Syracuse University SURFACE
School of Architecture Dissertations and Architecture Senior Theses Theses
Spring 2017
Metabolism for Cyborgs
Christopher Bressler
Colin Hoover
Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/architecture_theses
Part of the Architecture Commons
Recommended Citation Bressler, Christopher and Hoover, Colin, "Metabolism for Cyborgs" (2017). Architecture Senior Theses. 390. https://surface.syr.edu/architecture_theses/390
This Thesis, Senior is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Architecture Dissertations and Theses at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Architecture Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. thesis METABOLISM FOR CYBORGS
by Christopher Bressler & Colin Hoover
Advised by Amber Bartosh with Brian Lonsway & Ivan Bernal
Submitted May 9, 2017 Syracuse University School of Architecture 02 CONTENTS pg # chapters
05. 01 _overview 07. 02 _preliminary research image test | 1 image test | 2.1 image test | 2.2 image test | 3.1/3.2 image test | 4.1 image test | 4.2 image test | 5.1 image test | 7.1 image test | 7.2 image test | 8.1 031. 03 _image + city permutations 037. 04 _final permutation 051. 05 _final exhibition 055. 06 _appendix 059. 07 _bibliography
_note // due to the formatting of this book, animations and videos, which were heavely involved in the production and final presentation of this project, were not included. please refer to appendix on how to view said information. thank you.
03 04 01
overview
The networked device is becoming an integral part rooms, and a web of structure and services of the ways in which human beings interface with arises. The result is an edifice inscrutable to their environment. This project seeks to explore the few humans that remain - hundreds of rooms the architectural implications of this trend as suspended on top of one another. However, to the it reaches its logical conclusion in the cyborg cyborg, who is able to cull and sort through mind. Access to information concerning specific complex information, the web is a small town, geographic and architectural locations is already only a handful of virtual spaces occupying a tool used in the creation of communities and hundreds of physical instances. defining spatial boundaries. The ability to do so relies on the interconnected layers of virtual Although Brain-computer interfaces may be an and physical objects. This relationship is inevitable part of our future, we do not mean to described in Benjamin Bratton’s “The Stack” which present this project as an inevitable outcome. labels the mass of connected devices and users Rather, we hope to join a growing circle of as an “accidental megastructure.” Currently, architects exploring the possible manifestations our interactions with this megastructure are of overlays of physical and virtual space. mediated through external interfaces. However, Through a mix of conventional representation it seems inevitable that through augmentation, techniques and augmented overlays we hope to humans will adopt abilities that allow them to simulate the experiences of both human and interact directly with both physical and virtual cybernetic users, ultimately demonstrating spaces. As the cyborg becomes more prevalent, the necessity of new kinds and possibility architects will have to address structures that for architectural and urban organizations for can interface directly with the cyborg mind. cyborgs.
Our investigation utilizes the city as a test abstract site for an iterative series of prototype communities. Divided into four phases, beginning in the present day, and ending in an urban megastructure that is fundamentally designed around the cyborg. In each iteration of cyborg gentrification increasingly claims real estate, first virtually, then physically. Once claimed, spatial instances are copied and pasted into empty areas of the existing city. Corresponding infrastructure arises to support these duplicate
05 06 02
preliminary research
PROCESS: This project developed through a series of tests. Each week we developed a new image of the project as though it was the final product. Each iteration was analyzed and critiqued leading to the development of the next. In this way, even the drawings from the final thesis exhibtion would indicate successive iterations to come. This establishes the work as an ongoing project and in no means final.
07 image test | 1
TEST REPORT:
Test 1 – Image production methods.
Created in Photoshop, this is collaged from images of metabolist projects and the San Fransisco airport. The collage portion of the image was not laid out by hand, rather, a sections of buildings were placed in the background and the Photoshop content aware tool was used to successively build up the image. Thus, we end up with an incomprehensible image that still implies some kind of organization from the content aware algorithm.
08 09 image test | 2.1
TEST REPORT:
Test 2.1 – Graphic [re] organization.
This is a map of the United States that does not rely on either geographic adjacency or state shapes. Without those constraints, different information can be communicated. The states are each given new identities as polygons, and then filtered through a series of sorting mechanisms to reorganize the “map.” Here, area of a sate corresponds to its real world perimeter, while the number of points on a polygon correspond to real world area. Neither of these pieces of information can be communicated accurately on a projected map. Vertices are counted, color sorted by geographic coordinates, and displayed on the edge of the state. States are color coded by region, and a hatch pattern laid on top displaying population, with a greater population corresponding to a larger hatch scale (bigger dots.) States are packed into three containers not seen here, based on one person’s subjective ranking of the “quality” of states. Reading from the right to the left group, states fit into “worse” categories. This packing was performed by a nesting algorithm, not an intentional organization of objects.
After attempting this exercise, we begin to understand that an overly large amount of abstraction can lead to the lose of intention – by all accounts, this is no longer a map. The question is raised as to whether having geographic information embedded in a graphic constitutes a map, or whether specific relational information is required.
010 5 4 2 1 5 2 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 6 3 6 4 3 3 13 12 7 6 8 4 7 2 1 1 14 5 9 3 4 3 7 2 15 4 10 2 8 5 3 078 2 16 3 1 6 2 New Jeresey 1 4 09 0517 2 11 1 9 9 New Hampshire Delaware18 1 190 7 1 4 200 19 420 12 250 8 7 6 Maine 6 Alabama 5 3 Michigan 9 5 10 18 5 10 19 6 8 4 20 Missouri 41 13 24 10 4 8 170 8 7 5 4 1 21 40 11 311 17 Penn 11 189 63 7 22 39 14 2312 2 9 16 23 15 22 12 16 8 7 12 1710 2 04 38 13 1 13 15 10 9 6 13 Rhode2 Island24 37 16 21 14 14 10 15 11 5 4 14 15 16 11 1 25 36 17 18 19 20 300 12 11 10 9 8 7 12 5 4 2627 35 8 7 6 15 Tennessee 1413 6 11 14 3 12 260 3 3 28 3334 9 5 4 29 15 5 12 13 13 2 Arkansas 6 292 3031 32 10 16 4 14 13 25 12 11 10 11 3 28 16 3 1 7 1 151413 9 8 172 27 17 2 15 330 14 24 16 7 12 18 18 16 8 17 6 13 1 19 26 19 1 Missisippi 32 15 23 180 18 5 20 25 410 17 6 5 16 22 19 4 14 290 21 22 23 24 20 31 7 4 17 21 9 West Virginai 20 3 Washington 8 7 6 5 21 Oregon 40 18 30 3 18 19 20 1721 2 15 28 9 4 39 19 8 2 22 1 10 22 38 14 13 12 11 29 10 16 16 27 323 16 15 10 9 20 289 1 23 500 26 11 224 3717 8 21 22 27 11 15 24 49 17 12 25 3618 7 23 24 25 26 10 220 25 Florida 48 18 25 1 26 3519 6 6 5 4 12 13 14 19 24 13 27 3334 5 7 3 11 Georgia 12 11 10 9 8 7 26 47 20 21 22 23 280 2829303132 20 8 21 1312 11 10 9 8 1413 6 27 46 13 12 11 14 New York 21 4 2 1514 7 15 528 45 1514 10 9 27 3 9 12 2016 6 5 16 429 44 1716 8 7 15 22 1 17 4 17 330 43 18 6 26 23 2 10 13 1918 18 231 42 19 516 25 1 230 14 18 19 3 1 32 41 20 417 24 11 15 16 17 2 19 333435 383940 21 18 24 25 520 Illinois 22 20 1 20 430 3637 22 3 19 22 23 12 21 460 21 Arizona 42 2 20 21 26 Texas 51 21 22 45 41 23 1 50 13 23 New Mexico 22 24 510 27 20 44 23 40 4 3 25 28 49 14 24 43 24 39 5 2 California 50 15 19 25 42 25 38 26 49 29 48 16 17 18 13 12 11 10 26 41 26 376 1 27 30 47 4 3 1514 9 827 40 27 36 28 48 46 2 16 7286 39 28 3435 7 47 15 14 13 12 11 31 5 17 295 38 2930313233 160 29 46 16 10 32 45 1 18 304 31 3637 10 9 8 7 30 45 9 33 44 19 32333435 4 3 12 11 6 5 8 Ohio 31 44 17 834 43 6 20 3 5 2 13 4 15 32 43 18 357 36 41 42 14021 2 14 3 3334 4142 37 38 39 40 7 Maryland 22 1 6 1 92 35936837383940 19 6 490 15 14 11 10 7 6 20 2313 16 1 10 12 5 5 8 24 Montana 487 150 370 11 13 13 4 25 47 Indiana 17 12 14 3 21 4 12 46 18 Nebraska 36 2 9 11 26 458 14 19 35 9 8 7 6 15 22 3 3 102 27 10 5 4 16 1 28 44 20 3411 350 23 1 29 43 9 13 21 33 3 17 2 4 30 42 10 9 8 22 3212 2 18 Louisiana 34 2 31 404112 11 710 11 12 23 3113 24 100 321 33 3839 13 6 5 24 30 1 19 33 1 Massachusetts5 3 34353637 14 4 2526272829 14 310 20 3225 15 3 7 6 5 4 21 31 530 9 08 16 2 8 3 15 Utah 30 22 30 6 4 Vermont 17 16 29 23 29 26 Alaska 52 8 18 1 9 2 2425 262728 76 5 4 19 400 10 171 28 13 12 11 10 27 7 35 7 Virginia 39 18 27 1514 9 8 51 2 20 38 11 240 19 26 16 7 6 8 6 21 20 25 17 5 28 50 1 22 37 12 North Dakota 23 21 22 23 24 18 4 9 10 9 8 7 623 36 19 329 49 210 12 11 524 35 13 22 20 2 10 13 254 34 21 1 30 Iowa 263 3233 14 21 22 48 11 2014 22728293031 15 20 23 470 31 15 16 19 Minnesota 46 47 1619 1 3 17 18 24 45 32 12 360 2 25 46 13 1817 4 26 44 33 17 Wyoming 35 1 27 43 10 9 45 14 15 16 18 4212 11 8 7 34 44 1312 11 10 9 8 19 34 5 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 28 4113 6 5 14 7 33 10 9 8 7 120 14 6 2930 4014 435 43 15 6205 3212 11 6 15 5 31 383915 36 37 42 16 214 13 5 6South Carolina 16 4 323334353637 16 3 38 39 40 41 17 223 1431 4 17 3 3 2 2 3 18 23 293015 3 1118 2 17 1 4 2 19 2 2425262728 2 19 4 18 20 1 16 1 7 1 119 390 5 1 21 450 17 10 20 440 Colorado 38 44 18 380 8 9 21 43 5 20 22 Oklahoma Kansas 37 2 1 22 Nevada 42 21110 37 6 130 23 43 19 Wisconsin 22 36 Hawaii 24 42 20 36 23 41 23 35 25 41 21 35 60 24 40 6 24 34 7 12 26 40 34 Connecticut3 25 39 10 25 33 27 39 22 33 26 38 26 3132 28 38 23 32 27 37 7 27282930 8 11 29 37 24 31 5 2829 3536 8 9 9 10 30313233343536 252627282930 4 3031323334
_note // refer to appendix for supplemental videos & animation overlays.
011 image test | 2.2
TEST REPORT:
Test 2.2 – Textual [re] organization.
Original text: Carl Andre explored the reorganization of text in a series of poams in which color and graphic organization re contextualize the text. “What has planetary-scale computation done to our geopolitical realities? It takes different forms at Taking text from Benjamin Bratton’s The Stack and different scales—from energy and mineral sourcing and Zhongjie Lin’s Kenzo Tange and the Metabolist subterranean cloud infrastructure to urban software and Movement, each word is analyzed through their massive universal addressing systems; from interfaces frequency of use in relation to the two drawn by the augmentation of the hand and eye to users texts, as well as, their relationship to how identified by self—quantification and the arrival of frequently they are used in the English language legions of sensors, algorithms, and robots. Together, how (specifically between the years of 1999-2000). do these distort and deform modern political geographies The words are first sorted into categories of and produce new territories in their own image?” high, medium, and low usages between the texts, and then these categories are filtered through a similar process but using frequency in language as the sorting element. This process reveals a hierarchy in which words that are frequently used between the two texts, yet not frequently used in the English language, hold more value than words which are used commonly between the texts and the English language. The overlaying line reestablishes the order for how it should be read. By doing so, we free text from a sequential order, which results in a text that is simultaneously legible (when guided by the line), while also providing a kinds of relationship between this text and another. There is no need for any graphic organization which does not contribute alternate sets of information.
012 megastructure scales architecture. Together coherent ings planetary-scale computation cities urban modern forms infrastructure forming massive geopolitical realities? takes mineral systems; whole: political called universal eye identied produce sourcing subterranean cloud dierent dierent dierent both image? energy done seen hand us. software addressing interfaces many new new What these these own own how our do We can of drawn augmentation users so It it has but their their an at self—quantication arrival legions from from are by by be not on as sensors algorithms robots. distort as that that is is a a a in In to to to deform geographies territories and and and and and and and and Stack Benjamin Bratton proposes and and of of of of of the the the genres computation smart grids e the e e cloud platforms mobile apps smart Internet automation species evolving accidental Stack computational apparatus governing inside Stack inside megastructure scales architecture. Together coherent ings planetary-scale computation cities urban modern forms infrastructure forming massive geopolitical realities? takes mineral systems; whole: political called universal eye identied produce sourcing subterranean cloud dierent dierent dierent both image? energy done seen hand us. software addressing interfaces many new new What these these own own how our do We can of drawn augmentation users so It it has but their their an at self—quantication arrival legions from from are by by be not on as sensors algorithms robots. distort as that that is is a a a in In to to to deform geographies territories and and and and and and and and Stack Benjamin Bratton proposes and and of of of of of the the the genres computation smart grids e the e e cloud platforms mobile apps smart Internet automation species evolving accidental Stack computational apparatus governing inside Stack inside
_note // refer to appendix for supplemental videos & animation overlays.
013 image test | 3.1/3.2
TEST REPORT:
Test 3.1/3.2 – Room sorting_ objects + bins.
We are treating Slocum Hall as a container of rooms. Each of these rooms is sorted into one of five groups. Each group has the same number of rooms of a given program (studio, classroom, etc) but not necessarily the same square footage. Each of these groups represents the facilities necessary for a separate group of students. Slocum hall is then turned into three separate containers (or bins). Starting with group A, a packing algorithm in grasshopper moves the rooms into these bins in the most efficient pattern. It is important to note that the algorithm does not pay attention to the original orientation – rooms are packed on side or on end. Further, the algorithm optimized for each group, rather than the building overall. These rooms are then transformed again into building- either subtracted from the mass as in the first image, or supported in place as in the last. In either case, the issue of circulation is present. In the present Slocum hall organization is built around circulation, without it, a new retrieval or organization method is needed.
014 SL CUM HALL
rm. 0 306A 11 204B rm 306C . 0 308F 13 324F
308C 308E 0 308B
009 rm. 108 221 woo 409
r rm 212 m. d . 123 sh 4 195V op 120 211
0 210 14
1234 s1 r m C 108 . 8 r 013 0 m 0 326 0 . 12 099C 8 3 3 B . 306 m 1234
r 401
rm. 108 A 4F 2 3 sp . r m ay r b 123 306D oo 324E th 326E
324A 226A rm. 226C 114 308D
E 8 0 3 . rm 4B 021 422 20 s1 rm. . 121 1 104 122 rm 110A E 310A
114 110 4 310 rm 2 D . . 3 8 101 6 022 22 rm 0 . . 3 r rm m 301 m. 1 r wood 26 C 011 6 012 22 202 m. r A C 6 104 0 6 0 214 r . 3 3 m . . m B 1 r m 0 r 8 4 . 202 r rm. 21 rm m. 102
224 26A 2 224 414 rm. rm.
126
226B
6B 225A rm. 22 206A
007
411
008B 024A . 225A 410 rm rm. 206A
220 306B C 018
017A rm. 207 207 196V
112 017
201B
209 rm. 201B
s rm. 226 226D rm. 201A 226 201A rm 307
2 . 102 206 D 6 101 0 3 . rm C 6B 1 r 30 0 m. . 07 r 3 206 m . 3 m . B r rm . 1 rm 24 rm F . 2 424 8 25
0 314 3 r . m rm rm. m . . 2 r 2 20 06C 08 7A ca
124
rm. 308A
019B 2 019
019A 04A 095S
003
321 rm 206B . 322 2 219 109 0 326B 4 206C
A 003A
4 207A 2 326C 3 6E 308A . 324D m 2 B rm. r 3 8 225 . 0 m 3 r . . 314 m rm 326C r rm. 324D rm. 6B 204 rm. 32 308G 308 6 rm. 308
0 014 3 . 324H
m 324 r rm. 324 304
206D
4 206 4 rm. 30 1 4 . rm B rm. 24 324G . 4 rm
rm. 002 rm. rm 32 222 32 . 4 010A 6D 326 B 420 A 010