DOCSLIB.ORG

20161130 Humanitarian Needs Overview 2017 FINAL.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
20161130 Humanitarian Needs Overview 2017 FINAL.Indd HUMANITARIAN 2017 NEEDS OVERVIEW PEOPLE IN NEED 3.8 M NOV 2016 UKRAINE Credit: NRC/Ingrid Prestetun Credit: Th is document is produced on behalf of the Humanitarian Country Team and partners. Th is document provides the Humanitarian Country Team’s shared understanding of the crisis, including the most pressing hu- manitarian need and the estimated number of people who need assistance. It represents a consolidated evidence base and helps inform joint strategic response planning. Th e designations employed and the presentation of material in the report do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoev- er on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. www.unocha.org www.reliefweb.int www.humanitarianresponse.info/en/operations/ukraine PART I: PART I: SUMMARY Humanitarian needs and key fi gures Impact of the crisis Breakdown of people in need Concentration of needs 03 Velykyi PART I: Burluk PEOPLE IN NEED Kharkiv Troitske Pechenihy M Chuhuiv Dvorichna 3.8 Zmiiv Shevchenkove Kupiansk Kharkivska Bilokurakyne Novopskov Markivka Balakliia Svatove Borova Milove Starobilsk Izium Luhanska Bilovodsk Kreminna Rubizhne Lyman Novoaidar Lozova Barvinkove Lysychansk Sievierodonetsk Blyzniuky Sloviansk Oleksandrivka Kramatorsk Slovianoserbsk Stanytsia Luhanska Druzhkivka Popasna Bakhmut RUSSIAN Kadiivka Luhansk Kostiantynivka FEDERATION Petropavlivka Dobropillia Alchevsk Perevalsk Lutuhyne Horlivka Mezhova Pokrovsk Sorokyne 04 Yenakiieve Dnipropetrovska Yasynuvata Khrustalnyi Makiivka Shakhtarsk Antratsyt Dovzhansk Donetsk Khartsyzk Chystiakove Marinka Velyka Novosilka Amvrosiivka Donetska Starobesheve 02010 Volnovakha km Legend Boikivske Bilmak Rozivka 'Contact line' as of June 2016 Nikolske Area of critical concern Mariupol Novoazovsk Zaporizka Manhush Non-Government Controlled Area BELARUS RUSSIAN POLAND FEDERATION Berdiansk Kyiv SEA OF AZOV SLOVAKIA HUNGARY MOLDOVA ROMANIA SEA OF AZOV BLACK The boundaries, names and the designations used on this map do not imply SEA offi cial endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations SERBIA BULGARIA PART I: HUMANITARIAN NEEDS & KEY FIGURES HUMANITARIAN NEEDS & KEY FIGURES While absent from the international radar, the confl ict in eastern Ukraine and its resulting humanitarian needs are a daily reality for 4.4 million people affected by the confl ict, with no hopes for a quick end to their suffering. Some 3.8 million need humanitarian assistance, including livelihood and early recovery. Despite commitments to ceasefi re over the past 30 months, hostilities continue. Of more than 10,000 people killed, 2,000 are civilians. Houses, schools, hospitals and other critical infrastructure continue to suffer damage. Some IDPs decided or were forced to return, as they could not afford anymore to live in the Government-controlled areas (GCA) where livelihood and shelter solutions are insuffi cient. However, they still continue to face diffi culties in accessing Government support as well as limited services and markets in areas beyond Government control (NGCA). The confl ict also intensifi ed pre-existing systemic fl aws, from ageing infrastructures to legislative shortcomings, etc. that, in turn, adds to the complexity of the situation, requiring concurrent humanitarian, recovery and development action. Insecurity, access constraints and limited resources are major challenges. In winter, when temperatures drop below -20 degrees Celsius, any gap in assistance delivery will have life-threatening consequences. HUMANITARIAN NEEDS Protection Access Emergency shelter, Disrupted live- Civilians continue Access for people water, health lihoods, fi nding to bear the brunt to goods, services Time-critical hu- durable solutions of the confl ict. and aid is challeng- manitarian needs As the situation Hostilities, presence ing. Th e operating include shelter, becomes pro- 05 of landmines and Explosive environment in Do- water and health for people tracted, many civilians are 1Remnants of War (ERW) 2netska and Luhanska oblasts 3living along the ‘contact line’, 4increasingly unable to fend continue to threaten their continues to be volatile, in NGCA and in pockets of for themselves. Loss of live- lives and livelihoods. Th e aff ecting assistance delivery. GCA. Access to health for lihoods aff ects their ability Government’s decision to Th e ‘contact line’ has evolved one third of households in to access basic services and suspend social payments for into a diffi cult-to-cross the confl ict area is ham- erodes their ability to cope, 500,000-600,000 IDPs has border. Continued insecurity pered, in an environment especially for those living had a devastating impact, further hampers access for where every second family along the ‘contact line’ and particularly on IDP pen- civilians and humanitarian reports having one or more in NGCA. Th is is further sioners, many of whom live actors alike. Th e temporary family members suff ering compounded by the diffi - in NGCA. Legislation links closure of the few main from a chronic illness. Hous- cult economic situation of the IDP status to access to access corridors to NGCA ing repairs continue, but on- the country, which results social benefi ts, pensions and regularly increases the hard- going shelling triggers new in increased vulnerabilities aid. Th e protractedness of ship for people crossing. In needs every day. Concerns for many confl ict-aff ected displacement, Gender Based NGCA, the de facto author- on shelter, access to heating people. Depletion of savings Violence (GBV), concerns ities imposed a mandatory and running water are par- is pushing many into debt related to housing, land and ‘registration’ process of aid ticularly high in winter. Th e forcing them into negative property are just some of organisations, resulting in risk and incidences of water coping mechanisms. While the other major protection the suspension of operations shortages remain high across some of the most urgent concerns. In 2016, many for many actors. Some assis- the frontline as worn-out needs are addressed through people returned back to tance continues to be pro- water supply infrastructure the delivery of humanitar- NGCA as they could not vided, directly or indirectly, continues to suff er damage. ian aid, many households aff ord living in GCA, in including through remote Lack of mechanisms to continue to struggle to some cases, to areas of active management. Government pay utility bills across the survive and pay for basic hostilities. Others moved to imposed bureaucratic ‘contact line’ also resulted services. Th e most vulnera- places where humanitarian impediments still remain in in interruption of critical ble, both displaced and host assistance is available. Th is place. life-saving services, includ- communities alike, require unintended consequence of ing water. solutions which go beyond aid deliveries could become a humanitarian aid focusing signifi cant pull factor unless on recovery and enabling people’s access to assistance, self-suffi ciency, including in basic services and livelihood NGCA. is addressed. PART I: HUMANITARIAN NEEDS & KEY FIGURES TOTAL POPULATION * 45 M NUMBER OF PEOPLE AFFECTED 4.4 M NUMBER OF PEOPLE IN NEED OF HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE 3.8 M GCA NGCA IDPs in GCA 1.2M 2.3M 0.3M** CHILDREN (<18 ADULT (18-59 CHILDREN (<18 ADULT (18-59 CHILDREN (<18 ADULT (18-59 YEARS) YEARS) YEARS) YEARS) YEARS) YEARS) 0.3M 0.5M 0.7M 1.0M 40,000 0.2M 06 52% 52% 48% 49% 49% 60% 48% 48% 52% 51% 51% 40% ELDERLY (>59 BY AREA ELDERLY (>59 BY AREA ELDERLY (>59 BY AREA YEARS) YEARS) YEARS) 45,000 0.6M 80,000 25% Donetska Luhanska Other Luhanska 30% 40% Donetska oblasts Donetska 60% 53% Luhanska 75% 17% 65% 66% 64% 35% 34% 36% Females Males Females Males Females Males PEOPLE IN NEED OF PEOPLE IN NEED OF ELDERLY W/ MINE RISK CHILDREN IN NEED SHELTER NEEDS IN WASH SUPPORT PROTECTION SUPPORT CHRONIC ILLNESSES EDUCATION NEEDS OF SCHOOL KITS GCA AND NGCA 3.7M 2.9M 1.1M 0.6M 0.2M 47k 22k 25k GCA NGCA IDPs NO BREAKDOWN AVAILABLE * Based on population estimates by the Ukrainian Statistics Service as of 2016 ** MoSP registered 1.7 million IDPs, coutrywide. All of them need different type of assistance. Between 0.8 and 1 million IDPs reside permanently in GCA, while others move frequently across the ‘contact line‘ and, for the purpose of the HNO, are accounted for in the population fi gure of those living in NGCA. Among those living in GCA, 0.3 million IDPs, the most vulnerable, are in need of life-saving humanitarian interventions. PART I: IMPACT OF THE CRISIS IMPACT OF THE CRISIS Largely unnoticed, the protracted crisis in eastern Ukraine continues to trigger humanitarian needs as fi ghting is still ongoing and hopes for a rapid solution are slim. Renewed attempts to implement the Minsk agreement brought limited respite for people in the confl ict area. People’s coping mechanisms are weakened, making them more vulnerable as time progresses. Lack of trust, deepening political divide and the disruption of social networks due to displacement threaten social cohesion. Some steps have been taken by the Government assuming its responsibilities as duty bearer towards all Ukrainians, regardless of where they currently live. Yet, other measures appear to be discriminatory and attempts to put in place a comprehensive strategy to address the needs of all citizens are still in their infancy. The confl ict and the continuously fragile political situation, coupled with the country’s unstable economic circumstances,1 affect the pace of much needed reforms to modernise the economy. 1. Despite a slightly improved performance in 2016 compared to the previous year , as per the World Bank Ukraine Economic Update (September 2016) As confl ict continues, and troops confront each other in ‘contact line’ and for people crossing through checkpoints. densely populated areas, an estimated 4.4 million people Despite renewed commitments to the ceasefi re, fi ghting continue to be aff ected by the crisis in eastern Ukraine, and never fully ceased.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Dynamics of FM Frequencies Allotment for the Local Radio Broadcasting
    DEVELOPMENT OF LOCAL RADIO BROADCASTING IN UKRAINE: 2015–2018 The Project of the National Council of Television and Radio Broadcasting of Ukraine “Community Broadcasting” NATIONAL COUNCIL MINISTRY OF OF TELEVISION AND RADIO INFORMATION POLICY BROADCASTING OF UKRAINE OF UKRAINE DEVELOPMENT OF LOCAL RADIO BROADCASTING: 2015—2018 Overall indicators As of 14 December 2018 local radio stations local radio stations rate of increase in the launched terrestrial broadcast in 24 regions number of local radio broadcasting in 2015―2018 of Ukraine broadcasters in 2015―2018 The average volume of own broadcasting | 11 hours 15 minutes per 24 hours Type of activity of a TV and radio organization For profit radio stations share in the total number of local radio stations Non-profit (communal companies, community organizations) radio stations share in the total number of local radio stations NATIONAL COUNCIL MINISTRY OF OF TELEVISION AND RADIO INFORMATION POLICY BROADCASTING OF UKRAINE OF UKRAINE DEVELOPMENT OF LOCAL RADIO BROADCASTING: 2015—2018 The competitions held for available FM radio frequencies for local radio broadcasting competitions held by the National Council out of 97 FM frequencies were granted to the on consideration of which local radio stations broadcasters in 4 format competitions, were granted with FM frequencies participated strictly by local radio stations Number of granted Number of general Number of format Practical steps towards implementation of the FM frequencies competitions* competitions** “Community Broadcasting” project The
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Human Rights Situation in Ukraine 16 May to 15 August 2018
    Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Report on the human rights situation in Ukraine 16 May to 15 August 2018 Contents Page I. Executive summary .......................................................................................................................... 1 II. OHCHR methodology ...................................................................................................................... 3 III. Impact of hostilities .......................................................................................................................... 3 A. Conduct of hostilities and civilian casualties ............................................................................. 3 B. Situation at the contact line and rights of conflict-affected persons ............................................ 7 1. Right to restitution and compensation for use or damage of private property ..................... 7 2. Right to social security and social protection .................................................................... 9 3. Freedom of movement, isolated communities and access to basic services ...................... 10 IV. Right to physical integrity ............................................................................................................... 11 A. Access to detainees and places of detention ............................................................................ 11 B. Arbitrary detention, enforced disappearance and abduction, torture and ill-treatment ............... 12 C. Situation
    [Show full text]
  • U.S.-Ukraine Community Partnerships for Local Government Training and Education Project
    U.S.-Ukraine Community Partnerships for Local Government Training and Education Project Award No. 121-A-00-97-00149-00 Quarterly Report July 1-September 30, 2002 Prepared for United States Agency for International Development Regional Mission for Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova Office of Democratic & Social Transition November 12, 2002 Prepared by U.S.-Ukraine Foundation 733 15th Street NW, Suite 1026 Washington, DC 20005 Tel: 202-347-4264 FAX: 202-347-4267 E-mail: [email protected] 1 INTRODUCTION On July 15, 1997, a cooperative agreement was signed between the U.S.-Ukraine Foundation (USUF) and USAID/Kyiv for the implementation of the U.S.-Ukraine Community Partnerships for Local Government Training and Education Project (CPP). Under the three-year agreement, CPP established 18 partnerships between U.S. and Ukrainian communities to improve public administration in Ukrainian local governments. Each partnership is to identify and address a specific well-defined problem(s) in one of the following areas: housing, transportation, local budgeting, economic development, or citizen participation. In addition, four Regional Training Centers (RTCs) were established to provide training in these same focus areas to Ukrainian local government employees from both partner and non-partner communities. On December 1, 2000, CPP began a two-year cost extension. The RTCs and the Partners newsletter remain unchanged. However, some changes have been made to the project in the cost extension phase, the most important of which is the reduction in the number of partnerships. Due to budgetary constraints, the CPP project description foresaw that the 18 partnerships would be reduced to 12.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction
    State Service of Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre State Scientific Production Enterprise “Kartographia” TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES For map and other editors For international use Ukraine Kyiv “Kartographia” 2011 TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES FOR MAP AND OTHER EDITORS, FOR INTERNATIONAL USE UKRAINE State Service of Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre State Scientific Production Enterprise “Kartographia” ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prepared by Nina Syvak, Valerii Ponomarenko, Olha Khodzinska, Iryna Lakeichuk Scientific Consultant Iryna Rudenko Reviewed by Nataliia Kizilowa Translated by Olha Khodzinska Editor Lesia Veklych ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ © Kartographia, 2011 ISBN 978-966-475-839-7 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ................................................................ 5 2 The Ukrainian Language............................................ 5 2.1 General Remarks.............................................. 5 2.2 The Ukrainian Alphabet and Romanization of the Ukrainian Alphabet ............................... 6 2.3 Pronunciation of Ukrainian Geographical Names............................................................... 9 2.4 Stress .............................................................. 11 3 Spelling Rules for the Ukrainian Geographical Names....................................................................... 11 4 Spelling of Generic Terms ....................................... 13 5 Place Names in Minority Languages
    [Show full text]
  • Winterization Recommendations 2019-2020 Key Figures
    Winterization Recommendations 2019-2020 Key figures In need In need coverage (total) (priority) (existing programmes) HHs in private Donetsk obl. 3,150 committed houses and + 37,126 HHs 5,500 apartments Luhansk obl. 2,350 gap GCA Indiv. in CCs committed and Social All Ukraine 7,700 Ind 7,700 Institutions 7,700 gap 5,531* gap 6,000 committed Donetsk obl. 33,500 HHs 14,603 HHs in private 8,603 gap houses and 2,500 committed apartments Luhansk obl. 20,700 HHs 9,000 NGCA 6,500 gap 11,347 committed Indiv. in non- Donetsk obl. 30,900 ind NA specialized CCs 19,553 gap and Social NA committed Luhansk obl. 19,100 ind NA Institutions NA gap 23,182* gap * Note: # of individuals in CCs and social institutions were divided by Cluster coefficient of 2.42 in order to get the final number in HHs Contents 1. Winterization context and objectives .............................................................................................. 2 2. Key recommendations ..................................................................................................................... 2 3. Winterization beneficiary prioritization ........................................................................................... 4 4. Heating ............................................................................................................................................. 6 (a) GCA ........................................................................................................................................... 6 (b) NGCA .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Late T from the O C Pecial Monitoring Mi Ion to Ukraine ( MM), a Ed on Information Received A
    Latet from the OC pecial Monitoring Miion to Ukraine (MM), aed on information received a of 19:30, 20 Novemer 2018 KYIV 21 November 2018 This report is for the media and the general public. Compared with the previous reporting period, the SMM recorded fewer ceasere violations in both Donetsk and Luhansk regions. The Mission followed up on reports of a grenade explosion in Khartsyzk in which a woman was injured and a man died. The Mission recorded ceasere violations inside the Zolote disengagement area. The SMM facilitated and monitored adherence to the ceasere to enable repairs to essential civilian infrastructure near Artema and Holmivskyi, as well as repairs to houses in Marinka and Krasnohorivka. It continued to facilitate the operation of the Donetsk Filtration Station. Access for the SMM remained restricted in all three disengagement areas, near Syvash and near Novoazovsk, an area close to the border with the Russian Federation.* The Mission monitored protests in Kyiv, Lviv and Chernivtsi. Ceasere violations[1] In Donetsk region, the SMM recorded fewer ceasere violations, including about 60 explosions, compared with the previous reporting period (about 120 explosions). The majority of ceasere violations were recorded in areas south and south-west of the Donetsk Filtration Station (DFS), south-east of Svitlodarsk (government-controlled, 57km north-east of Donetsk) and east of Lomakyne (government-controlled, 15km north-east of Mariupol). In Luhansk region, the SMM recorded fewer ceasere violations, including 34 explosions, compared with the previous reporting period (about 200 explosions). The majority of ceasere violations were recorded in areas west of Kadiivka (formerly Stakhanov, non-government-controlled, 50km west of Luhansk) and south-west of Stanytsia Luhanska (government-controlled, 16km north- east of Luhansk).
    [Show full text]
  • Public Evaluation of Environmental Policy in Ukraine
    Public Council of All-Ukrainian Environmental NGOs under the aegis of the Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources of Ukraine Organising Committee of Ukrainian Environmental NGOs for preparation to Fifth Pan-European Ministerial Conference "Environment for Europe" Public Evaluation of Environmental Policy in Ukraine Report of Ukrainian Environmental NGOs Кyiv — 2003 Public Evaluation of Environmental Policy in Ukraine. Report of Ukrainian Environmental NGOs. — Kyiv, 2003. — 139 pages The document is prepared by the Organising Committee of Ukrainian Environmental NGOs in the framework of the «Program of Measures for Preparation and Conduction of 5th Pan-European Ministerial Conference» «Environment for Europe» for 2002–2003» approved by the National Organising Committee of Ukraine. Preparation and publication of the report was done wit the support of: Regional Ecological Center - REC-Kyiv; Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources of Ukraine; Milieukontakt Oost Europa in the framework of the project «Towards Kyiv-2003» with financial support of the Ministry of Territorial Planning, Construction and the Environment; UN office in Ukraine Contents Foreword . 1. Environmental Policy and Legislation . 1.1. Legislative Background of Environmental Policy . 1.2. Main State Documents Defining Environmental Policy . 1.3. Enforcement of Constitution of Ukraine . 1.4. Implementation of Environmental Legislation . 1.5. State of Ukrainian Legislation Reforming after Aarhus Convention Ratification . 1.6.Ukraine's Place in Transition towards Sustainable Development . 2. Environmental Management . 2.1. Activities of State Authorities . 2.2 Activities of State Control Authorities . 2.3. Environmental Monitoring System . 2.4. State Environmental Expertise . 2.5. Activities of Local Administrations in the Field of Environment .
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine Country Office
    Ukraine Country Office Humanitarian Situation Report No. 2/2021 UNICEF/2021/Filippov Situation in Numbers Reporting Period: 1 January – 30 June 2021 Highlights 510,000 children in need of Following a relative calm second half of 2020, ceasefire violations notably intensified in the first half of 2021, with significant deterioration of the overall security situation. Until May 1, the humanitarian assistance UN recorded 39 civilian casualties which was 22 per cent higher than the previous four months (32 casualties). Active armed clashes along the Line of Contact (LoC) also resulted in damages to schools and health facility. As a result, the humanitarian community, including UNICEF, 3,400,000 people launched a contingency plan to prepare for any possible escalation. in need (HRP, Jan 2021) The COVID-19 pandemic continued to generate an additional burden on the economy and healthcare services. From March to June, Ukraine experienced a third wave of the pandemic outbreak, resulting in strict lockdowns across the country and in some parts of eastern Ukraine. 189,000 Ukraine’s national vaccination campaign remained slow, with less than two million of its adult Internally displaced people in population being fully vaccinated as of 29 July. The access to the non-government-controlled need (IDPs, HRP, Jan 2021) areas (NGCA) remained a major challenge for the humanitarian community from the start of the pandemic. In the first half of 2021, UNICEF received USD 9 million, out of a USD 14.7 million appeal. The health, education and HIV/AIDS programmes remain largely under-funded. UNICEF Appeal 2021 US$ 14.7 million UNICEF’s Response and Funding Status Funding status 68% Funding status 100% Funding status 100% Funding status 69% Funding status 31% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Situation Overview & Humanitarian Needs The ongoing hostilities continued to affect schools and hospitals along the Line of Conflict (LoC) in eastern Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • THEMATIC REPORT SMM Facilitation and Monitoring of Infrastructure
    - 1 - THEMATIC REPORT SMM facilitation and monitoring of infrastructure repair in eastern Ukraine January 2017 – August 2018 December 2018 15362/18mf Published by the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine © OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine 2018 All rights reserved. The contents of this publication may be freely used and copied for non-commercial purposes, provided that any such reproduction is accompanied by an acknowledgement of the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine as the source. Available electronically in English, Ukrainian and Russian at: http://www.osce.org/ukraine-smm Table of Contents Summary: Infrastructure in context ...................................................................................................... - 1 - Political framework for facilitation of infrastructure repair ............................................................... - 2 - Working Group on Security Issues (WGSI) .................................................................................... - 2 - Joint Centre for Control and Co-ordination (JCCC) ..................................................................... - 3 - SMM support for infrastructure maintenance and repair in eastern Ukraine ..................................... - 3 - Overall SMM operational contributions ........................................................................................ - 3 - Water supply in Donetsk region ..................................................................................................... - 5 - Electricity supply
    [Show full text]
  • Kharkiv Luhansk Zaporizhzhia South Donetsk Dnipropetrovsk Ukraine
    Ukraine: Shelter Severity Scale: HSM November - December 2014 Total population of assessed raions (2014): ShelterSeverity Score 8,855,539 Oblast Raion Shelter Sumy Dnipropetrovs k Dniprodzerzhyns k 5 Number of assessed raions: Dnipropetrovs k Dnipropetrovs k 4 61 Dnipropetrovs k Mezhivs kyi 0 Kharkivskyi Dnipropetrovs k Mаrhаnets 2 Dnipropetrovs k Nikopols kyi 2 Kharkiv Pechenizkyi Dnipropetrovs k Novomos kovs k 5 Novopskovskyi Troitskyi Dnipropetrovs k Pаvlohrаd 3 Chuhuiv Donets k Artemivs k 5 Donets k Artemivs kyi 4 Donets k Donets k 3 Chuhuivskyi Bilokurakynskyi Zmiivskyi Donets k Druzhkivkа 3 Markivskyi Donets k Kos tiantynivаk 3 Poltava Donets k Kos tiantynivs kyi 3 Svativskyi Luhansk Milovskyi Donets k Krаmаtors k 3 Donets k Krаs noаrmiis kyi 4 Balakliiskyi Borivskyi Donets k Krаs nyi Lymаn 4 Starobilskyi Kreminskyi Bilovodskyi Donets k Mаkiivkа 4 Donets k Mаrins kyi 3 Kharkiv Donets k Mаriupol 2 Iziumskyi Krasnyi Novoaidarskyi Donets k Novoаzovs kyi 5 Lyman Rubizhne Donets k Pers hotаrvnevyi 3 Lozivskyi Sievierodonetsk Donets k Slovians k 4 Barvinkivskyi Slovianskyi Stanychno- Donets k Slovians kyi 4 Luhanskyi Sloviansk Donets k Volnovаs kyi 4 Donets k Volodаrs kyi 3 Artemivskyi Popasnianskyi Blyzniuk- Khаrkiv Blyzniukivs kyi 1 ivskyi Kramatorsk Pervomaisk Khаrkiv Borivs kyi 2 Kirovo- Luhansk Druzhkivka Artemivsk Stakhanov Khаrkiv Bаlаkliis kyi 3 hrad Novomoskovsk Khаrkiv Bаrvinkivs kyi 2 Kostiantynivka Alchevsk Khаrkiv Chuhuiv 2 Khаrkiv Chuhuivs kyi 2 Dniprodzerzhynsk Pavlohrad Kostiantynivskyi Dnipropetrovsk Khаrkiv Iziums kyi
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Economic Development Program in Eastern Ukraine
    REPORT TO USAID/KYIV REGIONAL CONTRACTING OFFICE REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM IN EASTERN UKRAINE USAID CONTRACT NO.: 121-C-00-00-00832-00 FINAL REPORT Submitted by: Mendez England & Associates 5550 Friendship Blvd., Suite 230 Chevy Chase, MD 20815-7201 USA Subcontractors: The Urban Institute Washington, D.C. Kharkiv Management Consulting Int’l Kharkiv, Ukraine Regional Economic Development Mendez England & Associates Program in Eastern Ukraine FINAL REPORT Regional Economic Development Program in Eastern Ukraine Contract No: 121-C-00-00-00832-00 October, 2000 – November, 2002 ______________________ Note: This report is supplemented by copies of materials developed during the project recorded on a CDROM that accompanies the report. The CDROM materials are referenced in the report and illustrate in depth, the activities which took place to implement the contract, training guides, results obtained, observations and conclusions drawn from the project. Overview and history of the project The contract was implemented in three phases. Phase I from October 2000 - March 2001; Phase II from April 2001 – March 2002, and Phase III from April 2002 – November 2002. During Phase I, effort was made to implement the original project as called for by the terms of the contract signed by ME&A. This implementation involved two major subcontractors, The Urban Institute (Washington DC) and Kharkiv Management Consulting International (KMCI), located in Kharkiv. The goal of the original project, Phase I, was to draft a regional strategic plan to develop promising sectors of the Kharkiv regional economy. The work plan envisioned assessing the regional economy and identifying those sectors that could be the major drivers of regional economic development over the next 3-10 years.
    [Show full text]
  • SGGEE Ukrainian Gazetteer 201908 Other.Xlsx
    SGGEE Ukrainian gazetteer other oblasts © 2019 Dr. Frank Stewner Page 1 of 37 27.08.2021 Menno Location according to the SGGEE guideline of October 2013 North East Russian name old Name today Abai-Kutschuk (SE in Slavne), Rozdolne, Crimea, Ukraine 454300 331430 Абаи-Кучук Славне Abakly (lost), Pervomaiske, Crimea, Ukraine 454703 340700 Абаклы - Ablesch/Deutsch Ablesch (Prudy), Sovjetskyi, Crimea, Ukraine 451420 344205 Аблеш Пруди Abuslar (Vodopiyne), Saky, Crimea, Ukraine 451837 334838 Абузлар Водопійне Adamsfeld/Dsheljal (Sjeverne), Rozdolne, Crimea, Ukraine 452742 333421 Джелял Сєверне m Adelsheim (Novopetrivka), Zaporizhzhia, Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine 480506 345814 Вольный Новопетрівка Adshiaska (Rybakivka), Mykolaiv, Mykolaiv, Ukraine 463737 312229 Аджияск Рибаківка Adshiketsch (Kharytonivka), Simferopol, Crimea, Ukraine 451226 340853 Аджикечь Харитонівка m Adshi-Mambet (lost), Krasnohvardiiske, Crimea, Ukraine 452227 341100 Аджи-мамбет - Adyk (lost), Leninske, Crimea, Ukraine 451200 354715 Адык - Afrikanowka/Schweigert (N of Afrykanivka), Lozivskyi, Kharkiv, Ukraine 485410 364729 Африкановка/Швейкерт Африканівка Agaj (Chekhove), Rozdolne, Crimea, Ukraine 453306 332446 Агай Чехове Agjar-Dsheren (Kotelnykove), Krasnohvardiiske, Crimea, Ukraine 452154 340202 Агьяр-Джерень Котелникове Aitugan-Deutsch (Polohy), Krasnohvardiiske, Crimea, Ukraine 451426 342338 Айтуган Немецкий Пологи Ajkaul (lost), Pervomaiske, Crimea, Ukraine 453444 334311 Айкаул - Akkerman (Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi), Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi, Odesa, Ukraine 461117 302039 Белгород-Днестровский
    [Show full text]