DOCSLIB.ORG

Contracting in Urban Public Transport Appendix: Contract Tables

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Contracting in Urban Public Transport Appendix: Contract Tables Contracting in urban public transport Appendix: Contract Tables Submitted to EC – DG TREN by inno-V | KCW | RebelGroup | NEA | TØI | SDG | TIS Contracting in urban public transport (appendix: contract tables) Contracted by: European Commission – DG TREN Contractors: NEA (NL), inno-V (NL), KCW (D), Re- belGroup (NL), TØI (N), SDG (GB), TIS.PT (P) Project co-ordinator: inno-V (NL) Main report written by: Didier van de Velde, Arne Beck, Jan- Coen van Elburg, Kai-Henning Ter- schüren With further contributions of: Bård Norheim, Jan Werner, Christoph Schaaffkamp, Arthur Gleijm Contract tables provided by: Didier van de Velde, Arne Beck, Bård Norheim, Frode Longva, Tamás Dombi, Nicole Rudolf, Andrew Mellor, Daniela Carvalho, Rosário Macário, Kai-Henning Terschüren Layout: Didier van de Velde, Annemone Meyer, Arne Beck Disclaimer: This report was produced for DG En- ergy and Transport and represents the Consultants views. These views have not been adopted or in any way ap- proved by the Commission and should not be relied upon as a statement of the Commission's or DG Energy and Transport's views, nor of the confor- mity of described practices with appli- cable Community law. The European Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this report, nor does it accept responsibility for any use made thereof. File: contracting in urban public transport - contract tables (v4.2) pub.doc Date: Amsterdam, 14 January 2008 Contracting in urban public transport (appendix: contract tables) 2 Table of contents 1 TEMPLATE...........................................................................................................4 2 AMSTERDAM (NL): DIRECT AWARD WITH COMPETITIVE THREAT ..........................6 3 BARCELONA (E): DIRECT AWARD TO PUBLIC OPERATOR........................................9 4 BRUSSELS (B): DIRECT AWARD TO PUBLIC OPERATOR ..........................................11 5 BUDAPEST (H): DIRECT AWARD TO PUBLIC OPERATOR........................................ 14 6 DIJON (F) : TENDERED NETWORK MANAGEMENT CONTRACT .............................. 16 7 DUBLIN (IRL): TENDERED ROUTE CONTRACT WITH INCENTIVES (TRAMWAY)...... 19 8 ELMSHORN (D): FUNCTIONAL TENDERING OF NETWORK CONTRACT ...................22 9 FRANKFURT/M. (D): TENDERED ROUTE BUNDLE CONTRACTS............................. 25 10 GIFHORN (D): SUB-CONTRACTING BY A PUBLIC OPERATOR .................................28 11 GIFHORN (D): COMPETITION FOR MARKET-INITIATED AUTHORISATIONS ............ 31 12 GRENLAND (N): TENDERED NETWORK CONTRACT WITH SUPER-INCENTIVES .......34 13 HAARLEM (NL): FUNCTIONAL TENDERING OF NETWORK CONTRACT ...................36 14 HALMSTAD (S): TENDERED NETWORK CONTRACT WITH ADDITIONAL INCENTIVES38 15 INNSBRUCK (A): DIRECT AWARD TO REORGANISED PUBLIC OPERATOR ................ 41 16 KRAKOW (PL): DIRECT AWARD TO PUBLIC OPERATOR WITHOUT EXCLUSIVITY ..... 45 17 LEEDS (GB): QUALITY PARTNERSHIP WITHIN FREE MARKET ............................... 47 18 LONDON (GB): TENDERING OF GROSS-COST BUS ROUTE CONTRACTS...................49 19 LONDON (GB): TENDERED GROSS-COST CONTRACT (RAIL) WITH INCENTIVES...... 53 20 LYON (F) : TENDERED NETWORK MANAGEMENT CONTRACT................................56 21 MANCHESTER (GB): TENDERING NON-COMMERCIAL ROUTES.............................60 22 MUNICH SUBURBS (D): TENDERING OF ROUTE CONTRACTS.................................62 23 OVIEDO (E): TENDERED NETWORK CONTRACT ...................................................65 24 PARLA/MADRID (E): TRAMWAY CONCESSION (INCLUDING BUILDING) ................68 25 PORTO (P): METRO CONCESSION (DBFO)...........................................................71 26 PRAGUE (CZ): DIRECT AWARD TO PUBLIC OPERATOR.......................................... 73 27 ROME (I): DIRECT AWARD AND PARTIAL TENDERING .......................................... 75 28 SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELLA (E): TENDERED NETWORK CONTRACT ....................78 29 SONDRIO/LOMBARDY (I): TENDERING OF ROUTE BUNDLES ................................ 81 30 STOCKHOLM (S): TENDERED ROUTE BUNDLES GROSS-COST CONTRACTS..............83 31 SUNDSVALL (S): TENDERED NET-COST NETWORK CONTRACT ..............................86 32 TRIESTE (I): TENDERED NETWORK CONTRACT....................................................88 33 WARSAW (PL): TENDERING OF ROUTE CONTRACTS.............................................90 34 WITTENBERG (D): COMPETITION FOR MARKET-INITIATED AUTHORISATIONS ......92 Contracting in urban public transport (appendix: contract tables) 3 1 Template The following template is used to present in a synthetic manner contrac- tual practices that are currently encountered in Europe. Main description Remarks and variations General description of the ♦ Describe briefly the authority/ies involved This column is used for two purposes: contracting parties and their responsibilities (union of authori- ♦ Provide additional relevant information ties, planning capacities, etc.) about the contractual feature, presented ♦ Describe briefly the operators involved succinctly in the column ‘main description’ (ownership, level of competition, etc.) ♦ Illustrate variations on that contractual ♦ Describe briefly how the transport service is feature, if needed. being initiated (authority initiative by law, market initiative by law – public operator or free market, etc. See reference framework) General description of the Present briefly the contract type. Present contract type whether allocation of both cost and revenue risks in a single unit, or in separated units, i.e. single risk versus multiple risks. Add information on the contract length. Awarding procedure Indicate how the contract was awarded Additional relevant information on the rela- (European legal text and national legislation tionship between the national legislation used and procedure used: direct award, competi- and the existing European legislation. tive tendering, which kind, etc.) Regime for Public Service Present briefly the legal feature used for the Obligations Public Service Obligations. Note that this may be several features, possibly in combination with each other (such as a contract, a finan- cial allocation decision, an authorisation, or other legal features specific to the country studied) Policy goals and contractual ♦ Describe briefly the main public transport goals (strategic level) policy goals (Why does the transport au- thority intervene in public transport? influ- encing mode choice? Reducing air pollu- tion?...) ♦ Describe briefly the specific contract goals that may come in addition to the policy goals (Realise a specific investment in new infrastructure? Privatise the existing public operator? Solving a financial crisis dating from the previous regime?...) Service definition (tactical Describe the allocation of tactical compe- level) tences between authority and operator. This should include at least the following: ♦ How much of the service design (routes, timetable, fares) is defined by the authority before the contracting/tendering process? ♦ How much of the service design (routes, timetable, fares) is defined by the (candi- date) operator during the contract- ing/tendering process? ♦ How much freedom to change service de- sign (routes, timetable, fares) does the op- erator have during the contracting period? Service production (opera- Describe the allocation of operational compe- tional level) tences between authority and operator. One example: are operational decisions (such as the allocation of vehicles to the timetable) predetermined by the contracting body, or does the operator decide on this autono- mously? Regime for changes in pro- Describe the contractual features used (if Indicate the maximum extent of the changes duction quantities or con- any) to allow the authority to request of the contract that can be made without tract amendments during changes of production quantities or other needed to re-tender or otherwise review the Contracting in urban public transport (appendix: contract tables) 4 Main description Remarks and variations the contract period contract amendments (production quality, relationship etc.) during the contract period Ownership Present briefly the arrangements concerning the ownership of assets (distinguish between infrastructures, other installations and vehi- cles by mode) Status of the personnel What is the status of the personnel in the Present the main information on the transfer case of a change of operator at contract of workers rights from the old to the new termination? (compulsory take-over or not) operator (general agreements, local company rules, etc.). What are the legal obligations in the country concerned? Did the authority introduce requirement above this? [Make one table row for Present the main financial elements of the Add here information on (if applicable): each risk component in the contract: ♦ Sharing of risks beyond thresholds contract: ♦ the source of each financial component ♦ Indexation clauses ♦ cost, (which authority, the passengers,…) ♦ revenue ♦ the incentive mechanism related to each of ♦ and/or expected deficit] these components (if any…). Distinguish when relevant between: ♦ Cost components when relevant (opera- tions, investments, infrastructure mainte- nance, etc) ♦ Revenue components Present clearly the usage of prox- ies/measurements (such as passenger satis- faction indexes, etc.) when relevant, and present the related financial incentives. Contract price and level of ♦ Indicate the contract price (if not commer- Add information on contractual and factual risk cially secret) possibilities for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tram Potential
    THE INTERNATIONAL LIGHT RAIL MAGAZINE www.lrta.org www.tautonline.com JULY 2019 NO. 979 GROWING LONDON’S TRAM POTENTIAL Brussels congress debates urban rail safety and sustainability Doha launches Metro Red line service US raises Chinese security concerns India plans ‘Metrolite’ for smaller cities Canberra Energy efficiency £4.60 Realising a 100-year Reduced waste and light rail ambition greater profitability 2019 ENTRIES OPEN NOW! SUPPORTED BY ColTram www.lightrailawards.com CONTENTS 244 The official journal of the Light Rail Transit Association 263 JULY 2019 Vol. 82 No. 979 www.tautonline.com EDITORIAL EDITOR – Simon Johnston [email protected] ASSOCIATE EDITOr – Tony Streeter [email protected] WORLDWIDE EDITOR – Michael Taplin [email protected] 256 NewS EDITOr – John Symons [email protected] SenIOR CONTRIBUTOR – Neil Pulling WORLDWIDE CONTRIBUTORS Tony Bailey, Richard Felski, Ed Havens, Andrew Moglestue, Paul Nicholson, Herbert Pence, Mike Russell, Nikolai Semyonov, Alain Senut, Vic Simons, Witold Urbanowicz, Bill Vigrass, Francis Wagner, Thomas Wagner, Philip Webb, Rick Wilson PRODUCTION – Lanna Blyth Tel: +44 (0)1733 367604 [email protected] NEWS 244 saving energy, saVING COST 258 Doha opens Metro Red line; US politicians Len Vossman explains some of the current DESIGN – Debbie Nolan raise Chinese security concerns; Brussels initiatives driving tramway and metro ADVertiSING celebrates ‘tramway 150’; Arizona’s Valley energy efficiency. COMMERCIAL ManageR – Geoff Butler Tel: +44 (0)1733 367610 Metro extends to Gilbert Rd; Bombardier [email protected] UK to build new Cairo monorail; Luas-style SYSTEMS FACTFILE: london trams 263 PUBLISheR – Matt Johnston system proposed for Ireland’s Cork; Neil Pulling looks at developments on the Kent-Essex tramway is feasible; India UK network formerly known as Tramlink.
    [Show full text]
  • Ðə Məʊˈbɪlɪtɪ ˈkʌmpənɪ
    / ðə məʊˈbɪlɪtɪ ˈkʌmpənɪ / Since 1853. Best known as Transdev. To be the mobility company is very ambitious but also very modest: to bring and build THE solution for clients, only the result counts! The commitment is to be the company that operates the best daily mobility options, in a spirit of open partnership serving communities and people, and with innovation and sustainability in mind at all times. 2 transdev.com THANK YOU TO OUR CONTRIBUTORS. Publication director: Pascale Giet. Photo credits: A. Acosta, W. Beaucardet, CDGVal, Connexxion, O. Desclos, J.-F. Deroubaix, Focke Strangmann, Fotopersbureau HCA/P. Harderwijk, P. Fournier, GettyImages/Westend61, Groupeer, T. Itty, Joel, S. van Leiden, Lizafoto/L. Simonsson, J. Locher, J. Lutt, U. Miethe, J. Minchillo, Mobike, Moovizy Saint-Etienne, Rouen Normandie Autonomous Lab, RyanJLane, Schiphol, T. Schulze, Service photographique The mobility company The mobility de Mulhouse Alsace Agglomération, SkyScans/D. Hancock, A. Oudard Tozzi, Transdev Australasia, Transdev Australia, Transdev et Lohr, Transdev North Holland, Transdev Sweden, Transdev USA, Transport de l’agglomération Nîmoise, Urbis Park, R. Wildenberg. This document is printed on FSC-certifi ed paper made from 100% recycled pulp by an Imprim’Vert-labelled professional. Partner of the Global Compact Design-production-editing: / Publication May 2019. TRANSDEV 10 Our people at the heart of Transdev’s value proposition 14 Meeting the expectations of our clients and passengers 28 Responsibility means being a local economic and social actor 32 Personalized 34 Autonomous 36 Connected 38 Electric 40 & Eco-friendly The mobility company The mobility TRANSDEV 2 Transdev ID* As an operator and global integrator of mobility, Transdev gives people the freedom to move whenever and however they choose.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Public Transport Service Co-Creation: Leveraging Passenger’S Knowledge to Enhance Travel Experience
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 111 ( 2014 ) 577 – 585 EWGT2013 – 16th Meeting of the EURO Working Group on Transportation Urban public transport service co-creation: leveraging passenger’s knowledge to enhance travel experience António A. Nunesa,*, Teresa Galvãoa, João Falcão e Cunhaa aFaculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal Abstract Mobile devices are increasingly pervasive and are transforming information distribution paradigms. A rapidly growing segment of urban public transport passengers carry mobile computing devices, permanently and on the move. In a context of thinning financial resources, getting customers involved in the actual delivery of a public transport service as real-time information consumers and providers, may be a powerful method to enhance travel experience while reducing operational costs for the service operator. Each and every customer travelling on a public transport network has unique knowledge about the service operation as it unfolds. This paper proposes a framework that aims to unify public transport passengers’ collective intelligence through crowdsourcing, using their mobile computing devices and dedicated web services. It strives to intensify win-win relationships between public transport passengers and operators. The structured exchange of information is sustained by a validation mechanism for data reliability, and an incentive mechanism to encourage passenger participation. Passengers benefit from rich real-time data tailored to their profiles, to ease their journeys and improve travel experience, in exchange for their own participation providing and validating information. Operators gain access to rich customer generated data, which in an aggregated format may provide a real-time assessment of customer experience and of local performance across the entire network operation.
    [Show full text]
  • Emta News N°25
    EUROPEAN METROPOLITAN TRANSPORT AUTHORITIES July 2006 - n° 25 News from Europe G Political agreement on the revised approve the modifications of the text • A methodology for smart charging for proposal for a regulation of PSO in adopted by the Council compared to the infrastructure (2008) public transport initial version of the Commission: The new • The start of Galileo concession (2009) The Council reached a political agreement text takes better in account remarks made on the revised proposal for a regulation on by most of public transport actors regarding Urban transport seems to be better taken in public service obligations for passenger the restrictive definition of internal operators, account compared to the 2001 White Paper transport services by rail and by road, publi- their strict geographical containment or the (see EMTA position on the mid-term review shed by EU Commission on 20 July 2005. maximum duration for contracts including on our website) and EMTA looks forward to The text as agreed will be adopted as a construction of infrastructures. EMTA position contribute to the 2007 Green Paper. common position at a forthcoming Council on the Commission’s proposal is available on ec.europa.eu/transport/transport_policy_revie session under Finnish Presidency and sent to EMTA website, section publications. w/index_en.htm the European Parliament with a view of the www.consilium.europa.eu second reading next Autumn. www.emta.com/article.php3?id_article=270 G Results of the pilot program on hydrogen-fuel cell buses The public service obligations proposal aims The EU Commission presented on 11 May at establishing a new legislative framework G New orientation for EU Transport the results of a pilot programme launched in for the increasingly open and competitive Policy 2003 that powered 27 hydrogen-fuel cell European market for public passenger The European Commission adopted on 22 public buses in 9 European cities.
    [Show full text]
  • PORTUGAL 899 Send Them Send Them Can None Required for Most Visitors for for Most Visitors for None Required GMT/UTC
    © Lonely Planet Publications 898 899 Portugal HIGHLIGHTS Óbidos This walled village was a royal wedding gift from Dom Dinis to his wife (beats a fondue set) and is overrun with tourists but still exquisite ( p917 ) Porto An intoxicating city, not just for its famous tipple but also for the vibrant street life and heady sights (p921 ) Best journey Bask in seagulls-and-seashore scenery from the Algarve train that runs beside the coast for most of the way between Lagos and Vila Real de Santo António ( p912 ) Off-the-beaten-track Parque Nacional da Peneda Gerês offers exceptional hiking through forests and over high plateaus dotted with ancient stone villages and archaeological sites( p924 ) FAST FACTS Area 92,389 sq km (twice the size of Switzerland as a comparison) ATMs plentiful Budget €40-50 Capital Lisbon Country code %351 Famous for fado, football, port, azulejos (tiles), salted cod Head of State President Anibal Cavaco Silva Language Portuguese Money euro (€); A$1 = €; CA$1 = €; ¥100 = €; NZ$1 = €; UK£1 = €; US $1 = € Time GMT/UTC. Daylight savings from Phrases bom dia (hello), obligado/a (thank March to October. you), desculpe (excuse me), adeus (good- Visas None required for most visitors for PORTUGAL bye), faz favor (please) stays up to 90 days Population 10.4 million TRAVEL HINTS Be wary of the nibbles provided at the start of a meal as they can cost and you can send them back. ROAMING PORTUGAL Check out Porto then Lisbon and nearby Sintra. Move on to Óbidos and coastal Nazaré before sidestepping to Évora and heading south to the Algarve.
    [Show full text]
  • Portfolio of Expertise
    Portfolio of expertise Environmental Solutions Connecting new lines, together. Drawing from our long experience as a multimodal operator, we look forward to assisting you with the construction and optimization of your mobility systems and services. Our ambition is to develop with you, in a genuine spirit of partnership, customized, safe, effective and responsible transit solutions that are adapted to your needs and constraints and closely in tune with customer expectations. The mobility of the future will be personalized, autonomous, connected and electric. This is our firm belief. Innovation is at the heart of our approach, in order to constantly improve the performance of public transportation services and make the promise of “new mobilities” a reality, for everyone. As well as uncompromising safety, which is our credo, our overriding concern is the satisfaction of our customers and the quality of their experience. Every team member in the Group engages on a daily basis to meet these challenges and implement solutions both for today and for the future...» Thierry Mallet Chairman & Chief Executive Officer Public transit, playing a key role in climate change prevention and energy mix A twofold challenge -- global and local Climate change and its impact on air quality represent a major threat to the environment and public health. During the Paris COP21 in December 2015, nearly 200 countries signed a universal agreement to cut greenhouse gases (GHG) and avoid the most dangerous effects of climate change. They committed themselves to keep rise in average global temperature below 2°C, which means a 70% GHG emissions reduction between 2010 and 2050*.
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Rail and Luas Ticketing
    Irish Rail and Luas Ticketing List of Valid and Not Valid Tickets on Luas November 2004 1. Single and Return Add-On Tickets Valid on Luas 2. Single and Return Add-On Tickets NOT Valid on Luas 3. Rail Season Add-On Tickets Valid on Luas 4. Rail Luas ‘Combi’ Tickets 5. Rail Tickets NOT valid on Luas 1 1. Single and Return Add-On Tickets Valid on Luas 1.1 Into Heuston Station – Valid all Luas stops to Connolly Station Only Cork etc. Has LUAS and INCL. FEEDER SERV. = Valid Cork etc. Has INCL. FEEDER SERV. = Valid 2 1.2 Into Connolly Station – Valid all Luas stops to Heuston Station Only Sutton etc. Has LUAS = Valid Sutton etc. Has LUAS = Valid Single and Return Add-On Tickets into Connolly or Heuston are only valid if they have either: - LUAS or - INCL. FEEDER SERV Printed. 3 2. Single and Return Add-On Tickets NOT Valid on Luas 2.1 Into Connolly Station Sutton etc. Has Heuston Bus Stop Only = Not Valid 2.2 Into Heuston Station Clondalkin etc. HAZELHATCH DUBLIN CITY CENTRE Has Dublin City Centre Only = Not Valid Single and Return Add-On Tickets into Connolly or Heuston are NOT valid if they do not have: - LUAS or - INCL. FEEDER SERV Printed. 4 3. Rail Season Add-On Tickets Valid on Luas 3.1 Existing into Connolly or Heuston Stations - Valid all Luas stops between Connolly and Heuston Stations Only – Daily, Weekly or Monthly Has LUAS and I.F.S. = Valid I.F.S. = Includes Feeder Services Has I.F.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Guide
    Stint Ireland Transport Guide Figuring out public transport in a new city and country can be a little stressful but fear not, Stint have got you covered. This guide should help you understand the various forms of transport available to you, how to use them best and cool travel Apps. Dublin Transport Here in Dublin we have three main forms of public transport: Bus, Train and Tram (whilst you can also avail of a pretty nifty public bike scheme too!). The first question to ask is … How do I get anywhere? 1. Use Google Maps to know how to get to your des na on via public transport. 2. Register your Leap card (so you can replace it if you lose it)- Stint will provide this ​ card. Please see the website for fare caps and general information. 3. Use your Leap Card for buses, trains & trams. 4. Top up your Leap Card at any Spar/Londis/Train/Tram sta on/via Leap Top-Up App. Dublin Bus We recommend using the Dublin Bus app for real time arrivals, route and fare calculators. If your fare is less than €2.60, tell the bus driver the price & scan it on the left. If your fare is €2.60, scan the card on the validator on the right of the bus. P. S. You can pay for others using your card too, just tell the driver! Oh and don’t forget to thank the driver when leaving the bus! There are over 100 different bus routes to and around the city. We recommend using the Dublin Bus route planner on the Dublin Bus website or App.
    [Show full text]
  • Floating Slab Mats 2020
    PRODUCT REFERENCE LIST Floating Slab Mats 2020 Year Network Project Product Type Type Track Load Total 2002 FR TBM Bordeaux: Tramway - Tramway 100 kN 31,000 m² Bordeaux 2002 PT Metro Lisbon: Odivelas, - Metro 100 kN 10,000 m² Lisboa Campo Grande & Falagueira station 2003 BE MIVB/STIB Brussels: Chaussée de - Tramway 100 kN 1,800 m² Charleroi - Phase 1 2003 Brussels: Chaussée de - Tramway 100 kN 5,250 m² Charleroi - Phase 2 2003 De Lijn Gent: Gent St-Pieters - - Tramway 100 kN 10,000 m² Flanders Expo 2003 FR TBM Bordeaux: Tramway - Tramway 130 kN 9,700 m² Bordeaux 2003 GR TRAM SA Athens: Kasamouli - - Tramway 100 kN 4,000 m² Panagitsas 2004 BE De Lijn Gent: Gent St-Pieters - - Tramway 95 kN 400 m² Flanders Expo 2004 ES GTP-FGV Valencia: Tram Valencia - Tramway 113 kN 200 m² 2005 BE MIVB/STIB Brussels: Avenue de - Tramway 100 kN 2,245 m² l'Hippodrome 2005 Brussels: Rue du Bailli - Tramway 100 kN 2,410 m² 2005 Brussels: Avenue - Tramway 100 kN 610 m² P.Janson 2005 Brussels: L94 - - Tramway 120 kN 600 m² Boulevard du Souverain 2005 Brussels: Montgomery - Tramway 100 kN 250 m² 2005 Brussels: Terminus - Tramway 100 kN 550 m² Boondael 2005 PT Metro Porto Porto: Metro do Porto - Tramway 100 kN 3,900 m² 2006 BE MIVB/STIB Brussels: Terminus - Tramway 130 kN 481 m² Louise Legrand 2006 Brussels: Montgomery - Tramway 100 kN 300 m² Fase 2 2006 Brussels: Montgomery - Tramway 100 kN 290 m² Fase 2E 2006 Brussels: Wielemans - - Tramway 100 kN 15 m² Van Volxem 2006 ES GTP-FGV Alicante: Tram Line 2 PANDROL FSM- Tramway 113 kN 690 m² L10 2020 © Pandrol 2020
    [Show full text]
  • Eighth Annual Market Monitoring Working Document March 2020
    Eighth Annual Market Monitoring Working Document March 2020 List of contents List of country abbreviations and regulatory bodies .................................................. 6 List of figures ............................................................................................................ 7 1. Introduction .............................................................................................. 9 2. Network characteristics of the railway market ........................................ 11 2.1. Total route length ..................................................................................................... 12 2.2. Electrified route length ............................................................................................. 12 2.3. High-speed route length ........................................................................................... 13 2.4. Main infrastructure manager’s share of route length .............................................. 14 2.5. Network usage intensity ........................................................................................... 15 3. Track access charges paid by railway undertakings for the Minimum Access Package .................................................................................................. 17 4. Railway undertakings and global rail traffic ............................................. 23 4.1. Railway undertakings ................................................................................................ 24 4.2. Total rail traffic .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Retail Sales Compensation Survey
    RETAIL SALES COMPENSATION SURVEY 2021 Edition INVITATION TO PARTICIPATE 01 January 2021 The attached materials contain the instructions for preparing your input to the Seventeenth Edition of the Retail Sales Compensation Survey. Initiated as a collaboration with leading retail companies, the survey has been designed to fulfill the need for a specialized and detailed compensation study for the industry. At Western Management, we are looking forward to working closely with you over the coming months to ensure the continued success and growth of this survey. This survey collects and reports data for Total Cash Remuneration in the form of Base Pay, Target Variable Cash, Actual Variable Cash and Allowances. Data is collected on an incumbent basis to ensure a complete picture of all compensation elements and true percentile analysis. The survey covers 35 countries, 300+ benchmarks, and over 300 major metropolitan centers. The functional areas covered include specific Retail Sales, plus Specialty Retail, In-Store Support and Corporate-level roles. The survey fee is $2,850 for ALL countries submitted. Includes access to BOTH the Standard AND Custom Reports for the 2021 survey results through our highly acclaimed DataCentral® reporting system. Reports can be produced in familiar PDF and XLS formats. The Custom reporting capabilities give you the ability to compare your data to that of your selected set of participants. Be sure to review the various DISCOUNTS that we offer to help moderate your costs this year. The results are NOT available to non-participants. The schedule for this study is: 01 March 2021 Effective Date of Data 1 May 2021 Deadline for submission of data input to WMG ($150 Discount) July 2021 Results Available for Participants via DataCentral® In order to ensure that participating companies will be able to use this data for salary planning purposes, participants will need to meet the 1 May input deadline.
    [Show full text]
  • Kwartaalrapportage OV Ombudsman Eerste Kwartaal 2020
    Kwartaalrapportage 1 januari 2020 – 31 maart 2020 Inhoud Inhoudsopgave Inhoud ............................................................................................................................... 2 1. Voorwoord ..................................................................................................................... 3 2. Resultaten ...................................................................................................................... 4 3. Corona en het openbaar vervoer ..................................................................................... 7 4. Cijfers januari – maart 2020 ......................................................................................... 10 Tabel 1. Klachten per categorie ........................................................................................ 10 Tabel 2. Klachten per vervoerder ...................................................................................... 11 Tabel 3. Categorie versus vervoerder ............................................................................... 12 Tabel 4. Klachten per vervoerder binnen de categorie vervoerbewijs ............................... 15 Tabel 5. Klachten per concessie ....................................................................................... 17 2 1. Voorwoord Het is de meest vreemde periode in het bestaan van de OV ombudsman. Misschien wel de meest vreemde tijd sinds we in Nederland openbaar vervoer hebben. In maart kwam het advies van het kabinet om zo min mogelijk te reizen en werd de
    [Show full text]