Innovative Solutions for Sustainable Cities

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Innovative Solutions for Sustainable Cities The Vivapolis network aims to federate French public and private stakeholders involved in conceiving, building and operating sustainable cities, in France or abroad, in order to improve synergy and help them be, individually and collectively, more efficient in their action. www.vivapolis-climat.com These sheets have been produced by the Vivapolis network members, who attended 5 different work groups to promote examples of innovative solutions for sustainable cities. Work groups jointly run by: Circular economy: Alice Sarran, OREE / Jean-Christophe Daragon, EuroMéditerranée / Innovative Nicolas Prego, Suez Citizen participation: Marianne Malez, FNAU / Alain Renk, Urbanfab / Catherine Savart, Veolia solutions for Energy: Maud Lelièvre, Eco Maires / Fabrice Bonnifet, Bouygues / Claude Thouvenin and Franck Lesueur, Enekio sustainable cities Integrated urban utilities and digital platforms: Amandine Crambes, Ademe / Jacques Perrochat, Schneider Electric / Adrien Ponrouch, TErao Mobility: Camille Roccaserra-Vercelli, Fédération des EPL / Christian Dubost, SNCF / Annabelle Ferry, AREP / Jean Bergounioux, ATEC ITS Mobility Solutions presented by cities have been prepared in collaboration with France Urbaine Each file focuses on a unique theme. Some solutions may address several themes, but they will appear in one file only. Some of the solutions are also included in another file edited by France Urbaine together with Vivapolis : “A French Experience of Smart Cities” which presents a set of innovative solutions implemented in several French cities. URBAN INNOVATIONS IN THE FIELD OF SUSTAINABLE MOBILITIES /// NEW MOBILITIES IN CITIES /// WHAT ARE THE MAIN AREAS OF AND TERRITORIES INNOVATION IN TRANSPORT AND MOBILITY? From long time, France has built up a tightly-meshed mass transit system, upgraded and adapted to new Coordination, consistency and continuity of service are forms of mobility: coverage of mass transit in the Greater essential in guaranteeing the effectiveness of the over- Paris Region, upgrading the tramway systems in met- all mobility system and service quality to users. We see ropolitan areas and the regional express trains (TER) three distinct avenues for action when it comes to that feed into cities from suburban and rural areas, etc. innovation in mobility: Avoid, Shift, Improve (ASI) Alongside that, it has taken action to extend the range Avoid, Reduce (AVOID) of mobility options available, with new services, such as Stepping up incentive policies self-service vehicles or the consolidated shared mobility Innovation in this regard means enabling mobility at the services that have come up with the digital economy, right time, via the most appropriate route. With the ever including car-pooling, car-sharing, etc. This new era in more intricate understanding of mobility demand and mobility coincides with broader changes across society movement flows made possible by traffic management and in ways of life, included low-impact mobility and and regulation tools, public policies can be designed to universal access to mobility. It changes the design and act as incentives, fostering the use of infrastructures dur- the use of urban spaces and the connection between ing non-peak times and optimising the infrastructures urban development and transport is becoming even and services that already exist. Limiting peak times will stronger, as can be seen in the more integrated planning require new incentives (loyalty and “rewards” systems, or documents being produced, the extended prerogative positive tolls) and ongoing dialogue between transport of transport authorities at the local level and urban pro- sector players and major flow generators. jects with a broader range of social and functional uses. Innovating in the field of mobility also implies curbing Changing, optimising and better integrating the city demand; the local authorities and enterprises offer more and mobilities (SHIFT) : guaranteeing accessibility and and more ways of eliminating or significantly reducing overall efficiency in the multimodal offer for all users transport, by facilitating tele-commuting, multiplying While innovation in mobility is supported by technical the number of co-working options available and adopt- and technological developments, one of the character- ing more mobility-friendly work tools. istics of French innovation is its endeavour to secure quality for all and intelligently integrate the urban area and mobility uses across all of neighbourhoods and territories. The result can be seen in the quality of the interchange hubs (physical and digital acces- sibility), accessibility for all user populations and neighbourhoods, and more broadly speaking, qual- accommodate the new vehicles and maximise their ity all along the route from “door to door”. potential, in particular when it comes to recharging Therefore, new mobility infrastructures are designed infrastructures. The connected vehicle (implying vehi- in connection with urban revival projects, to bring back cle-vehicle, vehicle-infrastructure, and vehicle-cloud to life older neighbourhoods and offer better accessibil- communication) also opens up a new avenue for ity to troubled neighbourhoods. Designing new neigh- progress which has the potential to develop far more bourhoods or re-developing neighbourhoods and pub- rapidly than those yet seen. It will enable a notable lic spaces are as many opportunities to integrate new improvement in transport safety as well as new mobil- mobility options into the landscape and come up with ity usages. Autonomous cars (cars that are more or new multi-use systems that include low-impact mobil- less “self-driving”, or autonomous driver-free shuttles) ity. An all-encompassing approach, embracing environ- offer many new opportunities for progress: greater mental, energy-related and digital factors, is now taken capacity to optimise vehicle flows, and more options by many project teams, to ensure lower environmental for offering door-to-door mobility services, including impact in every step : design, construction and manage- in sparsely-populated urban zones. ment. Fine-tuned management of intermodality within the larger interchange hubs makes it possible to guar- antee service quality across the whole range, from tradi- /// ACTION TAKEN IN FRANCE TO SUPPORT tional to low-impact and alternative forms. THIS INNOVATION The large-scale development of multi-modal inte- grated ticketing systems also offers the opportunity to For many years now, France has designed its public develop new technologies, new services and a reorgan- policy to support developing and experimenting with isation of management and partnership methods. Work innovative ideas as applied to transport. The following has been done on material and service design so that programmes are of note: users can approach the mobility offer in metropolitan The Investments for the Future Programme (PIA) is areas from a new angle. working with 31 Eco-Cities on integrated urban projects Improve: Improving means going further : upgrad- aimed at building attractive and resilient cities that pre- ing and embedding new technologies serve the environment, social cohesion and quality of • Working on existing infrastructures: French know- living for residents. Many project specifically focusing how makes it possible to upgrade infrastructures and on transport are included (infrastructures, low-impact services, without any break in service continuity. mobility, integrated ticketing, etc.) as part of this effort. Cities today and transport and mobility services are The Investments for the Future Programme - Vehi- transforming at ever-greater speeds. Our infrastruc- cles and Transport for the Future is facilitating the tures need to be conducive to these changes, while emergence of new technical and technological solutions also shifting themselves at an increasingly fast pace, so by supporting projects around logistics, hybrid engines, as to never hinder or hold up the service provision pro- vehicle weight reduction, rail transport, etc. cess. France has developed cutting-edge know-how The “Industry Demonstrators of the Sustainable City” that makes all the aforementioned developments pos- (DIVD), by the Ministry of Housing and Sustainable Hous- sible while also maintaining service as usual through- ing and the Ministry of the Environment, Energy and Mar- out the duration of construction. Its accomplishments itime Affairs, which are all championing one or more inno- on the historical rail infrastructures have been particu- vative products in the field of transport and energy, which larly awe-inspiring (automation of metro lines). promotes the exchange of flows between city stakehold- • Innovating in urban goods transport and urban logistics ers in order to cut back on the use of primary resources. A radically different approach to distribution channels (shared distribution tools, newly-created “secondary” As you can see, to every mobility question... there is logistics centres, delivery points by neighbourhood, etc.), an answer! Whatever the need, audience or territory! optimised third-party locations and interchange hubs, and capacity-sharing between different modes and infrastructures (using waterways or tramways to deliver merchandise during non-peak hours) are just some of the new practices that are opening the door to a new per- spective on cities, city planning and city infrastructures. • Developing clean, autonomous, connected cars along Work group run by Caroline Maurand, with the related services Ministry
Recommended publications
  • Doc Problèmatique
    Contenus Articles Transport 1 Grand Paris Express 1 Société du Grand Paris 16 Syndicat des transports d'Île-de-France 22 Arc Express 31 Réseau de transport public du Grand Paris 41 Urbanisme 54 Politique de la ville 54 Agence nationale pour la rénovation urbaine 59 Établissement public d'aménagement 63 Opération d'intérêt national 64 Établissement public foncier 65 Schéma directeur de la région Île-de-France 69 EPCI 74 Communauté d'agglomération 74 Liste des intercommunalités du Val-de-Marne 78 Communauté d'agglomération Plaine centrale du Val-de-Marne 81 Communauté d'agglomération Seine Amont 84 Références Sources et contributeurs de l’article 87 Source des images, licences et contributeurs 88 Licence des articles Licence 90 1 Transport Grand Paris Express Cet article ou cette section contient des informations sur un projet de transport en Île-de-France. Il se peut que ces informations soient de nature spéculative et que leur teneur change considérablement alors que les événements approchent. Grand Paris Express Situation Île-de-France Type Métro automatique [1] Entrée en service entre 2020 et 2030, Longueur du réseau 200 km Lignes 4 Gares 72 Lignes du réseau Réseaux connexes TC en Île-de-France : Métro de Paris RER d'Île-de-France Transilien Tramway d'Île-de-France Autobus d'Île-de-France [2] modifier Le Grand Paris Express est un projet de réseau composé de quatre lignes de métro automatique autour de Paris, et de l'extension de deux lignes existantes. D'une longueur totale de 200 kilomètres[], il doit être réalisé par la Société du Grand Paris (SGP) dans le cadre d'un accord avec le Syndicat des transports d'Île-de-France (STIF).
    [Show full text]
  • Light Rail Transit
    Light railMAJOR transitProjects NEW ENERGY IDEAS BY EGIS Rabat-Salé sharing power… A FIRST FOR AFRICA and reducing operating costs Everyone agrees that energy saving should be one of the top concerns of modern transport networks. And at LoremThe Moroccan ipsum dolor capital sit hasamet, cashed consectetuer in on the adipiscing fantastic elit.economic Sed non growth risus. of Egis we were the first to recommend Suspendisserecent years, lectusbut this tortor, hasn’t dignissim prevented sit drawbacks amet, adipiscing such as nec, congestion ultricies or introducing an innovative energy sed,pollution. dolor. That’s Cras why, elementum with the ultriceshelp of Egis,diam. the Maecenas Rabat and ligula Salé massa, local authorities varius recuperation system into Lyon’s public and the Bouregreg valley development agency started up an ambitious high transport network. Collecting the energy a, semper congue, euismod non, mi. Proin porttitor, orci nec nonummy generated from LRT vehicles when they molestie,capacity lightenim rail est project eleifend to mi,connect non fermentumthe two urban diam hubs nisl andsit amet their erat.generators, Duis brake, the sub-stations spread across the semper.the railway Duis station, arcu massa,shopping scelerisque centres, hospitalsvit and universities. network can make this energy available to LRT and other public transport LoremOpened ipsum in May dolor 2011, sitthis amet, state-of-the-art consec Lorem system ipsum proved dolor to be sit a amet,hit with systems that run on electricity, such as consectetuerthe public, judging adipiscing by theelit. highSed rush-hournon risus. occupationSuspendisse rates lectus of itstortor, 60m underground trains or electric buses.
    [Show full text]
  • Recueil Des Actes Administratifs Du Stif
    couverture.qxp 14/08/2009 08:45 Page 1 Date de parution : Lundi 17 Août 2009 RECUEIL DES ACTES ADMINISTRATIFS DU STIF N°61– juin 2009 41 rue de Châteaudun – 75009 PARIS - métro Trinité d’Estienne d’Orves – bus : 26-32-43 et Conseil du 8 juillet 2009 tel. 01 47 53 28 00 – fax 01 47 05 11 05 – http://www.stif.info RAA n°61 Juin 2009 et conseil du 8 juillet 2009 INFORMATIONS Sont publiées au recueil des actes administratifs du STIF : - les délibérations du conseil du Syndicat ; - les décisions du directeur général ou des directeurs, prises par délégation. Les annexes aux décisions non publiées au présent recueil sont consultables au siège du Syndicat. SOMMAIRE Pages Délibérations du conseil Grands projets d’investissement Délibération du conseil n°2009-0566 du 8 juillet 2009 – ARC EXPRESS : Dossier d’objectifs et caractéristiques principales et dossier de saisine de la CNDP………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...… 13 Délibération du conseil n°2009-0567 du 8 juillet 2009 – Schéma de principe du RER D ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 14 Délibération du conseil n°2009-0568 du 8 juillet 2009 – Schéma directeur du RER C………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 15 Délibération du conseil n°2009-0569 du 8 juillet 2009 – Tangentielle Nord : Avant projet tronçon Epinay-sur-Seine-Le Bourget………………………………………….. 16 Délibération du conseil n°2009-0570 du 8 juillet 2009 – TCSP Saint-Denis- Garges-Sarcelles : convention de financement tranche 3………………………………… 99 Délibération du conseil n°2009-0571 du 8 juillet 2009 – Prolongement du T1 de
    [Show full text]
  • Opening Your Horizons
    VINCI RAILWAYS – 2018 ATLAS HORIZONS OPENING YOUR ATLAS Contents Editorial 1 The year at a glance 2 Interview with the CEO 4 An integrated operator model 6 Tours- 8 Bordeaux Operating the line 10 A large-scale commitment 16 Ensuring traffic safety 22 Looking to the future 28 34 Lyon Rhônexpress reaches the 10 million passenger milestone 36 Innovating to enhance the passenger experience 42 Mainland 48 France Managing and maintaining railway telecommunications 50 56 Martinique Caraibus, daily transport 58 Editorial VINCI Railways played a major role in French rail transport in 2018, enabling business and leisure passengers alike to travel at high speed between Tours and Bordeaux and reach Lyon’s airport from its city centre in record time and the utmost comfort. VINCI Railways currently operates across France; through the SYNERAIL subsidiary, it manages the GSM-Rail telecommunications system on the high-speed and regional express rail networks, covering a total of 16,000 km of track across the country. VINCI Railways also maintains reserved lane public transport on a daily basis in Martinique. Everywhere, we commit to meticulously and sustainably managing public infrastructure and participating in the development of the regions where we operate. Read on to find out more about our projects. 1 The year at a glance For VINCI Railways, 2018 was a year of consolidation – including that of the South Europe Atlantic High-Speed Line (SEA HSL) between Tours and Bordeaux, whose commercial success enabled us to finalise one of the largest refinancing operations in Europe. The entire 16,000-km GSM-Rail network, managed by SYNERAIL, is operational and, in Martinique, passengers have started using the island’s first bus rapid transit (BRT) system.
    [Show full text]
  • New Signage System for Improving Pedestrian Flow on Single-Exit Metro Stations: Focus on Paris Metro Line 4 Historical Stations Matteo Porrino, Stefano Dal Pont
    New Signage System for Improving Pedestrian Flow on Single-Exit Metro Stations: Focus on Paris Metro Line 4 Historical Stations Matteo Porrino, Stefano Dal Pont To cite this version: Matteo Porrino, Stefano Dal Pont. New Signage System for Improving Pedestrian Flow on Single-Exit Metro Stations: Focus on Paris Metro Line 4 Historical Stations. International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development, 2018, 14. hal-01945816 HAL Id: hal-01945816 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01945816 Submitted on 31 Jan 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. International Journal Of Engineering Research And Development e- ISSN: 2278-067X, p-ISSN: 2278-800X, www.ijerd.com Volume 14, Issue 7 (July Ver. I 2018), PP.06-17 New Signage System For Improving Pedestrian Flow On Single- Exit Metro Stations:Focus On Paris Metro Line 4 Historical Stations Matteo Porrino, Meng, Phd, Stefano Dal Pont, Prof., Phd, Associate Professor, ENSA Paris-Malaquais, Université Paris-Est, Paris Professor, Université Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble Corresponding Author- Stefano Dal Pont, Prof., Phd ABSTRACT; For a number of years now, the use of the Metro is steadily augmenting, making it more and more difficult to ensure traffic regularity (due to a variety of technical problems, increases in exiting/boarding time and passenger accidents), which determines a loss in the system‟s energy efficiency and the increase of traction current expenses.
    [Show full text]
  • French Light Rail
    NEW FRENCH LIGHT RAIL SYSTEMS IN THE TWENTYFIRST CENTURY (Twentyone tramways, five tram-trains, five rubber-tyred tramways and one metro) -------------- by Graham Jellett Light Rail Transit Association Website: www.lrta.org Email: graham at jellett.plus.com Mobile: 07758087389 NEW TRAMWAYS, TRAM-TRAINS and METRO IN FRANCE from 2000 to 2017 Inner Urban Opening Inner Urban Opening Conurbation Population Year Conurbation Population Year STEEL WHEEL TRAMWAYS TRAM-TRAINS 1. Montpellier 264,538 2000 1. Paris T4 2,243,833 2006 2. Orléans 114,185 2000 2. Lyon 491,268 2010 3. Lyon 491,268 2000 3. Mulhouse 110,351 2010 4. Bordeaux 239,399 2003 4. Nantes 287,845 2011 5. Mulhouse 110,351 2006 5. Paris T11 2,243,833 2017 6. Valenciennes 43,471 2006 RUBBER-TYRED “TRAMWAYS” 7. Paris T3 2,243,833 2006 8. Marseille 850,636 2007 1. Nancy * 105,382 2001 9. Le Mans 143,240 2007 2. Caen * 108,793 2002 10. Nice 344,064 2007 3. Clermont- 140,597 2006 11. Toulouse 447,340 2010 Ferrand 12. Reims 180,752 2011 4. Paris T5 2,243,833 2013 13. Angers 148,803 2011 5. Paris T6 2,243,833 2014 14. Brest 140,547 2012 METRO 15. Dijon 151,504 2012 1. Rennes 208,033 2002 16. Le Havre 174,156 2012 (driverless) 17. Tours 134,633 2013 18. Paris T7 2,243,833 2013 Tramways, tram-trains and metros 19. Besançon 115,879 2014 are all electrically powered 20. Aubagne 45,800 2014 * Nancy and Caen trams also have 21.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Guidance: Detailed Coverage for Supported Transit Systems
    Urban Guidance: Detailed coverage for supported transit systems Andorra .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Argentina ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Australia ................................................................................................................................................. 5 Austria .................................................................................................................................................... 7 Belgium .................................................................................................................................................. 8 Brazil ...................................................................................................................................................... 9 Canada ................................................................................................................................................ 10 Chile ..................................................................................................................................................... 11 Colombia .............................................................................................................................................. 12 Croatia .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Paris & Île- De-France Region
    TECHNICAL NOTE NO. 8 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TRANSPORT POLICY PROCESSES PARIS & ÎLE- DE-FRANCE REGION CREATE PROJECT Congestion Reduction in Europe, Advancing Transport Efficiency TECHNICAL NOTE PREPARED BY: Charlotte Halpern & Caterina Orlandi Sciences Po, Centre d’études européennes et de politique comparée (CEE), CNRS, Paris, France CREATE has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 636573 Comparative Analysis of Transport Policy Processes - Paris & Île-de-France Region 1 // 5 THE CREATE PROJECT IN BRIEF Transport and mobility issues have increased in relevance on political agendas in parallel with the growing share of EU population living in cities, urban sprawl and climate change. In view of the negative effects of car use, there is a renewed interest about the role that transport should play in the sustainable city. The CREATE project explores the Transport Policy Evolution Cycle. This model is a useful starting point for understanding how this evolution took place, and the lessons that we can learn for the future. Within the CREATE project, the study coordinated by the Sciences Po, CEE team (WP4) explores the historical evolution of transport policies and processes – from ‘car-oriented’ to ‘planning for city life’ – in five European cities (Berlin, Copenhagen, London, Paris, Vienna). Paying attention to case-specific contextual factors, policy instruments and programmes and involved stakeholders, this comparative analysis unveils the processes and the main drivers for change. This technical note concerns Paris and the Ile-de-France Region. DID YOU KNOW? PARIS ÎLE-DE-FRANCE TRANSPORT OFFER IS: SUMMARY FINDINGS ROADS 40.771 km, of which 1.314 km of motorways When considering transport policy developments in both Paris and the Île-de-France region since the 1960s, competition emerges as the main driver for change: PUBLIC TRANSPORT competition between levels of government, between political parties, between transport companies and between social and economic groups.
    [Show full text]
  • A Saint-Ouen !
    LA LIGNE 14 (ENFIN) A SAINT-OUEN ! Le 14 décembre a été ouvert au public le prolongement de la ligne 14 du métro parisien entre Saint-Lazare et la Mairie de Saint-Ouen, sur un tracé de 5,8 km. Cette nouvelle section, tant attendue (elle devait ouvrir initialement en 2017), comporte quatre nouvelles stations (cf schéma). Outre la desserte de nouveaux quartiers du 17e arrondissement de Paris, de Clichy et St-Ouen (96 000 habitants et 72 000 emplois sont concernés), sa mission principale est de désaturer les sections Nord de la ligne 13 dont elle recoupe les deux branches. Il est à noter qu'une possibilité de correspondance entre deux lignes de métro est réalisée pour la première fois en banlieue1. (Source : dossier de presse Île-de-France Mobilités) Un peu d'histoire Décidée par le gouvernement de Michel Rocard en octobre 1989, la ligne la plus récente du métro parisien a été conçue sur un tracé général Sud-Est – Nord-Ouest sous le nom de baptême « METEOR » pour METro Est-Ouest Rapide. Elle devait relier le 13e arrondissement, notamment le nouveau quartier « Seine Rive Gauche » bâti autour de la Bibliothèque François Mitterrand, à la gare St-Lazare. Le tracé retenu devait desservir Bercy (palais omnisports et ministère de l'Économie et des Finances), la gare de Lyon, le Châtelet, le quartier de l'Opéra (Pyramides) et la Madeleine. Sa justification résidait aussi et surtout dans le délestage de la ligne A du RER sur son tronçon central parisien entre « Gare de Lyon » et « Auber » en voie de saturation, d'où un tracé quasi parallèle sur cette section.
    [Show full text]
  • FRENCH TRAMWAY REVIVAL Key Factors of Success
    FRENCH TRAMWAY REVIVAL Key factors of success APTA-TRB 12th National Light Rail Conference Salt Lake City November 2012 Christian Buisson Consultant France is worldwide the country where tramway/LRT revival is the most striking ...but also a pioneer in tram-scrapping in the 1930s-1950s: PARIS tramways totally withdrawn as early as 1938... In the 1970s,only 3 short remains in Lille-Roubaix- Tourcoing,Marseille,Saint- Etienne. To-day,21 systems (including the 3 modernized survivors) are in operation. Since 1985, 18 new systems opened (one more -Le Havre- on 12.12.12) 1985: Nantes 1987: Grenoble 1992: Paris 1994: Strasbourg,Rouen 2000: Montpellier,Orléans 2001: Lyon 2003: Bordeaux 2006:Mulhouse,Valenciennes 2007: Le Mans, Nice 2010: Angers, Toulouse 2011: Reims 2012:Brest,Dijon,(Le Havre) Plus 2 Interurbans (« Tram-Trains ») in MULHOUSE and LYON and 2 incursions in France of neighbouring system (SAARBRÜCKEN and BASEL) And this trend goes on.... 2 new systems under construction: Tours (opening 2013),Besançon (2014). 3 new systems approved: Avignon,Aubagne,Nîmes. Extensions on French territory of neighbouring Swiss systems (Geneva,Basel). Many extensions of existing systems (Lyon,Paris,Bordeaux,etc..) From large urban areas to middle-sized ones In the 1980s-1990s,tramways/LRT were considered for areas in the range of 500 000 pop. (Nantes,Strasbourg,etc..) or as a feeder to heavy rail in major cities (Paris,Lyon,Marseille). In 2000, Orléans was the first middle-sized area (250 000 pop.) to get a new tramway. Since,then,most French cities in this range have built or are planning new tramways (even Aubagne,100 000 pop.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimalization MRT System
    Danny Tandela Advisor : Prof. Kamal Serrhini 1 ` Paris Metropolitan is the major transport systems that serving millions of commuters everyday in metropolitan areas. ` The networks are a high frequency service established mainly in underground tunnels or on elevated tracks separated from other traffic. 2 ` One of the major problem in the subway system is the operational cost that cause by the energy consumption need to be reduce. ` The reducing of energy consumption also lead to the “green transportation” and stakeholders (major of the city) could use the budget for the transportation to another field like education, rural area development, etc. 3 With the proposed approach : ` To know the performance and the amount of the energy that could be reduced ` To know the performance and the travelling time that could be reduced 4 ` Literature Review ` Collecting Data ` Assumption ` Implementation and Analysis ` Limitation and Perspective 5 validation Research Logical Diagram 6 Station Train I Passenger Station II • Train • Station • User/ Passenger • Railway 7 Exit Gate Train Entrance Gate Automatic Ticket Manual Ticket Machine Operator Passengers 8 validation Research Logical Diagram 9 10 11 Ligne Number of stations Length (km) Average interstation (m) 1 25 16,6 692 2 25 12,3 513 3 25 11,7 488 3 bis 4 1,3 433 4 26 10,6 424 5 22 14,6 695 6 28 13,6 504 7 38 22,4 605 7 bis 8 3,1 443 8 37 22,1 614 9 37 19,6 544 10 23 11,7 532 11 13 6,3 525 12 28 13,9 515 13 32 24,3 776 14 9 9 1129 Wikipedia, 2012 12 Types of Number of mass Power Power Acceleration
    [Show full text]
  • INTER'modal Vers Une Meilleure Maîtrise De L'exposition Individuelle
    RAPPORT D’ÉTUDE 03/12/2009 N° DRC-09-104243-11651A INTER’MODAL Vers une meilleure maîtrise de l’exposition individuelle par inhalation des populations à la pollution atmosphérique lors de leurs déplacements urbains INTER’MODAL Vers une meilleure maîtrise de l’exposition individuelle par inhalation des populations à la pollution atmosphérique lors de leurs déplacements urbains Ministère de l’Ecologie, de l’Energie, du Développement Durable et de la Mer (MEEDDM) Bureau de l'Air & Bureau de la prospective et de l'évaluation des données Grande Arche de la Défense - Paris Nord 92055 PARIS LA DEFENSE CEDEX Liste des personnes ayant participé à l’étude : S.Fable, I.Fraboulet, F.Godefroy, G.Jantolek, J.Queron, B.Triart. DRC-09-104243-11651A - 1 / 119 - PRÉAMBULE Le présent rapport a été établi sur la base des informations fournies à l'INERIS, des données (scientifiques ou techniques) disponibles et objectives et de la réglementation en vigueur. La responsabilité de l'INERIS ne pourra être engagée si les informations qui lui ont été communiquées sont incomplètes ou erronées. Les avis, recommandations, préconisations ou équivalent qui seraient portés par l'INERIS dans le cadre des prestations qui lui sont confiées, peuvent aider à la prise de décision. Etant donné la mission qui incombe à l'INERIS de par son décret de création, l'INERIS n'intervient pas dans la prise de décision proprement dite. La responsabilité de l'INERIS ne peut donc se substituer à celle du décideur. Le destinataire utilisera les résultats inclus dans le présent rapport intégralement ou sinon de manière objective.
    [Show full text]