Humanitarian Snapshot 20171205 EN V2

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Humanitarian Snapshot 20171205 EN V2 UKRAINE: Humanitarian Snapshot (as of 15 May 2017) OVERVIEWOVERVIEW HRP 2017:PRIORITIES Daily hostilities continued to generate civilian casualties and humanitarian needs despite the ceasefire agreement reached at the end of March, which brought about a brief respite in early April. According to OHCHR, a slight STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES decrease of conflict-related civilian casualties was recorded in April, with 66 casualties (13 deaths and 53 injuries) reported compared to 71 in March. Since the beginning of 2017, the majority of the civilian casualties was caused by shelling (55 per cent), followed by mines and explosive remnants of war (ERW) at 35 per cent. Of particular concern is a recent sharp rise of civilian casualties as a result of the explosion of landmines and other Protection explosive devices at the start of farming season. Farmers and local population expose themselves to risks of such incidents as agriculture is among some of the limited sources of income. The real number of mine/ERW incidents is thought to be much higher in Non-Government controlled areas (NGCA), where humanitarian access is limited. While the conflict continues raging unabated, a risk of collapse of the inter-connected energy and water supply systems in both GCA and NGCA remains due to the unresolved issue of non-payment of debts despite multiple Access negotiations. The ongoing financial and bureaucratic bottlenecks could, in the immediate run, affect some 400,000 to 600,000 people on both sides of the ‘contact line’ in Luhanska Oblast, with people in Donetsk also at risk, according to the WASH Cluster. In late April, energy supplier Luhansk Energy Association (LEO) cut all electrical power supply to NGCA of Luhanska oblast, forcing the de facto authorities to take power from alternative sources, including Donetska oblast NGCA and the Russian Federation as a humanitarian action. These interim measures are unlikely to be sustainable. Meanwhile, Popasnianskyi Vodokanal (PVK) has also cut water to NGCA areas of the Karbonit water system due to lack of funds for repair works and non payment from NGCA. This has led to limited water supply for at least 180,000 people in Almazna, Brianka, Kirovsk, Pervomaisk, Emergency Shelter, Water & Health Stakhanov towns (Luhanksa oblast), while additional 200,000 people in Luhansk city and surrounding settlements — around two thirds of the population — face risks of disrupted water supply. Indiscriminate shelling damaged at least eight educational facilities in Avdiivka, Marinka (GCA), Dokuchaievsk, Dzerzhynske and Komunarivka (NGCA) during March and April 2017, resulting in temporary disruption of education, according to the Education Cluster. Since the start of the year, at least 32 educational facilities in GCA and NGCA were affected by the conflict, resulting in interruption of education for thousands of school children. Distrupted livelihoods, nding durable In two of these cases, the schools were attacked during the school day, which is of an alarming trend. solutions The Security Services of Ukraine (SSU) introduced in late April a new edition of a temporary order on control of the movement of individuals, transport and cargo along and across the ‘contact line.’ Humanitarian partners in consultation with relevant authorities are thoroughly analyzing the implications of this order on the movement of population, humanitarian goods, personnel and vehicles through the Entry-Exit Checkpoints (EECPs). PEOPLE IN NEED OF HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE CHECKPOINTS MAP HRP 2017: REQUIREMENTS AND FUNDING1 PEOPLE IN NEED HRP 2017 POLTAVSKA BELARUS OF HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE PEOPLE TARGETED RUSSIAN Chertkovo REQUIREMENTS (US$) FUNDED (US$) POLAND FEDERATION Milove Kyiv % LUHANSKA 14 m FUNDED 214 m 29.1 SLOVAKIA KHARKIVSKA M 2.6M HUNGARY 3.8 MOLDOVA SEA OF AZOV 'Svitlanove' 'Zolote' 'Horodnii' ROMANIA BLACK Funding by Cluster (% and million $) SEA 'Artemivsk 2' 'Stanytsia requested funded SERBIA BULGARIA Luhanska' million $ million $ GOVERNMENT CONTROLLED DONETSKA 'Hirske' Education 7.6 0.6 'Maiorsk' RUSSIAN 8% AREAS LUHANSK FEDERATION Emergency 33.8 0.8 Shelter/NFI 2% DNIPROPETROVSKA 'Fenolna' Food Security 1.2 M 12% 65.2 8.0 and Livelihood Health and 24% 23.3 5.6 NON-GOVERNMENT Legend Nutrition Block post Logistics 57% 1.5 0.8 CONTROLLED AREAS 'Marinka' DONETSK (including 0.6 m in ‘contact line’) Entrance/Exit Crossing Point (EECP) Protection 12% 42.6 5.1 Open EECP (cargo) 'Novotroitske' WASH 0% 26.2 0.1 Closed EECP (cargo) 2.3M Humanitarian Open EECP (individuals) 5.8 0.4 Coordination 7% 'Buhas' Closed EECP (individuals) Multipurpose 8.1 0.0 IDPs IN GOVERNMENT CONTROLLED Open EECP (cargo trains) Cash Assistance 0% ZAPORIZKA Cluster not yet AREAS* 0.0 7.6 'Pyshchevyk' Closed EECP (cargo trains) specified International border crossing TOTAL 214 29.1 M SEA OF Roads 0.3 AZOV 10km 'Contact line' as of June 2016 * Calculated on the basis of HRP data October 2016. The Goverment figures The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. 1 According to FTS as of 15 May 2017. Many donations are yet to be indicate 1.70 million registered IDPs (MoSP data as of 29 September 2016) recorded, and donors and partners are invited to register donations. TIMELINE OF EVENTS July 2015 February 2016 August 2016 December 2016 February 2017 April 2017 June 2014 September 2014 January 2015 April 2016 HRP 2017 launched e near miss hit of the chlorine Violence continued Minsk protocol signed A Temporary Order by GoU limited De facto authorities required e Ministry of Temporary Temporary closure of Stanytsia Luhanska, the only Escalation of the conict led e Security Services of Ukraine introduced a gas deport at DFS posed increased despite the Freedom of Movement and introduced ‘accreditation/registration’ in Occupied Territories and IDPs checkpoint for pedestrians in Luhanska oblast. to the highest number of new edition of a temporary order on control of life-threatening environment and ceasere agreement ban on commercial supplies of goods NGCA. Humanitarian aid was established Overow of civilians to other checkpoints civilian casualties since the movement of individuals, transport and cargo health risks for civilians and services to NGCA delivery to NGCA was suspended overwhelming capacity and increasing risk August 2015 along and across the ‘contact line’ May 2014 August 2014 December 2014 February 2015 November 2015 March 2016 June 2016 September 2016 January 2017 March 2017 Presidential elections. Preliminary Response Plan Crisis in Donbas continued Minsk II signed. Provisions UN distributions to Luhansk Government suspended Closer ghting positions led to further Security incidents continued Rapid deterioration of security situation- in De facto authorities’ introduced an Self-proclamation of so-called launched with major humanitarian include facilitation of resumed / hostilities increased social payments to over deterioration of security situation, to be reported on both sides Donbas regions ‘external management’ of companies “Donetsk people’s republic” & implications. SRP launched humanitarian assistance. HRP 600,000 IDPs. Opening of a intermittent closure of checkpoints despite renewed ceasere Government approved an Action Plan- on based in Ukraine and declared the “Luhansk people’s republic” 2016 launched new checkpoint Zolote failed and increased civil damages agreement on 1 September reintegration of NGCA territories ‘contact line’ as a ‘state border’ Creation date: 15 May 2017 Sources: OCHA, UNHCR, SBU, OHCHR Feedback: [email protected] Website: www.unocha.org | https://www.humanitarianresponse.info/en/operations/ukraine| www.reliefweb.int | www.facebook.com/ochaukraine .
Recommended publications
  • War in Religious Dimension
    War in religious dimension Attacks on religion in Crimea and Donbas region Report submitted under Article 15 for the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court Kyiv 2019 1 Table of content The Authors..........................................................................................................................................3 Truth Hounds...............................................................................................................................3 International Renaissance Foundation.......................................................................................3 Executive summary...............................................................................................................................3 Legal assessment..................................................................................................................................5 Methodology........................................................................................................................................7 Collecting data.............................................................................................................................7 Analyzing data.............................................................................................................................8 Background...........................................................................................................................................9 Prewar context............................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • WASH Incident Report No.39 Date: 11/03/2017
    WASH Incident Report No.39 Date: 11/03/2017 Location: Popasnyanskyi rayon (Luhansk GCA), Prepared by: Volodymyr Kalinin, WASH Cluster IMO CARBONIT SYSTEM SHELLING AND REPAIRS: Near Zolote, in Government Controlled Areas (GCA) of Luhansk oblast, the area around a pumping station and 1200 mm diameter water pipelines of the Catrbonit system was again under night-time shelling from 10 – 11 March 2017. A flexible pipe joint was damaged by soil movement due to the shelling, exacerbating damage incurred on 1st March 2017. As a result, water supply to Non- Government Controlled Areas (NGCA) was significantly reduced overnight from 1200 to 300 cubic meters per hour by PVK so that repair works can be completed. According to PVK, repair work should be finished until the end of today, 11 March 2017, with the volume of water supplied returned to normal levels of 1400 m3 per hour. The main water pipelines ensure water supply to around 400, 000 people in Luhansk NGCA (Pervomaisk, Stakhanov, Brianka, Alchevsk, Kranyi Luch, Antratsyt). There are two pipelines but one of them has not been in operation due to the significantly damages since 2015. The flow in the water pipeline, was reduced from 1400 to 1200 cubic meters per hour due to the last shelling on 1 March 2017. The pumping stations and Western Filter Station continue to operate in normal mode. Officially, Carbonit system supplies safe drinking water to over 460, 000 people from Luhansk GCA and NGCA (Pervomaisk, Stakhanov, Brianka, Alchevsk, Krasnyi Luch, Antratsyt). Since the beginning of the March 2017, the Carbonit system was shelled at least three times.
    [Show full text]
  • Latest from the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine (SMM), Based on Information Received As of 19:30, 10 May 2018
    The SMM recorded fewer ceasefire violations in Donetsk region and more in Luhansk region, compared with the previous reporting period. The SMM observed fresh damage caused by shelling in a residential area of Myronivskyi. The SMM continued monitoring the disengagement areas near Stanytsia Luhanska, Zolote and Petrivske; it recorded ceasefire violations inside the Petrivske disengagement area, as well as near the Zolote and Stanytsia Luhanska disengagement areas. Its access remained restricted in all three areas.* The SMM observed weapons in violation of withdrawal lines on both sides of the contact line. The Mission continued to facilitate access to the Donetsk Filtration Station for Voda Donbassa water company employees; it heard ceasefire violations in the area despite security guarantees. The SMM continued to facilitate and monitor repairs to high-voltage power lines near Almazna and a water pumping station near Artema. DAILY REPORT Latest from the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine (SMM), based on information received as of 19:30, 10 May 2018 This report is for the media and the general public. The SMM recorded fewer ceasefire violations in Donetsk region and more in Luhansk region, compared with the previous reporting period. The SMM observed fresh damage caused by shelling in a residential area of Myronivskyi. The SMM continued monitoring the disengagement areas near Stanytsia Luhanska, Zolote and Petrivske; it recorded ceasefire violations inside the Petrivske disengagement area, as well as near the Zolote and Stanytsia Luhanska disengagement areas. Its access remained restricted in all three areas.* The SMM observed weapons in violation of withdrawal lines on both sides of the contact line.
    [Show full text]
  • Hybrid Warfare and the Protection of Civilians in Ukraine
    ENTERING THE GREY-ZONE: Hybrid Warfare and the Protection of Civilians in Ukraine civiliansinconflict.org i RECOGNIZE. PREVENT. PROTECT. AMEND. PROTECT. PREVENT. RECOGNIZE. Cover: June 4, 2013, Spartak, Ukraine: June 2021 Unexploded ordnances in Eastern Ukraine continue to cause harm to civilians. T +1 202 558 6958 E [email protected] civiliansinconflict.org ORGANIZATIONAL MISSION AND VISION Center for Civilians in Conflict (CIVIC) is an international organization dedicated to promoting the protection of civilians in conflict. CIVIC envisions a world in which no civilian is harmed in conflict. Our mission is to support communities affected by conflict in their quest for protection and strengthen the resolve and capacity of armed actors to prevent and respond to civilian harm. CIVIC was established in 2003 by Marla Ruzicka, a young humanitarian who advocated on behalf of civilians affected by the war in Iraq and Afghanistan. Honoring Marla’s legacy, CIVIC has kept an unflinching focus on the protection of civilians in conflict. Today, CIVIC has a presence in conflict zones and key capitals throughout the world where it collaborates with civilians to bring their protection concerns directly to those in power, engages with armed actors to reduce the harm they cause to civilian populations, and advises governments and multinational bodies on how to make life-saving and lasting policy changes. CIVIC’s strength is its proven approach and record of improving protection outcomes for civilians by working directly with conflict-affected communities and armed actors. At CIVIC, we believe civilians are not “collateral damage” and civilian harm is not an unavoidable consequence of conflict—civilian harm can and must be prevented.
    [Show full text]
  • UKRAINE Donetsk Oblast
    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Bryhadyrivka Chmyrivka !Komarivka ! Vysche Starobil's'k !Novovodiane Solone !Iziums'ke !Pisky-Rad'kivs'ki Verkhnia !Lozoven'ka Dru!zheliubivka !Novooleksandrivka !Butove !Pokrovka !Novoselivka !Klymivka !Babenkove !Protopopivka ! f U K R A I N E !Novoborove !Zalyman !Tytarivka !Bunakove !Makiivka !Baranykivka Donetsk Oblast !Holubivka !Polovynkyne !Nyzhn'opokrovka h !Ivanivka !Krasnorichens'ke !Lozove (!o International Airport Highway \! National Capital International Boundary !Kapytolivka !Lozovivka !Zavhorodnie Chervonyi Primary Road !! Major Town First Level Admin Boundary Izium ! Domestic Airport ! !Ridkodub Bulhakivka o ! Shakhtar !Chervonyi Oskil !Baidivka !Rubtsi !Karpivka ! Yats! 'kivka h Secondary Road Inte!Prmetreivds'ikaete Town River ! Port Korovii !Nevs'ke ! !Nove !Kamianka Tertiary Road Small Town Surface Waterbody !Iar Railway !Dmytrivka ! !Khvorostianivka !Novokrasnianka Residential/Unclassified Village ! Shul'hynka !Chervonopopivka !Zavody !Kamianka Date Created: 19 Feb 2015 Data sources: WFP, UNGIWG, GeoNames, !Pischane Chervonyi !Hrushuvakha !Oleksandrivka GAUVL,e ©ly kOapenStreetMap Contributors !Malokhatka Contact: [email protected] !Lyman !Mykhailivka !Komyshuvakha Website: www.logcluster.org 0 5 10 20 !Zhytlivka ! Shtormove Prepared by: HQ, OSEP GIS Nova ! !Nadezhdivka The boundaries and names shown and the designations used !Shandryholove !Peremozhne Map Reference: Kilomete!Mryskolaivka Studenok !Kolodiazi !Tykhopillia on this map do not imply official
    [Show full text]
  • WASH Cluster Ukraine Alert Bulletin
    WASH Cluster Ukraine Alert Bulletin 01 November - 31 December 2017 Issue 12 WASH Cluster Coordinator OVERALL INCIDENTS ANALYSIS FOR 2017: TRENDS AND DEVELOPMENTS Mark Buttle [email protected] In 2017 the WASH Cluster recorded 1351 separate incidents in total, each of which put at risk the water supply or sanitation to 4.8 million people served by centralized systems in conflict-affected Eastern Ukraine, with almost WASH Cluster IMOs: 60% occurring in the first 6 months. Volodymyr Kalinin Donetsk oblast experienced 116 incidents: 14 in Government Controlled Areas (GCA) and 102 in Non-Government [email protected] Controlled Areas (NGCA). In Luhansk oblast there were only 19 incidents: 17 in GCA areas and only 2 in NGCA areas. This is not to say Luhansk was less affected: a single incident near Popasna, in April, cut water for around Stas Dymkovskyy 180,000 people for 27 consecutive days. The WASH Cluster notes that people were almost always affected on [email protected] both sides of the Line of the Contact for most incidents. In the overview, all months were different, however there were three main periods of increased activity, when there was heavy shelling around critical water infrastructure along the Line of Contact: February and March; May KEY FACTS to July; and December (see below). Ceasefires were effective only for relatively short-time periods. 135 is the total number of WASH Incidents and their effect, 2017 Of the 135 incidents, WASH incidents since the start 25 7,000,000 of 2017. water infrastructure was damaged or 6,000,000 Geographical breakdown of stopped due to explo- incidents by oblast and by gov- 20 sive risk 80 times; and ernment controlled versus non- 5,000,000 electricity cuts due to government controlled areas: shelling affected water 15 Donetsk Luhansk Total 4,000,000 supply another 46 times.
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Report 106/2020 5 May 2020 1 Summary
    - 1 - Daily Report 106/2020 5 May 2020 1 Summary • Compared with the previous 24 hours, the SMM recorded more ceasefire violations in both Donetsk and Luhansk regions. • The Mission saw damage from small-arms fire to a residential house in Yasynuvata and received information about civilians injured due to shelling in Oleksandrivka. • Members of the armed formations continued to deny the SMM passage at checkpoints along official crossing routes in Donetsk and Luhansk regions.* • The Mission continued monitoring the disengagement areas near Stanytsia Luhanska, Zolote and Petrivske. • It monitored and facilitated adherence to localised ceasefires to enable repairs to critical civilian infrastructure in non-government-controlled areas of Luhansk region. • The SMM continued following up on measures taken amid the COVID-19 outbreak, including at entry-exit checkpoints and their corresponding checkpoints in Donetsk and Luhansk regions. • The SMM’s freedom of movement continued to be restricted in both Donetsk and Luhansk regions.* Ceasefire violations 2 Number of recorded ceasefire violations 3 Number of recorded explosions 4 1 Based on information from the Monitoring Teams as of 19:30, 4 May 2020. All times are in Eastern European Summer Time. 2 For a complete breakdown of ceasefire violations, please see the annexed table. During the reporting period, the SMM camera at the Donetsk Filtration Station was not operational and heavy fog restricted the observations of SMM cameras. 3 Including explosions. 4 Including from unidentified weapons. - 2 - Map of recorded ceasefire violations - 3 - In Donetsk region, the SMM recorded more ceasefire violations, including more explosions (about 100), compared with the previous 24 hours (about 40 explosions).
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Ukraine
    UKRAINE - Eastern Ukraine Flow Diagram of Cross Contact Line Movement (NGCA to GCA) For Humanitarian Use Only (among permanent residents of NGCA) Production date: April 04, 2020 Other oblasts Donetsk oblast Luhansk oblast Note: Bilovodsk Data, designations and boundaries Sieverodonetsk contained on this map are not warranted to be error-free Stanytsia Luhanska and do not imply acceptance by the REACH partners, associates, and donors mentioned on this product. Sloviansk Stanytsia Luhanska Bakhmut Kramatorsk Kharkiv Luhansk Luhansk Data was collected at EECPs from Kyiv Zaitseve City January 9th till February 24, 2020 Kostiantynivka Luhansk Center Luhansk in time period from 8am till 3pm West by stratified random sampling with 95% confidence level and Kadiivka Kadiivka Sorokyne Dnipro oblast 5% margin of error. Mayorsk Brianka Debaltseve Area of origin/destination settlement Alchevsk citation frequency was weighted Lutuhyne using total number of EECP Yenakiieve crossings as reported by UNHCR Rovenky (as of January and February 2020). Pokrovsk Donetsk Antratsyt Myrnohrad North The diagram displays only Horlivka Khrustalnyi Selydove NGCA to GCA routes, as reported Luhansk by respondents permanently Dnipro South residing in NGCA. Makiivka Interviews were conducted on official EECPs. Marinka Kurakhove Donetsk Donetsk Khartsyzk Current flow diagram can be used City East Marinka Chystiakove only for qualitative analysis. Vuhledar Snizhne Amvrosiivka Donetsk Proportion of respondents Zaporizhzhia oblast Novotroitske reporting a settlement Funded by: Implemented with: Novotroitske as their area of origin/destination: Volnovakha 5% Docuchaievsk 10% 15% 20% Respondents interviewed at (EECP): Stanytsia Luhanska Donetsk Russian Federation Mayorsk South Marinka Data sources Cross contact line movement data: Novotroitske Right to Protection, UNHCR Hnutove Contact: Hnutove Direction of the depicted [email protected] cross-contact line movement Mariupol Novoazovsk GCA NGCA Contact line Sea of Azov.
    [Show full text]
  • Mobile Service Delivery for Conflict-Affected Populations in Eastern Ukraine
    Annual Project Results Report Mobile Service Delivery for Conflict-Affected Populations in Eastern Ukraine Project Number: Reporting Period: P006554 27 March 2019 – 31 March 2020 Country / Region: Date of Report: Ukraine / Europe 31 March 2020 Name of Implementer: United Nations Recovery and Peacebuilding Programme (UN RPP) Implementer’s name and contact Information: United Nations Recovery and Peacebuilding Programme (UN RPP) Victor Munteanu Programme Manager United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) 1 Aeroklubna Street, Kramatorsk, 84300, Ukraine E-mail: [email protected] Total Project Budget: CDN $5,000,000 Project start and end date: 27 March, 2019 – 30 June, 2022 1 3 Outcomes Achieved1 4 Progress towards the Ultimate Outcome 1000 Improved stability, enjoyment of human rights, and gender equality, of conflict- affected population, especially women and vulnerable or marginalized groups, of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts Prior to the establishment of a network of mobile administrative service centres (ASCs) in the conflict-affected areas of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts, the programme carried out a comprehensive assessment and analysis to identify 10 target communities - five from Donetsk and five from Luhansk oblasts. The communities were carefully selected in line with the project’s objectives and applications received from local authorities. Preference was given to the communities in close proximity to the “contact line” and to exit and entry checkpoints (EECPs), as well as large districts with a significant proportion of rural residents. Last but not least, the interest of communities in working and closely cooperating with the programme was assessed so as to ensure the sustainability of subsequent results. As a result, the following communities were selected to participate in the “Mobile Service Delivery for Conflict-Affected Populations in Eastern Ukraine” Project: Kurakhove, Mariinka, Mariupol, Siversk and Vuhledar in Donetsk Oblast, and Novoaidar, Popasna, Shchastia, Sievierodonetsk and Stanytsia Luhanska in Luhansk Oblast (see Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Donbas in Flames
    GUIDE TO THE CONFLICT ZONE This publication is the result of work of a group of authors of various competencies: investigative journalism, politology, geography, and history. Written as a kind of vade mecum, this guidebook will familiarize the reader with the precursors, problems, terminology, and characteristics of the war in the Donbas. The book is targeted at experts, journalists, and representatives of international missions working in Ukraine. It will also interest a wide range of readers trying to understand and develop their own opinion on the situation in the east of Ukraine. The electronic version of this publication can be downloaded from https://prometheus.ngo/donbas-v-ogni Donbas In Flames УДК 908(477.61/.62-074)”2014/…”(036=111) Guide to the conflict zone ББК 26.89(4Укр55) Lviv, 2017 Д67 Editor: Alina Maiorova Authors: Mykola Balaban, Olga Volyanyuk, Christina Dobrovolska, Bohdan Balaban, Maksym Maiorov English translation: Artem Velychko, Christina Dobrovolska, Svitlana Kemblowski, Anna Shargorodskaya, Andrii Gryganskyi, Max Alginin Design: Lukyan Turetsky Activity supported by the Security Environment Canada Fund for Local Initiatives Research Center © 2017 “Prometheus” NGO Activité réalisée avec l’appui du Fonds canadien d'initiatives locales Content Foreword. When the truth is the best weapon 5 Chapter 1. Donbas - The panoramic picture 7 Donbas on the Map of Ukraine 7 As Seen by Analysts and Journalists 10 Donbas (Un)Known to the World 14 Chapter 2. Could the War be Avoided? 17 Ukrainian land 17 Rust Belt 20 Similar and different 22 Voting Rights 25 Unsolicited patronage 26 Chapter 3. Chronicles of War 31 End of February 2014 31 March 2014 32 April 2014 33 May 2014 36 June 2014 38 July 2014 39 August 2014 41 Beginning of September 2014 42 September 2014 - February 2015 42 From February 2015 to this day 44 Chapter 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Civilians Continue to Pay the Highest Price Humanitarian Bulletin
    Humanitarian Bulletin Ukraine Issue 17 | 1 March - 30 April 2017 In this issue Increased casualties, mine risks P.1 Infrastructure damages P. 2 HIGHLIGHTS Looming energy and water crisis P. 2 • Casualties again on the Access impediments P.4 rise Sonia's house was damaged,and she received a brain concussion as a result of shelling, Maiorsk (Donetsk province).©NGO Proliska/E. • Life-saving water facilities Kaplin. at risk of breaking down • Claiming social benefits Civilians continue to pay the highest price more challenging Despite multiple efforts to adhere to ceasefire agreements, daily hostilities continued to • Access impediments trigger more needs and caused additional casualties. With no immediate ending in sight, the conflict continues to exacerbate the daily lives of thousands of people living on both impact ability to reach the sides of the ‘contact line’, deepening their dependence on external aid, and flattening hopes most vulnerable for a normal life. The trend of increased civilian casualties continues. Since March to 14 May 2017, OHCHR verified 178 civilian casualties (35 deaths and 143 injuries). The agency • Humanitarian Response estimates that total number of civilians killed since the start of the conflict (14 April 2014 to Plan remains severely 14 May 2017) to be over 2,000 people, while number of civilian injuries is estimated at 7,000- underfunded 9,000 people1. Most casualties were caused by shelling, mines and explosive remnants of war. In addition, significant damages caused to housing and critical infrastructure, such as electrcity, water, hospitals and schools further compounded the needs of the people living in and along the areas of hostilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Accountability for Killings in Ukraine from January 2014 to May 2016
    Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Accountability for killings in Ukraine from January 2014 to May 2016 Contents Paragraphs Page Executive summary ............................................................................................ 3 I. Introduction ....................................................................................................... 1-5 5 II. Legal framework ................................................................................................ 6-18 5 A. Applicable international law ...................................................................... 6-17 5 1. International human rights law ........................................................... 6-13 5 2. International humanitarian law ............................................................ 14-15 7 3. International criminal law .................................................................. 16-17 8 B. National legislation .................................................................................... 18 8 III. Killings and violent deaths in the context of assemblies ...................................... 19-28 8 A. Violence of January–February 2014 during the Maidan events .................... 20-24 9 B. Violence of 2 May 2014 in Odesa .............................................................. 25-27 10 C. Other assemblies marked by violent deaths ................................................ 28 10 IV. Killings in the context of armed conflict in eastern Ukraine ................................ 29-57
    [Show full text]