A Histology-Based Health Assessment of Selected Fish Species

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Histology-Based Health Assessment of Selected Fish Species A HISTOLOGY-BASED HEALTH ASSESSMENT OF SELECTED FISH SPECIES FROM TWO RIVERS IN THE KRUGER NATIONAL PARK BY WARREN CLIFFORD SMITH DISSERTATION SUBMITTED IN FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE MAGISTER SCIENTIAE IN AQUATIC HEALTH IN THE FACULTY OF SCIENCE AT THE UNIVERSITY OF JOHANNESBURG SUPERVISOR: DR. G.M. WAGENAAR CO-SUPERVISOR: PROF. N.J. SMIT MAY 2012 Contents Acknowledgements _______________________________________________________ 6 Abstract ________________________________________________________________ 8 List of abbreviations _____________________________________________________ 11 List of figures ___________________________________________________________ 14 List of Tables ___________________________________________________________ 17 Chapter 1: General Introduction ____________________________________________ 19 1.1 Introduction _______________________________________________________ 19 1.2 Study motivation ___________________________________________________ 19 1.3 Hypotheses ________________________________________________________ 21 1.4 Aim of the study ____________________________________________________ 21 1.5 Objectives _________________________________________________________ 21 1.6 Dissertation outline _________________________________________________ 21 Chapter 2: Literature Review ______________________________________________ 23 2.1 Introduction _______________________________________________________ 23 2.2 Study Sites ________________________________________________________ 23 2.2.1 Olifants River (OR) _______________________________________________ 23 2.2.2 Luvuvhu River (LR) _______________________________________________ 25 2.3 Metals in the aquatic environment _____________________________________ 26 2.3.1 Aluminium (Al) ___________________________________________________ 26 2.3.2 Arsenic (As) _____________________________________________________ 27 2.3.3 Cadmium (Cd) ___________________________________________________ 28 2.3.4 Chromium (Cr) ___________________________________________________ 29 2.3.5 Copper (Cu) _____________________________________________________ 30 2.3.6 Iron (Fe) ________________________________________________________ 31 2.3.7 Lead (Pb) _______________________________________________________ 31 2.3.8 Manganese (Mn) _________________________________________________ 32 [1] 2.3.9 Zinc (Zn) _______________________________________________________ 33 2.4 Study organisms ___________________________________________________ 34 2.4.1 Hydrocynus vittatus _______________________________________________ 34 2.4.2 Labeobarbus marequensis _________________________________________ 35 2.4.3 Labeo cylindricus _________________________________________________ 37 2.4.4 Labeo rosae _____________________________________________________ 38 2.5 Health Assessment Index ____________________________________________ 39 2.6 Blood constituents’ analysis __________________________________________ 39 2.7 Biometric indices ___________________________________________________ 40 2.7.1 Condition factor __________________________________________________ 40 2.7.2 Hepatosomatic index ______________________________________________ 40 2.7.3 Splenosomatic index ______________________________________________ 40 2.7.4 Gonadosomatic index _____________________________________________ 41 2.8 Histology and histopathology of selected target organs ___________________ 41 2.8.1 Liver as a target organ _____________________________________________ 41 2.8.2 Kidney as a target organ ___________________________________________ 43 2.8.3 Gill as a target organ ______________________________________________ 46 2.8.4 Testis as a target organ ____________________________________________ 52 2.8.5 Ovary as a target organ ____________________________________________ 53 2.8.6 Semi-quantitative histological assessment _____________________________ 54 2.9 Ageing ____________________________________________________________ 54 Chapter 3: Materials and Methods __________________________________________ 56 3.1 Introduction _______________________________________________________ 56 3.2 Study period _______________________________________________________ 56 3.3 Water and sediment collection ________________________________________ 60 3.4 Physical water quality parameters _____________________________________ 60 3.5 Field surveys ______________________________________________________ 61 3.6 Histology-based health assessment protocol ____________________________ 64 3.6.1 Blood constituents analysis _________________________________________ 64 3.6.2 Necropsy _______________________________________________________ 64 3.6.3 HAI ____________________________________________________________ 64 [2] 3.6.4 Biometric indices _________________________________________________ 64 3.7 Tissue processing __________________________________________________ 65 3.8 Qualitative histological assessment ___________________________________ 67 3.8.1 Gonadal reproductive stage determination: _____________________________ 67 3.9 Semi-quantitative histological assessment ______________________________ 69 3.10 Ageing ___________________________________________________________ 72 3.11 Statistical analysis _________________________________________________ 73 Chapter 4: Results _______________________________________________________ 74 4.1 Introduction _______________________________________________________ 74 4.2 Physical water quality parameters _____________________________________ 74 4.2.1 Temperature ______________________________________________________ 74 4.2.2 pH ____________________________________________________________ 74 4.2.3 Oxygen percentage _______________________________________________ 74 4.2.4 Conductivity _____________________________________________________ 74 4.2.5 Total dissolved salts ______________________________________________ 75 4.3 Metal concentrations ________________________________________________ 75 4.3.1 Water metal concentrations _________________________________________ 75 4.3.2 Sediment metal concentrations ______________________________________ 77 4.4 Biometric indices ___________________________________________________ 78 4.4.1 Condition factor (Cf) _______________________________________________ 78 4.4.2 Hepatosomatic index (HSI) _________________________________________ 78 4.4.3 Splenosomatic index (SSI) _________________________________________ 78 4.4.4 Male Gonadosomatic index (GSI) ____________________________________ 79 4.4.5 Female Gonadosomatic index (GSI) __________________________________ 79 4.5 Blood parameters ___________________________________________________ 79 4.5.1 Haematocrit (Hct) _________________________________________________ 79 4.5.2 Leukocrit (Lct) ___________________________________________________ 80 4.5.3 Total plasma protein (TP) __________________________________________ 81 4.6 Health assessment index ____________________________________________ 83 4.7 Normal histology ___________________________________________________ 85 4.7.1 Normal liver histology _____________________________________________ 85 [3] 4.7.2 Normal kidney tissue ______________________________________________ 88 4.7.3 Normal gill tissue _________________________________________________ 91 4.7.4 Normal testis tissue _______________________________________________ 93 4.7.5 Normal ovary tissue _______________________________________________ 96 4.8 Gonadal staging ____________________________________________________ 99 4.8.1 Testis staging ____________________________________________________ 99 4.8.2 Ovary staging ____________________________________________________ 99 4.9 Histopathology _____________________________________________________ 99 4.9.1 Liver histopathology ______________________________________________ 100 4.9.2 Kidney histopathology ____________________________________________ 104 4.9.3 Gill histopathology _______________________________________________ 108 4.9.4 Testis histopathology _____________________________________________ 109 4.9.5 Ovary histopathology _____________________________________________ 111 4.9.6 Fish index _____________________________________________________ 113 4.10 Age _____________________________________________________________ 115 4.11 Age – Histopathology correlations ___________________________________ 118 4.11.1 Age – Liver Index Correlations ____________________________________ 118 4.11.2 Age – Fish Index Correlations _____________________________________ 118 Chapter 5: Discussion ___________________________________________________ 121 5.1 Introduction ______________________________________________________ 121 5.2 Physical water quality parameters ____________________________________ 121 5.2.1 Temperature ___________________________________________________ 121 5.2.2 pH ___________________________________________________________ 121 5.2.3 Dissolved oxygen ________________________________________________ 122 5.2.4 TDS/Conductivity ________________________________________________ 122 5.3 Metal concentrations in water and sediment ____________________________ 122 5.4 Biometric indices __________________________________________________ 125 5.4.1 Condition factor (Cf) ______________________________________________ 125 5.4.2 Hepatosomatic index (HSI) ________________________________________ 126 5.4.3 Splenosomatic index (SSI) ________________________________________ 126 5.4.4 Gonadosomatic index (GSI) _______________________________________ 126 5.5 Blood parameters __________________________________________________
Recommended publications
  • Fish, Various Invertebrates
    Zambezi Basin Wetlands Volume II : Chapters 7 - 11 - Contents i Back to links page CONTENTS VOLUME II Technical Reviews Page CHAPTER 7 : FRESHWATER FISHES .............................. 393 7.1 Introduction .................................................................... 393 7.2 The origin and zoogeography of Zambezian fishes ....... 393 7.3 Ichthyological regions of the Zambezi .......................... 404 7.4 Threats to biodiversity ................................................... 416 7.5 Wetlands of special interest .......................................... 432 7.6 Conservation and future directions ............................... 440 7.7 References ..................................................................... 443 TABLE 7.2: The fishes of the Zambezi River system .............. 449 APPENDIX 7.1 : Zambezi Delta Survey .................................. 461 CHAPTER 8 : FRESHWATER MOLLUSCS ................... 487 8.1 Introduction ................................................................. 487 8.2 Literature review ......................................................... 488 8.3 The Zambezi River basin ............................................ 489 8.4 The Molluscan fauna .................................................. 491 8.5 Biogeography ............................................................... 508 8.6 Biomphalaria, Bulinis and Schistosomiasis ................ 515 8.7 Conservation ................................................................ 516 8.8 Further investigations .................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Book
    CELEBRATING 60 YEARS OF AFRICAN ZOOLOGY 39th ZSSA Congress Skukuza, Kruger National Park 7 – 10 July 2019 39th ZSSA Congress 2019 Proudly sponsored by: Gus & Margie Mills Please click on the images to be directed to the sponsors webpage. 39th ZSSA Congress 2019 39th ZSSA Congress 2019 Contents Plenary Speakers .................................................................................................................. 1 Presentation Abstracts .......................................................................................................... 3 Monday 8 July ................................................................................................................... 3 Plenary .......................................................................................................................... 3 Session 1: Physiology .................................................................................................... 3 Session 2: Physiology .................................................................................................... 7 Session 3: Biodiversity conservation and ecosystem resilience ................................... 11 Session 4: Taxonomy, systematics and evolutionary biology ....................................... 15 Tuesday 9 July ................................................................................................................ 20 Plenary ........................................................................................................................ 20 Session 5: Behavioural
    [Show full text]
  • Jlb Smith Institute of Ichthyology
    ISSN 0075-2088 J.L.B. SMITH INSTITUTE OF ICHTHYOLOGY GRAHAMSTOWN, SOUTH AFRICA SPECIAL PUBLICATION No. 56 SCIENTIFIC AND COMMON NAMES OF SOUTHERN AFRICAN FRESHWATER FISHES by Paul H. Skelton November 1993 SERIAL PUBLICATIONS o f THE J.L.B. SMITH INSTITUTE OF ICHTHYOLOGY The Institute publishes original research on the systematics, zoogeography, ecology, biology and conservation of fishes. Manuscripts on ancillary subjects (aquaculture, fishery biology, historical ichthyology and archaeology pertaining to fishes) will be considered subject to the availability of publication funds. Two series are produced at irregular intervals: the Special Publication series and the Ichthyological Bulletin series. Acceptance of manuscripts for publication is subject to the approval of reviewers from outside the Institute. Priority is given to papers by staff of the Institute, but manuscripts from outside the Institute will be considered if they are pertinent to the work of the Institute. Colour illustrations can be printed at the expense of the author. Publications of the Institute are available by subscription or in exchange for publi­ cations of other institutions. Lists of the Institute’s publications are available from the Publications Secretary at the address below. INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS Manuscripts shorter than 30 pages will generally be published in the Special Publications series; longer papers will be considered for the Ichthyological Bulletin series. Please follow the layout and format of a recent Bulletin or Special Publication. Manuscripts must be submitted in duplicate to the Editor, J.L.B. Smith Institute of Ichthyology, Private Bag 1015, Grahamstown 6140, South Africa. The typescript must be double-spaced throughout with 25 mm margins all round.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Proceedings 2006
    FOSAF THE FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN AFRICAN FLYFISHERS PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10 TH YELLOWFISH WORKING GROUP CONFERENCE STERKFONTEIN DAM, HARRISMITH 07 – 09 APRIL 2006 Edited by Peter Arderne PRINTING & DISTRIBUTION SPONSORED BY: sappi 1 CONTENTS Page List of participants 3 Press release 4 Chairman’s address -Bill Mincher 5 The effects of pollution on fish and people – Dr Steve Mitchell 7 DWAF Quality Status Report – Upper Vaal Management Area 2000 – 2005 - Riana 9 Munnik Water: The full picture of quality management & technology demand – Dries Louw 17 Fish kills in the Vaal: What went wrong? – Francois van Wyk 18 Water Pollution: The viewpoint of Eco-Care Trust – Mornē Viljoen 19 Why the fish kills in the Vaal? –Synthesis of the five preceding presentations 22 – Dr Steve Mitchell The Elands River Yellowfish Conservation Area – George McAllister 23 Status of the yellowfish populations in Limpopo Province – Paul Fouche 25 North West provincial report on the status of the yellowfish species – Daan Buijs & 34 Hermien Roux Status of yellowfish in KZN Province – Rob Karssing 40 Status of the yellowfish populations in the Western Cape – Dean Impson 44 Regional Report: Northern Cape (post meeting)– Ramogale Sekwele 50 Yellowfish conservation in the Free State Province – Pierre de Villiers 63 A bottom-up approach to freshwater conservation in the Orange Vaal River basin – 66 Pierre de Villiers Status of the yellowfish populations in Gauteng Province – Piet Muller 69 Yellowfish research: A reality to face – Dr Wynand Vlok 72 Assessing the distribution & flow requirements of endemic cyprinids in the Olifants- 86 Doring river system - Bruce Paxton Yellowfish genetics projects update – Dr Wynand Vlok on behalf of Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • IN Lake KARIBA ~As Development Ad­ Ndon)
    • View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Aquatic Commons THE A leA JOU L OF (Afr. J Trop. Hydrobiol. Fish) Yo. 1 1994 ASPECTS OF THE BIOLOGY OF THE lAKE TANGANYIKA SARDINE, LIMNOTHRISSA n illustrated key to the flinji. (Mimeographed MIODON (BOULENGER), IN lAKE KARIBA ~as Development Ad­ ndon). R. HUDDART ision des Synodontis Kariba Research Unit, Private Bag 24 CX, CHOMA, Zambia. e Royal de I'Afrique 'en, Belgium. 500p. Present address:- ~). The ecology of the 4, Ingleside Grove, LONDON, S.B.3., U.K. is (Pisces; Siluoidea) Nigeria. (Unpublished ABSTRACT o the University of Juveniles of U11lnothrissa 11liodon (Boulenger) were introduced into the man-made Lake Kariba in ngland). 1967-1968. Thirty months of night-fishing for this species from Sinazongwe, near the centre of the Kariba North bank. from 1971 to 1974 are described. Biological studies were carried out on samples of the catch during most of these months. Limnological studies were carried out over a period of four months in 1973. Li11lnothrissa is breeding successfully and its number have greatly increased. [t has reached an equilibrium level of population size at a [ower density than that of Lake Tanganyika sardines, but nevertheless is an important factor in the ecology of Lake Kariba. The growth rate, size at maturity and maximum size are all less than those of Lake Tanganyika Li11lnothrissa. A marked disruption in the orderly progression of length frequency modes occurs in September, for which the present body of evidence cannot supply an explanation. INTRODUCTION light-attracted sardines in Lake Kariba were The absence of a specialised, plankti­ tested in 1970 and early 1971.
    [Show full text]
  • Thezambiazimbabwesadc Fisheriesprojectonlakekariba: Reportfroma Studytnp
    279 TheZambiaZimbabweSADC FisheriesProjectonLakeKariba: Reportfroma studytnp •TrygveHesthagen OddTerjeSandlund Tor.FredrikNæsje TheZambia-ZimbabweSADC FisheriesProjectonLakeKariba: Reportfrom a studytrip Trygve Hesthagen Odd Terje Sandlund Tor FredrikNæsje NORSKINSTITI= FORNATURFORSKNNG O Norwegian institute for nature research (NINA) 2010 http://www.nina.no Please contact NINA, NO-7485 TRONDHEIM, NORWAY for reproduction of tables, figures and other illustrations in this report. nina oppdragsmelding279 Hesthagen,T., Sandlund, O.T. & Næsje, T.F. 1994. NINAs publikasjoner The Zambia-Zimbabwe SADC fisheries project on Lake Kariba: Report from a study trip. NINA NINA utgirfem ulikefaste publikasjoner: Oppdragsmelding279:1 17. NINA Forskningsrapport Her publiseresresultater av NINAs eget forskning- sarbeid, i den hensiktå spre forskningsresultaterfra institusjonen til et større publikum. Forsknings- rapporter utgis som et alternativ til internasjonal Trondheimapril 1994 publisering, der tidsaspekt, materialets art, målgruppem.m. gjør dette nødvendig. ISSN 0802-4103 ISBN 82-426-0471-1 NINA Utredning Serien omfatter problemoversikter,kartlegging av kunnskapsnivået innen et emne, litteraturstudier, sammenstillingav andres materiale og annet som ikke primært er et resultat av NINAs egen Rettighetshaver0: forskningsaktivitet. NINA Norskinstituttfornaturforskning NINA Oppdragsmelding Publikasjonenkansiteresfritt med kildeangivelse Dette er det minimum av rapporteringsomNINA gir til oppdragsgiver etter fullført forsknings- eller utredningsprosjekt.Opplageter
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of the Critically Endangered Freshwater Fish Species, the Clanwilliam Sandfish (Labeo Seeberi)
    Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of the critically endangered freshwater fish species, the Clanwilliam sandfish (Labeo seeberi) By Shaun Francois Lesch Thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the Faculty of Natural Science at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Dr C. Rhode Co-supervisor: Dr R. Slabbert Department of Genetics December 2020 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration: By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Date: December 2020 Copyright © 2020 Stellenbosch University All Rights Reserved i Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Abstract: Labeo spp. are large freshwater fish found throughout southern Asia, the Middle East and Africa. The genus is characterised by specialised structures around the mouth and lips making it adapted to herbivorous feeding (algae and detritus). Clanwilliam sandfish (Labeo seeberi) was once widespread throughout its natural habitat (Olifants-Doring River system), but significant decreases in population size have seen them become absent in the Olifants River and retreat to the headwaters in the tributaries of the Doring River. Currently sandfish are confined to three populations namely the Oorlogskloof Nature Reserve (OKNR), Rietkuil (Riet) and Bos, with OKNR being the largest of the three and deemed the species sanctuary.
    [Show full text]
  • YWG Conference Proceedings 2014
    FOSAF PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18 TH YELLOWFISH WORKING GROUP CONFERENCE BLACK MOUNTAIN HOTEL, THABA ´NCHU, FREE STATE PROVINCE Image courtesy of Carl Nicholson EDITED BY PETER ARDERNE 1 18 th Yellowfish Working Group Conference CONTENTS Page Participants 3 Opening address – Peter Mills 4 State of the rivers of the Kruger National Park – Robin Petersen 6 A fish kill protocol for South Africa – Byron Grant 10 Phylogeographic structure in the KwaZulu-Natal yellowfish – Connor Stobie 11 Restoration of native fishes in the lower Rondegat River after alien fish eradication: 15 an overview of a successful conservation intervention.- Darragh Woodford Yellowfish behavioural work in South Africa: past, present and future research – 19 Gordon O’Brien The occurrence and distribution of yellowfish in state dams in the Free State. – Leon 23 Barkhuizen; J.G van As 2 & O.L.F Weyl 3 Yellowfish and Chiselmouths: Biodiversity Research and its conservation 24 implications - Emmanuel Vreven Should people be eating fish from the Olifants River, Limpopo Province? 25 – Sean Marr A review of the research findings on the Xikundu Fishway & the implications for 36 fishways in the future – Paul Fouche´ Report on the Vanderkloof Dam- Francois Fouche´ 48 Karoo Seekoei River Nature Reserve – P C Ferreira 50 Departmental report: Biomonitoring in the lower Orange River within the borders 54 of the Northern Cape Province – Peter Ramollo Free State Report – Leon Barkhuizen 65 Limpopo Report – Paul Fouche´ 68 Conference summary – Peter Mills 70 Discussion & Comment following
    [Show full text]
  • Seasonal Variation in Haematological
    SEASONAL VARIATION IN HAEMATOLOGICAL PARAMETERS AND OXIDATIVE STRESS BIO-MARKERS FOR SELECTED FISH SPECIES COLLECTED FROM THE FLAG BOSHIELO DAM, OLIFANTS RIVER SYSTEM, LIMPOPO PROVINCE, SOUTH AFRICA by Makgomo Eunice Mogashoa A dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in PHYSIOLOGY in the FACULTY OF SCIENCE AND AGRICULTURE School of Molecular and Life Sciences at the UNIVERSITY OF LIMPOPO SUPERVISOR: Dr LJC Erasmus CO-SUPERVISORS: Prof WJ Luus-Powell Prof A Botha-Oberholster (SU) 2015 Eunice Mogashoa Tshepiso Modibe Martin Ramalepe Raphahlelo Chabalala “TEAM OROS” DECLARATION I declare that the dissertation hereby submitted to the University of Limpopo, for the degree of Master of Science in Physiology has not previously been submitted by me for a degree at this or any other University; that it is my work in design and execution, and that all material contained herein has been duly acknowledged. _________________ _____________ Mogashoa, ME (Miss) Date Page | i DEDICATION I dedicate this dissertation to my family and friends. I would like to express special gratitude to my loving parents, Freeman and Rebecca Mogashoa, who continuously encouraged me throughout my studies. My sister, Regina and brother, David for being understanding, supportive and always on my side. Furthermore, I also dedicate this dissertation to my grandparents (Magdeline Mogashoa and Regina Gafane) and my aunts (Betty, Merriam, Elizabeth and Vivian) for their wonderful support. I would also like to thank my dear friends, Monene Nyama and Adolph Ramogale, for their frequent words of encouragement and being there throughout my study. Page | ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would firstly like to give thanks to God for the knowledge, strength and guidance during the entire period of my study.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the 8Th Yellowfish Working Group Conference
    FOSAF THE FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN AFRICAN FLYFISHERS PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH YELLOWFISH WORKING GROUP CONFERENCE LE PARADISE RESORT, BADPLAAS 13 – 15 MAY 2004 Edited by Peter Arderne PRINTING & DISTRIBUTION SPONSORED BY: sappi CONTENTS Page List of Participants 2 Press Release 4 Welcome address -Bill Mincher (presented by Peter Mills) 6 Fishing Strategies & Tactics for the Nine Yellowfish species – Turner Wilkinson 8 Keynote Address: Mpumalanga Parks Board – Andre Coetzee 10 South African Freshwater Resources: Rights, Duties & Remedies – Morne Viljoen 11 Towards the fomulation of a Waste Discharge Charge System for South Africa - 24 Pieter Viljoen Catchment Management Approach to Conservation: What does it mean? – 34 Dr Wynand Vlok Establishment of the Elands River Conservation Area (ERYCA) – Gordon O’Brien 38 The Effect of Alien Plant Species on the Riparian Zone Water Management – 43 Hannes de Lange & Tony Poulter Fish kills in the Olifants River: Any Solution? – Dr Thomas Gyedu-Ababio 45 Yellowfish Sport Fisheries: Opportunities & Responsibilities – Kobus Fourie 48 Conservancies – A tool for river conservation involving the landowner – Peter Mills 49 Proposed project: Radio Telemetry on Labeobarbus marequensis in the Crocodile River, 54 Kruger National Park – Francois Roux The yellowfish fishery on the upper Komati: A landowners perspective – John Clarke 56 River Health: Managing and Monitoring Rivers on Sappi Plantations – Douglas 60 Macfarlane Iscor Newcastle: Water Strategy – Martin Bezuidenhout 63 Aquatic Biodiversity Conservation in South Africa – Pierre de Villiers 66 Field research update: Assessing the impact of smallmouth bass on the indigenous 67 fish community of the Rondegat River, Western Cape – Darragh Woodford Threatened fishes of Swaziland – Richard Boycott 70 Yellowfishes of Zambia & Mozambique – Roger Bills 76 Identification of conservation units of two yellowfish species: Labeobarbus 78 kimberleyensis & L.
    [Show full text]
  • Rivers Database Version 3 a User Manual
    Rivers Database Version 3 A User Manual Directorate: Resource Quality Services, Department of Water Affairs and Forestry Republic of South Africa Rivers Database Version 3 A User Manual Department of Water Affairs and Forestry Resource Quality Services September 2007 Directorate: Resource Quality Services, Department of Water Affairs and Forestry September 2007 Published by: Department of Water Affairs and Forestry Resource Quality Services Private Bag X313 PRETORIA 0001 Republic of South Africa Tel: (012) 808 0374 Co-ordinated by: Resource Quality Services Copyright Reserved Project Number 2004-157 This publication may be reproduced only for non-commercial purposes and only after appropriate authorisation by the Department of Water Affairs and Forestry has been provided. Additional copies can be requested from the above address. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any manner without the full acknowledgement of the source. This document should be cited as: Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (2007) Rivers Database Version 3 A User Manual, prepared by The Freshwater Consulting Group and Soft Craft Systems for DWAF, Pretoria, South Africa. To cite data in the Rivers Database: Reference the data by listing the owners of the data (Site or Site Visit data) in the following manner. Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (2007) Rivers Database: Data Owners: “List data owners” ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The following project team members and officials of the Department of Water Affairs and Forestry are thanked for their inputs, comments and assistance towards the development of this document. Project Management Team Mr. B. Madikizela, Deputy Director: RQS Ms. S. Jhupsee / Mr. R. Sekwele, Assistant Director: RQS Study Team Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of Fish Assemblages Between Protected and Non
    International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies 2017; 5(5): 93-99 E-ISSN: 2347-5129 P-ISSN: 2394-0506 (ICV-Poland) Impact Value: 5.62 An assessment of fish assemblages between protected (GIF) Impact Factor: 0.549 IJFAS 2017; 5(5): 93-99 and non-protected areas on the Zambezi /Chobe River © 2017 IJFAS www.fisheriesjournal.com Received: 05-07-2017 EK Simasiku, SK Mafwila, EF Chimbioputo, JL Kashimba and J Accepted: 06-08-2017 Lubanda EK Simasiku Department of Wildlife Abstract Management and Ecotourism, The fisheries of the Zambezi are currently experiencing an alarming decline due to an increasing fishing Katima Mulilo Campus, pressure. With increasing fishing pressure, fish populations may undergo a series of changes in size, University of Namibia, Private species composition and abundance. As a result, scientists and managers are deemed to seek for Bag 1096, Ngweze, Katima alternative measures to protect and conserve fish stocks. One such option is the use of fish protected Mulilo, Namibia areas (FPAs). Two recently established FPA’s on the Zambezi/Chobe River are the Kalimbeza and SK Mafwila Kasaya Channels. However, accrued benefits of these FPAs have never been assessed. Comparative Department of Fisheries and experiments using gillnets of different mesh sizes (12 mm – 150 mm) were conducted between FPA’s Aquatic Sciences, and Sam (Kalimbeza channel) and non-FPA’s (Hippo channel) between March and December 2016 to test the Nujoma Marine and Coastal hypothesis that, FPA’s would yield high fish abundance (CPUE) than non- FPAs. Experimental fishing Resources Research Centre, Sam trials showed a high CPUE by weight and number (p<0.05) of the five dominant species (Hydrocynus Nujoma Campus, University of vittatus, Schilbe intermedius, Pharyngochromis acuticeps, M.
    [Show full text]