophthoe falcata Etting, (Bajrangi, Amguruj). 166. Euphorbida lingularia Roxb. 167. Baliospermum javanica Bl. Bijdr, (Khungthi, Jahki). 168. Bridelia retusa Linn, (Kamkui, Kamlcuni).

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 24 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Recorded in Sl. N. Scientific Name Common Name the Oil Field 169. Bridelia Stipularis Bl. Bijdr; (Koila lata). 170. Croton oblongifolius Roxb, (Chucka), 171. Baccaurea ramiflora Lour, (Iphek, Lotka, Bhubi). 172. Antidesma acidum Retz. 173. Breynia vitisidaea C.E.C. Fischer, (Silpati). 174. Drypetes assamica Pax a Hoffim. 175. Homonoia riparia Lour. 176. Chaetocarpus castanicarpus Thw. Enum. 177. Mallotus philippensis Muell, (Kishur, Tung). 178. Celtis cinnamomea Lindl. 179. Poikilospermum suaveolens Meor, (Jogkog, Kamlata). 180. Streblus asper Lour. 181. Cannabis sativa Linn, 182. Casuarina equisetifolia Forst, (Jhau). 183. Castanopsis armata Spach, (Kantalat, Batana). 184. Castanopsis tribuloides A. DC, (Bara Hingrai). 185. Magnolia pumila Anders. 186. Milliusa roxburghiana Hook, (Tasbi). 187. Flacourtia jangomas Raeusch, (Paniala). 188. Hydnocarpus kurzii Warb, (Chalmugra). 189. Xylosma controversum Clos. 190. Garcinia cowa Roxb (Cowa, Kau). 191. Garcinia xanthochymus Hook, (Tamal). 192. ferrea Linn (Nageswar, Nahar). 193. Camellia sinensis O. Kurtze, (Cha, Eng-Tea). 194. Dipterocarpus turbinatus Gaertn, (Garjan). 195. Urena lobata Linn, (Ghagra). 196. Hibuscus sabdariffa Linn, (Mesta). 197. Microcos paniculata Linn, (Pichandi). 198. Elaeocarpus robustus Roxb 199. Solanea dasycarpa Hemsl. 200. Hiptage Benghalensis Kurz (Madhabilata). 201. Zanthoxylum limonella Alston (Bajrang, Kant-Harinda). 202. Glycosmis arborea DC.Prode (Ban nimbu, Kowatuti,

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 25 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Recorded in Sl. N. Scientific Name Common Name the Oil Field Ashhoura). 203. Citrus reticulata Blanco, (kamala, Narangi). 204. Clausena heptaphylla Wight. & Arn, (Karanphal, Pan Kafur). 205. Picrasma javanica Bl. Bijdr. 206. Canarium strictum Roxb. 207. Protium serratum Engl. 208. Dysoxylum binectariferum Hook, (Rata, Bandardim). 209. Aglaia spectabilis C. DC, Rangi-Rata 210. Aphanamixis polystachya R.N. Parkar, (Bagi-Rata, Pitraj). 211. Chisocheton paniculata Hiern. 212. Ilex umbellulata Loes, (Theny-ngoithen). 213. Vetis tuberculata Laws. 214. Leea guinensis G. Don. 215. Leea crispa L. Mont 216. Leea indica Meer. 217. Erioglossum rubiginosum Bl. Rumphia. 218. Meliosma simplicifolia Waip, (Rangi) 219. Mangifera indica Linn, (Am). 220. Holigarna caustica Roxb, (Phaloikung, Barola). 221. Semecarpus anacardium Linn, Bhela. 222. Crotalaria verrucosa Linn, (Ban-san). 223. Crotalaria spectaballis Roth, (Piplijhanjan). 224. Desmodium pulchellum Benth, (Juta-salpani). 225. Bauhinia malabarica Roxb, (Kanchan). 226. Entada phaseoloides Merr, (Gila). 227. Parkia javanica Merr, (Sapota, Kukitetai). 228. Pithecellobium hetrophyllum Roxb, (Arda, Moragmara). 229. Quisqualis indica Linn. 230. Anogeissus acuminata Wall. 231. Eugenia praecox Roxb, (Panijam). 232. Melastoma malabathricum, Linn, (Phutki, Ban Padam). 233. Memecylon celastrinum Kurz, 234. 235. Lagerstroemia microcarpa Wight

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 26 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Recorded in Sl. N. Scientific Name Common Name the Oil Field 236. Lagerstroemia indica Linn. 237. Ammania glabra Endl. 238. Passiflora foetida Linn, 239. Mitragyna rotundifolia O. Kuntze, (Phul Kadam). 240. Adina cordifolia HK. f. 241. Hymenodictyon excelsum Wall. 242. Randia longiflora Lamk, (Eshuri, Kala Main). 243. Coffea benghalensis Heyne ex Roem). 244. Meyna spinosa Roxb. 245. Morinda angustrifolia Roxb, (Ralum, Haldiruk). 246. Bhusnea balsamifera DC. Prodr, (Kakaronda). 247. Tagetes erecta Linn, (BarhaGenda, African marigold). 248. Lactuca sativa Linn, 249. Grangea maderaspatana Poir, (Namuti). 250. Palaquium polyanthum Engl. 251. Xantolin assamica C.B. Clarke 252. Diospyros montana Roxb, (Ban Gab). 253. Lepionurus sylvestris Bl. Bijdr. 254. Olax acuminata Wall 255. Rauvolfia serpentina Benth. (Chandra). 256. Alstonia scholaris R. Br., (Chhatni, Letuang, Chhatim). 257. Nerium indicum Mill; 258. Ichnocarpus frutescens R. Br., (Paralialata). 259. Canscora decussata Scult. Mant. 260. Tournefortia candollii C.B.Clarke. 261. Tournefortia roxburghii C.B. Clarke. 262. Argyreia capitala Choisy. 263. Solanum erianthum D. Don. 264. Capsicum annuum Linn, (Marich, Lanka marich). 265. Capsicum frutescens Linn, (Dhani marich). 266. Oroxylum indicum Vent, (Shona). 267. Stereospermum personatum Hassk, (Dharmara, Baruljata). 268. Fernandoa adenophylla Wall, (Pahari Hijal, Shil).

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 27 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Recorded in Sl. N. Scientific Name Common Name the Oil Field 269. Phlogacanthus thyrsiflorus, Nees. 270. Justicia gendarussa Burm, (Jagat Madan). 271. Callicarpa macrophylla Vahl, (Matranga, Mathani). 272. Premna esculenta Roxb, (Weylan). 273. Premna coriacea C.B. Clarke. 274. Premna latifolia Roxb, 275. Vitex pubescens Vahl, (Awal, Arekodal). 276. Vitex altissima Linn, (Monawal). 277. Vitex trifolia Linn. 278. Vitex penduncularis 279. Bambusa balcooa Roxb (Shil Barua, Tel Barua). 280. Bambusa tulda Roxb, (Mritinga). 281. Oxytenanthera albociliata Munro (Kalia). 282. Saccharum spontaneum Linn, (Khagra). 283. Phragmites karka Trin, (Nal Khagra, Nal). 284. Arundo donax Linn. 285. Eragrostis tenella Beauv. 286. Eragrostis unioloides Nees. 287. Erianthus arundinaceus Jeswiet. 288. Erianthus procerus Raizada. [Source: Primary Survey Data, SENES, May 2014; Forest Working plan]

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 28 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

ANNEXURE 3.9: CHECKLIST OF MAMMALIAN SPECIES IN THE STUDY AREA Reported Reported Wildlife Sl. No Common Name Scientific Name in Study in Tripura Schedule Area 1. Hoolock Gibbon Hylobates hoolock + I 2. Rhesus Macaque Macaca mulata + + II 3. Stumptailed Macaca speciosa + II Macaque 4. Barbe's Leaf Monkey Semurpithecus phayrei + 5. Phayre’s Leaf Trachypithecus phayrei + + I Monkey 6. Slow Loris Nycticebus bengalensis + I 7. Leopard or Panther Panthera pardus + I 8. Jungle Cat Fells chaus + + II 9. Leopard Cat Felis bengalensis + I 10. Small Indian Civet Viverricula indica + + II 11. Lagre Indian Civet Viverra zibetha + + II 12. Common Palm Civet Paradoxurus hermaphroditus + + II 13. Common Mongoose Herpestes edwardsi + + II 14. Indian Wild Dog Cuon dukhunensis + II 15. Indian fox Vulpes bengalensis + + II 16. Jackal Canis aureus + + II 17. Common otter Lutra lutra + + II 18. Sloth Bear Melursus ursinus + I 19. Grey Musk Shrew Suncus murinus + 20. Indian Flying Fox Pteropus giganteus + + IV 21. Fulvous Fruit Bat Rousettus leschenaulti + + IV 22. Shortnosed Fruit Bat Cynopterus sphinx + + IV 23. Indian Giant Squirrel Ratufa indica + II 24. Malayan Giant Ratufa bicolor + II Squirrel 25. Hoarybellied Dremomys lokrial + Himalayan Squirrel 26. Hoary Bamboo Rat Rhizomys pruinosus + 27. Common House Rat Rattus rattus + + 28. Indian Porcupine Hystrix indica + IV 29. Indian Hare Lepus nigricollis + + IV 30. Indian Elephant Elephas maximus + I

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 29 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Reported Reported Wildlife Sl. No Common Name Scientific Name in Study in Tripura Schedule Area 31. Indian Bison or Gaur Bos gaurus + I 32. Sambar Cervus unicolor + + III 33. Barking Deer Muntiacus muntjak + III 34. Indian Wild Boar Sus scrofa + + 35. Indian Pangolin Manis crassicaudata + + I [ Source: Discussion with local people and forest officials; Forest Working plan]

ANNEXURE 3.10: CHECKLIST OF BIRDS IN THE STUDY AREA Reported Reported Wildlife Sl. No Common Name Scientific Name in Study in Tripura Schedule Area 1. House Crow Corvus splendens + + 2. Jungle Crow Corvus macrorhynchos + + 3. Redvented Bulbul Pycnonotus cafer + + IV 4. Redwhiskered Bulbul Pycnonotus jocosus + + IV Black Drongo or King 5. Dicrurus adsimilis + + IV Crow 6. Indian Myna Acridotheres tristis + + IV 7. Pied Myna Sturnus contra + + IV 8. House sparrow Passer domestica + + 9. Tree Pie Dendrocitta vagabunda + + IV 10. Common Babbler Turdoides caudatus + + IV 11. Racket-tailed Drongo Dicrurus paradiseus + + IV 12. Jerdon's Chloropsis Chloropsis jerdon + IV Goldfronted 13. Chloropsis or Green Chloropsis aurifrons + IV Bulbul 14. Shama Copsychus malabaricus + 15. Indian Wren-Warbler Prinia subflava + + Streaked Fantail 16. Cisticola juncidis + + Warbler 17. Tailor Bird Orthotomus sutorius + + 18. Jungle Myna Acredotheres fuscus + + 19. Hill Myna Gracula religiosa + + 20. Blackheaded Oriole Oriolus xanthornus + + IV 21. Baya Weaver Bird Ploceus phillippinus + + 22. White Wagtail Motacilla alba + +

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 30 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Reported Reported Wildlife Sl. No Common Name Scientific Name in Study in Tripura Schedule Area 23. Yellowheaded Wagtail Motacilla citreola + + 24. Grey Wagtail Motacilla caspica + + 25. Spotted Munia Lonchura punctulata + + IV 26. Red Munia or Waxbill Estrada amandava + + IV 27. Whitebacked Munia Lonchura striata + + IV 28. Purple Sunbird Nectarinia asiatica + + IV 29. Purplerumped Sunbird Nectarinia zeylonica + + IV 30. Yellowbacked Sunbird Aethopyga siparaja + + IV Scarletbacked 31. Dicaeum eruentatum + + IV Flowerpecker 32. Scarlet Minivet Pericrocotus flammeus + IV Goldenbacked 33. Dinopium benghalense + IV Woodpecker Yellowfronted Pied or 34. Picoides mahrattensis + IV Mahratta Woodpecker 35. Blue Jay or Roller Caracias benghalensis + IV

36. Small Green Bee-eater Merops orientalis + + Whitebreasted 37. Halcyon smynenssis + + IV Kingfisher 38. Small Blue Kingfisher Alcedo atthis + + IV Blackcapped 39. Halcyon pileata + IV Kingfisher Brownheaded 40. Pelargopsis capensis + IV Storkbilled Kingfisher Common Grey 41. Tockus birostris + + IV Hornbill 42. Hoopoe Upupa epops + +

43. Pied Crested Cuckoo Clamator jacobinus + + IV 44. Crow-Pheasant Centropus sinensis + + 45. Koel Eudynamys scolopacea + + Blossomheaded 46. Psittacula cyanocephala + IV Parakeet

47. Roseringed Parakeet Psittacula Krameri + + IV 48. Barn or Screech Owl Tyto alba + IV 49. Brown Fish Owl Bubo zeylonensis + IV 50. Collard Scops Owl Otus bakkamoena + IV

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 31 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Reported Reported Wildlife Sl. No Common Name Scientific Name in Study in Tripura Schedule Area

51. Spotted Owlet Athene brama + + IV Whitebacked or 52. Gyps benghalensis + + I Bengal Vulture 53. Common Pariah Kite Milvus migrans + + 54. Spotted Dove Streptopelia chinensis + + IV Emerald or 55. Chalcaphas indica + IV Bronzewinged Dove 56. Red Junglefowl Gallus gallus + Whitebreasted 57. Amaurornis phoenicurus + + Waterhen 58. Sarus Crane Grus antigone + IV 59. Bronzewinged Jacana Metopidius indicus + IV 60. Pheasant-tailed Jacana Hydrophasiarzus chirugus + IV 61. Stone Curlew Burhinus oedicnemus + IV 62. Redwattled Lapwing Vanellus indicus + + 63. Whitenecked Stork Ciconia episcopus + IV 64. Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis + + Paddy Bird or Pond 65. Ardeola grayi + + IV Heron 66. Night Heron Nycticorax nycticorax + + IV 67. Chestnut Bittern Ixobrychus cinnamomeus + IV 68. Little Green Bittern Butorides striatus + IV 69. Shoveller Anas clypeata + 70. Common Teal Anas.crecca + IV 71. Cotton Teal Nettapus coromandelianus + IV 72. Indian pied hornbill Anthracocerus albirustris + + I 73. Great pied hornbill Bucerus bicornis + + I [Source: Source: Primary Survey Data, SENES, April 2014; discussion with local people; Forest Working plan]

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 32 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

ANNEXURE 3.11: CHECKLIST REPTILIAN FAUNA IN THE STUDY AREA Reported Reported Wildlife Sl. No Common Name Scientific Name in Study in Tripura Schedule Area 1. Tucktoo Gekko gecko + + I 2. Indian Garden Lizard Calotes Versicolor + + 3. The Bronze Grass Mabuya macularia + + Skink 4. Brahminy Skink Mabuya earinata + 5. Snake Skink Riopa albopunctata + + 6. Spotted little Skink Sophenomorphus maculatum + 7. Common Indian Varanus bengalensis + + Monitor 8. Water Monitor Varanus salvator + I 9. Common blind Ramphotyplops braminus + + Snake 10. Indian Phthon Python molurus + I 11. Common Rat Snake Ptyas mucosus + + 12. Common green whip Ahaetulla nasutus + + Snake 13. Common Wolf Lycodon Aulicus aulicus + Snake 14. Red necked Rhabdophis Subminiata + + Keelback 15. Common Indian Dendrclaphis tristis + Bronze back 16. Common Indian Bungarus Caeruleus + + Krait 17. Indian Cobra Naja naja + + II

[Source: Source: Primary Survey Data, SENES, April 2014; discussion with local people]

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 33 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

ANNEXURE 3.12: CHECKLIST OF AMPHIBIAN FAUNA IN THE STUDY AREA Reported Reported in Sl. No Common Name Scientific Name in Study Tripura Area 1. Common Indian Toad Duttaphrynus melanosticytus + + 2. Beordmores Microhylid Microhyla berdmorei + Frog 3. Omata Microhylid Microhyla omate + 4. Painted Frog Kaloula Plulchra + + 5. Nicobar frog Rana nicobariensis + 6. Skipping frog Rana lcyanophlyctis + + 7. Gunthers Warty Frog Rana Keralensis + 8. Cricket frog Rana limnocharis + + 9. Indian Bull Frog Raja tigerina + + 10. Tree Frog Polypedates lelucomystax + + [Source: Source: Primary Survey Data, SENES, April 2014; discussion with local people]

ANNEXURE 3.13: CHECKLIST OF MACROPHYTES IN THE STUDY AREA

Sl. No. Scientific Name Common Name Local Distribution 1. Alternanthera sessilis -- Abundant

2. Commelina benghalensis Kanasimolu Abundant

3. Cyperus rotendus Motha Abundant

4. Eichornia Crassipes Meteka Common

5. Hydrilla verticillata -- Abundant

6. Lemna natans Sorupuni Abundant

7. Pistia stratiotes Barpuni Abundant

8. Sagittari sagittifolia -- Abundant

9. Phragmites karka -- Common

10. Tridax procumbens -- Common

11. Vallisneria sp. -- Common

[Source: Source: Primary Survey Data, SENES, April 2014]

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 34 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

ANNEXURE 3.14: CHECKLIST OF FISHES IN THE STUDY AREA Reported Reported in Sl. No Common Name Scientific Name in Study Tripura Area 1. Eeel Anguilla bengalensis bengalensis + + 2. Ghaoura Pisodonophis boro + 3. Chapiia Gudusia chapra + + 4. Chital Notopterus chitala + 5. Chap Khowari Chela (Chela) cachius + + 6. Dan Kina Chela (Chela) laubuca + 7. Silver carp Hypophthalmichthys molitrix + + 8. Bushpata Danio derario + + 9. Maka Amblypharyngoden mola + 10. Caedra Barilius barila + 11. Carpio Cyprinus carpio carpio + 12. Puti (Tit) Puntius chola + + 13. Kanchan Puti Puntius chola + + 14. Bhangna Laeo bata + + 15. Bata Labeo baga + + 16. Kalibaus Labeo calbasu + + 17. Gonya Labeo gonius + 18. Rui Labeo rohita + + 19. Maha Sol Tor putitora + 20. Mrigal Cerrhinus mrigala + + 21. Catla Catla catla + + 22. Grass carp Cteaopharyngodon idella + + 23. Ranimach Nsoemacrcilus lbotia + 24. Gutum Lepocephalus guntea + 25. Reta Rita rita + + 26. Batasio Batasco batasia + 27. Tengra Mystusl bleekeri + + 28. Pabda Ompok bimaclulatlus + + 29. Boal Wallago attu + + 30. Kadali (Kajali) Ailia coila + 31. Gaoura Clupisoma garua + + 32. Bacha Elutropiichthys murius + + 33. Silon Silonia silondia +

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 35 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Reported Reported in Sl. No Common Name Scientific Name in Study Tripura Area 34. Pangash Pangasius pangasius + 35. Gagot Hara hara + 36. Bhagmach Bagarius bagarius + 37. Magur Clarias batrachus + + 38. Shing Heteropneustes fossilis + + 39. Kut Kutya Chaca chaca + 40. Kakhya Xenentodon cancila + 41. Gagar Channa marulius + + 42. Cheng Channa orientalis + + 43. Taki, lati Channa Punctatus + + 44. Kuchia Monopterus cuchi + + 45. Chanda Chanda nama + + 46. Koi Badis badis + + 47. Mani Nandus nandus + + 48. Tilapia Oreochromis mossamleiea + + 49. Bhalia Glossogobius giuris + + 50. Khalisha Colisa fasciata + + 51. Baim Mastacembelus armatus armatus + + 52. Tepa (Futika) Tetraodon cutcutia +

[Source: Secondary Data from Local People]

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 36 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

ANNEXURE 3.15: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE OF THE STUDY AREA VILLAGES

% of Sl No. of Total Household % of Male Sex % of SC % of ST Villages Female No Household Population Size Population Ratio Population Population Population

1 Purba Sarbang 231 993 4.3 48.94 51.06 1043 0.00 96.88 2 Paschim Sarbang 685 3064 4.5 50.62 49.38 975 0.00 99.51 3 Gungia 326 1493 4.6 52.18 47.82 917 0.20 73.21 4 Birganj 1129 4875 4.3 51.14 48.86 955 41.42 21.91 5 Paharpur 464 1986 4.3 50.10 49.90 996 0.30 98.09 6 Dalak 797 3626 4.5 50.77 49.23 970 7.58 68.01 7 Paschim Daluma 571 3091 5.4 62.21 37.79 607 3.69 79.07 8 Dakshin Barapathary 415 1772 4.3 53.33 46.67 875 0.00 99.66 9 Uttar Hichachhara 1231 5292 4.3 51.55 48.45 940 3.02 60.11 10 Abhangachhara 242 1123 4.6 48.71 51.29 1053 2.76 77.20 11 Purba Pillak 881 4073 4.6 50.43 49.57 983 0.00 95.56 12 Tairumachhara 426 2107 4.9 53.35 46.65 875 0.28 98.24 13 Baramura Deotamura R.F. 765 3328 4.4 49.97 50.03 1001 0.15 98.11 14 Laogang 253 1004 4.0 51.10 48.90 957 0.00 98.71 15 Lebachhara (CT) 1348 5273 3.9 50.09 49.91 997 15.68 27.90 16 Chalita Bankul 309 1498 4.8 49.93 50.07 1003 0.00 98.60 17 Uttar Taichhama 284 1331 4.7 50.56 49.44 978 0.45 98.80 18 Bagmara 304 1441 4.7 50.94 49.06 963 0.21 99.38 19 Uttar Manu Bankul 764 3484 4.6 50.98 49.02 962 0.86 70.09 20 Dakshin Manu Bankul 692 2929 4.2 49.85 50.15 1006 1.71 78.83 21 Kathalchhari 426 1853 4.3 51.86 48.14 928 1.19 79.01

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 37 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

ANNEXURE 3.16: LITERACY PROFILE IN THE STUDY VILLAGES

% Female Sl No Villages Total Population % Literate % Male Literate Literate

1 Purba Sarbang 993 67.27 77.78 57.20 2 Paschim Sarbang 3064 73.73 77.89 69.46 3 Gungia 1493 70.19 73.81 66.25 4 Birganj 4875 78.65 82.87 74.22 5 Paharpur 1986 71.55 78.79 64.28 6 Dalak 3626 68.28 75.77 60.56 7 Paschim Daluma 3091 75.90 84.19 62.24 8 Dakshin Barapathary 1772 38.04 45.29 29.75 9 Uttar Hichachhara 5292 68.42 73.75 62.75 10 Abhangachhara 1123 61.62 73.49 50.35 11 Purba Pillak 4073 55.71 64.26 47.00 12 Tairumachhara 2107 55.62 65.04 44.86 13 Baramura Deotamura R.F. 3328 43.87 52.86 34.89 14 Laogang 1004 59.96 71.15 48.27 15 Lebachhara (CT) 5273 69.32 74.82 63.79 16 Chalita Bankul 1498 45.86 53.61 38.13 17 Uttar Taichhama 1331 56.72 64.04 49.24 18 Bagmara 1441 42.05 50.41 33.38 19 Uttar Manu Bankul 3484 58.78 64.86 52.46 20 Dakshin Manu Bankul 2929 62.34 68.56 56.16 21 Kathalchhari 1853 53.86 60.98 46.19

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 38 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

ANNEXURE 3.17: WORKFORCE PARTICIPATION IN THE STUDY VILLAGES

Total % Household Sl No Villages % cultivator % agricutural Labor % other worker Total worker industry worker Population Population 1 Purba Sarbang 993 604 45.36 47.02 0.00 4.63 2 Paschim Sarbang 3064 1655 26.10 68.34 0.91 2.51 3 Gungia 1493 783 26.69 48.28 15.07 5.22 4 Birganj 4875 1786 27.88 28.56 0.62 15.73 5 Paharpur 1986 949 22.13 52.48 1.05 11.63 6 Dalak 3626 1437 22.55 54.07 2.30 8.36 7 Paschim Daluma 3091 1942 40.37 11.74 3.86 27.66 8 Dakshin Barapathary 1772 948 25.84 50.00 0.53 12.64 9 Uttar Hichachhara 5292 2189 16.90 36.36 4.11 17.63 10 Abhangachhara 1123 453 18.76 26.93 2.21 21.02 11 Purba Pillak 4073 1601 15.74 41.41 0.62 16.60 12 Tairumachhara 2107 857 28.12 35.24 1.52 14.29 13 Baramura Deotamura R.F. 3328 1754 51.65 31.13 0.51 8.80 14 Laogang 1004 568 16.37 80.11 0.53 1.69 15 Lebachhara (CT) 5273 2181 2.80 22.74 0.50 30.59 16 Chalita Bankul 1498 698 28.51 58.74 4.87 3.67 17 Uttar Taichhama 1331 660 70.15 23.64 0.61 2.78 18 Bagmara 1441 687 78.89 14.12 1.75 2.50 19 Uttar Manu Bankul 3484 1296 37.96 33.56 2.01 9.85 20 Dakshin Manu Bankul 2929 1230 12.52 46.10 1.06 16.93 21 Kathalchhari 1853 909 9.57 67.00 0.99 11.01

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 39 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

ANNEXURE 3.18: PROCEEDINGS OF PUBLIC DISCUSSIONS AT KATHALCHHERI GAS FIELD IN TRIPURA Proceedings of the Meeting with the Community Members in Purba Pillak village

Venue:– Purba Pillak Date: 26.05.2014 Attendees from the Community: From the Consultants: Mr. Lalamoni Deb Barma Mr. Souvik Basu Mr. Chanchal Deb Barma Mr. Dibyendu Chakraborty Mr. Mithun Deb Barma

Majority of the community are Tripuri but there also some other Sc and St Community present in this village. A total of about 881 households are present in the village. In Purba Pillak ADC there is six wards. Majority of the population belongs to Hindu community, few practices Islam and Christianity. A large portion of the community is engaged in cultivation of paddy. Due to the lack of irrigation mono cropping of paddy is mainly practiced during the monsoon months. Considerable portion of the community is engaged in other activity like fruite production. Few people are also involved in Government jobs. Potable water is obtained from ARWS scheme and mini deep tube well tube and Hand pump. Ground water is also used for other household activity. Community had complained about high concentration of iron in ground water. Most of the houses in the village are made up of Tin but there is also some cement and brick house with roof of asbestos sheet is present. All the houses in the village have electric connection; however, frequent power failures were also reported. Predominant cooking medium in the village is fuel wood but some house hold is also using LPG for cooking. The village can be approached through a pitch road. Health sub center is present in the village. All the houses have either pit latrine or sanitary latrine. As a result cases of enteric diseases were also reported to be very low. Community reported occurrence of vector borne diseases. Primary health care facility is available in the village.

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 40 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Proceedings of the Meeting with the Community Members in Abhangachhara Village

Venue:– Abhangachhara Date: 26.05.2014 Attendees from the Community: From the Consultants: Mr. Sabhu Charan Deb Barma Mr. Souvik Basu Mr. Sibayan Das Mr. Dibyendu Chakraborty Mr. Sukh Ranjan Deb barma

Majority of the villagers in the Abhangachhara village owns their own land. Majority of the population belongs to Hindu community, few practices Islam. Majority of the members of the village are cultivators. Mostly mono cropping of paddy is done during the monsoon months. Second largest source of livelihood is Rubber cultivation. Majority of the houses are made up of concrete and brick, with asbestos roof. Potable water is mostly obtained from ARWS scheme and hand pumped tube wells. The ground water quality was reported to be good and available throughout the year. Majority the houses in the village have electric connection; however, frequent power failures were also reported. Predominant cooking medium in the village is fuel wood. Few households were reported to use LPG cylinders. The village has a 1 Junior Basic and 1 High Senior Basic school land almost all the children attain primary school. Village is connected through a tar road. About 80% of the houses have sanitary latrine, rest practice open defecation. A primary health facility is locates in the village.

Proceedings of the Meeting with the Community Members in Tairumachhara Village

Venue:– Tairumachhara Date: 26.05.2014 Attendees from the Community: From the Consultants: Mr. shasi Charan Deb Barma Mr. Souvik Basu Mr. Bharat Deb Barma Mr. Dibndu Chakraborty Mr. Monoj Deb barma

Tairumachhara is primarily an agrarian village populated by Tripuri comounity. Most of the cultivators have their own land. Due to the absence of irrigation system, mostly monoculture of paddy is done during the monsoon season. A considerable number of people earn their lively hood from rubber cultivation. Almost the entire population of the village belongs to the Hindu community. Potable water is mostly obtained from ARWS scheme water supply and hand pumped tube wells. The ground water quality was reported to be good and available throughout the year. Majority the houses in the village have electric connection; however, frequent power failures were also reported. Predominant cooking medium in the village is fuel wood. Few households were reported to use LPG cylinders. Majority of the houses are made up of concrete and brick, with asbestos roof. The village can be approached through a pitch road. Both primary and secondary schools are present in the village. All the houses have

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 41 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari either pit latrine or sanitary latrine. Community reported occurrence of vector borne diseases. Primary health care facility is available in the village.

Proceedings of the Meeting with the Community Members in Putia Village

Venue:– Baramura Deotamura RF Date: 26.05.2014 Attendees from the Community: From the Consultants: Mr. Firoj Miya Mr. Souvik Basu Mr. Sanjay Laskar Mr. Dibyendu Chakraborty Mr. Mrinal Bhowmik

There are about 765 households in the village. All the villagers practice Hinduism. Majority of the people in the village earn their lively hood from agriculture. Main source of water for house hold use is ground water, which is obtained from supply water and hand pumped tube wells. The quality of water is good and the water is potable and ground water remains available throughout the year. Majority the houses in the village have electric connection; however, frequent power failures were also reported. Predominant cooking medium in the village is fuel wood. Majority of the houses are made up of concrete and brick with asbestos roof. Few houses in the village had sanitary or pit latrines, predominant practice was found to be open defecation. The village has a primary school and almost all the children attain primary school. Primary health facility is not available with in the village.

Proceedings of the Meeting with the Community Members in Laogang Village

Venue:– Laogang Date: 27.05.2014 Attendees from the Community: From the Consultants: Mr. Murali Debbarma Mr. Souvik Basu Mr. Gunadhar Debbarma Mr. Anindya Mukherjee Mr. Manik Ch Debbarma Mr. Bappa Debbarma

Laogang is an ADC village with 99% ST Community. Tripuri is the main ST Community in this village. Majority of the people are Hindu, a few Christian households are also present. All the houses are made of mud with tin roof. Potable water is mostly obtained from ring well and tanker supply. Ground water is used for other domestic uses and its quality was reported to be good. Majority the houses in the village have electric connection; however for majority part of the day no power connection remains unavailable. Predominant cooking medium was found to be fuel wood, with few house using coal. Sanitation was found to be very poor, open defecation was mainly practiced. Primary education facility was present in the vicinity of the settlement. Primary health care facility is provided by health sub centre. Community facility like post office is not available.

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 42 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Proceedings of the Meeting with the Community Members in Paschim Duluma Village

Venue:– Paschim Duluma Date: 27.05.14 Attendees from the Community: From the Consultants: Mr. Chiranjit Deb Barma Mr. Souvik Basu Mr. Lal Kumar Deb Barma Mr. Anindya Mukherjee Mr. Suraj Deb Barma

It is an ADC village. Most of the people belong to Tripuri community. Majority of the people are Hindu, a few Christian households are also present. Cultivation is main source of livelihood. Majority of people also involved in Rubber production. Jhum cultivation also observed here. All the houses are made of tin with tin roof. Water for domestic use is mostly obtained from ring wells. Villagers also dependent on tanker supply of drinking water during summer. Ground water quality was reported to be good and is used as drinking water but Ground water is not available during summer. Fuel wood was found to be the major cooking medium, with occasional use of coal. Sanitation system was reported to be satisfactory with every one having access to pit latrine or sanitary latrine. Both primary and secondary educational facilities are located close to the settlement. It was reported that no major disease outbreak occurs, but a large part of community suffers from stomach pain. Community gets primary health facility from health centre.

Proceedings of the Meeting with the Community Members in Uttar Taichhama Village

Venue:– Uttar Taichhama Date: 28.05.2014 Attendees from the Community: From the Consultants: Mr. Sanjit Deb Barma Mr. Souvik Basu Mr. Dipak Deb Barma Mr. Dibyendu Chakraborty Mr. Vivek Deb Barma Mr. Shanti Brata Deb Barma

In Uttar Taichhama panchayet there are six wards. Majority of the villagers belong to Hindu community. Total household no of the village is approximately 284. Majority of the members of the village are cultivators with paddy being the main cultivated crop. As there is irrigation system, some part land are multi cropped. Few people are also involved in Government jobs. Majority of the houses are made up of concrete and brick. Potable water is mostly obtained from supply water and hand pumped tube wells. The ground is reported to have high iron contain. Majority the houses in the village have electric connection; however, frequent power failures were also reported. Predominant cooking medium in the village is fuel wood. Latrines with septic tank are available in all households. Primary, middle and higher schools are present in the village. Almost all the parents send their children to primary school. A primary health centre is located at the village. But concern about health facility was expressed, as doctors are infrequent. Village is connected with bitumen road.

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 43 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Proceedings of the Meeting with the Community Members in Chalita Bankul Village

Venue:– Chalita Bankul Date: 28.05.2014 Attendees from the Community: From the Consultants: Mr. Dipak Kumar Deb Barma Mr. Ranjit Mukherjee Mr. Sunil Deb barma Mrs. Indrani Ghosh Mr. Kanchan Deb Barma Mr. Chanchal Deb Barma

Chalita Bankul is ADC village and majority of the people belongs to Tripuri Community. People mainly practice the hindu religion. Total household no of the village is approximately 309. Majority of the members of the village are cultivators with paddy being the main cultivated crop. All lands are mono cropped and agriculture mainly depends on monsoon. Few people are also involved in Government jobs. Majority of the houses are made up of concrete and brick. Potable water is mostly obtained from supply water and hand pumped tube wells. The ground is reported to have high iron contain. Majority the houses in the village have electric connection; however, frequent power failures were also reported. Predominant cooking medium in the village is fuel wood. Latrines with septic tank are available in all households. Primary, middle and higher schools are present in the village. Almost all the parents send their children to primary school. A primary health centre is located at the village. But concern about health facility was expressed, as doctors are infrequent. Village is connected with bitumen road.

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 44 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

ANNEXURE 4.1: FORMULA USED FOR CALCULATION OF NOISE LEVEL

A. CALCULATION FOR DETERMINATION OF NOISE LEVEL AT DIFFERENT DISTANCES

Distance from the source where Noise level is measured = R1 [Here considered 10 m.]

At the distance R1, Noise Level (L1) = 94 db

Let the distance of receiver from the source = R2 [Here calculated at various distance]

Therefore, at the distance R2 Noise Level (L2) = L1 – 20 Log (R2/R1) B. CALCULATION FOR COMBINED NOISE LEVEL AT CERTAIN POINT Let, Ambient (Base) Noise Level at a certain point = Leq1 [Here considered as 50 db] Noise Level coming from a point source at the same point = Leq2 So, there will be a combined noise level (Leq3) at that point. Combined Noise Level (Leq3) = 10 Log (10 Leq1/10 + 10 Leq2/10) C. CALCULATION OF ATTENUATION The noise reduction due to barrier (attenuation) is determined by first calculating the path length difference (δ). Path length is defined by the following equation: δ = A + B – C Here, A = Angular distance from source (S) of the noise to noise barrier (B) B = Angular distance from the noise barrier (B) to noise receiver (R) C = Linear distance from source (S) and receiver (R) of the noise In the following a Schematic Diagramme is provided to show the positions of noise source, receiver and barrier.

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 45 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

X3

X4 X2 X5

X1 X7 X6

X1 to X6 = Ground Level, X2 = Source of Noise (at man height), X3 = Receiver of Noise (at man height), X3 to X7 = Height of the Barrier from the ground level, X4 to X7 = Effective Height of barrier (here considered as 4 m.), A = Distance between X2 and X3, B = Distance between X3 and X5, C = Distance between X1 and X6.

Frequency (f) of the noise at the source is considered as 500 Hz. Velocity (c) of the sound = 340 m./sec.

We know from the standard formula, Wave Length (λ) = c / f

Here we have calculated the wave length as (500/340) m. = 0.68 m.

From these results we have to calculate the Fresnel Number (N), which is determined by the following equation:

N = δ / λ = (A+B-C) / λ

Having the value of N (Fresnel Number), Attenuation (Ae) value is determined from the Standard semi-logarithmic graph.

When the value of Attenuation (Ae) is deducted from the noise level, we get the net noise level (Leq) at that place after putting a barrier or attenuation along the path of noise i.e. Leq(actual) – Ae = Leq(net value)

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 46 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

ANNEXURE 6.1: CPCB INDUSTRIAL GUIDELINE FOR OIL AND GAS EXTRACTION INDUSTRIES

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 47 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 48 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 49 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 50 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 51 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 52 JOGPL Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Annexure 9.1 TSPCB – Minutes of Public Hearing recorded of South Tripura District

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 53 JOGPL Minutes of the Public Hearing for the proposed Field Development for setting up of Surface Facilities, Group Gathering Station(GGS), Development Driiling and Interconnecting Pipeline between welts for .Kathalchari Field Development' Block: AA-oNN-2oo2t1 ot M/s Jubirant Oil & Gas Pvt. Ltd., held on December 29, 2O1S at Kwaifung Gommunity Hall, Santirbazar, South Tripura.

PublicHearing for Drillingof. g nos developmentwells of KathalchhariFierd DevelopmentBlock, Interconnecting pipeline and Group Gathering station in SouthTripura Districtwas held on Decemberzg, zors at Kwaifungcommunity Hall, santirbazar, south Tripura.

Publicnotices (in vernacular language- Bengali) were issued on 30.11.2015in two dailyregional newspapers namery Dainik sambad, Daily Desher Katha. Apart from this, Englishversion of thesaid notice was also published in onemajor National daily namely the Telegraphon 30.11.20L5.suggestions, comments, views and objectionsof the publicon environmentalissues about the projectwere invitedthrough the notice.No writren suggestion/comment/view/objectionwasreceived.

Inthe hearing,Mr RawalH.Kumar, Additional District Magistrate & collector& r/cof DistrictMagistrate & collector,south Tripura District was presentto presideover the meeting.This apart the sri RupanjanDas, Deputy collector & Magistrate,santirbazar, south Tripurawas also present.

Thefollowing officials from Jubilant oil & Gasprivate Ltd. & GArLwere present:

. 1. Mr TajenderPal Singh, Project Manager, Jubilant Oil & Gasprivate Ltd. 2. ColonelD.K Sawan, Base Manager Jubilant Oil & Gasprivate Ltd. 3. Mr MahenderPilleywar,Snr Manager GAIL .

Thisapart, Dr.Mihir Kr, Das, Scientist- C, TSPCB, Aparajita Das, AEE, TSpCB and Sri shoumabhoBhattacharya, consultant of SENESconsultant India pvt. Ltd appointed by M/s JubilantOil & GasPvt. Ltd.were also present in the hearing

'C', At the onsetDr. Mihir Kr.Das, Scientist representativeof the TripuraState pollution controlBoard welcomed all the membersand participantsand emphasizedon the purpose of the instantpublic hearing. He alsohighlighted the provisionsof the Rulesincluding the EIANotification. Thereafter sri shoumabhoBhattacharya, consultant of sENESconsultant

\11r.rv2a? IndiaPvt. Ltd made a powerpoint presentation describing the projectfeatures, the baseIine data relatedto environment,outlining the environmental& socioeconomic impacts and describingthe environmentalmanagement plan of the proposedproject. He atsoensured that publicwill get betterservice from them afterimplementation of the project.This was followedby speechfrom sri RupanjanDas, Deputy Collector & Magistrate,santirbazar, SouthTripura making the publicaware about the aftereffects of oil drillingand statingthe importanceof their activeparticipation in it. Theseafter time was givenfor discussion wherein questionsfrom the publicwere invited and replied accordingly.

Therewas no suchadverse comment on the saidproject on environment.However,sri. chandimohanTripura, resident of Tailumaexpressed concern about earthquake and effect on soilfertility after the settingof the project.He alsoenquired about.job opportunities of localpeople in connectionwith the Drillingactivity. In relationto thisOfficial of M/s Jubilant oil & Gas Pvt' Ltd assuredto restorethe land to be usedafter the completionof the process.He alsostated that there is no written proof regardingincrease in intensityof earthquakeoccurrence during oil drilling.He also assured that Contractorswill be instructed to includelocal people during the drlllingprocess.

No other witness/participants raisedany other issuesrelated to adverseimpact of the projecton environment.

\Ll;*,v- a7 D1[ty't;' *e{*\r- (Dr.Mihlr Kr. Das) (SriRupanjan Das) Scientist-C DeputyCollector & Magistrate TripuraState Pollution Control Board SouthTripura District, Tripu ra

,/-: ( a .' '.'/ \, ' \".,{ rr,,\ \., ,-1.4\' \ (Mr RawalH.Kr-lmar , IAS) AdditionalDistrict Magistrate & Collector & l/c of DistrictMagistrate & Coliector SouthTripura District, Belon ia Annexure EIA for development activities of hydrocarbon, GGS & pipeline laying at Kathalchari

Annexure 9.2 TSPCB – Minutes of Public Hearing recorded of Gomati District

SENES/MESM-20241/ June 2016 54 JOGPL Minutesof the PublicHearing for the proposedField Development for settingup of SurfaceFacilities, Group Gathering Station(GGS), Development Drillingand InterconnectingPipeline between wells for 'KathalchariField Development'Block: AA-ONN-2002 /L of Mls JubilantOil & GasPvt. Ltd., held on December37,20L5 at AmarpurTown Hall, Amarpur, Gomati Tripura.

Public Hearingfor Drillingof 3 nos developmentWells of KathalchhariField DevelopmentBlock and lnterconnectingpipeline in GomatiDistrict was heldon December 31,2015 at AmarpurTown Hall, Amarpur, Gomati Tripura,

Publicnotices (in vernacularlanguage- Bengali) were issuedon 30.11.2015in two daily regionalnewspapers namely Dainik Sambad, Daily DesherKatha. Apart from this, Elglishversion of the saidnotice was also published in one majorNational daily namely the Telegraphon 30.11.2015.Suggestions, comments, views and objectionsof the publlcon environmentalissues about the project were invited through the notice. No written suggestion/comment/view/objectionwas received.

In the hearing,Sri Sajal Biswas, SDM, Amarpur, Sri RupanDas, Deputy Collector & Magistrate,Amarpur, Gomati Tripura was presentto presideover the meeting.This apart Chairmanand Vice Chairman,South EkchhariGram Panchayatwere also presentin the hea rin g.

Thefollowing officials from Jubilant Oil & GasPrivate Ltd. & GAILwere present:

1. Mr TajenderPal Singh ,Project Manager, Jubilant Oil & GasPrivate Ltd. 2. ColonelD.K Sawan ,Base Manager Jubilant Oil & GasPrivate Ltd. 3. Mr MahenderPilleywar,Snr Manager GAIL.

Thisapart, Dr.M.K. Das, Scientist- C, TSPCB,Aparajita Das, AEE, TSPCB and Sri ShoumabhoBhattacharya, Consultant of SENESConsultant India Pvt. Ltd appointed by M/s JubilantOil & GasPvt. Ltd.were also present in the hearin€,.

At the.-onsetDr. Mihir Kr.Das, Scientist 'C', representative of the TripuraState Pollution ControlBoard welcomed all the membersand participantsand emphasizedon the purpose of the instantpublic hearing. He alsohighlighted the provisionsof the Rulesincluding the EIANotification. Thereafter Sri Shoumabho Bhattacharya, Consultant of SENESConsultant IndiaPvt. Ltd made a powerpoint presentation describing the projectfeatures, the baseline data relatedto environment,outlining the environmental& socioeconomic impacts and describingthe environmentalmanagement plan of the proposedproject. He alsoensured NL"'E? w, that publicwill get betterservice from them afterimplementation of the project.This was followedby speechfrom Sri RupanDas, Deputy Collector & Magistrate,Amarpur, Gomati Tripuramaking the publicaware about the limitedresources and industries in Tripura.Lastly the Chairmanexplained the importanceof activeparticipation of the villagersin the Public Hearingin Kokborok(Local Regional Language). Duringthe sessionthe followingissues were discussed:

1. Sri KhudiramReang, resident of Gunadharpara, enquired about the probabilityof contaminationof drinkingand bathingwater. He alsodemanded for civicamenties likeschool and market.Dr. Das,Scientist "C", Tripura State pollution Control Board assuredto take careof the water qualityand officialsfrom M/s JubilantOil & Gas Pvt. Ltd. assuredthat arrangementof school and market will be made in collaborationwith Governmentonly after getting gas in the region. 2. Sri KarnajoyReang and KhatiroyReang, Resident of Gunadharparaenquired about the effectson their Rubberand Pineappleplantation during the Drillingprocess. Dr. Das,Tripura State Pollution Control Board said that their landswill be usedfor 3 yearsand compensationwill be madefor that from the DistrictAdministration . So far land restorationis concernedthe ProjectProponent is liableto follow that 1 otherwiseTripura State Pollution Control Board willtake necessary steps. 3. Milan Murasing,Resident of Gunadharparaasked about the job opportunitiesto whichDr. Das assured in a positivemanner. 4. Smt.Padmarani Debbarma enquired about the problemsthat might raiseafter gas hasbeen found to whichDr. Dassaid that TripuraState Pollution Control Board and the localadministration will takecare if anvproblem arises.

No other witness/participa nts raisedany other issuesrelated to adverseimpact of the projecton environment.

fn ,/.0 \,1.\.'"'z-tlrPl'trv/Y ffiytol'\" (Dr.M.K. Das) (SriRupan Das) Scientist-C DeputyCollector & Magistrate TripuraState Pollution Control Board GomaliDistrict, Amarpur

. ),1 f qN2-or\ a,-a?\. (SxiPl:ChaNnqJ SDM,Amarpur DistrictMagistrate & Collector GomatiDistrict,Udaipur