Delaware Massachusetts
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Delaware County: Community Health Assessment and Improvement Plan and Community Service Plans
2016- 2018 Delaware County: Community Health Needs Assessment and Improvement Plan and Community Service Plans This page was intentionally left blank. 1 | P a g e Delaware County 2016-2018 Community Health Needs Assessment and Improvement Plan and Community Service Plans Local Health Department: Delaware County Public Health Amanda Walsh, MPH, Public Health Director 99 Main Street, Delhi, NY 13856 607-832-5200 [email protected] Heather Warner, Health Education Coordinator 99 Main Street, Delhi, NY 13856 607-832-5200 [email protected] Hospitals: UHS Delaware Valley Hospital Dotti Kruppo, Community Relations Director 1 Titus Place Walton, NY 13856 607-865-2409 [email protected] Margaretville Hospital Laurie Mozian, Community Health Coordinator 42084 NY Route 28, Margaretville, NY 12455 845-338-2500 [email protected] Mark Pohar, Executive Director 42084 NY Route 28, Margaretville, NY 12455 845-586-2631 [email protected] O’Connor Hospital Amy Beveridge, Director of Operational Support 460 Andes Road, Delhi, NY 13753 607-746-0331 [email protected] Tri-Town Regional Hospital Amy Beveridge, Director of Operational Support 43 Pearl Street W., Sidney, NY 13838 607-746-0331 [email protected] Community Health Assessment update completed with the assistance of the HealthlinkNY Community Network, the regional Population Health Improvement Program (PHIP) in the Southern Tier. Support provided by Emily Hotchkiss and Mary Maruscak. 2 | P a g e 2016-2018 Community Health Needs Assessment and Improvement Plan for Delaware County Table of Contents Executive Summary 4-7 Acknowledgements 8 Introduction 8-9 Mission 8 Vision 8 Core Values 8 Background and Purpose 9 Community Health Assessment Update 9-82 I. -
Chapter 4: Regionwide Needs Assessment
REGIONWIDE 4 NEEDS ASSESSMENT INTRODUCTION A critical early step in developing the LRTP is to gather, organize, and analyze available sources of data about the transportation system. This allows the MPO to understand the many needs that exist for all transportation modes. After analyzing data included in the Web-based Needs Assessment described in Chapter 1, it is clear that the region has extensive maintenance and modernization requirements, including the need to address safety and mobility for all modes. MPO staff estimates that these needs likely would exceed the region’s anticipated financial resources between now and 2040. Therefore, the MPO must prioritize the region’s needs in order to guide investment decisions. This chapter provides an overview of the MPO region’s transportation needs for the next twenty-five years. The information in this chapter has been organized according to the LRTP’s goals—which are used to evaluate projects in the Universe of Projects List both for scenario planning, and then project selection for the recommended LRTP. The LRTP’s goals are related to: • Safety • System Preservation • Capacity Management and Mobility • Clean Air and Clean Communities • Transportation Equity • Economic Vitality Information in each goal-based section of this chapter falls into these general categories: • The goals and related objectives • Background information for each goal • The policy context that surrounds each goal, which includes: 1. Initiatives and directives that shape the goal and related needs. Detailed information about each of the policies is included in Appendix A. 2. Relevant studies, reports, and documents that help the MPO understand the region’s transportation needs. -
State Abbreviations
State Abbreviations Postal Abbreviations for States/Territories On July 1, 1963, the Post Office Department introduced the five-digit ZIP Code. At the time, 10/1963– 1831 1874 1943 6/1963 present most addressing equipment could accommodate only 23 characters (including spaces) in the Alabama Al. Ala. Ala. ALA AL Alaska -- Alaska Alaska ALSK AK bottom line of the address. To make room for Arizona -- Ariz. Ariz. ARIZ AZ the ZIP Code, state names needed to be Arkansas Ar. T. Ark. Ark. ARK AR abbreviated. The Department provided an initial California -- Cal. Calif. CALIF CA list of abbreviations in June 1963, but many had Colorado -- Colo. Colo. COL CO three or four letters, which was still too long. In Connecticut Ct. Conn. Conn. CONN CT Delaware De. Del. Del. DEL DE October 1963, the Department settled on the District of D. C. D. C. D. C. DC DC current two-letter abbreviations. Since that time, Columbia only one change has been made: in 1969, at the Florida Fl. T. Fla. Fla. FLA FL request of the Canadian postal administration, Georgia Ga. Ga. Ga. GA GA Hawaii -- -- Hawaii HAW HI the abbreviation for Nebraska, originally NB, Idaho -- Idaho Idaho IDA ID was changed to NE, to avoid confusion with Illinois Il. Ill. Ill. ILL IL New Brunswick in Canada. Indiana Ia. Ind. Ind. IND IN Iowa -- Iowa Iowa IOWA IA Kansas -- Kans. Kans. KANS KS A list of state abbreviations since 1831 is Kentucky Ky. Ky. Ky. KY KY provided at right. A more complete list of current Louisiana La. La. -
Key Findings: Existing Conditions Report – January 2017
NY 443/Delaware Avenue from Elsmere Avenue to the Normanskill Bridge Summary of Key Findings: Existing Conditions Report – January 2017 NY 443/Delaware Avenue in the Town of Bethlehem is owned and maintained by New York State. In general, it is a four-lane roadway 48 feet wide, with two 11-foot wide travel lanes in each direction, one-foot wide shoulders, and two-foot wide striping in the center. The roadway widens in the central part of the study area near Delaware Plaza and provides a 5-lane cross section (60 feet wide), and transitions on both ends to provide a two-lane cross section entering the Delmar hamlet on the west, and the City of Albany to the east. The roadway right-of-way is typically 66 feet wide; 90 feet wide near the Delaware Plaza, and variable width approaching the Normanskill bridge. As an urban minor arterial in a Commercial Hamlet District, Delaware Avenue serves several different functions. The roadway provides access to adjacent residential neighborhood streets and residences, businesses and a school, as well as serving as a multi-modal commuting route between the Town of Bethlehem and the City of Albany and activities elsewhere in the region. Delaware Avenue from Elsmere Avenue to Delaware Plaza carries about 18,300 vehicles on an average weekday. Daily traffic volumes between Delaware Plaza and the Normanskill Bridge are lower at approximately 15,600 vehicles. The amount of motor vehicle traffic along Delaware Avenue has remained relatively the same over the last 30 years. CDTA’s bus route 18 travels the study area providing service between Slingerlands and downtown Albany with most frequent service provided during the evening commute. -
COMPARISON of the PRINCIPAL PROVISIONS of the DELAWARE and MARYLAND CORPORATION STATUTES James J. Hanks, Jr. Venable LLP Baltimo
COMPARISON OF THE PRINCIPAL PROVISIONS OF THE DELAWARE AND MARYLAND CORPORATION STATUTES James J. Hanks, Jr. Venable LLP Baltimore, Maryland Copyright 2018 COMPARISON OF THE PRINCIPAL PROVISIONS OF THE DELAWARE AND MARYLAND CORPORATION STATUTES Table of Contents Page FOREWORD .................................................................................................................................. v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 1 ADVANTAGEOUS PROVISIONS OF THE MARYLAND GENERAL CORPORATION LAW ............................................................................................................................................ 1 ADVANTAGEOUS PROVISIONS OF THE DELAWARE GENERAL CORPORATION LAW .......................................................................................................................................... 16 I. ORGANIZATION.................................................................................................................... 23 1. Incorporation...................................................................................................................... 23 2. Corporate Names ............................................................................................................... 24 3. Amendment to Charter or Certificate of Incorporation ..................................................... 25 4. Extrinsic Events ................................................................................................................ -
Annual Report of the Metropolitan District Commission
Public Document No. 48 W$t Commontoealtfj of iWa&sacfmsfetta ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Metropolitan District Commission For the Year 1935 Publication or this Document Approved by the Commission on Administration and Finance lm-5-36. No. 7789 CONTENTS PAGE I. Organization and Administration . Commission, Officers and Employees . II. General Financial Statement .... III. Parks Division—Construction Wellington Bridge Nonantum Road Chickatawbut Road Havey Beach and Bathhouse Garage Nahant Beach Playground .... Reconstruction of Parkways and Boulevards Bridge Repairs Ice Breaking in Charles River Lower Basin Traffic Control Signals IV. Maintenance of Parks and Reservations Revere Beach Division .... Middlesex Fells Division Charles River Lower Basin Division . Bunker Hill Monument .... Charles River Upper Division Riverside Recreation Grounds . Blue Hills Division Nantasket Beach Reservation Miscellaneous Bath Houses Band Concerts Civilian Conservation Corps Federal Emergency Relief Activities . Public Works Administration Cooperation with the Municipalities . Snow Removal V. Special Investigations VI. Police Department VII. Metropolitan Water District and Works Construction Northern High Service Pipe Lines . Reinforcement of Low Service Pipe Lines Improvements for Belmont, Watertown and Arlington Maintenance Precipitation and Yield of Watersheds Storage Reservoirs .... Wachusett Reservoir . Sudbury Reservoir Framingham Reservoir, No. 3 Ashland, Hopkinton and Whitehall Reservoirs and South Sud- bury Pipe Lines and Pumping Station Framingham Reservoirs Nos. 1 and 2 and Farm Pond Lake Cochituate . Aqueducts Protection of the Water Supply Clinton Sewage Disposal Works Forestry Hydroelectric Service Wachusett Station . Sudbury Station Distribution Pumping Station Distribution Reservoirs . Distribution Pipe Lines . T) 11 P.D. 48 PAGE Consumption of Water . 30 Water from Metropolitan Water Works Sources used Outside of the Metropolitan Water District VIII. -
Springing the Delaware Tax Trap Under North Carolina Law to Obtain an Income Tax Basis Step-Up By
Springing the Delaware Tax Trap Under North Carolina Law to Obtain an Income Tax Basis Step-Up By: Graham D. Holding, Jr. and Paul M. Hattenhauer The significant increase in the federal estate tax exclusion amount, $11,400,000 for 2019, has caused estate planners to look at techniques to have assets in an irrevocable trust included in the taxable estate of the beneficiary in order to provide a basis step-up for appreciated assets under I.R.C. Section 1014. Inclusion of the assets in the beneficiary’s gross estate may be desirable to obtain the income tax savings of the basis step-up when, for example, a spouse-beneficiary holds a nongeneral power of appointment over a traditional bypass trust, or a beneficiary has a nongeneral power of appointment over a trust exempt from the federal generation-skipping transfer tax, and the spouse or beneficiary has sufficient remaining federal estate tax exemption left to prevent a portion or all of the assets of the trust from being subject to estate tax. There are four ways to cause trust assets to be included in the beneficiary’s taxable estate: (i) the Delaware Tax Trap, (ii) the use of an independent trustee’s power of distribution, (iii) a contingent general power of appointment, and (iv) a trust protector or independent trustee’s power to create a general power of appointment. Lester Law and Howard M. Zaritsky, “Basis After the 2017 Tax Act – Important Before, Crucial Now,” 1-84 (Fundamental Program Focus Series, Univ. of Miami Heckerling Institute on Estate Planning) (2019)). -
Reconnaissance-Level Survey of the Delaware Avenue Neighborhood 2011-2013
RECONNAISSANCE-LEVEL SURVEY OF THE DELAWARE AVENUE NEIGHBORHOOD 2011-2013 SPONSORED BY The Preservation League of New York State Delaware Area Neighborhood Association & Historic Albany Foundation PRODUCED BY Kimberly Konrad Alvarez, Landmark Consulting LLC 83 Grove Avenue, Albany, NY 12208 www.landmarkconsulting.net Produced March 2013 This project is funded by Preserve New York (2011), a grant program of the Preservation League of New York State and the New York State Council on the Arts. A reconnaissance-level historic resource survey is the most basic approach for systematically documenting and evaluating historic buildings. The primary purpose is to provide a "first cut" of buildings in a given area that appear by their age and integrity to be eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. Reconnaissance survey involves only a visual evaluation of properties, not an assessment of significance based on associated historical events or individuals. Properties are evaluated and identified as "eligible" in a reconnaissance survey based on criteria of age (must meet National Register age threshold) and integrity requirements. In other words, this means they should retain most of their original appearance and be at least 50 years old. It typically includes an historic overview of the community derived from a cursory review of available sources and a brief discussion of the buildings in the area based on a “windshield” survey. The survey work also involves documenting each site in the survey area, with digital photography, mapping, property identification information and a preliminary eligibility evaluation. Produced March 2013 Kimberly Konrad Alvarez Landmark Consulting LLC 83 Grove Avenue, Albany, NY 12208 518-45-8942 [email protected] With assistance by SUNYAB Planning Student Intern Megan Dawson 3 St. -
DELAWARE Advance Directive Planning for Important Health-Care Decisions
DELAWARE Advance Directive Planning for Important Health-Care Decisions CaringI nfo 1731 King St., Suite 100, Alexandria, VA 22314 www.caringinfo.org 800/658-8898 CaringInfo, a program of the National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization (NHPCO), is a national consumer engagement initiative to improve care at the end-of-life. It’s About How You LIVE It’s About How You LIVE is a national community engagement campaign encouraging individuals to make informed decisions about end-of-life care and services. The campaign encourages people to: Learn about options for end-of-life services and care Implement plans to ensure wishes are honored Voice decisions to family, friends and health-care providers Engage in personal or community efforts to improve end-of-life care Note: The following is not a substitute for legal advice. While CaringInfo updates the following information and form to keep them up-to-date, changes in the underlying law can affect how the form will operate in the event you lose the ability to make decisions for yourself. If you have any questions about how the form will help ensure your wishes are carried out, or if your wishes do not seem to fit with the form, you may wish to talk to your health-care provider or an attorney with experience in drafting advance directives. If you have other questions regarding these documents, we recommend contacting your state attorney general's office. Copyright © 2005 National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization. All rights reserved. Revised 2020. Reproduction and distribution by an organization or organized group without the written permission of the National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization is expressly forbidden. -
2009 Annual Report | Dept. of Conservation and Recreation, MA
Department of Conservation and Recreation NPDES Storm Water Management Program Permit Year 6 Annual Report Municipality/Organization: Department of Conservation and Recreation EPA NPDES Permit Number: MAR043001 MaDEP Transmittal Number: Annual Report Number & Reporting Period: No. 6: May 08-April 09 Department of Conservation and Recreation NPDES PII Small MS4 General Permit Annual Report Part I. General Information Contact Person: Robert Lowell Title: Storm Water Manager Telephone #: (617) 626-1340 Email: [email protected] Certification: I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. Signature: Printed Name: Richard K. Sullivan Title: Commissioner Date: 9/7/2010 Page 1 Department of Conservation and Recreation NPDES Storm Water Management Program Permit Year 6 Annual Report Part II. Self-Assessment The Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) has completed the required self-assessment and has determined that we are in compliance with all permit conditions, except as noted in the following tables. DCR received authorization to discharge under the general permit from EPA on November 8, 2007 and from DEP on November 21, 2007. -
Barley for Delaware, Maine, Maryland, New Jersey, New York
United States A Risk Management Agency Fact Sheet 2018 Crop Year Department of Agriculture Raleigh Regional Office — Raleigh, NC Revised September 2017 Barley Delaware, Maine, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina Pennsylvania, Vermont, Virginia, and West Virginia Crop Insured Final adjustment of a loss; Barley is insurable if: Abandonment of the crop; or The crop is in a county on insurable acreage, End of insurance period. where premium rates are provided; The crop is planted on insurable acreage for Important Dates harvest as a grain; and Fall-planted You have a share of the crop. Sales Closing Date ............... September 30, 2017 DE, MD, NJ, NY, NC, PA, VA, WV Counties Available End of Insurance Period ............... July 31, 2018 See the actuarial documents at webapp.rma.usda.gov/ DE, MD, NJ, NC apps/actuarialinformationbrowser/ for insurable End of Insurance Period ............ August 31, 2018 counties. The crop may be insurable in other counties NY, PA, VA, WV by written agreement if specific criteria are met. Spring-planted Contact an insurance agent for more details. Sales Closing Date ...................... March 15, 2018 ME, NY, PA, VT Causes of Loss End of Insurance Period .......... October 31, 2018 You are protected against the following: ME, NY, PA, VT Adverse weather conditions, including natural perils such as hail, frost, freeze, wind, drought, Reporting Requirements and excess moisture; You must file a report of planted acreage with your Failure of irrigation water supply, if caused by an crop insurance agent by the acreage reporting date. insured peril during the insurance year; Since acreage reporting dates vary by state, talk to your agent, or for more information see Fire, if caused by an insured peril during the www.rma.usda.gov/tools/. -
Public Outreach for Destination 2040
appendix D Public Outreach for Destination 2040 INTRODUCTION Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) staff conducted outreach activities throughout the development of the Destination 2040 Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). Outreach began in October 2017 with the development of the Needs Assessment and continued through the 30-day public comment period for the draft LRTP in July and August 2019. This appendix summarizes the outreach activities and public input received during the different phases of LRTP development: Needs Assessment, vision, goals and objectives revisions, and project and program selection. It concludes with the comments received during the formal 30-day public comment period for the draft LRTP. The MPO engaged a wide variety of individuals in the development of Destination 2040, including: • Regional Transportation Advisory Council (Advisory Council) • Municipalities • Transportation agencies, including the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT), the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA), and regional transit authorities • Professional groups (for example, planners, and engineers, etc.) • Community organizations • Transportation equity groups • Economic development and business organizations • Transportation and environmental advocates MPO staff used a variety of communication and engagement methods to engage the public and solicit feedback from the community: • In-person meetings with the Advisory Council, the Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPC) subregional groups, stakeholder