DOCSLIB.ORG

Quincy Furnace Brook EA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Quincy Furnace Brook EA Final Environmental Assessment Miller Street, Cross Street and Furnace Avenue Area Flood Control and Furnace Brook Restoration Project Quincy, Norfolk County, MA HMGP 4051-51 October 26, 2020 U.S. Department of Homeland Security Federal Emergency Management Agency Region 1 99 High Street, Sixth Floor Boston, MA 02110 Prepared by: This Environmental Assessment was prepared as a collaborative effort between the following parties: City of Quincy, MA Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency Woodward & Curran Consulting LEC Environmental Consultants, Inc. and FEMA Region 1 Staff: David Robbins, Region 1 Environmental Officer Mary Shanks, Region 1 Deputy Environmental Officer Eric Kuns, Senior Environmental Protection Specialist Kathryn Emmitt-Peabody, Environmental Protection Specialist Kimberly De Muro, Environmental Protection Specialist Linda Hutchins, Environmental Protection Specialist Josh Helms, Environmental Protection Specialist Cover photo by David Robbins, FEMA. 2019 2 Final Environmental Assessment – Quincy Furnace Brook, October 26, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................................................................. 3 APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................................................... 4 LIST OF ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................................. 5 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................... 6 2.0 PURPOSE AND NEED ....................................................................................................................................... 6 3.0 PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND ................................................................................................. 6 4.0 ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................................................................................ 7 4.1 ALTERNATIVE 1: NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE ................................................................................................... 7 4.2 ALTERNATIVE 2: PROPOSED ACTION ALTERNATIVE - MILLER ST., CROSS ST. AND FURNACE AVE. FLOOD CONTROL AND FURNACE BROOK RESTORATION .............................................................................................. 7 4.3 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED AND DISMISSED ................................................................................................. 9 4.3.1 Dismissed Alternative 1 ......................................................................................................................... 9 4.3.2 Dismissed Alternative 2 ......................................................................................................................... 9 4.3.3 Dismissed Alternative 3 ......................................................................................................................... 9 4.3.4 Dismissed Alternative 4 ......................................................................................................................... 9 4.3.5 Dismissed Alternative 5 ......................................................................................................................... 9 4.4 EFFECT EVALUATION ..................................................................................................................................... 10 5.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND POTENTIAL EFFECTS ....................................................................... 11 5.1 PHYSICAL RESOURCES ............................................................................................................................ 11 5.1.1 Geology and Soils ................................................................................................................................ 11 5.2 WATER RESOURCES ................................................................................................................................. 12 5.2.1 Water Quality ....................................................................................................................................... 12 5.2.2 Floodplains .......................................................................................................................................... 13 5.2.3 Wetlands .............................................................................................................................................. 14 5.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ....................................................................................................................... 15 5.3.1 Wildlife and Fish .................................................................................................................................. 15 5.3.1 Vegetation ............................................................................................................................................ 16 5.3.2 Threatened and Endangered Species ................................................................................................... 17 5.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES .......................................................................................................................... 18 5.4.1 Identification of APE, Cultural Resources, and Consultation Process ................................................ 18 5.4.2 Historic (Standing) Structures ............................................................................................................. 19 5.4.3 Archaeological Resources ................................................................................................................... 20 5.5 SOCIOECONOMIC RESOURCES .............................................................................................................. 21 5.5.1 Public Services and Utilities ................................................................................................................ 21 5.5.2 Public Health and Safety ..................................................................................................................... 21 5.5.1 Environmental Justice .......................................................................................................................... 22 6.0 PERMITS AND PROJECT CONDITIONS ...................................................................................................... 23 7.0 AGENCY COORDINATION AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ..................................................................... 24 8.0 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................................. 24 9.0 COMMENTS/RESPONSE ................................................................................................................................ 25 3 Final Environmental Assessment – Quincy Furnace Brook, October 26, 2020 APPENDICES APPENDIX A: Figure 1: Locus Map (Aerial) Figure 2: USGS Map Figure 3: FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map Figure 4: Drainage Area Map, prepared by Woodard & Curran Figure 5: Existing 25-year Flood Delineation, prepared by Woodard & Curran APPENDIX B: Supporting Graphics Graphic 1: Project Overview (Figure 1A and Figure 1B), prepared by Woodard & Curran Graphic 2: Photographic Documentation APPENDIX C: Supporting Documents Document A – 8-Step Decision Making Document 4 Final Environmental Assessment – Quincy Furnace Brook, October 26, 2020 LIST OF ACRONYMS APE – Area of Potential Effect ASAPP - Archaeological Site Avoidance and Protection Plan CEQ - Council on Environmental Quality C.F.R. – Code of Federal Regulations CWA - Clean Water Act EO - Executive Order EPA – Environmental Protection Agency ESA – Endangered Species Act FEMA - Federal Emergency Management Agency FONSI – Finding of No Significant Impact HMGP - Hazard Mitigation Grant Program MACRIS - Massachusetts Cultural Resource Information System MassDEP - Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection MEMA - Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency NEPA - National Environmental Policy Act NHPA – National Historic Preservation Act NPDES - National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NRHP – National Register of Historic Places PAL - Public Archaeology Lab, Inc. SHPO – State Historic Preservation Office USACE - U.S. Army Corps of Engineers USFWS - United States Fish and Wildlife Service 5 Final Environmental Assessment – Quincy Furnace Brook, October 26, 2020 1.0 INTRODUCTION The President declared a major disaster under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (Stafford Act) on January 6, 2012 for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts as a result of a severe winter storm and snowstorm that occurred from October 29-30. This declaration, designated FEMA-4051-DR-MA, authorized the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) statewide. Under the HMGP, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may provide financial assistance for state, local, and tribal governments and certain private nonprofit organizations to implement hazard mitigation measures that are cost effective and substantially reduce the risk of future damage, hardship, loss, or suffering in any area affected by the major disaster. The Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency (MEMA) is the recipient under the HMGP, responsible for submitting HMGP applications
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 4: Regionwide Needs Assessment
    REGIONWIDE 4 NEEDS ASSESSMENT INTRODUCTION A critical early step in developing the LRTP is to gather, organize, and analyze available sources of data about the transportation system. This allows the MPO to understand the many needs that exist for all transportation modes. After analyzing data included in the Web-based Needs Assessment described in Chapter 1, it is clear that the region has extensive maintenance and modernization requirements, including the need to address safety and mobility for all modes. MPO staff estimates that these needs likely would exceed the region’s anticipated financial resources between now and 2040. Therefore, the MPO must prioritize the region’s needs in order to guide investment decisions. This chapter provides an overview of the MPO region’s transportation needs for the next twenty-five years. The information in this chapter has been organized according to the LRTP’s goals—which are used to evaluate projects in the Universe of Projects List both for scenario planning, and then project selection for the recommended LRTP. The LRTP’s goals are related to: • Safety • System Preservation • Capacity Management and Mobility • Clean Air and Clean Communities • Transportation Equity • Economic Vitality Information in each goal-based section of this chapter falls into these general categories: • The goals and related objectives • Background information for each goal • The policy context that surrounds each goal, which includes: 1. Initiatives and directives that shape the goal and related needs. Detailed information about each of the policies is included in Appendix A. 2. Relevant studies, reports, and documents that help the MPO understand the region’s transportation needs.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Quincy, MA | 2015 Annual Report
    Municipality/Organization: City of Quincy EPA NPDES Permit Number: MAR041081 MassDEP Transmittal Number: W-041020 Annual Report Number Yeal' 12 & Reporting Period: Apl'ill, 2014- March 31, 2015 NPDES PII Small MS4 General Permit Annual Report (Due: May 1, 2015) Part I. General Information Contact Person: Peter Hoyt Title: Superintendent of Sewer and Water Telephone#: (617) 376-1910 Email: [email protected] Mailing Address: 55 Sea Street (Rear), Quincy, MA 02169 Certification: I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. Printed Name: Thomas P. Koch Title: Mayor Date: IJ -Z- 1- CC> IS Part II. Self-Assessment As required, the City of Quincy (City) evaluated compliance of the stormwater management program with the conditions of the NPDES General Permit for Stormwater Discharges from Small MS4s, effective May 1, 2003. From April 1, 2014 – March 31, 2015, the City continued to make progress implementing best management practices ( BMPs) to meet General Permit requirements. As required, the City also evaluated the appropriateness of all BMPs in efforts towards achieving the defined measureable goals, and has determined BMPs and measurable goals are appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of the Metropolitan District Commission
    Public Document No. 48 W$t Commontoealtfj of iWa&sacfmsfetta ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Metropolitan District Commission For the Year 1935 Publication or this Document Approved by the Commission on Administration and Finance lm-5-36. No. 7789 CONTENTS PAGE I. Organization and Administration . Commission, Officers and Employees . II. General Financial Statement .... III. Parks Division—Construction Wellington Bridge Nonantum Road Chickatawbut Road Havey Beach and Bathhouse Garage Nahant Beach Playground .... Reconstruction of Parkways and Boulevards Bridge Repairs Ice Breaking in Charles River Lower Basin Traffic Control Signals IV. Maintenance of Parks and Reservations Revere Beach Division .... Middlesex Fells Division Charles River Lower Basin Division . Bunker Hill Monument .... Charles River Upper Division Riverside Recreation Grounds . Blue Hills Division Nantasket Beach Reservation Miscellaneous Bath Houses Band Concerts Civilian Conservation Corps Federal Emergency Relief Activities . Public Works Administration Cooperation with the Municipalities . Snow Removal V. Special Investigations VI. Police Department VII. Metropolitan Water District and Works Construction Northern High Service Pipe Lines . Reinforcement of Low Service Pipe Lines Improvements for Belmont, Watertown and Arlington Maintenance Precipitation and Yield of Watersheds Storage Reservoirs .... Wachusett Reservoir . Sudbury Reservoir Framingham Reservoir, No. 3 Ashland, Hopkinton and Whitehall Reservoirs and South Sud- bury Pipe Lines and Pumping Station Framingham Reservoirs Nos. 1 and 2 and Farm Pond Lake Cochituate . Aqueducts Protection of the Water Supply Clinton Sewage Disposal Works Forestry Hydroelectric Service Wachusett Station . Sudbury Station Distribution Pumping Station Distribution Reservoirs . Distribution Pipe Lines . T) 11 P.D. 48 PAGE Consumption of Water . 30 Water from Metropolitan Water Works Sources used Outside of the Metropolitan Water District VIII.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Annual Report | Dept. of Conservation and Recreation, MA
    Department of Conservation and Recreation NPDES Storm Water Management Program Permit Year 6 Annual Report Municipality/Organization: Department of Conservation and Recreation EPA NPDES Permit Number: MAR043001 MaDEP Transmittal Number: Annual Report Number & Reporting Period: No. 6: May 08-April 09 Department of Conservation and Recreation NPDES PII Small MS4 General Permit Annual Report Part I. General Information Contact Person: Robert Lowell Title: Storm Water Manager Telephone #: (617) 626-1340 Email: [email protected] Certification: I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. Signature: Printed Name: Richard K. Sullivan Title: Commissioner Date: 9/7/2010 Page 1 Department of Conservation and Recreation NPDES Storm Water Management Program Permit Year 6 Annual Report Part II. Self-Assessment The Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) has completed the required self-assessment and has determined that we are in compliance with all permit conditions, except as noted in the following tables. DCR received authorization to discharge under the general permit from EPA on November 8, 2007 and from DEP on November 21, 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Outreach for Destination 2040
    appendix D Public Outreach for Destination 2040 INTRODUCTION Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) staff conducted outreach activities throughout the development of the Destination 2040 Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). Outreach began in October 2017 with the development of the Needs Assessment and continued through the 30-day public comment period for the draft LRTP in July and August 2019. This appendix summarizes the outreach activities and public input received during the different phases of LRTP development: Needs Assessment, vision, goals and objectives revisions, and project and program selection. It concludes with the comments received during the formal 30-day public comment period for the draft LRTP. The MPO engaged a wide variety of individuals in the development of Destination 2040, including: • Regional Transportation Advisory Council (Advisory Council) • Municipalities • Transportation agencies, including the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT), the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA), and regional transit authorities • Professional groups (for example, planners, and engineers, etc.) • Community organizations • Transportation equity groups • Economic development and business organizations • Transportation and environmental advocates MPO staff used a variety of communication and engagement methods to engage the public and solicit feedback from the community: • In-person meetings with the Advisory Council, the Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPC) subregional groups, stakeholder
    [Show full text]
  • Please Share with a Friend the Mystic Valley Railway Society Newsletter a Waybillnon-Profit Educational Corporation 1970-2017 • Over 47 Years of Service Credit R
    Please Share With A Friend THE Mystic Valley Railway Society Newsletter A WAYBILLNon-Profit Educational Corporation 1970-2017 • Over 47 Years of Service credit R. Goelet VOL. 50 NO. 1 ISSN 0897-7577 Got a question? Call us at 617-361-4445, 24 Hours • E-Mail at [email protected] MARCH - MAY 2019 www.mysticvalleyrs.org SUGAR TIME AND CT CAROUSELS Nantucket Daffodils SATURDAY – MARCH 16, 2019 SATURDAY – APRIL 27, 2019 Details on page 5 Details on page 5 BUTTERFLIES IN DEERFIELD Different Faces of Lowell SATURDAY – MAY 25, 2019 SATURDAY – JUNE 22, 2019 Details on page 8 Details on page 8 OVERNIGHT TRIP - TRAINS IN MAINE SEE PAGE 3 FOR DETAILS NOTICE! See page 3 for MEMBERSHIP Boston, MA U.S. POSTAGE PAID Permit No. 58868 RENEWAL NON-PROFIT ORG. NON-PROFIT 2019 April 1, 2019 - Annual Meeting March 31, 2020 and today! Appreciation Mail your Mail your renewal in renewal Banquet Deadline for Next Issue: May 1, 2019 Deadline for Include your previous address with address Include your previous corrections all address Saturday Keep the Good May 4, 2019 Times Rolling Mystic Valley Railway Society, Inc. Railway Society, Valley Mystic O. Box 365486 P. 02136-0009 Hyde Park, MA Details on Page 2 The WAYBILL • March - May 2019 2 www.facebook.com/MysticValleyRailwaySociety From the President - Theresa E. Rylko TRAIN SHOWS As we once again experience the winter season memories alive for your fellow members. Come know as we are always looking for new places to it is time to remember the Annual Meeting on support your team in their effort to give you interest- dine.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Real Property Owned and Leased by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
    The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office for Administration and Finance Report on the Real Property Owned and Leased by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Published February 15, 2019 Prepared by the Division of Capital Asset Management and Maintenance Carol W. Gladstone, Commissioner This page was intentionally left blank. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction and Report Organization 5 Table 1 Summary of Commonwealth-Owned Real Property by Executive Office 11 Total land acreage, buildings (number and square footage), improvements (number and area) Includes State and Authority-owned buildings Table 2 Summary of Commonwealth-Owned Real Property by County 17 Total land acreage, buildings (number and square footage), improvements (number and area) Includes State and Authority-owned buildings Table 3 Summary of Commonwealth-Owned Real Property by Executive Office and Agency 23 Total land acreage, buildings (number and square footage), improvements (number and area) Includes State and Authority-owned buildings Table 4 Summary of Commonwealth-Owned Real Property by Site and Municipality 85 Total land acreage, buildings (number and square footage), improvements (number and area) Includes State and Authority-owned buildings Table 5 Commonwealth Active Lease Agreements by Municipality 303 Private leases through DCAMM on behalf of state agencies APPENDICES Appendix I Summary of Commonwealth-Owned Real Property by Executive Office 311 Version of Table 1 above but for State-owned only (excludes Authorities) Appendix II County-Owned Buildings Occupied by Sheriffs and the Trial Court 319 Appendix III List of Conservation/Agricultural/Easements Held by the Commonwealth 323 Appendix IV Data Sources 381 Appendix V Glossary of Terms 385 Appendix VI Municipality Associated Counties Index Key 393 3 This page was intentionally left blank.
    [Show full text]
  • MEI State Facilities Inventory List.Xlsx
    MEI State Facility User list Agency Site Auditor Boston Berkshire Comm. College Berkshire Comm. College Bridgewater State University Bridgewater State College Bristol Comm. College Fall River Campus Bristol Comm. College New Bedford Campus Bunker Hill Comm. College Charlestown Campus Bunker Hill Comm. College Chelsea Campus Bureau of State Office Buildings Hurley Building Bureau of State Office Buildings Lindemann Mental Health Center Bureau of State Office Buildings McCormack Building Bureau of State Office Buildings Pittsfield State Office Site Bureau of State Office Buildings Registry of Deeds Bureau of State Office Buildings Springfield State Office Liberty St Bureau of State Office Buildings State House Cape Cod Comm. College Cape Cod Community College ‐ Hyannis Campus Cape Cod Comm. College Cape Cod Community College Main Meter Chelsea Soldiers Home Chelsea Soldiers Home Chief Medical Examiner Chief Medical Examiner ‐ Sandwich Chief Medical Examiner Chief Medical Examiners Office Commission for the Blind NA Dept. Agricultural Resources Dept. Agricultural Resources Eastern States Exposition Grounds Dept. of Children and Families NA Dept. of Conservation and Recreation Dept. of Conservation and Recreation Agawam State Pool Dept. of Conservation and Recreation Aleixo Arena Dept. of Conservation and Recreation Allied Veterans Memorial Pool/Rink Dept. of Conservation and Recreation Amelia Eairhart Dam Dept. of Conservation and Recreation Ames Nowell State Park Dept. of Conservation and Recreation Artesani Pool Dept. of Conservation and Recreation Ashland State Park Dept. of Conservation and Recreation Ashuwillticook Trail Dept. of Conservation and Recreation Bajko Rink Dept. of Conservation and Recreation Beartown State Forest Dept. of Conservation and Recreation Bennett Field Swimming Pool Dept. of Conservation and Recreation Blackstone River and Canal Heritage State Park Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 69, No. 41/Tuesday, March 2, 2004/Notices
    Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 41 / Tuesday, March 2, 2004 / Notices 9839 complete program announcement and species. That is, the projects we seek to accessed by visiting Grants.gov request for proposals (Notice of support should reflect new starts and (www.grants.gov). Grants.gov is the new Availability of Federal Assistance), should not fund management efforts single point of entry for posting Federal potential applicants were provided with already in place or ongoing.’’ Government grant and other assistance a set of minimum eligibility criteria. The January 6, 2004, notice also stated opportunities. Potential applicants for One of the eligibility criteria could be that project proposals must be received the PSGP may access program overview read to exclude projects on lands owned by the appropriate Regional Office information, the full text of the by conservation organizations from within 60 days of the notice. Due to the announcement, and the application eligibility for funding under the PSGP. need to revise and clarify the eligibility package for this request for proposals by We are now revising the eligibility criteria, and due to substantial interest accessing Grants.gov and then using the requirements to clarify, and correctly by the public in participating in this FIND utility (‘‘Find Grant notice, that projects on lands owned by program, we are now extending the due Opportunities,’’ or http://fedgrants.gov/ conservation organizations are eligible date for submission of project proposals grants/servlet/SearchServlet/) to access for funding through the PSGP. for Federal assistance under the Private this information. Potential applicants Specifically, section III (Eligibility Stewardship Grants Program (PSGP) to may use the FIND utility by searching Information), part 3 (Other), item 2, is March 31, 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • R Life Sciences Corridor Cambridge, Boston and Quincy
    The Life Sciences Corridor is connected by the Massachusetts Bay Transit Authority (MBTA) Red Line. This subway line serves as a connective link with 20 stops between r Life Sciences Corridor Cambridge, Boston and Quincy. The Life Sciences Corridor is sustained by skilled labor force The MBTA Commuter Rail system serves SOME~ VILLE BOg.ON BRAI~ >-T_R_E_E _J.. 9 ? availability, access to leading universities, the existence of as the heavy rail arm of the MBTA’s trans- CAMBRIDGE QUINCY CAMBRIDGE BOSTON QUINCY established innovative research and development districts, portation coverage of Greater Boston. Economic Development Division Office of Economic Development Office of Economic Development proximity to major research hospitals, and presence of venture Cambridge Community Development Boston City Hall Quincy City Hall capital resources, all within the world’s leading life sciences 344 Broadway One City Hall Square 1305 Hancock Street All 5 cities are easily accessible by Cambridge, MA 02139 Boston, MA 02201 Quincy, MA 02169 cluster. Companies located in these cities are also able to take major highways and transportation Phone: 617-349-4637 Phone: 617-635-5729 Phone: 617-376-1168 advantage of funding programs offered by the Massachusetts networks. Logan International Airport www.boston.gov/econdev www.quincyma.gov Life Sciences Center, backed by a ten-year, $1 billion state Park Street www.cambridgema.gov/lifesciences is just 15 minutes away, whether by investment initiative. train, boat, bus or car. Our Companies: The Life Sciences Corridor is focused on • The Life Sciences Corridor is home to over 500 companies within Transit Oriented Development (TOD) the Life Science Industry Cluster.
    [Show full text]
  • QPS Street Directory
    Quincy Public Schools Street Directory All school assignments are for both sides of a street unless otherwise noted. STREET ZIP SIDE FROM TO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL MIDDLE SCHOOL HIGH SCHOOL ABBEY ROAD 02169 CLIFFORD MARSHALL POINT WEBSTER QUINCY ABERDEEN ROAD 02171 SQUANTUM ATLANTIC NORTH QUINCY ABIGAIL AVENUE 02169 LINCOLN HANCOCK SOUTH~WEST QUINCY ACTON STREET 02170 WOLLASTON CENTRAL NORTH QUINCY ADAMS CIRCLE 02169 BERNAZZANI CENTRAL QUINCY ADAMS COURT 02169 MERRYMOUNT CENTRAL QUINCY ADAMS STREET 02169 1 77 MERRYMOUNT CENTRAL QUINCY ADAMS STREET 02169 140 693 BERNAZZANI CENTRAL NORTH QUINCY ADELE ROAD 02169 LINCOLN HANCOCK SOUTH~WEST QUINCY ADELINE PLACE 02169 MERRYMOUNT CENTRAL QUINCY ADMINISTRATION ROAD 02169 LINCOLN HANCOCK SOUTH~WEST QUINCY AGAWAM ROAD 02169 MERRYMOUNT BROAD MEADOWS QUINCY AIRPORT ROAD 02171 SQUANTUM ATLANTIC NORTH QUINCY ALBANY STREET 02170 WOLLASTON CENTRAL NORTH QUINCY ALBATROSS ROAD 02169 MERRYMOUNT BROAD MEADOWS QUINCY ALBERTINA STREET 02169 LINCOLN HANCOCK SOUTH~WEST QUINCY ALBION ROAD 02170 PARKER ATLANTIC NORTH QUINCY ALDEN STREET 02169 CLIFFORD MARSHALL POINT WEBSTER QUINCY ALFRED STREET 02171 SQUANTUM ATLANTIC NORTH QUINCY ALGONQUIN ROAD 02169 MERRYMOUNT BROAD MEADOWS QUINCY ALLERTON STREET 02169 ATHERTON HOUGH BROAD MEADOWS QUINCY ALLEYNE STREET 02169 MERRYMOUNT CENTRAL QUINCY ALRICK ROAD 02169 BERNAZZANI CENTRAL QUINCY ALSTEAD STREET 02171 SQUANTUM ATLANTIC NORTH QUINCY ALTAMOUNT ROAD 02169 LINCOLN HANCOCK SOUTH~WEST QUINCY ALTON ROAD 02169 LINCOLN HANCOCK SOUTH~WEST QUINCY ALVIN AVENUE 02171 MONTCLAIR ATLANTIC NORTH QUINCY AMES STREET 02169 LINCOLN HANCOCK SOUTH~WEST QUINCY AMESBURY STREET 02171 MONTCLAIR ATLANTIC NORTH QUINCY AMHERST STREET 02169 ATHERTON HOUGH BROAD MEADOWS QUINCY Updated January 2020: New Streets Added; No District Changes Page 1 of 38 Quincy Public Schools Street Directory All school assignments are for both sides of a street unless otherwise noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Neponset River Reservation
    A Master Plan for the Lower Neponset River Reservation Boston, Milton, and Quincy, Massachusetts A Master Plan for the Lower Neponset River Reservation Boston, Milton, and Quincy, Massachusetts Commonwealth of Massachusetts Metropolitan District Commission William E Weld David B. Balfour, Jr. Governor Commissioner Argeo Paul Cellucci Darryl Settles Lieutenant Governor Avril Elkort Trudy Coxe Charles E Wu Secretary, Robert Carr .Executive Office ofEnvironmental Affairs Associate Commissioners Leo Roy Julia B. O'Brien Undersecretary, Director ofPlanning .Executive Office ofEnvironmental Affairs David T. Queeley Project Manager December 1996 Master Plan Consultants Planners Collaborative Inc. Planners and Landscape Architects in association with Camp Dresser & McKee Environmental Engineers Judith Nitsch Engineering Land Surveyors Main Street Design Interpretive and Environmental Graphic Designers Wallace Roberts and Todd Planners and Landscape Architects Table of Contents Introduction 1 The Plan Pope John Paul II Park 7 The Riverside 10 The Bend 15 The Port 18 Squantum Point Park 20 Edgewater Park 22 Neponset River Trail 24 Trail Connections 31 Watercourse 33 Funding, Costs, and Phasing 34 Public Safety, Maintenance, & Mitigation 37 Permits 41 Preliminary Design Drawings: A-1 Neponset River Trail 60STON HARBOR N!PONHf IIVU. ~n,,·tlOl'Ol.fl',1.:- UISTlllC'I' aos-ro.:-- BOS TON 8 A Y ,-- j -~ti· P-­ - v "'w!._ -~:t~~11- ·i-=z jl:rft-~ t ~ .A-,c~,,..,""' Charles Eliot's 1893 Map ofthe Metropolitan Park System with the Neponset River Reservation in Lower Center Introduction This plan is about keeping a promise. eluding rich nature preserves and numerous popular parks. Acquisition of the Neponset Marshes began in 1896, mak­ The promise was made in the late 1800s.
    [Show full text]