WASH Incident Report No.39 Date: 11/03/2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

WASH Incident Report No.39 Date: 11/03/2017 Location: Popasnyanskyi rayon (Luhansk GCA), Prepared by: Volodymyr Kalinin, WASH Cluster IMO CARBONIT SYSTEM SHELLING AND REPAIRS: Near Zolote, in Government Controlled Areas (GCA) of Luhansk oblast, the area around a pumping station and 1200 mm diameter water pipelines of the Catrbonit system was again under night-time shelling from 10 – 11 March 2017. A flexible pipe joint was damaged by soil movement due to the shelling, exacerbating damage incurred on 1st March 2017. As a result, water supply to Non- Government Controlled Areas (NGCA) was significantly reduced overnight from 1200 to 300 cubic meters per hour by PVK so that repair works can be completed. According to PVK, repair work should be finished until the end of today, 11 March 2017, with the volume of water supplied returned to normal levels of 1400 m3 per hour. The main water pipelines ensure water supply to around 400, 000 people in Luhansk NGCA (Pervomaisk, Stakhanov, Brianka, Alchevsk, Kranyi Luch, Antratsyt). There are two pipelines but one of them has not been in operation due to the significantly damages since 2015. The flow in the water pipeline, was reduced from 1400 to 1200 cubic meters per hour due to the last shelling on 1 March 2017. The pumping stations and Western Filter Station continue to operate in normal mode. Officially, Carbonit system supplies safe drinking water to over 460, 000 people from Luhansk GCA and NGCA (Pervomaisk, Stakhanov, Brianka, Alchevsk, Krasnyi Luch, Antratsyt). Since the beginning of the March 2017, the Carbonit system was shelled at least three times. This represents an upscale of violence because before recent incidents this area was last shelled in the summer of 2015. WASH Incident Report .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

War in Religious Dimension
War in religious dimension Attacks on religion in Crimea and Donbas region Report submitted under Article 15 for the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court Kyiv 2019 1 Table of content The Authors..........................................................................................................................................3 Truth Hounds...............................................................................................................................3 International Renaissance Foundation.......................................................................................3 Executive summary...............................................................................................................................3 Legal assessment..................................................................................................................................5 Methodology........................................................................................................................................7 Collecting data.............................................................................................................................7 Analyzing data.............................................................................................................................8 Background...........................................................................................................................................9 Prewar context............................................................................................................................9
[Show full text]
Humanitarian Snapshot 20171205 EN V2
UKRAINE: Humanitarian Snapshot (as of 15 May 2017) OVERVIEWOVERVIEW HRP 2017:PRIORITIES Daily hostilities continued to generate civilian casualties and humanitarian needs despite the ceasefire agreement reached at the end of March, which brought about a brief respite in early April. According to OHCHR, a slight STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES decrease of conflict-related civilian casualties was recorded in April, with 66 casualties (13 deaths and 53 injuries) reported compared to 71 in March. Since the beginning of 2017, the majority of the civilian casualties was caused by shelling (55 per cent), followed by mines and explosive remnants of war (ERW) at 35 per cent. Of particular concern is a recent sharp rise of civilian casualties as a result of the explosion of landmines and other Protection explosive devices at the start of farming season. Farmers and local population expose themselves to risks of such incidents as agriculture is among some of the limited sources of income. The real number of mine/ERW incidents is thought to be much higher in Non-Government controlled areas (NGCA), where humanitarian access is limited. While the conflict continues raging unabated, a risk of collapse of the inter-connected energy and water supply systems in both GCA and NGCA remains due to the unresolved issue of non-payment of debts despite multiple Access negotiations. The ongoing financial and bureaucratic bottlenecks could, in the immediate run, affect some 400,000 to 600,000 people on both sides of the ‘contact line’ in Luhanska Oblast, with people in Donetsk also at risk, according to the WASH Cluster. In late April, energy supplier Luhansk Energy Association (LEO) cut all electrical power supply to NGCA of Luhanska oblast, forcing the de facto authorities to take power from alternative sources, including Donetska oblast NGCA and the Russian Federation as a humanitarian action.
[Show full text]
WASH Cluster Ukraine Alert Bulletin
WASH Cluster Ukraine Alert Bulletin 01 November - 31 December 2017 Issue 12 WASH Cluster Coordinator OVERALL INCIDENTS ANALYSIS FOR 2017: TRENDS AND DEVELOPMENTS Mark Buttle [email protected] In 2017 the WASH Cluster recorded 1351 separate incidents in total, each of which put at risk the water supply or sanitation to 4.8 million people served by centralized systems in conflict-affected Eastern Ukraine, with almost WASH Cluster IMOs: 60% occurring in the first 6 months. Volodymyr Kalinin Donetsk oblast experienced 116 incidents: 14 in Government Controlled Areas (GCA) and 102 in Non-Government [email protected] Controlled Areas (NGCA). In Luhansk oblast there were only 19 incidents: 17 in GCA areas and only 2 in NGCA areas. This is not to say Luhansk was less affected: a single incident near Popasna, in April, cut water for around Stas Dymkovskyy 180,000 people for 27 consecutive days. The WASH Cluster notes that people were almost always affected on [email protected] both sides of the Line of the Contact for most incidents. In the overview, all months were different, however there were three main periods of increased activity, when there was heavy shelling around critical water infrastructure along the Line of Contact: February and March; May KEY FACTS to July; and December (see below). Ceasefires were effective only for relatively short-time periods. 135 is the total number of WASH Incidents and their effect, 2017 Of the 135 incidents, WASH incidents since the start 25 7,000,000 of 2017. water infrastructure was damaged or 6,000,000 Geographical breakdown of stopped due to explo- incidents by oblast and by gov- 20 sive risk 80 times; and ernment controlled versus non- 5,000,000 electricity cuts due to government controlled areas: shelling affected water 15 Donetsk Luhansk Total 4,000,000 supply another 46 times.
[Show full text]
Eastern Ukraine
UKRAINE - Eastern Ukraine Flow Diagram of Cross Contact Line Movement (NGCA to GCA) For Humanitarian Use Only (among permanent residents of NGCA) Production date: April 04, 2020 Other oblasts Donetsk oblast Luhansk oblast Note: Bilovodsk Data, designations and boundaries Sieverodonetsk contained on this map are not warranted to be error-free Stanytsia Luhanska and do not imply acceptance by the REACH partners, associates, and donors mentioned on this product. Sloviansk Stanytsia Luhanska Bakhmut Kramatorsk Kharkiv Luhansk Luhansk Data was collected at EECPs from Kyiv Zaitseve City January 9th till February 24, 2020 Kostiantynivka Luhansk Center Luhansk in time period from 8am till 3pm West by stratified random sampling with 95% confidence level and Kadiivka Kadiivka Sorokyne Dnipro oblast 5% margin of error. Mayorsk Brianka Debaltseve Area of origin/destination settlement Alchevsk citation frequency was weighted Lutuhyne using total number of EECP Yenakiieve crossings as reported by UNHCR Rovenky (as of January and February 2020). Pokrovsk Donetsk Antratsyt Myrnohrad North The diagram displays only Horlivka Khrustalnyi Selydove NGCA to GCA routes, as reported Luhansk by respondents permanently Dnipro South residing in NGCA. Makiivka Interviews were conducted on official EECPs. Marinka Kurakhove Donetsk Donetsk Khartsyzk Current flow diagram can be used City East Marinka Chystiakove only for qualitative analysis. Vuhledar Snizhne Amvrosiivka Donetsk Proportion of respondents Zaporizhzhia oblast Novotroitske reporting a settlement Funded by: Implemented with: Novotroitske as their area of origin/destination: Volnovakha 5% Docuchaievsk 10% 15% 20% Respondents interviewed at (EECP): Stanytsia Luhanska Donetsk Russian Federation Mayorsk South Marinka Data sources Cross contact line movement data: Novotroitske Right to Protection, UNHCR Hnutove Contact: Hnutove Direction of the depicted [email protected] cross-contact line movement Mariupol Novoazovsk GCA NGCA Contact line Sea of Azov.
[Show full text]
Mobile Service Delivery for Conflict-Affected Populations in Eastern Ukraine
Annual Project Results Report Mobile Service Delivery for Conflict-Affected Populations in Eastern Ukraine Project Number: Reporting Period: P006554 27 March 2019 – 31 March 2020 Country / Region: Date of Report: Ukraine / Europe 31 March 2020 Name of Implementer: United Nations Recovery and Peacebuilding Programme (UN RPP) Implementer’s name and contact Information: United Nations Recovery and Peacebuilding Programme (UN RPP) Victor Munteanu Programme Manager United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) 1 Aeroklubna Street, Kramatorsk, 84300, Ukraine E-mail: [email protected] Total Project Budget: CDN $5,000,000 Project start and end date: 27 March, 2019 – 30 June, 2022 1 3 Outcomes Achieved1 4 Progress towards the Ultimate Outcome 1000 Improved stability, enjoyment of human rights, and gender equality, of conflict- affected population, especially women and vulnerable or marginalized groups, of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts Prior to the establishment of a network of mobile administrative service centres (ASCs) in the conflict-affected areas of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts, the programme carried out a comprehensive assessment and analysis to identify 10 target communities - five from Donetsk and five from Luhansk oblasts. The communities were carefully selected in line with the project’s objectives and applications received from local authorities. Preference was given to the communities in close proximity to the “contact line” and to exit and entry checkpoints (EECPs), as well as large districts with a significant proportion of rural residents. Last but not least, the interest of communities in working and closely cooperating with the programme was assessed so as to ensure the sustainability of subsequent results. As a result, the following communities were selected to participate in the “Mobile Service Delivery for Conflict-Affected Populations in Eastern Ukraine” Project: Kurakhove, Mariinka, Mariupol, Siversk and Vuhledar in Donetsk Oblast, and Novoaidar, Popasna, Shchastia, Sievierodonetsk and Stanytsia Luhanska in Luhansk Oblast (see Figure 1).
[Show full text]
Donbas in Flames
GUIDE TO THE CONFLICT ZONE This publication is the result of work of a group of authors of various competencies: investigative journalism, politology, geography, and history. Written as a kind of vade mecum, this guidebook will familiarize the reader with the precursors, problems, terminology, and characteristics of the war in the Donbas. The book is targeted at experts, journalists, and representatives of international missions working in Ukraine. It will also interest a wide range of readers trying to understand and develop their own opinion on the situation in the east of Ukraine. The electronic version of this publication can be downloaded from https://prometheus.ngo/donbas-v-ogni Donbas In Flames УДК 908(477.61/.62-074)”2014/…”(036=111) Guide to the conflict zone ББК 26.89(4Укр55) Lviv, 2017 Д67 Editor: Alina Maiorova Authors: Mykola Balaban, Olga Volyanyuk, Christina Dobrovolska, Bohdan Balaban, Maksym Maiorov English translation: Artem Velychko, Christina Dobrovolska, Svitlana Kemblowski, Anna Shargorodskaya, Andrii Gryganskyi, Max Alginin Design: Lukyan Turetsky Activity supported by the Security Environment Canada Fund for Local Initiatives Research Center © 2017 “Prometheus” NGO Activité réalisée avec l’appui du Fonds canadien d'initiatives locales Content Foreword. When the truth is the best weapon 5 Chapter 1. Donbas - The panoramic picture 7 Donbas on the Map of Ukraine 7 As Seen by Analysts and Journalists 10 Donbas (Un)Known to the World 14 Chapter 2. Could the War be Avoided? 17 Ukrainian land 17 Rust Belt 20 Similar and different 22 Voting Rights 25 Unsolicited patronage 26 Chapter 3. Chronicles of War 31 End of February 2014 31 March 2014 32 April 2014 33 May 2014 36 June 2014 38 July 2014 39 August 2014 41 Beginning of September 2014 42 September 2014 - February 2015 42 From February 2015 to this day 44 Chapter 4.
[Show full text]
Accountability for Killings in Ukraine from January 2014 to May 2016
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Accountability for killings in Ukraine from January 2014 to May 2016 Contents Paragraphs Page Executive summary ............................................................................................ 3 I. Introduction ....................................................................................................... 1-5 5 II. Legal framework ................................................................................................ 6-18 5 A. Applicable international law ...................................................................... 6-17 5 1. International human rights law ........................................................... 6-13 5 2. International humanitarian law ............................................................ 14-15 7 3. International criminal law .................................................................. 16-17 8 B. National legislation .................................................................................... 18 8 III. Killings and violent deaths in the context of assemblies ...................................... 19-28 8 A. Violence of January–February 2014 during the Maidan events .................... 20-24 9 B. Violence of 2 May 2014 in Odesa .............................................................. 25-27 10 C. Other assemblies marked by violent deaths ................................................ 28 10 IV. Killings in the context of armed conflict in eastern Ukraine ................................ 29-57
[Show full text]
Report on the Human Rights Situation in Ukraine 16 February to 15 May 2015
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Report on the human rights situation in Ukraine 16 February to 15 May 2015 CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 II. RIGHTS TO LIFE, LIBERTY, SECURITY AND PHYSICAL INTEGRITY 6 A. Armed hostilities 6 B. Casualties 7 C. Alleged summary, extrajudicial or arbitrary executions 8 D. Illegal and arbitrary detention, and torture and ill-treatment 9 E. Trafficking in persons 13 III. FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS 14 A. Freedom of movement 14 B. Freedom of expression 15 C. Freedom of peaceful assembly 17 IV. ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL RIGHTS 18 A. Right to an adequate standard of living 18 B. Right to social protection 19 C. Right to the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health 21 V. ACCOUNTABILITY AND ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE 21 A. Accountability for human rights violations in the east 22 B. Accountability for human rights violations committed during the Maidan protests 23 C. Accountability for the 2 May violence in Odesa 25 D. Investigation into Rymarska case 26 E. Administration of justice 27 VI. LEGISLATIVE DEVELOPMENTS AND INSTITUTIONAL REFORMS 29 VII. HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE AUTONOMOUS REPUBLIC OF CRIMEA 33 VIII. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 36 2 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. This is the tenth report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) on the situation of human rights in Ukraine, based on the work of the United Nations Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine (HRMMU)1. It covers the period from 16 February to 15 May 2015. 2. The reporting period
[Show full text]
WASH Cluster Ukraine Alert Bulletin 01 May - 31 June 2017 Issue 9 WASH Cluster Coordinator INCIDENT ANALYSIS
WASH Cluster Ukraine Alert Bulletin 01 May - 31 June 2017 Issue 9 WASH Cluster Coordinator INCIDENT ANALYSIS. JANUARY-JUNE 2017 Mark Buttle Overall the number of incidents increased from the second half of 2016 when 51 incidents were recorded, to 78 inci- [email protected] dents in total from January to June 2017. In the first half of 2017 the total number of incidents involving water and wastewater facilities peaked in March, howev- WASH Cluster IMOs: er while there were more incidents in Q1 than Q2 (47 incidents from January to March compared to 31 from April to Volodymyr Kalinin June) the severity of incidents significantly increased. In Q1 the average incident caused water to be stopped to 123,000 [email protected] people, but in Q2 the average incident caused a 24 hour stoppage to 287,000 people. Most significantly in June the 1st Lift Pumping Station of the south Donbass water pipeline was stopped for 10 days in total, cutting off around 400,000 Stas Dymkovskyy people for the entire 10 days, [email protected] at the same time risking water supplies to 1.1 million people in Donetsk city and around half a WASH Incidents million people in Mariupol. (Jan-June 2017) Conversely, in April there were relatively few incidents. In Q2 74.2 % of all incidents Donetska oblast – 67; were due to water infrastruc- Luhanska oblast – 11; ture damage and 22.5 % due to electricity cuts, compared to NGCA – 57; 36.1 % and 51.1% for Q1. This GCA – 21; shows that in the second quar- ter water infrastructure itself was much more affected than Issues to highlight in Q1, when damaged power lines were a greater problem.
[Show full text]
The Children of the Contact Line in East Ukraine
May 2018 Ukraine © UNICEF/UN0150817/GILBERTSON VII PHOTO The Children of the Contact Line in East Ukraine 2017 Assessment Update Markivka Novopskov Bilokurakyne Milove THE CHILDREN OF THE CONTACT LINE IN EAST UKRAINE UNICEF May 2018 2 2017 ASSESSMENT UPDATE Svatove Kyiv Starobilsk UKRAINE LUHANSK OBLAST Bilovodsk (GCA) Kreminna Novoaidar Rubizhne Lyman SEVERODONETSK Lysychansk Petrivka KHARKIV OBLAST Triokhizbenka Sloviansk Shchastia Stanytsia Luhanska Orikhove Krymske Kramatorsk Soledar Zolote Kirovsk Bahmut Popasna Pervomaisk Stahaniv DONETSK OBLAST Troitske LUHANSK Alchevsk (GCA) Svitlodarsk Brianka Kostiantynivka Dobropillia LUHANSK OBLAST Krasnodon Toretsk Debaltseve Horlivka (NGCA) Verkhnotoretske Enakieve Krasnyi Luch Sverdlovsk Pokrovsk Avdiivka Shahtarsk Antracyt Opytne Makiivka Rovenky Pisky Snizhne Krasnohorivka Torez Marinka DONETSK Velyka Novosilka Kostyantynivka DONETSK OBLAST Vugledar (NGCA) Novotroitske Komsomolske Mykolaivka Volnovaha Russian Federation Starohnativka Hranitne Telmanove ZAPORIZHZHIA Chermalyk OBLAST Pavlopil Sartana Novoazovsk MARIUPOL Shyrokine Mangush SEA OF AZOV EASTERN CONFLICT AREA Location of UNICEF Field Offices/Presence LEGEND Contact Line (~472km) Territory of Ukraine Settlement ‘Buffer Zone’ (5km Zone) Non-Government Unicef Field Office/Presence Controlled Area (NGCA) ‘Buffer Zone’ (15km Zone) UNICEF May 2018 THE CHILDREN OF THE CONTACT LINE IN EAST UKRAINE 2017 ASSESSMENT UPDATE 3 INTRODUCTION The conflict in Eastern Ukraine continues to threaten the Methodology: wellbeing of children. Some of the most vulnerable children live in close proximity to the ‘contact line’ between the This assessment is a direct follow-up to the firstChildren government-controlled area (GCA) and the non-government- of the Contact Line assessment conducted in late 2016 controlled area (NGCA). On the government-controlled with updates in April 2017. In-depth, open-ended interviews side alone, it is estimated that are over 55,000 children live were conducted following the format used in the previous within 15 km of the contact line.
[Show full text]
Destructions in Donbas
CIVIL ORGANIZATION «KHARKIV HUMAN RIGHTS PROTECTION GROUP» DESTRUCTIONS IN DONBAS SCALE, ATTEMPTS AT RECONSTRUCTION AND PERSPECTIVES FOR REDRESS FOR VICTIMS HDIM WARSAW 2016 CONTEXT AUTHORS n March 2014, Eastern regions of Ukraine became an arena of the Russian secret services’ "Russian Spring" Civil Organization «Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group» plan, aiming to pull a large part of Ukrainian territories out of Ukrainian jurisdiction. These actions were I supported by a wide information campaign in the Russian Federation. As a result of resistance from the Yurii Aseev Ukrainian state and its society, the plan was disrupted, but on the territory of Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts the self-proclaimed Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics ("DNR" and "LNR") were created, and the confronta- Yana Smelianska tion escalated into an armed conflict. Over the past 2.5 years the hostilities have not ceased. All plans for a peaceful settlement have been disrupted as a result of the Russian Federation’s policy. In the last 2.5 years at least 10,000 persons have been killed or have gone missing and at least 22,000 people have been wounded on both sides. Illegal armed groups of the so-called "republics" keep control over the territory within the administrative borders of the Donetsk Oblast with the total area of 8,552 sq.km. The control extends over such cities as Donetsk, Horlivka, Debaltseve, Dokuchaievsk, Yenakiievo, Zhdaniv, Kirovske, Makiivka, Snizhne, Torez (Chystiakovo), Khartsyzk, Shakhtarsk, Iasynuvata; rayons of Amvrosiivka, Novoazovsk, Starobeshev, Telmanovo, Shakhtarsk, as well as 11 village councils in the rayons of Volnovakha, Mariino and Iasynuvata.
[Show full text]
ENGLISH Only
SEC.FR/273/15 30 March 2015 ENGLISH only THEMATIC REPORT Findings on Formerly State-Financed Institutions in the Donetsk and Luhansk Regions 30 March 2015 12400/15ns Table of Contents 1. Summary ............................................................................................................................. 3 2. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 4 2.1. Background ................................................................................................................. 4 2.2. Applicable human rights law....................................................................................... 6 3. Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 7 4. Assessment of humanitarian needs in areas currently not under Government control within the Donetsk and Luhansk regions ................................................................................... 8 4.1. General findings .......................................................................................................... 8 4.2. Lack of medicines ....................................................................................................... 9 4.3. Psychosocial trauma cases ........................................................................................ 11 4.4. Lack of food supplies ...............................................................................................
[Show full text]