DOCSLIB.ORG

The Consequences of Life Without Sex an Examination Into Taxonomy and Evolution of the Anciently Asexual Bdelloid Rotifers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The Consequences of Life without Sex An Examination into Taxonomy and Evolution of the Anciently Asexual Bdelloid Rotifers Cuong Quoc Tang A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy from the Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London July 2014 59 The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives licence. Researchers are free to copy, distribute or transmit the thesis on the condition that they attribute it, that they do not use it for commercial purposes and that they do not alter, transform or build upon it. For any reuse or distribution, researchers must make clear to others the licence terms of this work. 59 Abstract The anciently asexual bdelloid rotifers are a ubiquitous and ecologically important group coined “evolutionary scandals” owing to their diversification and persistence over evolutionary time despite the pressures of obligate parthenogenesis. Understanding the biodiversity of rotifers, in the context of reproductive mode, will aid in the understanding of how differences in sex and ecology drive biodiversity patterns. Given that resolved taxonomy is a prerequisite to investigating larger scale macroevolutionary patterns, and that rotifer taxonomy is confounded by morphostasis, cryptic diversity, and a dearth of expert taxonomists, this thesis first deals with the use of DNA taxonomy as a tool to alleviate the taxonomic crisis so prevalent in the group. Results from multiple meta-analyses exploring the effects of choice in gene, phylogenetic reconstruction methods, and species delimitation metrics, provide better guidelines for DNA taxonomy. The analyses suggest that coalescent-based DNA taxonomy using the Generalised Mixed Yule Coalescent model in conjunction with the cytochrome oxidase 1 subunit c gene analysed in a Bayesian inference phylogenetic framework using BEAST, provides realistic and tangible species clusters (evolutionarily significant units; ESU) in both asexual and sexual organisms. Using these ESUs, the efficacy of DNA barcoding for identifying rotifer species is examined. These analyses suggest that the sexual monogonont rotifers are more readily identifiable than the asexual bdelloid rotifers. Explicit comparison of genetic discreteness of asexual and sexual rotifers indicates that sexual rotifers are separated by larger genetic and phylogenetic gaps than asexual rotifers and thus are more discrete. Combined, these analyses indicate that sex, specifically reproductive isolation, is the predominant factor in explaining why species form discrete clusters rather than a continuum of forms. Finally, a dated multilocus molecular phylogeny of Bdelloidea is reconstructed. The phylogeny suggests that bdelloid rotifers have persisted for at least 40 million years, but that bdelloid higher taxa are typically polyphyletic. 3 Acknowledgements I would like to thank Diego and Tim for their support all the way through the PhD. From you I’ve learnt what it is to be a scientist, and your example is an inspiration and something I want to emulate. Of all of the candidates, I’m glad you picked me. I hope that through all this work I’ve been a valuable addition to your groups. Thanks for never saying no, irrespective of how odd things sounded. Everything I’ve done for this PhD is down to you both. Years in the Barralab and the ever expanding BLAB family have been a huge privilege. Thanks for all of the help and for being such a pleasure to work alongside. Your support has been a massive pick me up. In particular, Aelys Humphreys, Isobel Eyres, and Chris Wilson for their discussions on all things evolutionary and bdelloid, and Alejandra, Diane, Francesca, Chris, Matt, Shorok, Damian, Drew, and Laura, for making, sometimes, gruelling days much more enjoyable. Life at Silwood wouldn’t have been the same had it not been for the friends that I’ve been fortunate enough to make on the way, you are too numerous to name, but you know who you are. Thanks to nearly all of my housemates over the years, especially Shorok who has been looking after me and feeding me for the last few months. You’ve all given me respite from work and stopped me going really peculiar towards the end. Yet all of this wouldn’t have been possible without the support of my family. I dedicate this thesis to them. Your enthusiasm and pride for my academic career is only matched by the bemused expressions you have when I try to explain what it is I do. Cảm ơn bố và mẹ. To Elle, you make me a happier person. Always. And to Charlie, who would have been a better academic than me. 4 This thesis was funded by a NERC studentship. Declaration of originality I hereby declare that this thesis includes some work that has been the result of joint work. In all cases, the key ideas, primary contributions, experimental designs, data analysis, interpretation, and writing were performed by myself under the supervision of both Tim Barraclough and Diego Fontaneto, but specific chapters have been made possible by certain collaborators providing data. Chapter 2 has been published in a slightly modified form in: Tang CQ, Leasi F, Obertegger U, Kieneke A, Barraclough TG, Fontaneto D. (2012) The widely used small subunit 18S rDNA molecule greatly underestimates true diversity in biodiversity surveys of the meiofauna. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 16208–16212. Three of the 55 alignments used were generated by Francesca Leasi (Testudinella spp.), Ulrike Obertegger (Synchaeta spp.), and Alex Kieneke (Turbanella spp.). The rest of the datasets were generated either by myself, or collated by myself from GenBank. Chapter 3 is in press at Methods in Ecology and Evolution as: Tang, CQ, Humphreys, AM, Fontaneto, D, Barraclough, TG (2014) Effects of phylogenetic reconstruction method on the robustness of species delimitation using single‐locus data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. All of the data was either downloaded from GenBank or provided by Chris Meyer (cowries dataset). The analyses and the manuscript was performed and written principally by myself, with helpful comments from Aelys Humphries. Chapter 5 is in press at Evolution as: Tang, C. Q., Obertegger, U., Fontaneto, D., & Barraclough, T. G. (2014). Sexual species are separated by larger genetic gaps than asexual species in rotifers. Evolution, 68(10), 2901–2916. The data were mostly downloaded from GenBank, but additional targeted sequencing was obtained by Ulrike Obertegger. Other than these targeted sequences, all of the data collection and analyses were performed by myself. Chapter 6 uses samples collected by myself, Nataliia Iakovenko, Chris G. Wilson, Carl W. Birky Jr, and Diego Fontaneto. Nuclear primers were designed using transcriptomic alignments provided by Isobel Eyres and Tim Barraclough. All of the subsequent lab work and analyses were performed by myself. Permission to reprint chapters 2, 3, and 5 can be found at the back of the thesis (pp208-210). 5 Table of contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................................... 3 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................. 4 Declaration of originality ........................................................................................................................ 5 Table of contents ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Figures and tables ................................................................................................................................. 10 Data accessibility .................................................................................................................................. 14 Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................................ 15 Chapter 1: Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 17 Rotifera ....................................................................................................................................... 18 Defining asexual species ............................................................................................................. 19 Ancient asexuality ...................................................................................................................... 20 Bdelloid rotifers ..................................................................................................................... 20 Oribatid mites (Acari: Arthropoda) ....................................................................................... 21 Darwinulid ostracods (Ostracoda: Arthropoda)..................................................................... 21 Timema stick insects (Pterygota: Arthropoda) ...................................................................... 22 Root knot nematodes (Secernentea: Nematoda) .................................................................... 22 Taxonomy ................................................................................................................................... 22 Molecular techniques and their limitations: Issues with using one locus instead of many ... 24 DNA barcoding ....................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Comparative Functional Morphology of Attachment Devices in Arachnida

    Comparative Functional Morphology of Attachment Devices in Arachnida

    Comparative functional morphology of attachment devices in Arachnida Vergleichende Funktionsmorphologie der Haftstrukturen bei Spinnentieren (Arthropoda: Arachnida) DISSERTATION zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor rerum naturalium (Dr. rer. nat.) an der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel vorgelegt von Jonas Otto Wolff geboren am 20. September 1986 in Bergen auf Rügen Kiel, den 2. Juni 2015 Erster Gutachter: Prof. Stanislav N. Gorb _ Zweiter Gutachter: Dr. Dirk Brandis _ Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 17. Juli 2015 _ Zum Druck genehmigt: 17. Juli 2015 _ gez. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang J. Duschl, Dekan Acknowledgements I owe Prof. Stanislav Gorb a great debt of gratitude. He taught me all skills to get a researcher and gave me all freedom to follow my ideas. I am very thankful for the opportunity to work in an active, fruitful and friendly research environment, with an interdisciplinary team and excellent laboratory equipment. I like to express my gratitude to Esther Appel, Joachim Oesert and Dr. Jan Michels for their kind and enthusiastic support on microscopy techniques. I thank Dr. Thomas Kleinteich and Dr. Jana Willkommen for their guidance on the µCt. For the fruitful discussions and numerous information on physical questions I like to thank Dr. Lars Heepe. I thank Dr. Clemens Schaber for his collaboration and great ideas on how to measure the adhesive forces of the tiny glue droplets of harvestmen. I thank Angela Veenendaal and Bettina Sattler for their kind help on administration issues. Especially I thank my students Ingo Grawe, Fabienne Frost, Marina Wirth and André Karstedt for their commitment and input of ideas.
  • Number of Living Species in Australia and the World

    Number of Living Species in Australia and the World

    Numbers of Living Species in Australia and the World 2nd edition Arthur D. Chapman Australian Biodiversity Information Services australia’s nature Toowoomba, Australia there is more still to be discovered… Report for the Australian Biological Resources Study Canberra, Australia September 2009 CONTENTS Foreword 1 Insecta (insects) 23 Plants 43 Viruses 59 Arachnida Magnoliophyta (flowering plants) 43 Protoctista (mainly Introduction 2 (spiders, scorpions, etc) 26 Gymnosperms (Coniferophyta, Protozoa—others included Executive Summary 6 Pycnogonida (sea spiders) 28 Cycadophyta, Gnetophyta under fungi, algae, Myriapoda and Ginkgophyta) 45 Chromista, etc) 60 Detailed discussion by Group 12 (millipedes, centipedes) 29 Ferns and Allies 46 Chordates 13 Acknowledgements 63 Crustacea (crabs, lobsters, etc) 31 Bryophyta Mammalia (mammals) 13 Onychophora (velvet worms) 32 (mosses, liverworts, hornworts) 47 References 66 Aves (birds) 14 Hexapoda (proturans, springtails) 33 Plant Algae (including green Reptilia (reptiles) 15 Mollusca (molluscs, shellfish) 34 algae, red algae, glaucophytes) 49 Amphibia (frogs, etc) 16 Annelida (segmented worms) 35 Fungi 51 Pisces (fishes including Nematoda Fungi (excluding taxa Chondrichthyes and (nematodes, roundworms) 36 treated under Chromista Osteichthyes) 17 and Protoctista) 51 Acanthocephala Agnatha (hagfish, (thorny-headed worms) 37 Lichen-forming fungi 53 lampreys, slime eels) 18 Platyhelminthes (flat worms) 38 Others 54 Cephalochordata (lancelets) 19 Cnidaria (jellyfish, Prokaryota (Bacteria Tunicata or Urochordata sea anenomes, corals) 39 [Monera] of previous report) 54 (sea squirts, doliolids, salps) 20 Porifera (sponges) 40 Cyanophyta (Cyanobacteria) 55 Invertebrates 21 Other Invertebrates 41 Chromista (including some Hemichordata (hemichordates) 21 species previously included Echinodermata (starfish, under either algae or fungi) 56 sea cucumbers, etc) 22 FOREWORD In Australia and around the world, biodiversity is under huge Harnessing core science and knowledge bases, like and growing pressure.
  • Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve Management Plan 2011-2016

    Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve Management Plan 2011-2016

    Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve Management Plan 2011-2016 April 1981 Revised, May 1982 2nd revision, April 1983 3rd revision, December 1999 4th revision, May 2011 Prepared for U.S. Department of Commerce Ohio Department of Natural Resources National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Division of Wildlife Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management 2045 Morse Road, Bldg. G Estuarine Reserves Division Columbus, Ohio 1305 East West Highway 43229-6693 Silver Spring, MD 20910 This management plan has been developed in accordance with NOAA regulations, including all provisions for public involvement. It is consistent with the congressional intent of Section 315 of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended, and the provisions of the Ohio Coastal Management Program. OWC NERR Management Plan, 2011 - 2016 Acknowledgements This management plan was prepared by the staff and Advisory Council of the Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve (OWC NERR), in collaboration with the Ohio Department of Natural Resources-Division of Wildlife. Participants in the planning process included: Manager, Frank Lopez; Research Coordinator, Dr. David Klarer; Coastal Training Program Coordinator, Heather Elmer; Education Coordinator, Ann Keefe; Education Specialist Phoebe Van Zoest; and Office Assistant, Gloria Pasterak. Other Reserve staff including Dick Boyer and Marje Bernhardt contributed their expertise to numerous planning meetings. The Reserve is grateful for the input and recommendations provided by members of the Old Woman Creek NERR Advisory Council. The Reserve is appreciative of the review, guidance, and council of Division of Wildlife Executive Administrator Dave Scott and the mapping expertise of Keith Lott and the late Steve Barry.
  • Towards a Management Hierarchy (Classification) for the Catalogue of Life

    Towards a Management Hierarchy (Classification) for the Catalogue of Life

    TOWARDS A MANAGEMENT HIERARCHY (CLASSIFICATION) FOR THE CATALOGUE OF LIFE Draft Discussion Document Rationale The Catalogue of Life partnership, comprising Species 2000 and ITIS (Integrated Taxonomic Information System), has the goal of achieving a comprehensive catalogue of all known species on Earth by the year 2011. The actual number of described species (after correction for synonyms) is not presently known but estimates suggest about 1.8 million species. The collaborative teams behind the Catalogue of Life need an agreed standard classification for these 1.8 million species, i.e. a working hierarchy for management purposes. This discussion document is intended to highlight some of the issues that need clarifying in order to achieve this goal beyond what we presently have. Concerning Classification Life’s diversity is classified into a hierarchy of categories. The best-known of these is the Kingdom. When Carl Linnaeus introduced his new “system of nature” in the 1750s ― Systema Naturae per Regna tria naturae, secundum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species …) ― he recognised three kingdoms, viz Plantae, Animalia, and a third kingdom for minerals that has long since been abandoned. As is evident from the title of his work, he introduced lower-level taxonomic categories, each successively nested in the other, named Class, Order, Genus, and Species. The most useful and innovative aspect of his system (which gave rise to the scientific discipline of Systematics) was the use of the binominal, comprising genus and species, that uniquely identified each species of organism. Linnaeus’s system has proven to be robust for some 250 years. The starting point for botanical names is his Species Plantarum, published in 1753, and that for zoological names is the tenth edition of the Systema Naturae published in 1758.
  • More Than 40 Years of Excellence: the Outstanding Contribution of the South African Edward A

    More Than 40 Years of Excellence: the Outstanding Contribution of the South African Edward A

    Systematic & Applied Acarology 23(7): 1480–1493 (2018) ISSN 1362-1971 (print) http://doi.org/10.11158/saa.23.7.15 ISSN 2056-6069 (online) Biography More than 40 years of excellence: the outstanding contribution of the South African Edward A. Ueckermann to acarology P.D. THERON1 & G.J. DE MORAES2 1Research Unit for Environmental Sciences and Development; North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa 2Depto. Entomologia e Acarologia; Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz, Universidade de São Paulo; Piraci- caba, SP, Brazil Acarology has been a very active area of research in South Africa for many years, especially with reference to taxonomy. For this reason, mites of agricultural importance are well known in that country compared to many other countries. Edward A. Ueckermann is a South African acarologist who has contributed enormously to knowledge about the mites of his country, as well as from many other countries around the world. Eddie, as he is called by his friends, is an admirable man, both for his enviable professional qualities and for his tremendous personality. The authors of this brief biography are glad to have had the opportunity to collaborate with Eddie as authors of several publications51, 52, 58, 70, 75, 80, 87, 92, 95, 101,103, 104, 107, 112, 114, 117, 121, 143, 151, 160, 189, 203, 207, 211, and to interact with him in many other ways. Eddie was born in Postmasburg, Northern Cape Province, South Africa, on 19 January 1951. He completed secondary school in his hometown and after a year of compulsory military training, Eddie enrolled at North- West University, Potchefstroom, in 1971 to study a B.Sc.
  • Acari: Prostigmata: Cunaxidae

    Acari: Prostigmata: Cunaxidae

    360 North-Western Journal of Zoology 13(2) / 2017 Kaczmarek, Ł., Diduszko, D., Michalczyk, Ł. (2011): New records of small arthropods (Skvarla et al. 2014). Addition- Mexican Tardigrada. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 82: ally, some species can also feed on honeydew pro- 1324-1327. Kaczmarek, Ł., Jakubowska, N., Michalczyk, L. (2012): Current duced by their host plant (Walter & Proctor 1999). knowledge on Turkish Tardigrades with a description of The genus Cunaxa was defined by Von Hey- Milnesium beasleyi sp. nov. (Eutardigrada: Apochela: den in 1826 with type species Scirus setirostris Milnesiidae, the granulatum group). Zootaxa 3589: 49-64. Kaczmarek, Ł., Michalczyk, Ł., McInnes, S.J. (2014): Annotated Hermann 1804 (Von Heyden 1826). It is the largest zoogeography of non-marine Tardigrada. Part I: Central in sub-family Cunaxinae Oudemans with ap- America. Zootaxa 3763(1): 1-107. proximately 50 valid species (Sergeyenko 2009, Maucci, W. (1978): Tardigradi muscicoli della Turchia (terzo contributo). Bollettino Museo civico Storia naturale 5: 111-140. Skvarla et al. 2014). And can be separated from McInnes, S. (1994): Zoogeographic distribution of other Cunaxinae genera by the following charac- terrestrial/freshwater tardigrades from current literature. ters: dorsal shields not reticulated, prodorsal Journal of Natural History 28: 257-352. Michalczyk, Ł., Kaczmarek, Ł. (2003): A description of the new shield smooth or striated, five segmented pedi- tardigrade Macrobiotus reinhardti (Eutardigrada, Macrobiotidae, palps, elongate apophyses or spine-like setae on harmsworthi group) with some remarks on the oral cavity inner margin of telofemur, genu, tibiotarsus, setal armature within the genus Macrobiotus Schultze. Zootaxa 331: 1- 24. formula of coxae II-IV 1-3-2 and long, slender, at- Michalczyk, L., Kaczmarek, L., Weglarska, B.
  • The Biodiverse Rotifers (Rotifera: Eurotatoria)

    The Biodiverse Rotifers (Rotifera: Eurotatoria)

    Bonn zoological Bulletin 68 (1): 147–162 ISSN 2190–7307 2019 · Sharma B.K. & Sharma S. http://www.zoologicalbulletin.de https://doi.org/10.20363/BZB-2019.68.1.147 Research article urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D9308652-B9BF-4BBB-B573-F1C4B53E1AC5 The biodiverse rotifers (Rotifera: Eurotatoria) of Northeast India: faunal heterogeneity, biogeography, richness in diverse ecosystems and interesting species assemblages Bhushan Kumar Sharma1, * & Sumita Sharma2 1, 2 Department of Zoology, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong – 793 022, Meghalaya, India * Corresponding author: Email: [email protected] 1 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:FD069583-6E71-46D6-8F45-90A87F35BEFE 2 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:668E0FE0-C474-4D0D-9339-F01ADFD239D1 Abstract. The biodiverse Rotifera of northeast India (NEI) revealed 303 species belonging to 53 genera and 24 families; ~96% of these species examined from seven states of NEI affirm the rotifer heterogeneity of our plankton and semi-plank- ton collections. This study documents the record number of species of global and regional biogeographic interest, high- lights affinity with Southeast Asian and Australian faunas, and indicates notable heterogeneity in richness and composition amongst the seven northeastern states. The speciose rotifers of small lentic biotopes of Arunachal Pradesh, Mizoram, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur and Tripura, the floodplain lakes beels( ) and small wetlands (dobas and dubies) of the Brahmaputra and the Barak floodplains of Assam, and the floodplain lakes (pats) of Manipur are noteworthy. Deepor Beel and Loktak Lake (two Ramsar sites) are the globally rich rotifer `hotspots’. Interesting assemblages per sample of 80+ species in certain beels and pats, and up to 50 species in dobas and dubies depict the `Rotifera paradox’.
  • New Records of 13 Rotifers Including Bryceella Perpusilla Wilts Et Al., 2010 and Philodina Lepta Wulfert, 1951 from Korea

    New Records of 13 Rotifers Including Bryceella Perpusilla Wilts Et Al., 2010 and Philodina Lepta Wulfert, 1951 from Korea

    Journal26 of Species Research 6(Special Edition):26-37,JOURNAL 2017 OF SPECIES RESEARCH Vol. 6, Special Edition New records of 13 rotifers including Bryceella perpusilla Wilts et al., 2010 and Philodina lepta Wulfert, 1951 from Korea Min Ok Song* Department of Biology, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangwon-do 25457, Republic of Korea *Correspondent: [email protected], [email protected] Rotifers collected from various terrestrial and aquatic habitats such as mosses on trees or rocks, tree barks, wet mosses and wet leaf litter at streams, and dry leaf litter at four different locations in Korea, were investigated. Thirteen species belonging to nine genera in five families of monogonont and bdelloid rotifers were identified: Bryceella perpusilla Wilts, Martinez Arbizu and Ahlrichs, 2010, Collotheca ornata (Ehrenberg, 1830), Habrotrocha flava Bryce, 1915, H. pusilla (Bryce, 1893), Macrotrachela aculeata Milne, 1886, M. plicata (Bryce, 1892), Mniobia montium Murray, 1911, M. tentans Donner, 1949, Notommata cyrtopus Gosse, 1886, Philodina lepta Wulfert, 1951, P. tranquilla Wulfert, 1942, Pleuretra hystrix Bartoš, 1950 and Proalinopsis caudatus (Collins, 1873). All these rotifers are new to Korea, and B. perpusilla, H. flava, M. montium, P. caudatus, P. hystrix and P. lepta are new to Asia as well. Of interest, the present study is the first to record B. perpusilla outside its type locality. In addition, P. lepta has previously been recorded from only three European countries. Keywords: Korea, new records, rotifera, taxonomy, terrestrial habitats Ⓒ 2017 National Institute of Biological Resources DOI:10.12651/JSR.2017.6(S).037 INTRODUCTION (Donner, 1965). The present study is the first record of Philodina lepta outside Europe as well as the fourth A taxonomic study of rotifers collected from various overall.
  • Invertebrate Fauna of Korea of Fauna Invertebrate

    Invertebrate Fauna of Korea of Fauna Invertebrate

    Invertebrate Fauna of Korea Fauna Invertebrate Invertebrate Fauna of Korea Volume 10, Number 1 Rotifera: Eurotatoria: Bdelloidea: Philodinida: Habrotrochidae, Philodinidae Rotifera I Vol. 10, 10, Vol. No. 1 Rotifera I Flora and Fauna of Korea National Institute of Biological Resources NIBR Ministry of Environment Invertebrate Fauna of Korea Volume 10, Number 1 Rotifera: Eurotatoria: Bdelloidea: Philodinida: Habrotrochidae, Philodinidae Rotifera I 2015 National Institute of Biological Resources Ministry of Environment Invertebrate Fauna of Korea Volume 10, Number 1 Rotifera: Eurotatoria: Bdelloidea: Philodinida: Habrotrochidae, Philodinidae Rotifera I Min Ok Song Gangneung-Wonju National University Invertebrate Fauna of Korea Volume 10, Number 1 Rotifera: Eurotatoria: Bdelloidea: Philodinida: Habrotrochidae, Philodinidae Rotifera I Copyright ⓒ 2015 by the National Institute of Biological Resources Published by the National Institute of Biological Resources Environmental Research Complex, Hwangyeong-ro 42, Seo-gu Incheon 22689, Republic of Korea www.nibr.go.kr All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of the National Institute of Biological Resources. ISBN : 9788968112065-96470 Government Publications Registration Number 11-1480592-000989-01 Printed by Junghaengsa, Inc. in Korea on acid-free paper Publisher : Kim, Sang-Bae Author : Min Ok Song Project Staff : Joo-Lae Cho, Jumin Jun and Jin Han Kim Published on November 30, 2015 The Flora and Fauna of Korea logo was designed to represent six major target groups of the project including vertebrates, invertebrates, insects, algae, fungi, and bacteria. The book cover and the logo were designed by Jee-Yeon Koo.
  • Gastrotricha, Chaetonotida) from Obodska Cave (Montenegro) Based on Morphological and Molecular Characters

    Gastrotricha, Chaetonotida) from Obodska Cave (Montenegro) Based on Morphological and Molecular Characters

    European Journal of Taxonomy 354: 1–30 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2017.354 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2017 · Kolicka M. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Research article urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:51C2BE54-B99B-4464-8FC1-28A5CC6B9586 A new species of freshwater Chaetonotidae (Gastrotricha, Chaetonotida) from Obodska Cave (Montenegro) based on morphological and molecular characters Małgorzata KOLICKA 1,*, Piotr GADAWSKI 2 & Miroslawa DABERT 3 1 Department of Animal Taxonomy and Ecology, Institute of Environmental Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University Poznan, Umultowska 89, 61–614 Poznan, Poland. 2 Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Hydrobiology, University of Łódź, Banacha 12/16, 90–237 Łódź, Poland. 3 Molecular Biology Techniques Laboratory, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University Poznan, Umultowska 89, 61–614 Poznan, Poland. * Corresponding author: [email protected] 2 E-mail: [email protected] 3 E-mail: [email protected] 1 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:550BCAA1-FB2B-47CC-A657-0340113C2D83 2 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:BCA3F37A-28BD-484C-A3B3-C2169D695A82 3 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:8F04FE81-3BC7-44C5-AFAB-6236607130F9 Abstract. Gastrotricha is a cosmopolitan phylum of aquatic and semi-aquatic invertebrates that comprises about 820 described species. Current knowledge regarding freshwater gastrotrichs inhabiting caves is extremely poor and there are no extant data regarding Gastrotricha from Montenegro. We describe a new species from Obodska Cave, which is also the fi rst record of a gastrotrich from this region. Due to its unusual habitat and morphological characteristics, this species may be important when considering the evolution and dispersion routes of Chaetonotidae Gosse, 1864 (sensu Leasi & Todaro 2008).
  • Rotifer Species Diversity in Mexico: an Updated Checklist

    Rotifer Species Diversity in Mexico: an Updated Checklist

    diversity Review Rotifer Species Diversity in Mexico: An Updated Checklist S. S. S. Sarma 1,* , Marco Antonio Jiménez-Santos 2 and S. Nandini 1 1 Laboratory of Aquatic Zoology, FES Iztacala, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Av. de Los Barrios No. 1, Tlalnepantla 54090, Mexico; [email protected] 2 Posgrado en Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Mexico City 04510, Mexico; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +52-55-56231256 Abstract: A review of the Mexican rotifer species diversity is presented here. To date, 402 species of rotifers have been recorded from Mexico, besides a few infraspecific taxa such as subspecies and varieties. The rotifers from Mexico represent 27 families and 75 genera. Molecular analysis showed about 20 cryptic taxa from species complexes. The genera Lecane, Trichocerca, Brachionus, Lepadella, Cephalodella, Keratella, Ptygura, and Notommata accounted for more than 50% of all species recorded from the Mexican territory. The diversity of rotifers from the different states of Mexico was highly heterogeneous. Only five federal entities (the State of Mexico, Michoacán, Veracruz, Mexico City, Aguascalientes, and Quintana Roo) had more than 100 species. Extrapolation of rotifer species recorded from Mexico indicated the possible occurrence of more than 600 species in Mexican water bodies, hence more sampling effort is needed. In the current review, we also comment on the importance of seasonal sampling in enhancing the species richness and detecting exotic rotifer taxa in Mexico. Keywords: rotifera; distribution; checklist; taxonomy Citation: Sarma, S.S.S.; Jiménez-Santos, M.A.; Nandini, S. Rotifer Species Diversity in Mexico: 1.
  • Freshwater Gastrotricha By: Tobias Kånneby, Department of Zoology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, PO Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden, and Mitchell J

    Freshwater Gastrotricha By: Tobias Kånneby, Department of Zoology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, PO Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden, and Mitchell J

    October 2016 U.S. Freshwater Gastrotricha By: Tobias Kånneby, Department of Zoology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, PO Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden, and Mitchell J. Weiss, 51-B Phelps Avenue, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, U.S.A. This list is based on the following works: Amato & Weiss 1982; Anderson & Robbins 1980; Bovee & Cordell 1971; Brunson 1948, 1949a, 1949b, 1950; Bryce 1924; Colinvaux 1964; Davison 1938; Dolley 1933; Dougherty 1960; Emberton 1981; Evans 1993; Fernald 1883; Goldberg 1949; Green 1986; Hatch 1939; Horlick 1975; Kånneby & Todaro 2015; Krivanek & Krivanek 1958a, 1958b, 1959; Lindeman 1941; Packard 1936, 1956, 1956-58, 1958a, 1958b, 1959, 1962, 1970; Pfaltzgraff 1967; Robbins 1964, 1965, 1966, 1973; Sacks 1955, 1964; Schwank 1990; Seibel et al. 1973; Shelford & Boesel 1942; Stokes 1887a, 1887b, 1896; Strayer 1985, 1994; Weiss 2001; Welch 1936a, 1936b, 1938; Young 1924; Zelinka 1889. Full references at end of document. Phylum Gastrotricha Metchnikoff, 1865 Order Chaetonotida Remane, 1925 Suborder Paucitubulatina d’Hondt, 1971 Family Chaetonotidae Gosse, 1864 [sensu Leasi & Todaro, 2008] Subfamily Chaetonotinae Gosse, 1864 Genus Aspidiophorus Voigt, 1903 1. Aspidiophorus paradoxus (Voigt, 1902) New Jersey [see also Schwank 1990] Genus Chaetonotus Ehrenberg, 1830 Subgenus Chaetonotus (Captochaetus) Kisielewski, 1997 2. Chaetonotus (Captochaetus) gastrocyaneus Brunson, 1950 Indiana, Michigan 3. Chaetonotus (Captochaetus) robustus Davison, 1938 New Jersey, New York Subgenus Chaetonotus (Chaetonotus) Ehrenberg, 1830 4. Chaetonotus (Chaetonotus) aculeatus Robbins, 1965 Illinois 5. Chaetonotus (Chaetonotus) brevispinosus Zelinka, 1889 New Hampshire, Ohio 1 October 2016 6. Chaetonotus (Chaetonotus) formosus Stokes, 1887 Alaska (?), Michigan, New Jersey 7. Chaetonotus (Chaetonotus) larus (Müller in Hermann, 1784) Maine (?), New Jersey (?) [see Zelinka 1889; see also Schwank 1990] 8.