DOCSLIB.ORG

Download=True

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download=True WAR WITHOUT RULES: Gender-Based Violence in the Context of the Armed Conflict in Eastern Ukraine Kyiv 2017 War without Rules: Gender-Based Violence in the Context of the Armed Conflict В 42 in Eastern Ukraine / Andriy Aliokhin (Sections 2.2, 10.1), Anton Korynevych (Section 2.1), Mariia Krona (Section 10.2), Helgi Nemo (Sections 3.2, 3.4, 4, 6), Myroslava Statkevych (Section 3.3), Oleksiy Lazarenko (Chapters 8, 9), Tetiana Sirenko (Chapter 9), Serhiy Kyrychenko (Section 3.1), Volodymyr Shcherbachenko (Chapters 3, 4, 5, 7), Hanna Yanova (Chapters 1 and 6, Sections 3.2 and 3.4); eds. Volodymyr Shcherbachenko, Hanna Yanova // NGO Eastern-Ukrainian Centre for Civic Initiatives, K.TsP “KOMPRINT”, 2017. — 126 pages. ISBN 978-966-929-583-5 This study was developed to cover the situation involving gender-based violence associated with the conflict in eastern Ukraine. The report provides an overview of national legislation and international legal norms and highlights gaps in the legal framework, shortcomings in the collection and compilation of statistics, different forms of violence in the armed conflict, as well as the impact of the conflict on the prevalence of gender-based violence in territorial communities located away from the conflict area. The study focuses on an analysis of sexual and gender-based violence in illegal detention facilities created by illegal armed groups in the self-proclaimed Luhansk People’s Republic and Donetsk People’s Republic, as well as by the Ukrainian military and members of volunteer armed groups in the context of the armed conflict in eastern Ukraine. ISBN 978-966-929-583-5 © NGO Eastern-Ukrainian Centre for Civic Initiatives, 2017 5 The English version of the report was developed by the Eastern-Ukrainian Centre for Civic Initiatives in cooperation with partner organizations from the Justice for Peace in Donbas Coalition with funding provided by the International Renaissance Foundation and the Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights (Warsaw). The authors are solely responsible for the content of the report. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the members of the Justice for Peace in Donbas Coalition,the Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights (Warsaw) or of the International Renaissance Foundation. HELSINKI FOUNDATION for HUMAN RIGHTS 6 CONTENTS SUMMARY 9 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 10 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS 11 BACKGROUND 13 RESEARCH DEFINITIONS, AIMS, OBJECTIVES, SUBJECT AND METHODOLOGY 18 FOREWORD 22 1. SCOPE OF THE PROBLEM IN THE REGION ACCORDING TO ORGANIZATIONS 23 SUPPORTING VICTIMS OF GBV 2. DOMESTIC LEGISLATION AND INTERNATIONAL LEGAL NORMS 26 2.1. INTERNATIONAL LAW: STANDARDS ON PREVENTION OF GBV 26 2.2. DOMESTIC LEGISLATION: STANDARDS AND IMPLEMENTATION IN UKRAINE 30 3. GBV IN THE SELF-PROCLAIMED REPUBLICS 34 3.1. SOCIAL AND POLITICAL CHANGES IN TEMPORARILY OCCUPIED TERRITORIES AND 34 THEIR IMPACT ON THE PREVALENCE OF GBV 3.2. GBV IN ILLEGAL DETENTION FACILITIES 38 3.3. GBV AGAINST LGBTI 44 3.4. SEXUAL VIOLENCE IN ILLEGAL DETENTION FACILITIES IN DONBAS ESTABLISHED BY IAGS 47 3.4.1. Sexual violence against women 48 3.4.2. Sexual violence against men 51 3.4.3. Identified illegal detention facilities where sexual violence took place 53 3.4.4. Potential perpetrators of sexual violence in illegal detention facilities 60 4. SEXUAL VIOLENCE COMMITTED BY UKRAINIAN GROUPS DURING THE 73 CONFLICT IN EASTERN UKRAINE 5. NUMBER OF VICTIMS OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE IN THE CONFLICT IN DONBAS. 78 CHARACTERISTICS OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE 6. SEXUAL VIOLENCE COMMITTED BY IAGs IN THE ARMED CONFLICT IN 83 EASTERN UKRAINE 6.1. CONDUCT 83 7 6.2. CONTEXTUAL CIRCUMSTANCES 86 6.3. MODE OF LIABILITY 88 7. SEXUAL VIOLENCE AS AN INFORMATION WARFARE COMPONENT DURING 91 THE ARMED CONFLICT IN DONBAS 8. ANALYSIS OF STATISTICS ON CRIMINAL OFFENCES CONNECTED WITH GBV 95 IN TERRITORIAL COMMUNITIES OF THE CONFLICT AREA 9. GBV IN COMMUNITIES REMOTE FROM THE ARMED CONFLICT AREA. 98 VIOLENCE IN THE FAMILIES OF ATO PARTICIPANTS 10. RESPONSE OF THE STATE AUTHORITIES, LOCAL GOVERNMENT, CIVIL 103 SOCIETY AND INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY TO GBV IN THE ARMED CONFLICT IN EASTERN UKRAINE 10.1. STATE AUTHORITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNANCE BODIES RESPONSIBLE FOR 103 COMBATING GBV: FUNCTIONS AND ACTIONS 10.2. ACTIVITIES OF UKRAINIAN AND INTERNATIONAL NONGOVERNMENTAL 110 ORGANIZATIONS ON PREVENTION OF GBV AND ASSISTANCE TO SURVIVORS OF GBV 11. CONCLUSIONS 112 12. RECOMMENDATIONS 115 ANNEX 117 EASTERN-UKRAINIAN CENTRE FOR CIVIC INITIATIVES 122 JUSTICE FOR PEACE IN DONBAS COALITION OF HUMAN RIGHTS 123 ORGANIZATIONS AND INITIATIVES 8 SUMMARY The findings of the study conducted by the Eastern- compiling statistics does not meet minimum standards for Ukrainian Centre for Civic Initiatives (EUCCI) within the preventing and responding to gender-based violence. framework of the Justice for Peace in Donbas Coalition show a lack of protection from gross violations of human rights in the There is no joint interagency document on cooperation or legal vacuum that emerged with the onset of the armed conflict on the exchange of information between agencies responsible in eastern Ukraine in 2014. This situation occurred in the for preventing and responding to gender-based violence in territories under the effective control of the Russian military Ukraine. As a result, there is no effective system of referrals for and illegal armed groups, as well as in the areas controlled by victims at the national or local level. The National Action Plan the Ukrainian military and volunteer formations. for the Implementation of UN Security Council Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace and Security until 2020 includes tasks The practice of gender-based violence is ongoing in the to ensure the activities of the Interagency Working Group on armed-conflict area in the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, Implementation of the Resolution and coordination between and there is a need to record cases and conduct effective stakeholders working on its implementation; however, there investigations. The level of violence depends on several is no provision for such cooperation in a broader context. factors, including the conflict phase, distance from the line of contact and the entity exercising control over the Survivors of gender-based violence have limited access area (whether illegal armed groups in separate areas of to medical, social and legal assistance. State authorities the Donetsk and Luhansk regions or the government of responsible for preventing gender-based violence lack Ukraine). The majority of recorded cases of gender-based qualified personnel and financial resources, in particular violence took place from 2014 to early 2015 during the for specialized rehabilitation programmes. active phase of hostilities. The problem continues due to unresolved structural issues that enable violence. According to the interviewees, sexual and gender-based violence in illegal detention facilities was widespread and The sources of information used in this study include used to intimidate, humiliate and punish combatants semi-structured interviews with survivors of, and/ belonging to the other side and political opponents. Despite or witnesses to, gender-based violence, experts, media this, competent authorities have failed to document publications, official statistics from state authorities, books, gender-based violence properly, to analyse the available academic articles, analytical publications and reports by information and to create an evidence base for national and international missions and organizations. The research international judicial bodies. highlights a number of issues in the field of preventing and combating gender-based violence. The study shows that only a small number of perpetrators of gender-based violence have been held There is no definition of gender-based violence in accountable. It indicates the lack of effective investigations Ukrainian legislation. State authorities usually refer to of gender-based violence, inaction and the low level of it in the context of domestic violence or violence against awareness among the competent state authorities. It also children. The terms “gender-based violence”, “domestic illustrates the stigmatization of victims and the practice of violence” and “sexual violence” are often confused and used silencing cases of violence. interchangeably. The study findings stem from an analysis of only a part There are no statistics on gender-based violence in of the spectrum of gender-based violence associated with Ukraine. The system for recording acts of violence and the armed conflict in Donbas. 9 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Collecting information on sexual and gender-based on an entirely new topic for the Ukrainian human rights violence is extremely complicated. Victims and witnesses community presented a challenge for our research team. of violence experience shame and sometimes guilt, as well We are grateful to everyone who supported and helped us as stigmatization by society. Therefore, victims of sexual in developing the research concept or co-authored the text. and gender-based violence prefer not to speak about these crimes. On behalf of the entire research team, we Unfortunately, due to security concerns, we cannot would like to thank the dozens of people who were able name several individuals from among the staff and partners to overcome their pain and shame and shared what they of the Eastern-Ukrainian Centre for Civic Initiatives saw and experienced. Without your efforts, Ukraine and who provided extremely valuable support in collecting
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Committed During the Armed Conflict in Eastern Ukraine Between 2014–2018
    VIOLENT CRIMES Committed During the Armed Conflict in Eastern Ukraine between 2014–2018 Kharkiv Human Rights Publisher 2018 УДК 355.012АТО(477)’’2014/2018’’(047)=111 Н31 THE List OF abbreviations This report was prepared with financial support of AI — Amnesty International; MTOT — Ministry of Temporarily Occupied Terri- tories and Internally Displaced Persons; ATO — Anti-Terrorist Operation; NGO — Non-Governmental Organization CC — Criminal Code of Ukraine; NPU — National Police of Ukraine; CMA — Civil-Military Administration; OTDLR — Occupied Territories of Donetsk and Lu- СMPO — Chief Military Prosecutor’s Office; hansk Regions; СP — Checkpoint; OSCE — Organization for Security and Coopera- CPC — Criminal Procedural Code; tion in Europe; EXCP — Entry-Exit Checkpoint; PLWHA — People Living with HIV/AIDS; DSA — District State Administration; RSA — Regional State Administration; RS — Rome Statute; ECHR — European Convention on Human Rights; Yuriy Aseev, Volodymyr Hlushchenko, Boris Knyrov, Natalia Okhotnikova, Anna Ovdiienko, LNR — the self-proclaimed “Luhansk People’s ECtHR — European Court of Human Rights; Olena Richko, Gennady Shcherbak, Pavlo Shvab, Yanina Smelyanska, Igor Sosonsky, Republic”; Gennadiy Tokarev, Martha Vovk, Anastasia Yegorova, Yevgeniy Zakharov GC — Geneva Convention(s) of 12 August 1949; DNR — the self-proclaimed “Donetsk People’s Н31 Violent Crimes Committed During the Armed Conflict in Eastern Ukraine between 2014–2018 / HRMM — UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission Republic”; compiler Yevgeniy Zakharov; CO “Kharkiv
    [Show full text]
  • The MH17 Trial Part 2: the Bezler Tapes, a Case of Red Herrings? - Bellingcat
    03.11.2020 The MH17 Trial Part 2: The Bezler Tapes, a Case of Red Herrings? - bellingcat The MH17 Trial Part 2: The Bezler Tapes, a Case of Red Herrings? October 17, 2020 MH17 Russia Translations: Русский When Dutch prosecutors of the court in The Hague read out their case against four suspects charged with complicity in the downing of MH17, they also explained why individuals previously linked to this crime were not (yet) indicted. One of them is former Donetsk People’s Republic (DNR) separatist leader Igor Bezler, a Russian citizen with ties to Russia’s military intelligence agency (known as the GRU) who currently lives in Russian-annexed Crimea. The main pieces of evidence that previously linked Bezler to this crime concern two of his phone calls that were originally intercepted by the Ukrainian Security Service (SBU). One of the recordings was part of a conversation with alleged GRU officer Vasily Geranin in which Bezler announces the downing of an aircraft just twenty minutes after MH17. The SBU had released this recording on the day of the downing along with the accusation that the Bezler Group was directly involved in the downing of MH17. The other intercepted conversation was released one week later and became known as the “birdie conversation”. In this call, which according to the SBU was recorded just two minutes before the downing of MH17, Bezler is informed by someone with the call sign “Naemnik” (“Mercenary”) that a “birdie” – i.e. an aircraft – flew towards him. Both calls have been the subject of much speculation in the media, and were also the subject of analysis in previous Bellingcat reports.
    [Show full text]
  • War in Religious Dimension
    War in religious dimension Attacks on religion in Crimea and Donbas region Report submitted under Article 15 for the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court Kyiv 2019 1 Table of content The Authors..........................................................................................................................................3 Truth Hounds...............................................................................................................................3 International Renaissance Foundation.......................................................................................3 Executive summary...............................................................................................................................3 Legal assessment..................................................................................................................................5 Methodology........................................................................................................................................7 Collecting data.............................................................................................................................7 Analyzing data.............................................................................................................................8 Background...........................................................................................................................................9 Prewar context............................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Human Rights Situation in Ukraine 16 May to 15 August 2018
    Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Report on the human rights situation in Ukraine 16 May to 15 August 2018 Contents Page I. Executive summary .......................................................................................................................... 1 II. OHCHR methodology ...................................................................................................................... 3 III. Impact of hostilities .......................................................................................................................... 3 A. Conduct of hostilities and civilian casualties ............................................................................. 3 B. Situation at the contact line and rights of conflict-affected persons ............................................ 7 1. Right to restitution and compensation for use or damage of private property ..................... 7 2. Right to social security and social protection .................................................................... 9 3. Freedom of movement, isolated communities and access to basic services ...................... 10 IV. Right to physical integrity ............................................................................................................... 11 A. Access to detainees and places of detention ............................................................................ 11 B. Arbitrary detention, enforced disappearance and abduction, torture and ill-treatment ............... 12 C. Situation
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Report 32/2021 10 February 20211
    - 1 - 1 Daily Report 32/2021 10 February 20211 Summary The SMM recorded ten ceasefire violations in Donetsk region. In the previous reporting period, it recorded 42 ceasefire violations in the region. The Mission recorded 40 ceasefire violations in Luhansk region. In the previous reporting period, it recorded five ceasefire violations in the region. The Mission continued monitoring the disengagement areas near Stanytsia Luhanska, Zolote and Petrivske, and again saw containers inside and near the southern edge of the area near Zolote. The Mission facilitated and monitored adherence to localized ceasefires to enable operation and maintenance of critical civilian infrastructure and a transfer of funds. The SMM continued following up on the situation of civilians, including at five entry- exit checkpoints and two corresponding checkpoints of the armed formations in Donetsk and Luhansk regions. The SMM’s freedom of movement continued to be restricted, including at a checkpoint of the armed formations near Bezimenne and on a road near non- government-controlled Korsun, Donetsk region.* Ceasefire violations2 Number of recorded ceasefire violations3 Number of recorded explosions4 1 Based on information from the Monitoring Teams as of 19:30, 9 February 2021. All times are in Eastern European Time. 2 For a complete breakdown of ceasefire violations, please see the annexed table. During the reporting period, the SMM camera in Petrivske was not operational, and weather conditions limited the observational capabilities of some of the other SMM cameras. 3 Including explosions. 4 Including from unidentified weapons. - 2 - Map of recorded ceasefire violations - 3 - In Donetsk region, the SMM recorded ten ceasefire violations, including nine explosions (five undetermined and four outgoing, all of undetermined weapons), which occurred in areas on the north-western edge of Horlivka (non-government-controlled, 39km north-east of Donetsk) and near the Donetsk Filtration Station (DFS) (15km north of Donetsk).
    [Show full text]
  • Humanitarian Snapshot 20171205 EN V2
    UKRAINE: Humanitarian Snapshot (as of 15 May 2017) OVERVIEWOVERVIEW HRP 2017:PRIORITIES Daily hostilities continued to generate civilian casualties and humanitarian needs despite the ceasefire agreement reached at the end of March, which brought about a brief respite in early April. According to OHCHR, a slight STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES decrease of conflict-related civilian casualties was recorded in April, with 66 casualties (13 deaths and 53 injuries) reported compared to 71 in March. Since the beginning of 2017, the majority of the civilian casualties was caused by shelling (55 per cent), followed by mines and explosive remnants of war (ERW) at 35 per cent. Of particular concern is a recent sharp rise of civilian casualties as a result of the explosion of landmines and other Protection explosive devices at the start of farming season. Farmers and local population expose themselves to risks of such incidents as agriculture is among some of the limited sources of income. The real number of mine/ERW incidents is thought to be much higher in Non-Government controlled areas (NGCA), where humanitarian access is limited. While the conflict continues raging unabated, a risk of collapse of the inter-connected energy and water supply systems in both GCA and NGCA remains due to the unresolved issue of non-payment of debts despite multiple Access negotiations. The ongoing financial and bureaucratic bottlenecks could, in the immediate run, affect some 400,000 to 600,000 people on both sides of the ‘contact line’ in Luhanska Oblast, with people in Donetsk also at risk, according to the WASH Cluster. In late April, energy supplier Luhansk Energy Association (LEO) cut all electrical power supply to NGCA of Luhanska oblast, forcing the de facto authorities to take power from alternative sources, including Donetska oblast NGCA and the Russian Federation as a humanitarian action.
    [Show full text]
  • Urgent Action
    UA: 297/14 Index: EUR 50/045/2014 Ukraine Date: 24 November 2014 URGENT ACTION ESTABLISH WHEREABOUTS OF DISAPPEARED MAN Aleksandr Minchenok, a 31-year-old civilian man from Lisichansk, disappeared on 21 July after being “arrested” by pro-Kyiv forces while travelling with his grandmother in eastern Ukraine. His parents, who have not heard from him since July, fear for his life. On the morning of 21 July Aleksandr Minchenok was traveling in his car with his grandmother Maria Naumova from Lisichansk, a town in Luhansk Region, to Kharkiv. He called his parents to tell them that they had passed the checkpoints controlled by pro-Russian separatist near Severodonetsk. After about 30 minutes, an unknown person who did not identify himself called Aleksandr Minchenok’s parents and told them that their son had been arrested and was being taken to the Prosecutor’s office. After this phone call, neither Aleksandr Minchenok nor the unknown caller could be reached again. Ekaterina Naumova and Yuriy Naumov, Aleksandr Minchenok’s parents, rushed to their son’s last known location and found people who told them that their son had been apprehended by the territorial defence battalion Aidar, one of over thirty so-called volunteer battalions to have emerged as part of the pro-Kyiv forces in the wake of the conflict. Members of the pro-Kyiv forces present at the site told the parents that Aleksandr Minchenok had already been released near Starobelsk, a town a short distance from Luhansk. Aleksandr Minchenok’s grandmother said that they had been stopped by men in military uniforms, but she could not remember what insignia they had.
    [Show full text]
  • Civic Sector of Euromaidan Grassroots Movement
    CIVIC SECTOR OF EUROMAIDAN GRASSROOTS MOVEMENT 2015 EuroMaidan Newsletter # 84 13 - Ukraine says 'record number' of Russian troops on border Why is the conflict in east Ukraine more important than the Greek debt crisis? Ukraine says 'record number' of Russian troops on http://goo.gl/jPhCmv ; live updates July 7 July 7 . border. 50,000 Russian troops and over 30,000 militants http://goo.gl/AohYoP 4 massed on Ukraine border. http://goo.gl/NOMJ3C 8 More than a year later, Euromaidan activists still # Why is the conflict in east Ukraine more important than demand justice for victims. http://goo.gl/CfLCHo R the Greek debt crisis? 'Ukraine far more strategically important to Europe' http://goo.gl/qFZVUu Will Ukraine Change the Law on Local Elections? An Update on Legislative Initiatives and Debates. The OSCE Parliamentary Assembly has approved a http://goo.gl/eAFUBP resolution condemning Russia’s “unilateral and unjustified assault on Ukraine’s sovereignty and Ukraine's former education minister Tabachnyk added to territorial integrity.” http://goo.gl/jfqNJa; country's wanted list. http://goo.gl/MBJqzF http://goo.gl/ui6CU6 Gradual russification continues in Ukraine. The On July 13, President Petro Poroshenko called an Ukrainian language strengthened only in certain areas NEWSLETTE extraordinary session of the National Security Council in according to NGO “Prostir Svobody” analysis. an effort to end a confrontation between fighters from http://goo.gl/r1aecX the radical nationalist group Right Sector and police SBU detains moderator of 500 anti-Ukrainian groups on following a deadly shootout in the western city of social networks.
    [Show full text]
  • 20161130 Humanitarian Needs Overview 2017 FINAL.Indd
    HUMANITARIAN 2017 NEEDS OVERVIEW PEOPLE IN NEED 3.8 M NOV 2016 UKRAINE Credit: NRC/Ingrid Prestetun Credit: Th is document is produced on behalf of the Humanitarian Country Team and partners. Th is document provides the Humanitarian Country Team’s shared understanding of the crisis, including the most pressing hu- manitarian need and the estimated number of people who need assistance. It represents a consolidated evidence base and helps inform joint strategic response planning. Th e designations employed and the presentation of material in the report do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoev- er on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. www.unocha.org www.reliefweb.int www.humanitarianresponse.info/en/operations/ukraine PART I: PART I: SUMMARY Humanitarian needs and key fi gures Impact of the crisis Breakdown of people in need Concentration of needs 03 Velykyi PART I: Burluk PEOPLE IN NEED Kharkiv Troitske Pechenihy M Chuhuiv Dvorichna 3.8 Zmiiv Shevchenkove Kupiansk Kharkivska Bilokurakyne Novopskov Markivka Balakliia Svatove Borova Milove Starobilsk Izium Luhanska Bilovodsk Kreminna Rubizhne Lyman Novoaidar Lozova Barvinkove Lysychansk Sievierodonetsk Blyzniuky Sloviansk Oleksandrivka Kramatorsk Slovianoserbsk Stanytsia Luhanska Druzhkivka Popasna Bakhmut RUSSIAN Kadiivka Luhansk Kostiantynivka FEDERATION Petropavlivka Dobropillia Alchevsk Perevalsk Lutuhyne Horlivka
    [Show full text]
  • QUARTERLY REPORT for the Development Initiative for Advocating Local Governance in Ukraine (DIALOGUE) Project
    QUARTERLY REPORT for the Development Initiative for Advocating Local Governance in Ukraine (DIALOGUE) Project October – December, 2013 QUARTERLY REPORT October – December, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS RESUME 5 Chapter 1. KEY ACHIEVEMENTS IN THE REPORTING PERIOD 6 Chapter 2. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION 9 2.1. Component 1: Legal Framework 9 Activity 2.1.1. Legislation drafting based on local governments legislative needs 9 Local government legislation need assessment 9 and work on local government technical profiles Legislation monitoring 11 Activity 2.1.2. Expert evaluation of conformity of draft legislation 15 to the European Charter of Local Self-Governance Activity 2.1.3. Introduction of institutional tools for local governments 15 to participate in legislation drafting Round table discussions in AUC Regional Offices and meetings of AUC Professional 15 Groups Setting up a network of lawyers to participate in legislation drafting 19 2.2. Component 2: Policy dialogue 20 Activity 2.2.1. Increasing the participation of the AUC member cities 20 in the policy dialogue established be the Association at the national level Dialogue Day: answers to the questions raised 20 Cooperation with central government authorities 20 Parliamentary local government support inter-faction group (local government caucus) 24 Participation in the work of parliamentary committees 26 Activity 2.2.2. Setting up advisory boards at the regional level with participation 31 of AUC Regional Offices and local State Executive agencies at the oblast level Working sessions of Local Government Regional Advisory Boards 31 Activity 2.2.3. Establishing formal and regular coordination 35 mechanisms with other USAID supported activities and other donor organizations Forum of Donor Organisations working in the local government sector 35 Cooperation with other USAID projects and projects supported by other donor 35 organisations 2.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Study (In English)
    The Long Shadow of Donbas Reintegrating Veterans and Fostering Social Cohesion in Ukraine By JULIA FRIEDRICH and THERESA LÜTKEFEND Almost 400,000 veterans who fought on the Ukrainian side in Donbas have since STUDY returned to communities all over the country. They are one of the most visible May 2021 representations of the societal changes in Ukraine following the violent conflict in the east of the country. Ukrainian society faces the challenge of making room for these former soldiers and their experiences. At the same time, the Ukrainian government should recognize veterans as an important political stakeholder group. Even though Ukraine is simultaneously struggling with internal reforms and Russian destabilization efforts, political actors in Ukraine need to step up their efforts to formulate and implement a coherent policy on veteran reintegration. The societal stakes are too high to leave the issue unaddressed. gppi.net This study was funded by the Konrad Adenauer Foundation in Ukraine. The views expressed therein are solely those of the authors and do not reflect the official position of the Konrad Adenauer Foundation. The authors would like to thank several experts and colleagues who shaped this project and supported us along the way. We are indebted to Kateryna Malofieieva for her invaluable expertise, Ukraine-language research and support during the interviews. The team from Razumkov Centre conducted the focus group interviews that added tremendous value to our work. Further, we would like to thank Tobias Schneider for his guidance and support throughout the process. This project would not exist without him. Mathieu Boulègue, Cristina Gherasimov, Andreas Heinemann-Grüder, and Katharine Quinn-Judge took the time to provide their unique insights and offered helpful suggestions on earlier drafts.
    [Show full text]
  • Hybrid Warfare and the Protection of Civilians in Ukraine
    ENTERING THE GREY-ZONE: Hybrid Warfare and the Protection of Civilians in Ukraine civiliansinconflict.org i RECOGNIZE. PREVENT. PROTECT. AMEND. PROTECT. PREVENT. RECOGNIZE. Cover: June 4, 2013, Spartak, Ukraine: June 2021 Unexploded ordnances in Eastern Ukraine continue to cause harm to civilians. T +1 202 558 6958 E [email protected] civiliansinconflict.org ORGANIZATIONAL MISSION AND VISION Center for Civilians in Conflict (CIVIC) is an international organization dedicated to promoting the protection of civilians in conflict. CIVIC envisions a world in which no civilian is harmed in conflict. Our mission is to support communities affected by conflict in their quest for protection and strengthen the resolve and capacity of armed actors to prevent and respond to civilian harm. CIVIC was established in 2003 by Marla Ruzicka, a young humanitarian who advocated on behalf of civilians affected by the war in Iraq and Afghanistan. Honoring Marla’s legacy, CIVIC has kept an unflinching focus on the protection of civilians in conflict. Today, CIVIC has a presence in conflict zones and key capitals throughout the world where it collaborates with civilians to bring their protection concerns directly to those in power, engages with armed actors to reduce the harm they cause to civilian populations, and advises governments and multinational bodies on how to make life-saving and lasting policy changes. CIVIC’s strength is its proven approach and record of improving protection outcomes for civilians by working directly with conflict-affected communities and armed actors. At CIVIC, we believe civilians are not “collateral damage” and civilian harm is not an unavoidable consequence of conflict—civilian harm can and must be prevented.
    [Show full text]